RSSAnyone for some retro 70s-80s Moroccan Sufi pop? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k_cXrFtQyUw
[Intro]
The loved ones are gone, they’ve left — and behind them, strong tears.
Since the day they parted from us, they haven’t returned.
And I, oh Men of God, my heart is heavy, my state is troubled.
[Chorus]
Oh Men of God, oh Men of God,
Oh Men of God, oh Men of God,
Oh Men of God, when the time has come, when the turn has come,
When the turn has come — let the one with the key open the door.
We are but visitors, we are but visitors,
We are but visitors, we are but visitors.
We are visitors, asking for repentance, asking for repentance,
Asking for repentance — pray to God to reunite the beloved ones.
[Verse 1]
After the long absence, and the flowing tears from the eyes,
After the long absence, and the flowing tears from the eyes,
Let hearts be purified, and confusion fade — let’s forget.
Let hearts be purified, and confusion fade — let’s forget.
Let the crowd disperse, and let water return to its course.
Let the crowd disperse, and let water return to its course.
[Chorus]
Oh Men of God, oh Men of God,
Oh Men of God, oh Men of God,
Oh Men of God, when the time has come, when the turn has come,
When the turn has come — let the one with the key open the door.
We are but visitors, we are but visitors,
We are but visitors, we are but visitors.
We are visitors, asking for repentance, asking for repentance,
Asking for repentance — pray to God to reunite the beloved ones.
Benton? That's Benetton, FFS. Have you never heard of Benetton and their social issue advertising photography?
His name was Oliviero Toscani. He’s actually the guy who made the Benton campaign all over the world.
Sorry for the typos. I put this and similar pieces out quickly using Substack’s machine transcription, for people who prefer text to videos. But since this is basically a discussion of photography, the video is far more important than the text, so if you’re interested in this topic, please watch it.
Obligatory disclaimer: I’m not sure Mazzucco is right about the Apollo missions, but he argues well, is a bona fide expert on the photography issue, and strikes me as sensible and sincere (I’ve met him face to face). Since the only NASA person I know, retired flight research engineer Dwain Deets, has come around to Apollo moon walk skepticism, if not outright denial, the only experts I know personally are moon walk skeptics. And as a non-expert, I would say the skeptics seem to have stronger arguments overall. The most probable scenario—the government committed to putting a man on the moon by 1970, discovered they couldn’t do it without high probabilities of failure and death, and decided “it would be so much cheaper and easier and safer to just pretend”— seems pretty commonsensical.
But there are also some seemingly strong arguments on the other side. So I think it’s an interesting, debatable issue, and the people on both sides who call those on the other side idiots are themselves idiots.
Kevin I have a lot of respect for you, but you'll end up with egg on your face if you keep believing that (at least as it relates to this issue).
But there are also some seemingly strong arguments on the other side. So I think it’s an interesting, debatable issue, and the people on both sides who call those on the other side idiots are themselves idiots.
Of course not all of them are, I concede that.
BTW, I don't think I've been calling too many people in this thread 'idiots'.
The words I've employed are more along the lines of: LYING JEWISH C*NTS and SHABBOS GOYS.
To the extent that it [superficially] appears to export a lot (it is still the world's second largest exporting nation as I recall), this is due to the overpriced and underperforming WEAPONS OF DEATH that it intimidates its grovelling vassals into purchasing.
The U.S economy, stock and bond markets are a House of Cards that will soon enough come crashing down.
The U.S is a hollowed-out husk. It makes next to nothing that the rest of the world wants.
That's like saying Stephen King is a qualified document examiner.
is a bona fide expert on the photography issue
The claim at issue is that the astronauts were in a location where Mother Nature provides the lighting. Was he on the moon? Okay, he spoke clumsily. On the matter on which he's an expert.
"And I was a professional, at the top level. I was working for magazines all over the world. I was using actually the same cameras and film and lighting that supposedly were used in the Apollo missions."
Kind of hilarious that the author references an “outlandish claim” and in the very next sentence claims that “a lack of white identity politics has led to most major American cities being violently ethnically cleansed of whites.” Really? Not a white person left in any of them?!
The keepers of statistics seem to think that more than a third of the population of America’s 10 biggest cities is white, putting whites about even with hispanics, far ahead of blacks, and even farther ahead of asians.
Of the top ten US cities, only Philadelphia has more blacks than whites (40% to 38%).
Some “ethnic cleansing.”
It wasn’t age, it was stupidity. In 2017 I was badly out of practice. I had only bodysurfed once since the 1980s. So I stupidly jumped on the first big wave that came along without studying them first.
It’s like downhill skiing. Best to learn it when you’re young, and keep doing it, but more carefully, as you get older.
Josh Mitteldorf and Dorion Sagan, building on the work of Lynn Margolis, argue that evolution itself has created ethics to hold DNA (“the selfish gene”) in check. Sex and death grow out of that natural ethical imperative. https://www.unz.com/audio/kbarrett_josh-mitteldorf-aging-is-an-inside-job-our-bodies-are-rigged-for-controlled-demolition/
I’m in the area through the weekend. Feel free to email me at truthjihad at gmail.
Yeah I'm sure that happened. 10 to 1 no Jews were killed on Oct 7 either by 'Hamas' or by the Israelis. Its all BS.Replies: @Kevin Barrett
the Israeli military used helicopter gunships & tanks to slaughter most of the civilians who died that day
“Nobody died on October 7”?! That is pushing Cass Sunstein & Co.’s “nobody died” meme WAY too hard ; – )
Thanks, I’ve watched a few of those videos starting not long after we moved to Morocco ourselves in July 2023.
Islam (like Unitarian Christianity, Buddhism, Taoism, and Confucianism) is much easier to interpret sensibly than, say, Judaism, Trinitarianism, polytheistic Hinduism, paganism, freemasonry, or New Age flim-flam. But both good and bad interpretations of almost any religion are possible. It’s just that some require more interpretive effort than others.
Also, the traditional Islamic ways of praying (salaat, duaa, dhikr) and fasting are highly efficacious both at the individual/spiritual and collective levels.
As an ignorant fatAmerican, you have every right not to know that “Arab” and “Muslim” are completely different categories. For starters, the majority of Arabs in the US are Christian, not Muslim. And the vast majority of Muslims worldwide are not Arab.
But if you’re that ignorant, you really shouldn’t be spouting off in comments sections.
You claim to be a white guy who suffered discrimination from a Lebanese co-worker, but you sound more like Schlomo trying to earn $7000 (or whatever they pay in your Tel Aviv basement) by spouting bullshit i.e. the lastest hasbara talking point: “Zionists Push Islamophobia Because It’s Easier Than Getting People To Like Israel.”
I’m white and have had all kinds of interactions with all kinds of Arabs, both in mosques (where they knew I was Muslim) and elsewhere (where they usually didn’t). I’ve hung around rich Arabs and poor ones, in the US, France, the UK, Belgium, and the Netherlands. I’ve visited the supposedly worst Arab/”Muslim” ghettos in Europe, and played on a mostly Arab college basketball team in France before I had embraced Islam or learned Arabic. I currently live in an Arab country, Morocco. And I’ve known lots of white people who have lived in a long list of Arab countries. So I know that your claim that Arabs are anti-white racists is utter bullshit.
The truth, for better or worse, is that white privilege ain’t what it used to be in the USA, but it’s still doing fine in the Arab world. In the Gulf States, for example, there’s a racial hierarchy with whites at the top and Asian and African guest workers at the bottom.
A white person who visits an Arab country, and possesses a modicum of social skills, will likely experience tremendous hospitality and more respect than they probably deserve.
his claim, (I think) is that *some* Arabs can be anti-white racists, which has been my experience too.
So I know that your claim that Arabs are anti-white racists is utter bullshit.
Almost 20 years ago I did some reading on the Reichstag Fire controversy and wasn’t fully persuaded by either side. (David Ray Griffin sparked my interest by buying in to the MIHOP theory.) But any way you slice it, Hitler used the PR bonanza to seize emergency powers in accordance with the proto-neocon philosophy of Carl Schmitt.
iowBAD when Hitler proto-neocons do itPLUS-GOOD when post-9/11 Patriots seize emergency powers helpfully stored on Joe Lieberman's shelf.The Crooked Road to Gazayou are over-thinking yourself, Dr. Barrett.
But any way you slice it, Hitler used the PR bonanza to seize emergency powers in accordance with the proto-neocon philosophy of Carl Schmitt.
These authors and their schools of thought have not been completely forgotten. The Barnes Review and American Free Press carry on their legacy. I highly recommend subscribing to the print edition of the excellent biweekly newspaper American Free Press, which is the closest thing to “the Unz Review on dead trees”: https://americanfreepress.net/subscribe/
You’re right, Portnoy’s complaint was inevitable, since he was facing a Sophie’s choice.
Groucho’s exoteric message was “F*** the WASPS, immigrants are more fun.” But we know which immigrants the Marx Brothers were secretly championing. Chico’s bad Italian accent was obviously a crypto disguise. And Harpo feigned muteness so we wouldn’t notice his Yiddish accent.
Duck Soup is a comic masterpiece that depicts the Jewish takeover and ruination of the West, in the form of Groucho’s takeover and ruination of Fredonia. Trump, whose crassness and chutzpah and love of chaos is reminiscent of Groucho’s character Rufus T. Firefly, will likely drag the West into its last, losing war. So the West will end pretty much the way Duck Soup does. Get out the popcorn!
Well, the fact that the worst people in the world felt the need to do something as evil as 9/11 to launch a global war on Islam DOES amount to a prima facie case that the Muslims are the good guys. The Devil’s war is obviously against the angels and the saints, i.e. the people of God.
But I converted to Islam in early 1993, so I guess I was ahead of the curve.
UTC/GMT is coupled with the International Date Line (0 and 180 degree longitudes). The IDL (and thus UTC/GMT) is part of the signs of God. UTC/GMT is the only meaningful way of refering to World Time. The author's emotional plea to replace it with "UQT" makes no "temporal" sense.
All Muslims should carry this one step further by making Al-Quds Time “Universal Quds Time” (UQT) and using it as a universal temporal reference.
Whenever we communicate with people outside of our time zone, rather than using UTC (Universal Time Coordinated) which is just a euphemism for the old imperialist GMT (Greenwich Mean Time) we ought to use UQT.
Like the commenter who mistakenly thinks UTC’s fitness for scientific purposes makes it equally suited for social purposes, you are making a category mistake in thinking that longitude has anything to do with the way we use time for social purposes. So let’s get specific. Awareness of what time it is in some other time zone has both practical and symbolic dimensions. Practically, it allows us to coordinate activities, mainly communications (Zoom meetings, etc.) with people in different parts of the world. To do that, all parties need a common time zone reference. I propose that we always use Quds time. Example: “I’ll send you a Zoom link at 14:00 Quds time.” Once we start doing that, we will gradually develop the habit of always knowing what time it is Quds time.
That awareness packs a powerful symbolic punch. As Eliade among others noted, traditional religions and cosmologies feature an omphalos—a symbolic center of the world. By explicitly linking universal awareness of Quds Time to a socio-political project uniting people from all corners of the world, we will give that project a huge boost.
CQ CQ CQ, this is CN8ABC, Charlie November Eight Alpha Bravo Charlie, calling CQ and standing by in Saidia, where it’s 9:10 a.m. local time, 8:10 UTC, and 11:10 UQT!
UTC is not a euphemism for GMT. UTC is a time standard based on an ensemble of atomic clocks; GMT is a time standard based on Earth’s irregular rotation, calibrated to mean solar time at 0° longitude. UT1 (Universal Time) is GMT corrected for polar motion, and UTC is defined to be within 0.9 seconds of UT1; when the difference between UT1 and UTC is projected to exceed 0.9 seconds, a leap second is observed in UTC.
All Muslims should carry this one step further by making Al-Quds Time “Universal Quds Time” (UQT) and using it as a universal temporal reference.
Whenever we communicate with people outside of our time zone, rather than using UTC (Coordinated Universal Time) which is just a euphemism for the old imperialist GMT (Greenwich Mean Time) we ought to use UQT.
Good points about UTC, but I don’t think we need that much precision for most social, non-scientific purposes. So my Quds Time proposal stands.
And speaking of superfluous precision, I wonder if the previous commenter (#8) knows the precise date and time that the world will end in 2695 AD, preferably to the nanosecond ; – )
My comment was not on your Quds Time proposal as a whole, but only on the two points that I’d noted there: namely, that UQT is better suited as a global temporal reference than as a universal temporal reference, and that UTC is not a euphemism for GMT. (In both cases, precision was provided to show the “why” behind the two points.)
Good points about UTC, but I don’t think we need that much precision for most social, non-scientific purposes. So my Quds Time proposal stands.
So unlike JFK and Charlie Kirk, it seems that Churchill was happy to do whatever Jewish money told him to do, no matter how stupid or evil.
And how about the Churchill-Trump parallels? Both are unimpressive chauvinistic blowhards and luxury-loving bankruptcy-courting wastrels whose entire careers have been kept afloat by Jewish money. Both have taken huge sums from war-loving Jews and dutifully demonized the Jews’ enemy du jour (Hitler for Churchill, Iran and the Palestinian resistance for Trump). Both will ultimately be seen as responsible for the destruction of their nations’ empires due to the stupid and/or evil decisions they made to allow the Jews to push them into disastrous wars.
The whole planet is suffering a “spit baptism”: https://truthjihad.com/2025/10/14/christians-to-flock-to-israel-for-spit-baptisms/
Since a significant segment of the huge hispanic population in the US (especially the higher-IQ demographic) is disgusted with ham-fisted yanqui imperialism—epitomized by Trump’s ICE raids, war on Venezuelan fishermen, and looming oil robbery—this kind of scenario isn’t as far-fetched as it appears. Most of Latin America, and plenty of US hispanics, will overtly or covertly support Venezuela, Cuba, etc. in conflicts with the Mad Emperor.
I assume the US is already awash in Bolivarian agents. Cuba has long been notorious for sending fake defectors and “refugees” who are actually trained intel operatives. Among the “millions of Venezuelans who have fled their evil commie dictatorship and settled in LA and Miami” I wonder how many thousands are covert Bolivarians trained to unleash retaliatory mayhem if necessary.
“Academic gulags” is an apt metaphor, since the original gulags were created by 80%-Jewish Bolsheviks. Today’s university gulags are even more Jewish than the originals. One of the craziest guards at the gulag where I was incarcerated, I mean, where I taught—the University of Wisconsin-Madison—was a “commie activist” historian named Allen Ruff. He was part of a big Jewish contingent that infiltrated the pro-Palestine movement and tried to steer it into cranky extreme-left craziness that would alienate average Americans.
When I first encountered these folks in the 1990s they were working overtime to coerce pro-Palestine activists into staying away from the topic of Jewish domination of the US and its Mideast policy, and to enforce the Chomskyian line that Israel is just a small appendage of the evil US empire and always does the empire’s bidding and serves its interests—and by the way, never question the Kennedy assassinations! Then after 9/11 they became hysterical enemies of the “antisemitic” 9/11 truth movement, and terrorized the anti-Bush antiwar liberals into reflexively avoiding it.
Just seconds before I introduced David Ray Griffin at his nationally-televised “9/11 and American Empire” talk at the University of Wisconsin in April 2005, Allen Ruff approached me at the podium, leaned into my face and snarled “We’re keeping a file on you!” That was just one of many examples of the bizarre harassment I endured from the unappointed Jewish commissars of a major American public gulag, I mean, university.
'Replies: @Kevin Barrett, @24th Alabama
Morocco Bolsters Military with $120 Million Israeli Drone Deal, Expanding 1,000km Strike Range
1 September 2025
by SylvanusMorocco continues the modernization of its Royal Armed Forces. In this sense, it plans to acquire new Israeli drones capable of reaching targets up to 1,000 km.Morocco is interested in the Harpy and Harop suicide drones, produced by Israel Aerospace Industries (IAI). It is negotiating the purchase of 200 to 300 units of Harpy and Harop loitering munitions for an estimated amount of 120 million dollars, reports the Israeli press. These Israeli drones have an operational range varying between 500 and 1,000 km.
...
https://en.bladi.net/morocco-bolsters-military-120-million-israeli-drone-deal-expanding-000km-strike,116601.html
I hope, pray, and half expect that some of those drones will one day deposit nuclear warheads on you and your compatriots.
I hope that Morocco continues to purchase weapons, services, technology and whatever else they need from Israel and thereby continue to contribute to Israelis economy!
"I hope, pray, and half expect that some of those drones will one day deposit nuclear warheads on you and your compatriots."
Because he doesn’t have a Muslim name?
Leave it to this Muslim retard to come up with such an utterly moronic analogy.
As for the ZioJews, they are epitomized by such paragons of self-control as Harvey Weinstein, Bernie Madoff, and Jeffrey Epstein
Weinstein, Madoff, and Epstein have EVERYTHING to do with Jews running the country. Weinstein epitomizes sleazy Jews taking over and debasing the media, especially Hollywood. Running the media is the central pillar of their power. Madoff epitomizes the Jewish Ponzi schemers (fiat-issuing usurers) who took over Western banking, also a pillar of their power. And Epstein epitomizes the Mossad-linked blackmailers who have had the dirt on just about every American who matters since the days when J. Edgar Hoover had dirt on everyone and Meyer Lansky had dirt on Hoover.
Diana West has rebutted this, to my eye pretty effectively. Her website is unreachable right now (at least by me) but here's the first part of her takedown, thanks to Ilana Mercer:
...and Meyer Lansky had dirt on Hoover.
Comparing ZioJews ruling America to Brits ruling India is unfair to the Brits, who kept a stiff upper lip, projected self-control and super-competence, and generally succeeded in convincing Indians that they were a breed apart. Orwell succinctly describes the sham in “Shooting an Elephant,” but the gist of it is ubiquitous in colonial literature.
As for the ZioJews, they are epitomized by such paragons of self-control as Harvey Weinstein, Bernie Madoff, and Jeffrey Epstein. Netanyahu and his famously shrewish, greedy wife Sara, who may soon find themselves in prison for shakedowns and bribes, are even less convincing as avatars of temperance, self-discipline, and propriety.
Leave it to this Muslim retard to come up with such an utterly moronic analogy.
As for the ZioJews, they are epitomized by such paragons of self-control as Harvey Weinstein, Bernie Madoff, and Jeffrey Epstein
It’s probably the greatest novel ever written that can easily be interpreted and celebrated from a right-wing racialist perspective. Between that and its transgressive name, I’m surprised it isn’t every racialist’s favorite novel.
CIA asset Susan Lindauer says her CIA boss, Richard Fuisz, was on the phone with her during the morning of 9/11. He had told her in August that a big terror event was brewing and she should stay out of Manhattan.
As they watched the Towers blow up, killing thousands, Fuisz started screaming “the goddamn Israelis! The GODDAMN Israelis!”
That’s just one among many indications that the US deep state was complicit in setting up a false flag aimed at triggering the invasion of Afghanistan and enabling a crackdown on alleged loose WMD, but that Israel hijacked it (or perhaps ran it as the “red team” with US blessing and a standown) and made it vastly bigger and more murderous than US-loyal people had imagined.
David Friedman’s Red Mafiya describes how the Russian-Jewish mob (called “Russian” though more loyal to co-ethnics and Israel than Russia) muscled into the US in the 1990s. Trump’s circle, which had originally been Roy Cohn’s Lansky-linked network, expanded to include these “Russians,” whose headquarters was Trump Tower. Friedman paid with his life for writing that book.
You're letting your histrionics concerning Israel get in the way of writing intelligently, Barrett.
There is only one foreign country whose misdeeds are systematically downplayed in mainstream media. Does anyone remember when Israeli agents were caught red handed trying to blow up the Mexican parliament shortly after 9/11? I didn’t think so.
You’re right, for once. The network was created by “some criminal group.” Namely, Israel. That’s why the Secret Service blamed “nation state actors.” Israel is both a nation state (bad) actor and a criminal group.
It’s a good thing your military genius has been squandered on trolling my articles. If they’d appointed you Netanyahu’s National Security Advisor, instead of Barrett’s pet Zionist troll, Israel’s genocide attempt would have succeeded.
[lol] I am not "trolling". I am merely correcting your misstatements and attempts to foster misinformation on the hoi polloi here at TUR.
"It’s a good thing your military genius has been squandered on trolling my articles. If they’d appointed you Netanyahu’s National Security Advisor, instead of Barrett’s pet Zionist troll, Israel’s genocide attempt would have succeeded."
Netanyahu: ‘If we wanted to commit genocide, it would have taken exactly one afternoon’
By ToI Staff
11 August 2025, 11:45 am
Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu rejected the accusation that Israel is committing genocide in Gaza, telling Israeli reporters on Sunday night, “If we had wanted to commit genocide, it would have taken exactly one afternoon.”
...
https://www.timesofisrael.com/netanyahu-if-we-wanted-to-commit-genocide-it-would-have-taken-exactly-one-afternoon/
Let’s hope Turkey, Egypt, Qatar, and their regional collaborators are serious about holding the Zionists to their word and making sure Trump & Co. understand that if the deal blows up the region does too.
In the Jewish version of the story of Joseph, the hero is a parasitical profiteer. In the Qur’anic version, the hero is a paragon of moral and spiritual beauty. It’s a striking example, among so many others, of how the Qur’an revises Biblical stories so they are compatible with a God of truth, beauty, and justice. (As opposed to the sociopathic tribal idol “Yahweh.”)
Guyenot’s and the earlier 9/11 Missing Links are the two I know of that highlight “Israel did it.” As Ron wrote in this article, 9/11: The New Pearl Harbor is the most comprehensive.
Aside from those, here’s the shortlist I sent to Ron:
Earliest:
The Great Conspiracy (by Canadian mainstream journalist Barrie Zwicker) (2004 – expanded version of 2002’s The Great Deception)
Confronting the Evidence (produced by Jimmy Walter) (2004)
Welcome to Terrorland: Mohamed Atta and the Venice Flying Circus (Daniel Hopsicker, 2004)
Loose Change (2005) – went through several iterations, each with strengths and weaknesses
Most mainstream-friendly:
Zero (2005, featuring at least one European parliamentarian and other reputable figures)
9/11 Press for Truth (featuring the Jersey girls) (2006)
Demolitions-focused:
9/11 Mysteries (2006)
Improbable Collapse (2006)
AE911Truth films including Blueprint for Truth (2009) and Explosive Evidence (2011)
One great myth in American society is that Osama Bin Laden was responsible for the 9/11 terror attacks. No hard evidence was ever presented and the US Justice Department never indicted him for the attacks. A Kuwaiti was blamed for the 9/11 attacks and remains in prison without trial over 20 years later. Osama Bin Laden was quickly blamed for 9-11 to discourage investigations as to who was really responsible. Hard evidence later emerged that high level officials in the government of Saudi Arabia funded the 9/11 attacks. They were allied with Israel and the Bush family who openly discussed the need for a “Pearl Harbor event" to declare a war on terror and conquer seven Muslim nations in five years.
I’d discovered that immediately following the attacks, the supposed terrorist mastermind Osama bin Laden had publicly denied any involvement, even declaring that no good Muslim would have committed such deeds.
Not only was Bin Laden innocent, so were the 19 alleged hijackers. Arguably one of the weaknesses of Carlson’s series is that it begins by assuming their guilt, and never decisively overturns that assumption (though it presents plenty of evidence allowing the audience to draw the correct inference).
Good sources on the alleged hijackers include:
*Jay Kolar’s essay in Paul Zarembka’s book The Hidden History of 9/11.
*Elias Davidsson’s Hijacking America’s Mind on 9/11 and his essay “No evidence that Muslims hijacked planes on 9/11”: https://wikispooks.com/w/images/9/95/Noevidence.pdf
*Daniel Hopsicker’s book Welcome to Terrorland.
Ex- commercial pilot Dan Hanley has argued persuasively that remote-control hijackings, not human hijackers, diverted planes on 9/11. I’ve interviewed him several times, most recently here: https://kevinbarrett.substack.com/p/911-big-lie-truth-action-project
And that is why Islam must be kept out of the West, and censoring Islam is a valid tactic for the West, as is banning Islam altogether in the West. Contain Islam in the lands it has already destroyed.Replies: @Redpill Boomer, @Kevin Barrett, @meamjojo, @Same old same old, @Colin Wright
As a practicing Muslim, I support penalizing “alcohol violations.”
Wow, you are almost as obtusely humorless as ChatGPT! Are you sure you’re human?
Gonzalo escaped once, and almost escaped twice.
I recommend Andalusia: https://alandalustribune.com/spain-fleeing-trumps-america-arte-documentary/
What bunch of dumb a-hokes would fight a civil war other than Zionists versus everyone else ?
Ironically, the Arabic word for 'submission' is Islam.Replies: @※, @lloyd, @Akbar, @Kevin Barrett, @EliteCommInc.
... there’s no Arabic word for submit. They can’t wrap their head around submit …
Actually the word that moron Barrack is looking for is استسلم (istaslam) meaning “submit to, give up, surrender.” (Which reminds me of another moronic linguist, Ronald Reagan, once claiming the Russian language has no word for “freedom.”)
اسلم (the verb whose verbal noun is اسلام (Islam) means (1) accepting the religion of Islam, and/or (2) peacefully ecstatic self-submission to God.
It’s plain to everyone here in the MENA region, and to more and more people worldwide, that Israel is the Antichrist, and that any form of surrender or submission to demonic Zionism is permanently out of the question. The worse Israel behaves, the more intense and widespread that commitment becomes.
I wrote that Civil War I was “arguably” about slavery and that Lincoln and Lee were “arguably” heroic, which is more comprehensive and accurate than the various partial, partisan positions of the arguers.
Lincoln opposed the expansion of slavery which spelled doom for the institution, and the southern leaders knew it. Several of the Southern states openly stated that preserving slavery was a central reason for seceding. So Lincoln fought for “preserving the Union” in a form which threatened the South’s slave-based economy and doomed the institution of slavery. But even without the slavery issue, “preserving the Union” can be viewed as heroic, since it enabled the rise of the world’s greatest-ever power.
Likewise, Lee was an extraordinary man and a gifted military leader, and “preserving states’ rights” can be viewed as a heroic project.
So my point was that both sides can see heroism and tragedy in the first Civil War, whereas the current conflict is a farcical clash of evil clowns.
Sure, just as the Iraq War was fought to strip Saddam of his WMD.
The First American Civil War had an undeniably tragic dimension. It featured arguably great leaders like Abraham Lincoln and Robert E. Lee, and was fought for arguably noble causes: to end slavery on one side, to preserve states’ rights on the other. . .
Actually, they have more in common than you realize. As John Brown was hoodwinked into railing against the "evils" of slavery, so was Kirk fooled into advocating for Israel's brutish behavior in the Levant.
Though Kirk was no John Brown. . .
I don't know why the Mullahs or Iran's secular authorities would suddenly decide Islamic law had changed just because Netanyahu and Trump engaged in sneak attack bombing missions against them.
So the real reason Iran wasn’t building nukes was that it didn’t want them. But now, thanks to Netanyahu and Trump, it probably does.
Iran’s Islamic Republic features an intricate balance of power between religious authority (itself split into factions with all sorts of different views) and the democratic-republican political system. It all rests on the will of the people, who don’t just elect the political leaders, but also the Assembly of Experts that chooses the Supreme Leader. If the Iranian people decide they’ve had enough and need a nuclear deterrent, the leaders, both on the religious and secular sides, will likely come around, perhaps sooner rather than later.
There is no consensus in Islamic jurisprudence that nuclear weapons are inherently so sinful they must never be built under any circumstances, even though that’s what the extant rulings by the Supreme Leaders (Khomeini and Khamenei) assert. But those rulings could conceivably change if circumstances change enough.
I'm no authority on Islamic law but I've never seen any statement from any Iranian leader indicating any desire by Iran to obtain nuclear weapons. Conceivably, everybody might wake up next week and make peace if circumstances change enough.
There is no consensus in Islamic jurisprudence that nuclear weapons are inherently so sinful they must never be built under any circumstances, even though that’s what the extant rulings by the Supreme Leaders (Khomeini and Khamenei) assert. But those rulings could conceivably change if circumstances change enough.
Also, don’t forget that Meyer Lansky had blackmail material on J. Edgar Hoover which raised questions about who was really running the FBI. The top level of the FBI and other agencies, or part of it, may still be “captured.”
When I once jokingly accused Jonas of writing as though he were being paid by the word, he denied being paid by the word with great energy and seriousness. Like Bibi denying killing Charlie Kirk, Jonas doth protest too much. His too-serious denial made me wonder whether maybe he really is somehow making money off long-windedness, with the length of his articles fueling a crypto mining algorithm or something.
TUR occasionally offers extended length articles. Ron's tend to be long, but he also tends to recycle by way of reference to his past articles; if you've read those you can skip the repetition. Too, Ron is usually quite organized within his overall presentation.Then there is the Jung Freud persona. Rambling, really needing an editor to better combubulate (sic) his interminable prose.Anglin sometimes writes long, and it's clear he doesn't spend a lot of time proofreading. His prose is more like speech, than it is formal composition.Occasionally we have TUR 'articles' consisting of strung together YT videos or Twitter (X) Tweets, supposed to covey important and insightful information, but winding up less coherent (and certainly less funny) than Hour of Slack media barrages. I forget the name of the guy who does a lot of that, here, which shows you how much of an impression the guy makes. I guess you can call it post-literate multi-media journalism for the lazy.I think most people come to a site like TUR for the quick and easy. Also, to give their own opinion, for better or worse. From my perspective there is nothing wrong with long, if it is done well. However anyone attempting to write for others would do well to read a few Ezra Pound essays on concision in words. Not everyone can be a Henry James, which is actually a good thing when you think about it.
...I once jokingly accused Jonas of writing as though he were being paid by the word...
If this gets out of hand, Bibi will have to order Trump to issue a blanket pardon for all 9/11 perps.
Followed by another blanket pardon:
Trump Pardons Jews Who Killed Kirk, Christ https://truthjihad.com/2025/09/22/trump-pardons-jews-who-killed-kirk-christ/
Trump is some kind of clown. On that much all serious people can agree.
How dare you? He’s a war hero. He took a figurative bullet to the ear for his beloved country (you know which one).
Not only that, Rabbi Trump is the soul of modesty. He doesn't even wear his Purple Heart on his sleeve.
How dare you? He’s a war hero. He took a figurative bullet to the ear for his beloved country (you know which one).
In his book Either/Or, Danish philosopher Soren Kierkegaard writes about a clown who came out to tell the audience in a theater that there is a fire offstage. The audience thought it was a joke, and they applauded. When he told them again, they started laughing even harder. “This is the way, I suppose, that the world will be destroyed, amid the universal hilarity of wits and wags who think it is all a joke,” he concludes.
And cultural critic Mark Dery, after saying that America’s top two export items are military hardware and entertainment products, thus describes a variation of the idea: “Our world will end, if it does, not with a bang or a whimper but with the violin shrieks from Psycho, played for laughs.”

Like most people with a religious studies background I’m actually pretty tolerant and open to hearing other people’s interpretations of scriptures. I like E. Michael Jones’ interpretation of Catholicism, Tikhon’s interpretation of Orthodoxy, Douglas Rushkoff’s interpretation of Judaism, DT Suzuki’s interpretation of Buddhism, René Guenon’s interpretation of Hinduism, Jacob Needleman’s interpretations of perennialist traditionalism and kabbalah (which got me into religious studies in the first place) and many more.
But I don’t like OT-thumping Protestant literalism, including the almost unbelievably moronic rapture cult, nor do I like heretical Jewish messianic millenarianism (i.e. Zionism) with its fanatical devotion to bringing on a Jewish military conquerer messiah to rule the world—i.e. the Antichrist. Those two schools are really just two sides of the same coin, one for morons and the other for psychopaths.
won't make them go away. For whatwever reason, Americans are collectively losing their Christian faith and the society as a whole is not doing well. It is not difficult for many to draw the conclusion that falling in Christian faith is leading to social problems. This explains the rise of right wing evangelicals. Inevitably many of this groups are biblical literalists.
don’t like OT-thumping Protestant literalism
There are plenty of simplistic, boneheadedly literal, and/or just plain stupid interpretations of scripture out there. The rapturists’ “it will all end in an apocalyptic beam-me-up-Scotty science fiction show” is one of the stupidest.
Putting an armageddonite like Hegseth in charge of thousands of nuclear weapons is even stupider.
I mean if you couldn’t tell it was satire, you failed miserably bad ; – )
Google says: “As of mid-2024, an estimated 7.4 million Palestinians lived in historic Palestine, which encompasses Israel, the Gaza Strip, and the West Bank.” And: “There are approximately 7.2 million Jews in Israel.”
You’re right. There are only 7 million squatting Jews alongside 7.5 million Palestinians in historic Palestine, so the 15 million figure is too high, if we’re talking about the people who are causing the problem.
If the assassination was fake then Charlie Kirk played getting shot much better than Trump did in Butler.
I have heard rumors that several South African nukes that were supposed to be handed over to the UK for disposal disappeared, setting off a frantic wild goose chase. According to one version, the African embassy bombings attributed to Al-CIA-duh were a ruse to bring US security forces into the African locations suspected of harboring the bombs.
As it turned out, Israel stole the South African nukes, while feeding the CIA false leads suggesting that Iraq or Syria had them. This was apparently one of several loose-WMD scares ginned up by Israel in the late 90s to convince American security pros to go along with 9/11 in order to allow them to take off the gloves and effectively defuse the “WMD threat.” The Cheney Doctrine, according to which a 1% chance that al-Qaeda had nukes means we should assume that they actually had them and should respond accordingly (i.e. with total ruthlessness, destroying democratic institutions as well as al-Qaeda) was the outcome of all these late-90s Israeli-instigated bogus WMD scares.
This article assumes that Israel’s only gain from killing Kirk would be replacing him with someone better for Israel. But by “freezing” much of Kirk’s base in its current relatively pro-Israel position by making him a “pro-Israel martyr,” rather than allowing it to follow him to a Carlson/Owens position (in part by waking up to the 9/11 problem thanks to Carlson’s new series which would have been promoted by Kirk) Israel may have addressed an emergency situation, as Ron Unz has argued.
It’s important to keep in mind that this assassination may not have been mainly about replacing a troublesome leader, as the JFK hit was. Instead, it was mostly about stampeding the public and media in a certain direction via an enormous sacrificial PR stunt, like 9/11. By enabling harsher pro-Zionist authoritarianism in the US, Israel can hang on to its control of America despite losing public opinion in general and the youth in particular.
I strongly disagree with this. Kirk's base was already overrun with anti-Israel sentiment which is why he was platforming that in the first place. His death has led to everyone blaming Israel, not making him a pro-Israel martyr. Also, for reasons I discussed in the article, I very much doubt that he would ever have ended up explicitly anti-Israel like Owens and Carlson.Replies: @muh muh, @Liosnagcat
But by “freezing” much of Kirk’s base in its current relatively pro-Israel position by making him a “pro-Israel martyr,” rather than allowing it to follow him to a Carlson/Owens position
Kirk reached the Turning Point for his creators of being more valuable dead than alive
Excellent summary, with good points about the Tucker Carlson 9/11 series motive and the tranny shell casings SNAFU. I hope you’re right that this one is going to blow up in their genocidal faces.
I found an interesting paper on ResearchGate dated August 2024 by Dr. Piers Robinson. The information presented is not current nor exciting for hardened information warriors like yourself.
“But when that threatened to produce a mass awakening to the realities of who really killed the Kennedys, who really did 9/11, and who really rules the Western world, among other hot-button topics, our rulers decided to crack down.”
Piers Robinson is doing great work. I’ve interviewed him a couple of times: https://www.unz.com/audio/kbarrett_piers-robinson-on-engineered-catastrophes-propaganda-academic-unfreedom-and-more/ https://www.unz.com/audio/kbarrett_journalism-professor-piers-robinson-exposes-propagandistsinc/
No, I skipped the conference this year (and last). It’s a long way from Morocco.
From what I hear the bad news was Tucker Carlson canceling due to the Charlie Kirk shooting, and the best part was Dennis Kucinich gingerly pointing at Israel:
https://kucinichreport.substack.com/p/reflections-on-the-24th-anniversary
Unfair to Huns! Attila was a Hunny-bunny compared to the Zionists.
Interesting that you choose an article on an obscure counter-culture news website to complain about, instead of the repugnant zionists who chopped off Kirk’s head and mounted it to the hood of the bulldozer they’re using to crash the Bill of Rights.
Actually I expect that smart Christian readers will appreciate the satirically-expressed point: “Judeo-Christianity” i.e. Jewish-controlled fake Christianity is part of Operation Antichrist. The partisans of Antichrist killed the real Charlie Kirk because he was threatening to become a real Christian, and have used their control of the media to “resurrect” a simulacrum or false messiah that serves their interests.
https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/1ca74d205575f95c6de03b9c9434a4330757974a10581e38692e13f31cd261c7.pngReplies: @bike-anarkist, @QCIC
That’s an important point, Ron. But the wildly implausible hyper-professionalism might be a feature not a bug. It sends a message: “We can take out anyone, even if they’re well-protected, and do it with in-your-face obviousness and still get away with it.” So if the entire Trump Administration circle knows Israel did it, but is afraid to say so in public (much less declare long-overdue war on Israel) they apparently got the message.
Excellent piece, Ron, and thanks for highlighting Michael Tracy’s article, which I hadn’t seen.
I vaguely remember the 1983 “Russians shoot down Korean airliner” incident and the conspiracy theories swirling around it. What’s the best source? Maybe Ron should do an American Pravda piece on it?
Without going into the strengths and weaknesses of personality profiles, this subject, like some other subjects that have been debated, falls outside of Ron’s exceptional strengths. A wide perspective needs to transcend one’s definition of “credible sources”.
“I vaguely remember the 1983 “Russians shoot down Korean airliner” incident and the conspiracy theories swirling around it. What’s the best source? Maybe Ron should do an American Pravda piece on it?”
I agree. Kirk’s mass mediated martyrdom is distracting from a very bad week for Netanyahu – not just Yemeni anti-genocide attacks, but especially the botched bombing of Qatar. We will talk about this on False Flag Weekly News: https://truthjihad.com/2025/09/10/ffwn-israel-attacks-everybody-with-j-michael-springmann/
When Rush Limbaugh came to my little town in 1992 the first thing us property owners and towns people noticed is how well the perimeter was secured(property rights be damned, they crawled all over our buildings without permission). An establishment pundit is always watched.
Who ever shot Kirk was “allowed” to shoot him…
Charlie Kirk refused Netanyahu funding offer, was ‘frightened’ by pro-Israel forces before death, friend reveals https://thegrayzone.substack.com/p/charlie-kirk-refused-netanyahu-funding
Nothing you see on the Talmudvision is true, it’s all lies from start to finish. What really got me this week was orange MIGA pig’s pontification on political violence while he just authorized the airstrike on Quatar and blew some Venezuelan boat out the water and is funding the Gaza genocide which has killed at least 500,000 mostly woman and children.
Evidence now makes it perfectly clear the hit was FBI/Mossad and totally pro.
There were two people who gave hand signals right before Charlie was shot, and until they are arrested Robinson is just an AI fake with AI fake video produced by an AI faking FBI. I don't believe any of the story line;
UNTIL THE TWO MEN WHO GAVE HAND SIGNALS FOR ALL CLEAR ARE ARRESTED, the Mossad did this, and flew out of Provo airport on a private jet 20 minutes later.
I don't care what story line gets presented, we are being lied to for as long as the two men who gave the hand signals are not in custody.
ANOTHER KENNEDY. Lee Harvey Robinson.
My initial reaction is that the world champions in political assassinations, who also happen to be the party that gained the most from killing Kirk, probably did it. In other words, “round up the usual suspects.”
I’ll be elaborating on False Flag Weekly News tomorrow (Saturday): https://truthjihad.com/2025/09/10/ffwn-israel-attacks-everybody-with-j-michael-springmann/
Hi Kevin
Every year I aim to do something special for September 11th. This year however somebody else already went around spray painting ‘Israel did 9/11’ on public property. So instead of doing that, I decided to demonstrate my bravery by making a list. This mini nuke of a list I made, is all of the english language non fiction conspiracy book suggestions from over in your previous article titled: Vote Here for “Best Conspiracy Book Ever”
I will start by listing off books the goy must pay shekels for. After that, below a MORE tab the Goyim can find links to the rest of the books, available to read for free online and there’s a lot of them – a whole big darn intimidating lot of them. I really went full autist on this one guys and I’m pretty sure that I included every single english language non fiction book that was suggested by y’all up to the 100th comment.
Nearly all of Mike Palecek’s books: https://www.amazon.com/stores/author/B00I9D8V4M?ingress=0&visitId=484b9c2e-333c-44fe-8de7-a194f2f1fba8&ref_=ap_rdr&ccs_id=ede0c412-03ac-40bf-8fde-bcb02c156458
9/11 & American Empire: Christians, Jews, and Muslims Speak Out Vol. 2 – by various authors (2006)
Truth Jihad: My Epic Struggle Against the 9/11 Big Lie – by Kevin Barrett (2007)
Questioning the War on Terror: A Primer for Obama Voters – by Kevin Barrett (2010)
We Are NOT Charlie Hebdo!: Free Thinkers Question the French 9/11 – by various authors (2015)
ANOTHER French False Flag?: Bloody Tracks from Paris to San Bernardino – by various authors (2016)
Orlando False Flag: The Clash of Histories – by various authors (2016)
From Yahweh to Zion – by Laurent Guyenot (2018)
JFK-9/11: 50 Years of Deep State – by Laurent Guyenot (2021)
The Unspoken Kennedy Truth – by Laurent Guyenot (2021)
Illuminati 3: Satanic Possession – by Henry Makow (2014)
Illuminati 4: Genocide & War – by Henry Makow (2025)
The Jewish Revolutionary Spirit (2nd Edition) – by E. Michael Jones (2020)
https://www.fidelitypress.org/book-products/the-jewish-revolutionary-spirit
And now the free stuff section:
As regards obesity, while there certainly may be a genetic component, it seems to me that the huge increases in obesity in countries where the “Western diet” is eaten are well correlated with the adoption and worsening of that diet.
Gary Taubes has written often and persuasively about such examples as that of the Pima Indians who went, within a generation or two, from lean, fit, and healthy to obese and lethargic. The same story was repeated everywhere indigenous people were forced to give up their traditional diets in favour of “Western” industrial “food-like substances” such as white bread and sugar. Dr Weston A. Price came to very similar conclusions in his magnificent magnum opus, “Nutrition and Physical Degeneration”.
“. . . So he needs to distract people. So what is he doing? He’s murdering people on Venezuelan boats, just randomly having his military murder ordinary people on boats, claiming that maybe they were drug traffickers. . . . ”
They don’t even have to be alleged drug traffickers. They don’t even have to be in international waters.
Unarmed defenseless shellfish divers will do, even when diving right offshore, and obviously in their own territorial waters.
How a Top Secret SEAL Team 6 Mission Into North Korea Fell Apart
NYT – Sept. 5, 2025
https://archive.ph/bt2MU“The 2019 operation, greenlit by President Trump, sought a strategic edge. It left unarmed North Koreans dead.”
A group of Navy SEALs emerged from the ink-black ocean on a winter night in early 2019 and crept to a rocky shore in North Korea. They were on a top secret mission so complex and consequential that everything had to go exactly right.
The objective was to plant an electronic device that would let the United States intercept the communications of North Korea’s reclusive leader, Kim Jong-un, amid high-level nuclear talks with President Trump.The mission had the potential to provide the United States with a stream of valuable intelligence. But it meant putting American commandos on North Korean soil — a move that, if detected, not only could sink negotiations but also could lead to a hostage crisis or an escalating conflict with a nuclear-armed foe.
It was so risky that it required the president’s direct approval.
For the operation, the military chose SEAL Team 6’s Red Squadron — the same unit that killed Osama bin Laden. The SEALs rehearsed for months, aware that every move needed to be perfect. But when they reached what they thought was a deserted shore that night, wearing black wet suits and night-vision goggles, the mission swiftly unraveled.
A North Korean boat appeared out of the dark. Flashlights from the bow swept over the water. Fearing that they had been spotted, the SEALs opened fire. Within seconds, everyone on the North Korean boat was dead.
The SEALs retreated into the sea without planting the listening device.
. . . .The military operation on North Korean soil, close to American military bases in South Korea and the Pacific region, also risked setting off a broader conflict with a hostile, nuclear-armed and highly militarized adversary.
. . . .the SEALs — all gripping untraceable weapons loaded with untraceable ammunition
. . . .The shore team swam to the boat to make sure that all of the North Koreans were dead. They found no guns or uniforms. Evidence suggested that the crew, which people briefed on the mission said numbered two or three people, had been civilians diving for shellfish. All were dead, including the man in the water.
Officials familiar with the mission said the SEALs pulled the bodies into the water to hide them from the North Korean authorities. One added that the SEALs punctured the boat crew’s lungs with knives to make sure their bodies would sink.
This 2019 stunt ordered by Trump:
1) Was a blatant act of war.
2) Risked everything and accomplished nothing. Real life is not a Hollywood action movie.
3) Murdered innocent, defenseless shellfish divers trying to eke out a living and feed their families.
4) Made it impossible for the grieving widows and orphans related to the murder victims to recover the bodies of their loved ones and provide them with a proper burial (“the SEALs punctured the boat crew’s lungs with knives to make sure their bodies would sink“).
5) Was a juvenile exercise in Trump’s vanity, a character flaw that is only exceeded by his transparently phony duplicity.
A bald Trump ala Kurtz would be appropriate.
I’m traveling across northern Morocco and talking to people, often at the pro-Palestine demonstrations I keep stumbling on. Moroccans can’t figure out why the US, which they’ve traditionally viewed very positively, is engaging in such self-destructive and evil behavior.
It's amazing how in the modern internet age that peasants in 3rd world countries like Morocco feel that their they are entitled to have an opinion on something that is so far out of their ability to understand or influence!
"I’m traveling across northern Morocco and talking to people, often at the pro-Palestine demonstrations I keep stumbling on. Moroccans can’t figure out why the US, which they’ve traditionally viewed very positively, is engaging in such self-destructive and evil behavior. "
Do you suggest that the veracity of the accusers is to be accepted without question? If you do, then I'd hate to have you sitting on my jury, were ever accused of a crime.
A (not so?) surprising number of individuals seem intent on questioning the veracity of the accusers.
Are you surprised?
... you have far more than one accuser ...
True enough.
Sorry, Trumpanzees… None of this would be an issue but for Trump’s 180 on the Epstein files.
You “lack an explanation for Donald Trump’s recent behavior regarding the Epstein files.” Here’s the best explanation/alibi yet: Heroic Donald Trump confirms he was only at Epstein Island to save the girls
Conspiracy theories can be rated on the basis of: (1) How important would this be if it were true? (2) How likely is it to be true? 9/11 is ultra-important (say 9.8 on a scale of 10) and obviously true (9.9+ on a scale of ten). Multiply the two numbers. Result: 9/11 is high up the 100 point scale of conspiracy theories.
Another way to rate them is to multiply “How completely crazy does this sound?” by “How likely is it to be true anyway?” That yields a rating reflecting entertainment value rather than importance. Dr. Mary’s Monkey lays out one of the craziest-sounding conspiracy theories (completely hairless pedophile CIA pilot and defrocked priest involved in weaponized-virus research around huge vaccine-cancer-virus coverup helps kill the president in his spare time then gets whacked himself) that is likely true, even though Hollywood would turn that scenario down as “way too weird.”
Good as it is, I like mine better.The axis turns on (1) Does the theory deal with air or water, or (2) transient events, air and water will determine the results.Example of one: US history begins with the Founding Financiers, the Whiskey War, and the movement of money. As in: England was too exposed, it was time to move air and water (money and bullion) to the next place, the way London was chosen after Amsterdam crapped out.The Whiskey War proved the US could dictate money policy within its borders. As a consequence, it was allowed to clean up the Barbary Pirates by itself. But the US armed forces were still tyros, and they had only a limited hand in the Napoleonic War -- even if some hot-headed Westerners wanted a bigger war, the Brits and French vetoed it.The evidence shows that our (1), finance, is destroying our ability to do anything about (2), and it is probable that by the mid-2030s, a decade from now, China will have the responsibilities that the US had from 1945 to about now. Biden's pulling the plug on the Afghan War was the big turning point. No power, not even a declining one, would allow that mess to happen.As far as money goes... the US may have a few cards to play, but only if it rejoins the British Commonwealth and advocates for Greater Britain. A reconstituted British Empire would change the situation remarkably. It's why I recommend Gary Stevenson even when he sounds leftist and pedantic. He's right: The wealthy threw the empire away; the empire can only be restored by taxing those layabouts into penury, if needs be.
Conspiracy theories can be rated on the basis of: (1) How important would this be if it were true? (2) How likely is it to be true?
I agree with various commenters that that the Illuminatus trilogy, Pynchon, Huxley, Orwell, and the Protocols (Balzac?) are contenders in the fiction category. I would add Philip K. Dick to that list. Maybe at the top. And after looking over the nonfiction nominees, many of which are excellent, I have to agree with the comment about Ron Unz owning the field, since nobody else has offered so many coherent, well-sourced arguments on such a broad array of conspiracy issues…or even come close.
If Ron Unz’s American Pravda series, or David Ray Griffin’s 9/11 series, were considered one book, they would obviously be in the running. – The essay
Ron Unz’s collective series would be far north of “in the running.” In fact, this would be an instance of the rare “ranking” phenomenon in which the first tier has but one occupant. Roger Ebert. Tom Brady.
Well, I'd rather he himself expound upon this, but unequivocal independence from corporations/businesses I'd rather boycott still isn't quite possible at this juncture.To cite but one example... Name a processor manufacturer that doesn't work in some capacity in Israel. Intel, AMD, NVidia... the lot of them are there.Now, are you going to stop using your computer?
Okay, but I would posit that it’s only making him dependent upon known Jewish supremacist Zionists, and that can never be a good thing.
That's rather beside the point.Everyone's situation is unique and the circumstances of your own personal life are never going to mirror those of other folks, including Kevin.If that's his means of livelihood (which it certainly appears to be), and, if PayPal is the sole processor by which he's able to earn income, he may not have much of a choice.
Also, for what it’s worth, insofar as truth-tellers depend upon people sending donations, I myself have managed to live humbly and within my modest means for many years now, which means I can spend a lot of time telling the harsh truths, (millions of words of them, in fact), without the necessity of one penny in donations to do so.
Not at all, but this isn't a good analogy.Sometimes, one has to think in terms of what's available, not what one wants. Frankly, I'm surprised you don't get this.
Would you take money from AIPAC, if you decided to run for office, or for any other reason?
Perhaps it has to do with Kevin being overseas, making PayPal a necessary option.Don't know, not sure. I'd let him explain if he's at liberty to do so.Replies: @Rurik, @Kevin Barrett
I notice CAIR does not use Paypal.
I started with Paypal 20 years ago. I didn’t know it was Zionist then. In any case, the whole monetary system is Zionist, so using the Federal Reserve dollar isn’t much better than using Paypal or any other aspect of it. Just as a military resistance group might have to use ziodollars to buy weapons, those of us waging a truth jihad may need to use them to buy communications tools for the infowar. (And food and shelter…)
this is an excellent article and covers the subject nicely. i’ve been a big fan of venezuela since the early days of chavez and the bolivarian revolution. chavez saw himself as a reincarnation of the great liberator, who drove the spanish out of six countries in the early 19th century. whether he was the direct reincarnation or not matters little, because he was driven by this belief and will be remembered with the same reverence held for bolivar.
maduro was hand picked by chavez and comes from humble beginnings, being a bus driver before rising to political power and accepting the mantle bestowed upon him by el comandante. i think he has done an admirable job considering all the illegal sanctions, color revolutions and outright assassination attempts to overthrow his government.
the venezuelans you will meet in this country are not representative of the venezuelan people in general, they are much like the miami mafia of cuban expats, either monied scum or drug gangs run out of the country. all the u.s. attempts to destroy their economy and starve their people, in order to foment a political uprising, are doomed to failure, due to the intelligence and strength of the venezuelan people.
they know who to blame for their misfortune and that finger is pointed squarely at the yankee dogs that steal their wealth and attempt to impose upon them idiot puppet leaders like juan guaido. the last time that dog dare set foot in the country he was almost ripped to pieces by angry crowds.
the days of gunboat diplomacy are long gone, with the advent of hypersonic missiles, as demonstrate by the houthis, running the u.s. carrier groups out of the red sea. venezuela has a lot of the same friends as the houthis, who knows what kind of anti-ship missiles they possess. the chinese want to help them in developing the ability to process the heavy crude reserves, which at 303 billion barrels is the largest in the world. it is only the underhanded tactics, illegal sanctions and embargos of the western zog world, that venezuela ranks only 21st on the list of largest producers.
a russian nuclear sub had a port call in venezuela a few months back, they have some very powerful friends in very high places, in this new rising world order. if not for the duplicitous actions of lula in brazil, they would be joining brics. maybe now that lula has been hit with trumps ridiculous tariffs he might change his toady ways, as the toady modi has now had a moment of enlightenment, after being hit with 50% tariffs.
the sun has now gone down the the anglozog empire, as it rises in the new emerging brics world. venezuela deserves a place of honor at the brics table, having fought this revolution longer than any other brics nation, other than iran. iran is also helping the venezuelan people in their struggle to free themselves from these parasites that have done so much harm to the venezuelan people and economy.
maduro has just mobilize a citizen defense force of 4 to 5 million men, donald trump should tred lightly before attempting to enter venezuela as it is not panama, just as iran wasn’t iraq. the days of the bully pulpit and the big stick, are as dead as the days of the gunboat. sorry teddy bear trump, your rough riders aren’t rough enough to handle the bolivarian revolutionaries.
Both in its position vis-a-vis Christianity, and in the culture it has created, Islam bears some striking similarities to Mormonism. Founded on the outskirts of the original civilization, a new prophet and a new text, the cultivation of a virtuous community life...
Islam seems like another Gospel.
I don’t see how Mormonism corrects defects in previous scriptures and interpretations to bring monotheism back into line with perennial wisdom—which is what Islam does, by insisting on the truth of unitarianism over trinitarianism/polytheism, universalism over tribalism, multiconfessional tolerance over my-way-or-the-highwayism, and rigorous universal morality and ethics over get-out-of-jail-free cards like “state that you accept our belief system and all your sins will be forgiven” or “the god of our tribe actually favors immoral scumbags who swindle their older brother, commit genocide, etc..”
I did make a point of saying Islam and Mormonism weren't the same. I'm merely pointing out that if one could somehow put all this on a graph, in some respects the two faiths are in the same quadrant.
'I don’t see how Mormonism...'
The Jews ARE the mob. Meyer Lansky was the mob’s banker, meaning he owned it, and he and his people built Las Vegas after Fidel kicked them out of Cuba. The Italians etc. are the next level down.
For details, read Michael Colins Piper, or start with https://www.unz.com/runz/american-pravda-the-power-of-organized-crime/ .
There's a bit more to it that that; the Jewish Mob wasn't only kicked out of Cuba, they were kicked out of "Sin City," just across the river from Cincinnati, in Kentucky. And there's more to Meyer Lansky "owning" the Mob. According to E Michael Jones, Meyer Lansky along with David Ben Grunion conspired to murder JFK in Dallas.
The Jews ARE the mob. Meyer Lansky was the mob’s banker, meaning he owned it, and he and his people built Las Vegas after Fidel kicked them out of Cuba.
There is little difference. And they both come from the same place :
The Jews ARE the mob. Meyer Lansky was the mob’s banker, meaning he owned it, and he and his people built Las Vegas after Fidel kicked them out of Cuba. The Italians etc. are the next level down.
The comparisons suggested the Ashkenazi circa 1350 had a mix of ancestry resembling populations from southern Italy or Sicily today, with components found in modern Eastern Europe and the Middle East mixed in. “That fits the historical data,” says Krishna Veeramah, a geneticist at Stony Brook University who was not involved in the work.https://www.science.org/content/article/meeting-ancestors-history-ashkenazi-jews-revealed-medieval-dnawe show that traces of genetic flows occurred in the island, due to ancient Greek colonization and to northern African contributions, are still visible on the basis of the distribution of some lineages. The genetic contribution of Greek chromosomes to the Sicilian gene pool is estimated to be about 37% whereas the contribution of North African populations is estimated to be around 6%.https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2985948/As Sardinia, also Sicily was an important Punic trading post, especially on the western coast. Despite the paucity of samples from this area, the presence of Northern African ancestry on the island could be tentatively reconducted to the Iron Age (or at least Antiquity), because, although absent in previous time layers, it’s present in modern Sicilians.https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8460580/The island of Sicily had a sizeable Jewish population in late antiquity, as indicated by epitaphs, tomb decorations and other finds that are the widest-ranging from all of Italy besides Rome.https://brill.com/display/title/18801Sicilians, Maltese, and Ashkenazi Jews have EEF estimates of >100% consistent with their having more Near Eastern ancestry than can be explained via EEF admixture. They also cannot be jointly fit with other Europeans, and they fall in the gap between European and Near Easterners.Early European Farmers (EEF),https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4170574/In the second of these papers, Behar et al. (2013) also undertook an IBD analysis of genomic data from Jews and other Western Eurasian regional populations. After subjecting these data to spatial ancestry and admixture analyses, they observed that “Ashkenazi Jews show significant IBD sharing only with Eastern Europeans, North African Jews and Sephardi Jews” (as well as Cypriots and Sicilians), and only minimally with Middle Eastern populations, with Ashkenazi Jews having a strong genetic affinity with Sephardic Jews (Behar et al. 2013:29). Similarly, in the principal component analysis (PCA), Ashkenazi Jewish individuals formed a relatively tight cluster with Jews from Italy, the Middle East, North Africa, and Spain. However, this cluster was also positioned near several non-Jewish populations (i.e., Armenians, Cypriots, Druze, Greeks, and Sicilians) that were characterized as “Middle Eastern” (Behar et al. 2013).Although these findings suggest a common ancestry for Ashkenazi, North African, and Sephardi Jews, the analysis also revealed support for an Italian source in the autosomal single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) analysis, thus suggesting a southern European origin. Furthermore, the assertion that “most lineages in the Ashkenazi Jewish population along the male and female lines trace primarily to the Levant” (Behar et al. 2013:8) is difficult to sustain when the Ashkenazi population clusters in equidistance from European (Cypriot, Greek, and Sicilian, Tuscan, and Abruzzian Italian) populations and only a single Levantine population (Druze), whose geographic origin is extremely complicated (Shlush et al. 2008). In fact, rather than demonstrating a strictly Levantine origin for contemporary Ashkenazi and Sephardi Jews, the Behar et al. (2013) study suggested a more diffuse, circum-Mediterranean origin for them.https://www.researchgate.net/publication/332958595_The_Geography_of_Jewish_Ethnogenesishttps://pbs.twimg.com/media/GmQ1cJPasAAOWgY?format=jpgReplies: @Himera
Not all of these shared haplogroups necessarily have common non-Jewish ancestors from Italy because many Sicilians from the Palermo region in the northwest, the Siracusa region in the southeast, and the province of Agrigento in the southwest descend from Sicilian Jews and Sephardic Jews who were forced to convert to Roman Catholicism in the 1490s. There had also been ancient Phoenician settlers in Sicily who were genetically similar to the Israelites.
Good points, Hua. Stupid presidents are one thing, stupid National Security Advisors are quite another. The Chinese establishment, which has been methodically selecting for smart leadership for millennia, must look at the US and wonder: If you’re so rich, why aren’t you smart?
Major correction: Zbigniew Brzezinski was neither Jewish nor Zionist. He was from a Polish Catholic background. He was the eminence grise of the realist faction that pushed back against the neocons after they did 9/11, forcing them to postpone their attack on Iran two whole decades. And though he mouthed pro-Israeli platitudes to avoid defenestration, he was disgusted by America’s subservience to Israel in general, and the 9/11 wars-for-Israel in particular. I am told he was a closet 9/11 truther. When I invited him on my podcast I got a respectful reply from his secretary hinting that he wouldn’t be averse and that such a thing might be possible in the future—a very different response than I was accustomed to from people in that world.
Minor correction: If Brzezinski were still around, I’m not sure he would be all that much better than Mearsheimer, though he would probably lean towards stupid bellicosity vs. Russia rather than China. Then again, his bellicosity may have been les stupid than Mearsheimer’s, since he knew the US would have to step down from its hegemonic perch by the 2030s at the latest.
And yet somehow, the Janissaries decayed when those castrated Christians insisted that their children be allowed to enroll as Janissaries as well.
'That sounds like a lie to me although Christians were taken prisoner and castrated by the Ottomans. '
Reading about Ottoman castrations triggers the pearl-clutching reflexes of the people Linh Dinh calls Angry White Pussies (AWPs). They are looking for someone to blame for their own lack of balls. If they wanted to be men and save their civilization they would rebuild a religious, patriarchal culture and start having more children, rather than projecting their own inadequacies on other, less-decadent civilizations.
They also overlook the detail that the original and perhaps most pious Christian civilization, Byzantium, was very much into castration. It was actually a route to power; great families often actually used to have one son castrated so that they would have a voice in the domestic life of the palace. Then the famous general Narses was a eunuch.
'Reading about Ottoman castrations triggers the pearl-clutching reflexes of the people Linh Dinh calls Angry White Pussies (AWPs). They are looking for someone to blame for their own lack of balls...'
You definitely need to finish reading the Quran. There are criticisms to be made of Islam, but when it comes to mandating tolerance, it's the hands-down winner in the Abrahamic Religion Division, no question.Okay, it is a weak division, but that's the way it is. Jewish and Christian minorities have survived in Islamic societies since Islam was founded: what's the record in Christian societies, Jewish societies?For Christian, I get Poland at about six hundred years; the average would be more like three hundred. Jewish? Well, Israel's less than eighty years old, and she's made remarkable progress.Replies: @Tennessee Jed, @Kevin Barrett
In my readings of the Koran, it appears brotherly love is only extended to fellow Muslims. It’s an either join us or expect no mercy philosophy...
Throughout history Christians have sought refuge from persecution by other Christians by fleeing to Muslim-ruled lands, or in some cases by helping Muslims conquer their oppressors and establish more just rule that respects the rights of all sects. The latter happened in the initial conquests of the Byzantines and Visigoths. The former was a common occurrence throughout the history of the Ottoman Empire, which, as even the arch-Zionist Islamophobe Bernard Lewis admits, welcomed large numbers of Christian and Jewish refugees from sectarian persecution throughout its history. (The Ottomans, as it turned out, were too nice to the Jews, but that’s another story…)
For information on Islam’s brotherly love of Christians, check out: https://covenantsoftheprophet.org
That sounds like a lie to me although Christians were taken prisoner and castrated by the Ottomans. The truth is that many went back home because they were getting too fat on all the milk and dates and the constant sex with unicorns quickly becomes just another chore.Replies: @Colin Wright, @Colin Wright
Throughout history Christians have sought refuge from persecution by other Christians by fleeing to Muslim-ruled lands
They would also convert -- particularly if they were members of a persecuted sect. This appears to be the origin of many of the Muslims of both Bosnia and Palestine. The Bosnian Muslim converts were drawn from a heretical Christian sect, while many of Palestines Muslims appear to have been Jews who converted when the Muslims 'opened the books' in the 8th/9th century.
Throughout history Christians have sought refuge from persecution by other Christians by fleeing to Muslim-ruled lands, or in some cases by helping Muslims conquer their oppressors and establish more just rule that respects the rights of all sects.
Partially true -- but at least in the case of the Byzantines, conversion got marauding Turks off your ass. You see, the Turk version of Islam held that it was right out to despoil Muslim villages -- but Christian ones were fair game for any party of young bucks out for fun and profit.
The latter happened in the initial conquests of the Byzantines and Visigoths.
Finally, on the subject of the Muslim conquest of the the Visigoths, a couple of thoughts occurred to me.
'...The latter happened in the initial conquests of the Byzantines and Visigoths.'
Thank you for alerting me. I’m in my mid-60s with less than perfect hearing (thanks to punk rock debauchery in my pre-Islamic youth) but can hear and understand Alexander fine throughout most of the video. I subtitled the part where he loses the mic. But I know many people have issues with accents. So I will try to make a transcript ASAP and leave a comment here with a link.
Other than those two Dr Barrett mentions, there are quite a few other reasons that are as least as obvious.
Let’s quickly summarize the reasons for strongly suspecting that there wouldn’t have been human hijackers on 9/11. The two obvious ones to me are ....
UR readers can click on to the link below, which will redirect them to a comment I posted last month about the plane that did impact with the Pentagon on 9/11:
But, the American Airlines employee who checked in the First Class passengers said she DID NOT RECOLLECT SEEING A SINGLE ARAB MALE among them.
Good points. I recommend Elias Davidsson’s work. Here is a good, free place to start: https://www.opednews.com/populum/page.php?f=There-is-no-evidence-that-by-Elias-Davidsson-100811-366.html
Dr Kevin Barrett writes:
Let’s quickly summarize the reasons for strongly suspecting that there wouldn’t have been human hijackers on 9/11. The two obvious ones to me are ….
Other than those two Dr Barrett mentions, there are quite a few other reasons that are as least as obvious.
Take for example the few minutes of the following video (watch from 1:16:30-1;20:20):

Simply put, there is NO PROOF that a single one of those 19 alleged Arab hijackers boarded ANY of those four planes that allegedly crashed on 9/11.
In addition, the aircraft that was alleged to have struck the Pentagon (AA77 – a Boeing 757), had a much smaller than usual complement of passengers that day – about 58 or so, of which a much smaller subset where in First Class.
Well, three of the four Arabs that allegedly hijacked AA77 were seated in First Class (according to the 9/11 Commission Report).
But, the American Airlines employee who checked in the First Class passengers said she DID NOT RECOLLECT SEEING A SINGLE ARAB MALE among them.
UR readers can click on to the link below, which will redirect them to a comment I posted last month about the plane that did impact with the Pentagon on 9/11:
https://www.unz.com/runz/american-pravda-franklin-roosevelt-the-great-depression-and-the-new-deal/?showcomments#comment-7232538
Thank you, that explains why the world is on the brink of catastrophic global Jewing. https://truthjihad.com/2025/04/26/ippccc-world-on-the-brink-of-catastrophic-global-jewing/
You say “Why would anyone need Jesus and salvation unless the OT was true?” I’m not sure what that means. Given that the NT has such a diametrically opposed message to much of the OT, it would make more sense to say “Jesus came to expose and correct the falseness of (much of) the OT.”
Regarding theodicy, I refer you to my first-ever Unz essay: https://www.unz.com/kbarrett/god-exists-the-rest-is-speculation/ Short version: It strikes me as hilariously presumptuous to insist that the universe(s) would be better if the Creator had deprived them of free will by forcing them to be good.
You theocrats deny non-believers the right to doubt you, when you are dominant. So far, you're Mr. Nice Guy, but so far, your beliefs are not dominant.
Regarding theodicy, I refer you to my first-ever Unz essay:
https://www.unz.com/kbarrett/god-exists-the-rest-is-speculation/
If you watch enough of John Elmer’s Electronic Intifada coverage of the Gaza fighting, you will probably come to believe that Hamas builds a lot of its own weaponry on site. You will also see that their weaponry is relatively simple and low tech: little is more sophisticated than Yassin 105 tandem RPGs, Al Ghoul sniper rifles and various home made mortar shells and mortar rocketry.
But in this article, Sheikh Imran Hosein claims that Saudi Arabia was somehow funneling more advanced war materials to Hamas in Gaza before October 7th, 2023. Why didn’t they funnel in something better than those stupid RPG blunderbusses? And why didn’t Hamas ever learn how to hold their cameras straight?
But I do wonder how Hamas still has anything left to fight with, if in fact Israel has been strictly regulating the supply of incoming supplies to Gaza. I mean, Israel can keep food, water and medicine out, but somehow Hamas still has enough RPGs to disable Merkavas and Caterpillar D-9s every week of the year. How is that happening?
And did Hamas really stockpile that much stuff in advance? Did Hamas really know this genocidal violence would continue for this long? And if they did, how could Hamas also think their hostage taking strategy would actually work?
Sheikh Hosein also comments that the Hamas leadership has peanuts for brains. And yet, you hear the testimony from American doctors who’ve visited Gaza that many of Gaza’s doctors are highly competent, even brilliant. I guess the doctors are not involved with Hamas decision making?
It seems clear that Israel, from the start, wanted to simply eliminate the population of Gaza, either by forced expulsion, or by mass murder (or some of both — whatever works), because the losses to Israeli forces are excessive if the only goal is “defeating Hamas.”
Israel must have known that the concept of “defeating Hamas” was illogical, nonsensical and totally meaningless since there are so many Palestinians who will violently resist Israel’s illegal occupation no matter the government in charge. Israel must have know it would need to kill all of the male population between the ages 8 and 80 to pacify the place. So it’s not hard to believe that October 7th was a false flag operation which would be magnified and distorted in order to justify this mass slaughter in the eyes of the world.
And yet said justification does not appear to be working. The world still blames Israel for the mess. There’s basically no solidarity with Israel outside American Jews and the lunatics in the American Christian Zionist community, like Mike Huckabee.
Saudi Arabia has announced that it won’t have normalized relations with Israel until there’s a Palestinian state. Iran was able to blow up part of Tel Aviv and keep its nuclear program alive. American voters are tired of Israel’s murderous nature and its constant parasitism. Gaza is blown to shit and people are starving. And no country wants to take in the remaining Palestinians.
It seems that almost everyone’s evil plans have failed to play out well. The whole situation is just a mess for everyone right now.
Good point. So maybe we won’t know for sure until the original manuscript in Balzac’s hand gets accidentally sold to some literature buff at a Shriners’ garage sale.
Speaking of gender…
Nazi Pseudo-Tranny Takes German Women’s Prison By Storm! https://www.rt.com/news/623373-neonazi-germany-gender-change-prison/
This article makes a good prima facie case. Balzac’s cynicism (some would say realism) about wealth and power in general, and Jewish use of it in particular, jibes with the spirit of the Protocols.
When I was studying literature 30 years ago I encountered claims that stylometry could positively identify authors of texts based on word use frequency and other factors. I wonder what cyber-enhanced stylometry could tell us about a comparison of Balzac’s vast output with the Protocols.
These exposes of how much of a pathetic slave of Zion the “Land of the Free” is are important. Keep it up, Kevin.
Everyone agrees that Kevin Barrett is some sort of religious idiot, and able to ignore anything that he chooses .... e.g. https://i.ibb.co/mtKb9ZD/1-Deuteronomy-20-16.jpgThe Bible (OT) discusses mass murder and all sorts of other crimes rape, infanticide, here's another good one ...https://i.ibb.co/ZjXt87d/Psalms-137-9.jpgFor a more complete discussion - https://www.bitchute.com/video/Ikc5XBxo2bcT/The amazing thing to me is that the Deuteronomy quote is not plastered over every discussion of the Gaza genocide, as it's the operative command from the Jewish/Christian/Islamic God himself.Replies: @Anon, @Brás Cubas, @anon, @Kevin Barrett
Everyone agrees that God hates the wanton mass murder of tens or hundreds of thousands of innocent women and children
I left the OT off the list of scriptures for this reason. “Everyone agrees…” Except people who take the whole OT as inerrant scripture (and fail to interpret away the problematic parts).
Just posted a podcast interview with the author: https://kevinbarrett.substack.com/p/prof-salim-mansur-on-donald-of-eretz
I agree that David Duke is a smart guy doing good work who has been unjustly maligned. Check out our conversation: https://www.unz.com/kbarrett/david-duke-on-jewish-supremacism-and-zionist-genocide/
Thanks to the writer for not letting this story go away. WE can’t let this one go, people. If the (((guilty))) are exposed on this one then surely the doors will be wide open for 911 and other past events that were lied about.
Well, as Ron Unz might say, I am *extremely* skeptical about The Jesus Hoax. But since there’s no conclusive evidence either way, I suppose David’s extreme skepticism is as good as mine.
I’m also skeptical not only of some of the numbers tossed around in this article, but of David Skrbina’s pro-eugenics position being compatible with his critique of technology. In The Metaphysics of Technology and other works David has expressed skepticism of technology at least as extreme as his skepticism about the historical Jesus. A core critique of technology, expressed by Ted Kaczynski and seconded by David, concerns its incompatibility with human freedom. Obviously eugenics as a public policy option would have to be enforced by the violence-monopolizing state using technology in a way that would radically encroach on freedom.
Of course, if all David is advocating is Uncle Ted’s claim that smart folks who are skeptical of technology should have as many children as possible, in service to a future anti-technology revolution that would permanently destroy the state, then his positions on technology and eugenics would be reasonably consistent.
https://www.unz.com/isteve/michael-lind-against-the-eugenicons-like-murray-and-sailer/#comment-6102907
...this whole controversy over “Eugenics” seems a little odd to me, especially the tendency to denounce the Eugenicists of the past. As far as I can tell, almost every educated individual—Left, Right or Center—around 100 years ago believed in Eugenics, the only exception being the very religious types who also opposed Darwinism.
Opposing Eugenics seems a lot like opposing Dentistry. But given the heated current controversy over whether men can give birth, I suppose it’s not too surprising.
The eugenics-dentistry comparison is misleading, Ron, since we are presumably talking about public policy issues, not private choices. Of course, if you mean “nobody 100 years ago would have supported legislation banning people from hiring dentists to fix their teeth, or legislation banning people from marrying people they find fit and attractive,” you would be correct. But very few people 100 years ago, or today, would support having the government use its claimed monopoly on violence to force people to fix their teeth or decide who reproduces with whom.
Kevin, I don't profess to know what Donald Trump did or didn't do. But unless you have some secret "smoking gun" evidence (and if so, why not put it out where everyone can view it?), you can't know either. You may think or want to think he committed such outrages, but statements such as that in the blockquote above are irresponsible.
Trump, that Epstein-blackmailed rapist of teenage virgins ...
Well, I agree that the Putin meeting was good, as well as being a distraction. But the DC occupation is pure theater designed to try to make his base forget Epstein.
Sam Husseini echoed and elaborated on my points 12 hours later: “Distraction Don: Pay no attention to that genocide or that Epstein scandal”
Tell a relative of someone who's been murdered by a criminal in DC, or who has been robbed at gun- or knife-point, that Trump sending in the cavalry was just political theater. I think it will be no sale.Mind you, I'm sure Trump had mixed motives for the Putin summit meeting and the DC crime-stopper action. In politics, as well as life in general, mixed motives are standard operating procedure. If the result is good, what does it matter?
Well, I agree that the Putin meeting was good, as well as being a distraction. But the DC occupation is pure theater designed to try to make his base forget Epstein.