RSSWhen all else fails there is always cucumbers or squash. If you plant those you’ll be guaranteed to feel like a horticultural genius!
Evidently your growing environment doesn’t have downy mildew or anthracnose.
This comment (was) for utu and his comment 881. When I posted it I immediately got a duplicate message notice which didn’t make sense and then a message saying it was in moderation.
Same here. I plan on putting together a simple pine box at some point to have on the ready. I've also already informed my kids (their spouses can help!) that they are responsible for digging the hole I get buried in. I told them if they bring a backhoe in to do it, I'm going to haunt them!
When I die, I want to be eaten by other life forms on earth, and make my contribution to the whole – the worms, the beasts, the insects, can have me. The worst fate is to be embalmed or put in a steel coffin, that hideous modern practice, thus even in death affirming ones separation from all life.
There is a beautiful Tibetan burial practice called “sky burial”, where they take your body to a high cliff in the mountains, and cut you into pieces for the vultures and other wild beasts to eat you, thus affirming your connection to, and compassion for, the whole of life.
I keep telling my kids that when the time comes, I want my cremated remains dumped into the compost pile, but I don’t think they are going to go for it.
Same here. I plan on putting together a simple pine box at some point to have on the ready. I've also already informed my kids (their spouses can help!) that they are responsible for digging the hole I get buried in. I told them if they bring a backhoe in to do it, I'm going to haunt them!
When I die, I want to be eaten by other life forms on earth, and make my contribution to the whole – the worms, the beasts, the insects, can have me. The worst fate is to be embalmed or put in a steel coffin, that hideous modern practice, thus even in death affirming ones separation from all life.
There is a beautiful Tibetan burial practice called “sky burial”, where they take your body to a high cliff in the mountains, and cut you into pieces for the vultures and other wild beasts to eat you, thus affirming your connection to, and compassion for, the whole of life.
I now remember why I had you on the CTI list for so many years.
Back you go.
I now remember why I had you on the CTI list for so many years.
Back you go.
High activity levels along with high quality fat intake is quite healthy.
a common civilizational good.
Wouldn’t you have to have some agreement on what’s “good” and which features of the civilization qualify?
I didn't ignore it. I just think that your statement has little connection with reality. While it may be true that it doesn't "have to be," it is.Replies: @WIzard of Oz
History doesn’t have to be used or misused for partisan political purposes.
You may find interest and merit in the book by someone described to me when I got to know him and persuadedhim to accept an honorary doctorate at a university where I had some influence as “the most intelligent socialist in Australia” – bt a decidedly non socialist intellectual.
Here is a bit of Hugh Stretton’s Wikipedia entry
The Political Sciences (1969) challenged the growth of positivism and abstraction in political, social, and economic understanding. The book promoted a view of the social sciences as inherently values-based, moral, and practical in nature. It was widely influential locally and internationally. Nmmm
As time passes, and the people who have an interest in the events die, or leave power, those influences wane.
Yes. Also, as time passes, it becomes much easier for us to construct the desired history.
working without the passions and ideological fads that conditions historical discourse;
“History” is contaminated since it is written by humans. Understanding this gives one a certain perspective but does not decontaminate “history”.
Replies: @iffen
History doesn’t have to be used or misused for partisan political purposes.
ignoring the carefully chosen words of the writer, in this case
History doesn’t have to be used or misused for partisan political purposes.
I didn’t ignore it. I just think that your statement has little connection with reality. While it may be true that it doesn’t “have to be,” it is.
The Political Sciences (1969) challenged the growth of positivism and abstraction in political, social, and economic understanding. The book promoted a view of the social sciences as inherently values-based, moral, and practical in nature. It was widely influential locally and internationally. Nmmm
You think history is some sort of objective phenomenon with its own rules and existence. It is us, and we make it what we want it to be when we are making “us”. Things happen. The writing about “what” happened is not what occurred. History is what a particular person or people want it to be. It’s not “real,” except to those who believe it to be.
Replies: @iffen
History doesn’t have to be used or misused for partisan political purposes.
that is transforming my understanding of culture and humanity in absolutely seminal ways
Not again!
Say it ain’t so, Joe.
Also his repeated mischarecterisation of Russian and Ukrainian history
Apparently, you do not understand history and its uses.
Should Hungarians adopt Pan-Mongolism?
Are Mongols (or Avars) cooler than Turks? Difficult question.Replies: @songbird
Since late 2018, Hungary has been an observer and may request full membership.
I appreciate the complement. I have lots of knowledge, and can usually provide a confirming link or two fairly quickly. To the extent that a limited amount of bad data slips through. My apologies.
What is interesting is that A123 often responds promptly with elaborate and full of information and disinformation content as if he had access to lots of data on his finger tips. This would require a quite resourceful and knowledgeable individual.
I sleep for much less than the typical 8 hours per day and sometimes have to coordinate with international colleagues. My posting timing is unusual, but not evidence of an AI or team.What organizer would fund a team to or AI to expose George IslamoSoros as a Muslim?I wish that type of support for the TRUTH existed. Sadly, it does not.PEACE 😇Replies: @iffen
so I wonder whether it is a team that is assigned to several forums to push Brooklyn -Tel Aviv – Lubyanka spiel. Actually I would like to know how such an operations work and what does it take to launch them and sustain them. I suspect that a database of past comments is generated in real time and somehow parsed by AI to provide quick answers to queries that are similar that already have been posed
This would require a quite resourceful and knowledgeable individual.
Or a mediocre Israeli propaganda bot.
America may have deliberately provoked Russia’s invasion of Ukraine
Is that you Barb?
Instead of continuing disputes over which side is winning the war, here’s a broader question, especially directed towards the several Ukrainian partisans on this thread…
Michael Hudson, Mike Whitney, and a few other analysts have argued that America may have deliberately provoked Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, hoping to use it to eliminate the former’s growing economic ties with Germany and the rest of Europe in what was becoming an economically unified Eurasia. Maybe that’s correct, and if so, perhaps the invasion has benefited America, or at least some people thought it would.
But I can’t see any way the invasion and the war benefit Ukraine, even if (by some miracle) the Ukrainians mostly win and force the Russians out. No matter what happens, there’s a great deal of death and destruction in Ukraine, ending in (probably) a strong Russian victory, which leads to far greater Russian control over the entire country. So it’s bad for Ukraine, regardless of what happens.
Now based upon all the Russian statements over the last few years and in the opinion of numerous American experts, the Russians wanted a neutral Ukraine what wouldn’t become part of NATO, wouldn’t have a strong military, and would agree to give local autonomy to the Donbas enclaves as had been promised in the Minsk agreements, plus maybe stopping government policies against the Russian language. Let’s assume that this is correct and agreeing to these conditions would have averted the Russian invasion.
So offhand, wasn’t the stubbornness of the Ukrainian government on these points a very bad idea? Wouldn’t it have been much better to just give in on those points and avert an invasion and war?
I realize that many might argue otherwise based upon national pride or legal independence. However, although Cuba has the perfect right under international law to host a Russian missile base, if the Cubans knew it would lead to an American invasion, they probably wouldn’t do it.
In hindsight, shouldn’t the Ukrainians have made those concessions to Russia?
I have tried to make this very suggestion several times.
Instead of continuing disputes over which side is winning the war, here’s a broader question,
Correct concept. Incorrect assignment of responsibility.The European WEF Elites of Davos want Open Borders to dilute Europe's Judeo-Christian population... Often stated as "The Great Replacement". The Brussels-Berlin Axis has recently encountered difficulty with sovereign nations resisting their Rape-ugees. Their European WEF solution? Create a Russia/Ukraine conflict to generate new migrant flows, thus covering the ongoing flood of illegal arrivals.Zerohedge asked the question “Who is coming across the border?”. In multiple cases the results are non-Ukrainians (1)
Michael Hudson, Mike Whitney, and a few other analysts have argued that America may have deliberately provoked Russia’s invasion of Ukraine,
The next phase of replacement is already foretold. The groundwork is being laid for Food Shortage — Mass African Migration.. The sucker pitch will be, "Compassionate nations must accept healthy, well fed Rape-ugees who claim to be without food."
More than 50 migrants clashed on Saturday night during a riot at a refugee facility in Munich as chairs and paving stones were used as weapons, prompting a huge police response.Bild cited a police source who said the overwhelming majority of the “refugees” were from the Sinti and Roma ethnic groups and that, “Only a fraction are really Ukrainian refugees.”“They have brand-new Ukrainian passports, which are also real. Someone in Ukraine is making a fortune right now,” the newspaper quoted the police representative as saying.
...
The official Twitter account of the Roscommon GAA Gaelic football team recently deleted a tweet which showed that around half of the “Ukrainian refugees” they welcomed to a game weren’t exactly Slavic-looking.
…
The reality of the situation is clear; Economic migrants from Africa, the Middle East and South Asia are cynically exploiting the Ukrainian refugee wave to abuse the system and get free accommodation and welfare in European countries with poor vetting systems.This comes at the expense of genuine Ukrainian refugees who need urgent help.
Exceedingly little actually needed to be conceded. Ukraine's leadership should never have allowed the European (non-American) WEF Elites of Davos to intentionally provoke Russia from their territory.Avoiding inflammatory comments, such as openly stating Ukrainian interest in nuclear arms, would have kicked the can down the road.PEACE 😇
So offhand, wasn’t the stubbornness of the Ukrainian government on these points a very bad idea? Wouldn’t it have been much better to just give in on those points and avert an invasion and war?
I find that reasoning extremely unlikely. Just look at the timing. Prior to the invasion, Germany was just about to close the deal with Russia on Nord Stream 2. I suppose it would be a matter of a few months at most. America's "provocations", on the other hand, were a continuing process, dating back to 2008, perhaps even earlier than that. Recent developments did not add anything that increased the perceived threat to Russia in a big enough way as to justify radical measures. If America hoped to provoke an invasion at such a short notice, they must have been quite clairvoyant that Russia would not wait until after Nord Stream 2 was in full operation to consider military action in Ukraine. By invading before the deal on Nord Stream 2 was closed, it was as if Russia severed its ties with Europe by her own free will. I don't know why she would do that, but sometimes countries act in stupid ways.
Michael Hudson, Mike Whitney, and a few other analysts have argued that America may have deliberately provoked Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, hoping to use it to eliminate the former’s growing economic ties with Germany and the rest of Europe in what was becoming an economically unified Eurasia. Maybe that’s correct, and if so, perhaps the invasion has benefited America, or at least some people thought it would.
Up to a point, but in retrospect I think the ongoing violent Donbass/Lunhansk insurgency made negotiations impossible. Even without the Ukrainian government being infested by the US State Department, no government still somewhat accountable to public opinion, or with any hope of foreign support (however ultimately malevolent), could make real concessions to Russia under such conditions. Earlier Russia had also been shortsighted in insisting on stupid gas-transit squabbles for years, a few ultimately minor concessions or symbolic magnanimous gestures, even if Ukraine was being difficult on purpose, could have gone a long way in convincing public opinion of real and ongoing benefits of economic integration with Russia over the EU. Even without Crimea I think Ukraines could have swallowed their pride, considering the strategic necessity of the Peninsula, and the complete lack of Ukrainian culture or population there, but the limbo 'Peoples Republics' spoiled everything. It would be asking too much of any country not completely on its knees and internationally ignored.The closest analogy that comes to mind now is Turkey and Cyprus, still barely talking decades later. Also instructive to compare that with Turkey's quick and decisive annexation of 'The Hatay Republic' it snatched from Syria.Replies: @Wokechoke
Now based upon all the Russian statements over the last few years and in the opinion of numerous American experts, the Russians wanted a neutral Ukraine what wouldn’t become part of NATO, wouldn’t have a strong military, and would agree to give local autonomy to the Donbas enclaves as had been promised in the Minsk agreements, plus maybe stopping government policies against the Russian language. Let’s assume that this is correct and agreeing to these conditions would have averted the Russian invasion.In hindsight, shouldn’t the Ukrainians have made those concessions to Russia?
If Ukraine had become a part of NATO sooner than later, it wouldn't be involved in this war today. For most of its history since independence (1991 - 2014) it never fully pursued NATO membership. Most of Ukraine's citizenry was opposed to NATO membership, and thus because NATO had no desire to be involved with a country which held itself with a low approval rating. Obviously, things changed after 201 4, and Russia opened a pandoras box within Ukraine for its desire to gain entrance in this organization. Some at this blog have suggested that Ukraine had already, by that time, lost its window of opportunity.
the Russians wanted a neutral Ukraine what wouldn’t become part of NATO,
Well, we all can see how foolish that notion has become? Without a strong military Ukraine would have ceased to exist as independent state after a three day cakewalk by Russia to Kyiv. We wouldn't be having this discussion today.
wouldn’t have a strong military,
This is a difficult and sticky problem for Ukraine to address. On the one hand, it couldn't just let the Donbas wither away, as it practically has in regards to Crimea, for this would set another bad precedent for trying to keep its large state in one unified whole. Also, there's the fact that unlike Crimea, this area had a majority of Ukrainians living within, today and historically. On the other hand, keeping it within Ukraine with its mostly Russified Ukrainian inhabitants would have always played to Russia's hand and would have prevented Ukraine's western EU aspirations. This is a hard nut to crack, and I admit that it's probably above my pay grade to unravel.
would agree to give local autonomy to the Donbas enclaves as had been promised in the Minsk agreements,
Here's one area that Ukrainian officials probably acted too hastily, and could have come up with something more pragmatic and balanced to address the language situation in the greatly Russified Eastern area, especially within Donbas. Actually, if I'm not mistaken, the new language policy that was promulgated on the heels of Yanukovych's departure in 2014 was one of the main reasons that the separatists gave for trying to secede from Ukraine. The reality was that the new language policy favoring the Ukrainian language never really took hold, and the locals never really felt any discriminatory backlash for continuing to use the Russian language. So, in effect the new law had no real effect other than to be used as a pretext for separation. For the few provinces that were heavilu Russified, a more balanced approach would have worked better, and allowed the "Easterners" to continue to use the language that they were most comfortable speaking. Ukrainian could have been implemented more slowly, especially within the school system, to influence the youth of the area to relearn what was for most of the inabitants their original mother tongue. Well, there you go, I hope that I provided you with some useful information, even if I couldn't honestly unravel the whole mess for you in a pragmatic sort of way.
plus maybe stopping government policies against the Russian language.
Indeed. Fuck Russia and Russians for their stupid war, their war crimes and their moronic propaganda about biolabs or whatever that makes anyone look like a cretin who falls for it, fuck the Poles and Balts who delude themselves they can pursue their resentment-driven chauvinist projects while being loyal American vassals, fuck the Western normies with their endless bouts of media-induced hysteria, and fuck the pro-Russian Western right-wingers who believe in the most blatant Russian propaganda too. I hate all of them.
is granted a new lease on life by Russia – the very country whose rejection of globohomo values many us hoped to hold up as a model worth emulating.
The only decent people might be the Nazis from Azov, my respect goes out to them
Seriously?
Lindner isn't a politician I'm going to defend, and I would even admit that Germany's stance prior to the invasion (not sending weapons to Ukraine) was very misguided. Still, people like Ilves should learn to express their sentiments in a more diplomatic way. These points of view aren't constructive when it looks like the next winter might be rather problematic for Germany in terms of energy supply.
from some absolutely respectable average mainstream carreer politician in the middle of EU.
it looks like the next winter might be rather problematic for Germany in terms of energy supply.
Not to worry, Ted Cruz will be sending you American LNG. You will, of course, have to pay 4-5 times what you would have paid for Russian gas, but you will have the satisfaction of knowing that you are helping the world’s greatest defender and promoter of rainbow people and not some backward country that hates it’s LGBTQXYZ citizens.
What a disgusting slander, how dare you?!
some backward country that hates it’s LGBTQXYZ citizens
The ultimate justification of liberal democracy is that it is militarily unbeatable. How counter intuitive.Replies: @iffen
Even after full mobilization and with an unlimited pool of slave labor, Germany plus it’s empire was unable to match the wartime production of the smaller economy of Great Britain alone.
The ultimate justification of liberal democracy is that it is militarily unbeatable.
LOL
No, no, and no.
ee cummings:
o to be in finland
now that russia’s here)swing low
sweet carr
yon(pass the freedoms pappy or
uncle shylock not interested
Thanks, you did an excellent job of explicating my thoughts.
I just hope that the damage that we do to the world on the way down is limited.
In my personal view there is a definite line drawn between the US as ideology and political entity and the concrete aspects of people and land.
IMHO this is an illusion, no such separation can be made. Well, you can, but it won’t be the U. S. anymore so your in group loyalty is to a different entity.
And also instrumental in the economic growth of Japan, South Korea (chaibols), Mexico (the IRP party stabilised the country after a century of anarchy), Victorian Britain, post 1979 China, and so on. Technically your definition is correct, but Nazi Germany wasn't exactly unique in successfully adopting a mixed economy.
State direction of private industry, rewarded by favourable awards of contracts is fascist economics.
And people wonder how Putin got a chip on his shoulder regarding the West..Replies: @songbird, @Dmitry, @Greasy William
The IMF experts had concluded that no real structural transformation had yet taken place in the Russian economy. In their opinion, the unemployment rate was still “too low” and no “inefficient” enterprises had been allowed to go bankrupt. The average consumption level in Russia had even risen, they complained. (This was because of imported consumer goods.) “Capital flight” remained high, and the self-indulgent life of “new Russians” abroad had already become legendary.
but Nazi Germany wasn’t exactly unique in successfully adopting a mixed economy.
The Nazi economy was not successful. The Nazis inherited a recovering economy and rode an unsustainable private lending boom to medium prosperity. The German economy was already showing signs of serious strain before the plundering of Austria, Czechoslovakia, Poland, Denmark, Belgium, Norway and France gave it some much needed breathing room. Even after full mobilization and with an unlimited pool of slave labor, Germany plus it’s empire was unable to match the wartime production of the smaller economy of Great Britain alone.
The ultimate justification of liberal democracy is that it is militarily unbeatable. How counter intuitive.Replies: @iffen
Even after full mobilization and with an unlimited pool of slave labor, Germany plus it’s empire was unable to match the wartime production of the smaller economy of Great Britain alone.
Indeed, which is why Russia initially tried (and failed) a blitzkrieg strategy. Ultimately a decision was made that slow progress is preferable to higher civilian casualties. I think that's the right call, Russia needs to influence the civilian population even in areas it does not want to annex. For the areas in the east where annexation risk is very high, all the more so.
It may also worsen the postwar settlement, because rapid victories can discredit the old order and produce collaborators.
I've tracked a lot of what Jake Sullivan, the national security advisor, has been saying and he's been adamant that the US shouldn't get involved with a NFZ or boots on the ground. The CIA director, William Burns, is also much less hawkish than someone like Pompeo and even warned about NATO expansion back in 2008-9 to more countries, including Ukraine. Biden isn't just geriatric, his mind is going. It makes more sense to look at what the people around him who actually shape day-to-day policy think. The people at the very top understand that a lot of these media narratives are utter lies. That was the case with James Clapper during the Syrian chemical gas hoax and it is true now.That said, I don't discount some form of false flag attack, but it will likely be used to motivate people (read: feckless europoors) to take the economic hits from even more extreme sanctions and to ramp up the proxy war, such as sending the S-300 from Slovakia. Hell, we might even see the MiG-29 issue being resurfaced if a significant fraction of the Western public gets fooled into thinking that Putin "was using a chemical gas attack because he is desperate, so we must double down". But US troops on the ground in Ukraine or a NFZ? No. This is a proxy war.Replies: @iffen
The media and political environments have coalesced around the idea that we need to do more to assist the Ukrainians, including routine calls for a so-called no-fly zone (itself a dangerously misleading term). Meanwhile, the slow progress of the Russian offensive along with Ukrainian dominance of the infowar has led many to the conclusion that Russia is a paper bear that will fold when pushed. Effectively the possibility of WW3 is being restrained by the prudence of one man–the geriatric President Biden.
That said, I don’t discount some form of false flag attack,
The Jew York Times and other MSM are pushing extremely hard for Russia to launch a WMD attack. They frequently get want they want.
Russia recognized Donbas as independent and Mariupol is in Donbas. You can see their initiative as liberation and Ukie forces as occupiers. Consider it like Britain fighting its way into Arnhem or Hamburg in WWII, or Baghdad, etc…It works that way, you have to be consistent.
Ahh, yes, the precious body fluids guy.
Thanks, my favorite was Slim Pickens.
More blood! Send more weapons! More killing!
Frigging idiots. Keep it up until some Dr. Strangelove in Russia drops Big Bertha in downtown Kiev.
Ukrainians were saying that since the 18th century. The Little Russians were saying that the Great Russians were politically Tatars or Mongols.
Russians are politically an Asiatic people.
So it’s true!
Ukies parrot Nazi propaganda.
The Little Russians were saying that the Great Russians were politically Tatars or Mongols.
Last I checked, Nazism didn’t exist in the 18th century
So it’s true!
Ukies were the original Nazis.
You hear this from Russian nationalists, who are motivated to lie. Ukrainian is about as distant from Russian as Dutch is from German. Norwegian is closer to Swedish than Ukrainian is to Russian.
I’m not a Slavic language speaker, but I frequently hear about Ukrainian simply being a dialect of Russian or at least mutually intelligible.
Ukrainian language sounds a lot nicer than does Russian. Smoother, more melodic. It makes for more beautiful folk songs. Russian sounds rougher, harsher and vulgar.
It should also be pointed out that English-language transliterations of Ukrainian words consistently look much worse than their Russian equivalents
This is just lazy. Diversity and beauty are good things. And necessary. Lack of genetic diversity can lead to extinction of a species, this is probably true of cultures also. If the Germanic peoples had been reduced to only one (say, the Visigoths in 400 AD) would that one had achieved what the others collectively would? It is always good to have a reserve of peoples.
Russia, Poland, and Serbia are the only Slavic states needed by the world.
Russians are politically an Asiatic people.
So it’s true!
Ukies parrot Nazi propaganda.
Duck walking, duck squawking.
Ukrainians were saying that since the 18th century. The Little Russians were saying that the Great Russians were politically Tatars or Mongols.
Russians are politically an Asiatic people.
So it’s true!
Ukies parrot Nazi propaganda.
I’m not particularly offended by the allegation, it just seems an odd one.
Good, I thought that you likely would not be upset and I really didn’t mean to imply any sort of derogation.
It might take some time to sort through it, but when you criticize the policies and actions of our country (which is great, I do it myself) you don’t seem to understand that this is still our country, right or wrong, and that it is the crucial group.
A few points:1). The only world ethno-racial group which can authoritatively be described as "pathologically altruistic" are Western Europeans and their descendants in North America. Not whites, not Europeans, not even Northern Europeans (Slavs, Greeks, Sicilians, Balts etc. need not apply) - just Western Europeans, save for perhaps Portugal. In other words, only what Joe Heinrich calls WEIRDOs exhibit a cultural/genetic trait that can be described as pathologically altruistic - at least in comparison to the rest of the world. 2). The Jesus influence on Western Europeans only began in the 3rd-4th century AD. Christianity is older in the Middle East, the Caucuses, and Southern Europe. If your thesis that Christianity leads to pathological altruism is true, we would see a greater deal of pathological altruism among Christian Arabs, Armenians, Georgians, Greeks etc. than Western Europeans - but that is not the case. At the very least, we should narrow it down to Western forms of Christianity (Catholicism and Protestanism), and exclude Orthodox and other non-Western versions of Christianity.3). Islam likewise has a universalist message at its core - similar to Christianity. If universalist teachings were a cause of pathological altruism, we would see the trait exhibited by Muslims - but that is not the case. From this, we can conclude that while the universality teachings of Christianity could have played a role in developing pathological altruism among Westerners, other contingent factors were necessary as well. Hajnal Western European marriage/kinship patterns (delayed marriage, low fertility, less cousin marriage) is likely a more critical factor in explaining why pathological altruism developed among WEIRDOs but not among Eastern Christians or Muslims.Figure 1: Global Out-Group Trusthttps://i.ibb.co/dQWdP23/1.png
What does make sense is runaway pathological altruism. Just the Jesus influence alone has had close to 2 thousand years to warp our genes.
1). The only world ethno-racial group which can authoritatively be described as “pathologically altruistic” are Western Europeans and their descendants in North America. Not whites, not Europeans, not even Northern Europeans (Slavs, Greeks, Sicilians, Balts etc. need not apply) – just Western Europeans, save for perhaps Portugal. In other words, only what Joe Heinrich calls WEIRDOs exhibit a cultural/genetic trait that can be described as pathologically altruistic – at least in comparison to the rest of the world.
Imo ‘pathological altruism’ has to be quite carefully defined e.g. in the recent past Northern Slavic peoples exhibited a strong tendency to adopt extreme left progressive political beliefs which led one way or another to the destruction of a significant part of their population. The same commitment to strong progressivism is present in Spain, Italy, France, Portugal, I believe with a similar kind of root. Just in the later countries it was balanced and contained by a stronger nationalistic and traditionalist right wing.
These kinds of socialist utopian political beliefs seem to be somewhat different to pathological altruism, which in origin is more associated with middle class Protestants in Anglo countries and Germany, also among the middle classes in France (again, Protestants are present), it’s a manifestation of progressive liberal rather than socialist politics. It’s become an issue because of the collapse of the cultural right wing in these Northern countries, there are no longer any counter-influences to contain or mitigate it.
Christianity itself is not likely to be a major factor in this, apart from by its collapse.
There are many terms that can be applied to the current Pope. However, 'Protestant' is not one of them.
In an address to supporters of a new project called Snapshots From The Borders Sept. 10, the pope said that it was “vital to change the way we see and talk about migration: it is about putting people, faces, stories at the center.”
“The inhabitants of the cities and frontier territories — the societies, communities, churches — are called to be the first actors in this turning point, thanks to the continuous opportunities of encounter that history offers them,” he said.
“Borders, long considered as barriers of division, can instead become ‘windows,’ spaces of mutual knowledge, of mutual enrichment, of communion in diversity; they can become places where models are experimented with to overcome the difficulties that the new arrivals bring for the indigenous communities
A few points:1). The only world ethno-racial group which can authoritatively be described as "pathologically altruistic" are Western Europeans and their descendants in North America. Not whites, not Europeans, not even Northern Europeans (Slavs, Greeks, Sicilians, Balts etc. need not apply) - just Western Europeans, save for perhaps Portugal. In other words, only what Joe Heinrich calls WEIRDOs exhibit a cultural/genetic trait that can be described as pathologically altruistic - at least in comparison to the rest of the world. 2). The Jesus influence on Western Europeans only began in the 3rd-4th century AD. Christianity is older in the Middle East, the Caucuses, and Southern Europe. If your thesis that Christianity leads to pathological altruism is true, we would see a greater deal of pathological altruism among Christian Arabs, Armenians, Georgians, Greeks etc. than Western Europeans - but that is not the case. At the very least, we should narrow it down to Western forms of Christianity (Catholicism and Protestanism), and exclude Orthodox and other non-Western versions of Christianity.3). Islam likewise has a universalist message at its core - similar to Christianity. If universalist teachings were a cause of pathological altruism, we would see the trait exhibited by Muslims - but that is not the case. From this, we can conclude that while the universality teachings of Christianity could have played a role in developing pathological altruism among Westerners, other contingent factors were necessary as well. Hajnal Western European marriage/kinship patterns (delayed marriage, low fertility, less cousin marriage) is likely a more critical factor in explaining why pathological altruism developed among WEIRDOs but not among Eastern Christians or Muslims.Figure 1: Global Out-Group Trusthttps://i.ibb.co/dQWdP23/1.png
What does make sense is runaway pathological altruism. Just the Jesus influence alone has had close to 2 thousand years to warp our genes.
Yes, the nuclear family definitely seems to have been crucial as well. It’s not like Christianity = WEIRDOS. The universalist theme of Christianity was the spark and there were hundreds of bundles of flammable materials along the way. (Perhaps the last one being Pax Americana.) “We” are basically failing in the application of our ingroup/outgroup instinct. You can see it everywhere. The nice commenter Barbarossa is a prime example.
You make a lot of good points, and I don’t want to get into a discussion on religion, but modern Islam compares to the Christianity of Medieval Europe.
Paul did that, not Jesus. There is no reason whatsoever to believe that Jesus was more of a universalist than any other impoverished Jew living in early 1st century Roman Palestine. Mark, Luke and John are all clearly written by non Jews. The only canonical gospel maybe written by a Jew is Matthew, and in that one Jesus preaches a decidedly Jewish exclusivist message.
He kicked off universalism in a big way by divorcing from the Jewish tribal religion.
No Jesus, no Paul, no Christianity, etc., etc.
Hellenized Jews kickstarted Christianity.
A few points:1). The only world ethno-racial group which can authoritatively be described as "pathologically altruistic" are Western Europeans and their descendants in North America. Not whites, not Europeans, not even Northern Europeans (Slavs, Greeks, Sicilians, Balts etc. need not apply) - just Western Europeans, save for perhaps Portugal. In other words, only what Joe Heinrich calls WEIRDOs exhibit a cultural/genetic trait that can be described as pathologically altruistic - at least in comparison to the rest of the world. 2). The Jesus influence on Western Europeans only began in the 3rd-4th century AD. Christianity is older in the Middle East, the Caucuses, and Southern Europe. If your thesis that Christianity leads to pathological altruism is true, we would see a greater deal of pathological altruism among Christian Arabs, Armenians, Georgians, Greeks etc. than Western Europeans - but that is not the case. At the very least, we should narrow it down to Western forms of Christianity (Catholicism and Protestanism), and exclude Orthodox and other non-Western versions of Christianity.3). Islam likewise has a universalist message at its core - similar to Christianity. If universalist teachings were a cause of pathological altruism, we would see the trait exhibited by Muslims - but that is not the case. From this, we can conclude that while the universality teachings of Christianity could have played a role in developing pathological altruism among Westerners, other contingent factors were necessary as well. Hajnal Western European marriage/kinship patterns (delayed marriage, low fertility, less cousin marriage) is likely a more critical factor in explaining why pathological altruism developed among WEIRDOs but not among Eastern Christians or Muslims.Figure 1: Global Out-Group Trusthttps://i.ibb.co/dQWdP23/1.png
What does make sense is runaway pathological altruism. Just the Jesus influence alone has had close to 2 thousand years to warp our genes.
’m not sure you can blame that on Jesus’ influence
He kicked off universalism in a big way by divorcing from the Jewish tribal religion. Roman state religion right down to us. He won’t let us treat people like they are Amalekites anymore. Universalism and altruism are great but absolutely have to be tempered with selfish thought.
Paul did that, not Jesus. There is no reason whatsoever to believe that Jesus was more of a universalist than any other impoverished Jew living in early 1st century Roman Palestine. Mark, Luke and John are all clearly written by non Jews. The only canonical gospel maybe written by a Jew is Matthew, and in that one Jesus preaches a decidedly Jewish exclusivist message.
He kicked off universalism in a big way by divorcing from the Jewish tribal religion.
Yes, I thought about that. It made sense in those days and really up until modern times in that most of the people in prison were there for political or socio-economic reasons. Most “criminals” were done away with. Now most of the people in prison are criminals so it no longer makes sense. What does make sense is runaway pathological altruism. Just the Jesus influence alone has had close to 2 thousand years to warp our genes.
no. It was way different than you'd expect. Not a lot of fights and no rapes or anything like that. You had a job but that was only 4 to 6 hours a day, no weekends, and they didn't really care if you just skipped work and hung out in the main area to play chess or watch TV or whatever. If you miss too much work you don't get to use the gym or the library though. The food was bad but not terrible and you could also buy additional snacks if you had somebody on the outside to put money in your account.
Did you get banged? And I mean that not in the good way.
There is a surprisingly high number of people who want to write to prisoners, I guess because they figure people in jails are likely to write back.
That may be part of it, but I think there is a lot more going on emotionally. I can’t quite figure it out, but it may stem from our “humanitarian” impulse. It might be a real shibboleth that can separate utopian leftists from the normal.
All I see are bitter and nasty old fools,
Hey!!
I’m not nasty.
Hong Kong actually has a slightly higher vaccination rate than the US, by about 5%.
That’s not what I read. I read that the vaccination rate for older people is very low, which is why Omicron is taking out so many.
I served 17 months.
Did you get banged? And I mean that not in the good way.
no. It was way different than you'd expect. Not a lot of fights and no rapes or anything like that. You had a job but that was only 4 to 6 hours a day, no weekends, and they didn't really care if you just skipped work and hung out in the main area to play chess or watch TV or whatever. If you miss too much work you don't get to use the gym or the library though. The food was bad but not terrible and you could also buy additional snacks if you had somebody on the outside to put money in your account.
Did you get banged? And I mean that not in the good way.
This points to natural immunity, of which HK has none,
It points to an extremely low vaccination rate. Vaccination lessens the severity of Omicron, but does nothing to reduce contagion.
Actually, red potatoes are very good as boiled potatoes, so they are right</b potatoes.
To be precise, red “Arsh” potatoes, unpeeled, freshly dug, (hours, not days) are supreme when boiled and served with English peas or just as good sliced and baked in butter.
when made form right potatoes.
What do they taste like if made from commie left potatoes?
So are you, but that doesn’t stop you from blurting out nonsense all of the time.
Well he has been RN for a long time, I think back in 2015 or 2017 or whatever he was poasting plans to strip-mine Ukraine of all talent and was analyzing the strategic situation there. What's happening seems clear: AK has made a very large bet that what is happening here is the vindication of the Russian nationalist strategy, and the start of a revision of the Western-hegemonic world order. Both reputationally and emotionally, he is obviously very invested in this as this event has been years in the making. If the Russian effort deflates with a big fart and they're left hyperinflating and irrelevant, this would obviously invalidate most of his professional efforts. He 'went sideways' on Ukraine supporters because he is obviously simply a nationalist at war with Ukraine, and that tends to heat things up.
for whatever reason he went sideways on the Ukrainian supporters here
Well, looking at the level of discourse between AK and a lot of the commenting people here, I think AK will leave soon enough by himself and then the whole thing will bleed out. At some point, mocking, insulting, and fighting with people just gets boring and then you leave.Replies: @German_reader, @iffen
It would be best to drive a stake into it
looking at the level of discourse between AK and a lot of the commenting people
Yeah, to me he seems to be doing a lot of gratuitous BS with regard to some commenters, but that comes with the hard core nationalism. I don’t read all of the comments so maybe he is picking up on some particular “attitudes”.
for whatever reason he went sideways on the Ukrainian supporters here
Well he has been RN for a long time, I think back in 2015 or 2017 or whatever he was poasting plans to strip-mine Ukraine of all talent and was analyzing the strategic situation there. What’s happening seems clear: AK has made a very large bet that what is happening here is the vindication of the Russian nationalist strategy, and the start of a revision of the Western-hegemonic world order. Both reputationally and emotionally, he is obviously very invested in this as this event has been years in the making. If the Russian effort deflates with a big fart and they’re left hyperinflating and irrelevant, this would obviously invalidate most of his professional efforts. He ‘went sideways’ on Ukraine supporters because he is obviously simply a nationalist at war with Ukraine, and that tends to heat things up.
It would be best to drive a stake into it
Well, looking at the level of discourse between AK and a lot of the commenting people here, I think AK will leave soon enough by himself and then the whole thing will bleed out. At some point, mocking, insulting, and fighting with people just gets boring and then you leave.
AK stopped producing new content here months ago and up until the start of the recent war wasn't even much of a presence anymore in this comments section, so he hasn't been central to the discussions here for some time.
I think AK will leave soon enough by himself and then the whole thing will bleed out.
Why? I can't be the only one who enjoys watching Karlin self-imploding. It's not like this community hinges on his presence. When he went away, commenting activity barely budged.Replies: @iffenYeah, for whatever reason he went sideways on the Ukrainian supporters here.
Seems safe to say that it’s over for this ‘community’, however. There’s no way any sort of cordiality will be re-established here between AK and everyone else
It would be best to drive a stake into it, but our esteemed publisher is not that sort of a person.
I can’t be the only one who enjoys watching Karlin self-imploding.
This is quite peculiar unless you have some sort of deliberate animosity toward him.
This emotion-based activism is tiresome.
You do know that the emotional/cognitive dichotomy is not valid.
Or did you forget that?
somehow, I just don’t think it will work anymore
Jesus H., I’m about to dial 911.
The end is very near.
AaronB. has written something that I agree with.
(Which part of “We don’t f***ing trust you cocks***ers do they not understand.”)
So, you are all in for Ukraine unless your dick gets pinched.
Of course, it may well be very true that Putin would not dare to go nuclear if we declare a no-fly-zone (or carry out any other hostile action)
Of course Putin would react, at a minimum with conventional missile strikes on NATO air bases. But it’s possible that he’d immediately resort to tactical nukes (maybe just a single one, for demonstration effects, which apparently would be according to Russian military doctrine). And depending on NATO’s reactions (that is whether NATO would back down or not…or maybe retaliate with a nuclear strike of their own) things could then easily escalate to a strategic level, leading to the deaths of dozens of millions.
I agree entirely with the rest of your comment (also am glad Biden is president right now, not Trump or some McCain-like Republican loony. As bad as he is on other issues, at least Biden still seems to retain a healthy fear of nuclear war).
Also pretty funny that Anatoly is talking about racial war
Yeah, doesn’t make a lot of sense.
I tuned in to his blog to learn about “Russian stuff” and now he is asking his commenters what’s going on.
Seems safe to say that it’s over for this ‘community’, however. There’s no way any sort of cordiality will be re-established here between AK and everyone else
Yeah, for whatever reason he went sideways on the Ukrainian supporters here.
It would be best to drive a stake into it, but our esteemed publisher is not that sort of a person.
Why? I can't be the only one who enjoys watching Karlin self-imploding. It's not like this community hinges on his presence. When he went away, commenting activity barely budged.Replies: @iffenYeah, for whatever reason he went sideways on the Ukrainian supporters here.
Seems safe to say that it’s over for this ‘community’, however. There’s no way any sort of cordiality will be re-established here between AK and everyone else
It would be best to drive a stake into it, but our esteemed publisher is not that sort of a person.
Well he has been RN for a long time, I think back in 2015 or 2017 or whatever he was poasting plans to strip-mine Ukraine of all talent and was analyzing the strategic situation there. What's happening seems clear: AK has made a very large bet that what is happening here is the vindication of the Russian nationalist strategy, and the start of a revision of the Western-hegemonic world order. Both reputationally and emotionally, he is obviously very invested in this as this event has been years in the making. If the Russian effort deflates with a big fart and they're left hyperinflating and irrelevant, this would obviously invalidate most of his professional efforts. He 'went sideways' on Ukraine supporters because he is obviously simply a nationalist at war with Ukraine, and that tends to heat things up.
for whatever reason he went sideways on the Ukrainian supporters here
Well, looking at the level of discourse between AK and a lot of the commenting people here, I think AK will leave soon enough by himself and then the whole thing will bleed out. At some point, mocking, insulting, and fighting with people just gets boring and then you leave.Replies: @German_reader, @iffen
It would be best to drive a stake into it
Well said. Shock and disbelief indeed. This is a racial holy war against Western Supremacy
Are you doing hallucinogenics again?
The willingness to use nukes has never been tested.
Duh! The “good guys” used them.
I'm suprised it replacement happened that late, honestly. But I don't really know a lot about the history of Germanic languages other than English, and to a lesser extent (from what little is known, at least), Gothic and its close relative, Vandalic.If I think of English personal names in use I think they're even scarcer, with nearly all sounding distinctly old-fashioned: Edgar, Edward Alfred, Edith (lol), Edmund. I suppose you can throw in a few common native Welsh or Goidelic ones too, Rhys, Arthur, Owen, Broderick (lol), Sean, Alastair (lol), Gareth, Lloyd.. hm, seems Celtic names are more common than Anglo-Saxon ones.. anyway, as I've implied, quite a few of them sound quite comical to native or fluent Anglophones nowadays.Armenian still has a few extremely common names of pagan/Zoroastrian origin, Anahit, Ani, Hayk, Arman, Tigran, Nare, Arpine, Gor.. on balance I think more than English, even without counting Greek-derived names.
Then in 1200 AD it’s like a population replacement has happened. All names are christianized and indeed most ‘normal’ Dutch names are the usual localized versions of Biblical figures’ names. I’d say 80% of normal names here are indeed not Germanic.
Uselessly? That's a pretty stupid statement. For some reason I noticed that Dutchies seem to be the people with the most negative attitude to their own language in all of Europe, constantly making half-jokes how useless and ugly ('Dutch isn't a language, its German with a throat-disease!' lol) their own tongue is lol. I guess its their proximity to England, near-universal English-ability, and lack of anything (that I know of) that can compare to Goethe, Kirkegard, or the Norse epics.
Likewise the old Germanic kindreds were extinguished and our way of life replaced with christianized forms. Yet, uselessly, the Dutch language persists even as christianity mutates everything around it.
The Dutch culture will still exist in a mutated form, but culture and language are ultimately not that important as they are just an appendix of the world-outlook.I suppose that's unfortunately quite true now. Arnold Toynbee, way back in the 50s (A Study of History), had grave concerns about 'all of Civilisation's eggs falling into one basket' [i.e., the Western], with all the others dead, decaying or moribund (whilst very memorably quoting Coleridge's 'Rime of the Ancient Mariner' doing it, although using actual numbers like Turchin would have been better), curiously Toynbee only considered 'Muslim Civilisation' (he saw Israel essentially Western, linguistic atavism aside.. I would say Israel is very distinct now) as the other viable living example at the time.
I guess the main take from Toynbee’s writings is that Civilisations die by cultural suicide, and practically never by force.
It is quite clear that we can read the scattered bones, tea leaves, animal entrails, history, etc. as we wish.
imo a lot of Karlin's recent statements are verging on caricature, like a recycling of the dumbest talking points of early 20th century nationalists. Sure, it's possible Russia will succeed in her current enterprise, maybe everything will work out to Karlin's satisfaction and lead to a glorious rebirth of the Russian empire. But still..."national rejuvenation through war", lol, what could possibly go wrong with such an approach, not like it's ever been tried before. I don't think one has to categorically reject nationalism in its entirety to be irritated by this kind of all-or-nothing risk-taking (and its implication that Russia is worthless if the present war doesn't lead to a glorious future).
Now, unless you can come up with some categorical denunciation of nationalism, one that applies to me, you and AK, then your attacks on AK are mere partisanship on your part.
I didn’t say anything about him being an outstanding example of a virtuous nationalist. I just mean that he has the right, just as you have the right to take the side of Ukraine.
And I have already posted that we Americans will owe an eternal debt to Ukrainians if this war does in fact force rich European countries to start investing in their own military and defense.
Since Dan C. is MIA (Russian foreign legion?), I wish to offer a defense of AK. This is not a defense of the invasion of Ukraine. Over the years, mostly from reading this blog, and following the trail from those comments to somewhat reliable information, I have formed the opinion that Ukrainians are “entitled” to their own country. But then so are hundreds of other “peoples”. (Perhaps like the people in Donbass.) More to the point, it is not my job (nor should it be my country’s) to help each and every one of them attain their nationalist goals. It is also not my job, nor my country’s job, to defend countries, nascent or otherwise, that foolishly provoke a powerful neighboring nation.
With that note out of the way, it is obvious that AK is now a fully committed Russian partisan. Now, unless you can come up with some categorical denunciation of nationalism, one that applies to me, you and AK, then your attacks on AK are mere partisanship on your part.
imo a lot of Karlin's recent statements are verging on caricature, like a recycling of the dumbest talking points of early 20th century nationalists. Sure, it's possible Russia will succeed in her current enterprise, maybe everything will work out to Karlin's satisfaction and lead to a glorious rebirth of the Russian empire. But still..."national rejuvenation through war", lol, what could possibly go wrong with such an approach, not like it's ever been tried before. I don't think one has to categorically reject nationalism in its entirety to be irritated by this kind of all-or-nothing risk-taking (and its implication that Russia is worthless if the present war doesn't lead to a glorious future).
Now, unless you can come up with some categorical denunciation of nationalism, one that applies to me, you and AK, then your attacks on AK are mere partisanship on your part.
She’s not white, she’s Jewish.
The problem is when honor is de-legitimized and men have no way to climb the social ladder with it||
When a Bandit can become a General, and be recognized for his ability is a fair Aryan society||
ਵਾਹਿਗੁਰੂਜੀਕਾਖਾਲਸਾਵਾਹਿਗੁਰੂਜੀਕੀਫਤਿਹ
Russia demanded that the autonomous territory be given veto power over the rest of the country's policies. No country would tolerate that. It would mean EU off the table and Ukraine either forced into Eurasia or in its unaffiliated limbo that led to impoverishment after the USSR split up (in contrast to every one of its neighbors who linked to the EU and who got a lot wealthier by doing so). Majority of Ukrainian people rejected this.
It is so simply and obvious that we must look for a reason why it was not done.
One of the two main pro-Russian politicians in Ukraine, Vadim Rabinovich, is Jewish:
Dem Jews?
Sometimes if you don’t take the half of the loaf you starve.
Russia demanded that the autonomous territory be given veto power over the rest of the country's policies. No country would tolerate that. It would mean EU off the table and Ukraine either forced into Eurasia or in its unaffiliated limbo that led to impoverishment after the USSR split up (in contrast to every one of its neighbors who linked to the EU and who got a lot wealthier by doing so). Majority of Ukrainian people rejected this.
It is so simply and obvious that we must look for a reason why it was not done.
One of the two main pro-Russian politicians in Ukraine, Vadim Rabinovich, is Jewish:
Dem Jews?
veto power over the rest of the country’s policies. No country would tolerate that
Black Americans have a veto power over who the Democratic Presidential nominee will be. That translates into a more or less 50% veto over who will be the American President.
Opinions are not so malleable when blood is involved.
Blood is thicker than water, but so is shit.
The Ukrainian people could have avoided this by giving a little autonomy to the Donbass and pledging military neutrality.
It is so simply and obvious that we must look for a reason why it was not done.
Dem Jews?
Russia demanded that the autonomous territory be given veto power over the rest of the country's policies. No country would tolerate that. It would mean EU off the table and Ukraine either forced into Eurasia or in its unaffiliated limbo that led to impoverishment after the USSR split up (in contrast to every one of its neighbors who linked to the EU and who got a lot wealthier by doing so). Majority of Ukrainian people rejected this.
It is so simply and obvious that we must look for a reason why it was not done.
One of the two main pro-Russian politicians in Ukraine, Vadim Rabinovich, is Jewish:
Dem Jews?
fed on a diet of expired off brand Doritos.
That’s where that after taste in the Flavor Blasted Xtra Cheddar comes from!
I have repeatedly stated that the better option is a gradual decoupling. So, "love" is clearly invalid language construction
A123 will love this for an opportunity to exploit for his Trumpist bloc autarky/hard decoupling dreams
America is food independent.
I just came from the local Wally-world and there was not a single bag of Goldfish. Just goes to show the “depth” of knowledge of an Israeli propaganda bot.
It may turn out that we will always owe a debt to Ukrainians if this puts us on a saner geopolitical path and compels us to hang up our world policeman’s badge.
Speaking of BFFs and allies:
https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2022/mar/9/saudi-arabia-uae-leaders-decline-calls-biden-amid-/
The leaders of Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates declined the White House’s requests to speak with President Biden about rising oil prices, according to a report Wednesday.
Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and the UAE’s Sheik Mohammed bin Zayed al Nahyan turned down the opportunity to speak with Mr. Biden, the Wall Street Journal reported, citing U.S. and Middle East officials.
It doesn’t seem like that long ago that none would dare dissing the Prez like this.
Do you also write A123?
My comment was purely that Russia has a better case than the US did in Iraq. Not that it has an empirically bullet proof case, just a more plausible one.
This highlights the shambolic nature of the “rules based international system”. Russia and China have correctly read that American might makes right, and are acting accordingly. This is not to necessarily defend them, since , as always the blood and tears of the common man feeds the ambitions of politicians.
I honestly don’t feel that either Russia or the West is blameless in Ukraine. There is plenty of blame to go around, but the Ukrainian people are the ones who will ultimately pay for the ambitions of all sides. It’s a tragedy, and I feel deeply for the Ukrainian people who were put into an untenable situation by their own government, the West, and Russia.
No, I don’t think that the Ukrainian movement in Ukraine has been coopted by the US or Nuland. There is a distinct difference in policy going on now, where the West has refused to go ahead and create a no fly zone over Ukraine. Zelensky has clearly pointed his finger at the US accusing it of being cowardly and such for its inability to do so. If Ukraine and Zelensky were under the thumb of Washington, he clearly would not be making such loud cries of cowardice. There was also the late shipments of weaponry that could have been made much earlier.
This is basic stage management, perhaps Zelensky is aware of his role, perhaps not. He doesn't seem as intelligent or shameless as Navalny, so I suspect he doesn't, it's always more effective that way regardless. I only feel sorry for Ukrainians caught up in all this whole sham.Replies: @Mr. Hack, @German_reader
If Ukraine and Zelensky were under the thumb of Washington, he clearly would not be making such loud cries of cowardice. There was also the late shipments of weaponry that could have been made much earlier.
under my name but I don’t even have moderation powers
Peter, Peter, pumpkin eater has lost his moderation theatre.
I remember you defending R. Unz vis-a-vis this issue with Peter Frost.
Serves you right.
Well, unfortunately, on the general ground facts, I don't disagree. But now, after Russia has been reckless enough to initiate a full-scale war (perhaps not intended or expected as such, but in some sense, the incompetence implied by this is even worse) there's simply no way of backing out of this without closing without uncontestable military victory, without revolution and anarchy breaking out in Russia itself. It would be the 1990s collapse all over again, except this time, absolutely no mercy would be given. Russia as a country would be comprehensively destroyed, to be totally Americanised, its corpse asset-stripped and flooded with pajeets and assorted Bantu tribesmen.
There really doesn’t seem to be any way out of this mess, unless Putin moderates his demands at least somewhat (which seems unlikely).
Only the US ultimately benefits from this,
Elephants, mice, trampling, etc.
No doubt about it, but it still seems to me Putin miscalculated, apparently he thought Ukraine would falter quickly and there wouldn't be that much bloodshed. Now it looks like it will be a bloody war with many really ugly scenes like the shelling in Kharkiv. I think the political fallout from this is worse than Putin expected, and there doesn't seem to be any good way out of this mess.
Unless Russia decides to pull back because of a behind-the-scene deal, they will win.
Yeah, I probably shouldn't make Karlin's megalomaniacal pronouncements about capturing Ukraine's human capital of 40 million the basis of my analysis.Replies: @Yellowface Anon, @Beckow
Don’t make their goal too big so you can claim they failed
We cannot know if they miscalculated if we don’t know what their goals are. The official goals are being achieved. The other speculative ones, AK’s views, etc…there is no evidence those were the objectives, actually just the opposite.
The “fallout is worse” argument doesn’t say: worse than what? One can make an argument that “fallout is less” based on NATO departing very quickly, no NATO ships in the Black See, and explicit statements that there will be “no NATO forces in Ukraine”, and energy sales still going on.
You focus too much on PR: the emotional anger in the West. People are angry all over the world at lots of things, it has some impact but it doesn’t change realities on the ground. The fully deranged TLaxa is projecting what she/he would like to see – and hallucinating out of anger about totally made-up situations.
One more time: if Russia simply takes Donbas, protects Crimea and the Black See coast, degrades Ukie military, and makes sure that no NATO forces are in Ukraine – how is that a loss? Who cares about who is stealing the Western aid in Kiev or Lviv (the West should, but they don’t)? They specifically and repeatedly said that they have no interest in ruling all of Ukraine. Why can’t we just stay with what the sides are saying – why go into a lala land of made-up maximalist dreams?
I enjoy reading your hard hitting comments here. This one was a good example of that, except the clincher at the very end? This varmint's corpse and soul should be exterminated and forgotten about as soon as possible. His memory should share an equal space in history with his predecessor, Adolph Hitler.Replies: @Yevardian
Putin can be rehabilitated in a couple of decades as a memory if need be.
Pure copium, Ukrainian government will fall within the month, any sane person should hope for the same, regardless of what they think of Putin at this point. It’s not as if ordinary Russians have genocidal feelings towards Ukrainians anyway, unlike the Azeri-Armenian conflict.
I don’t see any benefit in dragging out this war any longer with ultimately futile resistance or the West sending weapons systems (that will get captured anyway), and the longer fighting goes on the more dead, the more destroyed the Ukraine will be, and the higher chance of global escalation.
Czechia eschewed any quixotic heroics after they realised there would get no backing after Münich, and so they kept Prague intact, whilst Warsaw got razed to the ground. If Zelensky and other diehards wants to be a martyr, good for him, but he shouldn’t take the whole country down with them, when there’s absolutely zero chance of winning.
I have never seen a single substantiated fact on any topic of importance in a single one of her posts, though her digging up the Goebbel’s worshipper’s internet history was impressive, shows what women can do when faced with a task that genuinely interests them (hint: its not geopolitics).
It doesn't really matter what you or I think or feel about the situation. It's a matter for the Ukrainian people to determine for themselves. After all, it's their country, their land, their homes and their families that they're fighting to protect. So far, everybody is amazed at how well Ukrainians have been holding out. They feel no compunction to give up at this point. Clearly, they've managed to confound their Russian invaders. I think that it's possible for the Ukrainians to supplant the memory of the brave 300 Spartans of the ancient world, who managed to hold off and disperse the vastly larger and well equipped soldiers of Xerxes. The fighting spirit of men fighting to protect what is theirs should never be underestimated.Replies: @Yevardian, @Wokechoke
I don’t see any benefit in dragging out this war any longer with ultimately futile resistance or the West sending weapons systems (that will get captured anyway), and the longer fighting goes on the more dead, the more destroyed the Ukraine will be, and the higher chance of global escalation.
I have mixed feelings, I don't think Russia should just get away with such an egregious breach of the norms supposedly regulating inter-state relations. Harsh sanctions are certainly appropriate, and even sending anti-tank weapons and missiles is fine with me (giving Ukraine planes is already pushing it however). However, ideally this would be coupled with some sort of diplomatic approach giving Putin a chance to end this invasion without endangering his regime. I think Western states should offer a treaty about Ukrainian neutrality and recognition of Crimea as Russian. But of course there's little chance of that, given how stupid Western elites and how hysterical segments of the Western public are.Replies: @utu
I don’t see any benefit in dragging out this war any longer with ultimately futile resistance or the West sending weapons systems
When were the Greek words written? I highly suspect it is a temporal mistranslation.Until Satan let lose his spawn, The Anti-Christ Muhammad (a.k.a. The Colonial Prophet) in ~600 AD, language did not exist to properly express then necessary Biblical warnings. Even after the fact, language resistance continues. Let us consider the correct translation:Exodus 22:18 -- Thou shalt not suffer a Muslim live.
This is not a mistranslation, it is in the original Greek (emphases added):
You are less of a master of The Bible than you are of American politics. Sent an urgent message to your handlers that you need a critical software update.
Autonomy for the eastern provinces and military neutrality for Ukraine.
How fucking hard can that be?
Sure, ideally. We know precisely what the 'approach' should be: one verbal concession and one symbolic statement.- Zelensky, NATO and Biden announce that Ukraine will not be in NATO- Zelensky announces that he will not tolerate violence against Russian speakers in Ukraine and that Nazi symbols will be prohibited. That would 'save face' for everyone since even West couldn't object. Is that so hard? Or unreasonable?Replies: @iffen, @German_reader, @A123
...Ideally there should still be some sort of diplomatic approach allowing...
Nazi symbols will be prohibited
Would this mean that we can’t wear our MAGA caps in The Ukraine?
So, feel free to swing on QAnon… but it has nothing to do with me.
Yeah, but your sister is in bed with them (several, each night).
The fake election of a mental invalid is not just problematic for the U.S. -- It is globally destabilizing. Tragically, with Kamala Harris in this wings, there is not a good way out of the fiasco Nazicrats have created for the world.
Former White House Physician Says Biden Is Not Cognitively Fit To Deal With Russia Crisis
“The whole country is seeing his mental cognitive issues on display for over a year now, and there’s really no question in most people’s minds that there’s something going on with him,” said Jackson.
“He’s not cognitively the same as he used to be and, in my mind, not fit to be our president right now,” he added.
The Congressman said that the 79-year-old representing America at a time when a message of strength needs to be sent isn’t going to end well.
Why is the U.S. response so incoherent?
I will defer to the Israeli propaganda bot as the authority on incoherency.
Is Anatoly Karlin still a shill for Richard Spencer?
Pro-Putin Russian (fake) "journalist" Anatoly Karlin is in fact a white nationalist who attended neo-Nazi conferences with Richard Spencer : AntifascistsofReddit https://t.co/FuQBcMrEC6
— Franklyn Monk (@fqmonk) February 26, 2022
he seems to have understood that Germany’s previous approach to Russia has (unfortunately) just failed in a pretty drastic manner.
As in personal life, failure doesn’t have to be the end. It’s usually the failure to learn from failure that is devastating, and, on that point, the U. S. has no equal.
Obviously that's demented, I don't agree at all with idiots demanding no-fly zones and the like, and it's worrying that such proposals are even brought up by supposed elites. However, at this point I don't think there's a real risk of something like this being implemented. NATO's Stoltenberg has already ruled out direct intervention, and Biden's administration seems also to be quite sensible in this regard at least.
There are many overt calls in the U. S. MSM for direct NATO “boots on the ground” intervention in Ukraine.
Your argument has a certain merit (certainly am not looking forward to urban warfare which would kill lots of civilians, Ukrainians will have to make very difficult decisions in this regard), but I don't want Russia to secure a bloodless win and be able to pretend that this was a professional intervention desired by most Ukrainians. And there aren't just moral reasons, I admit I'm also looking at this from German self-interest. I don't want Germany to isolate herself completely in Europe and NATO because of alleged appeasement of Russia. And I also feel Russia has abused Germany's good will and willingness for "dialogue" with this invasion (also other unfriendly actions, like the assassination probably carried out on behalf of Russian intelligence in Berlin). So a signal has to be sent that hard limits will be set to the kind of behaviour Russia can get away with.Replies: @iffen, @Astuteobservor II
How do you justify your approval of German arm shipments to Ukraine? It will just increase the body count and what purpose will that serve?
and it’s worrying that such proposals are even brought up by supposed elites.
I’m not nearly as confident as you are that they won’t be able to push us in. I don’t know how extensively you follow U. S. MSM, but the push for a war was overwhelming, and they got it. Maybe we will see some opposition in Congress to the proposed supplemental package of aid.
You make some good points.
Interesting to me is supposed interest of Sweden and Finland in joining NATO.
I hope your government follows through on defense spending increase and will push it even higher, then you can start talking about real limitations on Russian behavior.
Scholz just announced a 100 billion Euro extra package for the Bundeswehr, which is at least a start.
I hope your government follows through on defense spending increase and will push it even higher
(with lots of none too subtle calls for military intervention)
There are many overt calls in the U. S. MSM for direct NATO “boots on the ground” intervention in Ukraine.
How do you justify your approval of German arm shipments to Ukraine? It will just increase the body count and what purpose will that serve?
Obviously that's demented, I don't agree at all with idiots demanding no-fly zones and the like, and it's worrying that such proposals are even brought up by supposed elites. However, at this point I don't think there's a real risk of something like this being implemented. NATO's Stoltenberg has already ruled out direct intervention, and Biden's administration seems also to be quite sensible in this regard at least.
There are many overt calls in the U. S. MSM for direct NATO “boots on the ground” intervention in Ukraine.
Your argument has a certain merit (certainly am not looking forward to urban warfare which would kill lots of civilians, Ukrainians will have to make very difficult decisions in this regard), but I don't want Russia to secure a bloodless win and be able to pretend that this was a professional intervention desired by most Ukrainians. And there aren't just moral reasons, I admit I'm also looking at this from German self-interest. I don't want Germany to isolate herself completely in Europe and NATO because of alleged appeasement of Russia. And I also feel Russia has abused Germany's good will and willingness for "dialogue" with this invasion (also other unfriendly actions, like the assassination probably carried out on behalf of Russian intelligence in Berlin). So a signal has to be sent that hard limits will be set to the kind of behaviour Russia can get away with.Replies: @iffen, @Astuteobservor II
How do you justify your approval of German arm shipments to Ukraine? It will just increase the body count and what purpose will that serve?
“Shane! Shane! Come back!”
“A gun is a tool, Marian; no better or no worse than any other tool: an axe, a shovel or anything. A gun is as good or as bad as the man using it. Remember that.”
The outcome that Russians in their delusions believed is that Ukrainians (other than Galicians, even Russian nationalists are not that crazy) would welcome Russians as liberators and that a new and happy union of brother-peoples would be created.
Heed my word – you are delusional if you disbelieve there is one and only one outcome for the Ukraine.
He thinks of Ukrainian nationalism as "Nazification." He has done far more for "Nazification" than anyone ever has. This is all very sad, so many lives lost, so many martyrs made.
Do you, really, believe that Putler would commit to denazification of the Ukraine if he weren’t 1500% sure of the success of his campaign!?
A Russia that invades and murders Ukrainians (or any other Slavs), including through the use of Chechens, deserves to fail and to end and to be replaced by s0me other kind of Russia.
I hope you do realize that his failure would be the end of Russia!
He clearly screwed up here. Echoes of what was said about Hitler - if he had stopped at Sudetenland and Austria he would have been known in history as a wonderful regatherer of German lands.
Do you really believe he’s the madman who’d demolish Russia!?
To be fair to the Russians, they are only using ~1/3rd of their mobilised manpower at the border. They are avoiding hitting critical civilian infrastructure that you would normally do if you were trying to win the war without holding back.
Clearly, the Russians understand the tightrope they are walking and try to minimise civilian casualties to the greatest extent possible. The escalation of NATO by sending arms convoys to re-inforce the Ukrainian army will not help matters and it’s intended to force Russia’s hand. NATO would prefer Russia let go of all inhibitions, thereby massively increasing civilian casualties. Will Ukraine still be able to join NATO or EU? No, but Western capitals do not care for Ukrainaian lives. They prefer them be radicialised and a horn in the side of the Kremlin no matter the cost – after all, it’s not Westerners who pay the ultimate price.
It’s a very cynical strategy and it’s a tragedy that Ukraine is allowing itself to be used in this way for people who ultimately don’t care much for its people.
Is Karlin volunteering to fight the “Nazis” in Ukraine?
He might just be waiting to see if his help is needed. Is that what you are waiting on?
I think those reports of the Ukrainian government handing out rifles to the average Ivan are pretty sad. Someone is intent upon juicing the body count.
Bad energy expended to results ratio.
It’s above my paygrade to know for sure, but I would think that once you had an AI up and running, the cost of placing it in multiple locations would be minimal. By that I mean that once you have created it multiple copies would almost be free.
There is almost no reporting of what is actually happening in Russian media. It’s like the rest of the world knows more about this war than Russian media consumers are provided.
The Jew York Times leads their headlines each day with the latest mumblings by President Biden. So yes, Americans are much better informed about the actual war.
Sad to see AP from the comfort of his American home cheering on the Azov types
Whaaaatttt?!
He’s not rushing to Ukraine to bravely defend the Motherland.
Long story short, putting Tubman on the bill is anti-white as well as completely ridiculous.
How about we have Tubman on one side and Spartacus on the other?
a specific goal of weakening Russian power than relatively open migration policy to skilled, young Russians
Well, AK went there so that negates a big chunk of this idea.
Plot twist:
I’m actually a bot hired by the Amish to flood the internet with anti-tech reactionary sentiment. It’s all part of their 4D chess.
Did you ever tell the commenters here whether you would be going back to participate in the brave defense of the motherland?
convincing Iffen and YellowfaceAnon to accept Trumpism
Read what I write, not what someone writes about me. I voted for Trump both times, intend to vote for him again in 2024, and will encourage anyone inclined to listen to me to vote for him as well. Trump is a Hail Mary for the American people, and like most Hail Marys will likely fail.
An Israeli propaganda bot is the only thing that make sense to me.
It mostly writes gibberish. It doesn’t understand much about American politics. For example, it does not know what a never-Trumper is. Or if it does, it wishes to obfuscate or discredit the term.
We have read what you wrote. Those words led to my accurate, fact based response. Here are some simple questions:-1- How do your #NeverTrump lies about his 1st term "encourage" anyone to vote for him?
Read what I write, not what someone writes about me. I voted for Trump both times, intend to vote for him again in 2024, and will encourage anyone inclined to listen to me to vote for him as well.
No disinformation here. Only accuracy & truth. Everyone knows that vote fraud & other election crimes are the only reason why Not-The-President Biden illegally occupies by the White House.
“illegitimate regime in the U.S.” – Usually I do not read you except the pictures you attach that I can’t avoid to see. But I was wondering which archipelago of lunacy and disinformation were you coming from
I have a positive and hopeful track record on the ability of MAGA to restore and rebuild America. This is in spite of a great deal of negativity from #NeverTrump extremists who post here.To date, I concede that I have been 100% negative about illegitimate DNC rule. However this is because, so far, they have been 100% wrong. If the current, fake U.S. regime ever manages to do something correctly, I will give it appropriate credit. Even a blind squirrel occasionally finds a nut. PEACE 😇Replies: @utu
Unless I have missed something there was no single post by you that would be in some way affirmative and constructive.
Reading what and how you have just written it occurred to me that you can be Wally who from doing the CODOH Holocaust denial schtick which arguable could have been Zionist psy-op (heavily used and endorsed by Ron Unz at the earlier phase of TUR) was repurposed to MAGA, libertarian, Breitbart, Q-anon schtick. I think some psycho-linguistic analysis software would point to very similar make up on several levels of Wally and A123. The child like naive libertarianism of Wally and A123 is the greatest give away.
The difference between Karlin and Unz is that Karlin is earnest Kremlin supporter while Unz is Kremlin's useful idiot.Replies: @iffen, @Thulean Friend, @Ron Unz
https://www.unz.com/akarlin/open-thread-175/#comment-5179657
“Putin strikes me as a very sober-minded, cautious, and pragmatic individual. I suspect he and his advisors would regard the analysis presented as total lunacy…”
“But on a more serious note, Karlin’s essay did include mention that the Russian media has exhibited a total absence of any war-propaganda. Russia is certainly a semi-democracy and we’re talking about launching the biggest European military action since WWII, arguably the biggest war anywhere since 1945, even with some risk of a nuclear confrontation. Putin would have to be totally insane not to have laid any groundwork with his population.”
“If Putin doesn’t invade, he makes the American MSM and government look like total lunatics,”
“If Putin hasn’t invaded in another week or two, I think lots of people should start reconsidering their media sources and their heavy reliance on Twitter.”
Brains saturated by conspiracy theories are by definition resistant to reality.
I see that Biden is talking more sanctions, which is quite a laugh.
Don’t make light of this.
He is promising severe sanctions. Not only that, he promises to lead the world in “holding Russia accountable”.
The Russkies better turn tail now while they still have a chance.
I wonder if we will find out if Putler has real balls.
Will he, at some near time, issue an ultimatum on the removal of offensive weapons in the Balts?
The invasion (or reclamation) is under way, but we don’t know what the end will look like.
One firm piece of information that will be proven is whether the national IQ of Ukraine is higher than that of Georgia.
undermine Western democracies.
I think that we are doing well enough on our own with that project.
whereas I wisely follow instinct not to.
You would be wise to not ignore her ideas, good or bad, too often.
That is, if you want to keep this girlfriend around.