RSSNot sure about the triads but the Big Circle Gang were started by former Red Guards who escaped from China to Hong Kong under British rule then spread throughout the other parts of the world.The British cops told the Mainland Chinese gangsters they’ll look the other way if they stick with running whorehouses and gambling because it was safer for the cops than getting into shootouts with trained gunmen who were armed with AKs and grenades.
In fact, Col. Macgregor thinks most of the Chinese illegals coming in from Mexico are fugitives wanted for corruption and other serious crimes in China.
By the way, I heard that back in the 1980s or 1990s, the Big Circle Gang in Hong Kong use to take the pajeets who were security guards hostages while robbing jewelry stores and the triads used Sikhs as low level errand boys for street level drug retail and to sell counterfeit products.
As far as gangster regimes go, this American Born Chinese did a vlog where a gang affiliated actor claims over 150 of the politicians in Taiwan have gang affiliations and prior convictions for criminal charges.

But, yeah. If I remember my Cold War history, the CIA worked with the Sicilian mafia, the triads, renegade KMT armies in SE Asia, opium growers in Turkiye and the Corsicans AKA French Connection in running international dope rings. All that was covered by Professor Alfred McCoy in Politics of Heroin in SE Asia.
On the eve of WW2, France had the most powerful military on paper. Both France and Great Britain also had way more experience and were purportedly more battle hardened from their decades of colonial bush wars than Germany's "untried" military which, itself, had to learn from their early setbacks in Poland.
I seem to recall reading that Americans chuckled at the notion of German and Japanese weapons being anything to worry about pre-WWII.
To be fair, the British military had figured out the primacy of AirPower.
RDF and the Merlin engine were ultimately supremacy weapons. The Germans never got beyond the idea of a tactical airforce. All the best minds in the UK were focussed on Aerial Supremacy and the command n control that goes into coordinating it.
How did it figure out the nuts n bolts of that in the 1930s? Bombing Arabs.
Ironically – it might be a higher percentage of the Taiwan celebrities that are against secession than the Hong Kong ones were – lol.
Speaking of which….. what do you know about this Taiwanese movie which appears to be their own version of Red Dawn?
Are the Directors, Stars and Producers famous in Asia?

I was initially interested in watching it but after seeing an ugly lesbian being a spokesperson promoting it, I’m thinking of taking a pass since I really don’t want to see any woke bullshit or be subjected to any homo sex scenes.
But yeah those Mitsubishi spots. Street racing became popular in Hong Kong because of Japanese. Especially Nissan and Mitsubishi. There were even Hong Kong films that went to Japan to make racing movies (track as opposed to street).
The older Hong Kong action movies from the late 1980s and early ’90s featured plenty of Japanese motorcycles and riding gear.
I guess you are pining away for the confederacy down in Tennessee – huh?
Since we’re on the subject of movies, everyone I know in Tennessee are huge fans of Asian films be they Japanese Kaiju and Samurai stuff or Hong Kong action cinema. Everything from 1970’s swordsman period pieces to modern action films.
On the eve of WW2, France had the most powerful military on paper. Both France and Great Britain also had way more experience and were purportedly more battle hardened from their decades of colonial bush wars than Germany's "untried" military which, itself, had to learn from their early setbacks in Poland.
I seem to recall reading that Americans chuckled at the notion of German and Japanese weapons being anything to worry about pre-WWII.
I see plenty of overconfidence and bravado from the leadership of both ZOG and the CCP.
China is confident but not in my opinion overconfident. If the US attacked China, I am sure that China would win. Not only because the US’s war games show that China would win; I’ve other reasons to think so, which I won’t go into now.
A US that sees defeat impending might be suicidal enough to launch its nukes. Thus the prevention of World War III is China’s top priority. I still believe that that was the main purpose of last month’s parade: deterrence against the US, not because the Chinese feel weak but because they emphatically do not want to risk the end of the world.
If direct conflict breaks out, both sides will initially make costly mistakes and miscalculations. The side that can learn from their mistakes and adapt to the new realities the fastest will determine the outcome.
There will be mistakes, undoubtedly. However, China’s advantages are such that it can afford to make mistakes and still win. Not so much the US, which at the start of an attack on China would already be extended over half the world — and that in itself would probably be a fatal mistake.
Aside from closing the technological parity gap , China's huge logistical edge combined with it's multilayered A2/AD doctrine in the South/East China Seas would spell disastrous losses for US forces never experienced before in history.
If the US attacked China, I am sure that China would win. Not only because the US’s war games show that China would win; I’ve other reasons to think so, which I won’t go into now.
Any nuclear first strike by ZOG will automatically trigger a Russian response since Washington's doctrine is geared towards destroying all near peer competitors in the event it opts to engage in any all out conflict where CONUS is likely to be devastated. The targets for our nukes will likely include India.
A US that sees defeat impending might be suicidal enough to launch its nukes. Thus the prevention of World War III is China’s top priority. I still believe that that was the main purpose of last month’s parade: deterrence against the US, not because the Chinese feel weak but because they emphatically do not want to risk the end of the world.
That was predicted in this 2014 novel.
There will be mistakes, undoubtedly. However, China’s advantages are such that it can afford to make mistakes and still win. Not so much the US, which at the start of an attack on China would already be extended over half the world — and that in itself would probably be a fatal mistake.
China is confident but not in my opinion overconfident. If the US attacked China, I am sure that China would win. Not only because the US's war games show that China would win; I've other reasons to think so, which I won't go into now.A US that sees defeat impending might be suicidal enough to launch its nukes. Thus the prevention of World War III is China's top priority. I still believe that that was the main purpose of last month's parade: deterrence against the US, not because the Chinese feel weak but because they emphatically do not want to risk the end of the world.
I see plenty of overconfidence and bravado from the leadership of both ZOG and the CCP.
There will be mistakes, undoubtedly. However, China's advantages are such that it can afford to make mistakes and still win. Not so much the US, which at the start of an attack on China would already be extended over half the world -- and that in itself would probably be a fatal mistake.Replies: @FTB
If direct conflict breaks out, both sides will initially make costly mistakes and miscalculations. The side that can learn from their mistakes and adapt to the new realities the fastest will determine the outcome.
If the US attacked China, I am sure that China would win. Not only because the US’s war games show that China would win; I’ve other reasons to think so, which I won’t go into now.
Aside from closing the technological parity gap , China’s huge logistical edge combined with it’s multilayered A2/AD doctrine in the South/East China Seas would spell disastrous losses for US forces never experienced before in history.
Whether Japan and South Korea can be dragooned into the providing military forces and operating bases for a Sino-F(ormer)USA conflict is an open ended question; they both rely on China as their largest trading partner.
While China most likely lacks the inclination and offensive capability to invade Japan, there’s nothing Japan can do to stop swarms of Chinese missiles from devastating their major ports and population centers if things go hot.
South Korea is likewise vulnerable to North Korea’s missile and artillery assets.
A US that sees defeat impending might be suicidal enough to launch its nukes. Thus the prevention of World War III is China’s top priority. I still believe that that was the main purpose of last month’s parade: deterrence against the US, not because the Chinese feel weak but because they emphatically do not want to risk the end of the world.
Any nuclear first strike by ZOG will automatically trigger a Russian response since Washington’s doctrine is geared towards destroying all near peer competitors in the event it opts to engage in any all out conflict where CONUS is likely to be devastated. The targets for our nukes will likely include India.
Worst case scenario would be tens of millions dead across Asia, Europe and North America within the first hours of an all out exchange followed by all the surviving national leaders struggling to establish a continuity of governance after systemic collapse.
Since most of the world relies on China, Russia and US relations for maintaining any semblance of a functioning modern society, the rest of the world will crumble from starvation, famine, disease and reversion to tribal warfare by survivors competing over dwindling resources.
Last I checked China produces over 70% of the world’s antibiotics alone…….
Considering how Western leaders have proven themselves to be unaccountable (to their own populaces), their rapacious and malevolent temperament and the demonstrable fact that they are delusional and criminally insane, I would not dismiss their willingness to risk Armageddon.
There will be mistakes, undoubtedly. However, China’s advantages are such that it can afford to make mistakes and still win. Not so much the US, which at the start of an attack on China would already be extended over half the world — and that in itself would probably be a fatal mistake.
That was predicted in this 2014 novel.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Twilight%27s_Last_Gleaming_(novel)
My .02? IRL, Pax Americana’s huge advantage will be it’s globe spanning fleet of submarines which can theoretically interdict all Chinese ocean supply routes outside of the PLA’s A2/AD net.
Whether China has stockpiled enough wartime caches, and if their land based supply lines transiting the Rus Federation, Central Asia and SE Asia, can offset maritime disruption is an open question.
To counter a Submarine blockade, I suppose China has already made preparations to provide logistical and military support to Venezuela and Iran when the madmen in charge here decide to initiate war against them. It’s also probable they might provide assistance in the unlikely event Russia needs it when Europe decides to directly intervene in Ukraine.
Yes, logistics give China an overwhelming edge. The country has what the military people call "interior lines of communication" (I think); these would be difficult to cut. And of course, China's transportation network is unrivalled; it can concentrate massive force wherever that is needed.
Aside from closing the technological parity gap , China’s huge logistical edge combined with it’s multilayered A2/AD doctrine in the South/East China Seas would spell disastrous losses for US forces never experienced before in history.
China's missiles could also devastate all the airfields in Japan, South Korea, and Taiwan -- simultaneously. Americans like to brag about having thousands of F-35s, but they would be useless if there were no nearby airfields from which to take off or land.
While China most likely lacks the inclination and offensive capability to invade Japan, there’s nothing Japan can do to stop swarms of Chinese missiles from devastating their major ports and population centers if things go hot.
Yes. And to China's army.
South Korea is likewise vulnerable to North Korea’s missile and artillery assets.
Worse, the supply chains for a modern agricultural system -- tractors, tractor fuel, fertilizers -- will be destroyed. Those who survive the nuclear strikes will starve. Those who do not starve quickly will succumb eventually, as most people have forgotten the skills needed for muscle-power farming.
Worst case scenario would be tens of millions dead across Asia, Europe and North America within the first hours of an all out exchange followed by all the surviving national leaders struggling to establish a continuity of governance after systemic collapse.
Not if China and/or Russia destroy the US' submarine bases. Even nuclear-powered submarines need food and new torpedoes. Perhaps they could rob the food from some impoverished Pacific island. More torpedoes would be harder to acquire, especially if all torpedo factories are in ruins.
My .02? IRL, Pax Americana’s huge advantage will be it’s globe spanning fleet of submarines which can theoretically interdict all Chinese ocean supply routes outside of the PLA’s A2/AD net.
Aren’t almost all Hong Kong actors opposed to the Hong Kong secessionists?
Even in his western movies like that trilogy series with the black comedian (the name escapes me right now).
The Rush Hour movies with Chris Tucker?
We are already seeing this, for at least 20 years now, since USA re-launched the nuclear arms race, taking China especially by surprise and forcing them into emergency defense spending to ramp up their own arsenal to prevent a USA decapitating first strike.The issue of course is that Russia and China (and Iran) are in an arms race to defend their countries from USA aggression, while USA is in the arms race to develop offensive weapons that can overcome Russia and China's defenses.Except what happens if Russia and/or China get tired of always defending against mindless aggression from USA, and decide to take the war to USA proper? USA spends nothing on actual defense, has no real defense against common weapons Russia and China are known to possess in abundance. We may be coming to a point where everyone agrees that in the interests of world peace and prosperity, USA and psychopathic sidekick Israel have to be taken out. That will come when the economic fallout of the destruction of USA wouldn't seriously affect China's future rise. And that point is almost here.Replies: @FTB
Will Chinese weapon devlopment force the US to enter into round after round of military weapon race?
USA spends nothing on actual defense, has no real defense against common weapons Russia and China are known to possess in abundance.
You have uncanny timing.
Col. Macgregor thinks war against Venezuela, Iran and Russia might be the swan song of the US Empire.
Fast cars are great… But I don’t care who is making them – I’m not a fan of humanoid robots trying to become human – at all!! Nor do I want AI trying to outthink humans. Both are potentially very dangerous.
As a teen I took Shorinji Kempo which the instructor said derived from Shaolin systems. Being a nerd, we also watched a lot of Japanese Anime and action films.
Looking back, it was amusing how many of their Manga and Anime involved either Chinese martial arts, criminal organizations, history, or you name it. The protagonist of Fist of the North Star was obviously modeled after Bruce Lee who is still widely admired in Japan.
When I met Japanese Director Takashi Miike he even said Lee was his personal hero.
Even Shinichi Chinba’s fictional Street Fighter character is depicted as being half Chinese.
I also recall Jackie Chan being some sort of bigwig with Mitsubishi. He used their SUVs and cars in all the insane stunts and chases when he was younger.
Now, just look at Japan’s handling of WWII. They couldn’t handle defeat though the writing was on the wall. It took two nukes and the Sublime Russian liberation of Dongbei, to make them surrender. Defeat was so anathema and shameful to Japan that there was the serious likelihood that all-Japanese would commit mass-suicide with the emperor than admit defeat.
That goes a long way to explaining why after four years of tactical victories but strategic stalemate in China, Tokyo decided to lash out at us with December 7th in a desperate bid to knock us out of the game as they conquered the Dutch and British colonies in SE Asia.
All in a gambit to seize the resources that we had cut them off from in order to break the stalemate in China so they could create their East Asian Co-Prosperity Sphere and conquer the USSR’s Far Eastern Provinces.
Paints a picture of a gambling addict on a losing streak who keeps borrowing money he refuses to acknowledge he’s never going to be able to pay back.
Now, fast forward to Tokyo Olympics of 1964 which was supposed to celebrate the revival of Japan as a democratic nation. Yet, when the dwarf Japanese judo wrestler lost the all-around title to some a bigger Dutch guy, the whole nation was crying and babbling like babies. Worse, the judo dude committed suicide. And the Japanese marathoner who came in third place, hardly disgraceful committed suicide too. Many Japanese regarded these suicides as acts of honor or self-atonement, but they are really acts of immaturity inoculated by a culture that has little tolerance or understanding for the human condition.
Hell. Aside from writer Yukio Mishima, I never knew there were so many high profile suicides in their culture in the post war era.
Were these other suicides by Seppuku too?Replies: @Torna atrás
I never knew there were so many high profile suicides in their culture in the post war era.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l6KyBusa5Wo
张志磊:中国50年不会再出第二个张志磊,大言不惭还是实事求是?
Zhang Zhilei: China won't see another Zhang Zhilei in 50 years—is this brazen boast or straightforward truth?
Mr. Miyagi’s inner strength stems from his ancestor, Shimpo Miyagi, who drifted to China’s coast while fishing. He stayed there for 10 years, married a Chinese woman, and returned to Okinawa with his family and the knowledge that would become Miyagi-do karate.
The Chinese are responsible for development of Miyagi-do and all effective techniques.
The Japanese are responsible for one innovation though.

IIRC, China began manufacturing it’s indigenous designs by the 1980s. Was keenly aware of this in the small arms field though I’m sure it encompassed the entire spectrum of military hardware,
I recall when they announced the phasing out of their Type 56 /Kalashnikov line of service rifles and replaced it with the Type 81 which was an upgraded SKS (which had far superior intrinsic accuracy than the AK) that came with a pistol grip, detachable box magazine and, strangely enough, an adjustable sleeve on the gas tube that was only found on the FN/FAL line of battle rifles.
During that period, Norinco also made many copies of American and Western weapons like the M1911, Uzis and the M1As along with their COMBLOC designs like the various AK and SKS configurations as well as their own copies of the Takarev and Makarov handguns. They even made an AK variant in 5.56 so we could feed them with domestically made ammo since all 7.62×39 had to be imported back then and availability was still uncommon.
All of those were hot selling items here in the U.S. and most of them enjoyed a positive reputation except the M1As which had problems with the heat treatment on the forged receivers. We later had the same problems of fragility with the American made Springfield Armory M1As which switched to investment cast receivers as a cost saving measure.
But the Rolls Royce of Chinese imports was the Polytech Legend Series of Kalashnikovs which sold for around $500. back in the ’80s and has quadrupled in value now.
Too bad George Bush Sr. banned the import of Chinese weapons back before I was old enough to buy or own them.
You mean jews, dolt…Not Yanks although they are a problem. Just look what they did to the South a War the Yank filthy instigated to begin with…
Will Chinese weapons work in a real war? Of course, as pointed out here, it would be folly to bet against them but who knows. Certainly if China ever enters a large-scale hot war against a peer enemy, there will be many initial glitches and mistakes and failures to integrate the systems – there always are (remember the initial days of the US army in WWI and WWII). It’s how fast they adapt that matters.
It’s also worth noting that countries with long military experience have an edge that lasts long after their nominal power has faded, due to institutional intelligence. Britain is now a third rate military power aspiring to be second rate, but the skill of the British leadership at using their existing assets should not be underestimated. A lot of the nasty tricks the Ukrainians have played on the Russians in Ukraine seem to have been run by the Brits.
But I do point out that as the United States de-industrialized under the false mantra of ‘free trade’ (look up the “American System (economic plan)” on Wikipedia), we didn’t just lose the ability to mass produce most consumer level goods – we lost supply chains and research and design expertise. Do we really think that high-tech military products can exist in a vacuum? Couple this with the absolutely disgusting new economic mantra that “greed is good” and the consolidation of defense contractors, and the institutionalization of cronyism and corruption, sooner or later the United States may not be able to make much of anything military at all, no matter how many trillions of dollars we spend.
I seem to recall reading that Americans chuckled at the notion of German and Japanese weapons being anything to worry about pre-WWII.
On the eve of WW2, France had the most powerful military on paper. Both France and Great Britain also had way more experience and were purportedly more battle hardened from their decades of colonial bush wars than Germany’s “untried” military which, itself, had to learn from their early setbacks in Poland.
In turn, the USSR was vastly underestimated by Hitler due to both Russia’s loss to Japan at the turn of the 20th Century as well as the horrific casualties the Red Army incurred in the Russo-Finnish War.
As a SF veteran of our recent Afghan War turned armed conflict analyst – Bill Buppert of Chasing Ghosts: An Irregular Warfare Podcast and War Notes fame – is so fond of reminding us; the least incompetent side usually prevails.
As the Russo-Ukraine War continues to demonstrate, we are entering into plenty of unknown territory as new forms of Space Based and AI driven ISR, EW, and the proliferation of Drones, Hypersonics, and Ballistic missiles have entirely changed the face of high intensity, conventional warfare.
I see plenty of overconfidence and bravado from the leadership of both ZOG and the CCP. If direct conflict breaks out, both sides will initially make costly mistakes and miscalculations. The side that can learn from their mistakes and adapt to the new realities the fastest will determine the outcome.
At present, China possesses superior logistical capabilities along with more defined strategic vision and operational goals.
China is confident but not in my opinion overconfident. If the US attacked China, I am sure that China would win. Not only because the US's war games show that China would win; I've other reasons to think so, which I won't go into now.A US that sees defeat impending might be suicidal enough to launch its nukes. Thus the prevention of World War III is China's top priority. I still believe that that was the main purpose of last month's parade: deterrence against the US, not because the Chinese feel weak but because they emphatically do not want to risk the end of the world.
I see plenty of overconfidence and bravado from the leadership of both ZOG and the CCP.
There will be mistakes, undoubtedly. However, China's advantages are such that it can afford to make mistakes and still win. Not so much the US, which at the start of an attack on China would already be extended over half the world -- and that in itself would probably be a fatal mistake.Replies: @FTB
If direct conflict breaks out, both sides will initially make costly mistakes and miscalculations. The side that can learn from their mistakes and adapt to the new realities the fastest will determine the outcome.
Between Trumps promised campaign against the cartels, his deployment of troops and federal law enforcement to cities in an active stage of insurrection – the only two legitimate missions for our military – exacerbated with the rumors of war with Venezuela and Iran, and NATO edging closer to direct conflict with Russia, I reckon we’ll be hit with both catastrophic military setbacks abroad and economic collapse at home. So who the hell knows if the much anticipated main event of a Sino-Pax Americana showdown will even happen?
https://imetatronink.substack.com/p/iacta-alea-est
The Sino-Russian Dragonbear alliance has solidified the foundations of the rapidly emerging multipolar reorganization of world power.
While the perpetual fence-straddlers in India and Turkey (and other lesser Asian powers) dance the vacillation jig they know so well, the formidable rising powers in North Korea and Iran have cast their lot where they must in order to survive.
This then is the order of battle.
The only question is WHO, WHERE, and WHEN.
Many in the US power structure concur with the British and the withering empty shell of western Europe: the Russians are the enemy that must be destroyed first, and then chopped into pieces for the “civilized world” to consume at its leisure.
Others remain convinced the Chinese are, far and away, the greatest threat to American hegemony and the “rules-based international order”. Sina delenda est!
Yet others, the advocates of “Greater Israel” among them, are determined to make Iran the chosen war, the prize of which would be dominant control over Persian Gulf energy production and exports.
There is a cold, hard logic to the latter option, because if Iran can be neutralized as the third-leg in the Eurasian trade and currency bloc, Chinese access to Persian Gulf energy can be severed, along with Russian access to the Indian Ocean via the International North-South Transport Corridor.
A common mistake in the West at present.
The Sino-Russian Dragonbear alliance has solidified the foundations of the rapidly emerging multipolar reorganization of world power.
China has had destructive trade policies against the US since the beginning of the current relationship after Nixon.
Completely untrue.
China didn’t enter the WTO until 1999.
Nixon’s visit to China in 1972 was to capitalize on the Sino-Soviet schism after the 1969 border clashes to use China to divert the Red Army’s attention away from the Fulda Gap which would have been the opening salvo of WW3 between the Soviets/Warsaw Pact and U.S./NATO.
To the extent that the U.S. wanted any economic ties with China, it couldn’t have happened under Mao and their economic reforms didn’t even happen until Mao’s successor, Deng Xiao Ping, took power and started privatizing sectors of their economy in the 1980s.
This has been well understood by everyone for fifty years.
100% false.
In the 1970s and 1980s, the electronics and automobiles industry were offshored to Japan. Old brands like Sanyo, Sony, Toshiba, Datsun, Isuzu etc. that were staples on American store shelves and auto showrooms – were all made in Japan.
There were also substantial products made in Taiwan, Hong Kong and Mexico during that era.
As I posted above, by the late 1980s, Japan’s growing economic parity with us also sparked rumors of unfair trade practices on the part of Japan and even talk of imminent armed conflict.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Coming_War_with_Japan
From the link:
Friedman and LeBard argue in the book that, with the USSR in a state of collapse and with the Cold War coming to a close at the time, the United States was more likely to come into conflict with Japan as the US no longer had sufficient reason to tolerate what the authors believed to be Japanese economic encroachment. Friedman and LeBard predicted that a series of trade wars between the US and Japan would lead to a final rupture between the two countries.[7] The authors also expressed the view that, as with Imperial Japan in the 1930s and 1940s, Japan would seek to take control of sources of raw materials and force the US out of the western Pacific.[4][8] The authors saw the only alternative to a hot war between the US and Japan as being a “long, miserable cold war”.[9]
The authors also made predictions about Europe, predicting that by 1992 European integration would lead to the US being “pushed out of” markets in Europe and the USSR.[10] Friedman and LeBard further predicted that this would lead to isolationism and “Japan-bashing” being adopted by candidates in the 1992 US presidential elections, leading to a drive to exclude Japanese imports from the US market.[11]
Friedman and LeBard believed that the Japanese armed forces could be expanded rapidly into “a world-class military force”. They also considered that Article 9 of the Japanese Constitution was only a “legal fiction” and would not prevent Japanese rearmament or aggression.[12] To meet this perceived threat, Friedman and LeBard proposed that the US Navy be kept at its 1991 size, and the US Marine Corps be doubled in size, with this being paid for by cuts to the US Army and strategic forces.[13]
Friedman and LeBard expected that a conflict between Japan and America would unfold within “a generation” and that the world would “settle into a new cold war before a hot war threatens”.[14][13] They predicted that the casus belli would be the shutting off of supplies of raw materials to Japan by US action.[12] A map accompanying the book portrayed the Asia-Pacific region as being divided into US and Japanese spheres of influence by the year 2000, with Indonesia, North Korea, Malaysia, Thailand, and Burma portrayed as Japanese allies, whilst Taiwan, Australia, Singapore, and South Korea were portrayed as being in the US sphere of influence, with other territories (including China, Vietnam, Mongolia, the Philippines, Laos, and Cambodia) being marked as “contested”.[15]
The original book jacket of the book stated that “conflict will escalate in the next two decades to include the possibility—indeed probability—of an armed conflict, a second US–Japanese war in the Pacific”.[16] Later editions replaced this statement with positive reviews.[17]
Same kind of alarmist bullshit being pushed these days to justify continued wasteful spending on the Military Industrial Complex State. Same shit, different century.
lets hope a bunch of antifa commies get mowed down in these commie cities like portland, chicago etc
This is really rich.
This is all really tiresome. Hua Bin is a loud-mouthed braggart.
We are not complaining about a single writer who praises another country.You guys are like toddlers who get all jealous because mommy picks up and kisses little Kimmy instead of you.
For crying out loud, what motivates you people? What the fuck is wrong with you? You are thin-skinned assholes who adopt a threatening posture because of some long-ago wounded pride.
The USA has been framing China as enemy far longer than China has reacted.Remember that
Your words, not ours.
The USA has been framing China as enemy far longer than China has reacted.
Remember that
1. USA changed its focus in its “Pivot to Asia” in 2011 designed to strangle China’s trade routes.
2. The actual Trade War started under Trump 1.0 back in 2018
3. The ban on Huawei started in 2019
4. etc etc.
To be fair, the U.S. has been framing and treating Russia as an enemy even longer.
Since the USSR collapsed, the Western Powers have installed pliant puppets, marginalized and isolated it economically from the West, stirred up troubles in Armenia, Chechnya, Georgia, etc. all in a bid to fracture the Russian Federation into perpetual warring factions and plunder it’s vast natural resources.
Yes, the West attempted the same thing in China. Especially, during the War Lord era of the 1920s.
But in the case of Russia, this hostility is even more egregious since Russia has extended the hand of friendship even before we became a nation. During our Revolutionary War, the British had expressed interest in hiring Russian mercenaries but Tsarina Catherine the Great rebuffed their offer and chose to remain neutral.
Seven decades later when the War Between the States broke out, Britain and France offered support to the secessionist CSA while Russia supported the Union to deter any serious intervention on the part of the Atlanticists.
Fast forward to the final months of WW2 when the Soviets declared war on Japan, many American Generals, including MacArthur, breathed a sigh of relief and admitted that the Red Army’s entry had sparred us over a possible million casualties had we been forced to invade Japan’s main islands.
Of course, that was before any of them knew about the impending atomic bombings.
Even so, in the months after Japan’s surrender, elements within the US Executive Branch were already scheming to launch an eventual atomic nuclear attack on all major populations of the USSR in an attempt to eliminate them as a potential rival power.
Yes, these days, the ruling cabal aspires to bring about the collapse of China and cause it to be dismembered as they had done to numerous other countries within the last 80 years. Blackwater’s Founder Erik Prince and global financier Erik Bethel even admitted as much in a recent interview with Shaw Ryan.

But my main point being that if it wasn’t China, it would have been some other rising power being painted as a threat or boogyeman du jure if it threatened to reach parity or overtake us.
Case in point. When Japan’s economy was rising and threatening to reach economic parity with us in the. 1980s, there were plenty of fearmongering among the Bankers calling for war with Japan under the guise of speculative analysis.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Coming_War_with_Japan
The only reason there has been so much attention focused on creating an enemy out of China is because Washington has squandered it’s Unipolar moment of being the world’s sole superpower by exporting color revolutions, coups, civil wars, and engaging in nonstop expeditionary military wars aboard to enrich the Bankers.
Three decades later, the pedophile, greedy war pigs in D.C. are confronted with both China and Russia returning to their traditional status as great civilization states on the world stage. At a time when the aggressive foreign policy of the rogue state in D.C. has made up the most hated nation in the world.
See this column from 2013.
https://www.lewrockwell.com/2013/03/fred-reed/the-view-from-abroad/
This rabid warmongering is not only a sign of panic in Washington of becoming increasingly irrelevant in world affairs but they are also scared shitless of becoming increasingly hated by the American populace who are reminded every day that this government does not represent them or their interests. And, in fact, is openly hostile to us.
Just peruse YouTube and see how many voices on the right are not buying the official story about Charlie Kirk’s killing.

Or the anger expressed by the younger generations of right wingers over the Zionist occupation of all our public and private institutions.

In that respect, they also have much in common with an older generation of saner voices who realize that Russia, China, Iran, Venezuela, North Korea, etc. are only our “enemies” because the powers that be have decreed it so.

Gaddafi’s speech probably was the greatest ever at the UN. It’s worth listening to today.
Just as many domestic analysts are woefully ill informed about the nuanced and below the surface level inner workings, along with huge gaps in their historical knowledge, of Russia, China and other foreign nations – their opinions formed by a mixture of caricatures, and both domestic and foreign propaganda organs – I’d venture to guess that content creators from China ( Hua Bin) and Russia (Simplicius 76) are equally ignorant when posting SITRREPs on FUSA.
In short, the world witnessed a lousy performance of a narcissistic, petty, shameless, and deranged former reality show celebrity and tyrant-wannabe.
Almost everyone who has occupied the office of POTUS has been a figurehead since, going back to Nixon. That’s been the case since the plot was hatched at Jekyll Island in 1913 and has accelerated with the assassination of JFK.
If every word of this is absolutely true … I could not care less.
The problems in the US have nothing to do with China, Russia, or any other country. They are all internal problems of the US and the West in general.
Hua, you might find this book interesting:
Greatness and Ruin: Self-Reflection and Universalism within European Civilization Paperback – March 28, 2025 by Ricardo Duchesne (Author)
This is from an essay posted here on the Unz Review by Duchesne a year or so ago.
The liberal West, the most accomplished civilization in history, the progenitor of all the disciplinary fields of knowledge, including the greatest musicians, painters, furniture designers, writers of children’s books, mathematicians, philosophers, is now decomposing before our eyes. It is not that societies in the past did not have huge problems of their own, starting with generalized poverty, endemic violence, mass illiteracy and few opportunities for individual expression. It is not that the modern liberalism has been a failure from its inception. To the contrary: it has been responsible for rule of law, freedom of the press, open scientific inquiry, equality of civic rights, relatively peaceful resolution of political conflict, and sustained capitalist growth characterized by the efficient allocation of scarce resources and satisfaction of consumer choice. What makes the internal decay of liberalism substantially different from prior civilizational declines is that it is a product of the progressive actualization of its moral ideals in recent decades, the removal of every obstacle or traditional norm standing in the way of the actualization of equal freedom, the promotion of cultural and racial pluralism via mass immigration, and the deconstruction of biological identities for the sake of unmitigated sexual and racial expressionism.
The result has been the creation of a contemporary Western world characterized by: i) permanent racial discord coupled with relentless anti-white campaigns in schools and media; ii) collapse of the institution of marriage along with the demonization of maleness and the celebration of transsexualism and child grooming; iii) high levels of inequality since the 1970s/80s despite massive growth in government spending; iv) decline of trust and community cohesion, isolation and anomie across society; v) erasure of the history of the liberal West itself, its heroes and its symbols; vi) a state of complete paralysis in the face of the arrival of millions of violent migrants enticed by the principles of equal rights; and vii) suppression of open “Enlightenment” discourse in our universities and media to hide the reality that liberalism has failed for these reasons, and that there is indeed ample scientific evidence refuting its fundamental premise that all human beings are born naturally equal and that diversity ensures civil peace.
The West has no choice but to find an alternative ideology. I believe it has to be some form of traditionalism, as Dugin has been arguing, a “fourth theory” beyond fascism, communism, and liberalism. It is called a “fourth theory” for it does not advocate specific principles and policies for mankind as such, but calls upon different cultures/civilizations in the world to find within themselves their own alternative paths to modernity. In the case of the West, transcending liberalism will be an immensely difficult task, however; for this ideology is epigenetically rooted in the psychology of whites, currently ensconced in every institution, advocated by almost every intellectual, and supported by global liberal capitalism. But a solution must be found or Europeans will perish as a world historical people.
While I'm not eager to play the game of defining labels, it must be said that liberalism in its original sense was coined to counter the claim of kings and monarchs that some people are born "royal" - i.e. better than thou - with privileges and titles extending to all their relatives, which of course is an entirely a nutty idea that nonetheless still prevails in Blighty and other backward places, as we saw over the weekend.
"... ample scientific evidence refuting its fundamental premise that all human beings are born naturally equal and that diversity ensures civil peace."
Remember when Reagan was shot by a guy who was in love with Jody Foster? Can you imagine if there were calls to give the government huge new spying, censorship, and policing powers to crack down on people in love with Jody Foster?
John Hinckley Jr.’s family supposedly had ties to the Bushes. Media at the time claimed he used .22 rimfire ammo with so called “devastator” bullets. That was complete bullshit as was that fucktard on CNN who stated the Mauser .30-06 used to kill Kirk could be broken down into compact components with a screwdriver in less than a second which can then be whisked away from the crime scene in a back pack.
Sadly, most imbeciles who watch CNN don’t know shit about guns and the majority of the populace is incapable of clear thinking which is why we’re being fed a steady diet of bullshit by the TPTB.
Then again, most people either don’t know or don’t care that everything we see on electronic medium is fake and gay AF.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Hinckley_Jr.
I mean, she looked great in Taxi Driver.
We are all Travis Bickle.
“Clearly, Charlie was a person, every person’s life has meaning, and no one should be killing people. But this issue of people being murdered is not new. Assuming the Gaza genocide isn’t making an impression because it’s far away and it’s brown people, then what about the constant school shootings, the endless random black murders? People are being murdered all over the place, and the explanations, if one is given at all, tend to be completely meaningless.”
99.9% of dead people will not be remembered 6 months after their death by anyone who wasn’t a family member or a close friend.
This is why the Hamas held hostages don’t matter and should be considered dead and gone, a sacrifice for the good of Israel.
And Andy, YOU are not innocent in the whole scheme of responsibility for murders across of our society. Your role as a constant agent-provocateur is a significant contributor to these problems.
Well, maybe the assassins aimed for the head or the breast, but missed?
Could have been either. Assuming the killer had properly zeroed his sights and accurately estimated the distance:
1) he could have pulled the shot low while aiming for the head
2) or failed to take into account the deviation between line of sight distance and compensating for actual distance (horizontal component distance) which would have resulted in the impact going high if shooting from an elevated firing position.
Yes, but his dad knew everyone was looking for him and it would look bad to run, and dangerous. He got him a lawyer, turned him in, an he's not talking to the cops or cooperating. The weak evidence mentioned by the media is being proven false by YouTubers. Mormons are smart so a jury conviction is unlikely. It's time for a Charlie Kirk supporter to shoot him in a parking garage when he goes to court, or maybe suicide. Case closed!Replies: @Lackadaisical Reader, @Getaclue, @FTB
Wouldn’t he mention that [he didn't shoot] to his dad?
It’s time for a Charlie Kirk supporter to shoot him in a parking garage when he goes to court, or maybe suicide.
Yup. More predictive programming to unfold.
He spent a minute to disassemble it while on the roof and put it in a case,
If it was the Mauser Bolt Gun shown by the Propaganda Organs, he’d need a helluva lot more time than a few minutes. Even if he had the tools to separate the receiver from the stock, removing the barrel from receiver itself is a long and involved process.
And it was a difficult shot!
Not at all. Even with a .45ACP fired from a 1911 pistol, I am able to hit man sized targets out to 150 yards when shooting from Rollover Prone.
The report of the gun shot arrived a second – at most – after the bullet struck Kirk which indicates the shooter was probably less than 200 yards away. Which any shooter who has a firm grasp of the integrated act of firing a rifle from a staged and static firing position can pull off.
My trouble with the official story (pick any of the ones being peddled) is if it was a .30-06 fired from ~200 yards or closer, there should have been an exit wound. Even if a frangible round like the 130GR Glaser Safety Slug was used, the impact would have resulted in way more damage.
You’re full of crap and just trying to push the ZOG tranny narrative.
“The screwdriver explains how he broke down the rifle.”
You apparently don’t have any gunsmithing experience. Now try explaining how to dismantle and assemble the weapon while fleeing the scene.
Jewish John’s Johnson (JJJ) writes (in relation to the words of wisdom from a Living Treasure – scroll up and watch the entirety of the video in comment # 232):
Galloway is too late to the party.
Galloway is going to embarrass himself again but he is shameless anyways so nothing new.
Only the most malignant of malignant Jews have a bad word to say about George Galloway.
He’s been right on ALL the substantive issues over the last two decades or more*.
(*Come to think of it, I can’t think of even a minor issue that he’s gotten wrong).
OK then JJJ, since you’re making the assertion that Galloway is ‘shameless’ (by implication claiming he’s less than reliable), it’s incumbent on you to furnish the evidence to back up your smears of this great man.
We’re all waiting. If you can’t, it will be yet further proof that you are the Number One mendacious Jewish troll in this webzine**.
(** That’s a big claim that I’ve made to be sure – in view of the hordes of Jewish sayan/disinfo peddlers that pollute this venue).
But, if you scroll through JJJ’s commentary archive over recent years (be that concerned with the Covid Psyop, the Ukraine proxy war or whatever), you’ll be assaulted with the most egregious bald faced lies. The man just can’t help himself.
He exudes deceit, dishonesty and duplicity from every pore of his body.
UR readers, I urge you to take some time out occasionally to mercilessly attack this rabid Jewish dog as I do.
Think of it as doing your Good Deed for the Day (like the Boy Scouts do).
“If you haven’t done anything wrong, then what’s there to worry about?” one posed to me.
Necessity is the plea for every infringement of human freedom. It is the argument of tyrants; it is the creed of slaves. ~ William Pitt
Seeing how easily the populace was cowed into submission in the aftermath of the 911 Mossad False Flag when all those cuckservative fags were voicing their support everything from an increase in the already onerous surveillance state to the internal passport system implemented with that TSA to the creation of monstrosities like DHS, reckon I should have jettisoned any remaining faith I had in humanity long ago.
Saw a repeat of that mass formation psychosis in action when all those room temperature IQ, face diaper wearing retards were lining up their their clot shots during the scamdemic.
I’m onboard with Anglin. Humanity should be killed in a sweeping apocalypse. I just want to stick around long enough to piss on the world’s grave.
I gotta admit. That does look like a bladder of blood neath his shirt and the way it leaks out is, shall we say, alarmingly unnatural.
But I know nothing. Any video could be doctored and I would have no way of disentangling what is real from what isn’t.
This is actually why I despair. With the advent of electronic media, storage, recall and editing, there are no constraints. Anything is possible and one of Orwell’s most famous quotes rings true.
The way in which I became the Thanksgiving Uncle to my in-laws was when, after dinner while sitting around the table, I brought up the subject of mass data collection, storage and processing and the ease with which the messaging could be massaged. Frowns, intense stares through me. I had touched upon a taboo subject.
“If you haven’t done anything wrong, then what’s there to worry about?” one posed to me.
“Umm, well that’s a little bit beside the point” was as far as I got before one told me to just stop talking.
I was the lone Protestant sitting amidst a still-fervently-believing Catholic clan.
I guess there’s something to the notion of a Catholic character that accepts its truth upon Authority—and I sure as Hell wasn’t that Authority, as they firmly reminded me, putting me in my place.
“Well, Okaay then. What’s for dessert?”
Necessity is the plea for every infringement of human freedom. It is the argument of tyrants; it is the creed of slaves. ~ William PittSeeing how easily the populace was cowed into submission in the aftermath of the 911 Mossad False Flag when all those cuckservative fags were voicing their support everything from an increase in the already onerous surveillance state to the internal passport system implemented with that TSA to the creation of monstrosities like DHS, reckon I should have jettisoned any remaining faith I had in humanity long ago.Saw a repeat of that mass formation psychosis in action when all those room temperature IQ, face diaper wearing retards were lining up their their clot shots during the scamdemic.I'm onboard with Anglin. Humanity should be killed in a sweeping apocalypse. I just want to stick around long enough to piss on the world's grave.https://www.bitchute.com/video/xrlPmJBcXK0P
“If you haven’t done anything wrong, then what’s there to worry about?” one posed to me.
Anglin also highlighted another Kirk clip in which the conservative activist ridiculed the academic dogma that there are 47 different genders while strongly affirming his own support for ordinary transgenderism, saying that men had the right to declare themselves women and vice-versa.
The drooling masses are fucking hopeless.
Do modern “conservatives” believe that conservatism began with Trump?
I mean even with the Boomers, many of them were raised in a time of a relatively trad mainstream culture if PSA such as these were the norm.
The truth is sanitation workers have done more to save lives than than any of the quacks in Big Pharma.
After seeing the legions of Doctors who were culpable in the Covid fraud and the proliferation of this tranny bullshit, as with politicians, NGOs, journalists, bankers and far left activists, huge numbers of those in the so called medical industry should be killed outright.
Rubio (secretary of state and NSA whose brain never fathered an original idea)
He appears to be competing with Blinken as to how many consecutive fuck ups he can blunder into on the world stage.
As the various Sunni and Shiite actors who are normally at each other’s throats are now ostensibly united by Israel’s attack on Hamas’ negotiators in Qatar which appears to be another assassination set up by the U.S., Rubio steps into another pile of steaming heeb shit.
https://larrycjohnson.substack.com/p/an-emergency-arab-islamic-summit
Secretary of State Marco Rubio made a huge amateur mistake today by visiting Israel as this summit was underway. Following the summit, Israel reportedly has launched a massive attack on Gaza City. The participants at this summit will likely interpret this as Donald Trump giving Israel permission to expand its campaign of genocide. It will reinforce the view of the members of the Arab-Islamic that Trump is weak and totally under the control of Bibi Netanyahu. Regardless of his intent, Rubio will be viewed as the guy who delivered Trump’s message to launch the offensive in Gaza City. Perception is reality, regardless of the actual facts.
As if ~ 50 million illegals still in need of deportation, an impending hot war with the Cartels and Venezuela a hair trigger away…….when drama cracks off again as Israel makes a move on Iran, Trump’s handlers are going write checks to Tel Aviv that our asses can’t cash.
In other news, NATO is about to be cooked now that it appears they exhausted Russia’s patience.
https://voxday.net/2025/09/15/nato-is-at-war-with-russia/
“NATO is at war with Russia”
No doubt this official observation will spark all sorts of denials from the various neocons and Eurocrats. And none of them will matter, because in the end, the only opinion that matters is Russia’s.
For the very first time, the official spokesman for the Kremlin in Moscow, Dmitry Peskov has said publicly “NATO is at war with Russia.” This statement is a harbinger of dramatic and horrifying developments soon to come.
It is vital to point out that for three and a half years, Peskov has NOT said this. The fact that he uttered these words over this past weekend, is no accident.
Peskov is the official Spokesman for the Kremlin. He says exactly, precisely, what the Russian government wants said. He doesn’t embellish. He doesn’t take liberties with what he says. Never once in history has the Kremlin had to “walk-back” anything Peskov has said. The words that come out of his mouth are exactly, precisely what the Russian government intends to express.
The fact that the Russian government is now openly saying “NATO is at war with Russia” holds all the severe implications any rational person would think, could stem from such a statement.
And in truth, this is nothing more than a statement of the obvious. NATO is, and has been, at war with Russia since at least mid-2023. Russia’s patience in simply absorbing the economic and military attacks has been tremendous. But now that NATO’s proxy has been defeated, NATO isn’t doing what it should be doing and laying down its weapons, instead, it is doubling down and making preparations to fight Russia directly.
Russia, it is now clear, will behave accordingly. And it is very unlikely that more than a few of the current European regimes are going to survive the experience, however tangential it might prove to be.
And the European leaders know NATO is responsible for starting the NATO-Russian war. They’ve even admitted as much.
French President Emmanuel Macron has privately admitted that NATO is the driving force behind the Ukraine conflict, prominent American economist Jeffrey Sachs has said. Macron, along with other Western leaders, has repeatedly claimed that Russia launched its military operation against Ukraine in 2022 without provocation and has insisted that Moscow is solely responsible for the conflict.
However, speaking during a foreign policy debate with the Italian daily il Fatto Quotidiano, Sachs recalled that when Macron awarded him the Legion of Honor in May 2022, the French leader privately told him “exactly the opposite of what he says publicly” and admitted that “NATO was causing this war.”
Rittenhouse shot three Jews that you call antifa.
So, you have sharp divisions in Taiwan between K.M,T. arrivistes, Japan supporters (I suppose mainly dying off now), and weird ‘we can’t say it, but we want to’, independence-minded ultra-liberals, LGBTQblah rainbow flags etc.
That reminds me of Wen Liu. This ugly dyke creature who is involved with Zero Day Attack; Taiwan’s speculative fiction of how they foresee a Chinese “invasion” of Taiwan playing out. Basically, a modern day DPP version of Red Dawn.

I seriously wonder how other conservative Americans would think of fighting a mutually destructive war, one which many military and geopolitical analysts such as Col. Macgregor, thinks will end in defeat for us, if they knew they were fighting for a bunch of woke faggots, feminists and their odious cohorts which spawned from the same cesspool as the ones who begat all the trannie mass shooters that have been making headlines worldwide recently.
A friend of mine, an expat American who owned a gym on Taiwan, got cancelled some years back because many fags had turned gyms into spots for random pick up spots and he had taken a stance against such ghastly practices at his gym since he wanted children to be bale to train there without being subjected to such obscenities.
Him and his family received multiple death threats and his gym was subjected to scathing reviews. Much of it organized by other Western expats who were part of the LGBT coven.
When eventual reunification occurs, I hope the KMT will overturn Taiwan’s same sex marriage laws and begin incarcerating all LGBT cretins for being sex offenders.
He physically turned himself in.
[…]
You really need a rational explanation for why a killer wouldn’t cooperate with the authorities?
Yes, there really needs to be a rational explanation for why someone who decided to cooperate with the authorities also decided not to cooperate with the authorities.
“I’m turning myself in and plea not guilty”. Nobody does that.
Jew Jewson has proven that he is a retard. Now that case is closed.
Why not? If he's wanted with a mug shot and a bounty on his head? I'd rather turn myself in to the police than get shot while trying to escape, be it by a trigger-happy cop or a crazy MAGA redneck.Replies: @John Johnson, @Anonymous534
“I’m turning myself in and plea not guilty”. Nobody does that.
https://voxday.net/2025/09/13/never-take-the-ticket/
Never Take the Ticket
It would appear that Charlie Kirk’s conscience was belatedly catching up to him. But developing a conscience has consequences for any ticket taker.
A Trump insider and longtime friend of Charlie Kirk tells The Grayzone how the assassinated conservative leader’s turning point on Israeli influence provoked a private backlash from Netanyahu’s allies that left him angry and afraid.
Charlie Kirk rejected an offer earlier this year from Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to arrange a massive new infusion of Zionist money into his Turning Point USA (TPUSA) organization, America’s largest conservative youth association, according to a longtime friend of the slain commentator speaking on the condition of anonymity. The source told The Grayzone that the late pro-Trump influencer believed Netanyahu was trying to cow him into silence as he began to publicly question Israel’s overwhelming influence in Washington and demanded more space to criticize it.
In the weeks leading up to his September 10 assassination, Kirk had come to loathe the Israeli leader, regarding him as a “bully,” the source said. Kirk was disgusted by what he witnessed inside the Trump administration, where Netanyahu sought to personally dictate the president’s personnel decisions, and weaponized Israeli assets like billionaire donor Miriam Adelson to keep the White House firmly under its thumb.
According to Kirk’s friend, who also enjoyed access to President Donald Trump and his inner circle, Kirk strongly warned Trump last June against bombing Iran on Israel’s behalf. “Charlie was the only person who did that,” they said, recalling how Trump “barked at him” in response and angrily shut down the conversation. The source believes the incident confirmed in Kirk’s mind that the president of the United States had fallen under the control of a malign foreign power, and was leading his own country into a series of disastrous conflicts.
By the following month, Kirk had become the target of a sustained private campaign of intimidation and free-floating fury by wealthy and powerful allies of Netanyahu – figures he described in an interview as Jewish “leaders” and “stakeholders.”
“He was afraid of them,” the source emphasized.
Kirk was 18 years old when he launched TPUSA in 2012. From its inception, his career was propelled by Zionist donors, who showered his young organization with money through neoconservative outfits like the David Horowitz Freedom Center. He repaid his wealthy backers over the years by unleashing a relentless firehose of anti-Palestinian and Islamophobic diatribes, accepting propaganda trips to Israel, and sternly shutting down nationalist forces challenging his support for Israel during TPUSA event…
Kirk was bombarded with infuriated text messages and phone calls from Netanyahu’s wealthy allies in the US, including many who had funded TPUSA. According to his longtime friend, the Zionist donors treated Kirk with outright contempt, essentially ordering him to fall back into line.
Once you sell your soul, you can’t really expect the Devil to simply give it back to you upon request. The one expectation of the purchased man is that he will stay bought. That’s why it’s better to simply live in the knowledge that you’ll never have the material success that the Prince of This World offers the untalented and the insufficiently self-confident. Not all “successful” people are ticket takers, but others much more informed on the subject than I am estimate that 90 percent of them are.
That history of hatred only started decades after Japan fully modernized by the late 19th Century.
I was but dimly aware—having read of it years ago—of the hatred between them.
👆🏻That there is some serious projecting by the Zio-Anglo-American zero sum game mindset.
I believe the quote I read in the 1980’s was something to the effect of…
“If the Asian countries ever unite, then we in the West are doomed. Thank goodness, they hate each other more than they do us.”
Naturally, as King of the West, I would do everything in my power to stoke that hatred and sow dissension. I would spread disinformation and secretly arm one or more parties.
Pretty good summation…. The only thing to add about ties is to note that much of Japanese society was based on things Japan learned from Tang Dynasty China. Of course since Japan leaned west starting in the Meiji period – that part of history is taken out. Shinto is indigenous to Japan – but much else about Japan were things learned from China. That includes tea ceremonies – Zen – architecture – writing – various martial arts – agriculture techniques (even bonsai trees). it’s spun now that those were all things Japan came up with on their own. You know because Chinese were always “backwards” so Japan needed to modernize it — in their spin
I guess he should have watched the old movie ‘Network’ as a cautionary tale as to what he could expect before signing on with them.
Too late for him but for those among the living who reserve the right to become more red pilled……
The assassination of Charlie Kirk struck a nerve on the American right because so many of us have had to fight our way past screaming, spitting, frothing mobs of Antifa protesters just to attend a Trump rally.
After Kirk was killed, we saw videos of these same Antifa protesters gleefully celebrating. We realized that they would just as gladly kill any one of us.
To them, we are guilty of unforgivable thought crimes – “racism”, “sexism”, “homophobia”, and above all else the unforgivable sin “antisemitism”.
Because of our wrong thoughts, we are all condemned to death in the minds of Antifa activists.
Charlie Kirk’s intellect or lack thereof is not the issue. His China policy is certainly not the issue. The issue is, we share a country with cowardly sadists who want us dead.
We need to name the source of such mindless lunacy. It's Jewish Power that put forth the false dichotomy of 'progressive' vs 'nazi'... even though this is blowing up in their faces cuz people are noticing that the Zionists are most Nazi-like.
The assassination of Charlie Kirk struck a nerve on the American right because so many of us have had to fight our way past screaming, spitting, frothing mobs of Antifa protesters just to attend a Trump rally.
Appears the government and the bullshit media are in cahoots once again.

nine inch nails or nothing.
Concur with that sentiment.

I was but dimly aware—having read of it years ago—of the hatred between them.
That history of hatred only started decades after Japan fully modernized by the late 19th Century.
Before that, aside from about a half dozen wars over the course of ~1,400 years and some pirate raids by Chinese/Korean/Japanese corsair fleets based out of Japan, the relationship between the two were fairly cordial.
At least from what’s out there in the interwebs.

The Chinese commenters here can elaborate further, if they care to.
I believe the quote I read in the 1980’s was something to the effect of…
“If the Asian countries ever unite, then we in the West are doomed. Thank goodness, they hate each other more than they do us.”
Naturally, as King of the West, I would do everything in my power to stoke that hatred and sow dissension. I would spread disinformation and secretly arm one or more parties.
👆🏻That there is some serious projecting by the Zio-Anglo-American zero sum game mindset.
Much like how much of the West was always terrified of good relations between a top tier European power like Germany having mutually beneficial relations with a titanic land power with vast and untapped natural resources like Russia. That pathological fear continues to this day as evidenced by the CIA/MI6s sabotage of the NordStream 2 pipeline.
Reading some of the publications from the 20th Century to the more recent writings, a unified East Asian bloc was always less concerning than a Russian-Chinese-Indian alliance.
Unfortunately, for the more rabid modern Western geopolitical planners who hijacked our once Constitutional Republic and metastasized it into being a hammer for their global empire, the formation of the Russian-Chinese led BRICS has become their worst nightmare come to life.


It’s analogous to a historical timeline as if the old Tang Dynasty had direct ties with the Constantinople since Russia is theByzantine Empire Version 2.0 while modern China appears to be going through another one of their Golden Age cycles that occur there every four hundred years, or so.
Ironic since our Founders would likely have been among the ones proposing the very notion of BRICS.
Peace, commerce, and honest friendship with all nations…entangling alliances with none ~Thomas Jefferson
Well UR readers, that just about sums up this apologist for Jewish depravity.
Lone shooter is the more likely answer.
Agree that Jew Jewstein is a Hasbara shill and a lying cadaver felcher who’s only here to troll and distract.
That sewer crawling, child sacrificing rodent openly professes his disdain for Anglin yet squanders endless hours with his trolling in the form of gaslighting and misdirection on AA’s columns.
Hopefully, with all the losses the IOF has been suffering, JJ will get recalled back to Occupied Palestine and we’ll see footage of him getting blasted to pieces by Hamas in Gaza.
Surely you’re not referring to the piece of choreographed theatre in Butler PA from July 2024?
Trump nearly had his head taken off with an AR and we just had a tranny shooter with one.
Jewish John’s Johnson (JJJ) writes (in relation to the obviously staged fake assassination attempt on the Orange baboon in July 2024 in Butler PA):
Lone shooter is the more likely answer.
Well UR readers, that just about sums up this apologist for Jewish depravity.
According to JJJ, a lone gunman:
1) Killed JFK/RFK/JFK Jr
2) Orchestrated the 9/11 False Flag
3) Perpetrated the attack on the USS Liberty
4) Foisted the Covid Psyop on humanity
In a nutshell, any explanation that DEFLECTS attention away from the actual Talmudic miscreants.
You see, from the day he was born, and continually drummed into his ringlet-hanging-from-his-temples-head at the yeshiva he attended, it is imperative that one ‘Always Covers for the (((Tribe)))’.
That was true over 100 years ago when covering for the paedophile/murderer Leo Frank, and it is equally applicable today.
ARs are nothing special. The .223 is a hyped-up trash round and someone shot in a vital area with almost any other cartridge out there will die just as fast. Stick one of those 30 round extended magazines into a 9mm pistol and you’re equal to anyone with an AR-15 in terms of firepower and rate of fire if you wanna do a mass shooting.
That is incorrect and lazy NRA style defenses do not work in an open forum.
A 223 round has about 1,089 pounds of energy at 100 yards.
A 9mm round has 276 pounds at 50 yards. So a quarter of the energy at half the distance.
The two rounds are not equal in a mass shooting. At 50 yards your odds of surviving a body shot from a 9mm is far higher than a 223.
An AR can fire a lot of high powered rounds in a short amount of time. The wounds are devastating when compared to handgun bullets. You wouldn’t go to war with a 9mm.
I don’t support banning them but I also don’t support intellectual dishonesty which I know is common by guns supporter that feel the need to be dishonest in order to preserve them. Well cry more. I don’t care and these dishonest arguments didn’t stop them from being banned in Dem majority states. So it doesn’t work.
The 9mm actually holds the edge with it's greater diameter. If each bullet fully penetrates a vital organ you'll bleed to death a tiny bit faster from the 9 because the hole it makes is that much bigger.Replies: @John Johnson, @John Johnson
At 50 yards your odds of surviving a body shot from a 9mm is far higher than a 223.
and while we're still at it...https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MP_40
You wouldn’t go to war with a 9mm.
Dumb fuck statement. The g–damned Cartels are already buying everything from SAWs to AT rocket launchers by showing cash or in exchange for dope.Federal controls on RPGs work as intended. Or do tell the last time there was a school shooting with an RPG. Libertarians support selling M-249s to felons. I can cite their platform directly if you think I am making that up. They want zero federal restrictions on firearm purchases. That would mean that DaShawn the 10 time felon can go buy a full auto M-249 from a sports store on the day he gets out of prison. Do you agree with that policy?Also, your fixation on the AR’s lethality is imbecilic. That crazy asshole, Charles Whitman, who shot up Austin from the UOT campus towerKind of funny how you have to cite a case from 1966 to show something comparable. The AR-15 can kill a lot of people very quickly. Much faster and easier than a bolt action used by Whitman. That was a marine who could have killed even more people with a semi-auto. Yes I realize you think gun owners should engage in NRA style intellectual dishonesty where we pretend these guns are all the same. Well I don't. I can hold an AR-15 in one hand and pepper a 50 yard target with 20 rounds in about 5 seconds. It isn't comparable. It's easy to shoot and can fire a lot of rounds in a very short time. Spree killer Michael Silka who murdered close to a dozen people in Alaska carried out his crimes with a Ruger (?) Single Shot .30-06 rifle. That was over a 3 week period. That would not be a shooting spree.Advocates of the AR-15 undermine their own arguments by claiming that hunters need them to kill a bunch of pigs at once. Is that true or is a bolt action just as good for a sounder of pigs?Replies: @don't care
Libertarians are complete idiots for thinking that thugs should be allowed M-249s if they can show cash
Shut the hell up about ARs already, idiot. You’re so ignorant of how guns actually work. You’re obviously one of those tards who thinks the scarier a gun looks the deadlier it must be. It’s like listening to a californian.
ARs are nothing special. The .223 is a hyped-up trash round and someone shot in a vital area with almost any other cartridge out there will die just as fast. Stick one of those 30 round extended magazines into a 9mm pistol and you’re equal to anyone with an AR-15 in terms of firepower and rate of fire if you wanna do a mass shooting. Cho at virginia tech proved that.
You might have had a point against ARs on account of their greater practicable shooting range, because the .223 keeps a flat trajectory farther out than most rounds, but it’s much farther out than a common mass shooter could be expected to aim with accuracy though, so whatever.
Spend a while studying terminal ballistics before you shitpost again. The science rather than your hollywood movie woowoo.
I think Kirk just let Smith say his piece on the expectation that he’ll look foolish.
Look, I’d agree with you about that if Kirk invited a Know-Nothing imbecile that he knew he could easily eviscerate in a debate.
But FOR SURE Kirk knew that Dave Smith was one very well informed individual indeed on the matter of Apartheid Israel’s mass slaughter of non combatants.
The fact of the matter is that Dave Smith (like the vast majority of Ron Paul libertarians), is extremely knowledgeable on things related to U.S foreign policy, economic and geopolitical matters etc.
I’ve seen DS involved in many an exchange and NO ONE has got the better of him – not even close.
In my opinion Kirk invited Dave Smith because he knew the latter would be able to get the message out (Re: Apartheid Israel’s depravity in Gaza), in an articulate way.
Retarded troll take dude
. About as retarded as the child ghoul that wrote the post.
The founders would not have supported guns for everyone just as they did not support citizenship for everyone.
By and large, this is true, but it’s also immaterial. Many founders didn’t support a great many things they eventually agreed to accept. The unfettered right to keep and bear arms had just enough supporters to get its opponents to swap their opposition for the nine votes needed to ratify the proposed Constitution. To the limited extent that any constitutional protection isn’t a dead letter, the deal, not the horse trading that produced it, is what matters now.
I don’t take the liberal position that the AR is the problem. I just wouldn’t sell them to anyone and especially not mentally unstable trannies or anyone who has taken anti-depressants.
I probably know way more people in the firearms industry than you – everyone from gun builders to firearms trainers – who would never sell weapons to anyone questionable. Hell, they won’t even sell to anyone who smokes weed or is hooked on painkillers because we hold ourselves to higher standards than the average normie who doesn’t know their ass from a hole in the ground. We’re a fairly competent demographic when it comes to self regulating.
Think about it. 300 million privately owned firearms in the hands of ~ 90 million Americans, that we know of. Juxtapose that with 17,000 firearms related homicides – some of which are justified – is pretty good. We could improve and be down to Swiss levels of low crime stats if the career criminals in a dozen mostly black urban clusters were to be incarcerated, executed or shot by their intended victims.
As with all things, the last thing we need is for incompetent bureaucrats to pass any more fucking ineffectual laws which will be misused or abused.
Libertarians are complete idiots for thinking that thugs should be allowed M-249s if they can show cash
Dumb fuck statement. The g–damned Cartels are already buying everything from SAWs to AT rocket launchers by showing cash or in exchange for dope. Many of those are US .mil equipment that was sent to your precious Ukrainian regime who’s corrupt officers resold to transnational syndicates.
Don’t get so butthurt over probability or talking about how ARs are often used in mass shootings.
You can thank the fucking MSM you adore so much for demonizing the Stoner platform which makes them more appealing to psychotic rampage shooters.
Before that, Mini-14s, SKS and Kalashnikovs were chosen by active shooters because of the IQ shaving MSM hyper focusing on those “scary” looking firearms of that era.
Also, your fixation on the AR’s lethality is imbecilic. That crazy asshole, Charles Whitman, who shot up Austin from the UOT campus tower, racked up most of his kills with a Remington 700 6MM hunting rifle which was considered a teenage boy’s starting gun for light medium game back in those days.
Spree killer Michael Silka who murdered close to a dozen people in Alaska carried out his crimes with a Ruger (?) Single Shot .30-06 rifle. Both Whitman and Silka managed to kill way more people with their manual loading rifles than any of the recent AR wielding murderers.
And their records was outmatched by that nutjob Korean kid who killed over 30 students at the Virginia Tech massacre with handguns.
I don’t claim to be some all encompassing firearms expert but you’re only parroting the addle brained talking points from fucking talking heads who are both dishonest and stupid as hell which is the worst sin one can commit when trying to present an argument.
Dumb fuck statement. The g–damned Cartels are already buying everything from SAWs to AT rocket launchers by showing cash or in exchange for dope.Federal controls on RPGs work as intended. Or do tell the last time there was a school shooting with an RPG. Libertarians support selling M-249s to felons. I can cite their platform directly if you think I am making that up. They want zero federal restrictions on firearm purchases. That would mean that DaShawn the 10 time felon can go buy a full auto M-249 from a sports store on the day he gets out of prison. Do you agree with that policy?Also, your fixation on the AR’s lethality is imbecilic. That crazy asshole, Charles Whitman, who shot up Austin from the UOT campus towerKind of funny how you have to cite a case from 1966 to show something comparable. The AR-15 can kill a lot of people very quickly. Much faster and easier than a bolt action used by Whitman. That was a marine who could have killed even more people with a semi-auto. Yes I realize you think gun owners should engage in NRA style intellectual dishonesty where we pretend these guns are all the same. Well I don't. I can hold an AR-15 in one hand and pepper a 50 yard target with 20 rounds in about 5 seconds. It isn't comparable. It's easy to shoot and can fire a lot of rounds in a very short time. Spree killer Michael Silka who murdered close to a dozen people in Alaska carried out his crimes with a Ruger (?) Single Shot .30-06 rifle. That was over a 3 week period. That would not be a shooting spree.Advocates of the AR-15 undermine their own arguments by claiming that hunters need them to kill a bunch of pigs at once. Is that true or is a bolt action just as good for a sounder of pigs?Replies: @don't care
Libertarians are complete idiots for thinking that thugs should be allowed M-249s if they can show cash
Some others also suspect similar malfeasance.

Your anal virginity has been taken away from you by your Rabbi’s fist, ya corpse felching monkey pox carrier.
Of course the Kaiju wants the goy to be disarmed.
If the latest reports are accurate, the murder weapon was a .30-06 bolt gun.

IOW, you’re wrong, as usual.
Actually, the AR15-M16 rifles are capable of being accurate out to 500 yards using only iron sights, if one is well versed on the fundamentals.
No that would not be the case based on fundamentals. You have to dope the wind that far out which goes beyond basic usage.
But what you are referring to is, is more correctly labelled the Eugene Stoner platform which encompasses
No one calls it that, stop trying to be a gun expert.
Unlike you, I’m not pro gun. I’m pro-Bill Of Rights and our Founders didn’t include Article 2 in that document so we can shoot ducks, clay pigeons or even defend ourselves against criminals but to defend ourselves against enemies, foreign and domestic.
Yes and they originally set a limit on rights in the constitution to land owning White men.
So get off your soapbox as you are repeating a conservative argument that quietly uses a revised version of the constitution and not the original. The founders would not have supported guns for everyone just as they did not support citizenship for everyone. Jefferson would think modern libertarians are retarded.
By and large, this is true, but it's also immaterial. Many founders didn't support a great many things they eventually agreed to accept. The unfettered right to keep and bear arms had just enough supporters to get its opponents to swap their opposition for the nine votes needed to ratify the proposed Constitution. To the limited extent that any constitutional protection isn't a dead letter, the deal, not the horse trading that produced it, is what matters now.
The founders would not have supported guns for everyone just as they did not support citizenship for everyone.
Replies: @Che Guava
Why Did it Have to be ... Guns?
by L. Neil Smith
[email protected]
Over the past 30 years, I've been paid to write almost two million words, every one of which, sooner or later, came back to the issue of guns and gun-ownership. Naturally, I've thought about the issue a lot, and it has always determined the way I vote.
People accuse me of being a single-issue writer, a single- issue thinker, and a single- issue voter, but it isn't true. What I've chosen, in a world where there's never enough time and energy, is to focus on the one political issue which most clearly and unmistakably demonstrates what any politician -- or political philosophy -- is made of, right down to the creamy liquid center.
Make no mistake: all politicians -- even those ostensibly on the side of guns and gun ownership -- hate the issue and anyone, like me, who insists on bringing it up. They hate it because it's an X-ray machine. It's a Vulcan mind-meld. It's the ultimate test to which any politician -- or political philosophy -- can be put.
If a politician isn't perfectly comfortable with the idea of his average constituent, any man, woman, or responsible child, walking into a hardware store and paying cash -- for any rifle, shotgun, handgun, machinegun, anything -- without producing ID or signing one scrap of paper, he isn't your friend no matter what he tells you.
If he isn't genuinely enthusiastic about his average constituent stuffing that weapon into a purse or pocket or tucking it under a coat and walking home without asking anybody's permission, he's a four-flusher, no matter what he claims.
What his attitude -- toward your ownership and use of weapons -- conveys is his real attitude about you. And if he doesn't trust you, then why in the name of John Moses Browning should you trust him?
If he doesn't want you to have the means of defending your life, do you want him in a position to control it?
If he makes excuses about obeying a law he's sworn to uphold and defend -- the highest law of the land, the Bill of Rights -- do you want to entrust him with anything?
If he ignores you, sneers at you, complains about you, or defames you, if he calls you names only he thinks are evil -- like "Constitutionalist" -- when you insist that he account for himself, hasn't he betrayed his oath, isn't he unfit to hold office, and doesn't he really belong in jail?
Sure, these are all leading questions. They're the questions that led me to the issue of guns and gun ownership as the clearest and most unmistakable demonstration of what any given politician -- or political philosophy -- is really made of.
He may lecture you about the dangerous weirdos out there who shouldn't have a gun -- but what does that have to do with you? Why in the name of John Moses Browning should you be made to suffer for the misdeeds of others? Didn't you lay aside the infantile notion of group punishment when you left public school -- or the military? Isn't it an essentially European notion, anyway -- Prussian, maybe -- and certainly not what America was supposed to be all about?
And if there are dangerous weirdos out there, does it make sense to deprive you of the means of protecting yourself from them? Forget about those other people, those dangerous weirdos, this is about you, and it has been, all along.
Try it yourself: if a politician won't trust you, why should you trust him? If he's a man -- and you're not -- what does his lack of trust tell you about his real attitude toward women? If "he" happens to be a woman, what makes her so perverse that she's eager to render her fellow women helpless on the mean and seedy streets her policies helped create? Should you believe her when she says she wants to help you by imposing some infantile group health care program on you at the point of the kind of gun she doesn't want you to have?
On the other hand -- or the other party -- should you believe anything politicians say who claim they stand for freedom, but drag their feet and make excuses about repealing limits on your right to own and carry weapons? What does this tell you about their real motives for ignoring voters and ramming through one infantile group trade agreement after another with other countries?
Makes voting simpler, doesn't it? You don't have to study every issue -- health care, international trade -- all you have to do is use this X-ray machine, this Vulcan mind-meld, to get beyond their empty words and find out how politicians really feel. About you. And that, of course, is why they hate it.
And that's why I'm accused of being a single-issue writer, thinker, and voter.
But it isn't true, is it?
Thanks for providing that quote. It is interesting and touching.
More to the point, though, is that meamjojo is clearly an Israeli agent (also likely a U.S. citizen), yet he clearly approves of the assassination of Kirk (please closely read his comments).
This would suggest that the earlier comment by Hulkamania was very much on the right track.
They dont know what king of gun it was. Why are you being moronic?
That is funny. Sounds like the title of a video game 'King of Guns'. A little like the old SNK 'King of Fighters'. They will have the bullet, it will identify the range of rifles or pistols that can fire it, that will have already have been done by now.
king of gun
From a gent who knows his shit on what kind of fallout might result from this.
From a late buddy who was quite active in the RKBA movement.
“The right of the people” is as plain as day, dumbass. Also surviving a knife attack isn’t like in the action movies, even a slit across your forearms is enough to kill you as they contain sensitive arteries.
Taking guns away from law abiding citizens only leaves the government and criminals armed.
Actually, the AR15-M16 rifles are capable of being accurate out to 500 yards using only iron sights, if one is well versed on the fundamentals.
But what you are referring to is, is more correctly labelled the Eugene Stoner platform which encompasses the entire AR-15/M-4/M-16/AR-18/AR-180 sub-family of intermediate caliber carbines in 5.56 or .233 as well as the .300 Blackout and the AR-10s rifles chambered for 7.62×51/.308.
Unlike you, I’m not pro gun. I’m pro-Bill Of Rights and our Founders didn’t include Article 2 in that document so we can shoot ducks, clay pigeons or even defend ourselves against criminals but to defend ourselves against enemies, foreign and domestic.
You have a chance of defense against knives.
As usual, complete bullshit. Close to 90% of those shot with handguns survive whereas only 65% of those attacked with knives pull through.
You don’t have much of a chance against a gun, especially from 100-300 yards away.
More people are murdered each year in the U.S. with hammers and knives than with rifles.
There are ~ 24,000 homicides in the U.S. each year. Of those, 17,000 are killed with mostly handguns but that figure also include s justified homicide where law abiding citizens or cops shooting violent criminals in defensive situations.
Wat more people die from heart disease, organ failures, medical malpractice and vehicle accidents than from any sort of criminal violence, including criminal misuse of firearms.
So many somber talking heads on the news channels! Poor Charlie Kirk. Such a swell guy with a beautiful; wife and a couple of young kids Thoughts and prayers and all that crap.
If you don’t want people taking pot shots at each other here in the USA, then abolish the 2nd Amendment or reinterpret it correctly, such that only members of a true militia (the National Guard) can own guns. Guns make little people (mentally speaking) think they are big dicks.
For anyone who wants to bring up hunting, you need to learn how to hunt with a bow and arrows, spear, knife or other non-explosive weapon.
And yes, people get killed with edged weapons all over the world. But not from a distance and not so easily. You have a chance of defense against knives. You don’t have much of a chance against a gun, especially from 100-300 yards away.
As usual, complete bullshit. Close to 90% of those shot with handguns survive whereas only 65% of those attacked with knives pull through.
You have a chance of defense against knives.
More people are murdered each year in the U.S. with hammers and knives than with rifles.
You don’t have much of a chance against a gun, especially from 100-300 yards away.
Replies: @Che Guava
Why Did it Have to be ... Guns?
by L. Neil Smith
[email protected]
Over the past 30 years, I've been paid to write almost two million words, every one of which, sooner or later, came back to the issue of guns and gun-ownership. Naturally, I've thought about the issue a lot, and it has always determined the way I vote.
People accuse me of being a single-issue writer, a single- issue thinker, and a single- issue voter, but it isn't true. What I've chosen, in a world where there's never enough time and energy, is to focus on the one political issue which most clearly and unmistakably demonstrates what any politician -- or political philosophy -- is made of, right down to the creamy liquid center.
Make no mistake: all politicians -- even those ostensibly on the side of guns and gun ownership -- hate the issue and anyone, like me, who insists on bringing it up. They hate it because it's an X-ray machine. It's a Vulcan mind-meld. It's the ultimate test to which any politician -- or political philosophy -- can be put.
If a politician isn't perfectly comfortable with the idea of his average constituent, any man, woman, or responsible child, walking into a hardware store and paying cash -- for any rifle, shotgun, handgun, machinegun, anything -- without producing ID or signing one scrap of paper, he isn't your friend no matter what he tells you.
If he isn't genuinely enthusiastic about his average constituent stuffing that weapon into a purse or pocket or tucking it under a coat and walking home without asking anybody's permission, he's a four-flusher, no matter what he claims.
What his attitude -- toward your ownership and use of weapons -- conveys is his real attitude about you. And if he doesn't trust you, then why in the name of John Moses Browning should you trust him?
If he doesn't want you to have the means of defending your life, do you want him in a position to control it?
If he makes excuses about obeying a law he's sworn to uphold and defend -- the highest law of the land, the Bill of Rights -- do you want to entrust him with anything?
If he ignores you, sneers at you, complains about you, or defames you, if he calls you names only he thinks are evil -- like "Constitutionalist" -- when you insist that he account for himself, hasn't he betrayed his oath, isn't he unfit to hold office, and doesn't he really belong in jail?
Sure, these are all leading questions. They're the questions that led me to the issue of guns and gun ownership as the clearest and most unmistakable demonstration of what any given politician -- or political philosophy -- is really made of.
He may lecture you about the dangerous weirdos out there who shouldn't have a gun -- but what does that have to do with you? Why in the name of John Moses Browning should you be made to suffer for the misdeeds of others? Didn't you lay aside the infantile notion of group punishment when you left public school -- or the military? Isn't it an essentially European notion, anyway -- Prussian, maybe -- and certainly not what America was supposed to be all about?
And if there are dangerous weirdos out there, does it make sense to deprive you of the means of protecting yourself from them? Forget about those other people, those dangerous weirdos, this is about you, and it has been, all along.
Try it yourself: if a politician won't trust you, why should you trust him? If he's a man -- and you're not -- what does his lack of trust tell you about his real attitude toward women? If "he" happens to be a woman, what makes her so perverse that she's eager to render her fellow women helpless on the mean and seedy streets her policies helped create? Should you believe her when she says she wants to help you by imposing some infantile group health care program on you at the point of the kind of gun she doesn't want you to have?
On the other hand -- or the other party -- should you believe anything politicians say who claim they stand for freedom, but drag their feet and make excuses about repealing limits on your right to own and carry weapons? What does this tell you about their real motives for ignoring voters and ramming through one infantile group trade agreement after another with other countries?
Makes voting simpler, doesn't it? You don't have to study every issue -- health care, international trade -- all you have to do is use this X-ray machine, this Vulcan mind-meld, to get beyond their empty words and find out how politicians really feel. About you. And that, of course, is why they hate it.
And that's why I'm accused of being a single-issue writer, thinker, and voter.
But it isn't true, is it?
Look at the full video. She was stabbed around the left side of her collarbone which may have punctured the arteries in that area that can lead to slower uncontrolled blood loss.
Also, some of the blood on the floor might initially be Brown’s as he appeared to have sliced his own hand open during the stabbing frenzy.
Japanese culture is both authoritarian (downwards) and obsequious (upwards) to an absurd degree: deference bordering on self-abasement is a vile concept, Many in the Japanese Right belong to the ‘Japan did nothing wrong in WWII’ crowd. They are totally crazy.
Japan really does not understand the Western mindset, and probably never will. They’ve had a weird, violent, surreal crash course in Westernism for the whole 20th century, and it resembled a twisted relationship more than anything else. They critically misunderstand most Western concepts and simply adapt them to their own unique uses.
They did the same thing with Chinese and Indian religious influences. Soon they will retreat entirely from global strategic significance, and go back to being what they’ve always been: strange and isolated.
China was invaded by Imperial Japan, and if the United Front did not happen, there would be no sovereign China.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Second_United_Front
Bromance of Three Kingdoms = CCKG
From 1931 to 1941, China resisted Japan without meaningful Allied support. Yet by 1941, China had pinned 80% of Japan’s army in China, thus preventing Japan from seizing Siberia or invading Australasia or India. China’s scorched-earth resistance drained Japan, and 400,000 Japanese were killed by the time Pearl Harbor happened. That’s more Jap deaths than the entire Pacific War from 1941 to 1945. US Aid to China was marginal until 1944.
By bleeding Japan dry for a decade, China forced Japan into a disastrous southern expansion, triggering US oil sanctions, and allowed the island hopping strategy to work because the IJA was occupied in China.
Why did Japan surrender with over a million troops still in China?
China broke the Japanese empire, the US atomic bombs, while based, was little more than a “f you” to Japan and Truman flaunting his new toys to the rest of the world, particularly Russia.
I'm confident the TV cameras did not show the fuck-up's!
"What also struck me about the parade, was the human capital. I have never seen marching formations with that level of precision. It looked like some kind of CGI, with the soldiers replicated in a perfect geometric array. "
C’mon Mean Jew…Every military parade marches to music . there’s always drums and brass . it synchronises the marchers ,etc,etc .
Too bad when the IDF marches, it’s more like a Pride Parade……and the “drums ” are likely bongos made from some ‘unfortunate Palestinians….children no less.Women and Fags, what an army … marching to Hava Nagila.
I am nearly 66 years old. I was taught that song in the 4th grade in Ottawa ,Canada.
The rot was setting in even then..
[If you don’t insert MORE tags your comments will get trashed.]
https://gaiusbaltar.substack.com/p/world-war-iii-situation-report?r=51cys1&triedRedirect=true
Something else to add. We get countless stories of the French Resistance even though the French government in Pairs folded quite rapidly while their occupation government in Indo-China was mostly a collaborationist regime.
War in Europe, Soviets caused 80% of German casualties
War in Asia, China caused 70% of Japanese casualties
You are certainly right.
There were huge efforts and sacrifices by lots of different peoples who resisted the Japanese. That is why minimising, dismissive statements by those idiots are so annoying.
Singapore was the major organising point for SE Asian funding for the Chinese resistance against Japan. As such the Japanese treated Singapore very harshly after they occupied the city.
I used have have lunch with the late Bishop of Malaya after church services. He was a courageous man who was not afraid to defy his own church to walk in solidarity with the oppressed. When he was a young man, he was tortured by the Japanese Kempeitai secret police, and walked with a bad limp every since.
My best friends uncle was disappeared in the Sook Ching Massacres. His grandmother had to adopt his younger brother in order to carry on the family name. Today my best friend and his brother have different surnames.
His father was luckier than his uncle. People were told to gather in a certain spot. They were interviewed and some were given a chop on the hand. Luckily his intuition told him to rub off the chop and so he escaped execution.
My own grandfather escaped because he was a pharmacist and useful to the Japanese. My own parents who were children at the time remember how they had to bow deeply to every passing Japanese soldier or risk a rifle butt to their stomachs.
Even our late Prime Minister Lee Kuan Yew was nearly killed, but was saved by his gardener. Here is a 6 minute story told by LKY’s brother

On the Sook Ching

This is the biggest mistake, which is that Trump, if he wants to stop drugs with random acts of violence, would be better off bombing random pharmaceutical company headquarters and drug production plants, whether across America or internationally in countries like Switzerland, Canada, and Israel where many can be found. Their rich CEOs even have private jets, defenselessly waiting for American fighter jets to come knock them out of the sky with their owner onboard.
Unlike drug cartels, they wouldn’t even know how to fight back, so it’d be like shooting fish in a barrel. For deterrence and to help the American economy reindustrialize, you could even legally enslave all of their pharmaterrorist employees that you don’t kill, because the Thirteenth Amendment doesn’t prohibit slavery for punishment of a crime (hence the private prison labour system). The people who made the opioid crisis ought repay their debt to society the hard way. Andrew Anglin would support this idea I think, since it could possibly get him a sex slave.
The argument of illegality doesn’t hold water, because the US has international jurisdiction over every other country (as it has continuously legally asserted and set precedent for, e.g in the Assange case) and their citizens, and because all is fair in love and war and the US has long ago declared both its love for violence; the Drug War, and the War Against an Emotion that is terror.
Yeah, Yanks like to continually crow about themselves and minimise the roles of others.They like to portray themselves as "Saving Europe" when 80% of German casualties were at the hands of the Soviets.Then you have idiotic statements like that quoted above.Chinese inflicted 70% of Japanese military deaths in WW2Estimates of Japanese military deaths range from 2.1 to 2.5 million
The land war in China was a sideshow.
War in Europe, Soviets caused 80% of German casualties
War in Asia, China caused 70% of Japanese casualties
Something else to add. We get countless stories of the French Resistance even though the French government in Pairs folded quite rapidly while their occupation government in Indo-China was mostly a collaborationist regime.
What also gets overlooked are the Filipino and Overseas Chinese who made up the bulk of anti-Japanese guerrillas in the SE Asian theater as well as the Serbian partisans in the Balkans.
A narco terrorist is someone that is not allowing big pharma to get a piece of the action.
ThreeCranes’ diversion tactics to avoid discussing the substance of ’s argument: 1) attack the messenger / emotionalize, antagonize, and goad opponents (avoid dealing with issues by sidetracking opponent with name calling and ridicule—“cross-eyed troll”. Make others shrink from support out of fear of gaining same label), 2) use a strawman (fabricate an element of opponent’s argument he can easily knock down to make himself look good and opponent look bad—“Killing a lot of people is a sign of military expertise” and “Sacrifice all your troops”), and 3) change the subject—“Efficiency is doing the most with the least, not experiencing losses while accomplishing little.”
simp, be careful what you wish for. they’d stomp on your nutsack with those stiletto heel combat boots right after they shit on your chest.
Are you trying to get me excited??
Col (ret) Douglass Macgregor maintains US’s only military advantage vis-a-vis China is USN’s superb submarine force*, if it comes to a war with China in China’s backyard (Taiwan).
As I know very little about Sub warfare but it would be enlightening to know how dependent our Sub fleet’s assets are on REM imports from China to remain functional.
Considering China also have overland routes for importing supplies from Russia/Central Asia and possibly a fleet of planes which might offset some damage done by a Sub blockade……any kinetic conflict will be a test of which side has the greater willingness to suffer through a war of attrition.
As you stated, the Chinese, like the Russians, have experienced existential threats within living memory and have both the motivation and incentives to do what it takes to prevail in any war waged against them on their home turf.
We haven’t had to contend with any armed conflict on our soil since the War Between the States. And the last foreign threat we had to face was the 1812 War.
Of course, that might likely change once the war against the Cartels – both inside and beyond our borders – becomes goes hot.
See links below.
https://cgpodcast.substack.com/p/ep-058-the-mexican-cartel-conundrum
https://cgpodcast.substack.com/p/ep-059-the-mexican-cartel-conundrum
Perhaps. But China's disciplined and exuberant march does indicate the high morale of its people. And the Middle Kingdom can call up a lot of soldiers; I think the CIA once estimated that China has 300 million men of military age.
It IS a form of dance/theatrical display. Probably little related to war-fighting potential.
I think the CIA once estimated that China has 300 million men of military age.
https://www.cia.gov/the-world-factbook/countries/china/#people-and-society
0-14 years: 16.3% (male 122,644,111/female 107,926,176)
15-64 years: 69.3% (male 505,412,555/female 476,599,793)
65 years and over: 14.4% (2024 est.) (male 94,144,838/female 109,315,797)
By military age men, we are talking about a 7:1 ratio of support personnel to direct combat arms personnel AKA tooth to tail ratio….so that could entail both older and younger than optimal age brackets, including females on the home front, pressed into full mobilization in a pinch.
But the real motherfucker in the the equation is that China will be fighting on it’s doorsteps with one of the largest, multi-domain A2/AD assets on earth. With far superior manufacturing capabilities and shorter supply lines; whereas we don’t even have anything resembling our Merchant Marine fleet of yore needed to sustain any expeditionary campaigns like in the past.
Shit, even during our 20 year war in Afghanistan we had to rely on tribal factions of the Taliban to allow the necessary supplies to reach our occupation forces.
https://www.theamericanconservative.com/the-talibans-toll/
I doubt the Chinese will be so accommodating.
Anglin – you really should reach out the retired DHSI fed, Myron Gaines, and see if he can provide a platform for you two to collaborate.
https://voxday.net/2025/09/08/focus-on-the-homeland/
Focus on the Homeland
A long overdue shift from maintaining the failing Pax Americana to defending the US homeland would be a very welcome change.
Pentagon officials are proposing the department prioritize protecting the homeland and Western Hemisphere, a striking reversal from the military’s yearslong mandate to focus on the threat from China. A draft of the newest National Defense Strategy, which landed on Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth’s desk last week, places domestic and regional missions above countering adversaries such as Beijing and Moscow, according to three people briefed on early versions of the report.
The move would mark a major shift from recent Democrat and Republican administrations, including President Donald Trump’s first term in office, when he referred to Beijing as America’s greatest rival. And it would likely inflame China hawks in both parties who view the country’s leadership as a danger to U.S. security.
“This is going to be a major shift for the U.S. and its allies on multiple continents,” said one of the people briefed on the draft document. “The old, trusted U.S. promises are being questioned.”
Why the American people should give one quantum of a damn about “old, trusted US promises” given to foreigners when none of the promises given to them have been kept is an obvious question. But Simplicius and others doubt that this “major shift” is real anyhow.
Recall the US even under Trump has dragged its feet for years on initiatives to pull troops from Iraq, Europe, etc. An excuse is always somehow resurrected at the last moment which buys the MIC time and keeps US occupation forces perpetually in places where their presence stirs conflict, exacerbates tensions, and unnecessarily provokes so-called “adversaries” like Russia, China, or Iran. US troops in Syria, for instance—which Trump has likewise failed to pull—have done nothing but facilitate conflict, act as JTACs for Israeli strike corridors, etc.; the claim of being some sort of ‘peacekeepers’ is a sham.
If the troops are brought back from Europe and the Middle East, the borders are manned, and the mass repatriations begin, then perhaps we can take some of these pronouncements seriously. But until then, it’s all just irrelevant noise.
Your anxious posting reflects the fundamental terror of the Jew since the dawn of time. That a healthy, unified and nationalist people that is not host to Jewish parasites cannot be defeated by your sick and self-hating collection of goyim. And that once they’re out of the picture, you’re next.
All joking aside, it’s only because of the low average IQ of Indians that it has taken them this long to see that China is an intrinsically more benign state than the US. There are two main reasons:
1) China was poor until recently, so the Chinese know that poverty is not necessarily the result of innate inferiority. That makes them more humble than the supremely arrogant Judeo-Anglo Empire, whose embodiment Donald Trump is.
2) “Judeo” is the keyword in Judeo-Anglo, meaning the Judeo-Anglo Empire is synonymous with the Synagogue of Satan and, therefore, utterly evil, which can been seen, among other things, it its complicity in the genocide of the Gazans.
Conspiratards here and elsewhere assert China is secretly dominated by Jews as well and offer as proof a 70-year-old photo of Mao with some Jew. That’s irrational and idiotic. When a society is dominated by Jews, as the US is, it’s completely obvious and can’t be hidden because Jews fill most positions of power and wealth, and the nation’s policies are geared to the benefit of Jews and Israel. Those things happen in the US, but they don’t happen in China because the US is dominated by Jews and China is not.
Fuck the nips. They are irrelevant to the current and future world order and can only pretend they matter when being a proxy for the Banker owned U.S. federal government.
Outside of China, the most potent Asian forces are the North Koreans and the Buryat/ Tuvan/ Mongolian contingents fighting with the Russian military.
Appears the NORKs did a competent job of dealing with FUSA/GAYTO’s Ukrainian proxies at Kursk.
https://old.bitchute.com/video/Yg57fx0kLrib/
Japan should be grateful that:
1) China is now their largest trade partner and appear more interested in commerce than exacting revenge for their wars of aggression between 1985 and 1945.
2) That, owing to Cold War political expediency, we helped to rebuild their shattered archipelago and protected them under a defense treaty/nuclear umbrella which allowed them to focus on their economy and internal development.
When, in reality, we should have dropped a third Atomic bomb on Tokyo and wiped out their royal family and allowed the Soviets to complete their conquest of the northern Islands as payment for their entry into the war on our side.
If the jappos were smart, they’d be content to remain a medium sized manufacturing hub while serving in their historical role as a port and weigh station for global commerce and give up any pretensions of being a heavyweight on the global arena. They had their shot at it between the late 19th and mid- ’20th Centuries and failed abysmally.
As per MacKinder’s predictions, China will return to it’s historical role as the preeminent commercial power as was the case for the past 2,500 years while Russia will be Byzantine Empire, redux.

I reckon Latin America will be the next flashpoint for a proxy war between the Global Hegemonic forces in the West and the multipolar order being ushered in by China, Russia and the growing BRICS bloc..

Thanks for posting this movie which I did not know existed. I learn about books and films from all the great Internet sites.
You’re very welcome, sir. 🫡
BTW, here’s a few more for your list. If you haven’t seen this one before, I’m certain you will object to the term “sniper” as it’s used in this film’s context. Other than that, fairly solid.
This 1987 mini-series about the takeover of the U.S. by the Soviet Union is another well crafted Cold War Dystopian speculative fiction.

Concur 💯
Actually, both Thailand and Cambodia’s largest trade partner is China so Beijing definitely have good reasons to want to end this conflict.
Both countries are also in the BRICS Partners bloc. IIRC, IT was Russia who sponsored Thailand.
TBH, I don’t think any of the major players want this conflict to continue, mush less expand.
This makes certain assumptions that are iffy at best.
Possessing 2, 5, 10 or even 50 nukes would not do a third rate country like NK or Iran any good if the US, Russia or China, for example, decided on a preemptive nuclear strike against the country. The country would be evaporated before it could get any nukes off and it might not even know who was sending them.
Hypersonic missiles generally don't get shot down. And who says there would be only one of them?
Then there is the question as to if NK or Iran could reliably deliver a nuke weapon. ... Iran would have to cross Iraq or Jordan to get to Israel. What if their nuke missile was shot down and exploded over either of those countries, instead of Israel?. That would be a serious miscalculation.
Iran could simply opt for airbursts. Nuclear airbursts cause minimal fallout while maximizing casualties. Surface detonations are what cause significant fallout.
Then there is the fallout cloud. As the world wind blows west to east, a successful nuke missile from Iran that hit Israel would then blow fallout back onto Iran and other further Westward countries like China.
Of course Israel would retaliate with whatever nukes it has (which some estimates put as low as 90). But no one, except Zionist kikes and kikealikes, is claiming that Iran would attack first even if they had nukes. Iran would only use nukes if it were forced to do so, in which case concerns about retaliation would be moot. Iran needs nukes as a deterrent against Israel, not the reverse.
And what do you think Israel would do with its supposed 200+ nukes, a few that I would wager are always fueled and armed, if Iran somehow managed to nuke some place in Israel? Go plead for the UN to smack Iran’s hand? [rotflol]
Centuries, eh? I think you need to educate yourself about the various isotopes that are most likely to be present in fallout. Make a note of their half-lives.
No, Israel (and perhaps the US also) would hit Iran with multiple nukes and make most of the country radioactive for the next few centuries.
Again, we're not talking about a first strike from Iran, but the practicality of Iran possessing nukes as a deterrent, particularly against Israeli and/or US attack. Obviously they would have nothing to lose by pushing the button on Israel (and regional US bases) if faced with an existential threat.
Then there is the question as to what would the leaders who pushed the button in Iran or NK do afterwards, assuming they survived in a deep mountain fallout bunker?
They would not find shelter elsewhere in the world. In fact, they would most likely be hunted down for a huge reward and then dismembered in a public square if they came out or could be forced out of their bunkers.
I have no doubt you could, but it would be just as ignorant as what you've written here.
I could write many more paragraphs on this subject, perhaps talk about EMP’s or dirty bombs or suitcase bombs.
The point is that they would only use the deterrent if their existence was threatened in the first place.
Sure Iran or NK could make a statement if they decided to attack a neighbor with a nuke weapon but to what avail? There would be nothing left of their countries after they did so.
It's not an absolute guarantee against attack, but it's a deterrent even against a superpower, provided the superpower is unwilling to accept the damage that even limited nuclear retaliation would bring.
It’s time to acknowledge that possessing nukes are not a real protection against superpower countries with thousands of nukes read to launch within minutes and pinpoint, reliable delivery.
💯 Facts.
Your knowledge of the effects of the various kinds of nuclear blasts and their respective employment is proven in this old classic on surviving nuclear war.
https://archive.org/details/pdfy-JqxMy58hd_NpnWT8/page/n1/mode/2up
And, yes. If the Zionists kick off a nuclear war because of their genocidal avarice, every remaining hook nosed Khazarian infesting the earth would soon be herded into mass graves. Including that foreskin chewing hasbara, MeamJewJew.
Apparently this was a past time for him, and probably the majority of homosexuals.
At one of the theaters I managed we discovered fags had drilled holes in the walls of the toilet stalls so they could look at the genitals of the men using the urinals. Your proposal that they be confined to mental asylums is a humane one. Emperor Justinian use to behead them en mass which I think is warranted but only for those among them who are guilty of rape or molesting children.
Homosexuality is rampant in the United States and the West in general. Anglin has been at the forefront of pointing out and documenting homosexuality in American culture. Homosexuality is indeed a mental illness and should be recognized as such. Any man that is sexually stimulated by the smell of another man’s anus and feces is mentally ill. George Takai (Star Trek Asian) once said in an interview that he would frequent male public restrooms so he could stand at a urinal , without actually using it, and breathe in the scent of feces and urine. I’m not making this up. Apparently this was a past time for him, and probably the majority of homosexuals.
This is degeneracy, peak degeneracy. Nothing else compares to the depravity of men playing stink-finger with each other. It is filth and it’s disgusting.
In a sane society, homosexuals would be rounded up and quarantined away from decent society. Perhaps reopen the insane asylums and repopulate them with homosexuals that are masturbating and defecating in the streets with children present during Pride Parade.
At one of the theaters I managed we discovered fags had drilled holes in the walls of the toilet stalls so they could look at the genitals of the men using the urinals. Your proposal that they be confined to mental asylums is a humane one. Emperor Justinian use to behead them en mass which I think is warranted but only for those among them who are guilty of rape or molesting children.
Apparently this was a past time for him, and probably the majority of homosexuals.
People who believe the 6 million holocaust hoax are the same people who believe the US landed men on the Moon six times, Muslim terrorist did 9/11, and that Borack Obama killed Osama Bin Laden.
Here’s the thing. There were many lies about communist atrocities, but many communist atrocities were true.
Yeah, they lie a lot. The Empire has grown so powerful that it believes reality exists only as a psy-op for its agenda. In a way, post-modern war on ‘truth’ had a way of serving the Power than ‘deconstructing’ it. If reality is always a matter of power and narrative, then there is no need to seek out the truth. It’s only a matter of gaining power and shaping ‘reality’ to fit one’s narrative and agenda.
Take the Iran nuclear thing. Iran never had nukes and didn’t have a viable plan to make one. It could if it really wanted, but it always wanted to come to a compromise with the West.
None of that truth mattered. Instead, it was always Iran has nukes or is 2 weeks away from getting them. And most US whore politicians just nodded along.
So, there you go. The West is more concerned with fantasy nukes in Iran than with real dead bodies in Gaza.
Hey, Jung-Freud, are you aware of the existence of the word 'rather'?
In a way, post-modern war on ‘truth’ had a way of serving the Power [rather] than ‘deconstructing’ it.
You're very welcome. 🙏
I shall watch that video. Thank you for the heads up.
No, sir. I belong to a Bible Study community affiliated with a non-denominational Church. The reason being our teacher has not only read the KJV Bible front to back 25 times, and counting. But he's studied the Interlinear Bible and had to learn the OT in the original Hebrew/Aramaic as well as the NT in Koine Greek.
Are you Orthodox?
streams.
The Church of the Eternal Logos's
unfolding before us....... I would not hesitate to take up arms alongside the Orthodox Church if events here necessitated it. And, yes, Saint Alexander Nevsky is one of my heroes.
Book of Revelations
I also believe that because I have faith in God. With the rise of BRI and BRICS, Russia is already becoming the new Byzantine Empire.
By God, Russia and Constantinople will reconcile.
It's truly a tragedy to see the horror occurring there owing to the machinations of Mossad, M16, the CIA and Turkey's Muslim Brotherhood; all acolytes of the Antichrist.
Antioch has the advantage of being very old and very comfortable with diversity and pressure. They’ve been living under persecution for a long time and are sort of a unifying onlooker between Muscovite and Greek and CIA shenanigans. We’re just waiting for the dust to settle.
From your lips to God’s ears. I haven’t read that book by patriarch Kyril, but now I’ll try to. Have you ever been to a liturgy? It’s the real deal man.
I do have to hand it to the Protestants for general biblical knowledge tho.
We are supposed to live as if we were in the end times, whether we are or not. And if the kibbeh ever hits the fan I’ll call you up on that offer. Down with Babylon!
God be With you
CIL
I shall watch that video. Thank you for the heads up.
You’re very welcome. 🙏
Are you Orthodox?
No, sir. I belong to a Bible Study community affiliated with a non-denominational Church. The reason being our teacher has not only read the KJV Bible front to back 25 times, and counting. But he’s studied the Interlinear Bible and had to learn the OT in the original Hebrew/Aramaic as well as the NT in Koine Greek.
You know the Green Beret concept of Nation Building where they train the trainers/leaders? This is the same only as it pertains to the Gospels.
That said:
1) I hold the Orthodox Doctrine/Church in extremely high regard and derive plenty of value from it’s teachings whether it’s from reading Bishop Kalistos Ware’s The Orthodox Way or watching
The Church of the Eternal Logos’s
streams.
2) Since it appears we are now seeing the
Book of Revelations
unfolding before us……. I would not hesitate to take up arms alongside the Orthodox Church if events here necessitated it. And, yes, Saint Alexander Nevsky is one of my heroes.
By God, Russia and Constantinople will reconcile.
I also believe that because I have faith in God. With the rise of BRI and BRICS, Russia is already becoming the new Byzantine Empire.
Speaking of which, have you read this book by Patriarch Kirill?
I recently saw it being cited as something he gifted to President Xi. My Ortho buddy has also recommended it to me.
Antioch has the advantage of being very old and very comfortable with diversity and pressure. They’ve been living under persecution for a long time and are sort of a unifying onlooker between Muscovite and Greek and CIA shenanigans. We’re just waiting for the dust to settle.
It’s truly a tragedy to see the horror occurring there owing to the machinations of Mossad, M16, the CIA and Turkey’s Muslim Brotherhood; all acolytes of the Antichrist.

Without Assad and Hezbollah providing the heavy firepower, I’m not sure how long the Syriac Christian militias will last but it’s moments like these that faith in Christ is forged.
One thing no one has mentioned is the low morale of having a military composed primarily of draftees who were thrown into a war with no grand overarching strategy or defined objective. That was compounded by the hostility they faced from a brainwashed public at home who scapegoated them for an unpopular war.
One of the things which drove that point home was watching footage of our South Korean allies. The ROK units were composed solely of the most highly trained volunteers who returned home to a hero’s welcome and were given promotions. They didn’t suffer from being marginalized and all the dysfunctions that entailed like we saw here.

The better way to beat Communism is to attack it early and focus on its leadership. It uses a very predictable structure where they are dependent on a handful of leaders and use workers for enforcement.
In the early stages of a communist insurgency, the core cadre usually mobilize the students as the most vocal and visible elements.
The women, clergy ( think the Maryknolls with their Liberation Theology), and artists/entertainers/musicians provide support networks often in the Auxiliary and Underground capacities or assist with PSYOPs.
The workers, in the more developed target nations, or the peasants in agrarian places like the ones in China and SE Asia, made up the bulk of the main guerrilla forces but only after a revolution had escalated to 3rd Stage insurgency.
Col. Roger Trinquier’s Modern Warfare is a quick guide on the structure of revolutionary organizations and his proposed counter-insurgency doctrine is a must read.
https://www.armyupress.army.mil/Portals/7/combat-studies-institute/csi-books/Modern-Warfare.pdf
Backtracking this to Vietnam, by the final years both us and the French were facing an insurgency which had already grew into an internationalized civil war.
Whether militarily crushing North Vietnam would have ended the conflict decisively is open to question. As retired Army Intel ACE (Analysis & Control Element), Mike Shelby, who was in Afghanistan once pointed out, all it takes is the support of 12-13% of the populace to keep maintain a perpetual insurgency.
Looking at the history of the Troubles in N. Ireland, I suspect Shelby was correct. PIRA numbered in the tens of thousands but their Active Service Unit cells which carried out the bombings and urban sniping campaigns only numbered 300 at it’s height. And despite Britain deploying it’s most capable forces (Royal Marines, SAS, etc), the IRA was able to fight them to a standstill until the Good Friday Accord.
Is your Church Antiochian?
Also, have you seen this? TPTB are attempting to create Schism 2.0 within the Orthodox Church just as they have created and armed the Salafists to fan the flames of sectarianism among Islam.
https://southfront.press/orthodox-crescent-of-instability/
It appears only Orthodox Russia and their Muslim allies within the Rus Federation have a good grasp on the spiritual dimensions of this seemingly growing chaotic world.