This and "the pendulum is going to swing back" have, within the past 20 or so years, proven to be totally bunk ideas.

Replies: @anonymous

I guess it beats “Put your name on a potholed bridge!”

How do these “Pentagon leaders” sleep at night?

Replies: @Notsofast

Another possible slogan "Just because Charlie didn't serve, doesn't mean you shouldn't."

Replies: @Maniscowco

You couldn’t make it up.

Die for Schlomo Boys.

Replies: @Emil Nikola Richard

Onward Christian soldiers! Fight and die for people who hate you! You are stupid and ignorant, so you will do it!

Replies: @Same old same old

Obama’s purge of top brass in the military, so I’ve read, apparently left costumed Democratic Party hacks in the place of patriots. Unfortunately, patriots outside the military still tragically assume the military defends America’s interests. It seems the military now exists to serve Israeli expansionism and the continued transfer of America’s wealth into the hands of Jewish oligarchs who, some claim, are the real beneficiaries of US sanctions and embargoes enforced by an Israeli fiefdom operating inside the Treasury, the Office of Foreign Asset Control.

The Pentagon is also likened to the mother of all those bloated DC bureaucracies, and the woke mother at that. A quick search of congressional hearings reveals the viciously anti-white indoctrination impressionable young recruits recently endured shortly after enlisting. The former head of education at the Pentagon, a black radical named Kelisa Wing, was hired because she’d written several insanely racist books damning whites and the police. Any bureaucracy that’d go along with that will go along with anything when the wind blows the other way once Trump leaves office.

There’s also the Pentagon’s longstanding practice of giving unmerited preferment across the board in training, assignment, and promotion to women, blacks, and Hispanics over better qualified white males. This applies as well to the corporate world where emasculo-feminists now dominate virtually all HR departments. This is a forever condition in the military and corporate world making it hard to understand why any young white male would in his weakest moments ever consider joining the military or major corporation.

Want to become a jet engine mechanic, young man? You might get it, but it’s my understanding you’ll be considered only out of desperation or because there are no women, transgenders, or minorities at hand to assign to the slot, and you’ll end up working under one anyway. You might even say that any young white man’s interest in joining either the military or large corporation is sufficient reason to reject him as mentally retarded.

A campaign aimed solely at Whitey. The Jew. S. military can't win anything without White men and they know it. Christ cucks can sign up in droves and go die for Pissrael - good riddance! Uncle Sam donned his yarmulke long ago and is now and forever Uncle Shmuel. No one should be the least bit surprised.

Replies: @Anonymous

"Possible slogans that Pentagon leaders have discussed include..."

How about, "Kill a Pali for Charlie"?

I loved it!

I understand the criticism It veered wildly. The music, at times, served, for me, as "filler" and overwhelmed the action The cinematography was DEFINITELY Film School 101, in terms of camera placement, although it looked good. The lighting, etc. The sound quality was excellent. And absolute KUDOS to the editor!!! Under the budgetary circumstances the editing was top drawer! I loved the names that were chosen, especially the leading lady's name "Evangeline Hart". The WN "gifts" like the "Welcome Frens" sign with Pepe, and Finn's White Rabbit Radio hat - sheer joy!

The best actor was Gentile Gentleman as Cedric, and the WORST - the bro in law until the Norse Shaman showed up. He was HORRIBLE. I really liked the gal that played the sister Lily. The diner scene was Ed Wood Worthy ; the direction was too SLOW. The camera was on the waitress for too long. There should have been quicker shots, to heighten the comedy, so most of that scene fell flat. I still got a laugh at the waitress's response at the end of the scene, though. But still - I wanted MORE.

Jenny Bean was good as Eva. She is young, and the Director needed to direct her more. She's obviously a novice, but she has real talent. I have mixed feelings about the glasses and hair. On one hand her "look" is that of a super serious young woman who just went through a very long weird experience. Sometimes people will makes themselves look dowdy and mousey to "hide from view" but if this was the intent it wasn't obvious. She looked very plain and her appearance undercut her role as the protagonist. She needs to be glammed up. Period. In order to make her compelling as a character.

I want to know more about her story - what drew her into the cult and why did she leave, really? I know this was super low budget. That curtails a lot of choices that can be made. I'd like to see more of the interpersonal history of the pals. One of the BEST moments in the film was the "selfie scene". That was GENIUS. And awkward selfie is taken, wherein bro in law looked like he wanted no part of any connection to Eva, Eva looked like she didn't want to be there either, and Lily and Cedric were "trying to be positive". Eva looks at the selfie, looks at a photo of the gang in the past, before she left for the cult, where all looked genuinely convivial and happy, and then back at the awkward selfie. That scene was perfect! It told the emotional trajectory of the gang in a few seconds. No narration nor expository dialogue! THAT is how you TELL a cinematic story!

There were moving moments from scene to scene -but the moment the men decided to save the "sacrificial victim" - the film began channeling Ed Wood. The dialogue and action was NOT the way people would behave in such a situation, if people thought someone was about to be murdered. The acting was the woodenest at that point. The staging wasn't fabulous. The "decision to save the victim" staging was super bad. The actual rescue was ok. The actor that played Cedric consistently held everything together, as much as he could, but between the bad acting of "Finn" and the HORRENDOUS acting and STAGING (camera placement) of the Draugr Hunter he was definitely the Lifeboat on the Titanic. The exposition of the Hunter should have been a powerful MYTHIC emotional climax - but the Spirit of Ed Wood was the real supernatural element!

The final scene worked though, in the way in which the Draugr was presented. That was excellent! It really was the only way to end the film due to budget considerations. I know "what happened" BU T I WANT TO WANT TO KNOW WHAT HAPPENED!!!!! I'd love to see an expanded story. More scenes of Eva's past, scenes of her time in the cult, and how every reacted to the Draughr. I'd love to see a really GOOD actor as the Hunter (and I have loads of thoughts as to camera placement to convey his "authority"). I'd like to see scenes of the Hunter - a real Hero - contrasted with the so-called "false leader" of the cult. Eva refers to his supernatural abilities, yet we don't see anything I know the budget! I WANT MORE!!!!! I want a full length film, with a buncha the things I just cited. You cAn even keep the guy who played Finn. He seemed more relaxed and natural in certain scenes than others Get him a little drunk Get him to the sweet spot where he's not too drunk where he will forget his lines, but drunk enough to be more natural. FINALLY - BEST MALE HAIRCUTS IN A FLEM EVER! EVER! EVER! I WANT MORE!!!!

Replies: @Maniscowco

Well that is the question. Does Trump really want to go to war with Iran? Is Trump receptive to people in media like Carlson who are his supporters and their views? I hold out some hope in that Bush/Cheney and those monsters are gone. While we still might have a cabinet and top advisors supporting Zionism domestically, going into another massive Middle East war is not the same as throwing some anti-Israel student protestors out of the country. If Trump falls for this Iran war scam, one of his primary core positions of no new wars then becomes a lie.

"You cannot think outside democracy."

What are you referring to that is "outside democracy"? Have you come up with a new system of governance? What is it? Are you establishing a new country capable of defending itself? Where is it? And where can people apply for citizenship? Or maybe you plan to lead a secession movement? Or a revolution? Tell me about it. I'm all ears.

"I'm arguing that remigration is a scam ..."

It wasn't even an idea a few years ago. Denmark is one of the first countries to engage in remigration. First, it has made itself less attractive to migrants by reducing benefits and tightening up qualifications for asylum and residency. Next, it has established incentives for migrants to leave, including financial assistance. Last, it has sought third-country partners such as Rwanda to house migrants with pending asylum claims.

Trump has been following the same model. The CBP-One app that Biden established for would be migrants to get advance permission to enter the US has been turned into a tracking device that now tells the migrants you can receive $1,000 and free airfare to leave voluntarily and still have the right to apply as a legal immigrant, or you can wait for us to catch you, be expelled (possibly to a third country like Rwanda or El Salvador), and never be allowed to legally immigrate to the US.

The idea of remigration is not to take drastic action all at once, but to boil the frog slowly, ratcheting up the pressure little by little. Sweden is making a much more generous offer of money for migrants to leave. Britain has also considered Rwanda as a place for holding "migrants" while their claims are being processed (and hopefully rejected).

Will remigration succeed in removing large numbers of aliens? That remains to be seen. But I wouldn't call it a scam -- unless by "scam" you mean something that isn't perfect. If you know of something that is perfect, please point me to it.

" ... this conference was kosher."

Maybe so, but there are plenty of Jews (probably the majority) who don't support what the conference participants are advocating.

Interesting article on legal immigration, but you weren't arguing with me about that. You were arguing about illegal immigration.

Replies: @Maniscowco

Rudd successfully stopped a recession while the rest of the world suffered
 

"You have made the mistake of believing democracy is real."

Why do you bring up democracy? We were talking about illegal immigration.

"You are not neuroplastic enough to think outside it."

You are not neuroplastic enough to back up your claims.

"Turn off Fox News or Newsmax ..."

The figures I gave are from the Department of Homeland Security. If you think they're wrong, tell me what alternative source you are relying on for your claims.

"The deportations haven't happened."

How do you know?

"Stephen Miller is a Jew."

I don't care as long as he gets the job done.

Non-Jewish white males have had the opportunity to man up and do the job. They haven't delivered. So now we have other races/genders/ethnicities taking charge:

Stephen Miller, White House Deputy Chief of Staff
Pam Bondi, Attorney General
Tulsi Gabbard, Director of National Intelligence
Kristi Noem, Dept. of Homeland Security
Harmeet Dhillon, Civil Rights Division, Department of Justice
Jeanine Pirro, US Attorney for the District of Columbia
Kash Patel, FBI Director
Susie Wiles, White House Chief of Staff

We have some decent non-Jewish white male Trump appointees as well:

Jay Clayton, US Attorney for the Southern District of New York
Tom Homan, Border Czar
John Ratcliffe, CIA Director
David Richardson, FEMA Director

And some questionable ones:

Sean Curran, Secret Service Director

I averaged yearly illegal alien removals (with a final court order of removal) under the Obama, Trump and Biden Administrations (figures only available through 2022):

Obama: 382,000 (2009 through 2016)
Trump: 298,000 (2017 through 2020)
Biden: 97,000 (2021 through 2022)

These figures don't count people removed or denied entry because of Covid restrictions or people whose applications for entry were denied.

They also don't count people discouraged from applying or entering based on Trump's "Remain in Mexico" policy.

Source: Office of Homeland Security Statistics, Table 39, Noncitizen Removals, Returns and Expulsions: Fiscal Years 1892 to 2022 (ohss.dhs.gov/topics/immigration/yearbook/2022/table 39).

Replies: @Maniscowco, @Maniscowco

The Labor PM Rudd, was offed in 2010 after a few actions against Israel, changing UN votes, and expelling a MOSSAD agent .... He was stabbed in the back
 

You see, after promising that Climate Change was an existential issue and his number one priority during campaigning in the Nov. 2007 election, he abandoned his promises soon after the COP15 Copenhagen summit when it became clear that none of the major industrial nations were going to do anything substantive to address the Non Problem of CO2 emissions.

The token things Rudd did to displease the Apartheid Israeli state were all small potatoes in the grand scheme of things. Rudd was every bit the piece of shit that Gillard was.
And here's the proof that Rudd was still very much in the good books with the ZOG elders that control both of the major parties in Oz:

1) As much as Gillard detested Rudd, who did she appoint in the coveted role of Foreign Minister?
That's right, she appointed Rudd.
Because the script* (written by the ZOG elders) said that she should.

(*Similarly, in relation to speculation as to who Donald Chump was likely to appoint as Secretary of State for his second term, not one person in a million would ever have imagined he'd appoint a lightweight like 'Little Marco' Rubio. Not only is Rubio supremely unqualified to do the job, but Donald Chump hated him with a passion).
But that counted for nothing. Clearly Rubio had fellated the ZOG elders at the head of the table - so they rewarded him.

2) In the role of Foreign Minister, this is what Rudd did (click on the link below):
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/us-not-looking-to-arm-libya-opposition/
From the article above:

Australian Foreign Minister Kevin Rudd called on the world's powers to impose a no-fly zone over Libya and compared Qaddafi's violent suppression of opposition forces to genocides in Rwanda, the Bosnian town of Srebrenica and Sudan's Darfur region.
"For the sake of humanity, go now," Rudd advised Qaddafi in a speech to the Human Rights Council in Geneva.

He later told The Associated Press his nation supported the creation of a U.N.-mandated no-fly zone over Libya aimed to prevent the type of aerial bombing unleashed on the Basque town of Guernica in 1937, killing hundreds in the Spanish Civil War.
A no-fly zone would require the approval of the 15-member U.N. Security Council.

"Guernica is known throughout the world for the bombing of the civilian population.
We have seen evidence of that in Libya. Let us not simply stand idly by while similar atrocities are committed again," Rudd told the AP.
 

Foreign Minister Kevin Rudd has defended NATO’s mission in Libya after reports an air strike killed several members of leader Muammar Gaddafi’s family.
 

Summary: Australia had absolutely no dog in the race as far as what regime ruled in Libya.
But, on instructions from his ZOG masters, there was no foreign minister on the planet that did more than Kevin Rudd to advocate on behalf of intervention that would ensure the toppling of the Libyan regime and destruction of that economy.
 

When it comes to Fiscal Incompetence, Rudd was in a league of his own.
 

'Kevin, the only reason you were appointed as a Shadow Minister in the first place, is because you polled well with people who never actually met you in person'.
 

Replies: @mulga mumblebrain

Very true. Politics is rigged in Australia, as it is everywhere else in the west. People need to do things outside the democratic system.

You have refuted neither of the two allegations I presented.

My original comments still stand.

This comment by "Maniscowco" is by someone clearly seething that there are still nationalists in Australia who possess the brains to see through the NSN propoganda.

He is unable to respond to the allegations made, for he knows them to be truthful and debilitating to the NSN.

Replies: @Maniscowco

>Unless you actually take power, there will be no remigration.

Wow, how insightful.

How close to 'taking power' are Striker et al? -- they've been around a long time, you know -- more than 10 years -- the AfD was founded in 2013 (mostly to oppose the financial bailout of Greece).

As mentioned, polls today often show the AfD is the most popular party in all Germany (only the CDU has more seats in the Bundestag) -- they have long been by far the most popular party in the former East Germany.

Currently shitty little parliamentary tricks (die Brandmauer) rob them of their rightful role in government, including minister posts -- but this won't last forever, as their share of the vote will continue to grow.

Yet all you can do is disparage them, grasping at low-hanging fruit like the fact co-leader Alice Weidel is a lesbian with a non-European partner (as if that matters vis-a-vis the political and legislative agenda of the AfD).

I speak German and follow German politics -- I've commented about the AfD, I'm not going to repeat it all here -- the AfD is not perfect, and Alice Weidel is not the front person I would prefer -- but I respect her as a politician, she's very professional -- her speeches are good, and when speaking ad hoc under pressure, e.g. in talk shows where all the other guests gang up on her, she always does a very good job -- so I accept her as co-leader -- the AfD could do a lot worse.

More than anything, your comments show you are realitätsfremd, a juvenile clown who has yet to move on from 'naming the Jew' online.

Replies: @Maniscowco, @Maniscowco, @Maniscowco, @Anonymous

You are stuck in the online world of the past when the now defunct Alt-Right (Striker et al) was 'naming the Jew' -- your juvenile mind cannot separate the real world from the online world.

To make it as simple as possible for you:

Like the speakers at this conference, I am now more interested in seeing something concrete accomplished in the real world, not continuing to LARP in the online world -- I can separate the real world from the online world.

It's not a question of what I want, it's a question of reality -- these 'hate' laws are about motivation, hence are thought crime laws; they should not exist -- more importantly, in the real world they will never be used against non-whites.

Progress can be made stopping migration by getting more Whites to see the reality of racial differences, as well as how menacing their future is as a minority (e.g. South Africa) -- you do not need to 'name the Jew' to do either -- in fact, if you are trying to do something concrete to stop migration, in the real world 'naming the Jew' is impolitic and can hurt your efforts.

In contrast, endorsing the existence and use of 'hate' laws can be seen as anti-white, because in the real world these laws will never be anything but a tool used by the Establishment to persecute Whites.

Replies: @Maniscowco, @eah

Since you seem to have and enforce ideological purity standards, let me point something out to you: not long ago, Striker and the NJP crowd spent a good deal of time and effort publicly protesting for 'hate' charges against Blacks accused of crimes against Whites -- e.g. they did it in Waukesha, and they did it in Akron.

It's hard for me to imagine anything more humiliating than a group of allegedly racially conscious white men begging the anti-white Establishment for 'hate' charges against non-whites, thereby legitimizing the existence and use of those statutes -- 'hate' laws were enacted to persecute and intimidate Whites for thought crime while their country is being demographically stolen from them -- that always has been, and always will be, their sole purpose -- Eric Holder testified before Congress that proposed federal 'hate' laws were not intended to prosecute 'hate' directed at Whites, rather only 'hate' directed against 'historically marginalized' groups.

Yet there was Striker, bellowing into a bullhorn, effeminately begging authorities who despise people like him for 'hate' charges, endorsing the existence of absurd laws designed to be used against guys like him.

It was a disgusting spectacle, and pretty much the end of my interest in the NJP.

Replies: @Maniscowco

prove me wrong

Man-is-Cow writes:

once upon a time Australia was officially a white country that didnt allow other immigration and prevented Jews from taking positions of power.
 

1) Isaac Isaacs was the first Australian born Governor General (in the 1930's) - he was a Jew.

2) Sir John Monash - WWI General (whose face now appears on the Australian $1oo bill) - also a Jew.

Replies: @Maniscowco, @mulga mumblebrain

Did you not watch the film? They clearly state that the Government and its Jewish occupiers are the enemy.

"The State" was not always the enemy, once upon a time Australia was officially a white country that didnt allow other immigration and prevented Jews from taking positions of power.

What do you suggest they do instead?

Replies: @Truth Vigilante

>Explain to me when cucking to the Jews and being weak has helped us?

No one's advocating 'cucking to the Jews' you idiot, that's just an infantile red herring, a ridiculous straw man thrown out by losers like you who do nothing but whine and disparage what others are doing, ostensibly because they don't 'name the Jew' as forcefully or often as you think they should.

And speaking of 'weak', it takes lot of guts to do what Jared Taylor has done with his life, just like it takes a lot of guts to be an activist and speak at an event like this.

You're too stupid to understand that at times it's important to soft-peddle rhetoric about Jews in order to credibly focus the public's attention on the more immediate problem, which is the Camp of the Saints-like invasion of Europe -- in recent polling, the AfD is now the most popular party in Germany, mostly because of the way they forthrightly talk about migration ('bildungsferne Migranten' is one of Alice Weidel's favorite phrases) -- I guarantee you that would not be the case if they talked about Jews.

The URL of the 24/7 stream of the National Alliance: 104.167.4.67:8115/stream

They air all the original American Dissident Voices broadcasts of William Luther Pierce, who talked about Jews all the time -- a contemporary of Jared Taylor, in my estimation Pierce was a superior intellect.

Replies: @Maniscowco

History lessons won't remove any Jews from power. They won't remove anyone from power and won't place anyone in power. In fact, history lessons on how based Hitler was are much more likely to prevent anyone from ever getting into power because the Hitler subject is a tar baby. One can easily talk about the Jews today without spending most of one's time talking about how based Hitler was 80 years ago instead of talking about the Jews today. A remigration conference that doesn't talk about the Jews or Hitler is ten times better than shit posts on the Internet about Hitler.

Replies: @Maniscowco

>I already do it.

That's funny.

So, what do you do? -- tell us, or me -- I mean besides insult Jared Taylor in pseudo-anonymous online comments, and make false statements about the mother of his kids -- e.g. provide a link to your blog, something you've written, proof of something you've done, preferably something comparable to organizing or speaking at an event like this, which for many who spoke is just one instance of their activism.

Otherwise I'll have to conclude you're just another loudmouth pleb faggot who does nothing more than mindlessly blurt out 'Jew' because you're too fucking stupid to say anything else.

Replies: @Maniscowco

>Jared Taylor is married to a Jew

No, he isn't.

Although I realize simple facts don't matter to cretins like you.

And why don't you get started 'making Jewish power your main focus', and helping with the 'liberation from Jewish financial power'? -- what's stopping you? -- instead of effeminately whining her, begging Jared Taylor to do it.

Replies: @Maniscowco

Surely "saying the truth" about European mid 20th century history is much less relevant than saying the truth about our contemporary issues. There's nothing wrong with saying the truth, but talking about remigration is more relevant than talking about history from three four generations ago.

Neither is guaranteed to achieve anything, but history lessons about Germany have a much smaller chance.

Replies: @Maniscowco

Jared Taylor has a disability which is concealed from him, but is a flashing red light
to others. The Jews failed to build an empire by the sword as other nations, so they
used money instead and left the fighting and dying to others. Globalism and mass
international migration were tools to break the spirit of national unity.

Replies: @eah

had a feeling someone would bring the bad news eventually. So in other words, European leaders aren't serious. When the Africans wanted the French out of Africa, they MEANT IT. White people on the other hand are just pretenders, and frauds when it comes down to taking back their nations.

Replies: @Maniscowco

Just like the US government transformed the anti-war, anti Wall Street left into the “woke left,” their new gameplan is to coopt the anti-immigration right into something just as fake and shitty.
 

The lack of protests isn’t necessarily good news.

It’s been noticeable of late in several territories that the usual protests haven’t been taking place, the usual crackdown by the authorities hasn’t been taking place etc

In the UK recently they had an anti-immigration march where it was antifa who got the rough treatment from the police. The antifa balaclava mob got contained and pushed back by the police in a reversal of the usual scenes.

This is all being hailed as some sort of breakthrough and a changed zeitgeist.

In reality it’s nothing more than a steam valve. All over the western world you’ll see this now more and more. They’re allowing things to be said and done which previously weren’t allowed, in the hope (knowledge) that allowing people to let off steam will alleviate the building tension.
 

Replies: @Lackadaisical Reader, @Pierre de Craon, @Liza, @AntiMason

Fake or not, having one conference like this is a thousand times more than what all Hitler fanboys combined will ever achieve. All Hitler fanboys are good for is arguing on the Internet about irrelevant minutia of 80 years old history that nobody gives a shit about.

What's Eric Striker's gameplan? To shitpost and LARP. There is no gameplan.

A conference is at least newsworthy. Has Eric Striker ever done anything newsworthy? Is that how he's going to win, by doing fuck all forever?

Replies: @Maniscowco, @Maniscowco, @Johnny LeBlanc, @Gerbils

Eric Striker is just sour that his stupid brand of neo-nazism has ignominiously imploded. He is just old news. Sometimes I even think that the First Amendment is not that great, because that is the reason the most stupid neo-nazis can blare out their old sad destructive message into all corners. In Europe we find new ways of doing things for our people. Listen and learn.

Replies: @Gerbils, @AntiMason

The only participant in the remigration summit I know personally is Kenny Smith, who is a true racial nationalist and has been active for decades.

If the barriers between so-called 'populism' and our own movement are weakened, then -of course- there is a danger that influence can travel both ways. However, that is no reason to do nothing and, in any debate, those who have a coherent and consistent worldview should have an advantage over those who have only an ever-shifting set of prejudices.

Well done to those who took part in the summit and thank you to Jared Taylor for providing such a full report.

Replies: @Maniscowco

"Did anyone ask the 'remigration' speakers from TPUSA why their boss Donald Trump is deporting fewer migrants than Obama and even Biden in his final year?"

1. Stephen Miller just ordered an increase in deportations from 1,000 to 3,000 a day.

2. Obama and Biden weren't being blocked by immigration judges the way Trump has been.

3. Unlike Obama and Biden, Trump has effectively stopped illegal immigration into the US. Under Biden, as many as 10,000 migrants a day illegally crossed the border. That has been reduced to several hundred a day.

If you credit Trump with expulsions and with preventing illegals from coming in the first place, his record will turn out to be much better than Biden's and Obama's.

Replies: @Maniscowco

I have just watched the interview; Ron Unz is an erudite man of great integrity.

lol, if medicine hasn’t been perverted, I don’t know what has!

Look at the opioid crisis, the covid “vaccine”, and countless other branches of medicine, which only keep people sick And enrich those selling both the sickness and the cure

Replies: @Bert

Great video.

28 mins very well spent, thanks.

Meant to add: I'm surprised the narrator didn't finish by saying that the Frankfurt School made it all the way to the presidency in 2008. Yes They Did!

Full props to Buchanan, who was one of the first to be canceled by The Lobby.

I remember a Jewish intellectual back in, I think, the 90’s saying that Buchanan should be excluded from the national conversation for having the temerity to object to sending American boys to fight in another middle east war (I forget which one).

And so he was, being subsequently relegated to fringe publications like those of our gracious host here.

Sadly, things have gotten much worse since then.

'You need to see the “Canary Mission” website. Its an online database operated by the Jewish Lobby (Americans and Israelis) where supposedly “anti-Zionist” or “antisemitic” undergrad students, grad students, medical students, and professionals of all types are identified and detailed profiles are kept about their views and activities...'
 

Replies: @Ernesto Che

Canarymission was established the same year as the Ukrainian Myrotvorets, 2014. Odd coincidence, isn't it?

Replies: @ProteinShake, @ProteinShake

Re: Canary Mission

It's featured in al Jazeera's four part documentary on the Israeli Lobby in America, part one of which is here:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3lSjXhMUVKE

The other parts are available in the sidebar. Adam Milstein was outed as its sugar daddy, though he's denied it. There are other faces in the doc that could be outed with facial recognition.

Time to turn the tables.

The Al Jazeera undercover investigation about the Israel Lobby exposed Canary Mission and the people funding it. I believe the main funder was Adam Milstein. The Israel Lobby managed to suppress the documentary by threatening Qatar, but the documentary was eventually leaked.

Great website!

Replies: @Shlomo Goldfart

seems a little odd you have that url next to your user name as your website yet you post here calling it disgusting.

Replies: @xyzxy, @ProteinShake

Everyone should go and flood the "report an individual" section of

canarymission.org

with Israeli soldiers and politicians (e.g., Netanyahu) with their war crimes. I did.

Or have a little fun (your choice of fun) with their psycho site.

Replies: @TKK, @Heretic50

Wow! That website is unreal. I am sure they will soon have an app, if they don't already. I do have a neighbor who would love this site though.

Thanks. It is unbelievable that a foreign government has this sort of influence over political speech in America.

Voltaire-
"I may not agree with what you have to say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it.”

Good video thanks for posting. 👍

Cheers Bro

You are an unworthy interlocutor. Please return to the sewer you came from.

Were the Beatles, Rolling Stones, Heavy Metals, Viking Rock and the like, anything else than creations of the Jewish pop-culture commissars/impressarios, with an open or subliminal anti-Christian messaging?

Replies: @Punch Brother Punch

Itzik Schmutzigovich.

And whats any of this suppose to do?

Replies: @Colin Wright

sent him my $100 (first time ever I gave to a politician).....you should too! thanks in advance!

Replies: @Colin Wright

Great post!

Thank you.

Replies: @Maniscowco

The United States (if that's what you mean) is not "my nation." I am one of those rootless cosmopolitans, though not Jewish. Catholic, actually, but unbelieving. Though certainly not a materialist, either. And I love ancient churches. Born American, so to speak, I presently live in France. The strong rip tides that ran through American and other Western societies, the whole world, really, after the postwar recovery and really took off from the early 1960s through to the late '70s, certainly had their Jewish element, disproportionate as always, but to reduce it all to such is to disqualify any already shaky argument you might have.

Replies: @Maniscowco

Thats why we have MAGA and phony nationalism, its an attempt to save the empire, or at least extract another big war out of it before its just a husk.
 

Replies: @Captain Jones

Your ignorance is showing yet again. The cultural upheaval of the 1960s was pro-tradition, not anti-tradition. Just think of the revival of traditional handicrafts that they ushered in. Or the revival of traditional musical forms. It is capitalist techno-progressivism, whether it is wearing a MAGA hat or waving a rainbow flag, that is anti-tradition and anti-art. You've been brainwashed by anti-communist propaganda. For all their other flaws, the few successful communist revolutions, such as Cuba and Russia (with the notable exception of the idiotic Maoists who tried to destroy great Chinese traditions as well as Western influences in China) cultivated the traditional arts: classical music, theatre, ballet, poetry, etc., and even touted the nuclear family as a fundamental unit for a stable, free society. You are confusing today's nihilistic identity-politics loonies with the romantic idealism of the 60s.

And if it makes you feel any better, today's pseudo-left wackos call me "right-wing" too, just because I love great art and literature and music and want to preserve it. They don't realize that they are the true reactionaries, trying to revive the dead myth of "progress."

Replies: @Maniscowco

Parvini recently told us that he doesn't have much patience with the topic. Check out his recent podcast where he launched his online Shakespeare course. Start listening around the 30 minute mark. "By the end of this course, if you are one of those people who think that really the plays were written by Edward de Vere or something, there's a lot of things that you're going to have to explain away."

https://shorturl.at/D3zTb

Then he goes on to talk about how de Vere died too soon to have written some of the plays, but has him passing in 1593, 11 years too early. And King Lear had to have been written in 1605 because it mentions an eclipse, and it was registered in 1606, and then was performed in court in front of King James. He's clearly unfamiliar with all the counter arguments which have literally been going on for centuries. (Some of the plays didn't even appear until after the man from Stratford had died.)

Later in the podcast, after Dr. Parvini had shifted topics multiple times, he admitted there was something he could never figure out. How it is that Shakespeare never got into trouble over the Essex Rebellion and the performance of Richard II? Hm...Well, if you happen to be "one of those people," you probably have a good answer for that.

Replies: @Maniscowco