The news you bring is both surprising and encouraging. Thank you. Since I never listen to this stuff,* I'll take your word for everything in your comment.
_____
*I still don't know why Billie Joe McAllister jumped off the Tallahatchie Bridge. Does anyone?

Replies: @Robbie B

Here you go:
From a National Institute of Health abstract:
“The effects of adrenochrome and epinephrine were investigated in cultured human umbilical arterial endothelial cells. The cells were exposed to either adrenochrome or epinephrine at levels of 50 and 200 microM, respectively, up to 24 hrs. At 3, 5, 7 and 24 hrs of the designed harvesting time …”
Boldface italics by me. Are these the length of the torture sessions?
From a Texas Medical Center article:
“FDA Commissioner (((Scott Gottlieb, M.D.))), spoke out last month about establishments that claim to use the liquid form for blood from young donors to treat a variety of age-related conditions, including dementia, Alzheimer’s disease, Parkinson’s disease, multiple sclerosis, heart disease and post-traumatic stress disorder.”
From the BBC:
“Because the super-wealthy are now pumping themselves with the blood of young people in an attempt to prevent themselves from ageing. Over 100 people have participated in a clinical trial at a San Francisco start-up offering blood transfusions for older patients. Each procedure costs $8,000 (£6,200) and sees the patient injected with two and a half litres of plasma – the liquid element of blood that remains after other cells have been removed – taken from young people. The procedure is being offered as an experimental attempt at rejuvenating the elderly. The median age of the patients is 60 years. (((Jesse Karmazin))), 32, a Stanford-trained scientist who founded the US clinic, told The Sunday Times that the initial results from his patients had been encouraging.
And yet countless other articles suggest that this is a “Qanon conspiracy theory.” Sounds real to me.

Replies: @Robbie B

Blood libel is a proven fact. Jews have been using gentile children's blood for millennium.

For those who are unaware, adrenochrome procedures take blood from gentile children under extreme duress induced by torture and inject it into lecherous old individuals, primarily jews who use it as a life-extending “treatment”. The extreme torture aspect is needed to raise adrenaline levels in the blood before it is removed from the child.

This vile procedure is actually a good description of the “blood sacrifices” that have been practiced by jews throughout history. Before the advent of modern science, gentile child victims of these horrendous procedures usually died from the procedure. Today’s blood transfusion techniques make it possible for these child victims to live and eventually outgrow the need for their blood once they reach puberty. They are then used as sex slaves and worse, organ transplant “donors”.

Israel has a thriving illegal “organ transplant trade” from past adrenochrome child victims to Palestinians that the IDF maims and murders. It is well-known in Palestinian circles that when Palestinian bodies are returned to their relatives, there are suture marks where organs have been removed.

Jewish “blood sacrifice” is real and is being practiced to this very day…

Replies: @JWalters, @Robbie B

Ron Unz #110 says:

By the end of the 18th century, a period of time that was known as the “Age of the Rothschilds,” it is estimated that the Rothschild family controlled half the wealth of the world.

I’ve always noticed these sorts of outrageous claims floating around on the Internet, often describing the present-day Rothschilds as multi-trillionaires. But I’ve never seen any solid evidence to support it, so perhaps you could provide a little.
 

If the family was actually worth trillions, that really proves Hitler really was a total fool. Then again, lots of conspiracy-activists claim that Hitler himself was secretly a Rothschild, so perhaps that explains it.
 

Replies: @Robbie B, @Wizard of Oz, @Ron Unz

i've read one of duesberg's papers on hemophiliacs and AIDS. you "host" it. it was ridiculous.

here's the takedown: https://www.yumpu.com/en/document/read/6358583/duesberg-and-critics-agree-hemophilia-is-the-best-test-science

here's my takedown: look up the word "epicycle" ron and look up the quote "e pur si muove".

duesberg is also either dishonest or stupid. he claims AIDS in hemophiliacs either is the same disease but with a different cause or a different disease (just like AIDS in africa).

duesberg: but muh koch's postulates!

jv: germans are so annoying.

ron: i know what occam's razor means.

jv: uhhh. no! you don't!

but of course i can't take you seriously for many other reasons including that you only allow me to post once every 24 hours.

and i am your fellow BGI volunteer. just not jewish.

Replies: @Robbie B

Based on the well-known characteristic of glass hit by a projectile, Glanges at Parkland and Whitaker at River Rouge were able to identify the direction of the bullet’s travel through the windshield, which was front to back, with a small hole in, and a big hole out, producing the classical cone-shaped defect.

You're back to the same two eyewitnesses and neither are forensics experts.

Glanges was a surgeon.

You went from saying that it was a clean hole from a fast bullet and now you are stating it was cone shaped. Your own narrative here isn't consistent.

So you aren't going to deny that a slow moving bullet can create a small hole?

When embalming fluid was applied to JFK’s cadaver, it leaked out through tiny holes in JFK’s face, providing further macabre evidence and confirmation that glass fragments struck JFK’s face after being blown out by the bullet that pierced the windshield from the front, and hit JFK in the throat.

He had a bullet exit the front of his head that blew his brains out. You think it would be strange for a man to have some holes in his face after a bullet goes through his skull? Where did the bullet hole in the back of his head come from? Are you going to claim that was an exit wound?

Nobody has ever been able to put a gun in any shooter’s hand on the 6th floor of the TSBD at the time JFK was shot.

That's because he carried it in concealed and left it after the shooting. What would you expect him to do? Walk around with a rifle? Make sure he gets on camera? He left the rifle with a palm print which matched to him.

There were witnesses that put him in the tower. Or do eyewitness accounts only matter for the glass?

Oswald also had gunpowder on his hands:
http://jfk.hood.edu/Collection/White%20%20Files/Warren%20Commission-Subject/Oswald/Oswald,%20Paraffin%20Tests.pdf

We know that Oswald bought the rifle: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_F._Kennedy_assassination_rifle

A mail order rifle that used an odd European caliber.

His wife testified that he tried killing Edwin Walker with the same gun.

Are you claiming the rifle was never his? There is a picture of him holding it.

https://www.gunsamerica.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2013/11/oswald-life-cover.jpg

but Oswald wasn’t even on the 6th floor at the time of the assassination!

You haven't explained the sharp angle of the bullet to JFK's back or how the front of his head blew out on camera.

The grassy position makes both the back of the head and jacket shot impossible.

https://ciakilledjfk.weebly.com/uploads/5/3/5/0/53505861/7066245_orig.png

Why don't you explain what you think happened instead of being insulting. You believe a bullet came from the front window. Well two shots entered Kennedy. Explain how there is a bullet entry wound in his back.

Replies: @Robbie B, @Truth Vigilante

I’m guessing it’s a pretty good weapon for assassins, since James Files was still using one 28 years after he’d sent JFK to the Happy Hunting Ground.
 

I’m guessing it’s a pretty good weapon for assassins, since James Files was still using one 28 years after he’d sent JFK to the Happy Hunting Ground.
 

Replies: @Hibernian, @Robbie B