RSSSpot on Mike Whitney.
And particular interesting to remember: — the American Psychological Asso. are the gentle folks that helped the CIA torture prisoners in Iraq.
“American Psychological Association Bolstered C.I.A. Torture Program, Report Says”
https://www.nytimes.com/2015/05/01/us/report-says-american-psychological-association-collaborated-on-torture-justification.html
My understanding is that this experimental injection is not a vaccine. It contains a piece of messenger RNA – m(RNA) – that goes into our cells and produces a protein that will attack a single piece of the c-19 virus known as the spike protein, which is a spike that sticks out from the surface of a c-19 virus. But, reportedly, these proteins will ignore any variant virus – and at the same time block your own immune system from attacking any virus. The injection material does not contain a piece of the virus, as a vaccine does, because they have never isolated the virus. Two sources for this info. are thehighwire and an interview with Dr. Byram Bridle, a viral immunologist. There are other sites to research. This is a huge topic as our immune systems have many types of defences against viruses. Also, I understand that we all do not have to be vaccinated to achieve herd immunity in our world population. In the meantime, there have been some pretty radical adverse reactions to these injections, including blindness. Blindness! Like, you get this injection and then you can’t see anymore. Why would somebody have an injection of some substance that could cause that?
Although what you state about Yaweh is accurate, you neglected to mention the most important part of the Torah: the Ten Commandments. And the first is Lo tirzach, Thou shalt not kill. (True, in modern Israel that word is translated “murder” not “kill.” But in the yeshivas, religious schools,
the original meaning is taught. And the ultra-Orthodox men do NOT go into the Israeli army, presumably for that reason. ) The God of the world gave that true commandment in all the major religions, and if humans were wise enough to follow God’s loving commands, humans would not be endangering all humankind with nuclear weapons, etc. , nor would there be the wars, which only humans and ants fight with their own species.
In other words, the real Jews do follow God’s commandments and should be respected for it, just as do the real Christians, Hindus, and Buddhists, and also Muslims, with some variation. Obviously, sadly, many alleged followers of those religions do not actually follow God’s laws. That is the reason for most humanly caused problems on earth.
Replies: @Kolya Krassotkin
The Ancient Egyptians were more evolved or Alien beings and God gave them the original 42 commandments. The Bible has only 10. Most of the 10 commandments are borrowed out of this list. It may appear that God thought that the children of Israel were only smart enough to carry out some of the commandments from the list or more plausible, Perhaps the children of Israel just picked out which ones they wanted. They left out the commandments that would make for poor warriors. Moses was raised an Egyptian, maybe Moses could of suffered from Dementia or Alzheimer's disease also.
The 42 Principles of Ma’at, above are shown above in commandment form. Ma’at was the Goddess who personified the ideals of Truth and Righteousness. These 42 principles were known to all the Ancient Egyptians. These 42 principle have been rephrased here in Biblical Commandment form to make them more intelligible and familiar to modern society. In the original form they were preceded with “I have not” as in “I have not stolen.” as these were from the Book of the Dead. Thou shalt was substituted for (I have not) to turn these into commandment form, The Egyptians believed that when they died, their spirit would be judged by these principle commandments. Moses and the Israelites, who were originally with Egyptians, would have been familiar with these principles, but after wandering the desert for forty years they seem to have only remembered some of these .
One of the few who makes sense….
very interesting. and how do you rate judith rich harris’s conclusions in the nurture assumption? Are her sample sizes big enough to make her claims robust do you think?