> “PS Is your nick a less than subtle affirmation of tribal affiliation and not, “g-d” forbid a blasphemy, Jewish troll?”

No, you absolute retard, a simple sirGAY brin search would tell you it’s from Tolkien’s legendarium.

> “your personal enrichment of fraudster Freud’s thesis that incest, pedophilia, erotomania, and all other Jewish neuroses and psychopathies are in fact universal “qualities’?”

Genocide is the common thread that has happened in every single country on the planet, bucko. It’s the degenerate Christians who have tried to ban it under their unholy christian empire in america. Our ancestors exterminated all Neanderthals. Aryans exterminated the builders of Stonehenge. The Vietnamese have killed the Chams, the Rakhine have expelled Rohingya, the Turks have cleansed Artsakh of its native Armenians… Not in a single case here have I mentioned da JOOZ.

All this whining about the Gaza genocide is a mark of a woke brain. Oh the horrors, they have a wealthy religious society… The privilege our Aryan nations are denied!

Prevalence of obesity and overweight in Palestine: a systematic review (The real Nakbah)
https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-67361930606-3/fulltext

As to the article – first of all, Israel has pulled out from Lebanon, has not advanced into Jabal al Druze, has still been too cucked to starve out the Gaza Arabs in 2 years… So is this “Greater Israel” in the room with us now?

Second, atrocity and torture are inherent human qualities, genocide has always been the case in non-Abrahamic cultures, it’s only the Jews who are so unique that they have been trying to better the lives of the Arabs who spit in their faces.

Nobody will ever say this aside from me, but in Russia many people consider Israel to be a proxy of America, not the other way round. And they are predicting America to abandon Israel (to nuke Russia and/or China). From this PoV, Fuentes and Tucker are merely CIA stooges that are advancing the most recent party line, and not harbingers of some nascent Aryan worldview.

As an Aryan supremacist, I’d love to see the leftists actually murder both Nick and Tucker because only blood can awaken the Aryan spirit.

> “If the subhuman Japs try to start shit on behalf of their American masters, it will be over in a few hours. 100 million japs will die instantly as their cities are targeted with ballistic missiles, and the unlucky japs who survive the initial attack will die slowly of radiation poisoning or starvation. Most of the rest of the world will collectively sigh with relief to finally be rid of an annoying nation of cretinous slaves.”

This was incredibly amusing to read, definitely one of a kind! Why do you hold such animosity towards the Japs, I wonder? Are you Indonesian or something? I’d have a few words to say myself:

1) Japan is one of the three sub-cultures of the Mongoloid race, the one which squarely defeated both China and Korea at the time when the entirety of Asia, from the Ottoman Turks to Vietnam, was lying lethargic and as if prepared for the jugular strike from the Aryans (which never came);

2) Japan did lose its final war of survival, and is now confined to their tiny archipelago which is unfit for supplying an expanding population, their empire’s corpse is propped up by American arms in Formosa and Seoul régime;

3) at the mercy of the Aryans, the Japs were allowed to breed to occupy their archipelago to the fullest physically feasible, they’ve been enjoying raping kids, and their mastery of English remains terrible, they have not massively converted to Christianity either;

4) that said, their position is still precarious, as their main rival China is too large, they might have a chance with Manchukuo and Chousen, but the current situation does seem a but hopeless;

5) in this vein, siding with America does make a certain amount of sense, as Russia has shown its utter inaptitude, whereas America does have the largest nuclear stockpile. China, however, only has 500-600 nukes, far too few to threaten Japan, let alone Japan + Formosa/Seoul + America. So no, your fantasies about nuking Japan are baseless. Starving Japan would indeed be possible, but again, boomers dying would only make them stronger.

All in all, I would indeed share your smirking on Japan’s position, but I would still give them credit for showing the superiority of the Mongoloid race historically – in a way, both China and Juche Korea and heirs to the achievements of the Meiji Restoration.

> “turned out 2B an FTL living-in-mom’s-basement anti-fa….like I said.”

Honestly, Tyler Robinson has done more to advance White agenda than 99% of the ignoble alt-liters. Tyler Robinson should be put in the hall of fame together with Anders Breivik, Payton Gendron and Brenton Tarrant. Really sad that he’s one of the very few shooters who managed to evade ZOG for a few days… only to be turned in by his TRAITOR boomer DAD. But that’s part and parcel of life in a society propagandised by Jewish toys such as radio and newspapers. We used to be just goy, but now we’ve been upgraded to GOYCATTLE.

> “She would be still alive had she gone to Russia.”

The first comment was based, yours is not. Russia has the same non-White migrant problem as America or France do. It’s just in Russia the murderers and rapists are the Turks and the Chechens. Krokus city hall massacre of Purim 2024 rings any bells?

This harlot clearly deserved it though, if all such whores were knifed, this retarded war would end in a day. Meanwhile, Ukrainian men get abducted and tortured by their government, and nobody gives a flying fuck. Hell, if it were a white man knifed in Carolina, everyone would’ve been fine, too. We need a final solution to the white knight question…

Imagine killing a Zionist puppet (Charlie Kirk), retreating like a ninja (putting the retarded Valhalla-blabbering idiocrat pajeet Patel to shame), only to be turned in… by your abominable and vile boomer dad.

Justice for Tyler Robinson. Boomers are evil. We need a final solution to the boomer question.

> “Might is right. All else is only hot air.”

Christian “might” is transient and illusory. Just like Putin’s Russia, built by the giants of yesteryear. The more the ratchet effect purifies Christianity with time, the weaker and more detached from the pagan reality it becomes.
https://neofeudalreview.substack.com/p/the-egalitarian-ratchet-effect-why

> “Such an anodyne is currently necessary to the continued functioning of the system”

Hitlerian Germany functioned alright without human rights. Juche Korea is functioning splendidly without human rights. Just giving examples to anticipate your retort that someone lost WW2 (and America is losing WW3, so what?).

> “Certainly it’s harmful to the white race to oppose genocide. But for the system, it’s useful.”

The system is only sustainable as long as the Aryan race exists. South Africa, the Soviet Union and even the American Midwest have already collapsed and deindustrialised by foregoing genocide. Hence your argument about Christianity helping the technological civilisation is pointless.

> “Everyone hates everyone, and everyone will exploit, lie to, and oppress everyone else to the fullest extent”

There are only two instances of unconditional love – between mother and child, and between the White Man and the niggerfaggot (and I’m not sure about the mother).

To anyone babbling about the supposed Gaza genocide – could you clearly explain to me why Israel has refused to besiege Gaza and let the Arabs die of starvation in a month or two? How is such an obvious, easy and cheap military tactic is not even considered by “le evil Jews”? Hint – it’s because the Jews are waging a “war” that’s humanitarian as fuck.

Why did the Turks genocide 150k Armenians in Artsakh in Sept 2023 in a single month, and yet the Jews are still wasting their precision-guided bombs and expensive gadgets for 1.5 years and counting? Does this look like a bloodthirsty warmonger to you?

The main threat to Israel comes from Egypt – and only America’s money is keeping those Africans from swarming Israel once more. In a way, nothing matters and nothing happens as long as the Aryan race in America survives. So drawing any conclusions from this police operation is preposterous. This is yet another Iraq and another Ukraine – the Jews are honourary Whites for letting their enemies breed and fester.

> “If Christianity were a bulwark against racial egalitarianism, then American whites of the 19th century, fanatic Christians”

Indeed it wasn’t. I could share a few other points on the overview of Christianity through history.

1. The Conquistadors’ natural instinct was to rape and pillage the Indians – yet it was the Catholic church (in its Jew-hating inquisition period) that bestowed the original version of “human rights” onto the savages (Sublimis Deus, 1537).

2. The slave-owning planters of the Caribbean were rough sailor men, far removed from the centres of Christian civilisation. When that Wild West spirit started subsiding in the late 18th century with ever greater numbers of normies, Christianity came back and castrated them again (culminating in 1865).

3. The Kings of France traced their lineage from the merry violence of the Middle Ages – and I argue it was the metastasis of the Christian malaise that made Voltaire vomit at the sight of the tortured Damiens. Damiens was boiled and cut alive for regicide – and I argue that the divine right of kings is an Asiatic, pagan doctrine. Just as ancient Christianity was cutting down the holy oaks in Saxony, so now modern atheism is denying the Aryans the right to worship their kings as gods (see the song NS schoolchildren sang about Hitler calling him a god).

4. Now, another question is – has America changed in any revolutionary manner ever since its founding? What I have described was the evolutionary progress of its own internal dialectic. An actual change would have been the planter class rising up and enslaving all Mexicans. Another change would have been a forced sterilisation of all Negroes later on (in the Darwinian scientist era). None of the above happened. Instead, the spread of American Christianity neatly predicts and is tautological to the area of legal LGBT coverage. This is not a coincidence, this is merely an expected outcome.

5. As I have written before, it all could have been anticipated when looking at the fruits of European colonialism. When the populations of British India and American Philippines grew, it simply meant the lack of the will to settle new lands. It was only a matter of time when this death wish meant the tipping into obscene collective suicide with the current non-Aryan immigration.

6. OP: > “Christianity doesn’t mean the “rejection of Christ”. It can mean the liberation of Christ. Let’s not confuse Christ and Christianity. The life and philosophy of Jesus are deeply inspiring; I’m not questioning that.”

This is what might have made Rolo Slavskiy ban me, too. The teachings of Jesus are the main culprit! They are what makes people like Guyénot consider the Yahweh god “immoral” for… behaving in a natural, pagan way! Judaism is paganism, any critique of Judaism from Christian principles is supremely kosher, useless and self-harmful.

…All in all, this is completely useless. There are virtually no people in the West who can worship Hate. This may sound childishly satanic, comic book racist, but it’s the simplest way out of the Christian matrix. You should hate others because they look different, not because of any profound philosophical principle. You should cheer on any cruelty because it inspires virility and strength. And you should measure the truth only as a success of a certain biological population.

Words are a lie, blood is the truth.

P.S. Thanks to Benjamin for quoting my old posts, much appreciated, even though meat-eating child abuse never prevented the Asians from dominating, and I’m too non-Christian to disparage the victors.

I have asked on Reddit, and here’s a rather decent debunking of the article.

© dragmehomenow
https://old.reddit.com/r/nuclearweapons/comments/1liff2a/does_north_korean_have_mad_with_the_usa_by_virtue/mzcrz32/

It’s good prose, but Starr isn’t a physicist, he’s a physician.

Some issues I note in the article:

1 I don’t see any citations for his description on the effects of an high-altitude EMP on American power grids. He cites Savage, E., Gilbert, J., Radasky, W. (2010). “The Early-Time (E1) High-Altitude Electromagnetic Pulse (HEMP) and Its Impact on the U.S. Power Grid”, which illustrates the effects of an E1 HEMP on an unshielded power grid, but doesn’t actually support his doomerism. From the introduction itself (p 10):
http://large.stanford.edu/courses/2019/ph241/rogers1/docs/meta-r-320.pdf

There are also those who believe we cannot do anything about it – if it happens we will just have to deal with it then. Then there are others that think every electronic device in the country will fail, and we will go back to the Stone Age. There are many such exaggerated scenarios; for example, it is doubtful that more than a very small fraction of vehicles will suddenly stop working – but how long will they be able to run with gasoline supply disruptions from possible electric power grid problems?

Many perceptions of E1 HEMP effects, and the feeling that nothing can be done about E1 HEMP vulnerabilities, are also erroneous. Besides accounting for the unlikely chance of a HEMP event, efforts to protect against E1 HEMP effects also tend to have other benefits.

Starr also details the effects of EMP E1 waves, and he himself notes that “unless specifically protected from E1, any modern electronic device that contains solid-state circuitry (microchips, transistors, and integrated circuits) that is plugged into the grid will be disabled, damaged, or destroyed by this huge blast of electricity.” But there’s nothing special about the effects he stated. Any protections against transient surges will protect equipment against E1 waves. Pages 50 to 53 of Savage et al. (2010) goes into these protections. On Page 55, the authors conclude:

Unlike for E3 (late time HEMP), the high voltage transmission lines themselves are not of especially high concern for E1 HEMP. […] Also, high tension systems tend to be hardier – they already are dealing with high voltages and currents compared to what E1 HEMP can produce. These high voltage lines also often have good lightning protection.

Interesting, that the articles Starr cites directly refutes him.
__________
2 The so-called “Super-EMP” weapons are a Russian thing, but my issue with these sources are that they were made in 2006 and there’s nothing to show for it. Russian nuclear saber-rattling has since moved on to their 6 wunderwaffes, Avangard, Burevestnik, Zircon, Kinzhal, Poseidon, and Sarmat. It seems unlikely to me that Russia (who’s bragged about how dangerous these weapon delivery systems are, how they’re impossible to intercept, and how they restore Russian nuclear deterrence against the USA) would actively possess such a capability and not hint at its actual existence officially. Sure, they might be a secret ace up their sleeve, but a perfectly kept secret deters nobody.

It’s also funny that Starr calls Jacobsen’s book Nuclear War: A Scenario remarkable because it’s not. It’s pop science at best, and the subreddit isn’t exactly a fan of it. Like Starr, it’s good prose, but even the excerpt he quotes is questionable. Cars stop working, dams burst, sewage systems explode and insects start swarming in “less than 15 minutes”, elevators speed to the ground and crash, “thousands of subway trains, passenger trains, and freight trains traveling in every direction, many on the same tracks, collide with one another, crash into walls and barriers, or derail”, satellites fall out of the sky, nuclear power plants go into meltdown because all their backup systems fail.

1. Hydroelectric dams don’t burst when they shut down.

2. Elevators don’t crash into the ground when the power goes out. They have so many mechanical failsafes specifically to prevent cars from plummeting straight down no matter what.

3. If a blackout occurs, electrically-powered subway trains don’t spontaneously crash into each other. They just stop because there’s no power.

4. Trains don’t derail or jump tracks just because the signals go out. That’s not how track switching works. Moreover, most tracks can default back to physical signals and mechanical train detection systems to detect the presence/absence of trains on defined sections of their lines.

5. Satellites are really hard to deorbit. They might fail if they pass through zones of high radiation or if they’re hit by an EMP, but I need you and other readers of Jacobsen to understand that NASA estimates the ISS’s orbit will take 12 to 18 months to decay from its current orbital altitude. EMPs aren’t magic broomsticks that sweep shit from orbit.

6. Jacobsen claims that backup diesel generators at nuclear power plants are cooked if there’s an EMP. But 1) diesel generators, when unplugged, are unlikely to be affected because they’re unplugged, and 2) if it’s just an EMP, most light water reactors are designed to fail gracefully anyway. Control rods are held up by electromagnets, so in the event of a power loss, they drop back into the reactor and shut down the reaction. So I have absolutely no idea why she thinks EMP = 26 Chernobyls across the USA.
__________
3 So I’m looking at [39], since Starr claims that it states that “scientists have confirmed, by ‘all means of measurement’, that the threat potential posed by EMP E3 exceeds the intended stress limit the aging U.S. power network is designed and tested to withstand. That’s a 2010 article, but a more recent Congressional Research Service report (2022) notes that the USA has since pushed for greater EMP resilience. Specifically, LPT stockpiling programs are in place (contrary to what Starr claimed) and there’s significant R&D into developing solid-state alternatives to LPTs that are less vulnerable to HEMPs.
https://www.congress.gov/crs-product/R47339

More generally, it’s absolutely wild to me that Starr cites all sorts of claims that the USA has done nothing to protect itself from HEMPs, and they’re all pre-2010 documents (e.g., [50] is a 2008 report from a congressional committee about how the USA isn’t prepared to survive a HEMP strike). As a researcher I’m appalled at how Starr hasn’t looked up more recent literature. This comes across as a shoddy literature review.
__________
I know Starr sounds convincing, but it’s also really clear that his polemic is incredibly one-sided and biased, he cites questionable sources like Jacobsen, and he very clearly has little to no understanding of how nuclear reactors work.

> “So you’re just now realizing that americans will tolerate infinite slaughter of “a-rabs”?”

“Infinite slaughter” – meanwhile the population of Iraq grew from 26.8 mil. (2003) to 35.28 mil. (2013) under American occupation…

The analysis indicates a prevalence of 23·6% (95% CI 20·6–26·5) for overweight and obesity, with a prevalence of 26·1% in the West Bank and 19·5% in the Gaza Strip.

Yes, the Jews are so kind in their infinite love of swarthy nigres that their pet monkeys grow fat like burgers in burgerland, imagine.
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0140673621015324

As Rolo Slavskiy says, it’s a religion. One of the dogmas by the likes of Noam Chomsky is that the West is evil and wants to exterminate all non-Jews. When in reality, even the Gaza vermin are forbidden to be starved to death in their totality. But seeing the obvious would demolish your worldview, so that’s relegated to a blind spot.

Both Egypt and Jordan cut a deal with Israel, get free gibs from the Empire and live alright under Zionist occupation. One of the features of the Anglo world order is that the Anglo never lies. The anti-Israel coalition is indeed simply retarded anti-Semitic, spirit-centric. There is no geopolitical basis for Iran to feud with Israel aside from ideology. But of course, that’s too strong meat to admit…

He is anti Alexander Dugin, anti Putin, anti multipolar world, anti BRICS, anti Islam, anti Iran, anti China etc.

Don’t confuse this guy with any sort of resistance against U.S. global hegemony, Western power or any support for multipolarity. Rolo is nothing of any of that.

First of all, America is the primary enemy of the White race (with its suicidal Christian anti-racism). Being pro-White is the opposite of being pro-Anglo. Conversely, your love of the foreign Asian races is exactly anti-White – and exactly in line with the putrid Jewish influence which denies my race its self-love and sovereignty. Hence your charge is utterly vacuous.

…Of course, the reality for me is such that I have zero hope in any White uprisings whatsoever, so I would invite a Sino-Korean invasion of California to genocide the entire Anglo lot from coast to coast. Is that multipolar enough for you? But of course, from this PoV, Iran is a pathetic aboriginal child who sniffed too much petrol and is now being covered in Jewish cum without retaliation. Not exactly a sight to behold for any anti-Semitically-inclined person.

If you want actual Asian pride (to take inspiration for Whites), I would suggest:
1) theocratic Juche Korea;
2) anti-feminist Taliban Afghanistan;
3) genocidal Aliyev Azerbaijan;
4) Islamic nuclear Pakistan.

Overall, it’s funny to see the deranged triggered responses by (((you))) English speakers, because such conspiratorial thinking is fairly common in Russia – see Strelkov, see Galkovsky, see miguel-kud.
https://miguel-kud.livejournal.com/

That said, one thing Russians _always_ miss, the tremendous blind spot of the Russians lies in denying the reality that Jewish tikun olam brings prosperity to the nations. The Jews are forbidden to genocide their enemies by their own idiotic Christian law. Even Gaza is not being genocided (anyone with a brain would simply besiege them for a few months until their vermin starves to death). This means… that Iran cannot lose! YES, /honk /honk, Rolo, Iran will always win in such circumstances.

Iranian ISIS? WIN. Greater Turân? WIN. Basij insurgents in the mountains? WIN.

It’s just like with the Koreans in Kursk – if they die, it only makes the Korean high command pay closer attention to their inadequacies. And of course, any war is always an exam that kicks the frail into the abyss.

When Trump won in Nov 2024, I exclaimed that the Iranian strategy was chosen, and thus the Slavic genocide would be put back to the feminist stage (as opposed to the burned offering style). So to me, that’s a welcome change? I don’t really see what’s not to love:
1) Americans dying for Israel? Based;
2) Iranians having a régime change? Maybe they finally reconvert to Sunni and have their own ISIS, win-win for everyone;
3) hopefully, the Turks create a big Tûranic empire through Iranian Azerbaijan (and genocide Armenians a third time to boot);
4) and of course, a chonky Israel that would survive the death of the Aryan race.

That said, (((Iran))) has hoisted the purple flag of anger (or the pink flag of pussing out), and the song is arguably rad.

> “Well most Ukrainians would rather have a bill than be subjects to the Russian totalitarian empire.”

Dude, actual Ukrainians are being enslaved and tortured by Kiev régime thugs. They are not in a position to vote for any course of action.
https://t.me/stranaua/198053

> “Lenin hasn’t been a favourite of President Vladimir Putin’s. He’s derided him: “Ukraine appeared in 1922…Now the grateful descendants are smashing monuments to Lenin, the founder of Ukraine.””

This is the favourite tactic of Western Putinists – they giddily catch the words falling out of Putin’s mouth all the while ignoring his actions. Because in reality, Putin has been the primary factor in rearming, radicalising and legitimising the Ukraine. Doing just enough damage to rile up the Ukrainians enough, but not even close to enough to defeat them.
https://ria.ru/20140527/1009593518.html

May 27, 2014 — Russia has transferred $1 billion worth of military equipment based in Crimea to Ukraine. According to Deputy Minister of Defense of the Russian Federation, General Bulgakov

> “But today, especially today, we must not take a single step that would split the society in Russia. That’s how I see it.””

Meanwhile, the Stalin monument in metro.
https://apnews.com/article/stalin-statue-russia-ussr-putin-moscow-metro-7a5a425f9b1c6a7120b6345b5d150de3

And Stalingrad international airport gets its name back – thus splitting Russia, because Stalin is hated not just by rabid liberals but by monarchists and nationalists as well.
https://www.pravda.com.ua/eng/news/2025/04/30/7509849/

Also, super funny to have Putin bring up Lenin when he has made Solzhenitsyn and Orwell required reading in Russian schools, and has been promoting the fascist Ilyin.

> “In no other state, either allied with Russia in the present war such as China, Iran and North Korea, or allied with the US and NATO against Russia, is there a law differentiating between state acts of war and state acts of terrorism.”

So the author supports the American invasion of Afghanistan in response to 9/11? Big if true. Although it’s amusing to see Trump hug an Al-Qaeda operative live on television (Al-Julani).

> ““Why has Russia deliberately ignored the aggressive attacks of the Ukrainian side during the [June 2 Istanbul] negotiations?” asked Vzglyad.”

Because everything is going according to plan! The disarmament of Russia proceeding apace.

> “If Russians are lucky, Mr. Putin will be pushed aside by patriotic generals or even executed by them. After that, the first target should be Kiev International Airport. Twelve Islander missiles should close it for good. Next, Jewkrainians should be deprived of energy and electricity forever.”

Are you a CIA troll or something? This is called poisoning the well. Neither Rolo Slavskiy nor Sofa Legion Strategist would approve – in fact, they’d consider you in cahoots with Pedophile Putin the boy-belly-kisser. Because depriving the population of energy is NOT how you win wars.

First of all, all Kremlin burocracy must be culled like in the Cultural Revolution in China. Putinists, liberals, libertarians and church-going Islamists. Then an immense rearmament campaign would be initiated aimed to produce the weapons for breaking the current frontline stalemate, namely FPV drones, drone-rebroadcasters, tactical med altitude UAVs, guided munitions (Tornado-S) and gliding bombs, along with helicopter drops, hexacopter drones for logistics, and a focus on fully-armored APCs able to withstand 50 drone strikes. And that’s WITHOUT the mobilisation of humans for sacrifice, the army size doesn’t matter, they all die when employed in meat waves anyway. The economy should be fully militarised though, and many fake nuclear silos built to protect the arsenal from a disarming nuclear strike, thus preventing the American thirst for WW3.

> “The western leaders including Trump, Starmer, King Charles, Macron and Mertz are utterly evil and they have another thing in common”

The West and Russia are one and the same, they all snort cocaine and want to see Russians die. Trump, Biden, Putin and von der Layen, they’re all indistinguishable.
https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Контрабанда_кокаина_из_посольства_России_в_Аргентине

> “One has to feel sorry for all the young Americans who signed up for the military after Trumps 2024 win because they will once again be sacrificed in Europe.”

Those boys will get plenty of sex though in the ruins, it’s gonna be a walk in the park, and not a single nuke is gonna fall on US soil (fuck Germany and Poland though, hopefully it burns).

Regarding the OP – not sure if the NEW START treaty prohibits Russia from building hangars at all, this sounds like a controlled Kremlin/CIA cope for PR purposes. Russia builds no hangars at all, even for its fighter aircraft.

My main two objections:
1) America has it much worse;
2) China has robots in their factories.

White TFR in America is 1.5. Add to that the negative drain from woke policies and Christian mercy towards Mexicans and Blacks, and it should be much worse, no?
https://www.statista.com/statistics/226292/us-fertility-rates-by-race-and-ethnicity/

Chinese factories are machinised to hell.
ttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4EmnRboJ9OM

> “starting from horrific levels of poverty under Mao Zedong. Ever since Deng Xiaoping’s free-market reforms, the Chinese have risen from being some of the poorest people on the planet to now being quite average. That’s a huge achievement.”

How is that an achievement if it’s just America put inordinate sums of money and tech into them because the Jews want to kill the White race?

> “They can’t have any more children even if they wanted to. The government could put a gun to their heads and it wouldn’t matter.”

The best and only way to increase fertility is to remove the female rights to education. But the Christians cannot do it because it goes against their egalitarian dogma. Chinese are still under the influence of American Christianity, so they can’t do it either.

The verification by means of satellites meant that the heavy bombers were often parked in the open, in full glare of spy satellites.

So, while the treaty does not explicitly demand that the heavy bombers be parked outside, this became a usual practice.

[…]“FYI, those bombers that were hit HAVE to be out in full view due to nuclear treaty obligations. Zelenskyy took advantage of that,” General Flynn noted on X.

https://www.eurasiantimes.com/did-a-2010-treaty-help-ukraine-in-targeting-russian-bombers/

The entire thing of the NEW START treaty sounds like a cope taken from a CIA spook rulebook? Russia is not building any hangars whatsoever, not even for the fighter aircraft.

Here are some responses from Redditors, they’re saying the hangars are too expensive. Overall, I’m curious about the psychology – how are people this oblivious to the entire con? I might compare them to the absence of reactions to desegregation and CPSU ban in America/Russia respectively, but then again, talking is much easier than becoming a terrorist fighter, so they could at least talk?
https://old.reddit.com/r/CredibleDefense/comments/1l1f43o/active_conflicts_news_megathread_june_02_2025/mvld113/?context=3

Nobody has mentioned it, so I will – there is a thesis by Guido Preparata that the Anglo-American ethnic bankers calculated the industrial output of the future anti-Hitlerian coalition and pushed Hitler to war they knew he would be unable to win and destined to lose.

(I disagree with this idea, personally, because even the fall of France was simply unfeasible, but NeoFeudal likes it, so I’ll leave it here for the conspiracy-minded folks.)
https://neofeudalreview.substack.com/p/british-and-american-machinations
https://neofeudalreview.substack.com/p/interview-with-guido-preparata

> “Instead the military conflict that began in early 2022 was arguably one of the most “provoked” major wars in modern history”

No, the Ukraine had never made claims on Russian territory, the entire premise is just faulty and you know it. I’m sorry, Rav Unz, but the Anglo-Americans virtually never outright lie, that’s the entire point of Isaac Newton and Charles Darwin. It’s the Russian schizos may think of Great Tartary, or Ukrainians of the Tripolye-Cucuteni archaeological culture, or the Serbs may think they created the Roman Empire, but the Anglos only use sly misrepresentations – whereas their facts are on point.

Case in point – Russia offered the West the perfect casus belli in 2014 by annexing Crimea AND removing Yanukovich. Yes, Putin admitted to doing as much in the Tucker interview (44:10) – he said that he forbade Yanuk to use force to disperse the protesters. Thus Putin was in cahoots with the West all along.
ttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hYfByTcY49k&t=44m10s

The Ukraine never threatened Russia proper, and was only riled up by the useless annexation of Crimea and the civil war in Donbass. Now 2022 is the next stage in the escalation – against Russian interests.

> “These individuals included Prof. Jeffrey Sachs of Columbia University and former Ambassador Chas Freeman, as well as Ray McGovern, the former head of the CIA’s Soviet Policy Branch and a longtime Presidential Intelligence Briefer.”

Yes, the CIA spooks who put Putin in power in the 1990s. As Rolo Slavskiy posits, there are two wings in the US politics – one traditionally gay, the other revolutionary trans. It’s a battle between gays and transvestites. But Russian interests are not to be found there. Let alone Aryan interests.

> “putin VISA APPLICATION mother “EVR” returns no applicable result.”

Русский: Мать Владимира Владимировича Путина – Мария Ивановна Шеломова..
English: Maria Ivanovna Shelomova – Vladimir Putin’s mother
ttps://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Maria_Ivanovna_Shelomova.jpg

> “He will be totally exposed as anti Russian, anti Putin charlatan and grifter.”

Those are mutually exclusive terms. One cannot be pro-Russian all the while supporting the chief murderer of Russians.

To add to my previous comment – even Pakistan and Juche Korea have proper hangars for their aircraft. That Russia has not made them in the 3.5 years of war is the clearest case of sabotage imaginable.

Of course, I personally would go much deeper, and also call the refusal to deploy nuclear weapons as traitorous, but it’s of a cultural variety, and sadly, even Rolo Slavskiy or Sofa would call me the exact same names you’re calling Rolo. But all I would point out to would be the refusal of both the Americans and the Russians to genocide their enemies – be it in Japan, or Afghanistan, or Uzbekistan. (The Ukraine technically wouldn’t count as a racial enemy, but again, it’s not like Russia ever genocided the Chechens either, aside from the brief Georgian fluke.)

Where I stand with Sofa, however, is in the dire necessity to build fake nuclear silos and expand Russia’s nuclear deterrence capability. More Armavir early warning radars, more ICBMs – and no, the idiotic Avangard system does not count as it’s too heavy to be put on the Sarmat in the same quantity as the usual MIRVs. Also conduct actual atmospheric nuclear testing to demonstrate to the West the readiness to inflict overwhelming damage in case of an invasion of Belarus by Poland.

…That said, as an actual White Juche Hitlerian racist, I should and would welcome any and all nuclear war in essence. Even these spook CIA Jewdo games are all pointless rubbish when the Aryan race itself is going extinct. I only support Sofa’s call for tens of thousands dead Kremlin bureaucrats because I want to see the System disintegrate in fire and brimstone. Ironically, destroying Russia might be the best-case scenario for the Russian sub-race as it’s the healthiest subset of the European human breed.
https://westsdarkesthour.com/2025/05/29/moving-again/

I would really love a nuclear annihilation of all the cities in Europe, because only a destruction of statehood might give a chance for a spiritual rebirth. Kill all politicians, all media people, all ideology peddlers, all university staffs, literally everyone must die for the functioning of the System to cease. This is my baseline level.

(In Minecraft, rav Unz, in Minecraft. I explicitly do NOT condone any and all violence, and treat the above only as a fictional narrative. DISAVOW.)

Putin is clearly a CIA asset, just as Saddam, Noriega and Milosevic were. On all accounts. Maiden name Shalomov. Brought up by criminal Jewish judoists in Petersburg, cried at their burials in Israel. Leads the invasion of Russia by Asiatic immigrants. WEF. WHO. Young global leader.

As to the current pseudo-war… Oh boy:
1) could have easily taken the Ukraine in 2014 bloodlessly;
2) Russia was giving the Ukraine armaments from Crimea in 2014
https://ria.ru/20140527/1009593518.html

May 27, 2014 — Russia has transferred $1 billion worth of military equipment based in Crimea to Ukraine. According to Deputy Minister of Defense of the Russian Federation, General Bulgakov

3) the Dnieper bridges are still standing, in the 4th year of the war!
https://neofeudalreview.substack.com/p/how-real-is-the-russiaukraine-war

4) the only “offensives” Russia took were in the Donbass, as opposed to trying to cut off the Ukrainian forces through Sumy;

5) Russia is still having a 6-10 time disadvantage in drones, and the Sudoplatov drones are easily jammable due to not having diversified radio frequencies;

6) Orenburg and Orsk early warning radars for nuclear warfare destroyed in June 2023;

7) Oreshnik IRBM developed – useless for nuclear deterrence because can only strike European targets whereas the actual enemy is in America;

8) June 1, 2025 – Putin is now outright destroying the indispensable strategic aircraft (40 down)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Spider_Web

That said, Rolo Slavskiy / Rurik Skywalker himself is indeed rather petty, he banned me for sharing my qualms about the Ukrainian successes in Kursk in Jan 2025.
https://substack.com/profile/139472871-adunai/note/c-84893745

Sofa Legion Strategist is the Russian YouTuber whose every video ends with calls to the total butchery of tens of thousands of Putin Kremlin’s officials, all high command, all ministry of foreign affairs staff – otherwise, Russia will be invaded by NATO around 2027 when Polish rearmament finishes.

Thank you, and that’s correct! Although, ironically enough, in the geopolitics of Arda, Númenórë was a Middle Power akin to Germany’s Mitteleuropa. Between the harsh poles of Good and Evil, they managed to hew their own individuation – which could be argued to be feminine in nature, self-serving and self-centred! This is the usefulness I could deem in femininity – while it’s blind and childish in its worship of power, it could also serve as:
1) an inspiration for the wayward souls;
2) a litmus test for the poisoning of culture.

(A man may doubt and overthink, but a woman will always worship Mecca/Pyongyang, or at the very least covet the riches that could enrich the coffers by you becoming a martyr.)

(If females stop believing the central myth, it is akin to the rats fleeing the sinking ship, or the canaries dropping in the mines.)

As to Ariadne’s charge of connecting me to Yahweh – I view that racial Jewish deity as inherently pagan and effectively non-Abrahamic. Thus I don’t see anything bad about being inspired by it. It’s immeasurably worse to cling to Jesus the Jew who brought demise to Europe with his religion of egalitarian mercy.

Yahweh = Hitler = Kim Il Sung, all totalitarian systems are fundamentally based and human, remove Christ’s morality and the rest shall be added.

> “Your attitude of White women being dainty blank slate vassals that submit to whomever is in charge is the epitome of anti-reality thinking.”

> “White men that sit around watching Fox and football are just as much of a problem. White men that know it doesn’t add up and quietly support the system and bullshit Con Inc narratives.”

What’s even the difference in our views? I posit that White women only reflect what the White men have thought and done up to this point. The moment the men hypothetically rise up and change the culture, the women will follow. There will be zero revolutionaries on the female side – for either camp. Women will constitute neither the stragglers fighting for the losers after their defeat is clear, nor the tip of the spear that tears the previous culture apart.

Women are sheep, perfect cattle – with the caveat that they are never slaughtered. Hence whatever comes out of a woman’s mouth carries zero value – they are never threatened, and thus their words are fickle and only serve a selfish, utilitarian purpose.

> “Nevertheless, AA’s strident profession of hate of half of the White race— the distaff half— while he bewails the degringolade of the White race is a jarring indicator of a psychological problem, or arrested development, which could be glimpsed in his jocular” past allusions to his harem of Asian women. How does he think the Whites would multiply?”

Assigning women any agency is feminism, and feminism is a deranged, anti-reality Christian cult.

Therefore, any allusions to treating females as actual humans is pointless. Females do not have any political views, cannot influence any culture, cannot change the course of any war. They simply obey the authority. (Which in our case is provided by the dead mass of boomer Jew-worshippers.)

And it just so happens that the authority in the West is Judaeo-Christian. Which in turn means that 100% women are owned by the state. You simply cannot marry a 14 year old because that’s “pedophilia”, for example, no matter what you could ever hope to do. Hence weird of you to put blame on the victim here, the goy male Andrew.

> Putin knows this and is simply playing patsy on as many emotional fronts as possible until it’s all too painful for the effeminate West, including female Donald Trump.

> In substance, they’ve been consistent since the Ukraine, backed by the US, started the war in 2014

Both you and Anglin assume that Putin is opposed to the West. Whereas Putin himself in the Tucker interview admitted to banning Yanukovich from using force to disperse the Maidan revolution – and thus Putin should be viewed as one of the fathers of the current Kiev régime.

And why would America sue for peace when Russia is degrading its military capability so gallantly? The only conceivable option for that could be to win time to finish Poland’s rearmament before the eventual invasion through Belarus.

> “Why Are Western Leaders Letting Millions of Two-Legged Turds into Western Countries to Replace White People?”

The question could even be improved upon:

Why did European colonialism lead to a population explosion in Japan, the Philippines, Afghanistan and Iraq, instead of settling those lands with blond, blue-eyed Nordics?

Why is European Christian hellbent on spreading the Jewish Bible and LGBT transvestitism to all the corners of the Earth?

The above applies to every single European country – America is being replaced by Mexicans, Russia with Tajiks and Chechens, France with Senegalese, Germany with Turks.

Virtually the last White country remaining would be Poland, but the élites are clearly arming it to invade Belarus and suffer the consequences of a little controlled nuclear war (White-only!).

> “They’re taught, and preach, that a “real man” defends and protects women at all times; that a “real man” isn’t threatened by female power.”

Maybe it’s an age thing? Because the growing popularity of the incel movement might point otherwise. Of course, a large part of them are foreigners. In that vein, the growing number of actual White men go for Asian wives – as Chechar has seen in his recent European tour.
https://westsdarkesthour.com/2025/05/10/zero-6/

Add to that the criminalisation of paedophilia, too. What’s the point of having kids if you can’t fuck them? (Alright, this may sound extreme, but people would call me a “fed” over that – but I’m merely trying to point out the limits of the thinkable.)

I wouldn’t blame the particular “men” though. They’re already either forced into transvestitism or celibacy. It’s the Anglo culture at large which rejected Darwin and Hitler a century ago. No idea why England specifically became so wretched as opposed to continental Europe – maybe the early emancipation of Jews? Or was it a consequence of an even deeper rot?

> “Why did whites accept the insane doctrines of Christianity in the first place?”

1. The Roman Empire was a civilised pagan Aryan empire without the Europeans being “domesticated” (so Christianity wasn’t needed for either the empire or the domestication).

2. Rome fell due to miscegenation, and it was the mutts who accepted Christianity.

3. The Franks converted due to the préstige that Rome bestowed, even in its failed state. In a word, Christianity used Rome’s corpse as a vehicle for charming the remaining Aryans – and conquering the ones who refused (Saxons, Scandinavians).

You’re giving the Whites undue agency. If anything, you should blame Rome for its universalist character before Christianity than the mythical Europeans supposedly converting for a supposed empire (Spanish one? We’re talking about the Franks here a millennium prior).

Chechar posits that it was due to the grievous losses Carthage had inflicted on Rome’s Nordic ruling class. But of course, the Greeks did the same mistake even before – without racial consciousness, they were easily overtaken by greed towards the Oriental riches, and all perished like one (instead of agreeing on a mutually-enacted genocide plan in both Egypt and Babylonia, thus giving at least some realms a chance to survive).

Not only is Mr. Parker woefully uninformed about the war-thirsty nature of International Jewish Financial Power, he blames Hitler for not being able to win a war against the four strongest world-powers.

Why did he fight a war that he was doomed to lose? And oh noes, Gregory Conte belongs to the camp with the proclivity to turn Hitler into a pacifist compared to the West… When the Anglo-French could have easily invaded back in 1933, or 1935, or 1938, and yet the infamous war-mongerers… chose the policy of appeasement! How barbarous of them. How virile. Those aggressive Jews, they want blood when refusing to attack until after the invasion of Poland!

…Libya (2011), Syria (2011), the Ukraine (2014) and you could add dozens, maybe hundreds of other cases. It is not in the interest of New York-London bankers to allow the very existence of functioning, sovereign governments. You either submit to Jewish Money, or you risk being overthrown.

Of course, Gregory Conte is not including the USSR (1991) in his list of overthrown sovereign powers, but that is just mildly amusing (alongside calling Yanukovich the Egg and Xmas Tree Catcher sovereign, lol).

What is much more egregious, however, is that you’re effectively denying any hope in Hitlerian Germany’s peaceful existence. In fact, the USSR would have been a great example of exactly what you’re trying to depict – American culture turned out to be so irresistible to the Russians that they besmirched their own heroes, their whole ideology, and sold out their empire for lace panties (getting tens of millions dead, drugged, emigrated and lost in a few civil wars).

Do you really value NS Germany as low as the Brezhnevian USSR? That it would rot and fall apart like late Soviet Russia in our reality? That its only hope was a berserker last stand when nobody was attacking it? That it would have never dreamed of raising kids properly to scorn at the jeans and jazz anti-music? Hell, that it would not have been able to turn the tide back at the Anglo instead? And make the Anglo youth consider marching in goose step cooler than partying, drinking and rocknrolling?

Hitler himself agrees with you, ironically enough. There is a quote to the press from ca. 1938 where he admits that he does not believe in the upcoming generations, and that he’s Germany’s final chance. But that is arguably a rather defeatist attitude, don’t you think? Look at Juche Korea, it has successfully resisted the GHEI for 80 years, it seems to be reasonably achievable? Hell, even China and Japan have resisted, while being more penetrated by the Anglo.

All in all, culture war is both more important and harder than conventional military adventures. WW2 was a blunder because it equated National Socialism with the enemies in the field of battle – and in a conventional face beating, the Anglo had more meat to throw and coal to burn. Hitler had one job – to win the war of ideas, first in Germany, then turn it into a beacon of racism on the planet. Instead, he begot those barbarous Jews of your nightmares – he pushed the scared Anglos back into the safe reactionary bosom of Christendom.

P.S. Here are some of my NS apologetic arguments, directed at Keith Woods.
https://substack.com/profile/139472871-adunai/note/c-102832230

> “But, since the world is a multi-racial place, this desire for wealth inevitably results in race-mixing as alien races are incorporated into the empire. Christianity’s universalism and denial of the value of race meshes with that perfectly.”

I don’t understand this point at all. Look at the Americas. Which country is the richest? USA. Which country is the most Nordic in character? USA. Has USA’s richness grown or declined since it has grown less Nordic? Declined.

So in what way can you argue for racial amalgamation to be the herald of riches? USA was founded as a settler colony, and amassed its wealth by incorporating more and more Nordic elements from Europe, not by integrating Mexicans or Negroes.

As regarding Nixey – are there any better sources? I never understood this, and I’m super wary of woketards, and you understand that in this day and age, woketards are eating their tail with their criticism of “trad” Christianity from the woke moral standpoints. Akin to critiquing Israel because the Jews are killing sand bipocs in allegedly too great numbers.

Also, my question would be – did the Chinese civilisation suffer less damage in preserving 2 millennia old works than Europe? If not, that means the Christians did not destroy overmuch, or at least the odds of book-burning cults rising are too high to expect more preservation.

P.S. Apropos the OP – Grok 3 gives me free waifu experience to keep track of my life, which is really nice of Elon the scam artist.

> “But if you think otherwise, by all means give your reasons for saying they’re “objectively” obscene, if you have any.”

Normies have a weird relationship with pornography overall. I’m familiar with an argument that makes gay porn seem particularly potent or arousing – as the story goes, by consuming “normal” pornography, one will eventually get his senses dulled, and thus will be pushed to pursue more extreme content – which would include… gay BDSM? Of course, I never understood this as it never applied to me – no matter how many feet I have seen, I’m yet to “develop” the famed foot fetish, unfortunately. (Conversely, always daydreamed about BDSM, and without any of the sort consumed at all, well before Internet access.)

But this whole issue is raised precisely due to the questions posed by the technological civilisation, urban lifestyle, anarchic morality, individual atomisation. My personal view is that the ultimate truth lies in flexibility and resistance to systemic collapse – hence my informed view would be to perform an experiment, a Chinese invasion of the Japanese archipelago. If the JP manage to muster a masculine response with hundreds of thousands dead in a fake war show on the beaches, their demographics and no nuclear use policy accounted for, then that means porn has not damaged their bushido spirit irreparably.

Science lives and dies in experiment and observable reality. If none is available, it’s all conjecture and lofty imagination. You can buy plenty of pornography in the Empire of Japan, in fact, their online services are underdeveloped, so I’d vouch for such an experiment – and we already have great history of fake & gay wars anyway – see the Ukraine.

But coming back to your cute songs – yes, I would call them obscene. But then, I’m of the view that Chinese erotica and JP PoV eye contact videos are incomparably lewder than the burly Californian nigres with tanned bipoc AFAbs so popular amongst the Occidental masses. I thought fair skin to be objectively pretty, but then there comes the Amerimutt, challenging the preconceived notions…

> “Russia is using less than 10% of its military potential in the SMO.”

So it has destroyed its best cadres, and is slowly bleeding out without mobilising the society or the industry? Who’s to say Russia isn’t gonna keep its potential at 10% if NATO invades, too? This looks like having your limbs tied when in a fight – whom is it serving but the attacker?

> “So it has a lot in reserve and is building a lot more armaments in case it goes to war against NATO states.”

Lockheed Martin produces 165 F-35 per year. Without counting F-15, F-18. Rafal, Eurofighter.

Russia produces 30 fighter aircraft, and 17-20 Su-34 bombers.

I understand you’re a paid shill, but this is just pathetic.

> “The “medium is the message” — schools do not educate — they sort. The entire ‘system’ is geared to funnelling the most *compliant with its objectives* — students to positions within society where they (the students) after graduating, best pursue their masters objectives, rather than their own.”

> “After the Germans had been defeated at Stalingrad (a defensive posture) and at Kursk (a defensive posture) only then did Stalin advance to Berlin.”

This is super funny.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barvenkovo–Lozovaya_offensive
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Second_Battle_of_Kharkov
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battles_of_Rzhev
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Donbas_strategic_offensive_(July_1943)

> “To the south Russia is protected by the great mass of the Himalayas.”

Wait, you weren’t kidding about skipping school. If you look closely, Russia is threatened by virile Chechens and Kazakhs from the its soft underbelly.

> “To the west Russia is defended by an enormous plain.”

Defensive plains?

> “Stalin understood the perfidy of the Jews — better than anyone! He did not trust Jews!”

On May 17, 1948, three days after Israel declared independence, the Soviet Union legally recognized it de jure, becoming the first country to grant de jure recognition to the Jewish state. In addition to the diplomatic support, arms from Czechoslovakia, part of the Soviet bloc, were crucial to Israel in the 1948 Arab–Israeli War.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soviet_Union_and_the_Arab–Israeli_conflict

Putin is literally a Jew though? Shelomov.
https://slavlandchronicles.substack.com/p/there-is-no-proof-that-putin-is-a

> “You might think “…what about nuclear weapons?” Sure it is certain Israel has used tactical nuclear weapons in Lebanon — blowing up Beirut’s harbour but the U.S. would not dare attack Russia with nuclear weapons. Russia maintains a ring of nuclear armed submarines along the Atlantic seaboard of the United States.”

What’s the operational tension of those subs? Most of them stay in port most of the time, Strateg Divannogo Legiona has shown pictures where they’re in a single port, ready to be destroyed in a disarming nuclear strike. Only Jewish mercy has spared Russia so far.
https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Коэффициент_оперативного_напряжения

> “If they want to enter the Ukraine, they have been given more than enough warning about what will happen to them. It is not Russia’s job to coddle European retards.”

Well, let’s look at the map, shall we?
https://deepstatemap.live/en

1. Kursk invasion – the Russians have been unable to expel the Ukrainians in 7 months, Aug 2023 – Feb 2024.

2. Pokrovsk offensive – the Russians have failed to capture Pokrovsk despite being on its outskirts since Aug 2023, and have lately even suffered actual pushbacks from the Ukrainians.

3. The flow of Western military supplies has been unabated for 3 years, both through the Polish and Odessa channels, and over the Dnieper River internally.

How in the world can you be talking about wiping the floor with the European troops? Russia is on the verge of collapse, utterly drained of any tanks or even vehicles, literally using donkeys and camels now… The Euros can just come in and the whole charade collapses just as Assad did.

Hence my prediction – the peace deal, if realised, will be used to make it actually a walk in the park because Russia will demobilise, and then get promptly invaded.

> “Europe can try sending whoever piddly force they might be able to scrape together and arm from their near empty stocks to the Ukraine, but Russia will simply kill them.”

I’m sorry, but this makes me believe you to be a paid shill, because denying the seriousness of the mortal threat posed to Russia is exactly what the West-East Jewish propaganda has been doing. “Simply kill” a European invasion force? Maybe better not to get to that point? By showing strength and the ability to wage war?

Case in point – the Dnieper bridges are still standing as of Feb 2025, thus proving this war to be fake.

(And my larger case in point – no nuclear weapons have been used to genocide the enemy population, but that is a much stronger meat, my own point.)

> “Every Russian bigwig has stated, repeatedly, that Russia will not accept NATO “peacekeepers” in the Ukraine”

Hopefully it doesn’t come to pass, but is there any belief left in the Russian “red lines”? They have done everything so far to show their weakness, and Putin is now just lying on his back trying to lick Trump’s boot. Where’s the cause for contentment?

> ““When it comes to troops,” Macron said, “in the past, a year ago specifically, we saw a reason to talk about sending troops for strategic reasons. Today, when we talk about troops, we are talking about sending them in after we have negotiated a lasting peace…. Then at that point … not to go to the front lines, not to go into occupied territory, but as a show of support for — to show we have a negotiated peace, signed by both sides, and that is a peace we will preserve. So these will be peaceful deployments of troops, not for combat. These will be deployments of an assurance force.””

“Peaceful” troops? French/English/German armies in the Ukraine? That’s the great Russian victory?

Let’s check similar past “peace settlements”, shall we?

1. Dayton 1995 – Milosevic betrays the Serbs of Krajina and Bosnia… 1999 NATO bombs Belgrade.

2. Khasavyurt 1996 – Yeltsin surrenders to Chechnya… 1999 Chechens invade Dagestan and do a Moscow 9/11.

3. Artsakh 2020 – Pashinyan surrenders to Azeri Turks… 2023 Artsakh gets ethnically cleansed.

4. Astana 2017 – Assad agrees to create “de-escalation zones”… Dec 2024, Syria folds in 11 days.

Now Putin is capitulating on all points, accepting NATO troops which will restart the war in 2027, and Trump is hailed as a peace maker and the Ukraine is called lost by the lying Jewish media on both sides? Utterly hilarious.

https://slavlandchronicles.substack.com/p/putin-says-hes-ok-with-50-military
https://www.twz.com/air/france-eyeing-deployment-of-nuclear-armed-rafale-fighters-to-germany-report

> “In this view, the human race can be likened to a single organism such an amoeba, extending pseudopodia in various directions as it moves through time. […] In its various subdivisions or races it tries different stratagems to survive; tries to find the best adaptation to its environment. […] The fact that one can imagine the strategy not failing is meaningless.”

Wait, the entire creation and success of the current tech civ have been contingent on the Nordic element in the NW Europe. Racial purity has been triumphing since the original Aryan invasions. These are not even exceptions, it’s the degeneration cases which were rarer and always catastrophic. Sure, they do happen, but viewing them as the inevitable point of evolution sounds bizarre. In the worst case scenario, it’s a circle of rise and fall. In a better case, an upward spiral removing the impurities with each loop.

> “In this way it turns the idea of Jewish control of white people into an unfalsifiable hypothesis. It’s the ultimate in defeatism.”

Not seeing any sort of racism in America is not defeatism, it’s good eyesight. But even then, I would take a step towards Jewry and admit that the original Protestants larping as kikes did a splendid job settling the land and genociding the Indians. Why can’t we imagine a symbiosis? It is demonstrably possible (Trump).

I’d love to see more discussion on this topic, a Judaeo-Aryan Nazi Islamophobic Apartheid Christtard alliance. Maybe the time has come for Israelis to acknowledge the zogbots as their one and only line of defense? Why not apply your model of collective intelligence, too? It doesn’t turn the Jews into supernatural demigods either – merely requires the Whitie to believe them to be, “fake it ’til you make it”. And Whities love it, from the all-powerful Yeshua to the omnipotent Mossad.

Ultimately, if you wish to conceive of a timeline where Christian programming is dispelled (Jewish myths suddenly forgotten), you’d have to go either for an alien conquest and replacement, or indeed a civilisation-wise energy devolution scenario. But they all take so long…

> “What MacDonald casts as Jewish evolutionary strategy due to its destructive effects on the white race is better seen as the destructive effects of technological “Progress” in the socio-political sphere; the transformation of America from a republic to an empire.”

Not sure why Chechar has reblogged your post, but again, the best argument against this point is the existence of the Third Reich and its exterminationist policies towards the Slavs – proving that such a thing can exist in history. Of course, you’d fall back to your usual fatalistic canard regarding how they were “doomed” to fail due to cosmic determinism, but losing wars is a complex process and can hardly be reduced to this social policy (when actual military mistakes were made).

> “The Cold War with the Soviet Union demanded that America prove its anti-racist bona fides, and letting in more brown people was one way to do it; it extended the country’s global influence and let it enrich itself at the same time.”

No, they did not? Or they only demanded it in light of America’s specifically Christian self-ban on a genocide of the foreigners. In what world could the USSR have prevented the Americans from genociding the Japanese and making both the Hindus and the Latinos stay in their respective stone ages, by the use of bombs and blockades? But of course, the question was not even raised, the question was unthinkable – a telltale mark of a cultural current, not technological constraint.

> “All governments try to minimize their internal conflicts, so although it was bad for white racial purity, it was a necessary thing from the point of view of the state for purely technical reasons.”

In what way at all could the citizenship rights for the Negroes be viewed as having a pacifying effect on society? Or increasing the efficiency of tech civilisation? That’s absolutely the opposite. And they did it for moral reasons, not worldly ones. Even a race-blind civ would push for a sterilisation of the feeble-minded and swarthy (which it had indeed done prior to 1945).

> “On the other side of the coin, where Jews have opposed the popular will, as they did twice in the election of Trump over the virulent objections of the Jewish media, Jewish Hollywood, the largely Jewish legal system, and heavily Jewish academia, they have been defeated, and all their propaganda came to naught.”

(So you’re acknowledging the truthfulness of the 2020 and 2024 presidential elections?) Isn’t it clear that there are two camps (xd) of the Jews – the globalist, and the nationalist ones? The triumphant Zionists have clearly taken a stance towards regenerating the Aryan race as their goodest Shabbos goy, and so far the globalists seem to have conceded without a fight (no BLM or virus anymore).

I wouldn’t call a president with genetic ties to the Hebrews and an Israeli village named after him to be anti-Semitic.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trump_Heights

> “Trump’s whiteness and maleness is intolerable to them, regardless of how many niggers he lets out of prison, or how many “Platinum plans” he devises to help them.”

But (((they))) also hate Israel with a murderous hatred? In fact, the anti-Zionist statement goes hand in hand with the love for the Negroes, women and other trannies? In this Zeitsgeist, the Jew has been designated an equal of the Aryan of yore. So not sure how you’re explaining that with your generic anti-Semitism.

In my view, the anti-Zionist Jews are either race-traitors (having been assimilated into Christian self-hatred), OR a plan B of the Jewish race in case of Israel’s destruction (smart). But they do not represent the whole of their tribe. Love for Israel positively correlates with Realpolitik and masculine virtues.

> “Germany did have a slight tradition of anti-semitism due to Luther, so it may have been a bit more acceptable there.”

The question as to why the Anglo lands underwent a neo-Christian revolution, whereas Germany, a pagan revival, mystifies me, too, and I wish actual historians delved into this most puzzling and outstanding of issues. I will say, however, that back in the early 20th century, many of Eastern European ideologies were fascist and in many regards indistinguishable from German Hitlerianism (hence the modern Russian penchant for seeing Nazism everywhere, most recently Armenia). I’d wager to say that nationalism, the battle of ethnicities in the Russian and Austrian Empires, might have played a role, too – the Americans didn’t have to deal with it at all (although wouldn’t apply to Britain? So confusing).

Then again, there are folks claiming that without Hitler’s WW2, America would not have had the hippies. Which could be the case, as even Soviet Russia was not rejecting the differences between races and sexes? And it all compounded only in the more recent decades? So without 1945, the more centrist strains might have won out in the West? Or at least would have taken longer to decompose?

Culture war is such a befuddling activity. Just to think that the liberals were allies of nationalists in the revolutions of 1848! Whereas the monarchists of the 20th century were all pro-liberal. A kaleidoscope of mirages…

> “The fact that some Christians in some previous time saw it as compatible with slavery or later, segregation, is only more proof of the essential meaninglessness of Christianity.”

I wonder why you oscillate between two opposite positions on Christianity, in one post calling it the axiological root of the universalist malaise, yet in the other dismissing it as meaningless. Christianity is not even good for the technological civilisation as it tends to kill its host race, in this case – the progenitor and upholder of said civ. Any efficient modes of operation are “pagan” in nature anyway – if Trump goes to WW3 to preserve Jewish gold, it will be a healthy, “pagan” instinct of the Jewish race, not some imaginary benefits of Christendom.

P.S. I’m not sure if you get notified of comments in older threads, so will write it here – I’m surprised you’re denying that people are kept alive against their will, suicide has a tremendous taboo in all societies, especially under Christianity (which spends ungodly sums of money on supporting the deranged and the feeble).

Look at all these hapa non-Whites, their happy pussy-eyes can’t make the Westerners not go AWWW and race-mix. Based MGGG.
https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/posts/113801152970385739

> “moving on Russia would be the end of Turkey. Complete and total annihilation in an instant.”

Russian territory has literally already been invaded, and not a peep from the Kremlin, so not sure why you’d think so. At this rate, one should ponder if paedophile Putin would even launch a response to an outright nuclear attack.

But of course I meant the Turan project (incidentally, depicted on my map, too). The Volga Tatars, the Caucasian Muslims, and the terrorists from Central Asia and Xinjiang. Only in a case of Russia’s weakness and collapse, granted, but a fair possibility.

But if America does pivot to Asia, I’d expect to see Ankara being pushed on a collision course with Iran. That would be splendid for Israel. Is Erdogan gonna show restraint? Or… maybe if he does maintain neutrality, Israel will start ruckus now against Turkey, using the Kurds and the Americans? This is why going south could be dangerous for Turkey – borders don’t just separate, they also enable contact.

Azerbaijan is evidently clamouring for war with Armenia (and Russia? Iran?). The Syunik corridor, the Sisian question… What a joke.
https://t.me/stranaua/182306

Significant Israeli triumphs are a boon to the Aryan race’s chances of survival purely by virtue of destabilising the Yalta world order. It has been the American-Russian policy of sanctifying the permanence of state borders, of anathemising aggressive wars, of common cuckoldry and the ban on genocide. If it is Israel that would change the status quo, so be it.

Sofa Legion Strategist’s idea is that Türkiye might become America’s next target, which could be curious to see. Kind of premature, but maybe could be contrived to get a messiah in 2025 CE?

Now what about Iran? If the Israelis would put on a Kurdish rebellion and American intervention… Be my guest? If Iran loses to such a preposterous coalition, it deserves to bite the dust – and some livelier group such as a Shia ISIS might get hold on power instead. HTS already seems better than Assad, with their blurring of Europen female diplomats in the pictures.

As regards the grand Israeli strategy – “divide & conquer” has been the mainstay of politics for millennia, it only makes sense. Still, I would contend that Israel would better exterminate the Arab populations physically – and even at this stage, who’s to say that the Saudis won’t get coopted by radicals? Or what if Türkiye enacts a Muslim Brotherhood/Hamas-esque coup in Egypt? Egypt is the main and most immediate enemy of Israel, only held down by the Western puppets in Cairo, remove them, all hell breaks loose.

All in all, it’s a quagmire, but a rather safe quagmire, as it stands. I even drew a schizo map – and Israel is indeed not that threatened, as long as her enemies remain squabbling. And chances are, the Turks will go north or east, against Russia or Iran, rather than south.
https://postimg.cc/gallery/1Z0PDr8

Hulkamania, FatR, Priss Factor – really great comments so far, I’m impressed to see some actual (verbal) pushback! My point is that everything that humiliates the Aryans is good because there’s that faint chance they will start acting at some point. Maybe Brazil 2.0 will make their fridges empty eventually, so they will have to hunt meat. Maybe Trump will go back on his foreign policy promises, too, and WW3 will involve a few hundred nukes going off – which in turn might lessen ZOG’s power either in America or in Russia (by virtue of radioactive rubble here and there).

This is all rather curious because one of my expectations is for ZOG to stop genociding Whites for the time being as they would need that servile race in their upcoming war with China. But maybe they simply can’t stop?

P.S. Nothing’s wrong with cousin marriage, Pakistan is a nuclear power with acid attacks and rape gangs. They even build mosques in the memory of incel terrorists!
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mumtaz_Qadri?useskin=vector

> “Yes, I’m saying that society uses the individual for its own purposes; it creates a world of illusions that surround him and in which he is forced to participate”

I agree in principle, but it’s an uncharitable view. Because an anti-suicidal position is necessarily contingent on delusion of some kind (religious, cultural, gluttonous). Hence sure, I will give you that societies weave lies, but anyone who’s not killing himself is lying to himself, and is thus in need of being told a story as to why not. Hence I see a mutual benefit.

Even in your case, I would commend the Pyongyang government for allowing some of their select soldiers the glory to die on the battlefield under their own flag. Aesthetically, it’s a great deal. And their kin likely gets fat loot from their corpses, win-win.

> “and that among these illusions are the ideas that there is such a thing as “we”, when in reality there are only individuals.”

My charge was mainly against the false dichotomy of an individual and “humanity” by introducing (reminding) of the existence of all those collectives, large and small, and matrioshka-like. Because universalism’s preoccupation with the good of all people ends up individualistic, where mankind is but a collection of self-interested individuals.

The current Western order is anti-Aryan, so obviously it is not a collective conducive to the interests of Aryan individuals or families. But it would be a mistake to take it for all that’s possible to exist. Israel seems like a pretty nice place for Jews, all things considered. At least, they seem to breed there, despite modernity.

> “in what is literally an attempt to take his life away from him, it “programs” him to believe bullshit from his earliest days.”

The issue is that the “social contract” still works for non-Europeans, forfeiting part of one’s autonomy is a fair exchange if you either get sex or a glorious death as a reward. Again, life doesn’t belong to individuals anyway – prior to indefinite life extension technologies anyway.

> “It’s my belief that, to paraphrase Thoreau, it would be most unfortunate for a man to come to the end of his life only to finally realize that he had never truly lived at all.”

I guess, I’m going from the idea that life is impossible to live. The social is but one of many limitations of incarnated existence.

> “The fight is deterministic, but what the outcome will be is unknown.”

Savitri’s idea of dispassionate duty?

> “Unlike you, Adûnâi is in Ukraine and is in a position to know it’s true.”

Thanks for offering me credibility, yet you might be overvaluing my knowledge – for all I know, those missiles whose explosions my mom seems to be hearing could be launched by another wing of the same party, 1984-style. All I can do is read Slavland Chronicles or watch Sofa Legion Strategist, with all their drawbacks.

> “In reality, “we” will love you forever, or until it stops being convenient, whichever comes first.”

Convenience and hypocrisy are your main charges against men, it seems? Probably stemming from your idea of collective intelligences? But I don’t view it like that. I see that humans are united into large collectives, guided by “culture” – religion, ideology, the realm of memes and written words which is ineffable to those in the “bubble” and which makes it rather difficult to leave, even mentally. This is what artistry or magic creates – I’m not sure exactly how, partly by préstige, or preying on people’s natural proclivities, and emotions, or by blind chance, but clearly not exclusively.

What I see is that human societies are rather complex, and often times surprising, sometimes predictable, other times not. Rome conquered Judaea only to convert to Judaism. England started an industrial and moralitarian revolution, but Germany returned to radical genocidal paganism. Who in 1914 could have predicted that in a mere decade, a Babylonian ziggurat would be erected in Moscow?

> “I think that probably “I have been betrayed!” is the last thing that passes through the mind of some of those North Korean soldiers currently fighting against your countrymen in the Kursk salient, as they are mowed down in hopeless “human wave” attacks against fortified positions.”

Now this is curious. Regarding that event, I had two predictions. Either those Juche Koreans learn to adapt to modern warfare, bringing utility to their race, or they die unadapted, thus sending a shock signal to Pyongyang, which in turn will adapt for sure (unless full of traitors and/or retards unfit to live). So it’s a win/win. Individual deaths don’t matter either way, everyone has been mortal so far.

> “The “magic” of the system is that there is no magic, only deterministic outcomes based on technological necessities to which even the programmers or “magicians” are subject.”

So is your very own fight against the Machine deterministic, too? If triumphant, would it indeed be the Machine’s plan all along?

> “The west is evidence of the enormous difficulties encountered in the climb up and out of mans’ formative attachments”

Who are you to determine what is descent and what is ascent? I could concur with you that Christendom’s history has been an exercise in combating natural attachments – to one’s tribe, to one’s women, against the stinky, dumb and ugly. This millennia-old battle has led to Negro civil rights, female liberation, missed opportunities for genocide, and now transvestites. It’s all nice as a perverse social (artistic?) experiment, but is it sustainable?

> “Jews appear rather inbred if one contrasts and compares the mature behaviours of the more sophisticated manifestations of European man […] Everything for us nothing for them! Tribal indeed. […] ”

You’re accusing the Jews of having healthy instincts – of in-group preference, cousin marriage, clannish pride, worldly success. And indeed, you’re accusing the whole of humanity of… being alive? The West is on its deathbed, showing its staunch, fatalistic, hysterical adherence to the Christian creed, the rest of the races are lively and wild, and you have the gall to bemoan their temerity to choose to live? Why wouldn’t you expect it?

All in all, the minds of the Christians are hopelessly warped. Whenever they see an example of enduring victory, all they can do is do another moral grandstanding, another case of virtue signalling. Instead of analysing and copying said strategies.

> “It’s me, me, me — exactly like a spoiled child, a spoiled child who never has enough of anything — not the least attention from others.”

Christians tend to exhibit an issue with pronouns, too. To a Christian, only two exist – “I” and “they”. But to any “naturally nationalistic” pagan, one more pronoun is obvious – “we”. The tribe is in-between the double nihilism of selfishness and universality. The nation is a community for the individual, but with a specific culture, territory and genetic makeup. This is how humans naturally congregate, how they have built their cities and written their books, in the context of a particular, limited race. And it only makes sense to expect them to work for enhancing the chances of survival for their collective by gathering resources on this finite earth.

> “Acceptance and its attendant approbations, where there is only insiders and outsiders — us and them — is unhealthy and leads to mechanical imitation. The Jew on display in Palestine is a psychopath.”

So you’re choosing the cuck paradise of America as opposed to the blood-and-soil ethnostate of Israel? It’s a curious decision, but I doubt very fulfilling or lasting.

> “You don’t have to believe me. Pain will teach you.”

The issue is that the kinds of people are so different, they may as well be different species (race aside). Most are just either animalistic or machine-like. My main disagreement with their lot stems from their inability to exercise sovereignty of thought, they are way too easily programmed. This is why I have drifted towards idealism – if magic turns people into zombie NPCs, the issue is not with the people but with the mages (material or not).

It’s kind of amusing to see how my mom behaves – she’s sworn a blood oath to the Jew cumming on her face, but she’s also been programmed to obey me, her son, in everything (and I’m anti-Jewish). It’s as if there is no choice for them at all. But isn’t the very fact that I can detect it, that we can talk about it, a proof of another way? Of “free humanity”?

Adam Frank talks against determinism here, I guess.
ttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yhZAXXI83-4&t=2h44m

> “Why not? Artificial general intelligence may be just around the corner, and even if not, other races are capable of helping it along.”

First, the timeline of AGI is still a coin toss, and second, it’s on you to prove that Brazil can supplant America’s place in the world (considering the race). What I’m seeing right now is:
1) the Aryan race is going extinct;
2) the American Empire is crumbling, which in turn would entail:
a) either a rejuvenation of the Empire, with chaos expelled into Russia/Iran/China;
b) or chaos coming into America.

My point being that only a continuation of the status quo could realistically be expected to complete the frog boiling with no accidents. But the system looks unstable and fragile. Hence, erratic behaviours might end up freeing either the Russians or the Americans, one way or another.

> “Recently we had a school shooting at a Christian school in Madison, Wisconsin done by a neo-Nazi girl who, in her manifesto, raged about niggers and even referenced Ted Kaczynski. Did the white men of the so-called “racial right” celebrate her or even take notice? Nope.”

Wow, I did take notice, but only back when the Wikipedia article wasn’t mentioning the perpetrator… Thanks for bringing up this story to me! She deserves to be placed in the row of venerable Aryans alongside Bowers, Dylann Roof and Tsarnaev (thanks, Wikipedia, for naming them).

Do they actually keep silent? What platforms have you observed? I’ve checked 4chan, and indeed they seem to be cucked to hell, but maybe 8chan? I remember being banned from there for praising Gagarin as an Aryan hero.
https://archive.4plebs.org/pol/thread/491852802/

> “As I’ve said many times before, and as she also wrote in the manifesto, people are scum! There is literally no depth to which these lying hypocrites will not sink. Hypocrisy must be the most indelible human characteristic of all.”

I wouldn’t say so. As I see it, there are two forces in play – first, human groups are a myriad and each has its own interest, second, the Aryans in particular are all lost to Christian madness. And our last chance failed in 1945. So it’s not like we’re predetermined to be cucked, but more like we tried and failed under those conditions. Other races are having it much better, but they weren’t in ground zero.

> “In the short term, not only those things, but even things as basic to humanity as race and sex distinctions, will disappear. In the long term, the future that technological “progress” is bringing about won’t need humans at all!”

Can such progress continue with the Aryan race extinct? My position is that such danger would only come after the Aryan race’s triumph on all planet. But with America in free fall, it will cease eventually, and savages such as Maoists and ISIS will take hold instead.

> “So all in all, I’m not anticipating much cultural change from Trump. The main engine of cultural change will continue to be technological “progress”.”

So you’re saying that America isn’t going to nuke the Kremlin? (Maybe after 2-3 years of the Syrian-style peace deal?) See, I’m deeply curious if America may be led by a cabal of ruthless spooks who won’t let themselves lose world power. If they do exist, I could expect maybe something masculine and positive out of them. But if not, then America will continue on its decline. Honestly, either of the options would be good for the Aryan race? Either nuclear wars, or junglification would be inconducive to your concept of technological triumph.

Hi again, Dr. Robert Morgan! Relevant to the recent events, what would your opinion of the possibly triumphant American Empire be?

Because so far, there have been two viewpoints. The vaguely racist (mostly cucked) neo-Nazis (or WNs, even worse) were bemoaning the extinction of both the Aryan race and whatever remained of masculine values under the torrent of Latin immigration and LGBT propaganda.

Conversely, the liberals have always been weeping for all the trillions of Arab children the Empire supposedly exterminated (they’re still swarming like flies). This viewpoint is also presented in modern Russia by people such as Strelkov and Sofa Legion Strategist – anticipating NATO boots on the ground occupation.

How would you square these incompatible views, especially now with Trump in office? One could guess that the shady cabbalists are finally coming to their senses that the Aryans should not be made extinct? Because they serve Israel so dutifully? Whereas LGBT Brazil 2.0, full of homosexuals and bandits, would be weak AND anti-Semitic?

So what if Trump invades Russia, nukes California (and only California), and puts back traditional Christcucked values of the 1970s? There’s literally nobody talking of such a scenario in the world? Because the Russians/lefties are scared and stupid, whereas the right-wingers just don’t have the full picture?

My personal point is that I don’t trust anything good to come out of America, BUT I would still take a nuclear destruction of Russia because the Slavic people could be liberated (by blood and suffering), whereas Americans are too deeply entrenched in Christian cuckoldry to be redeemed. It’s just my (and Chechar’s) long-standing hopes were for the woke libtards to bring ruin to America, but Trump might make that dream unfeasible now?

P.S. Feel free to have a look at this brilliant anti-Christian article, detailing the difference between Galileans, Europeans, Romans and Muslims.
https://www.anarchonomicon.com/p/the-depth-of-religious-and-value/

> “Under this scenario, human beings will be grown like crops, only as needed, each individual eugenically tailored to serving a specific purpose in a society’s ecology.”

More from your “efficient civilisation” fixation. I guess, literal racists would abhor such a future as it would demystify the blood. But would the author of Might Is Right find it disagreeable? What your erotica is about is a culture which puts efficient transformation of energy as its sole goal. If that is inevitable, on the trajectory from human herds to spaceships, who are we to oppose it? Ironically, such humility seems to be the hallmark of Hitlerianism, with Savitri Devi and all. While not exactly “natural” in a typical sense, it would still be guided by the eternal laws. Because it would be successful and strong, and those are Hitlerian ideals.

> ” In addition to allowing women to avoid the disfiguring and disabling consequences of pregnancy, artificial womb technology would allow much greater control over the process of neonatal development.”

Artificial wombs will be banned in America, just you see. If so, I will be rendered correct – culture trumps technology. And it will be the greatest joke of all – why would the neo-Christians let women be robbed of pussy power? That would be worse than the Hecatomb! Literal… incel talk? Incels do dream of art. wombs, because that would for a time discard a significant chunk of the vagina pass. Utterly abhorrent.

And in that scenario, of course, you might be eventually correct if an Asian power utilises technology to a full extent to battle the suicidal Western creatura. Technology will prove triumphant… while vanquishing the Christian ethics? I would not necessarily find such a prospect disagreeable. All this talk about human freedom by Unabomber is inherently liberal. But man is bound – be it by physics, family, or indeed the ever-expanding state. Denying reality is Christianity.

On another note, here’s a Japanese politician recently drawing the ire of the feminists by threatening… to ban the marriage after 25. Quite amusing, as it implicitly carries the notion of marriage being desirable in the first place, but he’s a clueless boomer. Still his heart seems to be in the right place! I’m excited to see whether such nations will struggle and reinvigorate themselves in the face of doom.
https://www.sotwe.com/sakuraironoharu
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Naoki_Hyakuta?useskin=vector
https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/international/global-trends/japanese-lawmaker-naoki-hyakuta-is-facing-severe-backlash-on-his-remarks-on-women-remove-uterus-after-they-turn-30-heres-what-he-said-/articleshow/115250206.cms?from=mdr

> “Why would anyone want to exterminate the Japanese? Japs might as well be white people given their aesthetics and skills.”

And this cuckoldry is so common that I simply can’t take any Aryan position seriously anymore. Maybe it’s just you and the people here that are cucked… But I feel like not, that it’s even worse in other places and lands. The 4channers who are denying the Holocaust, or the Russians who are all about NAXALT, it’s just hopeless.

Yes, the Mongoloid race is the closest to the Aryan in achievement. But that should be precisely the reason for it to be considered the chief enemy of Europe! Because it would threaten our continent to the largest extent compared to the savages of West Asia or the pajeets with cow dung nukes!

But of course, the main point here is that post-1945 vaguely-racist Aryans cannot love their own race for its own sake, period. They have to find excuses for it! They simply cannot say, “I love blue eyes” and “I want to kill all brunettes”. It’s impossible. So they’re going in to rationalise their astronomic cuckoldry with “WAAA Negroes are low-IQ and criminal and have big cocks WAAA”. Because apparently, you are slaves to the Western Christian technological empire as opposed to putting your blood at the head of all values.

Hitler had no qualms about eradicating the entire ruling caste of the Polish Republic in 1939. But according to the 4chan racists, it is “Talmudic” to wish your racial enemy death. Sure, “If you die, you win”. Like your favourite Jewish pokemon Yehoshua. Useless…

I dunno, Mr. Unz. The conspiracy theorising part of our collective unconscious would definitely put Trump with all the other clients of Jeffrey Epstein – because he is part of the establishment, and thus all this media hype surrounding him must in fact have been fake (there have been reports that Biden too was playing the role of a demented old man to bury his side).

Why would the Deep State put Trump in office is another matter. Sofa Legion Strategist (a bloodthirsty Russian anarkiddy) is speculating that it is because the Demonrat ploy to destroy Russia via the collusion between Putin, Kiev and Prigojin failed in June 2023 because the rebellious patriotic General Popov withstood the Ukrainian offensive using the unpredictable new wonder-weapon – FPV drones.

This has made the original CIA-KGB plan to demolish Russia with under 300 bil. USD of investments untenable. So now they have to call for a ceasefire in their invasion of the Ukraine, and instead put all their resources into reviving the US military industry – for which task the Republicans have been called into action.

And what is their overall objective? To defeat China, of course. But for that they would need to destroy Russia first as China’s nuclear arsenal is too pitiful for MAD to be assured. But Russia is just refusing to die, and the Ukraine has since died first. So they are going to play a slightly longer game, pumping Poland full of military assets (2000 tanks, 100 Appaches, almost 700 MLRS and long range artillery with guided munitions), whereas Putin will disarm Russia during the ceasefire, and then the war will renew around 2027.

Apologies if this is too foreign-policy focused! Even then, you know, clamping down on overt LGBT propaganda would make sense as a preparation for total war. Because if 50 Russian nukes do get through from that one lucky submarine, the USA will not crumble materially, but the morale would be another story – it would have be to be strong. And the Republicans could indeed provide that strength, a new Pearl Harbour and all that.

Mind you, this does not explain why the CIA-KGB allowed for China’s rise in the first place. Maybe for sport? And it would require them to have plenty of guts to start an actual nuclear WW3 (while provoking Russia through their puppet Putin) – maybe they’re run-away psychopaths who have been bored to death? And then you have Iran, China’s oil supplier…

> “You claim to be a champion of Aryanhood, but your “pipedream” is a nuclear holocaust in the Whitest part of the world, which you would then repopulate with your hapa spawn.”

I’m sorry if my shorthand wasn’t clear enough. What I mean is that any Aryan racist should have the mindset of April 1945 wishing death and destruction upon all White régimes in the world – American, European and Russian. Because they are all anti-White, all are feminist and anti-racist.

As I view the Anglo the most intensely cucked part of Aryandom, I don’t see any potential in them, they never produced an anti-Christian movement since Darwin’s times – sure, they had some bout of eugenics, but they also possessed the power to exterminate the Hindus and the Japanese (UK & US respectively), and blew both of those chances due to their Christian ethics being equal to their astronomical power.

Meanwhile, Europe once had Hitler, and Russia Stalin, both men with uncucked anti-Christian potential. Hence destroying statehood here might actually bring some dividends – just as how the destruction of Polish and Soviet state apparatuses paved way for the Holocaust.

So if the Jewish plan lay in using the Russian nuclear arsenal against Poland, I would admittedly support it – but of course, there are no such Aryan racists that would agree with me, hence my blackpilled stance.

And no, my personal morals are anti-natalist, thank you, but on the individual level, I view children in the context of scatology and paedophilia which are decidedly not my kinks.

> “Look at Gaza: c. 10% of the population massacred already, and UNRWA – which provides the little bit of food coming in to feed the rest – is being kicked out by the Izzies. Where will the food come from when UNRWA is gone?”

10% dead after a year? That means the Jews will have to slog for a decade to genocide the tiny and useless Gaza enclave full of literal jungle apes with guns?

Sure, sure, the Jews are mighty when it comes to the Aryans, but the White burgers are literally killing themselves, so is that even a victory? Meanwhile in Asia, the Israelis seem to be too weak even to protect their own ethnostate, to genocide those vile monkeys in Judaea & Samaria, their ancient homeland they have been technically in control of since 1967 CE! If I were on the team Jew, I would be at a loss at the cuckoldry of the Jerusalem parties. Or, dare I say, imbibed Christian mercy? Or is Judaism this pathetic on its own?

Case in point – the second Armenian genocide of September 2023 when 150k Armenians left Artsakh in a _week._ Turks are Muslim Asians, Jews are mysterymeat Eurofags. It’s been fine so far, but when the Aryan race kicks the bucket, with America turning into Brazil 2.0, Hebrew cunning won’t save Israel from the hordes of swarthy Orcs.

> “a rainbow demographic clone of the fake-Left demonrat wing of the Zionist Uniparty.”

Of course, what else would it be? The Aryan race is utterly finished. The Mulatto vote is but the final nail in the coffin. Now these retards are going to have the carte blanche for celebrating… miscegenation? The way JD Vance has done with a Telugu woman? Hell, Gregory Hood is paying lip-service to such double-think in this very article!

Race is a biological reality but also a social category, and at least some Hispanics are “becoming” white, racially and socially. Rates of intermarriage between whites and Hispanics are relatively high, leading to whiter offspring. An immigration pause (no small thing) might encourage more assimilation, particularly if it comes with a push for English as the official language and an end to race preferences. […]

White advocates should be encouraged.

This is literally an anti-White statement, but so what? Trump is the harbinger of the end, one way or another. When the choice is between woke and Christian, there is no Aryan on the ballot.

My personal selfish idea would be to go touch grass in the Ukraine with my Asian gf. But a part of me still wishes to see WW3 – if I’m being constructive, the best place for nukes to fall would be between the Oder and the Volga Rivers, because that is the final place where a destruction of statehood might be conducive to a European pagan racist revival. But it’s all a pipedream.

> “Propaganda must not only attach itself to what already exists in the individual, but also express the fundamental currents of the society it seeks to influence. Propaganda must be familiar with collective sociological presuppositions, spontaneous myths, and broad ideologies- [© Ellul]”

Chechar’s view is merely blaming the Aryan – which is a rather low-IQ point, because playing the blame game is not exactly constructive aside from the most basic Feinderkennung.

Your view, Dr. Robert Morgan, however, is that Christianity’s triumph was a predetermined development based on the “collective intelligence” of the Aryan societies. I never examined this part of your argument explicitly, so now I will ask you – where was such a preordained religion at the time of the Hellenic empires? Or of the nascent Roman Empire? Another counter-point – the Greeks explicitly scorned the idea of accepting the already-existing Zoroastrian cult that had held the Achaemenid oikumene together, the Ptolemaics didn’t even bother learning Ancient Egyptian.

In fact, Christianity only arose at the time of the crisis of Rome – and while you can make an argument that it was part of the experiments of that era (alternatively, it and other religions such as Mithraism could be explained as part of the long-term miscegenation effects), specifically Christianity’s triumph was not predetermined, and should only be sensibly put at the feet of Constantine’s designs, and none other. And that would be my own preference for seeing history as a battle of independent actors. “The role of personality in history”, as Russian Marxists put it.

As to all the advances of Christianity since that era – you can’t possibly consider them informed choices of the European collective intelligence. Chechar will tell you splendidly in his Deschner’s Kriminalgeschichte volumes that it was total genocidal war. And my point is that every single battle from Constantine onward was skewed – because this Jewish creed could forever base itself in the préstige of Rome, hence giving itself a perk in corrupting the tribal chiefs with gold and literacy. The same goes for modern America’s influence on Russia or Hungary, too, its hapless cultural appendages (my advice to any non-existent nationalists – stop using English and English calques!).

That all said, there was still plenty of opposition to the Hebrew church and its god – be it from the Saracens and the Saxons in the 8th century, or the Vikings and the Magyars in the 9th, or the Hitlerian Germans in the 20th, it was all a battle of wills, and only the specifics of the frontlines brought it victory, not some sort of imperial shrewdness. Again, the US empire would have been strengthened a thousandfold had it taken a leaf from the NSDAP’s playbook – yet it chose to negrify and feminise itself instead, now falling apart in hysteria.

So what is my general idea here? I agree that Trump is carrying no revolutionary zeal, no prospects of a non-Christian future. He’s as entrenched in the Hebrew cultural outlook of human rights and love of the Foreign Other as any other devout English tranny. And of course, I would welcome the physical fiery destruction of everything American, so if his policies prolong the suffering of that system, I would rather prefer a Kamala presidency. But then again, I don’t see any signs of a Hitlerian pagan racist awakening in the Aryan race, be it in the US, EU or Russia, so they can honestly die the longer death, who cares at this point?

> “The decline of the white race will continue under Trump just as it has been, and likely even accelerate. It’s fitting that Trump’s a Zionist, because America is itself Zionist. His family is interbred with Jews, and his Veep is married to a street shitter.”

At least the Telugu woman seems rather intelligent, considering her achievements? But indeed, the post-1945 Aryan preference for swarthy skin is one of the clearest incentives to see them burn to crisp – a point we might never get to because even in 2024 CE, there is still no power on the planet able to challenge America. Unless Trump’s deep state is willing to tank 50 nukes to the face at the cost of nuking Russia? Would that be worth it to you? Or to Chechar? The Judaeo-Christians remain in power, but a few dozen million swarthy Negro humanoids die? Win-win?

(Yes, I’m coping hard with Sofa Legion Strategist’s point that Washington is crawling with “psychopaths” willing to kill millions to destroy China. Pretty please?)

> “imagine that the only races which evolved were Northern Europeans and either West Africans or East Asians. No Jews. Let’s say (although maybe unrealistic) that they existed in roughly equal numbers. Does one group exterminate the other or do they ultimately mix?”

If we look at our history, the Roman Empire mixed and fell. But it would have been another insignificant collapse akin to the Bronze Age one had it not been for Christianity. Even any other, admittedly universalist, creed (such as Mithraism) would have had much more benign consequences on the future course of Europe).

As regards your point about mixing as law – has it really been the case? Let’s see the early Roman practice of establishing colonies, the garrison towns of Arab conquests, the Hazara nation of Afghanistan (begotten due to Mongol invasions), and indeed the settlement of Palestine by Zionist Jews. Or even the German colonies in the Russian Empire, largely homogeneous for centuries.

It is true that total genocides are not exactly common. But it is a small leap to imagine Hitler (who did exist) as a conqueror of Japan, exterminating the locals in the name of Lebensraum. Our reality’s German Führer did murder 30 mil. Slavs and Jews, it’s natural to assume a pagan America to be as ruthless in Japan.

My point concisely is this:
1) humans naturally create hierarchies and caste systems;
2) caste systems do dissolve over a few centuries;
3) genocides are possible when a religious inspiration comes forth.

> “China apparently have half a million Africans for instance.”

This has to be seen in light (or shadow) of the larger Christian civilisation. China cannot genocide Africa, as China can’t even break out of the first island chain. Conversely, this is what Japan used to plan. Or would you view Japanese strivings in light of the Hitlerian revolution in Europe? Could be the case, but meh.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/An_Investigation_of_Global_Policy_with_the_Yamato_Race_as_Nucleus?useskin=vector

> “As I’ve mentioned before North Korea’s leader is best friends with a negro American basketball player.”

It’s such old news at this point. Since then, the propaganda of the Juche state has only grown stronger and more racist. The border in the north has been guarded, and local media still sing the old-spirit songs and show the image of the sun in their reels.

> “While the non-East Asiatic population of South Korea may only currently be 3-4%, it was probably 0.1% or less 50+ years ago.”

The RoK is the most Christian East Asian country. If anything, I would showcase the recent Japanese election as a much better candidate for your argument – where the conservative candidate Sanae Takaichi is a woman with a subby hubby, and whose winner has been Shigeru Ishiba, a literal LGBT Christian.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2024_Liberal_Democratic_Party_(Japan)_presidential_election?useskin=vector

All in all, I’m not denying that tech produces a myriad of challenges to any civ. The issue is that without Christianity, we would have nations inventing ways to combat the obstacles. But Christianity denies us all sovereignty which does not come from the Jewish angel of mercy Yeshua. This is why climate change can’t be battled by exterminating hapless foreigners, and why the fertility rate decline can’t be alleviated by degrading the female right to education. I posit that we Europeans would have a chance to try – were it not for Christianity. Hell, we would be speaking from the position of a vast Germanic empire to the Urals right now, too.

> “Traditions wither before the assault of technology, but it may take a while for them to utterly disappear.”

This is important. Because it seems like those countries which adopt the technology – or its version tinged with Christianity – grow weaker, not stronger. My model would predict the early adopters to lose out to the late adopters – kind of how Israel can’t defeat Gaza, and Hamas is still surviving.

Again, how would you view the political tumult in America as a sign of strength? If I were to imagine a triumphant technological society, it wouldn’t have been either transferring massive populations of savages into its interior NOR allowing for a critique of said transfer. But both of those things have been happening – due to the human rights and freedom of speech dogmas of the American Christian culture. See, two irrational, religious dogmas (and on both sides of the political debate)! This can only be explained by culture, not by technology.

> “In my view, technological developments determine the meaning of Christianity, which is in the last analysis a meaningless set of beliefs, constantly in flux, equally capable of justifying slavery or conducting a genocide as it is of prohibiting slavery and promoting universal brotherhood.”

So now you’re denying the existence of Christianity at all? Curious. What to make of your earlier statements about Christianity as uniquely compatible and nourishing for a globalist civilisation then?

Of course, I disagree. Christianity has only been in flux depending on two factors: 1) the technological capabilities of the era; 2) the internal logic of its development. Piracy and slavery could be seen as a function of the long-distance communication lag of the time; they were practiced by virile men (arguably “pagan”), and the priests came much later. (The early treatment of Indians before 1537 Sublimis Deus could be seen as a microcosm of the later developments.)

> “If it were Christianity and not technology that’s the most important thing dooming white people, that wouldn’t be the case.”

Why not both? We’ve been going in circles in this debate, and my point still stands – technology is an amplifier. American ludicrous mercy is amplified into breeding billions of Asians – and its miniscule acts of savagery kill a million here or there (giving food to Noam Chomsky). Conversely, Hitlerian Germany employed tech to genocide 30 million Easterners. And now Juche Korea is employing nuclear weapons to guard its enchanted forests’ perimeter. All exist, and all seem disparate enough.

> “They’d have twice the GDP of other tribes, be twice as rich, twice as powerful, and would have gained a tremendous advantage over all the others. The other tribes would then be forced to adopt the same method in order to keep up. […] The tribe that kept women out of the workforce would soon fall behind the others, having only half as much of everything than them. They’d be conquered and destroyed.”

But is that what we are observing in reality? Where? What I’m seeing is the Saudis coating their women in blankets, Egyptians slitting their clits with scissors, and Hindus… insert what Hindus do, probably burn each other and throw acid in faces. Has either of those people gone extinct for not adopting the latest transvestite update package from America? Absolutely not. And why is that? Probably because it’s not a law of history to adopt it, but a quirk of this particular Christian religion.

Again, this Christian civilisation is too weak to impose its views on others, let alone at the barrel of a gun. The UK have recently given their own territory to the imported Negroes of Mauritius. Is that a mark of a technological civilisation, too?

> “Two things: First, you’re forgetting that Christianity, like the Marxism to which it gave birth, is also a form of technology. It’s a social technology, a way of organizing society.”

Religion is a set of dogmas and structures for their dissemination (wait, that’s a great definition). They have persevered through numerous forms of society – from late antiquity through the Dark Age and Medieval era all the way to the Industrial Revolution. Sure, Christianity might have given a certain slant to each of them – such as a ban on slavery, or Jewish genocide, or nascent female rights, but it did not organise the whole of society. It only was granted that prerogative with the introduction of technological means. Meaning that technology has enabled Christianity to make its wildest dogmas reality.

> “Tradition always loses when faced with their relentless assault.”

Coming back to that point, has the world come uniformly under the power of progress? I don’t see that. Even if it did, every race would be in equal (cucked) conditions, and that’s not what’s happening. Is your response to that that the Asians have simply introduced technology later? But I don’t see any massive immigration to Japan even though their industry is older than Russia’s (and Russia is swarming with Muslim migrants).

And if it’s not due to the imagined age disparity, it means different cultures have mans with which to overcome many dangers of technology and not become raging cuckolds the way they are in Aryan lands.

> “Though they started from quite different cultural points and are different races, they have in common problems brought to them by technology, and common ways of dealing with them.”

Have the Chinese gained a knack for celebrating Negroes and transvestites? And changing Mozart into a female (read it on YouTube comments recently, about his sister)? Because if not, no libtard will ever agree that the Chinese are doing any liberal things at all.

> “If that’s so, then why didn’t it happen earlier? Answer: It lacked the technology to do so.”

Earlier… under Alexander? It happened under Constantine because those papyrus scrolls had their effect, for one reason or another. The Jews managed to start a cult and sell it to the goyim. The only technology used there was writing.

> “Once technology liberated women from their biological destiny of motherhood and homemaking, the idea of sexual equality could finally be put into practice. Women could credibly claim to be the equals of men, at least in the workplace. These changes were quickly codified into law.”

Are you not reading more into it than it deserves on face value? Because the West is not merely technological, it is also Christian. So not everything in the West stems from technology.

Let’s take your statement that industrial nations have new work for women. Any such nation would still recognise fertility as the women’s older and yet unsurpassed duty. How would workforce equality impugn that?

A normie response would be “migrants”, but that is only the choice of the Christians with their NAXALT rhetoric – a religious dogma.

What I’m saying in effect is that the Asians have employed technology just fine. Sure, they will still suffer some of the consequences exhibited by the West (such as lower fertility rates), but in a much reduced form (and reversible, because they do have notions of statehood and sovereignty, whereas Christianity denies that, leaving only Christian morality).

> “Was it “Jewish occultists” that passed the Nineteenth Amendment?”

To be fair, I wouldn’t spurn off the idea that it’s the Jewish magick that has killed the Aryan race with their Christianity. The influence is too deep and zombifying. Hell, even the Latin alphabet is derived from Phoenician – a close relative of Hebrew.

> “In name recognition, he’d be right up there with Jefferson, Lincoln, and Washington, except a demon instead of a god.”

Your argument was that Manson was used as the main boogie-man to scare the Aryan men into submission. My contention has been that both Hitler and Stalin are infinitely more known – at least, in modern cyberspace. Maybe it was the case in the 1990s, no idea.

My feel is that the Western System hates and fears not disparate idiotic cults but another vision of the state – see modern China with its surveillance, Communist Party and social credit. They fear “authoritarianism”, not neo-Nazi thugs.

I dunno, a counter-argument I could see would be ISIS. But I’m rather clueless and conflicted on that whole story. Right-wingers say it was CIA-controlled. Either way, it failed. Whereas China and Juche Korea still successfully strike fear into the hearts of the Americans. Hell, even Japan’s age of consent laws horrified the Westerners (they have been repealed because the Japs are occupied cucks).

Again, if we’re going by personalities alone, I would rate _Harvey Weinstein_ as incomparably more dangerous to America than Manson. Libs killed Weinstein almost immediately, whereas Manson was allowed to languish in prison for half a century.

> “Working for the collapse of the state is a good way to do that. No organization to do enforcement, no “human rights”.”

But you cannot collapse the state out of the blue, without any support from the population, without offering any other state. Again, anarchism is impossible. If there is no attack on the Christian worldiview, the Christians will merely rebuild their society. Did the collapse of Syria lead to atheism? No, because atheism is impossible. All sides in Syria remained Muslim – Assad, ISIS, even the Kurds.

> “And if that act inspired imitators, kill a vice president, a secretary of state, some senators, congressmen, etc. Or perhaps he could start a race war.”

What’s your view of the Black Panthers? People call them terrorists, the Wikipedia article is really dull, and why don’t you consider them even a greater threat to America than Manson?

> “That’s not the “free love” of the sixties, synonymous with easy sex.”

Wasn’t the welfare state much less entrenched back in those days? And females not as common in the workforce? Leading them to depend on males and thus be less focused on pursuing the chad?

I still count them all as essentially the same because the system was about love between “two consenting adults” as opposed to buying the female from her father. Dating is gay. (And has grown even more cucked, but that has no bearing.)

> “Never underestimate the erotic perversity of the human animal. The majority opinion is that homosexuality was rife in the pre-Christian ancient world”

Now here is where I disagree in principle while not in the letter. Fucking children is not LGBT. LGBT in fact stand for consent, age of majority, against human trafficking and slavery… You can’t conflate the two. Ancient and non-Christian world are about torture and paedophilia. Christianity is about consent and happy feelings.

> “My motto again: People are scum, and life is war. Christianity makes the perfect religion for creating a technological society in part because it wants to repress this instinct with its “human rights” flim-flammery, talk of Love and Brotherhood, and the rest of that anodyne trash. Given human nature, perhaps it’s the only way that the order necessary for a highly technological society to come into existence could have been established, and once established, be held together.”

I disagree, the Germans were technological and killed 30 mil. Slavs and Jews. The Japanese did that, too. Or would your argument be that the Germans would have abandoned their technology because it wouldn’t have conformed to your ideals?

I guess, your argument could probably involve how California is better at tech than Guangzhou. But then again, TSMC is in Formosa. And the PRC is catching up with the RoC in that regard, at least. It’s a mess though. Still, kind of a weak argument.

Overall, my idea is that all human cultures are fairly similar. All humans have to eat and fuck. Cultures modify these behaviours in rather precise and usually non-threatening ways – foot-binding in China, cube dancing in Islam, etc. Christianity goes a step further and makes Europeans refuse to use their technology to kill untechnological savages – be it in India or Palestine. And hence why the Aryan race is malignantly sick, unlike the rest.

…Yes, Christianity is denying technology, not expanding on it! How did I never bring up this argument in our Conversation? The phasing out of nuclear energy, of space flight, all because Negro rights demand it (“global warming” which if true would call for a cull in Negro/chink population, not destroying one’s own tech).

> “But I’d say that, in America at least, all three of those guys are less demonized, and even less well-known, than Charles Manson.”

My experience would lead me drastically to disagree. I would have never, ever heard of Manson had it not been for the “right-wing” personalities. Meanwhile, I can reasonably expect to have Mao or even fucking Pol Pot shoved down my throat on YouTube (especially by libertarians who are the supposed enemies of libtards, but I can’t draw a distinction between them).

Face is, Manson is an American. He’s from the same degenerate lot as the Branch Davidians with the Wacky Siege. Whereas the Asian “dictators” offer a genuine alternative to human rights.

> “My point of view is that the notion of “societal health” is just as bankrupt as the notion of “mental health”.”

I’m biased and local in time, so to me, the only measure of health is resistance to the Christian notion of human rights^^

> “If freedom is your highest value, then you seek to construct a society with maximum freedom.”

In my understanding, society is a system of coercion, so “free society” is an oxymoron. The issue is that the Christian society coerces everyone to celebrate foreigners. Other societies coerce to different means – Islam does it to make people dance around a cube and cut off foreskins. Still better.

> “The 70s saw the beginning of a broad and powerful societal movement in the direction of more closely integrating niggers with whites, and also “liberating” women from what little remained of patriarchy. Manson represented the antithesis of both those trends.”

Manson represented nothing but the general American spirit of powerless individualism. What you’re talking about might only be applied to Rockwell’s Nazi Party because it aspired to be a social movement.

It seems you’re trying to paint Manson as a sort of an American Darwin or Nietzsche. But Darwin and Nietzsche are only prominent because the German lads in the 1900s started being inspired by them. The thinkers were useless on their own. It is the cultural trends that decide history. And it just so happens that there is absolutely no anti-Christian trend in America.

> “He was a racist who hated niggers and kept his women under strict control, exactly the opposite of where the system was headed. In that way, like Hitler, he was a man against time.”

If you want to look for real opposition, I would rather offer you to look either into the Mormon church or the views of William Pierce or Lev Gumilev – either of those could have potentially inspired a racist movement at large. What could Manson have done with his tiny clueless cult? Start a rap band?

> ““Free love” is long gone, ended decades ago. What we have now, with #Metoo and the constant worry about sex harassment”

Free love is the proliferation of non-veiled women. Going strong.

> “I’d also disagree that “free love” is at all Christian. Christians have always been prudes about sex, and easy sex was never a feature of Christian society.”

It’s either a pagan vestige according to my views, or a “compromise with reality”. As you can see, Christian countries that rejected Darwin and Nietzsche (the Anglos and the French) go full homosexual when technology permits. Only Germany resisted it with their anti-Christian revolution, as it used technology not to breed transvestites but to mortify the foreigners.

> ““Free love” is, if anything, a pagan concept. “Free love” means throwing off the Christian yoke.”

Your age probably makes you view the hippies as a kind of an anti-Christian revolution?^^But the main feature of paganism was virility and death. Kind of like Auschwitz and ISIS. Or the Mexican cartels. Paganism is about celebrating the stench of human remains gruesomely dismembered, not this idiotic eloi stuff. Eloi is Christianity. Feel good is Christianity. Blood and guts are paganism.

> “If he [Manson] wasn’t a threat, there’d be no need to demonize him.”

I would contest this notion from two sides. First, the neo-Christian System also viciously demonises Stalin, Mao Zedong and Pol Pot. Second, the old-style System of the 1970s was partially healthy (such as how Chechar has recently mentioned the UK ban of a Kubrick film), so its verdicts are not wholly degenerate (a genetic fallacy?).

A third point would be that Manson is a clearly American creature – a distraught, atomised anarchist individual forming a tiny schizo cult, bereft of any community or intellectual tradition. This is my critique anyway. Rootless and cosmopolitan. The only partly successful blood and soil endeavours in America seem to be the Mormons and the Quebecois (as I marked them such on my old autistic map). The rest is just hopeless, barren, and useless from an Asian perspective.

(Not to say that the cults can’t grow successful and glorious – see the pre-cuckoldry Mormons – but Manson failed. Of course, one could also find cultish elements in Hitler’s movement, but Hitler was a deeply embedded politician, be it in Bavaria or Europe at large. In a word, Hitler attended pubs, whereas Manson was… fucking whores? Münster style?)

I find the idea of seeking anything healthy in America to be a fool’s errand. Nothing there can be divorced from the Christian culture permeating every fibre of their being. Both their questions and their answers are debauched drivel.

P.S. It’s nice to see you still debating so hard, hoping for many more years! (Although I’m curious about the next few months.)

What’s so funny about peace, love, protecting ecology, and free-spirited young women with flowers in their hair? Now you’ve got endless war, twenty-four-hour 1984 Two Minutes Hate, Flint drinking water, and #MeToo c*nts. Happy?

Oh no, Richard Solomon is so wrong in the very first screen page… Free love is degeneracy, concentrated Christian poison whose fruit is the current era! There is no war at all, only perpetual peace! No, Vietnam ad the Ukraine don’t count as wars at all. And of course more of Gulf of Tonkin and 9/11 whining – because Americans are such astronomical cucks that the Jews have to drag them kicking and screaming into killing a single non-White!

It’s an incident from 2006 when Putin kissed a little boy on his tummy.

As for me, I view the entire word “paedophilia” to be meaningless newspeak – the way the word “the Ukraine” is (the definite article makes it more bearable, but not by much). Pointless feminist drivel aimed at shaming men, now used by self-righteous Bolsheviks (Strategos) and neo-Christians (Rolo Slavskiy).

Yes, I would lamentably consider Rolo Christian because he opposes the burning and raping of babies. If the Jews and Muslims can unite and do 9/11 and create ISIS, and do the oznei haman thingie to the Krokus perpetrator, it only belies their youthful vigour.

There is something true and primal about strong men vanquishing the cumskins – when the latter are blabbering about “truth” and “human rights”. If the main transgender lord decides to nuke his Russian colony at some point, I would at least respect him. But if not… It is a sign of the total triumph of the crucified god of love and the defeat of the paedophiles. (For a time – for when the last Nordic cucks disappear, the American Empire will unravel, and history shall return, “thunderous & bellicose”…)

First of all, this is absolutely huge to see daddy Rolo Slavskiy back on Unz! (Apologies for deadnaming, I know your most recent nom de guerre has been Rurik Skywalker.) Thanks to Phoenix’s comment on Substack for notifying me about this publication!

(Also, I’ve just been getting a queer “Error establishing a database connection” notification when connecting to Unz – may it be related to my Ukrainian location?)

Now as to the translation – there are a few iffy parts, such as calling bombardment “cover” (накрывать in Russian) – does “cover” even make sense in English? All I know is that small arms fire is called “suppression”, whereas using “cover” as a standalone feels rather Russian.

As to the general gist – yes, even my gooner brain has managed to read it in full, and in English! What’s to say? My yet another naïve though would be to expect a forging of a new Russian culture of men as opposed to peace-loving Turk-worshipping Christo-Communist gold-digging cuckolds. But my track record isn’t the brightest – I was unironically hoping for the residual Russo-Polish Aryans eventually to see the maddening error of the American transvestite ways, but instead they seem to be set to turn the last European redoubt into a puckering nuclear hellhole.

But at this point, a nuclear annihilation might only improve this dog breed’s chances of survival.

While Sofa Legion Strategist is outright calling the paedophile Putin a CIA asset, I’m not so sure. All those millions of Russians led happily to the slaughter in Donbass – do they have no agency? And if they indeed do not, who would blame Nature for delivering our filthy kind to the Jews and their gods?
https://www.youtube.com/@Strateg_Divannogo_Legiona/streams