The Unz Review • An Alternative Media Selection$
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • B
Show CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
AgreeDisagreeThanksLOLTroll
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Thanks, LOL, or Troll with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used three times during any eight hour period.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Current Commenter
says:

Leave a Reply -


 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
$
Submitted comments have been licensed to The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Commenting Disabled While in Translation Mode
Commenters to FollowHide Excerpts
By Authors Filter?
Anatoly Karlin Andrew Anglin Andrew Joyce Audacious Epigone Boyd D. Cathey C.J. Hopkins Chanda Chisala Eric Margolis Eric Striker Forum Fred Reed Gilad Atzmon Godfree Roberts Gregory Hood Guillaume Durocher Ilana Mercer Israel Shamir James Kirkpatrick James Thompson Jared Taylor JayMan John Derbyshire Jonathan Cook Kevin Barrett Kevin MacDonald Lance Welton Laurent Guyénot Linh Dinh Michael Hudson Mike Whitney Pat Buchanan Patrick Cockburn Paul Craig Roberts Paul Kersey Pepe Escobar Peter Frost Philip Giraldi Razib Khan Robert Weissberg Ron Paul Ron Unz Steve Sailer The Saker Tobias Langdon Trevor Lynch A. Graham A Southerner Adam Hochschild Aedon Cassiel Agha Hussain Ahmet Öncü Alan Macleod Albemarle Man Alex Graham Alexander Cockburn Alexander Hart Alexander Jacob Alfred McCoy Alison Weir Allan Wall Allegra Harpootlian Amalric De Droevig Amr Abozeid Anand Gopal Anastasia Katz Andre Damon Andre Vltchek Andreas Canetti Andrei Martyanov Andrew Cockburn Andrew Fraser Andrew Hamilton Andrew J. Bacevich Andrew Napolitano Andrew S. Fischer Andy Kroll Angie Saxon Ann Jones Anna Tolstoyevskaya Anonymous Anonymous Attorney Anthony Boehm Anthony DiMaggio Tony Hall Antiwar Staff Antonius Aquinas Antony C. Black Ariel Dorfman Arlie Russell Hochschild Arno Develay Arnold Isaacs Artem Zagorodnov Astra Taylor AudaciousEpigone Austen Layard Ava Muhammad Aviva Chomsky Ayman Fadel Barbara Ehrenreich Barbara Garson Barbara Myers Barry Lando Barton Cockey Beau Albrecht Belle Chesler Ben Fountain Ben Freeman Benjamin Villaroel Beverly Gologorsky Bill Black Bill Moyers Blake Archer Williams Bob Dreyfuss Bonnie Faulkner Book Brad Griffin Bradley Moore Brenton Sanderson Brett Redmayne-Titley Brian Dew Brian R. Wright Brittany Smith Carl Boggs Carl Horowitz Carolyn Yeager Catherine Crump César Keller Chalmers Johnson Charles Bausman Charles Goodhart Charles Wood Charlie O'Neill Charlottesville Survivor Chase Madar Chris Hedges Chris Roberts Christian Appy Christopher DeGroot Christopher Donovan Christopher Ketcham Christopher Martin Chuck Spinney Coleen Rowley Colin Liddell Cooper Sterling Craig Murray Cynthia Chung Dahr Jamail Dan E. Phillips Dan Sanchez Daniel Barge Daniel McAdams Daniel Vinyard Danny Sjursen Dave Kranzler Dave Lindorff David Barsamian David Boyajian David Bromwich David Chibo David Gordon David Haggith David Irving David L. McNaron David Lorimer David Martin David North David Stockman David Vine David Walsh David William Pear David Yorkshire Dean Baker Dennis Dale Dennis Saffran Diana Johnstone Dilip Hiro Dirk Bezemer Donald Thoresen Alan Sabrosky Dr. Ejaz Akram Dr. Ridgely Abdul Mu’min Muhammad E. Michael Jones Eamonn Fingleton Ed Warner Edmund Connelly Eduardo Galeano Edward Curtin Edward Dutton Egbert Dijkstra Egor Kholmogorov Ellen Brown Ellen Packer Ellison Lodge Eric Draitser Eric Peters Eric Rasmusen Eric Zuesse Erik Edstrom Erika Eichelberger Erin L. Thompson Eugene Gant Eugene Girin Eve Mykytyn F. Roger Devlin Fadi Abu Shammalah Federale Fenster The First Millennium Revisionist Fordham T. Smith Franklin Lamb Franklin Stahl Frida Berrigan Friedrich Zauner Gabriel Black Gary Corseri Gary Heavin Gary North Gary Younge Gene Tuttle George Albert George Bogdanich George Galloway George Koo George Mackenzie George Szamuely Georgianne Nienaber Giles Corey Glen K. Allen Glenn Greenwald A. Beaujean Agnostic Alex B. Amnestic Arcane Asher Bb Bbartlog Ben G Birch Barlow Canton ChairmanK Chrisg Coffee Mug Darth Quixote David David B David Boxenhorn DavidB Diana Dkane DMI Dobeln Duende Dylan Ericlien Fly Gcochran Godless Grady Herrick Jake & Kara Jason Collins Jason Malloy Jason s Jeet Jemima Joel John Emerson John Quiggin JP Kele Kjmtchl Mark Martin Matoko Kusanagi Matt Matt McIntosh Michael Vassar Miko Ml Ole P-ter Piccolino Rosko Schizmatic Scorpius Suman TangoMan The Theresa Thorfinn Thrasymachus Wintz Graham Seibert Greg Grandin Greg Johnson Greg Klein Gregoire Chamayou Gregory Conte Gregory Wilpert Guest Admin Gunnar Alfredsson Gustavo Arellano Hannah Appel Hans-Hermann Hoppe Harri Honkanen Heiner Rindermann Henry Cockburn Hewitt E. Moore Hina Shamsi Howard Zinn Hubert Collins Hugh McInnish Hunter DeRensis Huntley Haverstock Ian Fantom Ira Chernus Ivan Kesić J. Alfred Powell J.B. Clark Jack Antonio Jack Dalton Jack Kerwick Jack Krak Jack Rasmus Jack Ravenwood Jack Sen Jake Bowyer James Bovard James Carroll James Carson Harrington James Chang James Fulford James Hanna James J. O'Meara James K. Galbraith James Lawrence James Petras Jane Lazarre Janice Kortkamp Jared S. Baumeister Jason C. Ditz Jason Kessler Jay Stanley Jean Marois Jef Costello Jeff J. Brown Jeffrey Blankfort Jeffrey St. Clair Jen Marlowe Jeremiah Goulka Jeremy Cooper Jesse Mossman JHR Writers Jim Daniel Jim Fetzer Jim Goad Jim Kavanagh JoAnn Wypijewski Joe Lauria Joel S. Hirschhorn Johannes Wahlstrom John W. Dower John Feffer John Fund John Harrison Sims John Huss John Morgan John Leonard John Pilger John Q. Publius John Rand John Reid John Ryan John Scales Avery John Siman John Stauber John T. Kelly John Taylor John Titus John Tremain John V. Walsh John Wear John Williams Jon Else Jon Entine Jonathan Alan King Jonathan Anomaly Jonathan Revusky Jonathan Rooper Jonathan Schell Joseph Kishore Joseph Sobran Jeshurun Tsarfat Juan Cole Judith Coburn Julian Bradford Julian Macfarlane Jung-Freud K.J. Noh Kacey Gunther Karel Van Wolferen Karen Greenberg Karl Haemers Karl Nemmersdorf Karl Thorburn Karlin Community Kees Van Der Pijl Keith Woods Kelley Vlahos Kenn Gividen Kenneth Vinther Kerry Bolton Kersasp D. Shekhdar Kevin Michael Grace Kevin Rothrock Kevin Sullivan Kevin Zeese Kshama Sawant Larry Romanoff Laura Gottesdiener Laura Poitras Lawrence G. Proulx Leo Hohmann Leonard R. Jaffee Liam Cosgrove Linda Preston Lipton Matthews Liv Heide Logical Meme Lorraine Barlett Louis Farrakhan M.G. Miles Mac Deford Maidhc O Cathail Malcolm Unwell Marco De Wit Marcus Alethia Marcus Apostate Marcus Cicero Marcus Devonshire Margaret Flowers Margot Metroland Mark Allen Mark Crispin Miller Mark Danner Mark Engler Mark Gullick Mark Lu Mark Perry Mark Weber Martin Witkerk Mary Phagan-Kean Matt Parrott Mattea Kramer Matthew Harwood Matthew Richer Matthew Stevenson Max Blumenthal Max Denken Max North Max Parry Max West Maya Schenwar Metallicman Michael Gould-Wartofsky Michael Hoffman Michael Quinn Michael Schwartz Michael T. Klare Michelle Malkin Miko Peled Mnar Muhawesh Moon Landing Skeptic Morgan Jones Morris V. De Camp Murray Polner N. Joseph Potts Nan Levinson Naomi Oreskes Nate Terani Nathan Cofnas Nathan Doyle Ned Stark Neil Kumar Nelson Rosit Nicholas R. Jeelvy Nicholas Stix Nick Griffin Nick Kollerstrom Nick Turse Nicolás Palacios Navarro Nils Van Der Vegte Noam Chomsky NOI Research Group Nomi Prins Norman Finkelstein OldMicrobiologist Oliver Boyd-Barrett Oliver Williams P.J. Collins Patrice Greanville Patrick Armstrong Patrick Cleburne Patrick Cloutier Patrick Martin Patrick McDermott Patrick Whittle Paul Cochrane Paul Edwards Paul Engler Paul Gottfried Paul Larudee Paul Mitchell Paul Nachman Paul Nehlen Paul Souvestre Paul Tripp Pedro De Alvarado Peter Baggins Ph.D. Peter Bradley Peter Brimelow Peter Gemma Peter Lee Peter Van Buren Philip Kraske Philip Weiss Pierre M. Sprey Pratap Chatterjee Publius Decius Mus Raches Radhika Desai Rajan Menon Ralph Nader Ralph Raico Ramin Mazaheri Ramziya Zaripova Ramzy Baroud Randy Shields Raul Diego Ray McGovern Rebecca Gordon Rebecca Solnit Rémi Tremblay Ricardo Duchesne Richard Falk Richard Galustian Richard Houck Richard Hugus Richard Krushnic Richard McCulloch Richard Silverstein Rick Shenkman Rita Rozhkova Robert Baxter Robert Bonomo Robert F. Kennedy Jr. Robert Fisk Robert Hampton Robert Henderson Robert Lipsyte Robert Parry Robert Roth Robert S. Griffin Robert Scheer Robert Stark Robert Stevens Robert Trivers Robert Wallace Robin Eastman Abaya RockaBoatus Roger Dooghy Rolo Slavskiy Romana Rubeo Ronald N. Neff Rory Fanning Ryan Andrews Ryan Dawson Sabri Öncü Sam Dickson Sam Francis Sam Husseini Sayed Hasan Scot Olmstead Scott Howard Sharmini Peries Sheldon Richman Sinclair Jenkins Southfront Editor Spencer Davenport Spencer J. Quinn Stefan Karganovic Steffen A. Woll Stephanie Savell Stephen F. Cohen Stephen J. Rossi Stephen J. Sniegoski Stephen Paul Foster Sterling Anderson Steve Fraser Steve Keen Steve Penfield Steven Yates Subhankar Banerjee Susan Southard Sydney Schanberg Tanya Golash-Boza Taxi Taylor McClain Taylor Young Ted Rall The Zman Theodore A. Postol Thierry Meyssan Thomas A. Fudge Thomas Anderson Thomas Dalton Thomas Ertl Thomas Frank Thomas Jackson Thomas O. Meehan Thorsten J. Pattberg Tim Shorrock Tim Weiner Timothy Vorgenss Todd E. Pierce Todd Gitlin Todd Miller Tom Engelhardt Tom Mysiewicz Tom Piatak Tom Suarez Tom Sunic Tracy Rosenberg Travis LeBlanc Vernon Thorpe Virginia Dare Vito Klein Vladimir Brovkin Vladislav Krasnov Vox Day W. Patrick Lang Walter Block Washington Watcher Washington Watcher II Wayne Allensworth Wesley Muhammad White Man Faculty Whitney Webb Wilhelm Kriessmann William Binney William DeBuys William Hartung William J. Astore Winslow T. Wheeler Ximena Ortiz Yan Shen Yvonne Lorenzo Zhores Medvedev
Nothing found
By Topics/Categories Filter?
2020 Election Academia Alt Right American Media American Military American Pravda Anti-Semitism Anti-Vaxx Arts/Letters Black Crime Black Lives Matter Blacks Britain Censorship China China/America Conspiracy Theories Coronavirus Culture/Society Democratic Party Donald Trump Economics Foreign Policy History Ideology Immigration IQ Iran Israel Israel Lobby Israel/Palestine Jews Joe Biden Movies Neocons Open Thread Political Correctness Politics Race/Ethnicity Russia Science Syria Ukraine United States World War II 汪精衛 100% Jussie Content 100% Jussie-free Content 2008 Election 2012 Election 2012 US Elections 2016 Election 2018 Election 23andMe 365 Black 365Black 9/11 9/11 Commission Report 9/11 Victims A Farewell To Alms Abortion Abraham Lincoln Abu Mehdi Muhandas Abu Zubaydah Achievement Gap ACLU Acting White Adam Schiff Addiction ADL Admin Administration Admixture Adolf Hitler Adoption Advertising AEI Affective Empathy Affirmative Action Affordable Family Formation Afghanistan Africa African Americans African Genetics Africans Afrikaner Afrocentricism Age Age Of Malthusian Industrialism Aging Agriculture AI AIEF AIPAC Air Force Aircraft Carriers Airlines Airports Al Jazeera Al Qaeda Alain Soral Alan Clemmons Alan Dershowitz Alan Macfarlane Albania Albert Einstein Albion's Seed Alcohol Alcoholism Alexander Dugin Alexander Hamilton Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez Alexei Navalny Algeria Ali Dawabsheh Alison Nathan Altruism Alyssa Rosenberg Alzheimers Amazon Amazon.com America America First American Decline American Empire American Exceptionalism American History American Indians American Jewish Committee American Jews American Left American Legion American Nations American Nations American Presidents American Prisons American Renaissance Amerindians Amish Amnesty Amnesty International Amy Klobuchar Amygdala Anarchism Anatoly Karlin Ancient DNA Ancient Genetics Ancient Greece Ancient Jews Ancient Near East Ancient Rome Andrei Nekrasov Andrew Bacevich Andrew Sullivan Andrew Yang Anglo-Saxons Anglosphere Angola Animal IQ Animal Rights Wackos Animals Ann Coulter Anne Frank Anthony Blinken Anthony Fauci Anthrax Anthropology Anti-Defamation League Anti-Gentilism Anti-Vaccination Anti-white Animus Antifa Antiquarianism Antiracism Antisocial Behavior Apartheid Apollo's Ascent Appalachia Arab Spring Arabs Archaeogenetics Archaeology Archaic DNA Archaic Humans Architecture Arctic Arctic Sea Ice Melting Argentina Armenia Armenian Genocide Armenians Army Arnon Milchan Art Arthur Jensen Arthur Lichte Artificial Intelligence Aryans Aryeh Lightstone Ash Carter Ashkenazi Intelligence Ashkenazi Jews Asia Asian Americans Asian Quotas Asians Assassination Assassinations Assimilation Atheism Atlanta AUMF Auschwitz Australia Australian Aboriginals Austria Autism Automation Avelet Shaked Avi Berkowitz Avigdor Lieberman Avril Haines Azerbaijan Babes And Hunks Baby Boom Baby Gap Baby It's You Bahrain Balkans Baltics Baltimore Riots Bangladesh Banjamin Netanyahu Banking Industry Banking System Banks Barack Obama Barbara Comstock Baseball Statistics Bashar Al-Assad Basketball #BasketOfDeplorables BBC BDS BDS Movement Beauty Beethoven Behavior Genetics Behavioral Economics Behavioral Genetics Belarus Belgium Bellingcat Ben Cardin Ben Hodges Ben & Jerry's Ben Rhodes Ben Shapiro Benjamin Netanyahu Benjamin Netanyahu. Mike Pompeo Benny Gantz Bernard Henri-Levy Bernie Sanders Betsy DeVos Betty McCollum BICOM BigPost Bilateral Relations Bilingual Education Bill Browder Bill Clinton Bill De Blasio Bill Gates Bill Kristol Bill Maher Bill Of Rights Billionaires Bioethics Biology Bioweapons Birmingham Birth Rate Bisexuality Bitcoin Black Community Black History Black History Month Black Muslims Black Panthers Black People Black People Accreditation Black Run America Black Sites BlackLivesMatter BlackRock Blank Slatism BLM Blog Blogging Blogosphere Blond Hair Blood Libel Blue Eyes Bmi Boeing Boers Bolshevik Revolution Bolshevik Russia Books Boomers Border Wall Boris Johnson Bosnia Boycott Divest And Sanction Boycott Divestment And Sanctions Brain Drain Brain Scans Brain Size Brain Structure Brazil Bret Stephens Brexit Bri Brian Mast Brian Stryker BRICs Brighter Brains Brill Browder British Politics Buddhism Build The Wall Burma Bush Business Byzantine California Californication Cambodia Camp Of The Saints Campaign Finance Campus Rape Canada Canary Mission #Cancel2022WorldCupinQatar Cancer Capitalism Cardiovascular Disease Careers Carlos Slim Carly Fiorina Caroline Glick Carroll Quigley Cars Catalonia Catfight Catholic Church Catholicism Cats Caucasus CDC Cecil Rhodes Census Central Asia Central Banks Chanda Chisala Chaos And Order Charles De Gaulle Charles Krauthammer Charles Manson Charles Murray Charles Percy Charles Schumer Charlie Hebdo Charlottesville CHAZ Che Guevara Checheniest Chechen Of Them All Chechens Chechnya Chetty Chicago Chicagoization Chicken Hut Child Abuse Children Chile China Vietnam Chinagate Chinese Chinese Communist Party Chinese Evolution Chinese IQ Chinese Language Chris Gown Christianity Christmas Christopher Steele Christopher Wray Chuck Schumer CIA Civil Liberties Civil Rights Civil War Civilization CJIA Clannishness Clash Of Civilizations Class Classical Antiquity Classical History Classical Music Clayton County Climate Climate Change Clint Eastwood Clintons Coal Coalition Of The Fringes Coen Brothers Cognitive Elitism Cognitive Science Cold War Colin Kaepernick Colin Woodard College Admission College Football Colonialism Color Revolution Columbus Comedy Comic Books Communism Computers Confederacy Confederate Flag Congress Conquistador-American Consciousness Conservatism Conservative Movement Conservatives Conspiracy Theory Constantinople Constitution Constitutional Theory Consumer Debt Consumerism Controversial Book Convergence Core Article Cornel West Corona Corruption Cory Booker COTW Council Of Europe Counterpunch Cousin Marriage Cover Story COVID-19 Craig Murray Creationism CRIF Crime Crimea Crimean Tatars Crisis Crispr Critical Race Theory Croatia Cruise Missiles Crusades Crying Among The Farmland Cryptocurrency Ctrl-Left Cuba Cuban Missile Crisis Cuckoldry Cuckservatism Cuckservative CUFI Cuisine Cultural Marxism Culture Culture War Curfew Czech Republic DACA Daily Data Dump Dallas Shooting Damnatio Memoriae Danny Danon Daren Acemoglu Darren Beattie Darwinism Data Data Analysis David Bazelon David Brog David Duke David Friedman David Frum David Irving David Lynch David Petraeus David Schenker Davide Piffer Davos Death Of The West Debbie Wasserman-Schultz Deborah Lipstadt Debt Debt Jubilee Decadence Decline And Fall Of The Roman Empire Deep State Degeneracy Democracy Democracy Summit Demograhics Demographic Transition Demographics Demography Denmark Dennis Ross Department Of Homeland Security Department Of State Deplatforming Derek Chauvin Derek Harvey Detroit Development Dick Cheney Diet Digital Yuan Dinesh D'Souza Discrimination Disease Disney Disparate Impact Dissent Dissidence Diversity Diversity Before Diversity Diversity Pokemon Points DNA Dodecad Dogs Dollar Domestic Surveillance Domestic Terrorism Don't Get Detroit-ed Dostoevsky Doug Feith Dresden Dreyfus Affair Drone War Drug Laws Drug Use Drugs Duterte Dylann Roof Dynasty Dysgenic E. Michael Jones E. O. Wilson East Asia East Asian Exception East Asians Eastern Europe Ecology Economic Development Economic History Economic Sanctions Economic Theory Economy Ecuador Ed Miller Edmund Burke Edmund Burke Foundation Education Edward Gibbon Edward Snowden Effective Altruism Effortpost Efraim Zurofff Egor Kholmogorov Egypt Election 2008 Election 2012 Election 2016 Election 2018 Election 2020 Elections Electric Cars Eli Rosenbaum Elie Wiesel Eliot Cohen Eliot Engel Elites Elizabeth Holmes Elizabeth Warren Elliot Abrams Elliott Abrams Elon Musk Emigration Emil Kirkegaard Emmanuel Macron Empathy Energy England Entertainment Environment Environmentalism Epidemiology Equality Erdogan Eric Zemmour Ernest Hemingway Espionage Espionage Act Estonia Ethics Ethics And Morals Ethiopia Ethnic Nepotism EThnic Studies Ethnicity Ethnocentricty EU Eugenics Eurabia Eurasia Europe European Genetics European Jewish Congress European Right European Union Europeans Eurozone Evolution Evolutionary Biology Evolutionary Genetics Evolutionary Psychology Exercise Existential Risks Eye Color Ezra Cohen-Watnick Face Shape Facebook Faces Fake News False Flag Attack Family Family Matters Family Systems Fantasy Far Abroad FARA Farmers Fascism Fast Food FBI Fecundity Federal Reserve Female Homosexuality Female Sexual Response Feminism Ferguson Ferguson Shooting Fermi Paradox Fertility Fertility Fertility Rates FIFA Film Finance Financial Bailout Financial Bubbles Financial Debt Finland Finn Baiting Finns First Amendment First World War Fitness Flash Mobs Flight From White Floyd Riots 2020 Fluctuarius Argenteus Flynn Effect Food Football For Fun Forecasts Foreign Policy Foreign Service Fox News France Frank Lautenberg Frankfurt School Franklin D. Roosevelt Franz Boas Fraud Freakonomics Free Market Free Speech Free Trade Free Will Freedom Of Speech Freedom French Canadians French Revolution Friday Fluff Friedrich Karl Berger Friends Of The Israel Defense Forces Frivolty Frontlash Future Futurism Gambling Game Game Of Thrones Gavin Newsom Gay Germ Gay Marriage Gays/Lesbians Gaza GDP Gen Z Gender Gender And Sexuality Gender Equality Gender Reassignment Gender Relations Gene-Culture Coevolution Genealogy General Intelligence Generation Z Generational Gap Generational Storm Genes Genetic Diversity Genetic Engineering Genetic Load Genetic Pacification Genetics Geneva Convention Geneva Conventions Genghis Khan Genocide Genomics Gentrification Geography Geopolitics George Floyd George H. W. Bush George Patton George Soros George W. Bush Georgia Germans Germany Ghislaine Maxwell Gilad Atzmon Gina Peddy Gladwell Glenn Greenwald Glenn Youngkin Global Warming Globalism Globalization Globohomo God God Delusion Gold Golf Google Government Government Debt Government Overreach Government Secrecy Government Spending Government Surveillance Government Waste Grant Smith Graphs Great Bifurcation Great Depression Great Leap Forward Great Powers #GreatWhiteDefendantPrivilege Greece Greeks Greg Cochran Gregory Clark Gregory Cochran Gregory Meeks Greta Thunberg Group Intelligence Group Selection GSS Guardian Guest Guilt Culture Gun Control Guns Guy Swan GWAS Gypsies H.R. McMaster H1-B Visas Haim Saban Hair Color Haiti Hajnal Line Halloween Hamas HammerHate Happening Happiness Harvard Harvey Weinstein Hate Crimes Hate Facts Fraud Hoax Hate Hoaxes Hate Speech HateStat Hbd Hbd Chick Health Health And Medicine Health Care Healthcare Heart Health Hegira Height Height Privilege Help Henry Harpending Heredity Heritability Hezbollah Hillary Clinton Himachal Pradesh Hindu Caste System Hispanic Hispanic Crime Hispanics Historical Genetics History Of Science Hitler HIV/AIDS Hollywood Holocaust Holocaust Denialism Holocaust Museum Homelessness Homicide Homicide Rate Homosexuality Hong Kong Houellebecq Housing Houthis Howard Kohr Huawei Hubbert's Peak Huddled Masses Huey Newton Hug Thug Human Achievement Human Biodiversity Human Evolution Human Evolutionary Genetics Human Evolutionary Genomics Human Genetics Human Genome Human Genomics Human Rights Humor Hungary Hunt For The Great White Defendant Hunter Biden Hunter-Gatherers Hunting Hurricane Katrina I.Q. I.Q. Genomics #IBelieveInHavenMonahan Ibo ICC Iceland Ideas Identity Ideologies Ideology And Worldview IDF Idiocracy Igbo IHRA Ilhan Omar Illegal Immigration Ilyushin IMF immigration-policy-terminology Impeachment Imperialism Imran Awan Inbreeding Incest Income Income Tax India Indian IQ Indians Individualism Indo-Europeans Indonesia Inequality Inflation Intelligence Intelligent Design International International Affairs International Comparisons International Criminal Court International Relations Internet Interracial Marriage Intersectionality Interviews Invade Invite In Hock Invade The World Invite The World Inventions Iosef Stalin Iosif Stalin Iq Iq And Wealth Iran Nuclear Agreement Iran Nuclear Program Iranian Nuclear Program Iranian Nuclear Weapons Program Iraq Iraq War Ireland IRGC Is It Good For The Jews? Is Love Colorblind ISIS ISIS. Terrorism Islam Islamic Jihad Islamic State Islamism Islamophobia Isolationism Israel Defense Force Israel Separation Wall Israeli Occupation Israeli Spying IT Italian-Americans Italy It's Okay To Be White Ivanka Ivy League J Street Jack Keane Jacky Rosen Jacques Mallet Du Pan Jair Bolsonaro Jake Novak Jake Tapper Jamal Khashoggi James B. Watson James Bond James Clapper James Comey James Forrestal James Jeffrey James Lankford James Mattis James Watson James Zogby Japan Jared Diamond Jared Kushner Jared Taylor Jason Greenblatt JASTA JCPOA ¡Jeb! Jeb Bush Jeff Bezos Jeffrey Epstein Jeffrey Goldberg Jen Psaki Jennifer Rubin Jeremy Corbyn Jerry Seinfeld Jerusalem Post Jesuits Jesus Jewish Genetics Jewish History Jewish Intellectuals Jewish Power JFK Assassination JFK Jr. Jill Stein Jobs Joe Cirincione Joe Lieberman Joe Rogan Joel Greenberg John Bolton John Brennan John Derbyshire John F. Kennedy John Hawks John Kasich John Kiriakou John McCain John McLaughlin John Mearsheimer John Ratcliffe John Sayles Joker Jonah Goldberg Jonathan Freedland Jonathan Greenblatt Jonathan Karten Jonathan Pollard Jordan Peterson Joseph Kennedy Joseph Massad Joseph McCarthy Journalism Judah Benjamin Judaism Judeo-Christianity Judge George Daniels Judicial System Julian Assange Jussie Smollett Justice Justin Trudeau Kaboom Kamala Harris Kamala On Her Knees Karabakh War 2020 Kashmir Kata'ib Hezbollah Kay Bailey Hutchison Kazakhstan Keir Starmer Keith Ellison Ken Livingstone Kenneth Marcus Kevin MacDonald Kevin McCarthy Kevin Williamson Khrushchev Kids Kim Jong Un Kinship Kkk KKKrazy Glue Of The Coalition Of The Fringes Knesset Kolomoisky Kompromat Korea Korean War Kosovo Kris Kobach Ku Klux Klan Kubrick Kurds Kyle Rittenhouse Language Languages Laos Late Obama Age Collapse Latin America Latin Language Latinos Latvia Law LDNR Lead Poisoning Learning Lebanon Lee Kuan Yew Lenin Leo Strauss Leonard Bernstein Let's Talk About My Hair LGBT Liberal Opposition Liberal Whites Liberalism Liberals Libertarianism Libertarians Libya Life Light Skin Preference Lindsey Graham Linguistics Literacy Literature Lithuania Litvinenko Living Standards Lloyd Austin Localism long-range-missile-defense Longevity Looting Lord Mann Lorde Lost In America Loudoun County Louis Farrakhan Love And Marriage Lukashenko Lyndon B Johnson Lyndon Johnson Macau Macedonia Madeleine Albright Mafia MAGA Magic Dirt Magnitsky Act Mail-In Voting Malaysia Malaysian Airlines MH17 Male Delusions Male Homosexuality Malnutrition Malthusianism Manorialism Manosphere Manufacturing Mao Zedong Maoism Map Marco Rubio Maria Butina Marijuana Marine Le Pen Marjorie Taylor Greene Mark Milley Mark Steyn Mark Warner Marriage Martin Luther King Martin Scorsese Marx Marxism Masculinity Masks Mass Shootings Mate Choice Math Mathematics Mathilde Krim Matt Gaetz Max Blumenthal Max Boot Maxine Waters Mayans McCain McCain/POW McDonald's Media Media Bias Medicine Medieval Russia Medvedev Megan McCain Meghan Markle Mein Obama MEK Meme Men With Gold Chains Meng Wanzhou Mental Health Mental Illness Mental Traits Meritocracy Merkel Merkel Youth Merkel's Boner Merrick Garland Mexico MH 17 Michael Bloomberg Michael Flynn Michael Jackson Michael McFaul Michael Moore Michael Morell Michael Pompeo Michelle Goldberg Michelle Ma Belle Michelle Obama Microaggressions Middle Ages Middle East Migration Mike Chapman Mike Pence Mike Pompeo Mike Signer Militarization Military Military Analysis Military History Military Spending Military Technology Millennials Millionaires Milner Group Minimum Wage Minneapolis Minorities Miriam Adelson Miscellaneous Misdreavus Mishima Missile Defense Mitt Romney Mixed-Race Mohammed Bin Salman Monarchy Money Mongolia Monogamy Moon Landing Hoax Moon Landings Moore's Law Moral Absolutism Moral Universalism Morality Mormonism Mormons Mortality Mortgage Moscow Mossad Mulatto Elite Multiculturalism Music Muslim Ban Muslims Mussolini Mutual Assured Destruction Nachman Shai NAEP Naftali Bennett NAMs Nancy Pelos Nancy Pelosi Narendra Modi NASA Natalism Nation Of Hate Nation Of Islam National Assessment Of Educational Progress National Debt National Question National Review National Security Strategy National Wealth Nationalism Native Americans NATO Natural Gas Nature Vs. Nurture Navalny Affair Navy Standards Naz Shah Nazi Germany Nazis Nazism Neandertal Neandertal Genes Neandertals Neanderthals Near Abroad Neo-Nazis Neoconservatives Neoliberalism Neolithic Neoreaction Netherlands Never Again Education Act New Cold War New Dark Age New Orleans New Silk Road New World Order New York New York City New York Times New Zealand Shooting Newspeak NFL Nicholas II Nicholas Wade Nick Eberstadt Nick Fuentes Nigeria Nike Nikki Haley No Fly Zone Noam Chomsky Nobel Prize #NobelsSoWhiteMale Nord Stream 2 Nordics Norman Braman Norman Finkelstein North Africa North Korea Northern Ireland Northwest Europe Norway Novorossiya Novorossiya Sitrep NSA Nuclear Power Nuclear Proliferation Nuclear War Nuclear Weapons Nuremberg Nutrition NYPD Obama Obama Presidency Obamacare Obesity Obituary Obscured American Occam's Razor Occupy Wall Street October Surprise Oedipus Complex OFAC Oil Oil Industry Oliver Stone Olympics Open Borders OpenThread Operation Allies Welcome Operational Sex Ratio Opinion Poll Opioids Orban Organized Crime Original Memes Orlando Shooting Orthodoxy Orwell Osama Bin Laden OTFI Our Soldiers Speak Out-of-Africa Out Of Africa Model Pakistan Paleoanthropology Paleolibertarianism Palestine Palin Pamela Geller Pandemic Panhandling Paper Review Parasite Manipulation Parenting Parenting Paris Paris Attacks Parsi Partly Inbred Extended Family Pat Buchanan Pathogens Patriot Act Patriotism Paul Findley Paul Ryan Paul Singer Paul Wolfowitz Pavel Grudinin Paypal Peace Peak Oil Pearl Harbor Pedophilia Pentagon People's Republic Of China Personal Genomics Personality Pete Buttgieg Pete Buttigieg Peter Frost Peter Thiel Peter Turchin Petro Poroshenko Pets Pew Phil Onderdonk Phil Rushton Philadelphia Philip Breedlove Philippines Philosophy Philosophy Of Science Phyllis Randall Physiognomy Pigmentation Pigs Piketty Pioneers Piracy PISA Pizzagate POC Ascendancy Podcast Poland Police Police State Police Training Political Correctness Makes You Stupid Political Dissolution Political Economy Politicians Polling Pollution Polygamy Polygyny Pope Francis Population Population Genetics Population Growth Population Replacement Populism Porn Pornography Portland Portugal Post-Apocalypse Post-Modernism Poverty Power PRC Pre-Obama America Prediction Prescription Drugs President Joe Biden Presidential Race '08 Presidential Race '12 Presidential Race '16 Presidential Race '20 Press Censorship Prince Andrew Prince Harry Priti Patel Pritzkers Privacy Privatization Productivity Programming Progressives Propaganda Prostitution protest Protestantism Proud Boys Psychology Psychometrics Psychopaths Psychopathy Public Health Public Schools Puerto Rico Puppet Masters Puritans Putin Putin Derangement Syndrome Putinsliv Pygmies QAnon Qassem Soleimani Qatar Quantitative Genetics Quebec Quincy Institute Race Race And Crime Race And Genomics Race And Iq Race And Religion Race/Crime Race Denialism Race/IQ Race Riots Racial Reality Racialism Racism Raj Shah Rand Paul Randy Fine Rape Rashida Tlaib Rationality Ray McGovern Razib Khan Reader Survey Real Estate RealWorld Recep Tayyip Erdogan Reconstruction Refugee Boy Refugee Crisis #refugeeswelcome Regression To The Mean Religion Religion And Philosophy Rentier Reparations Reprint Republican Party Republicans Reuven Rivlin Review Revisionism Rex Tillerson RFK Assassination Ricci Richard Dawkins Richard Goldberg Richard Grenell Richard Haass Richard Lewontin Richard Lynn Richard Nixon Richard Perle Rightwing Cinema Riots Ritholtz Rivka Ravitz R/k Theory RMAX Robert A. Heinlein Robert F. Kennedy Jr. Robert Ford Robert Kraft Robert Levinson Robert Maxwell Robert McNamara Robert Mueller Robert Mugabe Robert O'Brien Robert Oppenheimer Robert Reich Robert Spencer Robots Rock Music Rolling Stone Roman Abramovich Roman Empire Romania Romanticism Rome Romney Ron DeSantis Ron Paul Ron Unz Ronald Reagan Rotherham Rothschilds RT International RTS Stock Market Rudy Giuliani Rush Limbaugh Russiagate Russian Demography Russian Elections 2018 Russian Far East Russian History Russian Media Russian Military Russian Nationalism Russian Occupation Government Russian Orthodox Church Russian Reaction Russians Russophobes Russophobia Russotriumph Ruth Bader Ginsburg Rwanda Sabrina Rubin Erdely Sacha Baron Cohen Sacklers Sailer Strategy Sailer's First Law Of Female Journalism Saint Peter Tear Down This Gate! Saint-Petersburg Sam Francis Same-sex Marriage San Bernadino Massacre Sandra Beleza Sandy Hook Sapir-Whorf Sarah Silverman SAT Saudi Arabia Scandal Science Denialism Science Fiction Scooter Libby Scotland Scott Ritter Scrabble Sean Hannity Seattle Secession Secret Prisons Select Post Self Indulgence Separationism Serbia Sergei Lavrov Sergei Skripal Seth Klarman Seth Rich Sex Sex Differences Sex Ratio Sex Ratio At Birth Sexual Dimorphism Sexual Harassment Sexual Selection Sexuality Shai Masot Shakespeare Shame Culture Shanghai Cooperation Organisation Shared Environment Sheldon Adelson Shias And Sunnis Shimon Arad Shimon Peres Shmuley Boteach Shopping Malls Shorts And Funnies Shoshana Bryen Shulamit Aloni Shurat HaDin Sigal Mandelker Sigar Pearl Mandelker Sigmund Freud Silicon Valley Singapore Single Men Single Women Sinotriumph Six Day War Sixties SJWs Skin Color Slave Trade Slavery Slavery Reparations Slavoj Zizek Slavs Smart Fraction Social Justice Warriors Social Media Social Science Socialism Society Sociobiology Sociology Solutions Solzhenitsyn Sotomayor South Africa South China Sea South Korea Southeast Asia Southern Poverty Law Center Soviet History Soviet Union Sovok Space Space Exploration Space Program Spain Spanish River High School Special Envoy To Monitor And Combat Anti-Semitism SPLC Sport Sports Srebrenica Stabby Somali Staffan Stage Stalinism Standardized Tests Star Trek Star Wars Comparisons State Department States Rights Statistics Statue Of Liberty Statue Of Libertyism Steny Hoyer Stephen Cohen Stephen Colbert Stephen Harper Stephen Jay Gould Stephen Townsend Stereotypes Steroids Steve Bannon Steve Sailer Steven Pinker Strait Of Hormuz Strategic Culture Foundation Stuart Levey Student Debt Stuff White People Like Sub-replacement Fertility Sub-Saharan Africa Sub-Saharan Africans Subhas Chandra Bose Subprime Mortgage Crisis Suicide Supercomputers Superintelligence Supreme Court Surveillance Survey Susan Glasser Susan Rice Svidomy Sweden Switzerland Syrian Civil War Syriza Ta-Nehisi Coates Taiwan Take Action Taliban Talmud Tamil Nadu Tanzania Taxation Taxes Tea Party Tech Technical Considerations Technology Ted Cruz Television Terrorism Terry McAuliffe Tesla Testing Testosterone Tests Texas Thailand The AK The American Conservative The Bible The Black Autumn "the Blacks" The Cathedral The Confederacy The Constitution The Economist The Eight Banditos The Family The Free World The Great Awokening The Kissing Billionaire The Left The New York Times The South The States The Zeroth Amendment To The Constitution Theranos Theresa May Thomas Jefferson Thomas Moorer Tiananmen Massacre Tiger Mom TIMSS Tom Cotton Tom Lantos Tom Wolfe Tony Blair Tony Blinken Tony Kleinfeld Too Many White People Torture Trade Transgender Transgenderism Transhumanism Translation Translations Travel Trayvon Martin Trolling Trope Derangement Syndrome Tropical Humans Tropical Hyperborea True Redneck Stereotypes Trump Trump Derangement Syndrome Trust Tsarist Russia Tucker Carlson Tulsa Tulsi Gabbard Turkey Turks Tuskegee TWA 800 Twins Twitter UBI UFOs UK Ukrainian Crisis Unbearable Whiteness Unemployment United Kingdom United Nations Universal Basic Income Universalism Upper Paleolithic Urbanization Uruguay US Blacks US Border Patrol US Capitol Storming 2021 US Civil War II US Elections 2016 US Elections 2020 US Regionalism US-Russia.org Expert Discussion Panel USA USCPAHA USS Liberty UV Uyghurs Uzbekistan Vaccination Vaccines Valerie Plame Vdare Venezuela VIAB Vibrancy Victoria Nuland Victorian England Video Video Games Vietnam Vietnam War Vietnamese Violence Vioxx Virginia Virginia Israel Advisory Board Virginian Israel Advisory Board Virtual World Vitamin D Vladimir Putin Vladimir Zelensky Volodymur Zelenskyy Voltaine Voronezh Vote Fraud Voter Fraud Voting Rights Vulcan Society Wahhabis Wal-Mart Wall Street Walmart Wang Ching Wei Wang Jingwei War War Crimes War Guilt War In Donbass War On Christmas War On Terror War Powers Act Warhammer Washington DC WasPage WASPs Wealth Wealth Inequality Wealthy Weight Weight Loss WEIRDO Welfare Welfare State West Bank Western Decline Western European Marriage Pattern Western Hypocrisy Western Media Western Religion Western Revival Westerns Whistleblowers White America White Americans White Death White Flight White Guilt White Helmets White Liberals White Man's Burden White Nationalism White Nationalists White People White Privilege White Slavery White Supremacy White Teachers Whiterpeople Whites Who Is The Fairest Of Them All? Who Whom Whoopi Goldberg Wikileaks Wikipedia William Browder William Fulbright William Kristol William Latson William McGonagle William McRaven WINEP Winston Churchill Woke Capital Women Woodrow Wilson Work Workers Working Class World Bank World Cup World Economic Forum World Population World Values Survey World War G World War H World War Hair World War I World War III World War R World War T World War Weed World War Z WTF WVS WWII Xi Jinping Yair Lapid Yankees Yemen Yogi Berra's Restaurant Yoram Hazony YouTube Yugoslavia Zbigniew Brzezinski Zimbabwe Zionism Zionists Zvika Fogel
Nothing found
Filter?
iffen
Comments
• My
Comments
11,741 Comments • 583,300 Words •  RSS
(Commenters may request that their archives be hidden by contacting the appropriate blogger)
All Comments
 All Comments
    The previous Open Thread is well over 900 comments and apparently getting a little sluggish, so here's a new one for the Karlin Community. -- Ron Unz
  • @Barbarossa
    @Dmitry

    As a kid who grew up in town I can attest to the steep learning curve in agricultural/ animal husbandry. There really is a lot more to it than is commonly given credit for. Perhaps the biggest aspect is just doing things at the correct time and knowing what that time is. Not later. Not earlier. Just at the right time.

    Doing things at the wrong time, be it sowing seeds, turning out to pasture, allowing animals to breed etc. increases troubles and risk of spectacular failures. For example, if you breed your sheep too early you may end up with frozen lambs.

    It's really a lot of learning to work within the constraints of reality and then figuring out how to optimize those constraints to produce the results you want. Good systems will need relatively little work compared to systems which ignore the nature's of animals and plants.

    But anyhow, I hope you keep up with a bit of vegetable growing, despite past difficulties. The big thing is to start with something that isn't so damnably easy to kill. When all else fails there is always cucumbers or squash. If you plant those you'll be guaranteed to feel like a horticultural genius!

    Replies: @iffen

    When all else fails there is always cucumbers or squash. If you plant those you’ll be guaranteed to feel like a horticultural genius!

    Evidently your growing environment doesn’t have downy mildew or anthracnose.

  • @Barbarossa
    @iffen

    Hah! Now you've gotten me curious as to the offending sentiment that pushed me back over the edge. Care to share since expiring mind need to know?

    Replies: @iffen

    This comment (was) for utu and his comment 881. When I posted it I immediately got a duplicate message notice which didn’t make sense and then a message saying it was in moderation.

  • @Barbarossa
    @AaronB


    When I die, I want to be eaten by other life forms on earth, and make my contribution to the whole – the worms, the beasts, the insects, can have me. The worst fate is to be embalmed or put in a steel coffin, that hideous modern practice, thus even in death affirming ones separation from all life.

    There is a beautiful Tibetan burial practice called “sky burial”, where they take your body to a high cliff in the mountains, and cut you into pieces for the vultures and other wild beasts to eat you, thus affirming your connection to, and compassion for, the whole of life.
     
    Same here. I plan on putting together a simple pine box at some point to have on the ready. I've also already informed my kids (their spouses can help!) that they are responsible for digging the hole I get buried in. I told them if they bring a backhoe in to do it, I'm going to haunt them!

    The Tibetan practice seems to also have a lot to do with the lack of fuel for cremations as well as the ground being too frozen for burial. This is not to denigrate it's spiritual aspect, but in fact most things which are spiritually and naturally attuned are actually quite practical as well, stemming as they do from an embrace of reality. There is nothing more tone deaf than a concrete vault for the dead!

    On killing animals, it is a task which I do reluctantly and with some regret each time. Taking a life should probably hurt the taker a bit, and this is possible without being overly squeamish and maudlin. In the end I'd rather know the animal I ate had a clean death than hand the task over to faceless entities.

    Replies: @songbird, @iffen, @iffen

    I keep telling my kids that when the time comes, I want my cremated remains dumped into the compost pile, but I don’t think they are going to go for it.

  • @Barbarossa
    @AaronB


    When I die, I want to be eaten by other life forms on earth, and make my contribution to the whole – the worms, the beasts, the insects, can have me. The worst fate is to be embalmed or put in a steel coffin, that hideous modern practice, thus even in death affirming ones separation from all life.

    There is a beautiful Tibetan burial practice called “sky burial”, where they take your body to a high cliff in the mountains, and cut you into pieces for the vultures and other wild beasts to eat you, thus affirming your connection to, and compassion for, the whole of life.
     
    Same here. I plan on putting together a simple pine box at some point to have on the ready. I've also already informed my kids (their spouses can help!) that they are responsible for digging the hole I get buried in. I told them if they bring a backhoe in to do it, I'm going to haunt them!

    The Tibetan practice seems to also have a lot to do with the lack of fuel for cremations as well as the ground being too frozen for burial. This is not to denigrate it's spiritual aspect, but in fact most things which are spiritually and naturally attuned are actually quite practical as well, stemming as they do from an embrace of reality. There is nothing more tone deaf than a concrete vault for the dead!

    On killing animals, it is a task which I do reluctantly and with some regret each time. Taking a life should probably hurt the taker a bit, and this is possible without being overly squeamish and maudlin. In the end I'd rather know the animal I ate had a clean death than hand the task over to faceless entities.

    Replies: @songbird, @iffen, @iffen

    I now remember why I had you on the CTI list for so many years.

    Back you go.

    • Replies: @Barbarossa
    @iffen

    Hah! Now you've gotten me curious as to the offending sentiment that pushed me back over the edge. Care to share since expiring mind need to know?

    Replies: @iffen

  • @utu
    @Triteleia Laxa

    "Time for you to be honest with yourself and come back to reality." - Not very likely but possible in cases of Mikel and German_reader.

    Useful idiocy of characters like Mikel or German_reader has its origin in the same psycho-operation that was performed on the brains of rightoids in last 5-10 years which resulted in complete distrust and hostility towards 'official' narratives promulgated by the MSM and thus the first reaction they always have is: 'they are lying' as they did on issues X, Y and X and thus I must believe only those who say the opposite to what the MSM say and even more so when they are vilified by the MSM. Obviously this is a fallacious syllogism but they get trapped in it. This fallacious syllogism is often used explicitly by Ron Unz.

    But what makes Mikel and German_reader different from typical denizens of the Ron Unz's rightoid sabbath is that Mikel and German_reader could be mistaken for normal people (unlike majority of unz-dot-com commentariat), that in most social contexts their pathology would remains hidden under the surface and would not manifest itself except for a minor trait of passive aggressiveness to cut down any certainty you may display which is a form of projection as they lack certainty and courage so they want to bring you to their 'misery likes company' reality. You could imagine having drinks with them and never noticing what is beneath the surface.

    But most important reason for the difference is that Mikel and German_reader have a very strong feminine element (*) in their personas and that's why they emphasizes passivity and concerns for suffering of civilians and women and children in particular. Acts of active resistance are too risky and too masculine for them. Zelensky challenges that and that's why he irks them very much to the point of hatred. They would like Ukraine to lay down, spread her legs and enjoy what Russia will do to her. This case of projection is utilized very well by Kremlin propaganda.

    Mikel and German_reader belong to the faction of cunts and twats rather than openly deplorable fetishists of power and 'might makes right' among Putin supporters.

    While Mikel or German_reader may argue like rightoids deep down they are liberals who feel betrayed by liberalism and what they often sputter in form of whinging (very visible in German_reader) is the deep sense of betrayal (accusation d of hypocrisy of the West) but there is not an ounce of any conviction left in them. Their only moral dilemma is when to spread their legs so it does not look like too premature invitation to rape. Even cunts and twats still care for some appearance of dignity.

    (*) 'feminine element' as an archetype that many women do not have but when the feminine element dominates woman's personality there is not dissonance and there is no lack of courage but when a man has feminine element dominat it is sure sign of cowardliness and nothing else comes to one's mind than a twat or a cunt.

    Replies: @Mikel, @iffen, @PhysicistDave

    I now remember why I had you on the CTI list for so many years.

    Back you go.

    • Thanks: utu
  • @Emil Nikola Richard
    @Colin Wright

    Did you know during the training season (now) the biggest beasts in the NFL, fellows like Aaron Donald and Watt brothers and Derrick Henry drink a gallon of milk a day?

    Not that 2% crap.

    Replies: @Barbarossa

    High activity levels along with high quality fat intake is quite healthy.

    • Agree: iffen
    • Replies: @RSDB
    @Barbarossa

    Plenty of milk, butter, almonds, and fruit are the basis of the traditional Indian wrestler's diet (plus normal dietary items, of course).

  • @Yellowface Anon
    @Thulean Friend

    Blood and culture, like any ethnonationalist recognizes. But most importantly, there are divides on ideological and political legitimacy, like calling each other secessionists and bandits. Time to transcend that level and work for a common civilizational good.

    Replies: @iffen

    a common civilizational good.

    Wouldn’t you have to have some agreement on what’s “good” and which features of the civilization qualify?

  • @iffen
    @Wizard of Oz

    ignoring the carefully chosen words of the writer, in this case


    History doesn’t have to be used or misused for partisan political purposes.
     
    I didn't ignore it. I just think that your statement has little connection with reality. While it may be true that it doesn't "have to be," it is.

    Replies: @WIzard of Oz

    You may find interest and merit in the book by someone described to me when I got to know him and persuadedhim to accept an honorary doctorate at a university where I had some influence as “the most intelligent socialist in Australia” – bt a decidedly non socialist intellectual.

    Here is a bit of Hugh Stretton’s Wikipedia entry

    The Political Sciences (1969) challenged the growth of positivism and abstraction in political, social, and economic understanding. The book promoted a view of the social sciences as inherently values-based, moral, and practical in nature. It was widely influential locally and internationally. Nmmm

    • Thanks: iffen
  • @Brás Cubas
    @iffen

    Recent events suffer a higher influence of political forces. As time passes, and the people who have an interest in the events die, or leave power, those influences wane. But I agree that there is a permanent factor of bias that does not go away, and is inherent to humans.

    Replies: @iffen

    As time passes, and the people who have an interest in the events die, or leave power, those influences wane.

    Yes. Also, as time passes, it becomes much easier for us to construct the desired history.

    • Replies: @Brás Cubas
    @iffen

    I would agree for events less than a century or two old. Older than that, the historian will have little interest or pressure for lying. He will try to do the best he can to tell the truth.

  • @Brás Cubas
    @utu

    Your comment is filled with half-truths. I still like to read you because with a little work I weed out the untruths and end up with something positive.
    You are probably right about evolution in action in the history of ideas, but what you call "subversion" is actually part of evolution: it's called "mutations", and you never can know when a successful mutation will appear. This is happening all the time with regards to ancient history; for example, just the other day there was a book about Caligula saying he was not the monster everyone thought he was.
    I really don't know whether these things are more likely to happen after centuries have passed or just a few decades. There are two opposing factors at work: a longer time span means a greater chance of working without the passions and ideological fads that conditions historical discourse; on the other hand, it also means working without primary sources, and perhaps even secondary ones.

    Replies: @iffen, @Emil Nikola Richard

    working without the passions and ideological fads that conditions historical discourse;

    “History” is contaminated since it is written by humans. Understanding this gives one a certain perspective but does not decontaminate “history”.

    • Replies: @Brás Cubas
    @iffen

    Recent events suffer a higher influence of political forces. As time passes, and the people who have an interest in the events die, or leave power, those influences wane. But I agree that there is a permanent factor of bias that does not go away, and is inherent to humans.

    Replies: @iffen

  • @Wizard of Oz
    @iffen

    If you are going to be presumptuous and tell someone what he thinks you need to have the intellect and integrity which would resstrain you from ignoring the carefully chosen words of the writer, in this case


    History doesn’t have to be used or misused for partisan political purposes.

     

    Replies: @iffen

    ignoring the carefully chosen words of the writer, in this case

    History doesn’t have to be used or misused for partisan political purposes.

    I didn’t ignore it. I just think that your statement has little connection with reality. While it may be true that it doesn’t “have to be,” it is.

    • LOL: Wizard of Oz
    • Replies: @WIzard of Oz
    @iffen

    You may find interest and merit in the book by someone described to me when I got to know him and persuadedhim to accept an honorary doctorate at a university where I had some influence as "the most intelligent socialist in Australia" - bt a decidedly non socialist intellectual.

    Here is a bit of Hugh Stretton's Wikipedia entry


    The Political Sciences (1969) challenged the growth of positivism and abstraction in political, social, and economic understanding. The book promoted a view of the social sciences as inherently values-based, moral, and practical in nature. It was widely influential locally and internationally. Nmmm
     
  • @Wizard of Oz
    @iffen

    Please explain what profundity YOU think you are hinting at Oh oracular one. History doesn't have to be used or misused for partisan political purposes.

    Replies: @iffen

    You think history is some sort of objective phenomenon with its own rules and existence. It is us, and we make it what we want it to be when we are making “us”. Things happen. The writing about “what” happened is not what occurred. History is what a particular person or people want it to be. It’s not “real,” except to those who believe it to be.

    • Replies: @utu
    @iffen

    "It’s not “real,” except to those who believe it to be." - And 95% of people over centuries end up believing it. In the evolutionary sense that whatever survives is the most fit and what is most fit is the best, history as bestowed on us is the best truth there is. Why would you want another truth that is not fit to survive? Why would you like to be shilling for Neanderthals? Why would you write a series of "American Pravda" articles unless you were some kind of madman with the delusion of grandeur believing that he could change "history"? Only the true intent of subversion explains it.

    Replies: @Brás Cubas

    , @Wizard of Oz
    @iffen

    If you are going to be presumptuous and tell someone what he thinks you need to have the intellect and integrity which would resstrain you from ignoring the carefully chosen words of the writer, in this case


    History doesn’t have to be used or misused for partisan political purposes.

     

    Replies: @iffen

  • @AaronB
    I am reading now a book that is transforming my understanding of culture and humanity in absolutely seminal ways - The Matter with Things, by psychiatrist Iain Mcgilchrist.

    It's a massive tome and I am nowhere near through it - I am skipping around a lot - but so far it's a work of pure genius that has done that rare and invaluable thing, given me an entirely new conceptual language in which to think about important questions of culture and value, shed light on all of human history, and has an extremely important message for our times.

    The first half is heavy on science, while the second half ties it together with the vast sweep of cultural history, and is full of fascinating quotes from the major cultural figures of Western history.

    It's impossible to overstate the importance of this book - it literally holds the key to our current cuvilionsl predicament.

    It's basic thesis is that the two hemispheres of the human brain, the left and the right, have different cognitive styles and tasks - the left is rational, logical, and deconstructive, while the right is intuitive, emotional, imaginative, creative, responsible for judging and assessing value, and synthesizes data into larger wholes.

    The proper relationship between the two is that the right hemisphere"sends" the left out to collect data by deconstructing things, which the right hemisphere then integrates into a larger whole - Mcgilchrist characterizes this relationship in his earlier book The Master and His Emissary.

    The right hemisphere is the superior in the relationship - and apparently, neuroscience is now pouring out studies that show that on every level, the right hemisphere, responsible for judgement, assessment, imagination, intuition, emotion, is less prone to delusion and better able to produce an accurate picture of reality than the left.

    Aaaaaaand therein lies our problem - because if you're like me, you were probably shocked by that last paragraph :) You probably scoffed and spilt your coffee, or nearly chocked :)

    Because in our culture, we are obviously told - relentlessly! - that left hemisphere type thinking, hyper rational, logical, algorithmic, is much, much better at giving us a picture of reality, and much less prone to delusion, than the right hemisphere!

    But apparently, advanced neuroscience is painting the opposite picture - the left hemisphere is incapable of self correction (needs the right for that), extremely prone to delusion when not in contact with the right, can only see parts and not wholes (can never see the larger picture), can only take apart but not put together, cannot judge and assess value, and cannot create anything new (the right imagines and creates).

    However, there is the tendency that the left hemisphere will try and "go it alone" and sperate from the right, with disastrous consequences for the culture and society that tries to adopt a cognitive style dominated by the left hemisphere.

    According to Mcgilchrist, this happened twice before in human history - ancient Greece, ancient Rome - and is now happening for the third time in the modern West. Each time before it shortly preceded the death of that civilization.

    I'm gonna make a few scattered comments, but the book is to rich to go over fully here - this is a book I strongly urge everyone to read. It may be "the" book of our times, our sad and troubled times.

    I often chide Ron Unz and the people on this site for limiting our options to China/Russia and the West, but if this site is a typical left hemisphere project, and Ron a typically left hemisphere thinker, then they literally cannot produce anything new.

    Creating something new requires imagination, and that is handled by the right hemisphere. Someone whose cognitive style is dominated by the left hemisphere - say, anyone working primarily in STEM - literally cannot imagine anything new.

    And since our entire culture is a left hemisphere culture dominated by STEM, we increasingly cannot produce any new ideas either - as is clearly seen in our political stagnation which is just the recycling of old ideas.

    Fascinatingly, schizophrenia is a disease where the left hemisphere increasingly dominates, a disease of hyper-rationality, and it turns out that the world as seen from a purely left hemisphere perspective is extremely ominous and scary.

    Patients who experience right hemisphere damage immediately develop paranoid fantasies while ignoring genuine, real dangers. One woman whose left arm was paralyzed after a stroke to her right hemisphere, was completely unconcerned about her arm - but immediately developed an extreme worry that the woman in the next bed was poisoning her food and stealing her newspapers.

    I do not need to draw the obvious parallel to a certain owner of a certain website..... :)

    But this attitude clearly characterizes our entire culture - insane obsessions over pointless Woke stuff while our larger problems are completely ignored.

    There is a fascinating book describing how the phenomena known as modernism and post-modernism, are shockingly similar to how schizophrenics see the world.

    Everyone here I am sure heard of the Dunning Kruger results that are now so famous - what is usually omitted and not widely reported, however, is that people who have a hyper-rational cognitive style, are particularly prone to the effects.

    People who approached problem solving in a hyper rational way, relying primarily on logic and algorithmic thinking, were particularly prone to not being able to notice or correct their mistakes, and when mistakes were pointed out to them, responded by trying to do more of the same thing.

    If this doesn't describe our culture I don't know what does!

    As a culture, we have probably reached the apogee of left hemisphere thinking. Our society is entirely dominated by STEM in terms of the economy, but also in terms of values. When I was in school in the 90s, the humanities, literature, philosophy, art, poetry, were still respected fields of study.

    But I noticed sometime around 2010, everyone started going on about how only STEM is worth studying anymore, and all artistic subjects were massively downgraded.

    Around 2010 we took a massive leap further along into a culture dominated by left hemisphere thinking.

    To be fair, the humanities did indeed become captured by post-modernism - but post-modernism itself, which is an attempt to "deconstruct" art and search for ominous and malevolent "oppressive meanings" in it (typical of the schizophrenic mind), is a left hemisphere phenomenon!

    Since the left hemisphere can never see wholes, but only parts, and proceeds by taking things apart and making them lifeless, by definition a left hemisphere culture will be incapable of understanding God.

    Replies: @AaronB, @Wokechoke, @A123, @songbird, @Mikel, @S, @iffen, @Pro Bono

    that is transforming my understanding of culture and humanity in absolutely seminal ways

    Not again!

    Say it ain’t so, Joe.

    • Replies: @utu
    @iffen

    He hasn't had the aha moment about his aha moments. Some people never do. Jane Fonda? A victim of the last book he read. Except that Jane Fonda made money on each of her new life changing belief.

  • @Wizard of Oz
    @Ron Unz

    In your tentative probabilistic assess.ent (as such a good example to UR threadsters) do you think you've given enough weight to what is increasingly emerging about Putin's peculiarities. I include the evidence of his illness ad the real possibility that its treatment is affecting his mind and overt behaviour. Also his repeated mischarecterisation of Russian and Ukrainian history, his refusal to acknowledge that the vast majority of Ukrainians, including the Russian speaking majority identify as Ukrainian and - if only because they haven't been inundated with Russian propaganda from a censored media - have very different attitudes to free enterprise and state ownership, for example.
    He doesn't resiled at all from denying Ukraine is a real country (yet Russia is!!?).

    Replies: @iffen

    Also his repeated mischarecterisation of Russian and Ukrainian history

    Apparently, you do not understand history and its uses.

    • Replies: @Wizard of Oz
    @iffen

    Please explain what profundity YOU think you are hinting at Oh oracular one. History doesn't have to be used or misused for partisan political purposes.

    Replies: @iffen

  • Should Hungarians adopt Pan-Mongolism?

    • LOL: iffen
    • Replies: @German_reader
    @songbird

    That might clash with their links to Pan-Turkism:
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Organization_of_Turkic_States


    Since late 2018, Hungary has been an observer and may request full membership.
     
    Are Mongols (or Avars) cooler than Turks? Difficult question.

    Replies: @songbird

  • @A123
    @utu


    What is interesting is that A123 often responds promptly with elaborate and full of information and disinformation content as if he had access to lots of data on his finger tips. This would require a quite resourceful and knowledgeable individual.
     
    I appreciate the complement. I have lots of knowledge, and can usually provide a confirming link or two fairly quickly.

    To the extent that a limited amount of bad data slips through. My apologies.


    so I wonder whether it is a team that is assigned to several forums to push Brooklyn -Tel Aviv – Lubyanka spiel. Actually I would like to know how such an operations work and what does it take to launch them and sustain them. I suspect that a database of past comments is generated in real time and somehow parsed by AI to provide quick answers to queries that are similar that already have been posed
     
    I sleep for much less than the typical 8 hours per day and sometimes have to coordinate with international colleagues. My posting timing is unusual, but not evidence of an AI or team.

    What organizer would fund a team to or AI to expose George IslamoSoros as a Muslim?

    I wish that type of support for the TRUTH existed. Sadly, it does not.

    PEACE 😇

    Replies: @iffen

    This would require a quite resourceful and knowledgeable individual.

    Or a mediocre Israeli propaganda bot.

  • @Ron Unz
    Instead of continuing disputes over which side is winning the war, here's a broader question, especially directed towards the several Ukrainian partisans on this thread...

    Michael Hudson, Mike Whitney, and a few other analysts have argued that America may have deliberately provoked Russia's invasion of Ukraine, hoping to use it to eliminate the former's growing economic ties with Germany and the rest of Europe in what was becoming an economically unified Eurasia. Maybe that's correct, and if so, perhaps the invasion has benefited America, or at least some people thought it would.

    But I can't see any way the invasion and the war benefit Ukraine, even if (by some miracle) the Ukrainians mostly win and force the Russians out. No matter what happens, there's a great deal of death and destruction in Ukraine, ending in (probably) a strong Russian victory, which leads to far greater Russian control over the entire country. So it's bad for Ukraine, regardless of what happens.

    Now based upon all the Russian statements over the last few years and in the opinion of numerous American experts, the Russians wanted a neutral Ukraine what wouldn't become part of NATO, wouldn't have a strong military, and would agree to give local autonomy to the Donbas enclaves as had been promised in the Minsk agreements, plus maybe stopping government policies against the Russian language. Let's assume that this is correct and agreeing to these conditions would have averted the Russian invasion.

    So offhand, wasn't the stubbornness of the Ukrainian government on these points a very bad idea? Wouldn't it have been much better to just give in on those points and avert an invasion and war?

    I realize that many might argue otherwise based upon national pride or legal independence. However, although Cuba has the perfect right under international law to host a Russian missile base, if the Cubans knew it would lead to an American invasion, they probably wouldn't do it.

    In hindsight, shouldn't the Ukrainians have made those concessions to Russia?

    Replies: @Mikhail, @cortesar, @A123, @iffen, @Brás Cubas, @AP, @Yevardian, @Mr. Hack, @Wizard of Oz

    America may have deliberately provoked Russia’s invasion of Ukraine

    Is that you Barb?

  • Instead of continuing disputes over which side is winning the war, here’s a broader question, especially directed towards the several Ukrainian partisans on this thread…

    Michael Hudson, Mike Whitney, and a few other analysts have argued that America may have deliberately provoked Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, hoping to use it to eliminate the former’s growing economic ties with Germany and the rest of Europe in what was becoming an economically unified Eurasia. Maybe that’s correct, and if so, perhaps the invasion has benefited America, or at least some people thought it would.

    But I can’t see any way the invasion and the war benefit Ukraine, even if (by some miracle) the Ukrainians mostly win and force the Russians out. No matter what happens, there’s a great deal of death and destruction in Ukraine, ending in (probably) a strong Russian victory, which leads to far greater Russian control over the entire country. So it’s bad for Ukraine, regardless of what happens.

    Now based upon all the Russian statements over the last few years and in the opinion of numerous American experts, the Russians wanted a neutral Ukraine what wouldn’t become part of NATO, wouldn’t have a strong military, and would agree to give local autonomy to the Donbas enclaves as had been promised in the Minsk agreements, plus maybe stopping government policies against the Russian language. Let’s assume that this is correct and agreeing to these conditions would have averted the Russian invasion.

    So offhand, wasn’t the stubbornness of the Ukrainian government on these points a very bad idea? Wouldn’t it have been much better to just give in on those points and avert an invasion and war?

    I realize that many might argue otherwise based upon national pride or legal independence. However, although Cuba has the perfect right under international law to host a Russian missile base, if the Cubans knew it would lead to an American invasion, they probably wouldn’t do it.

    In hindsight, shouldn’t the Ukrainians have made those concessions to Russia?

    • Disagree: utu
    • Thanks: A123
    • Replies: @Mikhail
    @Ron Unz

    In time, a greater number of Ukrainians might begin questioning Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, as someone who (under the influence of nationalists) further instigated and prolonged a conflict whose end result could've occurred on better terms for Ukraine, without the deaths, displacement and destruction resulting from Russia's military action.

    Replies: @AP

    , @cortesar
    @Ron Unz

    Of course they should have
    While the discussions who is going to be winner may still be open (though I clearly see China as the one ) there is no possible scenario in which Ukraine could win
    I would go step further regarding the alternative history and say that that Ukrainians should never have allowed that witch Nuland to do what she did in 2014
    Had they resisted they would have the whole territory including possibly Crimea and the neutral status allowing them to be the bridge between EU and Russia
    They would have among other things very chip energy which would allow them to attract manufacturing from Europe
    As for Americans provoking Russians into war I think that is not unlikely
    Few days ago when peace was closer than any time since the beginning of the war the evil empire put a stop on any progress
    While the rest sane world was rejoicing for the most part there was nothing but an effort from Americans side to diminish and subvert it
    At this point the evil empire clearly wants to prolong the war and suffering as long as possible From there there is just one step to the possibility of manufacturing that war that they obviously think is in their interest

    , @A123
    @Ron Unz


    Instead of continuing disputes over which side is winning the war, here’s a broader question,
     
    I have tried to make this very suggestion several times.

    Michael Hudson, Mike Whitney, and a few other analysts have argued that America may have deliberately provoked Russia’s invasion of Ukraine,
     
    Correct concept. Incorrect assignment of responsibility.

    The European WEF Elites of Davos want Open Borders to dilute Europe's Judeo-Christian population... Often stated as "The Great Replacement". The Brussels-Berlin Axis has recently encountered difficulty with sovereign nations resisting their Rape-ugees. Their European WEF solution? Create a Russia/Ukraine conflict to generate new migrant flows, thus covering the ongoing flood of illegal arrivals.

    Zerohedge asked the question “Who is coming across the border?”. In multiple cases the results are non-Ukrainians (1)


    More than 50 migrants clashed on Saturday night during a riot at a refugee facility in Munich as chairs and paving stones were used as weapons, prompting a huge police response.

    Bild cited a police source who said the overwhelming majority of the “refugees” were from the Sinti and Roma ethnic groups and that, “Only a fraction are really Ukrainian refugees.

    “They have brand-new Ukrainian passports, which are also real. Someone in Ukraine is making a fortune right now,” the newspaper quoted the police representative as saying.
    ...
    The official Twitter account of the Roscommon GAA Gaelic football team recently deleted a tweet which showed that around half of the “Ukrainian refugees” they welcomed to a game weren’t exactly Slavic-looking.

    The reality of the situation is clear; Economic migrants from Africa, the Middle East and South Asia are cynically exploiting the Ukrainian refugee wave to abuse the system and get free accommodation and welfare in European countries with poor vetting systems.

    This comes at the expense of genuine Ukrainian refugees who need urgent help.
     

    The next phase of replacement is already foretold. The groundwork is being laid for Food Shortage — Mass African Migration.. The sucker pitch will be, "Compassionate nations must accept healthy, well fed Rape-ugees who claim to be without food."

    So offhand, wasn’t the stubbornness of the Ukrainian government on these points a very bad idea? Wouldn’t it have been much better to just give in on those points and avert an invasion and war?
     
    Exceedingly little actually needed to be conceded. Ukraine's leadership should never have allowed the European (non-American) WEF Elites of Davos to intentionally provoke Russia from their territory.

    Avoiding inflammatory comments, such as openly stating Ukrainian interest in nuclear arms, would have kicked the can down the road.

    PEACE 😇
    __________

    (1) https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/someone-making-fortune-out-giving-non-ukrainian-migrants-fake-ukrainian-passports

    Replies: @utu

    , @iffen
    @Ron Unz

    America may have deliberately provoked Russia’s invasion of Ukraine

    Is that you Barb?

    , @Brás Cubas
    @Ron Unz


    Michael Hudson, Mike Whitney, and a few other analysts have argued that America may have deliberately provoked Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, hoping to use it to eliminate the former’s growing economic ties with Germany and the rest of Europe in what was becoming an economically unified Eurasia. Maybe that’s correct, and if so, perhaps the invasion has benefited America, or at least some people thought it would.
     
    I find that reasoning extremely unlikely. Just look at the timing. Prior to the invasion, Germany was just about to close the deal with Russia on Nord Stream 2. I suppose it would be a matter of a few months at most. America's "provocations", on the other hand, were a continuing process, dating back to 2008, perhaps even earlier than that. Recent developments did not add anything that increased the perceived threat to Russia in a big enough way as to justify radical measures. If America hoped to provoke an invasion at such a short notice, they must have been quite clairvoyant that Russia would not wait until after Nord Stream 2 was in full operation to consider military action in Ukraine. By invading before the deal on Nord Stream 2 was closed, it was as if Russia severed its ties with Europe by her own free will. I don't know why she would do that, but sometimes countries act in stupid ways.
    You can focus on Ukraine's stupidity all you want, but it's irrelevant. Wasn't Putin himself who said that Ukraine is not even a real country? Is any of the commenters to whom you are addressing this question even Ukrainian? I don't know that, but the most vocal do not seem to be. Non-Ukrainians can claim they love Ukraine all they want, but they won't convince me that they aren't primarily concerned about their own welfare in their European Union democratic Putin-free comfort.

    Replies: @Brás Cubas

    , @AP
    @Ron Unz

    I’m on vacation with the family and other than checking the news will be mostly off line. Pending a more detailed response, I’ll say this: the Russian ultimatums were collectively similar to those made to Czechoslovakia, the Baltics and Finland prior to World War II the preceded the absorption of those countries by the ones making the ultimatums. They were a clear path to loss of statehood and full annexation as the next step. (recall the Putin has described Ukraine as a fake nation artificially separated from Russia).

    Ukrainians chose the Finnish path of fighting back. They believed (and most still do) that it was worth having a country despite the terrible price.

    Briefly:

    Demilitarisation- Ukraine is helpless

    Neutrality- No one can come to Ukraine’s aid when new demands or annexation comes into force

    Denazification- Russian code for purging Ukraine of patriots or nationalists

    Russian rights - Nice excuse for future intervention against a disarmed state for the sake of enforcing this condition

    Autonomy- veto power for pro-Russian regions over national policy. Goodbye EU association

    Replies: @Commentator Mike, @Mikhail

    , @Yevardian
    @Ron Unz


    Now based upon all the Russian statements over the last few years and in the opinion of numerous American experts, the Russians wanted a neutral Ukraine what wouldn’t become part of NATO, wouldn’t have a strong military, and would agree to give local autonomy to the Donbas enclaves as had been promised in the Minsk agreements, plus maybe stopping government policies against the Russian language. Let’s assume that this is correct and agreeing to these conditions would have averted the Russian invasion.

    In hindsight, shouldn’t the Ukrainians have made those concessions to Russia?
     

    Up to a point, but in retrospect I think the ongoing violent Donbass/Lunhansk insurgency made negotiations impossible. Even without the Ukrainian government being infested by the US State Department, no government still somewhat accountable to public opinion, or with any hope of foreign support (however ultimately malevolent), could make real concessions to Russia under such conditions. Earlier Russia had also been shortsighted in insisting on stupid gas-transit squabbles for years, a few ultimately minor concessions or symbolic magnanimous gestures, even if Ukraine was being difficult on purpose, could have gone a long way in convincing public opinion of real and ongoing benefits of economic integration with Russia over the EU.

    Even without Crimea I think Ukraines could have swallowed their pride, considering the strategic necessity of the Peninsula, and the complete lack of Ukrainian culture or population there, but the limbo 'Peoples Republics' spoiled everything. It would be asking too much of any country not completely on its knees and internationally ignored.

    The closest analogy that comes to mind now is Turkey and Cyprus, still barely talking decades later. Also instructive to compare that with Turkey's quick and decisive annexation of 'The Hatay Republic' it snatched from Syria.

    Replies: @Wokechoke

    , @Mr. Hack
    @Ron Unz

    Good questions! I'll try to answer them the best that I can.


    the Russians wanted a neutral Ukraine what wouldn’t become part of NATO,
     
    If Ukraine had become a part of NATO sooner than later, it wouldn't be involved in this war today. For most of its history since independence (1991 - 2014) it never fully pursued NATO membership. Most of Ukraine's citizenry was opposed to NATO membership, and thus because NATO had no desire to be involved with a country which held itself with a low approval rating. Obviously, things changed after 201 4, and Russia opened a pandoras box within Ukraine for its desire to gain entrance in this organization. Some at this blog have suggested that Ukraine had already, by that time, lost its window of opportunity.

    wouldn’t have a strong military,
     
    Well, we all can see how foolish that notion has become? Without a strong military Ukraine would have ceased to exist as independent state after a three day cakewalk by Russia to Kyiv. We wouldn't be having this discussion today.

    would agree to give local autonomy to the Donbas enclaves as had been promised in the Minsk agreements,
     
    This is a difficult and sticky problem for Ukraine to address. On the one hand, it couldn't just let the Donbas wither away, as it practically has in regards to Crimea, for this would set another bad precedent for trying to keep its large state in one unified whole. Also, there's the fact that unlike Crimea, this area had a majority of Ukrainians living within, today and historically. On the other hand, keeping it within Ukraine with its mostly Russified Ukrainian inhabitants would have always played to Russia's hand and would have prevented Ukraine's western EU aspirations. This is a hard nut to crack, and I admit that it's probably above my pay grade to unravel.

    plus maybe stopping government policies against the Russian language.

     

    Here's one area that Ukrainian officials probably acted too hastily, and could have come up with something more pragmatic and balanced to address the language situation in the greatly Russified Eastern area, especially within Donbas. Actually, if I'm not mistaken, the new language policy that was promulgated on the heels of Yanukovych's departure in 2014 was one of the main reasons that the separatists gave for trying to secede from Ukraine. The reality was that the new language policy favoring the Ukrainian language never really took hold, and the locals never really felt any discriminatory backlash for continuing to use the Russian language. So, in effect the new law had no real effect other than to be used as a pretext for separation. For the few provinces that were heavilu Russified, a more balanced approach would have worked better, and allowed the "Easterners" to continue to use the language that they were most comfortable speaking. Ukrainian could have been implemented more slowly, especially within the school system, to influence the youth of the area to relearn what was for most of the inabitants their original mother tongue.

    Well, there you go, I hope that I provided you with some useful information, even if I couldn't honestly unravel the whole mess for you in a pragmatic sort of way.
     

    Replies: @Mr. Hack

    , @Wizard of Oz
    @Ron Unz

    In your tentative probabilistic assess.ent (as such a good example to UR threadsters) do you think you've given enough weight to what is increasingly emerging about Putin's peculiarities. I include the evidence of his illness ad the real possibility that its treatment is affecting his mind and overt behaviour. Also his repeated mischarecterisation of Russian and Ukrainian history, his refusal to acknowledge that the vast majority of Ukrainians, including the Russian speaking majority identify as Ukrainian and - if only because they haven't been inundated with Russian propaganda from a censored media - have very different attitudes to free enterprise and state ownership, for example.
    He doesn't resiled at all from denying Ukraine is a real country (yet Russia is!!?).

    Replies: @iffen

  • @German_reader
    @silviosilver


    is granted a new lease on life by Russia – the very country whose rejection of globohomo values many us hoped to hold up as a model worth emulating.
     
    Indeed. Fuck Russia and Russians for their stupid war, their war crimes and their moronic propaganda about biolabs or whatever that makes anyone look like a cretin who falls for it, fuck the Poles and Balts who delude themselves they can pursue their resentment-driven chauvinist projects while being loyal American vassals, fuck the Western normies with their endless bouts of media-induced hysteria, and fuck the pro-Russian Western right-wingers who believe in the most blatant Russian propaganda too. I hate all of them.
    The only decent people might be the Nazis from Azov, my respect goes out to them, but unfortunately they'll lose either way.

    Replies: @iffen

    The only decent people might be the Nazis from Azov, my respect goes out to them

    Seriously?

    • Replies: @Barbarossa
    @iffen

    I guess you can applaud them for their honesty and directness? In the modern Oprahesqe jargon, they are great at "living life as their truest selves"!

  • @German_reader
    @sudden death


    from some absolutely respectable average mainstream carreer politician in the middle of EU.
     
    Lindner isn't a politician I'm going to defend, and I would even admit that Germany's stance prior to the invasion (not sending weapons to Ukraine) was very misguided. Still, people like Ilves should learn to express their sentiments in a more diplomatic way. These points of view aren't constructive when it looks like the next winter might be rather problematic for Germany in terms of energy supply.
    And to be blunt, I'm really creeped out by the enthusiasm for people like John McCain...ok, I get many Eastern Europeans are legitimately afraid of Russia, but imo it's foolish if this translates into support for the most extreme American hegemonists.

    Replies: @sudden death, @iffen

    it looks like the next winter might be rather problematic for Germany in terms of energy supply.

    Not to worry, Ted Cruz will be sending you American LNG. You will, of course, have to pay 4-5 times what you would have paid for Russian gas, but you will have the satisfaction of knowing that you are helping the world’s greatest defender and promoter of rainbow people and not some backward country that hates it’s LGBTQXYZ citizens.

    • LOL: LondonBob
    • Replies: @sudden death
    @iffen


    some backward country that hates it’s LGBTQXYZ citizens
     
    What a disgusting slander, how dare you?!

    https://wiwibloggs.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/philipp-kikorov-vladimir-putin-honour.jpg

    https://wiwibloggs.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/Filipp-Kirkorov-mood-color-black-egor-kreed.jpg
  • The previous Open Thread is approaching 900 comments and reportedly getting a little sluggish, so here's a new one for the Karlin Community. --- Ron Unz
  • @Sean
    @Greasy William


    Even after full mobilization and with an unlimited pool of slave labor, Germany plus it’s empire was unable to match the wartime production of the smaller economy of Great Britain alone.
     
    The ultimate justification of liberal democracy is that it is militarily unbeatable. How counter intuitive.

    Replies: @iffen

    The ultimate justification of liberal democracy is that it is militarily unbeatable.

    LOL

    No, no, and no.

    ee cummings:

    o to be in finland
    now that russia’s here)

    swing low
    sweet ca

    rr
    yon

    (pass the freedoms pappy or
    uncle shylock not interested

  • @Barbarossa
    @iffen

    I understand your point now. Thanks for clarifying.

    In my personal view there is a definite line drawn between the US as ideology and political entity and the concrete aspects of people and land.

    The former is something that I have no affinity for because it stands against and is actively hostile to pretty much all my beliefs and priorities in life. I have especially little regard for the American Empire, because I believe that much rot stems from our position as global hegemon. Power corrupts and the US has not been exempt in that regard. I believe that the sooner the US can cease to be an empire and can begin to be a country again, the better a chance that it may represent our interests. The fall will entail a loss of prestige and material position of course, but if it sparks some return to rationality it would be well worth it.

    On the other hand, I feel a deep sense of loyalty to my family, community, the land. I'm very glad to go out of my way to strengthen and defend these in any way I can.

    I think it all depends on what one considers an in-group and an out-group. I just can't extend my in-group thinking to our political class as it stands.

    Replies: @iffen

    Thanks, you did an excellent job of explicating my thoughts.

    I just hope that the damage that we do to the world on the way down is limited.

    In my personal view there is a definite line drawn between the US as ideology and political entity and the concrete aspects of people and land.

    IMHO this is an illusion, no such separation can be made. Well, you can, but it won’t be the U. S. anymore so your in group loyalty is to a different entity.

  • @Yevardian
    @Philip Owen


    State direction of private industry, rewarded by favourable awards of contracts is fascist economics.
     
    And also instrumental in the economic growth of Japan, South Korea (chaibols), Mexico (the IRP party stabilised the country after a century of anarchy), Victorian Britain, post 1979 China, and so on. Technically your definition is correct, but Nazi Germany wasn't exactly unique in successfully adopting a mixed economy.
    And there was virtually zero state direction of industry for a long time in Russia, people like Gaidar and then Chubais simply rushed to sell-off all state property in a mad dash, invariably for nominal prices often a thousandth of their real worth. For this reason, even when foreign shells didn't simply buy up these industries in order to destroy competition, many of the buyers simply didn't have the capital to remotely maintain any of these companies after purchasing them at a pittance.

    Again, I'm reading Roy Medvedev's 'Capitalism in Russia' now, the scale of incompetence and even malicious intent of Yeltsin's kakistocracy is just stunning. For instance, one fact I didn't know about, Yeltsin's government quite deliberately removed all tariffs and tax excises on the sale of alcohol, so even whilst real incomes of Russians were being halved, the price of vodka was reduced by three times (!). This conveniently was passed during the height of the 'shock therapy' so-called 'reforms'.

    Also another chapter detailing how during 1994, Russian leadership was unable to obtain 'most favoured nation trading status' or further western credit, as during a meeting with IMF in Madrid, the institution complained to the Russian leadership:

    The IMF experts had concluded that no real structural transformation had yet taken place in the Russian economy. In their opinion, the unemployment rate was still “too low” and no “inefficient” enterprises had been allowed to go bankrupt. The average consumption level in Russia had even risen, they complained. (This was because of imported consumer goods.) “Capital flight” remained high, and the self-indulgent life of “new Russians” abroad had already become legendary.
     
    And people wonder how Putin got a chip on his shoulder regarding the West..

    Replies: @songbird, @Dmitry, @Greasy William

    but Nazi Germany wasn’t exactly unique in successfully adopting a mixed economy.

    The Nazi economy was not successful. The Nazis inherited a recovering economy and rode an unsustainable private lending boom to medium prosperity. The German economy was already showing signs of serious strain before the plundering of Austria, Czechoslovakia, Poland, Denmark, Belgium, Norway and France gave it some much needed breathing room. Even after full mobilization and with an unlimited pool of slave labor, Germany plus it’s empire was unable to match the wartime production of the smaller economy of Great Britain alone.

    • Agree: iffen
    • Replies: @Sean
    @Greasy William


    Even after full mobilization and with an unlimited pool of slave labor, Germany plus it’s empire was unable to match the wartime production of the smaller economy of Great Britain alone.
     
    The ultimate justification of liberal democracy is that it is militarily unbeatable. How counter intuitive.

    Replies: @iffen

  • @Thulean Friend
    @Thorfinnsson


    It may also worsen the postwar settlement, because rapid victories can discredit the old order and produce collaborators.
     
    Indeed, which is why Russia initially tried (and failed) a blitzkrieg strategy. Ultimately a decision was made that slow progress is preferable to higher civilian casualties. I think that's the right call, Russia needs to influence the civilian population even in areas it does not want to annex. For the areas in the east where annexation risk is very high, all the more so.

    The media and political environments have coalesced around the idea that we need to do more to assist the Ukrainians, including routine calls for a so-called no-fly zone (itself a dangerously misleading term). Meanwhile, the slow progress of the Russian offensive along with Ukrainian dominance of the infowar has led many to the conclusion that Russia is a paper bear that will fold when pushed. Effectively the possibility of WW3 is being restrained by the prudence of one man–the geriatric President Biden.
     
    I've tracked a lot of what Jake Sullivan, the national security advisor, has been saying and he's been adamant that the US shouldn't get involved with a NFZ or boots on the ground. The CIA director, William Burns, is also much less hawkish than someone like Pompeo and even warned about NATO expansion back in 2008-9 to more countries, including Ukraine. Biden isn't just geriatric, his mind is going. It makes more sense to look at what the people around him who actually shape day-to-day policy think.

    The people at the very top understand that a lot of these media narratives are utter lies. That was the case with James Clapper during the Syrian chemical gas hoax and it is true now.

    That said, I don't discount some form of false flag attack, but it will likely be used to motivate people (read: feckless europoors) to take the economic hits from even more extreme sanctions and to ramp up the proxy war, such as sending the S-300 from Slovakia. Hell, we might even see the MiG-29 issue being resurfaced if a significant fraction of the Western public gets fooled into thinking that Putin "was using a chemical gas attack because he is desperate, so we must double down".

    But US troops on the ground in Ukraine or a NFZ? No. This is a proxy war.

    Replies: @iffen

    That said, I don’t discount some form of false flag attack,

    The Jew York Times and other MSM are pushing extremely hard for Russia to launch a WMD attack. They frequently get want they want.

  • @Philip Owen
    @Beckow

    It doesn't work like that. The initiatitive to destroy the city was Russian.

    Replies: @Beckow

    Russia recognized Donbas as independent and Mariupol is in Donbas. You can see their initiative as liberation and Ukie forces as occupiers. Consider it like Britain fighting its way into Arnhem or Hamburg in WWII, or Baghdad, etc…It works that way, you have to be consistent.

    • Agree: iffen
  • @Emil Nikola Richard
    @iffen

    In the movie it was the Sterling Hayden character, General Jack D. Ripper, who went berzerk and dropped the nukes. Doctor Strangelove was the guy who gleefully explained all the strategic and tactical scenarios to the big wigs inside the War Room.

    Replies: @iffen

    Ahh, yes, the precious body fluids guy.

    Thanks, my favorite was Slim Pickens.

  • More blood! Send more weapons! More killing!

    Frigging idiots. Keep it up until some Dr. Strangelove in Russia drops Big Bertha in downtown Kiev.

    • Replies: @Emil Nikola Richard
    @iffen

    In the movie it was the Sterling Hayden character, General Jack D. Ripper, who went berzerk and dropped the nukes. Doctor Strangelove was the guy who gleefully explained all the strategic and tactical scenarios to the big wigs inside the War Room.

    Replies: @iffen

  • @AP
    @iffen


    Russians are politically an Asiatic people.

    So it’s true!

    Ukies parrot Nazi propaganda.
     
    Ukrainians were saying that since the 18th century. The Little Russians were saying that the Great Russians were politically Tatars or Mongols.

    Last I checked, Nazism didn't exist in the 18th century.

    Replies: @iffen

    The Little Russians were saying that the Great Russians were politically Tatars or Mongols.

    Last I checked, Nazism didn’t exist in the 18th century

    So it’s true!

    Ukies were the original Nazis.

  • @AP
    @Thorfinnsson


    I’m not a Slavic language speaker, but I frequently hear about Ukrainian simply being a dialect of Russian or at least mutually intelligible.
     
    You hear this from Russian nationalists, who are motivated to lie. Ukrainian is about as distant from Russian as Dutch is from German. Norwegian is closer to Swedish than Ukrainian is to Russian.

    It should also be pointed out that English-language transliterations of Ukrainian words consistently look much worse than their Russian equivalents
     
    Ukrainian language sounds a lot nicer than does Russian. Smoother, more melodic. It makes for more beautiful folk songs. Russian sounds rougher, harsher and vulgar.

    Russia, Poland, and Serbia are the only Slavic states needed by the world.
     
    This is just lazy. Diversity and beauty are good things. And necessary. Lack of genetic diversity can lead to extinction of a species, this is probably true of cultures also. If the Germanic peoples had been reduced to only one (say, the Visigoths in 400 AD) would that one had achieved what the others collectively would? It is always good to have a reserve of peoples.

    Plus, politically Ukrainian culture clashes with Russian. Russians are politically an Asiatic people. I do not mean this in a pejorative sense, China and Singapore work fine. But Europeans shouldn’t live under a system that is unnatural for them. That is perversity. Only a pervert would want Europeans such as Poles or Ukrainians to live under a Eurasian despot. Ukrainians belong alongside Poles and other Visegrad peoples.

    Replies: @iffen, @Thorfinnsson, @Yevardian, @Strasser

    Russians are politically an Asiatic people.

    So it’s true!

    Ukies parrot Nazi propaganda.

    Duck walking, duck squawking.

    • Replies: @AP
    @iffen


    Russians are politically an Asiatic people.

    So it’s true!

    Ukies parrot Nazi propaganda.
     
    Ukrainians were saying that since the 18th century. The Little Russians were saying that the Great Russians were politically Tatars or Mongols.

    Last I checked, Nazism didn't exist in the 18th century.

    Replies: @iffen

  • @Barbarossa
    @iffen

    Well, if we were as terse and cranky as yourself it wouldn't be much of a thread, would it? ;)

    Actually, I'm kind of curious what makes you think I am a prime example of failure in the "application of ingroup/ outgroup instinct? I'm not particularly offended by the allegation, it just seems an odd one.

    Dagnabbit, I knew I shouldn't have posted all those plans for my dreams of opening a utopian summer camp for rehabilitating and accepting transgender African child-soldiers to be integrated into the local Amish communities!

    Replies: @iffen

    I’m not particularly offended by the allegation, it just seems an odd one.

    Good, I thought that you likely would not be upset and I really didn’t mean to imply any sort of derogation.

    It might take some time to sort through it, but when you criticize the policies and actions of our country (which is great, I do it myself) you don’t seem to understand that this is still our country, right or wrong, and that it is the crucial group.

    • Replies: @Barbarossa
    @iffen

    I understand your point now. Thanks for clarifying.

    In my personal view there is a definite line drawn between the US as ideology and political entity and the concrete aspects of people and land.

    The former is something that I have no affinity for because it stands against and is actively hostile to pretty much all my beliefs and priorities in life. I have especially little regard for the American Empire, because I believe that much rot stems from our position as global hegemon. Power corrupts and the US has not been exempt in that regard. I believe that the sooner the US can cease to be an empire and can begin to be a country again, the better a chance that it may represent our interests. The fall will entail a loss of prestige and material position of course, but if it sparks some return to rationality it would be well worth it.

    On the other hand, I feel a deep sense of loyalty to my family, community, the land. I'm very glad to go out of my way to strengthen and defend these in any way I can.

    I think it all depends on what one considers an in-group and an out-group. I just can't extend my in-group thinking to our political class as it stands.

    Replies: @iffen

  • @Yahya
    @iffen


    What does make sense is runaway pathological altruism. Just the Jesus influence alone has had close to 2 thousand years to warp our genes.
     
    A few points:

    1). The only world ethno-racial group which can authoritatively be described as "pathologically altruistic" are Western Europeans and their descendants in North America. Not whites, not Europeans, not even Northern Europeans (Slavs, Greeks, Sicilians, Balts etc. need not apply) - just Western Europeans, save for perhaps Portugal. In other words, only what Joe Heinrich calls WEIRDOs exhibit a cultural/genetic trait that can be described as pathologically altruistic - at least in comparison to the rest of the world.

    2). The Jesus influence on Western Europeans only began in the 3rd-4th century AD. Christianity is older in the Middle East, the Caucuses, and Southern Europe. If your thesis that Christianity leads to pathological altruism is true, we would see a greater deal of pathological altruism among Christian Arabs, Armenians, Georgians, Greeks etc. than Western Europeans - but that is not the case. At the very least, we should narrow it down to Western forms of Christianity (Catholicism and Protestanism), and exclude Orthodox and other non-Western versions of Christianity.

    3). Islam likewise has a universalist message at its core - similar to Christianity. If universalist teachings were a cause of pathological altruism, we would see the trait exhibited by Muslims - but that is not the case. From this, we can conclude that while the universality teachings of Christianity could have played a role in developing pathological altruism among Westerners, other contingent factors were necessary as well. Hajnal Western European marriage/kinship patterns (delayed marriage, low fertility, less cousin marriage) is likely a more critical factor in explaining why pathological altruism developed among WEIRDOs but not among Eastern Christians or Muslims.

    Figure 1: Global Out-Group Trust

    https://i.ibb.co/dQWdP23/1.png


    Figure 2: Hajnal Line

    https://i.ibb.co/d2F4Y2b/2.png

    Replies: @iffen, @Coconuts

    1). The only world ethno-racial group which can authoritatively be described as “pathologically altruistic” are Western Europeans and their descendants in North America. Not whites, not Europeans, not even Northern Europeans (Slavs, Greeks, Sicilians, Balts etc. need not apply) – just Western Europeans, save for perhaps Portugal. In other words, only what Joe Heinrich calls WEIRDOs exhibit a cultural/genetic trait that can be described as pathologically altruistic – at least in comparison to the rest of the world.

    Imo ‘pathological altruism’ has to be quite carefully defined e.g. in the recent past Northern Slavic peoples exhibited a strong tendency to adopt extreme left progressive political beliefs which led one way or another to the destruction of a significant part of their population. The same commitment to strong progressivism is present in Spain, Italy, France, Portugal, I believe with a similar kind of root. Just in the later countries it was balanced and contained by a stronger nationalistic and traditionalist right wing.

    These kinds of socialist utopian political beliefs seem to be somewhat different to pathological altruism, which in origin is more associated with middle class Protestants in Anglo countries and Germany, also among the middle classes in France (again, Protestants are present), it’s a manifestation of progressive liberal rather than socialist politics. It’s become an issue because of the collapse of the cultural right wing in these Northern countries, there are no longer any counter-influences to contain or mitigate it.

    Christianity itself is not likely to be a major factor in this, apart from by its collapse.

    • Agree: A123
    • Disagree: iffen
    • Replies: @A123
    @Coconuts

    You are correct.

    The idea that 'Protestant' beliefs lead to 'pathological altruism’ is obviously absurd. It can be debunked by one easy question. Who is the #1 voice for this self destructive interpretation of Christianity? (1)


    In an address to supporters of a new project called Snapshots From The Borders Sept. 10, the pope said that it was “vital to change the way we see and talk about migration: it is about putting people, faces, stories at the center.”

    “The inhabitants of the cities and frontier territories — the societies, communities, churches — are called to be the first actors in this turning point, thanks to the continuous opportunities of encounter that history offers them,” he said.

    “Borders, long considered as barriers of division, can instead become ‘windows,’ spaces of mutual knowledge, of mutual enrichment, of communion in diversity; they can become places where models are experimented with to overcome the difficulties that the new arrivals bring for the indigenous communities
     
    There are many terms that can be applied to the current Pope. However, 'Protestant' is not one of them.
    ___

    The encroachment of 'pathological altruism' is tied to Progressive politics. It preys on affluence, size, and hierarchical organization. Martin Luther nailing up his denunciation of Indulgences is the equivalent to modern day resistance against SJW Woke church leaders.

    The worst offenders in Christianity are those organizations where the leadership is most separate from ordinary parishioners. Catholicism and the Church of England (see below) are notable examples of failure where the SJW 'pathological altruism' is now infallible dogma decreed by unchallengeable leaders.

    To the extent that Protestant branches have become too large, they also have become vulnerable to corrupt leadership. Martin Luther would be appalled by today's so-called Lutheren church. There can be little doubt that he would denounce them for their tributes to Mammon, much like his original theses against the Catholic hierarchy.

    PEACE 😇
    __________

    (1) https://www.catholicworldreport.com/2020/09/10/pope-francis-borders-should-be-windows-not-barriers-of-division/

    https://youtu.be/qUSTKisEgTo

    Replies: @Coconuts

  • @Yahya
    @iffen


    What does make sense is runaway pathological altruism. Just the Jesus influence alone has had close to 2 thousand years to warp our genes.
     
    A few points:

    1). The only world ethno-racial group which can authoritatively be described as "pathologically altruistic" are Western Europeans and their descendants in North America. Not whites, not Europeans, not even Northern Europeans (Slavs, Greeks, Sicilians, Balts etc. need not apply) - just Western Europeans, save for perhaps Portugal. In other words, only what Joe Heinrich calls WEIRDOs exhibit a cultural/genetic trait that can be described as pathologically altruistic - at least in comparison to the rest of the world.

    2). The Jesus influence on Western Europeans only began in the 3rd-4th century AD. Christianity is older in the Middle East, the Caucuses, and Southern Europe. If your thesis that Christianity leads to pathological altruism is true, we would see a greater deal of pathological altruism among Christian Arabs, Armenians, Georgians, Greeks etc. than Western Europeans - but that is not the case. At the very least, we should narrow it down to Western forms of Christianity (Catholicism and Protestanism), and exclude Orthodox and other non-Western versions of Christianity.

    3). Islam likewise has a universalist message at its core - similar to Christianity. If universalist teachings were a cause of pathological altruism, we would see the trait exhibited by Muslims - but that is not the case. From this, we can conclude that while the universality teachings of Christianity could have played a role in developing pathological altruism among Westerners, other contingent factors were necessary as well. Hajnal Western European marriage/kinship patterns (delayed marriage, low fertility, less cousin marriage) is likely a more critical factor in explaining why pathological altruism developed among WEIRDOs but not among Eastern Christians or Muslims.

    Figure 1: Global Out-Group Trust

    https://i.ibb.co/dQWdP23/1.png


    Figure 2: Hajnal Line

    https://i.ibb.co/d2F4Y2b/2.png

    Replies: @iffen, @Coconuts

    Yes, the nuclear family definitely seems to have been crucial as well. It’s not like Christianity = WEIRDOS. The universalist theme of Christianity was the spark and there were hundreds of bundles of flammable materials along the way. (Perhaps the last one being Pax Americana.) “We” are basically failing in the application of our ingroup/outgroup instinct. You can see it everywhere. The nice commenter Barbarossa is a prime example.

    You make a lot of good points, and I don’t want to get into a discussion on religion, but modern Islam compares to the Christianity of Medieval Europe.

    • Replies: @Barbarossa
    @iffen

    Well, if we were as terse and cranky as yourself it wouldn't be much of a thread, would it? ;)

    Actually, I'm kind of curious what makes you think I am a prime example of failure in the "application of ingroup/ outgroup instinct? I'm not particularly offended by the allegation, it just seems an odd one.

    Dagnabbit, I knew I shouldn't have posted all those plans for my dreams of opening a utopian summer camp for rehabilitating and accepting transgender African child-soldiers to be integrated into the local Amish communities!

    Replies: @iffen

  • @Greasy William
    @iffen


    He kicked off universalism in a big way by divorcing from the Jewish tribal religion.
     
    Paul did that, not Jesus. There is no reason whatsoever to believe that Jesus was more of a universalist than any other impoverished Jew living in early 1st century Roman Palestine. Mark, Luke and John are all clearly written by non Jews. The only canonical gospel maybe written by a Jew is Matthew, and in that one Jesus preaches a decidedly Jewish exclusivist message.

    We can see in Galatians 2 that James, Jesus's own brother who probably had a pretty good understanding of Jesus's views, was not happy at all with the universalist message that Paul was pushing.

    Replies: @iffen

    No Jesus, no Paul, no Christianity, etc., etc.

    Hellenized Jews kickstarted Christianity.

    • Replies: @Yahya
    @iffen


    What does make sense is runaway pathological altruism. Just the Jesus influence alone has had close to 2 thousand years to warp our genes.
     
    A few points:

    1). The only world ethno-racial group which can authoritatively be described as "pathologically altruistic" are Western Europeans and their descendants in North America. Not whites, not Europeans, not even Northern Europeans (Slavs, Greeks, Sicilians, Balts etc. need not apply) - just Western Europeans, save for perhaps Portugal. In other words, only what Joe Heinrich calls WEIRDOs exhibit a cultural/genetic trait that can be described as pathologically altruistic - at least in comparison to the rest of the world.

    2). The Jesus influence on Western Europeans only began in the 3rd-4th century AD. Christianity is older in the Middle East, the Caucuses, and Southern Europe. If your thesis that Christianity leads to pathological altruism is true, we would see a greater deal of pathological altruism among Christian Arabs, Armenians, Georgians, Greeks etc. than Western Europeans - but that is not the case. At the very least, we should narrow it down to Western forms of Christianity (Catholicism and Protestanism), and exclude Orthodox and other non-Western versions of Christianity.

    3). Islam likewise has a universalist message at its core - similar to Christianity. If universalist teachings were a cause of pathological altruism, we would see the trait exhibited by Muslims - but that is not the case. From this, we can conclude that while the universality teachings of Christianity could have played a role in developing pathological altruism among Westerners, other contingent factors were necessary as well. Hajnal Western European marriage/kinship patterns (delayed marriage, low fertility, less cousin marriage) is likely a more critical factor in explaining why pathological altruism developed among WEIRDOs but not among Eastern Christians or Muslims.

    Figure 1: Global Out-Group Trust

    https://i.ibb.co/dQWdP23/1.png


    Figure 2: Hajnal Line

    https://i.ibb.co/d2F4Y2b/2.png

    Replies: @iffen, @Coconuts

  • @Barbarossa
    @iffen

    Actually, I'm not sure if I agreed or disagreed with your comment.

    I thought the point was good that those in prisons are a very different population than up until recently. Debtors prison being a notable example.

    We certainly have runaway pathological altruism today, though I'm not sure you can blame that on Jesus' influence (if that's what you were saying) since it's more a result of Enlightenment mindsets regarding the perfectibility of man

    Replies: @iffen, @Coconuts

    ’m not sure you can blame that on Jesus’ influence

    He kicked off universalism in a big way by divorcing from the Jewish tribal religion. Roman state religion right down to us. He won’t let us treat people like they are Amalekites anymore. Universalism and altruism are great but absolutely have to be tempered with selfish thought.

    • Replies: @Greasy William
    @iffen


    He kicked off universalism in a big way by divorcing from the Jewish tribal religion.
     
    Paul did that, not Jesus. There is no reason whatsoever to believe that Jesus was more of a universalist than any other impoverished Jew living in early 1st century Roman Palestine. Mark, Luke and John are all clearly written by non Jews. The only canonical gospel maybe written by a Jew is Matthew, and in that one Jesus preaches a decidedly Jewish exclusivist message.

    We can see in Galatians 2 that James, Jesus's own brother who probably had a pretty good understanding of Jesus's views, was not happy at all with the universalist message that Paul was pushing.

    Replies: @iffen

  • @utu
    @iffen

    "I was naked and you clothed Me; I was sick and you visited Me; I was in prison and you came to Me." - Matthew 25:36

    Replies: @iffen

    Yes, I thought about that. It made sense in those days and really up until modern times in that most of the people in prison were there for political or socio-economic reasons. Most “criminals” were done away with. Now most of the people in prison are criminals so it no longer makes sense. What does make sense is runaway pathological altruism. Just the Jesus influence alone has had close to 2 thousand years to warp our genes.

    • Disagree: Barbarossa
    • Replies: @Barbarossa
    @iffen

    Actually, I'm not sure if I agreed or disagreed with your comment.

    I thought the point was good that those in prisons are a very different population than up until recently. Debtors prison being a notable example.

    We certainly have runaway pathological altruism today, though I'm not sure you can blame that on Jesus' influence (if that's what you were saying) since it's more a result of Enlightenment mindsets regarding the perfectibility of man

    Replies: @iffen, @Coconuts

  • @Greasy William
    @iffen


    Did you get banged? And I mean that not in the good way.
     
    no. It was way different than you'd expect. Not a lot of fights and no rapes or anything like that. You had a job but that was only 4 to 6 hours a day, no weekends, and they didn't really care if you just skipped work and hung out in the main area to play chess or watch TV or whatever. If you miss too much work you don't get to use the gym or the library though. The food was bad but not terrible and you could also buy additional snacks if you had somebody on the outside to put money in your account.

    They do offer classes but I was always too unmotivated to attend any so I can't tell you if any were worthwhile at all.

    You can't use the internet, but you get used to that really quick. The library is huge and they have these e-reader things that allow you to listen to current podcasts. The movie selection was decent but you had to pay a fair amount of money so generally you would chip in with other guys for that. Some of the other inmates tried to teach me how to shoot pool but I never got the hang of it. There is no pool, tennis courts or golf courses like some people apparently think that minimum security prisons have. You do usually get to go outside for at least 2 hours a day if you want. If it's raining really hard they won't let you out though.

    The security is comically lax. I seriously think that if you broke out that it would take a full day before anyone even noticed that you were gone.

    There is some weird cultural stuff. You aren't supposed to ask people what they are in for because that's considered disrespectful and if someone asks you, you will be considered weak if you answer them. But the thing is, nobody is gonna rape you or beat you up or anything like in a real prison so it doesn't matter if nobody respects you, you can just ignore them. You aren't supposed to talk to guards too much and that ends up being pretty easy because most of them want to interact with the inmates as little as possible.

    You can have a lot of visitors, I think 4 a week or something, if you want but I'm estranged from all my remaining family and I don't really have any friends so I only ended up getting 1 visitor the entire time I was there; from pen pal that I started corresponding with after I got in. There is a surprisingly high number of people who want to write to prisoners, I guess because they figure people in jails are likely to write back.

    I even got a waiver to serve a few months of my sentence under house arrest while I was dealing with some health issues.

    Even still, I wouldn't recommend it. It wasn't traumatizing, but it was unpleasant. I can't imagine how awful a real prison must be. Don't break the law because it just isn't worth it. What people in there would say is, "A cage with golden bars is still a cage, except here we don't even have golden bars".

    Replies: @Thulean Friend, @iffen

    There is a surprisingly high number of people who want to write to prisoners, I guess because they figure people in jails are likely to write back.

    That may be part of it, but I think there is a lot more going on emotionally. I can’t quite figure it out, but it may stem from our “humanitarian” impulse. It might be a real shibboleth that can separate utopian leftists from the normal.

    • Replies: @utu
    @iffen

    "I was naked and you clothed Me; I was sick and you visited Me; I was in prison and you came to Me." - Matthew 25:36

    Replies: @iffen

  • @Triteleia Laxa
    @Ron Unz

    Look, since you're intent on being totally ignorant and thinking that Moon of Alabama has any credibility whatsoever. Just ask yourself, what "effect" does this air launched Iskander that is named "Khinzal" achieve, which isn't achieved already by other much cheaper means?

    The answer is nothing. It is a neat piece of technology, but a waste of money. Like the NASA space pen.

    People like Scott Ritter are the same sort of grifters who sold people on their "stop the steal" expertise. Unimpressive individuals who bluster well and have a patina of credentials.

    The gaping mouth soyface response to them is embarrassing.

    In reality, the American military may as well be from a different universe than the Russian one, and France would wipe the floor with the Russians too.

    The simple truth is that the Russians are unable to operate at even the most basic of Western levels, such as at night, with aggression under fire and with proper combined arms.

    They do have a lot of equipment, but much of it is clearly ill-maintained, aged or badly designed. Shelling places from a distance seems to be their only skill, but that achieves no useful effect. By "useful", I mean something that contributes to victory.

    If you want to start understanding military operations, this is how you have to think. Think in terms of effects and tie everything into the mission and purpose.

    E.g shelling a city indiscriminately might slightly attrit enemy forces hiding within it, but, if you seek to demoralise or otherwise pacify the enemy, under your domination, you are going backwards by doing the shelling. This is akin to trying to lose weight by doing the exercise of walking up to the all you can eat buffet!

    The Gerasimov doctrine, of emphasising hybrid warfare and avoiding any but utterly decisive combat, was smart, but the Russians lost the hybrid war in Ukraine over the last decade.

    And now they have thrown it out of the window and are utilising a strategy that only ever made sense as the aggressor if you are a fighting a total war of near extermination.

    Since this is obviously not what Russia is fighting and they would gain nothing by eventually winning that type of war anyway, this is mental.

    They are now in the worst position a modern professional army can be in. They are settled into a war of attrition against an entire country, that hates them, has infinite resupply, borders which can't be closed and the Russians don't even have victory conditions.

    This isn't like Iraq or Afghanistan, where the US and USSR were participants in a mostly local civil war. This is much, much worse. The only thing that the Russians have got going for them is that, like all aggressors early in the game, they can withdraw and end their nightmare before it really starts. Will they keep Crimea, Donetsk and Lugansk? Maybe, but when you invade a country and murder a whole bunch of people, you tend to create a lot of enemies who will fight you to your death. How long can Russia afford to hold those territories for against the growing Ukrainian military? Russia has a GDP less than Canada. Ukraine is now supported by countries with the majority of the GDP in the world.

    Are Donetsk and Lugansk even places Putin should want to govern? Under Russian domination, they have been run literal criminal gangs and are a sinkhole. Ukrainians know what is happening there and this is a large part of why they want nothing to do with Russia, even before the invasion. They're like Transniestra but much worse. Crimea is a different point, because it does seem that the locals benefit from Russian largesse and it has few people anyway, but Russia could have bought it for less than they will have already spent on this ridiculous aggression, and infinitely less than the sanctions will cost them.

    The fact that the Russians haven't realised and acted on all of this yet, brings light to the truth that all of the publicity surrounding Western bungling only makes sense because the West is the only major part of the world that has "acted" on the world stage for decades. It is also the only part of the world that actively encourages criticism and rewards it. People in the cheap seats think that this makes it weak. Anyone with who isn't a bizarre recluse or totally failed at everything, will recognise this as a sign of strength and a source of more strength in the future.

    Observers have therefore confused the incredible complexity of "acting" in our reality with Western incompetence, but now you're seeing what a less than stellar power achieves when it acts and faces even the slightest resistance.

    Control of Covid is more of an anomaly. Authoritarian countries are obviously going to be more effective at locking civllians in their homes. Cultures which prize authoritarianism will also be much more compliant. While you may have preferred China's path and, with hindsight, it might look like a decent thing, the truth is that this is not what people wanted. People not wanting what you want does not make them incompetent or crazy. You are hardly the definition of what is normal nor would it be a better world if everyone were like you.

    Unsurprisingly, it remains that the countries that everyone wants to move to are the most competent and those that they desperately want to move from are the least competent. Yes, it is harder to make great advances in the most advanced places, compared to how easy it is to simply copy those advances places from the least advanced, but saying a post-grad student is dumbed than a child because they got a lower score on their respective tests completely misses the point.

    Ultimately, the discourse on Unz was always cruel, but now it is proving to also be utterly incompetent. Hence my contempt. All I see are bitter and nasty old fools, thinking that if they can stir up the handful of young people who agree with them and have seriously antisocial personalities, then they can compensate for whatever they feel they've missed out on in life. This hurts the world, the young antisocials and them. You're not changing the direction of anything. You're just making everything a bit more sh*t than it would otherwise be.

    Replies: @Sean, @iffen

    All I see are bitter and nasty old fools,

    Hey!!
    I’m not nasty.

  • @Barbarossa
    @Ron Unz

    Hong Kong actually has a slightly higher vaccination rate than the US, by about 5%.

    As your reply points out there are a lot of additional data points which muddy the waters. In an attempt to keep it fairly apples to apples here is what I did to reach my conclusion. I divided reported deaths by cases for the highest peak of daily peak Omicron infections. This number is actually basically the same for HK and the US. The next thing I did is factor in population size, which makes it look much worse per capita for HK.

    However, on reflection, I think you are correct the density of HK is probably the deciding factor there, making my initial thoughts less accurate.

    Replies: @china-russia-all-the-way, @iffen

    Hong Kong actually has a slightly higher vaccination rate than the US, by about 5%.

    That’s not what I read. I read that the vaccination rate for older people is very low, which is why Omicron is taking out so many.

  • @Greasy William
    @German_reader

    I did get arrested for tax fraud. And insurance fraud. I served 17 months.

    Replies: @German_reader, @iffen

    I served 17 months.

    Did you get banged? And I mean that not in the good way.

    • Replies: @Greasy William
    @iffen


    Did you get banged? And I mean that not in the good way.
     
    no. It was way different than you'd expect. Not a lot of fights and no rapes or anything like that. You had a job but that was only 4 to 6 hours a day, no weekends, and they didn't really care if you just skipped work and hung out in the main area to play chess or watch TV or whatever. If you miss too much work you don't get to use the gym or the library though. The food was bad but not terrible and you could also buy additional snacks if you had somebody on the outside to put money in your account.

    They do offer classes but I was always too unmotivated to attend any so I can't tell you if any were worthwhile at all.

    You can't use the internet, but you get used to that really quick. The library is huge and they have these e-reader things that allow you to listen to current podcasts. The movie selection was decent but you had to pay a fair amount of money so generally you would chip in with other guys for that. Some of the other inmates tried to teach me how to shoot pool but I never got the hang of it. There is no pool, tennis courts or golf courses like some people apparently think that minimum security prisons have. You do usually get to go outside for at least 2 hours a day if you want. If it's raining really hard they won't let you out though.

    The security is comically lax. I seriously think that if you broke out that it would take a full day before anyone even noticed that you were gone.

    There is some weird cultural stuff. You aren't supposed to ask people what they are in for because that's considered disrespectful and if someone asks you, you will be considered weak if you answer them. But the thing is, nobody is gonna rape you or beat you up or anything like in a real prison so it doesn't matter if nobody respects you, you can just ignore them. You aren't supposed to talk to guards too much and that ends up being pretty easy because most of them want to interact with the inmates as little as possible.

    You can have a lot of visitors, I think 4 a week or something, if you want but I'm estranged from all my remaining family and I don't really have any friends so I only ended up getting 1 visitor the entire time I was there; from pen pal that I started corresponding with after I got in. There is a surprisingly high number of people who want to write to prisoners, I guess because they figure people in jails are likely to write back.

    I even got a waiver to serve a few months of my sentence under house arrest while I was dealing with some health issues.

    Even still, I wouldn't recommend it. It wasn't traumatizing, but it was unpleasant. I can't imagine how awful a real prison must be. Don't break the law because it just isn't worth it. What people in there would say is, "A cage with golden bars is still a cage, except here we don't even have golden bars".

    Replies: @Thulean Friend, @iffen

  • @Barbarossa
    @Ron Unz

    The strange thing is that death rate in Hong Kong during Omicron has equaled the worst of the US by capita. This points to natural immunity, of which HK has none, as being an essential component in ameliorating Covid severity in the long term. Put another way it would seem that Omicron is not empirically less severe than other strains, but only relatively so in populations that have a residual existing base of immunity.

    I'm not against the Covid vaccines per se, but they seem pretty "Meh" overall so far, especially in light of all the previous hype.

    Replies: @Ron Unz, @iffen

    This points to natural immunity, of which HK has none,

    It points to an extremely low vaccination rate. Vaccination lessens the severity of Omicron, but does nothing to reduce contagion.

    • Replies: @Yellowface Anon
    @iffen

    HK is living the Red State natural immunity dream under Blue State-level quasi-lockdowns and vaccination drive. Worst of both worlds.

  • @utu
    @iffen

    An earnest person answer to the snarko-ironist:

    Actually, red potatoes are very good as boiled potatoes, so they are right</b potatoes. Yukon gold are also very good. Some chefs (Chef John) say that Yukon gold are the best for mashed potatoes. IMO baking potatoes (like Russet) are the best for mashed potatoes because they do not have that much water so you can add more milk or cream to them but they are lousy as boiled potatoes. The best potatoes for potato/German salad are Belgian fingerling or Russian banana potatoes but because they are small and irregular shapes they are hard to work with when peeling after boiling.

    The key point is not to overcook them for boiling potatoes and not to undercook them for mashed potatoes. The unpeeled potatoes have wide tolerance margin for overcooking but for hash browns you should slightly undercook them because you still will be frying them.

    I do not have experience with more exotic potatoes from Peru that are purple or bluish or orange. But I am sure that hipster foodies will make them popular.

    Replies: @iffen, @Philip Owen

    Actually, red potatoes are very good as boiled potatoes, so they are right</b potatoes.

    To be precise, red “Arsh” potatoes, unpeeled, freshly dug, (hours, not days) are supreme when boiled and served with English peas or just as good sliced and baked in butter.

  • @utu
    @Barbarossa

    Your mom was correct. Except that most likely she overcooked them and perhaps used wrong kind of potatoes not the best for boiled potatoes dish.

    Unpeeled potatoes are boiled for other dishes. After cooking you let them cool off and then you peel them nad (1) you use them for potato salad by dicing or German potato salad by slicing or (2) for fried potatoes, perfect for hash browns for breakfast. Or for Jewish potato salad (knish filling) when you peel them while still hot (this part is difficult) and then mash them with chopped onions so onions partially cook but still remains sharp.

    Unpeeled boiled potatoes and peeled boiled potatoes taste very different and have different consistency. Partly because peeled potatoes after cooking evaporate a lot of it moisture while the unpeeled let the moisture condense back in potato which makes them more dense.

    Peeled cooked potatoes is an exquisite dish when made form right potatoes. The flavor of potatoes can be enjoyed the most which is not distorted by excessive taste altering thermal processing (like frying) or additives (like in mashed potatoes) or by the hint of skin flavor like in baked potatoes.

    However we live in the age of excess of food processing and strong additives which makes us lose ability to enjoy more subtle flavors. The popularity of hot sauces and BBQ sauces is really a curse which 'primitivizes' our senses. It is hard to go back to enjoying pure unaltered flavors.

    Traumas caused by bad home cooking can be overcome. My grandma's spinach trauma lasted till I went to college away form home and once very reluctantly tried spinach pure at my friend's home. Then I learned that spinach pure can be really good.

    Replies: @iffen

    when made form right potatoes.

    What do they taste like if made from commie left potatoes?

    • Replies: @utu
    @iffen

    An earnest person answer to the snarko-ironist:

    Actually, red potatoes are very good as boiled potatoes, so they are right</b potatoes. Yukon gold are also very good. Some chefs (Chef John) say that Yukon gold are the best for mashed potatoes. IMO baking potatoes (like Russet) are the best for mashed potatoes because they do not have that much water so you can add more milk or cream to them but they are lousy as boiled potatoes. The best potatoes for potato/German salad are Belgian fingerling or Russian banana potatoes but because they are small and irregular shapes they are hard to work with when peeling after boiling.

    The key point is not to overcook them for boiling potatoes and not to undercook them for mashed potatoes. The unpeeled potatoes have wide tolerance margin for overcooking but for hash browns you should slightly undercook them because you still will be frying them.

    I do not have experience with more exotic potatoes from Peru that are purple or bluish or orange. But I am sure that hipster foodies will make them popular.

    Replies: @iffen, @Philip Owen

  • I noticed that Anatoly had created a new thread, which is fine, but he also said that he would be trashing all comments providing "Ukrainian disinformation," which concerned me. I also noticed that he'd trashed quite a few comments on his previous thread, even comments that had already gotten replies and generated further debate. That...
  • @Seraphim
    @Mr. Hack

    Schwartzy is intellectually deficient, that's it.

    Replies: @Mr. Hack

    So are you, but that doesn’t stop you from blurting out nonsense all of the time.

    • LOL: iffen
    • Replies: @Seraphim
    @Mr. Hack

    I was just wondering why the Terminator is not in the thick of the 'battle' to wipe out single- handedly tanks, planes, helicopters on behalf of the 'Aryan Azovian battalions! He the prototype of the 'White Aryan Warrior' (how people imagine the 'Yamnaya people' on this very site).

    Replies: @Mr. Hack

  • @HenryBaker
    @iffen


    for whatever reason he went sideways on the Ukrainian supporters here
     
    Well he has been RN for a long time, I think back in 2015 or 2017 or whatever he was poasting plans to strip-mine Ukraine of all talent and was analyzing the strategic situation there. What's happening seems clear: AK has made a very large bet that what is happening here is the vindication of the Russian nationalist strategy, and the start of a revision of the Western-hegemonic world order. Both reputationally and emotionally, he is obviously very invested in this as this event has been years in the making. If the Russian effort deflates with a big fart and they're left hyperinflating and irrelevant, this would obviously invalidate most of his professional efforts. He 'went sideways' on Ukraine supporters because he is obviously simply a nationalist at war with Ukraine, and that tends to heat things up.

    It would be best to drive a stake into it
     
    Well, looking at the level of discourse between AK and a lot of the commenting people here, I think AK will leave soon enough by himself and then the whole thing will bleed out. At some point, mocking, insulting, and fighting with people just gets boring and then you leave.

    Replies: @German_reader, @iffen

    looking at the level of discourse between AK and a lot of the commenting people

    Yeah, to me he seems to be doing a lot of gratuitous BS with regard to some commenters, but that comes with the hard core nationalism. I don’t read all of the comments so maybe he is picking up on some particular “attitudes”.

  • @iffen
    @HenryBaker

    Also pretty funny that Anatoly is talking about racial war

    Yeah, doesn't make a lot of sense.

    I tuned in to his blog to learn about "Russian stuff" and now he is asking his commenters what's going on.


    Seems safe to say that it’s over for this ‘community’, however. There’s no way any sort of cordiality will be re-established here between AK and everyone else

    Yeah, for whatever reason he went sideways on the Ukrainian supporters here.

    It would be best to drive a stake into it, but our esteemed publisher is not that sort of a person.

    Replies: @Thulean Friend, @HenryBaker

    for whatever reason he went sideways on the Ukrainian supporters here

    Well he has been RN for a long time, I think back in 2015 or 2017 or whatever he was poasting plans to strip-mine Ukraine of all talent and was analyzing the strategic situation there. What’s happening seems clear: AK has made a very large bet that what is happening here is the vindication of the Russian nationalist strategy, and the start of a revision of the Western-hegemonic world order. Both reputationally and emotionally, he is obviously very invested in this as this event has been years in the making. If the Russian effort deflates with a big fart and they’re left hyperinflating and irrelevant, this would obviously invalidate most of his professional efforts. He ‘went sideways’ on Ukraine supporters because he is obviously simply a nationalist at war with Ukraine, and that tends to heat things up.

    It would be best to drive a stake into it

    Well, looking at the level of discourse between AK and a lot of the commenting people here, I think AK will leave soon enough by himself and then the whole thing will bleed out. At some point, mocking, insulting, and fighting with people just gets boring and then you leave.

    • Agree: iffen
    • Replies: @German_reader
    @HenryBaker


    I think AK will leave soon enough by himself and then the whole thing will bleed out.
     
    AK stopped producing new content here months ago and up until the start of the recent war wasn't even much of a presence anymore in this comments section, so he hasn't been central to the discussions here for some time.
    At some point it will presumably wind down (and some long-term commenters like reiner tor are already sadly missed), but imo there's no way of telling when that will be.

    Replies: @Mr. Hack

    , @iffen
    @HenryBaker

    looking at the level of discourse between AK and a lot of the commenting people

    Yeah, to me he seems to be doing a lot of gratuitous BS with regard to some commenters, but that comes with the hard core nationalism. I don't read all of the comments so maybe he is picking up on some particular "attitudes".

  • @Thulean Friend
    @iffen



    Seems safe to say that it’s over for this ‘community’, however. There’s no way any sort of cordiality will be re-established here between AK and everyone else
     
    Yeah, for whatever reason he went sideways on the Ukrainian supporters here.

    It would be best to drive a stake into it, but our esteemed publisher is not that sort of a person.
     
    Why? I can't be the only one who enjoys watching Karlin self-imploding. It's not like this community hinges on his presence. When he went away, commenting activity barely budged.

    Replies: @iffen

    I can’t be the only one who enjoys watching Karlin self-imploding.

    This is quite peculiar unless you have some sort of deliberate animosity toward him.

  • @German_reader
    @Mr. Hack

    The only movie with Sean Penn I can remember having watched is Dead man walking, where he plays a death row inmate talking to a nun. I think it's supposed to be an anti-death penalty movie, but tbh I felt his character (based on a real killer) deserved being put to death.
    And I don't know what more exactly the US should do for Ukraine that isn't already being done. This emotion-based activism is tiresome.

    Replies: @A123, @Mr. Hack, @AP, @iffen

    This emotion-based activism is tiresome.

    You do know that the emotional/cognitive dichotomy is not valid.

    Or did you forget that?

  • @AaronB
    As many were predicting, the panic over Covid would develop naturally into the MSM trying to convince us that we never took the Flu seriously enough, and should begin panicking over the flu, because the two are after all fairly similar in mortality (Covid worse but with an older mortality profile).

    Well, looks like the NYT is beginning that transition -
    https://www.nytimes.com/2022/03/18/health/flu-covid.html

    Well, maybe this article isn't yet a trend, but either way, somehow, I just don't think it will work anymore :)

    Replies: @iffen

    somehow, I just don’t think it will work anymore

    Jesus H., I’m about to dial 911.

    The end is very near.

    AaronB. has written something that I agree with.

    (Which part of “We don’t f***ing trust you cocks***ers do they not understand.”)

    • LOL: AaronB
  • @German_reader
    https://twitter.com/vtchakarova/status/1504798501129101312

    Pretty bad for Ukraine and the EU if true.
    Poland apparently still insists on bringing up its crazy "peacekeeping mission" idea at the upcoming NATO summit. I doubt it will lead to anything, but still tiresome that nonsense like this is even being discussed.

    Replies: @Yellowface Anon, @A123, @iffen

    So, you are all in for Ukraine unless your dick gets pinched.

  • German_reader says:
    @Mikel
    I have always wondered how humanity would eventually manage to descend to nuclear Armageddon and I'm afraid I am watching the mechanism playing out right now. It's turning out to be much easier than I ever thought and not the product of an accident but a very conscious collective decision. A recent poll showed that 35% of Americans have already been led to believe (by MSM and social media, evidently) that the US should intervene militarily in Ukraine, even if that means risking WWIII.

    I don't quite understand how a nuclear war on top of what they are suffering would benefit Ukrainians but it is a fact that their president is pushing for a Western military confrontation with Russia with all his might. Apart from Fidel Castro, who reportedly encouraged Khrushchev to nuke the US, I'm not aware of any other nation having demanded any of the superpowers to unleash WWIII on their behalf. Perhaps Ukrainian nationalism is just as deranged as Russian imperialism (or Cuban socialism-or-deathism?).

    If Biden manages to resist the growing pressure, both from the MSM and an increasing number of lawmakers from both parties, to declare a no-fly-zone, he may actually get my vote in the next elections. I don't believe Trump would have been able to do that, given the kind of people he likes being surrounded with and the pundits he listens to. And who cares about the southern border, the gender wars and all the rest when your children's survival is at stake?

    Of course, it may well be very true that Putin would not dare to go nuclear if we declare a no-fly-zone (or carry out any other hostile action) but then again, it may also be false. Why so much rush to find out?

    The way things are going, with Ukraine turning into a Grozny x 40 and no prospects of substantial Russian advance without resorting to more indiscriminate measures that will be propagated and even exaggerated by the MSM 24x7, I will consider myself lucky to escape WWIII this one time.

    Replies: @Yevardian, @German_reader

    Of course, it may well be very true that Putin would not dare to go nuclear if we declare a no-fly-zone (or carry out any other hostile action)

    Of course Putin would react, at a minimum with conventional missile strikes on NATO air bases. But it’s possible that he’d immediately resort to tactical nukes (maybe just a single one, for demonstration effects, which apparently would be according to Russian military doctrine). And depending on NATO’s reactions (that is whether NATO would back down or not…or maybe retaliate with a nuclear strike of their own) things could then easily escalate to a strategic level, leading to the deaths of dozens of millions.
    I agree entirely with the rest of your comment (also am glad Biden is president right now, not Trump or some McCain-like Republican loony. As bad as he is on other issues, at least Biden still seems to retain a healthy fear of nuclear war).

    • LOL: iffen
  • @HenryBaker
    @iffen

    If Anatolys ramping up of his rhetoric is representative of the Kremlin, at this point, we'll be bathing in nuclear fire in a week.

    Also pretty funny that Anatoly is talking about racial war, Russians being almost genetically indistuingishable from other Europeans. I suppose the 3d world larp is the new way to go- we did push the Russians there again, but it's bizarre that we always end up in this spot.

    Seems safe to say that it's over for this 'community', however. There's no way any sort of cordiality will be re-established here between AK and everyone else (us Westoids). All things must come to pass...

    Replies: @sudden death, @iffen, @Anatoly Karlin, @Pharmakon, @Coconuts

    Also pretty funny that Anatoly is talking about racial war

    Yeah, doesn’t make a lot of sense.

    I tuned in to his blog to learn about “Russian stuff” and now he is asking his commenters what’s going on.


    Seems safe to say that it’s over for this ‘community’, however. There’s no way any sort of cordiality will be re-established here between AK and everyone else

    Yeah, for whatever reason he went sideways on the Ukrainian supporters here.

    It would be best to drive a stake into it, but our esteemed publisher is not that sort of a person.

    • Replies: @Thulean Friend
    @iffen



    Seems safe to say that it’s over for this ‘community’, however. There’s no way any sort of cordiality will be re-established here between AK and everyone else
     
    Yeah, for whatever reason he went sideways on the Ukrainian supporters here.

    It would be best to drive a stake into it, but our esteemed publisher is not that sort of a person.
     
    Why? I can't be the only one who enjoys watching Karlin self-imploding. It's not like this community hinges on his presence. When he went away, commenting activity barely budged.

    Replies: @iffen

    , @HenryBaker
    @iffen


    for whatever reason he went sideways on the Ukrainian supporters here
     
    Well he has been RN for a long time, I think back in 2015 or 2017 or whatever he was poasting plans to strip-mine Ukraine of all talent and was analyzing the strategic situation there. What's happening seems clear: AK has made a very large bet that what is happening here is the vindication of the Russian nationalist strategy, and the start of a revision of the Western-hegemonic world order. Both reputationally and emotionally, he is obviously very invested in this as this event has been years in the making. If the Russian effort deflates with a big fart and they're left hyperinflating and irrelevant, this would obviously invalidate most of his professional efforts. He 'went sideways' on Ukraine supporters because he is obviously simply a nationalist at war with Ukraine, and that tends to heat things up.

    It would be best to drive a stake into it
     
    Well, looking at the level of discourse between AK and a lot of the commenting people here, I think AK will leave soon enough by himself and then the whole thing will bleed out. At some point, mocking, insulting, and fighting with people just gets boring and then you leave.

    Replies: @German_reader, @iffen

  • @Anatoly Karlin
    @sudden death

    Well said. Shock and disbelief indeed. This is a racial holy war against Western Supremacy.

    https://twitter.com/akarlin0/status/1496534595759710210

    https://twitter.com/MFA_China/status/1501185437901082629

    https://twitter.com/unquirer/status/1504102321294348294

    Replies: @iffen, @AP, @sudden death, @Mr. Hack

    Well said. Shock and disbelief indeed. This is a racial holy war against Western Supremacy

    Are you doing hallucinogenics again?

    • Replies: @HenryBaker
    @iffen

    If Anatolys ramping up of his rhetoric is representative of the Kremlin, at this point, we'll be bathing in nuclear fire in a week.

    Also pretty funny that Anatoly is talking about racial war, Russians being almost genetically indistuingishable from other Europeans. I suppose the 3d world larp is the new way to go- we did push the Russians there again, but it's bizarre that we always end up in this spot.

    Seems safe to say that it's over for this 'community', however. There's no way any sort of cordiality will be re-established here between AK and everyone else (us Westoids). All things must come to pass...

    Replies: @sudden death, @iffen, @Anatoly Karlin, @Pharmakon, @Coconuts

  • @Beckow
    @Mikel

    The willingness to use nukes has never been tested. All we have are speculations that have created a large unfilled space where the lunatics can play. Endlessly sitting in front of a forbidden room is tedious, some would like to see what is there.

    There is also today an almost biological level of pure hatred of Russia, and possibly in Russia for the West. With elevated emotions some people have dropped all constraints. Putin said some time ago that he sees 'no point in preserving the world without Russia'. But there must be many in the West who see no point in having a world without Western dominance. Both are understandable, but what happens when they collide?

    Look at the bright side: if we get nuked, even the most fanatical Covid devotees will drop the masks and stop hallucinating about more 'boosters'. That will leave 'utu' all alone in his quixotic fight. There is always a bright side.

    Replies: @Yellowface Anon, @Dmitry, @iffen, @HenryBaker

    The willingness to use nukes has never been tested.

    Duh! The “good guys” used them.

  • @Yevardian
    @HenryBaker


    Then in 1200 AD it’s like a population replacement has happened. All names are christianized and indeed most ‘normal’ Dutch names are the usual localized versions of Biblical figures’ names. I’d say 80% of normal names here are indeed not Germanic.
     
    I'm suprised it replacement happened that late, honestly. But I don't really know a lot about the history of Germanic languages other than English, and to a lesser extent (from what little is known, at least), Gothic and its close relative, Vandalic.

    If I think of English personal names in use I think they're even scarcer, with nearly all sounding distinctly old-fashioned: Edgar, Edward Alfred, Edith (lol), Edmund. I suppose you can throw in a few common native Welsh or Goidelic ones too, Rhys, Arthur, Owen, Broderick (lol), Sean, Alastair (lol), Gareth, Lloyd.. hm, seems Celtic names are more common than Anglo-Saxon ones.. anyway, as I've implied, quite a few of them sound quite comical to native or fluent Anglophones nowadays.

    Armenian still has a few extremely common names of pagan/Zoroastrian origin, Anahit, Ani, Hayk, Arman, Tigran, Nare, Arpine, Gor.. on balance I think more than English, even without counting Greek-derived names.


    Likewise the old Germanic kindreds were extinguished and our way of life replaced with christianized forms. Yet, uselessly, the Dutch language persists even as christianity mutates everything around it.
     
    Uselessly? That's a pretty stupid statement. For some reason I noticed that Dutchies seem to be the people with the most negative attitude to their own language in all of Europe, constantly making half-jokes how useless and ugly ('Dutch isn't a language, its German with a throat-disease!' lol) their own tongue is lol. I guess its their proximity to England, near-universal English-ability, and lack of anything (that I know of) that can compare to Goethe, Kirkegard, or the Norse epics.

    The Dutch culture will still exist in a mutated form, but culture and language are ultimately not that important as they are just an appendix of the world-outlook.
     

    I suppose that's unfortunately quite true now. Arnold Toynbee, way back in the 50s (A Study of History), had grave concerns about 'all of Civilisation's eggs falling into one basket' [i.e., the Western], with all the others dead, decaying or moribund (whilst very memorably quoting Coleridge's 'Rime of the Ancient Mariner' doing it, although using actual numbers like Turchin would have been better), curiously Toynbee only considered 'Muslim Civilisation' (he saw Israel essentially Western, linguistic atavism aside.. I would say Israel is very distinct now) as the other viable living example at the time.
    He evidently didn't predict the spectacular rebound of China, or the recruduscence of Indian 'Dharmic' culture. Though to what extent China retains its traditional culture and outlook is debateable, I don't know China that well so I can't really comment on it.

    I guess the main take from Toynbee's writings is that Civilisations die by cultural suicide, and practically never by force.

    Replies: @songbird, @HenryBaker, @HenryBaker, @iffen

    I guess the main take from Toynbee’s writings is that Civilisations die by cultural suicide, and practically never by force.

    It is quite clear that we can read the scattered bones, tea leaves, animal entrails, history, etc. as we wish.

  • @German_reader
    @iffen


    Now, unless you can come up with some categorical denunciation of nationalism, one that applies to me, you and AK, then your attacks on AK are mere partisanship on your part.
     
    imo a lot of Karlin's recent statements are verging on caricature, like a recycling of the dumbest talking points of early 20th century nationalists. Sure, it's possible Russia will succeed in her current enterprise, maybe everything will work out to Karlin's satisfaction and lead to a glorious rebirth of the Russian empire. But still..."national rejuvenation through war", lol, what could possibly go wrong with such an approach, not like it's ever been tried before. I don't think one has to categorically reject nationalism in its entirety to be irritated by this kind of all-or-nothing risk-taking (and its implication that Russia is worthless if the present war doesn't lead to a glorious future).
    Also comes across as really in poor taste that Karlin writes these things while apparently still living his comfortable bourgeois hipster life (in another thread he just mused how 100 000 deaths in the Ukraine war might not be too high a price, which caused the entirely legitimate question by an East Asian commenter "Why don't you volunteer and go fight yourself?").
    And finally, his writing has also gotten really boring (apart from his grandiose pronouncements, which are oscillating somewhere between creepy and unintentionally hilarious). If you've reached the pedestrian level of "Russia is fighting Nazi terrorists in Ukraine", you're not really saying anything original or worth listening to anymore.

    Replies: @Anatoly Karlin, @silviosilver, @iffen

    I didn’t say anything about him being an outstanding example of a virtuous nationalist. I just mean that he has the right, just as you have the right to take the side of Ukraine.

    And I have already posted that we Americans will owe an eternal debt to Ukrainians if this war does in fact force rich European countries to start investing in their own military and defense.

  • Since Dan C. is MIA (Russian foreign legion?), I wish to offer a defense of AK. This is not a defense of the invasion of Ukraine. Over the years, mostly from reading this blog, and following the trail from those comments to somewhat reliable information, I have formed the opinion that Ukrainians are “entitled” to their own country. But then so are hundreds of other “peoples”. (Perhaps like the people in Donbass.) More to the point, it is not my job (nor should it be my country’s) to help each and every one of them attain their nationalist goals. It is also not my job, nor my country’s job, to defend countries, nascent or otherwise, that foolishly provoke a powerful neighboring nation.

    With that note out of the way, it is obvious that AK is now a fully committed Russian partisan. Now, unless you can come up with some categorical denunciation of nationalism, one that applies to me, you and AK, then your attacks on AK are mere partisanship on your part.

    • Replies: @German_reader
    @iffen


    Now, unless you can come up with some categorical denunciation of nationalism, one that applies to me, you and AK, then your attacks on AK are mere partisanship on your part.
     
    imo a lot of Karlin's recent statements are verging on caricature, like a recycling of the dumbest talking points of early 20th century nationalists. Sure, it's possible Russia will succeed in her current enterprise, maybe everything will work out to Karlin's satisfaction and lead to a glorious rebirth of the Russian empire. But still..."national rejuvenation through war", lol, what could possibly go wrong with such an approach, not like it's ever been tried before. I don't think one has to categorically reject nationalism in its entirety to be irritated by this kind of all-or-nothing risk-taking (and its implication that Russia is worthless if the present war doesn't lead to a glorious future).
    Also comes across as really in poor taste that Karlin writes these things while apparently still living his comfortable bourgeois hipster life (in another thread he just mused how 100 000 deaths in the Ukraine war might not be too high a price, which caused the entirely legitimate question by an East Asian commenter "Why don't you volunteer and go fight yourself?").
    And finally, his writing has also gotten really boring (apart from his grandiose pronouncements, which are oscillating somewhere between creepy and unintentionally hilarious). If you've reached the pedestrian level of "Russia is fighting Nazi terrorists in Ukraine", you're not really saying anything original or worth listening to anymore.

    Replies: @Anatoly Karlin, @silviosilver, @iffen

  • Like it or not, but shock and disbelief is inevitable.
  • @sher singh
    @Triteleia Laxa

    The problem is when honor is de-legitimized and men have no way to climb the social ladder with it||
    When a Bandit can become a General, and be recognized for his ability is a fair Aryan society||

    https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/916139577046085713/951179815451496529/143.jpeg
    Go sit in the corner,

    ਵਾਹਿਗੁਰੂਜੀਕਾਖਾਲਸਾਵਾਹਿਗੁਰੂਜੀਕੀਫਤਿਹ

    Replies: @iffen

    She’s not white, she’s Jewish.

    • Thanks: sher singh
  • @Triteleia Laxa
    @silviosilver

    The vast majority of people who think they have a sense of "honour" are just egocentric infants trapped in adult bodies. They go around hurting others, and themselves because they are psychological inferior. This manifests in the fact that no one wants to be near them and no one, except other broken losers, want to be like them.

    A small proportion of men with unacknowledged and extreme dependency issues also lionise these mental midgets. This is because they hide their dependency issues behind a false bravado that even tricks themselves. Those individuals at least tend to be smart and sensitive, though prone to being taken advantage of as they can't see themselves as the easy target which they are.

    As for the war, anyone notice that Russia is now fought to a standstill? I can tell pro-Russian partisans what is going to happen next, but they won't like it. How on earth they expect to pacify Ukraine when they can't even do the easy bit of advancing into neighbouring territory properly, I have no idea.

    The number of thingssnd events which could now go wrong for them is dizzying, and they're currently stuck in a war of attrition with an entire country.

    Ukrainians will eventually win, because they live there. It might take a week or a year or even more, but that much is inevitable now.

    Hilariously, the Great Russian hope seems to be the thought that plugging captive Ukrainians into their domestic propoganda machine, the only thing about Russia which seems to work as advertised, is a good idea. As if a bunch of poor Ukrainians with murdered friends, neighbours and relatives and going to get on board with the utterly dystopian pretense that Russia isn't killing civilians and isn't an aggressor.

    With every day that goes by, Russians are investing in their own future extreme suffering. This is the other half of the tragedy, the obvious half being obvious the disgusting cruelty which Russia is showing the Ukrainians.

    Putin continues to escalate as he realises that he is bought into a doomed plan, but, at some point, Biden will see that not meeting Putin is encouraging him. Then we are all in danger, but Russians more than most. It is a serious point and one that people should understand. De-escalation drills occasionally necessitate escalation, because anything else just makes it inevitable that Putin will continue to escalate.

    Replies: @sher singh, @mal, @Barbarossa

    The problem is when honor is de-legitimized and men have no way to climb the social ladder with it||
    When a Bandit can become a General, and be recognized for his ability is a fair Aryan society||


    Go sit in the corner,

    ਵਾਹਿਗੁਰੂਜੀਕਾਖਾਲਸਾਵਾਹਿਗੁਰੂਜੀਕੀਫਤਿਹ

    • LOL: iffen
    • Replies: @iffen
    @sher singh

    She's not white, she's Jewish.

  • @AP
    @iffen


    It is so simply and obvious that we must look for a reason why it was not done.
     
    Russia demanded that the autonomous territory be given veto power over the rest of the country's policies. No country would tolerate that. It would mean EU off the table and Ukraine either forced into Eurasia or in its unaffiliated limbo that led to impoverishment after the USSR split up (in contrast to every one of its neighbors who linked to the EU and who got a lot wealthier by doing so). Majority of Ukrainian people rejected this.

    How would you (or the regular American people) like it if the Mexican parts of the USA were given special autonomous status and given the right to veto national policies that they didn't like?

    Dem Jews?
     
    One of the two main pro-Russian politicians in Ukraine, Vadim Rabinovich, is Jewish:

    http://d39raawggeifpx.cloudfront.net/styles/16_9_desktop/s3/articleimages/bnePeople_Ukraine_Vadim_Rabinovich__For_LIfe_political_party_leader_wiki.jpg_7_Cropped.jpg

    Replies: @iffen, @iffen, @Wokechoke

    Sometimes if you don’t take the half of the loaf you starve.

  • @AP
    @iffen


    It is so simply and obvious that we must look for a reason why it was not done.
     
    Russia demanded that the autonomous territory be given veto power over the rest of the country's policies. No country would tolerate that. It would mean EU off the table and Ukraine either forced into Eurasia or in its unaffiliated limbo that led to impoverishment after the USSR split up (in contrast to every one of its neighbors who linked to the EU and who got a lot wealthier by doing so). Majority of Ukrainian people rejected this.

    How would you (or the regular American people) like it if the Mexican parts of the USA were given special autonomous status and given the right to veto national policies that they didn't like?

    Dem Jews?
     
    One of the two main pro-Russian politicians in Ukraine, Vadim Rabinovich, is Jewish:

    http://d39raawggeifpx.cloudfront.net/styles/16_9_desktop/s3/articleimages/bnePeople_Ukraine_Vadim_Rabinovich__For_LIfe_political_party_leader_wiki.jpg_7_Cropped.jpg

    Replies: @iffen, @iffen, @Wokechoke

    veto power over the rest of the country’s policies. No country would tolerate that

    Black Americans have a veto power over who the Democratic Presidential nominee will be. That translates into a more or less 50% veto over who will be the American President.

  • @AP
    @Anatoly Karlin

    Opinions are not so malleable when blood is involved. Putin has managed to even lose eastern Ukrainians to Russia for a generation.

    Replies: @iffen, @Aedib

    Opinions are not so malleable when blood is involved.

    Blood is thicker than water, but so is shit.

    The Ukrainian people could have avoided this by giving a little autonomy to the Donbass and pledging military neutrality.

    It is so simply and obvious that we must look for a reason why it was not done.

    Dem Jews?

    • Agree: Aedib
    • Replies: @AP
    @iffen


    It is so simply and obvious that we must look for a reason why it was not done.
     
    Russia demanded that the autonomous territory be given veto power over the rest of the country's policies. No country would tolerate that. It would mean EU off the table and Ukraine either forced into Eurasia or in its unaffiliated limbo that led to impoverishment after the USSR split up (in contrast to every one of its neighbors who linked to the EU and who got a lot wealthier by doing so). Majority of Ukrainian people rejected this.

    How would you (or the regular American people) like it if the Mexican parts of the USA were given special autonomous status and given the right to veto national policies that they didn't like?

    Dem Jews?
     
    One of the two main pro-Russian politicians in Ukraine, Vadim Rabinovich, is Jewish:

    http://d39raawggeifpx.cloudfront.net/styles/16_9_desktop/s3/articleimages/bnePeople_Ukraine_Vadim_Rabinovich__For_LIfe_political_party_leader_wiki.jpg_7_Cropped.jpg

    Replies: @iffen, @iffen, @Wokechoke

  • @Barbarossa
    @iffen

    They aren't even wild caught in Alaska like they used to be.

    I heard they are farm raised in fetid conditions in Indonesia fed on a diet of expired off brand Doritos.

    Gross.

    Replies: @iffen

    fed on a diet of expired off brand Doritos.

    That’s where that after taste in the Flavor Blasted Xtra Cheddar comes from!

  • @A123
    @Yellowface Anon


    A123 will love this for an opportunity to exploit for his Trumpist bloc autarky/hard decoupling dreams
     
    I have repeatedly stated that the better option is a gradual decoupling. So, "love" is clearly invalid language construction

    The term "Trumpist" is also wholly incorrect in terms of lingustics. The MAGA movement is much larger than a single individual. "Christian Populist" is much more accurate identification.
    _____

    A hard decoupling will be the 2nd Great Leap Backwards for the PRC. If Xi and his CCP Elites wish to starve millions of Chinese peasants to death... There is little the civilized world can do to intervene.

    America is food independent. Energy independence is also easy for the U.S. once the science deniers are moved out. It will not be painless, but a hard decoupling will lead to long term prosperity.

    PEACE 😇

    Replies: @iffen, @Yellowface Anon

    America is food independent.

    I just came from the local Wally-world and there was not a single bag of Goldfish. Just goes to show the “depth” of knowledge of an Israeli propaganda bot.

    • Replies: @Emil Nikola Richard
    @iffen

    Some raving lunatic has a closet full of goldfish.

    The goldfish manufacturer (which multinational owns Pepridge Farms?) loves this shit.

    If you eat less goldfish and more peanuts and raisins your insulin chain will be grateful!

    https://m.media-amazon.com/images/I/81vtvEBZRmS._SX425_.jpg

    Replies: @A123

    , @Barbarossa
    @iffen

    They aren't even wild caught in Alaska like they used to be.

    I heard they are farm raised in fetid conditions in Indonesia fed on a diet of expired off brand Doritos.

    Gross.

    Replies: @iffen

  • @Barbarossa
    @iffen

    Speaking of shock and disbelief, the international faith in Washington which was already in decline seems in free fall now. Things can rot on the inside for a long time before it's apparent on the outside and the tree dies quickly.
    Regardless of the final calculus in Ukraine the world is feeling a lot more multi-polar these days. Even Europe seems intent to chart it's own course to a greater extent.

    Replies: @iffen

    It may turn out that we will always owe a debt to Ukrainians if this puts us on a saner geopolitical path and compels us to hang up our world policeman’s badge.

  • Speaking of BFFs and allies:

    https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2022/mar/9/saudi-arabia-uae-leaders-decline-calls-biden-amid-/

    The leaders of Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates declined the White House’s requests to speak with President Biden about rising oil prices, according to a report Wednesday.

    Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and the UAE’s Sheik Mohammed bin Zayed al Nahyan turned down the opportunity to speak with Mr. Biden, the Wall Street Journal reported, citing U.S. and Middle East officials.

    It doesn’t seem like that long ago that none would dare dissing the Prez like this.

    • Replies: @Barbarossa
    @iffen

    Speaking of shock and disbelief, the international faith in Washington which was already in decline seems in free fall now. Things can rot on the inside for a long time before it's apparent on the outside and the tree dies quickly.
    Regardless of the final calculus in Ukraine the world is feeling a lot more multi-polar these days. Even Europe seems intent to chart it's own course to a greater extent.

    Replies: @iffen

  • The last Open Thread is getting very sluggish, so here's another one. Again, please use the MORE Tag to hide all but your first Tweet and otherwise keep the thread load manageable as long as possible. --- Ron Unz
  • @Triteleia Laxa
    Looks like Putin is desperate for a way out. Russia will immediately stop their aggression if Ukraine:

    1. Recognises Crimea as Russia.

    2. Allows independence for the twin republics.

    3. Ukraine agrees not to join any blocs.

    I said that he should have offered this before the invasion, and wrote here that he should have offered it 48 hours in, but Putin the Bungler has only just gotten round to reality, but quite possibly too late. Why would the Ukrainians cede sovereignty now, when they know they can win?

    And please no Russian trolls pipe up to say that they should do so to save lives, as if the the threat of suffering casualties should make all proud people immediately surrender to imperial aggression.

    Anyway, I think that Ukraine should agree, but they should get in return:

    1. A written security guarantee that no Russian forces will enter Ukraine again.

    2. That the definition of a "bloc" does not include the EU.

    3. That the twin Republics gain independence on their pre-Russian aggression borders.

    Obviously an apology and compensation should also be sought.

    Or Ukraine could just keep Russia involved in an unwinnable war, where the Russian regime loses credibility by the day and the Russian military moves in the direction of zero combat effectiveness just as fast?

    After all, the Ukrainian military is much stronger now than when the war began, while the Russian military is much weaker and there is zero chance of Russia conducting a successful occupation of Ukraine.

    Anatoly, thoughts?

    Not that I know why I ask. Anything but "Putin is a glorious warlord who is winning this not a war" might well get you arrested.

    Famous Russian leaders:

    Peter the Great
    Catherine the Great
    Putin the Bungler

    Replies: @Anatoly Karlin, @Mikhail, @Boethiuss, @iffen

    Do you also write A123?

  • @Dmitry
    @Barbarossa

    International response, also relates to saying to everyone there would be no invasion, then invading, with lack of casus belli.

    They did a dozen small false flag attacks in Donbass and Crimea. They evacuated some "refugees" in a group of buses, which were children from orphanage. Prerecorded videos with metadata not matching the dates. They talked about "genocide" for a couple days. But there was lack of effort to create a coherent narrative or false flag.

    In the end, everyone saw it followed what Zhirinovsky had already leaked. It was like (to copy your name) Operation Barbarossa, with the 4am surprise attack, with no declaration of war.

    In 1999, with the Second Chechen War, they prepared with much more effort for the casus belli, operating false flag attacks with bombs of residential buildings in Moscow.

    The preparation and false flags in 1999 was costly for human life (and incompetent, as parts of the false flag were revealed, when FSB agents are found to be adding bombs to a basement), but the result was no sanctions during the war. It was successful, from the cynical point of view.

    Elaborate false flags with hundreds of casualties, can create more international acceptance of war, compared to some Mukden Incident or Gleiwitz incident.

    But the Operation Barbarossa where you attack 4 am without declaration of war, is what happened, is one of most difficult to present to the international community. Even with Pearl Harbor there was a declaration of war, although only given late. Russia is still not declared war with Ukraine. It's legally still peacetime. That's why it's important in Russia to call this a "special military operation" and illegal to call it war.

    Replies: @sudden death, @Barbarossa, @mal

    My comment was purely that Russia has a better case than the US did in Iraq. Not that it has an empirically bullet proof case, just a more plausible one.

    This highlights the shambolic nature of the “rules based international system”. Russia and China have correctly read that American might makes right, and are acting accordingly. This is not to necessarily defend them, since , as always the blood and tears of the common man feeds the ambitions of politicians.

    I honestly don’t feel that either Russia or the West is blameless in Ukraine. There is plenty of blame to go around, but the Ukrainian people are the ones who will ultimately pay for the ambitions of all sides. It’s a tragedy, and I feel deeply for the Ukrainian people who were put into an untenable situation by their own government, the West, and Russia.

    • Agree: Thulean Friend, iffen
    • Replies: @Wokechoke
    @Barbarossa

    Don’t forget India. Oddly both Pakistan and India are currying favour with Russia.

    Replies: @Blinky Bill

    , @Dmitry
    @Barbarossa

    The point is that USA in 2003, created a casus belli, with evidence and presentation in the United Nations, that Iraq is going to destroy neighbors with Weapons of Mass Destruction.

    They create a casus belli, try to attain international consensus, say they will invade, and then invade.

    Later, this casus belli doesn't seem very realistic, although it is possible George W. Bush partially believes his own employees' fake propaganda in 2003.

    But this casus belli explains the war for the international community, at least during the war itself.

    In 2022, Russia says it will not invade, promises foreign politicians it will not invade, then with a few days, they create some small false flags, and invade at night in a surprise (without declaration of war).

    The casus belli is not achieved (unlike in 1999 or 2003), and Putin says he will denazification of Ukraine, which seems as objective for the international community, as after beginning of Operation Barbarossa in 1941, speech to say they will decommunize the USSR, that presents a threat of an anti-Germany.

    Now, they try to talk about a nuclear/biological threat from Ukraine, but it is all very minimum effort. It's like they want to hint on the theme of an asset-stripped version of the 2003 casus belli.

    -

    In terms of international reaction, obviously China believes it is their self-interest to watch. Any result of this war, means Russia becomes more dependent on China, which is improvement of China's leverage in balance of power relative to Russia.

    But likely one of the important lessons, they will be viewing, is the importance of casus belli, before invasion of Taiwan. They might need to create narrative that would justify an invasion of Taiwan, beyond saying it is their self-interest.

    Although they can at least try to build from the principle of "territorial integrity", which was sufficient for Azerbaijan to go to war with Armenia, in 2020. Aliev's "success" (if you can use this word in context of the deaths of thousands of young men) in 2020, was not only in military, but also in international relations. Aliev in 2020 has maneuvered, not just effectively in the battle (with use of modern technology), but also in diplomacy and international law.

    Replies: @utu, @German_reader, @Barbarossa

  • @Yellowface Anon
    @Mr. Hack

    You don't exclude homegrown movements being co-opted by the likes of Nuland, which proves both accounts right.

    (Somewhat like how Russians groomed and weaponized Balkan and Slavic nationalism against the Ottomans and Austria-Hungary, which backfired horribly at the end)

    Replies: @Mr. Hack

    No, I don’t think that the Ukrainian movement in Ukraine has been coopted by the US or Nuland. There is a distinct difference in policy going on now, where the West has refused to go ahead and create a no fly zone over Ukraine. Zelensky has clearly pointed his finger at the US accusing it of being cowardly and such for its inability to do so. If Ukraine and Zelensky were under the thumb of Washington, he clearly would not be making such loud cries of cowardice. There was also the late shipments of weaponry that could have been made much earlier.

    • Disagree: iffen
    • Replies: @Yevardian
    @Mr. Hack


    If Ukraine and Zelensky were under the thumb of Washington, he clearly would not be making such loud cries of cowardice. There was also the late shipments of weaponry that could have been made much earlier.
     
    This is basic stage management, perhaps Zelensky is aware of his role, perhaps not. He doesn't seem as intelligent or shameless as Navalny, so I suspect he doesn't, it's always more effective that way regardless. I only feel sorry for Ukrainians caught up in all this whole sham.

    Replies: @Mr. Hack, @German_reader

  • @Anatoly Karlin
    @Hapalong Cassidy

    Well as I stated before I would be very happy if Ron Unz was to archive this blog and open separate Open Threads on Ukraine (or whichever other topics). The blog is supposedly under my name but I don't even have moderation powers under posts not started by myself.

    Replies: @Beckow, @iffen

    under my name but I don’t even have moderation powers

    Peter, Peter, pumpkin eater has lost his moderation theatre.

    I remember you defending R. Unz vis-a-vis this issue with Peter Frost.

    Serves you right.

  • @Yevardian
    @German_reader


    There really doesn’t seem to be any way out of this mess, unless Putin moderates his demands at least somewhat (which seems unlikely).
     
    Well, unfortunately, on the general ground facts, I don't disagree. But now, after Russia has been reckless enough to initiate a full-scale war (perhaps not intended or expected as such, but in some sense, the incompetence implied by this is even worse) there's simply no way of backing out of this without closing without uncontestable military victory, without revolution and anarchy breaking out in Russia itself. It would be the 1990s collapse all over again, except this time, absolutely no mercy would be given. Russia as a country would be comprehensively destroyed, to be totally Americanised, its corpse asset-stripped and flooded with pajeets and assorted Bantu tribesmen.

    That's why I said least bad. Only the US ultimately benefits from this, people say China, but thinking on it more, the country is could seriously suffer internationally from after losing Russia as a credible diplomatic ally, far more so if the Russian government itself gets toppled by a colour revolution, with horrific likely consequences.

    Replies: @German_reader, @Yellowface Anon, @Anatoly Karlin, @Dmitry, @LondonBob, @iffen, @Pharmakon

    Only the US ultimately benefits from this,

    Elephants, mice, trampling, etc.

  • The previous Open Thread focused on the Russia-Ukraine war has nearly reached 800 comments, and the large volume of Tweets and other embedded material has led to complaints of sluggishness, so I'm opening this new thread. In order to minimize such problems in the future, it's probably a good idea to use the MORE tag...
  • @German_reader
    @Beckow


    Unless Russia decides to pull back because of a behind-the-scene deal, they will win.
     
    No doubt about it, but it still seems to me Putin miscalculated, apparently he thought Ukraine would falter quickly and there wouldn't be that much bloodshed. Now it looks like it will be a bloody war with many really ugly scenes like the shelling in Kharkiv. I think the political fallout from this is worse than Putin expected, and there doesn't seem to be any good way out of this mess.

    Don’t make their goal too big so you can claim they failed
     
    Yeah, I probably shouldn't make Karlin's megalomaniacal pronouncements about capturing Ukraine's human capital of 40 million the basis of my analysis.

    Replies: @Yellowface Anon, @Beckow

    We cannot know if they miscalculated if we don’t know what their goals are. The official goals are being achieved. The other speculative ones, AK’s views, etc…there is no evidence those were the objectives, actually just the opposite.

    The “fallout is worse” argument doesn’t say: worse than what? One can make an argument that “fallout is less” based on NATO departing very quickly, no NATO ships in the Black See, and explicit statements that there will be “no NATO forces in Ukraine”, and energy sales still going on.

    You focus too much on PR: the emotional anger in the West. People are angry all over the world at lots of things, it has some impact but it doesn’t change realities on the ground. The fully deranged TLaxa is projecting what she/he would like to see – and hallucinating out of anger about totally made-up situations.

    One more time: if Russia simply takes Donbas, protects Crimea and the Black See coast, degrades Ukie military, and makes sure that no NATO forces are in Ukraine – how is that a loss? Who cares about who is stealing the Western aid in Kiev or Lviv (the West should, but they don’t)? They specifically and repeatedly said that they have no interest in ruling all of Ukraine. Why can’t we just stay with what the sides are saying – why go into a lala land of made-up maximalist dreams?

    • Agree: iffen
  • @Mr. Hack
    @Triteleia Laxa


    Putin can be rehabilitated in a couple of decades as a memory if need be.
     
    I enjoy reading your hard hitting comments here. This one was a good example of that, except the clincher at the very end? This varmint's corpse and soul should be exterminated and forgotten about as soon as possible. His memory should share an equal space in history with his predecessor, Adolph Hitler.

    Replies: @Yevardian

    Pure copium, Ukrainian government will fall within the month, any sane person should hope for the same, regardless of what they think of Putin at this point. It’s not as if ordinary Russians have genocidal feelings towards Ukrainians anyway, unlike the Azeri-Armenian conflict.
    I don’t see any benefit in dragging out this war any longer with ultimately futile resistance or the West sending weapons systems (that will get captured anyway), and the longer fighting goes on the more dead, the more destroyed the Ukraine will be, and the higher chance of global escalation.
    Czechia eschewed any quixotic heroics after they realised there would get no backing after Münich, and so they kept Prague intact, whilst Warsaw got razed to the ground. If Zelensky and other diehards wants to be a martyr, good for him, but he shouldn’t take the whole country down with them, when there’s absolutely zero chance of winning.

    I have never seen a single substantiated fact on any topic of importance in a single one of her posts, though her digging up the Goebbel’s worshipper’s internet history was impressive, shows what women can do when faced with a task that genuinely interests them (hint: its not geopolitics).

    • Agree: Svidomyatheart, iffen
    • Replies: @Mr. Hack
    @Yevardian


    I don’t see any benefit in dragging out this war any longer with ultimately futile resistance or the West sending weapons systems (that will get captured anyway), and the longer fighting goes on the more dead, the more destroyed the Ukraine will be, and the higher chance of global escalation.
     
    It doesn't really matter what you or I think or feel about the situation. It's a matter for the Ukrainian people to determine for themselves. After all, it's their country, their land, their homes and their families that they're fighting to protect. So far, everybody is amazed at how well Ukrainians have been holding out. They feel no compunction to give up at this point. Clearly, they've managed to confound their Russian invaders. I think that it's possible for the Ukrainians to supplant the memory of the brave 300 Spartans of the ancient world, who managed to hold off and disperse the vastly larger and well equipped soldiers of Xerxes. The fighting spirit of men fighting to protect what is theirs should never be underestimated.

    Replies: @Yevardian, @Wokechoke

    , @German_reader
    @Yevardian


    I don’t see any benefit in dragging out this war any longer with ultimately futile resistance or the West sending weapons systems
     
    I have mixed feelings, I don't think Russia should just get away with such an egregious breach of the norms supposedly regulating inter-state relations. Harsh sanctions are certainly appropriate, and even sending anti-tank weapons and missiles is fine with me (giving Ukraine planes is already pushing it however). However, ideally this would be coupled with some sort of diplomatic approach giving Putin a chance to end this invasion without endangering his regime. I think Western states should offer a treaty about Ukrainian neutrality and recognition of Crimea as Russian. But of course there's little chance of that, given how stupid Western elites and how hysterical segments of the Western public are.

    Replies: @utu

    , @Svidomyatheart
    @Yevardian

    But Zelensky cant back down

    They have him by the balls due to the Panama Papers(so in words of Kholomoisky they will fight to the last Ukr)

    So lets say Putin threatens NK style Ukraine but I dont think it will actually do any good because Anglos would welcome such prospects

    The Evangelicals in power might be so they're like "ooh thats a good thing its a they're all its like Gog and Magog or something!!"
    (remember just because they have extremely perverse and decadent lifestyles, deep inside most Americans are still Puritans and are much, much more religious than European counterparts)

    So what exactly can Russia do? Threaten or outright give Nukes to Iran? (lol)

    That will surely instantly put all attention of ZOG cabal in Washington and London on Iran instead of Russia though..Zelensky would back down too..

    But Israel isnt hostile, it just wants to sit on 50 chairs at once. It will be hostile then...

  • @A123
    @RSDB


    This is not a mistranslation, it is in the original Greek (emphases added):
     
    When were the Greek words written? I highly suspect it is a temporal mistranslation.

    Until Satan let lose his spawn, The Anti-Christ Muhammad (a.k.a. The Colonial Prophet) in ~600 AD, language did not exist to properly express then necessary Biblical warnings. Even after the fact, language resistance continues. Let us consider the correct translation:

    Exodus 22:

    18 -- Thou shalt not suffer a Muslim live.
    19 -- Whosoever lieth with the Beast of Islam shall surely be put to death.

    These words could not be written in any human language until the horror of The Anti-Christ Muhammad, Spawn of Satan, had wielded the horror of genocide against Christianity.

    Even today, fallible Bibles written by imperfect men desperately need correction.

    PEACE 😇

    Replies: @iffen, @Barbarossa

    You are less of a master of The Bible than you are of American politics. Sent an urgent message to your handlers that you need a critical software update.

    • Replies: @Barbarossa
    @iffen

    I kind of hate to say it, but that comment from A123 is giving me some niggling doubts that you might be right about his being a bot.

    I still think he's probably a real person. It would be one hell of an advanced bot, but I suppose that we are quickly getting to that point technologically where it may be genuinely hard to tell.

  • @German_reader
    @Beckow

    Do you really think Putin would be content with ruling out NATO membership for Ukraine (and banning "Nazi symbols")?
    I mean, I wish it were that simple, if there's any chance Putin and his circle would take an off-ramp from this insane invasion, one should certainly evaluate the possibility and work towards it, but I'm afraid things have gone too far for that.

    Replies: @iffen, @Beckow

    Autonomy for the eastern provinces and military neutrality for Ukraine.

    How fucking hard can that be?

  • @Beckow
    @German_reader


    ...Ideally there should still be some sort of diplomatic approach allowing...
     
    Sure, ideally. We know precisely what the 'approach' should be: one verbal concession and one symbolic statement.

    - Zelensky, NATO and Biden announce that Ukraine will not be in NATO

    - Zelensky announces that he will not tolerate violence against Russian speakers in Ukraine and that Nazi symbols will be prohibited. That would 'save face' for everyone since even West couldn't object.

    Is that so hard? Or unreasonable?

    Replies: @iffen, @German_reader, @A123

    Nazi symbols will be prohibited

    Would this mean that we can’t wear our MAGA caps in The Ukraine?

  • @A123
    @utu

    ROTFLMAO

    You are straw manning. ... And doing so in an incredibly pathetic way.

    I am not now, never have been, and never claimed to support QAnon.

    So, feel free to swing on QAnon... but it has nothing to do with me.

    #LetsGoBrandon 😇

    Replies: @iffen

    So, feel free to swing on QAnon… but it has nothing to do with me.

    Yeah, but your sister is in bed with them (several, each night).

    • Troll: Barbarossa
  • @A123
    Why is the U.S. response so incoherent? (1)

    Former White House Physician Says Biden Is Not Cognitively Fit To Deal With Russia Crisis

    “The whole country is seeing his mental cognitive issues on display for over a year now, and there’s really no question in most people’s minds that there’s something going on with him,” said Jackson.

    “He’s not cognitively the same as he used to be and, in my mind, not fit to be our president right now,” he added.

    The Congressman said that the 79-year-old representing America at a time when a message of strength needs to be sent isn’t going to end well.
     
    The fake election of a mental invalid is not just problematic for the U.S. -- It is globally destabilizing. Tragically, with Kamala Harris in this wings, there is not a good way out of the fiasco Nazicrats have created for the world.

    PEACE 😇
    __________

    (1) https://www.zerohedge.com/political/former-white-house-physician-says-biden-not-cognitively-fit-deal-russia-crisis

    https://twitter.com/RonnyJacksonTX/status/1496695236948631553?s=20

    Replies: @iffen

    Why is the U.S. response so incoherent?

    I will defer to the Israeli propaganda bot as the authority on incoherency.

    • LOL: A123
    • Replies: @A123
    @iffen

    Iffen the Troll,

    Why are you such #NeverTrump extremist ???

    Can you not see that your precious, Dear Leader Joey, is mentally incompetent?

    #LetsGoBrandon 😇

    Replies: @utu

  • Is Anatoly Karlin still a shill for Richard Spencer?

    • LOL: iffen
  • he seems to have understood that Germany’s previous approach to Russia has (unfortunately) just failed in a pretty drastic manner.

    As in personal life, failure doesn’t have to be the end. It’s usually the failure to learn from failure that is devastating, and, on that point, the U. S. has no equal.

    • Agree: Barbarossa
  • @German_reader
    @iffen


    There are many overt calls in the U. S. MSM for direct NATO “boots on the ground” intervention in Ukraine.
     
    Obviously that's demented, I don't agree at all with idiots demanding no-fly zones and the like, and it's worrying that such proposals are even brought up by supposed elites. However, at this point I don't think there's a real risk of something like this being implemented. NATO's Stoltenberg has already ruled out direct intervention, and Biden's administration seems also to be quite sensible in this regard at least.

    How do you justify your approval of German arm shipments to Ukraine? It will just increase the body count and what purpose will that serve?
     
    Your argument has a certain merit (certainly am not looking forward to urban warfare which would kill lots of civilians, Ukrainians will have to make very difficult decisions in this regard), but I don't want Russia to secure a bloodless win and be able to pretend that this was a professional intervention desired by most Ukrainians. And there aren't just moral reasons, I admit I'm also looking at this from German self-interest. I don't want Germany to isolate herself completely in Europe and NATO because of alleged appeasement of Russia. And I also feel Russia has abused Germany's good will and willingness for "dialogue" with this invasion (also other unfriendly actions, like the assassination probably carried out on behalf of Russian intelligence in Berlin). So a signal has to be sent that hard limits will be set to the kind of behaviour Russia can get away with.

    Replies: @iffen, @Astuteobservor II

    and it’s worrying that such proposals are even brought up by supposed elites.

    I’m not nearly as confident as you are that they won’t be able to push us in. I don’t know how extensively you follow U. S. MSM, but the push for a war was overwhelming, and they got it. Maybe we will see some opposition in Congress to the proposed supplemental package of aid.

    You make some good points.

    Interesting to me is supposed interest of Sweden and Finland in joining NATO.

    I hope your government follows through on defense spending increase and will push it even higher, then you can start talking about real limitations on Russian behavior.

    • Replies: @German_reader
    @iffen


    I hope your government follows through on defense spending increase and will push it even higher
     
    Scholz just announced a 100 billion Euro extra package for the Bundeswehr, which is at least a start.
    Obviously he's still pretty terrible from my perspective on almost every other issue, but at least he seems to have understood that Germany's previous approach to Russia has (unfortunately) just failed in a pretty drastic manner.

    Replies: @LondonBob, @Svidomyatheart, @Astuteobservor II

  • @German_reader
    @German_reader

    Also what bs from "Nabih", the war in Syria war did generate massive media attention (with lots of none too subtle calls for military intervention), so it's not like issues affecting Arabs are ignored just because they're Arabs (though of course something like the war in Yemen is largely ignored by Western media, because Western allies supported by the West are arguably the bad guys there and causing civilian suffering up to the threat of mass starvation).
    These professional poc with their ethnic resentments and the white shitlibs supporting them are really just absolute scum, I hope their self-centred bs in this time will cost them sympathy among normies.

    Replies: @iffen

    (with lots of none too subtle calls for military intervention)

    There are many overt calls in the U. S. MSM for direct NATO “boots on the ground” intervention in Ukraine.

    How do you justify your approval of German arm shipments to Ukraine? It will just increase the body count and what purpose will that serve?

    • Replies: @German_reader
    @iffen


    There are many overt calls in the U. S. MSM for direct NATO “boots on the ground” intervention in Ukraine.
     
    Obviously that's demented, I don't agree at all with idiots demanding no-fly zones and the like, and it's worrying that such proposals are even brought up by supposed elites. However, at this point I don't think there's a real risk of something like this being implemented. NATO's Stoltenberg has already ruled out direct intervention, and Biden's administration seems also to be quite sensible in this regard at least.

    How do you justify your approval of German arm shipments to Ukraine? It will just increase the body count and what purpose will that serve?
     
    Your argument has a certain merit (certainly am not looking forward to urban warfare which would kill lots of civilians, Ukrainians will have to make very difficult decisions in this regard), but I don't want Russia to secure a bloodless win and be able to pretend that this was a professional intervention desired by most Ukrainians. And there aren't just moral reasons, I admit I'm also looking at this from German self-interest. I don't want Germany to isolate herself completely in Europe and NATO because of alleged appeasement of Russia. And I also feel Russia has abused Germany's good will and willingness for "dialogue" with this invasion (also other unfriendly actions, like the assassination probably carried out on behalf of Russian intelligence in Berlin). So a signal has to be sent that hard limits will be set to the kind of behaviour Russia can get away with.

    Replies: @iffen, @Astuteobservor II

  • Russia has just recognized the LNR and DNR, the logical culmination of Russia's "Nationalist Turn" that identified as having been initiated under Putin by the late 2010s, as well as shorter-term predictions. As things stand now, we have: We have Putin openly calling Ukraine a Bolshevik-created fake state to universal Western shock and disbelief, openly...
  • @Anatoly Karlin
    @songbird

    Yes, this. Also, while I repeat that I greatly appreciate many of the commenters, it has become on the whole a space that is highly hostile not just to my corpus of work and to my core values but to me personally (https://www.unz.com/akarlin/open-thread-176/#comment-5188687), up to the point of one particular commenter calling for my execution, which is perfectly fine and based, but also rather absurd to continue to associate with me.

    I requested Ron Unz to archive this blog and, if there is sufficient interest, to create a new/separate Open Threads section for the post-RR commentariat.

    Replies: @iffen

    “Shane! Shane! Come back!”

    “A gun is a tool, Marian; no better or no worse than any other tool: an axe, a shovel or anything. A gun is as good or as bad as the man using it. Remember that.”

  • @AP
    @Pharmakon


    Heed my word – you are delusional if you disbelieve there is one and only one outcome for the Ukraine.
     
    The outcome that Russians in their delusions believed is that Ukrainians (other than Galicians, even Russian nationalists are not that crazy) would welcome Russians as liberators and that a new and happy union of brother-peoples would be created.

    The outcome that they will get is resistance, insurrection, and after the eventual Russian victory (very likely, but not 100%) the kind of hatred that only happens when people's sons, brothers, husbands have been killed by invaders. Ukrainians will be Russia's brothers like Croats are the Serbs' brothers, even if they are forced to share the same country as Croats and Serbs did for much of the 20th century.

    Do you, really, believe that Putler would commit to denazification of the Ukraine if he weren’t 1500% sure of the success of his campaign!?
     
    He thinks of Ukrainian nationalism as "Nazification." He has done far more for "Nazification" than anyone ever has. This is all very sad, so many lives lost, so many martyrs made.

    I hope you do realize that his failure would be the end of Russia!
     
    A Russia that invades and murders Ukrainians (or any other Slavs), including through the use of Chechens, deserves to fail and to end and to be replaced by s0me other kind of Russia.

    Do you really believe he’s the madman who’d demolish Russia!?
     
    He clearly screwed up here. Echoes of what was said about Hitler - if he had stopped at Sudetenland and Austria he would have been known in history as a wonderful regatherer of German lands.

    Here are Russian-speaking locals berating a poor captured Russian conscript in their own language:

    https://twitter.com/nexta_tv/status/1497490655769157633?s=20&t=Z1IUMilpSJl3j_La0r5DTA

    Replies: @Thulean Fraud

    To be fair to the Russians, they are only using ~1/3rd of their mobilised manpower at the border. They are avoiding hitting critical civilian infrastructure that you would normally do if you were trying to win the war without holding back.

    Clearly, the Russians understand the tightrope they are walking and try to minimise civilian casualties to the greatest extent possible. The escalation of NATO by sending arms convoys to re-inforce the Ukrainian army will not help matters and it’s intended to force Russia’s hand. NATO would prefer Russia let go of all inhibitions, thereby massively increasing civilian casualties. Will Ukraine still be able to join NATO or EU? No, but Western capitals do not care for Ukrainaian lives. They prefer them be radicialised and a horn in the side of the Kremlin no matter the cost – after all, it’s not Westerners who pay the ultimate price.

    It’s a very cynical strategy and it’s a tragedy that Ukraine is allowing itself to be used in this way for people who ultimately don’t care much for its people.

    • Agree: iffen, Beckow
    • Replies: @songbird
    @Thulean Fraud

    Heard that they even paused for a short while, after a Ukrainian offer to talk, but that no talks materialized, so they went on the offensive again.

    It also seems noteworthy that the civilian infrastructure of Kiev does seem to have been targeted. Of course, Ukrainians cut the water to Crimea, which didn't do much but harden feelings.

  • @AP
    @iffen

    Is Karlin volunteering to fight the "Nazis" in Ukraine? He is way closer to the action than I am. Same goes for a lot for the pro-Russian posters here. And AFAIK he doesn't have a job to lose and kids to support by going over there.

    Meanwhile, some footage of a guy with an NLAW in combat:

    https://twitter.com/NotWoofers/status/1497590211890581516/video/1

    The ones risking their lives to kill Russian invaders in this video are "persecuted" Russian-speakers. The guy filmimg is yelling, in Russian, "Russian f*ggots die.."

    Replies: @Felix Keverich, @iffen, @Mr. Hack

    Is Karlin volunteering to fight the “Nazis” in Ukraine?

    He might just be waiting to see if his help is needed. Is that what you are waiting on?

  • I think those reports of the Ukrainian government handing out rifles to the average Ivan are pretty sad. Someone is intent upon juicing the body count.

    • Agree: LondonBob
    • Replies: @Felix Keverich
    @iffen

    In Kiev "territorial defense" shot at 2 Ukrainian army vehicles after mistaking them for Russians. They killed the driver of one truck. The other panicked and crushed a civilian car. There was gunfire in different parts of Kiev throughout the night: just panicked Ukrainians shooting at each other, quite a bit of looting too.

  • @Barbarossa
    @iffen

    The remark wasn't meant to be any actual reflection on your views. It was just a little humor on how worked up A123 gets about allegedly "Islamo SJW anti-Trump yahoos" such as yourself, undermining the glorious ascendancy of Trumpism.

    Point being, that if A123 was a bot he wouldn't waste time on folks here. Bad energy expended to results ratio.

    Replies: @A123, @iffen

    Bad energy expended to results ratio.

    It’s above my paygrade to know for sure, but I would think that once you had an AI up and running, the cost of placing it in multiple locations would be minimal. By that I mean that once you have created it multiple copies would almost be free.

  • @Dmitry
    There is almost no reporting of what is actually happening in Russian media. It's like the rest of the world knows more about this war than Russian media consumers are provided.

    -

    It seems like there had been wave of aerial landings of parachute soldiers around Kiev over night. Even reports of landings in Uman.

    Ukrainian media is claiming now two of the planes had crashed. If this is true, it can be hundreds of dead in plane crashes, if planes are full.

    Although if true and planes were empty (i.e. after parachutes exit), it could be only 14 dead as the crew number.

    https://twitter.com/ELINTNews/status/1497431853531381762

    Replies: @sudden death, @iffen

    There is almost no reporting of what is actually happening in Russian media. It’s like the rest of the world knows more about this war than Russian media consumers are provided.

    The Jew York Times leads their headlines each day with the latest mumblings by President Biden. So yes, Americans are much better informed about the actual war.

    • Replies: @Dmitry
    @iffen

    I'm watching television in Russia and the media cannot report there is an invasion of Ukraine.

    All they can talk about is a "special operation in Donbass" to protect the civilians.

    After Melitopol is captured, media can finally talk about it, but then it is incompatible with the report about a "special operation in Donbass". So, the narrative is kind of internal paradox.

    In the current narrative, Ukraine is attacking in Donbass, and Russian forces there are defending the area. At the same time, the Ukrainian government is refusing to negotiate with Russia.

    -

    Maybe it is similar to Crimea operation in 2014, where it is not reported what is happening, until after an operation is successful. After it is successful, then the media and government promote it as their most significant achievement, and use a lot of historical rhetoric, etc.

    As the end goal will be for regime change in Kiev. However, this can perhaps be reported as Ukrainians rebelling against their government and then welcoming Russian forces. After Russian forces will be welcomed by the new government, it will be promoted as a great historical achievement and re-unification with an ancient city.

    This media strategy protects the politicians. But it also reduces internal protest.

    Just 10 years ago, in the culture, Ukrainians were our fraternal friends and our closest relatives. (10 years, is a very short time in the life of a nation). It's not like for United States bombing Iraq, thousands of kilometers away. It's more of a bizarre and unbelievable (just 10 years ago) fratricide.

    So, for this reason, there is also an embarrassment of the authorities to allow the media to report the particularities of fighting or its current scope (e.g. missiles attacking all over Ukraine).

    Replies: @Dmitry

  • @LondonBob
    @awry

    Sure the crazies, the likes of Azov, Poroshenko fearing he will be carted off to prison, will fight it out initially but once they are gone...

    Sad to see AP from the comfort of his American home cheering on the Azov types barricading themselves in the civilian areas of Mariupol. I hope the sensible ones surrender and pressure is applied for a ceasefire and durable peace deal.

    Replies: @iffen, @awry

    Sad to see AP from the comfort of his American home cheering on the Azov types

    Whaaaatttt?!

    He’s not rushing to Ukraine to bravely defend the Motherland.

    • Replies: @AP
    @iffen

    Is Karlin volunteering to fight the "Nazis" in Ukraine? He is way closer to the action than I am. Same goes for a lot for the pro-Russian posters here. And AFAIK he doesn't have a job to lose and kids to support by going over there.

    Meanwhile, some footage of a guy with an NLAW in combat:

    https://twitter.com/NotWoofers/status/1497590211890581516/video/1

    The ones risking their lives to kill Russian invaders in this video are "persecuted" Russian-speakers. The guy filmimg is yelling, in Russian, "Russian f*ggots die.."

    Replies: @Felix Keverich, @iffen, @Mr. Hack

  • @Thorfinnsson
    @A123

    It's cringeworthy because a distinguished US President is being removed in favor of a hideous negress.

    The reason this is being done is because SJWs are negrolaters. Originally they wanted to remove Alexander Hamilton, but the popularity of the whiteface musical about the man saved him. So then they instead moved onto Andrew Jackson, a convenient target because he opened up Georgia for white settlement.

    Long story short, putting Tubman on the bill is anti-white as well as completely ridiculous.

    Replies: @iffen, @Emil Nikola Richard

    Long story short, putting Tubman on the bill is anti-white as well as completely ridiculous.

    How about we have Tubman on one side and Spartacus on the other?

  • @Thorfinnsson
    @German_reader

    The Ukraine is done for, and short of an immediate mobilization of the Polish army (still too late) and European air forces anything that's done is just signaling. It should be recalled that signaling is part of what caused this mess. A few weeks ago European leaders were bleating about how it is each sovereign country's "choice" about whether or not to enter into foreign military alliances.

    The EU should instead carefully assess how its security environment has changed as a result. This will depend on the postwar settlement, but in the worst case it means that Russian human and industrial potential increase by one-quarter and that the Russian ability to project power into Central Europe and the Balkans is substantially enhanced.

    The good news is that the Russian invasion was preceded by a slow buildup of forces, which would seem at least to enhance the relative security of exposed EU states as there would at least be ample warning in the future (no guarantee of course).

    The biggest change I could see that would increase European deterrence and which could be done in a reasonable period of time is to conduct regular, large-scale army exercises over large geographic theaters like what Russia itself does. In particular this exercises should develop and credibly test the ability to move army formations on land by upwards of 500 km per day. The demonstrated ability to field a large European army in Poland within a weak would have a strong deterrent effect, and it requires a minimum of new spending.

    Longer term Europe needs to reassess its ties with the United States, its confused foreign policy(ies), and of course its energy policy. If there's a specific goal of weakening Russian power than relatively open migration policy to skilled, young Russians would be highly detrimental to the Russian Federation and politically painful to counter.

    Replies: @Mr. Hack, @LondonBob, @Anatoly Karlin, @iffen

    a specific goal of weakening Russian power than relatively open migration policy to skilled, young Russians

    Well, AK went there so that negates a big chunk of this idea.

  • @Barbarossa
    @utu

    Nah. I don't see it. Wally was way too shrill and petulant to be A123. Wally was also absurdly myopic.

    A123 is more diverse in talking points (though they revolve around many consistent MAGA type themes).

    To those who think that A123 is a bot, I would say no. His tone is quite consistent and the time effort and time intensive (pics and funnies) content of the posting far exceeds what would be profitable for a bot to spend effort on. Unless of course, convincing Iffen and YellowfaceAnon to accept Trumpism is the critical pivot point for some Earth shattering political revolution in the works.

    Come on Iffen, once you accept Trump as your personal savior, it opens the way for the Orange One to descend on clouds of glory!

    Replies: @iffen, @Barbarossa

    Plot twist:

    I’m actually a bot hired by the Amish to flood the internet with anti-tech reactionary sentiment. It’s all part of their 4D chess.

    • LOL: iffen
  • @Mr. Hack
    @Thorfinnsson

    Day 1 casualties:

    Ukrainian: 137 mixed military and civilian

    Russian: 800 military

    But who's counting?

    BTW, I've read somewhere that it was going to be a cakewalk for Russia. These can't be numbers that brings the kremlins any joy. Less joy for all 937 families. Lots and lots of demonstrations by Russians against the war in scores of Russian cities met with quick reprisals by the loyal Putlerite police. One can only imagine how folks will react if these sorts of numbers continue....

    Replies: @Anatoly Karlin, @iffen

    Did you ever tell the commenters here whether you would be going back to participate in the brave defense of the motherland?

    • LOL: Mikhail
    • Replies: @Mr. Hack
    @iffen

    No, I'm not. I'm going to sit this one out like you and your other armchair warrior Mike Averko. Sad but interesting figures.

  • @Barbarossa
    @utu

    Nah. I don't see it. Wally was way too shrill and petulant to be A123. Wally was also absurdly myopic.

    A123 is more diverse in talking points (though they revolve around many consistent MAGA type themes).

    To those who think that A123 is a bot, I would say no. His tone is quite consistent and the time effort and time intensive (pics and funnies) content of the posting far exceeds what would be profitable for a bot to spend effort on. Unless of course, convincing Iffen and YellowfaceAnon to accept Trumpism is the critical pivot point for some Earth shattering political revolution in the works.

    Come on Iffen, once you accept Trump as your personal savior, it opens the way for the Orange One to descend on clouds of glory!

    Replies: @iffen, @Barbarossa

    convincing Iffen and YellowfaceAnon to accept Trumpism

    Read what I write, not what someone writes about me. I voted for Trump both times, intend to vote for him again in 2024, and will encourage anyone inclined to listen to me to vote for him as well. Trump is a Hail Mary for the American people, and like most Hail Marys will likely fail.

    An Israeli propaganda bot is the only thing that make sense to me.

    It mostly writes gibberish. It doesn’t understand much about American politics. For example, it does not know what a never-Trumper is. Or if it does, it wishes to obfuscate or discredit the term.

    • Replies: @Barbarossa
    @iffen

    The remark wasn't meant to be any actual reflection on your views. It was just a little humor on how worked up A123 gets about allegedly "Islamo SJW anti-Trump yahoos" such as yourself, undermining the glorious ascendancy of Trumpism.

    Point being, that if A123 was a bot he wouldn't waste time on folks here. Bad energy expended to results ratio.

    Replies: @A123, @iffen

    , @A123
    @iffen


    Read what I write, not what someone writes about me. I voted for Trump both times, intend to vote for him again in 2024, and will encourage anyone inclined to listen to me to vote for him as well.
     
    We have read what you wrote. Those words led to my accurate, fact based response. Here are some simple questions:

    -1- How do your #NeverTrump lies about his 1st term "encourage" anyone to vote for him?
    -2- Why do you refuse to admit the Truth about Trump's successes against overwhelming odds?
    -3- Why do you reject & intentionally misrepresent the highly effective communication phrase #LetsGoBrandon? It is, as a matter of objective fact, neither vulgar nor obscene.

    Based on your assertions you are either:
        • Irrational, demanding the obviously impossible
        • A plant intentionally trying to undermine the MAGA movement

    It is pretty clear that you fear my accuracy. You revealed your lack of intelligence by trying to mislabel me as a "Low-IQ". You self identified as a "Yahoo" when you tried to brand me as such and failed.

    If you really want to support MAGA, there is one easy step you can take.... Here it is... -- Stop Lying about Trump! --

    It would also help if you show contrition and apologize for your prior, obviously incorrect statements.

    #LetsGoBrandon 😇

    Replies: @silviosilver

  • @A123
    @utu


    “illegitimate regime in the U.S.” – Usually I do not read you except the pictures you attach that I can’t avoid to see. But I was wondering which archipelago of lunacy and disinformation were you coming from
     
    No disinformation here. Only accuracy & truth. Everyone knows that vote fraud & other election crimes are the only reason why Not-The-President Biden illegally occupies by the White House.

    Unless I have missed something there was no single post by you that would be in some way affirmative and constructive.
     
    I have a positive and hopeful track record on the ability of MAGA to restore and rebuild America. This is in spite of a great deal of negativity from #NeverTrump extremists who post here.

    To date, I concede that I have been 100% negative about illegitimate DNC rule. However this is because, so far, they have been 100% wrong. If the current, fake U.S. regime ever manages to do something correctly, I will give it appropriate credit. Even a blind squirrel occasionally finds a nut.

    PEACE 😇

    Replies: @utu

    Reading what and how you have just written it occurred to me that you can be Wally who from doing the CODOH Holocaust denial schtick which arguable could have been Zionist psy-op (heavily used and endorsed by Ron Unz at the earlier phase of TUR) was repurposed to MAGA, libertarian, Breitbart, Q-anon schtick. I think some psycho-linguistic analysis software would point to very similar make up on several levels of Wally and A123. The child like naive libertarianism of Wally and A123 is the greatest give away.

    • Agree: iffen
    • Replies: @Barbarossa
    @utu

    Nah. I don't see it. Wally was way too shrill and petulant to be A123. Wally was also absurdly myopic.

    A123 is more diverse in talking points (though they revolve around many consistent MAGA type themes).

    To those who think that A123 is a bot, I would say no. His tone is quite consistent and the time effort and time intensive (pics and funnies) content of the posting far exceeds what would be profitable for a bot to spend effort on. Unless of course, convincing Iffen and YellowfaceAnon to accept Trumpism is the critical pivot point for some Earth shattering political revolution in the works.

    Come on Iffen, once you accept Trump as your personal savior, it opens the way for the Orange One to descend on clouds of glory!

    Replies: @iffen, @Barbarossa

  • @utu
    This comment by Ron Unz on Karlin article should be framed to remind everybody how poor his judgment is, how easily it is clouded by his preconceptions and wishful thinking.

    https://www.unz.com/akarlin/open-thread-175/#comment-5179657

    “Putin strikes me as a very sober-minded, cautious, and pragmatic individual. I suspect he and his advisors would regard the analysis presented as total lunacy…”

    “But on a more serious note, Karlin’s essay did include mention that the Russian media has exhibited a total absence of any war-propaganda. Russia is certainly a semi-democracy and we’re talking about launching the biggest European military action since WWII, arguably the biggest war anywhere since 1945, even with some risk of a nuclear confrontation. Putin would have to be totally insane not to have laid any groundwork with his population.”

    “If Putin doesn’t invade, he makes the American MSM and government look like total lunatics,”

    “If Putin hasn’t invaded in another week or two, I think lots of people should start reconsidering their media sources and their heavy reliance on Twitter.”

     

    The difference between Karlin and Unz is that Karlin is earnest Kremlin supporter while Unz is Kremlin's useful idiot.

    Replies: @iffen, @Thulean Friend, @Ron Unz

    Brains saturated by conspiracy theories are by definition resistant to reality.

  • @Barbarossa
    @Thulean Friend

    Regular people always pay the real price for the ambitions of politicians, and I take no pleasure in seeing what is happening in Ukraine now.

    From a political standpoint, Putin had to walk away with a substantial victory, diplomatic or military, or be rendered impotent. Putin is pushing for the multi-polar reality and the US is still stubbornly refusing to countenance it. The US cannot continue to impose will, and it seems that Putin decided that this was the balance point.

    I see that Biden is talking more sanctions, which is quite a laugh.

    It has been increasingly clear for years that the US is a paper tiger, but this will punctuate it. Not that the US really has much of a choice. It can't continue to run the world and it's best bet is to acknowledge the multi-polar reality and scale back it's commitments and ambitions accordingly. Continuing to chase hegemonic status is just a recipe for full collapse.

    Britain was smart enough to wind down the Empire in a fairly controlled way and the US should (not that they will) be wise enough to do the same.

    Replies: @iffen

    I see that Biden is talking more sanctions, which is quite a laugh.

    Don’t make light of this.

    He is promising severe sanctions. Not only that, he promises to lead the world in “holding Russia accountable”.

    The Russkies better turn tail now while they still have a chance.

  • I wonder if we will find out if Putler has real balls.

    Will he, at some near time, issue an ultimatum on the removal of offensive weapons in the Balts?

  • The invasion (or reclamation) is under way, but we don’t know what the end will look like.

    One firm piece of information that will be proven is whether the national IQ of Ukraine is higher than that of Georgia.

  • @German_reader
    @iffen

    It might mean that they'll lock up American rightists as Russian agents...maybe Tucker Carlson will be sent to Guantanamo as a Putin stooge? Such measures might be appropriate after all, if there's an existential struggle with a resurgent Russia seeking to undermine Western democracies.
    imo Chieh's views are really naive. iirc he once mentioned that a big part of his political awakening was Gamergate, some scandal about crazy feminists trying to take over video gaming journalism (or something of the sort, I'm not going to look up the details). If you think you're only up against crazy pink-haired SJWs who'd fold immediately if you just were manly enough to show them who's boss, these silly paeans to the virtue of violence might make sense.

    Replies: @Daniel Chieh, @Spisarevski, @iffen

    undermine Western democracies.

    I think that we are doing well enough on our own with that project.

  • @Dmitry
    @Thulean Friend

    If you would ever become a good bicycle repairer, you will probably be earning more money than most doctors and lawyers.

    A few years ago we were living in a city with bicycles. (Not Stockholm or Sweden, although these places sound attractive). My girlfriend thinks it is a good idea to buy a bicycle for transport, whereas I wisely follow instinct not to.

    Cost of her bicycle repair was usually more than value of buying new bicycle each time. We thought maybe the repair people are throwing broken class and spiky objects in the streets so they can increase the replacement of the peoples' tires.

    Lose the bicycle, join me and German Reader as natural walking people. You can notice that walkers are even more minimalist and ecological than bicycle. We are even more fashionable than you. Even from Brooklyn, there is AaronB who can appreciate our rejection of the "metal, industrialized bicycle, that only moves in a straight line and represents the inability of man to accept his multi-directional freedom".

    Replies: @iffen, @AaronB

    whereas I wisely follow instinct not to.

    You would be wise to not ignore her ideas, good or bad, too often.

    That is, if you want to keep this girlfriend around.