RSSHad Germans with their work ethic, unity, and ability gained access to all those lands, the German Empire would likely have been more powerful than the US.Too bad Russians are such underachievers. Imagine what the Germans or Japanese could have done with all those resources. Russians need to up their act.Replies: @Anymike
Hitler, on the other hand, had very tangible ROI reasons for invading USSR: practically endless, rich agricultural lands**, practically unlimited hydrocarbon reserves, minerals, gold & silver deposits, fresh water, timber,……Slavic peoples slave labor,……
Germany didn’t need all those lands. Look at the lands Germany had before World War II even without the Anschluss and the Sudetenland. The idea that Germany had been deprived of its deserved civilizational grandeur because Germany lacked resources and population on a continental scale was a misreading of the world geopolitical situation. Underlying World War I was another misreading of the world geopolitical situation. That time, the German nationalists thought that Germany had been deprived of its deserved civilizational grandeur because it had been late in unifying and therefore had suffered a late start in the race for worldwide empire and the creation of a worldwide linguistic empire along the along the line of the British and French empire.
This was nonsense, of course. In fact, at the time World War I broke out, the German language was repsected and studied worldwide and Germany itself was regarded, man-for-man and pound-for-pound, as possibly the greatest country the world had ever seen.
If anyone is tempted to blame the German embrace of the continental scale of resources theory on grandiose reasoning and delusional propensities of the fomer corporal, remember that former corporal was a corporal when German was under the sway of the idea of the empire as the source of grandeur. Hitler was the designated front man for the German nationalist elite.
Germany didn’t need those lands. If World War II had not happened Germany today would be in the running to be considered the greatest nation in the world without those lands and the reign of the former corporal and the Nazi party would be regarded as just another among many of the authoritian regimes which arose during the debacle of the post-Great War era and dismissed./
Isn’t every country in the world which possesses land on a continental scale kind of a mess today with or without the comcomitant population? China. Brazil. Australia. Canada. The United States. Russia. No, Germany didn’t need it.
“This is a forum and not a doctoral thesis.”
Wrote a guy, who decided to write a thesis on his own stupidity in every possible aspect, but who failed in the first attempt 🙂
Johnson, you’re so funny when you’re angry. Almost as funny as when you write these idiotic claims of yours. Like this one: “2.5 week special operation is going well”.
You’re confusing me with the likes of you. Were I not Christian, I’d happily watch how you Khazars and the Mongols kill each other.
I'd rather watch Germany reclaim her lost lands in Poland.Replies: @Deep Thought
I’d happily watch how you Khazars and the Mongols kill each other.
Exactly as I thought – typical commie baseless allegations, just to change the topic.
I’m sorry you have no brain at all – the discussion was about Nepal and what people (Tibetans or not) can do there. You idiotically alleged that I made an opinion about Tibet. Your idiotic opinions – your problem. Just have some balls to own your mistakes.
Duh. You illustrate again how stupid you lot are.Just as Russian agents would not be allowed to berate shopowners in Vinius
It’s so cute that our local dumb red little CCP troll thinks CCP agents are allowed to operate in Nepal 🙂
wojtek: “It’s so cute that our local dumb red little CCP troll thinks CCP agents are allowed to operate in Nepal”
dumblittleredtroll: “Just as Russian agents would not be allowed to berate shopowners in Vinius
CCP agents would not be allowed to berate shopowners in Kathmandu.”
Your chinesium translator is malfunctioning again – it replaced operate with berate 🙂
But that’s a standard defect. Let’s recall the really idiotic quotes:
“Try going into a shop in Lithuania and ask for a Russian flag.”
“Russian agents would not be allowed to operate in Vilnius.”
🙂
I start to think that little_red_dot was actually supposed to be little_red_bot 🙂
Genocide, son.
Neville Chamberlain and the anti Bolsheviks in the British conservative government seems to get off scot free.
Chamberlain?
Brits wanted Hitler to fight with Stalin.
You know this and I know this. But indeed the absolute majority of the Anglosaxons belong to one of the 2 camps: “Hitler and nobody else is responsible for WW2”, or “somebody else is responsible for WW2, but only one person, at most two”.
And so we have quotes like this one, from our Host:
German Intelligence learned of this massive bribery of British parliamentarians, and passed the information along to Prime Minister Neville Chamberlain, who was horrified to discover the corrupt motives of his fierce political opponents, but apparently remained too much of a gentlemen to have them arrested and prosecuted
Talk about a complete and total naivety.
This belongs together with the claims that “Germans couldn’t have committed all these crimes in WW2, because they are too much of a gentlemen“.
I am curious what makes Anglosaxons so blind?
According to Ron Unz, even Sean Mckeekin talking about British-French plans to bomb Baku in 1940 caused problems with the British establishment. Depend on British to admit that Neville Chamberlain's policies were designed to push Germany eastwards to destroy Russia is a hopeless task. They are only interested in suppression and selling garbage.The work of fighting for truth of WWII origins depends on non Anglo Saxons. The Anglo Saxons are not going to do it.Strangely enough, the pro Hitler, pro Nazi right wing crowd in the West also has zero interest in telling this side of the story. Who could be bigger quasi ally of Hitler and Nazi Germany than Britain under Neville Chamberlain? He is your guy. He had ZERO issues with Germany expanding eastwards and destroying Russia for living space. He was hardcore anti Bolshevik. VERY hardcore. Hardcore to the extent that he was willing to sacrifice everything between Germany and Russia in order to instigate war between Germany and Russia.On this point the 1935 UK general elections is interesting. What if the conservatives had lost in 1935 and Labour government was in power during that period? Labour party was not pro Nazi. They had less interest in pushing Germany east to destroy Russia. It is disgraceful that the mainstream talk about WWII origins in 1930s is complete rubbish.
absolute majority of the Anglosaxons belong to one of the 2 camps: “Hitler and nobody else is responsible for WW2”, or “somebody else is responsible for WW2, but only one person, at most two”.
I have always been of the opinion that people judge others primarily through the lens of their own limitations.
Thank you for proving it for me 🙂
When the dispute with Poland over Danzig …
Poland had no control over Gdańsk. It only had a post office and a railroad with some small storage for visiting Polish ships. And Polish embassies were required by the treaties to provide assistance to FSD citizens around the world.
FSD was created and controlled by the League of Nations, so primarily by Brits, French and Italians. It was in their interest to maintain the status quo and so they did.
I’m afraid you missed the main point:
And the simple (and yet very complex) reality is that WW2 happened because too many people wanted it to happen.
W.W. died some 15 years earlier.
I think there must have been some misunderstanding. When I wrote: “It never ceases to amaze me that intelligent, bah, brilliant people …”, in no way it was addressed at you. Based on your sample writing above, you’re just a simple neonazi, who does not need any books at all. In fact, I’m sure if any one makes its way to you, you burn them whenever your HOA Karen is not looking. Unless it’s Mein Kampf, of course 🙂
The only difference is that Trump tries to sedate his enemies with phony “peace” BS so that he can attempt to stab them in the back and avoid the risks of a face-to-face fight.
If that were true, that’d be actually clever. So I doubt that.
It never ceases to amaze me that intelligent, bah, brilliant people can be watching the events in the world surrounding us right now, seeing how it tethers on the brink of WW3, and how complicated and complex the overall situation is, and yet the same people will be searching for a naive, simplistic, all-in-one, “shortcut” explanation for why WW2 happened.
Interestingly, in their search for a short answer on whom to blame for WW2, they’re never interested in the most obvious evil, clearly and undoubtedly responsible for the start of the war, namely Hitler (it needs to be clearly spelled out on this forum, I’m afraid). Instead they need like the “second worst culprit”, or in fact often the “third worst”, because Stalin for many of them is also not acceptable, as “too obvious” of a choice.
And so we have this ongoing quest for whom is it that we could blame for starting WW2, as long as his name does not start with H or S? Churchill? Chamberlain? Brits overall? FDR? Jews in general? Rothschilds in particular? Poles? Gdańsk? etc etc
And the simple (and yet very complex) reality is that WW2 happened because too many people wanted it to happen. Yes, Hitler wanted a war, Stalin wanted a war, Brits wanted a war (and not just Churchill), FDR wanted a war, Jews wanted a war, even enough of stupid Polish “colonels” wanted a war. It’s just that each one of them wanted a different war then the one that actually happened. Hitler wanted to conquer Poland, and then be happy and have peace until the next one. Stalin wanted to conquer the whole world. Brits wanted Hitler to fight with Stalin. Jews wanted Palestine. FDR wanted to replace the British empire. Interestingly I have no clue what is it that Polish colonels really wanted. But it’s safe to say that none of them got what they really were hoping for.
It’s actually way easier to list those who didn’t want another world war: Hacha didn’t want a war, Swiss didn’t want a war, Swedes didn’t want a war, Franco didn’t want another war. As far as everyone else – I’m not so sure.
So in many aspects all these books listed above are various variants of “Reasons for WW2 for Dummies”. Those here who are of Marxist inclination, will probably say that although each of these books taken individually is a failure when it comes to a correct diagnosis of the reasons of WW2, taken together, quantity will turn into quality. But I seriously doubt this.
Neville Chamberlain and the anti Bolsheviks in the British conservative government seems to get off scot free.
Chamberlain?
Brits wanted Hitler to fight with Stalin.
Why did Eastern European nations that bordered the Soviet Union ally with Hitler?
I actually would say that it is quite the opposite – they were more afraid of hitler and nazis.
Generally speaking, you avoid attacking that what you fear the most. Fear being the operative word.
After John Bolton’s disastrous stint in the first Trump Administration, promises were made …
Anyone who believed these promises after the RNC is naive and should primary blame themselves, if they voted for Trump.
You are also not going to change the mind of the two individuals you are arguing with.
You can do what you want but my suggestion would be to just walk away ….
Thanks for your suggestion Mark. It’s been suggested to me before.
But I certainly won’t be walking away.
If a thread is an old one, or one hot off the press, I will continue as I’ve done in the past.
You see, whether it’s a UR thread dealing with the Mossad/ZOG orchestrated 9/11 False Flag, the ZOG conjured fable of the Holohoax, the Anthropogenic Global Warming fraud or whatever, I am WELL AWARE that I won’t be changing the minds of the hard core cult members that have been brainwashed by the official narrative concocted by Malignant International Jewry.
My purpose here is twofold:
1) To embarrass and hand out almighty shellackings to the fools in UR that are propagating falsehoods.
I do this with a deluge of incontestable facts that make it clear to all impartial observers, that those propagating these myths (like the dumb Polack Woy-chek in the WWII threads), have no leg to stand on.
You see, the penny has not dropped for young Woy-chek, that Poland sided with the Jewish financiers during WWII.
It is these inbred Talmudic misfits that emerged as the CLEAR VICTORS of that calamitous event.
2) It is to EDUCATE those that are sitting on the fence.
In other words, there are many (for example, in the case of the Holohoax or the JFK coup d’etat), who more or less believe what’s been drummed into their heads about these matters from the Jewish controlled western media/public education system/major book publishing outlets, but who simultaneously smell a rat.
(In that they know that the official story does not add up).
What I’m saying is that these people, while not necessarily being critical thinkers, are nonetheless honest people who are prepared to change their minds when confronted with a tsunami of verified evidence.
Summary: For every individual that leaves a comment, I suspect that there are multiples more that read the comments and the article in UR, but leave no comment of their own.
I know that from first hand experience because I WAS ONE SUCH INDIVIDUAL.
I had been reading the UR for over a decade, but never posted a comment prior to 2021.
You see, I was well aware that comments could be posted below You Tube videos and in other formats, and I read the odd one from time to time.
But I never thought much of them. I never thought many people read them.
So I never bothered posting comments there or anywhere else.
But when I started reading the comments in this webzine, I noticed something different.
The UR allowed for participants to include links to articles, to include videos, photos and what not.
Moreover, unlike other venues where commenters posted inane nonsense for the most part, UR had some genuine KNOWLEDGEABLE PEOPLE that were providing excellent output*.
(*Whilst many of the articles are indeed very informative and good reading, I find that the comments are EVEN BETTER in most instances – often several pay grades above the article itself.
Nowhere is this more true than in the WWII and Holohoax articles, where the WORLD CLASS historical researcher JOHN WEAR leads the way).
He consistently swats down the Jewish liars like Incitatus (aka Incite-us), Patrick McNally and the rest.
I thought I knew a thing or two about WWII after many thousands of hours of research utilising the findings of the best Not-Beholden-to-ZOG historians and other researchers on the planet (like David Irving and A.J.P Taylor, to name just two).
But I’ve been floored by the sheer depth and breadth of John Wear’s knowledge on this matter.
I have learnt much from him over several years and I will always be thankful.
We are so lucky to have here in UR a man of John Wear’s stature, who patiently responds to all questions asked of him and NEVER shies away from answering – he truly is a colossus.
Yet I’m shocked time and again to see NO-NOTHING-NITWITS (like Incitatus, Woy-chek, Poupon Marx and several others), actually insulting this great man.
John Wear’s masterpiece ‘Germany’s War’, is available to read for FREE here in UR:
https://www.unz.com/book/john_wear__germanys-war/
And WHY do you think that is UR readers?
Answer: It’s because Ron UNZ paid John Wear for the privilege of allowing his book to be posted here.And that was the best money Ron Unz ever spent. I will always be grateful to you Mr Unz, for doing that.
This is a book which, had we lived in a just world, would’ve been an INTERNATIONAL BEST SELLER.
But Malignant International Jewry have gone out of their way to ensure that book sales are throttled, that John’s tour de force gets no publicity.
Meanwhile, returning to where I was before (on the matter of the quality of the those participating in the comments section), there are plenty of Jewish trolls, sayan and ADL operatives (like Patrick ‘Shlomo’ McNally, John’s Johnson, Mean Joo Joo, Curvanus, Incitatus – aka Incactus – and the rest, peddling their endless stream of lies in this webzine).
I don’t believe that people like Woy-chek, Avery, Odyssey and others of their ilk, are Jews themselves.
I also don’t believe (although I could be wrong), that they’re working in cahoots with Organised Jewry to post B.S with malice aforethought.
They are, I believe, just USEFUL IDIOTS that have been indoctrinated since birth to believe that the Armenians were on the side of the righteous in WWII by fighting in the Red Army (in the case of Avery), that the Poles were likewise (in the case of the ignorant Woy-chek), or that the Serbs were the righteous ones (Odyssey).
But the fact remains nevertheless, that both the Poles and the Serbs** (or at least their corrupt leadership), accepted the 30 shekels of silver on offer from Malignant International Jewry, so that they could fight and die in great number so as to advance the agenda of the Jewish financiers in the Square Mile that controlled then, as they do today, the entirety of the western financial and political systems.
(**In the case of the Serbs, they were DOUBLY STUPID – seeing as they sided with ZOG in both World Wars).
Woy-chek in particular blows a fuse whenever I bring that up.
Because he knows in his heart that the Poles sided with EVIL in WWII, by stooping to the dictates of the Anglo-Zionist empire in murdering tens of thousands of ethnic Germans that lived inside the illegally acquired Polish territory.
That’s right, TENS of THOUSANDS of innocent German civilians murdered by the Poles, and multiples more of that were brutalised, raped, had their EYES GOUGED OUT.
Yes UR readers, when it comes to bestial acts BEFORE hostilities had even broken out, the Poles were among the worst in history.
Truly a despicable people.
But little Woy-chek (named after Wojciech Jaruzelski, the last Communist leader of Poland – a hero of his Marxist parents and that community/shit-hole shtetl in Poland where Woy-chek was born and raised), still shows not contrition for the dastardly deeds of his countrymen.
How to tell everyone that your arse still hurts without using these exact words :)
But little Woy-chek (named after Wojciech Jaruzelski, the last Communist leader of Poland – a hero of his Marxist parents and that community/shit-hole shtetl in Poland where Woy-chek was born and raised), still shows not contrition for the dastardly deeds of his countrymen.
Thanks for your suggestion Mark. It's been suggested to me before.
You are also not going to change the mind of the two individuals you are arguing with.
You can do what you want but my suggestion would be to just walk away ....
You see, I was well aware that comments could be posted below You Tube videos and in other formats, and I read the odd one from time to time.
Summary: For every individual that leaves a comment, I suspect that there are multiples more that read the comments and the article in UR, but leave no comment of their own.
I know that from first hand experience because I WAS ONE SUCH INDIVIDUAL.
I had been reading the UR for over a decade, but never posted a comment prior to 2021.
Meanwhile, returning to where I was before (on the matter of the quality of the those participating in the comments section), there are plenty of Jewish trolls, sayan and ADL operatives (like Patrick 'Shlomo' McNally, John's Johnson, Mean Joo Joo, Curvanus, Incitatus - aka Incactus - and the rest, peddling their endless stream of lies in this webzine).
And WHY do you think that is UR readers?
Answer: It's because Ron UNZ paid John Wear for the privilege of allowing his book to be posted here.
And that was the best money Ron Unz ever spent. I will always be grateful to you Mr Unz, for doing that.
This is a book which, had we lived in a just world, would've been an INTERNATIONAL BEST SELLER.
But Malignant International Jewry have gone out of their way to ensure that book sales are throttled, that John's tour de force gets no publicity.
But little Woy-chek (named after Wojciech Jaruzelski, the last Communist leader of Poland – a hero of his Marxist parents and that community/shit-hole shtetl in Poland where Woy-chek was born and raised), still shows not contrition for the dastardly deeds of his countrymen.
How to tell everyone that your arse still hurts without using these exact words 🙂
Had Visser been Polish, Belarusian, Russian or something similar there would have been no question of any clemency. The Germans would have probably killed a whole host of hostages in retaliation, as was their practice. Stalin and his Russians destroyed Hitler and his superior beings even after being surprise attacked. This deification of Hitler verges on occult thinking, no longer grounded in reality. What’s the point?
Typical of the dumb Polacks out there, Woy-chek does not have it in him to admit he was dead wrong and that wages, in terms of gold, are FAR LESS in America in 2025 for the lower and middle classes than they were in the first couple of decades of the 20th century when America was on a Gold Standard.Well Woy-chek, it looks like you're going to get badly embarrassed once more.
Overall looks like this year in gold, UAW employees at Ford make nearly the same on average as it was 100 years ago.
Did you get that Woy-chek? Assuming they work a 40 hour week, that translates to a little over $1100 per week, or around $58K per year.
As stated therein US Bureau of Labor Statistics, the average auto worker earns $28 an hour.
That's right UR readers.
A 40-hour, five-day work week was not standard until the 1930s
Naziboi, you’re dumber than most of stupid neonazis I’ve seen here. And that says something.
I am giving you data from an established American recruiting company, which knows first hand what the salaries are:
https://www.glassdoor.com/Salary/Ford-Motor-Company-UAW-Member-Salaries-E263_D_KO19,29.htm
And in response you’re pasting a link to some defunct Canadian paper about some average auto worker??? Canadian? 🙂
At least now we know who you are: a spawn of these banderist beasts that escaped their due for what they’ve done during the war. That explains a lot – including mixing nazism with commie traits.
So, speaking of your commie-nazi dreams, here is some information:
“The $5-a-day rate was about half pay and half bonus. The bonus came with character requirements and was enforced by the Socialization Organization. This was a committee that would visit the employees’ homes to ensure that they were doing things the “American way.” They were supposed to avoid social ills such as gambling and drinking … Women were not eligible for the bonus unless they were single and supporting the family. Also, men were not eligible if their wives worked outside the home.”
Yeap, definitely a nazi banderist.
This simple anecdote serves to illustrate that Hitler was not the crazed, bloodthirsty monster he is made out to be in the prevailing narrative
Neonazis must be the dumbest people on Earth.
“General Scherff, approached with the letter from my mother and explained the story. Hitler looked up and said, “A friend of yours, eh?” and Hitler himself crossed out “Death Penalty” and wrote “15 years Zuchthaus” instead.’
And here’s who that family friend was:
“Karl Walter Scherff (1 November 1898 – 24 May 1945) was a German army officer and military historian with the rank of Generalmajor, who was appointed by Adolf Hitler to the Oberkommando der Wehrmacht in May 1942 to compile the history of the war, as the Führer’s Commissioner for the Writing of Military History.”
But even if by some miracle the family didn’t have high level nazi connections, to think that one act of a pardon, which we know were few and only to people with personal connections to highest level nazi circles, to claim that this somehow annihilates millions of innocent victims of german nazism?
Only dumb neonazis can come up with something so stupid.
Around 100 years ago, Henry Ford doubled the wages of his production line workers to $5 /day.
Namely, if you look at “money” in terms of gold, then the American GDP per capita, measured in ounces of gold, rather than paper dollars, has not changed much over the last 100 years.
During the 19th century, when America was on the Classical Gold Standard, a dollar in 1900 had MORE PURCHASING POWER than it had one hundred years prior in 1800.
Summary: Woy-chek has proven ONCE MORE (not that we didn't have scores of examples from the past), that he's a KNN (KNOW-NOTHING-NITWIT).When a nation has a Fiat Monetary system (esp. like America where a private cartel of Talmudic miscreants owns it), there is NO RESTRAINT on the amount of currency that can be printed/digitally created - thus massively reducing the purchasing power of each unit of that currency.
The U.S, in the period from the founding of the republic until the creation of ZOG owned Federal Reserve in 1913, was the closest society in all of recorded history to being a libertarian utopia - hence the reason for the stellar outcomes that saw it become the richest nation on Earth.
In other words, on the Classical Gold Standard, workers had far more dollars in their pocket and each of those dollars bought more than 100 years prior.
This is what SMALL GUBMINT coupled to Sound Money (ie: the Gold Standard), delivers EVERY TIME.
Replies: @Jokem, @wojtek
Australia* and Canada also during this period, were very close to being Free Market Capitalist libertarian utopia's - hence the reason they also became very prosperous.
(*For a few years in the late 19th/early 20th century, Australia had a higher per capita GDP than the U.S).These sort of results are delivered ALWAYS and EVERYWHERE if Gubmint is tiny, and unfettered Free Market Capitalism and Ron Paul/Jeffersonian libertarianism (or something very near to it), is practised.
I can’t think of anything dumber than a neonazi. And our local truth denier does his best to prove it every time 🙂
Did you know, nazi dumbo, that according to glassdoor, 25th percentile earnings at Ford for UAW workers stand at ~135K, and 75th percentile is ~250K per year? That does not include generous health package worth nearly 20K, 10% of salary contribution going to pension system every year, life and disability insurance, tuition assistance of 8K per year, etc etc.
Overall looks like this year in gold, UAW employees at Ford make nearly the same on average as it was 100 years ago.
Interestingly, 2 years ago they made twice as much as 100 years ago.
No wonder your arse is hurting so badly, naziboy 🙂
Typical of the dumb Polacks out there, Woy-chek does not have it in him to admit he was dead wrong and that wages, in terms of gold, are FAR LESS in America in 2025 for the lower and middle classes than they were in the first couple of decades of the 20th century when America was on a Gold Standard.Well Woy-chek, it looks like you're going to get badly embarrassed once more.
Overall looks like this year in gold, UAW employees at Ford make nearly the same on average as it was 100 years ago.
Did you get that Woy-chek? Assuming they work a 40 hour week, that translates to a little over $1100 per week, or around $58K per year.
As stated therein US Bureau of Labor Statistics, the average auto worker earns $28 an hour.
That's right UR readers.
A 40-hour, five-day work week was not standard until the 1930s
You’re even stupider than the dumb little red CCP troll.
But feel free to show me where I said anything like that.
Otherwise, it’s nothing more than a primitive attempt to turn the focus away from the moronic claims of the dumb little red CCP troll.
whose owner then is being harassed by Russian agents.Russian agents would not be allowed to operate in Vilnius. The anti-Russian sentiment in Lithuania is so strong that they would be thrown into jail in no time.That is how silly your stupid story is.The guy accused of being a "CCP agent" was likely a communist leaning Gurkha who could speak Nepalese.You are but a stupid Polack child who reads nothing but Western propaganda and shows how idiotic he is by showing he knows nothing about how the world works.This is what a Gurkha looks like. Neither you nor that idiotic original poster can tell the difference between them and Chinks.https://www.telegraph.co.uk/content/dam/men/2016/05/27/G3_trans_NvBQzQNjv4BqpJliwavx4coWFCaEkEsb3kvxIt-lGGWCWqwLa_RXJU8.jpg?imwidth=640Replies: @wojtek
Russian agents would not be allowed to operate in Vilnius.
It’s so cute that our local dumb red little CCP troll thinks CCP agents are allowed to operate in Nepal 🙂
You’re dumber than even dumb troll norms allow 🙂
Duh. You illustrate again how stupid you lot are.Just as Russian agents would not be allowed to berate shopowners in Vinius
It’s so cute that our local dumb red little CCP troll thinks CCP agents are allowed to operate in Nepal 🙂
First of all I feel very sorry for you – there comes a time in life, when pain becomes unbearable. And talking about “pain meds addiction” is like talking about “food addiction”. Definitely criminal. Fully agreed.
But I do disagree somewhat with the “more money” part.
Namely, if you look at “money” in terms of gold, then the American GDP per capita, measured in ounces of gold, rather than paper dollars, has not changed much over the last 100 years. In fact, today it is lower than it was 100 years ago. So relatively to population, it is just not true that there is “more money available”. Money is the same or less.
But what I think is happening is that a much bigger share of that money goes towards these necessities, like healthcare, education, housing, etc. Simply speaking I think “they” learned how to squeeze more out of an average person, both through personal expenses, and also tapping into people’s taxes though approved government spending.
Around 100 years ago, Henry Ford doubled the wages of his production line workers to $5 /day.
Namely, if you look at “money” in terms of gold, then the American GDP per capita, measured in ounces of gold, rather than paper dollars, has not changed much over the last 100 years.
During the 19th century, when America was on the Classical Gold Standard, a dollar in 1900 had MORE PURCHASING POWER than it had one hundred years prior in 1800.
Summary: Woy-chek has proven ONCE MORE (not that we didn't have scores of examples from the past), that he's a KNN (KNOW-NOTHING-NITWIT).When a nation has a Fiat Monetary system (esp. like America where a private cartel of Talmudic miscreants owns it), there is NO RESTRAINT on the amount of currency that can be printed/digitally created - thus massively reducing the purchasing power of each unit of that currency.
The U.S, in the period from the founding of the republic until the creation of ZOG owned Federal Reserve in 1913, was the closest society in all of recorded history to being a libertarian utopia - hence the reason for the stellar outcomes that saw it become the richest nation on Earth.
In other words, on the Classical Gold Standard, workers had far more dollars in their pocket and each of those dollars bought more than 100 years prior.
This is what SMALL GUBMINT coupled to Sound Money (ie: the Gold Standard), delivers EVERY TIME.
Replies: @Jokem, @wojtek
Australia* and Canada also during this period, were very close to being Free Market Capitalist libertarian utopia's - hence the reason they also became very prosperous.
(*For a few years in the late 19th/early 20th century, Australia had a higher per capita GDP than the U.S).These sort of results are delivered ALWAYS and EVERYWHERE if Gubmint is tiny, and unfettered Free Market Capitalism and Ron Paul/Jeffersonian libertarianism (or something very near to it), is practised.
It’s a great pity Irving wasn’t interested in the more recent history. I’m sure that using his “methods”, he’d be able to go through the little of what was left of commie records and would “prove” that there was no communist totalitarian murderous regime to be found in Poland or anywhere else.
One thing however that we can’t deny him was his discovery of a market of – mostly anglosaxon – gullible neonazi wannabies. That’s his most important and undeniable discovery.
PS. Interestingly I must question the title – holocaust establishment seems to be doing quite well, whereas Irving not so much, for quite a while now.
I don't care what they sell. If they are stupid enough to sell Nazi flags in Moscow, they are likely to be beaten up by Gopniks.If they sell USSR flags in Vilnius, then they are like to get a hard time from local youths.If they sell Tibetan rebel flags during a time of Communist revolution in Nepal, then expect to get a hard time from Nepalese commie sympathisers.Surely you are not too stupid to understand this?Or is your indoctrination so deep that you choose not to understand it?
Specifically you moron think you can dictate which flags Tibetans in Nepal can sell. What a dumbass you are.
No, you just like little blue kings.https://www.economist.com/cdn-cgi/image/width=1424,quality=80,format=auto/content-assets/images/20250222_LDD002_FH.jpgReplies: @wojtek
Well, we Poles are not good with little red dumb dictators.
If they sell USSR flags in Vilnius, then they are like to get a hard time from local youths.
Dumb little red CCP troll still is confused about the right analogy?
Here it is, again, moron:
A guys walking in to a Chechen shop in Lithuania and ordering a Chechen flag, whose owner then is being harassed by Russian agents.
The is the correct analogy to a Tibat shop selling Tibetan flags in Nepal..
Not the CCP trolling bs you’re trying to sell us here.
I told you already – if the Western values of freedom are too unpleasant for you, avoid forums like this, and stay inside your commie cage.
whose owner then is being harassed by Russian agents.Russian agents would not be allowed to operate in Vilnius. The anti-Russian sentiment in Lithuania is so strong that they would be thrown into jail in no time.That is how silly your stupid story is.The guy accused of being a "CCP agent" was likely a communist leaning Gurkha who could speak Nepalese.You are but a stupid Polack child who reads nothing but Western propaganda and shows how idiotic he is by showing he knows nothing about how the world works.This is what a Gurkha looks like. Neither you nor that idiotic original poster can tell the difference between them and Chinks.https://www.telegraph.co.uk/content/dam/men/2016/05/27/G3_trans_NvBQzQNjv4BqpJliwavx4coWFCaEkEsb3kvxIt-lGGWCWqwLa_RXJU8.jpg?imwidth=640Replies: @wojtek
Mark, you confuse facts with opinions! So why should I care about any opinion you steal from somebody else, if you do not understand the difference between a fact and an opinion?
Read the definitions I gave you, and learn the difference. Then write. Not the other way around.
No, you messed up the definitions so you could lie.
Don’t complain about these definitions to me – I copied them from a dictionary 🙂
Here are links for you – to an original English dictionary as opposed to an imperfect American copy:
https://www.oed.com/search/dictionary/?scope=Entries&q=fact
https://www.oed.com/search/dictionary/?scope=Entries&q=opinion
I am curious – this ailment you displayed right above, confusing simple words and their meaning, is this the reason you hate doctors?
You obviously don't understand what "dictate" means.
Stupid little red CCP troll continues to dictate Tibetan shop owners in Nepal which Tibetan flags they can display
Look closely, my stupid Polack. It is not the same.
I wonder, are you going next to tell Indians not to use sanskrit swastika?
Who cares what you use?
I guess after that the moron will tell us not to use white and red in our flag
You obviously don’t understand what “dictate” means.
Well, we Poles are not good with little red dumb dictators.
But you are obviously an expert, trying to dictate everyone in the whole World what they can or cannot do. You are – simply speaking – a dumb little red CCP troll.
Specifically you moron think you can dictate which flags Tibetans in Nepal can sell. What a dumbass you are.
I don't care what they sell. If they are stupid enough to sell Nazi flags in Moscow, they are likely to be beaten up by Gopniks.If they sell USSR flags in Vilnius, then they are like to get a hard time from local youths.If they sell Tibetan rebel flags during a time of Communist revolution in Nepal, then expect to get a hard time from Nepalese commie sympathisers.Surely you are not too stupid to understand this?Or is your indoctrination so deep that you choose not to understand it?
Specifically you moron think you can dictate which flags Tibetans in Nepal can sell. What a dumbass you are.
No, you just like little blue kings.https://www.economist.com/cdn-cgi/image/width=1424,quality=80,format=auto/content-assets/images/20250222_LDD002_FH.jpgReplies: @wojtek
Well, we Poles are not good with little red dumb dictators.
Brad, as always you have much to contribute and it’s hard to argue against the bulk of what you wrote.
But it is clear that you’ve been brainwashed by the ZOG media and the ZOG controlled public education system about the benevolence of Gubmint and especially about FDR – America’s greatest TRAITOR.
So I will now enlighten you.
With every President, no matter how bad, we can always dig deep and eventually find some thing he did that has marginal benefit for the American citizenry.
But on all the substantive issues, FDR was a disaster for America – and even more so for the rest of the world.
There are not enough hours in the day to itemise all the damaging things FDR did.
So I’ll just list some of the biggies off the top of my head:
1) He involved America in a war (WWII) THAT AMERICA HAD NO BUSINESS BEING INVOLVED IN.
2) FDR forced Japan into a corner (that would’ve seen her economy grind to halt and completely collapse – he cut off Japan’s oil and supply of other commodities), which left her no option other than the Pearl Harbour attack.
(Most importantly of all, FDR KNEW that his actions would lead to war).
3) I don’t have the exact figure off the top of my head, but something of the order of HALF A MILLION U.S SOLDIERS WERE KILLED DURING WWII – and it was ALL FOR EFF’N NOTHING.
4) Over and above the half million GI’s killed, multiples more were disfigured, crippled, lost limbs or PTSD’ed. Simply put, FDR fucked up a lot of lives.
5) And something that a lot of people don’t know (because they’ve only read the ZOG published history books and listened to the ZOG controlled History Channel), is that FDR and the British warmongers were DIRECTLY RESPONSIBLE FOR WAR IN EUROPE BREAKING OUT IN 1939.
The fact is that Germany sought peaceful coexistence with Poland.
But FDR and some prominent British oligarchs were having none of it.
The corrupt Polish leaders accepted the 30 shekels of silver on offer from the Anglo-Zionist empire in return for ESCALATING THE PROVOCATIONS AGAINST THE ETHNIC GERMANS living in Polish territory.
(Read my comment # 86 and see for yourself the heinous acts the Polacks committed).
6) Even after reports reached Hitler that large numbers of Germans were being murdered and brutalised, Hitler’s response was measured.
He asked them politely to desist and refused to take Germany to war with the dumb Poles.
7) But the Poles would not listen. All the while FDR was saying to the Poles:
‘Don’t worry, we’ve got your back’. FDR would say: ‘If Germany ever lifted a finger against you, both the U.S and Great Britain would intervene on your side’.
And the dumb Poles believed these empty promises.
Because after Germany attacked (after they pleaded constantly with the Poles to stop the atrocities and exhausted every avenue for peace), the U.S and Gross Britain did NOTHING.
8) FDR inherited would would’ve been a short/sharp recession in 1933 when he was inaugurated, and turned it into a prolonged Great Depression that engulfed the world and did not end until 1946.
He did this by introducing his disastrous New Deal – which not only completely failed, but made things much, MUCH worse.
9) FDR’s administration was filled from top to bottom with Jews – like no other administration, either before or since.
If you wish, I can send you a list of all those Jews (there are scores of them), and the position they occupied.
10) The two Jews that absolutely pulled all the strings and dictated FDR’s complete conduct of the war, were the Jewish financier Bernard Baruch and his Jewish Secretary of the Treasury Henry Morgenthau Jr.
That fact is that FDR read from a script dictated to him by Malignant International Jewry.
Summary: The three worst Presidents in America’s history were FDR, LBJ (America’s first Jewish Prez) and Woodrow Wilson – with Abe Lincoln closely behind.
It’s blue sky to the rest. And it can easily be argued that FDR was the worst of the lot.
He is the standout Piece Of Shit (POS) in the history of the republic.
Lastly, you mentioned this:
there have been a number of government agencies that have been extremely beneficial.
They have been responsible for the passage of LAWS which have made travel by air and rail much safer ….
For the most part, this is INCORRECT.
Gubmint has done PRECIOUS LITTLE to improve the lives of its citizenry. This is true for nearly all countries – but is ESPECIALLY TRUE for the various U.S Gubmints over the years.
Now, I’m not saying that there is absolutely no piece of legislation or law enacted by the U.S (or any other Gubmint) in history which didn’t provide some benefit.
After all, with all the countless trillions that the U.S Gubmint has forcibly stolen from taxpayers over the years and countless millions of parasitic Gubmint workers that never did an eff’n thing for anyone, of course one would expect that SOME Gubmint employees among them did something good and that there were at least a handful of laws that were beneficial.
At the end of the day many people will say that Gubmint made laws that made certain crimes illegal, and of course that was a good thing.
But let’s face it, most laws are just COMMON SENSE.
They were universal principles handed down from the scriptures. Like:
i) Thou Shall not kill
ii) Thou Shall not steal
iii) Thou Shall not bear false witness , etc.
Did we really need a Big Bloated Gubmint to tell us that?
We (as in the members of a community), could’ve gotten together and drafted our own code of ethics and lived in accordance with those rules.
People think that it’s because of Gubmint that we have safe products to buy.
They think that, absent Gubmint, many of us would be lying bleeding to death in a ditch by the side of the road with our LIMBS BLOWN OFF (as a result of unregulated electronic devices that exploded in our faces).
Brad, CAN YOU SEE HOW EFF’N STUPID THAT MINDSET IS?
Think about it. If I manufacture a TV or a computer monitor, a toaster or microwave oven, DO YOU REALLY THINK MY BUSINESS WILL LAST LONG if I make a device that injures a consumer and/or blows one of their limbs off?
That particular manufacturer’s name will be DIRT in no time when word gets around and they’ll go bankrupt in no time.
So, to prevent that, MANUFACTURER’S GO OUT OF THEIR WAY to test their products and make sure they’re safe.
Also Brad, you’ve told me about your experiences with various employers and how they exploited you. Well, the fact is that there are subset of pre-school teachers, of nurses, of butchers, bakers and candlestick makers that are also unscrupulous.
In EVERY PROFESSION there will be some that rip you off.
But the VAST MAJORITY of employers do not exploit their workers. I KNOW this to be true.
And the reasoning is very simple:
1) Employers are COMPETING for the best workers.
I’ve employed numerous people in my life and it’s very hard to get good workers.
You’d be surprised at the number of workers I’ve encountered that could not even meet minimal standards. Like:
1) Showing up punctually for work
2) That didn’t come to work stoned
3) That didn’t take off excessive ‘sick’ days (I’ve caught out one or two who were sunning themselves at the beach after calling in early in the morning and saying they were on ‘death’s door’ and couldn’t get out of bed).
And here is further proof that most employer’s do NOT exploit their employees.
The percentage figures I’m about to give you are those for Australia (but I’ve checked the numbers for America and they’re almost identical):
4) In Australia (and the U.S) there are minimum wage laws.
But the statistics show that IN EXCESS of 95% of workers get well above the minimum wage.
5) But according to some whiners, employers ALWAYS pay the minimum amount that they are required to as dictated by laws made by the ‘wise overlords’ in Gubmint.
If so, my question to you is: WHY THE EFF isn’t everyone being paid the minimum wage?
Answer: People with certain skill sets or even unskilled workers that are very productive, WILL NEVER WORK for minimum wage.
They know they can get more. They know that employers will pay a premium as an incentive to headhunt the best workers.
Conclusion: If you’re a dumb kid that just left high school and you have no work ethic, of course your productivity is very low.
You may only provide $5 worth of productivity to your employer with that bad attitude.
The onus is on THAT worker to change his ways, to improve his skill set.And if that worker improves to the extent that he offers his employer $50/hour of productivity, the employer would be a fool to only pay him $25/hour – because he runs the risk that said employee will depart and seek out greener pastures somewhere else where he’s valued.
Many people cite Henry Ford and how over 100 years ago he doubled the wages of his workers to $5/day – which was a princely sum for a worker in those days.
But Henry Ford did NOT do that out of altruism. He did that because SKILLED WORKERS WERE LEAVING – workers that took much time and effort to train in the first place.
You see, working on a production line was tedious and monotonous.
That type of work was messing with their sanity. So many went elsewhere and worked for lesser wages, but were compensated with job satisfaction.
That’s how the world works. You told me you worked in a state where the economy was depressed and jobs were hard to come by.
Well, workers MUST GO WHERE THE JOBS ARE.
If there are no opportunities in your state (or even in your country), you should consider relocating.
At the end of the day, to the extent that air travel is safe, to the extent that cars have better tyres with improves grip (compared to the cross ply radials that were the norm in the 1960’s), to the extent that cars have ABS, disc brakes with huge calipers that stop your car in a fraction of the time (and much more), these things occurred WITHOUT GUBMINT INTERVENTION.
These things occurred as a byproduct of improved technologies.
They were implemented by the aircraft and car manufacturers because THEY WERE SELLING POINTS.
Consumers demanded safer products and so the manufacturers GAVE THEM WHAT THEY WANTED.
But sneaky Gubmints that we know they are, they can see a new technology that is about to be adopted on the horizon. So they FRONT RUN and introduce legislation to make it compulsory.
Then they TAKE THE CREDIT.
Brad, can you see that’s how Gubmint works?
The vast bulk of Gubmint and the parasites it employees are WORTHLESS.
The ONLY reason many people gravitate towards Gubmint, is because they were FAILURES IN THE PRIVATE SECTOR.
In Gubmint they know they’ll get lavish wages and even more lavish retirement perks – something they would never achieve in the private sector because they’d be paid in accordance with their productivity there.
Gubmint meanwhile, can easily afford to pay high wages – because the Gubmint department chiefs are not paying out of their own pockets. The money comes from taxpayers that have been fleeced.
No, opinions.
This is the source of your issues – in your religious fanaticism you completely messed up the definitions.
fact: a thing that is known or proved to be true.
Examples: number of health providers, average salary of doctors, number of hospital stays.
opinion: a view or judgment formed about something, not necessarily based on fact or knowledge.
Examples: everything you wrote so far.
The only ones yapping on about "freedom" like a new god, are those indoctrinated by the Yanks.
if freedom
Only stupid Polacks interpret it as such. They can sell whatever the like. But the history of the flag is the same.
which flag a Tibetan store owner in Nepal can sell
Stupid little red CCP troll continues to dictate Tibetan shop owners in Nepal which Tibetan flags they can display 🙂
This must be the new CCP definition of the word moron 🙂
I wonder, are you going next to tell Indians not to use sanskrit swastika? 🙂
I guess after that the moron will tell us not to use white and red in our flag 🙂
With that low level of CCP trolling, things must not be good in the CCP land.
You obviously don't understand what "dictate" means.
Stupid little red CCP troll continues to dictate Tibetan shop owners in Nepal which Tibetan flags they can display
Look closely, my stupid Polack. It is not the same.
I wonder, are you going next to tell Indians not to use sanskrit swastika?
Who cares what you use?
I guess after that the moron will tell us not to use white and red in our flag
You haven't heard the half of it.
I am sure when I stop wasting time here you will consider yourself the “winner” because in your delusional mind I could not handle your feeble arguments.
You are a authoritarian nutcase ....
Ah, the local neonazi still can’t get over the fact that his favorite Goebbels propaganda listed – what was it exactly? – 19 “rapes or ATTEMPTED rapes” committed by a Polish guy on a German woman during a 3 year period, in an area with well over a million of people at that time.
So how many of them were attempted, dumb nazi? 18?
The 19th must be you, cause obviously your arse still hurts 🙂
Either way, if that’s all you have to say about the childish supply demand ideas in healthcare, that’s also a proof of something, I guess.
Brad, in other words you proved you are an expert on the World we live in and on the people surrounding us. Unsurprisingly this is all one needs.
I grew up in a world, where money was nothing, worthless, so the most important job benefit was the respect others had for you and for your services. As a youth I remember wondering why civil engineers had to sit under the bridge they designed during load testing, or why chemical engineers had to smoke a cigarette, when the new gas pipeline was opened, or why an electrical engineer had to grab with his bare hand an exposed piece of wiring, after shutting down the trafo-station for work.
These people commanded respect.
Same was true for doctors and nurses, who didn’t make fortunes and often were harassed for a bunch of flowers or a bottle of something stronger, which they received as a sign of gratitude.
Now we live in a world ruled by lawyers and various faceless organizations, not by personal responsibility. The difference perhaps has a precise monetary value. But we certainly lost something along the way.
I don’t know what’s the answer. But it seems to me that these problems are only part of a bigger picture, of an increasingly atomized society, weird notions of what constitutes a family, or worse – outright war on religion and family, all these modern “online interactions”, social media, etc, etc.
And I know that certainly the neonazi truth denier here doesn’t have answers for anything, and Mark has some illusions, but he cannot reconcile them with reality. Not for the lack of trying.
So the only thing left for us is leading by example 🙂
You continue to engage in obfuscation here by arguing about number of doctors or whether their incomes increased.
Yes, let’s repeat that: I am engaging in obfuscation by stating FACTS.
FACTS, which contradict your religious beliefs.
No wonder your only resort is to lie, lie and lie.
I am sure when I stop wasting time here you will consider yourself the “winner” because in your delusional mind I could not handle your feeble arguments.
Son, I’m already a loser for having to read all this religious production of yours. I am by now under under no illusion that you will be able to react to facts with anything sensible, beyond the childish libertarian nonsense.
And to think you had such an easy – all you had to do was to:
tell me, how do you imagine to convince these big shot doctors, who run the medical cartel in the US, to earn less and spread the wealth more?
But who am I to fight with religious fanatics?
Dumb little red CCP troll, not knowing what is freedom claims to know if the topic is changed. To prove his limitations on the topic of freedom, the dumb little red CCP troll is going to decide which flag a Tibetan store owner in Nepal can sell, and which one he cannot, and which countries “Westerners” can visit, and when 🙂
Normally I’d say you’re not China, troll, but obviously you are. Probably in some troll camp in occupied Bod.
Avoid “Western” websites, little red CCP troll, if freedom bothers you.
The only ones yapping on about "freedom" like a new god, are those indoctrinated by the Yanks.
if freedom
Only stupid Polacks interpret it as such. They can sell whatever the like. But the history of the flag is the same.
which flag a Tibetan store owner in Nepal can sell
Exactly what I had been saying from the beginning when I identified the four military districts on the June 1941 line of contact as the named "Leningrad MD," "Baltic MD," Western MD," "Kiev MD," Clark identified, not counting the Odessa MD that was off the line of contact that he didn't even mention except to note it was incorporated into the Kiev MD redesignated as the "Southwestern Front." Also note that exactly as I have been saying that you have been trying to obfuscate by galloping over the generic term that identifies a type of military HQ (i.e. military district Hq) such as "armored corps" or "infantry corps" as distinct from proper nouns appropriately capitalized identifying particular named HQs that singularly refers only to a specifically named Hq. such as 24th Panzer Crops.Your lengthy babbling IN WHICH YOU CONTINUED TO ENGAGE IN THE SAME obfuscation of galloping over named Hqs and generic references to military districts has, however, clearly evaded, avoided and tried to obfuscate the challenge I posed that you cite using the Latin alphabet the names of the CG of the "Western Military District and/or the "Western Special Military District." Not a very difficult task. But one you strenuously avoid because doing so would entirely expose the deception, lying, misrepresentation and fraud you have been practicing by galloping over the different words used to refer to named Hqs and generic references to a type of military command.Concludes :
"They [[were distributed in the five “military districts” running from north to south as “Leningrad,” “Baltic,” “Western,” “Kiev,” and “Odessa” commands”.
And summarized in one comment how you have been galloping over words with the lies, deceptions and misrepresentations and frauds you have posted.So until you give the simple, clear, direct and truth answer to that query, I will simply recite it as my response to any further gibberish you post on this issue.,Replies: @wojtek
I’m glad you begged for me to repeat all this again.
More galloping nonsense from galloping kike. Well, repetition is foundation of eductaion, so here it comes:
Since the old galloping kike is begging for it again, here it is:
1. Old Galloping Kike tried to claim “the entire issue under discussion has been the Command HQ on the line of contact on June22”, which exposed all of his stupidity.
2. The whole issue started with P.M.’s comment #456, where he claimed that “the inventory showed that 10,540 operable tanks were in the Western Defense Districts.”
3. Bonehead galloping kike replied to that in comment #467, demonstrating immediately your ignorance, by stating that Clark “identifies the Western Military District reconstituted on June 23 as Western Front had 6 Mech. Corps under command.”
Kike’s errors are elementary and are derived from your inability to read simple texts in English with a semblance of understanding:
– you mistakenly interpreted “Western Defense Districts”, which in Russian nomenclature is a term used to describe jointly 5 MDs, with a single one: “Western Military District” – you can’t tell singular form plural;
– you also made a mistake, because in 1941 there was no “Western Military District” – there was “Western Special military district”.
4. You also demanded that P.M. correct your errors by stating: “Maybe you can clear up the confusion your description of the inventory of tanks in the Russian military districts creates”
5. In further correspondence you admit in comment #572 to your mess: “It evidently escaped you that I identified the Western Military Districts as only one of four “fronts”” – which proves that you still had no clue about the mistakes you made.
6. This is when P.M. provided you with an original source which provides a detailed number of tanks in the so called “ЗАПАДНЫЕ ВОЕННЫЕ ОКРУГА” – aka Western military districts 🙂
7. In turn, old galloping lying kike further demonstrated his inability to read by stating in comment #650 that “The text you cite fails to address directly any of he points I made”, which is an outright lie, because
– it is a lie – the cited Russian text addresses every point you tried to make,,
– but also because you later admitted in comment #884 that you can’t read Russian – what a facepalm moment 🙂
8. In comments #836 P.M. corrected your mistake
9. But you insisted on being wrong and in comment #839 you incorrectly stated that “The following military districts were n the line of contact on June 22, 2941: Leningrad MD renamed Northern Front; Baltic MD renamed Northwestern Front; Western MD renamed Western Front, and Kiev MD renamed Southwestern Front as detailed in Clark The Russian German Conflict 1941-1945.”
10. To which P.M. finished you off with a direct quote from your source: “By the middle of May 1941 there were nearly 170 divisions, or over five sevenths of the country’s total armed strength, outside the 1939 frontiers. They were distributed in the five “military districts” running from north to south as “Leningrad,” “Baltic,” “Western,” “Kiev,” and “Odessa” commands”.
11. After this you unsuccessfully tried to change the narrative in comment #905, pathetically replying to your own post so that nobody can read it, that: “the entire issue under discussion has been the Command HQ on the line of contact on June22”.
I’m glad you keep begging for me to repeat all this again. It really shows what a galloping moron you are. This is the only response you will receive. Your other appeals are of no interest to me 🙂
“And I replied that if doctors are getting paid more then the cost of those hospital services will be higher.”
That’s false. According to your religious beliefs, doctors are getting paid more because the demand for their services increases. Not the other way around. Strike 1.
Also, the increase in demand does not match at all with increase in salaries that your religious beliefs dictate. Strike 2.
“Between 1960 and 2015 the number of primary care doctors dropped by fifty percent.”
False. Number of primary care providers per capita increased approx. 2-fold. Strike 3.
And you’re out.
Not going to even bother reading the rest of your nonsense. The first 1.5 sentences and 3 lies. This is enough son. Get you act together or get lost.
1. A Westerner is in Nepal during a time of Communist revolution
Let’s recap: A guy in Nepal is buying a Tibetan flag from a Tibetan shop whose owner is then harassed by a CCP agent.
Dumb little red Chinese troll is sinking deeper and deeper with more moronic excuses.
Clearly not understanding what is freedom, s/he’s complaining that a “Westerner” is in Nepal 🙂
As if Chinese trolls are the ones who can decide who goes where 🙂
Maybe in China, little red dumb buddy, not in the so called “West”.
Get used to it.
And if you can’t, avoid “Western” websites promoting freedom – clearly you’re allergic to it, you dumb little red moron.
If the number of doctors went up three times and the demand went up three times then doctors incomes would remain the same.
Oi, it is me (and almost every researcher) who claims that doctors’ incomes remained largely the same.
You believe that doctors’ incomes rose 3-fold over inflation. So you’ve done yourself again.
And, interestingly, I showed you that demand for hospital services rose much slower.
So your theories once again end up in the same place.
And your only answer is more bs distracting away from the important data and facts.
So when you keep repeating that the number of doctors tripled as if that by itself is of any importance
By itself no. But together with your “beliefs” it totally destroys the libertarian fairy tale you’re pushing here.
When you label a set of beliefs held by a person “quasi-religious”
I am very sorry and apologize for hurting your feelings. I should have never called your beliefs “quasi-religious”. That’s inappropriate and wrong of me. I apologize.
In view of the complete lack of any logic there, I should have outright called them religious beliefs. You’re a religious fanatic.
This view of others as inferiors when they are not is typical of people with authoritarian personality types such as yourself.
Don’t judge me through your own limitations – I do not equate you with your beliefs. You are doing it to yourself. Sounds like a you problem.
Traveling to neighboring Nepal
I was in Nepal in the 90s. There were Western hippies everywhere. Even in the capital Kathmandu, kids with dirty faces and torn clothes tried to sell a joint rolled up in aluminium foil to every foreigner. There was cow dung plastered to the sides of buildings, even temples to dry for cooking fuel. People were desperately poor.
The West had no interest in improving the lot of Nepalese then. Now you have a Yank who goes to Nepal after a desperate and impoverished people rise up in communist led revolution, and asks for a flag of an entity that symbolises opposition to communism?
Then insinuates that the Chinese were bullying the Nepalese?
Trump is not the only Yank who is ham fisted in dealing with foreign cultures. I see it is a general condition with Americans.
I appreciate the effort to present the region. Unless i go there myself I can’t tell what the situation really is. Traveling to neighboring Nepal (before the US led coup), I however saw how a Tibetan shop owner was harassed by a Chinese guy who seemed to work for the then communist government because I bought a Tibetan flag in his shop.
Why do Yanks make an issue of things like this? You go into a troubled region at a time when tensions are high, stick your foot into situations you don’t understand, and cast judgement on based on the reaction.
Try going into a shop in Lithuania and ask for a Russian flag.
Try going into a shop in Korea during an anti-Japanese tensions and ask for a Japanese flag.
Try going to a black neighborhood after wearing a White Lives Matter t-shirt.
Populated by people like that, there is a reason why America is reviled across the world.
I was in Nepal in the 90s. There were Western hippies everywhere. Even in the capital Kathmandu, kids with dirty faces and torn clothes tried to sell a joint rolled up in aluminium foil to every foreigner. There was cow dung plastered to the sides of buildings, even temples to dry for cooking fuel. People were desperately poor.The West had no interest in improving the lot of Nepalese then. Now you have a Yank who goes to Nepal after a desperate and impoverished people rise up in communist led revolution, and asks for a flag of an entity that symbolises opposition to communism?Then insinuates that the Chinese were bullying the Nepalese?Trump is not the only Yank who is ham fisted in dealing with foreign cultures. I see it is a general condition with Americans.
Traveling to neighboring Nepal
Why do Yanks make an issue of things like this? You go into a troubled region at a time when tensions are high, stick your foot into situations you don't understand, and cast judgement on based on the reaction.Try going into a shop in Lithuania and ask for a Russian flag.
I appreciate the effort to present the region. Unless i go there myself I can’t tell what the situation really is. Traveling to neighboring Nepal (before the US led coup), I however saw how a Tibetan shop owner was harassed by a Chinese guy who seemed to work for the then communist government because I bought a Tibetan flag in his shop.
This is a comment in the running for the Most Stupid Comment Ever prize. And that says a lot in view of the dozens of moronic nazi commenters here.
Let’s recap: A guy in Nepal is buying a Tibetan flag from a Tibetan shop whose owner is then harassed by a CCP agent.
Comparing it to a guy “going into a shop in Lithuania and ask for a Russian flag” is beyond moronic and worthy only of a dumb little red Chinese troll.
If one wants to search for real analogies, here are a few:
A guys walking in to a Chechen shop in Lithuania and ordering a Chechen flag, whose owner then is being harassed by Russian agents.
Or a guy asking for Ryukyu flag in Korea during anti-Japanese tensions.
These are the analogous situations. And they are as normal and as expected as anything. Nobody would even blink seeing those.
Only totalitarian Chinese …. let’s call them minds, for the lack of a better word – can think there is something wrong or provocative with any of the above situations.
On the black ghetto example I won’t even comment, since this is even more stupid than the author of the above ridiculous post.
1. A Westerner is in Nepal during a time of Communist revolution
Let’s recap: A guy in Nepal is buying a Tibetan flag from a Tibetan shop whose owner is then harassed by a CCP agent.
You almost immediately started insulting me, calling my beliefs trivialities, ridiculous and half-cooked etc.
You see Mark, where I come from there is a huge difference between attacking a person and attacking her/his quasi-religious beliefs.
I did attack your dogmas. You took it personally and attacked me.
That’s the difference. So stop whining hypocritically about me attacking you, when you are the culprit.
Because to me it means that you’re asking to be treated the same way that you treat me.
You have not explained why
Enough with these childish attempts at distraction from the main fact that your simplistic ideological supply-demand dogmas do not work in real life as you imagine. That’s not gonna work.
So let’s get to the bottom of the libertarian nonsense you’re peddling here:
I am talking about the income of each individual doctor tripling. The changes in number of doctors is irrelevant here.
vs
No, I want the requirements loosened a little so the number of doctors keeps up with increases in population and increases in demand
When you admit that you contradict yourself, we can have a sensible discussion.
Until then, you’re just throwing around nonsensical, self-contradictory statements, that have nothing to do with reality. The reality in which the number of providers increased per capita 3-fold since 1960.
My opinion is …
Mark, you’re a brainwashed member of a cult, you don’t have opinions – you have dogmas, which you are desperately trying to defend against the real world, which says:
If you believe that doctors’ salaries since 1960 rose 3-fold over inflation, then you yourself just disproved your childish supply-demand theory, because per capita rate of providers rose 3-fold during that same time.
🙂
My, you are certainly undergoing a major meltdown here calling me freak, imbecile, moronic etc, in this comment section.
I love it when whining hypocritical snowflakes resort to accusing others of what they started 🙂
Mark G. comment #58: “Only a moron believes that.”
Mark G. comment #58: “I labeled you a troll.”
Obviously these were requests for me to treat you the same way, so go whine where somebody cares.
Is this really correct? While it's not impossible for an ultra-right-wing Jew to be "anti-Zionist" that combination seems about as rare as a unicorn.
Stephen Miller is an anti Zionist, anti Marxist Jew who hates democrats and the left. That’s the difference.
There’s nobody in the Trump administration that is an “anti-Zionist”.
I believe it’s Laura Loomer’s job to ensure that.
Stephen Miller is an anti Zionist, anti Marxist Jew who hates democrats and the left. That’s the difference.
Is this really correct? While it’s not impossible for an ultra-right-wing Jew to be “anti-Zionist” that combination seems about as rare as a unicorn.
For example, very casually Googling around I found that Miller was allegedly a protege of David Horowitz, an ultra-pro-Israel fanatic Jew:
https://www.politico.com/news/magazine/2020/08/01/stephen-miller-david-horowitz-mentor-389933
So unless you can find some solid evidence that Miller is “anti-Zionist” I’ll regard that as nonsense.
It’s not difficult to verify that I didn’t write commie-controlled Singapore.
I wrote commie-controlled HK.
I described Singapore rather differently.
What do you know about what Dr Ron Paul has or hasn't said over the years?
Dr. Paul, you bonehead, never suggested that there should be “competition for doctors”.
Replies: @Mark G., @Jokem, @wojtek
Always and everywhere, a competitive playing field (in an environment where there are NO Gubmint mandates/meddling or distortions of the market), ensures that consumers get the highest QUALITY goods and services at the LOWEST price.
What do you know about what Dr Ron Paul has or hasn’t said over the years?
I know he didn’t write that there should be a competition for doctors, because – unlike you – he’s not a neonazi moron.
I’ve watched the near entirety of the two thousand (2000) plus episodes of The Ron Paul Liberty Report over the last decade, in addition to having read/watched many hundreds of hours of Dr Ron Paul articles, interviews and speeches that he’s made over the last 50 years.
Was that because of an order from your gauleiter? 🙂
In that case you won’t have any problem citing where and when Dr. Paul advocated for creation of a competion to medical doctors.
I know …
Naziboi is bragging 🙂
“There are only four, rather than five, influential cultural systems in the world: Chinese, Indian, Greek and Islam.”
Wrote a Brazilian journalist in English on an English language site. Yeah, right.
Nah.
This may sound racist to some, but the main reason everyone wants to come here is to benefit from European White America.
Nah.
Like the Native Americans before the European White Americans, people come for better lives, mostly the results of 1) more land and natural resources per capita and/or 2) better government.
The pre European natives came here for a better life? But there wasn’t any “better” life here as there wasn’t any Western European civilization here to have a “better life.” Lowest IQ comment I’ve ever seen here at the UNZ and there have been many many whoppers!
So when there is no Western Civilisation there is no "better life"?
But there wasn’t any “better” life here as there wasn’t any Western European civilization here to have a “better life.”
I had totally forgotten about that. During 2007 and most of 2008, Americans contentedly shopped at Walmart and dined at McDonald's and didn't necessarily want major political change. Now Americans have additional hobbies but are mostly in the same state of mind.
But many may have forgotten that until the collapse of the Housing Bubble just a few weeks before the 2008 elections, the Republicans had retained much of their popularity, with the sense of continuing national prosperity insulating them from most of the public hostility Bush had earned.
Benjamin Netanyahu towers over Trump for all his foreign policy decision-making, and Stephen Miller handles domestic policy. It's funny that Miller is so hostile to Democrats, because the previous Democratic presidential administration was also a Jewish one. Politics in America consists of battles between rival Jewish factions.
Similarly, the gradual, almost invisible growth of Jewish/Zionist control over America had taken around a century to reach its current levels, with the 1960s assassinations of the Kennedy brothers certainly marking a crucial inflection point. In my view, the bookend to the JFK Assassination might be the somewhat similar recent killing of youthful conservative leader Charlie Kirk, which quickly followed his sudden realization that he and his entire political movement were merely intended to function as Jewish/Zionist puppets, and indications of his political rebellion against that humiliating condition.
https://www.unz.com/article/who-killed-charlie-kirk-the-case-against-israel/?showcomments#comment-7312065Replies: @QCIC, @VinnyVette
Coolness towards Israel is potentially a bipartisan position among powerful, patriotic Gentiles like Kennedy and Kirk who interact frequently with Israeli and pro-Israel leaders.
Stephen Miller is an anti Zionist, anti Marxist Jew who hates democrats and the left. That’s the difference.
Is this really correct? While it's not impossible for an ultra-right-wing Jew to be "anti-Zionist" that combination seems about as rare as a unicorn.
Stephen Miller is an anti Zionist, anti Marxist Jew who hates democrats and the left. That’s the difference.
You are an imbecile who can’t even understand a short text in your allegedly native tongue.
Medical licensing is for doctors!
Not for shamans, witches, or some whining morons.
My claim stands:
Dr. Paul, you bonehead, never suggested that there should be “competition for doctors”.
In that short chapter he mostly complains about insurance and pharma. His only suggestions regarding doctors are to loosen licensing requirements and have more med schools.
None qualifies as your boneheaded suggestion to ” eliminates competition for the doctors.”
Do you need me to quote?
But what guarantees do I have that you functional analphabet will understand what is written? You haven’t demonstrated that ability so far.
Mentally focused on your boneheaded childish whining about doctors making a lot of money?
Stop your whining and use some arguments, maybe I’ll focus.
Some are more libertarian than others
Yet none is libertarian, you ideological freak.
Hong Kong has still largely been allowed
Oh yes, this is such a strong statement about the allegedly most libertarian country in the world – STILL LARGELY BEEN ALLOWED 🙂
Could you make it any worse? 🙂
You said the Tabarrok graph is an outlier and provided a link to the white coat investor website. That website has the same identical graph.
Yes, it does – because if you actually check the rest of the data, you will see that Tabarrok piece tells a completely different story, which in fact in contradicted by all the other listed works. And many more.
But for that one needs to be able to read short texts with a semblance of understanding them, which you are completely incapable of.
Still being an evasive little weasel I see …
Yes you are – you have not addressed any of the substantiated data I provided other than with your moronic boneheaded complaints about doctors.
It’s getting old and boring.
Johnson, we’ve already established that you’re a Khazar troll, so don’t try to teach anyone here English grammar.
Instead read the whole text you linked:
In passive voice constructions, the past participle “sunk” is combined with a form of the verb “to be.”
Even I know that “Ukraine doesn’t have a Navy and sunk most of the Black Sea fleet.” is incorrect.
Just like every other claim you have made on this forum 🙂
Conclusion is: you are unable to persuade anybody of anything, because you simply ignore facts and replace them with faulty data points and ideaology.
I do not have to talk to you or persuade you of anything.
“inflation since 1960”
I already told you doctor incomes have been adjusted for inflation in the link I provided. Adjusted for inflation, doctor incomes have tripled since 1960.
If you have a different opinion than me about whose data is more accurate, then it is just my opinion versus your opinion. I am not going to just repeat my opinion over and over while listening to you repeat your opinion over and over. That is a waste of my time.
I question your figures on hospitalizations going from 20 million annually to 35 million today. Population has almost doubled and average age is older. Even if that is the case, if the patients are being treated by doctors who are paid triple of what they were in 1960 costs of treatment will be higher. This is pretty obvious but you are just unable to grasp this. What is wrong with you?
Wow, really difficult - multiple papers, with publicly available data vs one chart that magically tells the opposite story. What to choose?
If you have a different opinion than me about whose data is more accurate
Question away:
I question your figures on hospitalizations going from 20 million annually to 35 million today.
Except all the published research papers (as opposed to blog posts), contradict this claim.
Even if that is the case, if the patients are being treated by doctors who are paid triple of what they were in 1960 costs of treatment will be higher.
Wow, really difficult - multiple papers, with publicly available data vs one chart that magically tells the opposite story. What to choose?
If you have a different opinion than me about whose data is more accurate
Question away:
I question your figures on hospitalizations going from 20 million annually to 35 million today.
Except all the published research papers (as opposed to blog posts), contradict this claim.
Even if that is the case, if the patients are being treated by doctors who are paid triple of what they were in 1960 costs of treatment will be higher.
I think I will go with Taborrak when it comes to doctor incomes. Having a minority opinion does not mean he is wrong. The powerful medical cartel and its propagandists have an incentive to engage in obfuscation about how the medical cartel bribes politicians to restrict doctor supply in order to boost doctor incomes. I prefer more objective sources of information.
We would be better off ditching the current overly expensive corrupt system and going back to what we did in 1960. Average life expectancy was seventy then while doctor incomes were a third of what they are now and overall medical spending was six percent of GDP instead of the sixteen percent now.
The corrupt medical cartel will not continue to have its way because in the future we will not be able to afford current levels of medical spending. By 2037 Medicare will be insolvent, Social Security will be insolvent, the national debt will be sixty trillion dollars and we will be paying two to three trillion dollars yearly in interest payments on that debt. The money will not be there for overinflated doctor incomes dishonestly achieved.
No, having a minority opinion doesn't mean wrong.
I think I will go with Taborrak when it comes to doctor incomes. Having a minority opinion does not mean he is wrong.
I am going to separate this fragment below, because it is a prime example that shows how moronic your positions are:
The reason I know Tabarrok is right is because you have been engaging in evasion about the fact that the corrupt medical cartel is buying political influence with bribes.
1. You combine two completely independent from each other things:
– me ignoring your idiotically childish distractions,
– invalidity of the suspect data you found on someone’s blog.
2. To really prove your idiocy, you are not just claiming that there is a relationship between these completely unrelated facts – you claim there is a causal relationship! 🙂
3. To push the absurd to the limit, one fact is about verifiable data, yet, your argument is not about validity of the data.
I mean you really are a special case, Mark.
In fact you are a quasi-religious freak.
Meltdown? No I am not angry at all. I am making fun of you and laughing at you. It is always funny how pompous gas bags like you are oblivious that others see you for the buffoons you are. I guess I should have used smile emojis like a dopey teenage girl to make it obvious I was sitting here laughing at you.
Of course, the phrase “suspect data” is just your opinion. The reason I know Tabarrok is right is because you have been engaging in evasion about the fact that the corrupt medical cartel is buying political influence with bribes. The fact you are doing that demonstrates you are a dishonest person of low moral character so, therefore, it is anything you say that is “suspect”.
You yourself say libertarians are just plain silly. So when will you be moving to the non-libertarian paradise of Venezuela to get away from us silly libertarians? I checked the Cato rankings of least libertarian countries and the non-libertarian paradise of Zimbabwe ranks number two so you could buy a plane ticket for there instead. Looking at the bottom ranking countries for economic freedom, I notice they are all poor. I am sure that is just a coincidence, though, right?
Of course not.
Meltdown? No I am not angry at all.
And you prove it with every single post, e.g., here:
You yourself say libertarians are just plain silly.
Would you like me to count logical errors in that one short statement? :)
So when will you be moving to the non-libertarian paradise of Venezuela to get away from us silly libertarians?
1. You combine two completely independent from each other things:
The reason I know Tabarrok is right is because you have been engaging in evasion about the fact that the corrupt medical cartel is buying political influence with bribes.
Meltdown? No I am not angry at all.
Of course not.
meltdown: a rapid or disastrous decline or collapse
You yourself say libertarians are just plain silly.
And you prove it with every single post, e.g., here:
So when will you be moving to the non-libertarian paradise of Venezuela to get away from us silly libertarians?
Would you like me to count logical errors in that one short statement? 🙂
1) Why would your silliness have any impact on me?
2) Since there is no libertarian country in the World, why would I need to move, even if libertarian silliness had any effect on me?
3) Why would Venezuela have to be the country to move to, if there is no libertarian country in the World.
In fact the highest ranking countries in the silly libertarian ranking are commie-controlled HK and Singapore, where they will beat you up for a whole range of nonviolent misdemeanors.
4) Why thinking that libertarianism is silly means I need to seek countries with the least amount of economic freedom, b/c that is actually what is ranked, not how libertarian any country is?
As I said – complete mental meltdown.
And all that is caused by, let’s remind you:
The fact that you cornered yourself with your silly ideological theories and suspect data, completely ignoring reality.
You’re not a libertarian, you’re an ideological freak.
No, having a minority opinion doesn't mean wrong.
I think I will go with Taborrak when it comes to doctor incomes. Having a minority opinion does not mean he is wrong.
Yes, the medical profession gives large political donations to politicians for no other reason than it likes to pass out free money. It does not want anything in return like having the government restrict the number of doctors in order to boost doctor incomes. Only a moron believes that.
I told you that you need to do better here but you have just been engaging in feeble attempts at obfuscation so I labeled you a troll. The political donations going to corrupt politicians from the corrupt medical cartel are to buy political influence to enable the medical cartel to receive benefits from political pull rather than through productive activities. Economists call this “rent seeking”.
When government was smaller and had less ability to pass out political favors, most people wanting to make money had to engage in productive activities. This led to rapid economic growth and the United States becoming the wealthiest country in the world. As government has expanded, economic growth has slowed.
The libertarian Cato Institute does a yearly ranking of countries by economic freedom. Last year Venezuela was ranked last, making it the least libertarian country in the world. Venezuela was formerly the wealthiest country in South America but under socialism has become a poor country that has had large numbers of citizens flee. Since it is the least libertarian country in the world, though, I am sure you will love it there and you should head there immediately. Don’t let the door hit you in your authoritarian ass on the way out!
And here came the – previously announced – meltdown 🙂
Mark, who cornered himself with his silly ideological theories and suspect (at best) data, now calls me a troll 🙂
Because the snowflake can’t reconcile the real facts that 3-fold increase in the per capita provider rate has not even dented the providers’ income, when adjusted for official inflation 🙂
Mark, your suggestion that someone who points your silly mistakes must love communism is as moronic as your supply demand claims about healthcare 🙂
I don’t think you’re right about it.
CTH at its origin (15 years ago) followed almost anybody who was not in the mainstream. That included Breitbart. But with Breitbart’s passing so long ago, I don’t think they even had time to develop into his acolytes. The only person who they religiously follow is Trump.
Yes, the members are very heavily pro-israel and pro-zionist, or even just outright zionists. But the leader of the pack is not.
One proof for my claim is that Mark Levin would never attack a fellow zionist. And wouldn’t call CTH “the conservative nuthouse”, if they indeed were part of the zio movement.
They are at best what Lenin called useful idiots.
I think I will go with Taborrak when it comes to doctor incomes. Having a minority opinion does not mean he is wrong.
No, having a minority opinion doesn’t mean wrong.
Having a complete outlier, without publishing the data supporting it, publishing it on a blog instead of in a refereed journal – all this implies he’s wrong.
But, to me it doesn’t matter that he is wrong.
What matters to me is that by accepting his data you prove immediately that all your bs about supply economics is wrong 🙂
You see, with your claim that “Even if that is the case, if the patients are being treated by doctors who are paid triple of what they were in 1960 costs of treatment will be higher” you painted yourself into a corner. And you have only two options:
1) Go with the suspect data, which proves that a 3-fold increase in the rate of providers per capita correlated with a 3-fold increase in their revenues (and your costs) when adjusted for inflation. Which in turn immediately makes all your naive supply-demand economics claims void and empty, because with demand growth below the population growth, there is no other excuse.
2) Or, if you want to stick with your ideology, you need to accept that the data if wrong. Which interestingly still makes your ideology wrong, because then we do know from many independent sources that doctors’ salaries grew on par with official inflation, despite 3-fold growth in per capita rates.
Tertium non datur.
So which one is it going to be?
Only an ignorant retard devoid of Dr Ron Paul's historical track record over the last few decades would say such a demonstrably false thing.The fact is, when one talks about libertarianism, one must acknowledge that Dr Ron Paul is the face of this tried and true ideology in the world today.
But in my opinion one of the biggest problems of libertarians is the fact that many of them are ideologists and avoid contact with real world problems.
That you aren't aware of these things is proof that you rely on the ZOG owned western MSM for all your information - hence the reason you're a Know Nothing Nitwit.Oh, and did I mention, Ron Paul is the ONLY Presidential candidate EVER (to the best of my knowledge), to openly run on the pledge that, should he be elected, he'd reduce U.S taxpayer largesse to the Apartheid Israeli state to ZERO.
Summary: Whether it was a solution to tackle inflation and erosion of purchasing power (the solution was Sound Money, Ending the Fed and a return to the Gold Standard - coupled to reining in Big Gubmint), or fixing the economy and a cessation of America's murderous foreign policy (elimination of entire Federal departments, massive cuts in military expenditure, closure of all of America's over 900 bases in 130 countries and bringing all the troops home), Dr Ron Paul HAD ALL THE ANSWERS.
The Talmudic misfits viewed Dr Paul as an existential threat - hence the reason they sabotaged his Presidential bid.UR readers, I'll leave you with this 1 min gem from Ron Paul's 2012 Presidential campaign:
Dr Ron Paul was a politician with REAL GUTS. No one in the post JFK era had even small fraction of the intestinal fortitude that Dr Ron Paul had in relation to tackling the big issues.There is no other politician that Malignant International Jewry feared more in the last 60 years.
That's why the small hats went out of their way to cheat Ron Paul out of the GOP nomination in the 2012 primaries.
wojtek: “in my opinion one of the biggest problems of libertarians is the fact that many of them are ideologists and avoid contact with real world problems”
local neonazi idiot: “bb…but Dr. Paul …. ”
Dr. Paul, you bonehead, never suggested that there should be “competition for doctors”.
PS. Interestingly Dr. Paul is against free market when it comes to tort laws for doctors. Not that he’s wrong about it – he’s right. But that’s because fanatic ideological libertarianism is just plain silly. A harmless ideology for maldjusted old boys.
What do you know about what Dr Ron Paul has or hasn't said over the years?
Dr. Paul, you bonehead, never suggested that there should be “competition for doctors”.
Replies: @Mark G., @Jokem, @wojtek
Always and everywhere, a competitive playing field (in an environment where there are NO Gubmint mandates/meddling or distortions of the market), ensures that consumers get the highest QUALITY goods and services at the LOWEST price.
Mark, you are desperately trying to run away from your failed ideas. But it won’t work.
3-fold adjusted for inflation = 30 fold.
Simple as that. And no matter how many times you repeat your claim, it won’t change the above.
If you have a different opinion than me about whose data is more accurate
Wow, really difficult – multiple papers, with publicly available data vs one chart that magically tells the opposite story. What to choose?
No, these are not opinions. Mine is a fact, yours is an illusion. You’re grasping at straws.
I question your figures on hospitalizations going from 20 million annually to 35 million today.
Question away:
https://www.aha.org/statistics/fast-facts-us-hospitals
https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/series/sr_10/sr10_020acc.pdf
You see – this is how it will turn out ever single time – you show me some cooked up data mixed with your ideology, and I will show the facts.
And the most important fact is that this libertarian ideological nonsense about supply side economics in medicine so far is working like this: triple the the rate of doctors per capita and the costs keep increasing. But the fanatics like you will call for more of the same, claiming that this time it will certainly work.
Even if that is the case, if the patients are being treated by doctors who are paid triple of what they were in 1960 costs of treatment will be higher.
Except all the published research papers (as opposed to blog posts), contradict this claim.
You have two options now: either you will realize that your single data outlier is fake, or you will have to conclude that your ideology does not work as you’re claiming it should. Tertium non datur.
I think I’m going to stick around and watch a meltdown.
Mark, I do understand that you finally realized that the reality ignored your naive supply-side arguments, so you are now looking for some silly excuses to get out of this conundrum of how to reconcile your ideology with real facts. But there are two ways about it, the way you just presented above, and alternatively behaving like a normal adult.
1) 3-fold increase when accounting for inflation, combined with ~1000% inflation since 1960, gives you 30-fold increase in salaries. Nothing more, nothing less.
2) You also need to stop this idiotic game of attributing me things I never said.
My exact quote: “However you look at it there was no 30-fold increase till 2016.”
I didn’t claim you said it.
In fact I don’t care much for what you said, facts don’t depend on it.
3) “According to him, doctor incomes tripled since 1960”.
There are lies, big lies, and statistics. How he calculated his claim is unknown to me. But what I do know is that his data is an outlier among all data available.
Here is a short summary someone made:
https://www.whitecoatinvestor.com/golden-age-of-medicine/
E.g., your GMU buddy claims that salaries more than doubled (when adjusted for inflation) since 1970, whereas there is a very well documented data since 1970 (introduction of Medicaid forced people tracking doctor’s salaries much more closely, and there are many real papers documenting that – not some blog posts), which shows that there is little to no growth – when adjusted for (official) inflation.
4) “while numbers of doctors more than doubled”. Add to it over 460K nurse practitioners, who didn’t exist in 1960, because they were introduced in 1970s, and you have a 3-fold increase in providers per 100,000K residents.
5) “if the demand for doctors increases faster than the supply, doctor incomes increase” – another example where reality and ideology disagree. Number of hospitalizations in 1960 – over 20M. Number of hospitalizations in 2024 – under 35M. 75% increase – well below the rate of growth of medical population. And costs are rising. Surprise.
I do not have to talk to you or persuade you of anything.
Conclusion is: you are unable to persuade anybody of anything, because you simply ignore facts and replace them with faulty data points and ideaology.
So indeed better go and try to talk to someone who will keep your hand and will nod to all your ideas.
Interestingly, neocon was right.
We can also discuss the best strategies to achieve our goals. This did not occur to you?
Actually, it did occur to me. But I never saw it in these discussions here, so didn’t think it was the reason 🙂
I find the data in the link you provided very suspicious.
Census office has significantly changed the way they report data between 1960 and today. Still, say for 2023 they provide the median full time physician annual income as around 250K. In 1960 census data, they provided average annual income for self-employed male medical workers as ~13k, and indicated that number of women in such category was statistically insignificant.
However you look at it there was no 30-fold increase till 2016.
“The number of providers increased three fold”
No, that is not what I said.
No, it is not what you said.
But it is a fact, which I provided for you.
And nowhere in my statement it is attributed to you.
Let me repeat, so it sinks in:
The number of providers in the US per 100,000 residents increased 3-fold from 1960 to 2025.
Now you made me repeat it, so I guess we are even and can move on to reconcile this fact?
I’ll go out on a limb here, and will make a wild and unsubstantiated claim that there is a small chance that for Trump this is all about making his family rich. Various strange US rare minerals companies are skyrocketing in valuation, even Pentagon is investing real money. Sounds like a perfect opportunity for taking money from naive investors. Perhaps even not just the naive ones.
These days the Wall Street Journal probably ranks as America’s most influential and credible print outlet
As emphasized in the first several paragraphs, the Chinese had suddenly imposed an unprecedented new wave of licensing requirements
Only towards the bottom of the original article did the Journal writers explain that the new Chinese restrictions were in direct retaliation for similarly sweeping American export restrictions against Chinese technology companies imposed a dozen days earlier but given much less attention in our mainstream media outlets.
A couple of obvious conclusions:
1) The “most credible” label does not mean anything these days.
2) More importantly, however, I think this whole scenario indicates that it is not merely Trump and his personal “limitations” (to put it delicately), who is responsible for what is going on. For the whole range of MSM to coordinate so well, both on the original American move, and then on the Chinese retaliation, it cannot simply come from the White House. Instead, Trump is clearly representing certain interests beyond his own. We already knew it for a while that he represents the warmongering zionists. Now we see that there is another equally powerful coterie out there which controls Trump and which wants a war with China.
3) This point I could be mistaken about, but interestingly it seems to me this new coterie is not exactly the same as the standard Deep State, which we got used to by now.
4) If, however, I am not entirely incorrect about #3, then it becomes quite clear that Trump is essentially monetizing his presidency for personal gains, with various strange investment vehicles, like say the crypto companies, serving as money laundering mechanisms for the whole operation.
serious doubts
So regarding your claim that “This is a huge story and it’s still getting momentum”, I have serious doubts.
Just for the record:
– episode 2 on utube – 2 weeks – 1.3M views
– episode 3 on utube – 1 week – 7ooK views – his recent show on UFOs got more views in 2 days.
As I wrote earlier – you are still confusing an experiment with an accident. The essence of an experiment is NOT its frequency. It is its controlled nature.
Chink snowflake in action again 🙂
What a meltdown.
I’m curious what will happen when someone tells him that big chunk of that research is stolen.
REALLY?!
I do know communism first hand. And the simple fact is that the communism is what the communists want it to be.
Replies: @wojtek
The phrase "the meek will inherit the earth" means that those with power under control—who are humble, teachable, and not arrogant—will ultimately be the ones to receive God's promises, which can be a spiritual inheritance and a peaceful, prosperous existence. It does not mean that the meek are weak or will rule over others, but that their strength is channeled through gentleness, self-control, and submission to divine will.
Do you know that communism, like capitalism, are mental diseases that the whites created in order to destroy their own societies so that the earth can be returned to the meek who truly own it?
Not a deep thought at all.
“the meek will inherit the earth” means that those with power under control—who are humble, teachable, and not arrogant
So that’s certainly not the Chinese then. Sounds more like Polish 🙂
BTW, was it Google or Google AI? 🙂
No need. Everyone can see that-- except wooden poles.
Not a deep thought at all
More like Africans and Muslims, who are already in much of Western Europe and pushing east. The poles are onlt good at under other powers' control-- Germans, Russians and now the Amelikans... :-D
Sounds more like Polish
You’re confusing 40 years in (mostly Western, transferred to China) technological development with something entirely different.
What is the point of discussing things with other admirers? Nothing constructive can come out of this. You do need to confront your ideas with people who might disagree. And I don’t mean those who totally critique everything. But in my opinion one of the biggest problems of libertarians is the fact that many of them are ideologists and avoid contact with real world problems. Even Catholic church, as principled as it is, can adjust, occasionally 🙂
Only an ignorant retard devoid of Dr Ron Paul's historical track record over the last few decades would say such a demonstrably false thing.The fact is, when one talks about libertarianism, one must acknowledge that Dr Ron Paul is the face of this tried and true ideology in the world today.
But in my opinion one of the biggest problems of libertarians is the fact that many of them are ideologists and avoid contact with real world problems.
That you aren't aware of these things is proof that you rely on the ZOG owned western MSM for all your information - hence the reason you're a Know Nothing Nitwit.Oh, and did I mention, Ron Paul is the ONLY Presidential candidate EVER (to the best of my knowledge), to openly run on the pledge that, should he be elected, he'd reduce U.S taxpayer largesse to the Apartheid Israeli state to ZERO.
Summary: Whether it was a solution to tackle inflation and erosion of purchasing power (the solution was Sound Money, Ending the Fed and a return to the Gold Standard - coupled to reining in Big Gubmint), or fixing the economy and a cessation of America's murderous foreign policy (elimination of entire Federal departments, massive cuts in military expenditure, closure of all of America's over 900 bases in 130 countries and bringing all the troops home), Dr Ron Paul HAD ALL THE ANSWERS.
The Talmudic misfits viewed Dr Paul as an existential threat - hence the reason they sabotaged his Presidential bid.UR readers, I'll leave you with this 1 min gem from Ron Paul's 2012 Presidential campaign:
Dr Ron Paul was a politician with REAL GUTS. No one in the post JFK era had even small fraction of the intestinal fortitude that Dr Ron Paul had in relation to tackling the big issues.There is no other politician that Malignant International Jewry feared more in the last 60 years.
That's why the small hats went out of their way to cheat Ron Paul out of the GOP nomination in the 2012 primaries.
Mark, so your claim is that physician incomes rose 30-fold since 1960? I don’t think that claim holds water.
But more importantly, your simplistically naive supply-demand theory does not apply here. And your own claims are the proof. The number of providers in the US per 100,000 residents increased 3-fold from 1960 to 2025. If you believe your own claim of 3-fold increase in revenue (adjusted for inflation), well, you have answered your own question: more doctors means higher costs.
Now, of course you are not the first to do so. There is a great deal of research that has been done, going as far back as early 1970s, demonstrating that the increase in the ratio of doctors per population, only leads to fee increases and increased doctor revenues.
Whatever the causes of the strong dislike you demonstrate here for the physician community (and I’m sure it’s well deserved), if you want to have a reasonable discussion, you need to be able to put these personal feelings aside, and to look at the facts objectively.
For example – although I would agree with most of your claims you made in the last paragraph, there is one that I am not so sure about. Namely that reducing demand will lower costs. It is again one of those naively simplistic economic ideas that often fail, when applied in real life to real people.
Think about it – fewer cases – yes, but the cases will be often more advanced, more difficult, more life threatening, so there is no reason why costs should be lower.
Our mental patient is getting worse by the minute 🙂
A really interesting case – tell her/him a tiny bit of truth and you get a total collapse. Must be one of those single chink kids, with no siblings. Mommy and daddy spoiled rotten and nobody ever said no to little bastard, and now can’t function in the normal Western culture 🙂
Mark, you should be really concerned by the fact that Truth Denier is siding with you (refer to his juvenile comments # 15, 21, 28, 38 … well, all of them).
The fact of the matter is that the foaming-at-the-mouth neonazi Truth Denier (like his hero Adolf Hitler), has never encountered a problem that he didn’t screw up way worse.
Truth Denier has been wrong on every substantive issue in recent years.
He’s just a perennial loser and resident contrarian indicator.
Simply put, if Truth Denier supports you on any matter, you can be certain that your line of reasoning is completely wrong.
So you don’t even have a clue what communism means.
Unfortunately – as I indicated above – I do know communism first hand. And the simple fact is that the communism is what the communists want it to be. So in reality communism can mean different things. At one moment it can mean a bunch crazed murderous thugs running amok, next it can be just stupid boring propaganda and shortages of everything, and then it can be a system, where the party still controls everything, but supply-demand improves to a level where a larger portion of the population is no longer hungry. We went through these phases, to a degree, as well.
So, you can stop your silly propaganda – it may work on dumb Americans, but not on people who do know what communism is.
China, son, is a communist country, despite all your protestations.
In fact, the more you protest the more you prove my point.
REALLY?!
I do know communism first hand. And the simple fact is that the communism is what the communists want it to be.
Replies: @wojtek
The phrase "the meek will inherit the earth" means that those with power under control—who are humble, teachable, and not arrogant—will ultimately be the ones to receive God's promises, which can be a spiritual inheritance and a peaceful, prosperous existence. It does not mean that the meek are weak or will rule over others, but that their strength is channeled through gentleness, self-control, and submission to divine will.
It’s fun to watch your mental collapse, boy. Or should it be bot? 🙂
Mark, I can only comment about what you write. And so far every single thing you wrote was about how we need to allow unlicensed doctors and how that will make healthcare cheaper. (I’m paraphrasing a little – but only a little.)
At the same time you are ignoring the reality in which, in the past 15 years, US added something like 230K doctors and 260K nurse practitioners. Overall, it’s a 50% increase of the overall number of providers in merely 15 years. And their salaries on average grew over 30% over the past 9-10 years. (I couldn’t find reliable data for 15 years ago.)
So 50% increase and their (already very high) salaries keep up with inflation. Meaning nothing drops.
At the same time you make claims that “Doctors incomes have tripled since 1960”. Mark, inflation since 1960 was 1000%. So a 10-fold increase. Something doesn’t add up in your claims.
I think you need to look at the data and think again about your ideas.
Man, you can’t even copy-paste properly 🙂
It’s:
More whining from a mental commie-boi.
Can you do anything correctly?
Besides your commie whining, of course 🙂
“The 2024 physician census conducted by the Federation of State Medical Boards (FSMB) documents a total of 1,082,187 actively licensed physicians across the United States and the District of Columbia, marking a 27% growth since 2010.”
Mark, nearly 1.1M licensed doctors. Add to this over 400K licensed nurse practitioners. Since 2010, circa 300% increase in nurse practitioners.
Clearly the requirements already have been loosened more than just a little in the past 10-15 years.
And no effect on costs.
I would say this means you are looking in the wrong place.
P.M., you confusing an accident with an experiment explains a lot. Not sure if everything, but a lot.
More whining from a mental commie-boi.
I’m shocked. Shocked I am. 🙂
Seems like a typical commie play: put a little different light on his/her ridiculous posts about science and we get to see the real troll 🙂
Have you realized by now why I said you are a complete moron? 🙂
You need to catch up with reality. Here’s a quote for you, written by Chinese researchers.
“In terms of its academic status, Marxism is the most important and unique research field in contemporary Chinese humanities and social sciences.”
QED
There will be no medical cartel once the federal government stops maintaining the cartel status that eliminates competition for the doctors.
Mark, don’t you worry about what I can or cannot grasp. Instead worry about the claims you are making here. Especially the one above is what I was waiting for you to write. So let’s say it one more time: you are proposing to allow competition for doctors in healthcare.
Do you even understand what you are suggesting? You want unlicensed doctors to practice medicine. This means doctors who are complete retards, b/c less than 0.5% of all medical board cases end with a doctor losing a license. It’s under 200 doctors a year – a drop, negligible, with no impact on prices. But a huge negative impact on our health.
The other group of unlicensed doctors are immigrants, who did not pass (for whatever reason – usually language) the boards in the US.
So your solution is to use fedbois to force the medical community to accept medical screw-ups and semi-qualified immigrants to practice medicine. Great. Do you see now how ridiculous and half-cooked your ideas are? You really are not grasping the consequences of what you are proposing.
I don’t like your condescending attitude.
Shrug. You should have tried to write something that makes a little more sense, instead of spewing your marxist nonsense, about quantity turning into quality.
Nobody here cares about who you say you are, or are not.
On a forum like this, you are represented by what you write.
And – to put it very delicately – your commie whining does not come out good.
What you did was finding OTHER sources that didn’t agree with the Nature Index
🙂
On top of being a whining commie, you’re also a complete moron 🙂
But I doubt you can comprehend the reason 🙂
For UR readers not familiar with the history I've had with Woy-chek, he is a dumb Pole that pollutes the WWII UR threads with his smears of the noble Germans during WWII.Now, in war all sides commit atrocities. No one is denying this.
And yet you’re a nazi – interesting, if you had the capacity to understand the meaning of the word and minimal knowledge of history
.
Summary: UR readers, you should go easy on Woy-chek.
Because he is seething with frustration just below the skin.
He knows that Poland sided with evil in WWII. It believed the promises made by ZOG controlled FDR and Britain that they would come to its aid in the event that Germany attacked it.And to that end, the Anglo-Zionist filth encouraged the conscience-free Polish cowards to commit unspeakable atrocities against ethnic Germans living within Poland (tens of thousands murdered, had their eyes gouges out, raped and brutalised etc), PRIOR to September 1939.
They did this to actually provoke a war with Germany.Of course hostilities with Germany could SO EASILY have been avoided.
Hitler sought friendly relations with Poland.
He extended all manner of magnanimous overtures to Poland right up until May/June 1939.But the feral Poles spat in his face. At that moment Hitler knew that negotiation with these inbred imbeciles was no longer possible, that the crimes against ethnic Germans would continue endlessly - because the Jew masters of the Polish ruling elite had decreed it
Our neonazi Truth Denier never fails to miss an opportunity to prove that he is a complete idiot and a functionally illiterate moron 🙂
And, after having me totally destroy your previous vomit in this thread (I was tempted to call it an “intellectual” vomit, but we both know there was nothing intellectual about it), you now come begging for more trashing, spewing your usual nazi nonsense? Are you some sick SM nazi psycho? Must be.
So, because it is now obvious to everyone that you have nothing to contribute to the topic at hand, you should apologize to other participants of this thread, who are forced to look at the excrements of your nazi “brain”, and get lost.
Mark, you are turning to stating trivialities, in order to avoid answering the basic question.
So, let me remind you – the “special interest group” you are talking about is called doctors.
And here’s the question:
how do you imagine to convince these big shot doctors, who run the medical cartel in the US, to earn less and spread the wealth more?
And I notice that you are still not showing us a link that shows the university rankings and describes how they were calculated.
Unfortunately for me it is not my ranking, it is the same Nature Index effort as described in the article.
You are still lying that my opinion was unfounded; as I said (link), "I showed evidence to demonstrate that the printing press arose first in the Middle Kingdom, centuries before Gutenberg was born, and then was propagated to Central Asia, Middle East, and Europe." (Link and link to copius evidence.)
Your unfounded personal opinions really don’t matter much here.
And I notice that you are still not showing us a link that shows the university rankings and describes how they were calculated.
No, I am not going to show you the link.
As I already wrote before:
“You’ll have to learn to live with that.
Alternatively you can use the link in the article above.
It is the same Nature Index database. ”
It does require a certain minimal level of IQ (not very high) to realize that, which you seem to lack. But it’s your problem not mine.
You are still lying that my opinion was unfounded
You just disproved your own statement immediately: “I showed evidence to demonstrate that the printing press arose first in the Middle Kingdom, centuries before Gutenberg was born, and then was propagated to Central Asia, Middle East, and Europe.”
Again, it does require a certain minimal level of IQ to realize that what you have written never even came close to address my point that:
“Gutenberg’s invention was his own and independent. A true invention. The fact that he may have reinvented something already known at that time in China is irrelevant, as he was not in any way influenced by the existing solutions, which he simply had no knowledge of. ”
Until you show a proof that Gutenberg had knowledge of Chinese printing presses, you showed nothing.
Again – don’t fight with facts Vidi, because unlike for Cesar, for you it’s always: veni, Vidi, victus 🙂
In other words, you don't have a link to back up your alternate list of top universities. People will judge whether you are lying.
No, I am not going to show you the link.
The way to counter this is through the political process.
So, simply speaking, your proposed solution is to bring in the government into the equation.
OK, that’s what many countries do. The difference is, these other countries have usually a completely different legal system. In the British (and hence American) system, these once given rights to a profession to self-rule are very difficult to be taken away. I simply do not see a possibility for SCOTUS to grant any group that does not consist of recognized doctors, the right to create new med schools. This is not going to happen. Period.
So what you would need would be a significant new organization of doctors, who would want to earn LESS money. You will not be able to escape from this basic question.
That is not surprising, as most Nobel committee members probably can't read Chinese.
[Wojtek's rankings of the top universities] correlates much better with the main prizes, such as Nobel...
It does nothing of the sort.
...and proves that accusations of political bias are rather baseless.
[Wojtek’s rankings of the top universities] correlates much better with the main prizes, such as Nobel…
You are too kind.
Unfortunately for me it is not my ranking, it is the same Nature Index effort as described in the article.
most Nobel committee members probably can’t read Chinese.
They don’t need to – I can assure you that most important discoveries are published in English. Including those for Chinese researchers.
It does nothing of the sort. I don’t expect much from someone who has been caught lying
Your unfounded personal opinions really don’t matter much here. Including your opinion that Gutenberg “stole” his idea from the Chinese 🙂 They just make your current claims look even more ridiculous and immature (as impossible as it sounds in view of your production here).
And I notice that you are still not showing us a link that shows the university rankings and describes how they were calculated.
Unfortunately for me it is not my ranking, it is the same Nature Index effort as described in the article.
You are still lying that my opinion was unfounded; as I said (link), "I showed evidence to demonstrate that the printing press arose first in the Middle Kingdom, centuries before Gutenberg was born, and then was propagated to Central Asia, Middle East, and Europe." (Link and link to copius evidence.)
Your unfounded personal opinions really don’t matter much here.
In other words, an institution with 50,000 researchers has an advantage over one a tenth the size, and that according to you is unfair. In my opinion, that is not unfair if we want to estimate the institution -- or country -- that is likely to produce more breakthoughs.
Institution scores [in the Nature index] are not normalized for their size.
that according to you is unfair
I did not say it is unfair. I said it creates bias. Two completely different things. But I can see how you could confuse them.
that is not unfair if we want to estimate the institution — or country
You are correct about institution, and yet you are wrong about country.
Later you presented a list of your top universities.
Wrong. It is not my list. It is the same Nature Index, but using only top 2 publications, Nature and Science.
(I notice that you did not provide a link.)
No, I didn’t. You’ll have to learn to live with that.
Alternatively you can use the link in the article above.
It is the same Nature Index database.
Do yourself a favor and don’t mix two different notions: the article above was not about ethnicity of researchers, but about institutions. And by proxy, it measured national “strength” in research as a reflection of that of the national institutions. So it has nothing to do with race, ethnicity, nationality, etc. Only geography.
Second favor you can do for yourself is to look at the 2 most important journals, instead of the nearly 150 ones which were selected by Springer (owner of Nature), and which are heavily biased towards Springer owned publications.
Science and Nature are great indicators when it comes to measure Nobel-level impact. And the story these 2 publications tell is very very different from the mass of 150 journals. Lagging is not an issue here. And in fact Nature offers a double-blind review as an option, if you’re worried they might be biased against you. (Although indeed that is not true for Science.)
I personally do understand that in communist countries there is this tendency to confuse quantity with quality, but generally speaking these are two different things.
Woy-chek, you're not very bright, are you?
how do you imagine to convince these big shot doctors, who run the medical cartel in the US, to earn less and spread the wealth more?
Throughout history we've found that government is NEVER the solution.
Interestingly the only solution to this problem that I am aware of across the World is to bring in the government.
Our neonazi Truth Denier never fails to miss an opportunity to prove that he is a complete idiot and a functionally illiterate moron 🙂
wojtek: “how do you imagine to convince these big shot doctors […] to earn less”
dumb neonazi: “Consequently, the expense in visiting a doctor will FALL – as competition always lowers prices”
Yes, naziboi, competition lowers the prices and hence doctors’ incomes – the same doctors who control the medical schools in the US. They would earn less. So my question stands.
But, in view of your newest facepalm moment above, a new question arises: what made you think that you have the intellectual ability to discuss these complicated notions with me, in the first place?
Throughout history we’ve found that government is NEVER the solution.
And yet you’re a nazi – interesting, if you had the capacity to understand the meaning of the word and minimal knowledge of history 🙂
For UR readers not familiar with the history I've had with Woy-chek, he is a dumb Pole that pollutes the WWII UR threads with his smears of the noble Germans during WWII.Now, in war all sides commit atrocities. No one is denying this.
And yet you’re a nazi – interesting, if you had the capacity to understand the meaning of the word and minimal knowledge of history
.
Summary: UR readers, you should go easy on Woy-chek.
Because he is seething with frustration just below the skin.
He knows that Poland sided with evil in WWII. It believed the promises made by ZOG controlled FDR and Britain that they would come to its aid in the event that Germany attacked it.And to that end, the Anglo-Zionist filth encouraged the conscience-free Polish cowards to commit unspeakable atrocities against ethnic Germans living within Poland (tens of thousands murdered, had their eyes gouges out, raped and brutalised etc), PRIOR to September 1939.
They did this to actually provoke a war with Germany.Of course hostilities with Germany could SO EASILY have been avoided.
Hitler sought friendly relations with Poland.
He extended all manner of magnanimous overtures to Poland right up until May/June 1939.But the feral Poles spat in his face. At that moment Hitler knew that negotiation with these inbred imbeciles was no longer possible, that the crimes against ethnic Germans would continue endlessly - because the Jew masters of the Polish ruling elite had decreed it
Look up the Liaison Committee on Medical Education and the Commission on Osteopathic College Accreditation (COCA). These are private bodies that oversee all medical (MD and DO) schools in the US. Check who “owns” these organizations. Then you will know that the medical cartel is controlled by the doctors and hospital owners, and that the government has ceded the right to control med schools to them.
So now, that you know this, and have no more excuses for blaming the government, please answer my simple question:
how do you imagine to convince these big shot doctors, who run the medical cartel in the US, to earn less and spread the wealth more?
Mark, first of all you are right – by simple extension I have attributed to you Dr. Paul’s recommendation, whereas you have suggested something different.
But your personal recommendation, as already pointed above, is based on false assumptions – government has nothing to do with the number of available seats in med schools in the US. The cartel you are thinking about consists of doctors and hospital owners. Interestingly the only solution to this problem that I am aware of across the World is to bring in the government.
Simply speaking unchecked human greed is the gatekeeper here. Not the government.
So tell me, how do you imagine to convince these big shot doctors, who run the medical cartel in the US, to earn less and spread the wealth more?
Woy-chek, you're not very bright, are you?
how do you imagine to convince these big shot doctors, who run the medical cartel in the US, to earn less and spread the wealth more?
Throughout history we've found that government is NEVER the solution.
Interestingly the only solution to this problem that I am aware of across the World is to bring in the government.
Impressive achievements. But some context is missing. It would be nice if the Author explained that the Nature index is based on a couple of assumptions:
1) Every author is counted as equal, regardless of their contributions;
2) Institution scores are not normalized for their size.
Clearly 1+2 creates a bias. For example, CAS has (officially) 7-8 times as many researchers as Harvard. yet its Nature index share is less than 2.5 times that of Harvard.
But a really interesting thing happens, when we look at the two most prestigious science publications. The ranking is very different then:
1 Harvard University 267 70.40
2 Stanford University 189 67.32
3 Max Planck Society 210 54.26
4 Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS) 219 46.68
5 Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) 194 34.30
6 University of California, San Francisco (UCSF) 78 26.02
7 Cornell University 95 23.78
8 Peking University (PKU) 94 22.95
9 California Institute of Technology (Caltech) 89 22.56
10 University of California, San Diego (UC San Diego) 81 22.51
This correlates much better with the main prizes, such as Nobel, and proves that accusations of political bias are rather baseless.
In other words, an institution with 50,000 researchers has an advantage over one a tenth the size, and that according to you is unfair. In my opinion, that is not unfair if we want to estimate the institution -- or country -- that is likely to produce more breakthoughs.
Institution scores [in the Nature index] are not normalized for their size.
That is not surprising, as most Nobel committee members probably can't read Chinese.
[Wojtek's rankings of the top universities] correlates much better with the main prizes, such as Nobel...
It does nothing of the sort.
...and proves that accusations of political bias are rather baseless.
Mark,
A few facts: life expectancy in the US now is about 80; health care of an average 80YO costs twice as much as that of a 70YO; in the 60s the quality of healthcare for blacks, latinos, and white immigrant communities measured relative to WASPs was much worse than it is today; individual medical schools – which means doctors – decide how many matriculants to accept; the freeze in the number of matriculants started in early 1980s – during Reagan era, and that number has not changed until ~2015, despite the population growth.
Generally you need to accept that the American economic model means that life necessities are very expensive, even when compared to other developed countries. Whether it is health care, or housing, or schooling, or fresh food. The only cheap things are the ones that are imported from the 3rd world countries (that to me includes China). Although apparently even imported things now cost a fortune – $50K before taxes and fees for an average new car??? I guess we should add cars to life necessities in the US.
Putting aside for a moment trying to understand why this model developed in this way, you are proposing to change only one element of the model – healthcare – without addressing the whole structure of the system. A system which has been designed to suck out every penny and then some from the working population.
It’s clear your solution cannot work. Because what you (or Dr. Paul) are proposing, namely HSAs, means just more of the same system.
I am not sure you now what avoidance is.
Don’t you worry – I may not be an expert at avoidance like you are (and you are a true expert – you avoid to acknowledge the zio-nazi putsch in Ukraine in 2014), but I know enough to notice that you avoided it 🙂
And the brain dead imbecile is obviously unable to comprehend the simple fact that as capitalized, "Western Military Districts" is a proper noun purporting to identify a particularized named Hq that in the plural form is a generic term identifying and referring to any number of like Hqs. rather than any particularized named Hq such as the "Western Military District." Thus there is fact were no named "Western Military Districts" hq. There only was a "Western Military District" that was located in Minsk and no other place.And not the galloping pole continues to ignore the challenge I posed that he identify using the Latin alphabet the name of the CG of the Western Military District and Western Special Military District that he avoids precisely because it would instantly expose the deception, misrepresentation and fraud he practices by how he refers to those Hqs.Replies: @wojtek
he confused plural and real “Western Defense Districts” with a nonexistent entity of “Western Military District”.
pole continues to deceive, mislead and misrepresent that:
Since the old galloping kike is begging for it again, here it is:
1. Old Galloping Kike tried to claim “the entire issue under discussion has been the Command HQ on the line of contact on June22”, which exposed all of his stupidity.
2. The whole issue started with P.M.’s comment #456, where he claimed that “the inventory showed that 10,540 operable tanks were in the Western Defense Districts.”
3. Bonehead galloping kike replied to that in comment #467, demonstrating immediately your ignorance, by stating that Clark “identifies the Western Military District reconstituted on June 23 as Western Front had 6 Mech. Corps under command.”
Kike’s errors are elementary and are derived from your inability to read simple texts in English with a semblance of understanding:
– you mistakenly interpreted “Western Defense Districts”, which in Russian nomenclature is a term used to describe jointly 5 MDs, with a single one: “Western Military District” – you can’t tell singular form plural;
– you also made a mistake, because in 1941 there was no “Western Military District” – there was “Western Special military district”.
4. You also demanded that P.M. correct your errors by stating: “Maybe you can clear up the confusion your description of the inventory of tanks in the Russian military districts creates”
5. In further correspondence you admit in comment #572 to your mess: “It evidently escaped you that I identified the Western Military Districts as only one of four “fronts”” – which proves that you still had no clue about the mistakes you made.
6. This is when P.M. provided you with an original source which provides a detailed number of tanks in the so called “ЗАПАДНЫЕ ВОЕННЫЕ ОКРУГА” – aka Western military districts 🙂
7. In turn, old galloping lying kike further demonstrated his inability to read by stating in comment #650 that “The text you cite fails to address directly any of he points I made”, which is an outright lie, because
– it is a lie – the cited Russian text addresses every point you tried to make,,
– but also because you later admitted in comment #884 that you can’t read Russian – what a facepalm moment 🙂
8. In comments #836 P.M. corrected your mistake
9. But you insisted on being wrong and in comment #839 you incorrectly stated that “The following military districts were n the line of contact on June 22, 2941: Leningrad MD renamed Northern Front; Baltic MD renamed Northwestern Front; Western MD renamed Western Front, and Kiev MD renamed Southwestern Front as detailed in Clark The Russian German Conflict 1941-1945.”
10. To which P.M. finished you off with a direct quote from your source: “By the middle of May 1941 there were nearly 170 divisions, or over five sevenths of the country’s total armed strength, outside the 1939 frontiers. They were distributed in the five “military districts” running from north to south as “Leningrad,” “Baltic,” “Western,” “Kiev,” and “Odessa” commands”.
11. After this you unsuccessfully tried to change the narrative in comment #905, pathetically replying to your own post so that nobody can read it, that: “the entire issue under discussion has been the Command HQ on the line of contact on June22”.
I’m glad you begged for me to repeat all this again.
Exactly what I had been saying from the beginning when I identified the four military districts on the June 1941 line of contact as the named "Leningrad MD," "Baltic MD," Western MD," "Kiev MD," Clark identified, not counting the Odessa MD that was off the line of contact that he didn't even mention except to note it was incorporated into the Kiev MD redesignated as the "Southwestern Front." Also note that exactly as I have been saying that you have been trying to obfuscate by galloping over the generic term that identifies a type of military HQ (i.e. military district Hq) such as "armored corps" or "infantry corps" as distinct from proper nouns appropriately capitalized identifying particular named HQs that singularly refers only to a specifically named Hq. such as 24th Panzer Crops.Your lengthy babbling IN WHICH YOU CONTINUED TO ENGAGE IN THE SAME obfuscation of galloping over named Hqs and generic references to military districts has, however, clearly evaded, avoided and tried to obfuscate the challenge I posed that you cite using the Latin alphabet the names of the CG of the "Western Military District and/or the "Western Special Military District." Not a very difficult task. But one you strenuously avoid because doing so would entirely expose the deception, lying, misrepresentation and fraud you have been practicing by galloping over the different words used to refer to named Hqs and generic references to a type of military command.Concludes :
"They [[were distributed in the five “military districts” running from north to south as “Leningrad,” “Baltic,” “Western,” “Kiev,” and “Odessa” commands”.
And summarized in one comment how you have been galloping over words with the lies, deceptions and misrepresentations and frauds you have posted.So until you give the simple, clear, direct and truth answer to that query, I will simply recite it as my response to any further gibberish you post on this issue.,Replies: @wojtek
I’m glad you begged for me to repeat all this again.
You're obviously in the same category of troll as others here who've made wild but entirely false and completely ridiculous accusations against me, which seems to be your shared script and common stock in trade, while keeping your heads firmly planted where the sun doesn't shine, like the Flat Earth people.Luckily for all of us, physics doesn’t care what moronic fedbois have to say.
I’ve said from the beginning that aluminum cannot cut steel.
What, fedboi, no quotes from Google AI this time? Or is your whole post LLM generated? 🙂
But this below, coming from a bonehead who confuses chemistry with physics, is priceless 🙂
who’ve made wild but entirely false and completely ridiculous accusations
Still it checks that others would recognize you – you’re so … obvious. Almost wondering who would think you’re of any use.