The Unz Review • An Alternative Media Selection$
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • B
Show CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
AgreeDisagreeThanksLOLTroll
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Thanks, LOL, or Troll with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used three times during any eight hour period.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Current Commenter
says:

Leave a Reply -


 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
$
Submitted comments have been licensed to The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Commenting Disabled While in Translation Mode
Commenters to FollowHide Excerpts
By Authors Filter?
Alastair Crooke Ambrose Kane Anatoly Karlin Andrew Anglin Andrew Joyce Audacious Epigone Boyd D. Cathey C.J. Hopkins E. Michael Jones Eric Margolis Eric Striker Fred Reed Gilad Atzmon Gregory Hood Guillaume Durocher Hua Bin Ilana Mercer Israel Shamir ISteve Community James Kirkpatrick James Thompson Jared Taylor John Derbyshire Jonathan Cook Jung-Freud Karlin Community Kevin Barrett Kevin MacDonald Larry Romanoff Laurent Guyénot Linh Dinh Michael Hudson Mike Whitney Pat Buchanan Patrick Cockburn Paul Craig Roberts Paul Kersey Pepe Escobar Peter Frost Philip Giraldi Razib Khan Ron Unz Steve Sailer The Saker Tobias Langdon A. Graham A. J. Smuskiewicz A Southerner Academic Research Group UK Staff Adam Hochschild Aedon Cassiel Agha Hussain Ahmad Al Khaled Ahmet Öncü Al X Griz Alain De Benoist Alan Macleod Albemarle Man Alex Graham Alexander Cockburn Alexander Hart Alexander Jacob Alexander Wolfheze Alfred De Zayas Alfred McCoy Alison Weir Allan Wall Allegra Harpootlian Amalric De Droevig Amr Abozeid Anand Gopal Anastasia Katz Andre Damon Andre Vltchek Andreas Canetti Andrei Martyanov Andrew Cockburn Andrew Fraser Andrew Hamilton Andrew J. Bacevich Andrew Napolitano Andrew S. Fischer Andy Kroll Angie Saxon Ann Jones Anna Tolstoyevskaya Anne Wilson Smith Anonymous Anonymous American Anonymous Attorney Anonymous Occidental Anthony Boehm Anthony Bryan Anthony DiMaggio Tony Hall Antiwar Staff Antonius Aquinas Antony C. Black Ariel Dorfman Arlie Russell Hochschild Arno Develay Arnold Isaacs Artem Zagorodnov Astra Taylor AudaciousEpigone Augustin Goland Austen Layard Ava Muhammad Aviva Chomsky Ayman Fadel Bailey Schwab Barbara Ehrenreich Barbara Garson Barbara Myers Barry Kissin Barry Lando Barton Cockey Beau Albrecht Belle Chesler Ben Fountain Ben Freeman Ben Sullivan Benjamin Villaroel Bernard M. Smith Beverly Gologorsky Bill Black Bill Moyers Blake Archer Williams Bob Dreyfuss Bonnie Faulkner Book Brad Griffin Bradley Moore Brenton Sanderson Brett Redmayne-Titley Brett Wilkins Brian Dew Brian McGlinchey Brian R. Wright Britannicus Brittany Smith Brooke C.D. Corax C.J. Miller Caitlin Johnstone Cara Marianna Carl Boggs Carl Horowitz Carolyn Yeager Cat McGuire Catherine Crump César Keller Chalmers Johnson Chanda Chisala Charles Bausman Charles Goodhart Charles Wood Charlie O'Neill Charlottesville Survivor Chase Madar ChatGPT Chauke Stephan Filho Chris Hedges Chris Roberts Chris Woltermann Christian Appy Christophe Dolbeau Christopher DeGroot Christopher Donovan Christopher Harvin Christopher Ketcham Chuck Spinney Civus Non Nequissimus CODOH Editors Coleen Rowley Colin Liddell Cooper Sterling Courtney Alabama Craig Murray Cynthia Chung D.F. Mulder Dahr Jamail Dakota Witness Dan E. Phillips Dan Roodt Dan Sanchez Daniel Barge Daniel McAdams Daniel Moscardi Daniel Vinyard Danny Sjursen Dave Chambers Dave Kranzler Dave Lindorff David Barsamian David Boyajian David Bromwich David Chibo David Chu David Gordon David Haggith David Irving David L. McNaron David Lorimer David Martin David North David Skrbina David Stockman David Vine David Walsh David William Pear David Yorkshire Dean Baker Declan Hayes Dennis Dale Dennis Saffran Diana Johnstone Diego Ramos Dilip Hiro Dirk Bezemer Dmitriy Kalyagin Don Wassall Donald Thoresen Alan Sabrosky Dr. Ejaz Akram Dr. Ridgely Abdul Mu’min Muhammad Dries Van Langenhove E. Frederick Stevens E. Geist Eamonn Fingleton Ed Warner Edmund Connelly Eduardo Galeano Edward Curtin Edward Dutton Egbert Dijkstra Egor Kholmogorov Ehud Shapiro Ekaterina Blinova Ellen Brown Ellen Packer Ellison Lodge Emil Kirkegaard Emilio García Gómez Emma Goldman Enzo Porter Eric Draitser Eric Paulson Eric Peters Eric Rasmusen Eric Zuesse Erik Edstrom Erika Eichelberger Erin L. Thompson Eugene Gant Eugene Girin Eugene Kusmiak Eve Mykytyn F. Douglas Stephenson F. Roger Devlin Fadi Abu Shammalah Fantine Gardinier Federale Fenster Fergus Hodgson Finian Cunningham The First Millennium Revisionist Fordham T. Smith Former Agent Forum Francis Goumain Frank Key Frank Tipler Franklin Lamb Franklin Stahl Frida Berrigan Friedrich Zauner Gabriel Black Ganainm Gary Corseri Gary Heavin Gary North Gary Younge Gavin Newsom Gene Tuttle George Albert George Bogdanich George Galloway George Koo George Mackenzie George Szamuely Georgia Hayduke Georgianne Nienaber Gerhard Grasruck Gilbert Cavanaugh Gilbert Doctorow Giles Corey Glen K. Allen Glenn Greenwald A. Beaujean Agnostic Alex B. Amnestic Arcane Asher Bb Bbartlog Ben G Birch Barlow Canton ChairmanK Chrisg Coffee Mug Darth Quixote David David B David Boxenhorn DavidB Diana Dkane DMI Dobeln Duende Dylan Ericlien Fly Gcochran Godless Grady Herrick Jake & Kara Jason Collins Jason Malloy Jason s Jeet Jemima Joel John Emerson John Quiggin JP Kele Kjmtchl Mark Martin Matoko Kusanagi Matt Matt McIntosh Michael Vassar Miko Ml Ole P-ter Piccolino Rosko Schizmatic Scorpius Suman TangoMan The Theresa Thorfinn Thrasymachus Wintz Godfree Roberts Gonzalo Lira Graham Seibert Grant M. Dahl Greg Garros Greg Grandin Greg Johnson Greg Klein Gregg Stanley Gregoire Chamayou Gregory Conte Gregory Wilpert Guest Admin Gunnar Alfredsson Gustavo Arellano H.G. Reza Hank Johnson Hannah Appel Hans-Hermann Hoppe Hans Vogel Harri Honkanen Heiner Rindermann Henry Cockburn Hewitt E. Moore Hina Shamsi Howard Zinn Howe Abbot-Hiss Hubert Collins Hugh Kennedy Hugh McInnish Hugh Moriarty Hugh Perry Hugo Dionísio Hunter DeRensis Hunter Wallace Huntley Haverstock Ian Fantom Ian Proud Ichabod Thornton Igor Shafarevich Ira Chernus Irmin Vinson Ivan Kesić J. Alfred Powell J.B. Clark J.D. Gore J. Ricardo Martins Jacek Szela Jack Antonio Jack Dalton Jack Kerwick Jack Krak Jack Rasmus Jack Ravenwood Jack Sen Jake Bowyer James Bovard James Carroll James Carson Harrington James Chang James Dunphy James Durso James Edwards James Fulford James Gillespie James Hanna James J. O'Meara James K. Galbraith James Karlsson James Lawrence James Petras James W. Smith Jane Lazarre Jane Weir Janice Kortkamp Janko Vukic Jared S. Baumeister Jason C. Ditz Jason Cannon Jason Kessler Jay Stanley Jayant Bhandari JayMan Jean Bricmont Jean Marois Jean Ranc Jef Costello Jeff J. Brown Jeffrey Blankfort Jeffrey D. Sachs Jeffrey St. Clair Jen Marlowe Jeremiah Goulka Jeremy Cooper Jeremy Kuzmarov Jesse Mossman JHR Writers Jim Daniel Jim Fetzer Jim Goad Jim Kavanagh Jim Mamer Jim Smith JoAnn Wypijewski Joe Atwill Joe Dackman Joe Lauria Joel Davis Joel S. Hirschhorn Johannes Wahlstrom John W. Dower John Feffer John Fund John Gorman John Harrison Sims John Helmer John Hill John Huss John J. Mearsheimer John Jackson John Kiriakou John Macdonald John Morgan John Patterson John Leonard John Pilger John Q. Publius John Rand John Reid John Ryan John Scales Avery John Siman John Stauber John T. Kelly John Taylor John Titus John Tremain John V. Walsh John Wear John Williams Jon Else Jon Entine Jonas E. Alexis Jonathan Alan King Jonathan Anomaly Jonathan Revusky Jonathan Rooper Jonathan Sawyer Jonathan Schell Jordan Henderson Jordan Steiner Jorge Besada Jose Alberto Nino Joseph Correro Joseph Kay Joseph Kishore Joseph Sobran Josephus Tiberius Josh Neal Jeshurun Tsarfat Juan Cole Judith Coburn Julian Bradford Julian Macfarlane K.J. Noh Kacey Gunther Karel Van Wolferen Karen Greenberg Karl Haemers Karl Nemmersdorf Karl Thorburn Kees Van Der Pijl Keith Woods Kelley Vlahos Kenn Gividen Kenneth A. Carlson Kenneth Vinther Kerry Bolton Kersasp D. Shekhdar Kevin DeAnna Kevin Folta Kevin Michael Grace Kevin Rothrock Kevin Sullivan Kevin Zeese Kit Klarenberg Kshama Sawant Lance Welton Larry C. Johnson Laura Gottesdiener Laura Poitras Lawrence Erickson Lawrence G. Proulx Leo Hohmann Leonard C. Goodman Leonard R. Jaffee Liam Cosgrove Lidia Misnik Lilith Powell Linda Preston Lipton Matthews Liv Heide Logical Meme Lorraine Barlett Louis Farrakhan Lydia Brimelow M.G. Miles Mac Deford Maciej Pieczyński Mahmoud Khalil Maidhc O Cathail Malcolm Unwell Marc Sills Marco De Wit Marcus Alethia Marcus Apostate Marcus Cicero Marcus Devonshire Marcy Winograd Margaret Flowers Margot Metroland Marian Evans Mark Allen Mark Bratchikov-Pogrebisskiy Mark Crispin Miller Mark Danner Mark Engler Mark Gullick Mark H. Gaffney Mark Lu Mark O'Brien Mark Perry Mark Weber Marshall Yeats Martin Jay Martin K. O'Toole Martin Lichtmesz Martin Webster Martin Witkerk Mary Phagan-Kean Matt Cockerill Matt Parrott Mattea Kramer Matthew Battaglioli Matthew Caldwell Matthew Ehret Matthew Harwood Matthew Richer Matthew Stevenson Max Blumenthal Max Denken Max Jones Max North Max Parry Max West Maya Schenwar Merlin Miller Metallicman Michael A. Roberts Michael Averko Michael Gould-Wartofsky Michael Hoffman Michael Masterson Michael Quinn Michael Schwartz Michael T. Klare Michelle Malkin Miko Peled Mnar Muhawesh Moon Landing Skeptic Morgan Jones Morris V. De Camp Mr. Anti-Humbug Muhammed Abu Murray Polner N. Joseph Potts Nan Levinson Naomi Oreskes Nate Terani Nathan Cofnas Nathan Doyle Ned Stark Neil Kumar Nelson Rosit Neville Hodgkinson Niall McCrae Nicholas R. Jeelvy Nicholas Stix Nick Griffin Nick Kollerstrom Nick Turse Nicolás Palacios Navarro Nils Van Der Vegte Noam Chomsky NOI Research Group Nomi Prins Norman Finkelstein Norman Solomon OldMicrobiologist Oliver Boyd-Barrett Oliver Williams Oscar Grau P.J. Collins Pádraic O'Bannon Patrice Greanville Patrick Armstrong Patrick Cleburne Patrick Cloutier Patrick Lawrence Patrick Martin Patrick McDermott Patrick Whittle Paul Bennett Paul Cochrane Paul De Rooij Paul Edwards Paul Engler Paul Gottfried Paul Larudee Paul Mitchell Paul Nachman Paul Nehlen Paul Souvestre Paul Tripp Pedro De Alvarado Peter Baggins Ph.D. Peter Bradley Peter Brimelow Peter Gemma Peter Haenseler Peter Lee Peter Van Buren Philip Kraske Philip Weiss Pierre M. Sprey Pierre Simon Povl H. Riis-Knudsen Pratap Chatterjee Publius Decius Mus Qasem Soleimani R, Weiler Rachel Marsden Raches Radhika Desai Rajan Menon Ralph Nader Ralph Raico Ramin Mazaheri Ramziya Zaripova Ramzy Baroud Randy Shields Raul Diego Ray McGovern Raymond Wolters Rebecca Gordon Rebecca Solnit Reginald De Chantillon Rémi Tremblay Rev. Matthew Littlefield Ricardo Duchesne Richard Cook Richard Falk Richard Faussette Richard Foley Richard Galustian Richard Houck Richard Hugus Richard Knight Richard Krushnic Richard McCulloch Richard Parker Richard Silverstein Richard Solomon Rick Shenkman Rick Sterling Rita Rozhkova Rob Crease Robert Baxter Robert Bonomo Robert Debrus Robert F. Kennedy Jr. Robert Fisk Robert Hampton Robert Henderson Robert Inlakesh Robert LaFlamme Robert Lindsay Robert Lipsyte Robert Parry Robert Roth Robert S. Griffin Robert Scheer Robert Stark Robert Stevens Robert Trivers Robert Wallace Robert Weissberg Robin Eastman Abaya Roger Dooghy Rolo Slavskiy Romana Rubeo Romanized Visigoth Ron Paul Ronald N. Neff Rory Fanning Rose Pinochet RT Staff Ruuben Kaalep Ryan Andrews Ryan Dawson Sabri Öncü Salim Mansur Sam Dickson Sam Francis Sam Husseini Samuel Sequeira Sayed Hasan Scot Olmstead Scott Howard Scott Locklin Scott Ritter Seaghan Breathnach Servando Gonzalez Sharmine Narwani Sharmini Peries Sheldon Richman Sidney James Sietze Bosman Sigurd Kristensen Sinclair Jenkins Southfront Editor Spencer Davenport Spencer J. Quinn Stefan Karganovic Steffen A. Woll Stephanie Savell Stephen F. Cohen Stephen J. Rossi Stephen J. Sniegoski Stephen Paul Foster Sterling Anderson Steve Fraser Steve Keen Steve Penfield Steven Farron Steven Starr Steven Yates Subhankar Banerjee Susan Southard Sybil Fares Sydney Schanberg Talia Mullin Tanya Golash-Boza Taxi Taylor McClain Taylor Young Ted O'Keefe Ted Rall The Crew The Zman Theodore A. Postol Thierry Meyssan Thomas A. Fudge Thomas Anderson Thomas Hales Thomas Dalton Thomas Ertl Thomas Frank Thomas Hales Thomas Jackson Thomas O. Meehan Thomas Steuben Thomas Zaja Thorsten J. Pattberg Tim Shorrock Tim Weiner Timothy Vorgenss Timur Fomenko Tingba Muhammad Todd E. Pierce Todd Gitlin Todd Miller Tom Engelhardt Tom Mysiewicz Tom Piatak Tom Suarez Tom Sunic Torin Murphy Tracy Rosenberg Travis LeBlanc Trevor Lynch Vernon Thorpe Virginia Dare Vito Klein Vladimir Brovkin Vladimir Putin Vladislav Krasnov Vox Day W. Patrick Lang Walt King Walter E. Block Warren Balogh Washington Watcher Washington Watcher II Wayne Allensworth Wei Ling Chua Wesley Muhammad White Man Faculty Whitney Webb Wilhelm Kriessmann Wilhem Ivorsson Will Jones Will Offensicht William Binney William DeBuys William Hartung William J. Astore Winslow T. Wheeler Wyatt Peterson Wyatt Reed Ximena Ortiz Yan Shen Yaroslav Podvolotskiy Yvonne Lorenzo Zhores Medvedev
Nothing found
By Topics/Categories Filter?
2020 Election Academia American Media American Military American Pravda Anti-Semitism Benjamin Netanyahu Black Crime Black Lives Matter Blacks Britain Censorship China China/America Conspiracy Theories Covid Culture/Society Donald Trump Economics Foreign Policy Gaza Genocide Hamas History Holocaust Ideology Immigration IQ Iran Israel Israel Lobby Israel/Palestine Jews Joe Biden NATO Nazi Germany Neocons Open Thread Political Correctness Race/Ethnicity Russia Science Ukraine Vladimir Putin World War II 汪精衛 100% Jussie-free Content 2008 Election 2012 Election 2016 Election 2018 Election 2022 Election 2024 Election 23andMe 9/11 Abortion Abraham Lincoln Academy Awards Achievement Gap ACLU Acting White Adam Schiff Addiction ADL Admin Administration Admixture Adolf Hitler Advertising AfD Affective Empathy Affirmative Action Affordable Family Formation Afghanistan Africa African Americans African Genetics Africans Afrikaner Age Age Of Malthusian Industrialism Agriculture AI AIPAC Air Force Aircraft Carriers Airlines Airports Al Jazeera Al Qaeda Alain Soral Alan Clemmons Alan Dershowitz Albania Albert Einstein Albion's Seed Alcohol Alcoholism Alejandro Mayorkas Alex Jones Alexander Dugin Alexander Vindman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez Alexei Navalny Algeria Ali Dawabsheh Alien And Sedition Acts Alison Nathan Alt Right Altruism Amazon Amazon.com America America First American Civil War American Dream American History American Indians American Israel Public Affairs Committee American Jews American Left American Nations American Presidents American Prisons American Renaissance Amerindians Amish Amnesty Amnesty International Amos Hochstein Amy Klobuchar Anarchism Ancient DNA Ancient Genetics Ancient Greece Ancient Rome Andrei Nekrasov Andrew Bacevich Andrew Yang Anglo-America Anglo-imperialism Anglo-Saxons Anglos Anglosphere Angola Animal IQ Animal Rights Wackos Animals Ann Coulter Anne Frank Anthony Blinken Anthony Fauci Anthrax Anthropology Anti-Defamation League Anti-Gentilism Anti-Semites Anti-Vaccination Anti-Vaxx Anti-white Animus Antifa Antifeminism Antiquity Antiracism Antisemitism Antisemitism Awareness Act Antisocial Behavior Antizionism Antony Blinken Apartheid Apartheid Israel Apollo's Ascent Appalachia Apple Arab Christianity Arab Spring Arabs Archaeogenetics Archaeology Architecture Arctic Arctic Sea Ice Melting Argentina Ariel Sharon Armageddon War Armenia Armenian Genocide Army Arnold Schwarzenegger Arnon Milchan Art Arthur Jensen Arthur Lichte Artificial Intelligence Arts/Letters Aryan Invasion Theory Aryans Aryeh Lightstone Ashkenazi Intelligence Ashkenazi Jews Asia Asian Americans Asian Quotas Asians Assassination Assassinations Assimilation Atheism Atlanta AUMF Auschwitz Austin Metcalf Australia Australian Aboriginals Automation Avril Haines Ayn Rand Azerbaijan Azov Brigade Babes And Hunks Baby Gap Balfour Declaration Balkans Balochistan Baltics Baltimore Riots Banjamin Netanyahu Banking Industry Banking System Banks #BanTheADL Barack Obama Baseball Statistics Bashar Al-Assad Basketball BBC BDS BDS Movement Beauty Behavior Genetics Behavioral Genetics Belarus Belgium Belgrade Embassy Bombing Ben Cardin Ben Rhodes Ben Shapiro Ben Stiller Benny Gantz Bernard Henri-Levy Bernie Sanders Betar US Betsy DeVos Betty McCollum Bezalel Smotrich Bezalel Yoel Smotrich Biden BigPost Bilateral Relations Bilingual Education Bill Clinton Bill De Blasio Bill Gates Bill Kristol Bill Maher Bill Of Rights Billionaires Billy Graham Bioethics Biology Bioweapons Birmingham Birth Rate Bitcoin Black Community Black History Month Black Muslims Black People Black Slavery BlackLivesMatter Blackmail Blake Masters Blank Slatism BLM Blog Blogging Blogosphere Blond Hair Blood Libel Blue Eyes Boasian Anthropology Boeing Boers Bolshevik Revolution Bolshevik Russia Books Boomers Border Wall Boris Johnson Bosnia Boycott Divest And Sanction Brain Scans Brain Size Brain Structure Brazil Bret Stephens Bretton Woods Brexit Brezhnev Bri Brian Mast BRICs British Empire British Labour Party British Politics Buddhism Build The Wall Bulldog Bush Business Byzantine Caitlin Johnstone California Californication Camp Of The Saints Canada Canary Mission Cancer Candace Owens Capitalism Carlos Slim Caroline Glick Carroll Quigley Cars Carthaginians Catalonia Catholic Church Catholicism Catholics Cats Caucasus CCP CDC Ceasefire Cecil Rhodes Census Central Asia Central Intelligence Agency Chanda Chisala Chaos And Order Charles De Gaulle Charles Kushner Charles Lindbergh Charles Manson Charles Murray Charles Schumer Charlie Hebdo Charlie Kirk Charlottesville ChatGPT Checheniest Chechen Of Them All Chechens Chechnya Chetty Chicago Chicagoization Chicken Hut Child Abuse Children Chile China Vietnam Chinese Chinese Communist Party Chinese Evolution Chinese IQ Chinese Language Christian Zionists Christianity Christmas Christopher Steele Christopher Wray Chuck Schumer CIA Cinema Civil Liberties Civil Rights Civil Rights Movement Civil War Civilization Clannishness Clash Of Civilizations Class Classical Antiquity Classical History Classical Music Clayton County Climate Change Clint Eastwood Clintons Coal Coalition Of The Fringes Coen Brothers Cognitive Elitism Cognitive Science Cold Cold War Colin Kaepernick Colin Woodard College Admission College Football Colombia Colonialism Color Revolution Columbia University Columbus Comic Books Communism Computers Confederacy Confederate Flag Confucianism Congress Conquistador-American Conservatism Conservative Movement Conservatives Conspiracy Theory Constantinople Constitution Constitutional Theory Consumerism Controversial Book Convergence Core Article Corona Corporatism Corruption COTW Counterpunch Country Music Cousin Marriage Cover Story Covert Action COVID-19 Craig Murray Creationism Crime Crimea Crispr Critical Race Theory Cruise Missiles Crusades Crying Among The Farmland Crypto Cryptocurrency Ctrl-Left Cuba Cuban Missile Crisis Cuckery Cuckservative CUFI Cuisine Cultural Marxism Cultural Revolution Culture Culture War Czars Czech Republic DACA Daily Data Dump Dallas Shooting Damnatio Memoriae Dan Bilzarian Danny Danon Daren Acemoglu Darwinism Darya Dugina Data Data Analysis Dave Chappelle David Bazelon David Brog David Cole David Duke David Friedman David Frum David Irving David Lynch David Petraeus Davide Piffer Davos Death Of The West Deborah Lipstadt Debt Debt Jubilee Decadence Deep State DeepSeek Deficits Degeneracy Democracy Democratic Party Demograhics Demographic Transition Demographics Demography Denmark Dennis Ross Department Of Education Department Of Homeland Security Deplatforming Deportation Abyss Deportations Derek Chauvin Detroit Development Dick Cheney Diet Digital Yuan Dinesh D'Souza Discrimination Disease Disinformation Disney Disparate Impact Disraeli Dissent Dissidence Diversity Diversity Before Diversity Diversity Pokemon Points Dmitry Medvedev DNA Dogs Dollar Domestic Surveillance Domestic Terrorism Doomsday Clock Dostoevsky Doug Emhoff Doug Feith Dresden Drone War Drones Drug Cartels Drug Laws Drugs Duterte Dysgenic Dystopia E. Michael Jones E. O. Wilson East Asia East Asian Exception East Asians East Turkestan Easter Eastern Europe Ebrahim Raisi Economic Development Economic History Economic Sanctions Economy Edmund Burke Edmund Burke Foundation Education Edward Snowden Effective Altruism Effortpost Efraim Zurofff Egor Kholmogorov Egypt El Salvador Election 2016 Election 2018 Election 2020 Election Fraud Elections Electric Cars Eli Rosenbaum Elie Wiesel Eliot Cohen Eliot Engel Elise Stefanik Elites Elizabeth Holmes Elizabeth Warren Elliot Abrams Elliott Abrams Elon Musk Emigration Emmanuel Macron Emmett Till Employment Energy England Enoch Powell Entertainment Environment Environmentalism Epidemiology Equality Erdogan Eretz Israel Eric Zemmour Ernest Hemingway Espionage Espionage Act Estonia Ethics Ethics And Morals Ethiopia Ethnic Cleansing Ethnic Nepotism Ethnicity Ethnocentricty EU Eugene Debs Eugenics Eurabia Eurasia Euro Europe European Genetics European Right European Union Europeans Eurozone Evolution Evolutionary Biology Evolutionary Genetics Evolutionary Psychology Existential Risks Eye Color Face Shape Facebook Faces Fake News False Flag Attack Family Fantasy FARA Farmers Fascism Fast Food FBI FDA FDD Federal Reserve FEMA Feminism Ferguson Ferguson Shooting Fermi Paradox Fertility Fertility Fertility Rates Film Finance Financial Bailout Financial Bubbles Financial Debt Finland Finn Baiting First Amendment First World War FISA Fitness Flash Mobs Flight From White Floyd Riots 2020 Fluctuarius Argenteus Flynn Effect Food Football For Fun Forecasts Foreign Agents Registration Act Foreign Aid Foreign Policy Fourth Amendment Fox News France Francesca Albanese Frank Salter Frankfurt School Franklin D. Roosevelt Franklin Scandal Franz Boas Fraud Fred Kagan Free Market Free Speech Free Trade Freedom Of Speech Freedom Freemasons French French Revolution Friedrich Karl Berger Friends Of The Israel Defense Forces Frivolty Frontlash Furkan Dogan Future Futurism G20 Gambling Game Game Of Thrones Gavin McInnes Gavin Newsom Gay Germ Gay Marriage Gays/Lesbians Gaza Flotilla GDP Gen Z Gender Gender And Sexuality Gender Equality Gender Reassignment Gene-Culture Coevolution Genealogy General Intelligence General Motors Generation Z Generational Gap Genes Genetic Diversity Genetic Engineering Genetic Load Genetic Pacification Genetics Genomics Gentrification Geography Geopolitics George Floyd George Galloway George Patton George Soros George Tenet George W. Bush Georgia Germans Germany Ghislaine Maxwell Gilad Atzmon Gina Peddy Giorgia Meloni Gladwell Glenn Greenwald Global Warming Globalism Globalization Globo-Homo God Gold Golf Gonzalo Lira Google Government Government Debt Government Spending Government Surveillance Government Waste Grant Smith Graphs Great Bifurcation Great Depression Great Leap Forward Great Powers Great Replacement Greece Greeks Greenland Greg Cochran Gregory Clark Gregory Cochran Greta Thunberg Grooming Group Selection GSS Guardian Guest Guilt Culture Gun Control Guns GWAS Gypsies H.R. McMaster H1-B Visas Haim Saban Hair Color Haiti Hajnal Line Halloween HammerHate Hannibal Procedure Happening Happiness Harvard Harvard University Harvey Weinstein Hassan Nasrallah Hate Crimes Fraud Hoax Hate Hoaxes Hate Speech Hbd Hbd Chick Health Health And Medicine Health Care Healthcare Hegira Height Hell Henry Harpending Henry Kissinger Heredity Heritability Hezbollah High Speed Rail Hillary Clinton Hindu Caste System Hindus Hiroshima Hispanic Crime Hispanics Historical Genetics History Of Science Hitler HIV/AIDS Hoax Holland Hollywood Holocaust Denial Holocaust Deniers Homelessness Homicide Homicide Rate Hominin Homomania Homosexuality Hong Kong Houellebecq Housing Houthis Howard Kohr Huawei Huddled Masses Huey Newton Human Achievement Human Biodiversity Human Evolution Human Evolutionary Genetics Human Evolutionary Genomics Human Genetics Human Genomics Human Rights Human Rights Watch Humor Hungary Hunt For The Great White Defendant Hunter Biden Hunter-Gatherers I.F. Stone I.Q. I.Q. Genomics #IBelieveInHavenMonahan ICC Icj Ideas Identity Ideology And Worldview IDF Idiocracy Igbo Ilan Pappe Ilhan Omar Illegal Immigration Ilyushin IMF Impeachment Imperialism Inbreeding Income Income Tax India Indian Indian IQ Indians Individualism Indo-Europeans Indonesia Inequality Inflation Intelligence Intelligence Agencies Intelligent Design International International Comparisons International Court Of Justice International Criminal Court International Relations Internet Interracial Marriage Interracism Intersectionality Intifada Intra-Racism Intraracism Invade Invite In Hock Invade The World Invite The World Iosef Stalin Iosif Stalin Iq And Wealth Iran Nuclear Agreement Iran Nuclear Program Iranian Nuclear Program Iraq Iraq War Ireland Irish Is Love Colorblind Isaac Herzog ISIS Islam Islamic Jihad Islamic State Islamism Islamophobia Isolationism Israel Bonds Israel Defense Force Israel Defense Forces Israel Separation Wall Israeli Occupation IT Italy Itamar Ben-Gvir It's Okay To Be White Ivanka Ivy League J Street Jacky Rosen Jair Bolsonaro Jake Sullivan Jake Tapper Jamal Khashoggi James Angleton James Clapper James Comey James Forrestal James Jeffrey James Mattis James Watson James Zogby Janet Yellen Janice Yellen Japan Jared Diamond Jared Kushner Jared Taylor Jason Greenblatt JASTA Javier Milei JCPOA JD Vance Jeb Bush Jeffrey Epstein Jeffrey Goldberg Jeffrey Sachs Jen Psaki Jennifer Rubin Jens Stoltenberg Jeremy Corbyn Jerry Seinfeld Jerusalem Jerusalem Post Jesus Jesus Christ Jewish Genetics Jewish History Jewish Intellectuals Jewish Power Jewish Power Party Jewish Supremacism JFK Assassination JFK Jr. Jihadis Jill Stein Jimmy Carter Jingoism JINSA Joe Lieberman Joe Rogan John Bolton John Brennan John Derbyshire John F. Kennedy John Hagee John Kirby John Kiriakou John McCain John McLaughlin John Mearsheimer John Paul Joker Jonathan Freedland Jonathan Greenblatt Jonathan Pollard Jordan Peterson Joseph McCarthy Josh Gottheimer Josh Paul Journalism Judaism Judea Judge George Daniels Judicial System Judith Miller Julian Assange Jussie Smollett Justice Justin Trudeau Kaboom Kahanists Kaiser Wilhelm Kamala Harris Kamala On Her Knees Kanye West Karabakh War 2020 Karen Kwiatkowski Karine Jean-Pierre Karmelo Anthony Kash Patel Kashmir Kay Bailey Hutchison Kazakhstan Keir Starmer Kenneth Marcus Kevin MacDonald Kevin McCarthy Kevin Williamson Khazars Kids Kim Jong Un Kinship Kkk KKKrazy Glue Of The Coalition Of The Fringes Knesset Kompromat Korea Korean War Kosovo Kristi Noem Ku Klux Klan Kubrick Kurds Kushner Foundation Kyle Rittenhouse Kyrie Irving Language Laos Larry Ellison Larry C. Johnson Late Obama Age Collapse Latin America Latinos Laura Loomer Law Lawfare LDNR Lead Poisoning Leahy Amendments Leahy Law Lebanon Lee Kuan Yew Leftism Lenin Leo Frank Leo Strauss Let's Talk About My Hair LGBT LGBTI Liberal Opposition Liberal Whites Liberalism Liberals Libertarianism Libya Lindsey Graham Linguistics Literacy Literature Lithuania Litvinenko Living Standards Liz Cheney Liz Truss Lloyd Austin long-range-missile-defense Longevity Looting Lord Of The Rings Lorde Los Angeles Loudoun County Louis Farrakhan Love And Marriage Low-fat Lukashenko Lula Lyndon B Johnson Lyndon Johnson Madeleine Albright Mafia MAGA Magnitsky Act Mahmoud Abbas Malaysia Malaysian Airlines MH17 Manufacturing Mao Zedong Maoism Map Marco Rubio Maria Butina Maria Corina Machado Marijuana Marine Le Pen Marjorie Taylor Greene Mark Milley Mark Steyn Mark Warner Market Economy Martin Luther King Martin Scorsese Marvel Marx Marxism Masculinity Mass Immigration Mass Shootings Mate Choice Mathematics Matt Gaetz Max Blumenthal Max Boot Max Weber Maxine Waters Mayans McCain McCain/POW McDonald's Meat Media Media Bias Medicine Medieval Christianity Medieval Russia Mediterranean Diet Medvedev Megan McCain Meghan Markle Mein Obama Mel Gibson Men With Gold Chains Meng Wanzhou Mental Health Mental Illness Mental Traits Meritocracy Merkel Merkel Youth Merkel's Boner Merrick Garland Mexico MH 17 MI-6 Michael Bloomberg Michael Collins PIper Michael Flynn Michael Hudson Michael Jackson Michael Lind Michael McFaul Michael Moore Michael Morell Michael Pompeo Michelle Goldberg Michelle Ma Belle Michelle Obama Microaggressions Middle Ages Middle East Migration Mike Huckabee Mike Johnson Mike Pence Mike Pompeo Mike Signer Mike Waltz Mikhael Gorbachev Miles Mathis Militarized Police Military Military Analysis Military Budget Military History Military Spending Military Technology Millennials Milner Group Minimum Wage Minneapolis Minorities Minsk Accords Miriam Adelson Miscegenation Miscellaneous Misdreavus Mishima Missile Defense Mitch McConnell Mitt Romney Mixed-Race MK-Ultra Mohammed Bin Salman Monarchy Mondoweiss Money Mongolia Mongols Monkeypox Monopoly Monotheism Moon Landing Hoax Moon Landings Moore's Law Morality Mormonism Mormons Mortality Mortgage Moscow Mossad Movies Muhammad Multiculturalism Music Muslim Ban Muslims Mussolini NAEP Naftali Bennett Nakba NAMs Nancy Pelos Nancy Pelosi Narendra Modi NASA Natanz Nation Of Hate Nation Of Islam National Assessment Of Educational Progress National Debt National Endowment For Democracy National Review National Security Strategy National Socialism National Wealth Nationalism Native Americans Natural Gas Nature Vs. Nurture Navalny Affair Navy Standards Nazis Nazism Neandertals Neanderthals Negrolatry Nehru Neo-Nazis Neoconservatism Neoconservatives Neoliberalism Neolithic Neoreaction Nesta Webster Netherlands Never Again Education Act New Cold War New Dark Age New Deal New Horizon Foundation New Silk Road New Tes New Testament New World Order New York New York City New York Times New Zealand New Zealand Shooting NFL Nicholas II Nicholas Wade Nick Eberstadt Nick Fuentes Nicolas Maduro Niger Nigeria Nike Nikki Haley NIMBY Nina Jankowicz Noam Chomsky Nobel Peace Prize Nobel Prize Nord Stream Nord Stream Pipelines Nordics Norman Braman Norman Finkelstein North Africa North Korea Northern Ireland Northwest Europe Norway Novorossiya NSA NSO Group Nuclear Energy Nuclear Power Nuclear Proliferation Nuclear War Nuclear Weapons Nuremberg Nutrition Nvidia NYPD Obama Obama Presidency Obamacare Obesity Obituary Obscured American Occam's Razor Occupy Wall Street October Surprise OFAC Oil Oil Industry OJ Simpson Olav Scholz Old Testament Oliver Stone Olympics Open Borders OpenThread Opinion Poll Opioids Orban Organized Crime Orlando Shooting Orthodoxy Orwell Osama Bin Laden OTFI Ottoman Empire Our Soldiers Speak Out Of Africa Model Paganism Pakistan Pakistani Palantir Palestine Palestinians Palin Pam Bondi Panhandling Papacy Paper Review Parasite Burden Parenting Parenting Paris Attacks Partly Inbred Extended Family Pat Buchanan Patriot Act Patriotism Paul Craig Roberts Paul Findley Paul Ryan Paul Singer Paul Wolfowitz Pavel Grudinin Paypal Peak Oil Pearl Harbor Pedophilia Pentagon Personal Genomics Personality Pete Buttgieg Pete Hegseth Peter Frost Peter Thiel Petro Poroshenko Phil Rushton Philadelphia Philippines Philosophy Phoenicians Phyllis Randall Physiognomy Piers Morgan Pigmentation Pigs Piracy PISA Pizzagate POC Ascendancy Podcast Poetry Poland Police Police State Polio Political Correctness Makes You Stupid Political Dissolution Political Economy Politicians Politics Polling Pollution Polygamy Polygyny Pope Francis Population Population Genetics Population Growth Population Replacement Populism Porn Pornography Portland Portugal Portuguese Post-Apocalypse Postindustrialism Poverty Power Pramila Jayapal PRC Prediction Prescription Drugs President Joe Biden Presidential Race '08 Presidential Race '12 Presidential Race '16 Presidential Race '20 Prince Andrew Prince Harry Princeton University Priti Patel Privacy Privatization Progressives Propaganda Prostitution protest Protestantism Protocols Of The Elders Of Zion Proud Boys Psychology Psychometrics Psychopathy Public Health Public Schools Puerto Rico Puritans Putin Putin Derangement Syndrome QAnon Qasem Soleimani Qassem Soleimani Qatar Quantitative Genetics Quiet Skies R2P Race Race And Crime Race And Genomics Race And Iq Race And Religion Race/Crime Race Denialism Race/IQ Race-Ism Race Riots Rachel Corrie Racial Purism Racial Reality Racialism Racism Rafah Raj Shah Rand Paul Randy Fine Rape Rare Earths Rashida Tlaib Rationality Ray McGovern Raymond Chandler Razib Khan Real Estate RealWorld Recep Tayyip Erdogan Reconstruction Red Sea Refugee Crisis Religion Religion And Philosophy Rentier Reparations Reprint Republican Party Republicans Review Revisionism Rex Tillerson RFK Assassination Ricci Richard Dawkins Richard Goldberg Richard Grenell Richard Haas Richard Lewontin Richard Lynn Richard Nixon Rightwing Cinema Riots R/k Theory RMAX Robert A. Heinlein Robert F. Kennedy Jr. Robert Ford Robert Kagan Robert Kraft Robert Maxwell Robert McNamara Robert Mueller Robert Reich Robots Rock Music Roe Vs. Wade Roger Waters Rolling Stone Roman Empire Romania Romans Romanticism Rome Ron DeSantis Ron Paul Ron Unz Ronald Reagan Rotherham Rothschilds Roy Cohn RT International Rudy Giuliani Rush Limbaugh Russiagate Russian Demography Russian Elections 2018 Russian History Russian Media Russian Military Russian Nationalism Russian Occupation Government Russian Orthodox Church Russian Reaction Russians Russophobes Russophobia Rwanda Ryan Dawson Sabrina Rubin Erdely Sacha Baron Cohen Sacklers Sailer Strategy Sailer's First Law Of Female Journalism Saint Peter Tear Down This Gate! Saint-Petersburg Salman Rushie Salt Sam Altman Sam Bankman-Fried Sam Francis Samantha Power Samson Option San Bernadino Massacre Sandy Hook Sapir-Whorf SAT Satan Satanic Age Satanism Saudi Arabia Scandal Science Denialism Science Fiction Scooter Libby Scotland Scott Bessent Scott Ritter Scrabble Secession Self Determination Self Indulgence Semites Serbia Sergei Lavrov Sergei Skripal Sergey Glazyev Seth Rich Sex Sex Differences Sexism Sexual Harassment Sexual Selection Sexuality Seymour Hersh Shai Masot Shakespeare Shame Culture Shanghai Cooperation Organisation Sheldon Adelson Shias And Sunnis Shimon Arad Shireen Abu Akleh Shmuley Boteach Shoah Shorts And Funnies Shoshana Bryen Shulamit Aloni Shurat HaDin Sigal Mandelker Sigar Pearl Mandelker Sigmund Freud Silicon Valley Singapore Single Women Sinotriumph Six Day War Sixties SJWs Skin Color Slavery Slavery Reparations Slavs Smart Fraction Social Justice Warriors Social Media Social Science Socialism Society Sociobiology Sociology Sodium Solzhenitsyn Somalia Sotomayor South Africa South Asia South China Sea South Korea Southeast Asia Soviet History Soviet Union Sovok Space Space Exploration Space Program Spain Spanish Spanish River High School SPLC Sport Sports Srebrenica St Petersburg International Economic Forum Stabby Somali Staffan Stage Stalinism Standardized Tests Star Trek Star Wars Starvation Comparisons State Department Statistics Statue Of Liberty Steny Hoyer Stephen Cohen Stephen Jay Gould Stereotypes Steroids Steve Bannon Steve Sailer Steve Witkoff Steven Pinker Steven Witkoff Strait Of Hormuz Strategic Ambiguity Stuart Levey Stuart Seldowitz Student Debt Stuff White People Like Sub-Saharan Africa Sub-Saharan Africans Subhas Chandra Bose Subprime Mortgage Crisis Suburb Suella Braverman Sugar Suicide Superintelligence Supreme Court Surveillance Susan Glasser Svidomy Sweden Switzerland Symington Amendment Syria Syrian Civil War Ta-Nehisi Coates Taiwan Take Action Taliban Talmud Tariff Tariffs Tatars Taxation Taxes Technical Considerations Technology Ted Cruz Telegram Television Terrorism Terrorists Terry McAuliffe Tesla Testing Testosterone Tests Texas THAAD Thailand The AK The American Conservative The Bell Curve The Bible The Black Autumn The Cathedral The Confederacy The Constitution The Eight Banditos The Family The Free World The Great Awokening The Left The Middle East The New York Times The South The States The Zeroth Amendment To The Constitution Theranos Theresa May Third World Thomas Jefferson Thomas Massie Thomas Moorer Thought Crimes Tiananmen Massacre Tibet Tiger Mom TikTok TIMSS Tom Cotton Tom Massie Tom Wolfe Tony Blair Tony Blinken Tony Kleinfeld Too Many White People Torture Trade Trains Trans Fat Trans Fats Transgender Transgenderism Transhumanism Translation Translations Transportation Travel Trayvon Martin Trolling True Redneck Stereotypes Trump Trump Derangement Syndrome Trust Tsarist Russia Tucker Carlson Tulsa Tulsi Gabbard Turkey Turks TWA 800 Twins Twitter Ucla UFOs UK Ukrainian Crisis UN Security Council Unbearable Whiteness Unemployment United Kingdom United Nations United Nations General Assembly United Nations Security Council United States Universal Basic Income UNRWA Urbanization Ursula Von Der Leyen Uruguay US Blacks US Capitol Storming 2021 US Civil War II US Congress US Constitution US Elections 2016 US Elections 2020 US State Department USA USAID USS Liberty USSR Uyghurs Uzbekistan Vaccination Vaccines Valdimir Putin Valerie Plame Vdare Venezuela Victor Davis Hanson Victoria Nuland Victorian England Video Video Games Vietnam Vietnam War Vietnamese Vikings Viktor Orban Viktor Yanukovych Violence Vioxx Virginia Virginia Israel Advisory Board Vitamin D Vivek Ramaswamy Vladimir Zelensky Volodymyr Zelensky Vote Fraud Voting Rights Voting Rights Act Vulcan Society Waffen SS Wall Street Walmart Wang Ching Wei Wang Jingwei War War Crimes War Guilt War In Donbass War On Christmas War On Terror War Powers War Powers Act Warhammer Washington DC WASPs Watergate Wealth Wealth Inequality Web Traffic Weight WEIRDO Welfare Wendy Sherman West Bank Western Civilization Western Decline Western European Marriage Pattern Western Hypocrisy Western Media Western Religion Western Revival Westerns White America White Americans White Death White Flight White Guilt White Helmets White Liberals White Man's Burden White Nakba White Nationalism White Nationalists White People White Privilege White Race White Racialism White Slavery White Supremacy White Teachers Whiterpeople Whites Whitney Webb Who Whom Whoopi Goldberg Wikileaks Wikipedia Wildfires William Browder William F. Buckley William Kristol William Latson William McGonagle William McRaven WINEP Winston Churchill Woke Capital Women Woodrow Wilson Workers Working Class World Bank World Economic Forum World Health Organization World Population World War G World War H World War Hair World War I World War III World War R World War T WTF WVS WWII Xi Jinping Xinjiang Yahya Sinwar Yair Lapid Yemen Yevgeny Prigozhin Yoav Gallant Yogi Berra's Restaurant Yoram Hazony YouTube Yugoslavia Yuval Noah Harari Zbigniew Brzezinski Zimbabwe Zionism Zionists Zohran Mamdani Zvika Fogel
Nothing found
Filter?
Wojtek
Comments
• My
Comments
773 Comments • 78,800 Words •  RSS
(Commenters may request that their archives be hidden by contacting the appropriate blogger)
All Comments
 All Comments
    During the early 1990s Germar Rudolf was a young chemist employed at Germany's prestigious Max Planck Institute with a bright future ahead of him. But then he was hired to conduct a chemical analysis of the walls of the Auschwitz concentration camp. One thing led to another and he spent the next thirty-odd years suffering...
  • @Priss Factor
    @Avery


    Hitler, on the other hand, had very tangible ROI reasons for invading USSR: practically endless, rich agricultural lands**, practically unlimited hydrocarbon reserves, minerals, gold & silver deposits, fresh water, timber,……Slavic peoples slave labor,……
     
    Had Germans with their work ethic, unity, and ability gained access to all those lands, the German Empire would likely have been more powerful than the US.

    Too bad Russians are such underachievers. Imagine what the Germans or Japanese could have done with all those resources.

    Russians need to up their act.

    Replies: @Anymike

    Germany didn’t need all those lands. Look at the lands Germany had before World War II even without the Anschluss and the Sudetenland. The idea that Germany had been deprived of its deserved civilizational grandeur because Germany lacked resources and population on a continental scale was a misreading of the world geopolitical situation. Underlying World War I was another misreading of the world geopolitical situation. That time, the German nationalists thought that Germany had been deprived of its deserved civilizational grandeur because it had been late in unifying and therefore had suffered a late start in the race for worldwide empire and the creation of a worldwide linguistic empire along the along the line of the British and French empire.

    This was nonsense, of course. In fact, at the time World War I broke out, the German language was repsected and studied worldwide and Germany itself was regarded, man-for-man and pound-for-pound, as possibly the greatest country the world had ever seen.

    If anyone is tempted to blame the German embrace of the continental scale of resources theory on grandiose reasoning and delusional propensities of the fomer corporal, remember that former corporal was a corporal when German was under the sway of the idea of the empire as the source of grandeur. Hitler was the designated front man for the German nationalist elite.

    Germany didn’t need those lands. If World War II had not happened Germany today would be in the running to be considered the greatest nation in the world without those lands and the reign of the former corporal and the Nazi party would be regarded as just another among many of the authoritian regimes which arose during the debacle of the post-Great War era and dismissed./

    Isn’t every country in the world which possesses land on a continental scale kind of a mess today with or without the comcomitant population? China. Brazil. Australia. Canada. The United States. Russia. No, Germany didn’t need it.

    • Agree: wojtek
    • Troll: JPS
    • Replies: @Anonymous joe
    @Anymike

    What about Russia you jerk .Yeah Germany didn't need more land or people what the hell are you smoking!!

    , @Biggles
    @Anymike

    As I remember, it was R.H.S. Stolfi, in his Hitler: Beyond Evil and Tyranny (2011), the most impartial Hitler biography I know of, who corrects the widely believed myth that Hitler was a corporal.

    Hitler was our equivalent of a private first-class - not a corporal. Hitler was a messenger, an intrinsically dangerous role, with no line command; although he also participated in a number of dangerous infantry charges, where he behaved with valor, and survived, when many (most?) of those around him were killed. Like Trump, Hitler came to believe Providence was on his side.

    R. H. S. Stolfi, professor emeritus at the US Naval Postgraduate School in Monterey, California, and retired colonel in the US Marine Corps Reserve, is the author of German Panzers on the Offensive: Russian Front, North Africa 1941–1942; Hitler’s Panzers East: World War II Reinterpreted; and NATO under Attack: Why the Western Alliance Can Fight Outnumbered and Win in Central Europe without Nuclear Weapons (with Friedrich Wilhelm von Mellenthin and E. Sobik).
    https://counter-currents.com/2016/05/r-h-s-stolfis-hitler-beyond-evil-tyranny/

    https://www.amazon.com/Hitler-Beyond-Tyranny-German-Studies/dp/1616144742

  • These days the Wall Street Journal probably ranks as America's most influential and credible print outlet, so Friday morning's front-page story describing a sudden new escalation in our episodic trade war with China caught my attention. As emphasized in the first several paragraphs, the Chinese had suddenly imposed an unprecedented new wave of licensing requirements...
  • @John Johnson
    @wojtek

    You know the 2.5 week special operation is going well when you are trying to be pedantic over grammar while the number of Russian ships at the bottom of the Black sea remains the same.

    This is a forum and not a doctoral thesis. Trying to nitpick over grammar shows weakness of argument. It doesn't change what exists in reality.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iyUDhwD6WLQ

    Maybe another year of the 2.5 week special operation should do it?

    Boy was I waaaaaaaay off when I said that this war was a stupid idea while alt-right rallied to an angry dwarf and his needless invasion.

    Wojtek: The word way doesn't contain that many letters. IM SO SMART U GUYZ.

    Replies: @wojtek

    “This is a forum and not a doctoral thesis.”

    Wrote a guy, who decided to write a thesis on his own stupidity in every possible aspect, but who failed in the first attempt 🙂

    Johnson, you’re so funny when you’re angry. Almost as funny as when you write these idiotic claims of yours. Like this one: “2.5 week special operation is going well”.

    You’re confusing me with the likes of you. Were I not Christian, I’d happily watch how you Khazars and the Mongols kill each other.

    • Replies: @littlereddot
    @wojtek


    I’d happily watch how you Khazars and the Mongols kill each other.
     
    I'd rather watch Germany reclaim her lost lands in Poland.

    Replies: @Deep Thought

  • The future of the former “Western Regions”: an energy-rich, multi-cultural, multi-religious, geostrategic New Silk Road hub of “moderately prosperous” China. YUTIAN, ON THE SOUTHERN SILK ROAD – We are on the road in southern Xinjiang, after a harrowing back-and-forth in the Taklamakan, across the sand dunes, to visit the “lost tribe” cum village of Daliyabuyi,...
  • @showmethereal
    @wojtek

    The discussion was about Tibet and you brought up western freedoms. I’m sorry your brain is too clouded for you to even understand what you write

    Replies: @wojtek

    Exactly as I thought – typical commie baseless allegations, just to change the topic.

    I’m sorry you have no brain at all – the discussion was about Nepal and what people (Tibetans or not) can do there. You idiotically alleged that I made an opinion about Tibet. Your idiotic opinions – your problem. Just have some balls to own your mistakes.

  • @littlereddot
    @wojtek


    It’s so cute that our local dumb red little CCP troll thinks CCP agents are allowed to operate in Nepal 🙂
     
    Duh. You illustrate again how stupid you lot are.

    Just as Russian agents would not be allowed to berate shopowners in Vinius
    CCP agents would not be allowed to berate shopowners in Kathmandu.

    Therefore it is evident that the guy berating the "Tibetan" shopowner was Gurkha Nepalese from the eastern parts of the country.

    More Gurkhas for you. Perhaps you will be stupid enough to assume they are CCP agents also.

    https://www.shutterstock.com/image-photo/brecon-powys-wales-gurkha-freedom-260nw-1912603651.jpg

    https://www.telegraph.co.uk/content/dam/men/2016/05/27/G1_trans_NvBQzQNjv4BqqVzuuqpFlyLIwiB6NTmJwZwVSIA7rSIkPn18jgFKEo0.jpg?imwidth=350

    https://visit-winchester.transforms.svdcdn.com/production/Dress-like-a-Gurkha.jpg

    Replies: @wojtek

    wojtek: “It’s so cute that our local dumb red little CCP troll thinks CCP agents are allowed to operate in Nepal”

    dumblittleredtroll: “Just as Russian agents would not be allowed to berate shopowners in Vinius
    CCP agents would not be allowed to berate shopowners in Kathmandu.”

    Your chinesium translator is malfunctioning again – it replaced operate with berate 🙂

    But that’s a standard defect. Let’s recall the really idiotic quotes:

    “Try going into a shop in Lithuania and ask for a Russian flag.”
    “Russian agents would not be allowed to operate in Vilnius.”

    🙂

    I start to think that little_red_dot was actually supposed to be little_red_bot 🙂

  • During the early 1990s Germar Rudolf was a young chemist employed at Germany's prestigious Max Planck Institute with a bright future ahead of him. But then he was hired to conduct a chemical analysis of the walls of the Auschwitz concentration camp. One thing led to another and he spent the next thirty-odd years suffering...
  • @24th Alabama
    @wojtek

    What crimes?

    Replies: @wojtek

    Genocide, son.

    • Replies: @24th Alabama
    @wojtek

    How very reflexive of you, Gramps!

  • @Bankotsu
    @wojtek


    Chamberlain?

    Brits wanted Hitler to fight with Stalin.
     
    Neville Chamberlain and the anti Bolsheviks in the British conservative government seems to get off scot free.

    Curiously enough, the pro Hitler, pro Nazi right wing in the West seems to have no interest in championing the policies of Chamberlain. He was hardcore anti bolshevik. He helped Hitler to annex and dismember eastern European countries. Chamberlain and Hitler were a tag team. Without Neville Chamberlain, Hitler would never had got as far as he did in 1939.

    I think they don't understand the history well due to suppression and fake history in mainstream western historiography.


    …Churchill[WWII UK PM] was not even apparently unwilling to rule out that Nazi Germany might have to be utilised as a counter against ‘such a Russia’. For on 4 August 1936 he was sent a private letter by an intimate friend General Sir Hugh Tudor, who argued as follows:


    The situation in Europe certainly seems to be getting worse.
    Spain is a new complication. If the rebels win the Fascist group will be strengthened in Europe, and Spain may line up with Italy an Germany.

    If the red Government wins Bolshevism will come very near us. With Spain Bolshie, France half Bolshie, and Russia subsidising our communists are we going to line up with them and Russia?

    I know how important even vital our friendship with France is, but I feel many in England would rather make a strong western pact with Germany and France and let Germany settle Russia and Bolshevism in her own way. No doubt Germany would eventually be stronger after defeating Russia but in the meantime we and France would have time to get our defences right; and it would take years before Germany would be in a position to make war again, nor do I suppose she would want to having got a satisfactory expansion. Even Germany cannot like war. Russia deserves what is coming to her, as she will never stop undermining capitalistic governments in every way she can. If she is left alone, in 1o years or so she will be the strongest power on earth and she may want to take in India and may be a more dangerous enemy than Germany.’

    Churchill’s remarkable reply read:

    I have, as you divine, been much perturbed in my thoughts by the Spanish explosion. I feel acutely the weight of what you say … I am sure it represents the strong and growing section of Conservative opinion, and events seem to be driving us in that direction.

    https://www.jstor.org/stable/3679427
    https://annas-archive.org/scidb/10.2307/3679427

    “…there is the example of one old Appeaser who did in fact “give the game away” in an interview with the press: in 1962 Sir Alec Douglas-Home [later UK PM in 1963] (then Lord Home) explained to his interviewer this about Appeasement in the 1930’s, when he was Private Parliamentary Secretary to Neville Chamberlain:

    I think the main thing to grasp is that Chamberlain, like many others, saw Communism as the major long-term danger. He hated Hitler and German Fascism, but he felt that Europe in general and Britain in particular [why, “in particular”?] were in even greater danger from Communism. Hitler was an evil man but in the short term one should—and possibly could— do a deal with him, and after that he could be controlled. He didn’t realise till too late you see that the man was mad and his policy aimed at war…

    https://archive.org/details/warpedvisionbrit0000geor/page/220/mode/2up

    Two weeks after Munich, [former UK PM] Baldwin said prophetically in a conversation with Lord Hinchingbrooke: “Can’t we turn Hitler East? Napoleon broke himself against the Russians. Hitler might do the same”.

    https://archive.org/details/baldwinbiography0000midd/page/1046/mode/2up

    “We none of us know what is going on in that strange man’s mind. We all know the German desire as he has come out with in his book [Mein Kampf] to move East, and if he moves East, I shall not break my heart, but that is another thing. I do not believe he wants to move West, because West would be a very difficult programme for him … If there is any fighting in Europe to be done, I should like to see the Bolsheviks and Nazis doing it.”

    Baldwin to the deputation at the end of July, 1936, as quoted in Baldwin : A Biography by Keith Middlemas and John Barnes (1969), p. 947, p. 955.

    https://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Stanley_Baldwin

    …Eden[later UK PM in 1955] noted in his diary after talks with Hitler:”Only thing Hitler wants is Air Pact without limitation. Simon much inclined to bite at this….I had to protest and he gave up the idea…. Simon toys with the idea of letting Germany expand eastwards. I am strongly against. Apart from dishonesty it would be out turn next”(cited in Dutton 1994, 50)…

    https://books.google.com.sg/books?id=UyMXon0JmBsC&pg=PA107&lpg=PA107&dq=edens+diary+1935+hitler+simon+&source=web&ots=A58iIH7xr6&sig=IChZUDHy4vJ-mJ8C112mq56Mfks&hl=en#v=onepage&q=edens%20diary%201935%20hitler%20simon&f=false

    May 6, 1935:

    “…Lord Lothian, who as Philip Kerr was secretary to Lloyd George during the World War, wrote me about this in a letter which I received today. He expressed the opinion that the opportunity to bring Germany into the League of Nations had been missed because of the failure of France to face reality and Great Britain’s failure to alter her course. Consequently he believed the League would be reduced to merely an anti-Nazi combination giving Germany additional reason to follow its own path of power politics.

    He indicated clearly that he favors a coalition of the democracies to block any German move in their direction and to turn Germany’s course eastwards.

    That this might lead to a war between Russia and Germany does not seem to disturb him seriously. In fact he seems to feel this would be a good solution of the difficulties imposed on Germany by the Versailles Treaty…


    https://archive.org/details/ambassadordoddsd00doddrich/page/n262/mode/1up?q=eastwards

    …Most of the War Office speculations were only circulated internally; the criticism of official foreign policy thus fed on itself. The most radical and complete expression of the War Office’s alternative policy was compiled by Major Whitefoord, head of Ml3(b), in a paper entitled “Germany and British Security in the Future.”

    In it, he argued that Britain must avoid a “life and death struggle with Germany which would bring ruination.”

    Instead the Drang nach Osten should be allowed to run its course.
    Whitefoord believed that German expansion in the East would not greatly increase German strength, since “the annexation of purely Slav districts would weaken the racial cohesion of the Reich.” Sooner or later, German expansion would bring her into conflict with Russia.

    Here, Whitefoord reiterated a favorite personal theme: “From a conflict between Germany and Russia, which would probably ruin our two potential enemies in Europe, we have little to lose, and might even gain considerably.”

    Five points from Whitefoord’s twelve-point program for foreign policy, concerned the necessity for Britain to eschew any commitment or involvement in Eastern Europe. His conclusion embraced what amounted to the War Office’s worst case: “Even if Germany emerges victorious from a struggle with Russia and thus gains the hegemony of the continent, or if Germany in the future should threaten British interests, the requirements of our military security suggest a policy of firm defensive alliances in Western Europe, coupled with an alliance with America to oppose any German attempt at world dominion, rather than reliance on a policy of alliances with Russia and the weaker states in Europe.”27 Whitefoord’s views may have been more extreme than those of his War Office colleagues, but the military judgments that underpinned them, especially the low value placed on the possibility of eastern resistance to Hitler, were orthodox ones — that is until the hasty creation of an eastern front with the guaranty to Poland in March 1939…”

    https://archive.org/details/ultimateenemy00wesl/page/87/mode/1up?q=twelve+point+program

    “…Other assumptions were weakened by the experience of the Munich crisis. After September 1938 the German army was no longer regarded in London as having an important moderating voice in foreign policy counsels.63 Munich seemed also to prove that Hitler might risk war against major opponents even before his army was fully ready.64 By far the most ominous news, derived from intelligence that flowed into London through a multiplicity of channels after Munich, suggested that it was no longer safe to believe that Hitler would only direct the Germany army eastwards in search of Lebensraum. Rumors and reports piled up throughout the winter of 1938-39. By January 1939 few authorities would discount the possibility that Hitler would move against the West, perhaps even before securing his ambitions in the East.

    https://archive.org/details/ultimateenemy00wesl/page/112/mode/1up?q=if+germany+tries

    Not only was Britain unready for war, but in Chatfield’s view, such German expansion would not necessarily strengthen the Hitler regime.

    If Germany . . . tries to expand to the Southeast, we must, in my opinion, accept it.
    Europe must work out its own salvation in that quarter. . . . It is exceedingly doubtful whether one nation can dominate another, still less several others, in these times, when it is not a Nation, but a whole people that has to be conquered. . . . I feel therefore that the idea that we must be drawn in is wrong and dangerous. I do not believe that peoples can be conquered and held in subjection nowadays. If Germany makes any decided military move to the eastward in her present unbalanced strength she is much more likely to upset her civilization, such as it is, and to ride for a downfall internally…74

    https://archive.org/details/ultimateenemy00wesl/page/144/mode/1up?q=if+germany+tries

    “…In reality, it was not appeasement but British imperialism actively aiding and abetting the European fascist states, and not just Chamberlain but the previous Conservative Prime Minister Stanley Baldwin too, and all the hierarchy of the Conservative Party.

    Their strategy is best summed up by Henry ‘Chips’ Channon, who declared in 1936:

    “We should let gallant little Germany glut her fill of the Reds in the East and keep decadent France quiet while she does so” (Nicholson, Diaries and Letters, 1968).

    Channon was no low ranking, fringe Conservative, but a leading member who led the British delegation to the League of Nations during the Munich Crisis of 1938. He summed up what was the Conservative position…

    https://www.left-horizons.com/2024/03/07/1934-when-conservatives-backed-fascism/

    “…the British Conservative government had reached the fantastic idea that they could kill two birds with one stone by setting Germany and Russia against one another in Eastern Europe.

    In order to carry out this plan of allowing Germany to drive eastward against Russia, it was necessary to do three things:

    (1) to liquidate all the countries standing between Germany and Russia;
    (2) to prevent France from honoring her alliances with these countries; and
    (3) to hoodwink the English people into accepting this as a necessary, indeed, the only solution to the international problem.

    The Chamberlain group were so successful in all three of these things that they came within an ace of succeeding, and failed only because of the obstinacy of the Poles, the unseemly haste of Hitler, and the fact that…

    This idea of bringing Germany into a collision with Russia was not to be found, so far as the evidence shows, among any members of the inner circle of the Milner Group.

    Rather it was to be found among the personal associates of Neville Chamberlain, including several members of the second circle of the Milner Group. The two policies followed parallel courses until March 1939. After that date the Milner Group’s disintegration became very evident, and part of it took the form of the movement of several persons (like Hoare and Simon) from the second circle of the Milner Group to the inner circle of the new group rotating around Chamberlain…

    https://web.archive.org/web/20221029210347/http://www.yamaguchy.com/library/quigley/anglo_12b.html
    http://www.carrollquigley.net/books.htm

    See pages 284, 559, 576, 608, of this book “Tragedy and Hope”; the true story of British appeasement policy is told there:

    http://www.carrollquigley.net/pdf/Tragedy_and_Hope.pdf

    If you search for the terms “East” or “Eastwards” in the below sources, you will find tons of quotes from British conservatives saying to just let Hitler “go east” and destroy Soviet Union. Hitler must not be opposed in his march eastwards. This policy was executed under Neville Chamberlain from 1937 onwards. It wasn’t really his personal policy. It was the policy of the anti Bolshevik section of the British conservative party and elite.

    Stalin, appeasement, and the Second World War by Mark Jones
    http://www.columbia.edu/%7Elnp3/mark_jones/appeasement.htm

    In our time : the Chamberlain-Hitler collusion by Clement Leibovitz
    https://archive.org/details/inourtimechamber0000leib

    The Spanish Civil War: Revolution and Counterrevolution by Burnett Bolloten (chapters 8, 9, 16, 17, 61)
    https://archive.org/details/spanishcivilwarr0000boll_z8t8

    The Munich Conspiracy by Andrew Rothstein
    https://archive.org/details/munichconspiracy0000andr/mode/2up

    Europe on the Eve, the Crises of Diplomacy, 1933-1939 by Frederick L. Schuman
    https://archive.org/details/europeoneve0000schu
    Book by Carroll Quigley’s friend Gaetano Salvemini

    “My doctoral dissertation on The Public Administration of the Napoleonic Kingdom of Italy was never published because over-specialized experts who read the version revised for publication persisted in rejecting the aspects of the book in which they were not specialists. The only man who read it and had the slightest idea what it was all about was Salvemini, the great historian from the University of Florence, who was a refugee in this country at the time…

    http://www.carrollquigley.net/books.htm

    Prelude to World War II by Gaetano Salvemini
    https://archive.org/details/preludetoworldwa0000gaet

    British Foreign Policy During World War II, 1939-1945 by Vladimir Trukhanovsky
    https://archive.org/details/britishforeignpolicywwii

    Anthony Eden by Vladimir Trukhanovsky
    https://archive.org/details/anthonyedentrukhanovsky

    The warped vision : British foreign policy, 1933-1939 by Margaret George
    https://archive.org/details/warpedvisionbrit0000geor

    Peace for our time by Robert Rothschild
    https://archive.org/details/peaceforourtime0000roth

    The Ultimate Enemy: British Intelligence and Nazi Germany, 1933-1939 by Wesley R. Wark
    https://archive.org/details/ultimateenemy00wesl

    Falsifiers of History: An Historial Document on the Origins of World War II
    https://libgen.is/book/index.php?md5=4AD21DF829DA634FAFED44BE71ED6C62
    https://web.archive.org/web/20050616080438/http://www.agitprop.org.au/lefthistory/1948_falsifiers_of_history.php

    Selected Works of Mao Zedong
    https://www.marxists.org/reference/archive/mao/selected-works/volume-2/mswv2_17.htm
    https://www.marxists.org/reference/archive/mao/selected-works/volume-2/mswv2_19.htm
    http://www.china.org.cn/china/military/2007-07/30/content_1219034.htm

    Documents And Materials Relating To The Eve Of The Second World War II. Dirksen Papers Vol. I ( 1937 1938)
    https://archive.org/details/documents-and-materials-relating-to-the-eve-of-the-second-world-war-ii.-vol.-i-

    Documents And Materials Relating To The Eve Of The Second World War II. Dirksen Papers Vol. II ( 1938 1939)
    https://archive.org/details/documents-and-materials-relating-to-the-eve-of-the-second-world-war-ii.-vol-ii-

    THE COMING OF THE WAR AND EASTERN EUROPE IN WORLD WAR II.
    https://web.archive.org/web/20240524164847/https://acienciala.ku.edu/hist557/lect16.htm

    The Road to War: A Selection of Primary Documents
    https://web.archive.org/web/20140815094039/https://www2.bc.edu/~heineman/origins.html

    Replies: @wojtek

    You know this and I know this. But indeed the absolute majority of the Anglosaxons belong to one of the 2 camps: “Hitler and nobody else is responsible for WW2”, or “somebody else is responsible for WW2, but only one person, at most two”.

    And so we have quotes like this one, from our Host:

    German Intelligence learned of this massive bribery of British parliamentarians, and passed the information along to Prime Minister Neville Chamberlain, who was horrified to discover the corrupt motives of his fierce political opponents, but apparently remained too much of a gentlemen to have them arrested and prosecuted

    Talk about a complete and total naivety.

    This belongs together with the claims that “Germans couldn’t have committed all these crimes in WW2, because they are too much of a gentlemen“.

    I am curious what makes Anglosaxons so blind?

    • Replies: @24th Alabama
    @wojtek

    What crimes?

    Replies: @wojtek

    , @Bankotsu
    @wojtek


    absolute majority of the Anglosaxons belong to one of the 2 camps: “Hitler and nobody else is responsible for WW2”, or “somebody else is responsible for WW2, but only one person, at most two”.
     
    According to Ron Unz, even Sean Mckeekin talking about British-French plans to bomb Baku in 1940 caused problems with the British establishment.

    Depend on British to admit that Neville Chamberlain's policies were designed to push Germany eastwards to destroy Russia is a hopeless task. They are only interested in suppression and selling garbage.

    The work of fighting for truth of WWII origins depends on non Anglo Saxons. The Anglo Saxons are not going to do it.

    Strangely enough, the pro Hitler, pro Nazi right wing crowd in the West also has zero interest in telling this side of the story.

    Who could be bigger quasi ally of Hitler and Nazi Germany than Britain under Neville Chamberlain? He is your guy. He had ZERO issues with Germany expanding eastwards and destroying Russia for living space. He was hardcore anti Bolshevik. VERY hardcore. Hardcore to the extent that he was willing to sacrifice everything between Germany and Russia in order to instigate war between Germany and Russia.

    On this point the 1935 UK general elections is interesting. What if the conservatives had lost in 1935 and Labour government was in power during that period? Labour party was not pro Nazi.

    They had less interest in pushing Germany east to destroy Russia.

    It is disgraceful that the mainstream talk about WWII origins in 1930s is complete rubbish.

  • @notanonymoushere
    @wojtek

    So sorry to hear about your WeeWee.

    Replies: @wojtek

    I have always been of the opinion that people judge others primarily through the lens of their own limitations.

    Thank you for proving it for me 🙂

  • @Mactoul
    Traditional German lands?
    Was Warsaw a traditional German land?
    When the dispute with Poland over Danzig and the Corridor, why did Hitler had to conquer Poland totally?

    It was precisely Hitler's decision to occupy Czechs in March 39, contrary to his promises only 5 months ago, that was occasion of the Polish gurantee.

    Replies: @wojtek, @Hartmann, @Marcali

    When the dispute with Poland over Danzig …

    Poland had no control over Gdańsk. It only had a post office and a railroad with some small storage for visiting Polish ships. And Polish embassies were required by the treaties to provide assistance to FSD citizens around the world.

    FSD was created and controlled by the League of Nations, so primarily by Brits, French and Italians. It was in their interest to maintain the status quo and so they did.

  • @Carroll Price
    @wojtek

    If any one person is to blame for WW2, it would be Woodrow Wilson who oversaw and approved of the unrealistic and overly harsh conditions imposed on Germany by the Treaty of Versailles, including depriving Germany of historic German territory and unrealistic war reparation demands.

    Replies: @wojtek

    I’m afraid you missed the main point:

    And the simple (and yet very complex) reality is that WW2 happened because too many people wanted it to happen.

    W.W. died some 15 years earlier.

    • Replies: @notanonymoushere
    @wojtek

    So sorry to hear about your WeeWee.

    Replies: @wojtek

  • @JPS
    @wojtek

    The Second Great War was begun by the powers that initiated conflict with Germany. The Poles were abusing the German minority because they refused to give up control of Danzig and permit German access to East Prussia. If they didn't want war, they could have avoided it. They had no interest in avoiding it. They trusted the English and the French!

    The German conquest of France in 1940 was no more an act of German aggression than the war on Louis Napoleon's France in 1871. Louis Napoleon declared war on Germany, the French declared war on Germany, because they were controlled by Jews. Britain because they were forced by Roosevelt and world Jews. Germany's bombing of British cities was retaliatory. The British were determined to bomb Germany, they had built their bomber fleet and doctrine in anticipation of just such a war. The US bombers were designed for that purpose as well, well ahead of the war, the air campaign was planned long in advance.

    The war with Japan was caused by Roosevelt cutting off Japan's access to resources that they could not go without. That act was tantamount to an act of war, and Roosevelt's provocations (like the undeclared naval war) were only going to intensify.

    Replies: @wojtek, @Annacath, @tolkin

    I think there must have been some misunderstanding. When I wrote: “It never ceases to amaze me that intelligent, bah, brilliant people …”, in no way it was addressed at you. Based on your sample writing above, you’re just a simple neonazi, who does not need any books at all. In fact, I’m sure if any one makes its way to you, you burn them whenever your HOA Karen is not looking. Unless it’s Mein Kampf, of course 🙂

    • Disagree: Petermx
  • According to several recent news reports, the two major Trump foreign policy shifts last week are the handiwork of Marco Rubio, the President’s Secretary of State and (acting) National Security Advisor. As with all neocon plans, they will be big on promises and small on delivery. First up, according to Bloomberg it was Rubio who...
  • @Hulkamania
    Neither of these can be blamed on Marco Rubio, since Trump had similar neocon policies during his first term.

    Call it what it is: the Trump doctrine. The only difference is that Trump tries to sedate his enemies with phony "peace" BS so that he can attempt to stab them in the back and avoid the risks of a face-to-face fight.

    Replies: @Chris Moore, @wojtek

    The only difference is that Trump tries to sedate his enemies with phony “peace” BS so that he can attempt to stab them in the back and avoid the risks of a face-to-face fight.

    If that were true, that’d be actually clever. So I doubt that.

  • During the early 1990s Germar Rudolf was a young chemist employed at Germany's prestigious Max Planck Institute with a bright future ahead of him. But then he was hired to conduct a chemical analysis of the walls of the Auschwitz concentration camp. One thing led to another and he spent the next thirty-odd years suffering...
  • It never ceases to amaze me that intelligent, bah, brilliant people can be watching the events in the world surrounding us right now, seeing how it tethers on the brink of WW3, and how complicated and complex the overall situation is, and yet the same people will be searching for a naive, simplistic, all-in-one, “shortcut” explanation for why WW2 happened.

    Interestingly, in their search for a short answer on whom to blame for WW2, they’re never interested in the most obvious evil, clearly and undoubtedly responsible for the start of the war, namely Hitler (it needs to be clearly spelled out on this forum, I’m afraid). Instead they need like the “second worst culprit”, or in fact often the “third worst”, because Stalin for many of them is also not acceptable, as “too obvious” of a choice.

    And so we have this ongoing quest for whom is it that we could blame for starting WW2, as long as his name does not start with H or S? Churchill? Chamberlain? Brits overall? FDR? Jews in general? Rothschilds in particular? Poles? Gdańsk? etc etc

    And the simple (and yet very complex) reality is that WW2 happened because too many people wanted it to happen. Yes, Hitler wanted a war, Stalin wanted a war, Brits wanted a war (and not just Churchill), FDR wanted a war, Jews wanted a war, even enough of stupid Polish “colonels” wanted a war. It’s just that each one of them wanted a different war then the one that actually happened. Hitler wanted to conquer Poland, and then be happy and have peace until the next one. Stalin wanted to conquer the whole world. Brits wanted Hitler to fight with Stalin. Jews wanted Palestine. FDR wanted to replace the British empire. Interestingly I have no clue what is it that Polish colonels really wanted. But it’s safe to say that none of them got what they really were hoping for.

    It’s actually way easier to list those who didn’t want another world war: Hacha didn’t want a war, Swiss didn’t want a war, Swedes didn’t want a war, Franco didn’t want another war. As far as everyone else – I’m not so sure.

    So in many aspects all these books listed above are various variants of “Reasons for WW2 for Dummies”. Those here who are of Marxist inclination, will probably say that although each of these books taken individually is a failure when it comes to a correct diagnosis of the reasons of WW2, taken together, quantity will turn into quality. But I seriously doubt this.

    • Disagree: JPS, Petermx
    • Replies: @JPS
    @wojtek

    The Second Great War was begun by the powers that initiated conflict with Germany. The Poles were abusing the German minority because they refused to give up control of Danzig and permit German access to East Prussia. If they didn't want war, they could have avoided it. They had no interest in avoiding it. They trusted the English and the French!

    The German conquest of France in 1940 was no more an act of German aggression than the war on Louis Napoleon's France in 1871. Louis Napoleon declared war on Germany, the French declared war on Germany, because they were controlled by Jews. Britain because they were forced by Roosevelt and world Jews. Germany's bombing of British cities was retaliatory. The British were determined to bomb Germany, they had built their bomber fleet and doctrine in anticipation of just such a war. The US bombers were designed for that purpose as well, well ahead of the war, the air campaign was planned long in advance.

    The war with Japan was caused by Roosevelt cutting off Japan's access to resources that they could not go without. That act was tantamount to an act of war, and Roosevelt's provocations (like the undeclared naval war) were only going to intensify.

    Replies: @wojtek, @Annacath, @tolkin

    , @Carroll Price
    @wojtek

    If any one person is to blame for WW2, it would be Woodrow Wilson who oversaw and approved of the unrealistic and overly harsh conditions imposed on Germany by the Treaty of Versailles, including depriving Germany of historic German territory and unrealistic war reparation demands.

    Replies: @wojtek

    , @Bankotsu
    @wojtek


    Chamberlain?

    Brits wanted Hitler to fight with Stalin.
     
    Neville Chamberlain and the anti Bolsheviks in the British conservative government seems to get off scot free.

    Curiously enough, the pro Hitler, pro Nazi right wing in the West seems to have no interest in championing the policies of Chamberlain. He was hardcore anti bolshevik. He helped Hitler to annex and dismember eastern European countries. Chamberlain and Hitler were a tag team. Without Neville Chamberlain, Hitler would never had got as far as he did in 1939.

    I think they don't understand the history well due to suppression and fake history in mainstream western historiography.


    …Churchill[WWII UK PM] was not even apparently unwilling to rule out that Nazi Germany might have to be utilised as a counter against ‘such a Russia’. For on 4 August 1936 he was sent a private letter by an intimate friend General Sir Hugh Tudor, who argued as follows:


    The situation in Europe certainly seems to be getting worse.
    Spain is a new complication. If the rebels win the Fascist group will be strengthened in Europe, and Spain may line up with Italy an Germany.

    If the red Government wins Bolshevism will come very near us. With Spain Bolshie, France half Bolshie, and Russia subsidising our communists are we going to line up with them and Russia?

    I know how important even vital our friendship with France is, but I feel many in England would rather make a strong western pact with Germany and France and let Germany settle Russia and Bolshevism in her own way. No doubt Germany would eventually be stronger after defeating Russia but in the meantime we and France would have time to get our defences right; and it would take years before Germany would be in a position to make war again, nor do I suppose she would want to having got a satisfactory expansion. Even Germany cannot like war. Russia deserves what is coming to her, as she will never stop undermining capitalistic governments in every way she can. If she is left alone, in 1o years or so she will be the strongest power on earth and she may want to take in India and may be a more dangerous enemy than Germany.’

    Churchill’s remarkable reply read:

    I have, as you divine, been much perturbed in my thoughts by the Spanish explosion. I feel acutely the weight of what you say … I am sure it represents the strong and growing section of Conservative opinion, and events seem to be driving us in that direction.

    https://www.jstor.org/stable/3679427
    https://annas-archive.org/scidb/10.2307/3679427

    “…there is the example of one old Appeaser who did in fact “give the game away” in an interview with the press: in 1962 Sir Alec Douglas-Home [later UK PM in 1963] (then Lord Home) explained to his interviewer this about Appeasement in the 1930’s, when he was Private Parliamentary Secretary to Neville Chamberlain:

    I think the main thing to grasp is that Chamberlain, like many others, saw Communism as the major long-term danger. He hated Hitler and German Fascism, but he felt that Europe in general and Britain in particular [why, “in particular”?] were in even greater danger from Communism. Hitler was an evil man but in the short term one should—and possibly could— do a deal with him, and after that he could be controlled. He didn’t realise till too late you see that the man was mad and his policy aimed at war…

    https://archive.org/details/warpedvisionbrit0000geor/page/220/mode/2up

    Two weeks after Munich, [former UK PM] Baldwin said prophetically in a conversation with Lord Hinchingbrooke: “Can’t we turn Hitler East? Napoleon broke himself against the Russians. Hitler might do the same”.

    https://archive.org/details/baldwinbiography0000midd/page/1046/mode/2up

    “We none of us know what is going on in that strange man’s mind. We all know the German desire as he has come out with in his book [Mein Kampf] to move East, and if he moves East, I shall not break my heart, but that is another thing. I do not believe he wants to move West, because West would be a very difficult programme for him … If there is any fighting in Europe to be done, I should like to see the Bolsheviks and Nazis doing it.”

    Baldwin to the deputation at the end of July, 1936, as quoted in Baldwin : A Biography by Keith Middlemas and John Barnes (1969), p. 947, p. 955.

    https://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Stanley_Baldwin

    …Eden[later UK PM in 1955] noted in his diary after talks with Hitler:”Only thing Hitler wants is Air Pact without limitation. Simon much inclined to bite at this….I had to protest and he gave up the idea…. Simon toys with the idea of letting Germany expand eastwards. I am strongly against. Apart from dishonesty it would be out turn next”(cited in Dutton 1994, 50)…

    https://books.google.com.sg/books?id=UyMXon0JmBsC&pg=PA107&lpg=PA107&dq=edens+diary+1935+hitler+simon+&source=web&ots=A58iIH7xr6&sig=IChZUDHy4vJ-mJ8C112mq56Mfks&hl=en#v=onepage&q=edens%20diary%201935%20hitler%20simon&f=false

    May 6, 1935:

    “…Lord Lothian, who as Philip Kerr was secretary to Lloyd George during the World War, wrote me about this in a letter which I received today. He expressed the opinion that the opportunity to bring Germany into the League of Nations had been missed because of the failure of France to face reality and Great Britain’s failure to alter her course. Consequently he believed the League would be reduced to merely an anti-Nazi combination giving Germany additional reason to follow its own path of power politics.

    He indicated clearly that he favors a coalition of the democracies to block any German move in their direction and to turn Germany’s course eastwards.

    That this might lead to a war between Russia and Germany does not seem to disturb him seriously. In fact he seems to feel this would be a good solution of the difficulties imposed on Germany by the Versailles Treaty…


    https://archive.org/details/ambassadordoddsd00doddrich/page/n262/mode/1up?q=eastwards

    …Most of the War Office speculations were only circulated internally; the criticism of official foreign policy thus fed on itself. The most radical and complete expression of the War Office’s alternative policy was compiled by Major Whitefoord, head of Ml3(b), in a paper entitled “Germany and British Security in the Future.”

    In it, he argued that Britain must avoid a “life and death struggle with Germany which would bring ruination.”

    Instead the Drang nach Osten should be allowed to run its course.
    Whitefoord believed that German expansion in the East would not greatly increase German strength, since “the annexation of purely Slav districts would weaken the racial cohesion of the Reich.” Sooner or later, German expansion would bring her into conflict with Russia.

    Here, Whitefoord reiterated a favorite personal theme: “From a conflict between Germany and Russia, which would probably ruin our two potential enemies in Europe, we have little to lose, and might even gain considerably.”

    Five points from Whitefoord’s twelve-point program for foreign policy, concerned the necessity for Britain to eschew any commitment or involvement in Eastern Europe. His conclusion embraced what amounted to the War Office’s worst case: “Even if Germany emerges victorious from a struggle with Russia and thus gains the hegemony of the continent, or if Germany in the future should threaten British interests, the requirements of our military security suggest a policy of firm defensive alliances in Western Europe, coupled with an alliance with America to oppose any German attempt at world dominion, rather than reliance on a policy of alliances with Russia and the weaker states in Europe.”27 Whitefoord’s views may have been more extreme than those of his War Office colleagues, but the military judgments that underpinned them, especially the low value placed on the possibility of eastern resistance to Hitler, were orthodox ones — that is until the hasty creation of an eastern front with the guaranty to Poland in March 1939…”

    https://archive.org/details/ultimateenemy00wesl/page/87/mode/1up?q=twelve+point+program

    “…Other assumptions were weakened by the experience of the Munich crisis. After September 1938 the German army was no longer regarded in London as having an important moderating voice in foreign policy counsels.63 Munich seemed also to prove that Hitler might risk war against major opponents even before his army was fully ready.64 By far the most ominous news, derived from intelligence that flowed into London through a multiplicity of channels after Munich, suggested that it was no longer safe to believe that Hitler would only direct the Germany army eastwards in search of Lebensraum. Rumors and reports piled up throughout the winter of 1938-39. By January 1939 few authorities would discount the possibility that Hitler would move against the West, perhaps even before securing his ambitions in the East.

    https://archive.org/details/ultimateenemy00wesl/page/112/mode/1up?q=if+germany+tries

    Not only was Britain unready for war, but in Chatfield’s view, such German expansion would not necessarily strengthen the Hitler regime.

    If Germany . . . tries to expand to the Southeast, we must, in my opinion, accept it.
    Europe must work out its own salvation in that quarter. . . . It is exceedingly doubtful whether one nation can dominate another, still less several others, in these times, when it is not a Nation, but a whole people that has to be conquered. . . . I feel therefore that the idea that we must be drawn in is wrong and dangerous. I do not believe that peoples can be conquered and held in subjection nowadays. If Germany makes any decided military move to the eastward in her present unbalanced strength she is much more likely to upset her civilization, such as it is, and to ride for a downfall internally…74

    https://archive.org/details/ultimateenemy00wesl/page/144/mode/1up?q=if+germany+tries

    “…In reality, it was not appeasement but British imperialism actively aiding and abetting the European fascist states, and not just Chamberlain but the previous Conservative Prime Minister Stanley Baldwin too, and all the hierarchy of the Conservative Party.

    Their strategy is best summed up by Henry ‘Chips’ Channon, who declared in 1936:

    “We should let gallant little Germany glut her fill of the Reds in the East and keep decadent France quiet while she does so” (Nicholson, Diaries and Letters, 1968).

    Channon was no low ranking, fringe Conservative, but a leading member who led the British delegation to the League of Nations during the Munich Crisis of 1938. He summed up what was the Conservative position…

    https://www.left-horizons.com/2024/03/07/1934-when-conservatives-backed-fascism/

    “…the British Conservative government had reached the fantastic idea that they could kill two birds with one stone by setting Germany and Russia against one another in Eastern Europe.

    In order to carry out this plan of allowing Germany to drive eastward against Russia, it was necessary to do three things:

    (1) to liquidate all the countries standing between Germany and Russia;
    (2) to prevent France from honoring her alliances with these countries; and
    (3) to hoodwink the English people into accepting this as a necessary, indeed, the only solution to the international problem.

    The Chamberlain group were so successful in all three of these things that they came within an ace of succeeding, and failed only because of the obstinacy of the Poles, the unseemly haste of Hitler, and the fact that…

    This idea of bringing Germany into a collision with Russia was not to be found, so far as the evidence shows, among any members of the inner circle of the Milner Group.

    Rather it was to be found among the personal associates of Neville Chamberlain, including several members of the second circle of the Milner Group. The two policies followed parallel courses until March 1939. After that date the Milner Group’s disintegration became very evident, and part of it took the form of the movement of several persons (like Hoare and Simon) from the second circle of the Milner Group to the inner circle of the new group rotating around Chamberlain…

    https://web.archive.org/web/20221029210347/http://www.yamaguchy.com/library/quigley/anglo_12b.html
    http://www.carrollquigley.net/books.htm

    See pages 284, 559, 576, 608, of this book “Tragedy and Hope”; the true story of British appeasement policy is told there:

    http://www.carrollquigley.net/pdf/Tragedy_and_Hope.pdf

    If you search for the terms “East” or “Eastwards” in the below sources, you will find tons of quotes from British conservatives saying to just let Hitler “go east” and destroy Soviet Union. Hitler must not be opposed in his march eastwards. This policy was executed under Neville Chamberlain from 1937 onwards. It wasn’t really his personal policy. It was the policy of the anti Bolshevik section of the British conservative party and elite.

    Stalin, appeasement, and the Second World War by Mark Jones
    http://www.columbia.edu/%7Elnp3/mark_jones/appeasement.htm

    In our time : the Chamberlain-Hitler collusion by Clement Leibovitz
    https://archive.org/details/inourtimechamber0000leib

    The Spanish Civil War: Revolution and Counterrevolution by Burnett Bolloten (chapters 8, 9, 16, 17, 61)
    https://archive.org/details/spanishcivilwarr0000boll_z8t8

    The Munich Conspiracy by Andrew Rothstein
    https://archive.org/details/munichconspiracy0000andr/mode/2up

    Europe on the Eve, the Crises of Diplomacy, 1933-1939 by Frederick L. Schuman
    https://archive.org/details/europeoneve0000schu
    Book by Carroll Quigley’s friend Gaetano Salvemini

    “My doctoral dissertation on The Public Administration of the Napoleonic Kingdom of Italy was never published because over-specialized experts who read the version revised for publication persisted in rejecting the aspects of the book in which they were not specialists. The only man who read it and had the slightest idea what it was all about was Salvemini, the great historian from the University of Florence, who was a refugee in this country at the time…

    http://www.carrollquigley.net/books.htm

    Prelude to World War II by Gaetano Salvemini
    https://archive.org/details/preludetoworldwa0000gaet

    British Foreign Policy During World War II, 1939-1945 by Vladimir Trukhanovsky
    https://archive.org/details/britishforeignpolicywwii

    Anthony Eden by Vladimir Trukhanovsky
    https://archive.org/details/anthonyedentrukhanovsky

    The warped vision : British foreign policy, 1933-1939 by Margaret George
    https://archive.org/details/warpedvisionbrit0000geor

    Peace for our time by Robert Rothschild
    https://archive.org/details/peaceforourtime0000roth

    The Ultimate Enemy: British Intelligence and Nazi Germany, 1933-1939 by Wesley R. Wark
    https://archive.org/details/ultimateenemy00wesl

    Falsifiers of History: An Historial Document on the Origins of World War II
    https://libgen.is/book/index.php?md5=4AD21DF829DA634FAFED44BE71ED6C62
    https://web.archive.org/web/20050616080438/http://www.agitprop.org.au/lefthistory/1948_falsifiers_of_history.php

    Selected Works of Mao Zedong
    https://www.marxists.org/reference/archive/mao/selected-works/volume-2/mswv2_17.htm
    https://www.marxists.org/reference/archive/mao/selected-works/volume-2/mswv2_19.htm
    http://www.china.org.cn/china/military/2007-07/30/content_1219034.htm

    Documents And Materials Relating To The Eve Of The Second World War II. Dirksen Papers Vol. I ( 1937 1938)
    https://archive.org/details/documents-and-materials-relating-to-the-eve-of-the-second-world-war-ii.-vol.-i-

    Documents And Materials Relating To The Eve Of The Second World War II. Dirksen Papers Vol. II ( 1938 1939)
    https://archive.org/details/documents-and-materials-relating-to-the-eve-of-the-second-world-war-ii.-vol-ii-

    THE COMING OF THE WAR AND EASTERN EUROPE IN WORLD WAR II.
    https://web.archive.org/web/20240524164847/https://acienciala.ku.edu/hist557/lect16.htm

    The Road to War: A Selection of Primary Documents
    https://web.archive.org/web/20140815094039/https://www2.bc.edu/~heineman/origins.html

    Replies: @wojtek

  • @Dr. X
    @Carlton Meyer

    An excellent point that is often overlooked by biased historians. Why did Eastern European nations that bordered the Soviet Union ally with Hitler? Because they were more afraid of Soviet communist expansion than they were of Germany.

    Replies: @wojtek, @Anonymous534

    Why did Eastern European nations that bordered the Soviet Union ally with Hitler?

    I actually would say that it is quite the opposite – they were more afraid of hitler and nazis.
    Generally speaking, you avoid attacking that what you fear the most. Fear being the operative word.

  • According to several recent news reports, the two major Trump foreign policy shifts last week are the handiwork of Marco Rubio, the President’s Secretary of State and (acting) National Security Advisor. As with all neocon plans, they will be big on promises and small on delivery. First up, according to Bloomberg it was Rubio who...
  • After John Bolton’s disastrous stint in the first Trump Administration, promises were made …

    Anyone who believed these promises after the RNC is naive and should primary blame themselves, if they voted for Trump.

  • For all the media hand-wringing over the government shutdown the fact is only approximately 750,000 of the over two million non-military federal workers are being furloughed. Most federal programs will continue operating, including the major entitlement and welfare programs. The national parks will remain open, if understaffed and with closed visitor centers. Unfortunately, the shutdown...
  • @Mark G.
    @Truth Vigilante

    "UR readers should click on the link below"

    TV, on an old comment thread like this there are probably few people still reading it who can be persuaded to change their minds and also few people to applaud or cheer on your comments. You can tell that by the lack of people clicking the agree or thanks buttons on any of the comments.

    You are also not going to change the mind of the two individuals you are arguing with. You can do what you want but my suggestion would be to just walk away from this and find something more productive or enjoyable to do. I spent today taking an outdoors walk and relaxing in a coffee shop. I posted a couple comments elsewhere here at UR but, as I said, there are few viewers of this old comment thread so did not leave comments here. Overall, I have been disappointed with the quality of commenters here in this particular comment section and may not spend much time here in the future.

    Replies: @Truth Vigilante

    You are also not going to change the mind of the two individuals you are arguing with.
    You can do what you want but my suggestion would be to just walk away ….

    Thanks for your suggestion Mark. It’s been suggested to me before.
    But I certainly won’t be walking away.

    If a thread is an old one, or one hot off the press, I will continue as I’ve done in the past.
    You see, whether it’s a UR thread dealing with the Mossad/ZOG orchestrated 9/11 False Flag, the ZOG conjured fable of the Holohoax, the Anthropogenic Global Warming fraud or whatever, I am WELL AWARE that I won’t be changing the minds of the hard core cult members that have been brainwashed by the official narrative concocted by Malignant International Jewry.

    My purpose here is twofold:
    1) To embarrass and hand out almighty shellackings to the fools in UR that are propagating falsehoods.

    I do this with a deluge of incontestable facts that make it clear to all impartial observers, that those propagating these myths (like the dumb Polack Woy-chek in the WWII threads), have no leg to stand on.
    You see, the penny has not dropped for young Woy-chek, that Poland sided with the Jewish financiers during WWII.
    It is these inbred Talmudic misfits that emerged as the CLEAR VICTORS of that calamitous event.

    2) It is to EDUCATE those that are sitting on the fence.
    In other words, there are many (for example, in the case of the Holohoax or the JFK coup d’etat), who more or less believe what’s been drummed into their heads about these matters from the Jewish controlled western media/public education system/major book publishing outlets, but who simultaneously smell a rat.
    (In that they know that the official story does not add up).

    What I’m saying is that these people, while not necessarily being critical thinkers, are nonetheless honest people who are prepared to change their minds when confronted with a tsunami of verified evidence.

    Summary: For every individual that leaves a comment, I suspect that there are multiples more that read the comments and the article in UR, but leave no comment of their own.
    I know that from first hand experience because I WAS ONE SUCH INDIVIDUAL.
    I had been reading the UR for over a decade, but never posted a comment prior to 2021.

    You see, I was well aware that comments could be posted below You Tube videos and in other formats, and I read the odd one from time to time.
    But I never thought much of them. I never thought many people read them.
    So I never bothered posting comments there or anywhere else.

    But when I started reading the comments in this webzine, I noticed something different.
    The UR allowed for participants to include links to articles, to include videos, photos and what not.
    Moreover, unlike other venues where commenters posted inane nonsense for the most part, UR had some genuine KNOWLEDGEABLE PEOPLE that were providing excellent output*.

    (*Whilst many of the articles are indeed very informative and good reading, I find that the comments are EVEN BETTER in most instances – often several pay grades above the article itself.
    Nowhere is this more true than in the WWII and Holohoax articles, where the WORLD CLASS historical researcher JOHN WEAR leads the way).

    He consistently swats down the Jewish liars like Incitatus (aka Incite-us), Patrick McNally and the rest.
    I thought I knew a thing or two about WWII after many thousands of hours of research utilising the findings of the best Not-Beholden-to-ZOG historians and other researchers on the planet (like David Irving and A.J.P Taylor, to name just two).

    But I’ve been floored by the sheer depth and breadth of John Wear’s knowledge on this matter.
    I have learnt much from him over several years and I will always be thankful.
    We are so lucky to have here in UR a man of John Wear’s stature, who patiently responds to all questions asked of him and NEVER shies away from answering – he truly is a colossus.

    Yet I’m shocked time and again to see NO-NOTHING-NITWITS (like Incitatus, Woy-chek, Poupon Marx and several others), actually insulting this great man.
    John Wear’s masterpiece ‘Germany’s War’, is available to read for FREE here in UR:
    https://www.unz.com/book/john_wear__germanys-war/

    And WHY do you think that is UR readers?
    Answer: It’s because Ron UNZ paid John Wear for the privilege of allowing his book to be posted here.

    And that was the best money Ron Unz ever spent. I will always be grateful to you Mr Unz, for doing that.
    This is a book which, had we lived in a just world, would’ve been an INTERNATIONAL BEST SELLER.
    But Malignant International Jewry have gone out of their way to ensure that book sales are throttled, that John’s tour de force gets no publicity.

    Meanwhile, returning to where I was before (on the matter of the quality of the those participating in the comments section), there are plenty of Jewish trolls, sayan and ADL operatives (like Patrick ‘Shlomo’ McNally, John’s Johnson, Mean Joo Joo, Curvanus, Incitatus – aka Incactus – and the rest, peddling their endless stream of lies in this webzine).

    I don’t believe that people like Woy-chek, Avery, Odyssey and others of their ilk, are Jews themselves.
    I also don’t believe (although I could be wrong), that they’re working in cahoots with Organised Jewry to post B.S with malice aforethought.

    They are, I believe, just USEFUL IDIOTS that have been indoctrinated since birth to believe that the Armenians were on the side of the righteous in WWII by fighting in the Red Army (in the case of Avery), that the Poles were likewise (in the case of the ignorant Woy-chek), or that the Serbs were the righteous ones (Odyssey).

    But the fact remains nevertheless, that both the Poles and the Serbs** (or at least their corrupt leadership), accepted the 30 shekels of silver on offer from Malignant International Jewry, so that they could fight and die in great number so as to advance the agenda of the Jewish financiers in the Square Mile that controlled then, as they do today, the entirety of the western financial and political systems.
    (**In the case of the Serbs, they were DOUBLY STUPID – seeing as they sided with ZOG in both World Wars).

    Woy-chek in particular blows a fuse whenever I bring that up.
    Because he knows in his heart that the Poles sided with EVIL in WWII, by stooping to the dictates of the Anglo-Zionist empire in murdering tens of thousands of ethnic Germans that lived inside the illegally acquired Polish territory.

    That’s right, TENS of THOUSANDS of innocent German civilians murdered by the Poles, and multiples more of that were brutalised, raped, had their EYES GOUGED OUT.
    Yes UR readers, when it comes to bestial acts BEFORE hostilities had even broken out, the Poles were among the worst in history.

    Truly a despicable people.
    But little Woy-chek (named after Wojciech Jaruzelski, the last Communist leader of Poland – a hero of his Marxist parents and that community/shit-hole shtetl in Poland where Woy-chek was born and raised), still shows not contrition for the dastardly deeds of his countrymen.

    • LOL: wojtek
    • Replies: @Mark G.
    @Truth Vigilante

    I am quite happy Ron Unz has his website, along with its excellent commenting system, here. When Ron Unz ran for Senator of California in 2016, Ron Paul endorsed him. If the California then was the same as the California of the sixties which made Reagan governor he might have won. Unfortunately, according to my cousins there, California is much changed from when I visited them there in 1969.

    Replies: @Truth Vigilante

    , @wojtek
    @Truth Vigilante


    But little Woy-chek (named after Wojciech Jaruzelski, the last Communist leader of Poland – a hero of his Marxist parents and that community/shit-hole shtetl in Poland where Woy-chek was born and raised), still shows not contrition for the dastardly deeds of his countrymen.
     
    How to tell everyone that your arse still hurts without using these exact words :)
    , @Jokem
    @Truth Vigilante

    Tooth - Your Marxist handlers are certainly working overtime.

  • @Truth Vigilante
    @Mark G.


    You are also not going to change the mind of the two individuals you are arguing with.
    You can do what you want but my suggestion would be to just walk away ....
     
    Thanks for your suggestion Mark. It's been suggested to me before.
    But I certainly won't be walking away.

    If a thread is an old one, or one hot off the press, I will continue as I've done in the past.
    You see, whether it's a UR thread dealing with the Mossad/ZOG orchestrated 9/11 False Flag, the ZOG conjured fable of the Holohoax, the Anthropogenic Global Warming fraud or whatever, I am WELL AWARE that I won't be changing the minds of the hard core cult members that have been brainwashed by the official narrative concocted by Malignant International Jewry.

    My purpose here is twofold:
    1) To embarrass and hand out almighty shellackings to the fools in UR that are propagating falsehoods.

    I do this with a deluge of incontestable facts that make it clear to all impartial observers, that those propagating these myths (like the dumb Polack Woy-chek in the WWII threads), have no leg to stand on.
    You see, the penny has not dropped for young Woy-chek, that Poland sided with the Jewish financiers during WWII.
    It is these inbred Talmudic misfits that emerged as the CLEAR VICTORS of that calamitous event.

    2) It is to EDUCATE those that are sitting on the fence.
    In other words, there are many (for example, in the case of the Holohoax or the JFK coup d'etat), who more or less believe what's been drummed into their heads about these matters from the Jewish controlled western media/public education system/major book publishing outlets, but who simultaneously smell a rat.
    (In that they know that the official story does not add up).

    What I'm saying is that these people, while not necessarily being critical thinkers, are nonetheless honest people who are prepared to change their minds when confronted with a tsunami of verified evidence.

    Summary: For every individual that leaves a comment, I suspect that there are multiples more that read the comments and the article in UR, but leave no comment of their own.
    I know that from first hand experience because I WAS ONE SUCH INDIVIDUAL.
    I had been reading the UR for over a decade, but never posted a comment prior to 2021.
     
    You see, I was well aware that comments could be posted below You Tube videos and in other formats, and I read the odd one from time to time.
    But I never thought much of them. I never thought many people read them.
    So I never bothered posting comments there or anywhere else.

    But when I started reading the comments in this webzine, I noticed something different.
    The UR allowed for participants to include links to articles, to include videos, photos and what not.
    Moreover, unlike other venues where commenters posted inane nonsense for the most part, UR had some genuine KNOWLEDGEABLE PEOPLE that were providing excellent output*.

    (*Whilst many of the articles are indeed very informative and good reading, I find that the comments are EVEN BETTER in most instances - often several pay grades above the article itself.
    Nowhere is this more true than in the WWII and Holohoax articles, where the WORLD CLASS historical researcher JOHN WEAR leads the way).

    He consistently swats down the Jewish liars like Incitatus (aka Incite-us), Patrick McNally and the rest.
    I thought I knew a thing or two about WWII after many thousands of hours of research utilising the findings of the best Not-Beholden-to-ZOG historians and other researchers on the planet (like David Irving and A.J.P Taylor, to name just two).

    But I've been floored by the sheer depth and breadth of John Wear's knowledge on this matter.
    I have learnt much from him over several years and I will always be thankful.
    We are so lucky to have here in UR a man of John Wear's stature, who patiently responds to all questions asked of him and NEVER shies away from answering - he truly is a colossus.

    Yet I'm shocked time and again to see NO-NOTHING-NITWITS (like Incitatus, Woy-chek, Poupon Marx and several others), actually insulting this great man.
    John Wear's masterpiece 'Germany's War', is available to read for FREE here in UR:
    https://www.unz.com/book/john_wear__germanys-war/

    And WHY do you think that is UR readers?
    Answer: It's because Ron UNZ paid John Wear for the privilege of allowing his book to be posted here.

    And that was the best money Ron Unz ever spent. I will always be grateful to you Mr Unz, for doing that.
    This is a book which, had we lived in a just world, would've been an INTERNATIONAL BEST SELLER.
    But Malignant International Jewry have gone out of their way to ensure that book sales are throttled, that John's tour de force gets no publicity.
     
    Meanwhile, returning to where I was before (on the matter of the quality of the those participating in the comments section), there are plenty of Jewish trolls, sayan and ADL operatives (like Patrick 'Shlomo' McNally, John's Johnson, Mean Joo Joo, Curvanus, Incitatus - aka Incactus - and the rest, peddling their endless stream of lies in this webzine).

    I don't believe that people like Woy-chek, Avery, Odyssey and others of their ilk, are Jews themselves.
    I also don't believe (although I could be wrong), that they're working in cahoots with Organised Jewry to post B.S with malice aforethought.

    They are, I believe, just USEFUL IDIOTS that have been indoctrinated since birth to believe that the Armenians were on the side of the righteous in WWII by fighting in the Red Army (in the case of Avery), that the Poles were likewise (in the case of the ignorant Woy-chek), or that the Serbs were the righteous ones (Odyssey).

    But the fact remains nevertheless, that both the Poles and the Serbs** (or at least their corrupt leadership), accepted the 30 shekels of silver on offer from Malignant International Jewry, so that they could fight and die in great number so as to advance the agenda of the Jewish financiers in the Square Mile that controlled then, as they do today, the entirety of the western financial and political systems.
    (**In the case of the Serbs, they were DOUBLY STUPID - seeing as they sided with ZOG in both World Wars).

    Woy-chek in particular blows a fuse whenever I bring that up.
    Because he knows in his heart that the Poles sided with EVIL in WWII, by stooping to the dictates of the Anglo-Zionist empire in murdering tens of thousands of ethnic Germans that lived inside the illegally acquired Polish territory.

    That's right, TENS of THOUSANDS of innocent German civilians murdered by the Poles, and multiples more of that were brutalised, raped, had their EYES GOUGED OUT.
    Yes UR readers, when it comes to bestial acts BEFORE hostilities had even broken out, the Poles were among the worst in history.

    Truly a despicable people.
    But little Woy-chek (named after Wojciech Jaruzelski, the last Communist leader of Poland - a hero of his Marxist parents and that community/shit-hole shtetl in Poland where Woy-chek was born and raised), still shows not contrition for the dastardly deeds of his countrymen.

    Replies: @Mark G., @wojtek, @Jokem

    But little Woy-chek (named after Wojciech Jaruzelski, the last Communist leader of Poland – a hero of his Marxist parents and that community/shit-hole shtetl in Poland where Woy-chek was born and raised), still shows not contrition for the dastardly deeds of his countrymen.

    How to tell everyone that your arse still hurts without using these exact words 🙂

  • In his living room, studded with signed photographs of the rich and famous, Henk Visser, the arms collector and businessman, once told me about his wartime experience. Barely eighteen years old, he had joined the Dutch resistance, was captured by the Germans and sentenced to death. While he was awaiting his execution, his mother wrote...
  • anonymous[328] • Disclaimer says:

    Had Visser been Polish, Belarusian, Russian or something similar there would have been no question of any clemency. The Germans would have probably killed a whole host of hostages in retaliation, as was their practice. Stalin and his Russians destroyed Hitler and his superior beings even after being surprise attacked. This deification of Hitler verges on occult thinking, no longer grounded in reality. What’s the point?

    • Agree: wojtek
  • For all the media hand-wringing over the government shutdown the fact is only approximately 750,000 of the over two million non-military federal workers are being furloughed. Most federal programs will continue operating, including the major entitlement and welfare programs. The national parks will remain open, if understaffed and with closed visitor centers. Unfortunately, the shutdown...
  • @Truth Vigilante
    @wojtek

    Woy-chek writes:


    Overall looks like this year in gold, UAW employees at Ford make nearly the same on average as it was 100 years ago.
     
    Typical of the dumb Polacks out there, Woy-chek does not have it in him to admit he was dead wrong and that wages, in terms of gold, are FAR LESS in America in 2025 for the lower and middle classes than they were in the first couple of decades of the 20th century when America was on a Gold Standard.

    Well Woy-chek, it looks like you're going to get badly embarrassed once more.
    UR readers should click on the link below to see for themselves what UAW workers earn:
    https://www.thepacket.ca/how-much-do-uaw-workers-earn-a-look-at-hourly-wages-across-us-states/

    From the article above:


    As stated therein US Bureau of Labor Statistics, the average auto worker earns $28 an hour.
     
    Did you get that Woy-chek? Assuming they work a 40 hour week, that translates to a little over $1100 per week, or around $58K per year.
    ie: a small fraction of the wages quoted by the liar Woy-chek (who obviously quoted the salaries of upper management in the Auto industry).

    And UR readers should take note that what I have blockquoted above is that:
    ''the AVERAGE auto worker earns $28 an hour'.
    In other words, some are earning LESS THAN THAT.
    Well, when Henry Ford increased the wages to $5/day over 100 years ago, that was the BASE WAGE for the lowest workers on his assembly line.

    FOR SURE the better skilled machinists/tool makers and foremen got higher wages still.
    And then management would've made multiples more of that.
    Woy-chek, why not just admit it? You are a dumb cunt even judged vs other dumb Poles (which is a pretty low bar to hurdle at the best of times).

    You've been exposed as being on par with Joker, your sycophantic little pal.
    Both of you are as thick as a brick.

    NOTE ALSO: My calculations of Ford workers making $5/day (and therefore $25 per week), were obviously based on workers working a FIVE (5) day week.
    But the reality is that:


    A 40-hour, five-day work week was not standard until the 1930s
     
    That's right UR readers.
    The fact of the matter is that in 1926, Henry Ford (in an effort to incentivise his workers to stay - because there was a high turnover rate), took his six-day-a-week operation down to five days per week.
    He was the first to do so among the major industrialists.
    But for MOST INDUSTRIES, as mentioned above, a five day week did not become the norm until well into the 1930's.

    Simply put, if Ford workers were making $5/day prior to 1926 (which they were), and working SIX days a week, this increased the wages over 100 years ago - that I posted (in terms of gold), by another 20%.
    In other words, the $265K per year (adjusted for the price of gold today) I quoted in comment # 107, now becomes $318K per year.

    Woy-chek, you've not only gotten your calculations wrong, but you are BADLY WRONG.
    Are we ever going to see some contrition from you and an admission that you don't know what you're talking about?

    Replies: @wojtek, @Mark G., @Jokem

    Naziboi, you’re dumber than most of stupid neonazis I’ve seen here. And that says something.

    I am giving you data from an established American recruiting company, which knows first hand what the salaries are:

    https://www.glassdoor.com/Salary/Ford-Motor-Company-UAW-Member-Salaries-E263_D_KO19,29.htm

    And in response you’re pasting a link to some defunct Canadian paper about some average auto worker??? Canadian? 🙂

    At least now we know who you are: a spawn of these banderist beasts that escaped their due for what they’ve done during the war. That explains a lot – including mixing nazism with commie traits.

    So, speaking of your commie-nazi dreams, here is some information:

    “The $5-a-day rate was about half pay and half bonus. The bonus came with character requirements and was enforced by the Socialization Organization. This was a committee that would visit the employees’ homes to ensure that they were doing things the “American way.” They were supposed to avoid social ills such as gambling and drinking … Women were not eligible for the bonus unless they were single and supporting the family. Also, men were not eligible if their wives worked outside the home.”

    Yeap, definitely a nazi banderist.

  • In his living room, studded with signed photographs of the rich and famous, Henk Visser, the arms collector and businessman, once told me about his wartime experience. Barely eighteen years old, he had joined the Dutch resistance, was captured by the Germans and sentenced to death. While he was awaiting his execution, his mother wrote...
  • This simple anecdote serves to illustrate that Hitler was not the crazed, bloodthirsty monster he is made out to be in the prevailing narrative

    Neonazis must be the dumbest people on Earth.

    “General Scherff, approached with the letter from my mother and explained the story. Hitler looked up and said, “A friend of yours, eh?” and Hitler himself crossed out “Death Penalty” and wrote “15 years Zuchthaus” instead.’

    And here’s who that family friend was:

    “Karl Walter Scherff (1 November 1898 – 24 May 1945) was a German army officer and military historian with the rank of Generalmajor, who was appointed by Adolf Hitler to the Oberkommando der Wehrmacht in May 1942 to compile the history of the war, as the Führer’s Commissioner for the Writing of Military History.”

    But even if by some miracle the family didn’t have high level nazi connections, to think that one act of a pardon, which we know were few and only to people with personal connections to highest level nazi circles, to claim that this somehow annihilates millions of innocent victims of german nazism?

    Only dumb neonazis can come up with something so stupid.

  • For all the media hand-wringing over the government shutdown the fact is only approximately 750,000 of the over two million non-military federal workers are being furloughed. Most federal programs will continue operating, including the major entitlement and welfare programs. The national parks will remain open, if understaffed and with closed visitor centers. Unfortunately, the shutdown...
  • @Truth Vigilante
    @wojtek

    Woy-chek keeps on demonstrating his ignorance with this comment:


    Namely, if you look at “money” in terms of gold, then the American GDP per capita, measured in ounces of gold, rather than paper dollars, has not changed much over the last 100 years.
     
    Around 100 years ago, Henry Ford doubled the wages of his production line workers to $5 /day.
    So, after working a 5 day week, they would've earned enough to go to a bank and exchange their $25 of Federal Reserve notes for these two coins below (approx. one and a quarter troy ounces of gold):
    https://www.herobullion.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/20-Saint-Gaudens-Double-Eagle-Gold-Coin-BU-440x440.jpg

    https://avatars.mds.yandex.net/i?id=cdd713f5c47d2a6e04a76c1cb65bb509a484aa18-4901462-images-thumbs&n=13

    Today those coins, in gold value alone (not including their numismatic premium above the gold price), would be worth over USD $ 5100.
    I ask you UR readers, are any bottom-of-the-rung U.S Auto workers, today in 2025, making $5100 a week (equating to $265K per year)?


    Summary: Woy-chek has proven ONCE MORE (not that we didn't have scores of examples from the past), that he's a KNN (KNOW-NOTHING-NITWIT).

    When a nation has a Fiat Monetary system (esp. like America where a private cartel of Talmudic miscreants owns it), there is NO RESTRAINT on the amount of currency that can be printed/digitally created - thus massively reducing the purchasing power of each unit of that currency.
     

    During the 19th century, when America was on the Classical Gold Standard, a dollar in 1900 had MORE PURCHASING POWER than it had one hundred years prior in 1800.
    That's right, although their were brief inflationary periods during that century, for the period as a whole the U.S experienced DEFLATION.

    And bear in mind also, this deflation occurred while America had SPECTACULAR GROWTH during that century.
    In other words, contrary to the lies being peddled by ZOG funded sources that deflation only generally occurs during a sharp recession or a Depression, on a Gold Standard deflation accompanied by high growth rates, is the NATURAL ORDER OF AFFAIRS.

    And the purchasing power of a dollar in 1900 was not just one or two percentage points greater than it was in 1800. From memory it had around 25-30% greater purchasing power.
    Coupled to that, the average salary for a lowly worker was FAR GREATER in nominal terms than it was in 1800.


    In other words, on the Classical Gold Standard, workers had far more dollars in their pocket and each of those dollars bought more than 100 years prior.
    This is what SMALL GUBMINT coupled to Sound Money (ie: the Gold Standard), delivers EVERY TIME.
     
    The U.S, in the period from the founding of the republic until the creation of ZOG owned Federal Reserve in 1913, was the closest society in all of recorded history to being a libertarian utopia - hence the reason for the stellar outcomes that saw it become the richest nation on Earth.

    Australia* and Canada also during this period, were very close to being Free Market Capitalist libertarian utopia's - hence the reason they also became very prosperous.
    (*For a few years in the late 19th/early 20th century, Australia had a higher per capita GDP than the U.S).

    These sort of results are delivered ALWAYS and EVERYWHERE if Gubmint is tiny, and unfettered Free Market Capitalism and Ron Paul/Jeffersonian libertarianism (or something very near to it), is practised.
     

    Replies: @Jokem, @wojtek

    I can’t think of anything dumber than a neonazi. And our local truth denier does his best to prove it every time 🙂

    Did you know, nazi dumbo, that according to glassdoor, 25th percentile earnings at Ford for UAW workers stand at ~135K, and 75th percentile is ~250K per year? That does not include generous health package worth nearly 20K, 10% of salary contribution going to pension system every year, life and disability insurance, tuition assistance of 8K per year, etc etc.

    Overall looks like this year in gold, UAW employees at Ford make nearly the same on average as it was 100 years ago.

    Interestingly, 2 years ago they made twice as much as 100 years ago.

    No wonder your arse is hurting so badly, naziboy 🙂

    • Replies: @Jokem
    @wojtek

    Keep in mind Tooth Dilettante is a Marxist agent. Nazism and Marxism are both similar in that they are statist political philosophies, and Marxists make war on religion - including Judaism.
    So, one can look a lot like the other.

    , @Truth Vigilante
    @wojtek

    Woy-chek writes:


    Overall looks like this year in gold, UAW employees at Ford make nearly the same on average as it was 100 years ago.
     
    Typical of the dumb Polacks out there, Woy-chek does not have it in him to admit he was dead wrong and that wages, in terms of gold, are FAR LESS in America in 2025 for the lower and middle classes than they were in the first couple of decades of the 20th century when America was on a Gold Standard.

    Well Woy-chek, it looks like you're going to get badly embarrassed once more.
    UR readers should click on the link below to see for themselves what UAW workers earn:
    https://www.thepacket.ca/how-much-do-uaw-workers-earn-a-look-at-hourly-wages-across-us-states/

    From the article above:


    As stated therein US Bureau of Labor Statistics, the average auto worker earns $28 an hour.
     
    Did you get that Woy-chek? Assuming they work a 40 hour week, that translates to a little over $1100 per week, or around $58K per year.
    ie: a small fraction of the wages quoted by the liar Woy-chek (who obviously quoted the salaries of upper management in the Auto industry).

    And UR readers should take note that what I have blockquoted above is that:
    ''the AVERAGE auto worker earns $28 an hour'.
    In other words, some are earning LESS THAN THAT.
    Well, when Henry Ford increased the wages to $5/day over 100 years ago, that was the BASE WAGE for the lowest workers on his assembly line.

    FOR SURE the better skilled machinists/tool makers and foremen got higher wages still.
    And then management would've made multiples more of that.
    Woy-chek, why not just admit it? You are a dumb cunt even judged vs other dumb Poles (which is a pretty low bar to hurdle at the best of times).

    You've been exposed as being on par with Joker, your sycophantic little pal.
    Both of you are as thick as a brick.

    NOTE ALSO: My calculations of Ford workers making $5/day (and therefore $25 per week), were obviously based on workers working a FIVE (5) day week.
    But the reality is that:


    A 40-hour, five-day work week was not standard until the 1930s
     
    That's right UR readers.
    The fact of the matter is that in 1926, Henry Ford (in an effort to incentivise his workers to stay - because there was a high turnover rate), took his six-day-a-week operation down to five days per week.
    He was the first to do so among the major industrialists.
    But for MOST INDUSTRIES, as mentioned above, a five day week did not become the norm until well into the 1930's.

    Simply put, if Ford workers were making $5/day prior to 1926 (which they were), and working SIX days a week, this increased the wages over 100 years ago - that I posted (in terms of gold), by another 20%.
    In other words, the $265K per year (adjusted for the price of gold today) I quoted in comment # 107, now becomes $318K per year.

    Woy-chek, you've not only gotten your calculations wrong, but you are BADLY WRONG.
    Are we ever going to see some contrition from you and an admission that you don't know what you're talking about?

    Replies: @wojtek, @Mark G., @Jokem

  • The future of the former “Western Regions”: an energy-rich, multi-cultural, multi-religious, geostrategic New Silk Road hub of “moderately prosperous” China. YUTIAN, ON THE SOUTHERN SILK ROAD – We are on the road in southern Xinjiang, after a harrowing back-and-forth in the Taklamakan, across the sand dunes, to visit the “lost tribe” cum village of Daliyabuyi,...
  • @showmethereal
    @wojtek

    You are stupid if you think the Tibetan system under the Dalai Lama was freedom

    Replies: @wojtek

    You’re even stupider than the dumb little red CCP troll.

    But feel free to show me where I said anything like that.

    Otherwise, it’s nothing more than a primitive attempt to turn the focus away from the moronic claims of the dumb little red CCP troll.

    • Replies: @showmethereal
    @wojtek

    The discussion was about Tibet and you brought up western freedoms. I’m sorry your brain is too clouded for you to even understand what you write

    Replies: @wojtek

  • @littlereddot
    @wojtek

    How stupid can you be.

    whose owner then is being harassed by Russian agents.
     

    Russian agents would not be allowed to operate in Vilnius.

    The anti-Russian sentiment in Lithuania is so strong that they would be thrown into jail in no time.

    That is how silly your stupid story is.

    The guy accused of being a "CCP agent" was likely a communist leaning Gurkha who could speak Nepalese.

    You are but a stupid Polack child who reads nothing but Western propaganda and shows how idiotic he is by showing he knows nothing about how the world works.

    This is what a Gurkha looks like. Neither you nor that idiotic original poster can tell the difference between them and Chinks.

    https://www.telegraph.co.uk/content/dam/men/2016/05/27/G3_trans_NvBQzQNjv4BqpJliwavx4coWFCaEkEsb3kvxIt-lGGWCWqwLa_RXJU8.jpg?imwidth=640

    Replies: @wojtek

    Russian agents would not be allowed to operate in Vilnius.

    It’s so cute that our local dumb red little CCP troll thinks CCP agents are allowed to operate in Nepal 🙂

    You’re dumber than even dumb troll norms allow 🙂

    • Replies: @littlereddot
    @wojtek


    It’s so cute that our local dumb red little CCP troll thinks CCP agents are allowed to operate in Nepal 🙂
     
    Duh. You illustrate again how stupid you lot are.

    Just as Russian agents would not be allowed to berate shopowners in Vinius
    CCP agents would not be allowed to berate shopowners in Kathmandu.

    Therefore it is evident that the guy berating the "Tibetan" shopowner was Gurkha Nepalese from the eastern parts of the country.

    More Gurkhas for you. Perhaps you will be stupid enough to assume they are CCP agents also.

    https://www.shutterstock.com/image-photo/brecon-powys-wales-gurkha-freedom-260nw-1912603651.jpg

    https://www.telegraph.co.uk/content/dam/men/2016/05/27/G1_trans_NvBQzQNjv4BqqVzuuqpFlyLIwiB6NTmJwZwVSIA7rSIkPn18jgFKEo0.jpg?imwidth=350

    https://visit-winchester.transforms.svdcdn.com/production/Dress-like-a-Gurkha.jpg

    Replies: @wojtek

  • For all the media hand-wringing over the government shutdown the fact is only approximately 750,000 of the over two million non-military federal workers are being furloughed. Most federal programs will continue operating, including the major entitlement and welfare programs. The national parks will remain open, if understaffed and with closed visitor centers. Unfortunately, the shutdown...
  • @selfdo59
    @wojtek

    It's much simpler than that. The more money, especially when it's taken from OTHER PEOPLE, you make available for a product or service, whether it's EVs, subsidized college educations, or "single-payer" health care, the more they end up COSTING. We have this mistaken notion that transportation, education, and medical care are an OBLIGATION of the Government, which, in practice, means that the privileged ones get worthwhile products or services, the masses get...DRECK. Government doesn't produce anything that's wanted, it only takes by force and "gives" what it's willing to FORCE upon us.

    As for medicine, not only are alternatives interfered with by the AMA that has a vested interest in the current system, it's often CRIMINALIZED. I'm not talking about some pathetic meth head enjoying some of Walter White's best. I'm talking about a simple thing as my HMO fights fang, nail, and claw to step up my painkiller dosage. Well, it's simple...I HURT. Arthritis bedevils me, and part of it is just that I'm getting OLD. At this point, whether I have 50 mg of Tramadol daily, or 100 mg, will make little difference as to how long I live, but it makes one hell of a difference in how I enjoy it! My HMO docs pontificate about "pain management" and "pain meds addiction", when in reality, they don't want to do the paperwork necessary to cover their lazy asses from Federal prosecution. Or the HMO get sued if somehow I were driving while "tranked" (which, if I allowed it to happen, I'd be in some deep shit, and rightly so, as driving drugged is no less a crime than driving drunk), and their Jew attorneys have told them it's better I suffer than they risk a lawsuit for "overdosing" me. This is but a smidge of the tyranny which our Forefathers, were they to see it, would wonder why the hell we put with up, and what, pray tell, did they risk their homes, fortunes, and very LIVES for? Maybe King George III wasn't so bad after all!

    Replies: @wojtek

    First of all I feel very sorry for you – there comes a time in life, when pain becomes unbearable. And talking about “pain meds addiction” is like talking about “food addiction”. Definitely criminal. Fully agreed.

    But I do disagree somewhat with the “more money” part.

    Namely, if you look at “money” in terms of gold, then the American GDP per capita, measured in ounces of gold, rather than paper dollars, has not changed much over the last 100 years. In fact, today it is lower than it was 100 years ago. So relatively to population, it is just not true that there is “more money available”. Money is the same or less.

    But what I think is happening is that a much bigger share of that money goes towards these necessities, like healthcare, education, housing, etc. Simply speaking I think “they” learned how to squeeze more out of an average person, both through personal expenses, and also tapping into people’s taxes though approved government spending.

    • Replies: @Truth Vigilante
    @wojtek

    Woy-chek keeps on demonstrating his ignorance with this comment:


    Namely, if you look at “money” in terms of gold, then the American GDP per capita, measured in ounces of gold, rather than paper dollars, has not changed much over the last 100 years.
     
    Around 100 years ago, Henry Ford doubled the wages of his production line workers to $5 /day.
    So, after working a 5 day week, they would've earned enough to go to a bank and exchange their $25 of Federal Reserve notes for these two coins below (approx. one and a quarter troy ounces of gold):
    https://www.herobullion.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/20-Saint-Gaudens-Double-Eagle-Gold-Coin-BU-440x440.jpg

    https://avatars.mds.yandex.net/i?id=cdd713f5c47d2a6e04a76c1cb65bb509a484aa18-4901462-images-thumbs&n=13

    Today those coins, in gold value alone (not including their numismatic premium above the gold price), would be worth over USD $ 5100.
    I ask you UR readers, are any bottom-of-the-rung U.S Auto workers, today in 2025, making $5100 a week (equating to $265K per year)?


    Summary: Woy-chek has proven ONCE MORE (not that we didn't have scores of examples from the past), that he's a KNN (KNOW-NOTHING-NITWIT).

    When a nation has a Fiat Monetary system (esp. like America where a private cartel of Talmudic miscreants owns it), there is NO RESTRAINT on the amount of currency that can be printed/digitally created - thus massively reducing the purchasing power of each unit of that currency.
     

    During the 19th century, when America was on the Classical Gold Standard, a dollar in 1900 had MORE PURCHASING POWER than it had one hundred years prior in 1800.
    That's right, although their were brief inflationary periods during that century, for the period as a whole the U.S experienced DEFLATION.

    And bear in mind also, this deflation occurred while America had SPECTACULAR GROWTH during that century.
    In other words, contrary to the lies being peddled by ZOG funded sources that deflation only generally occurs during a sharp recession or a Depression, on a Gold Standard deflation accompanied by high growth rates, is the NATURAL ORDER OF AFFAIRS.

    And the purchasing power of a dollar in 1900 was not just one or two percentage points greater than it was in 1800. From memory it had around 25-30% greater purchasing power.
    Coupled to that, the average salary for a lowly worker was FAR GREATER in nominal terms than it was in 1800.


    In other words, on the Classical Gold Standard, workers had far more dollars in their pocket and each of those dollars bought more than 100 years prior.
    This is what SMALL GUBMINT coupled to Sound Money (ie: the Gold Standard), delivers EVERY TIME.
     
    The U.S, in the period from the founding of the republic until the creation of ZOG owned Federal Reserve in 1913, was the closest society in all of recorded history to being a libertarian utopia - hence the reason for the stellar outcomes that saw it become the richest nation on Earth.

    Australia* and Canada also during this period, were very close to being Free Market Capitalist libertarian utopia's - hence the reason they also became very prosperous.
    (*For a few years in the late 19th/early 20th century, Australia had a higher per capita GDP than the U.S).

    These sort of results are delivered ALWAYS and EVERYWHERE if Gubmint is tiny, and unfettered Free Market Capitalism and Ron Paul/Jeffersonian libertarianism (or something very near to it), is practised.
     

    Replies: @Jokem, @wojtek

  • Christopher Hitchens: “The Holocaust has become a secular religion, with state support in the form of a national museum.” David Irving is arguably one of the most controversial historians of the modern era. He has been characterized by critics as an “anti-Semite,” a “neo-Nazi,” and a “Holocaust denier.” In 2010, former news anchor Keith Olbermann...
  • It’s a great pity Irving wasn’t interested in the more recent history. I’m sure that using his “methods”, he’d be able to go through the little of what was left of commie records and would “prove” that there was no communist totalitarian murderous regime to be found in Poland or anywhere else.

    One thing however that we can’t deny him was his discovery of a market of – mostly anglosaxon – gullible neonazi wannabies. That’s his most important and undeniable discovery.

    PS. Interestingly I must question the title – holocaust establishment seems to be doing quite well, whereas Irving not so much, for quite a while now.

  • The future of the former “Western Regions”: an energy-rich, multi-cultural, multi-religious, geostrategic New Silk Road hub of “moderately prosperous” China. YUTIAN, ON THE SOUTHERN SILK ROAD – We are on the road in southern Xinjiang, after a harrowing back-and-forth in the Taklamakan, across the sand dunes, to visit the “lost tribe” cum village of Daliyabuyi,...
  • @littlereddot
    @wojtek


    Specifically you moron think you can dictate which flags Tibetans in Nepal can sell. What a dumbass you are.
     
    I don't care what they sell.

    If they are stupid enough to sell Nazi flags in Moscow, they are likely to be beaten up by Gopniks.

    If they sell USSR flags in Vilnius, then they are like to get a hard time from local youths.

    If they sell Tibetan rebel flags during a time of Communist revolution in Nepal, then expect to get a hard time from Nepalese commie sympathisers.

    Surely you are not too stupid to understand this?

    Or is your indoctrination so deep that you choose not to understand it?


    Well, we Poles are not good with little red dumb dictators.
     
    No, you just like little blue kings.

    https://www.economist.com/cdn-cgi/image/width=1424,quality=80,format=auto/content-assets/images/20250222_LDD002_FH.jpg

    Replies: @wojtek

    If they sell USSR flags in Vilnius, then they are like to get a hard time from local youths.

    Dumb little red CCP troll still is confused about the right analogy?

    Here it is, again, moron:

    A guys walking in to a Chechen shop in Lithuania and ordering a Chechen flag, whose owner then is being harassed by Russian agents.

    The is the correct analogy to a Tibat shop selling Tibetan flags in Nepal..
    Not the CCP trolling bs you’re trying to sell us here.

    I told you already – if the Western values of freedom are too unpleasant for you, avoid forums like this, and stay inside your commie cage.

    • Replies: @littlereddot
    @wojtek

    How stupid can you be.

    whose owner then is being harassed by Russian agents.
     

    Russian agents would not be allowed to operate in Vilnius.

    The anti-Russian sentiment in Lithuania is so strong that they would be thrown into jail in no time.

    That is how silly your stupid story is.

    The guy accused of being a "CCP agent" was likely a communist leaning Gurkha who could speak Nepalese.

    You are but a stupid Polack child who reads nothing but Western propaganda and shows how idiotic he is by showing he knows nothing about how the world works.

    This is what a Gurkha looks like. Neither you nor that idiotic original poster can tell the difference between them and Chinks.

    https://www.telegraph.co.uk/content/dam/men/2016/05/27/G3_trans_NvBQzQNjv4BqpJliwavx4coWFCaEkEsb3kvxIt-lGGWCWqwLa_RXJU8.jpg?imwidth=640

    Replies: @wojtek

    , @showmethereal
    @wojtek

    You are stupid if you think the Tibetan system under the Dalai Lama was freedom

    Replies: @wojtek

  • For all the media hand-wringing over the government shutdown the fact is only approximately 750,000 of the over two million non-military federal workers are being furloughed. Most federal programs will continue operating, including the major entitlement and welfare programs. The national parks will remain open, if understaffed and with closed visitor centers. Unfortunately, the shutdown...
  • @Mark G.
    @wojtek

    I said the number of primary care doctors decreased between 1960 and 2015 and you replied "false". You are a liar. That is not an opinion. That is a fact.

    Here is an opinion piece supported with facts:

    https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/1692395/thanks-to-doctors-there-arent-enough-doctors/

    I just spent four paragraphs quoting from it. Is your new tactic for me to type five paragraphs and you to ignore four that support my argument and to say something retarded in response to the fifth?

    So, why do you think the medical cartel donates large sums of money to politicians?

    Replies: @wojtek

    Mark, you confuse facts with opinions! So why should I care about any opinion you steal from somebody else, if you do not understand the difference between a fact and an opinion?

    Read the definitions I gave you, and learn the difference. Then write. Not the other way around.

  • @Mark G.
    @wojtek

    No, you messed up the definitions so you could lie. I said number of primary care doctors decreased and you replied that was false and said primary care providers increased. You did not use "provider" and "doctor" as synonyms. You added in nurse practioners and physician assistants. When I said number of primary care doctors decreased that was a true statement. For you to label it false is just plain lying.

    Number of health care providers is a fact but not an important fact as I have already said. What is important is the combination of supply and demand. Rising incomes is a sign of demand increasing faster than supply.

    The Washington Examiner published a 2018 article titled "Thanks to doctors there aren't enough doctors". Part of it described how physician associations have lobbied to limit competition from nurse practitioners and physician assistants by trying to limit the scope of what they can do in spite of evidence they can safely perform these functions.

    According to the article the medical cartel has been trying to limit the numbers of doctors since the AMA lobbied lawmakers in the early 20th century to shut down some medical schools. This practice of limiting numbers of med school grads has continued.

    The ACGME, started by several physician organizations, has been given power by the government to decide what residency programs get Medicare funding and has consistently allocated too many slots to specialist residencies and not enough for primary care doctors. Most patients don't need expensive specialists but due to primary care doctor shortages often visit specialists for primary care needs, driving up medical costs. In 1997 physician groups successfully lobbied the government to place a cap on the number of total residencies Medicare funds. According to the article, this was another way to limit supply to increase doctor incomes. This too drives up costs. The article ends by stating the doctors cartel is a major reason healthcare is so costly and that policymakers need to address that.

    Replies: @wojtek

    No, you messed up the definitions so you could lie.

    Don’t complain about these definitions to me – I copied them from a dictionary 🙂

    Here are links for you – to an original English dictionary as opposed to an imperfect American copy:

    https://www.oed.com/search/dictionary/?scope=Entries&q=fact

    https://www.oed.com/search/dictionary/?scope=Entries&q=opinion

    I am curious – this ailment you displayed right above, confusing simple words and their meaning, is this the reason you hate doctors?

    • Replies: @Mark G.
    @wojtek

    I said the number of primary care doctors decreased between 1960 and 2015 and you replied "false". You are a liar. That is not an opinion. That is a fact.

    Here is an opinion piece supported with facts:

    https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/1692395/thanks-to-doctors-there-arent-enough-doctors/

    I just spent four paragraphs quoting from it. Is your new tactic for me to type five paragraphs and you to ignore four that support my argument and to say something retarded in response to the fifth?

    So, why do you think the medical cartel donates large sums of money to politicians?

    Replies: @wojtek

  • The future of the former “Western Regions”: an energy-rich, multi-cultural, multi-religious, geostrategic New Silk Road hub of “moderately prosperous” China. YUTIAN, ON THE SOUTHERN SILK ROAD – We are on the road in southern Xinjiang, after a harrowing back-and-forth in the Taklamakan, across the sand dunes, to visit the “lost tribe” cum village of Daliyabuyi,...
  • @littlereddot
    @wojtek


    Stupid little red CCP troll continues to dictate Tibetan shop owners in Nepal which Tibetan flags they can display
     
    You obviously don't understand what "dictate" means.

    I can't blame you. Polacks are not known for intelligence.

    I wonder, are you going next to tell Indians not to use sanskrit swastika?
     
    Look closely, my stupid Polack. It is not the same.

    I guess after that the moron will tell us not to use white and red in our flag
     
    Who cares what you use?

    I am not the one commenting about things happening on another continent, even though I have been to Europe. Have you ever been to Asia?

    Stupid Polack thinks he understands the world because he watches Yankee propaganda.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=36JqvTdg2fo

    Replies: @wojtek, @Deep Thought

    You obviously don’t understand what “dictate” means.

    Well, we Poles are not good with little red dumb dictators.

    But you are obviously an expert, trying to dictate everyone in the whole World what they can or cannot do. You are – simply speaking – a dumb little red CCP troll.

    Specifically you moron think you can dictate which flags Tibetans in Nepal can sell. What a dumbass you are.

    • Replies: @littlereddot
    @wojtek


    Specifically you moron think you can dictate which flags Tibetans in Nepal can sell. What a dumbass you are.
     
    I don't care what they sell.

    If they are stupid enough to sell Nazi flags in Moscow, they are likely to be beaten up by Gopniks.

    If they sell USSR flags in Vilnius, then they are like to get a hard time from local youths.

    If they sell Tibetan rebel flags during a time of Communist revolution in Nepal, then expect to get a hard time from Nepalese commie sympathisers.

    Surely you are not too stupid to understand this?

    Or is your indoctrination so deep that you choose not to understand it?


    Well, we Poles are not good with little red dumb dictators.
     
    No, you just like little blue kings.

    https://www.economist.com/cdn-cgi/image/width=1424,quality=80,format=auto/content-assets/images/20250222_LDD002_FH.jpg

    Replies: @wojtek

  • For all the media hand-wringing over the government shutdown the fact is only approximately 750,000 of the over two million non-military federal workers are being furloughed. Most federal programs will continue operating, including the major entitlement and welfare programs. The national parks will remain open, if understaffed and with closed visitor centers. Unfortunately, the shutdown...
  • @Brad Anbro
    @Truth Vigilante

    T-V (and "wojtek" & "Mark G.),

    I will attempt to "play Devil's Advocate" here, in my reply to all of you and to anyone else who cares to put in their "two cents worth" in this discussion.

    First of all, I am no "expert" on anything. I am a 74-year-old retired industrial electrician (United Auto Workers Journeyman Electrician), who worked in that capacity in industry for over 40 years. From being in the workforce, buying & selling my private residences and managing my money, I have learned a few things.

    I am in complete agreement with "wojtek" in his post #19 - "Simply speaking unchecked human greed is the gatekeeper here."

    And in "Mark G.'s" post #24: "The way to counter this is through the political process." - I disagree 100% with this statement.



    I entered the workforce in 1969, after graduating from high school in that year. I obtained a job at a canning factory as general UNSKILLED help, earning $2.24 per hour. I retired from a factory a few years ago, where I was an electrician, doing SKILLED work and making $25+ per hour. I could actually purchase MORE with the $2.24 in my youth that I could with the $25+ when I retired. In other words, at the time of retirement, I was working for year 1969 UNSKILLED WAGES.

    At the end of World War II, the United States had EVERYTHING going for it. The country was a manufacturing powerhouse, manufacturing practically everything here and depending very little on foreign technology or manufacturing. Thanks to Franklin D. Roosevelt, the president that many commenters here love to hate, the unions had gained some bargaining power and because of this, the living standards of ALL Americans was rising.

    Americans were now enjoying paid vacations, sick leave & hospitalization, funding for their retirements, and a host of other benefits. Had it not been for the unions, we probably would have none of this today.

    "Fast forward" from the end of World War II to the present day. WHAT do we NOW have in the United States? We have record numbers of millionaires & billionaires, record numbers of homeless person, record numbers of bankruptcies, both personal and corporate, and record numbers of drug addicts. We have also LOST most of our manufacturing capacity, we have GIVEN AWAY most of our technology and we have these PHONY "wars" on drugs and "terror."

    And what has been the CAUSE of America's decline? Certainly, it was NOT the unions. The blame can be placed with the Jews and "WASPs" (and the WASPs' descendants) in the financial industry, especially the banks, with their fictitious "money" and DEBT creation, and with the corporations, which have willingly given away their technology, in search of ever cheaper labor.

    Here in the United States, there are NO "free markets" - EVERYTHING is RIGGED - to benefit the rich. All these markets are rigged: the stock market, the commodities market, the agricultural market and the energy market. And ESPECIALLY the "money" market, thanks to the UNCONSTITUTIONAL Federal Reserve, which is not "federal" at all, but rather a CARTEL of privately-owned banks that can create money out of thin air at will, CREATING DEBT.

    The major corporations and the financial markets, whom I refer to as the "wreckers," to use a term from old Soviet Union days, are the ones that have been responsible for the closure of tens of thousands of factories across the United States and the destruction of millions of good-paying jobs. Along with the "wreckers" are the politicians of BOTH national parties, who have been responsible for writing tax laws favoring this closure of factories and exodus of jobs - NOT THE UNIONS.

    Contrary to what "Mark G." states in post #24, I do not believe that the political process will be of any significant help in the future to rectify the problems we face here in the United States. I am of the opinion that BOTH national political parties have been completely bought off by the really big money interests - the "Secret Team" that was referred to by L. Fletcher Prouty. I think that the only thing which will effect any meaningful change here in the United States will be another revolution and my fear is that if there is a revolution, the new government will be at least as bad, and most likely WORSE, than the government we now have.

    I enjoy condemning government agencies as the Libertarian folks do, but there have been a number of government agencies that have been extremely beneficial. They have been responsible for the passage of LAWS which have made travel by air and rail much safer, as well as travel by automobile. They have also been responsible for making workplaces much safer, the improvement in workplace safety which would NOT have occurred out of the "goodness" of the corporations' "hearts."

    Thank you.

    Replies: @Mark G., @wojtek, @Truth Vigilante

    Brad, as always you have much to contribute and it’s hard to argue against the bulk of what you wrote.
    But it is clear that you’ve been brainwashed by the ZOG media and the ZOG controlled public education system about the benevolence of Gubmint and especially about FDR – America’s greatest TRAITOR.
    So I will now enlighten you.

    With every President, no matter how bad, we can always dig deep and eventually find some thing he did that has marginal benefit for the American citizenry.
    But on all the substantive issues, FDR was a disaster for America – and even more so for the rest of the world.
    There are not enough hours in the day to itemise all the damaging things FDR did.
    So I’ll just list some of the biggies off the top of my head:

    1) He involved America in a war (WWII) THAT AMERICA HAD NO BUSINESS BEING INVOLVED IN.

    2) FDR forced Japan into a corner (that would’ve seen her economy grind to halt and completely collapse – he cut off Japan’s oil and supply of other commodities), which left her no option other than the Pearl Harbour attack.
    (Most importantly of all, FDR KNEW that his actions would lead to war).

    3) I don’t have the exact figure off the top of my head, but something of the order of HALF A MILLION U.S SOLDIERS WERE KILLED DURING WWII – and it was ALL FOR EFF’N NOTHING.

    4) Over and above the half million GI’s killed, multiples more were disfigured, crippled, lost limbs or PTSD’ed. Simply put, FDR fucked up a lot of lives.

    5) And something that a lot of people don’t know (because they’ve only read the ZOG published history books and listened to the ZOG controlled History Channel), is that FDR and the British warmongers were DIRECTLY RESPONSIBLE FOR WAR IN EUROPE BREAKING OUT IN 1939.

    The fact is that Germany sought peaceful coexistence with Poland.
    But FDR and some prominent British oligarchs were having none of it.
    The corrupt Polish leaders accepted the 30 shekels of silver on offer from the Anglo-Zionist empire in return for ESCALATING THE PROVOCATIONS AGAINST THE ETHNIC GERMANS living in Polish territory.
    (Read my comment # 86 and see for yourself the heinous acts the Polacks committed).

    6) Even after reports reached Hitler that large numbers of Germans were being murdered and brutalised, Hitler’s response was measured.
    He asked them politely to desist and refused to take Germany to war with the dumb Poles.

    7) But the Poles would not listen. All the while FDR was saying to the Poles:
    ‘Don’t worry, we’ve got your back’. FDR would say: ‘If Germany ever lifted a finger against you, both the U.S and Great Britain would intervene on your side’.

    And the dumb Poles believed these empty promises.
    Because after Germany attacked (after they pleaded constantly with the Poles to stop the atrocities and exhausted every avenue for peace), the U.S and Gross Britain did NOTHING.

    8) FDR inherited would would’ve been a short/sharp recession in 1933 when he was inaugurated, and turned it into a prolonged Great Depression that engulfed the world and did not end until 1946.
    He did this by introducing his disastrous New Deal – which not only completely failed, but made things much, MUCH worse.

    9) FDR’s administration was filled from top to bottom with Jews – like no other administration, either before or since.
    If you wish, I can send you a list of all those Jews (there are scores of them), and the position they occupied.

    10) The two Jews that absolutely pulled all the strings and dictated FDR’s complete conduct of the war, were the Jewish financier Bernard Baruch and his Jewish Secretary of the Treasury Henry Morgenthau Jr.
    That fact is that FDR read from a script dictated to him by Malignant International Jewry.
    Summary: The three worst Presidents in America’s history were FDR, LBJ (America’s first Jewish Prez) and Woodrow Wilson – with Abe Lincoln closely behind.

    It’s blue sky to the rest. And it can easily be argued that FDR was the worst of the lot.
    He is the standout Piece Of Shit (POS) in the history of the republic.

    Lastly, you mentioned this:

    there have been a number of government agencies that have been extremely beneficial.
    They have been responsible for the passage of LAWS which have made travel by air and rail much safer ….

    For the most part, this is INCORRECT.
    Gubmint has done PRECIOUS LITTLE to improve the lives of its citizenry. This is true for nearly all countries – but is ESPECIALLY TRUE for the various U.S Gubmints over the years.

    Now, I’m not saying that there is absolutely no piece of legislation or law enacted by the U.S (or any other Gubmint) in history which didn’t provide some benefit.
    After all, with all the countless trillions that the U.S Gubmint has forcibly stolen from taxpayers over the years and countless millions of parasitic Gubmint workers that never did an eff’n thing for anyone, of course one would expect that SOME Gubmint employees among them did something good and that there were at least a handful of laws that were beneficial.

    At the end of the day many people will say that Gubmint made laws that made certain crimes illegal, and of course that was a good thing.
    But let’s face it, most laws are just COMMON SENSE.
    They were universal principles handed down from the scriptures. Like:

    i) Thou Shall not kill
    ii) Thou Shall not steal
    iii) Thou Shall not bear false witness , etc.

    Did we really need a Big Bloated Gubmint to tell us that?
    We (as in the members of a community), could’ve gotten together and drafted our own code of ethics and lived in accordance with those rules.

    People think that it’s because of Gubmint that we have safe products to buy.
    They think that, absent Gubmint, many of us would be lying bleeding to death in a ditch by the side of the road with our LIMBS BLOWN OFF (as a result of unregulated electronic devices that exploded in our faces).
    Brad, CAN YOU SEE HOW EFF’N STUPID THAT MINDSET IS?

    Think about it. If I manufacture a TV or a computer monitor, a toaster or microwave oven, DO YOU REALLY THINK MY BUSINESS WILL LAST LONG if I make a device that injures a consumer and/or blows one of their limbs off?
    That particular manufacturer’s name will be DIRT in no time when word gets around and they’ll go bankrupt in no time.
    So, to prevent that, MANUFACTURER’S GO OUT OF THEIR WAY to test their products and make sure they’re safe.

    Also Brad, you’ve told me about your experiences with various employers and how they exploited you. Well, the fact is that there are subset of pre-school teachers, of nurses, of butchers, bakers and candlestick makers that are also unscrupulous.
    In EVERY PROFESSION there will be some that rip you off.

    But the VAST MAJORITY of employers do not exploit their workers. I KNOW this to be true.
    And the reasoning is very simple:

    1) Employers are COMPETING for the best workers.
    I’ve employed numerous people in my life and it’s very hard to get good workers.
    You’d be surprised at the number of workers I’ve encountered that could not even meet minimal standards. Like:

    1) Showing up punctually for work
    2) That didn’t come to work stoned
    3) That didn’t take off excessive ‘sick’ days (I’ve caught out one or two who were sunning themselves at the beach after calling in early in the morning and saying they were on ‘death’s door’ and couldn’t get out of bed).

    And here is further proof that most employer’s do NOT exploit their employees.
    The percentage figures I’m about to give you are those for Australia (but I’ve checked the numbers for America and they’re almost identical):

    4) In Australia (and the U.S) there are minimum wage laws.
    But the statistics show that IN EXCESS of 95% of workers get well above the minimum wage.

    5) But according to some whiners, employers ALWAYS pay the minimum amount that they are required to as dictated by laws made by the ‘wise overlords’ in Gubmint.
    If so, my question to you is: WHY THE EFF isn’t everyone being paid the minimum wage?

    Answer: People with certain skill sets or even unskilled workers that are very productive, WILL NEVER WORK for minimum wage.
    They know they can get more. They know that employers will pay a premium as an incentive to headhunt the best workers.

    Conclusion: If you’re a dumb kid that just left high school and you have no work ethic, of course your productivity is very low.
    You may only provide $5 worth of productivity to your employer with that bad attitude.
    The onus is on THAT worker to change his ways, to improve his skill set.

    And if that worker improves to the extent that he offers his employer $50/hour of productivity, the employer would be a fool to only pay him $25/hour – because he runs the risk that said employee will depart and seek out greener pastures somewhere else where he’s valued.

    Many people cite Henry Ford and how over 100 years ago he doubled the wages of his workers to $5/day – which was a princely sum for a worker in those days.

    But Henry Ford did NOT do that out of altruism. He did that because SKILLED WORKERS WERE LEAVING – workers that took much time and effort to train in the first place.
    You see, working on a production line was tedious and monotonous.
    That type of work was messing with their sanity. So many went elsewhere and worked for lesser wages, but were compensated with job satisfaction.

    That’s how the world works. You told me you worked in a state where the economy was depressed and jobs were hard to come by.
    Well, workers MUST GO WHERE THE JOBS ARE.
    If there are no opportunities in your state (or even in your country), you should consider relocating.

    At the end of the day, to the extent that air travel is safe, to the extent that cars have better tyres with improves grip (compared to the cross ply radials that were the norm in the 1960’s), to the extent that cars have ABS, disc brakes with huge calipers that stop your car in a fraction of the time (and much more), these things occurred WITHOUT GUBMINT INTERVENTION.

    These things occurred as a byproduct of improved technologies.
    They were implemented by the aircraft and car manufacturers because THEY WERE SELLING POINTS.
    Consumers demanded safer products and so the manufacturers GAVE THEM WHAT THEY WANTED.

    But sneaky Gubmints that we know they are, they can see a new technology that is about to be adopted on the horizon. So they FRONT RUN and introduce legislation to make it compulsory.
    Then they TAKE THE CREDIT.
    Brad, can you see that’s how Gubmint works?

    The vast bulk of Gubmint and the parasites it employees are WORTHLESS.
    The ONLY reason many people gravitate towards Gubmint, is because they were FAILURES IN THE PRIVATE SECTOR.

    In Gubmint they know they’ll get lavish wages and even more lavish retirement perks – something they would never achieve in the private sector because they’d be paid in accordance with their productivity there.
    Gubmint meanwhile, can easily afford to pay high wages – because the Gubmint department chiefs are not paying out of their own pockets. The money comes from taxpayers that have been fleeced.

    • LOL: wojtek
    • Replies: @Brad Anbro
    @Truth Vigilante

    T-V,

    Thanks for the reply and thanks also to "wojtek" for his reply. I was NOT trying to imply that Roosevelt was a perfect president. People here on this website have a habit of bashing all presidents, as if none of them did any good. They also bash our Founding Fathers, for whom I have the utmost admiration. The fact of the matter is that all presidents have done "some" good as well as having done much that was not good.

    NO ONE has "brainwashed" me into believing ANYTHING. I am well aware of the Big Money behind ALL WARS and the fraudulent nature of our banking system and the "financial industry." I am also well aware of the endemic corruption in most government agencies, so you are not providing me with any new information. But the fact is, again, that "some" government agencies have "done" some good and that there are some government employees who try to serve the taxpayer the best that they can.

    Please re-read the post that I addressed to "wojtek" and to you. I stand behind every statement that I made in it. I am well aware of the Big Money behind both World Wars, the Korean War and the war in Vietnam, as well as all of the countless military actions that the American military has engaged in since the end of World War II. In my opinion, EVERY U.S. president from Roosevelt to the present date, was / is a war criminal. But these wars and military actions have been splendid successes for the bankers and the armaments manufacturers.

    Contrary to what "wojtek" says, I DO NOT consider myself to be an "expert" on anything. Having learned the skilled trade of being an electrician for 40+ years, I accomplished what anyone can accomplish if he or she has average intelligence and applies himself or herself to the task.

    Also, contrary to what you say, the "Libertarians" are not going to "save" me or anyone else. As I said in my post, there are NO "free markets" here in the United States or anywhere else. Even if there were free markets, the major corporations CANNOT be trusted "to do the right thing." They have to be FORCED by laws, regulations, lawyers and courts into behaving responsibly.

    I have stated many times before here on this website that ALL ROADS lead to tyranny - capitalism, communism, libertarianism and socialism. That is because of the greed and lust for power that is inherent in mankind.

    My "best" estimation is that capitalism is the best system, IF greed and lust for power can be controlled and IF we have politicians who are honest and "want to do the right thing," which we do not have. As far as what "Mark G." said about depending on the political process to work, I could not even get ANY help from my U.S. Representative when I contacted her office about all the chemtrails that I see here in the skies of NE Tennessee. Her office basically blew me off. That is not surprising, since her husband, a pharmacist, was imprisoned for 4 years, was ordered to pay over $848,000 in restitution, paid a $25,000 criminal fine and forfeited $425,000 in cash. She is still married to her wonderful husband and the corruption in her family continues unabated.

    Thank you.

    , @Jokem
    @Truth Vigilante

    Which Communist Nation has provided your narrative?

    Replies: @Truth Vigilante

  • @Mark G.
    @wojtek

    "by stating facts"

    No, opinions. You said primary care providers per capita increased. According to my Google AI you are wrong. They decreased. If you think some other source is more accurate then that is just your opinion. If you put the word "facts" in all caps like you are yelling on the internet then any opinions you are referring to are still just opinions. Yelling something does not make it a fact. Only loons believe that. You are a loon. If you say Tabarrok is wrong because his view is in the minority then you are engaging in the argumentum ad populum logical fallacy.

    I already told you we do not need to convince the doctors of anything. We convince the politicians who control the government with our votes and political donations. We convince other voters the corrupt medical cartel is increasing the cost of their medical care by bribing politicians to restrict supply of and increase demand for doctors. You are pretending I did not already say that because you are an evasive little weasel.

    Yes, you are definitely extending this so when I get bored and walk away you can pretend in your delusional brain I ran off because I could not respond to your brilliant arguments. Let me ask you a question since you keep fearfully dodging the subject: Why does the medical cartel give big political donations to politicians?

    Replies: @wojtek

    No, opinions.

    This is the source of your issues – in your religious fanaticism you completely messed up the definitions.

    fact: a thing that is known or proved to be true.

    Examples: number of health providers, average salary of doctors, number of hospital stays.

    opinion: a view or judgment formed about something, not necessarily based on fact or knowledge.

    Examples: everything you wrote so far.

    • Replies: @Mark G.
    @wojtek

    No, you messed up the definitions so you could lie. I said number of primary care doctors decreased and you replied that was false and said primary care providers increased. You did not use "provider" and "doctor" as synonyms. You added in nurse practioners and physician assistants. When I said number of primary care doctors decreased that was a true statement. For you to label it false is just plain lying.

    Number of health care providers is a fact but not an important fact as I have already said. What is important is the combination of supply and demand. Rising incomes is a sign of demand increasing faster than supply.

    The Washington Examiner published a 2018 article titled "Thanks to doctors there aren't enough doctors". Part of it described how physician associations have lobbied to limit competition from nurse practitioners and physician assistants by trying to limit the scope of what they can do in spite of evidence they can safely perform these functions.

    According to the article the medical cartel has been trying to limit the numbers of doctors since the AMA lobbied lawmakers in the early 20th century to shut down some medical schools. This practice of limiting numbers of med school grads has continued.

    The ACGME, started by several physician organizations, has been given power by the government to decide what residency programs get Medicare funding and has consistently allocated too many slots to specialist residencies and not enough for primary care doctors. Most patients don't need expensive specialists but due to primary care doctor shortages often visit specialists for primary care needs, driving up medical costs. In 1997 physician groups successfully lobbied the government to place a cap on the number of total residencies Medicare funds. According to the article, this was another way to limit supply to increase doctor incomes. This too drives up costs. The article ends by stating the doctors cartel is a major reason healthcare is so costly and that policymakers need to address that.

    Replies: @wojtek

  • The future of the former “Western Regions”: an energy-rich, multi-cultural, multi-religious, geostrategic New Silk Road hub of “moderately prosperous” China. YUTIAN, ON THE SOUTHERN SILK ROAD – We are on the road in southern Xinjiang, after a harrowing back-and-forth in the Taklamakan, across the sand dunes, to visit the “lost tribe” cum village of Daliyabuyi,...
  • @littlereddot
    @wojtek


    if freedom
     
    The only ones yapping on about "freedom" like a new god, are those indoctrinated by the Yanks.

    Congratulations. You have gone from Soviet mind control to USA mind control.

    which flag a Tibetan store owner in Nepal can sell
     
    Only stupid Polacks interpret it as such. They can sell whatever the like. But the history of the flag is the same.



    https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/7/77/Flag_of_Germany_%281935%E2%80%931945%29.svg/1200px-Flag_of_Germany_%281935%E2%80%931945%29.svg.png

    https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/4/4f/Naval_Ensign_of_Japan.svg/1200px-Naval_Ensign_of_Japan.svg.png

    https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/3/3c/Flag_of_Tibet.svg

    Replies: @wojtek

    Stupid little red CCP troll continues to dictate Tibetan shop owners in Nepal which Tibetan flags they can display 🙂

    This must be the new CCP definition of the word moron 🙂

    I wonder, are you going next to tell Indians not to use sanskrit swastika? 🙂
    I guess after that the moron will tell us not to use white and red in our flag 🙂

    With that low level of CCP trolling, things must not be good in the CCP land.

    • Replies: @littlereddot
    @wojtek


    Stupid little red CCP troll continues to dictate Tibetan shop owners in Nepal which Tibetan flags they can display
     
    You obviously don't understand what "dictate" means.

    I can't blame you. Polacks are not known for intelligence.

    I wonder, are you going next to tell Indians not to use sanskrit swastika?
     
    Look closely, my stupid Polack. It is not the same.

    I guess after that the moron will tell us not to use white and red in our flag
     
    Who cares what you use?

    I am not the one commenting about things happening on another continent, even though I have been to Europe. Have you ever been to Asia?

    Stupid Polack thinks he understands the world because he watches Yankee propaganda.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=36JqvTdg2fo

    Replies: @wojtek, @Deep Thought

  • For all the media hand-wringing over the government shutdown the fact is only approximately 750,000 of the over two million non-military federal workers are being furloughed. Most federal programs will continue operating, including the major entitlement and welfare programs. The national parks will remain open, if understaffed and with closed visitor centers. Unfortunately, the shutdown...
  • @Truth Vigilante
    @Mark G.

    You responded with this to the dumb Polack called Woy-chek:


    I am sure when I stop wasting time here you will consider yourself the “winner” because in your delusional mind I could not handle your feeble arguments.
    You are a authoritarian nutcase ....
     
    You haven't heard the half of it.
    If you'd been involved in the UR WWII threads and seen the B.S little Woy-chek had been posting, you'd witness Stupidity on Steroids.

    You see, in the lead up to the German invasion of Poland in Sept.1939, Hitler wanted peaceful cooperation with the Poles.
    But the Poles instead chose to accept the 30 shekels of silver on offer from the Jewish financiers that controlled then, as they do now, the entirety of the western financial and political systems.

    So instead of negotiating with Germany (not that the Germans were anything other than magnanimous), the Poles (on the instigation of FDR and warmongers in Britain), were told to keep committing atrocities to ethnic Germans living in what was then classified as Polish territory*.

    (*The reality was that these were Germans living in what had been German ancestral lands for a millennium or more. These lands were allocated to the conjured up nation called 'Poland' after WWI).
    But it was, and remains up to the present, German land that was stolen from Germany.

    Anyway, in the lead up to Sept. 1939, the Poles murdered tens of thousands of ethnic Germans.
    In addition, they brutalised countless thousands more. ie: beaten to a pulp, raped and EYES GOUGED OUT in numerous cases.
    The Poles were truly an animalistic people.

    And Woy-chek considers Poland the 'winner' in WWII, for having sided with Malignant International Jewry in that conflict.
    He considers what happened to Poland during the war and in the decades following (the bulk of their misfortunes were inflicted by the Soviets), Woy-chek considers that a 'win'.

    I tell you Mark, this Woy-chek bloke is one very stupid c*nt.
    You'd go a long way before you crossed paths with someone so ignorant and unable to be educated.
    He is indeed a nutcase as you correctly point out.

    Replies: @wojtek, @Jokem

    Ah, the local neonazi still can’t get over the fact that his favorite Goebbels propaganda listed – what was it exactly? – 19 “rapes or ATTEMPTED rapes” committed by a Polish guy on a German woman during a 3 year period, in an area with well over a million of people at that time.
    So how many of them were attempted, dumb nazi? 18?

    The 19th must be you, cause obviously your arse still hurts 🙂

    Either way, if that’s all you have to say about the childish supply demand ideas in healthcare, that’s also a proof of something, I guess.

  • @Brad Anbro
    @Truth Vigilante

    T-V (and "wojtek" & "Mark G.),

    I will attempt to "play Devil's Advocate" here, in my reply to all of you and to anyone else who cares to put in their "two cents worth" in this discussion.

    First of all, I am no "expert" on anything. I am a 74-year-old retired industrial electrician (United Auto Workers Journeyman Electrician), who worked in that capacity in industry for over 40 years. From being in the workforce, buying & selling my private residences and managing my money, I have learned a few things.

    I am in complete agreement with "wojtek" in his post #19 - "Simply speaking unchecked human greed is the gatekeeper here."

    And in "Mark G.'s" post #24: "The way to counter this is through the political process." - I disagree 100% with this statement.



    I entered the workforce in 1969, after graduating from high school in that year. I obtained a job at a canning factory as general UNSKILLED help, earning $2.24 per hour. I retired from a factory a few years ago, where I was an electrician, doing SKILLED work and making $25+ per hour. I could actually purchase MORE with the $2.24 in my youth that I could with the $25+ when I retired. In other words, at the time of retirement, I was working for year 1969 UNSKILLED WAGES.

    At the end of World War II, the United States had EVERYTHING going for it. The country was a manufacturing powerhouse, manufacturing practically everything here and depending very little on foreign technology or manufacturing. Thanks to Franklin D. Roosevelt, the president that many commenters here love to hate, the unions had gained some bargaining power and because of this, the living standards of ALL Americans was rising.

    Americans were now enjoying paid vacations, sick leave & hospitalization, funding for their retirements, and a host of other benefits. Had it not been for the unions, we probably would have none of this today.

    "Fast forward" from the end of World War II to the present day. WHAT do we NOW have in the United States? We have record numbers of millionaires & billionaires, record numbers of homeless person, record numbers of bankruptcies, both personal and corporate, and record numbers of drug addicts. We have also LOST most of our manufacturing capacity, we have GIVEN AWAY most of our technology and we have these PHONY "wars" on drugs and "terror."

    And what has been the CAUSE of America's decline? Certainly, it was NOT the unions. The blame can be placed with the Jews and "WASPs" (and the WASPs' descendants) in the financial industry, especially the banks, with their fictitious "money" and DEBT creation, and with the corporations, which have willingly given away their technology, in search of ever cheaper labor.

    Here in the United States, there are NO "free markets" - EVERYTHING is RIGGED - to benefit the rich. All these markets are rigged: the stock market, the commodities market, the agricultural market and the energy market. And ESPECIALLY the "money" market, thanks to the UNCONSTITUTIONAL Federal Reserve, which is not "federal" at all, but rather a CARTEL of privately-owned banks that can create money out of thin air at will, CREATING DEBT.

    The major corporations and the financial markets, whom I refer to as the "wreckers," to use a term from old Soviet Union days, are the ones that have been responsible for the closure of tens of thousands of factories across the United States and the destruction of millions of good-paying jobs. Along with the "wreckers" are the politicians of BOTH national parties, who have been responsible for writing tax laws favoring this closure of factories and exodus of jobs - NOT THE UNIONS.

    Contrary to what "Mark G." states in post #24, I do not believe that the political process will be of any significant help in the future to rectify the problems we face here in the United States. I am of the opinion that BOTH national political parties have been completely bought off by the really big money interests - the "Secret Team" that was referred to by L. Fletcher Prouty. I think that the only thing which will effect any meaningful change here in the United States will be another revolution and my fear is that if there is a revolution, the new government will be at least as bad, and most likely WORSE, than the government we now have.

    I enjoy condemning government agencies as the Libertarian folks do, but there have been a number of government agencies that have been extremely beneficial. They have been responsible for the passage of LAWS which have made travel by air and rail much safer, as well as travel by automobile. They have also been responsible for making workplaces much safer, the improvement in workplace safety which would NOT have occurred out of the "goodness" of the corporations' "hearts."

    Thank you.

    Replies: @Mark G., @wojtek, @Truth Vigilante

    Brad, in other words you proved you are an expert on the World we live in and on the people surrounding us. Unsurprisingly this is all one needs.

    I grew up in a world, where money was nothing, worthless, so the most important job benefit was the respect others had for you and for your services. As a youth I remember wondering why civil engineers had to sit under the bridge they designed during load testing, or why chemical engineers had to smoke a cigarette, when the new gas pipeline was opened, or why an electrical engineer had to grab with his bare hand an exposed piece of wiring, after shutting down the trafo-station for work.

    These people commanded respect.
    Same was true for doctors and nurses, who didn’t make fortunes and often were harassed for a bunch of flowers or a bottle of something stronger, which they received as a sign of gratitude.

    Now we live in a world ruled by lawyers and various faceless organizations, not by personal responsibility. The difference perhaps has a precise monetary value. But we certainly lost something along the way.

    I don’t know what’s the answer. But it seems to me that these problems are only part of a bigger picture, of an increasingly atomized society, weird notions of what constitutes a family, or worse – outright war on religion and family, all these modern “online interactions”, social media, etc, etc.

    And I know that certainly the neonazi truth denier here doesn’t have answers for anything, and Mark has some illusions, but he cannot reconcile them with reality. Not for the lack of trying.

    So the only thing left for us is leading by example 🙂

  • @Mark G.
    @wojtek

    Doctors include specialists and, as I just said, the demand for their services increased with more money coming into the system from Medicare and Medicaid. This caused an increase in their numbers but not enough of an increase in numbers to decrease their incomes.

    You continue to engage in obfuscation here by arguing about number of doctors or whether their incomes increased. You claim Tabarrok is wrong because his is a minority view, meaning you are engaging in the argumentum ad populum logical fallacy.

    You are engaging in obfuscation and continuing to be evasive here because you can't explain why doctors are donating money to politicians. The obvious reason, of course, is they expect a benefit in return in the form of higher incomes from government policies.

    I am not going to continue responding back here forever on an old comment thread no one is reading. I am sure when I stop wasting time here you will consider yourself the "winner" because in your delusional mind I could not handle your feeble arguments. You are a authoritarian nutcase and, like all authoritarian nutcases, think you are smarter than everyone else. You all think you are something special but all your arguments are the same and you are all the same.

    Replies: @Truth Vigilante, @wojtek

    You continue to engage in obfuscation here by arguing about number of doctors or whether their incomes increased.

    Yes, let’s repeat that: I am engaging in obfuscation by stating FACTS.
    FACTS, which contradict your religious beliefs.
    No wonder your only resort is to lie, lie and lie.

    I am sure when I stop wasting time here you will consider yourself the “winner” because in your delusional mind I could not handle your feeble arguments.

    Son, I’m already a loser for having to read all this religious production of yours. I am by now under under no illusion that you will be able to react to facts with anything sensible, beyond the childish libertarian nonsense.

    And to think you had such an easy – all you had to do was to:

    tell me, how do you imagine to convince these big shot doctors, who run the medical cartel in the US, to earn less and spread the wealth more?

    But who am I to fight with religious fanatics?

    • Replies: @Mark G.
    @wojtek

    "by stating facts"

    No, opinions. You said primary care providers per capita increased. According to my Google AI you are wrong. They decreased. If you think some other source is more accurate then that is just your opinion. If you put the word "facts" in all caps like you are yelling on the internet then any opinions you are referring to are still just opinions. Yelling something does not make it a fact. Only loons believe that. You are a loon. If you say Tabarrok is wrong because his view is in the minority then you are engaging in the argumentum ad populum logical fallacy.

    I already told you we do not need to convince the doctors of anything. We convince the politicians who control the government with our votes and political donations. We convince other voters the corrupt medical cartel is increasing the cost of their medical care by bribing politicians to restrict supply of and increase demand for doctors. You are pretending I did not already say that because you are an evasive little weasel.

    Yes, you are definitely extending this so when I get bored and walk away you can pretend in your delusional brain I ran off because I could not respond to your brilliant arguments. Let me ask you a question since you keep fearfully dodging the subject: Why does the medical cartel give big political donations to politicians?

    Replies: @wojtek

  • The future of the former “Western Regions”: an energy-rich, multi-cultural, multi-religious, geostrategic New Silk Road hub of “moderately prosperous” China. YUTIAN, ON THE SOUTHERN SILK ROAD – We are on the road in southern Xinjiang, after a harrowing back-and-forth in the Taklamakan, across the sand dunes, to visit the “lost tribe” cum village of Daliyabuyi,...
  • @littlereddot
    @wojtek

    Stupid Polacks keep changing subjects.

    We were talking about some dude who went to Nepal, bought a rebel Tibetan flag, and witnessed some words between two people whom he conjectured as a CCP agent.

    Now you want to shift and insinuate that the Chinese government wants to dictate who goes where.

    Then you start yapping on about freedom.

    If you had a proper points to make you would stick to the subject. But you keep changing the subject because you are talking out of your ass.

    This is the kind of freedom you and your propaganda sources like to yap about:

    https://euromedmonitor.org/img.php?src=http://euromedmonitor.org/uploads/IMG_9146.jpg&crop-to-fit

    Replies: @wojtek

    Dumb little red CCP troll, not knowing what is freedom claims to know if the topic is changed. To prove his limitations on the topic of freedom, the dumb little red CCP troll is going to decide which flag a Tibetan store owner in Nepal can sell, and which one he cannot, and which countries “Westerners” can visit, and when 🙂

    Normally I’d say you’re not China, troll, but obviously you are. Probably in some troll camp in occupied Bod.

    Avoid “Western” websites, little red CCP troll, if freedom bothers you.

    • Replies: @littlereddot
    @wojtek


    if freedom
     
    The only ones yapping on about "freedom" like a new god, are those indoctrinated by the Yanks.

    Congratulations. You have gone from Soviet mind control to USA mind control.

    which flag a Tibetan store owner in Nepal can sell
     
    Only stupid Polacks interpret it as such. They can sell whatever the like. But the history of the flag is the same.



    https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/7/77/Flag_of_Germany_%281935%E2%80%931945%29.svg/1200px-Flag_of_Germany_%281935%E2%80%931945%29.svg.png

    https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/4/4f/Naval_Ensign_of_Japan.svg/1200px-Naval_Ensign_of_Japan.svg.png

    https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/3/3c/Flag_of_Tibet.svg

    Replies: @wojtek

  • World War II was certainly the most colossal military conflict in human history and it became the shaping event of our modern world, with its consequences and influence still extremely important nearly eighty years after the guns fell silent. Major wars are naturally accompanied by a great deal of governmental media propaganda, and t
  • @The Old Philosopher
    @wojtek

    Citing PM, acknowledges


    "They [[were distributed in the five “military districts” running from north to south as “Leningrad,” “Baltic,” “Western,” “Kiev,” and “Odessa” commands”.
     
    Exactly what I had been saying from the beginning when I identified the four military districts on the June 1941 line of contact as the named "Leningrad MD," "Baltic MD," Western MD," "Kiev MD," Clark identified, not counting the Odessa MD that was off the line of contact that he didn't even mention except to note it was incorporated into the Kiev MD redesignated as the "Southwestern Front." Also note that exactly as I have been saying that you have been trying to obfuscate by galloping over the generic term that identifies a type of military HQ (i.e. military district Hq) such as "armored corps" or "infantry corps" as distinct from proper nouns appropriately capitalized identifying particular named HQs that singularly refers only to a specifically named Hq. such as 24th Panzer Crops.

    Your lengthy babbling IN WHICH YOU CONTINUED TO ENGAGE IN THE SAME obfuscation of galloping over named Hqs and generic references to military districts has, however, clearly evaded, avoided and tried to obfuscate the challenge I posed that you cite using the Latin alphabet the names of the CG of the "Western Military District and/or the "Western Special Military District."

    Not a very difficult task. But one you strenuously avoid because doing so would entirely expose the deception, lying, misrepresentation and fraud you have been practicing by galloping over the different words used to refer to named Hqs and generic references to a type of military command.

    Concludes :


    I’m glad you begged for me to repeat all this again.
     
    And summarized in one comment how you have been galloping over words with the lies, deceptions and misrepresentations and frauds you have posted.

    So until you give the simple, clear, direct and truth answer to that query, I will simply recite it as my response to any further gibberish you post on this issue.,

    Replies: @wojtek

    More galloping nonsense from galloping kike. Well, repetition is foundation of eductaion, so here it comes:

    Since the old galloping kike is begging for it again, here it is:

    1. Old Galloping Kike tried to claim “the entire issue under discussion has been the Command HQ on the line of contact on June22”, which exposed all of his stupidity.

    2. The whole issue started with P.M.’s comment #456, where he claimed that “the inventory showed that 10,540 operable tanks were in the Western Defense Districts.”

    3. Bonehead galloping kike replied to that in comment #467, demonstrating immediately your ignorance, by stating that Clark “identifies the Western Military District reconstituted on June 23 as Western Front had 6 Mech. Corps under command.”

    Kike’s errors are elementary and are derived from your inability to read simple texts in English with a semblance of understanding:
    – you mistakenly interpreted “Western Defense Districts”, which in Russian nomenclature is a term used to describe jointly 5 MDs, with a single one: “Western Military District” – you can’t tell singular form plural;
    – you also made a mistake, because in 1941 there was no “Western Military District” – there was “Western Special military district”.

    4. You also demanded that P.M. correct your errors by stating: “Maybe you can clear up the confusion your description of the inventory of tanks in the Russian military districts creates”

    5. In further correspondence you admit in comment #572 to your mess: “It evidently escaped you that I identified the Western Military Districts as only one of four “fronts”” – which proves that you still had no clue about the mistakes you made.

    6. This is when P.M. provided you with an original source which provides a detailed number of tanks in the so called “ЗАПАДНЫЕ ВОЕННЫЕ ОКРУГА” – aka Western military districts 🙂

    7. In turn, old galloping lying kike further demonstrated his inability to read by stating in comment #650 that “The text you cite fails to address directly any of he points I made”, which is an outright lie, because
    – it is a lie – the cited Russian text addresses every point you tried to make,,
    – but also because you later admitted in comment #884 that you can’t read Russian – what a facepalm moment 🙂

    8. In comments #836 P.M. corrected your mistake

    9. But you insisted on being wrong and in comment #839 you incorrectly stated that “The following military districts were n the line of contact on June 22, 2941: Leningrad MD renamed Northern Front; Baltic MD renamed Northwestern Front; Western MD renamed Western Front, and Kiev MD renamed Southwestern Front as detailed in Clark The Russian German Conflict 1941-1945.”

    10. To which P.M. finished you off with a direct quote from your source: “By the middle of May 1941 there were nearly 170 divisions, or over five sevenths of the country’s total armed strength, outside the 1939 frontiers. They were distributed in the five “military districts” running from north to south as “Leningrad,” “Baltic,” “Western,” “Kiev,” and “Odessa” commands”.

    11. After this you unsuccessfully tried to change the narrative in comment #905, pathetically replying to your own post so that nobody can read it, that: “the entire issue under discussion has been the Command HQ on the line of contact on June22”.

    I’m glad you keep begging for me to repeat all this again. It really shows what a galloping moron you are. This is the only response you will receive. Your other appeals are of no interest to me 🙂

  • For all the media hand-wringing over the government shutdown the fact is only approximately 750,000 of the over two million non-military federal workers are being furloughed. Most federal programs will continue operating, including the major entitlement and welfare programs. The national parks will remain open, if understaffed and with closed visitor centers. Unfortunately, the shutdown...
  • @Mark G.
    @wojtek

    "I showed you that demand for hospital services rose much slower"

    And I replied that if doctors are getting paid more then the cost of those hospital services will be higher. Between 1960 and 2015 the number of primary care doctors dropped by fifty percent while there was a big increase in higher paid specialists. The additional flood of money coming into the medical system after the introduction of Medicare and Medicaid in the sixties created a bigger demand for highly paid specialists since in many cases patients no longer had to pay the full costs of those specialists services.

    So you are continuing to be dishonest and engage in obfuscation. You were also being dishonest in producing two quotes from me and saying I was contradicting myself. The second quote mentioned demand in addition to supply so I was not saying the same thing in each quote. You engaged in further dishonesty by boldfacing another part of the second quote to try to distract attention away from me talking about demand. You really are a dishonest individual.

    Because of your authoritarian personality type you are outraged that a lowly peon like me dares to question anything you say and are calling me names like religious fanatic.

    I have been putting up with your obfuscation, dishonesty and insults only because there was a possibility people were reading our exchanges and I might change their view on this topic. It appears, though, from the lack of agrees or thanks on our comments almost no one is actually reading this. Any additional time I spend here is most likely time wasted so do not be surprised if I just hit disagree or troll on your further comments.

    Replies: @wojtek

    “And I replied that if doctors are getting paid more then the cost of those hospital services will be higher.”

    That’s false. According to your religious beliefs, doctors are getting paid more because the demand for their services increases. Not the other way around. Strike 1.

    Also, the increase in demand does not match at all with increase in salaries that your religious beliefs dictate. Strike 2.

    “Between 1960 and 2015 the number of primary care doctors dropped by fifty percent.”

    False. Number of primary care providers per capita increased approx. 2-fold. Strike 3.

    And you’re out.

    Not going to even bother reading the rest of your nonsense. The first 1.5 sentences and 3 lies. This is enough son. Get you act together or get lost.

    • Replies: @Mark G.
    @wojtek

    Doctors include specialists and, as I just said, the demand for their services increased with more money coming into the system from Medicare and Medicaid. This caused an increase in their numbers but not enough of an increase in numbers to decrease their incomes.

    You continue to engage in obfuscation here by arguing about number of doctors or whether their incomes increased. You claim Tabarrok is wrong because his is a minority view, meaning you are engaging in the argumentum ad populum logical fallacy.

    You are engaging in obfuscation and continuing to be evasive here because you can't explain why doctors are donating money to politicians. The obvious reason, of course, is they expect a benefit in return in the form of higher incomes from government policies.

    I am not going to continue responding back here forever on an old comment thread no one is reading. I am sure when I stop wasting time here you will consider yourself the "winner" because in your delusional mind I could not handle your feeble arguments. You are a authoritarian nutcase and, like all authoritarian nutcases, think you are smarter than everyone else. You all think you are something special but all your arguments are the same and you are all the same.

    Replies: @Truth Vigilante, @wojtek

  • The future of the former “Western Regions”: an energy-rich, multi-cultural, multi-religious, geostrategic New Silk Road hub of “moderately prosperous” China. YUTIAN, ON THE SOUTHERN SILK ROAD – We are on the road in southern Xinjiang, after a harrowing back-and-forth in the Taklamakan, across the sand dunes, to visit the “lost tribe” cum village of Daliyabuyi,...
  • @littlereddot
    @wojtek

    Duh, more Polack stupidity on display.

    You can't even understand what is being written, let alone tease out what it means.


    Let’s recap: A guy in Nepal is buying a Tibetan flag from a Tibetan shop whose owner is then harassed by a CCP agent.
     
    1. A Westerner is in Nepal during a time of Communist revolution
    2. He buys a Japanese designed flag that originated during the Japanese invasion of China in attempt to pry Tibet away from Republican (Taiwan ruled) China. It is now used as anti-communist rebel flag.
    3. The "Tibetan" has words with another guy who is alleged to be a CCP agent....pure conjecture on the part of the Westerner. I question whether this Westerner can tell the difference between a Gurkha or a Tibetan.
    4. Strangely enough, this "CCP Chinese" agent can speak either Tibetan or Nepalese fluently. It is far more likely that he is actually an ethnic Gurkha who supports the Nepalese revolution.

    You not only lack knowledge about things you yap about, you also lack the brains to understand the contexts, let alone the implications.

    No wonder Poles are so easily fooled. One guy makes an allegation, and you believe the narrative hook line and sinker.

    This flag was invented by the Imperial Japanese at a time when they were allied with Nazi Germany. You don't seem to realise this, you dumb Polack.

    Replies: @wojtek

    Dumb little red Chinese troll is sinking deeper and deeper with more moronic excuses.

    Clearly not understanding what is freedom, s/he’s complaining that a “Westerner” is in Nepal 🙂
    As if Chinese trolls are the ones who can decide who goes where 🙂
    Maybe in China, little red dumb buddy, not in the so called “West”.

    Get used to it.

    And if you can’t, avoid “Western” websites promoting freedom – clearly you’re allergic to it, you dumb little red moron.

    • Replies: @littlereddot
    @wojtek

    Stupid Polacks keep changing subjects.

    We were talking about some dude who went to Nepal, bought a rebel Tibetan flag, and witnessed some words between two people whom he conjectured as a CCP agent.

    Now you want to shift and insinuate that the Chinese government wants to dictate who goes where.

    Then you start yapping on about freedom.

    If you had a proper points to make you would stick to the subject. But you keep changing the subject because you are talking out of your ass.

    This is the kind of freedom you and your propaganda sources like to yap about:

    https://euromedmonitor.org/img.php?src=http://euromedmonitor.org/uploads/IMG_9146.jpg&crop-to-fit

    Replies: @wojtek

  • For all the media hand-wringing over the government shutdown the fact is only approximately 750,000 of the over two million non-military federal workers are being furloughed. Most federal programs will continue operating, including the major entitlement and welfare programs. The national parks will remain open, if understaffed and with closed visitor centers. Unfortunately, the shutdown...
  • @Mark G.
    @wojtek

    If the number of doctors went up three times and the demand went up three times then doctors incomes would remain the same. If the number of doctors went up three times and the demand went up nine times then doctor incomes triple. The change in numbers of doctors is not the relevant factor to be looking at here. The relevant factor is change in supply versus change in demand.

    So when you keep repeating that the number of doctors tripled as if that by itself is of any importance you are just being obtuse or engaging in a dishonest attempt at obfuscation. I think it may be the latter in an attempt to continue to avoid addressing the subject of the doctors bribing politicians with political donations.

    When you label a set of beliefs held by a person "quasi-religious" you are saying that the person is holding his beliefs for irrational reasons so that is insulting the person involved. You have been condescending and insulting towards me almost from the beginning because you view me as your inferior. This view of others as inferiors when they are not is typical of people with authoritarian personality types such as yourself.

    Replies: @wojtek

    If the number of doctors went up three times and the demand went up three times then doctors incomes would remain the same.

    Oi, it is me (and almost every researcher) who claims that doctors’ incomes remained largely the same.
    You believe that doctors’ incomes rose 3-fold over inflation. So you’ve done yourself again.
    And, interestingly, I showed you that demand for hospital services rose much slower.

    So your theories once again end up in the same place.
    And your only answer is more bs distracting away from the important data and facts.

    So when you keep repeating that the number of doctors tripled as if that by itself is of any importance

    By itself no. But together with your “beliefs” it totally destroys the libertarian fairy tale you’re pushing here.

    When you label a set of beliefs held by a person “quasi-religious”

    I am very sorry and apologize for hurting your feelings. I should have never called your beliefs “quasi-religious”. That’s inappropriate and wrong of me. I apologize.

    In view of the complete lack of any logic there, I should have outright called them religious beliefs. You’re a religious fanatic.

    This view of others as inferiors when they are not is typical of people with authoritarian personality types such as yourself.

    Don’t judge me through your own limitations – I do not equate you with your beliefs. You are doing it to yourself. Sounds like a you problem.

    • Replies: @Mark G.
    @wojtek

    "I showed you that demand for hospital services rose much slower"

    And I replied that if doctors are getting paid more then the cost of those hospital services will be higher. Between 1960 and 2015 the number of primary care doctors dropped by fifty percent while there was a big increase in higher paid specialists. The additional flood of money coming into the medical system after the introduction of Medicare and Medicaid in the sixties created a bigger demand for highly paid specialists since in many cases patients no longer had to pay the full costs of those specialists services.

    So you are continuing to be dishonest and engage in obfuscation. You were also being dishonest in producing two quotes from me and saying I was contradicting myself. The second quote mentioned demand in addition to supply so I was not saying the same thing in each quote. You engaged in further dishonesty by boldfacing another part of the second quote to try to distract attention away from me talking about demand. You really are a dishonest individual.

    Because of your authoritarian personality type you are outraged that a lowly peon like me dares to question anything you say and are calling me names like religious fanatic.

    I have been putting up with your obfuscation, dishonesty and insults only because there was a possibility people were reading our exchanges and I might change their view on this topic. It appears, though, from the lack of agrees or thanks on our comments almost no one is actually reading this. Any additional time I spend here is most likely time wasted so do not be surprised if I just hit disagree or troll on your further comments.

    Replies: @wojtek

  • The future of the former “Western Regions”: an energy-rich, multi-cultural, multi-religious, geostrategic New Silk Road hub of “moderately prosperous” China. YUTIAN, ON THE SOUTHERN SILK ROAD – We are on the road in southern Xinjiang, after a harrowing back-and-forth in the Taklamakan, across the sand dunes, to visit the “lost tribe” cum village of Daliyabuyi,...
  • @lafiotrondet
    I appreciate the effort to present the region. Unless i go there myself I can't tell what the situation really is. Traveling to neighboring Nepal (before the US led coup), I however saw how a Tibetan shop owner was harassed by a Chinese guy who seemed to work for the then communist government because I bought a Tibetan flag in his shop.

    I also know people who actually went in Tibet in the 1990's and saw violence from the authorities against Tibetans.

    Maybe, you should visit the autonomous Tibet region next?

    Replies: @Biff, @littlereddot

    Traveling to neighboring Nepal

    I was in Nepal in the 90s. There were Western hippies everywhere. Even in the capital Kathmandu, kids with dirty faces and torn clothes tried to sell a joint rolled up in aluminium foil to every foreigner. There was cow dung plastered to the sides of buildings, even temples to dry for cooking fuel. People were desperately poor.

    The West had no interest in improving the lot of Nepalese then. Now you have a Yank who goes to Nepal after a desperate and impoverished people rise up in communist led revolution, and asks for a flag of an entity that symbolises opposition to communism?

    Then insinuates that the Chinese were bullying the Nepalese?

    Trump is not the only Yank who is ham fisted in dealing with foreign cultures. I see it is a general condition with Americans.

    I appreciate the effort to present the region. Unless i go there myself I can’t tell what the situation really is. Traveling to neighboring Nepal (before the US led coup), I however saw how a Tibetan shop owner was harassed by a Chinese guy who seemed to work for the then communist government because I bought a Tibetan flag in his shop.

    Why do Yanks make an issue of things like this? You go into a troubled region at a time when tensions are high, stick your foot into situations you don’t understand, and cast judgement on based on the reaction.

    Try going into a shop in Lithuania and ask for a Russian flag.
    Try going into a shop in Korea during an anti-Japanese tensions and ask for a Japanese flag.
    Try going to a black neighborhood after wearing a White Lives Matter t-shirt.

    Populated by people like that, there is a reason why America is reviled across the world.

    • Troll: wojtek
    • Replies: @wojtek
    @littlereddot

    This is a comment in the running for the Most Stupid Comment Ever prize. And that says a lot in view of the dozens of moronic nazi commenters here.

    Let's recap: A guy in Nepal is buying a Tibetan flag from a Tibetan shop whose owner is then harassed by a CCP agent.

    Comparing it to a guy "going into a shop in Lithuania and ask for a Russian flag" is beyond moronic and worthy only of a dumb little red Chinese troll.

    If one wants to search for real analogies, here are a few:

    A guys walking in to a Chechen shop in Lithuania and ordering a Chechen flag, whose owner then is being harassed by Russian agents.

    Or a guy asking for Ryukyu flag in Korea during anti-Japanese tensions.

    These are the analogous situations. And they are as normal and as expected as anything. Nobody would even blink seeing those.

    Only totalitarian Chinese .... let's call them minds, for the lack of a better word - can think there is something wrong or provocative with any of the above situations.

    On the black ghetto example I won't even comment, since this is even more stupid than the author of the above ridiculous post.

    Replies: @littlereddot, @bike-anarkist

  • @littlereddot
    @lafiotrondet


    Traveling to neighboring Nepal
     
    I was in Nepal in the 90s. There were Western hippies everywhere. Even in the capital Kathmandu, kids with dirty faces and torn clothes tried to sell a joint rolled up in aluminium foil to every foreigner. There was cow dung plastered to the sides of buildings, even temples to dry for cooking fuel. People were desperately poor.

    The West had no interest in improving the lot of Nepalese then. Now you have a Yank who goes to Nepal after a desperate and impoverished people rise up in communist led revolution, and asks for a flag of an entity that symbolises opposition to communism?

    Then insinuates that the Chinese were bullying the Nepalese?

    Trump is not the only Yank who is ham fisted in dealing with foreign cultures. I see it is a general condition with Americans.


    I appreciate the effort to present the region. Unless i go there myself I can’t tell what the situation really is. Traveling to neighboring Nepal (before the US led coup), I however saw how a Tibetan shop owner was harassed by a Chinese guy who seemed to work for the then communist government because I bought a Tibetan flag in his shop.
     
    Why do Yanks make an issue of things like this? You go into a troubled region at a time when tensions are high, stick your foot into situations you don't understand, and cast judgement on based on the reaction.

    Try going into a shop in Lithuania and ask for a Russian flag.
    Try going into a shop in Korea during an anti-Japanese tensions and ask for a Japanese flag.
    Try going to a black neighborhood after wearing a White Lives Matter t-shirt.

    Populated by people like that, there is a reason why America is reviled across the world.

    Replies: @wojtek

    This is a comment in the running for the Most Stupid Comment Ever prize. And that says a lot in view of the dozens of moronic nazi commenters here.

    Let’s recap: A guy in Nepal is buying a Tibetan flag from a Tibetan shop whose owner is then harassed by a CCP agent.

    Comparing it to a guy “going into a shop in Lithuania and ask for a Russian flag” is beyond moronic and worthy only of a dumb little red Chinese troll.

    If one wants to search for real analogies, here are a few:

    A guys walking in to a Chechen shop in Lithuania and ordering a Chechen flag, whose owner then is being harassed by Russian agents.

    Or a guy asking for Ryukyu flag in Korea during anti-Japanese tensions.

    These are the analogous situations. And they are as normal and as expected as anything. Nobody would even blink seeing those.

    Only totalitarian Chinese …. let’s call them minds, for the lack of a better word – can think there is something wrong or provocative with any of the above situations.

    On the black ghetto example I won’t even comment, since this is even more stupid than the author of the above ridiculous post.

    • Replies: @littlereddot
    @wojtek

    Duh, more Polack stupidity on display.

    You can't even understand what is being written, let alone tease out what it means.


    Let’s recap: A guy in Nepal is buying a Tibetan flag from a Tibetan shop whose owner is then harassed by a CCP agent.
     
    1. A Westerner is in Nepal during a time of Communist revolution
    2. He buys a Japanese designed flag that originated during the Japanese invasion of China in attempt to pry Tibet away from Republican (Taiwan ruled) China. It is now used as anti-communist rebel flag.
    3. The "Tibetan" has words with another guy who is alleged to be a CCP agent....pure conjecture on the part of the Westerner. I question whether this Westerner can tell the difference between a Gurkha or a Tibetan.
    4. Strangely enough, this "CCP Chinese" agent can speak either Tibetan or Nepalese fluently. It is far more likely that he is actually an ethnic Gurkha who supports the Nepalese revolution.

    You not only lack knowledge about things you yap about, you also lack the brains to understand the contexts, let alone the implications.

    No wonder Poles are so easily fooled. One guy makes an allegation, and you believe the narrative hook line and sinker.

    This flag was invented by the Imperial Japanese at a time when they were allied with Nazi Germany. You don't seem to realise this, you dumb Polack.

    Replies: @wojtek

    , @bike-anarkist
    @wojtek

    Low IQ Alert!

    Projection via ignorance - an idiot that cannot be told he is an idiot, because he is an idiot!

  • For all the media hand-wringing over the government shutdown the fact is only approximately 750,000 of the over two million non-military federal workers are being furloughed. Most federal programs will continue operating, including the major entitlement and welfare programs. The national parks will remain open, if understaffed and with closed visitor centers. Unfortunately, the shutdown...
  • @Mark G.
    @wojtek

    I believe what Alex Tabarrok believes about rising doctor incomes. You want me to believe some other authorities which you consider better, but I do not agree they are better.

    When I talk about doctors incomes tripling, I am not talking about the total amount spent on doctors. I am talking about the income of each individual doctor tripling. The changes in number of doctors is irrelevant here. What is relevant is the interaction between increase in supply of doctors and increase in demand for doctors. If demand goes up faster than supply, the income of each individual doctor rises.

    You have not explained why the medical cartel is bribing politicians with political donations and are being evasive about it instead. I think that bribe is to pay politicians to have the government restrict the number of doctors in order to boost their incomes.

    You almost immediately started insulting me, calling my beliefs trivialities, ridiculous and half-cooked etc. From that and the rest of the way you acted here, I realized you are an evasive and dishonest person who has strong authoritarian tendencies. Obviously, you are angry that I do not act subservient to you or adopt your beliefs just because you believe them. You are just a dishonest and unimportant nobody out on the internet to me.

    Replies: @wojtek

    You almost immediately started insulting me, calling my beliefs trivialities, ridiculous and half-cooked etc.

    You see Mark, where I come from there is a huge difference between attacking a person and attacking her/his quasi-religious beliefs.

    I did attack your dogmas. You took it personally and attacked me.
    That’s the difference. So stop whining hypocritically about me attacking you, when you are the culprit.
    Because to me it means that you’re asking to be treated the same way that you treat me.

    You have not explained why

    Enough with these childish attempts at distraction from the main fact that your simplistic ideological supply-demand dogmas do not work in real life as you imagine. That’s not gonna work.
    So let’s get to the bottom of the libertarian nonsense you’re peddling here:

    I am talking about the income of each individual doctor tripling. The changes in number of doctors is irrelevant here.

    vs

    No, I want the requirements loosened a little so the number of doctors keeps up with increases in population and increases in demand

    When you admit that you contradict yourself, we can have a sensible discussion.
    Until then, you’re just throwing around nonsensical, self-contradictory statements, that have nothing to do with reality. The reality in which the number of providers increased per capita 3-fold since 1960.

    • Replies: @Mark G.
    @wojtek

    If the number of doctors went up three times and the demand went up three times then doctors incomes would remain the same. If the number of doctors went up three times and the demand went up nine times then doctor incomes triple. The change in numbers of doctors is not the relevant factor to be looking at here. The relevant factor is change in supply versus change in demand.

    So when you keep repeating that the number of doctors tripled as if that by itself is of any importance you are just being obtuse or engaging in a dishonest attempt at obfuscation. I think it may be the latter in an attempt to continue to avoid addressing the subject of the doctors bribing politicians with political donations.

    When you label a set of beliefs held by a person "quasi-religious" you are saying that the person is holding his beliefs for irrational reasons so that is insulting the person involved. You have been condescending and insulting towards me almost from the beginning because you view me as your inferior. This view of others as inferiors when they are not is typical of people with authoritarian personality types such as yourself.

    Replies: @wojtek

  • @Mark G.
    @wojtek

    "other listed works"

    You have no idea of the quality of anything contradicting the Tabarrok graph. Any claim by you the quality is higher is just your opinion. My opinion is that Tabarrok is a professor at a well known university and, being an economist, understands basic economics and things like supply and demand and the effects of government actions on supply and demand. I already told you I do not want to just hear your opinion over and over and repeat my opinion over and over again, yet you are still doing it.

    So, no, I am not being evasive. However, I see your tactic is now to respond to me saying you are being evasive by saying I am being evasive too. Once again, you are an evasive little weasel trying to divert attention away from the corrupt medical cartel bribing politicians into restricting doctor supply to boost doctor incomes.

    My, you are certainly undergoing a major meltdown here calling me freak, imbecile, moronic etc, in this comment section. That's hilarious 😂 . See, I can add emojis like a dopey teenage girl too.

    As for you saying there is no libertarian country, yes there may not be a purely libertarian country but some countries are more libertarian than others. I think the Cato economic index is a fairly good ranking but we can also use the Cato human freedom index which ranks countries by a combination of personal and economic freedom. Venezuela is ranked 159 out of 165 countries. Even lower is Syria, Yemen, Iran, Myanmar, Sudan and Egypt. I am certain there are few of those silly libertarians in any of those countries so it is time to pack your bags and leave so you can get away from them. Good luck!

    Replies: @wojtek

    My opinion is …

    Mark, you’re a brainwashed member of a cult, you don’t have opinions – you have dogmas, which you are desperately trying to defend against the real world, which says:

    If you believe that doctors’ salaries since 1960 rose 3-fold over inflation, then you yourself just disproved your childish supply-demand theory, because per capita rate of providers rose 3-fold during that same time.

    🙂

    My, you are certainly undergoing a major meltdown here calling me freak, imbecile, moronic etc, in this comment section.

    I love it when whining hypocritical snowflakes resort to accusing others of what they started 🙂

    Mark G. comment #58: “Only a moron believes that.”
    Mark G. comment #58: “I labeled you a troll.”

    Obviously these were requests for me to treat you the same way, so go whine where somebody cares.

    • Replies: @Mark G.
    @wojtek

    I believe what Alex Tabarrok believes about rising doctor incomes. You want me to believe some other authorities which you consider better, but I do not agree they are better.

    When I talk about doctors incomes tripling, I am not talking about the total amount spent on doctors. I am talking about the income of each individual doctor tripling. The changes in number of doctors is irrelevant here. What is relevant is the interaction between increase in supply of doctors and increase in demand for doctors. If demand goes up faster than supply, the income of each individual doctor rises.

    You have not explained why the medical cartel is bribing politicians with political donations and are being evasive about it instead. I think that bribe is to pay politicians to have the government restrict the number of doctors in order to boost their incomes.

    You almost immediately started insulting me, calling my beliefs trivialities, ridiculous and half-cooked etc. From that and the rest of the way you acted here, I realized you are an evasive and dishonest person who has strong authoritarian tendencies. Obviously, you are angry that I do not act subservient to you or adopt your beliefs just because you believe them. You are just a dishonest and unimportant nobody out on the internet to me.

    Replies: @wojtek

  • These days the Wall Street Journal probably ranks as America's most influential and credible print outlet, so Friday morning's front-page story describing a sudden new escalation in our episodic trade war with China caught my attention. As emphasized in the first several paragraphs, the Chinese had suddenly imposed an unprecedented new wave of licensing requirements...
  • @Ron Unz
    @VinnyVette


    Stephen Miller is an anti Zionist, anti Marxist Jew who hates democrats and the left. That’s the difference.
     
    Is this really correct? While it's not impossible for an ultra-right-wing Jew to be "anti-Zionist" that combination seems about as rare as a unicorn.

    For example, very casually Googling around I found that Miller was allegedly a protege of David Horowitz, an ultra-pro-Israel fanatic Jew:

    https://www.politico.com/news/magazine/2020/08/01/stephen-miller-david-horowitz-mentor-389933

    So unless you can find some solid evidence that Miller is "anti-Zionist" I'll regard that as nonsense.

    Replies: @Rurik, @not hoytmonger, @Carroll Price, @Anon59, @Chuzaemon

    There’s nobody in the Trump administration that is an “anti-Zionist”.

    I believe it’s Laura Loomer’s job to ensure that.

    • Agree: wojtek, Carroll Price
  • @VinnyVette
    @Chebyshev

    Stephen Miller is an anti Zionist, anti Marxist Jew who hates democrats and the left. That’s the difference.

    Replies: @Ron Unz

    Stephen Miller is an anti Zionist, anti Marxist Jew who hates democrats and the left. That’s the difference.

    Is this really correct? While it’s not impossible for an ultra-right-wing Jew to be “anti-Zionist” that combination seems about as rare as a unicorn.

    For example, very casually Googling around I found that Miller was allegedly a protege of David Horowitz, an ultra-pro-Israel fanatic Jew:

    https://www.politico.com/news/magazine/2020/08/01/stephen-miller-david-horowitz-mentor-389933

    So unless you can find some solid evidence that Miller is “anti-Zionist” I’ll regard that as nonsense.

    • Replies: @Rurik, @not hoytmonger
    @Ron Unz

    There's nobody in the Trump administration that is an "anti-Zionist".

    I believe it's Laura Loomer's job to ensure that.

    , @Carroll Price
    @Ron Unz

    He might pretend otherwise but if Miller was anything other than a devout Zionist, he sure as hell wouldn't be in the Trump administration.

    , @Anon59
    @Ron Unz

    He had his honeymoon in Israel and his wedding was officiated by David Friedman, the US Ambassador to Israel.

    Replies: @Anon59

    , @Chuzaemon
    @Ron Unz

    "Anti-Zionist" is a term that has no place on the internet. It's usually used in real life by people that wish to dress justified criticisms of Israel and or Jewish people in leftist terms. I've never met anyone white actually opposed to the existence of Israel.

  • For all the media hand-wringing over the government shutdown the fact is only approximately 750,000 of the over two million non-military federal workers are being furloughed. Most federal programs will continue operating, including the major entitlement and welfare programs. The national parks will remain open, if understaffed and with closed visitor centers. Unfortunately, the shutdown...
  • @Jokem
    @wojtek

    I hardly think Singapore is commie-controlled. It is an example of economic liberty, but restricted civil liberty. There are strong Islamic elements in the government.

    Replies: @wojtek

    It’s not difficult to verify that I didn’t write commie-controlled Singapore.
    I wrote commie-controlled HK.
    I described Singapore rather differently.

  • @Truth Vigilante
    @wojtek

    Woy-chek writes:


    Dr. Paul, you bonehead, never suggested that there should be “competition for doctors”.
     
    What do you know about what Dr Ron Paul has or hasn't said over the years?
    I would be very surprised if you've perused even 1% of the amount of Dr Paul's output that I've been exposed to over the years.
    You're a dumb Polack and an economic illiterate, so you're in no position to pass judgement on this great man.

    I've watched the near entirety of the two thousand (2000) plus episodes of The Ron Paul Liberty Report over the last decade, in addition to having read/watched many hundreds of hours of Dr Ron Paul articles, interviews and speeches that he's made over the last 50 years.

    I know that Dr Paul advocates for unfettered Free Market Capitalism.
    And, by definition, this entails that there be FIERCE COMPETITION in all business sectors - with no exceptions.

    Always and everywhere, a competitive playing field (in an environment where there are NO Gubmint mandates/meddling or distortions of the market), ensures that consumers get the highest QUALITY goods and services at the LOWEST price.
     

    Replies: @Mark G., @Jokem, @wojtek

    What do you know about what Dr Ron Paul has or hasn’t said over the years?

    I know he didn’t write that there should be a competition for doctors, because – unlike you – he’s not a neonazi moron.

    I’ve watched the near entirety of the two thousand (2000) plus episodes of The Ron Paul Liberty Report over the last decade, in addition to having read/watched many hundreds of hours of Dr Ron Paul articles, interviews and speeches that he’s made over the last 50 years.

    Was that because of an order from your gauleiter? 🙂

    In that case you won’t have any problem citing where and when Dr. Paul advocated for creation of a competion to medical doctors.

    I know …

    Naziboi is bragging 🙂

  • Brilliant Eurasian cultures converged, interacted and spread their wings on the Ancient Silk Roads. DUNHUANG – Across History, the Silk Road – actually a network of roads – is the supreme Highway Star: the most important connectivity corridor ever, rolling across Ancient Eurasia, linking what Chinese scholars consensually define as the main civilization systems in...
  • “There are only four, rather than five, influential cultural systems in the world: Chinese, Indian, Greek and Islam.”

    Wrote a Brazilian journalist in English on an English language site. Yeah, right.

    • Thanks: Tennessee Jed
  • These days the Wall Street Journal probably ranks as America's most influential and credible print outlet, so Friday morning's front-page story describing a sudden new escalation in our episodic trade war with China caught my attention. As emphasized in the first several paragraphs, the Chinese had suddenly imposed an unprecedented new wave of licensing requirements...
  • @ltlee1
    @QCIC


    This may sound racist to some, but the main reason everyone wants to come here is to benefit from European White America.
     
    Nah.
    Like the Native Americans before the European White Americans, people come for better lives, mostly the results of 1) more land and natural resources per capita and/or 2) better government.

    1) above means more opportunity, and
    2) above means more likely to flourish.

    Replies: @kiwk, @Titus7, @VinnyVette

    Nah.
    Like the Native Americans before the European White Americans, people come for better lives, mostly the results of 1) more land and natural resources per capita and/or 2) better government.

    The pre European natives came here for a better life? But there wasn’t any “better” life here as there wasn’t any Western European civilization here to have a “better life.” Lowest IQ comment I’ve ever seen here at the UNZ and there have been many many whoppers!

    • Troll: wojtek
    • Replies: @littlereddot
    @VinnyVette


    But there wasn’t any “better” life here as there wasn’t any Western European civilization here to have a “better life.”
     
    So when there is no Western Civilisation there is no "better life"?

    Rich hunting, better climate, plentiful resources. These are not elements of a "better life?"

    LOL. And you have the gall to criticize others for "low IQ comments"?

    You will benefit from buying an affordably priced mirror from Temu.

    Replies: @mulga mumblebrain, @VinnyVette

    , @Same old same old
    @VinnyVette

    Western Civilization is trash. Asia has been the hub of civilized culture for all of human history. It doesn't have Christcuckery, though, so you hate it.

  • @Chebyshev
    America will be economically naked and Israel will be adrift once China stops the flow of chips, and the American AI industry fizzles.

    But many may have forgotten that until the collapse of the Housing Bubble just a few weeks before the 2008 elections, the Republicans had retained much of their popularity, with the sense of continuing national prosperity insulating them from most of the public hostility Bush had earned.
     
    I had totally forgotten about that. During 2007 and most of 2008, Americans contentedly shopped at Walmart and dined at McDonald's and didn't necessarily want major political change. Now Americans have additional hobbies but are mostly in the same state of mind.

    Similarly, the gradual, almost invisible growth of Jewish/Zionist control over America had taken around a century to reach its current levels, with the 1960s assassinations of the Kennedy brothers certainly marking a crucial inflection point. In my view, the bookend to the JFK Assassination might be the somewhat similar recent killing of youthful conservative leader Charlie Kirk, which quickly followed his sudden realization that he and his entire political movement were merely intended to function as Jewish/Zionist puppets, and indications of his political rebellion against that humiliating condition.
     
    Benjamin Netanyahu towers over Trump for all his foreign policy decision-making, and Stephen Miller handles domestic policy. It's funny that Miller is so hostile to Democrats, because the previous Democratic presidential administration was also a Jewish one. Politics in America consists of battles between rival Jewish factions.

    High-ranking Gentiles on both sides may resent this situation, as I suggested last month:

    Coolness towards Israel is potentially a bipartisan position among powerful, patriotic Gentiles like Kennedy and Kirk who interact frequently with Israeli and pro-Israel leaders.
     
    https://www.unz.com/article/who-killed-charlie-kirk-the-case-against-israel/?showcomments#comment-7312065

    Replies: @QCIC, @VinnyVette

    Stephen Miller is an anti Zionist, anti Marxist Jew who hates democrats and the left. That’s the difference.

    • Troll: wojtek
    • Replies: @Ron Unz
    @VinnyVette


    Stephen Miller is an anti Zionist, anti Marxist Jew who hates democrats and the left. That’s the difference.
     
    Is this really correct? While it's not impossible for an ultra-right-wing Jew to be "anti-Zionist" that combination seems about as rare as a unicorn.

    For example, very casually Googling around I found that Miller was allegedly a protege of David Horowitz, an ultra-pro-Israel fanatic Jew:

    https://www.politico.com/news/magazine/2020/08/01/stephen-miller-david-horowitz-mentor-389933

    So unless you can find some solid evidence that Miller is "anti-Zionist" I'll regard that as nonsense.

    Replies: @Rurik, @not hoytmonger, @Carroll Price, @Anon59, @Chuzaemon

  • For all the media hand-wringing over the government shutdown the fact is only approximately 750,000 of the over two million non-military federal workers are being furloughed. Most federal programs will continue operating, including the major entitlement and welfare programs. The national parks will remain open, if understaffed and with closed visitor centers. Unfortunately, the shutdown...
  • @Mark G.
    @Truth Vigilante

    Actually, Ron Paul did say there should be more competition in the medical field in one of his books, Liberty Defined, so wojtek is incorrect. In that book, Ron Paul says licensing is used to restrict the supply of doctors in order to increase their incomes. This is one of the causes of the high cost of medical care.

    Replies: @wojtek

    You are an imbecile who can’t even understand a short text in your allegedly native tongue.

    Medical licensing is for doctors!
    Not for shamans, witches, or some whining morons.

    My claim stands:

    Dr. Paul, you bonehead, never suggested that there should be “competition for doctors”.

    In that short chapter he mostly complains about insurance and pharma. His only suggestions regarding doctors are to loosen licensing requirements and have more med schools.

    None qualifies as your boneheaded suggestion to ” eliminates competition for the doctors.”

    Do you need me to quote?
    But what guarantees do I have that you functional analphabet will understand what is written? You haven’t demonstrated that ability so far.

  • @Mark G.
    @wojtek

    No, you need to try to mentally focus and put what you want to say in one comment. I am not going to have two simultaneous conversations going with you at the same time. I did not even read what you said so if you want me to see it incorporate it into your next reply to me.

    Replies: @wojtek

    Mentally focused on your boneheaded childish whining about doctors making a lot of money?
    Stop your whining and use some arguments, maybe I’ll focus.

  • @Mark G.
    @wojtek

    "there is no libertarian country in the world"

    Some are more libertarian than others, moron. Hong Kong has still largely been allowed to keep its free market economic system intact since being taken over by China. Economic freedom and secure property rights is a major component of libertarianism. You do not know that? This is why the libertarian Cato Institute is putting out this ranking, you dolt.

    Oh, you sound angry here calling me a freak. Are you melting down here? LOL!

    You said the Tabarrok graph is an outlier and provided a link to the white coat investor website. That website has the same identical graph. This does not demonstrate the Tabarrok graph is an outlier. This just demonstrates you are a retard.

    Still being an evasive little weasel I see and not talking about the corrupt medical cartel bribing politicians to restrict the number of doctors in order to boost doctor incomes. Any intelligent person can see you are just an evasive little weasel and a very stupid one too!

    Replies: @wojtek

    Some are more libertarian than others

    Yet none is libertarian, you ideological freak.

    Hong Kong has still largely been allowed

    Oh yes, this is such a strong statement about the allegedly most libertarian country in the world – STILL LARGELY BEEN ALLOWED 🙂
    Could you make it any worse? 🙂

    You said the Tabarrok graph is an outlier and provided a link to the white coat investor website. That website has the same identical graph.

    Yes, it does – because if you actually check the rest of the data, you will see that Tabarrok piece tells a completely different story, which in fact in contradicted by all the other listed works. And many more.
    But for that one needs to be able to read short texts with a semblance of understanding them, which you are completely incapable of.

    Still being an evasive little weasel I see …

    Yes you are – you have not addressed any of the substantiated data I provided other than with your moronic boneheaded complaints about doctors.
    It’s getting old and boring.

    • Replies: @Mark G.
    @wojtek

    "other listed works"

    You have no idea of the quality of anything contradicting the Tabarrok graph. Any claim by you the quality is higher is just your opinion. My opinion is that Tabarrok is a professor at a well known university and, being an economist, understands basic economics and things like supply and demand and the effects of government actions on supply and demand. I already told you I do not want to just hear your opinion over and over and repeat my opinion over and over again, yet you are still doing it.

    So, no, I am not being evasive. However, I see your tactic is now to respond to me saying you are being evasive by saying I am being evasive too. Once again, you are an evasive little weasel trying to divert attention away from the corrupt medical cartel bribing politicians into restricting doctor supply to boost doctor incomes.

    My, you are certainly undergoing a major meltdown here calling me freak, imbecile, moronic etc, in this comment section. That's hilarious 😂 . See, I can add emojis like a dopey teenage girl too.

    As for you saying there is no libertarian country, yes there may not be a purely libertarian country but some countries are more libertarian than others. I think the Cato economic index is a fairly good ranking but we can also use the Cato human freedom index which ranks countries by a combination of personal and economic freedom. Venezuela is ranked 159 out of 165 countries. Even lower is Syria, Yemen, Iran, Myanmar, Sudan and Egypt. I am certain there are few of those silly libertarians in any of those countries so it is time to pack your bags and leave so you can get away from them. Good luck!

    Replies: @wojtek

  • These days the Wall Street Journal probably ranks as America's most influential and credible print outlet, so Friday morning's front-page story describing a sudden new escalation in our episodic trade war with China caught my attention. As emphasized in the first several paragraphs, the Chinese had suddenly imposed an unprecedented new wave of licensing requirements...
  • @John Johnson
    @Jim H

    ‘Ukraine doesn’t have a Navy and sunk most of the Black Sea fleet.’ — John Johnson

    The past tense of ‘sink’ is ‘sank.’

    No it is actually correct when used as a passive voice

    The ship was sunk by a German U-boat.
    The ship is the subject and received the action of being sunk.
    https://leangrammar.com/sank-vs-sunk-whats-the-past-tense-of-sink/

    Or would you say the ship was sink by a German U-boat? Maybe sinked? Sinked by a Singh?

    Replies: @wojtek, @ariadna

    Johnson, we’ve already established that you’re a Khazar troll, so don’t try to teach anyone here English grammar.

    Instead read the whole text you linked:

    In passive voice constructions, the past participle “sunk” is combined with a form of the verb “to be.”

    Even I know that “Ukraine doesn’t have a Navy and sunk most of the Black Sea fleet.” is incorrect.
    Just like every other claim you have made on this forum 🙂

    • Thanks: Notsofast
    • Replies: @John Johnson
    @wojtek

    You know the 2.5 week special operation is going well when you are trying to be pedantic over grammar while the number of Russian ships at the bottom of the Black sea remains the same.

    This is a forum and not a doctoral thesis. Trying to nitpick over grammar shows weakness of argument. It doesn't change what exists in reality.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iyUDhwD6WLQ

    Maybe another year of the 2.5 week special operation should do it?

    Boy was I waaaaaaaay off when I said that this war was a stupid idea while alt-right rallied to an angry dwarf and his needless invasion.

    Wojtek: The word way doesn't contain that many letters. IM SO SMART U GUYZ.

    Replies: @wojtek

  • For all the media hand-wringing over the government shutdown the fact is only approximately 750,000 of the over two million non-military federal workers are being furloughed. Most federal programs will continue operating, including the major entitlement and welfare programs. The national parks will remain open, if understaffed and with closed visitor centers. Unfortunately, the shutdown...
  • @wojtek
    @Mark G.

    Mark, I do understand that you finally realized that the reality ignored your naive supply-side arguments, so you are now looking for some silly excuses to get out of this conundrum of how to reconcile your ideology with real facts. But there are two ways about it, the way you just presented above, and alternatively behaving like a normal adult.

    1) 3-fold increase when accounting for inflation, combined with ~1000% inflation since 1960, gives you 30-fold increase in salaries. Nothing more, nothing less.

    2) You also need to stop this idiotic game of attributing me things I never said.
    My exact quote: "However you look at it there was no 30-fold increase till 2016."
    I didn't claim you said it.
    In fact I don't care much for what you said, facts don't depend on it.

    3) "According to him, doctor incomes tripled since 1960".
    There are lies, big lies, and statistics. How he calculated his claim is unknown to me. But what I do know is that his data is an outlier among all data available.
    Here is a short summary someone made:
    https://www.whitecoatinvestor.com/golden-age-of-medicine/

    E.g., your GMU buddy claims that salaries more than doubled (when adjusted for inflation) since 1970, whereas there is a very well documented data since 1970 (introduction of Medicaid forced people tracking doctor's salaries much more closely, and there are many real papers documenting that - not some blog posts), which shows that there is little to no growth - when adjusted for (official) inflation.

    4) "while numbers of doctors more than doubled". Add to it over 460K nurse practitioners, who didn't exist in 1960, because they were introduced in 1970s, and you have a 3-fold increase in providers per 100,000K residents.

    5) "if the demand for doctors increases faster than the supply, doctor incomes increase" - another example where reality and ideology disagree. Number of hospitalizations in 1960 - over 20M. Number of hospitalizations in 2024 - under 35M. 75% increase - well below the rate of growth of medical population. And costs are rising. Surprise.


    I do not have to talk to you or persuade you of anything.
     
    Conclusion is: you are unable to persuade anybody of anything, because you simply ignore facts and replace them with faulty data points and ideaology.
    So indeed better go and try to talk to someone who will keep your hand and will nod to all your ideas.

    Interestingly, neocon was right.

    Replies: @Mark G.

    “inflation since 1960”

    I already told you doctor incomes have been adjusted for inflation in the link I provided. Adjusted for inflation, doctor incomes have tripled since 1960.

    If you have a different opinion than me about whose data is more accurate, then it is just my opinion versus your opinion. I am not going to just repeat my opinion over and over while listening to you repeat your opinion over and over. That is a waste of my time.

    I question your figures on hospitalizations going from 20 million annually to 35 million today. Population has almost doubled and average age is older. Even if that is the case, if the patients are being treated by doctors who are paid triple of what they were in 1960 costs of treatment will be higher. This is pretty obvious but you are just unable to grasp this. What is wrong with you?

    • LOL: wojtek
    • Troll: Jokem
    • Replies: @wojtek
    @Mark G.

    Mark, you are desperately trying to run away from your failed ideas. But it won't work.
    3-fold adjusted for inflation = 30 fold.
    Simple as that. And no matter how many times you repeat your claim, it won't change the above.


    If you have a different opinion than me about whose data is more accurate
     
    Wow, really difficult - multiple papers, with publicly available data vs one chart that magically tells the opposite story. What to choose?
    No, these are not opinions. Mine is a fact, yours is an illusion. You're grasping at straws.

    I question your figures on hospitalizations going from 20 million annually to 35 million today.
     
    Question away:
    https://www.aha.org/statistics/fast-facts-us-hospitals
    https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/series/sr_10/sr10_020acc.pdf

    You see - this is how it will turn out ever single time - you show me some cooked up data mixed with your ideology, and I will show the facts.

    And the most important fact is that this libertarian ideological nonsense about supply side economics in medicine so far is working like this: triple the the rate of doctors per capita and the costs keep increasing. But the fanatics like you will call for more of the same, claiming that this time it will certainly work.

    Even if that is the case, if the patients are being treated by doctors who are paid triple of what they were in 1960 costs of treatment will be higher.
     
    Except all the published research papers (as opposed to blog posts), contradict this claim.

    You have two options now: either you will realize that your single data outlier is fake, or you will have to conclude that your ideology does not work as you're claiming it should. Tertium non datur.
    I think I'm going to stick around and watch a meltdown.

    Replies: @Mark G.

  • @wojtek
    @Mark G.

    Mark, you are desperately trying to run away from your failed ideas. But it won't work.
    3-fold adjusted for inflation = 30 fold.
    Simple as that. And no matter how many times you repeat your claim, it won't change the above.


    If you have a different opinion than me about whose data is more accurate
     
    Wow, really difficult - multiple papers, with publicly available data vs one chart that magically tells the opposite story. What to choose?
    No, these are not opinions. Mine is a fact, yours is an illusion. You're grasping at straws.

    I question your figures on hospitalizations going from 20 million annually to 35 million today.
     
    Question away:
    https://www.aha.org/statistics/fast-facts-us-hospitals
    https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/series/sr_10/sr10_020acc.pdf

    You see - this is how it will turn out ever single time - you show me some cooked up data mixed with your ideology, and I will show the facts.

    And the most important fact is that this libertarian ideological nonsense about supply side economics in medicine so far is working like this: triple the the rate of doctors per capita and the costs keep increasing. But the fanatics like you will call for more of the same, claiming that this time it will certainly work.

    Even if that is the case, if the patients are being treated by doctors who are paid triple of what they were in 1960 costs of treatment will be higher.
     
    Except all the published research papers (as opposed to blog posts), contradict this claim.

    You have two options now: either you will realize that your single data outlier is fake, or you will have to conclude that your ideology does not work as you're claiming it should. Tertium non datur.
    I think I'm going to stick around and watch a meltdown.

    Replies: @Mark G.

    I think I will go with Taborrak when it comes to doctor incomes. Having a minority opinion does not mean he is wrong. The powerful medical cartel and its propagandists have an incentive to engage in obfuscation about how the medical cartel bribes politicians to restrict doctor supply in order to boost doctor incomes. I prefer more objective sources of information.

    We would be better off ditching the current overly expensive corrupt system and going back to what we did in 1960. Average life expectancy was seventy then while doctor incomes were a third of what they are now and overall medical spending was six percent of GDP instead of the sixteen percent now.

    The corrupt medical cartel will not continue to have its way because in the future we will not be able to afford current levels of medical spending. By 2037 Medicare will be insolvent, Social Security will be insolvent, the national debt will be sixty trillion dollars and we will be paying two to three trillion dollars yearly in interest payments on that debt. The money will not be there for overinflated doctor incomes dishonestly achieved.

    • LOL: wojtek
    • Troll: Jokem
    • Replies: @wojtek
    @Mark G.


    I think I will go with Taborrak when it comes to doctor incomes. Having a minority opinion does not mean he is wrong.
     
    No, having a minority opinion doesn't mean wrong.
    Having a complete outlier, without publishing the data supporting it, publishing it on a blog instead of in a refereed journal - all this implies he's wrong.

    But, to me it doesn't matter that he is wrong.

    What matters to me is that by accepting his data you prove immediately that all your bs about supply economics is wrong :)

    You see, with your claim that "Even if that is the case, if the patients are being treated by doctors who are paid triple of what they were in 1960 costs of treatment will be higher" you painted yourself into a corner. And you have only two options:

    1) Go with the suspect data, which proves that a 3-fold increase in the rate of providers per capita correlated with a 3-fold increase in their revenues (and your costs) when adjusted for inflation. Which in turn immediately makes all your naive supply-demand economics claims void and empty, because with demand growth below the population growth, there is no other excuse.

    2) Or, if you want to stick with your ideology, you need to accept that the data if wrong. Which interestingly still makes your ideology wrong, because then we do know from many independent sources that doctors' salaries grew on par with official inflation, despite 3-fold growth in per capita rates.

    Tertium non datur.

    So which one is it going to be?

    Replies: @Mark G.

  • @Mark G.
    @wojtek

    Meltdown? No I am not angry at all. I am making fun of you and laughing at you. It is always funny how pompous gas bags like you are oblivious that others see you for the buffoons you are. I guess I should have used smile emojis like a dopey teenage girl to make it obvious I was sitting here laughing at you.

    Of course, the phrase "suspect data" is just your opinion. The reason I know Tabarrok is right is because you have been engaging in evasion about the fact that the corrupt medical cartel is buying political influence with bribes. The fact you are doing that demonstrates you are a dishonest person of low moral character so, therefore, it is anything you say that is "suspect".

    You yourself say libertarians are just plain silly. So when will you be moving to the non-libertarian paradise of Venezuela to get away from us silly libertarians? I checked the Cato rankings of least libertarian countries and the non-libertarian paradise of Zimbabwe ranks number two so you could buy a plane ticket for there instead. Looking at the bottom ranking countries for economic freedom, I notice they are all poor. I am sure that is just a coincidence, though, right?

    Replies: @wojtek, @wojtek

    I am going to separate this fragment below, because it is a prime example that shows how moronic your positions are:

    The reason I know Tabarrok is right is because you have been engaging in evasion about the fact that the corrupt medical cartel is buying political influence with bribes.

    1. You combine two completely independent from each other things:
    – me ignoring your idiotically childish distractions,
    – invalidity of the suspect data you found on someone’s blog.

    2. To really prove your idiocy, you are not just claiming that there is a relationship between these completely unrelated facts – you claim there is a causal relationship! 🙂

    3. To push the absurd to the limit, one fact is about verifiable data, yet, your argument is not about validity of the data.

    I mean you really are a special case, Mark.
    In fact you are a quasi-religious freak.

    • Replies: @Mark G.
    @wojtek

    No, you need to try to mentally focus and put what you want to say in one comment. I am not going to have two simultaneous conversations going with you at the same time. I did not even read what you said so if you want me to see it incorporate it into your next reply to me.

    Replies: @wojtek

  • @wojtek
    @Mark G.

    And here came the - previously announced - meltdown :)

    Mark, who cornered himself with his silly ideological theories and suspect (at best) data, now calls me a troll :)

    Because the snowflake can't reconcile the real facts that 3-fold increase in the per capita provider rate has not even dented the providers' income, when adjusted for official inflation :)

    Mark, your suggestion that someone who points your silly mistakes must love communism is as moronic as your supply demand claims about healthcare :)

    Replies: @Mark G.

    Meltdown? No I am not angry at all. I am making fun of you and laughing at you. It is always funny how pompous gas bags like you are oblivious that others see you for the buffoons you are. I guess I should have used smile emojis like a dopey teenage girl to make it obvious I was sitting here laughing at you.

    Of course, the phrase “suspect data” is just your opinion. The reason I know Tabarrok is right is because you have been engaging in evasion about the fact that the corrupt medical cartel is buying political influence with bribes. The fact you are doing that demonstrates you are a dishonest person of low moral character so, therefore, it is anything you say that is “suspect”.

    You yourself say libertarians are just plain silly. So when will you be moving to the non-libertarian paradise of Venezuela to get away from us silly libertarians? I checked the Cato rankings of least libertarian countries and the non-libertarian paradise of Zimbabwe ranks number two so you could buy a plane ticket for there instead. Looking at the bottom ranking countries for economic freedom, I notice they are all poor. I am sure that is just a coincidence, though, right?

    • LOL: wojtek
    • Troll: Jokem
    • Replies: @wojtek
    @Mark G.


    Meltdown? No I am not angry at all.
     
    Of course not.

    meltdown: a rapid or disastrous decline or collapse

    You yourself say libertarians are just plain silly.
     
    And you prove it with every single post, e.g., here:

    So when will you be moving to the non-libertarian paradise of Venezuela to get away from us silly libertarians?
     
    Would you like me to count logical errors in that one short statement? :)

    1) Why would your silliness have any impact on me?
    2) Since there is no libertarian country in the World, why would I need to move, even if libertarian silliness had any effect on me?
    3) Why would Venezuela have to be the country to move to, if there is no libertarian country in the World.

    In fact the highest ranking countries in the silly libertarian ranking are commie-controlled HK and Singapore, where they will beat you up for a whole range of nonviolent misdemeanors.

    4) Why thinking that libertarianism is silly means I need to seek countries with the least amount of economic freedom, b/c that is actually what is ranked, not how libertarian any country is?

    As I said - complete mental meltdown.

    And all that is caused by, let's remind you:

    The fact that you cornered yourself with your silly ideological theories and suspect data, completely ignoring reality.

    You're not a libertarian, you're an ideological freak.

    Replies: @Mark G., @Jokem

    , @wojtek
    @Mark G.

    I am going to separate this fragment below, because it is a prime example that shows how moronic your positions are:


    The reason I know Tabarrok is right is because you have been engaging in evasion about the fact that the corrupt medical cartel is buying political influence with bribes.
     
    1. You combine two completely independent from each other things:
    - me ignoring your idiotically childish distractions,
    - invalidity of the suspect data you found on someone's blog.

    2. To really prove your idiocy, you are not just claiming that there is a relationship between these completely unrelated facts - you claim there is a causal relationship! :)

    3. To push the absurd to the limit, one fact is about verifiable data, yet, your argument is not about validity of the data.

    I mean you really are a special case, Mark.
    In fact you are a quasi-religious freak.

    Replies: @Mark G.

  • @Mark G.
    @wojtek

    Meltdown? No I am not angry at all. I am making fun of you and laughing at you. It is always funny how pompous gas bags like you are oblivious that others see you for the buffoons you are. I guess I should have used smile emojis like a dopey teenage girl to make it obvious I was sitting here laughing at you.

    Of course, the phrase "suspect data" is just your opinion. The reason I know Tabarrok is right is because you have been engaging in evasion about the fact that the corrupt medical cartel is buying political influence with bribes. The fact you are doing that demonstrates you are a dishonest person of low moral character so, therefore, it is anything you say that is "suspect".

    You yourself say libertarians are just plain silly. So when will you be moving to the non-libertarian paradise of Venezuela to get away from us silly libertarians? I checked the Cato rankings of least libertarian countries and the non-libertarian paradise of Zimbabwe ranks number two so you could buy a plane ticket for there instead. Looking at the bottom ranking countries for economic freedom, I notice they are all poor. I am sure that is just a coincidence, though, right?

    Replies: @wojtek, @wojtek

    Meltdown? No I am not angry at all.

    Of course not.

    meltdown: a rapid or disastrous decline or collapse

    You yourself say libertarians are just plain silly.

    And you prove it with every single post, e.g., here:

    So when will you be moving to the non-libertarian paradise of Venezuela to get away from us silly libertarians?

    Would you like me to count logical errors in that one short statement? 🙂

    1) Why would your silliness have any impact on me?
    2) Since there is no libertarian country in the World, why would I need to move, even if libertarian silliness had any effect on me?
    3) Why would Venezuela have to be the country to move to, if there is no libertarian country in the World.

    In fact the highest ranking countries in the silly libertarian ranking are commie-controlled HK and Singapore, where they will beat you up for a whole range of nonviolent misdemeanors.

    4) Why thinking that libertarianism is silly means I need to seek countries with the least amount of economic freedom, b/c that is actually what is ranked, not how libertarian any country is?

    As I said – complete mental meltdown.

    And all that is caused by, let’s remind you:

    The fact that you cornered yourself with your silly ideological theories and suspect data, completely ignoring reality.

    You’re not a libertarian, you’re an ideological freak.

    • Replies: @Mark G.
    @wojtek

    "there is no libertarian country in the world"

    Some are more libertarian than others, moron. Hong Kong has still largely been allowed to keep its free market economic system intact since being taken over by China. Economic freedom and secure property rights is a major component of libertarianism. You do not know that? This is why the libertarian Cato Institute is putting out this ranking, you dolt.

    Oh, you sound angry here calling me a freak. Are you melting down here? LOL!

    You said the Tabarrok graph is an outlier and provided a link to the white coat investor website. That website has the same identical graph. This does not demonstrate the Tabarrok graph is an outlier. This just demonstrates you are a retard.

    Still being an evasive little weasel I see and not talking about the corrupt medical cartel bribing politicians to restrict the number of doctors in order to boost doctor incomes. Any intelligent person can see you are just an evasive little weasel and a very stupid one too!

    Replies: @wojtek

    , @Jokem
    @wojtek

    I hardly think Singapore is commie-controlled. It is an example of economic liberty, but restricted civil liberty. There are strong Islamic elements in the government.

    Replies: @wojtek

  • @wojtek
    @Mark G.


    I think I will go with Taborrak when it comes to doctor incomes. Having a minority opinion does not mean he is wrong.
     
    No, having a minority opinion doesn't mean wrong.
    Having a complete outlier, without publishing the data supporting it, publishing it on a blog instead of in a refereed journal - all this implies he's wrong.

    But, to me it doesn't matter that he is wrong.

    What matters to me is that by accepting his data you prove immediately that all your bs about supply economics is wrong :)

    You see, with your claim that "Even if that is the case, if the patients are being treated by doctors who are paid triple of what they were in 1960 costs of treatment will be higher" you painted yourself into a corner. And you have only two options:

    1) Go with the suspect data, which proves that a 3-fold increase in the rate of providers per capita correlated with a 3-fold increase in their revenues (and your costs) when adjusted for inflation. Which in turn immediately makes all your naive supply-demand economics claims void and empty, because with demand growth below the population growth, there is no other excuse.

    2) Or, if you want to stick with your ideology, you need to accept that the data if wrong. Which interestingly still makes your ideology wrong, because then we do know from many independent sources that doctors' salaries grew on par with official inflation, despite 3-fold growth in per capita rates.

    Tertium non datur.

    So which one is it going to be?

    Replies: @Mark G.

    Yes, the medical profession gives large political donations to politicians for no other reason than it likes to pass out free money. It does not want anything in return like having the government restrict the number of doctors in order to boost doctor incomes. Only a moron believes that.

    I told you that you need to do better here but you have just been engaging in feeble attempts at obfuscation so I labeled you a troll. The political donations going to corrupt politicians from the corrupt medical cartel are to buy political influence to enable the medical cartel to receive benefits from political pull rather than through productive activities. Economists call this “rent seeking”.

    When government was smaller and had less ability to pass out political favors, most people wanting to make money had to engage in productive activities. This led to rapid economic growth and the United States becoming the wealthiest country in the world. As government has expanded, economic growth has slowed.

    The libertarian Cato Institute does a yearly ranking of countries by economic freedom. Last year Venezuela was ranked last, making it the least libertarian country in the world. Venezuela was formerly the wealthiest country in South America but under socialism has become a poor country that has had large numbers of citizens flee. Since it is the least libertarian country in the world, though, I am sure you will love it there and you should head there immediately. Don’t let the door hit you in your authoritarian ass on the way out!

    • LOL: wojtek
    • Troll: Jokem
    • Replies: @wojtek
    @Mark G.

    And here came the - previously announced - meltdown :)

    Mark, who cornered himself with his silly ideological theories and suspect (at best) data, now calls me a troll :)

    Because the snowflake can't reconcile the real facts that 3-fold increase in the per capita provider rate has not even dented the providers' income, when adjusted for official inflation :)

    Mark, your suggestion that someone who points your silly mistakes must love communism is as moronic as your supply demand claims about healthcare :)

    Replies: @Mark G.

  • @Mark G.
    @wojtek

    Yes, the medical profession gives large political donations to politicians for no other reason than it likes to pass out free money. It does not want anything in return like having the government restrict the number of doctors in order to boost doctor incomes. Only a moron believes that.

    I told you that you need to do better here but you have just been engaging in feeble attempts at obfuscation so I labeled you a troll. The political donations going to corrupt politicians from the corrupt medical cartel are to buy political influence to enable the medical cartel to receive benefits from political pull rather than through productive activities. Economists call this "rent seeking".

    When government was smaller and had less ability to pass out political favors, most people wanting to make money had to engage in productive activities. This led to rapid economic growth and the United States becoming the wealthiest country in the world. As government has expanded, economic growth has slowed.

    The libertarian Cato Institute does a yearly ranking of countries by economic freedom. Last year Venezuela was ranked last, making it the least libertarian country in the world. Venezuela was formerly the wealthiest country in South America but under socialism has become a poor country that has had large numbers of citizens flee. Since it is the least libertarian country in the world, though, I am sure you will love it there and you should head there immediately. Don't let the door hit you in your authoritarian ass on the way out!

    Replies: @wojtek

    And here came the – previously announced – meltdown 🙂

    Mark, who cornered himself with his silly ideological theories and suspect (at best) data, now calls me a troll 🙂

    Because the snowflake can’t reconcile the real facts that 3-fold increase in the per capita provider rate has not even dented the providers’ income, when adjusted for official inflation 🙂

    Mark, your suggestion that someone who points your silly mistakes must love communism is as moronic as your supply demand claims about healthcare 🙂

    • Replies: @Mark G.
    @wojtek

    Meltdown? No I am not angry at all. I am making fun of you and laughing at you. It is always funny how pompous gas bags like you are oblivious that others see you for the buffoons you are. I guess I should have used smile emojis like a dopey teenage girl to make it obvious I was sitting here laughing at you.

    Of course, the phrase "suspect data" is just your opinion. The reason I know Tabarrok is right is because you have been engaging in evasion about the fact that the corrupt medical cartel is buying political influence with bribes. The fact you are doing that demonstrates you are a dishonest person of low moral character so, therefore, it is anything you say that is "suspect".

    You yourself say libertarians are just plain silly. So when will you be moving to the non-libertarian paradise of Venezuela to get away from us silly libertarians? I checked the Cato rankings of least libertarian countries and the non-libertarian paradise of Zimbabwe ranks number two so you could buy a plane ticket for there instead. Looking at the bottom ranking countries for economic freedom, I notice they are all poor. I am sure that is just a coincidence, though, right?

    Replies: @wojtek, @wojtek

  • These days the Wall Street Journal probably ranks as America's most influential and credible print outlet, so Friday morning's front-page story describing a sudden new escalation in our episodic trade war with China caught my attention. As emphasized in the first several paragraphs, the Chinese had suddenly imposed an unprecedented new wave of licensing requirements...
  • @Anglo Mark
    @littlereddot

    The web site is @ https://theconservativetreehouse.com/ and consists of the acolytes of Andrew Breitbart - a notorious Christian Zionist and neo-conservative. Accordingly, the opinions expressed by said individual reflect support for western/Israeli hegemony and more wars under the banner of bellicose Christendom - while pretending to support the Prince of Peace, Jesus Christ, of course!

    Indeed, in 2007 Andrew Breitbart and his friend, Larry Solov, traveled to Israel together. During the trip, Breitbart and Solov conceived Breitbart News and said individual reflects the evil thereby born.

    https://www.google.com/search?q=was+Breitbart+founded+in+Israel%3F&oq=was+Breitbart+founded+in+Israel%3F&aqs=chrome..69i57j0i10i22i30i455j0i390i512i650l4j0i512i546l4.14393j0j15&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8

    Replies: @littlereddot, @wojtek

    I don’t think you’re right about it.

    CTH at its origin (15 years ago) followed almost anybody who was not in the mainstream. That included Breitbart. But with Breitbart’s passing so long ago, I don’t think they even had time to develop into his acolytes. The only person who they religiously follow is Trump.

    Yes, the members are very heavily pro-israel and pro-zionist, or even just outright zionists. But the leader of the pack is not.

    One proof for my claim is that Mark Levin would never attack a fellow zionist. And wouldn’t call CTH “the conservative nuthouse”, if they indeed were part of the zio movement.
    They are at best what Lenin called useful idiots.

  • For all the media hand-wringing over the government shutdown the fact is only approximately 750,000 of the over two million non-military federal workers are being furloughed. Most federal programs will continue operating, including the major entitlement and welfare programs. The national parks will remain open, if understaffed and with closed visitor centers. Unfortunately, the shutdown...
  • @Mark G.
    @wojtek

    I think I will go with Taborrak when it comes to doctor incomes. Having a minority opinion does not mean he is wrong. The powerful medical cartel and its propagandists have an incentive to engage in obfuscation about how the medical cartel bribes politicians to restrict doctor supply in order to boost doctor incomes. I prefer more objective sources of information.

    We would be better off ditching the current overly expensive corrupt system and going back to what we did in 1960. Average life expectancy was seventy then while doctor incomes were a third of what they are now and overall medical spending was six percent of GDP instead of the sixteen percent now.

    The corrupt medical cartel will not continue to have its way because in the future we will not be able to afford current levels of medical spending. By 2037 Medicare will be insolvent, Social Security will be insolvent, the national debt will be sixty trillion dollars and we will be paying two to three trillion dollars yearly in interest payments on that debt. The money will not be there for overinflated doctor incomes dishonestly achieved.

    Replies: @wojtek

    I think I will go with Taborrak when it comes to doctor incomes. Having a minority opinion does not mean he is wrong.

    No, having a minority opinion doesn’t mean wrong.
    Having a complete outlier, without publishing the data supporting it, publishing it on a blog instead of in a refereed journal – all this implies he’s wrong.

    But, to me it doesn’t matter that he is wrong.

    What matters to me is that by accepting his data you prove immediately that all your bs about supply economics is wrong 🙂

    You see, with your claim that “Even if that is the case, if the patients are being treated by doctors who are paid triple of what they were in 1960 costs of treatment will be higher” you painted yourself into a corner. And you have only two options:

    1) Go with the suspect data, which proves that a 3-fold increase in the rate of providers per capita correlated with a 3-fold increase in their revenues (and your costs) when adjusted for inflation. Which in turn immediately makes all your naive supply-demand economics claims void and empty, because with demand growth below the population growth, there is no other excuse.

    2) Or, if you want to stick with your ideology, you need to accept that the data if wrong. Which interestingly still makes your ideology wrong, because then we do know from many independent sources that doctors’ salaries grew on par with official inflation, despite 3-fold growth in per capita rates.

    Tertium non datur.

    So which one is it going to be?

    • Troll: Mark G.
    • Replies: @Mark G.
    @wojtek

    Yes, the medical profession gives large political donations to politicians for no other reason than it likes to pass out free money. It does not want anything in return like having the government restrict the number of doctors in order to boost doctor incomes. Only a moron believes that.

    I told you that you need to do better here but you have just been engaging in feeble attempts at obfuscation so I labeled you a troll. The political donations going to corrupt politicians from the corrupt medical cartel are to buy political influence to enable the medical cartel to receive benefits from political pull rather than through productive activities. Economists call this "rent seeking".

    When government was smaller and had less ability to pass out political favors, most people wanting to make money had to engage in productive activities. This led to rapid economic growth and the United States becoming the wealthiest country in the world. As government has expanded, economic growth has slowed.

    The libertarian Cato Institute does a yearly ranking of countries by economic freedom. Last year Venezuela was ranked last, making it the least libertarian country in the world. Venezuela was formerly the wealthiest country in South America but under socialism has become a poor country that has had large numbers of citizens flee. Since it is the least libertarian country in the world, though, I am sure you will love it there and you should head there immediately. Don't let the door hit you in your authoritarian ass on the way out!

    Replies: @wojtek

  • @Truth Vigilante
    @wojtek

    The dumb Pole Woy-chek writes:


    But in my opinion one of the biggest problems of libertarians is the fact that many of them are ideologists and avoid contact with real world problems.
     
    Only an ignorant retard devoid of Dr Ron Paul's historical track record over the last few decades would say such a demonstrably false thing.

    The fact is, when one talks about libertarianism, one must acknowledge that Dr Ron Paul is the face of this tried and true ideology in the world today.
    In other words, you can't talk about libertarianism without simultaneously focusing on Dr Ron Paul and his application of that ideology.

    And not only has Dr Paul NOT avoided contact with real world problems (contrary to Woy-chek's scurrilously false claim), he went OUT OF HIS WAY to highlight their effects on Americans and the citizens of the world.
    At the same time Dr Paul offered realistic and workable REAL WORLD SOLUTIONS that would've ameliorated America's sickness.

    More than than, Dr Paul PREDICTED YEARS IN ADVANCE that the chicanery in the subprime mortgage market (which precipitated the 2008 GFC), would lead to systemic risk.
    No one (and I do mean NO EFF'N ONE - at least among politicians) was as assertive and vociferous as Dr Paul (not to mention being years in advance with his prediction) in relation to the looming crisis.
    Watch the following 3 min video and educate yourself:
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ojgBODMioLo


    Summary: Whether it was a solution to tackle inflation and erosion of purchasing power (the solution was Sound Money, Ending the Fed and a return to the Gold Standard - coupled to reining in Big Gubmint), or fixing the economy and a cessation of America's murderous foreign policy (elimination of entire Federal departments, massive cuts in military expenditure, closure of all of America's over 900 bases in 130 countries and bringing all the troops home), Dr Ron Paul HAD ALL THE ANSWERS.
     
    That you aren't aware of these things is proof that you rely on the ZOG owned western MSM for all your information - hence the reason you're a Know Nothing Nitwit.

    Oh, and did I mention, Ron Paul is the ONLY Presidential candidate EVER (to the best of my knowledge), to openly run on the pledge that, should he be elected, he'd reduce U.S taxpayer largesse to the Apartheid Israeli state to ZERO.
    That's right - NOT A SINGLE EFF'N PENNY FROM AMERICA to subsidise the mass murder of Palestinians.


    Dr Ron Paul was a politician with REAL GUTS. No one in the post JFK era had even small fraction of the intestinal fortitude that Dr Ron Paul had in relation to tackling the big issues.

    There is no other politician that Malignant International Jewry feared more in the last 60 years.
    That's why the small hats went out of their way to cheat Ron Paul out of the GOP nomination in the 2012 primaries.
     

    The Talmudic misfits viewed Dr Paul as an existential threat - hence the reason they sabotaged his Presidential bid.

    UR readers, I'll leave you with this 1 min gem from Ron Paul's 2012 Presidential campaign:
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VlYG6vh2T-M

    Replies: @wojtek

    wojtek: “in my opinion one of the biggest problems of libertarians is the fact that many of them are ideologists and avoid contact with real world problems”

    local neonazi idiot: “bb…but Dr. Paul …. ”

    Dr. Paul, you bonehead, never suggested that there should be “competition for doctors”.

    PS. Interestingly Dr. Paul is against free market when it comes to tort laws for doctors. Not that he’s wrong about it – he’s right. But that’s because fanatic ideological libertarianism is just plain silly. A harmless ideology for maldjusted old boys.

    • Replies: @Truth Vigilante
    @wojtek

    Woy-chek writes:


    Dr. Paul, you bonehead, never suggested that there should be “competition for doctors”.
     
    What do you know about what Dr Ron Paul has or hasn't said over the years?
    I would be very surprised if you've perused even 1% of the amount of Dr Paul's output that I've been exposed to over the years.
    You're a dumb Polack and an economic illiterate, so you're in no position to pass judgement on this great man.

    I've watched the near entirety of the two thousand (2000) plus episodes of The Ron Paul Liberty Report over the last decade, in addition to having read/watched many hundreds of hours of Dr Ron Paul articles, interviews and speeches that he's made over the last 50 years.

    I know that Dr Paul advocates for unfettered Free Market Capitalism.
    And, by definition, this entails that there be FIERCE COMPETITION in all business sectors - with no exceptions.

    Always and everywhere, a competitive playing field (in an environment where there are NO Gubmint mandates/meddling or distortions of the market), ensures that consumers get the highest QUALITY goods and services at the LOWEST price.
     

    Replies: @Mark G., @Jokem, @wojtek

  • @Mark G.
    @wojtek

    "inflation since 1960"

    I already told you doctor incomes have been adjusted for inflation in the link I provided. Adjusted for inflation, doctor incomes have tripled since 1960.

    If you have a different opinion than me about whose data is more accurate, then it is just my opinion versus your opinion. I am not going to just repeat my opinion over and over while listening to you repeat your opinion over and over. That is a waste of my time.

    I question your figures on hospitalizations going from 20 million annually to 35 million today. Population has almost doubled and average age is older. Even if that is the case, if the patients are being treated by doctors who are paid triple of what they were in 1960 costs of treatment will be higher. This is pretty obvious but you are just unable to grasp this. What is wrong with you?

    Replies: @wojtek

    Mark, you are desperately trying to run away from your failed ideas. But it won’t work.
    3-fold adjusted for inflation = 30 fold.
    Simple as that. And no matter how many times you repeat your claim, it won’t change the above.

    If you have a different opinion than me about whose data is more accurate

    Wow, really difficult – multiple papers, with publicly available data vs one chart that magically tells the opposite story. What to choose?
    No, these are not opinions. Mine is a fact, yours is an illusion. You’re grasping at straws.

    I question your figures on hospitalizations going from 20 million annually to 35 million today.

    Question away:
    https://www.aha.org/statistics/fast-facts-us-hospitals
    https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/series/sr_10/sr10_020acc.pdf

    You see – this is how it will turn out ever single time – you show me some cooked up data mixed with your ideology, and I will show the facts.

    And the most important fact is that this libertarian ideological nonsense about supply side economics in medicine so far is working like this: triple the the rate of doctors per capita and the costs keep increasing. But the fanatics like you will call for more of the same, claiming that this time it will certainly work.

    Even if that is the case, if the patients are being treated by doctors who are paid triple of what they were in 1960 costs of treatment will be higher.

    Except all the published research papers (as opposed to blog posts), contradict this claim.

    You have two options now: either you will realize that your single data outlier is fake, or you will have to conclude that your ideology does not work as you’re claiming it should. Tertium non datur.
    I think I’m going to stick around and watch a meltdown.

    • Replies: @Mark G.
    @wojtek

    I think I will go with Taborrak when it comes to doctor incomes. Having a minority opinion does not mean he is wrong. The powerful medical cartel and its propagandists have an incentive to engage in obfuscation about how the medical cartel bribes politicians to restrict doctor supply in order to boost doctor incomes. I prefer more objective sources of information.

    We would be better off ditching the current overly expensive corrupt system and going back to what we did in 1960. Average life expectancy was seventy then while doctor incomes were a third of what they are now and overall medical spending was six percent of GDP instead of the sixteen percent now.

    The corrupt medical cartel will not continue to have its way because in the future we will not be able to afford current levels of medical spending. By 2037 Medicare will be insolvent, Social Security will be insolvent, the national debt will be sixty trillion dollars and we will be paying two to three trillion dollars yearly in interest payments on that debt. The money will not be there for overinflated doctor incomes dishonestly achieved.

    Replies: @wojtek

  • @Mark G.
    @wojtek

    "30 fold increase"

    I never said there was a 30 fold increase. I have said three fold repeatedly. Once again you are making me repeat myself.

    "It is a fact, which I provided for you."

    No, you made an unsupported assertion with no links. You do not understand the difference? You have also not provided a link showing doctor incomes unchanged adjusted for inflation.

    The link I provided you is by an economist who is a professor at George Mason University. According to him, doctor incomes tripled since 1960 while numbers of doctors more than doubled. Once again, if the demand for doctors increases faster than the supply, doctor incomes increase. This is what happened. You are unable to grasp the basic economic concept of supply and demand and I am not going to waste time going over it repeatedly with you. If you do not start doing better with your comments, I will stop talking to you completely. I do not have to talk to you or persuade you of anything. Do you understand?

    Replies: @wojtek

    Mark, I do understand that you finally realized that the reality ignored your naive supply-side arguments, so you are now looking for some silly excuses to get out of this conundrum of how to reconcile your ideology with real facts. But there are two ways about it, the way you just presented above, and alternatively behaving like a normal adult.

    1) 3-fold increase when accounting for inflation, combined with ~1000% inflation since 1960, gives you 30-fold increase in salaries. Nothing more, nothing less.

    2) You also need to stop this idiotic game of attributing me things I never said.
    My exact quote: “However you look at it there was no 30-fold increase till 2016.”
    I didn’t claim you said it.
    In fact I don’t care much for what you said, facts don’t depend on it.

    3) “According to him, doctor incomes tripled since 1960”.
    There are lies, big lies, and statistics. How he calculated his claim is unknown to me. But what I do know is that his data is an outlier among all data available.
    Here is a short summary someone made:
    https://www.whitecoatinvestor.com/golden-age-of-medicine/

    E.g., your GMU buddy claims that salaries more than doubled (when adjusted for inflation) since 1970, whereas there is a very well documented data since 1970 (introduction of Medicaid forced people tracking doctor’s salaries much more closely, and there are many real papers documenting that – not some blog posts), which shows that there is little to no growth – when adjusted for (official) inflation.

    4) “while numbers of doctors more than doubled”. Add to it over 460K nurse practitioners, who didn’t exist in 1960, because they were introduced in 1970s, and you have a 3-fold increase in providers per 100,000K residents.

    5) “if the demand for doctors increases faster than the supply, doctor incomes increase” – another example where reality and ideology disagree. Number of hospitalizations in 1960 – over 20M. Number of hospitalizations in 2024 – under 35M. 75% increase – well below the rate of growth of medical population. And costs are rising. Surprise.

    I do not have to talk to you or persuade you of anything.

    Conclusion is: you are unable to persuade anybody of anything, because you simply ignore facts and replace them with faulty data points and ideaology.
    So indeed better go and try to talk to someone who will keep your hand and will nod to all your ideas.

    Interestingly, neocon was right.

    • Replies: @Mark G.
    @wojtek

    "inflation since 1960"

    I already told you doctor incomes have been adjusted for inflation in the link I provided. Adjusted for inflation, doctor incomes have tripled since 1960.

    If you have a different opinion than me about whose data is more accurate, then it is just my opinion versus your opinion. I am not going to just repeat my opinion over and over while listening to you repeat your opinion over and over. That is a waste of my time.

    I question your figures on hospitalizations going from 20 million annually to 35 million today. Population has almost doubled and average age is older. Even if that is the case, if the patients are being treated by doctors who are paid triple of what they were in 1960 costs of treatment will be higher. This is pretty obvious but you are just unable to grasp this. What is wrong with you?

    Replies: @wojtek

  • @Mark G.
    @wojtek

    "What is the point of discussing things with other admirers?"

    It lets them know they are not alone in the world in their beliefs. We can also discuss the best strategies to achieve our goals. This did not occur to you?

    I agree that many libertarians are ideologists who have lost contact with reality but the same is often true of their opponents. I will discuss things with opponents but I do not spend time with trolls who are condescending, engage in personal attacks or make me repeat the same thing over and over or make me state the obvious in order to waste my time. Also, if I see someone engaging in extensive obfuscation like setting up strawmen, gaslighting etc. I do not waste my time by continuing with them.

    Replies: @wojtek

    We can also discuss the best strategies to achieve our goals. This did not occur to you?

    Actually, it did occur to me. But I never saw it in these discussions here, so didn’t think it was the reason 🙂

  • @Mark G.
    @wojtek

    "I don't think that claim holds water."

    https://marginalrevolution.com/marginalrevolution/2019/05/physician-and-nurse-incomes-have-increased-tremendously.html

    You have not provided information that doctor incomes have stayed the same adjusted for inflation.

    "The number of providers increased three fold"

    No, that is not what I said. Doctors incomes increased three fold, not the number of doctors. The numbers of doctors has increased but has not increased enough to keep up with increased demand, causing rising doctors incomes which is part of the explanation for rising medical costs. When doctor incomes were a third of what they are now back in 1960 doctors were of adequate quality so if we increased the number of doctors enough so that income levels drop back down to 1960 they should still be of adequate quality.

    You forced me to repeat twice that three fold increases in doctor incomes are incomes adjusted for inflation. You just incorrectly stated that I think the number of doctors increased three fold, forcing me to spend time correcting it. You did that because you did not make an attempt to understand what I am saying or on purpose to make me waste time correcting you. In either case being true, I see little reason to continue this. I do not want to spend large amounts of my time getting someone to correctly understand what I just said or to let someone waste my time by forcing me to repeat the same thing multiple times.

    Replies: @wojtek

    I find the data in the link you provided very suspicious.

    Census office has significantly changed the way they report data between 1960 and today. Still, say for 2023 they provide the median full time physician annual income as around 250K. In 1960 census data, they provided average annual income for self-employed male medical workers as ~13k, and indicated that number of women in such category was statistically insignificant.
    However you look at it there was no 30-fold increase till 2016.

    “The number of providers increased three fold”
    No, that is not what I said.

    No, it is not what you said.
    But it is a fact, which I provided for you.
    And nowhere in my statement it is attributed to you.
    Let me repeat, so it sinks in:

    The number of providers in the US per 100,000 residents increased 3-fold from 1960 to 2025.

    Now you made me repeat it, so I guess we are even and can move on to reconcile this fact?

    • Replies: @Mark G.
    @wojtek

    "30 fold increase"

    I never said there was a 30 fold increase. I have said three fold repeatedly. Once again you are making me repeat myself.

    "It is a fact, which I provided for you."

    No, you made an unsupported assertion with no links. You do not understand the difference? You have also not provided a link showing doctor incomes unchanged adjusted for inflation.

    The link I provided you is by an economist who is a professor at George Mason University. According to him, doctor incomes tripled since 1960 while numbers of doctors more than doubled. Once again, if the demand for doctors increases faster than the supply, doctor incomes increase. This is what happened. You are unable to grasp the basic economic concept of supply and demand and I am not going to waste time going over it repeatedly with you. If you do not start doing better with your comments, I will stop talking to you completely. I do not have to talk to you or persuade you of anything. Do you understand?

    Replies: @wojtek

  • As if following a pre-ordained script, the US China trade and tech war escalated to a peak last week when China launched a range of hard-hitting counter measures against the US in retaliation for its provocations, including severe restrictions on rare earth products. Predictably, Trump went into a blind rage and raised import tariff of...
  • I’ll go out on a limb here, and will make a wild and unsubstantiated claim that there is a small chance that for Trump this is all about making his family rich. Various strange US rare minerals companies are skyrocketing in valuation, even Pentagon is investing real money. Sounds like a perfect opportunity for taking money from naive investors. Perhaps even not just the naive ones.

    • Replies: @nokangaroos
    @wojtek

    Good point ...
    Orange Man´s trade proposal is essentially "give me money or I´ll shoot
    myself in the clit"; no one profits from grinding the world economy to a halt
    (as we have seen 100 years ago, when the same US tried the same snake oil) -
    no one except Bessent and his insider chawerim, that is.

    , @reb
    @wojtek

    Interesting angle. Very likely though.

  • These days the Wall Street Journal probably ranks as America's most influential and credible print outlet, so Friday morning's front-page story describing a sudden new escalation in our episodic trade war with China caught my attention. As emphasized in the first several paragraphs, the Chinese had suddenly imposed an unprecedented new wave of licensing requirements...
  • These days the Wall Street Journal probably ranks as America’s most influential and credible print outlet

    As emphasized in the first several paragraphs, the Chinese had suddenly imposed an unprecedented new wave of licensing requirements

    Only towards the bottom of the original article did the Journal writers explain that the new Chinese restrictions were in direct retaliation for similarly sweeping American export restrictions against Chinese technology companies imposed a dozen days earlier but given much less attention in our mainstream media outlets.

    A couple of obvious conclusions:

    1) The “most credible” label does not mean anything these days.

    2) More importantly, however, I think this whole scenario indicates that it is not merely Trump and his personal “limitations” (to put it delicately), who is responsible for what is going on. For the whole range of MSM to coordinate so well, both on the original American move, and then on the Chinese retaliation, it cannot simply come from the White House. Instead, Trump is clearly representing certain interests beyond his own. We already knew it for a while that he represents the warmongering zionists. Now we see that there is another equally powerful coterie out there which controls Trump and which wants a war with China.

    3) This point I could be mistaken about, but interestingly it seems to me this new coterie is not exactly the same as the standard Deep State, which we got used to by now.

    4) If, however, I am not entirely incorrect about #3, then it becomes quite clear that Trump is essentially monetizing his presidency for personal gains, with various strange investment vehicles, like say the crypto companies, serving as money laundering mechanisms for the whole operation.

    • Agree: Annacath
    • Troll: VinnyVette
  • The twenty-fourth anniversary of the 9/11 Attacks passed with virtually no media attention this year, and that hardly surprised me. However, I did discuss it to a limited extent in my own article last week, and in a couple of paragraphs I briefly summarized the enormous historic impact of those 2001 terrorist attacks: During the...
  • @Emil Nikola Richard
    @wojtek


    So regarding your claim that “This is a huge story and it’s still getting momentum”, I have serious doubts.
     
    serious doubts

    Excellent. The way to frame this is a probability tree. Mathematics is indubitable and that's about all.

    Replies: @wojtek, @wojtek

    Just for the record:
    – episode 2 on utube – 2 weeks – 1.3M views
    – episode 3 on utube – 1 week – 7ooK views – his recent show on UFOs got more views in 2 days.

  • @Patrick McNally
    @wojtek

    If terrorists were regularly flying planes into buildings, there would be no need to wonder about experiments. Because it rarely happens, we have little data about how a building is expected to respond in such an incident. That's the only reason anyone would ever wonder about how to experiment on something like this. It's always easier if the type of incident is occurring frequently in the natural world. Such is the case with car-crashes.

    Replies: @wojtek

    As I wrote earlier – you are still confusing an experiment with an accident. The essence of an experiment is NOT its frequency. It is its controlled nature.

  • Earlier this year, I wrote about the prestigious Nature magazine’s 2024 Nature Index ranking of global research institutions based on the quantity and impact of their research output in high end science journals. ( ) Chinese research institutes and universities were prominently featured in the 2024 results. Recently, the latest Nature Index came out, reaffirming...
  • @tamo
    @wojtek

    My MENTAL patient is getting worse by the minute.
    A really interesting case – tell him a tiny bit of truth and you get a total collapse.

    The ugly kid must be one of those little MULATTO bastards, the result of happy union of a HONKIE whore and a BLACK pimp and the BLACK pimp ran away and was raised terribly by the stupid middle school dropout HONKIE whore and now this lttle half-breed bastard can’t function in the RACIST American HONKIE culture. That little MULATTO bastard is your own nephew,LOL !!!

    Replies: @wojtek

    Chink snowflake in action again 🙂
    What a meltdown.
    I’m curious what will happen when someone tells him that big chunk of that research is stolen.

    • Replies: @tamo
    @wojtek

    You are an ignorant MAGA Honkie who doesn't know much about China. According to The Dawn of Innovation by Charles R. Morris, the 19th century American textile industry was almost entirely set up with STOLEN British technology.

    Also before the Industrial Revolution Europe STOLE and or copied a lot of Chinese technologies.

  • @Deep Thought
    @wojtek


    I do know communism first hand. And the simple fact is that the communism is what the communists want it to be.
     
    REALLY?!

    Do you know that communism, like capitalism, are mental diseases that the whites created in order to destroy their own societies so that the earth can be returned to the meek who truly own it?

    From Google:

    The phrase "the meek will inherit the earth" means that those with power under control—who are humble, teachable, and not arrogant—will ultimately be the ones to receive God's promises, which can be a spiritual inheritance and a peaceful, prosperous existence. It does not mean that the meek are weak or will rule over others, but that their strength is channeled through gentleness, self-control, and submission to divine will.
     

    Replies: @wojtek

    Do you know that communism, like capitalism, are mental diseases that the whites created in order to destroy their own societies so that the earth can be returned to the meek who truly own it?

    Not a deep thought at all.

    “the meek will inherit the earth” means that those with power under control—who are humble, teachable, and not arrogant

    So that’s certainly not the Chinese then. Sounds more like Polish 🙂

    BTW, was it Google or Google AI? 🙂

    • Replies: @Deep Thought
    @wojtek


    Not a deep thought at all
     
    No need. Everyone can see that-- except wooden poles.

    Sounds more like Polish
     
    More like Africans and Muslims, who are already in much of Western Europe and pushing east. The poles are onlt good at under other powers' control-- Germans, Russians and now the Amelikans... :-D
  • @showmethereal
    @wojtek

    Ok - I got it... You couldn't afford that "communist" car in the video. Poor guy.

    Replies: @wojtek

    You’re confusing 40 years in (mostly Western, transferred to China) technological development with something entirely different.

    • Replies: @showmethereal
    @wojtek

    I already noted the tenets of communism - which centers on “commune”. You don’t even get there is a difference between socialism and communism. China now styles itself as “socialism with Chinese characteristics”. Which basically means a socialism mixed with trade and commerce (which is China’s history). China is less socialist than some European states even. France is more socialist than China. The government does NOT give everything free in China in exchange for Chinese all working for the government and giving away individual means of gain. That is communism. China gave that up over 40 years ago. That is why a private sector - publicly traded (their stock price is up this year) company like Nio can build a car like the ET9 competing with the Mercedes S Class - which you cannot afford to buy. Personally I prefer the S Class styling and interior - but the tech in the Nio beats the Mercedes. A car like that isn’t produced in communism. Yugo and Lada produced mainstream cars. Even Volkswagen - the people’s car - was a national socialist vehicle. Nio is not even socialist. It’s a luxury and tech brand. Educate yourself

  • For all the media hand-wringing over the government shutdown the fact is only approximately 750,000 of the over two million non-military federal workers are being furloughed. Most federal programs will continue operating, including the major entitlement and welfare programs. The national parks will remain open, if understaffed and with closed visitor centers. Unfortunately, the shutdown...
  • @Mark G.
    @wojtek

    "Truth Denier has been wrong on every substantive issue in recent years."

    Oh, I wouldn't say that. Him and me disagree on some issues but I do not want to get in fights with a fellow Ron Paul admirer so I avoid long heated arguments with him. On a number of issues, I agree with him.

    I come here to read Ron Paul's columns and talk about his views with fellow Ron Paul admirers in the comment section. Unfortunately, it appears there are not many commenters here who understand his views and agree with them. Because of this, I may eventually decide to cut back on commenting here or just mostly ignore the commenters here who dislike Ron Paul and his beliefs. I do not want to only spend time getting into endless arguments with others.

    Replies: @wojtek

    What is the point of discussing things with other admirers? Nothing constructive can come out of this. You do need to confront your ideas with people who might disagree. And I don’t mean those who totally critique everything. But in my opinion one of the biggest problems of libertarians is the fact that many of them are ideologists and avoid contact with real world problems. Even Catholic church, as principled as it is, can adjust, occasionally 🙂

    • Replies: @Mark G.
    @wojtek

    "What is the point of discussing things with other admirers?"

    It lets them know they are not alone in the world in their beliefs. We can also discuss the best strategies to achieve our goals. This did not occur to you?

    I agree that many libertarians are ideologists who have lost contact with reality but the same is often true of their opponents. I will discuss things with opponents but I do not spend time with trolls who are condescending, engage in personal attacks or make me repeat the same thing over and over or make me state the obvious in order to waste my time. Also, if I see someone engaging in extensive obfuscation like setting up strawmen, gaslighting etc. I do not waste my time by continuing with them.

    Replies: @wojtek

    , @Truth Vigilante
    @wojtek

    The dumb Pole Woy-chek writes:


    But in my opinion one of the biggest problems of libertarians is the fact that many of them are ideologists and avoid contact with real world problems.
     
    Only an ignorant retard devoid of Dr Ron Paul's historical track record over the last few decades would say such a demonstrably false thing.

    The fact is, when one talks about libertarianism, one must acknowledge that Dr Ron Paul is the face of this tried and true ideology in the world today.
    In other words, you can't talk about libertarianism without simultaneously focusing on Dr Ron Paul and his application of that ideology.

    And not only has Dr Paul NOT avoided contact with real world problems (contrary to Woy-chek's scurrilously false claim), he went OUT OF HIS WAY to highlight their effects on Americans and the citizens of the world.
    At the same time Dr Paul offered realistic and workable REAL WORLD SOLUTIONS that would've ameliorated America's sickness.

    More than than, Dr Paul PREDICTED YEARS IN ADVANCE that the chicanery in the subprime mortgage market (which precipitated the 2008 GFC), would lead to systemic risk.
    No one (and I do mean NO EFF'N ONE - at least among politicians) was as assertive and vociferous as Dr Paul (not to mention being years in advance with his prediction) in relation to the looming crisis.
    Watch the following 3 min video and educate yourself:
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ojgBODMioLo


    Summary: Whether it was a solution to tackle inflation and erosion of purchasing power (the solution was Sound Money, Ending the Fed and a return to the Gold Standard - coupled to reining in Big Gubmint), or fixing the economy and a cessation of America's murderous foreign policy (elimination of entire Federal departments, massive cuts in military expenditure, closure of all of America's over 900 bases in 130 countries and bringing all the troops home), Dr Ron Paul HAD ALL THE ANSWERS.
     
    That you aren't aware of these things is proof that you rely on the ZOG owned western MSM for all your information - hence the reason you're a Know Nothing Nitwit.

    Oh, and did I mention, Ron Paul is the ONLY Presidential candidate EVER (to the best of my knowledge), to openly run on the pledge that, should he be elected, he'd reduce U.S taxpayer largesse to the Apartheid Israeli state to ZERO.
    That's right - NOT A SINGLE EFF'N PENNY FROM AMERICA to subsidise the mass murder of Palestinians.


    Dr Ron Paul was a politician with REAL GUTS. No one in the post JFK era had even small fraction of the intestinal fortitude that Dr Ron Paul had in relation to tackling the big issues.

    There is no other politician that Malignant International Jewry feared more in the last 60 years.
    That's why the small hats went out of their way to cheat Ron Paul out of the GOP nomination in the 2012 primaries.
     

    The Talmudic misfits viewed Dr Paul as an existential threat - hence the reason they sabotaged his Presidential bid.

    UR readers, I'll leave you with this 1 min gem from Ron Paul's 2012 Presidential campaign:
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VlYG6vh2T-M

    Replies: @wojtek

  • @Mark G.
    @wojtek

    "inflation since 1960 was 1000%"

    I already told you the tripling of doctors incomes since 1960 is adjusted for inflation. Please do not waste my time by making me repeat myself.

    The concept of supply and demand is not complicated. If demand goes up and supply does not increase to meet demand then prices rise. This has been the case since the sixties. The number of doctors has increased in recent years. Doctors incomes would drop if demand remained the same but it has not. There has been a big increase in demand because of the large Boomer generation reaching old age.

    Saying I want unlicensed doctors is not true. I want more licensed doctors. The corrupt medical profession has been bribing corrupt politicians with their political donations to keep the supply of doctors restricted. We need more medical schools graduating more doctors.

    We also need to look at reducing demand. The large number of illegal immigrants are driving up medical costs since in many states hospital emergency rooms are legally required to treat them so we need to reduce immigration. We need to change liability laws to reduce the need for defensive medicine and unneeded medical tests. In some cases, we need to have people pay a larger percentage of their medical costs since free or almost free medical care increases demand. We need to encourage people to eat better diets and lose weight to reduce obesity related diseases. We need to decide if we want to do things like spend a hundred thousand dollars to keep a ninety year old alive another month. High doctor incomes result from both restricting supply and increasing demand.

    Replies: @wojtek

    Mark, so your claim is that physician incomes rose 30-fold since 1960? I don’t think that claim holds water.

    But more importantly, your simplistically naive supply-demand theory does not apply here. And your own claims are the proof. The number of providers in the US per 100,000 residents increased 3-fold from 1960 to 2025. If you believe your own claim of 3-fold increase in revenue (adjusted for inflation), well, you have answered your own question: more doctors means higher costs.

    Now, of course you are not the first to do so. There is a great deal of research that has been done, going as far back as early 1970s, demonstrating that the increase in the ratio of doctors per population, only leads to fee increases and increased doctor revenues.

    Whatever the causes of the strong dislike you demonstrate here for the physician community (and I’m sure it’s well deserved), if you want to have a reasonable discussion, you need to be able to put these personal feelings aside, and to look at the facts objectively.

    For example – although I would agree with most of your claims you made in the last paragraph, there is one that I am not so sure about. Namely that reducing demand will lower costs. It is again one of those naively simplistic economic ideas that often fail, when applied in real life to real people.
    Think about it – fewer cases – yes, but the cases will be often more advanced, more difficult, more life threatening, so there is no reason why costs should be lower.

    • Replies: @Mark G.
    @wojtek

    "I don't think that claim holds water."

    https://marginalrevolution.com/marginalrevolution/2019/05/physician-and-nurse-incomes-have-increased-tremendously.html

    You have not provided information that doctor incomes have stayed the same adjusted for inflation.

    "The number of providers increased three fold"

    No, that is not what I said. Doctors incomes increased three fold, not the number of doctors. The numbers of doctors has increased but has not increased enough to keep up with increased demand, causing rising doctors incomes which is part of the explanation for rising medical costs. When doctor incomes were a third of what they are now back in 1960 doctors were of adequate quality so if we increased the number of doctors enough so that income levels drop back down to 1960 they should still be of adequate quality.

    You forced me to repeat twice that three fold increases in doctor incomes are incomes adjusted for inflation. You just incorrectly stated that I think the number of doctors increased three fold, forcing me to spend time correcting it. You did that because you did not make an attempt to understand what I am saying or on purpose to make me waste time correcting you. In either case being true, I see little reason to continue this. I do not want to spend large amounts of my time getting someone to correctly understand what I just said or to let someone waste my time by forcing me to repeat the same thing multiple times.

    Replies: @wojtek

  • Earlier this year, I wrote about the prestigious Nature magazine’s 2024 Nature Index ranking of global research institutions based on the quantity and impact of their research output in high end science journals. ( ) Chinese research institutes and universities were prominently featured in the 2024 results. Recently, the latest Nature Index came out, reaffirming...
  • @tamo
    @wojtek

    It’s DOUBLY fun to watch your TOTAL mental collapse, boy.Or should it be a MALFUNCTIONING stupid MAGA bot? LOL !!!!

    Replies: @wojtek

    Our mental patient is getting worse by the minute 🙂
    A really interesting case – tell her/him a tiny bit of truth and you get a total collapse. Must be one of those single chink kids, with no siblings. Mommy and daddy spoiled rotten and nobody ever said no to little bastard, and now can’t function in the normal Western culture 🙂

    • Replies: @tamo
    @wojtek

    My MENTAL patient is getting worse by the minute.
    A really interesting case – tell him a tiny bit of truth and you get a total collapse.

    The ugly kid must be one of those little MULATTO bastards, the result of happy union of a HONKIE whore and a BLACK pimp and the BLACK pimp ran away and was raised terribly by the stupid middle school dropout HONKIE whore and now this lttle half-breed bastard can’t function in the RACIST American HONKIE culture. That little MULATTO bastard is your own nephew,LOL !!!

    Replies: @wojtek

  • For all the media hand-wringing over the government shutdown the fact is only approximately 750,000 of the over two million non-military federal workers are being furloughed. Most federal programs will continue operating, including the major entitlement and welfare programs. The national parks will remain open, if understaffed and with closed visitor centers. Unfortunately, the shutdown...
  • @Truth Vigilante
    @Mark G.

    Mark, you should take heart from the fact that Joker is siding with the dumb Pole Woy-chek (refer to former's juvenile comment # 35).

    The fact of the matter is that the foaming-at-the-mouth warmongering neocon Joker (like his hero John McCain), has never encountered a war that he didn't want America to immediately engage in full force - and thereby squander blood and treasure.

    Joker has been wrong on every substantive issue in recent years.
    He's just a perennial loser and resident contrarian indicator.

    Simply put, if Joker opposes you on any matter, you can be certain that your line of reasoning is rock solid.

    Replies: @Jokem, @wojtek

    Mark, you should be really concerned by the fact that Truth Denier is siding with you (refer to his juvenile comments # 15, 21, 28, 38 … well, all of them).

    The fact of the matter is that the foaming-at-the-mouth neonazi Truth Denier (like his hero Adolf Hitler), has never encountered a problem that he didn’t screw up way worse.

    Truth Denier has been wrong on every substantive issue in recent years.
    He’s just a perennial loser and resident contrarian indicator.

    Simply put, if Truth Denier supports you on any matter, you can be certain that your line of reasoning is completely wrong.

    • Replies: @Mark G.
    @wojtek

    "Truth Denier has been wrong on every substantive issue in recent years."

    Oh, I wouldn't say that. Him and me disagree on some issues but I do not want to get in fights with a fellow Ron Paul admirer so I avoid long heated arguments with him. On a number of issues, I agree with him.

    I come here to read Ron Paul's columns and talk about his views with fellow Ron Paul admirers in the comment section. Unfortunately, it appears there are not many commenters here who understand his views and agree with them. Because of this, I may eventually decide to cut back on commenting here or just mostly ignore the commenters here who dislike Ron Paul and his beliefs. I do not want to only spend time getting into endless arguments with others.

    Replies: @wojtek

  • Earlier this year, I wrote about the prestigious Nature magazine’s 2024 Nature Index ranking of global research institutions based on the quantity and impact of their research output in high end science journals. ( ) Chinese research institutes and universities were prominently featured in the 2024 results. Recently, the latest Nature Index came out, reaffirming...
  • @showmethereal
    @wojtek

    So you don't even have a clue what communism means. They don't even really have communal farming in China anymore. You look at words rather than action. Communism doesn't allow for personal wealth such as business or homeownership or investment portfolios.... So again - you are clueless as to what a communist society is. China isn't one. Yes they are ruled by the communist party - but it's not the same. Even religion exists again in China. You people are fools. You are talking about Marxism and Chinese companies are building cars to compete against European luxury cars - bought by private Chinese citizens. You are clueless... I will let an American explain it to you... Can you afford this car???

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EnztTS8rbFM&t=58s

    Replies: @wojtek

    So you don’t even have a clue what communism means.

    Unfortunately – as I indicated above – I do know communism first hand. And the simple fact is that the communism is what the communists want it to be. So in reality communism can mean different things. At one moment it can mean a bunch crazed murderous thugs running amok, next it can be just stupid boring propaganda and shortages of everything, and then it can be a system, where the party still controls everything, but supply-demand improves to a level where a larger portion of the population is no longer hungry. We went through these phases, to a degree, as well.

    So, you can stop your silly propaganda – it may work on dumb Americans, but not on people who do know what communism is.

    China, son, is a communist country, despite all your protestations.
    In fact, the more you protest the more you prove my point.

    • Agree: craicaassmofo
    • LOL: tamo
    • Replies: @showmethereal
    @wojtek

    Ok - I got it... You couldn't afford that "communist" car in the video. Poor guy.

    Replies: @wojtek

    , @Deep Thought
    @wojtek


    I do know communism first hand. And the simple fact is that the communism is what the communists want it to be.
     
    REALLY?!

    Do you know that communism, like capitalism, are mental diseases that the whites created in order to destroy their own societies so that the earth can be returned to the meek who truly own it?

    From Google:

    The phrase "the meek will inherit the earth" means that those with power under control—who are humble, teachable, and not arrogant—will ultimately be the ones to receive God's promises, which can be a spiritual inheritance and a peaceful, prosperous existence. It does not mean that the meek are weak or will rule over others, but that their strength is channeled through gentleness, self-control, and submission to divine will.
     

    Replies: @wojtek

  • @tamo
    @wojtek

    Hey whinning STUPID, you CAN'T even copy-paste properly

    It’s:

    More whining from a moronic MAGA- BOT !!!.

    Can you do anything correctly?

    Besides your stupid MAGA whining, of course NOT, lol !!!

    Replies: @wojtek

    It’s fun to watch your mental collapse, boy. Or should it be bot? 🙂

    • Replies: @tamo
    @wojtek

    It’s DOUBLY fun to watch your TOTAL mental collapse, boy.Or should it be a MALFUNCTIONING stupid MAGA bot? LOL !!!!

    Replies: @wojtek

  • For all the media hand-wringing over the government shutdown the fact is only approximately 750,000 of the over two million non-military federal workers are being furloughed. Most federal programs will continue operating, including the major entitlement and welfare programs. The national parks will remain open, if understaffed and with closed visitor centers. Unfortunately, the shutdown...
  • @Mark G.
    @wojtek

    No, I am not looking in the wrong place. Once again, the medical profession has not been giving politicians donations for no reason. The money given is at least partly to keep the supply of doctors restricted . Doctors incomes have tripled since 1960. Just the law of supply and demand tells anyone who understands it that the supply of doctors is not keeping up with the demand. The growth in incomes in recent years has slowed, indicating doctor numbers have started to rise already but have not increased enough since incomes are much higher than the past.

    Also, I believe I have already said there are multiple reasons why medical costs are rising. You seem to be under a mistaken impression I am arguing rising doctors incomes are the only cause for rising medical costs. I am not.

    Replies: @Truth Vigilante, @wojtek

    Mark, I can only comment about what you write. And so far every single thing you wrote was about how we need to allow unlicensed doctors and how that will make healthcare cheaper. (I’m paraphrasing a little – but only a little.)

    At the same time you are ignoring the reality in which, in the past 15 years, US added something like 230K doctors and 260K nurse practitioners. Overall, it’s a 50% increase of the overall number of providers in merely 15 years. And their salaries on average grew over 30% over the past 9-10 years. (I couldn’t find reliable data for 15 years ago.)

    So 50% increase and their (already very high) salaries keep up with inflation. Meaning nothing drops.

    At the same time you make claims that “Doctors incomes have tripled since 1960”. Mark, inflation since 1960 was 1000%. So a 10-fold increase. Something doesn’t add up in your claims.

    I think you need to look at the data and think again about your ideas.

    • Replies: @Mark G.
    @wojtek

    "inflation since 1960 was 1000%"

    I already told you the tripling of doctors incomes since 1960 is adjusted for inflation. Please do not waste my time by making me repeat myself.

    The concept of supply and demand is not complicated. If demand goes up and supply does not increase to meet demand then prices rise. This has been the case since the sixties. The number of doctors has increased in recent years. Doctors incomes would drop if demand remained the same but it has not. There has been a big increase in demand because of the large Boomer generation reaching old age.

    Saying I want unlicensed doctors is not true. I want more licensed doctors. The corrupt medical profession has been bribing corrupt politicians with their political donations to keep the supply of doctors restricted. We need more medical schools graduating more doctors.

    We also need to look at reducing demand. The large number of illegal immigrants are driving up medical costs since in many states hospital emergency rooms are legally required to treat them so we need to reduce immigration. We need to change liability laws to reduce the need for defensive medicine and unneeded medical tests. In some cases, we need to have people pay a larger percentage of their medical costs since free or almost free medical care increases demand. We need to encourage people to eat better diets and lose weight to reduce obesity related diseases. We need to decide if we want to do things like spend a hundred thousand dollars to keep a ninety year old alive another month. High doctor incomes result from both restricting supply and increasing demand.

    Replies: @wojtek

  • Earlier this year, I wrote about the prestigious Nature magazine’s 2024 Nature Index ranking of global research institutions based on the quantity and impact of their research output in high end science journals. ( ) Chinese research institutes and universities were prominently featured in the 2024 results. Recently, the latest Nature Index came out, reaffirming...
  • @tamo
    @wojtek

    More whining from a moronic MAGA-BOT
    I’m shocked. Shocked I am. lol!!!

    Seems like a typical KNOW-NOTHING idiotic MAGA play: put a little different light on his/her ridiculous posts about science and we get to see the real IDIOTIC troll , lol !!!

    Have you realized by now why I said you are a complete STUPID? lol !!!

    Replies: @wojtek

    Man, you can’t even copy-paste properly 🙂

    It’s:

    More whining from a mental commie-boi.

    Can you do anything correctly?

    Besides your commie whining, of course 🙂

    • Replies: @tamo
    @wojtek

    Hey whinning STUPID, you CAN'T even copy-paste properly

    It’s:

    More whining from a moronic MAGA- BOT !!!.

    Can you do anything correctly?

    Besides your stupid MAGA whining, of course NOT, lol !!!

    Replies: @wojtek

  • For all the media hand-wringing over the government shutdown the fact is only approximately 750,000 of the over two million non-military federal workers are being furloughed. Most federal programs will continue operating, including the major entitlement and welfare programs. The national parks will remain open, if understaffed and with closed visitor centers. Unfortunately, the shutdown...
  • @Mark G.
    @wojtek

    "You want unlicensed doctors to practice medicine"

    No, I want the requirements loosened a little so the number of doctors keeps up with increases in population and increases in demand for medical services that have been taking place since the government started giving free or reduced price medical care to people with programs like Medicare and Medicaid. It was shortly after those two programs were introduced in the sixties that medical costs started to rise. Over the last sixty years doctor incomes adjusted for inflation have tripled.

    Doctors do not give politicians political donations just because they like passing out free money. These are bribes to get the government to restrict competition in order to boost their incomes. You can't let doctors be the sole decision makers on how many doctors there should be because they will use that power for their own selfish ends. The voters through elected representatives need to be involved. We have a country where ordinary people are allowed to vote rather than have some self-appointed elite make all the decisions.

    Replies: @wojtek

    The 2024 physician census conducted by the Federation of State Medical Boards (FSMB) documents a total of 1,082,187 actively licensed physicians across the United States and the District of Columbia, marking a 27% growth since 2010.”

    Mark, nearly 1.1M licensed doctors. Add to this over 400K licensed nurse practitioners. Since 2010, circa 300% increase in nurse practitioners.

    Clearly the requirements already have been loosened more than just a little in the past 10-15 years.
    And no effect on costs.

    I would say this means you are looking in the wrong place.

    • Replies: @Mark G.
    @wojtek

    No, I am not looking in the wrong place. Once again, the medical profession has not been giving politicians donations for no reason. The money given is at least partly to keep the supply of doctors restricted . Doctors incomes have tripled since 1960. Just the law of supply and demand tells anyone who understands it that the supply of doctors is not keeping up with the demand. The growth in incomes in recent years has slowed, indicating doctor numbers have started to rise already but have not increased enough since incomes are much higher than the past.

    Also, I believe I have already said there are multiple reasons why medical costs are rising. You seem to be under a mistaken impression I am arguing rising doctors incomes are the only cause for rising medical costs. I am not.

    Replies: @Truth Vigilante, @wojtek

  • The twenty-fourth anniversary of the 9/11 Attacks passed with virtually no media attention this year, and that hardly surprised me. However, I did discuss it to a limited extent in my own article last week, and in a couple of paragraphs I briefly summarized the enormous historic impact of those 2001 terrorist attacks: During the...
  • @Patrick McNally
    @wojtek

    Car-crashes happen all the time, so we actually have a lot of data about that. Anyone who thought they might wish to review data about car-crashes when making a new design would have no difficulty making a study of car-crashes. When we're dealing with things like skyscrapers or space shuttles, there's always a sense of lacking experimental data.

    Replies: @wojtek

    P.M., you confusing an accident with an experiment explains a lot. Not sure if everything, but a lot.

    • Replies: @Patrick McNally
    @wojtek

    If terrorists were regularly flying planes into buildings, there would be no need to wonder about experiments. Because it rarely happens, we have little data about how a building is expected to respond in such an incident. That's the only reason anyone would ever wonder about how to experiment on something like this. It's always easier if the type of incident is occurring frequently in the natural world. Such is the case with car-crashes.

    Replies: @wojtek

  • Earlier this year, I wrote about the prestigious Nature magazine’s 2024 Nature Index ranking of global research institutions based on the quantity and impact of their research output in high end science journals. ( ) Chinese research institutes and universities were prominently featured in the 2024 results. Recently, the latest Nature Index came out, reaffirming...
  • @tamo
    @wojtek

    Hey stupid, I don't give a damn about communism or CCP. You are nothing but a one-track minded low-iq MAGA simpleton who thinks anybody who doesn't agree with you must be a commie. LOL !!!

    Replies: @wojtek

    More whining from a mental commie-boi.
    I’m shocked. Shocked I am. 🙂

    Seems like a typical commie play: put a little different light on his/her ridiculous posts about science and we get to see the real troll 🙂

    Have you realized by now why I said you are a complete moron? 🙂

    • Replies: @tamo
    @wojtek

    More whining from a moronic MAGA-BOT
    I’m shocked. Shocked I am. lol!!!

    Seems like a typical KNOW-NOTHING idiotic MAGA play: put a little different light on his/her ridiculous posts about science and we get to see the real IDIOTIC troll , lol !!!

    Have you realized by now why I said you are a complete STUPID? lol !!!

    Replies: @wojtek

  • @showmethereal
    @wojtek

    Anyone who considers China to still be a communist country is obviously clueless and shouldn’t lecture anyone about understanding concepts. It’s only been over 40 years now

    Replies: @wojtek

    You need to catch up with reality. Here’s a quote for you, written by Chinese researchers.

    In terms of its academic status, Marxism is the most important and unique research field in contemporary Chinese humanities and social sciences.”

    QED

    • Replies: @showmethereal
    @wojtek

    So you don't even have a clue what communism means. They don't even really have communal farming in China anymore. You look at words rather than action. Communism doesn't allow for personal wealth such as business or homeownership or investment portfolios.... So again - you are clueless as to what a communist society is. China isn't one. Yes they are ruled by the communist party - but it's not the same. Even religion exists again in China. You people are fools. You are talking about Marxism and Chinese companies are building cars to compete against European luxury cars - bought by private Chinese citizens. You are clueless... I will let an American explain it to you... Can you afford this car???

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EnztTS8rbFM&t=58s

    Replies: @wojtek

  • For all the media hand-wringing over the government shutdown the fact is only approximately 750,000 of the over two million non-military federal workers are being furloughed. Most federal programs will continue operating, including the major entitlement and welfare programs. The national parks will remain open, if understaffed and with closed visitor centers. Unfortunately, the shutdown...
  • @Mark G.
    @wojtek

    You don't convince the doctors to earn less. There will be no medical cartel once the federal government stops maintaining the cartel status that eliminates competition for
    the doctors. I have already said that and the problem here is not that I am stating trivialities but that you have not been able to mentally grasp what I am trying to explain to you.

    You drive prices down with competition. Many professions try to use the government to restrict competition in order to reduce the supply of what they are selling. The basic law of supply and demand is that if you reduce the supply of a good or service then price goes up.

    Government licensing can be used to restrict supply. Yes, the doctors themselves may decide who gets licenses but if an unlicensed doctor starts practicing medicine it is going to be the government that arrests him. Voters decide if the government is going to make that arrest through their elected representatives.

    Replies: @wojtek

    There will be no medical cartel once the federal government stops maintaining the cartel status that eliminates competition for the doctors.

    Mark, don’t you worry about what I can or cannot grasp. Instead worry about the claims you are making here. Especially the one above is what I was waiting for you to write. So let’s say it one more time: you are proposing to allow competition for doctors in healthcare.

    Do you even understand what you are suggesting? You want unlicensed doctors to practice medicine. This means doctors who are complete retards, b/c less than 0.5% of all medical board cases end with a doctor losing a license. It’s under 200 doctors a year – a drop, negligible, with no impact on prices. But a huge negative impact on our health.

    The other group of unlicensed doctors are immigrants, who did not pass (for whatever reason – usually language) the boards in the US.

    So your solution is to use fedbois to force the medical community to accept medical screw-ups and semi-qualified immigrants to practice medicine. Great. Do you see now how ridiculous and half-cooked your ideas are? You really are not grasping the consequences of what you are proposing.

    • Replies: @Mark G.
    @wojtek

    "You want unlicensed doctors to practice medicine"

    No, I want the requirements loosened a little so the number of doctors keeps up with increases in population and increases in demand for medical services that have been taking place since the government started giving free or reduced price medical care to people with programs like Medicare and Medicaid. It was shortly after those two programs were introduced in the sixties that medical costs started to rise. Over the last sixty years doctor incomes adjusted for inflation have tripled.

    Doctors do not give politicians political donations just because they like passing out free money. These are bribes to get the government to restrict competition in order to boost their incomes. You can't let doctors be the sole decision makers on how many doctors there should be because they will use that power for their own selfish ends. The voters through elected representatives need to be involved. We have a country where ordinary people are allowed to vote rather than have some self-appointed elite make all the decisions.

    Replies: @wojtek

    , @Jokem
    @wojtek

    Mark G is absolutely confident in his ideas.
    No amount of reason or facts can change his mind.
    He is a Troll

  • Earlier this year, I wrote about the prestigious Nature magazine’s 2024 Nature Index ranking of global research institutions based on the quantity and impact of their research output in high end science journals. ( ) Chinese research institutes and universities were prominently featured in the 2024 results. Recently, the latest Nature Index came out, reaffirming...
  • @tamo
    @wojtek

    You said "I personally do understand that in communist countries there is this tendency to confuse quantity with quality, but generally speaking these are two different .

    Hey fukhead, I don't like your condescending attitude. I'm NOT either communist OR Chinese.
    You assume automatically that a pro -Chinese person is a cominist, if he does not agree with you.

    You said "Do yourself a favor and don’t mix two different notions: the article above was not about ethnicity of researchers, but about institutions. And by proxy, it measured national “strength” in research as a reflection of that of the national institutions. So it has nothing to do with race, ethnicity, nationality, etc. Only geography."

    You are a lying white nationalist MF. Of course it has everything to do with RACE, ETHNICITY, NATIONALITY.

    What you did was finding OTHER sources that didn't agree with the Nature Index finding of Chinese scientific research institutions doing an excellent job.

    Therefore Nature Index CONTRADICTED your outdated white supremacy beliefs. You are the kind of a white hypocrite who would have praised the Nature Index if American and European research instititions dominated the Nature Index ranking.

    Here is an AI submary of the problems with your favorite journal Science,
    .

    The journal Science faces some notable issues.

    Publication Bias
    There is a tendency to favor POSITIVE results over NEGATIVE or NULL findings, which can SKEW the scientific literature and MISREPRESENT the state of research.

    Accessibility Issues
    As a subscription-based journal, ACESS to articles can be LIMITED, creating BARRIERS for researchers and the public who CAN NOT afford subscriptions.

    Impact Factor Pressure
    The emphasis on impact factors can lead to researchers PRIOTIZING QUANTITY ove QUALITY, potentially COMPROMISING the INTEGRITY of research published in the journal.

    So it seems to me that the findings of journal Science CAN NOT be trusted.

    Replies: @wojtek

    I don’t like your condescending attitude.

    Shrug. You should have tried to write something that makes a little more sense, instead of spewing your marxist nonsense, about quantity turning into quality.

    Nobody here cares about who you say you are, or are not.
    On a forum like this, you are represented by what you write.
    And – to put it very delicately – your commie whining does not come out good.

    What you did was finding OTHER sources that didn’t agree with the Nature Index

    🙂

    On top of being a whining commie, you’re also a complete moron 🙂
    But I doubt you can comprehend the reason 🙂

    • Replies: @tamo
    @wojtek

    Hey stupid, I don't give a damn about communism or CCP. You are nothing but a one-track minded low-iq MAGA simpleton who thinks anybody who doesn't agree with you must be a commie. LOL !!!

    Replies: @wojtek

  • For all the media hand-wringing over the government shutdown the fact is only approximately 750,000 of the over two million non-military federal workers are being furloughed. Most federal programs will continue operating, including the major entitlement and welfare programs. The national parks will remain open, if understaffed and with closed visitor centers. Unfortunately, the shutdown...
  • @Truth Vigilante
    @wojtek

    Woy-chek writes:


    And yet you’re a nazi – interesting, if you had the capacity to understand the meaning of the word and minimal knowledge of history
     
    For UR readers not familiar with the history I've had with Woy-chek, he is a dumb Pole that pollutes the WWII UR threads with his smears of the noble Germans during WWII.

    Now, in war all sides commit atrocities. No one is denying this.
    But using any metric one chooses to apply, the Anglo-Zionist empire committed BY FAR the greater atrocities in quantitative and qualitative terms.
    We know for a fact that the '6 million yids killed in gas chambers' fable is a preposterous lie.
    There is NO PROOF that a single gas chamber for killing humans existed at ANY of the German supervised work camps that were falsely labelled as extermination centres.

    But Woy-chek was indoctrinated from birth to believe that the WWII Germans were evil incarnate. No amount of verifiable evidence is going to convince him otherwise.
    Thus anyone that supports the OBVIOUS 'good guys' of WWII (ie: Hitler's Germany - who sought to unshackle the world from strangulation by the Malignant Jewish financiers), is a 'Nazi' in his eyes - even though I have made clear that I am an Anarcho-Capitalist and libertarian.

    So yes Woy-chek, I recognise that central planning and authoritarian control of the economy is NOT the way to go. And in that respect the Third Reich misallocated resources before and during the war that the private sector could've used more productively and thus improved Germany's performance in the war.


    Summary: UR readers, you should go easy on Woy-chek.
    Because he is seething with frustration just below the skin.
    He knows that Poland sided with evil in WWII. It believed the promises made by ZOG controlled FDR and Britain that they would come to its aid in the event that Germany attacked it.

    And to that end, the Anglo-Zionist filth encouraged the conscience-free Polish cowards to commit unspeakable atrocities against ethnic Germans living within Poland (tens of thousands murdered, had their eyes gouges out, raped and brutalised etc), PRIOR to September 1939.
    They did this to actually provoke a war with Germany.

    Of course hostilities with Germany could SO EASILY have been avoided.
    Hitler sought friendly relations with Poland.
    He extended all manner of magnanimous overtures to Poland right up until May/June 1939.

    But the feral Poles spat in his face. At that moment Hitler knew that negotiation with these inbred imbeciles was no longer possible, that the crimes against ethnic Germans would continue endlessly - because the Jew masters of the Polish ruling elite had decreed it
     

    .
    In a nutshell, the dumb Poles took the 30 shekels of silver on offer from the Jewish financiers and threw in their lot with the agenda of Malignant International Jewry.

    Well karma has a way of paying back greedy degenerates - with compound interest added.
    As a result Poland paid a terrible price for choosing to side with the Vampire Squid.
    And justice was served.
    Because the Poles just couldn't work up the gumption to stay on friendly terms with Germany, as Hitler sincerely desired.

    Replies: @wojtek, @Jokem, @Brad Anbro

    Our neonazi Truth Denier never fails to miss an opportunity to prove that he is a complete idiot and a functionally illiterate moron 🙂

    And, after having me totally destroy your previous vomit in this thread (I was tempted to call it an “intellectual” vomit, but we both know there was nothing intellectual about it), you now come begging for more trashing, spewing your usual nazi nonsense? Are you some sick SM nazi psycho? Must be.

    So, because it is now obvious to everyone that you have nothing to contribute to the topic at hand, you should apologize to other participants of this thread, who are forced to look at the excrements of your nazi “brain”, and get lost.

  • @Mark G.
    @wojtek

    "Your proposed solution is to bring in the government into the equation."

    The government is already in the equation since it enforces the cartel status of the medical profession. It does that because, like I already said, the medical profession donates money to politicians. All special interest groups do that and the medical profession is a special interest group.

    In a free market economy the government would not be passing out favors to special interest groups. When we had a more free market economy in the past, spending on medical care as a percentage of GDP was much lower. American life expectancy increased by 15 years between 1865 and 1915 and another 15 years between 1915 and 1965 with much lower levels of medical spending.

    Replies: @wojtek

    Mark, you are turning to stating trivialities, in order to avoid answering the basic question.

    So, let me remind you – the “special interest group” you are talking about is called doctors.

    And here’s the question:

    how do you imagine to convince these big shot doctors, who run the medical cartel in the US, to earn less and spread the wealth more?

    • Replies: @Mark G.
    @wojtek

    You don't convince the doctors to earn less. There will be no medical cartel once the federal government stops maintaining the cartel status that eliminates competition for
    the doctors. I have already said that and the problem here is not that I am stating trivialities but that you have not been able to mentally grasp what I am trying to explain to you.

    You drive prices down with competition. Many professions try to use the government to restrict competition in order to reduce the supply of what they are selling. The basic law of supply and demand is that if you reduce the supply of a good or service then price goes up.

    Government licensing can be used to restrict supply. Yes, the doctors themselves may decide who gets licenses but if an unlicensed doctor starts practicing medicine it is going to be the government that arrests him. Voters decide if the government is going to make that arrest through their elected representatives.

    Replies: @wojtek

  • Earlier this year, I wrote about the prestigious Nature magazine’s 2024 Nature Index ranking of global research institutions based on the quantity and impact of their research output in high end science journals. ( ) Chinese research institutes and universities were prominently featured in the 2024 results. Recently, the latest Nature Index came out, reaffirming...
  • @Vidi
    @wojtek


    Unfortunately for me it is not my ranking, it is the same Nature Index effort as described in the article.
     
    And I notice that you are still not showing us a link that shows the university rankings and describes how they were calculated.

    Your unfounded personal opinions really don’t matter much here.
     
    You are still lying that my opinion was unfounded; as I said (link), "I showed evidence to demonstrate that the printing press arose first in the Middle Kingdom, centuries before Gutenberg was born, and then was propagated to Central Asia, Middle East, and Europe." (Link and link to copius evidence.)

    In contrast, we had only your word, no evidence at all, that Gutenberg made an independent invention of the printing press.

    Most people would say that my position was founded far better than yours.

    Replies: @wojtek

    And I notice that you are still not showing us a link that shows the university rankings and describes how they were calculated.

    No, I am not going to show you the link.
    As I already wrote before:

    “You’ll have to learn to live with that.
    Alternatively you can use the link in the article above.
    It is the same Nature Index database. ”

    It does require a certain minimal level of IQ (not very high) to realize that, which you seem to lack. But it’s your problem not mine.

    You are still lying that my opinion was unfounded

    You just disproved your own statement immediately: “I showed evidence to demonstrate that the printing press arose first in the Middle Kingdom, centuries before Gutenberg was born, and then was propagated to Central Asia, Middle East, and Europe.”

    Again, it does require a certain minimal level of IQ to realize that what you have written never even came close to address my point that:

    “Gutenberg’s invention was his own and independent. A true invention. The fact that he may have reinvented something already known at that time in China is irrelevant, as he was not in any way influenced by the existing solutions, which he simply had no knowledge of. ”

    Until you show a proof that Gutenberg had knowledge of Chinese printing presses, you showed nothing.

    Again – don’t fight with facts Vidi, because unlike for Cesar, for you it’s always: veni, Vidi, victus 🙂

    • Replies: @Vidi
    @wojtek


    No, I am not going to show you the link.
     
    In other words, you don't have a link to back up your alternate list of top universities. People will judge whether you are lying.
  • For all the media hand-wringing over the government shutdown the fact is only approximately 750,000 of the over two million non-military federal workers are being furloughed. Most federal programs will continue operating, including the major entitlement and welfare programs. The national parks will remain open, if understaffed and with closed visitor centers. Unfortunately, the shutdown...
  • @Mark G.
    @wojtek

    "the government has ceded the right to control med schools to them"

    Yes, but if someone challenges that right by opening a med school not approved by the medical cartel it is the government that will use force to shut the unapproved med school down.

    The medical profession is a special interest group that influences the decisions of the government with political donations to politicians. It can also give jobs to former politicians or bureaucrats as a reward for having done what the medical profession wants.

    The way to counter this is through the political process. For example, doctors donated much more money to Harris than Trump in the last election. It did not matter because voters wanted reforms. Trump saw how popular reformers like RFK Jr. were with the voters, managed to get their endorsements and won. The doctors do not always get their way if the voters do not want that.

    Replies: @wojtek

    The way to counter this is through the political process.

    So, simply speaking, your proposed solution is to bring in the government into the equation.
    OK, that’s what many countries do. The difference is, these other countries have usually a completely different legal system. In the British (and hence American) system, these once given rights to a profession to self-rule are very difficult to be taken away. I simply do not see a possibility for SCOTUS to grant any group that does not consist of recognized doctors, the right to create new med schools. This is not going to happen. Period.

    So what you would need would be a significant new organization of doctors, who would want to earn LESS money. You will not be able to escape from this basic question.

    • Replies: @Mark G.
    @wojtek

    "Your proposed solution is to bring in the government into the equation."

    The government is already in the equation since it enforces the cartel status of the medical profession. It does that because, like I already said, the medical profession donates money to politicians. All special interest groups do that and the medical profession is a special interest group.

    In a free market economy the government would not be passing out favors to special interest groups. When we had a more free market economy in the past, spending on medical care as a percentage of GDP was much lower. American life expectancy increased by 15 years between 1865 and 1915 and another 15 years between 1915 and 1965 with much lower levels of medical spending.

    Replies: @wojtek

  • Earlier this year, I wrote about the prestigious Nature magazine’s 2024 Nature Index ranking of global research institutions based on the quantity and impact of their research output in high end science journals. ( ) Chinese research institutes and universities were prominently featured in the 2024 results. Recently, the latest Nature Index came out, reaffirming...
  • @Vidi
    @wojtek

    In my previous post I forgot to respond to the following:


    [Wojtek's rankings of the top universities] correlates much better with the main prizes, such as Nobel...
     
    That is not surprising, as most Nobel committee members probably can't read Chinese.

    ...and proves that accusations of political bias are rather baseless.
     
    It does nothing of the sort.

    I don't expect much from someone who has been caught lying (link), but I will give you another chance.

    Replies: @wojtek, @showmethereal

    [Wojtek’s rankings of the top universities] correlates much better with the main prizes, such as Nobel…

    You are too kind.
    Unfortunately for me it is not my ranking, it is the same Nature Index effort as described in the article.

    most Nobel committee members probably can’t read Chinese.

    They don’t need to – I can assure you that most important discoveries are published in English. Including those for Chinese researchers.

    It does nothing of the sort. I don’t expect much from someone who has been caught lying

    Your unfounded personal opinions really don’t matter much here. Including your opinion that Gutenberg “stole” his idea from the Chinese 🙂 They just make your current claims look even more ridiculous and immature (as impossible as it sounds in view of your production here).

    • Replies: @Vidi
    @wojtek


    Unfortunately for me it is not my ranking, it is the same Nature Index effort as described in the article.
     
    And I notice that you are still not showing us a link that shows the university rankings and describes how they were calculated.

    Your unfounded personal opinions really don’t matter much here.
     
    You are still lying that my opinion was unfounded; as I said (link), "I showed evidence to demonstrate that the printing press arose first in the Middle Kingdom, centuries before Gutenberg was born, and then was propagated to Central Asia, Middle East, and Europe." (Link and link to copius evidence.)

    In contrast, we had only your word, no evidence at all, that Gutenberg made an independent invention of the printing press.

    Most people would say that my position was founded far better than yours.

    Replies: @wojtek

  • @Vidi
    @wojtek


    Institution scores [in the Nature index] are not normalized for their size.
     
    In other words, an institution with 50,000 researchers has an advantage over one a tenth the size, and that according to you is unfair. In my opinion, that is not unfair if we want to estimate the institution -- or country -- that is likely to produce more breakthoughs.

    Later you presented a list of your top universities. Were the rankings on that list "normalized" the way you preferred? (I notice that you did not provide a link.)

    Replies: @nokangaroos, @wojtek

    that according to you is unfair

    I did not say it is unfair. I said it creates bias. Two completely different things. But I can see how you could confuse them.

    that is not unfair if we want to estimate the institution — or country

    You are correct about institution, and yet you are wrong about country.

    Later you presented a list of your top universities.

    Wrong. It is not my list. It is the same Nature Index, but using only top 2 publications, Nature and Science.

    (I notice that you did not provide a link.)

    No, I didn’t. You’ll have to learn to live with that.
    Alternatively you can use the link in the article above.
    It is the same Nature Index database.

  • @tamo
    @wojtek

    You can do me a favor. Find out how many ethnic Chinese STEM researchers are doing researches for such American universities as Harvard,Stanford, MIT, CalTech, UCSF,UC San Diego.etc, for the benefit of the U.S. It may tell you a different story.

    According to to THE POLITICS OF EXCELLENCE : Behind The Nobel Prize In Science, written by Robert Marc Freidman who RESEARCHED for about 20 years for the book,

    the author reveals that the Nobel Prize in SCIENCE is NEITHER above the politics NOR the personal agendas or prejudices of the Nobel Prize Nominating Committee members

    As the result of this kind of UNPROFESSIONAL behavior by the committee members, very often NOT the best physicists or chemists get the Nobel Prize in SCIENCE.

    I think the author who SPENT 20 years reseraching for this book, make a very CREDIBLE case against the Nobel Prize Nominating Committee.

    Anyway, Nobel Prizes are LAGGING indicator rewarding scientists for what they accomplished 20 or 30 years ago.

    Replies: @wojtek

    Do yourself a favor and don’t mix two different notions: the article above was not about ethnicity of researchers, but about institutions. And by proxy, it measured national “strength” in research as a reflection of that of the national institutions. So it has nothing to do with race, ethnicity, nationality, etc. Only geography.

    Second favor you can do for yourself is to look at the 2 most important journals, instead of the nearly 150 ones which were selected by Springer (owner of Nature), and which are heavily biased towards Springer owned publications.

    Science and Nature are great indicators when it comes to measure Nobel-level impact. And the story these 2 publications tell is very very different from the mass of 150 journals. Lagging is not an issue here. And in fact Nature offers a double-blind review as an option, if you’re worried they might be biased against you. (Although indeed that is not true for Science.)

    I personally do understand that in communist countries there is this tendency to confuse quantity with quality, but generally speaking these are two different things.

    • Replies: @tamo
    @wojtek

    You said "I personally do understand that in communist countries there is this tendency to confuse quantity with quality, but generally speaking these are two different .

    Hey fukhead, I don't like your condescending attitude. I'm NOT either communist OR Chinese.
    You assume automatically that a pro -Chinese person is a cominist, if he does not agree with you.

    You said "Do yourself a favor and don’t mix two different notions: the article above was not about ethnicity of researchers, but about institutions. And by proxy, it measured national “strength” in research as a reflection of that of the national institutions. So it has nothing to do with race, ethnicity, nationality, etc. Only geography."

    You are a lying white nationalist MF. Of course it has everything to do with RACE, ETHNICITY, NATIONALITY.

    What you did was finding OTHER sources that didn't agree with the Nature Index finding of Chinese scientific research institutions doing an excellent job.

    Therefore Nature Index CONTRADICTED your outdated white supremacy beliefs. You are the kind of a white hypocrite who would have praised the Nature Index if American and European research instititions dominated the Nature Index ranking.

    Here is an AI submary of the problems with your favorite journal Science,
    .

    The journal Science faces some notable issues.

    Publication Bias
    There is a tendency to favor POSITIVE results over NEGATIVE or NULL findings, which can SKEW the scientific literature and MISREPRESENT the state of research.

    Accessibility Issues
    As a subscription-based journal, ACESS to articles can be LIMITED, creating BARRIERS for researchers and the public who CAN NOT afford subscriptions.

    Impact Factor Pressure
    The emphasis on impact factors can lead to researchers PRIOTIZING QUANTITY ove QUALITY, potentially COMPROMISING the INTEGRITY of research published in the journal.

    So it seems to me that the findings of journal Science CAN NOT be trusted.

    Replies: @wojtek

    , @showmethereal
    @wojtek

    Anyone who considers China to still be a communist country is obviously clueless and shouldn’t lecture anyone about understanding concepts. It’s only been over 40 years now

    Replies: @wojtek

  • For all the media hand-wringing over the government shutdown the fact is only approximately 750,000 of the over two million non-military federal workers are being furloughed. Most federal programs will continue operating, including the major entitlement and welfare programs. The national parks will remain open, if understaffed and with closed visitor centers. Unfortunately, the shutdown...
  • @Truth Vigilante
    @wojtek


    how do you imagine to convince these big shot doctors, who run the medical cartel in the US, to earn less and spread the wealth more?
     
    Woy-chek, you're not very bright, are you?
    And clearly you've never heard of the core economic principle of Supply and Demand.

    If the supply of doctors were increased, then this would entail that MORE doctors are competing for the patronage of fixed number of patients.
    Consequently, the expense in visiting a doctor will FALL - as competition always lowers prices.
    You also go on to write this asinine sentence:

    Interestingly the only solution to this problem that I am aware of across the World is to bring in the government.
     
    Throughout history we've found that government is NEVER the solution.
    When government is minimised and the Free Market (or as close as possible to it), is allowed to function, prosperity is maximised.

    I'm not surprised that a dumb Pole like yourself (someone that was indoctrinated from birth to believe that government cares for the masses), would state such a foolish thing.

    Replies: @wojtek, @Jokem

    Our neonazi Truth Denier never fails to miss an opportunity to prove that he is a complete idiot and a functionally illiterate moron 🙂

    wojtek: “how do you imagine to convince these big shot doctors […] to earn less

    dumb neonazi: “Consequently, the expense in visiting a doctor will FALL – as competition always lowers prices

    Yes, naziboi, competition lowers the prices and hence doctors’ incomes – the same doctors who control the medical schools in the US. They would earn less. So my question stands.

    But, in view of your newest facepalm moment above, a new question arises: what made you think that you have the intellectual ability to discuss these complicated notions with me, in the first place?

    Throughout history we’ve found that government is NEVER the solution.

    And yet you’re a nazi – interesting, if you had the capacity to understand the meaning of the word and minimal knowledge of history 🙂

    • Replies: @Truth Vigilante
    @wojtek

    Woy-chek writes:


    And yet you’re a nazi – interesting, if you had the capacity to understand the meaning of the word and minimal knowledge of history
     
    For UR readers not familiar with the history I've had with Woy-chek, he is a dumb Pole that pollutes the WWII UR threads with his smears of the noble Germans during WWII.

    Now, in war all sides commit atrocities. No one is denying this.
    But using any metric one chooses to apply, the Anglo-Zionist empire committed BY FAR the greater atrocities in quantitative and qualitative terms.
    We know for a fact that the '6 million yids killed in gas chambers' fable is a preposterous lie.
    There is NO PROOF that a single gas chamber for killing humans existed at ANY of the German supervised work camps that were falsely labelled as extermination centres.

    But Woy-chek was indoctrinated from birth to believe that the WWII Germans were evil incarnate. No amount of verifiable evidence is going to convince him otherwise.
    Thus anyone that supports the OBVIOUS 'good guys' of WWII (ie: Hitler's Germany - who sought to unshackle the world from strangulation by the Malignant Jewish financiers), is a 'Nazi' in his eyes - even though I have made clear that I am an Anarcho-Capitalist and libertarian.

    So yes Woy-chek, I recognise that central planning and authoritarian control of the economy is NOT the way to go. And in that respect the Third Reich misallocated resources before and during the war that the private sector could've used more productively and thus improved Germany's performance in the war.


    Summary: UR readers, you should go easy on Woy-chek.
    Because he is seething with frustration just below the skin.
    He knows that Poland sided with evil in WWII. It believed the promises made by ZOG controlled FDR and Britain that they would come to its aid in the event that Germany attacked it.

    And to that end, the Anglo-Zionist filth encouraged the conscience-free Polish cowards to commit unspeakable atrocities against ethnic Germans living within Poland (tens of thousands murdered, had their eyes gouges out, raped and brutalised etc), PRIOR to September 1939.
    They did this to actually provoke a war with Germany.

    Of course hostilities with Germany could SO EASILY have been avoided.
    Hitler sought friendly relations with Poland.
    He extended all manner of magnanimous overtures to Poland right up until May/June 1939.

    But the feral Poles spat in his face. At that moment Hitler knew that negotiation with these inbred imbeciles was no longer possible, that the crimes against ethnic Germans would continue endlessly - because the Jew masters of the Polish ruling elite had decreed it
     

    .
    In a nutshell, the dumb Poles took the 30 shekels of silver on offer from the Jewish financiers and threw in their lot with the agenda of Malignant International Jewry.

    Well karma has a way of paying back greedy degenerates - with compound interest added.
    As a result Poland paid a terrible price for choosing to side with the Vampire Squid.
    And justice was served.
    Because the Poles just couldn't work up the gumption to stay on friendly terms with Germany, as Hitler sincerely desired.

    Replies: @wojtek, @Jokem, @Brad Anbro

  • @Mark G.
    @wojtek

    Isn't it a case that if someone started up a new medical school that graduated doctors and these doctors started to practice medicine it would be the government that would arrest them? Government has a monopoly on the use of force. The medical cartel can't exist without the force of government behind it.

    Replies: @wojtek

    Look up the Liaison Committee on Medical Education and the Commission on Osteopathic College Accreditation (COCA). These are private bodies that oversee all medical (MD and DO) schools in the US. Check who “owns” these organizations. Then you will know that the medical cartel is controlled by the doctors and hospital owners, and that the government has ceded the right to control med schools to them.

    So now, that you know this, and have no more excuses for blaming the government, please answer my simple question:

    how do you imagine to convince these big shot doctors, who run the medical cartel in the US, to earn less and spread the wealth more?

    • Replies: @Mark G.
    @wojtek

    "the government has ceded the right to control med schools to them"

    Yes, but if someone challenges that right by opening a med school not approved by the medical cartel it is the government that will use force to shut the unapproved med school down.

    The medical profession is a special interest group that influences the decisions of the government with political donations to politicians. It can also give jobs to former politicians or bureaucrats as a reward for having done what the medical profession wants.

    The way to counter this is through the political process. For example, doctors donated much more money to Harris than Trump in the last election. It did not matter because voters wanted reforms. Trump saw how popular reformers like RFK Jr. were with the voters, managed to get their endorsements and won. The doctors do not always get their way if the voters do not want that.

    Replies: @wojtek

  • @Mark G.
    @wojtek

    I know a lot more changes need to be made to the medical system than the single one I suggested but it would take a book to cover them all. Several such books have been written of varying quality.

    Ron Paul, being a doctor and political conservative, could have written a good one but he seemed to focus his energies on other topics like the Fed, foreign policy, homeschooling or just general introductions to his beliefs. His son Rand is a doctor so maybe he can write one.

    Replies: @wojtek

    Mark, first of all you are right – by simple extension I have attributed to you Dr. Paul’s recommendation, whereas you have suggested something different.

    But your personal recommendation, as already pointed above, is based on false assumptions – government has nothing to do with the number of available seats in med schools in the US. The cartel you are thinking about consists of doctors and hospital owners. Interestingly the only solution to this problem that I am aware of across the World is to bring in the government.

    Simply speaking unchecked human greed is the gatekeeper here. Not the government.

    So tell me, how do you imagine to convince these big shot doctors, who run the medical cartel in the US, to earn less and spread the wealth more?

    • Replies: @Mark G.
    @wojtek

    Isn't it a case that if someone started up a new medical school that graduated doctors and these doctors started to practice medicine it would be the government that would arrest them? Government has a monopoly on the use of force. The medical cartel can't exist without the force of government behind it.

    Replies: @wojtek

    , @Truth Vigilante
    @wojtek


    how do you imagine to convince these big shot doctors, who run the medical cartel in the US, to earn less and spread the wealth more?
     
    Woy-chek, you're not very bright, are you?
    And clearly you've never heard of the core economic principle of Supply and Demand.

    If the supply of doctors were increased, then this would entail that MORE doctors are competing for the patronage of fixed number of patients.
    Consequently, the expense in visiting a doctor will FALL - as competition always lowers prices.
    You also go on to write this asinine sentence:

    Interestingly the only solution to this problem that I am aware of across the World is to bring in the government.
     
    Throughout history we've found that government is NEVER the solution.
    When government is minimised and the Free Market (or as close as possible to it), is allowed to function, prosperity is maximised.

    I'm not surprised that a dumb Pole like yourself (someone that was indoctrinated from birth to believe that government cares for the masses), would state such a foolish thing.

    Replies: @wojtek, @Jokem

  • Earlier this year, I wrote about the prestigious Nature magazine’s 2024 Nature Index ranking of global research institutions based on the quantity and impact of their research output in high end science journals. ( ) Chinese research institutes and universities were prominently featured in the 2024 results. Recently, the latest Nature Index came out, reaffirming...
  • Impressive achievements. But some context is missing. It would be nice if the Author explained that the Nature index is based on a couple of assumptions:
    1) Every author is counted as equal, regardless of their contributions;
    2) Institution scores are not normalized for their size.

    Clearly 1+2 creates a bias. For example, CAS has (officially) 7-8 times as many researchers as Harvard. yet its Nature index share is less than 2.5 times that of Harvard.

    But a really interesting thing happens, when we look at the two most prestigious science publications. The ranking is very different then:

    1 Harvard University 267 70.40
    2 Stanford University 189 67.32
    3 Max Planck Society 210 54.26
    4 Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS) 219 46.68
    5 Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) 194 34.30
    6 University of California, San Francisco (UCSF) 78 26.02
    7 Cornell University 95 23.78
    8 Peking University (PKU) 94 22.95
    9 California Institute of Technology (Caltech) 89 22.56
    10 University of California, San Diego (UC San Diego) 81 22.51

    This correlates much better with the main prizes, such as Nobel, and proves that accusations of political bias are rather baseless.

    • Agree: Eric135
    • Replies: @tamo
    @wojtek

    You can do me a favor. Find out how many ethnic Chinese STEM researchers are doing researches for such American universities as Harvard,Stanford, MIT, CalTech, UCSF,UC San Diego.etc, for the benefit of the U.S. It may tell you a different story.

    According to to THE POLITICS OF EXCELLENCE : Behind The Nobel Prize In Science, written by Robert Marc Freidman who RESEARCHED for about 20 years for the book,

    the author reveals that the Nobel Prize in SCIENCE is NEITHER above the politics NOR the personal agendas or prejudices of the Nobel Prize Nominating Committee members

    As the result of this kind of UNPROFESSIONAL behavior by the committee members, very often NOT the best physicists or chemists get the Nobel Prize in SCIENCE.

    I think the author who SPENT 20 years reseraching for this book, make a very CREDIBLE case against the Nobel Prize Nominating Committee.

    Anyway, Nobel Prizes are LAGGING indicator rewarding scientists for what they accomplished 20 or 30 years ago.

    Replies: @wojtek

    , @Vidi
    @wojtek


    Institution scores [in the Nature index] are not normalized for their size.
     
    In other words, an institution with 50,000 researchers has an advantage over one a tenth the size, and that according to you is unfair. In my opinion, that is not unfair if we want to estimate the institution -- or country -- that is likely to produce more breakthoughs.

    Later you presented a list of your top universities. Were the rankings on that list "normalized" the way you preferred? (I notice that you did not provide a link.)

    Replies: @nokangaroos, @wojtek

    , @Vidi
    @wojtek

    In my previous post I forgot to respond to the following:


    [Wojtek's rankings of the top universities] correlates much better with the main prizes, such as Nobel...
     
    That is not surprising, as most Nobel committee members probably can't read Chinese.

    ...and proves that accusations of political bias are rather baseless.
     
    It does nothing of the sort.

    I don't expect much from someone who has been caught lying (link), but I will give you another chance.

    Replies: @wojtek, @showmethereal

  • For all the media hand-wringing over the government shutdown the fact is only approximately 750,000 of the over two million non-military federal workers are being furloughed. Most federal programs will continue operating, including the major entitlement and welfare programs. The national parks will remain open, if understaffed and with closed visitor centers. Unfortunately, the shutdown...
  • @Mark G.
    Spending on medical care was only six percent of GDP in 1960, a third of what it is now, with an average life expectancy of seventy. This shows medical care does not have to cost a lot. Costs started going up after the introduction of Medicare and Medicaid in the sixties. This increased the demand for medical care.

    The medical system is a government enforced cartel where supply is restricted to keep up the incomes of the cartel members. Not enough additional doctors were graduated from medical schools to meet the additional demand, causing doctor incomes to triple over the next sixty years adjusted for inflation. If the supply of doctors was increased or some medical services could be provided by someone other than doctors then prices would drop.

    Replies: @wojtek

    Mark,

    A few facts: life expectancy in the US now is about 80; health care of an average 80YO costs twice as much as that of a 70YO; in the 60s the quality of healthcare for blacks, latinos, and white immigrant communities measured relative to WASPs was much worse than it is today; individual medical schools – which means doctors – decide how many matriculants to accept; the freeze in the number of matriculants started in early 1980s – during Reagan era, and that number has not changed until ~2015, despite the population growth.

    Generally you need to accept that the American economic model means that life necessities are very expensive, even when compared to other developed countries. Whether it is health care, or housing, or schooling, or fresh food. The only cheap things are the ones that are imported from the 3rd world countries (that to me includes China). Although apparently even imported things now cost a fortune – $50K before taxes and fees for an average new car??? I guess we should add cars to life necessities in the US.

    Putting aside for a moment trying to understand why this model developed in this way, you are proposing to change only one element of the model – healthcare – without addressing the whole structure of the system. A system which has been designed to suck out every penny and then some from the working population.

    It’s clear your solution cannot work. Because what you (or Dr. Paul) are proposing, namely HSAs, means just more of the same system.

    • Replies: @Mark G.
    @wojtek

    I know a lot more changes need to be made to the medical system than the single one I suggested but it would take a book to cover them all. Several such books have been written of varying quality.

    Ron Paul, being a doctor and political conservative, could have written a good one but he seemed to focus his energies on other topics like the Fed, foreign policy, homeschooling or just general introductions to his beliefs. His son Rand is a doctor so maybe he can write one.

    Replies: @wojtek

    , @selfdo59
    @wojtek

    It's much simpler than that. The more money, especially when it's taken from OTHER PEOPLE, you make available for a product or service, whether it's EVs, subsidized college educations, or "single-payer" health care, the more they end up COSTING. We have this mistaken notion that transportation, education, and medical care are an OBLIGATION of the Government, which, in practice, means that the privileged ones get worthwhile products or services, the masses get...DRECK. Government doesn't produce anything that's wanted, it only takes by force and "gives" what it's willing to FORCE upon us.

    As for medicine, not only are alternatives interfered with by the AMA that has a vested interest in the current system, it's often CRIMINALIZED. I'm not talking about some pathetic meth head enjoying some of Walter White's best. I'm talking about a simple thing as my HMO fights fang, nail, and claw to step up my painkiller dosage. Well, it's simple...I HURT. Arthritis bedevils me, and part of it is just that I'm getting OLD. At this point, whether I have 50 mg of Tramadol daily, or 100 mg, will make little difference as to how long I live, but it makes one hell of a difference in how I enjoy it! My HMO docs pontificate about "pain management" and "pain meds addiction", when in reality, they don't want to do the paperwork necessary to cover their lazy asses from Federal prosecution. Or the HMO get sued if somehow I were driving while "tranked" (which, if I allowed it to happen, I'd be in some deep shit, and rightly so, as driving drugged is no less a crime than driving drunk), and their Jew attorneys have told them it's better I suffer than they risk a lawsuit for "overdosing" me. This is but a smidge of the tyranny which our Forefathers, were they to see it, would wonder why the hell we put with up, and what, pray tell, did they risk their homes, fortunes, and very LIVES for? Maybe King George III wasn't so bad after all!

    Replies: @wojtek

  • A few weeks ago I published an article noting that the State of Israel and the Zionist movement that gave rise to it have probably employed assassination as a tool of statecraft more heavily than any other political entity in recorded history. Indeed, their deadly activities had easily eclipsed those of the notorious Muslim sect...
  • @EliteCommInc.
    @wojtek

    I am not sure you now what avoidance is. On the issue you constantly raise, and your constant attempts to drag me into your rabbit hole. Others have effectively responded to that issue.

    And more importantly, it is irrelevant to my position regarding Russian aggression.

    Replies: @wojtek

    I am not sure you now what avoidance is.

    Don’t you worry – I may not be an expert at avoidance like you are (and you are a true expert – you avoid to acknowledge the zio-nazi putsch in Ukraine in 2014), but I know enough to notice that you avoided it 🙂

    • Replies: @EliteCommInc.
    @wojtek

    As I make clear -- it is entirely irrelevant to the question.

  • World War II was certainly the most colossal military conflict in human history and it became the shaping event of our modern world, with its consequences and influence still extremely important nearly eighty years after the guns fell silent. Major wars are naturally accompanied by a great deal of governmental media propaganda, and t
  • @The Old Philosopher
    @wojtek

    The galloping pole continues to deceive, mislead and misrepresent that:


    he confused plural and real “Western Defense Districts” with a nonexistent entity of “Western Military District”.

     

    And the brain dead imbecile is obviously unable to comprehend the simple fact that as capitalized, "Western Military Districts" is a proper noun purporting to identify a particularized named Hq that in the plural form is a generic term identifying and referring to any number of like Hqs. rather than any particularized named Hq such as the "Western Military District." Thus there is fact were no named "Western Military Districts" hq. There only was a "Western Military District" that was located in Minsk and no other place.

    And not the galloping pole continues to ignore the challenge I posed that he identify using the Latin alphabet the name of the CG of the Western Military District and Western Special Military District that he avoids precisely because it would instantly expose the deception, misrepresentation and fraud he practices by how he refers to those Hqs.

    Replies: @wojtek

    pole continues to deceive, mislead and misrepresent that:

    Since the old galloping kike is begging for it again, here it is:

    1. Old Galloping Kike tried to claim “the entire issue under discussion has been the Command HQ on the line of contact on June22”, which exposed all of his stupidity.

    2. The whole issue started with P.M.’s comment #456, where he claimed that “the inventory showed that 10,540 operable tanks were in the Western Defense Districts.”

    3. Bonehead galloping kike replied to that in comment #467, demonstrating immediately your ignorance, by stating that Clark “identifies the Western Military District reconstituted on June 23 as Western Front had 6 Mech. Corps under command.”

    Kike’s errors are elementary and are derived from your inability to read simple texts in English with a semblance of understanding:
    – you mistakenly interpreted “Western Defense Districts”, which in Russian nomenclature is a term used to describe jointly 5 MDs, with a single one: “Western Military District” – you can’t tell singular form plural;
    – you also made a mistake, because in 1941 there was no “Western Military District” – there was “Western Special military district”.

    4. You also demanded that P.M. correct your errors by stating: “Maybe you can clear up the confusion your description of the inventory of tanks in the Russian military districts creates”

    5. In further correspondence you admit in comment #572 to your mess: “It evidently escaped you that I identified the Western Military Districts as only one of four “fronts”” – which proves that you still had no clue about the mistakes you made.

    6. This is when P.M. provided you with an original source which provides a detailed number of tanks in the so called “ЗАПАДНЫЕ ВОЕННЫЕ ОКРУГА” – aka Western military districts 🙂

    7. In turn, old galloping lying kike further demonstrated his inability to read by stating in comment #650 that “The text you cite fails to address directly any of he points I made”, which is an outright lie, because
    – it is a lie – the cited Russian text addresses every point you tried to make,,
    – but also because you later admitted in comment #884 that you can’t read Russian – what a facepalm moment 🙂

    8. In comments #836 P.M. corrected your mistake

    9. But you insisted on being wrong and in comment #839 you incorrectly stated that “The following military districts were n the line of contact on June 22, 2941: Leningrad MD renamed Northern Front; Baltic MD renamed Northwestern Front; Western MD renamed Western Front, and Kiev MD renamed Southwestern Front as detailed in Clark The Russian German Conflict 1941-1945.”

    10. To which P.M. finished you off with a direct quote from your source: “By the middle of May 1941 there were nearly 170 divisions, or over five sevenths of the country’s total armed strength, outside the 1939 frontiers. They were distributed in the five “military districts” running from north to south as “Leningrad,” “Baltic,” “Western,” “Kiev,” and “Odessa” commands”.

    11. After this you unsuccessfully tried to change the narrative in comment #905, pathetically replying to your own post so that nobody can read it, that: “the entire issue under discussion has been the Command HQ on the line of contact on June22”.

    I’m glad you begged for me to repeat all this again.

    • Replies: @The Old Philosopher
    @wojtek

    Citing PM, acknowledges


    "They [[were distributed in the five “military districts” running from north to south as “Leningrad,” “Baltic,” “Western,” “Kiev,” and “Odessa” commands”.
     
    Exactly what I had been saying from the beginning when I identified the four military districts on the June 1941 line of contact as the named "Leningrad MD," "Baltic MD," Western MD," "Kiev MD," Clark identified, not counting the Odessa MD that was off the line of contact that he didn't even mention except to note it was incorporated into the Kiev MD redesignated as the "Southwestern Front." Also note that exactly as I have been saying that you have been trying to obfuscate by galloping over the generic term that identifies a type of military HQ (i.e. military district Hq) such as "armored corps" or "infantry corps" as distinct from proper nouns appropriately capitalized identifying particular named HQs that singularly refers only to a specifically named Hq. such as 24th Panzer Crops.

    Your lengthy babbling IN WHICH YOU CONTINUED TO ENGAGE IN THE SAME obfuscation of galloping over named Hqs and generic references to military districts has, however, clearly evaded, avoided and tried to obfuscate the challenge I posed that you cite using the Latin alphabet the names of the CG of the "Western Military District and/or the "Western Special Military District."

    Not a very difficult task. But one you strenuously avoid because doing so would entirely expose the deception, lying, misrepresentation and fraud you have been practicing by galloping over the different words used to refer to named Hqs and generic references to a type of military command.

    Concludes :


    I’m glad you begged for me to repeat all this again.
     
    And summarized in one comment how you have been galloping over words with the lies, deceptions and misrepresentations and frauds you have posted.

    So until you give the simple, clear, direct and truth answer to that query, I will simply recite it as my response to any further gibberish you post on this issue.,

    Replies: @wojtek

  • The twenty-fourth anniversary of the 9/11 Attacks passed with virtually no media attention this year, and that hardly surprised me. However, I did discuss it to a limited extent in my own article last week, and in a couple of paragraphs I briefly summarized the enormous historic impact of those 2001 terrorist attacks: During the...
  • @Sparkon
    @wojtek



    I’ve said from the beginning that aluminum cannot cut steel.
     
    Luckily for all of us, physics doesn’t care what moronic fedbois have to say.

     

    You're obviously in the same category of troll as others here who've made wild but entirely false and completely ridiculous accusations against me, which seems to be your shared script and common stock in trade, while keeping your heads firmly planted where the sun doesn't shine, like the Flat Earth people.

    So go sit on it, slick, and take your water jets for a long ride back to the sewer pipe you squirted out of.

    Replies: @wojtek

    What, fedboi, no quotes from Google AI this time? Or is your whole post LLM generated? 🙂

    But this below, coming from a bonehead who confuses chemistry with physics, is priceless 🙂

    who’ve made wild but entirely false and completely ridiculous accusations

    Still it checks that others would recognize you – you’re so … obvious. Almost wondering who would think you’re of any use.