What are they going to do when there are no whites around to blame or shake down?

hahhhahhahahaaaa!, Reg! Africans and many blacks will never go for gay marriage - a true taboo for them.

On, the otherhand, in Zimbabwe, they are still taking farms and kidnapping and ransoming the farmer's kids.

Hey! That and five bucks american'll get me a cup of coffee!

At least, it would if they hadn't burned down the coffee shop.

The whole world is also waking up to the fact that the Chinese people are satisfied with their government, the enormous economic prosperity they have experienced over the past decades, and the direction that their country is moving in.
 

What we're seeing is the first generation for whom famine hasn't been experienced by either themselves or their parents. The ovaries of this generation of Chinese women will be bursting with healthy eggs - IQ in that region is going to skyrocket.

I'm guessing also that China has observed how the west is failing, and it won't be making those mistakes.

The whole world is also waking up to the fact that the Chinese people are satisfied with their government, the enormous economic prosperity they have experienced over the past decades, and the direction that their country is moving in.
 

Replies: @frankie p

China is now a world-class nation. They will conquer Negro America this century to settle with their excess population.

Japan had 73 mil. people in 1940, now they have 128 mil. They stepped on the path of conquest because of the ideology of not dying. Modern Japan is a corpse without a future.

There is no other choice but to have many children. Anything else is suicide. Even now, Japan might survive if they had a revolution comparable in scale to Mohammedanism - because the cucked Americans did not exterminate them in 1945 when they had a chance.

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/c/c6/Population_of_Japan_since_1872.svg/1280px-Population_of_Japan_since_1872.svg.png

Mexico and Côte d'Ivoire were never prosperous.

> "Contrast that with the peaceful orderly Syrians, after their government criminalized the sale and possession of contraceptives, and the population was quadrupled in 36 years, and the water ran out and the economy collapsed, turned on each other in a vicious civil war."

Syria is still a powerful and proud nation. They have survived the civil war with only around 4 mil. citizens lost, most of them alive (21.36 mil. > 17 mil.). Now their population is recovering. That cannot be said about the transvestite Christcucks of America and Belgium.

Blaming the civil war on demography is partially silly. Yugoslavia and Ukraine got their civil wars without demographic explosions.

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/e/e5/Syria-demography.png

Replies: @Dumbo, @Hang All Text Drivers, @Bill Jones

Your narrative is fact free.

Bravo.

Contrast that with the peaceful orderly Chinese, who, as Mao insisted that they all breed like rodents and created horrible crushing poverty (“strength through numbers”) nearly tore the country apart in a paroxysm of rage so extreme to make all the black riots in the US look like tea parties.

 

Replies: @anonymous jew

The pace of globalization and offshoring really accelerated only in the mid-late ‘90s. What is the excuse for the violent and self-destructive behavior of blacks before that?
Heroin supplied by the CIA?
White women pushing past them on escalators?

Immigrants who come to this country, many of whom speak little or no English, don't have their hand outstretched for a handout like Black Americans. They problem with Black Americans is their culture. On the other hand, blacks from African countries are not at all like Black Americans, and, unlike Black Americans, have a very strong family life. That's where it begins...

Oh, yes, the blacks – protesting that all their jobs have been given away to the Mexicans and Chinese, why can’t they just starve to death in peace? How dare they?
 

Oh, yes, the blacks – protesting that all their jobs have been given away to the Mexicans and Chinese, why can’t they just starve to death in peace? How dare they?
 

Blacks are failed subhuman race of retarded mutants who destroy everything around them.

You can give them all the freebies you want and dress them up any way you like, but they'll still be stupid niggers at the end of the day.

Just look at Africa. Twelve times the size of India with vast arable land, resources and mineral wealth, and the stupid monkeys still starve by the millions...lol

So yes, how dare US blacks behave so badly. Why can’t they behave as well as the beaten-down underclass in the rest of the world when they have no jobs and no hope?
 

Replies: @Peter Akuleyev

Why are you conflating a number of singular incidents among other races with that of repetitive black behavior? I fail to see the connection.

"Oh, yes, the blacks – protesting that all their jobs have been given away to the Mexicans and Chinese, why can’t they just starve to death in peace? How dare they?"

Is that what they are protesting? And does that only affect blacks?

Did Mexico, China and Japan spend $15,000 per year per student to uplift their people as the US does in big city minority schools?

Did those countries give Pell Grants to the poor to attend colleges and trade schools? Did they provide welfare, foodstamps, unearned tax credits and racial and socioeconomic preferences in hiring for city, state and federal jobs?

Blacks in the United States are better off than any minority population on the planet, and better off than many majority populations within this country.

They don't protest because their jobs have been stolen by the Mexicans and Chinese. They protest because they can.

Ironic that the "oppressed" can wield enough power to pressure the government into indicting people so as not to risk civil unrest. Think Zimnerman. Think the attempts against Darren Wilson. At the same time, they can burn down cities with impunity. Think Baltimore, Saint Louis, and the police station in Minneapolis.

The riots are about taking the outrageous powers they have already been given and using every incident to get more.

A guy in Philadelphia shot a looter who broke into his business. Before it's over, he'll be charged with something I'm almost sure.

Exactly! The anti-Christian sentiment in here is so thick, one could cut it with a knife. They are too ignorant and hate-filled to really look into what Catholicism really is, instead they rely on pseudo-intellectualism and ad hominids. Let them have their day, because in the end that is all they will have.

As you see I've gone into this right at the beginning. For a while I dabbled into this thought myself. But there are over 300 theories on the downfall of the Roman Empire and "Christcuckery made the ROMAN BVLL a cuck" is just one of them. There's lead poisoning, inflation and problems with silver coins, vast over stretch, multi-culturalism, dependency on mercenaries and fifth columns, constant incursions, an overpayment of the useless senate and basically military-industrial complex, the praetorian guard de facto holding the emperor hostage, over taxation, no more social mobility, decadence and rot, an increase in the competitiveness of the so called barbarians surrounding Rome which actually overtook it many aspects. - Lots of parallels with Murica and Edward Gibbon was a Freemason with an axe to grind. Also the Roman Empire DID survive for another thousand years in the so called Byzantine Empire who actually saw themselves and called themselves the Romans. The Eastern Part was also the far more wealthy one. So this common idea that without Christianity we would have been on the moon a millennium early with Divine Rome leading a star Imperium is just a total Warhammer 40k fantasy.

My own 3 punch theory is that the century of constant soldier Caesars and permanent civil war, the then permanent over payment and dependence on the legions introduced by Caracalla and finally Islamic sea and slave raids which lead to the collapse of the med trade, impoverished the West so much that it transitioned from late antiquity to the early middle ages. But ultimately it "collapsed" unto what it already had been de facto and the central government had become a parasitic, chaotic, distant problem and the real authority was already localized. It became what it was through catastrophe. By contrast the chaos of the short lived Germanic Caesars was nothing in particular out of the ordinary for Rome and many Caesars before found a Mussolini end dragged through the streets, thrown into the Tiber, assassinated, strangled by a slave or a Praetorian and at best exiled.

Given that Byzantium survived another thousand years, that our Holy Roman Empire lasted longer than the Roman Republic and Empire combined, especially if you count the Karolingian dynasty, and that the European Nations conquered the world under the cross, this Nietzsche idea is not it. Although it's not as down right mischeavous and dumb as blaming the downfall on "The eternal German". Byzantium, I think, also found a somewhat harmonious coexistence between (Neo-)Platonism and Orthodox-Christianity.

I think the answer is not complex: Jews have conquered the USA. They own the media, the publishing industry, dominate education and banking. Today the USA rules all of Europe by proxy through Pax Americana. An atomized, alienated and not educated public can then easily be manipulated into the absurd lie of "Judeo-Christianity". The Christian Zionism of the USA from the founding fathers to today is of course a distinct problem.

What route of attack for subversion there is in traditional Christianity, ten times the amount exists in liberalism or Marxism. They can also be seen as "Christian" heresies, but that's also just a very broad, inaccurate brush. We simply have no intact racio-religious continuum of our own and it is today almost impossible to imagine, even if a genuine new prophet came along. For a while the Catholic Church had provided it and preserved also the Roman Empire, Nietzsche also acknowledged this, but with an inbuilt contradiction. Yet Nazism failed, too, and with it positive Christianity, which again is another heresy. Now the remnants of Norse Paganaism, Hellenism, Roman Law and Christianity exist in the collective European psyche all at the same time.

Replies: @Adûnâi, @Rurik

Hello, it was the Caesars who first overthrew Rome, a generation before Jesus supposedly lived. It is the Caesars who occupied Judea and later destroyed Jerusalem. It was the Caesars who then invented Christianity to encourage extant Jews to worship a male idol and co operate with Roman rule. That the false creed of Christianity turned around and destroyed Rome itself is what you call, well, karma. Christianity is an imperial religion and an abomination to Republican values.

174 Pater Many thanks for the reference. If you look the map
https://www.volcanodiscovery.com/saudi-arabia.html
You will notice that there are 13 active volcanos in Saudi Arabia, indicating that this is the most probable place where the stories of Torah originate from, as Laurent Guyenot already proposed.

I do see this specific mention of Abrahamism here, as some "pestilence" on mankind.

But, why specifically only Abrahamism? Does that mean you and Guyenot here (and other anti-Abrahamists) think that such batshit extreme pagan faiths like Hindooism are acceptable, as a soul soothing balm upon civilisation? If yes, do you morons even see the satanic-isms out there, masquerading as faiths, supposedly with a comprehension of God?!

Anyway, since there is absolutely no proof that atheism (or heck, hindooism, if you wish) would have ensured complete peace on earth, meaning mankind would definitely have found other reasons to rip each other to pieces, this "Abrahamism/Religion is a plague upon civilisation," simply seems like dissembling by atheists to feel good about their hollow godless, ultimately meaningless, lives.

It feels like they subliminally agonise over their inferiority complex about not having the same sense of worldly purpose, which theists seem to have.

Replies: @Laurent Guyénot, @Pater

Stop bombing their countries and changing their governments by force and most importantly stop aiding and abetting the criminal Zionists with $Billions and free sophisticated weaponry and you will not see any Moslem or any other ethnic or religious group knocking on your doors.

Neither Syria or Iraq and especially Libya were failed states but became so after the imperial intervention on behalf of the Zionists.

One would have be open minded and use facts to deal with this immigration problem by 3rd world people into western Europe and find out what really has caused such exodus .

But apparently you are too close minded and intellectually lazy and blame the whole problem on defenseless people whose lives have been shattered and destroyed by imperialism and Zionism.

I am not a fan of the Saker but his point was to define Islam as it is and not as perceived or interpreted by clueless red necks such as Steve Bannon or the dope addict Rush Limbaugh.

They made the cultural changes needed to attain potency. The Chinese case couldn't be clearer. Mao brought unity while Deng brought economic potency.

Replies: @DB Cooper

So now you're engaged in naked trolling. I'm sure things a million times worse than that have happened on the streets of London and elsewhere.

Pater,

LOL. That's just Africans having a friendly banter, nothing to get excited about. But yes, they shouldn't be doing it on London's streets. Or even being there for that matter. Well, most of them at least.

Replies: @Maowasayali

Maybe the great Boxer Mohammed Ali will enlighten you a bit.
Muhammad Ali on Integration and interracial marriage
 

Replies: @ben sampson, @Malla

There were no maps or passport controls back then. The borders were very fluid. There was no law or authority that would've prevented Igbos from becoming indigens of Southern Cameroon and considering it part of the wider Igbo homeland.

Another thing, groups like the Efik are closely related to Igbos (my mother is Efik). Efiks and a host of other tribes were part of Biafra. They all faught the Hausas together.

Replies: @Pater

Pheeeeeeew Pater! now where would that reality you just described above here exist?

I hope in your long proud euro history you make some room for racism, slavery, Imperialism...planned, deliberate, genocidal wars that targeted your own..those very same people of the long, old and proud cultures

hypocrisy appears embed in your veins passed along the generations that interferes with your sight and cognition so you can only the sense of your reality you report above of your reality

it occurred to me that the world is yours too you know..the whole human species and its history is your history too...and that accepting that fact and reality you might be girded to deal between with the section of it you limit yourself too

sanity can be found in or developed out of white reality only you know. what white people have done in the world, what white people believe and practice is total insanity most critically the Jewish part of it, the Khazar contribution. right there is a representation of the insanity that is leading humanity to extinction

don't you relive your truth man!?

look at what comes out of the crap you describe: walk into any supermarket or shop if you are moving and hungry and need to grab a snack to keep you going. in fact it does not matter where you stop! ANY AND ALL FOOD PURCHASED ANYWHERE ANY TIME IS POISONED AND EATEN IN SUFFICIENT QUANTITY WILL DESTROY YOUR BODY.

this is the deliberate, conscious manufacture and sale of poisoned food for profit.. and to control the population to exploit it, to keep it down and unable to fight back for itself in its collective ordinary interest

that is what your proud cultures do..routinely, and for profit! mass murder the human population.

but more truth about you also is that at base you are African. that is where you are from..evolved out of us Black people. and as I accept that fact as proven by science, by history, I must accept you as mine too..the whole species as one, one story. how can I be sane other wise but in the truth of my story.

you talk pride in insanity and massive crime against humanity..that is because you soon morphed into crime in European conditions, the cold and the comprehensive and extreme challenge to survival the cold presented you with.

we know you are cold adapted and have an idea what that meant/means..and so we can explain you a bit as white in the world. a lot more work has to be done to complete the story and make it available to all..the entire human story..so that we have a chance to make collective global sanity sane as a species..and so have our best chance of lasting in nature

Replies: @Malla

what are you accusing me off?

you behaving as if I am doing it, making people mix!!

its not me at all. look it right there, outside your window. I don't know those people who meet and eff and reproduce. I don't know any of them..never met them in my life!

I am keen on understanding life...and from what I see you guys don't understand and yet you want to cut the world into pieces in correspondence with shapes you like.

you know what that means: that the day all of you realize you dreams and take power over the world its time for people to run and hide, to leave the planet, go to Mars or somewhere far so they wont hear the screams of humanity, under the knives of the people who inhabit the racist threads on the Unz Review, now in charge of the world...as ya'all cut and shape humanity to your liking

oh man! that is another reason why I fear for Black people! imagine the chopping as you guys try to cut the world white again. PHEEEEEEEEEW!!!!

we wont know Black people from chopped liver and minced anything.

oh mi god!

Replies: @Malla

Help me out here. What is that map supposed to mean?

Replies: @Pater

I always chuckle at the mute points of diasporic people who want to claim the territory & resources of others
 

Replies: @ben sampson, @Pater

you actually get tired of something Malla..really?
you keep shocking me! The impression I have is you were turned on and left running. if I knew where I would send someone to turn you off

take a look at the audience in this video:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=94&v=8ueJ5oPRQdk

where they are not ethnically mixed they are so mixed culturally.

all of them from the same national location..all employed, likely highly educated by western standards. I would wager that at least 50% or more of those people 'joomping' to the music there have at least 1 university degree..all from one country and economically same class. so they mix and match on all levels of their existence

what will the BRI produce..the very same prosperous reality between giant populations.
borders will become utterly porous between populations that would then be educated, prosperous, secure and free from all that we now see and know as prejudice. they would long have questioned life comprehensively, resolved a whole lot in the process. they would know, would have proven a whole lot about life far in advance of what we now know. all the religious nonsense would ave been long tossed....

what would stop such populations from living exactly as they find suitable, progressive and in concert with life that they have proved..that has been proved all along up to them...behavior that not only pleases them but advances human life and chances in nature

what screws up human life and beliefs is the input of exploitative divisive society..dominated by minorities in whose interest lies must be created and told, cut, shaped, plagiarized into 'truth'

the human of the future will clear all that shit away with prosperity earned in truth, can discover and establish more as it goes and we will have a different kind of human being, one we can hardly contemplate and discern currently.

yet we have an idea of what is true now and where development of truth will lead, and the kind of humans such truth will shape and emerge, extrude. what would stop those people from living as they find best for them? nothing!


take a look at the advanced regions of all societies today, now currently and see how they live in there. take look at the USA, Europe before the current immigrant deluge..what was happening relevant to ethnicity..MIXING!

you guys talking about returning immigrants to their various sources...from where?

there are only a very very few places in the world that is not deeply mixed already..from whence immigrants cannot be removed, already too invested to move, leave, or be made to leave,...have been there too long already.

and in those places the mixing is already such a factor of existence that you cannot walk 10 paces in any city and not meet a person of mixed ethnic heritage

like this debate makes little sense from that angle.. in the face of global reality already

Replies: @Pater

Igbos of Cameroon?
 

Replies: @Pater

I wonder if these Cameroonian Igbos are the same folks, the Anglophones who want an independent Ambrosia out of Cameron. Cameroon is run by Francophone ethnic groups and there is a rivalry. I wonder why they did not join Nigeria in the first place.

Replies: @Pater

Very true.

I want to reply to Pater but I am struggling badly with my health these past few days. I don't even know if what I have been saying makes sense.

I am trying here but it isn't working out. so I will leave it for a few days and see whats happens..see how I feel.

just let me say that the world will mix..is mixing regardless of how hard others with the opposite interest try to prevent it
capitalism with its racist, divisive interests to facilitate plunder is the problem. i do not agree with separation and isolation. those are not options for human beings. humans do not live like that

white and black people got to know each other in slavery. it is infuriating and counter productive to consider or observe Orientals and Black people coming to know each currently ..likewise in Oriental rip off of African populations.

we should not let that happen. there is a vast and positive cooperative alternative that should in fact work itself out between these peoples

that is what I am arguing as best I can for at moment

Replies: @Malla

You're right of course. But humans are frail, frightened and fallen (with or without the Christian doctrine of original sin). As a result, they cling to their spooks and spirits and salvation in the sky. I am reminded of Gibbon's wry observation concerning the gods of ancient Rome:

“The policy of the emperors and the senate, as far as it concerned religion, was happily seconded by the reflections of the enlightened, and by the habits of the superstitious part of their subjects. The various modes of worship, which prevailed in the Roman world, were all considered by the people as equally true; by the philosopher as equally false; and by the magistrate as equally useful. And thus toleration produced not only mutual indulgence, but even religious concord.”

A truly secular society is a difficult act to master. In today's 'post-Christian' West, the central tenets of our moribund society derive from Protestant Christian axiology. It might very well appear to be a secular society, but it's ethics and its moral grammar are those of the New Testament, and as such they are wreaking great havoc upon us. This quasi-Jewish tract is responsible for the sort of life-denying nonsense that has succeeded in replacing family and tribe with the 'universalism' that adjures its followers to find greater affinity with complete strangers, from totally different cultures, than with their own brothers, should those brothers 'profess' a different 'faith'. This of course is the seedcorn of Communism, whereby one class - the workers - is adjured to find equally great affinity with those of their own condition throughout the world, rather than with the ordered structure of a functioning society at home. As the Jewish pundit Oscar Levy remarked, in his Foreword to George Pitt-Rivers The World Significance of the Russian Revolution in 1919:

'There is a direct line of succession from Savonarola to Luther, from Luther to Robespierre and from Robespierre to Lenin.'

Left-Liberal Progressivism is Protestant Christianity shorn of its miracles and mumbo-jumbo. It may appear secular, but the 'mysterious' half, of which it has divested itself, has been rapidly made good by means of the axiological half having grown to replace it, thus repairing the ruptured circle, as it were. The quasi-religious zeal, displayed by the Progressive zeitgeist, is actually far greater - and far more deleterious - than even that of the Puritans in the tragic and despicable 'wars of religion' of the sixteenth- and seventeenth-centuries.

If we take Shaw's and Nietzsche's shared analogy that we of the great Western tradition are the inheritors of 'Supermen', then Christian axiology is the green kryptonite, that until the Reformation was stowed more or less safely and successfully inside the lead-lined box that was the Roman Catholic Church.

Technology, in the form of the Guttenberg press, arguably led to the removal of said kryptonite from its traditional storage, where it was brazenly on display in the form of Calvin and Luther's Reformation. Today, the next great leap forward in the world of communications, in the shape of the internet, might just see technology once again changing the world. The only question is, will it be for the better or the worse?

An atheist like “nsa” must concede Dosteovsky’s point from his novel The Possessed that even for the atheist the concept of God represents the collective consciousness, highest principles, and ontological aspirations of believers. Given this sense, “nsa’s” real animus is more than likely an atavistic hatred of Christians and Muslims, probably for just being alive in his paranoid mind. What imbecility when this clown cites a multiverse of universes that has no proof and less plausibility for its existence than the tooth fairy. I’d also bet “nsa” speaks algebra, too, like the recently deceased mathematical genius, Jeffrey Epstein.

What’s Mr. Wexner’s, Mega’s, and Mossad/CIA’s involvement? That’s the real question trolls like “nsa” and the Dems and Republicans alike are crapping in their pants we’ll find out. When evidence starts to cascade out of their ability to spin or suppress it, things will get interesting. Meanwhile, Fox News is still doing its best from what I can tell to run cover for 911, now extended to the suspiciously related perps in the Epstein affair.

Replies: @AB_Anonymous, @Stonehands

You're saying shit happens, thus we have this amazing creation. Yeah, sure.

Muslims openly endorse lying to infidels. I was a bit puzzled by Barret's El HAQQ until you pointed out he was a Muslim. Actually it is the Bible that says "The Truth shall make you free", and it is the search for truth in the West that has enabled science and such amazing tools for finding truth as Occam's Razor, the hypothetical deductive method and curiosity in general. The Bible also based on Logos, which is reason, supposedly embedded in the creation -- dedication to truth is needed to uncover the laws of nature. It's not a question of God enforcing anyone's yearning for truth. Lately, the denial of laws of genetics (race and sex especially), a kind of of Lysenkoist obfuscation of obvious truths that influential people want to deny, is causing much of the degeneration Barrett refers to.

Replies: @utu, @AnonStarter

Speaking of converts, jews are khazar converts. As semitic as a steamy pile of manure. (An insult to manure, but nonetheless)

And of course there's gravity wave, and black holes, and oh yeah the, a relative theory on of all things relativity.
To date: no one has figured out what gravity is. Why? Because there is no such thing. and if they accept that there is no gravity they have to accept there is a creator, whom I call God. Once you accept him the powers that be have no power over you.
We went to the moon. Prove it. Well we can't. Ya see. We lost all the records, all the video, pictures, designs for the rover, and everything. Yeah, 70,000 boxes of moon stuff. Gone. Duh! I'll buy that.
In 2016 Obama said maybe in a few years we'll be able to go beyond low earth orbit. But, you didn't hear that. Did you?
Geeesh, you're dumb.

My dad was a WWII Marine. He said one of his worst mistakes was getting a Marine Corp tattoo, with an anchor, on his forearm. But, unlike many WWII vets, he only had one. I served in the Army, but never had any desire to get one, perhaps listening to my father for once.

I've read that a quickly growing industry is tattoo removal, which is expensive, quite painful, and may take several sessions to totally remove one. To those careless, fad-driven women who so mutilated their body, but now wish to reverse the damage, I hope they've learned a very costly, painful lesson, which they will relay to their children, if they have any.

Replies: @Bardon Kaldian

The German economy had always been export oriented from Bismarck’s time, as it was facing increased sanction & isolation without a war of conquest & expansion in Europe it would likely have faced crisis then collapse somewhere in the 1940’s.
 

It might not be entirely correct to claim that the story of World War II was that Franklin Roosevelt sought to escape his domestic difficulties by orchestrating a major European war against the prosperous, peace-loving Nazi Germany of Adolf Hitler. But I do think that picture is probably somewhat closer to the actual historical reality than the inverted image more commonly found in our textbooks.
 

Replies: @j2, @j2, @Bennet, @Incitatus, @Wizard of Oz, @utu

https://forum.axishistory.com/viewtopic.php?f=66&t=191649&sid=1ac9a4ed4ba3185c8e32dceae9a30aff

A Comparison of American and German economies in WW2

All the economic data to your heart’s content. Notice the massive rise in German GNP after Hitler came to power. In 1933, Germany was 31.95% of the US economy while in 1940 it was 52.30% of the US economy, all this time while the American economy nearly doubled.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NRQEAbPVImE

Also this video is worth a look. The Third Reich used a barter system independent of and thus by passing the International Finance system, for trade with other nations.

Same can be said about the Soviets, who actually desired world domination and had plans to conquer the entire European subcontinent.

What is ridiculous is to claim that Germany, not the USSR, was the greater threat. You can argue that Britain/France was ignorant at the time, but you can't really justify the decision in hindsight.

Britain and France declared war on Germany to "protect the freedom/territorial integrity of Poland" -- how did that work out? Remind me

I looked for something to disagree with, here, and found nothing.

Shed your basic belief system as beaten into your head by the German schooling system. Think of something in better accord with reality than the obsessive neurotic mantra of the FRG lalaland.

The speech has to be seen in context: in december 1940 the swift action against Poland over the corridor had led Germany into a year long war, the formidable victory over France had not ended the war, the destruction of German cities fron RAF bombing had begun, the husbands were gone of to war and the people were about to suffer a rerun of 1917 style starvation. Hitler had ordered to take on the Soviet Union, which necessarily would lead Germany to its doom.
In this situation the Führer thinks that it is an adecuate answer to educate his people to the fact that democracy is Shtonk (to quote from the Charlie Chaplin film) - he is probably right, but still the speech seems a slight little bit out of place.
He should have admited that he had miscaculated. He had thought that he had a deal with the Anglosaxon establishment, in which they would leave him to deal with the continent and they take to the high seas. He thought that he had made a great deal with the Zionists, in which he would scare the Jews out of Europe and they would allow him to become the greater Napoleon. He should have told the people that he had messed up in believing that the Angloamerican elite would accept him and shoot himself on the spot. Exposing the criminality of the democratic West is childs play ( though one that is to little in the public sphere). It is not the job of an acting head if state. If I had heard the speech, I would have been desperate

Replies: @Malla

'the fact remains that Hitler, without any really compelling necessity, initiated one of the most destructive wars in history and then had his followers commit some of the worst mass murders ever. The “revisionists” posting on UR may be able to ignore that, but most people won’t.'

The only 'fact' your comment reflects is that of Allied propaganda, put out in the late 1930s and still - remarkably - widely believed today. Revilo P Oliver, who was a very important head of an American Intelligence department in the Second World War, came to understand who had really started that tragic and unnecessary conflict. Roosevelt and his handlers, who had engineered their dupe Churchill into power early in the war, were determined to embark upon what must be understood as the earliest and greatest of all America' criminal and despicable 'regime change' wars. Oliver later remarked that up until about 1956 he still thought that the truth of what had happened would come out, and that the American people would rise up in fury against those who had caused so much carnage among their own and among so many others throughout Europe and beyond. But as he put it: "in 1956 I still believed that there was a significant intellectual difference between the American middle-classes and those beasts on sees peering down from between the slats in those high-sided vehicles, contentedly munching hay on their was to the abattoir".

As for your curt dismissal of 'revisionists', the Jew Murray Rothbard had this to say in 1966:

'Revisionism has the general function of bringing historical truth to a public that had been drugged by wartime lies and propaganda. Now revisionism teaches us that this entire myth, so prevalent then and even now about Hitler, and about the Japanese, is a tissue of fallacies from beginning to end. Every plank in this nightmare evidence is either completely untrue or not entirely the truth.

'If people should learn this intellectual fraud about Hitler’s Germany, then they will begin to ask questions, and searching questions, about the current World War III version of the same myth. Nothing would stop the current headlong flight to war faster, or more surely cause people to begin to reason about foreign affairs once again, after a long orgy of emotion and cliché. For the same myth is now based on the same old fallacies. And this is seen by the increasing use that the Cold Warriors have been making of the “Munich myth”: the continually repeated charge that it was the “appeasement” of the “aggressor” at Munich that “fed” his “aggression” (again, the Fu Manchu, or Wild Beast, comparison), and that caused the “aggressor,” drunk with his conquests, to launch World War II. This Munich myth has been used as one of the leading arguments against any sort of rational negotiations with the Communist nations, and the stigmatizing of even the most harmless search for agreement as “appeasement.” It is for this reason that A.J.P. Taylor’s magnificent Origins of the Second World War received probably its most distorted and frenetic review in the pages of National Review.

'The task of revisionism has been to penetrate beneath these superficialities and appearances to the stark realities underneath — realities which show, certainly in this century, the United States, Great Britain, and France — the three great “democracies” — to be worse than any other three countries in fomenting and waging aggressive war. Realization of this truth would be of incalculable importance on the current scene.

'For revisionism, in the final analysis, is based on truth and rationality. Truth and rationality are always the first victims in any war frenzy; and they are, therefore, once again an extremely rare commodity on today’s “market.” Revisionism brings to the artificial frenzy of daily events and day-to-day propaganda, the cool but in the last analysis glorious light of historical truth. Such truth is almost desperately needed in today’s world.'

And here Rothbard has hit upon the most important reason to refute you and others' assertion that 'we must forget Hitler'. Until the truth about Hitler and WWII finally emerge, and gain popular understanding, there will be no progress made. The mythology that has been all too successfully placed around the Third Reich and WWII now forms the entire foundation of the ugly, corrupt, deracinated cesspit that is late-Western pathology.

Adolf Hitler was potentially its saviour. Today, he has been turned into Emmanuel Goldstein. Like Winston Smith, it is our duty to tell the truth.

Replies: @refl, @Joe Levantine

Anyway, do you really think it’s a good idea for modern nationalists to link themselves to Hitler and the 3rd Reich (because many of your articles could be interpreted that way, as if Hitler was some profound thinker who has to be read by every nationalist today)? Yes, the man wasn’t as stupid as is often claimed today, and some elements of Nazism are certainly attractive if seen in isolation…but the fact remains that Hitler, without any really compelling necessity, initiated one of the most destructive wars in history and then had his followers commit some of the worst mass murders ever.
 

So called revisionists are bunch of morons. Hitler was, without lapsing into moralizing, a very specific product of a very specific time, a charismatic leader of a great humiliated nation during a deep crisis in all Western civilization (this includes Russia, too).

Now, Europe & Europe-derived peoples face a completely different crisis (or various crises), so that what Hitler was or wasn't is utterly irrelevant to our contemporary condition & its challenges.

Replies: @Anon, @fnn, @John Regan, @Marcus

but the fact remains that Hitler, without any really compelling necessity, initiated one of the most destructive wars in history and then had his followers commit some of the worst mass murders ever. The “revisionists” posting on UR may be able to ignore that, but most people won’t.
 

No German under decades of forceful Judeo-communist trauma, control, brainwashing, and current oppression has any credible platform to lecture anyone on facts. No offense.

I feel bad for you and your people, but that doesn't mean that we begin to listen to those whose minds have been thoroughly routed and are not their own.

You cannot credibly lecture anyone on what "most people" will admit to thinking until they are legally and socially free to weigh and argue the facts and then admit their conclusions.

Replies: @Emslander

Oh, nonsense, German_Reader, Hitler didn't initiate WW2, he tried several times to talk peace to England but Churchill and Roosevelt and the Zionists were determined to crush Germany. Educate yourself. You can start with Pat Buchanan's Churchill, Hitler and the Unnecessary War, but there are many others. Revisionist historians are the true historians. The first histories written by the victors are just more war propaganda. "Mass murders", you say. You mean the holyhoax, I assume. Educate yourself.

rats killed more people than hitler.

…but the fact remains that Hitler, without any really compelling necessity, initiated one of the most destructive wars in history and then had his followers commit some of the worst mass murders ever. The “revisionists” posting on UR may be able to ignore that, but most people won’t.
 

The “revisionists” posting on UR may be able to ignore that, but most people won’t.
 

“but the fact remains that Hitler, without any really compelling necessity, initiated one of the most destructive wars in history and then had his followers commit some of the worst mass murders ever. The “revisionists” posting on UR may be able to ignore that, but most people won’t.”

Fighting a recalcitrant Poland manipulated by the UK and the USA into obstinacy as a means of perpetrating the ignoble aims of the Treaty of Versailles is hardly an initiation of war. I wonder if they ever taught you that it was Britain and France that declared war against Germany when Hitler was suing for peace ever evident by his letter to Daladier invoking him not to repeat the horrors of the WWI and reminding him that Germany had no qualms about its borders with France.

Yet Hitler made many strategic mistakes of which I would list the following:

- a great fascination with the British Empire
- stopping nuclear research from 1936 till 1939
- stopping Heinz Guderian from blocking the British army retreat from Dunkirk in the hope that he would give the British the chance to sign an honourable peace.
- trusting the input of his intelligence service about the military and industrial state of the Soviet Union.
-refusing the development of Von Ohain’s successfully designed jet engine.

History never exonerates a loser. Had Hitler won the war, I am sure your comments along with most of the German intelligentsia would have been if a totally different nature. This is what is called ‘judging by hindsight’.

the fact that who write can seem filo-nazi is right, specially when mainstream will try to under evaluate the argument. But the fact that Hilter started the war is clear only in the history book written by winners. In the real facts occurred we know, we are aware that the evil powers behind Churchill and and the americans were the real starters of the ww2, with Germany and with Japan that were only fighting for their independence and their liberation from economic power of the anglo-saxon/zionist elites.
Then.... and now!!!
Noam Chomsky understood very well and tried to explain to the mass of ignorant people which read very few books to arrive knowing something better our history, they are under the pressure of mainstream media and televisions owned by same powers which started all the wars from ww2 to now

Newsflash: America has far more Africans per capita than Western Europe. Let's be honest and admit that America is in a far worse shape than any other developed Western country. For the moment.

Replies: @Ed, @syonredux

It is the Neocons and other products of WASP culture, itself a product of the Judaizing heresy Anglo-Saxon Puritanism, that will always side with the Africans and Mohammedans against the vast majority of whites.

56% White.

"The idea that these societies can triple or quadruple their populations with the added factors of soil degradation & water stress is preposterous."

I looked into the projections when Steve posted on this same topic a year or so ago. The growth rates. The population projections are based on growth rates that have persisted for a very long time - 30-40-50 years. Birth rates in many countries seems to have actually increased in recent years. If Africa's population were to continue to grow at rates similar to the last several decades it would actually reach 6-8 billion by the end of the century. No joke. The UN projection seems on the low side, by comparison.

Unreasonable? Haiti has nearly 1,000 people per square mile. The Indian state of Uttar Pradesh has 200 million people - 2,100 people per square mile. It is smaller than Michigan. If Africa achieved the population density of Uttar Pradesh it would have over 24 billion people. Suddenly 6-8 billion people doesn't seem so unlikely, does it?

There are, of course, environmental limits on human population size. There are apparently no limits, though, on human stupidity, or on what degree of squalor some humans will tolerate before they stop shagging. That's the "survival of the fittest" we are faced with today is between those humans with a low tolerance for squalor (Westerners) and those with a very high tolerance for squalor (Third Worlders). With no limits on immigration there is no way tye Westerners will win that battle in our own countries.

You are working on the fantasy that Jews will be treated better in a putative non-White America (they will hardly be better treated than now where they are the de facto elite of the country). Actually they will be treated far worse if America is ever run by so called people of color who has no guilt complex whatsoever toward the Jews. You think is by chance that the most "antisemitic" congressmen today tend to be black?

Replies: @Expletive Deleted

I wish you mate with pure African man. You'd enjoy it no doubt.

Replies: @Stebbing Heuer

M Krauthamma-- Your must be the latest riff (iteration) of Marc Zuckerburg from over at AMREN.

One thing about this article is that he launches way ahead to the great beauty of some of the population, (like any country…) but what about the ugly ones?



What about the sickness of these beauty contests in the first place, like… ‘’ oh look at me, aren’t I the prettiest of all?’’? What about the crass exploitation by not so pretty assholes that feed off that kind of obsession… including jack ass T’rump, who looks like the face of the mummy from the Schleswig peat bog, what a poor viking throwback IE. he turned out!

I wish all these beauties mate with an pure African man.
 

As a person of half Jewish ancestry,
 

Replies: @Sam Coulton

Like lynching capitalists? Those are for the wrong kind/small kind of Capitalists, those capitalists your own BIG capitalist funders want to get rid off.

They did push Tibetan independence in the 50's. The CIA armed and trained an uprising. Its declassified now. It failed and that's when they extracted the Dalai Lama to India.

I guess Russia kept Chechnya because its separation is impractical. There is geography, as well as the fact that more Chechens live in the rest of Russia than in Chechnya. Not to mention that when Chechnya was given a de-facto independence under Yeltsin (may he rot in Hell), Chechen Islamists invaded Dagestan.

As to losing Belarus, the jury is still out.

In 2018, Ukrainian TFR was at 1.30 children per woman, but that uses the official population estimates. The average age is 41.6.

Here is the population pyramid according to official data (42.0 million inhabitants).

https://i.ibb.co/dLjhSJ2/ukra.png

Replies: @Anuxicus

FDR's unstated deep project was to take down the British Empire in Wall Street's favor, and he succeeded. A veracious history of US-British relations from 1919-1945 and after shows far more covert antagonism than otherwise. The US and Britain were world trade rivals through the inter-war period and from the beginning FDR used US "aid" to Britain and US war strategy to US advantage and British disadvantage. As a result of the war, the British Empire was kaput -- goodbye India, Pakistan, and the rest, and the US replaced Britain as the dominant figure in the Middle East of Oil, where the contest continued through the 1954 Iran coup and beyond. The grand "alliance" summed up to the end of Imperial Britain and the confirmation of Imperial Wall Street (don't call it America because it isn't America any more than the British ruling 1% was or is England).

Replies: @Wizard of Oz, @S, @Pater