RSSI believe Hispanics mostly kill other Hispanics, plus one could count white drug overdose deaths as white victims of Hispanic crime, in my opinion.
And if 11M or more illegals don’t seem to have murdered even 10 white people this year, out of 15,000 total American homicides, well then, maybe all my very detailed statistical analyses are actually correct, and Hispanics don’t have high crime rates…
If Hispanics are responsible for White ODs then Whites are responsible for drug-related crimes not just in Latin America, but Asia too.
I wish I could the article, but I remember years ago Spaniard Antonio Banderas said in an interview something to the effect, “In Europe I am white, but as soon as my plane lands in the US I am not–I become hispanic.”
Obviously such places are atypical, but I bet there are places like it all over the country, and more than a “few”. Anecdotally, I know that up until relatively recently there were black neighborhoods (that have become much more non-black) in the east Oakland hills that had very little crime. I lived for a few years in one of them. It had some doctors and other professionals, but more typical were some of my neighbors I knew personally: a fireman, an airline mechanic, a general contractor, a teacher and a loan officer.
Doing a quick search I was able to find a few majority black, low black crime communities:
50% black Bowie, Maryland (pop. 54k) has a crime rate well below the national average.
http://www.city-data.com/city/Bowie-Maryland.html
85% black Country Club Hills, Illinois (pop. 17k) has a crime rate below the national average.
http://www.city-data.com/city/Country-Club-Hills-Illinois.html
78% black Matteson, Illinois (pop. 19k) has a crime rate below the national average.
http://www.city-data.com/city/Matteson-Illinois.html
82% black Richhton Park, Illinois (pop. 14k) has a crime rate below the national average.
http://www.city-data.com/city/Richton-Park-Illinois.html
And though not majority black, 41% black Missouri City, Texas (pop. 75k) has a crime rate well below the national average.
Heather is definitely of (part) Lumbee “Indian” backround (Locklear is a very common Lumbee name), however in this case it’s the entire “tribe” whose claim to Indian ancestry is false. The Lumbee are of mostly white ancestry with a minority black component. They have little or no Indian ancestry and no historical connection to any Indian tribes. They originated with blacks and mulattoes who took white wives/babymamas in during the colonial period in Virginia, whose descendants were eventually driven out to North Carolina. During Jim Crow they successfully lobbied for a legal “Indian” identity that allowed them to have their own schools and not have to mix with blacks.
In fact, all of west and north Oakland are whiter now than they were in 1980. West Oakland in particular has gone from almost no whites to now having a visibile white minority.
I once listened to a podcast featuring Russell Simmons. It struck me that he was the first black man I had ever heard who talked like a stereotypical New York Jew.
Could the same be said of towns in Westerm Michigan?
Fallout 3?
People are starting to wake up and realize that their rights are being taken away. We are slipping into totalitarianism and the counter-protesters are doing everything they can to justify that view. Even more websites are being shut down. Eventually, they’ll come for this one, too.
Steve,
The Supreme Court actually decided back in 1923 that even light skinned south asians were legally non-white and ineligible for naturalization.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Bhagat_Singh_Thind
Yes, in Toronto only the Somalis out-do the Jamaicans for brazen violence. The criminal element in both groups admire each other for how hard and cold they are. And no, and of course not all Jamaicans are criminals, etc….
I’ am an Indian.
Caste System? Brahmins? You are wrong mister.
That was the past.It exist but not as prevalent and explict as you say it is.
Untouchables? Nothing sort of that exists now. Like In Many Other countries , the major inequality
is ofcourse based on wealth.
I still can’t get over the fact you have not properly researched before making such serious allegations.
A Latin American I know told me that Monet is a particularly American taste. I think his stuff looks muddy, personally, and prefer Raphael, Vermeer, and yes Picasso though I agree with Wolfe that he’s a creature of the 20th century and won’t last. I second all comments about the utter grossness of the modern art world.
hi Razib – I like your theory on the Central/South Asian component. Dienkes said that this study proves that the Kalash are not European. Do you agree with him? They are probably Indo-European as in your theory, right? (they certainly look Northern European, not Greek or South Asian)