Troll: Someone that, when I read what he writes, I don't feel contented with it.

Roberto says: "Fascism is how Hitler saved the capitalistic system in Germany and maintained the control of its oligarchy."

Pure twaddle. Fascism is a brand of socialism, directly derived from Marx's communism. Always has been, always will be. Its almost the exact same crap with a different name.

A wealth confiscation and expropriation scheme to benefit elites [ i.e. "the oligarchy"] with the thin veneer of "the national interest" to fool the always gullible masses as they are robbed blind.

Like its brother, communism, it's got absolutely nothing to do with capitalism and everything to do with larceny on a grand scale.

There was little or no capitalism in Germany even prior to Hitlers rise. Hitler just stepped on the gas and just about entirely eliminated it , "in the national interest" :-) .

Roberto says:"Fascism’s prime tool is military spending. Military spending produces a product that doesn’t build up on the nation’s shelves in the form of unsold inventory, and therefore can not cause a depression or a recession.

Complete and utter twaddle! Basically you are claiming that massive government spending programs do not cause recessions or depressions [as long as the spending is on military and associated] . Yeah right!

But carry on fantasizing your econo-porn by all means. Highly amusing I must say.

Regards, onebornfree

It doesn’t matter, the point is that the money stays in one place. You can hire the math kid and pay him a few hundred thousand, toss in some stock options, but the owners, the moneyed class, the ones making billions off the backs of those kids, they’re Goldman Sachs. They hire from Ivys and keep the money in the family.

They're fine with Africa: http://www.chinawhisper.com/chinese-in-africa-chinese-men-marry-african-wife/

Replies: @Truth

As demonstrated by the high number fraudulent scientific studies, no doubt.


https://www.nytimes.com/2017/10/13/world/asia/china-science-fraud-scandals.html

http://www.ey.com/Publication/vwLUAssets/EY-asia-pacific-fraud-survey-2015-a-life-sciences-perspective/%24FILE/EY-asia-pacific-fraud-survey-2015-a-life-sciences-perspective.pdf

http://occamstypewriter.org/boboh/2010/11/17/rates_of_scientific_fraud/

Well, the original was “Mein Kampf” (my struggle). BTW, grammatically correct would be “Das Kampf”, not “Der Kampf”.

He's just being sarcastic, as usual.

Agree that they can't start this war "cold", and they once again need to mobilize their stupid giant (the US) - and the only way they can do it, is a new piece of 9/11 style fakery, this time implicating Iran.

IMO it's only a question of "how and when", not "if". No doubt that it's already prepared, along with the instant fake story and 24/7 media outrage.

They have to portray the US attack on Iran as righteous defense.

It never is. Just one more bit of deceit and misdirection in a grossly misleading and dishonest article.

It’s amazing that people can be so thoroughly deluded. Was there a single acknowledgement in that entire article that this “genocide” of blacks is being carried out by blacks themselves?

If you just fell to earth and didn’t know anything about the circumstances, you would read this article and think that some scary non-black group is targeting and murdering blacks wholesale. Which is what the writer of this article WANTS you to think…

I saw a statistic once that so callled assault weapons were used in 1% of all gun crimes.

So yes, it’s very low.

Banning blacks would be far more effective than banning these weapons. But of course this pastor and his stupid white liberal friends will never admit that.

Because (( they )) know that if they give the groids an out-of-school suspension then there goes the neighborhood! Hide your wife. Hide your kids. Hide anything of value! Hence the ISS AA hire to handle the "misunderstood" groids. Whoever said it, YES, this country IS a JOKE !!!!!

Thanks for that speech from NETWORK!

Which reminds me of something: Trump may be the greatest artist of political television that we have ever seen. That's the secret weapon that he has that may allow him to carry on for a few more years, maybe for the full four, possibly the big eight. If we last that long.

http://www.cnn.com/2017/05/10/politics/donald-trump-henry-kissinger/index.html

As a friend of mine has pointed out: the only way we will see a revolution in the USA is if somehow we could take away their television from the masses.

the hispanic perps will be labeled as White if they have a white sounding name like George Zimmerman . But if they have a spanish surname like Cruz, they will be considered non-white.

Replies: @in the middle

Hispale-male.
Lightino / Lightina
Gringcano / Gringcana

Zimmerman.

As in a PoC was attacked by a Zimmerman or a group of Zimmermen.

How about Zims?

There's a veritable White Terror in Texas http://www.bccs.crimestoppersweb.com/Pictures/www.txdps.state.tx%20(2)_edited-1.jpg

We say 'dark white male' and non Hispanic white, might as well. Anything to differentiate the whiteness of well, whites, who could be as dark as an Ethiopian, but if their name is James, Johnson, O'hare, etc. then.. .you know.

Not everyone agrees that Roman Catholics are fully Christian.

Replies: @whorefinder, @in the middle, @Former Darfur

Divide and conquer. They DO like to use WASP to sneer at Protestants a lot, lately. Don't get me started on all the "dumb blonde" jokes that I have had to endure! Although, envy of blonde women has always surprised me.

Replies: @Forbes

Seems about right. "Taqiyya" is the muslim term for it. You can lie to non believers about anything as long as it is used constructively for gaining influence for Islam. Thats why you cant trust that whole section of the world. They encourage lieing!

I guess all those anti gun violence marches are working.

Regarding immigration, this is precisely the "Invisible Hand of the Market" Adam Smith, laissez-faire free market, live and let live and let well alone policy that such economist types insist is the only way for an effective economy to run, yet when its applied to immigration, then its suddenly oh so bad and the government needs to play a more hands on role in bringing in more and more unrelated peoples and cultures to one's own nation, and for no good reason.

Question: If all these refugees that are coming from Africa/Middle East, basically not from the first world and with lower IQs to match, how exactly again is this a greater good and benefit for the nation that just opens their borders and accepts them willy nilly?

As a nation, Japan's IQ is around 106 and that's quite high. Certainly higher than just about every Middle Eastern/African nation, in some cases by about 20-30pts.

Also, no African/Middle Eastern nation has any direct experience with writing, reading, speaking Japanese. If its hard enough for Westerners to learn the lingo, what gives the author the idea that 2nd/3rd worlders with inferior IQs will suddenly be able to pick up Japanese and be speaking/writing/reading it immediately without difficulty?

Also, the author fails to explain why exactly African nations have a direct claim and automatic right to pack up, pick up, and head for remote and distant island nation Japan? Why exactly and where is it written that they do? Just cause they have two arms, two legs and a head?

Now see, if the UK had only had the gumption to protect its own borders and keep out the lot of them then they wouldn't be having "homegrown" terrorists in their midst.

Perhaps Japan knows a thing or two about how to run its own nation without any outside help, especially when it hasn't been asked. After all, they've been doing so for nearly fifteen hundred plus years and quite well enough at that.

All nations need to be aware of the global Jewish-Homo Complex or the Jomo Complex.

The canon of the Alt Right, The Camp of the Saints isn't some theoretical future scenario. It already happened big time in the 2oth century. In Palestine. All those poor and helpless Jewish refugees and migrants arrived 'peacefully' and then took over the entire territory, and the native Palestinians have been reduced to second-class citizens --- or not even that --- in their own homeland.

We do not need to speculate about Europe's future. We only need to look at what happened in Palestine to see the future of the European people. They will become Palestinianized. That was the Camp of the Saints scenario played out to the hilt.

But here's the thing. Jews couldn't have done it all on their own. They needed the backing of the great powers, especially US and USSR and under the auspice of globalist imperialist system. Without such protection, the native Palestinians, with help of other Arabs, would have been able to keep the Jews away. Of course, Palestine was then ruled by foreign powers and had race-traitor fifth columnist Arabs who sold themselves out for 30 pieces of silver.

Today, EU is being invaded in much the same manner. It is not ruled by Europeans but by globalist imperialists --- mostly Jomo in nature --- and their collaborator Quislings who should now be called Merkels.
The 'refugees' and 'migrants' thus have the protection, backing, and blessing of the globalist powers who encourage them and even sanctify them(while patriotic Europeans are demonized as 'New Nazis' planning a new holocaust for the simple reason that they wanna protect their own nations. If Europeans had real power, they would push back the hordes and save fortress Europe. But the walls have been breached from the inside at the behest of globalist overlords, to whom the likes of Merkel are mere puppets, stooges, and running dogs both politically and spiritually.
The idea of Fortress Europe goes back to aristocratic Europe when the warrior caste of noblemen defended their territory from invasion. Jews weren't part of the warrior class. They were of the merchant class and their advantage was in the erasure of walls so that they, as middlemen, could profit off everyone all over the world. (But of course, Jews have turned into a warrior race in Israel because they want the Holy Land for themselves.)

This invasion isn't simply about foreigners vs. Europeans. It's about Europeans rendered paralytic by the globalists(and their Merkelite leaders who serve the Jomo Complex than their own people) from doing anything to protect themselves from the crisis. Of course, as the Jomo complex controls so much of education and entertainment, a good many European masses have been turned into pathetic cucks who actually invite their own demise.
But who made them this way? Who changed their hearts and minds?

Just as Palestinians were powerless to stop the Jews since Jewish hordes arriving in Palestine had the backing of the great powers, Europeans are helpless to stop the invasion since the masses of invaders have the backing and blessing of the globalist Jomo elites.

Europe is like a spider stung by a hornet. It hasn't been killed but has been rendered paralyzed. The hornet will the lay the eggs on the spider and then the eggs will hatch and devour the spider... while it's still alive but helpless to save itself.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=24cvHq4Y4Tg

Europe has been rendered paraplegic. The patriotic mind can no longer move the body, and the patriotic body, without leadership and guidance, lies immobile and helpless.

Europeans are parapeans. Watching Europe vs the invaders is like watching pathetic paralympians vs ruddy olympians(coached by Jomo elites).

Some idiots say that Europeans shouldn't flip out or get worried because the masses of arrivals are not invaders with guns and bombs. They are coming 'peacefully' and totally unarmed. (Unarmed refugees, like 'unarmed teen' Michael Brown?) But consider what Gandhi did with the strategy of 'peace'. He mobilized 100s of millions of Hindus and Muslims in India and managed to drive the British out without resorting to guns and bombs. Indians gained power over India through 'peaceful' means. Of course, since Gandhi was an Indian who led Indians to take back India from the British, it was justified. But anyway, the point is this 'peaceful' strategy can have huge political and social repercussions. It could lead even lead to one people taking power from another people. 'Peace' can change mountains.
In the case of British departure from India, it was okay since the British had a homeland to return to. British were defeated and pushed out by 'peaceful' Indians, but they still had their Mother Country, good ole Britain. Indeed, even as Brits were kicked out of many nations in Asian and Africa and Middle East, it wasn't so bad cuz there was one place on earth that they could always return to. But if even UK is lost to Britons, what they do have? All Anglos will be exiles and nomads, even in their ancestral homeland.

Indians were right to use 'peaceful' means to defeat the British in India, but when increasing hordes of non-whites use 'peaceful' invasion to conquer Europe, that is not okay. What Gandhi did was right for India. Gandhi would have had no right to pull such stuff in UK, and even Gandhi would have understood. He was for Indian independence, not for the 'right' of Indians to invoke 'peaceful resistance' or 'peaceful invasion' to take over other nations.

Peace is nice, but 'peaceful' aggression is dangerous, even more so than violent aggression. Indeed, consider how Israel lucked out that Palestinians were too hotheaded and proud to choose the 'peaceful' path of resistance. Back in the 80s, there were hardly much walls and fences between Israel and the Occupied territories. Suppose Palestinians, instead of throwing rocks, smiled a lot and went for mass peace marches and parades where they acted like Indians under Gandhi. Suppose Palestinians threw flowers than rocks at Jews. Jews would have lowered their guard and many more West Bank Arabs would have found jobs and even occupancy in Israel and then their population would have grown and grown.