But for others, the changes have fueled talk about “white replacement,” a racist conspiracy theory tied to the declining birthrates of white Americans

Do they provide any evidence, any whatsoever, that it is ‘tied to declining birthrates’ and not a mass inflow of racial aliens?

Here in the UK, annual statistics on the country of Birth of the mother are provided. After being stable at a percent or two either side of 12% of mothers being immigrants between 1969 and 1998, they rose rapidly. To such an extent that 90% of the decrease in the share of British born mothers has not been due to lower native fertility, but due to increased immigration. Had immigration been held at 1990s levels, births to immigrant mothers would have risen from 13.2% in 1998 to 14.6% in 2017, a less than 1.5% increase. In fact, by 2017, immigrant mothers were 29.3%, a more than 16.0% increase. Ergo, over 90% of the increase is due to immigration, NOT fertility.

Its the battle of the ‘i’m alright jacks’ …those who arent slipping behind, who are, or have been made to believe they are, benefitting from globalism, and the losers, those who have seen 25 years of stagnant or falling real wages and a decimation of skilled, middle income jobs.

Ironically, the Brexit party under Farage promises to replicate a free trade, open borders relationship with the hordes of Eastern Europe, with a free trade, open borders relationship with the far larger, far poorer, far, far more hostile hordes of the third world.

Those seeking freedom from the EU think they are getting one thing when they are actually getting something quite different, something far worse.

Indeed

White flight continues apace in Birmingham.

1991: 78.5%/754,289 white
2001: 70.4%/687,406 white, 65.6%/641,345 white British
2011: 57.9%/621,636 white 53.1%/570,217 white British
2016: 52.5%/591,000 white, 48.3%/543,000 white British (ONS estimate)
2031: 33% white, 28% white British (UoM projection)

Birmingham schools

1998: 59.8% white (55.2% white British)
2008: 46.5% white (43.4% white British)
2018: 34.5% white (30.2% white British)

Oddly, not even even the white other/white non-British category of kids has grown unlike in many British cities. Not even the Poles or Romanians want anything to do with Birmingastan.

Seriously, wall the damn cesspit off & let it be the Pakistani governments problem. All that exists for British people in Birmingham nowadays are gangs of paedophile rapists and curry houses with hygiene issues. That, and Muslim driving standards, which have probably resulted in more deaths of whites than have all the murders of whites by ethnics put together since this damn mass immigration project got foisted onto us.

The only funding that should head to Birmingham should be in the form of re-location packages to get the remaining besieged white minority the hell out of there. Whatever EU funding has been doing for Birmingham since 1992, it hasnt stopped white natives being driven out, so frankly, I couldnt care less about it. It has a third world population, let it have a third world economy to match.

For an image of a typical street scene in Birmingham today, this is pretty much what to expect…
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4014030/Hate-preacher-dubbed-black-Jason-Bourne-repeatedly-asked-police-don-t-know-viral-video-rant.html
Mentally deficient roided up Afro-Carribbean, probable ex?-drug dealer muslim convert and his mystery meat (white…perhaps with gypsy admixture) obese wench.

I’ve been to Rotterdam, Cologne, Islamified parts of Paris, and none of them are anywhere near as depressing or inhospitable for whites as is Birmingham. Its a wart.

I’ve done some playing about with statistics on this…it sounds far worse if you consider it in context of the two population groups (white, black) sizes…(figs for England/Wales, no London specific ones available)…

The Home Offices most recent ‘Race and Crime report’ and their tally on inter-racial murders. (table 3.19)
It states, for where the race of the killer and deceased are known, in the three year period ending 2016, 24 blacks were killed by whites, and 79 whites were killed by blacks. Simply put, blacks killed whites at about 3.3 times the rate of the opposite.

HOWEVER, as there are 79 killers of whites in that black cohort of 1,865,000, every 1 in 23,000 blacks is a killer of whites (assuming no multiple murders) By comparison, as there are only 24 white killers of blacks, out of 47,000,000 whites, the chances of finding a white killer of blacks is barely 1 in 2 million (1,958,333)

ie, blacks, as a whole, are only 3.3 times more likely to kill a white than vice versa. But given the still relatively small number of blacks, taken as individuals, they are nearly 100 times more likely to be killers of whites than vice versa.

Its worse than that…blacks (and half blacks, who are often lumped in with blacks in homicide stats) are now (as of the january 2018 annual school census) 26% of Londons 11-18 year old secondary school population (1% more than NYC if you can believe it…London now more africanized than NYC…who’d of seen that coming 20 years back) I’d imagine in the 18-30 age range they are around 25% too, accounting for illegals.

They are less ghettoized than the muslims too, so there is really no getting away from them. That being said, they don’t (yet) seem to have quite the same level of hostility towards whites as do americanized-africans.

While not us current, official/legal immigration doesnt present a particularly great picture.

Emigration of Italian nationals massively up in recent years…a significant Brain Drain, not unlike Greece…

Didnt see this one coming! LOL

Its not ‘the left’

Its ‘the blacks’

‘The left’ is merely responding to a market of votes created by the presence of ‘the blacks’ in the democratic system.

On that, one detail, correct. And all the more difficult for him to do so badly because the Tories are so utterly tone deaf towards the WWC. They talk like Jeb!, ignoring all signs of populism, and sounding as banal and globalist as humanly possible.

Margaret “Oppenheimer” Hodge did what the luftwaffe failed to do – cleanse the East End of London of signs of British Life.

Hers was a constituency which was over 94% white in 1991 (92% white British) – slightly higher than the English Average
By 2011, it was 49.5% white British. Its classrooms, as of 2018, only 22% white British.
By 2031, the University of Manchester social sciences dept estimates the constituency will be 4% white British.

From 92% to 4% in 40 years.

Clearly the Japanese haven’t cottoned on to the western notion of ‘electing a new people’ yet

2% of people now…flood it with Japanese migrants & im sure 51% could be achieved. It seems Russias immigration policy would even facilitate such a change.

“the city is 64% white”

Ah, but for how much longer.

The schools are only 35% white…

http://www.mpls.k12.mn.us/uploads/mps_at_a_glance.pdf

Wrong. I am not a libertarian, and have not been for some years. It is just that it is barely conceivable to imagine a more dysfunctional concoction of rent seeking and unproductive directives than exist in the sphere of US healthcare.

Firstly, you are confusing free-market and private ownership. It is entirely possible to have private ownership & no free market. The state monopoly on planning via the permit system is the most obvious example. The actors demanding permits are, typically private. But the supplier issuing them, most certainly isnt.

Firstly, you have CON laws, creating a constant undersupply of Hospitals, MRI clinics and so forth…
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Certificate_of_need
These panels are ejudicated by state boards filled with industry insiders who, not surprisingly, want supply restricted so prices remain high.

They may not be forced to serve, but they in practical terms, they near as damn it may as well be. To gain access to profitable medicare and medicaid funds, they must be signatories to the EMTALA act, which requires them to treat anyone dropped off, regardless of whether they have insurance, funds or no ability to pay….
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emergency_Medical_Treatment_and_Active_Labor_Act

Then there are all the other rules. Profit limits that not surprisingly have the (un)intended consequence of beaureaucratic bloat (10% of 2billion is more than 10% of 1.5billion, afterall)

Or the fact US consumers cannot import drugs cheaper from abroad, often drugs made in the USA in the form of reimportation bans.

Quite so.

Its a load of crock, really.

Trump may not levy visible, straightfoward taxes on the incomes of wealthy Americans, but, he will do what Republicans have been doing for the last 40 years…raise the inflation tax while sounding off about being a ‘fiscal conservative’. Confiscate spending power from all Americans, but particularly less wealthy Americans with ever greater deficit spending (and rampant unbacked money creation from wall street too, i might add), thus diluting the purchasing power of their dollars. A far more insidious form of taxation, and one that has essentially condemned the middle class to zero real income growth since the 1970s, in spite of productivity meaning people should need only work 3 days a week in 2018 to achieve the same living standard a 5 day week in 1970 afforded.

And free markets? HAH! gimme a break. The US healthcare Industrial Complex, that which accounts for 1/5th of US GDP, soon to be 1/4 of US GDP, nearing 3 times the cost of other industrialized nations, depends on the complete absence of the free market. Americans do, and will continue to, pay many multiples more than the rest of the world for pharmaceuticals. Trump has done zero about it.

If Trumps speech was a success, it was more because of the comatose state of the american voters consciousness and/or poll gerrymandering.

As it becomes clear Trump isnt serious on immigration, healthcare will likely be the defining issue of 2020, as, indeed it has in many local elections, regardless of whether Trump wants to talk about it…

https://www.cnbc.com/2017/11/08/health-care-played-big-role-in-democratic-win-in-virginia-poll.html

He was also against breaking up the banks.

Any stock I put in Krugman quickly evaporated some years back when he dodged any kind of debate with Steve Keen for months on end, issued a statement kind of response that addressed nothing Keen covered, & said thats that.

He’s a shill for Wall Street. Fake opposition.

And the partisan nonsense grates too.