Has to be a pretty big thumb.

This guy really thinks these two are legit? Has he not seen the Mamdani with Soros picture? I read until I realized that Barrett actually believes these two plants are real. Wow.

It never fails. Every single time, wherever Jews are concerned, they always always take that stretch to the “Holocaust.” Oh, it’s exactly this kind of blah blah blah that culminated into the Holocaust. Always in absolutes and to the extreme. If this or that isn’t stopped or brought into check, then millions of actual decent Jews will be murdered. Whatever. I should be used to this claptrap by now knowing that hardly anyone will miss an opportunity to make this bogus leap.

It isn’t any different today than it was then. Nobody wants to murder millions of Jews, they just want them gone. Along with all their harmful behaviors.

This comment about the IDF being one of the strongest militaries in the world is also quite the reach imo. Certainly they’re masters in murdering children and second to none in cruelty. But I can’t recall any point in history where they’ve ever went up against any real military force. Good old front lines battles, not snake in the grass sneak attacks. I think they’re all cowards and would be promptly annihilated if ever they had to square off against a real army. They can’t even defeat Hamas or the Houthies for Pete’s sake!

Who knows?

Maybe you can poke a tiny hole through the sheet and find out? Have some of that smelly, hung like a cashew kike sex.

More red-herring-flavored bullshit from Jonathan Cook. (a) He writes an entire essay about Jews without saying “Jews”. (b) Israel is obviously Jews, the Israel Lobby in the US and Europe is obviously Jews (with a sprinkling of Christian Zionists), so the entire issue is Jewish power. (c) The “billionaire class” is half or more Jews (look it up). (d) The only actual policy struggles in the West today are between left-leaning Jews (and their lackeys) and right-leaning Jews (and their lackeys). (e) “Zack Polanski” (aka David Paulden), new UK Green Party leader, is a Jew (unidentified by Cook).

Also, the “Western neo-colonial mindset” is largely a manifestation of the Jewish quest for world-dominion, as spelled out in black and white in the Old Testament.

All this is so obvious that it is hardly worth repeating. And yet Cook is calling people foolish for rightly believing that the Jewish Lobby “distorts and poisons” Western governments — as it has for over 100 years.

Nice work from champion bullshitter Jonathan Cook.

The Unz Review is primarily respected owing to its compelling exposes on NeoCons, That Spenser would use this medium to vent his insecure persona with a rant on canonizing Kirk, is pathetic! Especially that Spenser fails to grasp that dropout-Kirk was a hero to college neocons, bespeaks not so much as to Kirk’s zionist con, but moreso to Spenser’s vivid ignorance.

Shit, most of the whites in prison think and act like they’re black! All that wigger wannabe shit. The good old days are exactly that and long gone. Our ancestors knew how to deal with and treat these mongrels. Like you said, the noose and a tall, sturdy tree in full public view. Let the sack of shit dangle for a couple weeks to let it sink in. It wouldn’t take but a few of these to start putting things back in their rightful place.

Thanks, Mom

Jared

So I skimmed to the part about the canal construction and in terms of bodies thrown into the concrete I only found this…

And in the summer bones remained from corpses which had not been removed in time, and together with the shingle they got into the concrete mixer. And in this way they got into the concrete of the last lock at the city of Belomorsk and will be preserved there forever.

So this portion mentions only the bones and not bodies put directly into the concrete but into the mixer.

The only reason I point this out is that after reading your comment I was reminded of old rumors that surrounded the construction of the Hoover Dam and how there were at times some workers who had fallen into the concrete. Due to the rush and speed at which the dam had to be built there was no time nor bother to retrieve the bodies and that they were left to settle in and with the concrete. I’m paraphrasing but that’s the jist of those rumors.

Those stories about the Hoover Dam workers in concrete turned out to be false for a number of reasons, the two most important being that the concrete poured during construction of the dam was done so in at most 1 foot layers where after it was spread around to set some before the next 1 foot layer was added. Meaning that the concrete wasn’t deep enough to submerge a human body. And the second reason being that the concrete wouldn’t set correctly if there was a body or bodies in it. Not to mention it would most likely be all lumpy. But this all concerns the Hoover Dam, not the Belomar Canal.

I’m not certain if or how similar the concrete work was between these two projects but I would imagine there being some similarities if only considering the basic rules of pouring and finishing concrete.

The article in the link however only mentions bones being thrown into the mixer. I would think that such a huge project would have more than one mixer but that’s what was written and having mixed, poured and finished concrete myself for a living over the years, I don’t believe that a concrete mixer would crush bones. It’s basically just a drum that rotates. This would mean that the bones would go into the pour whole and stick out here and there. They could be tamped down by hand to be covered I suppose but I imagine that would slow things down to some degree.

I guess what I’m coming to believing here is that this claim is most likely false. In my opinion anyways. It read as if it was a claim by someone repeating a story they may have heard. This being very similar to how the Hoover Dam rumor got spread around.

I do not doubt, under any circumstances, though that millions of people were killed during the revolution. Starvation being one of the greatest causes among other horrific acts of barbarity.

As for the bodies buried in the rubble of Gaza, I agree and have no doubts that they wouldn’t just plow over them and build whatever monstrosity on top.

Little IDF guys getting stabbed. That’s adorable.

Solomon writes:

A major reason President Franklin Roosevelt steered the US into WW2 was to end the Great Depression.
Global finance may decide that WW3 is the only way out of the Wall Street Ponzi scheme.

Of course the U.S did NOT get out of the Great Depression during WWII.
FDR fan boys look at the greatly increased GDP of America during the war and say:
‘You see, GDP went up significantly, so we Americans must’ve been living high on the hog’.

But the material well being of Americans did NOT improve during the war, for the most part.
There were shortages of all manner of consumer goods and rationing was in force.
In addition inflation took off.

With 15 million Americans in uniform, of course there were labour shortages in other areas of the economy, so most that were unemployed in the 1930’s now had a job.
But most toiled long hours in factories producing those weapons of death.

Summary: Producing tens of thousands of P-51 Mustang fighter aircraft, B-17’s and Sherman tanks, generated enormous GDP – to say nothing about about building a single USS Missouri battleship.
But this did very little towards improving the prosperity and living conditions of American themselves.

The indisputable fact is that the U.S did not escape from the Depression until AFTER THE WAR, as Gubmint spending radically tapered off.
The private sector, thus infused with funding that had previously been diverted to Gubmint, now started to create sustainable jobs and REAL WEALTH*.

(*ie: increased GDP without increasing America’s debt obligations – and in fact the debt to GDP levels came down significantly over subsequent decades.

And the biggest falsehood of all that Solomon propagates is that FDR ‘steered’ the U.S into war for economic reasons.
FDR was a traitor. He was a ZOG sock puppet right through to his brittle bones.
He did no ‘steering’ – either before or during WWII.
He merely read from a ZOG dictated script – much like Donald J Chump does today.

The ONLY purpose of the U.S entry into war was to FULFILL THE TALMUDIC AGENDA.
The war in the Pacific was a side show. Yes, the Japanese were getting uppity and their rise as an industrial power threatened U.S hegemony in the region. So that had to be stopped.

But the REAL REASON for America’s entry into WWII was the destruction of Germany. The Talmudic elders in the City of London decreed it so, and thus it came to pass.

The Pearl Harbour incident was a back door entry into the war in the European theatre.
Even if Hitler had not declared war on America soon after Pearl Harbour, some False Flag would’ve been conjured to allow the U.S to commence hostilities with Germany – -just like America’s first Jewish President (LBJ) did with the Gulf of Tonkin incident.

You see, the German economic miracle could not be allowed to survive.
After extricating themselves from the orbit of Jewish Zionist exploitation, a thriving German economy would serve as a template for other countries to follow.
They likewise would also seek to leave the orbit of the Jewish controlled western financial system.
That’s why ZOG ordered his two leading conscience-free foot soldiers and slavish puppets (ie: Winston Churchill and FDR), to engineer a war with NSDAP Germany.

So Richard Solomon, educate yourself about these matters.
All of the things I speak of above have been discussed at great length in the various WWII threads in UR over the years. Evidently you were asleep at the wheel and didn’t read any of it.
Instead, like most ignorant Jews, you relied on what the ADL told you about ‘FDR the saviour’.
He was no such thing. He deserved to be strung up from a lamp post.

FDR needlessly sacrificed the lives of hundreds of thousands of GI’s, all for the sake of a war that America had no need to be involved in, a war which only served to advance the Jewish agenda.

. . . imagining that the only possible reason is that Israel controls the West; that it has special, unseen powers to intimidate the US, the strongest, most militarised state in history; and that behind all this, Jews and Jewish money are what pulls the levers in western capitals.

Yeah, that pretty much describes the true state of affairs exactly. The idea that the U.S. wants to kill Gazans and is using Israel to achieve this aim is f***ing retarded. And nothing in the article remotely supports that conclusion. Give the Jews the credit they deserve — they are the world’s greatest political manipulators, and always have been.

I disagree about the unwashable stain part. Only one of these two genocides are real which is why Germany’s hands will forever be stained and the US will have hands spotless and pure.

I guess real blood washes off while imaginative blood remains forever.

“Its incineration ovens made the disposal of the corpses quick and inexpensive…”

“Inexpensive”????? Shirley, you jest.

As though the Germans had any carbon-based gas, fluid or lump of something to spare on gassing Jews.

In Sepp Dietrich’s biography, (https://www.amazon.com/dp/0080312071?ref_=ppx_hzsearch_conn_dt_b_fed_asin_title_11) which brings to life the realities of life on the Eastern Front, the one constant theme is how the German’s had no fuel to run their tanks as they fought the Soviets in desperate close-quarters battles. (And the Germans practically invented producer gas, which converts coal to liquid fuel so had there been any way to squeeze any more out of anywhere, they would have exploited it.)

You expect us to believe that rather than stop the Soviet tanks, Hitler determined it more expedient for the Third Reich to divert fuel his elite soldiers so desperately needed to do unto Jews what a simple bullet to the back of the head—the Soviet’s preferred style–would do?

“You a foo” as black kids in my grade school used to say.

No doubt about that last one for sure. I wouldn’t be at all surprised to find out if we were. Funny, there was probably a time when I would’ve found that notion creepy. Now it’s par for the course, business as usual.

Just go back and mash [•LOL] now. You can change it long afterwards, maybe with no time limit. (Adam Smith and I have been testing this.)

Ron Unz has got some clever features here. You can’t put 2 different “responses” on one comment though, or this particular thing couldn’t work.

• Best Website in American History: Ron Unz

Hi there, I just wanted to respond to something you had mentioned in your comment, mainly the comment about many, many Jews being murdered by the Nazis…

I agree wholeheartedly with you about the burden of proof. I myself have said that plenty of times and as I’m certain you’re aware that the accusers in this area of discussion never even attempt to deal with that burden on any level. Insults, ostracizing, doxxing, libel suits and even arson in extreme cases are their preferred methods. Personally I don’t believe there will ever be any type of serious discussion let alone any debate between the two sides. I like to think that it would’ve happened by now. I’m talking on a major world stage level that is. Who knows though, perhaps we may see it in our lifetime? Anyhow on to the comment…

You had mentioned after the burden of proof that there is lots of evidence that the Nazis and their allies had murdered many, many Jews. I’m not going to copy and paste your text, I will just paraphrase what I read. I like to keep this more conversational than getting all into sources and exactitudes. Not that those aren’t important, they are and they matter. I just prefer a more personal way of discussion. Kinda as if we were talking to one another on the street.

So is there lots of evidence that the Nazis murdered lots of Jews? It really depends on what you consider evidence and where that information was obtained. There is zero doubt cast by revisionists that Jews weren’t targeted and dealt with harshly by the National Socialists. That I would say is a fact. But let’s consider some things that occurred leading up to these events. I don’t know if you’ve seen it but that popular newspaper headline in 1933 after Hitler became Chancellor of Germany. In bold font it read “Judea declares war on Germany” with a sub heading that read something like “Demands boycott on all German goods.” Demands or calls for it was, either way you get the jist. In the early days I never really thought about or considered the severity of this until I learned more about it. Here you have a very small foreign group of people who have just now openly declared war on their host country. Think about that. They did this in a newspaper they control and if they call for a devastating boycott on German products, you best believe they can pull it off. We’re not just talking about the immediate Jews in Germany no. This tactic was designed and orchestrated by the Jews in the U.S. New York in particular. I remember reading that an elder Jewish spokesman for the Jews in Germany tried desperately to prevent this claiming that by doing so the Jews in the U.S. would make life a living Hell for the Jews in Germany. And that’s exactly what happened. I’m not saying that this is some excuse or explanation that makes killing Jews okay. I’m just laying out the vibe at the time. I can imagine if today in the U.S. I opened a morning paper and read the headline “Latin Kings, MS 13 and all Hispanics declare war on America.” Especially if it’s true! Because with the Jews back then it was true, they really did that. So if my hypothetical happened in America should I be surprised to see Hispanic folks being arrested en mass and sent off to prison camps? I know it’s far fetched but it’s an analogy to help describe what happened then and that there are consequences for doing such things.

In my opinion that headline and boycott was the first shot fired in WWII. That’s when it really began. There was at the time enormous amounts of pressure and lobbying in the U.S. to get involved. War mongering. It was the same then as it is today. Nevertheless it’s no secret that Hitler wanted the Jews out of Germany and ultimately Europe. There were 7 million communists in Germany at that time and something had to be done. But was it killing them? I don’t believe so. I’m not outright claiming that the National Socialists killed zero Jews that’s absurd but did they kill many, many Jews? No. I do know that the British and the Americans killed many many Jews and here’s how. Carpet bombing for one. The relentless terror bombings of fire on civilian cities, Dresden being the worst but not just there. They did this all over Europe for months on end indiscriminately bombing everything on the ground. So I ask what kinds of conditions would you expect to find on the ground after such bombings? Infrastructure shot, railway lines and trains gone. Food and medical supplies and all important delousing equipment to keep diseases from spreading can no longer be distributed to the camps both East and West. The Germans could no longer contain the typhus from spreading, they couldn’t treat the sick and wounded nor feed them. Those bombing campaigns killed far more Jews than the National Socialists ever did that’s for sure. And to boot, Chuck Yeager (the sound barrier breaking guy) wrote in his book about his missions during the war that he was instructed to strafe anything on the ground that moved. It just so happened that he would often shoot at long marching columns of people on the ground. These people were Jews marching Westward with the Germans from Auschwitz in search of better conditions. Man, in the dead of winter, walking for miles and miles, freezing cold and starving and now you’re being shot at and killed from above by the “good guys.”

Maybe it’s the summary shootings on the Eastern Front where the National Socialists killed many many Jews? Maybe. I think it’s all on how you look at it. That the Einsatzgruppen rode around all over the East rounding up people simply because they were Jews is utter rubbish. It isn’t that simple. If that were the case then that means they were ordered to do so and in any military orders come from up top. No such orders were ever issued. No evidence exists that claims any such orders existed at all. Then you get the “ambitious Nazi” claim where everyone just took it upon themselves to do this stuff. That, to me doesn’t fit any formal military behavior of any kind and in the German Army, the Wermacht, the Reichswehr and especially the SS, there were strict rules and harsh punishments for insubordination. The German military had honor and dignity. Yes the Einsatzgruppen too were soldiers. They were husbands and fathers, brothers and sons. Not a bunch of lawless hooligans running amuck killing on a whim. That’s more like IDF behavior or to be more specific to the topic, the behavior of partisans.

Partisans yes, a group of people who willingly decided to take up arms and operations against the Germans. They attempted and at times pulled off assassinations, they blew up trains and railway lines, radio towers, they used bombs and explosives a lot. They terrorized the local populations in every city they occupied. They were a murderous menace and had to be dealt with. Remember there’s a war going on. They also didn’t help themselves much when they murdered Reinhardt Heydrich in Prague. The Germans knew who they were, what they were about and where to find them and that was the primary reason for the Einsatzgruppen. This was their job. To go behind the German Army into liberated cities and territories and hunt down partisans. Self declared enemies, communist plotters and sympathizers. The enemy of the Germans plain and simple.

Another thing partisans became famous for later was being portrayed as innocent Jews being executed on film by the Einsatzgruppen. Yes the Einsatzgruppen executed partisans, lots of them, you could say many, many of them. But they did so after arrests were made and trials held and verdicts given. When you see one getting shot in the back of the head before an open ditch or a group of them being killed by a firing squad you’re seeing the sentence being carried out.

I don’t know about you but me personally, I do not have a problem with this on any level and here’s why. Again these people, most of them Jewish, made up their minds and chose to attack the Germans. Whether they blew up trains or had all out fire fights with the army they acted on what they believed was right. Again there are consequences for this when you get caught. It’s not hard for me to imagine what to expect if I had been killing soldiers with bombs or sniper fire and I get caught. What do you think my chances are? It’s war and that was part of it and the game doesn’t change, only the players. In Iraq, Afghanistan U.S. soldiers often times caught insurgents. These are the guys burying IEDs along the roads. Sniping soldiers in their bases, strapping bombs to people and detonating them in crowds. Guess what our guys did to these insurgents when they caught them? Killing insurgents today is no different than killing partisans then or Viet Cong for that matter. Right or wrong isn’t the issue in these circumstances because there was a war going on simple as that.

There are also countless photographs of the civilian victims of the terror bombings in Dresden, Hamburg and dozens of other cities. In Dresden there were 400,000 German women, children and elderly civilians murdered by the allies. If they did kill any soldiers they were injured from war and convalescing in Dresden. There were zero military targets there. It was a total civilian city, an arts and culture district. There was a German airstrip outside of Dresden but no bombs ever found it. These photos are hard to look at man, I’ve seen them and you can too if you want. They aren’t hard to find. They’re horrific. Mother’s holding infants all melted flesh. They died as they were huddled during the raid. These weren’t concussive fragmentary bombs, they were incendiary. Bomb shelters provide zero protection from these bombs and that’s how these people were found in the shelters after each raid was over. This being done by the allies at a time when the whole world knew that Germany wasn’t going to win this war. February, 1944. After the corpses were gathered they were piled up in the center of town. There tons of pictures of corpses lying everywhere. No shortage of dead bodies. Could these be the many, many Jews killed by the National Socialists? Yes because these exact photos were used and given misleading captions. So dead German civilians were edited to, you guessed it, murdered Jews.

There’s literally scores of information on this subject and it’s easy to find if one ever feels inclined to look. It’s not easy sometimes seeing those images because these were people. Human beings incinerated alive in hopes of forcing a German capitulation. It never works. It only builds the resolve of those being killed. It just happened in Iran and it’s happening now in Gaza. Hamas isn’t going to surrender anything no matter how many Palestinians Israel murders. Nothing changes man.

And another cause for many, many Jews being killed by the Nazis is one that happens a lot, too much actually by too many people who know better. Plain old lying and misdirection. There’s always this automatic assumption that Jews missing or unaccounted for were killed. By the Nazis. When Hitler became Chancellor and even before there was a program in place for the Zionist to move the Jews from Europe to Palestine. It’s actually a continuation of The Balfour Declaration from WW1. Originally the Island of Madagascar was chosen but for reasons I can’t remember at the moment it was later decided that it wouldn’t work. Palestine came back up on the market if you will and Hitler, working with Jewish leaders arranged for the migration of 400,000 Jews to Palestine. The way it worked was pretty simple. Any assets and money the Jews had in Germany would be sent to Palestine ahead of them and currency converted so when the Jews arrived they were all set. This migration, which was amicable and agreed on by both sides, would have continued normally if not for the war. Not all Jews went to Palestine. Some went to Russia, Poland and other places. 7 million went to the United States. Those who didn’t register or went elsewhere than they were supposed to are now missing. Even though they’re alive and well some where, they’re considered and tallied dead. Murdered by the Nazis. This is a big one that gets a lot of people. David Cole himself was spouting this crap on this thread too. Just because they’re unaccounted for doesn’t mean they were murdered anymore than a huge pile of their shoes does of their glasses etc. even photos of dead bodies laying about everywhere doesn’t mean that those victims are Jews. It only proves that somebody took a picture of a bunch of dead bodies. Doesn’t tell you where, when, why or even how they died.

When you get down to it and do some digging around you will find that the National Socialists really didn’t kill untold numbers of Jews. Yes, they’re responsible for some of the deaths because a lot of them died in the camps from typhus and other disease. Had they not been put in the camps to begin with them yeah, you can say the Germans are responsible. But then I’ll say well if the allies didn’t bomb the hell out everything in sight then the Germans would have been able to keep Jews alive in the camps. Round and round it goes.

Anyhow, thanks for giving me the time to comment. You may have known most of that stuff or even all of it. But if you didn’t then I hope I may have helped bring some understanding to that issue. I’m no expert or scholar. I just read a lot about the Third Reich in general and that time period in history. A long time ago I believed all those stories. Schindler’s list gave me nightmares because I had to watch it in class. It was mandatory in junior high! Nudity and all. But I believed it. Then, 20 or so years later I stumbled across some information pointing out the reality of Amon Goeth and his camp Plascow. Literally blew my mind to learn that entire film is a gigantic lie all the way through. The big shock for me was the camps placement in the movie versus real life. In the film Goeth can’t eat breakfast in the morning unless he shoots a couple of Jews first from his balcony overlooking the camp. In reality it is literally reversed! I saw a picture of Goeth sitting on his balcony and behind him is a huge grassy hillside. Plascow is situated on the top of that hill making his morning sniping routine impossible. There’s just so many ridiculous lies about this and just when you think they can’t get any crazier, they go and redeem themselves. They actually can and do get crazier. I see a lot of people who aren’t 100 on the issue. They’ll keep moving their fence back more and more as they obtain new and credible information they previously weren’t aware of. Like 6 million is obviously outrageous but 2.5 million makes more sense? That’s a concession and it only keeps receding from there the more they learn. No matter the number they give one thing is correct. As you said…

The burden of proof is on the accusers.

Have a good one and take it easy. I’ll see ya around maybe in the comments. Take care.

Well said. As I was reading one of the sources you provided it got me thinking. It was the part about how this committee decided that at the end of an Auschwitz tour there should be a crematorium to go through. Since the “actual ones in Birkenau lie in ruins blah blah blah.” So that decide to build a fake or at least restore the sham that the Poles threw together after the war. Complete with unconnected chimney XD.

Anyhow, that part about the tours. Those tours have always made me curious in so many ways. For me it’s nothing just a bunch of crap. I see an old run down and in some places modified prison camp. I know about the library. I know about the whore house upstairs. I’m aware of the swimming pool, the kitchen, the post office, the movie theater, the orchestra, the nursery and daycare, the hospital, the carpentry and sewing shops. I also see the open air fence all around the permititer of the camp. I see all of it for what it truly was. An old prison camp. Nothing more.

Now I love history especially all things Third Reich and I would be interested in seeing these things while knowing their true and actual purposes. I would still be very much into that.

But what about all these people from all over the globe who go there because they believe that that particular location was responsible for the systematic mass murder of millions? In fact that is precisely why the do go! It’s so sick to me. Why would anyone in their right mind not only want to see something like that but pay for it too!?! I don’t know what it costs to get in or if there’s any charge for the tour but I do remember reading about gift shops and restaurants. Like WTF??? It’s so macabre. So vile and appalling to think about. Probably worse if they’ve read Night!

“And if you’ll look to the left you will see an old wooden horse drawn cart. During the holocaust that cart was filled with Jewish infants and were summarily torn in half bare handedly by a British Nazi fiend.”

Or

“Thank you ladies and gentlemen, this concludes our Auschwitz Death Camp tour. If you’d all like some refreshments or would like to take home a Arbeit Macht Frei coffee mug please feel frei to visit the Birkenau Bistro or the Never Again Shoppe where everything is 6% off. And don’t forget to let the kids take a run through our Geysers of Blood WaterPark! Again thanks for coming and do mind your step when walking across the undulating ground.”

I don’t get it at all. The sickening appeal to actually pay money to see some horrifying places where countless people were killed. I wouldn’t want to see Jeffrey Dahmer’s house or see Ted Bundy’s VW much less pay for the privilege. Then again at least if I did I’d get to see actual places and things real murderers owned.

I never understood the bizarre obsession with people and that place. I know that Jewish family members leave flowers and stuff and sometimes scatter ashes of loved ones there and I just might go so far as to think that they really do believe the stories. Otherwise they’d be in on it, the sham, the bamboozle, the okie doke, the fraud, the flimflammery of it all. I don’t put that past them either. I guess I just can’t grasp that mentality of wanting to see a place that you “know” committed such atrocious deeds.

What’s your take on that? What do you think makes these folks so morbidly curious?

Wow. You sir left not one single stone unturned. That was awesome to read, twice actually. I do thank you for clearing this up as well as some other out of context/misleading comments on this thread.

As I was reading his comment I remembered immediately that I just read Carlo’s Einsatzgruppenbook about a month ago. As with the bulk of Carlo’s work it was a handful but that is exactly why he’s one of my favorite revisionists. He really gets down into specifics of all sorts. I’m convinced that if an SS man purchased a lightbulb for Auschwitz, Carlo will find the receipt for it. He’s that thorough. But I also remember his numbers at the start and what he concluded with and immediately that jumped out at me when I read that 500,000 some number Blank threw out. It only got worse from there.

And as you said, the audacity to claim that most deniers never do research other than memes and bazooka Joe comics. (Might as well have said it) That, that one really bothered me. It’s one thing to spout vague, generalized and out of context figures and statements out there but to blatantly assume that deniers as a whole or majorally don’t bother with serious research? That’s more like a personal attack on very well an entire group. The arrogance of it.

I never concern myself with those of us who know better and can hold our own but I do think about folks that are genuinely ignorant of certain facts and details. Honest ignorance, not deliberate. Uninformed I should say. When they come across trash like that. Real events, real locations but false statements, overinflated numbers, the mishmash. I just loathe to think about an innocent mind being intentionally duped. It’s mendacious. We all started somewhere at one point to look for the truth. To find the right answers to this. It’s no wonder you hear this midway garbage more and more. It’s like hey, you still get a holocaust just not as big. It’s preposterous considering all the information now available like you mentioned, a couple of clicks away, to basically spout the same impossible nonsense just on a smaller scale with less fantastical methods. Bullets instead of gas chambers and what have you. A country smaller than Texas fighting a war on two fronts. An army that never at any time outnumbered anyone among their enemies still had infinite bullets to spare!

I also just wanted to bring up how he also repeated the old Hitler’s War Machine or Germany’s War Machine falsehood. I’ve always hated that one. Any country in Germany’s position back then, before Operation Barbarossa could not understand any circumstances have won a defensive battle against an invading Soviet Army. No way possible. You’re slowly but surely being surrounded more and more. There’s no other option than a preemptive strike. It’s either that or be invaded and conquered. Brilliant strategy, execution, tactics and weaponry is what did that. That’s how the German Army was gaining on the Soviets at a rate of 50 miles a day. Take also into account the mindset of the Red Army Man. If he surrenders, is taken prisoner, and later returns, he’s a dead man anyway. “Who but a traitor returns from enemy captivity alive?” When I learned that it finally explained to me all those photographs I saw showing hundreds, sometimes thousands of Red Army Soldiers surrendering to a small handful of German soldiers. Most of those Soviets didn’t believe in or support that ideology and also knew they were as good as dead if they went back defeated. Their best chances were to go with the Germans. And that right there was a bad call on Hitler’s side in my opinion. He disliked the Slavs. He could have and should have used those guys. I believe they would’ve fought just as hard along side the Wermacht as they did against them at times.

But hey man most of that is all just my personal opinions and thoughts. I do want to thank you though for breaking down all that Blank BS point by point. I’ve been reading damn near the entire thread mostly his responses which keep changing more into excuses and the comments by CY. Most of the stuff I wanted to bring up you guys already covered and that is just awesome. I still wanted to get my two bits in there as well.

As I said. I never subscribed to the whole “War Machine” nonsense. It makes things sound as though Germany were the aggressor nation which is exactly the point of that false moniker. Hitler fought as best he could in the situations he was in. He’s often blamed for blunders and his generals hailed for victories and it’s exactly the opposite I believe. Stalin was going to invade the West 100% The pact over Poland bought time. Barbarossa pushed him back, damn near to Moscow’s front porch. You know the rest. People can and do say what they will of Hitler and his armies but I always remind them that the only thing that prevented communism from spreading all the way to France was the Waffen SS. And ultimately I would say Hitler because he gave the orders with final and total authority. Anyways, thanks again and also thanks for the info you gave on my comment regarding Cole and the Kohrrer report. The so called “final nail” in revisionism’s coffin XD

Take care my friend.

[1]. ““…The Jews, however, got arrested and deported simply because they were Jews…”
Rubbish!
[2] “In 1933 already, “Judea Declares War on Germany”!”

You seem to imply that [2[ negates [1] when in fact it explains it, i..e, Jews had proven themselves to be implacable enemies of the German nation.

You believe Blankaerd is honestly summarizing his “years of research” on this topic? Even he doesn’t claim “years” but you hand it to him, gratis. You’re very generous with what does not belong to you. In fact, he offers NO sources. Commenter Lief (comment #69) actually pointed out that Blankaerd was mistaken in every one of his claims! But, you see, the odds are that readers here won’t know that and will accept what he says as accurate, as you have done. Lief has described B’s comment as an

“endless rant-mishmash of large opinionated generalizations consisting of nothing but claim after claim, without even a single one detailed source to back any of it or refresh/check the author`s memory of what he claims to have read other writer`s write..

I knew he was a fake when he said “I came to the conclusion that it is around 2.5 million jews” — who died from all causes during the war […] both inside and outside of concentration camps.” That number has become very popular after David Irving settled on it, in his quest to shed the “holocaust denier” label after getting out of that Austrian prison 2 years early.

There is no basis for the number of 2.5 million except that its a nice, neat number and far below the impossible 6 million. You say:

He could hardly present all of [his sources & research] in a website comment.

Oh yes he could, and he needs to. Commenters do it all the time. But liars don’t want to be held to any standard; it cramps their style. Yes, I think he is lying. He’s new here, so I can’t say why. But I think it’s just a fun pastime for many people on the Internet bc they can be anonymous. You need to understand that opinions are a dime a dozen.

I actually like Langdon’s articles, particularly the ones covering Black on White crimes, non-White immigration and all it’s perils and the articles where he brilliantly points out the hypocrisies and evil intentions of the far left. I’ve enjoyed those articles so much that I went through his entire history and read well over 20 of them. He became certified in my book as one of my favorite, go to authors. I seldom, if ever disagree with his writings… Until I read this one.

Nothing about the scales and weights. It wasn’t the epistemics stuff. It was when he brought up holocaust denial. It caught my attention immediately because it’s a subject I am very much familiar with. All of his other articles I learn a lot from but on this topic he’s now entered into my territory. After the first few opening sentences I found myself a bit surprised and perplexed that he felt the way he did. I pretty much took for granted that Mr. Langdon himself was also a denier. Seemed a logical conclusion to make given his intellect and scientific mindset on so many other subjects of his. I noticed that he often uses scientific and biological analogies to drive his points on race and similar matters and I suppose this might’ve been what fueled my prognostication.

The more I read on the more that disappointment became my status. After I finished the article I felt rather perturbed at the way he described certain things, so much so that I vaguely remember the previous topics of weights and such. He struck a nerve I guess you could say. Judging from the comments thread I see I’m not the only one who felt that way. And real quick, I just want to express how good that is and feels because I remember a time when very few other than myself spoke out on this issue. It’s good that there’s more and more of us.

Here’s what bothered me. It’s not so much Mr. Langdon’s uncertainty on the veracity of the holocaust. If a person hasn’t bothered with devoting some time to look into the information then that would explain why they’re uncertain. And it’s exactly that which bothered me.

This is a guy who has used the complex biological make ups of butterflies and their erratic flight patterns as analogies for wanton Black violence and behavior. He’s taken the time to study scientific information to bolster and prove certain points in that regard but admits to doing next to no research on the holocaust. I found that bizarre. That was just one example, I’m sure those who are familiar with his posts are aware of his use of scientific comparisons. No doubt the man is well read in other areas too from philosophy to poetry, he mentions these things regularly in his columns. Naturally one would presume he would do the same when learning more about “The Most Documented Event in Human History.”

Instead he gave us his sources, for lack of a better term, for his findings on the holocaust and whether he believes one side or the other. Ron Unz and David Cole. While I know more about the latter rather than the former I do know that neither are scholars or historians or whatever else. It just has me perplexed as to how Langdon could reach any definitive conclusion in either direction based only on those two individuals opinions. He has taken the time for his due diligence when it came to butterflies and poets so why not here as well? I find it very difficult to believe that he hasn’t heard about any number of revisionists and their works. Maybe a decade ago but not this day and age. All the more now that revisionists and their lawyers are being sent to prisons in Europe. Even with the benefit of doubt, it is not even remotely difficult to find revisionist work online covering any topic of the holocaust. This leads me two the other reason Langdon ruffled my feathers a bit.

His opinions of and the things he said about revisionists and holocaust deniers. Dumbing the latter down to foil hat cultist morons. It’s almost as bad as what the holocaust orthodoxy do when they label deniers as vicious hate mongers with all the phobias and isms. All holocaust deniers are racist anti-semites and they’re dumb too. All combined together. This isn’t true at all and while it may be his opinion it certainly isn’t a fact. He wasn’t wrong about very strange people being attracted to it but that’s fair to say on any other such controversial topic really.

I don’t know, I guess I took some offense to it. While I am an anti-semite there’s good reason for it and practically everyone is nowadays anyway so that slur lost its desired affect long ago. I am by no means stupid or idiotic to any degree because I deny the holocaust. I deny it because it’s a lie. A very poor lie bereft of credibility, physical possibility, and plain common sense. I know that it’s a lie because I did my research. For years I read about this topic from both sides. I read books written by professors, engineers, historians, chemists, and so on. I put serious amounts of time in on this and I made up my mind based on facts, sound reasoning, critical thinking and examination. All are feats few if any morons could perform. I made my decision at the cost of personal and professional relationships. Family members won’t even speak to me at times. That decision has cost me but it’s the only decision there is for me. Learning what I have and knowing what I do it’s irreversible. The people who’ve educated and enlightened me have paid worse than I. Tenures lost, freedoms and more. One might say that the sheer taboo of the holocaust is the proof it didn’t happen.

I would like to think that a person such as Mr. Langdon would actually put in his own legwork. Draw his own conclusions based off of his own personal studies as opposed to going the route he has. There was a lot of contradictory double speak in that article that ultimately led to no definitive conclusion or statement. Perhaps that was intentional? I don’t know and don’t much care really. I will continue to read articles by Langdon in the future and I will comment when I feel compelled to do so. As I said, some of his assertions rubbed me the wrong way. Didn’t sit well with me. Got my panties in a twist and pissed in my Cheerios. I felt the need to respond and speak my thoughts on those couple of issues at least.

I will kindly remind people out there who might not be privy that there are enormous amounts of scholarly work by highly qualified and respected revisionist authors out there and has been since the sixties at least. Maybe earlier. All of this information is constantly updated and revised as needed. There are all kinds of web sites too. Plenty of others have provided the links in their comments so I won’t bother here.

Oh, and I’d also like to point out that the late, great Prof. Robert Faurison’s challenge has yet to be accepted in going on what now, 40 years?

“Show me or draw me a Nazi homicidal gas chamber.” Still no takers eh?

I don’t know if you are aware, but Germany ran a huge train fumigation plant near Budapest, and a lot more train fumigation tunnels. The US had similar sites for the same purpose.
Aim was to fumigate the train wagons, since they transported soldiers, civilians whatever, you don’t want to have flees on these trains making the passengers ill.

The plant in Budapest had all the features missing in all the flimsy cellars deemed “extermination” chambers. Ventilation, coating of walls, a heating device that converts the solid Zyklon pellets into a gas, gas masks and protective gear for the operators.

The problem with the train fumigation plant and tunnels, no Jew has ever claimed these were used to gas them.
These would have been the perfect sites, train rolls in the plant or Tunnel, gasses Jews with a more potent nerve agent, Zyklon B does not do it, train leaves plant/tunnel without Jews. Never been claimed. Degesch even provided all the technical plans and details of these sites.

I remember when I first read about those tunnels too and I’m glad you mentioned it here.

I’m also reminded of producer gas and wood gas vehicles. Those were extremely abundant in wartime Germany and Europe. Due to the necessity of regular gas for the war, Germany and many other countries were to switch their vehicles over to producer gas methods. I don’t remember the exact number of these vehicles but it was definitely in the hundreds of thousands. They were easy to construct out of readily available materials and their output was 100% carbon monoxide. Highly lethal. One had to be careful when operating any of these machines.

Yet we’re told that the Germans supposedly used diesel engines to kill inmates in the Aktion Reinhardt camps, diesel so called “gas vans” or “wagens” by the Einsatzgruppen on the Eastern front and allegedly Zyklon B in the Polish camps.

Again, much like the tunnels we have all these very real and very deadly wood gas machines all over Europe at the time and readily available. Yet the Germans never bothered with either of these two innovations which would’ve worked very efficiently and effectively. Hmm…

Then I’m reminded about exactly how precise German engineering was/is! These were a people who in their time invented all sorts of new technologies. All the moreso to replace things that they could no longer get from other countries because of war sanctions, blockades etc. They created their own synthetic fuels, fibers (rayon) jet propulsion, gyroscopes and countless other innovations. The majority of Nobel Prize winners of that era were German. Practically everyone knows about German precision engineering. It’s virtually in their DNA for cripes sakes!

A nation of people so intelligent, so visionary that they figured out a means to fumigate an entire train for life saving purposes without having to unload anything! Just pull it in, seal it off and let her rip. Genius. To find a method to fuel cars, trucks, tractors, farm equipment with an alternative gas made from wood chips! Genius. They figured out how to stabilize rockets and reach air speeds previously unheard of or thought possible. But for some inexplicable reason… For the ever loving life of them, they just couldn’t figure out systematic mass murder on an industrial scale.

I’ve always said that if anyone could’ve pulled that off, it would’ve been the Germans. But there’s no way in hell they would’ve used these half assed, brainless and outright ridiculous methods that they’ve been wrongly accused of for almost a hundred years now. It’s sickening.

Listen. I know all this and you know all this and so do many others as well. I just wanted to thank you for pointing out the fumigation tunnels and I myself just needed to vent out a little on it. I learned about all this back around 2007. That’s when I became a denier. And there’s way more qualified and intelligent individuals out there that have know even longer. It isn’t something that happens overnight. It isn’t some decision made on a whim. It occurs after a long period of research and study. I was always interested in The Third Reich. Even when I still believed all the stories. That period has always fascinated me and it still does. It was that interest and constant propagating that ultimately compelled me to look into it. I “knew” the Germans did it. I wanted to know how. 6 million people, the rough equivalent to the population of the entire state of Tennessee, all gassed, buried, dug up and cremated (depending on the camps) in less than what, 3 years? I never, ever found any such answer in all the mainstream documentaries I’ve consumed. No books, no films ever satisfactorily answered that for me and that’s when I happened upon The Rudolph Report. A chain reaction from there and all these years later I still study it.

I learned that the actual, physical existence of the camps themselves proves that the Germans intended to keep people alive. Under tight control but alive. I hadn’t seen an actual death camp until I saw Eisenhower’s camp. I hadn’t seen any effective system for mass murder until I saw how the Soviets did it and hell, the British and the Americans too for that matter. Bullets to the back of the skull a bayonet too for good measure. Mass starvation and zero disease control, terror fire bombings of civilian cities day and night for months on end. And after all of that 27 million Germans died AFTER the war. That’s a holocaust. That’s a genocide, ethnic cleansing a very real systematic mass murder. No supposed Hitler order was ever found because it never existed. If anyone cares to see what a real holocaust order looks like they need look no further than the Morgantheau Plan.

Apologies for the long rant but when you mentioned the tunnels it sparked my memory and got me all fired up. Thanks again though.

or they don’t exist as real persons but are two-dimensional cardboard characters he created to serve his thesis against the “irrationality” of Denial

That which doesn’t kill you only makes you stronger.

Well, I’ve seen them nearly killed and they couldn’t be more wronger.

I visualize a man with no arms or legs. Still alive, albeit only a torso, but alive.

“Start embracing a form of National Socialism. That’s how you win. The Germans during Hitler’s reign had the right idea.”

That’s the epitome of a jew shoving Nazism down people’s throats, hoping some Goyim retards will swallow their 100% transparent crap.

It’s also the epitome of jewish INVERSION, which they have been pulling off since time immemorial.

Just check out how the Nazi-pushing jew operates: “That’s how you win,” knowing full well that that’s how the Germans LOST, a complete 180 degree flip-flop of historical reality. They hope you’re too demented to even notice something that’s right there in front of you, staring you in the eyes.

They hope you won’t read “Mein Kampf” in which the jew actually TOLD everyone how he was going to destroy Germany, and this was in the mid-1920s, which he then proceeded to execute, in fact hastening his very plan, that he had put down in black & white, when in late Aug. 1939 he did the very thing he had written about and then immediately rushed into WWII to make sure the very destruction of Germany he had laid out in his book would be GUARANTEED.

And that’s the story of the Ribbentrop-Molotov cocktail from late Aug. 1939 and Hitler’s rush into Poland on Sep. 1, the absolute GUARANTEE that Germany would be DESTROYED, exactly the way he himself had outlined in “Mein Kampf.”

Hitler-ben-Israel epitomizes Moshiach-ben-Yoseph because he WAS the jewish Messiah son of Joseph, which is why they put him there to cause an ocean of Eisov’s tears and blood.

These Nazi promoting jews pretending to be neo-Nutsees can’t and don’t fool us all.
You’ve been busted, buster.

Is there really any time left for something like that?

I agree 100% but it sounds like something that will take years and years to accomplish if it could be accomplished at all given the censorship and new laws being enacted to take away freedoms. It’s at a point now where things are very close to tipping and once that occurs all hell will be breaking loose. It wouldn’t seem like educating people about the truth would be of many concerns if there’s fire and riots in the streets.

Perhaps after the dust has begun to settle, assuming anything is left after the fall, that could be the time to do something like what you’re describing but right now the way things are it just doesn’t seem like there’s time for that.

I really don’t know as I’m looking for solutions myself and there aren’t very many, just tons of articles explaining the current problems. I would love a nation under National Socialism, true NS that is but I just can’t see it happening.

Seriously, how much intellectualizing do you people need to do until you realize that Jews have been, and always will be a problem in EVERY society they reside in? This is especially true of Western societies.

Dealing with Jews is a very much win or lose game. There is no compromising with them. They are as delusional as they are neurotic.

Start embracing a form of National Socialism. That’s how you win. The Germans during Hitler’s reign had the right idea. The plan has largely already been laid out for you, white man and woman!

Also, stop using terms that Jews created, such as “anti-Semitism”, “racism”, etc. If you do, you’ve put yourself at a significant disadvantage, as if you’re letting your enemy set the terms, conditions and boundaries for a battle.

Besides, Jews are not Semites. They are a nomadic tribe called “Khazarians” who come from the area east of Ukraine and north of the Black Sea. The Biblical people of Israel have been dead for thousands of years now. Modern day “Jews” have been roleplaying as Jews for thousands of years. They are total imposters.

With the genocide that the Kazarians are commiting against not only the people of Gaza, but also Whites all over the western world via mass migration, I’m shocked news sites like this are not filled with articles on how to subvert and take down organized “Jewish” power which is the heart of the problem plaguing humanity at this point.

That’s antisemitic! XD

Thanks (out of buttons) but I’ve never considered Cole insightful but rather just your standard issue jew and for the life of me can’t figure out why he gets published at all.

I agree with you, Judea fired the first shot no doubt. I was just pointing out that the revisionists indeed have covered this topic quite thoroughly this proving that Cole is wrong in saying they avoid it because it proves a holocaust.

The old trick of missing Jews means murdered Jews.

Thanks, saved me the job of pointing it out. This is a perfect sad example of typical Cole-arguments (and even more sadly people like Langdon- innocent of ANY thorough investigation/will to investigate- falling for it).

No1: COLE NEVER LINKS TO ANY EXACT PRIMARY SOURCE FOR HIS ENDLESS CLAIMS and most importantly:

No2: NEVER ANY SOURCES REPRESENTING FAIRLY BOTH SIDES OF THE DISCUSSION OR ANYTHING RESEMBLING OBJECTIVITY RESEARCH/SELF-REFLECTION/HUMBLENESS.

What you get instead from him is an endless stream of large obtuse claims totally out of context, hiding behind a few pseudo-specifics/terms thrown around like “Korherr”, “1942/43” only obfuscating their/his utter lack of any real in-depth specificity/investigation, all held together by nothing but purile polemics, histrionics and child-like self-aggrandisement (him being “the first”, “the only”, “most experienced”….) … and more 5 grade schoolyard polemics (see his replies to Ron).

And if one actually ever bothers (in stark contrast to the likes of Mr Langdon apparently..) to factually exactly check what he throws out there in his cacophony one gets the result like you -and Ron and in a long line before Robert Faurrisson, Germar Rudolf, Carlo Mattogno, Thomas Kues…pretty much any academic revisionist researcher who bothered to deal with that little histrionic man have-demonstrated time again:

His claims are simply totally made up and actually the exact opposit of truth:

He manages to write “The deniers do not mention the Korherr report”

-All the while not only this report, but the entire biography of the man and his office and his/their task and all documents they wrote and their exact sources and background history and exact time-line of absolutely every tiny aspect regarding the matter are to be found everywhere and by All of the prominent revisionist authors

https://nukebook.org/historical-person/politician/korherr-richard/

https://codoh.com/?s=korherr

And not only that but most importantly they have and do present all this information with the most painstakingly nerdy academic rigor/exactitude regarding their sources so that everybody at any time can exactly re-trace and check whether they adhered to the rules of scientific objectivity at any time, exactly the opposit of Cole.

And they thus present all the facts of the greater picture that Cole either un-or willingly keeps out of his article because they would immediately demolish his tower-of-cards- argument, like, interestingly:’

a) None other than Mr Richard Korherr himself upon whom Cole`s whole argumentation and Langdon`s belief rest, in 1977 wrote an explicit published letter to the renowned German magazine “Der Spiegel” after they had again produced the exact same wild claims that Cole re-iterates, protesting and stating that he was fed up with his report being constantly mis-represented and used as proof for an alleged Holocaust, calling it nonsense (see Rudolf`s Encyclopedia article linked to above).

b) the Korherr report was no original report at all, but simply a summary of the everywhere and long discussed/investigated (infamous) “Höfle-telegram”:

https://nukebook.org/document/hofle-hans/326/

And interestingly again, the author of that telegram (Hans Höfle) despite all the extensively documented Allied post-war common techniques of illegal coercion and torture, until his death protested strongly that his report was used as proof for a Holocaust. A death that fascinatingly and fittingly occured immediately afterwards under the very same Allied imprisonment, ruled as suicide….

That someone like Mr Langdon “finds him more convincing” sadly says it really all, both about Cole and his own intellectual horizon….

“God directed me to mobilize as many Christians as possible to vote for Trump because of his positions on Israel and abortion.”

So killing unborn babies is bad but murdering countless innocent children in Gaza is good?
Jews are so whacked out it’s almost unbelievable. They “convert” so they can subvert. That’s what I think anyways. I don’t trust them and seriously doubt I ever will. I don’t like them and I don’t have to.

Or they don’t exist at all.

“Deniers never cite Korherr either.”

I found this after less than 5 minutes of search…

Dr. Richard Korherr (30 Oct. 1903 – 24 Nov. 1989) was a statistician, and from late 1940, the head of the SS’s statistical office. In early 1943, Himmler ordered him to compile a report on the trends of European Jewish population developments since the National Socialists’ rise to power. After several discussions and some correspondence with Himmler, Korherr submitted a 16-page long version for Himmler (Nuremberg Document NO-5194), and a 6½-page short version meant for Hitler (NO-5193).

These two reports and a few accompanying letters are seen by the orthodoxy as a smoking gun for the Holocaust. They claim that these documents prove that some two million Jews had been murdered up to early 1943. The subsequent discussion will focus on the long version.

The data used by Korherr to compile these statistics were provided to him by various SS offices. For instance, the number of Jews listed in the long version (p. 9, Point 4) as “passed through the camps in the General Government,” meaning occupied Poland, is identical with the number given by SS official Hans Höfle in a radio message sent in early 1943 to the SS headquarters. Höfle listed this number as a total of individual “arrival” figures (“Zugang”) of all the camps located in that area: Belzec, Lublin (meaning Majdanek), Sobibór and Treblinka. While Höfle had the inmates arrive at these camps, Korherr listed them as “passed through” (“durchgeschleust”), suggesting that these camps served as transit camps.

An earlier draft of Korherr’s report used the term “special treatment of the Jews” here (“Sonderbehandlung der Juden”). In a letter, Himmler asked Korherr not to use that expression anywhere, and to headline Point 4 of page 9 instead: “Transportation of Jews from the Eastern provinces to the Russian East.” Some 35 years later, in a letter to the editors of the German news magazine Der Spiegel (No. 31, 1977, p. 12), Korherr explained that he was perplexed by the term special treatment, hence had inquired about it with the German Department of Homeland Security (Reichssicherheitshauptamt). He was told that it referred to resettlements. That phone call probably triggered Himmler’s letter giving instructions on what term to use instead. This supports Korherr’s postwar statement that these camps had been presented to him as transit camps for Jews getting resettled.

Korherr’s report also has 145,302 Jews “passed […] through the camps in the Warthegau” (ibid.). However, there was only one camp in that area: Chełmno. This figure gives a maximum number of Jews deported to that camp. While the orthodoxy claims that they were all killed there in gas vans, Korherr’s report again suggests a mere transit camp.

The orthodoxy claims that the original term used (special treatment) was a euphemism for murder (through gassing). However, the largest of all claimed mass-murder centers – Auschwitz – is not included in that number. Most Jews deported to Auschwitz are instead listed in the next entry of that list (“Evacuations of Jews from other countries,” Point 5, pp. 9f.), which evidently never had the term “special treatment” attached to it, hence was in no need of any changes. Therefore, if special treatment meant murder, then Jews evacuated to Auschwitz were not murdered according to the Korherr Report.

On the other hand, Höfle’s radio message proves that the “camps in the General Government” included the Majdanek Camp. In this case, the rich extant documentation allows us to ascertain that Jews sent to this camp were not murdered there. (See the entry on that camp). Hence, “special treatment” did not mean murder in this case. By analogy, it may not have meant murder for Jews sent to the other three camps either (Belzec, Sobibór, Treblinka).

When summing up all evacuation figures on page 10 (for which Himmler had not requested any change), all single items are tallied, “including special treatment.” That instance of this term’s use had been overlooked by Himmler and Korherr. It was a back reference to Point 4 on page 9, but after its text had been changed, this reference pointed nowhere.

We know from numerous Auschwitz documents that the evacuation of Jews to and through Auschwitz was indeed labeled “special treatment.” (See the entry on that term.) However, this referred not to murder, but to the special treatment Jews were getting in comparison to all other groups of people who were arrested, incarcerated and/or deported by the Third Reich. Everyone else had to have committed – or be suspected of having committed – some infraction to get arrested. The Jews, however, got arrested and deported simply because they were Jews. That was their special treatment.

Furthermore, the report lists a little over 1.6 million Jews who are said to have been evacuated or transported from Germany, the Protectorate (occupied Czechia) and the eastern provinces to “the East” or the “Russian East” (meaning the then-occupied Soviet territories; p. 9, Points 2 and 4.). It then states that these “evacuations […] are counted here as part of the decrease” (p. 15), although mere transfers to the European part of Russia, strictly speaking, did not remove them from Europe, which is what this report was all about. However, if they had been killed in the East, they would not just count as decreases, but be irreversible population declines.

Hence, in this regard as well, Korherr believed – or wrote as if he believed – that mass relocations to Russia happened, and that these relocated Jews were very much alive and kicking. Not a single word, expression or inkling in this document indicates that mass murder was being perpetrated against the Jews.

The orthodoxy insists that all this is a game of smoke and mirrors, where euphemisms are used to hide the ugly truth of genocide. The problem is that this report was not meant to be published or spread. It was for Himmler’s and Hitler’s eyes only. So why use lies, euphemisms and code language in top-secret documents to be seen only by the nation’s top leaders? Who was Korherr or Himmler trying to dupe?

(For more details, see Graf/Kues/Mattogno 2020, pp. 311-330.)

Wouldn’t let me just post the link. I for one never considered David Cole and expert on anything. Insightful perhaps but no expert. There are plenty of respectable scholars and experts whom deny the holocaust. There are some weirdos out there too. If one is familiar with the subject, one can tell the difference.

you are an idiot or a troll, that doesn’t understand the obligations of the start treaties. by terms of the agreement the strategic bombers must be displayed on the tarmac, just as u.s. b-2 bombers were at diego garcia. unlike the u.s., russia follows treaty law, not for the u.s. but the rest of the world (just like the chinese) but that will end and not be renewed. this is nothing but an over hyped propaganda campaign and all that zato and their ukranazi proxies have left in the tank. this will have zero impact on the outcome of the s.m.o., as russia is advancing on all fronts, in the end this will speed their demise.

russia is not at war with the u.s., just yet, although you trolls may get your wish. don’t be surprised if the u.s. and u.k. don’t start experiencing terrorist acts in their own backyard, if and when the shit hits the fan. russia has destroyed zato’s weapon systems and their reputation, that’s all the u.s. has left. now only their vasssls will buy their overpriced, outdated, junk systems. look around you, it’s the u.s. that’s falling apart, not russia. look at what’s happening to ukraine right now, as a result of their terrorist actions, they will lose even more territory in the end.

russia doesn’t need your advice on anything, they are doing a fine job of destroying the ukranazis, their zato handlers and the e.u. and u.s. economies that fund it, this is the real war. our economy is a dead man walking and the idiots big beautiful bill, will speed the demise of this zombie economy. russia doesn’t need the u.s., the u.s. needs russia, trump understands this but is too much of a duplicitous idiot and puppet, to be able to take the life line extended to us. this is the last chance for this idiot pretender to the throne but it seems, he’d rather play with matches and go down in history as the american nero, most likely that’s what he was selected for in the first place.

“And so much of contemporary warfare is weirdly choreographed, after all.”

I knew I couldn’t have been the only one noticing this.

If it’s a fact as you say then you gotta give me a source to back up your claim. Otherwise it is just another conspiracy theory.

I’m not saying that it is, I would just like a link or something to some valid information to support what you said.

I don’t know but I have been thinking more along the lines of why not target the people who allow and openly invite these hordes? Like the politicians. The party leaders and members who actually facilitate the migrations? Or hell, why not both? The offenders and the politicians responsible for bringing them in to begin with?

Either way you’re going to have all Hell break loose at some point. Civil war or whatever you want to call it. It can’t go on forever. There’ll either be no more White people left or Whites take back what is theirs. I don’t believe the latter can happen without violence.

I feel the same here in the States towards politicians who put Israel first, which is just about all of them. Congressman, senators etc. What if they start getting popped off one by one? I dunno. I have no solution, only anger. Much like everyone else.

Very very well said. You’ve concisely broken down all the thoughts in my head and laid them out perfectly. Foul language and all.

During the campaign I was cautious because, well for obvious reasons that these people can’t be trusted or believed. Still though with all his talk I found myself feeling this miniscule amount of hope. Maybe he’ll actually change things. It didn’t last long. Once his EO’s started getting overturned by the courts. That’s when I began to fall back on my business as usual thoughts. Yeah, it didn’t take long at all to see him for what he is. A giant fucking failure. A disaster and all the things you said.

Nothing can be done. What can you do? Take action? How? What, by voting? What is the solution? Get rid of Jews in power? How?

We’ve all read these articles and books about this. JFK, The USS Liberty, 9/11, October 7th, Hell let’s throw the Levan Affair in there to boot. What then? They always say stuff like “Stand up.” Or “Take action.” Out of all the stuff I’ve read about Zionist domination, media/political/banking control, Mossad false flags, I have never read anything in regards to what anyone can do about it? It’s a disease with no cure? What is the solution? It has to be practical and doable. I would love to hear it.

Informing people. That’s taking a form of action right? Except you just come off as some nutter. It doesn’t matter how factual and credible your statements are. You’re just black listed a conspiracy nut job, anti-semite. I don’t know. I digress.

You’re so very right on this, in fact it actually feels like not only is this the outcome but that it is inexorably headed that way. I mean what other way could this possibly go at this point?

Do they (Jews) know this? Are they counting on it? Do they even care?

It’s at the point where they’ll just keep doing whatever they want as long as they want. “The Jew cries out in pain even as he strikes you.”

I have embraced my antisemitism long ago. It was only natural to do so. I’ve also accepted the fact that nothing can be done at this point. It’s too far gone. An inevitable wipe out of Israel and the United States is long overdue. A reset button so to say. Rebuilding from the ashes and ruins kind of thing. Doing anything to prevent said reset is dead, done and over with. What else can we do?