RSSSteve, why not accept the obvious explanation:
1. Trump increased his share among whites by 5% and his share among minorities by 15%.
2. The CIA/Dominion vote stealers increased their transfers from Trump to Dem by 10%.
3. Net effect was for Trump to “lose” 5% among whites and gain 10% among minorities.
But the Dems increased their share among black poll workers with suitcases of ballots. That is a very important demographic.
1. Trump increased his share among whites by 5% and his share among minorities by 15%.
Look at the number of votes cast, the increase in number of voters which scales with Trump’s increased vote count, and the election day increase in voters:
2016: 3,270,734 voters registered before election day, 353,179 voters registered on election day, Hillary 1,367,716 votes and Trump 1,322,951 votes. Total number of votes cast (2,968,281) was 91% of the pre-election number of registered voters.
2020: 3,588,563 voters registered before election day, no data yet on new election day registrations, Biden 1,693, 901 votes and Trump 1,462,105. Total votes cast (3,229,516) was 90% 9f the pre-election number of registered voters.
So Trump added 139,154 votes to his 2016 total, a 10.5% increase. The number of registered voters increased by 9.7% and turnout did not fall. Biden added 326,185 votes to Hillary’s total or a gain of 23.8%.
Minnesota’s population rose by about 140,000 between 2016 and 2020, so the increase in voters of more than 260,000 over 2016’s tops-in-the-nation voter participation represents a tremendous eagerness to vote on the part of Minnesotans.
The logical conclusion is either that (a) there was tremendously more enthusiasm for Biden than for the first female presidential candidate, leading to vastly higher Democratic turnout and registration of first-time voters eager to vote for Biden, or (b) Democrats in Minnesota can manufacture as many voters and votes as they need to win the election, no matter how many human hearts Trump captures.