RSSIt is easy to find out the truth, but the typical racist Trumpo-magat-trolls wouldn’t understand anyway.
Many shall be purified, and made white, and tried; but the wicked shall do wickedly: and none of the wicked shall understand; but the wise shall understand. (Daniel 12:10)
Babylon USA/West is the home of demons. This incarnated demon will be fried in the lake of fire along with their demonic heathen garbage evangelical, pale skin supremacist egghead sickos, and their zionist brothers.
Relevation 18:2
“‘Fallen! Fallen is Babylon the Great!’[a]
She has become a dwelling for demons
and a haunt for every impure spirit,
a haunt for every unclean bird,
a haunt for every unclean and detestable animal.
I’m not a fan of them Chicoms, but the world is tired of Demonic Babylon/USA and its infested demonic inhabitants. Its government sucks, the best that they can throw at their people is the two old pale farts, so they can have their two demonic cults pitted against each other. Its evangelical heathen religion is garbage. Its churches suck. Its manufacturing is garbage, most of its people don’t want to work but want to collect the paycheck. Its financial Moloch system is about to come down at any given time. Now it’s being saddled with more debts with its two bitches on both arms. The bitch zionist Israel is so jealous of the bitch Ukraine and would not want the bitch Ukraine from taking more garbage fiat money from the bitch Babylon/USA, so now they started a fiasco with Iran. The world is so tired of the three lesbian bitches and EU hookers standing around at the street corner. Enjoy a few years left on prison planet earth, incarnated demonic lesbian bitches. Demonic Babylon/USA will not be raptured out of here, but be destroyed in one hour and hauled off to the lake of fire where you belong. That is for sure. Chicoms will follow next in line to demonic Babylon/USA to the lake of fire.
Is this a joke? Satire?Replies: @Truthdefender
"But where does that leave the New Testament . . . Are we to reject all of the eyewitness accounts recorded in the Bible for a theory explained by an author who writes under a pseudonym? Now that would be foolish."
No joke at all.
The writer casts doubts about the reality of the Roman Empire in the first century, despite the evidence provided by the most thoroughly researched document in history, i.e. the Christian New Testament. That document clearly identifies actual names, places, and titles of many of the leaders and cities of the Roman Empire. The accuracy of Early Christian history is corroborated by Josephus and other Roman historians. Paul of Tarsus wrote letters to and from the imperial capital of Rome in Italy. He documented his journey from Palestine to Rome with stops in Crete and Malta. Fragments of early manuscripts dating from the second century a.d. still exist.
Yet the writer suggests that all this Roman history is fiction. Now that is a joke.
Let’s hope all the cadavers from the Justinian plague remain in the ground. We don’t need a new pandemic.
Even if the manuscripts of Tacitus are proved to be forgeries it casts no doubt on the original New Testament documents. Those documents were meticulously hand copied in the very monasteries that allowed the pagan documents to decay.
The accuracy of the Old Testament manuscripts was conclusively established by the discovery of the Dead Sea Scrolls. Almost no differences were found between the manuscripts that sat in clay jars in the Qumran Caves for over 2,000 years and modern versions of the same scriptures.
The article calls into question everything we know about Rome. But where does that leave the New Testament, which includes the names of the specific roman emperors and governors of the period? What about Pontius Pilate and the various centurions who spoke with Christ. “Give to Caesar what is Caesar’s,” Jesus said, looking at a Roman coin. Are we to reject all of the eyewitness accounts recorded in the Bible for a theory explained by an author who writes under a pseudonym? Now that would be foolish.
Is this a joke? Satire?Replies: @Truthdefender
"But where does that leave the New Testament . . . Are we to reject all of the eyewitness accounts recorded in the Bible for a theory explained by an author who writes under a pseudonym? Now that would be foolish."