If Jews hate whites so much, why did they follow in the footsteps of trail-blazing Anglos?

Jews say genocide is evil. They point to the holocaust.
But was US created by 'genocide' of Indians. Anglos were 'nazis' of yesteryear. And yet, the #1 favorite immigration for Jews was the Anglo-US. US was also created through slave labor. If Jews were so moral and upright, why did they follow behind Anglos? Why participate in a nation created by white 'genocide' of red people and slavery of black people?

Surely, Jews could have chosen other destinations for immigration. Also, as various European empires needed labor and investment, they would have gladly accepted Jews to settle Africa and other parts. As whites didn't wipe out the peoples in those parts but merely ruled over them, those empires were less morally tainted than the US that was created by wholesale removal of peoples.

After all, Anglos only ruled over blacks in Kenya and Rhodesia. There was no plan to wipe them out or expel them. But in the US, Indians were pushed out and removed from the land. So, the kind of imperialism that made the US was a greater 'historical crime' than European empires in Asia and Africa where whites ruled but didn't wipe people out. And yet, Jews preferred to move to US, the 'white supremacist' nation made by 'genocide' and slavery. US was created by pogroms against Indians.

In the US, the whites 'whitened' the land unlike in Africa, Asia, and Middle East. As for Latin America, whites failed to whiten the land much. Latin America remained majority non-white.
If Jews hate whitening, they should have moved to Latin America that was hungry for immigrants and envious that most preferred to move to the whitened Anglo-US.

Now, if whitening is bad, why did Jews favor the US, a nation that did the most the whiten the land? Just ask the Indians? And even in Africa, why did Jews favor South Africa as destination spot over other parts of Africa? South Africa was more whitened than other parts of Africa. Again, Jews preferred a part of the world that was whitened.

How does one explain this irony? Jews followed behind whites to enter a whitened world. Jews esp loved Anglo-America where whitening had been extensive against Indians and Mexicans. There were lots of blacks, but they were kept in 'their place'. When Jews arrived in Ellis Island, they were moving away from 'Asiatic' Russian rule to White Anglo rule.

If Jews wanted to enter the whitened world so much, why are they now so hell bent on unwhitening America?

Because focus of Jewish interest went from well-being to domination.

Poor Jews in Eastern Europe wanted better material conditions and more stability under rule of law. And Jews realized such was most assured in whitened Anglo-America. They were too poor to think about power. They just wanted freedom and better material life.
Since whitened America offered the best hope, they went to the US.

But over time, Jews went from wishing for well-being to relishing their great wealth and power.
If poor Jews looked to White America as the promised land, powerful Jews see white America as a potential challenge to their dominance. So now, they must destroy whiteness.

It's sort of like the crossing of the Red Sea(or Sea of Reeds) in the Exodus. The sea splits open and the land is so welcome. If God hadn't split open the sea and if Jews tried to swim to the other side, they all would have drowned. So, Jews were so happy to see the land bridge between the raised waters. And they crossed this land to the other side.
But a blessing became a curse. Once the Jews were on the other side, the exposed land that had been to their advantage became a threat. The Egyptians could cross it to and attack the Jews. So, Jews begged God to close the sea. And it was closed to drown the Egyptians.

Jews see whitened America the same way. Jews, esp those living under 'Asiatic' Russians, hated being in the Old World. They wanted an exodus to the promised land. And America seemed like a better place with more freedom and opportunities. And white people were like the land bridge that had opened up for them. After all, if not for white trail-blazing to create America(via 'genocide' and slavery), there wouldn't have been the spectacular rise of a New Nation. Jews needed to walk on that white land bridge. But once Jews made their way across and then gained supreme power in America, they came to see white power as ancient Hebrews saw Egyptians at the other side of sea. Before white power could wake up and challenge Jewish power, it must be drowned by seas of humanity.

History repeats itself.

And that means, even if Jews win against whites, they will have "40 yrs of wandering" in New America where there will be new battles along tribal lines. After all, Hebrews made it out of Egypt only to face off against one tribe after another.

As white America fades and US fills up with diversity and new tribalisms, good luck to Jews as they combat new enemies. In Europe, it's heating up already with Muslims.
In the US, Jewish elites won't be able to outmuscle Hindus so easily.

In yrs to come, Jews will realize they really messed things up. White America was never the Egyptians trying to wipe out Jews. Because of the Holocaust, Jews got to seeing Nazis everywhere when the White West in both US and EU were the best bet for future Jewish prosperity and security.
If anything white US and white Russia were the two sides of the oceans that crashed on the Nazi Egyptians who were totally defeated. It could have been smooth sailing since then if everyone got along. But paranoia and hubris reigned among Jews in their prophetic delirium, and history is gonna get very ugly. And if Jews think history will end with the fall of whites, think again. They were the last people with any conscience toward Jews.

Replies: @JSM, @William Badwhite, @Citizen of a Silly Country, @guest, @Becky

@Anonymous

Jews do best in unstable societies divided by factionalism, with weak governments and general lack of gentile cohesion. Weimar Germany and Yeltsin’s Russia are the most recent examples of Jewish utopias.
 

Your post might make sense if you invert it. Yeltsin’s Russia (1990s Russia) sucked for Jewish community, which is why the majority of the country's entire Jewish community had emigrated from Russia by the end of the decade (the mass emigration only ended in the early 2000s, when the country started to recover under an oil boom - resulting in hundred of thousands of Jews returned http://rense.com/general65/100000formersovietjews.htm) . While, far worse still, was Weimar Germany (in fact this entire period of war and interwar crisis for Germany which lasted from 1914-1945), which resulted by winter 1941 in the Nazis reaching Moscow - and ongoing attempts to murder every Jewish person all along the way.

Read the post again:

Historically Jews do best in stable, ascending societies, which reform in such a way as to offer them some kind of meritocratic path (even when it was only through the local aristocracy) and religious freedom.

They historically do worst after times of mass unrest, revolution and war.

You can see their fortunes in the Early Middle Ages and High Medieval Period – and how fortunes turned against them with the beginning of the Late Middle Ages and its time of crisis.

Replies: @J.Ross, @Becky