RSS@Laurent Guyénot
Niccolo Machiavelli was influenced and inspired by the ideas of his arab predecessor and their books because of the arab rule(established in8th century) near Italian region.The12th-century Arab-Sicilian philosopher Muhammad ibn Zafar al-Siqilli (also known as Ibn Zafar al-Siqilli, 1104–1170/1172 CE) and his book Sulwan al-Muta’ fi ‘Udwan al-Atba’ (translated as “Consolation for the Ruler During the Hostility of Subjects”)is the chain of continuity in political ideas later reflecting in Niccolos works . This work is a classic example of the “mirrors for princes” genre in Islamic political literature, providing pragmatic advice on rulership, power dynamics, governance, and handling subjects—themes that parallel Machiavelli’s The Prince in striking ways, such as emphasizing adaptability, strategic use of force and cunning, and the prioritization of stability over strict morality.fbf85ae3bbc3336d12
researchgate.netThe book was largely unknown in the Western world until the mid-19th century, when Italian Orientalist and historian Michele Amari discovered a manuscript and published the first Italian translation in 1851 (titled Solwân el-Mota’, ossia conforto al sovrano nell’ostilità dei sudditi). An English translation followed in 1852. This modern translation brought the text to wider attention among European scholars, revealing its similarities to The Prince (written over 350 years later).c81e18195c36
The direct parallels and precursor status were highlighted in the early 20th century by Italian political theorist Gaetano Mosca, who dubbed Ibn Zafar “Machiavelli’s Arab precursor” after comparing the two works. Mosca noted how Ibn Zafar’s maxims on leadership, like those in The Prince, transcended their era and focused on realpolitik. Other scholars, such as Hrair Dekmejian and Adel Fathy Thabit, have since explored this connection, suggesting Ibn Zafar as a worthy forerunner in Arab political thought, though direct evidence of Machiavelli reading the Arabic original is lacking (it wasn’t available in Latin or Italian during his lifetime). The similarities could stem from shared influences like classical sources or the turbulent political contexts of medieval Sicily and Renaissance Italy.
They could also at least mention Machiavelli's "Greek precursor" in that Xenophon's book on the wily machinations of Cyrus the Great -- hence the title Cyropaedia -- was written just after the great king's death, and after Xenophon managed to get out of hostile territory. The story of the book is a great adventure on its own.
The direct parallels and precursor status were highlighted in the early 20th century by Italian political theorist Gaetano Mosca, who dubbed Ibn Zafar “Machiavelli’s Arab precursor”
It explains why Jews, once sympathetic to the Soviet Union, became so hostile to it. Churchill got his wish. Jews went from socialism to Zionism.
In 1996, Netanyahu and his American advisors devised a “Clean Break” strategy. They advocated that Israel would not withdraw from the Palestinian lands captured in the 1967 war in exchange for regional peace. Instead, Israel would reshape the Middle East to its liking. Crucially, the strategy envisioned the US as the main force to achieve these aims—waging wars in the region to dismantle governments opposed to Israel’s dominance over Palestine. The US was called upon to fight wars on Israel’s behalf.
Clean Break strategy, though articulated in 1996, seems to have been conceived much earlier during the Cold War. Weakening the USSR/Russia was seen as crucial to softening up the Middle East for Zionist-US invasions and dictates.
Yes,jews did lobbied in the west including america to weaken USSR and ultimately helped its fall in.
Refusniks,the internal russian jews,from inside helped create crisis in Russia.
Both this sealed the fate of socialism and Russian demise. This Jewish aspect of Socialism or USSR’S downfall is nit discussed or even mentioned in history books. One has to dig deeper to get this truth.
Lyndon B. Johnson was the best president for Jews and Israel:
– **Johnson’s Zionism and Oil Ties**: Johnson strongly supported Israel—helping Jewish refugees in the 1930s and arming it later—earning a “Zionist” label. He also got rich during Texas’s oil boom, with radio station KTBC and oil money from tycoons like H.L. Hunt funding his 1948 Senate win, showing personal gain mixed with policy.
– **Civil Rights Act (1964)**: Johnson signed this law ending segregation. Jewish groups, like the American Jewish Committee, pushed it to fight discrimination, aiding their community’s values, though not directly helping Israel.
– **Immigration Act (1965)**: He ended strict quotas, opening America to more immigrants. Jewish lawmakers Emanuel Celler and Jacob Javits, plus groups like the AJC, lobbied hard, making it easier for Jews and others to enter.
– **Nuclear Support (1967)**: Johnson didn’t stop Israel from building nuclear weapons by 1967, quietly boosting its safety and power, a big win for its survival.
– **Six-Day War (1967)**: He backed Israel’s land grab—West Bank, Gaza, and more—with arms and UN support, growing its strength, despite calling it defense, not expansion.
– **USS Liberty Attack (1967)**: Israel hit this U.S. ship, killing 34 and wounding 171 Americans. Johnson accepted Israel’s “mistake” excuse, but its limited media coverage suggests a cover-up tied to U.S.-Israel friendship.
Johnson’s blend of Jewish-friendly laws and Israel’s gains stands out.
I think the author of this article, Mr Guyenot, is coming from a feeling of a wounded mind which is struggling to lay out a foundation of European civilisation where corrupt and corrosive mythological Judaistic and its deformed expression like Christianity could be as far away and detached as much as he could.
I understand his intellectual anxiety and appreciate his endeavours to find out a better explanation, but in doing so, he should not shoot himself in the foot. Open your heart, sir; let fresh air come in and try to give some other perspective a serious consideration, one of which is outlined above for a direction. Do not let race be the principal perspective of looking into things of society; this is what the self-proclaimed chosen ones do, which is wrong, but not letting this lens away is basically an indirect subscription to the same flawed fundamental racial ideology for others.
Otherwise your article was very refreshing to read.
The rise of medieval European civilization owes much to Islamic influence, a fact often overshadowed by the exaggerated “Judeo-Christian” narrative. Islamic Spain (Al-Andalus) and Sicily served as vital conduits for ancient Greek knowledge, preserved and expanded by scholars like Ibn Sina and Ibn Rushd, later reintroduced to Europe. Gothic architecture’s defining features — pointed arches, ribbed vaults — trace back to Islamic structures like the Alhambra. Sicily’s Norman rulers embraced Arab-Byzantine styles, while Toledo’s Mudéjar art blended Islamic aesthetics into Christian Spain. The paradox lies in how this legacy was later “re-Christianized” — thinkers like Thomas Aquinas relied on Muslim interpretations of Aristotle yet framed them as purely Christian thought, masking the true, diverse roots of Europe’s intellectual rebirth.
References:
“The House of Wisdom: How Arabic Science Saved Ancient Knowledge and Gave Us the Renaissance” by Jim Al-Khalili.
“Stealing from the Saracens: How Islamic Architecture Shaped Europe” by Diana Darke.
“The Norman Kingdom of Sicily” by Donald Matthew.
“Mudéjar Art: Islamic Aesthetics in Christian Art” by Gonzalo M. Borrás Gualís.
“Avicenna and the Aristotelian Tradition: Introduction to Reading Avicenna’s Philosophical Works” by Dimitri Gutas.
These resources provide in-depth analyses of the Islamic contributions to Europe’s architectural and intellectual heritage, challenging the traditional Judeo-Christian-centric narrative of European civilization.
Have you read this new book? Ron,
the author comes up with a novel hypothesis, that appears to be both questionable and lacking in strength. Highly suspicious, due to the fact of his ethnicity, and weak too because of his wrong description of Benjamin Disraeli in the below-linked interview. I have not read the book yet but only listened to his one or two interviews. I am curious to know your view while here this “J Question” is being discussed.
About the author
Richard Poe is a New York Times-bestselling author and award-winning journalist. He has written many bestselling books on many subjects, both fiction and non-fiction. Poe’s best-known book is The Shadow Party, co-written with David Horowitz. His latest book is How the British Invented Communism (And Blamed It on the Jews).
One interesting comment from Amazon, including his 2001 book “The Seven Myths of Gun Control” and its dubious claims:
“Poe’s tribal nature and Neocon tendencies are really showing: THIS is the same man who unhesitatingly wrote about African-American over-representation in gun crime rates in his 2001 book ‘The Seven Myths of Gun Control’ but now he turns around says the BRITISH invented Communism and the Jews were merely scapegoats?! That’s right g0yz… All the numbers and stats in countless books showing Jewish over-representation among the Bolsheviks and the Cheka were all in your imagination. What’s next, Poe? Are you going to write a book about how all the Neocons who cheer-leaded and pushed for the Iraq war(including YOUR boss David Horowitz) in Dubya Bush’s cabinet were just scapegoats? Will it be entitled ‘How AMERICA Invaded Iraq(And blamed it on the Jews)?”

After 9/11, the Bush Jr. neocons (led by Cheney and Rumsfeld) and the Bush Jr. insiders of the Israel Lobby (led by Wolfowitz and Feith), teamed up to remake the Middle East through a series of U.S.-led wars on Netanyahu’s targets in the Middle East (Lebanon, Iran, Iraq, Syria) and Islamic East Africa (Libya, Somalia, and Sudan).
I am waiting to see how much time personalities like Jeffery Sahcs’s standing take to break the last taboo, i.e., 9/11.
If he thinks he is fighting for truth, he should speak it fully without compromising or concealing a part of it.
Dear Unz,
Are you familiar with the work of economist Richard Werner?
He is credited with coining the term “quantitative easing” (QE) in 1995, introducing a two-step central banking policy designed to address financial crises swiftly and to mitigate the adverse effects typically associated with such crises, including bank bailouts, austerity measures, and prolonged economic stagnation.
He is shattering the fundamental dogmas of the economic discipline with his empirical scientific research, contrary to the prevalent orthodoxy. Werner calls mainstream economics an ‘axiomatic-based deductive myth making economics’. I will not elaborate about all that here, but it needs to be read by curious people like you.One can’t avoid Werner, as he has an extensive educational and professional background. Originally from Germany, he studied at the London School of Economics and Oxford University. He lived and worked in Japan from 1991 to 2004. His 2001 publication, *Princes of the Yen*, became a bestseller in Japan, exploring the underlying causes of Japan’s financial crisis in the 1990s and the actors responsible for deliberately undermining the economy under the guise of structural reform.
The topics addressed in your essay may remain incomplete or unresolved without engaging with Professor Werner’s significant and pioneering research in economics. His most recent work,
The rise of the red dragon: the non-binary political economy of decentralized public banks (published 2024)
(https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/14631377.2024.2306377)
Swiss Policy Research(SPR),the anonymous source website, has just dropped an interesting short article reviewing your website and your ideas. I am very much inclined to SPR’s take, would you like to write a response of it.
HOW INDEPENDENT IS THE UNZ REVIEW
https://swprs.org/how-independent-is-the-unz-review/
Great to have these fellows keeping tabs on Ron Unz's psychological idiosyncracies.Replies: @Brás Cubas
Despite these important considerations, SPR media analysts have so far found no direct evidence that the Unz Review editor is some kind of “gatekeeper” or “disinformation agent”. Rather, the main issue appears to be a combination of a general lack of subject-matter expertise, long-standing political activism, strong biases, and several psychological idiosyncracies.
Extremely interesting. I think it's possible that the "Swiss Propaganda Research" people might have made a major mistake and blown their cover.
Swiss Policy Research(SPR),the anonymous source website, has just dropped an interesting short article reviewing your website and your ideas. I am very much inclined to SPR’s take, would you like to write a response of it.
https://swprs.org/how-independent-is-the-unz-review/
“Today marks the one year anniversary of the remarkably successful Hamas raid on Israel, in which some 1,500 lightly-armed Islamic militants from Gaza so greatly humiliated the government of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and his country’s entire national security establishment.”
What does islamist mean? Mr Unz. Is there any available international laid-down criteria of when and to make distinction of any resistance by the any occupied population to be classified based on their religious identity? In the case of Gaza, why is it islamist, and what have the occupied Gazans failed to do or not fulfilled that western-led global media and academia (including you also unintentionally or intentionally) attribute their action islamist? Since the establishment of the state of Israel in 1948, the zionist regime has, with the active collusion of anglo-american media and academia, produced industrial-level propaganda and misinformation regarding Islam and Muslims to suppress their legitimate concerns, give it the negative turn, and paint it to make it look like a radical religious fanatic to deceive the western population to not share any sympathy for their fellow human beings, who are facing torture and terrorism.
Industrial scale Propaganda of two generations would not be able to eraze so easily. Post-1945 USA-led western but zionist-controlled and owned misinformation will take multiple generations to neutralize fully. The above example makes it very clear when people of Ron’s caliber still have slip into this. Imagine how the general population and their hatred towards Islam and muslims.
If the logic of western zionist-led media is accepted, should organizations like the IRA and others like them should also be called Christian militants? Why are they not principally defined and known by their religious association?
I should also mention that there are people of religious fundamentalism, and people and groups like these are found in every community in every religion. They are fringe and will remain so everywhere. Among the Muslims, they are very much highlighted by the western media exclusively to legitimize the zionist regimes existence in the heart of the Arab world and their brutal colonial actions against their terrorism.
But if anyone has doubts about this phony islamist or political Islam or Islamic radicals and wants to know their reality, then one should read these two books to understand the true history about how the Zionist and Anglo-American Empire have used these fringe factions and founded and funded them to use them for their own geopolitical objectives, for example, alqaeda or isis, among others.
Devil’s Game: How the United States Helped Unleash Fundamentalist Islam (2006) by Robert Dreyfuss.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Devil’s_Game_(book)
Secret Affairs: Britain’s Collusion With Radical Islam (2010) by Mark Curtis
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Secret_Affairs:_Britain%27s_Collusion_with_Radical_Islam
@Laurent Guyenot
“The following article provides a factual overview and references on the topic of organized pedocriminality in the context of geopolitics, elite management, and the Western media system.
Foreword
Pedocriminality can have an individual or commercial dimension, but it can also have a political or even geopolitical dimension. This is the case when political representatives, business executives, intelligence services or blackmail are involved.
As the following overview shows, various court trials and victim testimonies, but also sabotaged investigations and murdered witnesses, point to a potentially influential role of pedocriminal individuals and networks in Europe and the United States.”
I am unable to comprehend this neoconservative and neolibralism phenomena.
What it is actually? what’s it origin? who were behind this idea? Can someone explain it and cite some best books and references.
As far as i know,most often these academics use it but 99% don’t know it,and 1% who are aware of the reality but fails to write it due to lack of courage or fear of repercussions. I don’t know in which category Mr Sachs is.
Only taking name of some fancy terminologies is dishonesty because its fail readers to get to the actual reality. These ideological terminologies are intetionaly employed to obfuscating the truth, don’t be so fearful to talk directly, first cultivate some honesty otherwise its waste of mental and emotional energy and nothing else.
Interesting perspective below:
https://odysee.com/@swprs:3/jews-not-chosen-people-matveev-2018:7
Why the Jews are not “God’s chosen people” according to the Old Testament (Reuvin Metveev, 2018) | Fact Check
A review of the terms Hebrews, Israelites, Semites and Jews according to the Old Testament. The video was produced in 2018 by Reuvin Matveev, a half-Jewish Russian-Canadian who converted to Christianity and adopted National Socialism.
For the full transcript of the video and comments:
https://christiansfortruth.com/biblical-proof-that-the-jews-are-not-gods-chosen-people/
“Cannibal” officially derived from Caribs not Canaan/Baal:
https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/cannibal
Like China.Replies: @Qwerty123, @nognverra
Sensors implanted in your body will track every move you make. No one will be free to come and go outside the controlled areas. Good conduct reports will be issued to every citizen. You will have access to certain benefits only according to your accumulated social credits. Tattling will be encouraged in exchange for good points.[18]
Wrong, completely wrong.
This understanding is based on deliberate confusion created by Anglo-American media to report issue and show it what its not and do exactly the same in your own backyard clandestinely.
China’s social credit system is not what Western media portrays it to be,its very different thing. Western dinosaur media themselves accept it but not so loudly.
Plz see:

Even Wikipedia mentions it via mainstream media reports
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_Credit_System
And whats Americaica is building:
https://www.unz.com/ghood/americas-social-credit-system-is-worse-than-chinas/
Given these severe inconsistences, some conspiratorially-minded individuals naturally suggested that the two Pakistani Muslims had been selected as patsies for a terrorist false-flag attack organized by our government or its allies. But that hypothesis also seemed to make little sense to me. Why would the government stage a false-flag massacre involving three large gunmen and then try to pin the blame on a Pakistani immigrant and his very short wife?
Nine years have now passed and much of the video evidence has disappeared, so determining exactly what happened seems quite difficult. But at the time I believed that a completely unrelated shooting incident in the Los Angeles area a couple of years earlier provided some important insights for this case and I still think the same today.
Mr Unz have you gone through the work of Swiss Policy Research (SPR) website?
In the past I've occasionally looked at it and it seems to be a semi-reliable conspiracy website, unfortunately containing quite a lot of nonsense. Last time I checked, their readership traffic seemed extremely low.
Mr Unz have you gone through the work of Swiss Policy Research (SPR) website?
How about the BAHAI population who are CRYPTO JEWS, and are close allies of Israel?
example: Payam Akhavan, a Bahai, lives in Canada, is a servant of CIA/Mossad/MI6 invovled in FAKE ‘Human rights’ activities on behalf of the west intelligence services. Wikipedia says:
Akhavan was born in Iran to a Bahá’í family of Jewish origin. His family later emigrated to Toronto, Canada during his childhood.
Part of his Bio says:
Akhavan was formerly Legal Advisor to the Office of the Prosecutor of the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia at The Hague and appeared as counsel before the International Criminal Court, the International Court of Justice, the European Court of Human Rights, and the Supreme Court of Canada. He is recipient of the 2021 Human Rights Award of the Law Society of Ontario.
But, this ‘human right activist’ has never said a single word against Jewish mafia genocide of Palestinians or against the apartheid entity, he only goes after Iran, Russia and China to help Mossad/CIA/MI6. The population of BAHAI, the Crypto Jews, in Americas is large where many of whom are working with the western intelligence services to manufacture ‘documents’ for these agencies. They are close to AIPAC and zionist leaders. The Bahai psychologists were working at Guam airbase assisting the TORTURE regime.
Akhavan has close relationship with the rabid zionist Irwin Cotler,supporting the terrorist org. MEK, like Akhavan, to topple the Iranian government.
Hitler was not a Jewish asset and neither is Putin, let me refer you to my previous article:https://www.unz.com/article/was-hitler-controlled-opposition/Replies: @Anonymous, @Kurt Knispel, @Qwerty123, @sarz, @Truthor, @Holy Catholic
One thing these evil Bastards cannot stand is one of their assets going rogue as Hitler did…and now Putin, they’ll move heaven and earth to revenge themselves on the wrongdoer like any organised crime outfit would.
After the war, the Master Race made sure that their alleged god given racial superiority would never again be challenged. With the charter of human rights, the UN, the Nuremberg trials, they poisoned the well of racial consciousness with anti-racism, individualism, liberalism, consumerism, democracy, and the particularly powerful Holocaust venom, which they injected in the minds of every White person on the Globe.
“What Jews fear more than anything else,” writes author F. Britton in his book Behind Communism, “is a rebirth of race consciousness among the great White majority of the Christian world. They remember that at the very instant that the German people became race-conscious they turned with deadly fury against the Jews.”
“It is precisely for this reason,” concludes Curse, an anonymous commenter on one of the social medias, “that they have stigmatized racism in our minds, they know it’s the best survival strategy. Their position in our societies is a testament to that.”
Race consciousness is not something an evil idea but very natural and biological expression of individuality, it is found in every society. One can observe it over entire human history in different civilization irrespective of religion, region, culture and geography with its own specific way of manifestation and tone. It is problematic only when Race consciousness turns into Race Pride, which crosses the fence of self confidence and get onto self-obsession and group narcissism, which threatens not only its own well-being and engenders corruption in morals but becomes bereft itself of positive spirit of human productivity.
The Race Pride also endangers other race groups because of inferiority and meanness that Pride race group associates with other groups, to which naturally, other race groups react in defense of the themselves with different degree of social and political measures.
I am an Asian and live in Asia and I found Race consciousness everywhere in old poetry, culture and literature, music but do not consider it double standard, bad or threating or even negative. I found this phenomena even in those great personalities who are revered and considered as great moral and religious giants.
Its modern western knowledge production , with its newer knowledge disciplines specifically social sciences, which completely turned the meaning of Race upside down.
Q 1.The question then arises why it happened? Why the Race consciousness has been turned into an evil thing?
Q 2.What causes this 180 degree shift in human perception towards race? What factors drive this shift and who supported this momentous transformation, or west was being turned astray to wrong direction?
Q 3. 19th century was full of Race consciousness but was it positive or natural expression or crossing into unnatural limits of Race pride?. Read Malthus, Spencer, Darwin, Huxley, Francis Galton (all are British). This British idea of Race travelled to Germany ( Ernst Haeckel, Emil du Bois Reymond to Hitler),ensued hygiene movement ,environmentalism and fascinated many of them among others. From Britain it got across Atlantic towards USA ( Cold Harbor Spring Laboratory, Rockefellers, American Eugenic Society, Margaret Sanger, Population control measures, sterilization all of that.
Q 4. Emancipation of Jews produced the most hateful narcissist Race pride ideology of Zionism in the very same period of 19th century. Is there any connection between Eugenics or Zionism or not?
What was it? What exactly was happening in this period of time?
clarity on above questions and issues are warranted.
Sharing some references which poses more complexities:
https://www.historynewsnetwork.org/article/the-horrifying-american-roots-of-nazi-eugenics


Kevin MACDONALD, Individualism and the Western Liberal Tradition: Evolutionary Origins, History, and Prospects for the Future, Kindle Direct Publication Edition, 2019, p. 284.Replies: @tamberlint, @annacat
Jewish ethics is universalist, while at the same time maintaining that Israel must remain separate in order to present a moral beacon to the rest of humanity—a beacon of universalism and ethnic dissolution of non-Jews. One cannot underestimate the importance of the fact that the central pose of post Enlightment Jewish intellectuals is a sense that Judaism represents a moral beacon to the rest of humanity. (1)
The European Union is a sad story, when compared to the potential of a German mitteleuropa to revitalize the peoples of Europe
European Union was tool of American Empire to control the Europe. It was was created by CIA
Is it really that high? Do you have a source for that information?
2)The demographic question of american Jewish community.Ninety percent of them came from eastern Europe what is known as Pale of settlement in last two decades of 19th century
The Russian Jew in America
By Abraham Cahan
JULY 1898 ISSUE
Atlantic magazine
The thirteen page long article is written to soften and persuade the then political and administrative functionaries who were flagging the negative effects of mass migration of eastern European Jews. The columnist wrote that from the foundation of HIAS in 1882 to 1898 in just sixteen years the population of Jews has increased from quarter of a million to one. So there was already a portion of Jews from pale of settlement due to sporadic migration from the beginning of the century,and later in the 20th also there was huge multiple wave of migration during and after the two world wars. The percentage seems to touch the 90 percentage mark. And don’t forget that after the collapse USSR a flux of migration happened also.
“Sixteen years have elapsed[since 1882]. The Jew-
ish population in the United States has
grown from a quarter of a million to
about one million.”
https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/1898/07/the-russian-jew-in-america/636491/ ( download option of PDF copy of the article is available.)
By the way the above article is for me personally an earliest example of PR or propaganda stunt of Zionist diaspora in the then American media landscape.
But, this 'human right activist' has never said a single word against Jewish mafia genocide of Palestinians or against the apartheid entity, he only goes after Iran, Russia and China to help Mossad/CIA/MI6. The population of BAHAI, the Crypto Jews, in Americas is large where many of whom are working with the western intelligence services to manufacture 'documents' for these agencies. They are close to AIPAC and zionist leaders. The Bahai psychologists were working at Guam airbase assisting the TORTURE regime.
Akhavan was formerly Legal Advisor to the Office of the Prosecutor of the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia at The Hague and appeared as counsel before the International Criminal Court, the International Court of Justice, the European Court of Human Rights, and the Supreme Court of Canada. He is recipient of the 2021 Human Rights Award of the Law Society of Ontario.
Yes, sir! This is it in a nutshell. I scanned your writing here and got to that, and I thought, "Yes, he understands what I understand."
Instead of attacking Hamas, Netanyahu took advantage of the wave of global sympathy by unleashing an unprecedented military assault against Gaza’s more than two million civilians, apparently intending to kill huge numbers of them and drive the remainder into Egypt’s Sinai desert, allowing Israel to annex their territory and resettle it with Jews.
-- Ron Unz
Why Israel created Hamas:
An analysis by Swiss Policy Research
https://swprs.org/why-israel-created-hamas/
“Most of the history of modern terrorism, not just since 2001, but really since World War II, has been a deception manufactured by Western and Israeli intelligence services.”
Hi,Mr Unz
its a pleasure and enlightening to read your column here.
As you mentioned above the possibility of contemporary Western government functionaries working as front men stooge and actors devoid of any real power and leadership capability. This is not a false hypothesis which lacks any empirical evidence but is truthful and can be substantiated through publicly available facts. The problem with this testable hypothesis is that it is so bizarre and outlandish inherently that even if one comes to the obvious evidence of its factuality, the mind of an average normal person become repulsive to accept it.
See:
Is it really that high? Do you have a source for that information?
2)The demographic question of american Jewish community.Ninety percent of them came from eastern Europe what is known as Pale of settlement in last two decades of 19th century
Hi Mr unz
its pleasure and enlightening to read your column here. I have a query and suggestion, as you mentioned above the possibility of Western government functionaries working as front ment stooge and actors devoid of any real power and leadership capability
Efron, John M. (1994). Defenders of the race: Jewish doctors and race science in fin-de-siècle Europe. New Haven CT: Yale University Press. ISBN 978-0300054408.
Book overview
By the late nineteenth century, physical anthropologists were engaged in debates about the “Jewish Racial Question,” asking whether there was a biological basis for Jewish distinctiveness and social development. This fascinating book describes for the first time the response of Jewish race scientists to these debates, demonstrating that in their participation, the scientists were involved in a complex process of Jewish self-definition, one that was impelled by two factors: the external threat of antisemitism and the internal need to reassert a Jewish ethnic pride that had been battered by assimilation.
John Efron examines the racial science of Jewish anthropologists and physicians in Germany, England, Russia, and Austria, showing that their work differed from place to place because it was contingent on such historical factors as the nature of Jewish integration in a given country, the character of a nation’s Jewish community or communities, and the level of antisemitism there. Efron sketches the growth of race science from the eighteenth to the twentieth centuries and considers how Jews were represented in it. He then studies the image of Jews in British anthropology, discusses the first Jewish race scientist, Joseph Jacobs, an Anglo-Australian who focused on the Jews of Western Europe, and the Russian Jewish race scientist Samuel Weissenberg, who studied the Jews of Eastern Europe, Central Asia, and the Near East. Finally he examines the link between race science and the politics of Zionism, showing how Zionist scientists used race science not to assert Jewish superiority but to bolster a political cause that was concerned with Jewish spiritual and physical regeneration.
Its not that jewish attempts were suddenly started after 1948 but way before since mid 19th century in concerted planned way.One can even trace it’s to back further to John Calvin and his Institute writing which helped to set in motion the Protestant revolution and dividing Christianity.The Protestant revolution shifted the focus to old testament and inclined positively to Jewish identity and history.
Calvin also introduced the doctrine to promote competition,elevated judaism.
(“It was the followers of Calvin,and especially the Puritans who first elevated the Old Testament into a position of supreme importance,”weote George O’Brien,who noted that during the Middle ages the “blanks” in the Gospel were filled by Aristotle’s work and by natural reason)
Sorce:The Lost science of Money by stephen zarlenga chaoter 7 pg 195.
In 19th century America Schiff and other jewish financier pedestaled corrupt person Scofield to write Newer interpretation of bible and published through Oxford publisher for wider circulation in Anglo American World to legitimise the Zionist movement of establishing israel. This heralded dispensationalism and evangelical fundamentalism. All this to the benefit of choose people and their worldview.
https://www.the-highway.com/Scofield.html

Yesterday was the 25th anniversary of kosovo war
25 years ago, Nato started the Kosovo War against Serbia.
https://swprs.org/the-kosovo-war-25-years-ago/
Mr unz
There is a website called SPR(Swiss policy research)run by anonymous academic experts,to avoid face any repurcussion by establishment circles, has done some brilliant work on geopolitical propaganda and war.
On the Rawanda issue also they have a page which covers both version of the incident.
Have you gone through the site ever?or its any content?
Homepage address:
https://swprs.org/
“Although I’ve been sharply critical of Power’s book and the rather superficial analysis of events it provided, in all fairness we should consider her circumstances. She apparently researched and wrote most of it while she was still in her late 20s, enrolled as a Harvard Law School student, so it was hardly surprising that she lacked the deep knowledge of noted scholars such as Herman, who had been publishing books on important policy issues years before Power was even born.
Should we really expect a fledgling young policy writer such as Power to strongly challenge the almost universally accepted factual narrative on major world events such as 1994 Rwanda or the Balkan Wars while still enrolled in law school? Only a twenty-something writer of extraordinary knowledge, skill, and self-confidence would have done so.”
Power is a classical representative of Establishment’s modus operandi of quid pro quo i.e enlisting new young guys from universities and media to do the official job of disinfo and gave them in turn sharp career rise solely built on propagandist academic work and scholarship.
Mr Unz in the digital age like Youtube you dont even have to publish book, you can reach to millions through sharp editing a video and present history in certain way that suits both the power elite and official narrative by exploiting anti establishmentarian sentiments of the masses but never touch the obvious Truth.
Johnny Harris is doing exactly this on Youtube,he previously worked with Vox on Border series and now with support of world economic forum,New York times and many more he is propagandizing american minds via selective presentation of American history of territoral expansion.
Is he helping propelling knowgly and unknowingly the same narrative of american history( which is specifically written after 1948 creation of israel)to present it as land of violent migrants of genocidal tendencies who replaced the indiginous people, to pacify the american gentiles ‘s objection to the Choosen people’s slaughter of Palestinian and their land grabbing.
Harris’ Wikipedia entry does support the above skepticism.
In the digital era persons like Harris are small fry but hugely infuentential in making and breaking the opinions of the masses.
Plz see this

Mr Unz slowly you are very near to the fresh-end of your quest of ascertainment regarding the truth of Holocaust.Your effort is absolutely no doubt will help unleash a new serious revision of the 20th century history in alternative academic circles.
Your rigorous style and voracious reading has raised the bar of expectation for me. Some more ‘controversial issues’ that i want you to delibrate over for better clarity about our past.
Eeager to read and listen your investigative and historicaly based thoughts on the ”Protocols of the Elders of zion”.
What is its actuality?where did it come from?who (group?/circle?) wrote it and for what purposes?
It is very easily and summarily dismissed as false and fabricated document to demonize the “intended community” by both state and non state actors namely right wing authorities and that it has hotch-potch content devoid of any practical merit.
But being a student of Political science i am not satisfied with all these arguments,even if no historical evidence will be aavailable but tools and tricks it mentions cant be dismissed.
To the contrary I consider it to be a brilliant compiled document which has great wisdom and very sharp insights regarding politics and society.I will not be surprised if it is included in Diplomacy and foreign service training of officials in different countries because of it’s sheer sharpness,methods and astute observations.
There are some authors who suggests the link between Communist Manifesto and Protocols thanks to their similarity of capturing of state power and a handy guide of societal level sabotage.
I am writing name of some books which has dealt with the issue of protocols,all are written for the purpose of its dismissal:
1. The Perennial conspiracy theory: reflections on the history of the Protocols of the elders of the zion(2021) by Michael Hagemeister
2. The paranoid apocalypse: a hundred-year retrospective on the Protocols of the elders of zion (2012) by Richard Allen Landes
3. The Global impact of the Protocols of the Elders of zion : A century old myth (2011) by Esther webman
4. The Lie that wouldn’t die: the protocols of the elders of zion (2005) by Hadassa Ben-itto
5. A rumor about the jews: reflections on antisemitism and the protocols of the learned elders of zion (2000) by Stephen Eric Brinner
Mr Unz have you gone through the Gerry Docherty & Jim Macgregor’s 2013 book ‘ The Hidden History:The secret origins of first world war’?
It goes very deeper via multiple sources to aptly clear the picture of causes and motives of the first world war and personalities involved in the entire episode.
Plz do a detailed book review to the benefit of your readers
Sure, I read both of the Docherty/Macgregor books, but I'm afraid I found them extremely unconvincing, basically conspiratorial nonsense, with the second being much worse than the first.
Mr Unz have you gone through the Gerry Docherty & Jim Macgregor’s 2013 book ‘ The Hidden History:The secret origins of first world war’?
It goes very deeper via multiple sources to aptly clear the picture of causes and motives of the first world war and personalities involved in the entire episode
OT:
Hulu is generating some primo iSteve content. I give you their latest…
Bad Hair
