RSS
... why is the Tito’s communism the only communism, which found favours with people like Churchill, a well known staunch anticommunist?
Hi Zed. Thank you for chiming in.Yes, you are on the right track - Upon Vatican's request, Churchill switched to supporting Tito in order to hide Vatican's genocide inflicted upon the Serbian people (Orthodox Christians) [1][2]. Pope Pius XII [3] was the one that gave the blessing for the slaughter! That genocide is most likely the most gruesome one that ever happened, e.g. Serbs were slaughtered in 57 ways [2], yet the least known one!In 1943, it became clear that Germany will lose the war, and that the Chetnics (Serbian King Special Forces / Legionaries / Guerrilla ) will free Serbia from Nazi occupation and that the genocide that Vatican, Croats, and Bosnian Muslims perpetrated upon the Serbian people would be exposed and found out. So, the deal was made between USA, Britain, Vatican, USSR, and Tito's communists - that they will help him get power over Yugoslavia if he promises to hide Vatican Holocaust. Yes, you read that right - part of the deal seems to have included the agreement with the USSR to help achieve this goal!So what was the plan?British and US would bomb Serbia repeatedly starting in 1943 to inflict maximum death and damage to the population, all in order to prevent Chetnics and Serb civilians to rise up and free themselves from weakened Germany, until Soviet Army reaches territory of Serbia, occupies it, abolishes monarchy, and hands it over to Tito's communists. Serbia was bombed relentlessly in 1943/1944! The way Dresden was bombed, multiple cities in Serbia were bombed multiple times! Belgrade was bombed 11 times by Britain/USA airplanes! Damage to the German troops there were minimal as the main targets were Chetnics, Serbian cities and civilians.The plan worked - Soviet Army entered Serbia in 1944, chased away Germans, back-stabbed and betrayed Chetnics, abolished monarchy, and gave the power to Tito, who essentially just walked in and took power without fighting. After Tito took power, and Soviets left as mission accomplished, genocide against Serbian people started even in Serbia proper, on top of Nazi Croatia territory, Bosnia, etc. - communists mass-murdered at least 250,000 Serb civilians post "liberation".Communists kept their promise - they dismantled all Croatian extermination camps in 1945, hid all the evidence, lists, documentation, concrete-sealed all the pit caves and mass graves with 100s of thousands of murdered Serbs, and made it a crime to research and report.P.S. One more thing: Preventing discovery of the Vatican Holocaust may have been the main reason why D-Day was in Normandy, where it was much harder to break through, rather than through the Adriatic entering Nazi Croatia, which would have been far easier, but the genocide against Serbian people would have been discovered by the American soldiers passing through the Balkans - multiple large extermination camps (e.g. Jasenovac, 5 times the size of Auschwitz) and 100s of local execution sites - pit caves, pits, villages, towns, etc. As a matter of fact, Serbian Chetnics prepared the area for the D-Day on the Adriatic Sea coast, upon Britain/USA request, and then the deal with Vatican was made!Hope this helps.~~ Notes ~~~There were 100s of locations in Nazi Croatia where Serbs were slaughtered including multiple large extermination camps. Croats even had at least one extermination camp just for Serbian children. Estimates of Serb deaths in the biggest camp, Jasenovac, according to Gideon Greif [2], is at least 1.4 million. He also mentioned that the total number is higher for sure as many victims were not buried in mass graves, but rather thrown into Sava river, burned in furnaces, made soap of (yes you read that right - Croats made soap of murdered Serbs), etc. Note that those were extermination camps and not concentration camps, as Croats did not feed the prisoners, since they were brought in to be slaughtered asap. According to American WW2 findings/reports, around 1,300 Croatian Catholic priests took direct part in murders, rapes, etc. Yes, you read that right - Croatian Catholic priests slitting throats, raping women and girls, torturing people, etc.~~~ References ~~~[1] Book Scan - The Vatican's Holocaust by Avro Manhattan - Internet Archive:
Perhaps, Churchill was trying to protect genocidal Vatican ...
Thank you so much for your reply. I could not imagine this was so premeditated and evil even though there were lots of signs an unanswered questions. Really appreciate your response.
Thank you for this article. I believe this issue to be of extreme importance as it disproportionately strongly influences today’s world events. And thank you to some very knowledgeable commentators who took time and trouble explaining those and bringing to light important hidden truths.
If I could contribute at all, it would be to ask why is the Tito’s communism the only communism, which found favours with people like Churchill, a well known staunch anticommunist? The person who was very keen to extinguish Greek communism (the one, which really fought Nazis) and also wanted to continue the war against SSSR not long after the end of WWII. What happened when Churchill and Tito met in (I believe 1943) on island of Vis, which subsequently diverted the allied support from Serbian resistance and to the communists. There is very little historical evidence that Tito fought Croatian Ustase and was solely concentrated on fighting Serbian resistance fighters (antfashists and freedom fighters).
Perhaps, Churchill was trying to protect genocidal Vatican, lumping together victims and perpetrators of the crime under the “Brotherhood and Unity” in a single country Yugoslavia? What better way to do it than under the new religion, which erases all the differences – communism?
We know today that the genocide against Serbian people was spearheaded by 1500 Franciscans and the Croats even today are trying to bestow the sainthood on Alojsije Stepinac, the war time cardinal who approved of the genocide. We know about the rat lines and Father Draganovic shipping the most hardened Croatian criminals to South America. We also know that Tito was a mason, trockite, Anti Serb and anti Russian (the whole Yugoslavia was). Was this the condition that enabled every possible favour from the west?
... why is the Tito’s communism the only communism, which found favours with people like Churchill, a well known staunch anticommunist?
Hi Zed. Thank you for chiming in.Yes, you are on the right track - Upon Vatican's request, Churchill switched to supporting Tito in order to hide Vatican's genocide inflicted upon the Serbian people (Orthodox Christians) [1][2]. Pope Pius XII [3] was the one that gave the blessing for the slaughter! That genocide is most likely the most gruesome one that ever happened, e.g. Serbs were slaughtered in 57 ways [2], yet the least known one!In 1943, it became clear that Germany will lose the war, and that the Chetnics (Serbian King Special Forces / Legionaries / Guerrilla ) will free Serbia from Nazi occupation and that the genocide that Vatican, Croats, and Bosnian Muslims perpetrated upon the Serbian people would be exposed and found out. So, the deal was made between USA, Britain, Vatican, USSR, and Tito's communists - that they will help him get power over Yugoslavia if he promises to hide Vatican Holocaust. Yes, you read that right - part of the deal seems to have included the agreement with the USSR to help achieve this goal!So what was the plan?British and US would bomb Serbia repeatedly starting in 1943 to inflict maximum death and damage to the population, all in order to prevent Chetnics and Serb civilians to rise up and free themselves from weakened Germany, until Soviet Army reaches territory of Serbia, occupies it, abolishes monarchy, and hands it over to Tito's communists. Serbia was bombed relentlessly in 1943/1944! The way Dresden was bombed, multiple cities in Serbia were bombed multiple times! Belgrade was bombed 11 times by Britain/USA airplanes! Damage to the German troops there were minimal as the main targets were Chetnics, Serbian cities and civilians.The plan worked - Soviet Army entered Serbia in 1944, chased away Germans, back-stabbed and betrayed Chetnics, abolished monarchy, and gave the power to Tito, who essentially just walked in and took power without fighting. After Tito took power, and Soviets left as mission accomplished, genocide against Serbian people started even in Serbia proper, on top of Nazi Croatia territory, Bosnia, etc. - communists mass-murdered at least 250,000 Serb civilians post "liberation".Communists kept their promise - they dismantled all Croatian extermination camps in 1945, hid all the evidence, lists, documentation, concrete-sealed all the pit caves and mass graves with 100s of thousands of murdered Serbs, and made it a crime to research and report.P.S. One more thing: Preventing discovery of the Vatican Holocaust may have been the main reason why D-Day was in Normandy, where it was much harder to break through, rather than through the Adriatic entering Nazi Croatia, which would have been far easier, but the genocide against Serbian people would have been discovered by the American soldiers passing through the Balkans - multiple large extermination camps (e.g. Jasenovac, 5 times the size of Auschwitz) and 100s of local execution sites - pit caves, pits, villages, towns, etc. As a matter of fact, Serbian Chetnics prepared the area for the D-Day on the Adriatic Sea coast, upon Britain/USA request, and then the deal with Vatican was made!Hope this helps.~~ Notes ~~~There were 100s of locations in Nazi Croatia where Serbs were slaughtered including multiple large extermination camps. Croats even had at least one extermination camp just for Serbian children. Estimates of Serb deaths in the biggest camp, Jasenovac, according to Gideon Greif [2], is at least 1.4 million. He also mentioned that the total number is higher for sure as many victims were not buried in mass graves, but rather thrown into Sava river, burned in furnaces, made soap of (yes you read that right - Croats made soap of murdered Serbs), etc. Note that those were extermination camps and not concentration camps, as Croats did not feed the prisoners, since they were brought in to be slaughtered asap. According to American WW2 findings/reports, around 1,300 Croatian Catholic priests took direct part in murders, rapes, etc. Yes, you read that right - Croatian Catholic priests slitting throats, raping women and girls, torturing people, etc.~~~ References ~~~[1] Book Scan - The Vatican's Holocaust by Avro Manhattan - Internet Archive:
Perhaps, Churchill was trying to protect genocidal Vatican ...
I find this lingering narrative of Serbs being genocidal people (against fictional Bosniaks this time ) quite disturbing. Yes, I understand that lots of people bought this narrative and that there was no social media or web to put the things right but what does it take to acknowledge that the Serbs themselves endured 3 genocides since WWI. The latest one saw entire Krajina region depopulated (hardly any Serbs left), pretty much as Gaza today. Why is Croatian Christian Zionism (outright Nacizm) and Islamic clero-fashizm (Bosniak???) treated with kids gloves. Why is genocide against Serbian people forgotten? Is it because they are, just like people of Donbas, Lugansk, orthodox Cristian? Perhaps they don’t fit in the “European values” bracket so any Zionist, Masonic or Neoliberal evil can be unleashed on them?
Russia never claimed they would “defeat nazi ukraine” in a week. This is a cia propaganda op. The entire piece supports the narrative that Russia is bogged down (column of Russian troops outside of ukraine). This isn’t a war to take ukraine. Don’t fall for nato pig propaganda.
Propaganda is propaganda is propaganda. See Soviet propaganda posters which I believe predates the Rockwell war bond poster. Quite similar, all.
Fred, stay on vacation and don’t come back! Finally confront your wife’s infidelity and be a man. Sancho es en to casa, gringo!
Doesn’t Rain Man follow from Oliver Sachs’ sweep through the intelligentsia, leading on to De Niro’s follow-up role in Awakenings?
I’d like to hear the exemplar of “whaddaya whaddaya”. I’m thinking Jackie Gleason?
Industrial parks, government complexes, military bases: outside traffic is restricted, street design is controlled, policed by internal security, lower speed so accidents aren’t a mess. EPCOT
Steve: You’ve dropped a number of comments about Moneyball. If the steroids story arc you suggest is included does the lesson about quantitative management hold up, or does it just collapse into a cover story? Is the reaction of other teams ignorant?
Augusta has the feeling of needing an army of gardeners who scurry out of sight as the paying customers approach. OTOH, although Chambers looks like they’re going flat out for St. Andrews, I think they could have the imagination to update it with a few dour shade trees.
And another is regression toward the mean: people whose parents were below the mean in income tend to regress upward toward the mean, and the mean whites regress toward is higher than the mean for blacks or Hispanics. So youngish adults from very white counties like these tend to regress toward a higher mean.
Steve, I’m worried about this statement. I think these data are considering delta from parents, not the absolute endpoint of movement on the lower tail?
White men are still the largest group at 49 percent of known offenders in this category, according to a 2012 study by the Office of the Children’s Commissioner, which identified 2,409 victims over a 14-month period across England even before the Rotherham report was published.
But Pak&Jam® together control 51% of the market. (The "known" market, that is.)And how many of the "white" men could pass for this girl's brother? In America, when José is the victim of a hate crime, he's Hispanic. When he commits one, he's white. Is the same thing going on in the UK?
White men are still the largest group at 49 percent of known offenders in this category…
Thanks for raising that Zed, it's always useful to have a reminder regarding the term per capita. White people make up well over 80% of the population of the UK (somewhat less in England) Good to know that 80% of the population commit only 49% of those offences. Any idea who might be taking up that, not inconsiderable, slack?
White men are still the largest group at 49 percent of known offenders in this category
Joe Klein blames the teacher's union for the defeat of Fenty. In Klein's opinion, we are only allowed to form unions against capital, not against our enlightened social engineers.
Having a penis and an emotional system that doesn't respond to women is like having a pupil that doesn't respond to light, like having food in front of you and putting it in your ear instead of in your mouth, like trying to run from prey with your arms instead of with your legs. Those behaviors wouldn't be social constructs.
I don't agee with B. F. Skinner's boast "Give me a child and I'll shape him into anything"; however, I suspect it's not that difficult to turn a child into an adult homosexual. It's common for childhood victims of sexual trauma to seek out and relive their experiences over and over in their adult years.
Did the island attract the best people from Europe, or did the island and it's distance from the continent mold average Celts, Saxons, and Normans into a special people?
Oh, good god! British history is one long story of decline since the days of Camelot.