RSSDo you have even a basic grasp of sarcasm?
When will we ever know ?????As suspected .... see Chomsky quote comment 76 above.Let's say it - The Occidental Observer is controlled opposition.I'll also guess that "Tobias Langdon" is a pen name and the real person, if there is one, is anonymous.Replies: @jr8392, @Robert Dolan
Of course if the revisionists could score a major hit — if, for instance, they are right about the gas chambers at Auschwitz —
Let’s say it – The Occidental Observer is controlled opposition.
Right, now Kevin MacDonald is controlled by high Jewry, among whom is Tobias Langdon. Any other retarded comments you got for us?
Here is the criteria you have to apply - to see the purpose behind the rhetoric - Langdon wrote a long article criticizing the 'holocaust cult' without ever mentioning that the holocaust didn't happen. The article promotes the hoax white criticizing the 'cult', think Finkelstein.Chomsky explains the technique -
Your comment is pure idiocy. Langdon was not promoting anything in that quote.
The first quote from the article - "This contradicts a central lie of the Holocaust Cult ..... ".What is the central lie of the 'holocaust cult'? See if you can figure that one out (hint: see above).Here is an even better one from the same article ....
Keeping the People Passive & Obedient
The smart way to keep people passive and obedient is to strictly limit the spectrum of acceptable opinion, but allow very lively debate within that spectrum - even encourage the more critical and dissident views. That gives people the sense that there's free thinking going on, while all the time the presuppositions of the system are being reinforced by the limits put on the range of the debate.
Again, pure idiocy.What is at the heart of the culture of victimhood? Hint: see above.Langdon poses as a vitriolic critic of the holocaust while never mentioning that it is a hoax, a 100% fabrication that did not happen.Comprende'?https://www.bitchute.com/video/Ul72dV4SbAoh/
The Holocaust Cult is at the heart of the “culture of victimhood” described so well by Rabbi Sacks.
So by your logic, anyone who mentions the holocaust in an article without getting into revisionism must be Jewish, a holocaust-promoter, and an idiot?
The only idiot I see is you. And I know for a fact Langdon isn’t Jewish.
Steyn is rather like Ben Shapiro. You know he won’t cross certain lines, but he gets it mostly right and does well at it. And if he did cross those lines, he wouldn’t have his platform to reach the masses. Sometimes it’s better to appreciate what you can get instead of dismissing it as controlled opposition.
Well, Tobias Langdon is one of my favorites, but it's always a good idea to test even an unlikely hypothesis, so let's apply the litmus 'Jew or not' test: does Langdon promote the holohoax. It's usually an easy test to apply, all that is necessary is to google Tobias Langdon holocaust and examine the results.https://www.unz.com/article/the-hollow-cult-sins-of-omission-in-the-rhetoric-of-the-holocaust/
That’s easy. The author of this article is (likely) jewish himself.
Regards,
There you have it - pure idiocy. Langdon could very well be a Jew.Replies: @jr8392
This contradicts a central lie of the Holocaust Cult: that the majority is always the aggressor and minorities are always the helpless victims of the majority. It also contradicts another lie of the Holocaust Cult: that it’s always Christians who attack Jews and Muslims, never vice versa.
There you have it – pure idiocy. Langdon could very well be a Jew.
Your comment is pure idiocy. Langdon was not promoting anything in that quote.
Here is the criteria you have to apply - to see the purpose behind the rhetoric - Langdon wrote a long article criticizing the 'holocaust cult' without ever mentioning that the holocaust didn't happen. The article promotes the hoax white criticizing the 'cult', think Finkelstein.Chomsky explains the technique -
Your comment is pure idiocy. Langdon was not promoting anything in that quote.
The first quote from the article - "This contradicts a central lie of the Holocaust Cult ..... ".What is the central lie of the 'holocaust cult'? See if you can figure that one out (hint: see above).Here is an even better one from the same article ....
Keeping the People Passive & Obedient
The smart way to keep people passive and obedient is to strictly limit the spectrum of acceptable opinion, but allow very lively debate within that spectrum - even encourage the more critical and dissident views. That gives people the sense that there's free thinking going on, while all the time the presuppositions of the system are being reinforced by the limits put on the range of the debate.
Again, pure idiocy.What is at the heart of the culture of victimhood? Hint: see above.Langdon poses as a vitriolic critic of the holocaust while never mentioning that it is a hoax, a 100% fabrication that did not happen.Comprende'?https://www.bitchute.com/video/Ul72dV4SbAoh/
The Holocaust Cult is at the heart of the “culture of victimhood” described so well by Rabbi Sacks.
Dog consumption in China has declined a lot, and this stereotype is almost outdated now. You might find it in some rural areas among older generations, but it has disappeared elsewhere. Chinese state media have played a role discouraging it. The media there actively tries to elevate public behavior as the state sees fit. And overall they’ve done well at it, I’d say. Compared with Hollywood there’s a higher moral tone on TV.