RSSAren’t there differences between what types of people do better in different branches of the service (as with most jobs)? Anyone with actual military experience able to comment?
No argument about that. But even in the most aggressive combat arms, i think you'll still find the most effective people are from the civilized races, not the troublesome ones. (See US special forces.)
Aren’t there differences between what types of people do better in different branches of the service (as with most jobs)? Anyone with actual military experience able to comment?
I did not say you said that: I asked you a question. It seemed to me that you were criticizing people for going out and protesting the corruption in the 2020 election, which of course they have a right to do.But, okay, you just are pissed at Anglin. I get it.SS also wrote:
Where did I make that argument exactly? Point it out please! Oh that’s right, you can’t, because I didn’t say that!
Cool. Thanks for clarifying that.SS also wrote:
If you want me to go on the record, yes, I was and am strongly against the George Floyd riots, and I don’t think the Capitol goofballs should be held in solitary confinement, and entering the Capitol and walking around with no plan like an idiot should be (at most) a misdemeanor.
I don't follow Anglis closely: I know I disagree with some of his views, but he does not interest me that much.SS also wrote to me:
Please make your argument for why Andrew Anglin is a Deep Wise Thinker and he should be at the top of Unz every goddamn day.
Oh, you're welcome.SS also wrote:
Anyway I’d like to thank you for helping dispel the stereotype that physicists are smart.
My what???I got my Ph.D. in the early 1980s. No "google scholar page" then.As I have said many, many times, my name is Dave Miller. If you care (I don't think you do!), a bit of googling will turn up my doctoral work on the tau lepton and various patents on error-correction coding.Wow! I just checked and my thesis is up there on google scholar! I guess Stanford or SLAC uploaded all the old Ph.D. theses.Pretty cool.Take care.Replies: @SFG, @Danindc
Although frankly at this point I’d like to see a link to your google scholar page before I believe it.
You both actually seem to agree Anglin is dumb and yet managed to get into a minor flame fest.
Just pointing out you may actually be on the same side.
I have to admit, this site has gone more and more full Nazi. I miss Epigone and Karlin (even if I disagree with him on the Ukraine war).
As has the whole world.
I have to admit, this site has gone more and more full Nazi.
I actually do not know much about Anglin one way or another: my impression is that he is a White supremacist, which I am not, but perhaps my impression of him is mistaken.
You both actually seem to agree Anglin is dumb and yet managed to get into a minor flame fest.
You may have explained the origin of the ‘bearded liberal hipster’ meme. Low T-weak jaw-beard. Thank you!
Musk 2024! “What are you, a Martian?” “Not YET…”
(We’ll be back in space I’m sure…)
I knew guys who said it got them laid as late as the 1990s. Now of course post metoo I would not advise it.
You can say that about rape and murder, too. Just because something's existed on the fringe forever doesn't make it good or OK.
(But if you’re gay and don’t do that kind of thing, I have no problem with you at all. It’s been around for centuries-the Romans evidently had it, and there are descriptions of gay emperors in China.)
I suspect back in the 60s they realized they couldn’t do anything about it…but there’s probably some conspiracy aspect I’m not aware of.
Low status guys like nerds will hang around sometimes.
Yeah, I don’t think it will be all that common…but how many people actually become trans?
I think the point is homosexuality is objectionable morally only when targeted at someone who can’t consent, but that’s the same as heterosexuality in that regard.
The real question is whether there’s a higher incidence of pedophilia etc among gay men. The books used to say yes, then they changed the books.
(But if you’re gay and don’t do that kind of thing, I have no problem with you at all. It’s been around for centuries-the Romans evidently had it, and there are descriptions of gay emperors in China.)
You can say that about rape and murder, too. Just because something's existed on the fringe forever doesn't make it good or OK.
(But if you’re gay and don’t do that kind of thing, I have no problem with you at all. It’s been around for centuries-the Romans evidently had it, and there are descriptions of gay emperors in China.)
World War P (polyamory) could be next. I observed it in Boston in the late 90s among some geeky friends of mine (as you say, there is a shortage of women and the geeks tolerate jealousy better), and the NYT has had a few articles pushing it.
Whatever. I am no fan of the Current Year US regime but Putin’s tanks are in Ukraine not the other way around.
I’m sure you could find a similar bunch of stories about what the Ukrainians did to the Russians when they got the upper hand.
I’m with the Ukrainians, though. They live there.
Show me one. AFAIK, the Ukrainians have not killed one Russian civilian in this war. It appears that some unofficial militia type guys may kneecapped a few Russian POWs in an isolated incident which of course the Russians and their supporters are trying to make hay out of in order to change the subject. There are zero reports of regular Ukrainian Army abusing prisoners or anyone else. The Ukrainian government has promised to investigate this incident and prosecute the offenders if war crimes have occurred. I have heard no such promises from the Russian government.
I’m sure you could find a similar bunch of stories about what the Ukrainians did to the Russians when they got the upper hand.
Armored warfare, maybe.
War will just keep on evolving. Unfortunately for almost everyone involved. Lots of people hope war will end because of the newest evolution in tactics, but it never pans out. There will always be war, like death and taxes.
I think the War Nerd said it best a while ago: take an 18 year old boy away from his family, give him a gun, make him march on a broken ankle and shoot at him for a month and you may not like what you get.
That comes out of the corporate ownership structure; founders are deposed all the time. The only other example I can think of is Gary Gygax, but I am sure others here can come up with others.
Gygax is a great example, but in the grand scheme of things TSR was small potatoes. More famously, Steve Jobs was ousted from Apple Computer in 1985. In 1997 he pulled off the greatest comeback in corporate history when Apple Computer bought his new company, NeXT.
The only other example I can think of is Gary Gygax, but I am sure others here can come up with others.
You wonder how many of these were Russian nerds who just wanted a job shitposting. Kind of like the guys who claimed they were looking for terrorists recruiting in World of Warcraft games.
Something tells me his lack of interest in women’s feelings would get him in a lot more trouble nowadays.
Maybe that’s what happened to all the geniuses. 😉
Makes sense it was invented in China!
As Jack D said, lots of weird science people.
Don’t they say defenders usually have a three to one advantage over attackers, all else equal? ‘We live here’.
Right wing compared to other LGBTQ people is Steve’s point, I think, not right wing compared to average Americans. The most conservative group in the sample was 3 on the 1 to 5 scale.
I think most Americans would probably describe a Zionist neocon as right wing- these intraconservative spats make as much sense to the average person as a Marxist using ‘liberal’ as an insult, or a blue haired SJW saying the Marxist is collaborating with white supremacy by not centering POC. BAP versus Mitt Romney is going to be incomprehensible.

So chicken fried steak is actually a schnitzel? That’s awesome.
They were attacking Jews, and the destruction of German American culture came after WW1, not WW2. That’s when they banned teaching German and closed down the German language newspapers in the Midwest. The whole Midwestern pacifist stereotype of a while ago came about, as Steve pointed out a few years back, because German Americans didn’t really want to kill Cousin Fritz, quite reasonably.
This whole ‘Germans and Jews are enemies’ thing came in with Hitler-before that German Jews were often big supporters of German culture.
One of the best things to be during WW2 was a German POW in a camp located somewhere in Nebraska or Wisconsin:
The whole Midwestern pacifist stereotype of a while ago came about, as Steve pointed out a few years back, because German Americans didn’t really want to kill Cousin Fritz, quite reasonably.
True. We hear loads about the Japanese internment camps in WW2, not so much about the German internment camp in Hot Springs, North Carolina. All brought to you by our English-American elite at the time, which should remind everyone that things were not necessarily better when the WASPs ran the show. (Yes immigration policy was better, I grant you that)
They were attacking Jews, and the destruction of German American culture came after WW1, not WW2
https://www.tabletmag.com/sections/arts-letters/articles/woke-womens-studies
OT, but this has Coalition of the Fringes written all over it.
And I was stupid enough to post it here instead of writing it down on a piece of paper and mailing it to myself. So the only profit I'll ever derive from it is the warm accolades of the iSteve commentariat.
You have the plot.
The novel is assigned reading in many high schools. Many parents feel that forcing kids to read the book is inappropriate, especially because in one key scene the bully semi-rapes the girl and gets her pregnant.
Matt was leaning against the refrigerator in the corner; he must have let himself in through the open garage door. Like always, he made her head swim with seasons -- his hair was all the colors of autumn; his eyes the bright blue of a winter sky; his smile as wide as any summer sun. He was wearing a baseball hat backward, and a Sterling Varsity Hockey tee over a thermal shirt that Josie had once stolen for a full month and hidden in her underwear drawer, so that when she needed to she could breathe in the scent of him. "Are you still pissed off?" he asked.
She later induces a miscarriage, leaving an even bigger stain on her bedsheets.
She lay in his arms for ten minutes and then said she was tired and needed to go to sleep. After she kissed Matt good-bye at the front door, she went into the kitchen and took the rug cleaner out from underneath the sink. She scrubbed it into the wet spot on the carpet, prayed it would not leave a stain.
Seriously, stop whining and write. I suspect some of these right wing writers will be happy to give you pointers. Conservatives were way too happy to surrender the arts. At least you’ll have a good time. Change a few plot points so you have plausible deniability and get to it. 😉
Oh, that’s easy.
Religion is a social outlet, a method of social control (in the ‘don’t kill people because you will go to hell’ sense), a source of stability (Jesus loves me even if nobody else does), discourages bad habits (my body is a temple to the Lord), a sort of private welfare state and risk insurance (food drives and the like…I hear the Mormons have this down to a science) and can be a networking opportunity if your group is high status enough.
None of which actually require the existence of a higher power. I’m an atheist but I never try to shake someone’s faith.
Just write it yourself already. You have the plot. Distribution is the tricky bit but you could probably network with other right wing writers like Delicious Tacos and Zero HP Lovecraft. Amazon is still listing Tacos and Mike Ma, so you might get away with them.
Seriously, if nobody writes the new fiction nobody is going to read it. I’d do it myself if it weren’t for this ancestry problem.
And I was stupid enough to post it here instead of writing it down on a piece of paper and mailing it to myself. So the only profit I'll ever derive from it is the warm accolades of the iSteve commentariat.
You have the plot.
The novel is assigned reading in many high schools. Many parents feel that forcing kids to read the book is inappropriate, especially because in one key scene the bully semi-rapes the girl and gets her pregnant.
Matt was leaning against the refrigerator in the corner; he must have let himself in through the open garage door. Like always, he made her head swim with seasons -- his hair was all the colors of autumn; his eyes the bright blue of a winter sky; his smile as wide as any summer sun. He was wearing a baseball hat backward, and a Sterling Varsity Hockey tee over a thermal shirt that Josie had once stolen for a full month and hidden in her underwear drawer, so that when she needed to she could breathe in the scent of him. "Are you still pissed off?" he asked.
She later induces a miscarriage, leaving an even bigger stain on her bedsheets.
She lay in his arms for ten minutes and then said she was tired and needed to go to sleep. After she kissed Matt good-bye at the front door, she went into the kitchen and took the rug cleaner out from underneath the sink. She scrubbed it into the wet spot on the carpet, prayed it would not leave a stain.
I imagine if the vast majority of the women swimmers were to stumble on this blog they’d be leading the charge to get you and everyone else cancelled.
They worship DIE and want you and me dead. They endorse, embrace, and advocate for this tranny crap. They’re “allies”.
I hope the dude crushes every collegiate swimming record there is.
Quit trying to be Captain Save A Ho.
I hope the dude is really just the world's greatest troll.
I hope the dude crushes every collegiate swimming record there is.
Perhaps.
I imagine if the vast majority of the women swimmers were to stumble on this blog they’d be leading the charge to get you and everyone else cancelled.
They worship DIE and want you and me dead. They endorse, embrace, and advocate for this tranny crap. They’re “allies”.
.....oh come on, you gotta' have a little love for the guy clinging to the crow's nest as the ship goes down......admit it, the pumpkin /tomato thing was pretty good.
Quit trying to be Captain Save A Ho.
My best guess is that splitting out East Asians (most of whom are relatively successful Chinese, in part because there are just so many Chinese in the world) raises unfortunate questions about ‘model minority’ and even HBD. So they stick the Pacific Islanders in there so they can say ‘see, not all Asians are successful, you’re ignoring the complexity’ etc.
That way they can keep ambitious Asian Ivy Leaguers who need Wokemon points and blue collar Pacific Islanders on the same side. It’s all about coalition building.
Same reason the NYT is writing free speech editorials-they’re afraid of the midterms.
That regime has nukes, too.
I mean, the cultures are more conformist, but I have my doubts the actual creativity level is lower. Kids these days can’t get enough K-pop and anime. It’s like an octopus whose tentacles go into…OK, I’ll stop.
Seriously, the breadth and visual creativity of anime is pretty impressive. And it isn’t woke.
You've gotta be kidding me. Anime all look same. And what's with the round eyes? Pupil envy?
Seriously, the breadth and visual creativity of anime is pretty impressive. And it isn’t woke.
So only wars by those claiming to defend the white race are justifiable? Strange statement.
He is not some defender of the white race
Geopolitics is not stupid. His country is cornered. There were no good options. If you want to get moralistic about it maybe you should look at your own country's role in all this.Replies: @SFG
all he is doing is killing a bunch of Russians and Ukrainians. This fratricidal war is stupid.
I agree the USA shares a lot of the blame-we wouldn’t be so cool if Russia tried to make a military alliance with Canada, and we almost blew up the world over the Cuban missiles.
But Putin marched in the troops.
You can get a woman of childbearing age to have kids with you in your 80s…if you are a famous Hollywood actor!
He is not some defender of the white race-he rules a multiethnic empire and is mostly interested in his own glory.
I kinda looked up to him in some ways I admit, but now all he is doing is killing a bunch of Russians and Ukrainians. This fratricidal war is stupid.
So only wars by those claiming to defend the white race are justifiable? Strange statement.
He is not some defender of the white race
Geopolitics is not stupid. His country is cornered. There were no good options. If you want to get moralistic about it maybe you should look at your own country's role in all this.Replies: @SFG
all he is doing is killing a bunch of Russians and Ukrainians. This fratricidal war is stupid.
No, no, it's the exact opposite.
One gets the sense that Poland is itching for war with Russia, to settle its historic grievances. Expanding NATO was a bad idea.
The whole point of the WaPo story is that the Poles finally got sick of this and struck back at the Americans -- very cleverly.
Chancellery of the Prime Minister of Poland
@PremierRP_en
·
Mar 3
Government spokesman: Former Ukrainian president Petro Poroshenko provided incorrect information. Poland won’t send its fighter jets to #Ukraine as well as allow to use its airports. Poland significantly helps in other areas e.g. in providing humanitarian aid.
Poland’s between Germany (and, earlier, Austria and Prussia) and Russia. Dealing with more powerful countries is something they’re used to.
She also defended freedom of speech against the wokies.
25 years ago I might have agreed with you, but you really do see them favoring nonwhites over whites, Muslims over Christians and the like.
I’m a verbalist blatherer, and I basically agree.
Mighty terse of you.
I’m a verbalist blatherer, and I basically agree.
I read his argument against it in National Review, and he basically says no good can come of exploring it (they had a counterpoint by Robert verbruggen). He seems kind of sad actually, and I felt bad for him-it’s basically like a guy who doesn’t want to admit his kid is developmentally disabled. He’s wrong, but you can’t blame the guy.
The purpose of the UN, the International Court of Justice, etc. was to make it civic. If the only principle was "might makes right", then why HAVEN'T we occupied say, Saudi Arabia? Your oil is ours now. Especially in Europe there was a tacit bargain not to disturb the 1945 borders because the previous 2 wars had almost destroyed European civilization. (Kosovo doesn't count - by that point Yugoslavia had fallen apart on its own and the Serbs were committing genocide. Putin claims of "genocide" in Ukraine in order to match up with the Kosovo fact pattern are 100% bullshit.) If it's OK to change borders by force once, then it's OK to change them by opposing force later on, and again - it's a recipe for endless war. We'll see what will happen in Ukraine but I doubt that Putin is going to be able to establish a long term stable regime. Ukrainian nationalism didn't die even after centuries of repression. I don't think he's going to be able to do a Xinjiang and put a million Ukrainians in camps in order to stamp out Ukrainian identity. The Czars tried banning their language and it didn't work. Stalin tried starvation and that didn't work either.Replies: @SFG, @nebulafox, @The Anti-Gnostic, @Rich, @Dmon, @silviosilver, @Sam Malone, @PhysicistDave
The international order is anarchic, not civic.
We haven’t occupied Saudia Arabia because we couldn’t get the troops over there and no country would let us go through, and the country wouldn’t support an extended war to conquer a country that size.
The USA’s recent hegemony was because the last challengers blew themselves up in WW2 or bankrupted themselves trying to keep up with us (Russia). But might makes right. Always has been (cue astronaut meme).
The SA, up to Ernst Rohm, was pretty gay if I remember right-it was one of the things Hitler went after them for (though of course it was mostly a power struggle).
Intellectuals love to believe that ideas have consequences. But Putin’s actions have less to do with the power of his ideas than his becoming head of a nuclear power.
In an example closer to everyone here, Trump wasn’t driven by ideas, he drew on people’s resentment against the woke professional managerial class. He started talking about immigration because it worked for him at rallies, but he wasn’t reading Peter Brimelow (or our host).
A while back Steve posted a contemporaneous op-ed written by Trump (circa 1993, I think) speaking out against ratification of NAFTA so that is not true. Even then, despite having from birth lived in this weird Trump family neo-Gilded Age demimonde, Trump actually did care about the common working man. Trump is no egg-head, but he is complex and despite every personal and familial incentive keeps doing the right thing. Or to paraphrase, Trump can always be counted on to gut-feel the right thing and then maybe even do it, but only after having blurted out several wrong things.
In an example closer to everyone here, Trump wasn’t driven by ideas, he drew on people’s resentment against the woke professional managerial class. He started talking about immigration because it worked for him at rallies, but he wasn’t reading Peter Brimelow (or our host).
There was also Johnny Cash, who managed to get someone freed who kept reoffending. I don’t think the guy killed anyone though.
Whatever else one may say about Trump, much like his old friend Bill Clinton, he seems very heterosexual by the most obvious metric.
No ideas for five year olds (though as others say here interaction with other boys may help), but for a teenager playing up the conspiratorial angle of the trans crowd (banning books, controlling the media, hiding information) may help. You could play on a teenager’s distrust of authority. Go to pubmed and find the rates of strictures and fistulas after the surgery. If the thing progresses you might be able to make him think twice.
She acts like a total teenager. 😉
It’s more ‘crazy is undesirable and most men go for looks, so if you go for hot you may have to get some crazy’.
Bipolar women (like bipolar men) often have higher sex drives so there is that.
I don’t remember Gisele Bundchen being particularly nuts, but look who got her-Tom Brady.
Elon Musk, well, he thought common interests were a thing (he met Grimes over a joke about AI) but ran into the increasing gender divide over politics in nerd culture.
You're thinking of colon cancer, which indeed is one of the most common cancers but is not identical to rectal cancer. All the reports of his first bout with cancer indicate that it was rectal or anal cancer, which are different and never described interchangeably with colon cancer.Replies: @SFG, @Art Deco
Oh for crying out loud. Colorectal cancer is about the most common cancer their is for men and for women; for men, only lung cancer is more prevalent. Some reports have it that he had a bout of anal cancer about 15 years ago. HIV and HPV are risk factors for anal cancer, but lots of cancers are random strikes. HPV is the more consequential of the two as a risk factor and spreads during coitus.
Nitpick but relevant here: it usually gets divided into colorectal (glandular cells gone bad) and anal (skin cells gone bad, more or less). The risk factors for anal are more tied in with HPV (human papilloma virus, not HIV) infection and thus sex.
First time I’ve seen a retarded girl sexualized. Makes me wonder if my apparent bigotry masquerading as common decency hasn’t been a lifelong mistake. I mean, how many problems can a retarded girlfriend, or especially a retarded wife, present? Just teach them how to clean the house, work the air fryer and dishwasher safely, and all the drama is done!
In somewhat related news, Victoria’s Secret announced hiring its first model who actually admits to being clinically retarded:
Big problem with a developmentally disabled woman is the kids. Dumb mom, dumb kids.
The smart ones are more likely to contract feminism, though, so there’s an argument for middle of the road. Or you go to church, start early, and try to get one of the few smart conservative women out there.
I think the best recent satirical novel is The Mandibles by Lionel Shriver. When I was fifteen, I thought the future would be like 1984. When I was thirty, I thought the future would be like Atlas Shrugged. When I was forty-five, I thought the future would be like Camp of the Saints. Now I think the future is going to be like The Mandibles. P.J. and Lionel Shriver did a joint interview and it is worth going to YouTube and searching it out and watching it.Replies: @Steve Sailer, @SFG
Who has taken up his mantle? Who is the great rightist satirist today?
Shriver’s gotten in a little trouble a few years back for defending free speech and wearing a sombrero, so there is that.
Which is probably why he gets the ‘strange new respect’ not accorded Rush Limbaugh posthumously.
It’s not worth selling your soul for, I suppose, but the guy never sold out-he was a libertarian, so Reaganite tax cuts really were his thing. Opposing Trump and nationalism really is consistent in his case.
Has anyone come up with a good answer as to what actually to do with gayness? It seems to actually be biological and making people hide in the closet seems pointless. Maybe something like the old Roman standard where it was OK to be attracted to men but you were still supposed to raise a family.
Apprehension? Putin and Xi have got to be laughing their heads off at their principal rival shooting itself in the foot like this.
More like the head.Replies: @Wilkey
Apprehension? Putin and Xi have got to be laughing their heads off at their principal rival shooting itself in the foot like this.
“Para continuar en inglés, óprima el número dos, blanquito maldito.”
That’s why he didn’t become super famous earlier, I think.
Now, it’s politics.
Agreed.
I kind of think this could be one of the few things the dissident right and the remains of the old left could agree on.
Read Kendi’s “How to be Antiracist”. He basically says either the discrepancy has to be due to inferiority or discrimination, and is counting on your conditioning to make you pick option B.
He’s trying to close off the ‘culture’ argument used by the mainstream right and until recently much of the left. But he’ll probably wind up redpilling a few people.
(Ironically I actually think culture plays a fairly big role, though not 100 percent or I wouldn’t be here.)
Isn’t one of Steve’s big arguments that the Inner Party now believes their own BS and this is one of the problems we’re seeing?
I’m sure he’d kick an ass or two. Probably bury them in concrete.
Maybe close to 100 years of males in the STEMIEST of STEM, physics, saying exactly that has something to do with it. I guess calling "collapse of the superpositioned wave function" makes it manly.Replies: @SFG, @Reg Cæsar, @David Davenport, @PhysicistDave
It seems like a lot of women have trouble separating the existence of a difference of perspectives of an event and there also being an objective event (Even if nobody knows what it is), almost like the different emotional perspectives of spectators were themselves reality or perhaps more interestingly, a difficulty in articulating this difference.
I mean, at the subatomic level.
Heisenberg’s uncertainty principle says you can’t know position and momentum more accurately than Planck’s constant (roughly). But Planck’s constant is 0.00000000000000000000000000000000066.
Similarly, relativity doesn’t really become important until you get close to the speed of light.
I remember once talking to the smartest most academic girl in my school. I can't remember what led up to it once but I said "Well, there is always the truth" and she snapped back, shocked, "You believe in absolute truth?". I was completely floored. It seems like a lot of women have trouble separating the existence of a difference of perspectives of an event and there also being an objective event (Even if nobody knows what it is), almost like the different emotional perspectives of spectators were themselves reality or perhaps more interestingly, a difficulty in articulating this difference. Maybe because they are so used to social politicking and details being massaged in their social lives growing up with other girls. The quintessential mass female social media enclave, Tumblr was a hive of post-modernism and I suspect most of the more intellectual feminist authors being mid century post-modernists is what propels this. As these users have migrated to Twitter and as Twitter and other female-dominated social media platforms (Maybe Gab is the only male dominated one?) they have brought this very un-detached style of public discourse with them.So is this all just a result of the big wave of feminist intellectuals coming up in an environment where post-modernists seemed like natural allies? How much of history is dictated by intellectual and political coalitions continuing long after their original context has ceased to make sense but the ideas come tangled together none the less? Or is the appeal of post-modernism not dissimilar to astrology and are female authors more comfortable with it?This isn't to say highly autistic men can't also be blind to reality in order to fit into their meta-narrative (See so much of what libertarians have to say about anything) but it seems like they are much more likely to debate the details and for neutral observers to be better served. Nobody pretends politics was ever not full of self-serving narratives but it seems like narratives is all there is now.Replies: @LP5, @SFG, @Peter D. Bredon, @RW
But, surely, the decline in rationality-orientation after the late 1970s has much to do with the rise of women writers and feminist values.
The persistence of coalitions is definitely a thing. Look at the way lots of social conservatives still oppose regulation of business.
I think the observation about women being more interested in social than physical reality is true as well, and makes plenty of evolutionary sense. Social reality is more important 90 percent of tune anyway, at least until your crops stop growing.
Jordan Peterson points to Sweden as an example of a country where the Government has to great lengths to remove any structural obstacles for women in any field they chose to enter. The net result is that they have the most gender imbalance of any country in the West with women overwhelmingly in teaching, nursing etc (people jobs) and men in manufacturing, farming, transportation etc- (things jobs).It causes the shit-libs no end of grief.https://nationalpost.com/opinion/jordan-peterson-the-gender-scandal-in-scandinavia-and-canadahttps://sputniknews.com/20190118/scandinavia-feminism-women-labour-1071594857.htmlhttps://theculturetrip.com/europe/sweden/articles/swedish-teens-choose-careers-based-on-gender-roles-according-to-science/Love the last one "According to science"! Yup, written by a chick.
I think the observation about women being more interested in social than physical reality is true as well, and makes plenty of evolutionary sense. Social reality is more important 90 percent of tune anyway, at least until your crops stop growing.
I’m sure if the pup was a woman it would have been an issue.
Figures to your left such as Pinker and Haidt would probably agree with reading the other side’s stuff.
Agreed…but that’s what he’s writing about!
All 3 are Catholic interestingly enough.
https://richardhanania.substack.com/p/womens-tears-win-in-the-marketplace
Richard Hanania has a great article about this just now. Thought this for years but the man put it all together so nicely.
Replies: @Efim Polenov
The woman was young, no more than twenty-five, all breasts, bright red lips, raging hair, and sultry makeup, popping out of a black turtleneck sweater. She wore black pants and teetered atop a pair of black spike-heel shoes.
At first their voices were muffled. Then the woman’s voice became louder and the man’s became lower. It was the classic case. The man wants to confine matters to a quiet private argument, but the woman decides to play one of her trump cards, which is Making a Scene. There is Making a Scene, and there is Tears. This was Making a Scene. The woman’s voice became louder and louder, and at last the man’s rose, too.
“But you gotta,” the woman said.
“But I don’t gotta, Irene.”
“What am I suppose a do? Rot?”
“You suppose a pay your bills like everybody else,” he said, mimicking her. “You already beat me for half my fee. And then you keep asking me to do things that could get me disbarred.”
“You dun care.”
“It ain’t that I dun care, Irene. It’s that I dun care anymore. You don’t pay your bills. Don’t look at me like that. You’re on your own.”
“But you gotta! What happens if they rearrest me?”
“You shoulda thoughta that, Irene. What did I tell you the first time you walked into this office? I told you two things. I told you, ‘Irene, I’m not gonna be your friend. I’m gonna be your lawyer. But I’m gonna do more for you than your friends.’ And I said , ‘Irene, you know why I do this? I do it for money.’ And then I said, ‘Irene, remember those two things.’ Idd’n’at right? Did’n I say that?”
“I can’t go back there,” she said. She lowered her heavy Tropical Twilight eyelids and then her whole head. Her lower lip trembled; her head and the raging hair shook, so did her shoulders.
The Tears.
“Oh, for Christ’s sake, Irene. Come on!”
The Tears.
“All right. Look…I’ll find out if they’re going after you on a 220–31, and I’ll represent you on rearraignment if they are, but that’s it.”
The Tears!—victorious even after these many millennia. The woman nodded like a penitent child. She walked out through the blazing waiting room. Her bottom bobbed in a glossy black shimmer. One of the Leather Men looked at Sherman and smiled, man to man, and said, “Ay, caramba.”
On this alien terrain Sherman felt obliged to smile back.
I wonder how much of this is competition between lesbians and men for bisexual or persuadable women. Criminalizing male approaches seems like a way to give the gay women the edge.
They're also trying to nudge straight men into alternative lifestyles.
Criminalizing male approaches seems like a way to give the gay women the edge.
Getting in wars all the time will do that.
Seriously, they have too many neighbors. Look at a map. The USA can afford isolationism because we’re in the middle of nowhere.
Good analysis.
Getting in wars all the time will do that.
Seriously, they have too many neighbors. Look at a map.
Sadly, we no longer are isolated from anything. Stuff that's happening in eastern Ukraine is, for some reason, our problem.
The USA can afford isolationism because we’re in the middle of nowhere.
I remember back in the 2000s and early 2010s when some of the data on genetic differences was getting published and Simon Baron Cohen was ascendant and everyone thought the Narrative was about to go down thanks to science. Derbyshire even talked about it a little in We Are Doomed.
Nope, they just forced the wokeness into the sciences.
The tech guys like this stuff because it’s useful and helps you understand the world. Visual people really are different from verbal people, and I am guessing that has significant effects on programming ability.
You’ll notice there are ideas from the dissident right they don’t pick up, like women staying in the home or some of the more esoteric racial stuff. And they’ll take stuff from the hippie left like polyamory that helps them manage their woman shortage, or trans stuff that lets the significant number of them with autogynephilia be more comfortable . (As I have said I do not think polyamory will be good for society as a whole, and the trans stuff, well, it doesn’t bug me that much personally but if I had an tomboyish daughter I would be very worried.)
It’s the Bruce Lee thing, study your experience, take what is useful, discard the rest.
I’m a wordcel (good at math though), but after watching the decline of American society over the past 40 years have drifted right.
I’ve never been sure to what degree our ruling class actually believes their own BS about races and sexes being equal, but I think as Steve says they have started moving from faking it to actually believing in it, with predictably awful results.
I suspect every society has stuff they lie about, and obviously it changes over time. But this is ours. The Chinese no doubt have a completely different set of taboos.
I read the article. It was basically saying the affirmative action monster finally got the Jews of Hollywood. And he brings up their role in assembling the monster in the first place quite often.
He does somewhat exaggerate the Jewish role in building Hollywood-in the early parts of the 20th century it was a little more goyish.
- - - But the song is about the Fortunate Son - and that's no small feat. It's rather what made it a signature song of the whole - prosperous - oh so porsperous! - era: That was the basic feeling: Being - Fortunate Sons at that special point in time - and: Announcing that in a rather double-faced artistic fashion*** of masculine self-assertion as Steve calls that in his TM-article! ******
"Fortunate Son could have been about ANYTHING in the world, and it would have been a great song."
Maybe I am missing something, but isn’t the point of the song that the narrator isn’t the fortunate son, I.e. the millionaire’s son who doesn’t go to war?
The singer/narrator is fortunate for not having betryaed anybody. - And for having survived the war (at least possibly) which is also a great thing. - He is experienced. The betrayers and treacherers aren't. - The underdog is in a way the looser, but - in the end he is the triumphant prototypical proud boy standing in front of the enthusiastic crowd and roaring out his - taste - his energy channelled into a very beautiful song indeed (that was Achmed E. Newman's point) - of rage, charme and sparkling strength.Replies: @Ripple Earthdevil
Maybe I am missing something, but isn’t the point of the song that the narrator isn’t the fortunate son, I.e. the millionaire’s son who doesn’t go to war?
He’s a white guy. Gay, but I guess that doesn’t count for much anymore.
Still vegan though-when the Simpsons spoofed him his biggest complaint was they had him eating a ham sandwich.
I mean, I agree with you. There’s a theoretical dysgenic effect as dual career couples have fewer kids, but on an individual level it is as you say.
Thing is, I think, if you think America’s gone south since 1960 you tend to want to turn the clock back altogether. My parents both worked at jobs of similar income and remain together over four decades later. But they were from another generation and, honestly, a different culture.
I agree with a lot of what you say, but I always thought the whole Marxist thing was overblown. Class struggle is a distraction to most modern wokists.
But there was an old NR article about the vices of the rich being more injurious to the poor, and it’s stuck with me for a while. I’m pretty sure Silicon Valley millionaires and billionaires can engage in polyamory and microdose LSD and get away with it, but when the poor try free live they just get broken homes.
This tension has always been a part of a moral society. The "good" principles on which a life-well-lived is based are those that work well for the least among us. They are the guardrails that are most necessary for the least gifted, the least resourced, and those less surrounded by a supportive network. In Christian terms, that is the beauty of God's design -- many things that are wrong or less than ideal don't always lead to disaster. But if practiced widely, they hurt the most vulnerable first.It is the modern way that the well-off preach one set of values and live another, by and large. The less well-off live the values that the culture preaches, and thereby suffer and inflict harm.
I agree with a lot of what you say, but I always thought the whole Marxist thing was overblown. Class struggle is a distraction to most modern wokists.But there was an old NR article about the vices of the rich being more injurious to the poor, and it’s stuck with me for a while. I’m pretty sure Silicon Valley millionaires and billionaires can engage in polyamory and microdose LSD and get away with it, but when the poor try free live they just get broken homes.
Marxism has replaced "class" with "race." Other than that it looks just the same.
I agree with a lot of what you say, but I always thought the whole Marxist thing was overblown. Class struggle is a distraction to most modern wokists.
Person262144 at hotmail dot com I guess. I’ll be curious to see if anyone else bugs me. 😉
Yeah, I always thought the PUA thing about stay at home wives was more showing their sociopolitical cards than purely self interested advice for men. Ironically the second wave feminist career dream is the safest thing these days. Whether that was the whole point of no fault divorce, well, I am fond of conspiracy theories but I bet there were lots of men eager to chase their mistresses who got the whole thing started. You always have a couple of greedy guys who spoil it for everyone else.
It's more about stating an idealized view of what should be like, but it doesn't acknowledge the modern marital reality of divorce settlements, alimony, and child custody battles.
Yeah, I always thought the PUA thing about stay at home wives was more showing their sociopolitical cards than purely self interested advice for men.
Yes. Without getting into the question of whether feminism & careerism are good for society, the reality is that it's impossible to see either being rolled back. So you can learn to live with the consequences of these ideologies, or you can try to adhere to old norms and get screwed in divorce court.
Ironically the second wave feminist career dream is the safest thing these days.
In its initial phase, probably.
but I bet there were lots of men eager to chase their mistresses who got the whole thing started. You always have a couple of greedy guys who spoil it for everyone else.
That’s really fascinating and heartening to hear. Can you elaborate?
Pretty much, Reg.
It used to be that way. Hey, you made a promise. Not just to each other, but to the church, to the state, to two families, and to the future children. Suck it up
It’s one of the big reasons I never did.
Seems to me best way to limit your liability on family court is marry a career woman as she has the least to gain. But the odds are stacked against guys these days no matter what you do.
There is some actual interest among internet rationalists in government by prediction markets, which I find astoundingly moronic. Yeah, like nobody knows how to manipulate markets.
It’s hard, because a lot has to do with the history of the country. China does pretty well with rule by bureaucrats, but they have a LONG history of it and basically invented the exam based meritocracy. Feudal rulers in Europe don’t seem to have adapted well to the modern age, and the results of military government in Latin America are uninspiring to say the least. Our mix of lawyers and businessmen may be the best we can do given our history. One of the things about the USA is popular government is a big part of the National mythology so I doubt a government that doesn’t at least pretend to be elected would have any legitimacy.
A couple of the nerdier losers will content themselves with sharing a porker.
The less nerdy losers…well…yeah. Higher crime rates for sure.
Human nature has proved unmalleable, despite the lefts best efforts. They will view her as a free hooker. If they say it is a polyamorous “relationship “ she puts out to be viewed as hip and edgy. They aren’t losing or investing much no matter how nerdy.
A couple of the nerdier losers will content themselves with sharing a porker.
No feudal nobility, so it’s lawyers and businessmen.
The left puts a lot of silly things in the mouths of POC to make them more credible to their guilty liberal base (‘defund the police’ was more popular among activists than regular black people) but I could believe people in other countries knowing about US politics- I remember Le Monde having a heading for following the US presidential election along with politics, business, local, etc. We’re big and powerful and, unlike Russia and China, relatively open about our internal politics at the sub-head of state level.
So that’s why we had enough masks?
Seriously the market can’t do everything.
Yeah, I mean, the media these days lionizes women who act like caddish men, and they are definitely out there, but I don’t think it’s anywhere near a majority.
Most women want families, but you would never realize that from reading the NYT.
Good pickup.
“It puts the pronoun in its mouth or its reputation goes south!”
Some truth to that, though I remember at the time there was a lot of Freudian BS drifting around, so having more common sense out there was definitely a plus I think.
Plus it’s not like Epictetus was missing out on royalties.
What I wrote above could be read this way, but it is not meant this way.
This is offensive to sadomasochists. We restrict our activities to consenting partners.
It was a joke. 😉
Seriously you are probably right-probably plenty of pathological sadists here, though nobody ever will do the study to check.
A dominance thing. As was the absurd public value-system in old-style Communism (s. Theordore Dalrympe's famous claim that Communism was a lot about humiliating its unerlings (and its followers too at times).
Instead, we are supposed to believe them unreservedly. Because they said so.
This is offensive to sadomasochists. We restrict our activities to consenting partners.
What I wrote above could be read this way, but it is not meant this way.
This is offensive to sadomasochists. We restrict our activities to consenting partners.
The founder of rational emotive behavioral therapy, the precursor to CBT, Albert Ellis, regularly mentioned the Stoic antecedents of his philosophy.
He regularly had sessions open to the public on Friday nights to demonstrate his technique where he would tell people they had ‘screwed up thinking’ and that life was ‘tough shit’.
About as manly as a therapeutic technique gets, I think. Short of building a cabin in the woods. Which, hey, if you don’t feel better at least you now have a cabin in the woods.
That observation reminds me of nobody so much as my old and ultimately suicidal acquaintance Tony Bourdain--who as I've previously mentioned here entertained me the night we first met with obsessive monologues about NY gang lore, who had an obtrusive thing for The Ramones, etc. etc. Now that you mention it, one wonders...
I wouldn’t say that literary journalist Luc Sante is “renowned,” but he’s been around for a long time writing about Downtown Manhattan smart straight guy topics like seeing the Ramones and Patti Smith at CBGBs, hanging out with director Jim Jarmusch, pre-Prohibition New York gangsters, Lou Reed, that kind of thing: the kind of guy who would have been a punk rocker if he’d had even minimal musical ability and extraversion.
Exactly right. My wife's uncle, now "aunt," was busted by his wife for his ladies' underpants problem in middle age, which started him on his late-in-life "journey" to "becoming" a "woman." You couldn't get more bourgeois than that dude: Ivy-League white-shoe lawyer from an old-school northeastern WASP family. He has since literally renamed himself after his mother.I remember the first time I met him maybe sixteen years ago. He hadn't yet inverted his penis or had himself castrated, but he was already dressing like a late-middle-aged empty-nester NYC member of the Colony Club who'd recently discovered Downtown and the color black and was maybe toying with the idea of buying a nice loft in Tribeca. On that occasion (and all subsequent occasions) he thoroughly creeped me out. And he utterly grossed my wife out by asking her where he could score some nice really tights around here, which apparently are in short supply in suburban Boston.Once she'd recovered, she recommended Wolford, on Madison Ave.Replies: @SFG, @Peter D. Bredon, @Buzz Mohawk, @Dieter Kief
In contrast, the autogynephilic straight guy look is more of a-simple-strand-of-tasteful-real-pearls modeled after their mothers, who were typically respectable bourgeois ladies.
I always thought it made more sense to let people like that play their drag games and not take them that seriously. I mean, it’s a fetish, whatever. But some of them start to think it’s because they ‘really are’ women, and then we indulge them.
I suspect POC displacing Jews from the left’s choice posts is going to have all kinds of after effects. I don’t know what they all are but I feel a less effective left is probably a good thing.
My big worry is Neocon II will drag the USA into war with Iran.
Could be!
I still think he went home to his wife after expounding on how it was about commercialization and said,
“Hey honey. Guess what crap I just sold.”
ACX regulars are engaging with Sailer as if he's a person with interesting ideas as opposed to an emissary of (secular) Satan, which is not always the case.Replies: @SFG, @Emil Nikola Richard, @Hypnotoad666, @MM
I'm a professional media critic. My assumption from decades of close reading of the New York Times is that if I read a statement in the Times, it's very likely true. For example, if the New York Times tells me an Asian woman named Michelle Go was shoved to her death on the subway tracks by a man named Simon Martial, I'm sure that's true.
If the Times were to tell me Simon Martial is white, I'm sure they wouldn't be lying.
On the other hand, the Times finds some other facts are not fit to print. In particular, the Times does not like to go out of its way to raise doubts in the minds of its subscribers about their general picture of who are the Good Guys and who are the Bad Guys that they've developed over their years of relying on the Times for news.
Therefore, in both Times articles I've read that mentioned that victim Michelle Go is Asian did not mention the race of perp Simon Martial.
.
Continues...
The reason the left has it in for Scott A is he and his regulars deal civilly with Sailer and Co., and at least one leaked email suggests that one of the reasons is he knows HBD is true but knows he cannot admit it too loudly.
With Pollock, the boogers could still be part of the art. 😉 (OK, lunch…)
Then there was Piero Manzoni, whose ‘Merde d’artiste’ was exactly what it sounds like..
They tried to make him go to rehab, but he said no.
He lost his psych job after being outed by the NYT, and it could be a FIRE thing. Those people usually try to stop renting ASAP though, obviously, so maybe it’s a social outlet of sorts.
I think this wasn’t made in the USA. The references to slavery and purity are way off for a modern AWFL. The second black guy looks Indian. The math is even off-180 years since slavery ended? We are in 2045?
I think these guys read up on American history in Wikipedia and made a video about standing up for yourself that’s 20 years out of date.
Plus the whip gets a few kinky people to click.
If it is a money thing they are probably trying to get the kink audience. Dress the kink thing up as a moral parable-goes back to the Middle Ages.
You know, I remember reading the articles saying men were supposed to talk about our feelings more. Stuff like this is how you know they’re not actually annoyed with stuff you’re doing and just hate you.
Those articles are the feline feminine mind at work, dissembling to get men to expose their vulnerabilities so that the men can be more easily manipulated and dismissed. The feint was of course the falsity that women find vulnerable emotional men more attractive and will let a man be weak for a while while but not learn to find him pathetic and disgusting.
You know, I remember reading the articles saying men were supposed to talk about our feelings more. Stuff like this is how you know they’re not actually annoyed with stuff you’re doing and just hate you.