RSSI understand that this site is frequented most by Americans but I think your headline of this article applies to the majority of people in every nation.
That’s a very fair point. Actually, my original title didn’t have “American” in it, but once I learned of Glazyev’s views, I decided it wasn’t fair to include the Russians among the deluded. But then again, I’d assume the populations of all the NATO countries are in the same boat as the Americans, and given American MSM domination, probably most of the rest of the world as well.
So having “American” in the title is more wrong than right, and I think I’ll exercise my prerogative as the author, and remove it.
Yes, it has become clear that the US strategy morphed into treating Ukraine as if it were a NATO ally while denying it the formal recognition as such. Watch the Scott Ritter video interviews from Grey Zone, and listen to him describe the inter-operability that you mention. A large Ukranian force could be sent to Germany and seamlessly transition into the NATO military structure there.
I’m not surprised that they have been finding NATO training books in Mariupol, and everywhere in Ukraine. I would be surprised if at this point in time there were still NATO advisors and trainers in Mariupol.
Do you actually believe that there are NATO advisors in Mariupol? That sounds rather far-fetched to me. If there are NATO advisors in Mariupol, and the remnants of the Azov Battalion took them hostage and threatened to kill them, I reckon the Russians would say “Go ahead, kill them. If you don’t, we will.” The Russians have made it abundantly clear that ANY western or NATO forces in Ukraine are belligerents who will be killed. Over two weeks ago the Russians delievered missile strikes on defacto NATO bases in Yavoriv and Zhytomyr in western Ukraine. NATO carried out training at Zhytomyr in September 2018 and described Ukraine as a “NATO partner.” Zhytomyr was destroyed with hypersonic missiles on March 18. Yavoriv suffered a similar fate on March 19. It was the primary training and logistics center that NATO and EUCOM used to supply fighters and weapons to Ukraine. A large number of the military and civilian personnel at that base became casualties. This was a loud message of warning to NATO and the US that the Russians will kill NATO and US forces who enter Ukraine.
Buddhism is not Chinese.
The three teachings would be Confucianism, Taoism, and Legalism (Han Fei Zi).
The west is going to be dealing with spiraling inflation, shortages of food and energy, and populations seething with growing anger at their feckless politicians. There isn’t going to be money to invest in Ukraine. No, I see the investment in Ukraine as coming from the east, China specifically. If Russia plays its cards right and offers incentives (re-open natural gas pipelines running through Ukraine, etc) they will also enable some kind of economic support for Ukraine. China should and will come in with offers for infrastructure help that will build rail and sea links to the BRI. They want Ukraine’s food exports, and building infrastructure in Ukraine will help them to achieve that.
First, the food shortages will be global in nature, and Biden’s comment seems to have been twisted by the media to be related more to shortages in the US when it seems that he was referring to the entire world. Second, the food shortages in poor countries are going to get really ugly really fast, and people who have traditionally been poor but food secure are going to start to experience hunger and even starvation. Next, the food shortages in the US are going to have a number of root causes, including production problems, supply chain problems, and shipping problems. They will cause a decrease in the availability of certain categories of food products, not a drying up of all foodstuffs.
The good news politically is that the food shortages in the US will be experienced in the blue, Democratic Party-run cities, and the red states will not have problems, seeing that nearly all major food production takes place in those states. Of course California is not in this category, but if you think about it, the food production areas of California are MUCH less blue and more red than the other areas, which mean cities and suburban high-tech areas. The food shortages will rightly be blamed on the Democratic Party, though the media and administration will try to blame it all on Vlad Putin. That won’t really fly, because, yes, the people are remarkably stupid, but they’re not that stupid. They can see that the inflation, supply chain disruptions, drug crazy homeless problems, etc. were all up and running well before the Ukraine war. The food shortages will result in election losses for the woke madmen, madwomen, madtransfreaks, madidentitarians who are running the Dems. Good riddance.
Mark Dice: Pot, Kettle, Black!
He talks about these “conservatives” with surprise that they would support Dave Rubin in his artificial insemination project to rent two wombs so that he and his gay lover can have kids, and he even names names: Ben Shapiro, Prager U, the Blaze, etc. He completely FAILS to mention the real reason that they are now strangely genuflecting at the altar of gay marriage/adoption: Jews can do no wrong.
That’s right. For Shapiro and Prager U, both ardent “Jew first” activists, the fact that Rubin is violating their principles is in a distant second place to the fact that the is a Jew, and as such, is beyond criticism. The rest of the non-Jews that Dice mentions are all well aware that they will put their cash flow at risk if they criticize Jews; ask Whoopi.
So, why doesn’t Mark Dice just come out with the real issue: Thou shalt no criticize Jews; not as individuals, not as organizations, not as a collective. Why doesn’t HE show some backbone and mention the elephant stomping around the room?
Remember, friends. Any accusation of antisemitism should never be met with emotion. It should be met with a calm discussion pointing out the fact that antisemitism is reactionary in nature. It is a logical and reasonable RESPONSE to the corrosive effects of the Jews on goy societies. The analogy of the guy who gets kicked out of 100 bars should be mentioned calmly. Are all those bar owners really haters? The fact that there is a difference in viewpoint must be quietly brought up. Something like this: “We disagree on a major issue here. YOU think that we goys (non-Jews) have some kind of genetic proclivity towards hating Jews. I think that we goys REACT to the bad behavior of Jews towards us and respond to this behavior.” The Jews cannot tolerate this kind of calm discussion and will either stomp out to kill the conversation, or totally go beserk. It’s fun to watch.
I love this. China is pushing the buttons of the (((elites))) in the (((Biden Administration))), sending a message. You dare to tell Biden to call President Xi and lecture him on morality! We will show the world your hypocrisy! We will remind the world how you have ignored International Law and UN Resolutions for many years. Next step, start highlighting the history of the Security Council veto, and how the overwhelming majority of Security Council vetoes have been the US protecting Israel.
He has found his inner racist; it is Jewish supremacism. He is the anti-goy. Unfortunately, anti-goy thinking is now PART of the mainstream, and goys are supporting it in droves. This guy embraces his hatred of the goy. It drips from his whining about antisemitism!
Fantastic commentary on the February 4, 2022 Joint Statement of the Russian Federation and the People’s Republic of China by Kim Iversen. I didn’t even know this woman before I saw this clip, but she is spitting out realpolitik and logic in a way that is almost nonexistent on US mainstream media. God certainly gifted her with a great brain, and he did an excellent job in covering her bones as well! This is the first time I have seen any western mainstream media actually try to dissect and analyze the content and parts of the Joint Statement, providing details of the actual text. I imagine that the media won’t run it because the response of many traditional, white, populist Americans would be to call the statement logical and reasonable, a blueprint for a multi-polar world. That is exactly what the elites want to avoid. The part where the talking heads on either side of her start to call the statement ridiculous is also enlightening, as they basically have no real talking points, just the usual bs that the media spews. Kim does well sticking to her guns; it’s clear that she admires the moves of China and Russia and supports the multi-polar world, with America putting more focus on the welfare and life of its own population. Great stuff!
As it turned our, the putsch leaders followed Nuland’s advice to the letter, installing “Yats” as the new prime minister. But it also filled four cabinet posts out of eleven with rabid anti-Russian crypto-Nazis.
It’s certainly true that important elements of the Ukrainian government have been more or less explicit neo-Nazis, naturally embarrassing our very supportive mainstream media, which normally disfavors Nazis. So when Putin or others have regularly raised this issue, the media (including this morning’s NYT) has often ridiculed the accusations by pointing out that the current Ukrainian leader is Jewish, as was the previous one. Since Jews and Nazis obviously don’t get along, the charges must be absurd.
This completely disingenuous argument only works because much of the true history of the World War II era is so little known. The undeniable reality is that throughout the 1930s, the Zionists were quasi-allies of Nazi Germany, and even after WWII began, a rightwing Zionist faction led by a future Prime Minister of Israel attempted to enlist in the Axis military alliance. Indeed, Nazi Germany played an absolutely central role in the creation of the State of Israel.
For anyone interested, I discussed all these fascinating but under-reported facts in a long 2018 article:
I have never seen any evidence that Poroshenko, the previous President, was Jewish. Quite the contrary.
So when Putin or others have regularly raised this issue, the media (including this morning’s NYT) has often ridiculed the accusations by pointing out that the current Ukrainian leader is Jewish, as was the previous one.
To be fair to Mr. Stockman, he is on the same page as you regarding the need to greatly downsize the government, especially the overseas US military machine. The difference is in the degree. He serves on the board of directors of the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget. He certainly doesn’t adore the criminal state that he shines a critical light on, and to make it seem that his unpopular views and willingness to express them benefits him is disingenuous. Remember that he was part of the Republican machine in the 70s and 80s. He could have cultivated a lucrative career as a swamp denizen, but he followed his heart.
As far as small government ideology goes, I would say that I am somewhere between you and him.
The NSDAP (National Socialist German Workers’ Party) didn’t have an ideological hatred of Communists. They were for the most part reactionary, responding to the (((communist emissaries))) who were striving to spread their ideology westward, initially and primarily into Germany as far as Western Europe goes.
It was a completely rational reaction to the destablilization of the country.
Could you share those photos? Perhaps post them in a comment?
Ezra Pound was a bit more specific 😛
What we learn from the Whoopi story:
In the thug autocracies that Giraldi shills for — Russia, China, Iran, Hezb, Hamas — when a public figure speaks contrary to the narratives that powerful elites insist upon, consequences range from cancellation to outright brutality (detention, beating, long term imprisonment, murder), often carried out by “legitimate” state actors.
In the open societies where Jews naturally assume elite roles, when a glib, smiling clown with a substantial media footprint utters shallow, ahistorical nonsense, there is — breathe deep now — a “talking to”, a scold, imploring the transgressor to gain a more mature appreciation of well established historical events, and, in this case, the imposition of a two week timeout before the transgressor resumes their high paid high visibility role.
Correction: In the jewish-controlled societies where Jews give each other elite roles,
In the open societies where Jews naturally assume elite roles,
The most critical point is that Khamenei violated the JCPOA deal while Barack Hussein was still in office. (1)
The IAEA first ignored the reports. This should not come as a surprise: the IAEA has a long history of misreporting the Islamic Republic’s compliance with the deal and declining to follow up on credible reports about Iran’s illicit nuclear activities. Iran’s clandestine nuclear sites in Natanz and Arak were revealed by the opposition group, the National Council of Resistance of Iran.
In any event, after a significant amount of pressure was imposed on the IAEA, and after the IAEA’s chief passed away and Iran was reportedly able to moving the suspected materials out of the secret nuclear facility, inspection of the site was recently implemented.
What was the outcome? Even though the Iranian leaders had cleaned up the facility, the IAEA’s inspectors were able to detect traces of radioactive uranium at the site. Israel’s warning and other reports had proved accurate
The IAEA is known to be very friendly with Iran, verging on co-conspirator levels of complicity. Khamenei’s violation was so extreme, obvious, and undisguisable even the IAEA could not orchestrate a cover up.
Khamenei’s intentional assault on Obama’s legacy has alienated many Democrats who supported, or at least tolerated, the original JCPOA.
___
On top of that, Khamenei is making demands that are obviously irrational. Even far left advocates of a JCPOA restart, such as The Guardian, see the folly: (2)
A second issue surrounds the guarantees Iran is seeking that the US will not repeat Trump’s withdrawal from the deal in May 2018. The US cannot offer a legally binding treaty since the Senate would never agree to one. Price said: “There is no such thing as a guarantee in diplomacy and international affairs. We can speak for this administration, but this administration has been very clear that we are prepared to return to full compliance with the JCPOA [Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action] and to stay in full compliance with the JCPOA as long as Iran does the same.”
A UN security council resolution might be a bare minimum of comfort for Iran, but is hardly binding on the parties. Tehran wants binding commitments that if the US quits the deal, the EU will do more to defy secondary US sanctions by injecting real cash into the abortive trading mechanism Instex set up by the EU to bypass US sanctions.
The only tool in the U.S. Constitution that can bind a subsequent administration is a treaty. Given the state of U.S. internal politics + Democrats offended by Khamenei’s betrayal of Barack Hussein, the current White House occupant cannot obtain Senate 2/3 vote for ratification to lock in a new or amended treaty. The concept of “legally binding” is simply not available. Even if the U.S. negotiating team says “Yes” the U.S. Senate will openly rebuke Biden with a *bipartisan* “No”.
Trying to obtain binding commitment from an EU teetering on the brink of internal conflagration is even more absurd. Europe cannot even guarantee that the EU will exist in 12 months.
___
The futile negotiations are headed toward inevitable failure. One can imagine Shakespeare describing the show as:
“Talks among idiots, full of sound and fury, signifying nothing.”
PEACE 😇
__________
(1) From 2019 – https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/14910/iran-nuclear-deal-violations
(2) https://www.theguardian.com/world/2022/jan/17/iran-nuclear-talks-deadlock-risks-dangerous-vacuum
"Poor sourcing" is an understatement; primarily quoting Nutty Yahoo and The Jewish Press is bootstrapping worthy of Ned Price (the evidence for my allegation IS my allegation (self-evident evidence!). Are you an Iranian agent?) Netanyahu, well after the US had already reneged on its agreement, cites secret chambers with traces of uranium. What are the odds of that within a legit nuclear energy development program? Even one of its own sources contradicts Gatestone's claims (just pepper your article with myriad links that unpaid readers won't bother to fact-check):https://www.armscontrol.org/act/2018-11/news/israel-claims-secret-nuclear-site-iran
"Overall, we rate the Gatestone Institute Questionable based on extreme right wing bias, promotion of propaganda and conspiracies, poor sourcing, a lack of transparency and the publication of misleading or false information regarding Muslims."
The Guardian article is correct. Iran is unlikely to get a legally binding treaty thru the US Knesset. But that wouldn't matter anyway. The US doesn't honor oral assurances, agreements, international laws, UN resolutions, or treaties. As Russia states, the US is not "agreement capable". Now that is self-evident.Replies: @anonymous, @A123
U.S. intelligence officials also disputed Netanyahu’s description of the facility and said his comments were misleading. One intelligence official quoted by Reuters on Sept. 27 said that the facility has been known to the U.S. intelligence community for some time and is full of documents, not nuclear equipment. The officials said that “so far as anyone knows, there is nothing in it that would allow Iran to break out” of the nuclear deal any faster. Iranian officials immediately denounced Netanyahu’s accusation as a farce, and Iranian Foreign Minister Javad Zarif said on Sept. 30 that Netanyahu is “desperately seeking to find a pretext to create hype” about Iran’s nuclear program.
This is the second time Netanyahu has publicly revealed what he describes as secret information tied to Iran’s nuclear weapons program. In February 2018, Israel stole archival material from a facility in Iran that appears to document activities related to the country’s nuclear weapons development and shared the information with several states and the IAEA."...Those traces were, however, of uranium, the diplomats said - the same element Iran is enriching and one of only two fissile elements with which one can make the core of a nuclear bomb. One diplomat said the uranium was not highly enriched, meaning it was not purified to a level anywhere close to that needed for weapons.
"There are lots of possible explanations," that diplomat said. But since Iran has not yet given any to the IAEA it is hard to verify the particles' origin, and it is also not clear whether the traces are remnants of material or activities that predate the landmark 2015 deal or more recent, diplomats say.
Political correctness is communist propaganda writ small. In my study of communist societies, I came to the conclusion that the purpose of communist propaganda was not to persuade or convince, nor to inform, but to humiliate; and therefore, the less it corresponded to reality the better. When people are forced to remain silent when they are being told the most obvious lies, or even worse when they are forced to repeat the lies themselves, they lose once and for all their sense of probity. To assent to obvious lies is to co-operate with evil, and in some small way to become evil oneself. One’s standing to resist anything is thus eroded, and even destroyed. A society of emasculated liars is easy to control. I think if you examine political correctness, it has the same effect and is intended to.
-Theodore Dalrymple
I will add that actresses are correctly considered to be a type of whore, as all ancients agreed. I will further add that I got algorithmically locked for saying so on twitter. Actresses are a race, naturally, so calling them whores is racist.
Probably shouldn’t be so loose if they don’t want me to call them whores, though.
Should I also repeat that Russian joke?
A new teacher comes into the class:
– My name is Abram Davidovich, I’m a liberal. And now all stand up and introduce yourself like I did …
– My name is Masha, I’m a liberal …
– My name is Petia, I’m a liberal …
– My Little Johnny, I’m a Stalinist.
– Little Johnny, why are you a Stalinist? !
– My mom is a Stalinist, my dad is a Stalinist, my friends are Stalinists and I too am a Stalinist.
– Little Johnny, and if your mother was a whore, your father – a drug addict, your friends – homos, what would you be then in that case? !
– Then I would be a liberal.
The Republic of China (Taiwan) maintains that it is the legitimate government of all China. The People`s Republic of China maintains that it is the legitimate government of all China. Since both governments are claiming the same territory, how can it be an annexation? The PRC`s position on Taiwan is no different today than it was when it replaced the Republic of China at the UN. The only thing that has changed is US meddling.
• China has made overt threats of annexing Taiwan.
That depends on what you consider a threat. Why are there 2 carrier strike groups operating in the South China Sea?
The U.S./NATO has not threatened China with war.
Let’s not forget the US and their official formal position on China/Taiwan:
When the United States moved to recognize the People’s Republic of China (PRC) and de-recognize the Republic of China (ROC) in 1979, the United States stated that the government of the People’s Republic of China was “the sole legal Government of China.” Sole, meaning the PRC was and is the only China, with no consideration of the ROC as a separate sovereign entity.
The United States did not, however, give in to Chinese demands that it recognize Chinese sovereignty over Taiwan (which is the name preferred by the United States since it opted to de-recognize the ROC). Instead, Washington acknowledged the Chinese position that Taiwan was part of China.
I just gave you two solutions, yet somehow it didn't land? The problem I'm concerned with is the Jew problem, especially their operating as an in-group, and taking usury and rents on society.There is a name for this, and it is called demoralization. The brain becomes so myelin sheathed along certain neuronal pathways, that it cannot take in information at variance with what it thinks it knows.Her womb (your brain) was a barren desert for which my seed could find no purchase.https://althouse.blogspot.com/2010/10/her-womb-was-barren-desert-in-which-my.htmlAnother solution is to brain scan for psychopaths and prevent them from being in sensitive professions. Of course our (((friends))) would object to this idea vigorously. People who blame the victims are lacking in empathy.https://www.smithsonianmag.com/science-nature/the-neuroscientist-who-discovered-he-was-a-psychopath-180947814/Replies: @Realist, @frankie p
What is your solution to the problem you are so concerned with???
“I just gave you two solutions, yet somehow it didn’t land?”
Realist is playing out in real time the behavior of Jews described in Mein Kampf by Hitler. He asks you questions about how to solve the Jewish problem of usury and collecting rents on society as well as the great web of collateral problems this initial problem begets, such as the need to destroy the dominant culture in society (to protect the Jews, of course), control of media, academia, corporations, debauched social programs prioritizing and celebrating criminal and twisted minorities such as blacks and LGBT freaks. You answer rationally and patiently, explaining some early steps, such as the establishment of state banks like North Dakota’s and pursuing a strategy to organize the referendum states; you mention the international conflict among powerful states like China, Russia, and Iran, which are fighting tooth and nail against the financial capitalist behemoth that the usurers have raised. You mention support for policies like debt forgiveness.
Realist takes action: He posts a LOL on your comment. He refuses to engage in the ideas that you have posted. He may even agree with them, though in this case he hasn’t even commented on them.
Later on the same comment thread, he then acts as if the exchange never took place, and he continues with the exact same question that you just answered: “What is your solution to the problem you are so concerned with?”
It reminds me of CS Lewis from “That Hideous Strength”.
Ransom? Ransom? Ransom? Ransom? Ransom?
What?
Nothing?
Ransom? Ransom? Ransom?…
A significant objective of the novel is to illustrate the destructive folly of seeking power and prestige by belonging to a ruling clique or inner circle.
Sound like (((anyone))) you know?
And Hitler gradually came to hate them.
Realist is playing out in real time the behavior of Jews described in Mein Kampf by Hitler. He asks you questions about how to solve the Jewish problem of usury and collecting rents on society as well as the great web of collateral problems this initial problem begets, such as the need to destroy the dominant culture in society (to protect the Jews, of course), control of media, academia, corporations, debauched social programs prioritizing and celebrating criminal and twisted minorities such as blacks and LGBT freaks.
We had our own alternative chorus back in the day, when we took these things for granted, waking up with them every morning, experiencing them at inconvenient times, etc.:
Know when you feel it
You’ve got to free it
Unzip your fly
Heave a sigh
It’s a boner
Great song, The Loner
Sung to the tune of “The Loner” (Neil Young):
Is it a code of honor
That he just can’t un-codify?
Is he a prima donna
With opinions he won’t modify?
Is he afraid of Corona?
Is that why he’s off Spotify?
No more Spotify content
He took his songs and home he went
Rogan lied
Neil Young cried
He’s the loser
Neil Young wrote and recorded “Lotta Love” for the Comes a Time album. Nicolette Larson sang backing vocals on Comes a Time, but not on the “Lotta Love” track. The story goes that while they were recording American Stars and Bars, she found a tape on the floor of his car and popped it in. She hears “Lotta Love” and said that it was a great song. Neil said, “You want it. It’s yours.” He certainly didn’t write it for Nicolette Larson.
Soral and Dieudonné are hostile. Others – Jean-Yves Le Gallou, Renaud Camus, indeed several RN cadres defecting to Zemmour – are favorable.
Dieudonné’s position seems motivated by Zemmour’s opposition to Islam. He asks: if Islam is incompatible with France and the Republic, what about Judaism? He has a point. Many of the attacks on Zemmour by Dieudonné’s supporters are frankly unworthy – I think of the preface to Dieudonné’s book against Zemmour, which was just vulgar ad hominem.
Soral and Zemmour had some discrete dialogue in previous years. Now Soral seems to be on the warpath against Zemmour, making again some very unworthy and irrelevant personal claims, that I won’t even dignify by repeating.
Soral’s political claim is that the System/Zionists are making Zemmour rise in order to foster gentile-Muslim conflict and break France through civil war. This doesn’t strike me as credible. The System has different factions within it and does not wholly control political and narrative developments. In this sense, Zemmour’s situation strikes me as analogous to Trump’s in 2016.
The FN ➔ RN rebranding has not served the party well. Becoming softer gained no friends in the hostile media conglomerates and opened political space for a less squishy candidate. (1)
Soral and Dieudonné are hostile. Others – Jean-Yves Le Gallou, Renaud Camus, indeed several RN cadres defecting to Zemmour – are favorable.
Zemmour's breakthrough is rather surprising. One helpful factor. He cannot targeted by the usual media cheap shots. No one would believe accusations of White Nationalism or Neo-Nazi group membership.
Three months before France's presidential vote, Jerome Riviere made a blunt calculation: Marine Le Pen, long the leader of the traditional far-right, had lost her anti-establishment edge and veered too close to the mainstream to win the election.
He defected and rallied behind the campaign of Eric Zemmour, the writer-turned-presidential challenger whose nationalist agenda echoes the one-time aspiration of former U.S. President Donald Trump to "Make America Great Again". Riviere, who was Le Pen's top lawmaker in the European Parliament before he jumped ship earlier this month, said Le Pen had become too soft on immigration and compromised the party's tough eurosceptic stance with her tack towards the mainstream.
"Eric Zemmour says things as they are. It's black or white, he doesn't use shades of grey to describe reality," Riviere, now vice president of Zemmour's Reconquete (Reconquest) party, told Reuters. His defection illustrates how Le Pen's strategy to make her party more acceptable to traditional centre-right voters is alienating core supporters and has left her out-flanked further to the right by Zemmour's burst into the political arena.
Meanwhile, conservative candidate Valerie Pecresse's own talk on immigration, identity and security has toughened at a time political discourse in France drifts to the right. The result is that Le Pen, 53, is being squeezed from both sides. Le Pen, Zemmour and Pecresse are all vying to win a second round runoff spot in April's elections, with President Emmanuel Macron currently leading opinion polls and expected to take the other runoff place.
Mr. Durocher,
A serious question: what is the position of the canceled French nationalists on Zemmour? What is the official position of Equality and Reconciliation? Has Soral written much on Zemmour? What is his viewpoint? Has Ryssen spoken out about him? What about Dieudonne?
Thanks to any French speakers who may have information on this.
Neil Young has no input into the composition of that tune.
Your comment here (above) reflects badly on you as a writer and analyst. Who didn't bother to read the line at the beginning of iSteve's article on Young's bio Shakey that first appeared in the American Conservative in 2002. Spotify didn't exist in 2002, just so you get my point. As to your other remark about "not being about Joe Rogan" that's misleading. It was Spotify's hosting of the Rogan podcast (paid for dearly by Spotify) that is the "beef." Young, the former "rebel hippie" is now just another dumb Woke COVID fear monger, bullying a vendor of music streams and podcasts. Young objects to having his precious music being sold along side of a streamed very popular podcaster who has a different opinion. So rather dim bulb Young is just another would be fascist style bully (or more contemporary, Red Guard style commie bully.) When you demand that others "shut up" and disappear, that is worse than simply being in disagreement. That is Woke fascism. Of course senile Young, the would be Canadian virtue signaler, is merely shooting himself in the foot. "Don't sell my product in the same online store as Joe Rogan!"
This most recent kerfuffle that Steve so terribly misrepresents as being a beef between Neil Young and Joe Rogan is the last straw. Steve, this is a beef between Neil Young and Spotify. The fact that I cannot find the name Spotify anywhere in your article reflects badly on you as a writer and analyst.
I’m not talking about the ancient American Conservative article. I’m talking about this blog post, framed as Neil Young vs. Joe Rogan when it is actually Neil Young vs. Spotify.
I’m not talking about the ancient American Conservative article. I’m talking about this blog post, framed as Neil Young vs. Joe Rogan when it is actually Neil Young vs. Spotify.
Right on, Steve! I don’t know where these guys come from, saying that Neil Young didn’t make much money. Harvest was released in early 1972, and the original album sold 15,000,000 copies. To date, including compilations, singles, downloads, and streaming, the album is up to 23,000,000 in total sales. You mention Crosby, Stills, Nash and Young, and they were wildly successful in the very period that these guys say Neil didn’t make any money; Deja Vu, released in March, 1970, sold nearly 15 million copies as an original album, and since then has broken sales of 24,000,000 copies. The money doesn’t stop pouring in when the sales continue. Neil Young also toured prolifically through the years, and some of those tours were stadium tours. I remember Rust Never Sleeps in 1979 or 1980. This was a huge stadium tour, yielded a film and an album, and earned huge money. Neil Young accumulated a big pile of money over the years, but he also developed very expensive habits (the train collection, the land upkeep, not to mention the full-time staff taking care of his son, who has a severe disability).
Neil Young released 43 studio albums, as well as contributing to multiple bands.
Young was in a hugely popular band, CSN&Y, and had a very successful solo career simultaneously. He’d previously been in Buffalo Springfield, so CSN&Y was not his first rodeo. He was a smart guy and I think he tended to deal with the less larcenous music executives, such as Ahmet Ertegun. Plus, he’s not the type of personality you could easily bully into bad deals. So, a larger than normal chunk of the huge revenue generated by Woodstock Era rock stars wound up in Young’s pocket than was was common due to the rapaciousness of music industry suits.
Do you remember the lyrics of the verse about possessions when he sang “Imagine” after 9/11?
It was a fleeting glimpse of honesty from Neil Young, one of my favorite singer/songwriters when I was young. “Imagine no possessions, I wonder if I can.”
I have no time for Neil Young anymore. I read his autobiography. He is deranged, trying to hold on to his sinking wealth and finding surprise by the fact that he has to tone down his wildly expensive lifestyle and sell some “possessions” that he wonders if he can imagine living without. He carried on smoking weed for too many years and it seriously affected his brain. He was told by doctors to give it up and now is supremely proud that he was able to do so…at the age of 68 or something.
This most recent kerfuffle that Steve so terribly misrepresents as being a beef between Neil Young and Joe Rogan is the last straw. Steve, this is a beef between Neil Young and Spotify. The fact that I cannot find the name Spotify anywhere in your article reflects badly on you as a writer and analyst. As to Neil, who the f*** does he think that he is? Has he ever watched Joe Rogan? Is he aware that Rogan has hosted doctors, scientists, researchers, etc. from both sides of the divide on the vaccines? Rogan is all about the right to free and open scientific discourse. Neil Young is all about woke fascism these days, and those views cancel him for me personally. You see, cancellation is okay when it is done by an individual. I can never condone people being cancelled broadly, by media, big tech, the establishment, etc. The only thing I can condone is your right to NEVER give people a cent of your money again. That is the way I feel about Neil Young. I admit that I probably learned more Neil Young songs than any other artist besides the Beatles. I still remember them all, though I can’t remember the songs I wrote a month or two ago, but that’s old age. If I want to hear Cinnamon Girl, a song I still love, I will listen to it for free. I would never see Neil Young live again, buy any of his music, or buy any of his books.
Watch the Canadian Covid Care Alliance video for a logical analysis of this issue and the right to free and open scientific discourse.
Your comment here (above) reflects badly on you as a writer and analyst. Who didn't bother to read the line at the beginning of iSteve's article on Young's bio Shakey that first appeared in the American Conservative in 2002. Spotify didn't exist in 2002, just so you get my point. As to your other remark about "not being about Joe Rogan" that's misleading. It was Spotify's hosting of the Rogan podcast (paid for dearly by Spotify) that is the "beef." Young, the former "rebel hippie" is now just another dumb Woke COVID fear monger, bullying a vendor of music streams and podcasts. Young objects to having his precious music being sold along side of a streamed very popular podcaster who has a different opinion. So rather dim bulb Young is just another would be fascist style bully (or more contemporary, Red Guard style commie bully.) When you demand that others "shut up" and disappear, that is worse than simply being in disagreement. That is Woke fascism. Of course senile Young, the would be Canadian virtue signaler, is merely shooting himself in the foot. "Don't sell my product in the same online store as Joe Rogan!"
This most recent kerfuffle that Steve so terribly misrepresents as being a beef between Neil Young and Joe Rogan is the last straw. Steve, this is a beef between Neil Young and Spotify. The fact that I cannot find the name Spotify anywhere in your article reflects badly on you as a writer and analyst.
“Blacks need to understand that even if racism is morally wrong, it is still a rational response to the bad behavior of certain segments of the black population.”
This is for you:
Jews need to understand that even if antisemitism is morally wrong, it is (and always has been) still a rational response to the bad behavior of certain segments of the Jewish population.
Jews say, goyim obey.
What Jewish-run media does to whummy minds.
This is totally normal behavior and not insane at all pic.twitter.com/3EOs3T0MHp
— Libs of Tik Tok (@libsoftiktok) January 23, 2022
At this point, any “populist” goy, from the left or the right who is not antisemitic according to the definitions of the day is not worth a cup of stale piss. Chew on that, Jonathan Cook. The two populist wings in the English speaking world need to be joined together in a functional bird that flies like Equality and Reconciliation in France, and intellectual leaders need to speak out honestly about how the “corporate, billionaire-owned media” is largely owned, run and controlled by the Jews for the Jews. The “corrupt system”, the “elite interests”, and the “judiciary” that is silencing independent journalism are all top heavy with Jews and acting on the behalf of other wealthy Jews. You, Jonathan Cook, have been programmed since childhood to be unable to express these truths, but the calcification in your brain that prevents you from seeing these truths is cracking and crumbling as you investigate and examine.
Keep it up. I hope you find the courage the break free and become a complete truth teller.
I’m beginning to wonder whether you’re being disingenuous here or if you’re just somewhat dense. I must admit that I’m leaning toward the former and coming to the conclusion that you’re a pilpul artist. You put forth your ridiculous argument that “the merits of the particular ideas being promoted are ultimately what matters most”, and you deliberately ignore the fact that those who feel that the ideas pushed by organized Jewish groups (free immigration of minorities, LGBT supremacy, minoritarianism including worship of blacks, anti-white and anti-Christian policies) have no merit and impact US society negatively are canceled, attacked, deplatformed, and lose their jobs for holding their opinions and daring to express them.
Your point about Jews having had a positive effect on public education is so far off the mark as to be laughable. I know that you will argue that in YOUR public school, Jewish parents fought for a better education for all, but the effects of the organized community as a whole on education in the US have been nothing short of CATASTROPHIC for goys, starting with the choke hold Jews have had on teachers unions and the subsequent horrible results and finishing with the university admissions situation documented so thoroughly and accurately by our host Ron Unz.
You call Priss “a polemicist of great skill”, but I call you a “pilpul monger of mediocre ability”. What world do you live in?
The Jewish Utopia*
What world do you live in?
* https://ia803104.us.archive.org/14/items/TheJewUtopia1932/1932%20-%20The%20Jew%20Utopia%20-%20M%20Higger.pdf
On page after page Mr. Higger's Jewish Utopia unfolds the ultimate order. Some mighty force, with the ruler from the house of David on the throne, is to take control of every life, every shekel's worth of property, every acre of land, every nugget and coin; no child may live, none may be born, if the Power objects.THE AIM
Professor Higger states his aim in the first paragraph of his Preface:"For my main problem is to reconstruct an ideal social life on earth as pictured by the rabbis of old."He adds, later:"An ideal society among the family of nations, as visualized by the prophets, although not realized as yet, will ultimately be achieved. Nations will come, nations will go. Dogmatic Christianity has come, dogmatic Christianity will be gone. 'Isms' have created nations, 'isms' will destroy nations. Capitalism has brought happiness and woes to mankind; Communism may bring its paradise and hells to mankind. Doctrines have shaped the destinies of peoples, doctrines may bring destruction to peoples. But the millennium will come only when the nations of the earth direct their efforts toward the visions of the prophets, and make function the teachings of Amos, Isaiah and Micah."http://www.thepeoplesvoice.org/TPV3/Voices.php/2008/11/17/the-ultimate-world-order-the-jewish-utop
There are a thousand hacking at the branches of evil to one who is striking at the root.
Hacking at the branches isn’t going to solve our problems. You are like a doctor prescribing medicine to try to ease symptoms: Abdominal pain, Diarrhea, Nausea or vomiting, Gas or bloating,
Dysentery (loose stools containing blood and mucus),
Rash or itching around the rectum or vulva, Stomach pain or tenderness, Feeling tired.
We have a serious intestinal parasite infestation. Remove it and all the symptoms disappear.
More on this, on the Parushim, and additional related information is in my book "Against Our Better Judgment: The hidden history of how the U.S. was used to create Israel," available on Amazon.Additional information on how Israel and its partisans pushed the US into invading Iraq is in "Israel loyalists embedded in U.S. government pushed U.S. into Iraq War" at https://israelpalestinenews.org/israel-loyalists-embedded-in-u-s-government-pushed-us-into-iraq-war/Replies: @Frankie P, @Alex70, @anon, @barnabus, @R2b
“After an understanding had been arrived at between Sir Mark Sykes and [Zionists] Weizmann and Sokolow, it was resolved to send a secret message to Justice Brandeis that the British Cabinet would help the Jews to gain Palestine in return for active Jewish sympathy and for support in the USA for the Allied cause, so as to bringabout a radical pro-Ally tendency in the United States.”Landman wrote that once the British had agreed to help the Zionists, this information was communicated to the press, which he reported rapidly began to favor the U.S. joining the war on the side of Britain.Landman claimed that Zionists had fulfilled their side of the contract and that it was “Jewish help that brought U.S.A. into the war on the side of the Allies,” thus causing the defeat of Germany XE "Germany" . He went on to state that this had “rankled” in Germany ever since and “contributed in no small measure to the prominence which anti-Semitism occupies in the Nazi programme.”
Thank you, Alison Weir, for everything you do.
You stand for truth in the face of a massive wall of deception.
I admire your judgement.
Perhaps if more Americans knew, we could recover our better judgement.
Frankie
Your hunch about climbers is incorrect. Ed Viesturs, an American, has climber the 14 peaks over 8,000 meters, all without oxygen. Many climbers who have developed their abilities without supplemental oxygen take the challenge. Climbers who use oxygen and take their masks off near the summit report that they immediately lose all energy and capacity to continue. This is because they are conditioned to the bottled oxygen, and its sudden absence leaves them unable to continue.
Viesturs on climbing without oxygen: “Your thought processes are slower. Your motivation is depressed. I mean, just to go and put your boots on takes 20 minutes of thinking, and then another half an hour of doing, and then you’re like exhausted”.
Mario Dibona, a guide from the Dolomites, on climbing Everest without oxygen: “After 7,000 meters (23,000 feet), you have difficulty breathing. You have to concentrate on inhaling. The worst problem is the difficulty sleeping. The night comes and you can’t sleep. You gasp for air. You wake up and can’t inhale. On Everest, at the top, when you’re standing still, you’re okay. But when you start to walk you have to inhale and inhale over again.”
Steve,
I would say that all of the top 100 climbers in the world have climbed Everest. We should keep in mind that these climbers are more willing to attempt alternative routes and use scheduling that will avoid the two short windows that most of the “tourist climb groups” use. The SOP for climbing Everest is that at the beginning of the season, Sherpas will climb up and fix ropes that ALL of the tourists will use. The mountain guiding companies will have to pay the Sherpas who fixed the ropes according to the number of people who climb and use the ropes. This of course leads to the photos we have all seen of massive traffic jams of people waiting in line when they encounter a particularly difficult place where it takes more time to get up. The top climbers in the world have the ability to assault these mountains WITHOUT ANY FIXED ROPES. They climb in a team with “man ropes”, which they can tie to each other and belay any climber that slips and falls. This gives them more freedom to attempt alternate routes or at least get away from the fixed lines. For his 1980 solo climb of Everest, Messner chose the northeast ridge to the summit, where he crossed above the North Col in the North Face to the Norton Couloir and became the first man to climb through this steep gorge to the summit. Messner decided spontaneously during the ascent to use this route to bypass the exposed northeast ridge.
This is the kind of freedom these pros have. They can read the mountain. Those who do so, climb patiently without taking unnecessary risks, turn back when weather conditions are not ideal, and HAVE GOOD LUCK, get to live to be old folks. The rest die on the mountain.
Messner was the first to ascend Everest without oxygen, first with Peter Habeler in 1978, when there was a great controversy about whether it was possible. Many believed that they would die trying to reach the peak without bottled oxygen. Messner likes to say that “impossible” is in your mind, not in the thing you are trying to achieve. Two years later Messner would solo climb Everest without oxygen in incredible time and cement himself as the greatest Himalayan climber of all time. The reason Messner is alive today is his deep understanding of mountains and mountain conditions and his willingness to call off expeditions when he feels that the conditions are not optimal. On his solo attempt to climb of Everest without oxygen in the summer of 1980, he acclimatized for three weeks and made the first assault, reaching 7,000 meters and finding the snow so wet that he knew the avalanche risk was much too high. He descended, and moved north to Tibet, where the monsoon doesn’t reach. He climbed a few 7,000 meter peaks to keep his body acclimatized, and then returned to Everest. In August, the weather changed, becoming cold and most suitable for good snow conditions. Messner decided to climb. He started just after midnight and climbed from the advanced base camp (6,400 meters) to 7,800 meters elevation in ONE DAY. This is an incredible altitude gain at such high altitude. I believe that he descended before sleeping, because gaining so much altitude in one climb would give anyone altitude sickness that would kill you. He ascended Everest solo, with no oxygen, in three days, with two days for the descent. Messner: “On the way down, I needed my footprints, otherwise, I would not have the smallest chance to come back. It was slightly snowing and these clouds everywhere, sometimes a hole would open and I could see down to the glaciers. So I was looking back and the footprints were still there. Otherwise it would be dangerous, but I could find them, so I found my tent again.”
It’s hard to overemphasize the effect of this solo ascent among the mountain climbing community.
John Krakauer called it ” a deed widely regarded as the greatest mountaineering feat of all time.” The climbing community knew that Messner was a phenomenal climber, but this iced the cake, and as far as I know, NOBODY has ever matched this feat.
Messner would be the first climber to summit all 14 of the world’s 8,000+ meter peaks without supplemental oxygen.
“The passion for limits. I think this is the best title for my activity. Passion for limits. Almost going a step further on the limits of the possible. My personal limit. ”
Great documentary

“If you have someone who is in great need and you are still strong and energetic, then you have a duty, really, to give all you can to get the man down and getting to the summit becomes very secondary,”
No climber who has ascended to 7,500 – 8,000 meters elevation is still strong and energetic. I think that you lack a fundamental understanding of what climbing at such an altitude entails. When you enter the “death zone”, your body begins to break down; you are dying, slowly, quite slowly, and yet, if you remain there for a longish period of time, you will die. High elevation climbers understand that they have a window of opportunity to reach the peak and descend to lower elevation where there is enough oxygen to sustain human life. I completely agree with Hillary’s statement, but we must consider what is feasible for the people who are struggling at such an altitude.
The sad truth is that the only climbers who are equipped physically to deal with climbers in great need are the Sherpas, and the stories of people being saved are nearly always those in which the Sherpas save lives and bring people down at considerable risk and danger to themselves. An incapacitated climber is very difficult to deal with, and we are talking about trying to take this climber down extremely steep slopes, often roping them to the Sherpas.
Climb at your own risk. If I were younger and able, I would climb other peaks: never Everest. There are enough less climbed peaks that are super challenging, and every one of them, the 14 peaks over 8,000 meters, are super dangerous. My dream is to get to Nepal and climb East Lobuche, with an elevation just over 6,000 meters. There are wonderful opportunities to do trekking trips with just one or two days with some technical climbing using ropes. Real climbers would climb those without ropes or with just man ropes, but tourists like me would need fixed ropes. Know your abilities and weaknesses and plan accordingly.
Thank God for Stalin and Putin.
Russia is in pretty good shape these days, behaving rationally, pursuing its sovereign interests, old school style.
Look at the 1990s to compare.
This two-part video is a MUST-SEE. I’m still shocked that it is still available on youtube.
It’s so balanced and factual, and we know youtube HATES that.
The Rise of Putin and the Fall of the Jewish Oligarchs

Well, here's my own perspective:
How is it that the US and buddies is sanctioning and threatening Russia and China and yet all of them are on exactly on the same page when it comes to international Covid New Normal fascist control?
https://www.unz.com/mwhitney/are-the-opponents-of-the-covid-injections-anti-vaxx-crackpots/Replies: @Biff, @animalogic, @Johnny Smoggins, @obwandiyag, @obwandiyag, @obwandiyag, @Anon62, @Jonathan Revusky, @Mulga Mumblebrain, @Numa, @Fart Blossom, @Carroll price, @dina, @sally, @Mike1, @Randolph, @HeebHunter, @Low Voltage, @RobinG
Virtually every world leader supports Covid vaccination. Maybe that’s because there’s a secret, diabolical conspiracy, or maybe that’s because all the medical experts everywhere support vaccination. After all, all those same world leaders also believe that rocks fall downward.
It is important not to conflate Medicine with Science.
Medicine is normally around 10-20 years behind advances in biochemistry/microbiology.
Particularly RNA, where the science is still in its infancy, and has demonstrated thigns like reverse transcriptases that can bring at least parts of the SARS2 RNA into the gemome. A brand new discovery.
Add to the fact that the average doctor is as well versed in cellular biochemistry as he is at nutrition – and you can see where the ‘experts’ are led by the nose by those with the loudest voices and fattest wallets.
Political/social influence on science and medicine policy is not new.
The Soviets had their Lysenkoism.
We have a Corporatism that only treats symptoms, except with SARS2 where it refuses to even consider symptoms until the patient is moribund. They are completely oblivious to the biochemical ‘orthomolecular’ approach which has been evolving since the crude era of Pauling and his immediate successors. The concept being that a fully functional immune system can fight off pretty much anything – from allergies to cancer.
So the problem is you are dealing with the worlds leading physicians who are ignoring the work of some of the worlds leading scientists who have done key work in the RNA field, such as Mallone and Montegnier.
Fauci and his PIs are not researchers – they are salesmen, who have long forgotten their medical education, which would be obsolete by now anyway.
These people may not be deliberately evil. Most likely they suffer from bureaucratic rot, a disease most noted in the USSR, and which Mao tried to cure with a social purgative of many, many lives. If you wash your head you will lose a few hairs….
It manifests itself here in both government and corporatioons, beig essentially a fascist organism where our nomenklatura and their corporate sponsors are essential symbiotic parasites on each other.
In fairness an ‘appeal to authority’ is often all the average person has when confronted by technical issues. But it is fundamentally irrational. The contradictions will and must become obvious in time.
Soon your causes, will meet ‘our’ effects, and hopefully we can come to some type of Hegelian syntheses.
In the mean time:
A verry Merry Christmas to you and yours.
It is the feast of Sol Invictus, and the celebrated birth of an itinerant, and probably mad rabbi whose followers helped introduce the concept of individual soul and sovereignity into Western Civilization, so the advent of Jesus should be celebrated by all ( although as a child forced to go to church – I found the religiouon repellant).
Exactly because I agree with that statement - that is why I believe Taiwanese should be treated like PRC citizens - in terms of behaviors and laws.
Do you deny my quote? “The CCP views the people of Taiwan as Chinese people, and the party has NO desire to kill Chinese people. ”
I actually think you are a troll, patronizing and without substance. You did not argue or refute any of my statements. For examples:
"Your statements are more than extreme – they are extreme bullshit."
d dan,
Communicating with you is very frustrating, because although we agree on many issues, you seem to believe that your opinions are facts. You continue to ignore the status quo and history of the China / Taiwan situation, and you approach things as if people in Taiwan are already a part of China. Wake up; they aren’t. The key is this: there’s a huge difference between being Chinese culturally and being Chinese politically, that is, being a citizen of the PRC.
There are a few things you need to understand. First, being Chinese doesn’t demand following the laws of the People’s Republic of China. For example, a Chinese person whose family has lived for generations in France, or the USA, or Malaysia, or Singapore, and has citizenship in their home country but none in the PRC, has no obligation to follow or respect the laws of the PRC. I understand that the CCP has passed laws trying to control the actions and thoughts of such people, especially if they become activists in their home countries against the PRC. I also understand that if these people continue their activism against the CCP and PRC and then VISIT the PRC, there is a great possibility that they will be scooped up by the security apparatus in the PRC and tried as a Chinese citizen. I vehemently disagree with this strategy by the PRC, and it will lead to future problems. I further believe that Chinese people from other nations who become activists against the CCP are wise to this and will not visit China, including Hong Kong.
1. Do you believe Taiwanese should be expected to follow Chinese laws, if they want to enjoy all the privileges of being Chinese?
This is an interesting question, but I don’t think it’s one that Xi and the CCP spend a lot of time thinking about. The reason is reality. Xi and the CCP are working to persuade the people of Taiwan to return to the motherland. I feel that they have made a decision that the carrot will be more effective than the stick in achieving this objective. Showmethereal made a comment (246) about how the CCP has offered incentives to Taiwanese people who want to live/study/do business in China. There are opportunities for Taiwanese people to enjoy privileges ABOVE AND BEYOND those given to Chinese citizens. These policies have clear objectives; as more and more Taiwanese people have a stake in China and their economic welfare is dependent upon China, they will support reunification. This is soft power, and China has the resources to deploy A LOT OF it. I agree with this policy. On a personal note, my children, both citizens of the US and Taiwan (ROC), would have my blessing to study or start a business in China. I do not subscribe to the narrative that China and the PRC are some kind of evil that should be avoided. Many Taiwanese feel the same; they are able to see logic and avoid jumping into the emotional media game being carried out by certain interests that want to see China and Taiwan remain separated. The Covid-19 pandemic has greatly decreased the capacity for these kind of business/educational/residential opportunities for Taiwanese, but I believe that they will return after the pandemic dies down in 2022. In conclusion, China wants to return the “renegade province” to the fold, and they are willing to appeal directly to the people through incentives. Good overall strategy.
2. Do you deny there are extreme corruption and treason among the “leaders”?
There is extreme corruption among the “leaders” of nearly every country in the world, even the PRC, though I agree that the corruption is less there than in my country, the USA, where the “leaders” and system are totally corrupt.
There is no treason among the “leaders” in Taiwan, because they would have to see themselves as part of the PRC for them to consider themselves treasonous to it. Again, keep in mind the history: these people have NEVER been governed by the PRC or obligated to follow its laws. Those in power today highly resent even the KMT, and see them as outsiders (foreigners) who used force to take control of Taiwan. I see the complexity of this situation, and although I don’t agree with the DPP and its insistence that the people in Taiwan are NOT CHINESE, I understand where they are coming from. Now that I’ve said that there is no treason, that makes it even more important that the two sides are brought together through shared interests and benefits. I think the leadership of the CCP understands this. I DO NOT SEE the CCP like our friend The Master Wang does, as being weak and a party that could be replaced with a more nationalistic alternative. To me that is ridiculous. I feel that the CCP follows a plan that involves sovereignty and nationalism in pursuit of a great future for the nation of China. I admire this plan very much and wish that my country could return to it.
I DO NOT talk in a superior position. You are oversensitive when people disagree with you. I do not condemn you, just your ideas. My goal is to see an agreement between China and Taiwan that satisfies both sides. My goal is to see Taiwan avoid becoming a tool of the US in its desire to contain the rise of China, which is a hopeless objective. My goal is a peaceful reconciliation. Call me arrogant, I don’t care.
Get help.
“They tell me they want to kill us.”
Who is “they” and who is “us”?
You have some kind of fixation with the desire to do violence to children. Get help.
“I would like to think I am humble person…”
That’s a pretty ridiculous statement in light of your comments.
“They want us to believe they are on a higher plane of existence,”
Who the hell is “they”?
“when we show them there is no God and make niggers out of them.”
Who is “we”? How are you going to show anyone that there is no God?
Are you implying slaves when you use “niggers” here?
I’m glad you have spilled your bile. You have shone the light on your ugly self.
Get help.
Well, most Australians to begin with, especially the ones sick with the Zionist demented oppression. They should embrace China as they (we) have a common enemy, but they are brainwashed by "conservative" leaders to hate Chinese and see them as the source of all their problems.
“They tell me they want to kill us.”
Who is “they” and who is “us”?
Then, Taiwanese should be subjected to Chinese laws too. Remember:1. Extreme corruption in PRC is subjected to death sentence. I won't be surprised that some of the current Taiwanese political thugs are close to or over that threshold of corruption.2. Treason is also subjected to death sentence. Again, many are very close to that threshold.3. If war unfortunately breaks out between the 2 sides, regardless of which side initiated it, many of the current and past Taiwanese leaders should also be subjected to death sentence. That is because Taiwan has many many opportunities for peaceful reunification. The dead soldiers who die for the war need to have justice repaid by the Taiwanese leaders.4. Don't forget that f0reigners who assist or cause the war should also be subjected to appropriate punishment.At the minimum, most of the thugs should be thrown to prison for a long time, rather than being allowed to escape to the West with their family and corruption money, and continue to be the anti-China tool of the Western evil forces.I don't think any of the above statements should be considered "extreme", but just commonsense justice and fairness.Replies: @frankie p, @Showmethereal
"Remember, the CCP views the people of Taiwan as Chinese people, and the party has NO desire to kill Chinese people. "
You just don’t get it, d dan, and that’s okay. Because Xi Jinping and the CCP DO get it. Your statement lacks any semblance of subtlety or respect for the context of the China/Taiwan issue. Again, I am glad that Xi is in charge and not you. Your statements are more than extreme – they are extreme bullshit.
Do you deny my quote? “The CCP views the people of Taiwan as Chinese people, and the party has NO desire to kill Chinese people. ”
The CCP considers the people of Taiwan as Chinese people, but at the same time they are fully aware of the fact that those Chinese people have NEVER been under the political control or system of laws in the People’s Republic of China.
Their goal is to reunite the two sides. Their goal is not to sentence the Chinese people in Taiwan and foreign people to death for corruption and treason.
The CCP will adopt strategies that will benefit the Chinese people of Taiwan, giving them opportunities to prosper economically if they would like to live/study/invest/open companies in China.
Your descriptors, too, resemble the worst of the western media and establishment when they describe China. “thugs”, “evil forces”, etc. are all used to describe China, and here you are with the same.
I’m glad that there are cooler heads in charge in China.
Just sayin’
Exactly because I agree with that statement - that is why I believe Taiwanese should be treated like PRC citizens - in terms of behaviors and laws.
Do you deny my quote? “The CCP views the people of Taiwan as Chinese people, and the party has NO desire to kill Chinese people. ”
I actually think you are a troll, patronizing and without substance. You did not argue or refute any of my statements. For examples:
"Your statements are more than extreme – they are extreme bullshit."
I’m very encouraged by the fact that Xi Jinping and the CCP are so much more rational than you are. The CCP will continue to seek a peaceful reunification with Taiwan, as it benefits China to do so. Remember, the CCP views the people of Taiwan as Chinese people, and the party has NO desire to kill Chinese people. I am appalled by much of the over-the-top homo/trans bullshit in Taiwan, including the constant promotion of that strange being, Minister Without Portfolio Audrey Tang (唐鳳). This DPP tactic is NOT a representation of the people of Taiwan. Your statements about Taiwan being beyond redemption are exaggerations; Taiwan is a very complex place, and there is a very good chance that as geo-political and economic realities become clearer over time, there will be a subtle change in politics on the island.
You and other pro-China pundits on this site often come across as being extreme, and dare I say it, very UNLIKE Chinese people. As a matter of fact, many of you, though sporting Chinese handles, come across as being very WESTERN in your outlooks, arrogance and support for belligerence.
A few points that I believe about Xi and the CCP:
They have NO desire to attack Taiwan; they will be patient and understand that time is on their side. America is imploding, and allow it to do so will resolve the issue.
They have NO desire to wipe out America, the west, white people, etc. Some of the comments from you and people like you are so unhinged, as unhinged as some of the vile Americans who promote war against China, like that bomb the three gorges dam vile creature. Don’t be like them!
China is admirable in that it wants to promote the welfare of Chinese people, trade with other nations, and continue to progress. The CCP has no desire to “rule the world” or replace America as a global hegemon.
Then, Taiwanese should be subjected to Chinese laws too. Remember:1. Extreme corruption in PRC is subjected to death sentence. I won't be surprised that some of the current Taiwanese political thugs are close to or over that threshold of corruption.2. Treason is also subjected to death sentence. Again, many are very close to that threshold.3. If war unfortunately breaks out between the 2 sides, regardless of which side initiated it, many of the current and past Taiwanese leaders should also be subjected to death sentence. That is because Taiwan has many many opportunities for peaceful reunification. The dead soldiers who die for the war need to have justice repaid by the Taiwanese leaders.4. Don't forget that f0reigners who assist or cause the war should also be subjected to appropriate punishment.At the minimum, most of the thugs should be thrown to prison for a long time, rather than being allowed to escape to the West with their family and corruption money, and continue to be the anti-China tool of the Western evil forces.I don't think any of the above statements should be considered "extreme", but just commonsense justice and fairness.Replies: @frankie p, @Showmethereal
"Remember, the CCP views the people of Taiwan as Chinese people, and the party has NO desire to kill Chinese people. "
“Interstingly his widow chose to stay on the Mainland rather than flee to Taiwan with the KMT.”
She hated the direction that Chiang Kai-shek had taken after the death of Sun Yat-sen. Charles Soong was the father of three daughters and one son. The oldest daughter, Soong Ai-ling married H.H. Kung, a descendant of Confucius and the richest man in China. He was the finance minister of China under the KMT government. (Concerning the three sisters, the Chinese say: “One loved money.”). The second daughter was Soong Ching-ling, who married Sun Yat-sen, the Father of China and the first president of the Republic of China (which included the Communists at that point.) She broke with the rest of her family and remained in China after the war, backing the Communists and indeed being named joint Vice President of the PRC, a mostly honorary position, from 1959-1972. (The Chinese say: “One loved her country”) The third sister, Soong May-ling, married Chiang Kai Shek, the leader of the KMT, commander in chief (Generalissimo) of the Chinese armies and later president of the Republic of China, moving the government to Taiwan where he ruled as an autocrat until his death in 1975. (The Chinese say: “One loved power”).
Wiki attributes the quote to Mao or Maoism.
“One loved money, one loved power, one loved her country” (Chinese: 一個愛錢、一個愛權、一個愛國
Read the book “The Soong Dynasty” by Sterling Seagrave. It’s worth the read.
I've wrestled with this too. Who is the rightful party? My hope is that both Taiwan and China will reunify peacefully, as they both have Sun Yat Sen's vision, and can find common cause.It is the U.S. and Atlantacism that is keeping the reunification from happening.Atlantacism is predicated on goods moving about by ship - and blue water navies. Taiwan is an outpost that can interdict shipping using Rim Theory. The outposts are conveniently located on shipping routes.I keep reminding people, that Atlantacism is an implanted memory, and is not American. If you are an American and believe in finance capitalism, and expeditionary war to protect creditors, then you are a traitor. If you believe in mammonism and finance shenanigans rather than productive economy, you are a traitor.Sun Yat Sen had adopted the American tradition, passed onto the American people at the founding. I would say that the Spanish American War (1898), then Teddy Roosevelt and his white fleet sailing around the world (1907-1909), was when the Atlantacists had arisen to control the brain center of America. The election of 1912 consolidated the gains, and then the tragedy of world war. The European people became deformed by false ideology.Replies: @Showmethereal, @frankie p
CPC is the rightful party who carried out Sun Yat Sen’s vision to restore China’s glory – culminating in the “New Silk Roads”.
“My hope is that both Taiwan and China will reunify peacefully, as they both have Sun Yat Sen’s vision, and can find common cause.”
I live in Taiwan, and I can attest that Taiwan is moving farther and farther away from Sun Yat Sen’s vision, and indeed from any identification with being Chinese at all. This is very concerning for me, as it is a denial of their cultural identity. In addition, it is stoked by the DPP and the American establishment, who see Taiwan as a (disposable) containment tool. My own interest is the protection of Taiwan, my home. In any kind of belligerent conflict between the US and China, it is Taiwan that will pay the ultimate price.
So when did they find time to invent the bagel in between slaves and silver mines 8,000 years ago?
You do have a simple mind.
A Jewish man would sit on an outdoor bench in Greek Markets. The Greek farmers would want some sort of luxury good available from somewhere in the Mediterranean, mostly so he could impress his wife or girlfriend. He wanted get some.
You find this sort of thing often, where women make men do crazy things.
In those days, the Jews were obviously physically different from the Greeks. They tended to be smaller and darker, with obvious Semitic features (more neanderthalic).
A Jew would present a clay tablet to the Greek farmer, and said farmer would impress his mark into the clay. The mark was done with a stylus.
Silver would emit forth from the ledger, and the farmer could get some trim that night.
Control of the silver mines, especially in Lydia, allowed the “international jew” to make silver dear during harvest. The farmer had to sell his goods and wares at a discounted price due to the inability to acquire silver to pay back his silver debts.
Eventually so many farmers were consigned to the silver mines, that food production stopped. Many farmers became slaves and buildings only faced the sea, as ships came to pick up newly “minted” greek slaves. That p*ssy was sure worth the price, wasn’t it?
These sort of usurious shenanigans have been part and parcel of Jewish method since long before Christ.
Jews being kicked out of countries some 108 times in history is no accident, it is due to “putting land next to land” (using fictitious capital and usury methods).
When Jesus started his mission, it was on the Jubilee year.
Judasim is now a creditor religion, which protects creditor rights. Judeo-Christianity is a creditor religion, which protects creditor rights.
https://michael-hudson.com/2018/08/and-forgive-them-their-debts/
and forgive them their debts, readers will discover shocking historical truths about how debt played a central role in shaping ancient societies. Perhaps most striking of all is that – in a nearly complete consensus of Assyriologists & biblical scholars – the Bible is preoccupied with debt, not sin.
Still waiting on my Jewish friends to admit they use fictitous capital and usury as the mechanism for parasitic control. I won’t hold my breath.
“ That said, the CCP will keep total control of their central bank and the big four banks. The big Jews cannot exercise control of a nation without control of the money supply.”
Beautifully stated.
And that is the fly in the ointment for the banksters cartel that has ruined so many countries by sucking the bone marrow of their people through their financial shenanigans. And not only is the Chinese government putting the banks at the service of economic growth and people’s welfare but they are keeping the rising oligarchy on a tight leash as proven by the recent trip of Jack Ma to the woodshed were he was warned in a stern way about engaging in predatory or monopolistic endeavours. More important is that China has discarded the travesty of the “ too big to fail” when dealing with Evergrande’s crisis which tells us that communist China is more keen on applying true free market principles than the gangster U.S. government that caters to the interests of the banksters at the expense of the people.
Jared Taylor’s refusal to name the Jew detracts more than half of the good work that he’s doing. He is not alone in this fear of enraging the Jews. Those who tiptoe around the issue do NOTHING to improve the overall situation, as grim as it is. Look at the pitiful, weak subject that he starts his sentences with: “They”, “Our rulers”, or the passive constructions, as if these deliberate strategies and tactics are some kind of force majeure, an act of nature beyond the control of man: “There has been a vicious attack on our heritage in modern art.” Those who refuse to name the drivers of this madness, the chosenite tribe, are like lumberjacks hacking at the branches of trees and complaining about the poor results in timber production.
Name them.
“One of the articles says that s/he beat a man named Andrew He.”
He should consider a name change to “Andrew They”.
Another difference is that the Chinese tell the truth-it is a virtue prized for millennia. In the West by total contrast, lying in public life, in the MSM and in business is not just ubiquitous, it is obligatory.The West is run and controlled by Evil psychopaths, and China is not.
America needs to confront China because the really big Jews, those who run the western banking system, are looking for a way to claw their way into the high levels of the Chinese financial system and those damn Chinese are too smart to allow the parasites in. The Chinese will allow the western banks to open some commercial and business banks, and they’re willing to let Ray Dalio and other wealth management funds in to help the wealthy and higher middle class Chinese investors grow their wealth; after all, China doesn’t have a well developed investment industry, and they will let Ray Dalio in and quickly study his tricks. That said, the CCP will keep total control of their central bank and the big four banks. The big Jews cannot exercise control of a nation without control of the money supply.
Another reason America has to confront China is that the CCP are doing too many things right, that is, in the interest of and to benefit the Chinese people. They’re shining a spotlight on the unbelievably shitty job the US and European governments do at taking care of their own people. Policies and laws in the west are formulated and passed to benefit the corporations, private banking industry, and the 1%.
It’s called accusatory inversion, and you’re correct, the Jews are masters of it.
Daniel,
I agree. I posted the Emperor Claudius quote as a response to the writer’s shallow analysis of Jewish malfeasance and his attempt to lay the sins of the Jews on the Christians, at least those sins starting in the 19th Century. The guy is just another Nathan Confas; he has an agenda to delegitimize KMAC and E. Michael Jones’ analyses and books on the Jews, and he builds his straw man argument based on his agenda, conveniently trying to blame Zionism on Protestantism. Zionism may be the biggest current sin against an indigenous people, but the sins of the Jews have been a constant narrative throughout history, and there weren’t any Protestants to blame in the time of Emperor Claudius. However, the behavior described in his quote matches perfectly the behavior of the Jews today and throughout history.
He probably IS Nathan Cofnas.
The guy is just another Nathan Confas
“I command the Jews not to agitate for anything beyond that which they have hitherto enjoyed, and not from henceforth, as if they lived in two cities, to send two embassies — a thing which never occurred before now – nor to intrude themselves into games and elections, but to profit by what they possess and to enjoy in a city not their own an abundance of all good things, and not to introduce or invite Jews who make voyages to Alexandria from Syria or Egypt, thus compelling me to conceive the worst suspicions; otherwise I will by all means take vengeance upon them, as fomenting a general plague upon the whole world.”
Emperor Claudius, Letter to the Jews at Alexandria, A.D. 41.
You must understand, the leading Bolsheviks who took over Russia were not Russians. They hated Russians. They hated Christians. Driven by ethnic hatred they tortured and slaughtered millions of Russians without a shred of human remorse. It cannot be overstated. Bolshevism committed the greatest human slaughter of all time. The fact that most of the world is ignorant and uncaring about this enormous crime is proof that the global media is in the hands of the perpetrators.
Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn
“Well now, this whole Jewish world which constitutes a single exploiting sect, a sort of bloodsucker people, a collective parasite, voracious, organized in itself, not only across the frontiers of states but even across all the differences of political opinion—this world is presently, at least in great part, at the disposal of Marx on the one hand and of the Rothschilds on the other. I know that the Rothschilds, reactionaries as they are and should be, highly appreciate the merits of the communist Marx; and that in his turn the communist Marx feels irresistibly drawn, by instinctive attraction and respectful admiration, to the financial genius of Rothschild. Jewish solidarity, that powerful solidarity that has maintained itself through all history, united them.”
— Mikhail Bakunin, “December 1871 Letter to the Bologne Members of the International”
Heresy! Heresy! Brother Badger Down speaketh with thy tongue of the devil! The vaccine is thy only salvation, the only way!
This is why, because the virus and response has never been about science and illness, it’s now more or less its own religion where the only savior is “the vaccine”. To speak about any other treatment is heresy in the religion of covid.
Perhaps he favors a plan similar to Dr. Robert Malone’s plan, which I believe he presented to the Italian parliament. It is much more logical and science-based than anything “I represent science.” Fauci has come up with, so of course it will never be adopted.
4 pronged proposal for dealing with the SARS-Cov-2 pandemic
1. Save the vaccine that we have and use it globally to protect the elderly and very high-risk individuals. Do not deploy it universally and drive escape variants.
2. Make imperfect but relatively effective repurposed drug therapies and combinations widely available for early intervention. We need to allow physicians to practice medicine and stop putting barriers in place to prevent physicians from distributing proven early-intervention strategies. The current model of only treating people after they are hospitalized is insane.
3. Make rapid test kits available in the home. Yes, there will be false positives, but they can be confirmed with follow-up tests that are more specific.
4. Develop computational tools or “apps” that can be put on digital devices, allowing people to key in their own information privately and receive information about their own personal risk. They can then make informed decisions about whether they are in a vulnerable group and should take vaccines.
Save the vaccine that we have and use it globally to protect the elderly and very high-risk individuals
The vaccines are poisons that act in multiple ways:
...informed decisions about whether they are in a vulnerable group and should take vaccines.
thank you bobby, for being a beacon of truth in these dark and oppressive times. the stunning silence that has accompanied the release of your book proves the powers that be have no response to this indictment you have presented to the court of world opinion. they will attempt to memory hole this publication and it is now up to us, to see to it that this book is put into as many hands as possible. in an act of 21st century samizdat give this book to everyone you know for the holidays, it just might save their life. thank you ron as well, any chance you might interview bobby?
Agreed. Impalement is the proper penalty for this scum. We can borrow Vlad Tepes from the thread on vampires and Jews and he and his merry men could do us a great service. It would be best if it were the first of many. Methinks after the first 50 to 100, black deviants would begin to be deterred from their violent, criminal ways.
“Hungary under Hungarians…”
should be
“Hungary under Hunyadi…”
Vlad the Impaler (Vlad Dracula, Vlad III) was the voivode of Wallachia three times in his life. Politics in the Balkans at that time were extremely complicated, and your surface explanation of his fighting the Turks alongside the Hungarians and Austrians fails to address the long and complex political career that Vlad Tepes had. First, we must remember that young Vlad spent years as a “guest” (yes, actually a hostage) of the Sultan in the Ottoman Empire. This ensured his father’s (the voivode at the time) loyalty to the Ottomans. It was said that he hung out with Jannisaries and it was there that he learned the disgusting practice of impaling that he subsequently became infamous for). Hungary under Hungarians invaded Wallachia and killed Vlad’s father and eldest brother, setting Vlad’s cousin up as voivode. Vlad Tepes (Vlad III, the Impaler) broke into Wallachia with Ottoman support after Hunyadi and the Hungarians attacked the Ottomans, taking his cousin, the voivode Vladislav along. Later, Vlad went to Moldavia and Hungary, and after relations between the Hungarians and his cousin Vladislav soured, he attacked and took control of Wallachia, this time with Hungarian support. Later he DID fight the Ottomans, and he matched their brutality. Quite an interesting story, from a different world, one in which life was cheap. Impaling was a horrible way to die, as a long sharp wooden stake was driven into the body at the anus, pushed up through the intestines and into the stomach and torso. The victim could still live a day or two if vital organs weren’t too badly injured, and the suffering must have been horrific. They should use this punishment on the monster who drove his SUV into the Christmas Parade in Waukesha.
Bbbbbut, but, bbut, don’t you get it? Your own narrative?
As if we haven’t heard it before. Every time some mad negro twigs and decides to follow the narrative of his (((masters))), the yarn that was spun and weaved into his brain about how he has been oppressed and held down by “white sins” and “white privilege”, and no amount of affirmative action, welfare benefits and reparations will ever even the playing field gives him the right to go out and kill whitey. Now, recite this prayer with me, Corny.
He was a victim of oppression.
He was an aspiring rapper.
He was a straight A student.
He was misunderstood (in many criminal arrests and subsequent releases).
Kyle Rittenhouse killed black men in Kinosha.
Wisconsin whites must pay.
Thanks Alfred, but I don’t think you were replying to my comment.
Nobody is dying in Africa for a number of reasons. The first is demographics; there aren’t many old folks in Africa. The second is body weight; covid deaths in Africa seem to track obesity levels, and obesity isn’t much of a problem in many African countries. The fact that Ivermectin and Hydroxychlorquine are used as anti-parasitic and antiviral prophylaxis could have an effect as well.
All the best
Mr. Wang,
Taoism does not presuppose creation out of nothing.
“Nameless” is not the same as “nothing”.
I think that Jesus was well into Taoism. He, like Lao Tze, told people to be like water, and seek the lower ground. He even called himself “the Tao” or “the Way”.
Chinese Christians who speak the words of Jesus say “I am the way, and the truth and the life”
我是道路、真理、生命。 I am the Tao, the truth and the life.
The way that can be spoken of
Is not the constant way;
The name that can be named
Is not the constant name.
The nameless was the beginning of heaven and earth;
The named was the mother of the myriad creatures.
Hence always rid yourself of desires in order to observe its secrets;
But always allow yourself to have desires in order to observe its manifestations.
These two are the same
But diverge in name as they issue forth.
Being the same they are called mysteries,
Mystery upon mystery –
The gateway of the manifold secrets.
This brings back a memory from about a decade ago. I was sitting in the living room of an old Chinese couple here in Kaohsiung, Taiwan, the husband born in Fujian Province and an immigrant in 1949 with the KMT. He wasn’t a soldier, but he was a scholar, and as his family had been involved with international trade with Japan, it was wise for him to make the move to Taiwan. The wife was a local Taiwanese woman. They had succeeded in Taiwan, both in government work, him as a teacher and then administrator in the school, and she was also a civil servant of some type. They had raised a daughter who was married and living in the US. They were quite wealthy, upper middle class I would say, with a number of properties that they had acquired over the years. The wife and daughter were Catholic, and the old man, Lao Tsai, was well on the road to converting, under the constant onslaught of pressure that only a Chinese/Taiwanese wife can bring to bear. We were talking about it, mostly in English, as I was surprised that he could carry on such a fluent conversation.
He said, with what I see to be a world outlook positively brimming with Chinese culture, “In the Bible, there’s a story where God tells the Jews to paint the blood of a lamb on their doors to protect them. For he planned to kill the first born sons, every first born son of Egypt.”
“I’m very aware of that story, I said. “The tenth plague, what the Jews call Passover.”
He looked at me incredulously, with a baffled countenance.
“What kind of God would kill the first sons of a society?”
I answered immediately: “Not mine.”
Read any Christian website now about this story. They are all full of excuses, why it really wasn’t God who killed the firstborn sons, it was some kind of “destroyer”. God was the one who was protecting the sons of those with lamb’s blood on their doors, and the rest of humanity, for that matter. The poor European derived people – they are unable to attribute such horrible descriptors to their God, such a blood-hungry, unforgiving God, as if he went through some kind of fundamental change between the Testaments, Old and New.
I attended the funeral of Lao Tsai a few years later. It was in a Catholic church, and it was interesting to me to hear the entire Catholic mass in Chinese. I had heard it so many times in English in my youth, so I was able to follow it, unfamiliar as I was with a lot of the religious vocabulary.
Anglin wants to f*** Chinese women. Look at the article and how his desire oozes off the page. Look at the photos of that young Asian high school student. Anglin has looked through every photo he could find of her to assemble the two that have her looking really hot and attractive.
He needs to grow up.
Fool. If you want to see a large sample of East Asian women, go to East Asia.
F*** your universities. Most of them are bananas, yellow on the outside and striving to be white inside.
Look at your comment. I can’t get over it. Have you ever seen a large sample of East Asian women?
And tell me, was it in a university in the US.
The nearest member of the Kakistocracy to you at the moment is Ron Unz, the piece-of-shit Ashkenazi Jew that manages this site -- he does not own or fund it, the Ashkenazi do.
"Kakistocracy"
Ron Unz, our host, is the creator of the “American Pravda” Series, a long series of historical revisionism of the events of the last 100 years in American history and an in-depth analysis of some of the powers that have pushed narratives that are not merely clearly counterfactual, their very purpose was to propagandize and misinform the public. While not focusing only on Jews and Jewish interests, a good part of this series touches on topics in which organized Jewish groups and wealthy Jews have supported, pushed, and influenced untrue and misleading historical perspectives, mostly with the same hackneyed question foremost in their minds: “Is it good for the Jews?”. Mr. Ron Unz has not approached ANY of these topics with kid gloves on. He is direct, unrelenting, and willing to shine a light on Jewish malfeasance that NO OTHER MAINSTREAM INTELLECTUAL will touch. Make of that what you will; you seem to see it as some evidence that he is controlled opposition or run by Mossad. I can see Ron laughing at that accusation. I see it more as an individual who values the truth. Let’s take a look at some of the issues that he has attacked with his unsparing honesty and truth. Keep in mind that these issues cause even non-political and non-Zionist Jews, brainwashed as they are to see the antisemitism golem behind every criticism of any individual or organized Jewish group, break into a heavy sweat. Here is a partial list of these important issues; forgive me for not being meticulous in listing every one: 1. The cancelling of David Irving despite his huge importance and excellent work as a historian 2. The gradual cancelling of the work and ideas from a huge number of important American intellectuals, writers and influencers from the early to mid 20th Century who held views different from the vanguard of (((new thought))), whether it was thinkers who opposed US intervention in WWII, criticized the financial policies of the FED, or mentioned the growing influence of the European and Russian Jews in US society. 3. The JFK Assassination and the idea of the involvement of Johnson and the servers of Israel he was surrounded by. 4. The strange practices of the Jewish religion and the idea that what has been dismissed as dog whistles, canards, etc. are actually factual. 5. The huge role of Jews in the Bolshevik Revolution and its bloody anti-Russian aftermath. 6. Antisemitism and the idea that so-called “antisemitic canards” are based in fact and antisemitism as a whole is more reactionary than some genetic tic in every goy. 7. The ADL and its pernicious role and influence in US society and government 8. Holocaust “denial” and the need for true revisionism, because denial and minimization are closer to the truth than what is taught in US schools as history. 9. Mossad assassinations and the inaction of the world to call them to account, mostly because of big money politics 10. The Israeli attack on the Liberty and the fantasy story of it being some kind of “accidental attack”.
This list is not comprehensive. Sorry Ron Unz, but I don’t have enough time to compile and describe it all. I implore the readers of Unz to read it all; it’s a good project for a year. Ron makes compelling arguments, based on factual research. Thank God for Ron Unz, one of the only men with a voice on the internet who insists of truth, even when it is intensely unpopular.
Keep it up!
Frankie P
Van Morrison! Are you sure he’s still on that list. (((They))) have done their best to cancel old Van, though he is such an icon it may be impossible. Too many people love his art, and his perseverance.
(((They))) have labeled him an ex-megastar, though, for his 2021 double album release ‘Latest Record Project: Volume 1’ his 42nd record release. Yes, you read that correctly, it says 42.
Steven Thomas Erlewine reviewed it on allmusic dot com. Here’s an excerpt:
“He takes dead aim at his irritants with song titles that convey as much as his full set of lyrics: “Where Have All the Rebels Gone,” “No Good Deed Goes Unpunished,” “Stop Bitching, Do Something,” “Why Are You on Facebook,” and “They Own the Media.” The latter song thankfully doesn’t descend into conspiracy tropes — a justifiable worry considering how Van wrote a series of anti-lockdown singles during the Covid-19 pandemic — but it does show how Morrison’s crankiness has calcified into nastiness.”
“doesn’t descend into consipracy tropes”?!?!?!?! Not according to (((them)))
We’ll let you decide, but I have to say. Great job, Van. The truth is much more important than staying in the good graces of the powers that be, bit tech, and big media:
“They Own The Media”
They tell us that ignorance is bliss
I guess by those that control the media, it is
They own the media, they control the stories we are told
If you ever try to go against them, you will be ignored
‘Cause they control
They control
They control
They control the narrative, they perpetuate the myth
Keep on telling you lies, tell you ignorance is bliss
Believe it all and you’ll never get, never get wise
To the truth, ’cause they control everything you do
Everything you do
Everything you do
Everything you do
They control the narrative, they perpetuate the myth
Keep on telling you lies, tell you ignorance is bliss
Believe it all and you’ll never get the truth
Never get wise, wise through their lies
Through their lies
Through their lies
They control the media
They control the media
They control the media
“That’s means it ought to be \$90,000 per troy oz of gold.”
Sounds reasonable, Achmed.
I thank you for your interesting comment and the CDC link on estimated COVID-19 burden. Perhaps you could explain your statement, “which most Americans have based on CDC estimates”, because I am not seeing that in the link you provided. According to the CDC link, the estimated number of total infections at the end of May, 2021 was 120.2 million, well over a third of the population. I find it amazing that the CDC has published this information on its website and virtually NO Americans are aware of this high number of people with natural immunity. However, it still doesn’t jibe with your “most Americans” comment. Am I missing something? Thanks again for your comment and the link.
Beneath the chaos and stupidity of our own public affairs, there is still space for liberty, decency, and truth.
Here’s the vax mandate map. The globohomo media complex tries to make it look like “everyone is doing it” but that’s far from the case.
Take the Mike away from this clueless Commentator!
Israel and the beholden Uncle Sam USA are both painfully aware of the fact that any attack on Iran will result in a massive missile salvo on Israel itself from a variety of locations, primarily from Hezbollah in Lebanon, but also from Iran itself, Iraq, and Syria. In addition, as you mention but fail to detail, Iran will immediately attack US allies in the region, close down the Strait of Hormuz, and incapacitate Saudi Arabian oil production, refining and shipping. The effect of this on the global economy would be catastrophic. Russia and China WOULD support Iran, and that support could include a wide variety of weapons and tactical help. Keep in mind the short distance between northern Iran and the Russian Caucasus Region. Do you actually think that Russia will just stand by while its ally is bombed and “is going down”? I don’t think so. So, in my view, “If war breaks out..” is a massive “if”. It just ain’t happening, no matter what kind of noise we hear from the western jewmedia and the empty suits from Israel. They are sweating heavily under the collar in fear of the Resistance, and although they are getting hysterical and desperate, they will not go so far to bring about their own end.
Step two is to let China re-take Taiwan and then lead a worldwide blockade on China trying to destroy China's economy. The US won't be stupid enough to actually get into war with China.
Apparently, they want to manipulate China into drawing first blood.
But then what happens? What is step two? The United States is going to have a nuclear war with China?
At last, someone who sees what the US agenda is really about. Please don’t forget to mention that China’s retaking of Taiwan will have to involve plenty of destruction and death in order for the US to cobble together their alliance of blockade against China. They will cry long and hard about all the gay couples in Taipei who were bombed out. Boo-hoo!
The spoiler, of course, is that Xi and the CCP see through this plan and have no intention of attacking Taiwan and enabling the US strategy to come about.
You have to realize that “Comfortably Numb” (and most of Pink Floyd’s oeuvre) isn’t about some hep cat jazz soloist noodling on the keys or bebop scatting or whatever. It’s an intricately composed piece for an entire, rather talented band to play. It’s literally a concerted effort.Replies: @frankie p
I just wonder if he might enjoy it more if he stretched out a bit and got back to improvising.
Jennifer,
Thanks. I DO realize what Comfortably Numb is about. I was probably 17 when the album The Wall was released, and I know that song inside out. I can play it, I can sing it, and I have listened to it countless times.
This is not about some “hep cat jazz soloist” noodling. The song is for a band to play, and it has a rigid structure. We are not talking about changing the concerted effort. We are talking about the possibility of a different solo in the two solo sections, the first one eight measures long, the second one running on and on, probably 40 measures or more live, and guess what? I just listened to Live in Pompeii 2016 and Gilmour most definitely improvises during the second solo section, though he also plays the parts on the record in the early part of the solo.
The best of both worlds.
That might be why you got so much flak for your comment—you replied to Buzz’s posting of that exact solo, and wrote:
I just listened to Live in Pompeii 2016 and Gilmour most definitely improvises during the second solo section ...
… we assumed, reasonably, that you expected far more variance in his playing in Pompeii. Of course, any Floydhead is able to tell the difference between that version and the ones on Delicate Sound of Thunder, Pulse, etc. He and the band(s) sound recognizable, yet different, in each rendition. And yet the song remains the same, as it should.Also, this hot take was silly:
it must really suck to have to play the EXACT SAME SOLO in every show
And this was silly:
After I started listening to jazz players, and not just guitarists, but pianists like Bill Evans, I realized what bullshit rock music is for a musician.
Gilmour, with later Pink Floyd and also solo, has done great new work. Faithfully playing older classics never stunted him musically. He maybe never reached the thematic grandeur of ’70s PF, but there are gems in his later works. And to his credit, he never turned away from his older stuff, and was wise to keep control of “Pink Floyd” the commercial entity.But ultimately I think we agree on the important stuff: Pink Floyd, and Gilmour, are great. (Not exactly an obscure opinion, I know :) )
What a great way to arrest your development as a musician.
LOL, you’re not the first to misread my handle.It’s “Generic American” (after Peter Brimelow’s “Generic American Party”)
Jennifer,
David Gilmour absolutely IS an improvisational musician and guitarist, as what you describe points that out. He takes the rhythm tracks of the song and then IMPROVISES guitar leads over it, rinse and repeat, rinse and repeat, developing ideas, rinse and repeat. You say he “composed” the two solos, but what he actually did was, again as you said, take the best pieces from many, many IMPROVISED solos.
I think it’s fine that Dave makes big bucks playing the same solo again and again.
I just wonder if he might enjoy it more if he stretched out a bit and got back to improvising.
You have to realize that “Comfortably Numb” (and most of Pink Floyd’s oeuvre) isn’t about some hep cat jazz soloist noodling on the keys or bebop scatting or whatever. It’s an intricately composed piece for an entire, rather talented band to play. It’s literally a concerted effort.Replies: @frankie p
I just wonder if he might enjoy it more if he stretched out a bit and got back to improvising.
Not when you're making that much money for every show. You or I would gladly perform the same trick over and over for that kind of money. In some sense, we in fact do it every day for far less.Replies: @James J O'Meara, @frankie p
That said, it must really suck to have to play the EXACT SAME SOLO in every show.
Apples and oranges!
“You or I would” is true, because you and I are not independently wealthy to the degree of a David Gilmour.
Gilmour should play Comfortably Numb in his next concert with a completely different solo.
It’s NOT all about the listener.
Listen to some of this interview with Bill Evans, done by the famous Marian McPartland, herself a famous jazz pianist as well as journalist/reporter.
“As far as the jazz playing goes, I think the rhythmic construction of the thing has evolved quite a bit. I don’t know how obvious that would be to the listener, but the displacement of phrases, and the way phrases follow one another, and their placement against the meter is something I’ve worked on rather hard, and it’s something that I believe in, it has little to do with trends, it has more to do with my feeling about my basic conception of jazz structure and jazz melodies and the way the rhythmic things follow one another. And so I keep trying to get deeper into that, and as the years go by, I seem to make some progress in that direction, and do some things which please myself, and I know what’s happening… We must look at it as an art; I mean, otherwise we get so confused because there are a million things that you can do, so you just have to perfect your own art, and hopefully there will be room for it, and I’m very thankful for the position I have and the freedom I have, and I just keep my focus and I play what pleases me.”
Here is a lesson on how advanced Bill Evans’ playing and conception of jazz (and all) music was. Although Marian McPartland was a famous jazz pianist, she had NO IDEA of what he was talking about when he talked about jazz soloing and “displacement of the phrases”. She asks him to demonstrate on the tune that he opened with “Waltz for Debby”, his most famous song. He refused, as that song is for solo piano, and suggested “All of You”, another Evans original. They did this interview in a piano shop, and they jammed together on many tunes. Evans demonstrated what he meant.

David Gilmour has always been among my favorite rock guitarists, an unbelievably emotional soloist who really joined with Roger Waters to make Pink Floyd much larger than the sum of its parts. That said, it must really suck to have to play the EXACT SAME SOLO in every show. Please note that David Gilmour was a guitar solo builder, a soloist who ran tape and improvised, choosing neat little phrases and parts that he liked and putting them end after end, creating the final product and then learning the solo.
After I started listening to jazz players, and not just guitarists, but pianists like Bill Evans, I realized what bullshit rock music is for a musician. You create a hit and a bunch of idiots want to hear it over and over, for decades, exactly the way it appeared on the album. What a great way to arrest your development as a musician.
A guitarist friend who played in a rock band told me essentially the same thing. (He also told me one of the Neville Brothers borrowed one of his guitars and never gave it back. LOL) As far as I am concerned, what matters is what the listener enjoys, so rock is great when it's good. So is jazz.Replies: @Anonymous
After I started listening to jazz players...I realized what bullshit rock music is for a musician.
Not when you're making that much money for every show. You or I would gladly perform the same trick over and over for that kind of money. In some sense, we in fact do it every day for far less.Replies: @James J O'Meara, @frankie p
That said, it must really suck to have to play the EXACT SAME SOLO in every show.
Yeah, the pre-Pandemic Chinese annual tourists travelling overseas equaled the population of California, 40 million and more, and virtually ALL of them returned to China.
That “tourist” number is too low. Most accounts have Chinese overseas tourists north of 150 million.
Yeah, the pre-Pandemic Chinese annual tourists travelling overseas equaled the population of California, 40 million and more, and virtually ALL of them returned to China. Why wouldn’t they? They have increased personal freedoms unknown three decades ago, and they have a dynamic economy that facilitates prosperity!
The western pundits are still looking at China through their 40-year-old sunglasses, and they are not seeing the truth. Perhaps they fear the truth, but actually it would set them free.
You should look at the real world instead of your antiquated perspective of how the world used to be.
First, if you have looked at trends over the past 40 years at all regarding Chinese students who study in US universities, you will find that nearly ALL of the Chinese students now plan to return to China to work and care for their parents. This is a no-brainer for anyone who looks at the job market and opportunities. Some Chinese students will work in the US for a few years, mainly to gain experience and relationships that will bolster their resume for when they return to China. The time of the Chinese students who attend US universities and never return is decades in the past.
Second, the Chinese who buy real estate in the US do NOT do so to escape the next upheaval. They are smart enough to know that the next upheaval is going to occur in the US, not in China. They invest in the US because they are aware of the nature of the financial capitalism that exists in the US, and they follow the ever-increasing bubble in real estate. Investors tend to believe that trends will continue, so they invest in US real estate to profit from ever-increasing housing prices. The idea of a chance for a green card is certainly an extra bonus here, no doubt about it, but in most cases, the investors will use that for the wife and kids while they remain in China to make money and be productive. They are hedging their bets.
Finally, how many Chinese really use the “snake heads” and get smuggled to the US? Really. Now think about it. What is the population of China? How many Chinese are being smuggled into the US these days? Answer: a completely insignificant number. And those who do want to enter the ranks of the illegal immigrants in the US are unskilled, unproductive, and hold out some hope that they or their children will be amnestied into US citizenship and can start sucking on the teat of US government welfare benefits.
It’s the 21st century. Stop looking at the world through your 20th century sunglasses.
Basically a rentier is someone who trades capital for a cashflow. If that transaction is done at normal interest rates related to the real inflation rate, this is a fair transaction, right?
Rentier concept is derived from rent-racking. The process by which the landed gentry would jack up rents on their lands, to then suck the increment of production from an industrializing economy. As labor made gains, then apartment/housing rent prices would be increased, so the increment of production was sucked out of labor’s pocket, and transferred to the landed owners.
This was especially critical in England, where a landed gentry existed as a function of the Norman conquests.
Rentier is a term that is used when there is some sort of taking of gains, with no counterpart in production. A rentier is a parasite in that they consume the wealth production of the host.
It’s possible for somebody to invest capital, and earn some cash flow, and not be a rentier. For example, the cash invested in something productive (usually physical economy), where the production yields gains.
Absentee landlords were used in this article as an example of cash invested into property, then the absentee landlord later cashes out after the property has gone up in price. The very act of buying up property using foreign flows of money, pushes up prices and forces a housing bubble, where the natives have to bid against each other by hypothecating themselves with new property debts.
The way out of rentier activities in real estate, is to tax away the gains, especially with Georgist style site value taxes. Also, it would take government power to forbid foreign flows into buying up and taking rents.
But, in a financialized west, there also exists brainwashing (I’m talking to you Lolbertarians and Neo-liberals), where rents and unearned income don’t exist. If there is no words for a concept, then the concept doesn’t exist, or at least it cannot be talked about. By erasing concepts, then pockets may be picked.
So why doesn't G.M and Ford jack up the price of their cars and do likewise ?
The process by which the landed gentry would jack up rents on their lands, to then suck the increment of production from an industrializing economy.
Libertarians understand this as does anyone with even the most basic grasp of economics (unlike Mefoe-bull and Michael Hudson).
The rents charged are a function of SUPPLY and DEMAND.
So Me-Foe-Bull, stop your demonising of the Libertarians and actually try and learn REAL economics from them.
Demand for both residential and commercial property is greatly reduced and RENTS DROP LIKE A STONE - irrespective of the machinations of the 'landed gentry' and their propensity to 'jack up the rents on their lands'.
Simple rockets and such, like the drones from Yemen that made precision hits on Saudi oil production sites? Or perhaps you’re talking about the “simple rockets” that the Iranians used to hit Ayn al-Asad Airbase in Anbar Province in Iraq. Maybe you’re talking about the overstated abilities like the shoot down of a United States RQ-4A Global Hawk BAMS-D surveillance drone in Iranian airspace in 2019.
If the Iranians overstate their abilities so much, pray tell why Trump did NOT respond militarily to the missile attack on Ayn al-Asad Airbase in Iraq. No, let me tell you. Trump arranged for a message to be sent through the Swiss, asking for a location that the US could bomb without any damage to Iranian assets, a face-saving measure for the US. The Iranians put their entire military and missile forces on the highest level of preparation and replied that ANY attack on ANY grain of sand of Iranian territory would result in a full response. Military satellite information confirmed the preparedness of the Iranians, and the US backed down.
Seriously, raga, get your head out of your ass and do some research. Even as far back as 2006, Hezbollah took out the Israeli Navy’s corvette INS Hanit with a C-802 anti-ship missile. Since that time, they have increased their guided missile arsenal and upgraded countless rockets to GPS guided missiles using the “suitcase kits” provided by Iran, a program pushed for and made successful by Qasem Soleimani.
Update your military analysis, man.
Simple rockets like the ones Palestinians fired by the thousands recently - they were either brought from Iran, or build locally based on Iranian designs.
Simple rockets and such, like the drones from Yemen that made precision hits on Saudi oil production sites?
Maybe you’re talking about the overstated abilities like the shoot down of a United States RQ-4A Global Hawk BAMS-D surveillance drone in Iranian airspace in 2019.Shooting down unarmed, not even remotely stealthy drone? Yeah, great achievement. The only defense that drone could have was flying high, but guess what - Soviets could shoot down targets at that attitude back in 1960 - just ask Gary Powers.And don't forget to add shooting down that Ukrainian airliner to your list of Iranian accomplishments... or sinking their own warship by mistake.I'm talking about things like their claim that they built a stealthy destroyer of their own design that turned out to be a corvette based on old English design with no stealth features whatsoever.... ... or their claim they work on a 5th gen fighter aircraft, claim that is generally considered to be complete bullshit everywhere outside of Iranian propaganda offices.
The fundraisers have been going on for some time, but not in the west. In the resistance countries, Iran, Lebanon, Syria and Iraq, military leaders have dedicated material and funds for the Palestinians in their fight against Israel. See the last confrontation in Gaza and the improvements in Palestinian missiles/rockets that shocked the Israelis.
The pro-America, anti-Zionist right must become allies to this resistance, or continue to watch their country sink into the Jewish swamp it has become.
That’s an excerpt from a Wall Street Journal article. I would hesitate to call ANY of the “Xi has talked about…” or “Mr. Xi saw…” as quotes, especially attributing them to President Xi.
And he is President Xi. What’s with the Wall Street Journal, Steve? Why didn’t you call them out on this ENTIRE excerpt referring to PRESIDENT Xi as Mr. Xi?
I feel that Xi is much more interested in smashing foreign institutional investors and domestic Chinese oligarchs against to wall than just going to war against woke culture. He is garnering populist support from the grass roots of Chinese society. This was very much a Mao move. Of course that means it is a warning to the big money faction in Shanghai and any other faction that might be trying to challenge Xi’s power in this time of challenges. I like the point about Xi’s supposed observation of Twitter and Facebook take-down of Trump and subsequent conclusion that big (internet) business had too much power in the US. If anyone has seen any official statements regarding this issue, please provide a link. I have grown cynical and hesitate to trust “officials familiar with his views said. …” from any western media source.
Ah, ye of so little imagination.
The sissy fit is a play on word, specifically the fact that the new laws in China forbid “sissy boys” being featured on tv, the movies and internet.
Was Officially moderating population growth. In 2015 the 1979 one child policy was changed to a two child policy to no effect, which might support your position, and on May 31st to a three child one.Replies: @frankie p
But don’t forget Ma Yinchu.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ma_Yinchu
China is moderating population growth
We should be clear that increasing the “child policy” from one to two to three will not have the desired effect, and the CCP will implement additional policies to stimulate population growth. The CCP has shown itself to be remarkably agile and flexible in moving from research and analysis to policy implementation. I expect the encouragement to begin with policies similar to those we see in Orban’s Hungary, with large tax forgiveness for families that produce three or four children. I don’t think it will stop there, and it will be interesting to observe how the CCP provides incentives to families to procreate more in today’s modern China.
Modern industrialized countries are in population decline. Why? Because when "women" become work units for labor; they see their value as substitute men, and not as a woman.Finance Capitalism wants a labor unit at a low price, and one aspect of Neo-Liberalism is to convince women to enter the workforce, and eschew the hard unmonetized work of child bearing and rearing.China's industrial capitalism has not advanced to the stage where women are sent home, and housing prices are held down, to then allow family formation.https://gospelnewsnetwork.org/2020/06/23/goebbels-1933-speech-masculine-women-feminine-men-low-birth-rates-it-could-have-been-written-today/The woman in public life today is no different than the women of the past. No one who understands the modern age would have the crazy idea of driving women from public life, from work, profession, and bread winning. But it must also be said that those things that belong to the man must remain his. That includes politics and the military. That is not to disparage women, only a recognition of how she can best use her talents and abilities.
CCP provides incentives to families to procreate more in today’s modern China.
From the Byzantines, Ezra Pound derived his no-violent formula for controlling the Jews.
“The answer to the Jewish problem is simple,” he said.
“Keep them out of banking, out of education, out of government.”
Start digging. It won’t be easy on the internet these days, as so much of the information in controlled by (((our friends))) in Big Tech and their algorithms.
While you’re at it, read more about Sicut Judaes Non and the series of papal bulls that protected the Jews from Christians BUT AT THE SAME TIME required them to avoid their evil machinations in undermining and weakening the prevailing culture, society, and civilization.
We need rules like these today, but in order to do so, we must first reap the heads of many of our evil, usurious, culture-killing (((friends))). A large number of examples must be made, and the subsequent message to the rest (You’re next!) will change behaviors, as the subsequent laws will recover resources and make amends.
I must end all interaction with you, troll.
I would like to see Soros die painfully, preferably by long-term blunt trauma to bones, muscle and tendons.
I am certainly not a Muslim, but I respect Muslims considerably more than I respect Jews like you.
Jews want to promote conflict and war between Muslims and Christians. I reject this promotion and support the idea of Muslims and Christians uniting to defeat, declaw and strip all power from Jews, ending their nefarious ways.
The Byzantine solution is good for me: no Jews in politics; no Jews in banking; no Jews in education; no Jews in media (I added that last one to make it modern).
The Chinese post and publish to express themselves, and when the shitstorm from (((Jewish Organizations))) start pouring in, they make the articles disappear. It’s a strategy.
A good one. They get their ideas out, make the Ziobankers and businessmen shit themselves, and then deny accountability. Everyone knows what they think.
They did it recently with the article about how American Jews control the US Government which then steps in to run interference and play bodyguard to Israel. The screaming and gnashing of teeth from the Jewish Supremacists was deafening. The article was disappeared, but the message gets across.
“We know you scum; we understand your modus operandi; it will never work with China; keep pushing and we will keep speaking publicly about it, for we feel NO GUILT for the fairy stories that you tell about being eternally oppressed; we know about the so-called Holocaust and how you use it.”
Clear?
A123 is filth.
Stop posing as a Christian, you evil piece of sh**.
There is no such thing as Judea and Samaria.
Jewish parents want their children to spit when they see a cross.
Putting you and your ilk to death, wherever you hide, is the solution.
I hope the European will open his eyes are realize what a curse you and your people are on their culture, nations and societies.
Expel, burn. Expel, burn. Bomb Israel.
I’m no Muslim, but given the choice, I would fight with the brothers from Hezbollah, Iran and the Resistance against filth like you and the squatters in Palestine.
When my four great grandparents on my father’s side immigrated from Italy in the 1880s, that also changed what America was. Now I would agree that they were still European and more likely to assimilate, but there was xenophobia that lasted right up to the middle of the 20th Century, and my mother’s family, (Catholic but primarily British / Irish background) wasn’t particularly excited about the princess daughter hooking up with an Italian. My father, the youngest son in his family, never learned to speak Italian, though his father, born in Philadelphia, was a fluent speaker of Italian from birth to death. My point is that when whites marry Hispanics and Asians, there should be no freaking out and hand wringing about different history and traditions. The children of these marriages very well might be the next tide of conservative voices in the US. I am married to an Asian, and although we don’t reside in the US, I sent my son to high school in Pennsylvania, where he lived with my sister. He is based, and he will never be a wokester. He has cultural traditions of both East Asia and the US, and when I say that I mean the traditional US, where merit and hard work were appreciated and respected. Open the tent to allies. It’s our only hope.
You and many others underestimate the fact that a lot of mixed blood Americans (white/Hispanic and white/Asian) will lean conservatively as the elites in the nation go further and further woke. Look at how Trump’s approval and votes among Hispanics jumped. The Mexican-Americans and Hispanic-Americans want to work and live in a society in which work is rewarded. The Asians are the same. I know that there are a lot of visible Asians in the media who are super woke, but they are just sellouts to (((our friends))), mercenaries for the almighty dollar. The deep conservative roots of Asian culture will not accept the black, homo, LGBTXYZ, open borders mess that America is becoming. Look for allies among the families of the whites married to Hispanics and Asians instead of making them the “other”.
Do you really think Fred hates us?
I don’t think Fred Reed hates the 1960s America he grew up in at all. He writes often with his fond memories of the old USA. Let me define who I meant by “us”, Rich. From reading his stuff, I have noticed that the guy will disparage all those Americans who have been working for years to stop what you and Mr. Reed say we should just lay back and accept.
As one example, Peter Brimelow has been fighting against the immigration invasion since the mid-1990s, Rich. Yet Fred Reed derides the VDare people, who he even worked with, or wrote for, for a small bit. He derides Conservative Americans who have been fighting this shit for decades.
I consider myself part of “us”, not just because I write comments about Mr. Reed being a pseudo-intelligent asshole who never gets to the root of problems. I am part of “us” because I and family members having been supporting those who have tried to end the American experiment in stupidity since the 1960s! I have my blog, which is no big thing but a little difference I can make.
I don’t like to just give up, Rich. If it comes to what you describe, I and my family will not be in that section of the former America that you describe.
Anyway, thanks for your question. I hope this explains my attitude about this asshole a little better.
TKK,
You point out one facet of a broader government run movement in China that should resonate with conservatives in the US, especially Christian conservatives. The social policies that the Christian Protestant Right are always whinging and railing about and wishing would change are being actively changed and stamped out by Xi and his dominant faction of the CCP. Let’s look at some of the components here: First, China has recently announced that children under 18 will be limited to 3 hours of online gaming per week, and the monitoring of this gaming will be the responsibility of the internet gaming companies under constant scrutiny of the CCP’s regulators. Although it’s clear that this will spawn a new business model, the “rented” internet account, it will still have a significant result. Later, the CCP announced that they would not approve ANY new online games, and this ban is indefinite. Strong words were published, “Children are addicted to electronic drugs.” Another part of the curbing of the internet giants in China involves user privacy, with laws being passed forbidding internet companies to sell user information without the users’ consent. This also involves mandatory toolbars to allow users to opt out of their browsing or shopping information to be sold for profit. The war on the “culture of celebrity” which is touched on in your video, is another step that the Christian Right would be right behind, as they hate the Hollywood culture and its decadence. The fact that they have put an outright ban on “sissy boys” on both tv and the internet is telling. Niang Niang Pao: “Sissy Guns” is what the Chinese call these effeminate pretty boys, and the CCP is having none of it. Pile this on top of the CCP bans on pornography online, and the Christian Right is going apoplectic with envy.
I admit openly that I support ALL of these policy moves by the CCP, and none more than the reining in of the big tech internet giants, which has hurt both foreign institutional investors, ADR holders and the elite 5% and rich oligarchs in China.
The difference between the Christian Right and myself is that they have been propagandized by the US Media to see China as the bad guy, a totalitarian state that oppresses Christians. The Protestant Right, dialed in as they are to the Ben Shapiro / Prager U stream of conservative Jews who promote the fallacy of Judeo-Christian values, need to wake up to real actions and see that China is pursuing policies that will improve social values and lead to a better, healthier society for the people of China.
Carlton,
I respect your comments and your videos. However, you are WAY off on this one. You are in the reality from a decade ago. Things have changed. I live in Taiwan.
Google search for this and you see it repeated everywhere. Of course any aircraft that can carry a large bomb can be called "nuclear capable" and Taiwan's air defense zone extends into mainland China. The BBC article did the leak the truth:https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-58459128
Taiwan's defense ministry reported that Chinese military airplanes—including nuclear-capable bombers—flew into the nation's air defense identification zone on Sunday.
So Chinese bombers with no bombs flew along its own coast nowhere near Taiwan and that is deemed a threat!Remember a year ago when it was daily news about the evil Chinese cracking down on rioters in Hong Kong. Most Americans don't realize Hong Kong is part of China. The dispute was that Hong Kong refused to extradite any wanted criminals to other Chinese states, and the CCP insisted they must. It was proven that foreign NGOs were instigating most protests and violence and most people in Hong Kong supported the crackdown. The silly Hong Kong story died, so they spun up the threat to Taiwan like they've done for 70 years.Replies: @mulga mumblebrain
The defence ministry released a map showing a flight path north-east of the Pratas, closer to the Chinese coast than the Taiwanese coast.
Stryker,
Read some history about when the Chinese first went to Malaysia, Indonesia and Singapore. Hint: It was WAY before the western countries had ever visited these places. So to say that the Chinese first went to these places as cookies in western colonies is preposterous.
Shifty