Atzmon's infection with biological determinism seems to be the latest delta-variant out of Virus Zionism, and Atzmon's got it bad.

Boots:

"[Atzmon's] reference to Hitler’s “biologism” is misguided and ignorant of history"
 

Atzmon, Aug. 20, 2021:

"Hitler’s call for the Aryan people to do the same . . .[ identify politically with their biology] . . . happened about two decades later."
 

Atzmon, July 19, 2021:

“the issue that some of us had with Hitler — Hitler told people to identify with their biology. [Nobody’s really] upset with Hitler because he believed in national socialism. It was the racial — the racist element: the idea that people should identify with their biology."
@ 2.30 min in Atzmon - Romanello discussion
https://www.unz.com/gatzmon/the-philosophy-that-drives-the-chaos/
 

 

Jews were pissed that Germans failed to embrace the virus that was (((they))).
But it's normal for the human immune system to resist a harmful invasion. Atzmon calls this rejection of a virus "biological determinism."

Maybe he's right: the human immune system rejects harmful invasions. That what an immune system does.
History repeats: can't count the number of Jewish "experts" demanding that every American take a vaccine, even those who have acquired normal immunity from having had and survived the virus.

Replies: @BorisMay

Your words are harsh. Could it not be said of Mr. Atzmon that he, like all of us, is not as bad as the worst thing he ever did and not as good as the best thing he ever did?

I find his views interesting and he participates in a friendly fashion in the commentary on his articles here. Nor does he grate the way Pat Buchanan does who from time to time uses ideas or language that seem to be right out of the neocon, globalist, or deep state playbook. I still highly respect him and always will. Both men are worth reading and provide ye grist for ye mill. My quest for the perfect commentator continues and I will report back any developments. ☺️

“…cultural Marxism. It’s the application of Marxism to race, gender, sexual orientation and sexual identity.”

Formal Marxism cannot be “applied” as modifying any facet of what we call “culture”, since Marx considered man’s economic experience to be the only important determinant of individual behavior and social outcome. This tenet of Marxism alone, which is “dialectic materialism”, disallows retrospective application of any Marxist solution to features of “culture”.

Moreover, it can be argued that those of different races cannot successfully share any culture, that cultural integration projects are doomed long before “cultural Marxist” agitations might be applied. This is not to say it is impossible to synthesize a successful hybrid culture, but before that test can occur, Jews intend to collapse any society working out its practical response to cultural shocking (itself the Jew’s first job).

The Jews wrecking any society with identity politics have called their work “cultural marxism” for three reasons: First, to produce an academic response instead of visceral outrage from within the (always white) culture sustaining the harm (because Jews know white people would rather discuss than rebel); second, because anything “marxist” is, in the dim American mind, synonymous with socialism, about which Merry Khans have been trained to be stupidly reflexive, and which leads reliably to economic obfuscation and a focus on the non-existent domestic communist threat; third, it gives Jews another successful deception, which is what gives satanic value to their conquests apart from gratifications flowing from the acquisition of raw power.

Anyway, the oxymoronic term ‘cultural marxism’ should be replaced with something that better describes what’s going on: Jewish mischief and perfidy. Again.