RSSOh, gee whiz. Slutty? I think they're cute! https://i.imgur.com/TwvwDXx.pngReplies: @Alden, @Bill Jones, @Neuday, @PatriotGal2257
But the girls ... wanted to wear the slutty shirts
The particular example above is nice, but in general, the whole Cold Shoulders thing is about the dumbest recent clothing fad to come down the pike. If I wanted a dressy summer top, I’d buy a sleeveless one.
Before you make such sweeping mischaracterizations, consider that most Americans have to be vaccinated against certain illnesses as children before they are permitted to enroll in school: diptheria, pertussis and German measles. And as I recall, these had to be repeated in the first grade.
I was just a young child when the polio vaccine became available and I and everyone in my family got it.
I happen to get a flu shot every year; I especially thought it necessary when I had to use public transportation on a regular basis.
I am not against certain vaccines. I am against people like Bill and Melinda Gates, people with no medical training whatsoever, trying every which way to Sunday to coerce the entirety of the population into taking an unproven, and to my mind, dangerous, experimental treatment so they can acquire even more money and to satisfy their sick desire for power.
So is the vaccine for shingles. The first dose made my arm hurt for a week. The second, received about four months later, gave me flu-like symptoms and a bad headache the next day.
When I told my doctor about it, her reaction was a nonchalant “Oh, yeah, about 50 percent of our patients say they had that kind of side effect.”
I am going nowhere near any kind of COVID vaccine.
Replies: @PatriotGal2257
"It's time to get serious with Vacine Deniers"
Vaccines, including the COVID-19 vaccine, are entirely safe. There is nothing dangerous about them, and no ulterior motive to them. Distrust is a difficult thing to combat, and there’s often no use in providing evidence to those disinclined to believe (though here is some, just in case). It will be difficult to insist that our loved ones are simply wrong — and it may strain or temporarily disrupt some relationships.
But the stakes are too high for anything else. If a friend or family member tells you they won’t get the vaccine when it’s their turn, tell them in no uncertain terms that you will not see or speak to them until they do. Tell them that their mistrust is based on rumor, not evidence, and the vaccine is safe.
Don’t engage with misinformation, if they present it. It’s long past time to stop framing vaccine doubt as a debate; it’s not. It is the truth on one side, and a bizarre, dangerous lie on the other.
https://www.pittsburghmagazine.com/perspectives-its-time-to-get-serious-with-vaccine-deniers/
Even louder LOLs!
Hahaha! Well, thanks. [blush]
I didn’t have a sister, but I’ll bet you’re right about boy toys being more exciting, though I will confess I was covetous of my cousins Easy Bake Oven...
Your list of Christmas gifts illustrate something that I tell my husband all the time: boys had much more interesting toys than did girls in the 60s and 70s.
I did have an Easy Bake Oven which I used every so often. But I also had a mother and two aunts who were excellent cooks and bakers and it wasn’t long before I was helping them and getting to use real kitchen appliances. The Easy Bake Oven got relegated to the closet.
On the other hand, I begged one of my uncles to buy me a cap gun because one of my male playmates had one. He obliged.
It was a golden age of boy toys.
LOLOLOL!
:
Your list of Christmas gifts illustrate something that I tell my husband all the time: boys had much more interesting toys than did girls in the 60s and 70s.
However, being a tomboy, many of my toys were not the typical ones for a girl in that era. The few dolls I owned languished at the back of my closet, but I loved my Super Spirograph, building and painting model cars, my Schwinn Stingray bike (although the white wicker basket with blue plastic flowers around the rim was the first thing to come off), a magnetic sculpture set with rods, ball bearings and flat pieces that I could arrange in any form I liked, a Creeple Peeple set, where I poured liquid plastic into molds, which I could then assemble into dragon-like characters, wooden blocks when I was very young and so on. I had – and still have – an artistic bent, so my parents didn’t hesitate to buy me all kinds of art supplies and in many ways, they were better than any toy. Since the girls in my neighborhood were older than I was, I played baseball with the boys who were my age. I enjoyed being athletic and being outdoors and even though I had lots of male playmates, I was never confused about the fact that I was a girl.
I didn’t have a sister, but I’ll bet you’re right about boy toys being more exciting, though I will confess I was covetous of my cousins Easy Bake Oven...
Your list of Christmas gifts illustrate something that I tell my husband all the time: boys had much more interesting toys than did girls in the 60s and 70s.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thingmaker
a Creeple Peeple set, where I poured liquid plastic into molds, which I could then assemble into dragon-like characters
Thingmaker, also called Creepy Crawlers, is an activity toy made by Mattel, beginning in 1964. The toy consists of a series of die-cast metal moulds resembling various bug-like creatures, into which is poured a liquid chemical substance called "Plastigoop", which comes in assorted colours. The mould is then heated to about 390 °F (199 °C) in an open-face electric hot plate oven. The Plastigoop is cured by the heat, and when cooled forms semi-solid, rubbery replicas which can be removed from the mould.
The concept of the Thingmaker was introduced in 1963, as part of Mattel's Vac-U-Maker set. This omnibus toy combined the new moulds and Plastigoop technology with the existing Vac-U-Form machine, which molded simple sculptures by heating thin sheets of plastic, then using a vacuum pump to form the softened plastic over hard plastic forms. Following this introduction period, the Thingmaker portion was spun off as a separate set, and launched as the "Creepy Crawlers" line.
Mattel packaged moulds from various sets to be sold separately, and also combined moulds into larger omnibus editions, encompassing several themes into one set, under names such as "Triple Thingmaker", "Super Thingmaker" and "Every Thingmaker". Mattel produced many Thingmaker sets as follow-ups to the original "Creepy Crawlers" throughout the 1960s, utilising a variety of themes, aimed at both boys and girls. There were also several exclusive single mould sets, such as Superman and Tarzan, and original Mattel concepts including Squirtles and Gangly Danglies.
https://www.patti-goop.com/creeple-peeple.html
Varieties of Thingmaker mould sets
• Giant Creepy Crawlers (1965) — This set featured nine moulds (as did the original "Creepy Crawlers"), but these new moulds featured just one giant creature apiece.
• Fighting Men (1965) — This set of six moulds could be used to create mini soldier figures, using an innovative two-part mould to give the Fighting Men a front and a back. The set also included pieces of wire to place in the figure, making it bendable with the bottom wire protrusions being able to stand on a styrofoam base. Other moulds in the set created weaponry and equipment for the Fighting Men to carry into battle.
• Creeple Peeple (1965) — This five-mould set formed strange heads, arms and feet. When assembled onto a pencil, they formed weird, Troll-like creatures.
• Fun Flowers (1966) — Seven moulds full of different styles and shapes of flowers and leaves, for use in decorating and design.
• Fright Factory (1966) — Five of this set's seven moulds were dedicated to creepy disguises, making pieces such as fake scars, snaggled teeth, or a third eye for one's forehead. Another mould (with a special insert) made a shrunken head, and the last made a dangly skeleton that one built from parts.
• Incredible Edibles (1967) - A Thingmaker that made edible pieces. It used a special goop called Gobble De-goop which was placed in molds and cooked like regular Plasti-goop.
• Picadoos (1967) — A Thingmaker for artists. This one featured moulds with 10x10-space numbered grids. By carefully placing coloured Plastigoop in the grid, one could create decorative artwork in either beads, mosaic tile, or cross-stitch varieties.
• Mini-Dragons (1967) — The eight moulds in this set formed wings, horns, claws, tails, and other body parts, which could be combined into various fantasy creatures.
• Eeeeks! (1968) — In the same vein as Mini-Dragons, this set of eight moulds formed several varieties of mix-and-match legs, bodies, heads, wings, antennae, etc., to create large, bizarre insects.
• Zoofie-Goofies (1968) — Seven moulds form heads, bodies and feet of various animals, from cats and dogs to elephants and lions.
• Hot Wheels Factory (1969) Moulds made two piece bodies that fit together with wheels embedded into the bottom mould so you could make your own Hot Wheels cars.
• DollyMaker (1969) — Five two-sided moulds are used to create two styles of little dolls, and a wardrobe of late '60s fashions and accessories for them.
• Super Cartoon Maker (1969) — A licensed Thingmaker, the eight moulds in this set form replicas of Charles Schulz's Peanuts characters, such as Snoopy, Charlie Brown and Lucy.
• Jillions of Jewels (1970) — The last of the classic Mattel Thingmakers. The set had five moulds, but instead of the liquid Plastigoop, these formed solid plastic "gemstones" and jewelry frames from two kinds of powdered "Jewel Dust" compounds.