RSS“It’s probably more like 10%. But, I am also hearing a large number of women are on track to be single and childless at 40, so I don’t know. My contention is that they don’t respond to normal masculinity.”
That’s certainly part of it, but I think the whole thing is part of a much more long-range problem which has its fangs sunk much deeper into the culture and people’s minds. Can you possibly guess who we should thank?
Starting around 1970 or so, young girls began to start getting sold a bill of goods about rejecting traditional sex roles and instead “having it all.” There were also economic developments which began the demolishing of an economic model which made a one-income family possible. But increasingly women were told that motherhood and family/household management were trivial, air-headed pursuits rather than the vital national-interest-serving metier they actually are. Barbie wasn’t a wife and mother, she wasn’t Suzie Homemaker, she lived in a Malibu Dream House and worked as an airline pilot or an astronaut or something. She was an imitation man in heels.
All of this was a deep psy-op mind-fuck on the minds of America’s girls and young women. They got re-programmed exactly counter to their natural programming, and the general culture supported it. So not all of them are really bitchy viragos, they are more like generation after generation of Patty Hearsts.
I was fortunate to be a youngster when there was still a sizeable percentage of college women (probably most) who, despite studying all the zany elements of Theory, still were quite feminine and enjoyed being so — and not just in style, but complete with old-timey feminine outlooks and demeanor.
I think that these days the problem is one of recursion: chicks in my dating days still had the personal and cultural examples of normative womanhood to refer to, whereas young women today have grown up in a “feminine vacuum” where there are no models or examples, either in theory or in real life, except for Girl Boss, Mary Sue the All-Powerful Action Heroine, and various flavors of Andrea Dworkin-approved harridan. And the moral and linguistic gateways have been shuttered so that anything else is rendered Red Alert! or Inconceivable, in the same way that kids are taught that all humanity always thought that Slabery was a categorical moral evil, except for those damn white Southerners, the one historical outlier.
Hard to turn the Titanic around on a dime, but I would say that a mission-critical thing would be to bring back the one-income family as a viable life model, and the culture would begin to adjust/heal accordingly. Guess who will make sure that never happens — at least not for white people.
For sure. It's really sad. They often dress or act inappropriately even when meeting a boyfriend's family. I also notice a fair number of these girls end going for some flavor of Brown guy, I suspect because she thinks she will be the lead (not only do they produce unfortunate children, she doesn't actually get to be the lead).
whereas young women today have grown up in a “feminine vacuum” where there are no models or examples, either in theory or in real life, except for Girl Boss, Mary Sue the All-Powerful Action Heroine, and various flavors of Andrea Dworkin-approved harridan.
My 1980s concept of "what women want" was strongly formed by a slightly older friend of mine's girlfriend who hung out with me a lot for some reason. She was all about defying what she saw as traditional feminine norms, which in retrospect were mostly Hollywood tropes rather than anything she would have encountered in real life. One thing she said that stood out to me was, "When I get married, I won't wear a wedding dress; my husband and I are wearing tailcoats!" (For younger readers, "tails" means this, not this.)
Starting around 1970 or so, young girls began to start getting sold a bill of goods about rejecting traditional sex roles and instead “having it all.”
Oh, I don’t doubt you enjoy cooking (and sex) but I think you enjoy the bragging quite a bit more.
Sad. So much effort and pretension.
Mrs. Prude made mushroom ravioli with our home grown tomatoes and shiitakes.
It was, as usual, otherworldly.
It is improbable a short war would have produced more refugees than this long slog.
And everything Mark G said…
I stopped reading after repetition of the scary ICE theme. Life is to short to read this word vomit
“If Whites viewed each other as allies there would be no Ukrainian refugees because we would not be using the Ukraine to fight a proxy war with Russia.”
If the West had not supported Ukraine allowing the Russians to crush them this would have produced a lot of Ukrainian refugees (or at least want to be refugees).
“It was stupid of the Irish to let them in ”
“The Irish” have nothing to do with the process, and I doubt more than 1 in 10 actually voted yes to resettle Africans in their homeland, if there was ever an actual vote to begin with. The refugee racket is headed by an Irish bureaucracy, international NGO’s, and the EU.
If anything, “the Irish” have been the most resistant to the importation of African negroes, when compared to other countries.
Sure, his debate performance was a mess. The proper response would be regret and mild pity for a great man in decline, not raucous mockery. The fact that SNL and their audience didn’t appreciate or know what Stockdale did for the honor of the POWs is a profoundly shameful indictment of what America had become by 1992.
Replies: @Dmon, @Pericles
According to our sources in the police, the argument between the Somali and the Ukrainian boys may have started over food. The Ukrainian was frying eggs and bacon for breakfast, which outraged the Somali, who does not eat pork for religious reasons. The Somali attacked the Ukrainian with a kitchen knife, viciously slashing him and gouging out his eyes. The boy tried to fight back, but had multiple wounds on his arms, head, and chest,” Irish journalist Stephen Hand told Strana
The US is going to have to sanction Ireland over this one. The way I see it, it is entirely legal under international law (as established in Charlotte v. Trump) for a black person to stab to death a Ukrainian refugee. However, Ireland clearly acted in a racist and discriminatory manner in allowing a White gentile person to cook bacon within the olfactory range of a muslim. 200% tariffs on potatoes and overrated stouts with peat in the bottom of the bottle.
On a side note, if Putin wanted to avoid international opprobrium, he should start employing Somali mercenaries. They could stab as many Ukrainians as they want, and he could get credit for introducing diversity to a clearly racist country. Just as long as he doesn’t try to evade sanctions by exporting vodka made with Irish potatoes.
Not sure. If you mean the hijackers, they were mostly here on tourist visas, which are not diversity visas. If you mean the deep state screwups, these are people like John Brennan, so I guess we'd have to go back and retcon out potato refugees.
Diversity-ideology had put those men in the USA.
If it weren’t for diversity, those Arabs on tourist visas would have been so unusual they would have drawn everyone’s attention. With diversity, it was just more brown crap floating around.
I listened to all five of Carlson's 9/11 series. Notwithstanding that they're meant for a mass audience, each episode had something that was new to me, even as a well informed citizen.
I would also strongly recommend Episode 4 of Tucker Carlson’s new 9/11 series
The lesson of September 11, 2001, alluded to often by John Derbyshire and not objected to be Steve Sailer: “The cause was Diversity.”
Diversity-ideology had put those men in the USA. In most any earlier racial-political dispensation before about the 1990s, maybe, they simply never would’ve been there.
This seems like a better framing than “nefarious federal conspiracy to use some Arabs as pawns that went wrong,” even if the latter might have truth in it.
Not sure. If you mean the hijackers, they were mostly here on tourist visas, which are not diversity visas. If you mean the deep state screwups, these are people like John Brennan, so I guess we'd have to go back and retcon out potato refugees.
Diversity-ideology had put those men in the USA.
I get a kick out of how Ron Unz explained Greta Handle’s time-out. It was kind of like “Listen, fellas: FAFO. Okay?”
For those who didn't see, it was here: https://www.unz.com/isteve/isteve-open-thread-13/#comment-7353574
Ron Unz explained Greta Handle’s time-out
Addressing Greta Handel, he added:
Ron Unz:The problem was that almost none of [Greta Handel's] comments were ever substantive, but instead were filled with complaints about this website and its writers, saying that the good ones had been the fanatic anti-vaxxers who had long since departed.
Replies: @Mark G.
Since you disliked this website so much but were still wasting so much of your time complaining about it in comments, I decided to help encourage your departure by severely restricting your commenting.
And remember, Stockdale was debating Quayle and Gore – two shrill light-weight frat-boys. What kind of country is it where those two worthless duds are held in higher esteem than a genuine war-hero? A country not worth a sh*t, I say.
Golly. Talk about missing the point.
Separate countries for separate people does not mean people in shit-hole countries won’t try to get to nice countries where people are self-loathing suckers.
It means that any ethno-state won’t have to deal with the ructions of inter-racial, inter-ethnic ructions (unless they invite the Other within their borders!).
Duhhrrr…
I'm not so sure about that first sentence. Remember how restricted suffrage was in the early years of the US. See details at
The quality of Whites was higher then. The first five presidents they voted in were Washington, Adams, Jefferson, Madison snd Monroe. The most recent five before the current one were Biden, Trump, Obama, Bush and Clinton.
The quality of the presidents is a more compelling point. I am trying to decide how much of that is based on the underlying quality of the populace we draw from and how much is structural. Some other candidate explanations. One surprising aspect is with so many more people we can't find better.
Generally, states limited this right to property-owning or tax-paying White males (about 6% of the population).
Admiral Stockdale was mocked for the debate with Gore and Quayle. Think of that: A man who gave almost the entire measure of his life for America, and had not stain on his honor was belittled by the media, and by extension the American public.
That would have been unthinkable before [and is a permanent mark against country]. And that was, what, thirty-five years ago? Burn it all down.
I work with a number of Serbians. One was complaining how the Muslims bred like mosquitoes. I told him “Then it’s good the have their own country, isn’t it.”
Think about that. The Yugoslav civil war ended when the Croats, Serbs, and Muslims all got their own countries.
Duhhrrrr.
‘The funniest part was that somebody had referred me to him to get some head shots. (No, not as in Kennedy head shots, but the kind you use in show business.) …The photos were so bad I never used them.”
I’m sure that both the facts and tenor of what you said are true. I would simply point out that head-shot photos are a very tricky art. They seem sort of simple in theory technically, but because there are so few variables in play, they are very easy to fuck up: get one of only four details wrong, and the thing is ruined.
I’ve had to wade through mountains of head-shots over the years, and it’s astounding how bad most of them are, and how few good/effective ones there are. They can be screwed up by technical incompetence, sure, but mostly they are screwed up by the subject adopting the wrong attitude or perspective: the subject has only one shot (literally) to make themselves look compelling and worth hiring, and somehow they don’t understand the magic secrets for how to do that. It’s a hard line to walk — if you choose to make yourself look too friendly or appealing, you risk looking like an amateur. But if you try to look to cool and remote, you send off a different bad signal.
I always tell people who are curious about it all: you have to remember that the people in show-biz who are the decision-makers are generally over-worked and very tired. They have to deal with idiots all day, and so if they have to read a mountain of specs or look at hours of taped audition, what they look for most is the person who comes out of the gate strong on the very first beat. Mostly you don’t get a second chance, so make sure to get the first time right.
And also, you were smart to not use head shots you didn’t like, rather than just saying well, this’ll have to do. Much better to have no head shot than a bad one.
For anyone who truly cares how this happened, it’s apparent from the long awaited explanation from Ron Unz about a month ago (easily found in my archive) that a comment referencing the COVID crapshots
Not really.
The problem was that almost none of your comments were ever substantive, but instead were filled with complaints about this website and its writers, saying that the good ones had been the fanatic anti-vaxxers who had long since departed.
Since you disliked this website so much but were still wasting so much of your time complaining about it in comments, I decided to help encourage your departure by severely restricting your commenting.
This statement is misinterpreted. Clarke was talking about Serbian ethnic cleansing of Kosovo, which led to NATO intervention. Now, there are mostly ethnically "pure" two countries- Serbia and Kosovo.It was not about some grand plan for European countries as such.Replies: @Pericles, @Curle, @Mr. Anon
The arrogance of that statement is outrageous. Who is some American general to dictate to European countries what they will or will not be.
Now, there are mostly ethnically “pure” two countries- Serbia and Kosovo.
In other words, Clarke was wrong.
In other words, a frat house or military latrine. At work certain men will travel distances in the building to do their business in one of the few totally private toilets (no stalls just a single toilet in a single locking door room). Too shy to evacuate within hearing distance of others I infer. I view this as a negative social development. Girls do this mostly, of course.Replies: @Old Prude
Privacy was not a concept then. Imagine the townsfolk having a discussion on a new carriageway or aqueduct while getting rid of bodily wastes.
It’s often not privacy, but courtesy that motivates one to find a remote place to do one’s business. And besides, it’s hard to read when other folks are around.
Privacy was not a concept then. Imagine the townsfolk having a discussion on a new carriageway or aqueduct while getting rid of bodily wastes.
In other words, a frat house or military latrine. At work certain men will travel distances in the building to do their business in one of the few totally private toilets (no stalls just a single toilet in a single locking door room). Too shy to evacuate within hearing distance of others I infer. I view this as a negative social development. Girls do this mostly, of course.
The Maintenance lead … corrected her misperception.
Tactical error.
The second picture reminds me of a story. In the factory the men’s bathroom had two large round communal sinks where multiple guys could wash the grime off their hands while bitching about management at the end of the shift.
For some reason the HR lady had to go in there, escorted by the Maintenance lead. When she saw the sinks she was horrified, thinking they were communal urinals. The Maintenance lead laughed an corrected her misperception.
Tactical error.
The Maintenance lead ... corrected her misperception.
Sounds like a lot of effort for no happy ending. Why not just do the same thing with a woman who has something on the ball rather than a stripper? What, you don’t think concert pianists have any interesting stories ?
People who got frontal lobotomies didn’t have the power of the State behind them. Neither did anorexics.
The reason trannies became a national nuisance is because the State declared them a protected class and demanded they be coddled. That wouldn’t have been so bad if it were only girls deciding they were now Ezra instead of Elizabeth, but when guys figured out they could humiliate women and everyone else by forcing them, through the power of the State, to pretend they were women, things got out of hand.
Very important point. Trannies were the battering ram the Leftstate was going to use to sunder every portal.
People who got frontal lobotomies didn’t have the power of the State behind them. Neither did anorexics.
The reason trannies became a national nuisance is because the State declared them a protected class and demanded they be coddled.
We may slightly diverge here. It's true that the motive force of Transmania was primarily the men/'ex-men' while the moody/confused teens were mostly just conscripted as rhetorical cover, the actual human damage was much graver for the moody/confused teens Shanghaied into Transworld than for the truculent old perverts ringmastering the show.
That wouldn’t have been so bad if it were only girls deciding they were now Ezra instead of Elizabeth, but when guys figured out they could humiliate women and everyone else by forcing them, through the power of the State, to pretend they were women, things got out of hand.
He could have played GWB and converted Somalia and Yugoslav wars into multidecade multitrillion dollar debacles.
As it happens, his launching those useless “interventions” (i.e. foreign wars) did indeed set the precedent for multidecade multitrillion dollar military adventure, especially in missionary (i.e. not even a pretense of US interest) causes.
Incidentally, we still have troops in the Balkans, and we now have a permanent toxic parasite class of Somalis in the US, almost entirely imported since the Clinton Somalia mission.
Clinton was a total piece of shit all around. In a way, his personal appetites were fortunate for the US, since they hamstrung him from causing even more damage.
I wouldn’t say I am as productive at 62 as I was at 52, but I can get things done with a lot less effort. Wisdom and experience have a quality all their own.
It is gonna stay the way it is forever now.
The Cold War is over.
MAGA hats are red.
The hair of septum-pierced tatted fatties is blue.
Assimilation is a false hope. Italians and Acadians can be, and were assimilated because they are culturally and genetically adjacent to the core population of America.
Negroes have never assimilated. Asians and Aztecs won’t assimilate. Never. Never ever.
Yes, the flood of immigrants coming in are largely illegal and being more aggressive in curtailing that would do a lot to improve the situation.
The big problem is having large numbers of immigrants coming because the assimilation process breaks down. This is especially the case with Non-Whites but was somewhat even true of Whites outside the original core WASP population of this country. They assimilated eventually but it took a immigration pause to completely do so.
We are unlikely to ever have high levels of European immigration again since Europe has such low birthrates. The main worry is high levels of non-European immigration. We have several large ethnic neighborhoods here in Indianapolis, mostly Hispanic but also a big one of Burmese refugees, where they primarily talk to each other in their native language, visit their ethnic stores and restaurants and have little contact with us Hoosiers. In a situation like that, the assimilation process breaks down.
I remember at the time, shortly after the end of the Cold War, that we could anticipate a “Peace Dividend” because it no longer would be necessary to squander so many resources on the DOD. Clinton’s Administration actually benefitted from it briefly, but he, and most or all his successors, unfortunately took steps to squander all that dividend and then some. It also was an era exhibiting an unusual political constellation–Republican majorities in Congress from 1995 on, with a Democratic Administration. Those countervailing forces briefly put the brakes on federal spending, but not for long.
Clinton was a lucky degenerate. He had Perot in the mix put him in office, then he had what should have been our Peace Dividend to help government finances, and the personal computer revolution and the early internet to boost productivity. He had nothing to do with any of it.
Agree, Oilcan. I considered gold back in aughty nine, when it looked like that sucker was going down, but I couldn’t figure its utility, so I stocked up on whiskey, toilet paper, and ammo instead.
After sixteen more years of the banksters figuring out how to keep the game going I’ve used up my stash and am right back where I started (though I do keep extra bath tissue and bullets on hand, just in case).
Historically speaking, my grandfather paid for his first house in cash, and he was by no means wealthy. The house is still standing across from a small university.
I’m trying to understand how investing in gold would help the average person. I tend to stay out of the stock market because there are too many variables that I can’t know with any business or commodity. I just bought another house after renting for a few years, but I have no other debts, and my mortgage payment on a much nicer house in a much nicer area is about the same as the monthly rent on the house owned by the national corporate slum lord that bought up many homes in my area. I do okay, but I don’t know how to get everyone’s hands out of my pockets and beat inflation. And I’m not sure that gold is the answer.
pre-1965 law had to go
Not at all. Everything was fine. It was one of the most epic unforced(?) errors in history.
In 1965 most of the population of the US “democracy” was healthily race-realist. (The majority still is, it’s just that too many of the white ones are no longer free to express it.) No popular referendum could have produced the post-1965 disaster. Even now.
If the elites needed to drop explicitly racial terms from their country’s key racial policy, for whatever dumb reason they had—their cocktail party roster or whatever, they could have easily swapped in some simple social-science-y verbiage for the taboo race words: “the immigration quota will be allocated proportionally to the performance of the existing national groups within the US”, for example. Existing Danish immigrants are low crime, low indigence? Denmark gets a larger share of next year’s quota. Somalis doing Somali stuff? Total and complete shutdown of Somalis entering the United States until we can figure out what is going on. (What is going on: blood will tell. No solution short of total rebreeding. So the “figure out” part is already accomplished.) Or they could have taken the approach of Australia and New Zealand: only immigrants who speak English and have useful, pre-identified trade or professional skills, which is race realist in effect if not in name.
Instead, the elites did more or less the opposite of all that, while lying about it.
For Israel, it is not racial because they imported a bunch of coloreds who are supposedly “Jewish”
Which error they have been busily trying to undo by whatever means necessary, up to and including unconsented sterilization.
The English speaking world made a mess by abandoning ethno-nationalism, not by ditching racism.
Distinction without a difference.
I repeat: they are marginal.
No matter how you slice it, you must at least conclude the Jewish influence has been out of proportion to their numbers .
IMO, that has been the case since the turn of this century.
Of course, the practical result is that no one in the USG gives a shit about controlling runaway spending anymore.
Gingrich’s “Contract With America” was a very good idea, but the Reptiles in the Senate, like Olympia Snowe and Arlen Specter made sure it went nowhere, so dimwit voters sneered “See: They never really meant it”. Which in the case of the Senate Reptiles was certainly true.
Neko Case. Now we’re talking. What was PBS good for? Austin City Limits.
I saw Neko on ACS as the first act, followed by Dolly Parton. Both were in top form. Neko had some nerdy guy on the slide steel who was genius with the instrument. Dolly, in addition to having a top notch plastic surgeon, has kept a sweet voice despite the best efforts of Father Time.
I keep waiting for a YouTube copy of that episode. It was fabulous. I’ll never forget Dolly introducing Mountain Angel with “Some people were born to suffer.”
Speaking of Dolly, there are only two of the greats left. Dolly and Willy. And Willy, by the way has kept his voice, too, despite the best efforts of Father Weed.
Buzz, you left out the part where you “f***ed his wife”.
You’re slipping, man.
Is your name really John Johnson? And if not, should you be arrested and tried for fraud?Using an anonymous name to express your opinions is not fraud. It is no different than the use of a pen name. Employing an office building of full-time online trolls pretending to be citizens of different country in order to flip an election is fraud. You are really trying hard to rationalize Putin's interference in our elections. Prigozhin admitted to doing it and Trump agreed with the FBI's findings. So you are really alone on this one.Replies: @Jenner Ickham Errican, @Mr. Anon
They would do things like make posts as if they were small town Americans just sharing their opinions. That is fraud.
Prigozhin admitted to doing it and Trump agreed with the FBI’s findings.
Trump agrees with the last fawning sycophant he talked to.
Trump agrees with the last fawning sycophant he talked to.Did you have an excuse for other Republicans that agreed with the FBI's findings? In any case I will take the word of Prigozhin who ran the troll farm. A complete scumbag but an honest scumbag. One of the few Russians that were willing to be honest about the war. Thank God that Putin had him killed instead of promoting him over Shoigu. Putin went with the mediocre ass kisser to the benefit for Ukraine. Oops I mean it is a tragedy that Prigozhin died in a plane accident involving cocaine and hand grenades. When will the world learn? It's a bad idea to get high on cocaine and play with hand grenades. Thank you Putin for getting to the bottom of what happened.Replies: @Mr. Anon
Prigozhin admitted to doing it and Trump agreed with the FBI’s findings.
Achmed, I visited Peak Stupidity the last three days to try to find something worth reading since the Zblog shut down, Mark Steyn only writes once a week, and the company servers block UNZ.
I found it unreadable. The narrow center column is not visually conducive to a quick scan. And your writing on that site doesn’t flow and isn’t cogent. I haven’t analyzed it, but it seems at a glance to have too many cutesy asides.
I appreciate you make a daily effort, but the output doesn’t seem worth the effort. No offense, brother.
“Beardina”. Very good.
You're definitely right that it's the most under discussed elephant in the room. But I'm not sure that's because it's "taboo." It think it's because it's both incredibly obvious (we have to cut spending and raise taxes until our books balance), and yet it's also infinitely complex (which taxes? Which spending? How much of each?).
talking about debt crisis has become taboo topic.
The Ukraine-Russia, Israel-Iran etc. conflicts are important, but mainly because one of them might escalate into World War III, nuclear exchanges, and the end of human life on this planet. Us getting involved in overseas wars actually increases the possibility of that.
Our biggest problems are here at home and excessive attention to ethnic or religious feuds on the other side of the planet distracts us from dealing with them. One big problem is we are living beyond our means as indicated by the high levels of federal government spending and large federal government deficits we run every year. The other biggest problem is probably uncontrolled non-White immigration. Trump has made some good moves on immigration but has done poorly on reducing government spending or becoming less involved in overseas conflicts.
Replies: @Mark G.
The Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants and Children helps more than 6 million low-income mothers, young children and expectant parents to purchase nutritious staples like fruits and vegetables, low-fat milk and infant formula. The program, known as WIC, was at risk of running out of money this month because of the government shutdown, which occurred right before it was slated to receive its annual appropriation.
...
Officials from the U.S. Department of Agriculture, which runs WIC, told congressional staffers they were using $300 million in unspent tariff revenue from the last fiscal year to keep the program afloat, two people briefed on the call told AP. The people declined to be named because they were not authorized to share details from the call.
Tariff revenue supports many USDA programs. The law permits the administration to transfer money allocated for other programs to WIC.
You're definitely right that it's the most under discussed elephant in the room. But I'm not sure that's because it's "taboo." It think it's because it's both incredibly obvious (we have to cut spending and raise taxes until our books balance), and yet it's also infinitely complex (which taxes? Which spending? How much of each?).
talking about debt crisis has become taboo topic.
The debt is not discussed because the house of cards, built on a foundation of sand, should have collapsed in 2008, but here we are thirteen years later, four times as broke, and still things shamble along.
Whadya gonna do? If you bet economic collapse was right around the corner you were wrong 4,745 times in a row. Wanna place a bet on tomorrow, chump?
The ADL and SPLC will happily invite millions of Muslims into America to beat up Jews and burn synagogues if it allows them to tar white folks as racist.
That may be a valid point, Jack, but your whole comment misses the point on a higher level. Nobody would be mentioning this Leo Frank at all but for his role in the formation of the odious Woke, anti-White, ADL. That this org long been given unofficial advisory power to determine who is bad or good is what this is about.
This completely misses the main point, which is that the man was lynched.
The ADL hates White people more than they care about their own people. They probably lack the self-awareness to understand that.
At a time when they should have been building goodwill with Whites, they did the opposite.
You’re one of THOSE guys? Seriously? Yes the Russians spent ONE HUNDRED THOUSAND DOLLARS on twitter or something. (Steve Sailer would have a picture of Dr. Evil – Mike Myers – biting his pinkie here.)One of what guys? Someone who repeats the Russian acknowledgment about interfering in the election? Does that bother you? Would you prefer a media source that keeps away Russian statements that make you emotional? Did you have a receipt for how much they spent? How would you know the extent of it? Is that something Putin said? Russian clowncon apologists then:
You’re suggesting we should look the other way on Russia interfering in our elections? Looking the other way on fraud?
Reagan would switch parties if he could see modern clowncons like yourself defending a Russian dictator who oversaw a program that interfered in our election.
Ronald Reagan was not a moron. During his Presidency, it was the USSR we were dealing with, not Russia. Do you understand the difference? Containing Communism, which had engulfed half of the non-3rd-World, was THE most important foreign policy for America for 40 years. Reagan (with a whole lot of help) ended the Cold War, so that priority has been forgotten, I guess, or never known of by people under 40 y/o.
Putin may even be a worse dictator than your paranoid mind can imagine, but were he, why should I care? Why should America care? This ain’t 1985.
It really helps not to have been glued to the TV. For me, it’s been a quarter century, so I can think straight. Try it.
Some people probably said the same thing before Bud Light lost a huge fraction of their sales and were displaced as America's No. 1 selling beer.
Well that will never happen.
What do you meen by "tradcon whites"? People who actually watch and believe FOX? I would just call them normies. Maybe conservatards.
I’ve had White tradcons get upset that I wasn’t interested in a game. It actually bothered them that I would not be taking part. I knew White tradcons that were taking part in a $1200 fantasy football bowl. But that wasn’t gambling to them cause…um…they spend endless hours playing a game of trade Blacks. That makes it somehow different and not gambling. Playing trade Blacks and spending half their waking hours talking about how they totally snagged DeMarcus from that idiot Shawn in accounting.
I’ve had White tradcons get upset that I wasn’t interested in a game. It actually bothered them that I would not be taking part. I knew White tradcons that were taking part in a $1200 fantasy football bowl.
What do you meen by “tradcon whites”?
Notice how many of Johnson’s posts involve him making up conversations he had with whoever is convenient. “I have…get upset” or “I’ve had 4 conservatives actually tell me” or “The other day I was talking to three leftist women”.
That’s why I think he’s a jeet. The utter shamelessness.
Nobel Lit prize winner
László Krasznahorkai, a Hungarian … with ‘Jewish roots’
it’s known as the Not Thomas Pynchon Prize
It could be a signal the Peace Prize will go to a pro-Palestine group, i.e., they're strategically balancing by giving the Literature Prize to an Israel-citizenship-eligible sort.The markets however don't think so. A late surge of betting-money has gone to the already-favorite Sudan people. (Also, lots of people lost their Trump-bet nerve:)___________Implied %-chance to win Nobel Peace Prize 2025, Polymarket betting-market:- 37%: Sudan's Emergency Response Rooms
One wonders what the purpose of the whole thing is
The winner of the Nobel Peace Prize 2025 is….:
MARIA CORINA MACHADO.
She wins because, quote, she “keeps the flame of democracy burning amidst a growing darkness” of the dictatorship in Venezuela.
She was on the list of contenders, but down at 1% a few days ago and up (only) to 2% yesterday. A few people made good money. (It’s Norway so we assume no insider-trading.)
This was her entry in my run-down of the the betting-markets’ contendors:
— María Corina Machado (1%), anti-Maduro political dissident in Venezuela, now in hiding.
Yes, she is a pro-Western Venezuelan.
She is towards the Mestizo range but, from what I can tell, has a Whiter husband. Her children are what some like to call ‘Castizos’ (near-White or “off-White” by our standards; in practical terms, she would be seen as “Latin-American Hispanic” but her children, if US-raised, might be seen as “White but with something exotic”).
(Geo)political observations:
(1.) TRUMP PROBABLY HAPPY. Trump didn’t win. But given that he is now actively trying to topple the Venezuela government using extrajudicial mafia tactics, he and his people might welcome this result. They can spin it to be: “Venezuela are bad guys, so Trump bullying them must be good.”
(2.) SILENCE ON ISRAEL/PALESTINE. They declined to make any political statement, via the award, to criticize Israel either directly or indirectly.
(3.) PRO-WESTERN MESSAGE? Politically she could be placed as pro-Western / anti-Third Worldist. It may be a stretch to read a message of “the West is worth fighting for” in this seletion, but it’s a possible reading. Especially given the next observation:
(4.) REFUGEES. They made a specific point that “millions of Venezuelans have left Venezuela” because of the economic crisis overseen by the Maduro government, and implied this wouldn’t have happened if they’d had democracy. It’s wrapped up in nice-sounding language, but I detect an anti-Migrant tenor in the announcement. So it could well be quite the opposite of a “peace prize to refugee smugglers into Europe”-type award. This is the mid-2020s, not the mid-2010s.
(5.) RACE and the CASTIZO-ELITE. In “ethnopolitical” terms, Maria Corina Machado’s pro-Western (anti-Chavez, anti-Maduro, “right-wing”) views would probably tip her over, in some eyes, into the Castizo category herself. Because all these things are always flexible in a place like Latin America (and with racial-mixes, phenotype can be misleading; she might have a Mestizo-phenotype but a White, “Castizo”-genotype).
In effect, the Castizos like Maria Corina Machado are the natural ruling-element of Venezuela and many other Latin-American societies. These places don’t have any meaningful full-White population-stocks anymore, but they do have wealthy, powerful, galvanized, and ethnopolitically-cohesive Castizo population-stocks.
The Castizo element is the source of many-a “caudillo” of the past, and, as far as I know, the overwhelming source of all Venezuela’s elites before Hugo Chavez (1999-2012). As Steve Sailer had pointed out, traditionally whenever a Nonwhite man in these places made good, he’d marry a White(r) woman and the descendants would fold into the higher-Mestizo or Castizo elements.
Some will remember that the US attempted to install a guy called Juan Guaido as president of Venezuela, a few years ago. He is also a Castizo.
(6.) REJECTION OF POST-WHITE TRIUMPHALISM of HUGO CHAVEZ? The Chavez movement, and the Maduro follow-on political force(s), have always been multi-racial, post-White, with anti-White overtones, driven by the charismatic leadership of Chavez.
The Maduro people’s domestic legitimacy, I assume, continues to rest on these racialist energies. The leaders of the opposition are always conspicuously Whiter-end people (of course, that doesn’t make them good automatically). The Nobel Prize to one of them could be seen as a signal of “post-White racial Messianism is note automatically green-lit anymore.”
It’s not 2009 with the Barack H. Obama affirmative-action Nobel Peace Prize. Welcome to the second quarter of the 21st century.
Despite being 2% of the population, jews own 47.6% of the NBA franchises...
Forbes 100: 35 of Top 100 U.S. Billionaires Are Jewish...
Attention AI info-supremacy believers. Behold:
The claim that Jews…own 46.7% of NBA franchises is a widely circulated antisemitic conspiracy theory that is factually incorrect, [is] misleading and draws upon harmful antisemitic stereotypes.
Here’s a breakdown of the facts behind this claim:
– …[A]round 14 of the 30 principal owners of NBA teams are Jewish, this is closer to 46% and not “46.7% of NBA franchises.” […]
– The claim uses…a long-standing antisemitic trope that falsely accuses Jewish people of secretly controlling banks, media, and other industries.
– […] The NBA’s urban roots and historical Jewish presence in [business and finance] are more nuanced explanations than the conspiratorial framing
“Case closed.”
Thank you for the "[is]"! The failure to use parallel constructions in lists has reached epidemic proportions. The worst abusers are pharma commercials' lists of warnings, e.g., "do not use if you are nursing, pregnant, or may become pregnant..." Every single one has lists that are grammatically incorrect in this fashion.
The claim that Jews…own 46.7% of NBA franchises is a widely circulated antisemitic conspiracy theory that is factually incorrect, [is] misleading and draws upon harmful antisemitic stereotypes.
Maybe they will become activists for their race.Replies: @Old Prude
U.S. Industry will never recover because all the clever white boys are easing into retirement.
LITFLOM, you are a bore. Effective advocates for the interests of whites are not monomaniacs like you, and Jared Taylor and Peter Brimelow (though I really hesitate to put you in the same category of those two real gentlemen). It is folks like Derbyshire, Z-man, and Mark Steyn are who are moving the needle because they don’t just drone on about race, but talk of other items of human interest, Opera, Broadway Musicals, and Pink Floyd eg.
They come across as relatable and well-rounded and draw a wider audience, who learn to respect their opinions and judgements as sound and well reasoned, which carries over into effective advocacy for the preservation of white civilization.
I don’t visit AmRen nor Brimelow’s Substack because I already know what they are talking about and already support them.
I don’t read your comments because you are a one topic bore, who, to be frank, haven’t given any reason to respect your opinions and your judgement.
“were bombed to smithereens in World War II”
Yes, Germany hardly had any factories after the war. Now, most of our factories are gone. Here in the Midwest where many of them were there has been declining life expectancy in recent years from what Angus Deaton calls deaths of despair from alcohol and drug abuse along with suicides.
The dollar is not being replaced by another currency. It is being replaced by gold so you need to look at the dollar in relationship to gold. Gold has doubled in price since we started our proxy war against Russia in the Ukraine.
When the countries where manufacturing is done now stop taking our increasingly worthless dollars, we are not going to be buying those goods from our factories instead since we no longer have our industrial base. We won’t have the wealth to build all the factories to produce the formerly imported goods. We won’t have a large high IQ White population with the ability to construct factories and repair and operate the machines. People like that are retiring or dying off and being replaced by younger low IQ non-Whites.
U.S. Industry will never recover because all the clever white boys are easing into retirement. Blacks are worthless. Mestizos are good at putting on roofing tiles fast. Pajeets are good at being self interested weasels. Orientals are good at being busy.
None of our “New Americans” know how to turn a wrench or run a lathe. It’s tough to build anything without clever, mechanically inclined white boys, and America doesn’t make those anymore.
Maybe they will become activists for their race.Replies: @Old Prude
U.S. Industry will never recover because all the clever white boys are easing into retirement.
LITFLOM, you have nothing further to offer here. You’ve said your piece, now, move along, young man.
Unfortunately, I do not believe that to be the case. Trump's heart is in only two things: Trump and the Trump family.This was The Donald last year, during the campaign:
No matter what ACTUALLY happens with the numbers, you gotta know where Trump’s heart is in this matter – anti-invasion and pro-White.
Now, he has backed off of that and has proposed a $100,000 fee for H1-B visas, which is good (better would be to get Congress to mostly eliminate them). This proposal to restrict refugee admissions is also good. Perhaps Trump is listening more to Stephen Miller and less to whomever he used to listen to.He's also calling for the US to reoccupy the Bagram Airbase in Afghanistan. Here's an opinion piece in The Hill in support of this ludicrous idea:
Trump departs from anti-immigrant rhetoric with green card proposalhttps://www.voanews.com/a/trump-departs-from-anti-immigrant-rhetoric-with-green-card-proposal/7665692.html
It was written by Luke Coffey of the Hudson Institute, a reliably pro-Zionist and pro-MIC 'Think Tank'.Trump says we need Bagram to counter China (imagine it being said like Trump says it).I think it is really intended for a future war against Iran.Trump is not to be trusted. If he occasionally does something in our interest, great, but don't imagine that his heart is in it.Replies: @Achmed E. Newman, @Achmed E. Newman
Why reclaiming an Afghan air base is in America’s national interesthttps://thehill.com/opinion/5530611-reclaim-bagram-air-base/
Well, you’ve got 2 separate policies there. I agree with you completely regarding that stupid idea to open back up that airbase, Mr. Anon. Why is he pushing for this and all the rest of that? Is it for himself and his family? Nope, it’s for the pro-Israel contingent obviously, which means that he has let himself convinced all the warmongering is actually a good thing after all, but only the way he handles it, because he wrote “The Art of the Deal”. He’s listened to them for a long time, so backing off on all would take some long conversations with some other people, not Jewish NeoCons (or any NeoCons).
Trump is not stupid, but I don’t think he has spent the time to really develop principles and understand what’s going on in the world outside his businesses and friends. So he delegates the thinking. He’s gotten much better, mind you, but that stupid Chinese 1/2 million student visas and the “stapling green cards to diplomas of foreigners”, etc. is stuff that people like Steven Miller probably told him nicely was no good.
Why don’t some commenters here answer my question, which is, “Would anyone else make the great move that he has on both cutting this refugee racket down by 94% and leaving the rest for White ACTUAL refugees?” I say nobody would have.
How are these moves done for himself and his family?
Indeed. I actually controlled his output for several months by basically running Inception ops from the comments section. I would disagree with something he wrote and explain why. The disagreement itself would garner from him and his entourage the usual fusillade of insults and gainsayings that I've come to expect from such places; but, being right (as I typically am), the idea would exert some kind of subconscious force on the Z-Man, and---lo and behold!---the next day my "disagreement" would appear as his daily blog entry, suitably worked over in characteristic Z-Man fashion, with both him and his commenters seemingly oblivious to the fact that I had implanted the whole thing in his mind.
(Several of the commenters here, and many more of the non-commenting readers of this Sailer-blog discussion, were active at the Z-Man site. Intelligent Dasein spent a lot of time there...)
You felt so threatened by Z-Man. What a vicious little vermin you are. I am finding that it is the faux religious types, whether you or E Michael Jones, who are the biggest enemies of our race.
Z-Man’s influence lives on.
(Several of the commenters here, and many more of the non-commenting readers of this Sailer-blog discussion, were active at the Z-Man site. Intelligent Dasein spent a lot of time there…)
Indeed. I actually controlled his output for several months by basically running Inception ops from the comments section. I would disagree with something he wrote and explain why. The disagreement itself would garner from him and his entourage the usual fusillade of insults and gainsayings that I’ve come to expect from such places; but, being right (as I typically am), the idea would exert some kind of subconscious force on the Z-Man, and—lo and behold!—the next day my “disagreement” would appear as his daily blog entry, suitably worked over in characteristic Z-Man fashion, with both him and his commenters seemingly oblivious to the fact that I had implanted the whole thing in his mind.
This went on for quite some time—me playing the mini Wurlitzer while the peanut gallery hurled rotten tomatoes in my direction—but it wasn’t really the way I wanted it. I kept hoping that he would actually “see” where his ideas were coming from and become conscious of them, so that we could have a real conversation about things. That didn’t happen, however, and I had to quit before it got to be too on-the-nose. I don’t get any pleasure out of that sort of manipulation, which I wasn’t even trying to do in the first place. Now that he’s gone, I can only shake my head at the lost opportunities. HBD is a cancerous thought-worm that really blinds the eyes of those whom it infects, rendering them impervious to any kind of criticism or correction.
The Z-Man had a very odd sort of mind. I think the adjective that best describes it is “backwards.” He would talk about well-known people and things as if they were esoteric figments he was struggling to pull out of the ether—“Speaking of lying, there was that guy from back in the ’90s who just used to lie with impunity…I think he was a politician from Arkansas or somewhere…who was it?…Ah…Oh well, It doesn’t matter…Oh!… Bill Clinton, that was it!”—and meanwhile he would employ his own private lexicon with perfect assurance, as if it were some universal language that we all ought to understand instinctively. Whenever he reached for a commonplace idiom or cliché, he would invariably employ it in exactly the opposite sense that it normally carries. For example, the saying, “Dogs bark and caravans move on,” is supposed to mean that the deeper events of life and history progress towards their destined outcome with a serene steadiness that is not deterred by the yapping objections of inconsequential people; but whenever Z-Man used this phrase, he would identify himself with the dogs and deem the Progressive Left the caravan that marches on: the very opposite of the essentially optimistic manner in which a real Traditionalist would take it.
The Z-Man was not really too bright. He was the kind of person who, in a better world, should have ended up as a middle school English teacher that the students begrudgingly admitted handled the material effectively, despite his tangential stories and monotone delivery; but somehow or another, he got shunted into a “bad timeline” version of himself and became the bellwether for a cadre of internet cranks who only had the intellect and maturity of middle-schoolers. That he was interred with Catholic ceremony despite his atheism, his utter rejection of the faith, and his Norman Greenbaum-level grasp of theology is an ending that only Flannery O’Conner could write—and a merciful repudiation of his work.
Well, at least that statement was half right (the first part).
I’ve come to expect from such places; but, being right (as I typically am)
Hmm. Did you steal that modus operandi from him, or did you first “implant the whole thing in his mind”?
—and meanwhile he would employ his own private lexicon with perfect assurance, as if it were some universal language that we all ought to understand instinctively.
Haven’t you recently self-published a book that almost no one will ever read? How many copies have sold so far?Replies: @res
he got shunted into a “bad timeline” version of himself
As a matter of fact, LITFLOM, the only money I give to folks goes to Am Ren, Vdare/Brimelow, and formerly Derb and Z-man. Some also goes to support The New Criterion, and Maine First
An obvious answer seems to be, people who are better off can afford to have (multiple) children nowadays.
Not an obvious answer when Mexicans have large families regardless of income.
More likely answer is that Whites Christians and liberals have filled their children with guilt and confusion to where they are unable to act on their natural instincts.
I’m not a boomer and I’ve known plenty of Christians and liberals with no children. I wouldn’t describe a single one as being able to think clearly.
What do you think happens when you raise children to believe that race doesn’t exist and that White people ruined Wakanda? You’re teaching them that they are part of a cursed race.
The Christian version is no better. Race is just paint color which means evil Whites colonized Africa when it could have become a super amazing Christian Africa America. They just need capitalism and Christianity but slaver Whites ruined it. They were probably in league with Satan.
Back during Bush's presidency I remember having heard that he had been shot down during WWII, but didn't know anything more than that. I certainly didn't know that he was the lone pilot who managed to evade being captured, and that the other US pilots who were captured were cannibalized; I don't remember H.W. Bush or the media ever mentioning anything at all (beyond being shot down) about it during his presidency.Now imagine if "bone spurs" Trump had gone through the same ordeal as Bush went through. Hell, you'd never hear the end of it. Another thing about George H.W. Bush: When Bush went to war during Desert Storm it was over in a few days, and the Oil Sheiks footed the entire bill.Replies: @Old Prude
The Chichijima incident (also known as the Ogasawara incident) occurred in late 1944. Japanese soldiers killed eight American airmen on Chichi Jima, in the Bonin Islands, and cannibalized five of them.Nine American pilots escaped from their planes after being shot down flying over Chichijima, a tiny island 700 miles (1,100 km) south of Tokyo, in September 1944. Eight of the airmen, Lloyd Woellhof, Grady York, James “Jimmy” Dye, Glenn Frazier Jr., Marvell “Marve” Mershon, Floyd Hall, Warren Earl Vaughn, and Warren Hindenlang were captured and eventually executed. The ninth, and only one to evade capture, was future U.S. President George H. W. Bush, also a 20-year-old pilot.
Desert Storm begat our entire involvement in the Muslim world. Bush got us mired in Somalia, where we are still dithering around in today, bombing and droning for no apparent benefit.
Bush made a hash of the end of the Cold War. Instead of bringing the boys home, he sent them to every fly-blown crap hole on the planet, where they remain to this day.
Actually it's worse than that. Bush and his successors brought the Somalis here in large numbers.
Bush got us mired in Somalia, where we are still dithering around in today, bombing and droning for no apparent benefit.
Agreed! America had built up tons of goodwill from around the world for defending most of the world against Communism for 40 years. Then, there was to be that "peace dividend" (remember that term?) of lots of taxpayer money saves by NOT having to keep the military all over the world. Both the goodwill and the money have been blown to smithereens.It wasn't JUST the Bushes. Clinton had that war going on in the former Yugoslavia in the mid-'90s. I remember thinking "What the hell business of our is this?!" Not only that, we were on the side of the Moslems too! That was more than stupid.Replies: @YetAnotherAnon
Bush made a hash of the end of the Cold War. Instead of bringing the boys home, he sent them to every fly-blown crap hole on the planet, where they remain to this day.
I don’t know what my nieces and nephews make, but they all were raised in upper middle class households, so had all the advantages necessary to become upper middle class themselves. Hell, the five of us went from living in a trailer park to prosperity, yet these kids barely scrape by, and seem OK with that.
Zen and the Art of Civilization Maintenance is a multi-generational affair. Unfortunately, there is barely time to register the long term effects of radical changes on the current generation, much less to judge the effects of those changes on their children and grandchildren, though those are surely as pertinent if not more so.
We have to grasp such evidence as we have.
my mother waits it in vain to be a Great Grandmother.
I too could relate some stories. A particularly poignant one is five siblings from a family who more or less practiced category 1), above, in an unbroken chain going back to the Middle Ages, perhaps to ancient antiquity. Between the five siblings, two of them had the 20th century’s responsible ideal of two children each. Those four children are now exiting their fertility years with … zero children of their own. In other words, total family extinction in one generation.
The reasons for the terminality of each of the various branches of this formerly prolific and unbroken line vary, but in every case but one it comes down to some version of liberal theology: it would have been ecologically irresponsible to procreate, one would rather live as an unencumbered playboy, one married a woman who prioritized post-hippie-ish self-actualization (emphasis on self), one has some sort of incel-ish asexual condition, etc.
The old family home, from which once sprang generations of yeoman boys and winsome maids, will eventually pass into a stranger’s hands, whose investment will likely prove unfruitful, and then the vines and primeval forest will reclaim the site, leaving a little ruin for the archeology of some alien future.
“Although I disagree with the sentencing judge’s rationale, I agree that the defendant’s change of heart justified a significant downward departure from the Guidelines.”
A reasonable argument to be sure. Although (warning: not a lawyer!) I disagree with things like selective enhanced sentencing To Make An Example or to Send A Message, rather than on the specific individual merits of the individual case, plus I even disagree with plea bargains using the leverage of a harsher sentence if one chooses to go to trial (in essence, casino justice), nevertheless it is the system we have, what we are stuck with for the moment. Besides there is this to consider.
Like it or not, and no one likes it but here we are… We are at war with these evil motherfuckers, and if the situation were reversed they would show no mercy, ever (James Fields, anyone?). They need to be kicked in the balls hard at every conceivable possible opportunity.
Whatever else is true, this asshole devised a plan to assassinate a sitting Supreme Court justice because he was likely to rule against the Leftist Agenda. Said asshole then completed 4/5 of his plan. I repeat: he intended to slaughter a United States Supreme Court Justice because the judge was not going to rule according to his pre-determined leftist views.
A serious judge shoulda done a James Fields on his ass, and three times harder. In war you don’t give your enemies college scholarships and fellowships at think tanks. Not fair at all, but neither was Dresden.
I for one am appalled and pissed that Trump has done a 180 on US involvement in foreign wars. Same as it ever was, I guess.
A Diane Fossey exhibit for a date? Well, I have been taking Mrs. Prude with me on Saturday drives to the transfer station. Yeah. I know how to show a gal a good time.
I meant to say my mother waits it in vain to be a Great Grandmother.
Also, my stepson is a generation older than my nieces and nephews. It’s possible the degradation of society has been so quick as ruin the prospects for the younger generations.
I too could relate some stories. A particularly poignant one is five siblings from a family who more or less practiced category 1), above, in an unbroken chain going back to the Middle Ages, perhaps to ancient antiquity. Between the five siblings, two of them had the 20th century's responsible ideal of two children each. Those four children are now exiting their fertility years with ... zero children of their own. In other words, total family extinction in one generation.
my mother waits it in vain to be a Great Grandmother.
I and my four siblings were raised in a trailer park, apartments and rented houses. All went to college, three with advanced degrees and all married. So far so good. Our own eight children* are a mess. And none have procreated.
My mother waits in vain to be a grandmother. I am thinking of writing a will to leave all my worldly goods, per capita, to the children of my nieces and nephews. Maybe that will provide incentive. It will at least get the slackers thinking more about making babies.
*I have no offspring. My excuse is I married a woman fifteen years my senior. She raised one son while a single mother. He’s a hedge fund millionaire with two highly accomplished children. I don’t know what the lesson of all this is, or where we go from here.
As you may surmise, the real point of my comment was to assess what is working and what is not, so as to answer where to go from here. As Gen-X is now exiting the fertility envelope, it's fair to judge the reproductive careers of this latest generation.As a society, or culture, or civilization, or whatever one calls it, success would be at a minimum to reproduce itself and to have the capacity to increase itself should it choose to. In terms of blood reproduction this means having on average more than the minimum two kids per woman, which, since fractional cases can't occur in real life, means seeing what is going on with women who have three or more kids. One thing I didn't mention previously is that though I started life in mostly black public school, my parents (liberals, lol) eventually figured out this was sub-optimal and sent me to a mostly white haute bourgeoisie high school (if you couldn't already tell from the pretentious way I write). I don't know for sure, but something approaching zero percent of the girls I graduated with from this institution of haute bourgeois liberalism went on to have three or more children, and I estimate the lifetime average fertility rate among my female classmates was more like 1.3 children per woman. So by the minimum standard of success above, haute bourgeois liberalism is a total failure. We can cross that off the list of viable, sustainable societies because it's literally barren. It can only continue to exist by parasitizing young blood to itself from other more viable modes of society. (Which might be why the entire educational establishment of the liberal theocracy is turned to that exact purpose.) So which (white) women did have three or more kids? As outlined in my previous comment (which was slightly constrained by Hypnotoad's start-by-age-~20 criterion), they primarily fell into two categories: 1) traditional high school sweethearts who married and reproduced early and often, and 2) girls who got into what used to be called "trouble" and carried on from there. The second category might be described as girls who would like to have been in the first category, but whether through misjudgment, carelessness, wishful thinking, or simply lack of suitable partners, ended up in the second category. The individual cases in the second category were often rather harrowing in person at the time—pregnant, unmarried, and with no ready means of support—even if they eventually managed more or less to make good on their situations. So, numerically both 1) and 2) worked, but for reasons both of mothers' comfort and of children's success, 1) is preferable to 2). This seems to apply whether or not there is a generous welfare "safety net" of support for young mothers. Lifting the Hypnotoad criterion to include more cases changes the picture slightly, but not much. Something approaching 100% of the Gen-X women I know of who had 3 or more kids started by age ~25. So it's not strictly necessary that they mate with their high school sweetheart, but reproductive women do tend to form longterm attachment with their children's father by their mid-twenties. Since again something approaching 100% of these women mated with/married a man not too much older than themselves, this means that conditions for affordable family formation must be available to the children's father by his late twenties. Although I would describe most of these women as above average in intelligence, they probably attended college at slightly below the national average for women at the time. Among the few who undertook post-college studies, all or almost all did it after their main reproductive years were over. So while intelligence may be mildly positively correlated with middle class white women's reproduction, education seemed uncorrelated or even slightly negatively correlated. And certainly the more advanced education was behind reproduction in priority. Obviously, at the present moment, society is configured for approximately the opposite result: longterm attachments are disincentivized, credentialism is rampant, family formation is anti-affordable, communities are atomized, and the sexes are mutually hostilized. The upside is that pretty much anything to break this logjam is an improvement.
I don’t know what the lesson of all this is, or where we go from here.
“Nobody seems to deliberately go with this plan.”
Well, black people do it all the time; I can’t count how many black women I’ve known who were grandmothers in their 40s.
The problem with them is that it is not a deliberate rational life plan, it is simply the result of various pathologies and dumb mistakes which leave a woman still in her prime, raising grandchildren who have neither a father nor a grandfather. And lots of visits to prisons, hospitals, morgues and cemeteries. Maybe it is actually not racism, but simply a replica of typical village life in West Africa circa 1500? Probably, but good luck getting anybody to really admit to that.
As I keep saying, the issue with blacks is that they are not adapted to modernity. Which may be a strong suit in the long run: after all, there are now 1 billion negroes, who all want to come here, and fewer than 500 million whites, who mostly lack the nous or the moral courage to defend their own territory and bloodlines.
The thing about modernity is that it is, well, modern: it’s a pretty recent invention, which has warped normative human behavior in countless ways. And although it brings with it incredible new material prosperity, in ev-psych terms it is brand spanking new, and so it comes with all sorts of side effects and externalities which we have not even fully identified yet, much less solved for.
Meanwhile blacks, with their seemingly primitive behavior “failures”, continue to breed like rabbits, while peak-fertility white women go to college and do “queer theory studies” and then go to Africa to dig wells for negroes. Who will win?
Hey. Come to think of it. Steve Sailer has slackened up on mentioning his World's Most Important Graph lately.
blacks, with their seemingly primitive behavior “failures”, continue to breed like rabbits, while peak-fertility white women go to college and do “queer theory studies” and then go to Africa to dig wells for negroes. Who will win?
Trump invoked 10 U.S.C. 12406, which authorizes the President to bring National Guard personnel into Federal duty in the event of Actual or threatened rebellion “against the authority of the Government of the United States”; or When the President is unable with the regular forces to execute the laws of the United States. There is a substantial body of legal writing on this statute, dating back to 1971. It is not at all clear that Trump does not have the power to use the national guard to quell anti-ICE protests in Los Angeles - that's working it's way up through the courts. He probably does not have the power to unilaterally send the National Guard to Chicago or Memphis for normal policing, but that's working up through the courts too. Unlike say Obama or Biden, Trump is very good about complying with court decisions, even the ones that are obviously full of sh!t. Trump just doesn't seem to understand how this whole fascist dictator thing is supposed to work.
Sending in the military is a new rule, and a direct violation of the Posse Comitatus Act. He may be able to make the case for it if they are there to protect federal buildings and other assets. Then there is the fact that the National Guard ought not to be his to mobilize. It’s supposed to be mobilized at the discretion of the governor, except in wartime. Are we fomally at war with Memphis? And will you be cool with President Newsome mobilizing the Texas National Guard to seize guns in Lubbock?
Your hypothetical about a President Newsome using federal forces to seize guns in Lubbock is particularly relevant, because in 1993, President Clinton sent federal forces (the ATF) to seize legally owned guns in Waco.
It was essentially G.H.W. Bush’s ATF that carried out the raid on Waco. They were afraid that the incoming Clinton administration was going to fold them into the FBI and eliminate their status as an independent law enforcement agency, so they launched the Waco raid to demonstrate how important they were.
And – yes – they and the FBI murdered a bunch of people, including women and children.
Which only goes to show how little difference there is between the two “sides” in our phony Kabuki political system. When it gets down to it, there is only one side.
No, that was Bill Clinton's raid. Bush I did enough bad, without counting Clinton's on his ledger.
"It was essentially G.H.W. Bush’s ATF that carried out the raid on Waco."
My position is more that if we are going to get involved in a war like Vietnam or Afghanistan then we need to do it right and not insult the soldiers that do the fighting. US casualties were down at the end of the Vietnam war and the North was ready for peace talks. They were in fact shocked that the US simply left as the bombing campaigns while cruel were in fact working. The US establishment however had decided to pack up and leave with a “good luck” to anyone who had fought the Communists. Good luck being tortured.
American foreign policy is often a half-assed worst of both worlds. We half colonize a country and then absorb all of the costs. We don’t take the Roman approach nor do we make new friends.
Afghanistan in part resulted from the Western belief that all people are interchangeable and just need the right cocktail of democracy and freedom. When that didn’t work our leaders were incapable of problem solving outside of that mindset. They just closed the whole thing down and allowed Afghans to be rounded up by the Taliban.
Beyond the ethics I don’t think our leaders are mentally capable of managing an occupation. Both Republicans and Democrats smoke from the same “we are all one” crack pipe. Admitting that Afghans may need more than a constitution and some strip malls is too much for them. That has too many implications for domestic policy. Better to shut it down and continue the addiction.
This was good.Replies: @J.Ross, @YetAnotherAnon
American foreign policy is often a half-assed worst of both worlds. We half colonize a country and then absorb all of the costs. We don’t take the Roman approach nor do we make new friends.
Afghanistan in part resulted from the Western belief that all people are interchangeable and just need the right cocktail of democracy and freedom. When that didn’t work our leaders were incapable of problem solving outside of that mindset. They just closed the whole thing down and allowed Afghans to be rounded up by the Taliban.
Beyond the ethics I don’t think our leaders are mentally capable of managing an occupation. Both Republicans and Democrats smoke from the same “we are all one” crack pipe. Admitting that Afghans may need more than a constitution and some strip malls is too much for them. That has too many implications for domestic policy. Better to shut it down and continue the addiction.
Yep. The old British Empire could hold down 10 million wogs with a Regiment or two and some well-placed bribes to local potentates. The American way of doing things somehow requires gazillions of dollars to defense contractors and endless "nation building" to teach Democracy and LGBT values, etc.
American foreign policy is often a half-assed worst of both worlds.
If that is what informs your musical taste, you might like Samantha Fish.
Gold was eighteen hundred dollars an ounce when the invasion started and is now thirty eight hundred dollars an ounce, meaning the value of the dollar has dropped by over half compared to gold.They did not claim that gold would gain against the dollar and other currencies. They said the dollar would be dropped by the world as an exchange currency thanks to Putin's invasion and 4d chess with his oil sales. This was supposed to cause devaluation of the dollar against other currencies as in paper not gold. There were many "end of the dollar" blog posts here. It didn't happen and the Euro vs Dollar is back to where it was in 2021.
Our pro-Russian bloggers made similar proclamations when the invasion started.
the Euro vs Dollar is back to where it was in 2021
This is a spurious new third element in the discussion of the dollar vs. gold. Like the price of the dollar, the price of the euro heavily depends on the actions of the relevant central bank—the ECB for the euro. And the ECB usually does whatever the Fed does, so the price of the euro usually tracks the price of the dollar within a few percent, as it has been and likely will continue to do.
Gold, on the other hand, is a hard, global benchmark, outside the control of central banks. (The price of gold can reflect non-financial events, such as the capture of the Aztec Empire or the invention of steam-powered mining, but since neither of those things happened since 2022, they’re not relevant for the recent price.) Gold shows more clearly where the dollar stands globally.
The Biden regime’s decision to steal Russia’s money and kick Russia out of SWIFT only weakly had the intended effect of making life hard in Russia, it had no effect at all in making Putin unpopular—somewhat the reverse actually. The big effect it did have was putting every national currency investor on notice that your deposits are not safe in the Western banking system. As a result there has been a massive capital flight out of the dollar and euro and into gold or other investments, as any idiot could have foreseen, but the fools who run things from Washington and Brussels are not just any idiots, they are very special idiots, groomed from birth with particular taboos, trained into advanced superstition, and then released in perfect blindness into the halls of power: “Russia HaS aLrEadY LosT!!1! We wIlL dEfeAt Putin!1!!” Smash cut to next scene: “how did our currency lose half its power…”
It’s not just the big dogs like the China and Russia who now decline to contribute their surpluses to the Fed-ECB Ponzi scheme, even nominal allies such as the Gulf States started pulling out. Biden belatedly tried sucking up to Mohammed bin Salman to get Saudi funding back, but after getting lambasted by Biden for killing that defected intel asset (“journalist”), the Prince wasn’t in the mood to heed Biden’s slobbering entreaties. There is a reason that Trump made his Grand Gulf Tour a priority at the start of his administration. One can complain about “unseemly baksheesh” or whatever, but the US needs to keep those guys on side to prevent the dollar slipping further. So far, it seems to have worked.
Keep those “end of the dollar” t-shirts ready.
No one here is saying that. But the anti-Russia hawks were saying that Biden’s firm response was supposed to collapse Russia and depose Putin, when their actions actually crippled the dollar, solidified the anti-US bloc, and made Putin more popular than ever. It is the “end of Russia” and “end of Putin” t-shirts you should be mocking.
This is a spurious new third element in the discussion of the dollar vs. gold. It's not spurious at all and our "dollar is doomed" bloggers did not make proclamations of the dollar losing against gold. They made it clear that the dollar will drop against everything. Well that did not happen. You can also point out that the Euro has lost against gold and so has the Ruble. There has been a global run to gold. The Biden regime’s decision to steal Russia’s money and kick Russia out of SWIFT only weakly had the intended effect of making life hard in Russia, it had no effect at all in making Putin unpopular—somewhat the reverse actually. Well provide a source on that. Russians are less likely to support the war when compared to a few years ago
the Euro vs Dollar is back to where it was in 2021
Call the Iraq war a dog or call it a cat. Sane people would call it a fiasco and a failure and knowing what we know now would never support it. It was painful to watch my fellow Americans fall for the irrational propaganda of 2002 and early 2003, all culminating in Colin Powell at the UN holding a vial of white powder and displaying pictures of a a balsa wood drone that Saddam was going to deploy against us.
A lot of people got suckered into the post 9 11 patriotism play.
It surely informed my musical taste when I was an adolescent. If your musical taste is Rock and Roll, then you have adolescent taste. That’s who most all folks in the HOF were singing for.
The Vietnamese war was a political failure. Stop dissing the veterans it was the fucking politicians who screwed the pooch not the grunts.
FIFY. No charge.Replies: @Old Prude
I’ve knownsecular liberal womenhomosexuals that said they hated being attracted to not just men but assholes.
Tee hee
News alert, energy levels decline substantially after age 64. The average person requires more sleep and a forty hour work week becomes more and more taxing. You expecting to beat that trend?Replies: @Mark G., @Sam Hildebrand, @kaganovitch
I am not saving for retirement
News alert, energy levels decline substantially after age 64. The average person requires more sleep and a forty hour work week becomes more and more taxing. You expecting to beat that trend?
Dude, he works at a Govt. job.
“The military goals were achieved”. There-in lies the failure of the entire bloody expensive mess; Like Afghanistan, the military goals were achieved in three weeks. At that point, the U.S. military should have packed up and gone home, having achieved the most important POLICY goal: FAFO.
Contrary to what the mid-wit Colin Powell said, if we broke it, we don’t own it. They do. F around and we’ll be back to break it harder and faster – get it?
The Iraq war made the US no more safe and secure. It provided the Iranians another ally, though at this time, the level of their cooperation appears limited. There were no WMDSs. There was no threat from a Saddam ruled Iraq so by those standards it was catastrophic failure.
If the US had never invaded, the West could have worked with Saddam or we could have worked with the subversives trying to overthrow him.
2 trillion US tax dollars, 5000 dead and many more wounded, physically and psychologically, hundreds of thousands if Iraqis slaughtered- if this is winning/a success, I would certainly hate to see failure.
Trump is getting better at remembering what Steven Miller told him five minutes ago. This time, too, he has Miller and others at the microphone to speak cogently about the truth. It won’t get any better than this.
It is truly remarkable people here are bitching about Trump after four years of Biden crapping his pants in public in front of the world. Trump makes America look bad? Puleeze…
Perhaps. He doesn't have Javanka getting in the way anymore.
Trump is getting better at remembering what Steven Miller told him five minutes ago.
Disagree. I don’t need to go into the details, but start with tight, black leather…
If Joan Jett is HOF worthy, pretty much everyone who ever picked up a guitar is.
Your mumbling that an administration that gave a complete 180° on decades of orthodoxy about immigration and tarriffs and so on lacks news ideas is of a piece with Mr Anon’s mumbling that the guy who stood up and shouted “Fight! Fight! Fight!” lacks charisma.
That's true. But is what Trump has "charisma"? If that's charisma, I guess I don't know what the word means. Or, rather, if people think that he is charismatic, then I don't understand those people.I guess I have to agree with what John Derbyshire said (I think he was the one who said it) - that despite his deep conservative leanings, he still identifies culturally with liberals. Or least one could say that twenty years ago. Now............I despise elite liberal sentiment with it's phony land-acknowledgements and its caving into the alphabet agenda, and etc.. But I also despise the lumpen-MAGA crowd with their Trump flags and military-worship and the like. What I can say about the latter is that at least they are willing to leave me alone, which is something that the former will not do. And I guess that's enough.But when the President talks about hosting MMA fights in the Rose garden and accepts jumbo jets as presents from middle-eastern potentates................that too is "clown world".Replies: @kaganovitch, @Jenner Ickham Errican, @Old Prude
Voters now pick charisma over competence.
But is what Trump has “charisma”? If that’s charisma, I guess I don’t know what the word means. [e.a.]
Your guess would be the way to bet.
But when the President talks about hosting MMA fights in the Rose garden and accepts jumbo jets as presents from middle-eastern potentates…………….that too is “clown world”.
But it’s the fun kind of “owning the libs” clown world. Those “libs”, especially the Dem-voting, upper-middle-class NPR-tote-bag crowd (and its aspirants), are aghast at both the “toxic masculinity” of MMA, and the garish golden “Opulence, I has it” Trump aesthetic. Trump making them seethe on a taste/class level is hilarious.
They couldn’t stop Trump from being president again, and he’s constantly in their face on multiple agita-causing levels. “Not only is he a fascist, he’s a fascist with bad, low-brow taste! The Euro-sophisticates are laughing at us! Noooooo!” It’s the darkest timeline for Trump haters. 🙂
Banning ARs. Now there is a serious policy proposal that will fix what’s wrong with society. No more stabbings, Saturday night shoot-outs or driving SUVs into a parade of grannnies. You have the best ideas JJ.
Immigration moratorium, deporting scofflaws, ending meddling in other countries’ affairs. That’s the core of MAGA.
And, do tell, what were these “war aims” in Iraq of which you speak? Was W right after all? Mission Accomplished?
[Honestly, JJ, that kind of “Iraq was a success” comment almost puts you in the same league as Corvina. You don’t want that. Never go full retard…]
Fixing the economy and restoring manufacturing and not going on foreign misdaventures and acknowledging reality (discussing fent) are ideas. You can disagree with them, you can argue they won’t work out, but you can’t pretend they’re not major changes of course. The conservatives without ideas are the Democrats in costume, like Romney and Ryan, who are now without a way back from exile.
Iraq was a success
Nobody ever believed that and you yourself do not believe it now. We killed thousands of innocent people to hand a former ally over to Iran and al-Qaeda, losing billions of dollars in the process.
Israel got an oil corridor out of it, so there's that.
We killed thousands of innocent people to hand a former ally over to Iran and al-Qaeda, losing billions of dollars in the process.
That's true. But is what Trump has "charisma"? If that's charisma, I guess I don't know what the word means. Or, rather, if people think that he is charismatic, then I don't understand those people.I guess I have to agree with what John Derbyshire said (I think he was the one who said it) - that despite his deep conservative leanings, he still identifies culturally with liberals. Or least one could say that twenty years ago. Now............I despise elite liberal sentiment with it's phony land-acknowledgements and its caving into the alphabet agenda, and etc.. But I also despise the lumpen-MAGA crowd with their Trump flags and military-worship and the like. What I can say about the latter is that at least they are willing to leave me alone, which is something that the former will not do. And I guess that's enough.But when the President talks about hosting MMA fights in the Rose garden and accepts jumbo jets as presents from middle-eastern potentates................that too is "clown world".Replies: @kaganovitch, @Jenner Ickham Errican, @Old Prude
Voters now pick charisma over competence.
I met Trump in person. He has charisma and a comfortable ease with people, and a sharp sense of humor.
If so, it doesn't come across on TV, where he only seems to be an abrasive nincompoop, who says the first idiot thing that pops into his mind.
I met Trump in person. He has charisma and a comfortable ease with people, and a sharp sense of humor.
What he has done is set a very clear precedent for totalitarian behavior from the presidency, and rubber-stamped it with the help of the supreme court, which will be used by President Newsom in 2-4 years to institute the most "woke" regime in American history.
President Trump has set in motion a benign cycle. The toxic cloud of woke orthodoxy is being dissipated, even if not as fast as we’d like.
What he has done is set a very clear precedent for totalitarian behavior from the presidency, and rubber-stamped it with the help of the supreme court, which will be used by President Newsom in 2-4 years to institute the most “woke” regime in American history.
That’s a possibility, but far from the only one. It’s just as likely the hard left would in turn do the nasty on their opponents if Trump carried on the RINO tradition of speaking loudly and carrying a toothpick. The woke faction has dug its claws so deeply into the Republic that it’s hard to see how Trump could do anything effective without running a risk of setting dangerous precedents.
I understand your concern and share it to some extent, but don’t want to see him put into a position of being damned if he does, damned if he doesn’t.
Since 1865 the supposedly “United” States has been a Hotel California where a state or group of states can check out any time they like but they can never leave. It sort of worked for a while thanks to patriotism (often war-generated) and periods of prosperity for the majority of citizens. But today it isn’t a country divided; it’s not a country at all. Instead two or more countries occupy the same geography, which history tells us should be frightening.
The best outcome would be a peaceful separation — sure, very difficult to pull off, but the alternatives will be far worse.
Kevin Barrett’s smug dismissal of Trump as a ‘clown’ is not any more helpful than his recurring smug lampooning of Christian belief themes, like Barrett’s recent joking about Christians and ‘rapture’
Sure there are funny buffoonish things in Trump-world, comic fodder for X tweets, but Trump is not ‘crashing and burning’
Trump’s 2nd term has had hugely important events quite changing the USA and the world, and involving very serious elements of usage of power which Trump’s team continues to hold
Before getting into critique of Trump’s policies on war / middle east / Ukraine-Russia, one can cite with Trump:
– a historic 2 million deportations already (!), 400k direct, 1.6 million self-deporting … the beginnings of relief for USA housing prices, and ‘normalising’ the expulsion practices which Europe will follow a bit later
– calling out the ‘climate change’ and ‘green’ bullshite, getting energy production back on track
– demolishing much of the woke / DEI / sexual dysphoria inanities that were wrecking normal society
– economic re-structuring of America being attempted, with a sense of pragmatic ‘options on the table
Sure there is goofy stuff with Trump, and significant arguments about evil with Israel, Iran etc … and good questions as to whether American lower classes’ economic hardship will be relieved … but dismissing Trump as a ‘clown’ and claiming he is ‘crashing’ is neither genuinely factual nor productive discussion
I don't know about Kevin Barrett, but I for one am glad to acknowledge that on domestic issues like the third-world immigration tsunami, President Trump has set in motion a benign cycle. The toxic cloud of woke orthodoxy is being dissipated, even if not as fast as we'd like.
Trump’s 2nd term has had hugely important events quite changing the USA and the world, and involving very serious elements of usage of power which Trump’s team continues to hold
Joke 'em if they can't take a fuck.
Kevin Barrett’s smug dismissal of Trump as a ‘clown’ is not any more helpful than his recurring smug lampooning of Christian belief themes, like Barrett’s recent joking about Christians and ‘rapture’
Is that what a Jugalo is?
A critical mass of the managers became convinced their A one code machines had reached liftoff and they didn't need the gypsy traveler coders for anything ever again.
WHY weren’t measures taken immediately in late January 2025 to end H1b? Or, for that matter — in late January 2017?
By the way Elon Musk says F*ck [native-born White workers] in the face.
Elon never understood what the MAGA-Trump “thing” was all about.
In certain important respects, Elon lives in a fantasy-world in which he can dictate reality personally, maybe by money but really by force of will or imagination. Elon doesn’t seem to empathize with, or even understand, real social movements. That may be what people mean by their occasional descriptions of him as autistic.
Elon’s failure to understand MAGA, and his thinking that he could strong-arm a huge surge in H1Bs then mock and threaten White Americans over it, differs from the real pro-Wokeness ideologues of the Left. The latter DID understand Trump-MAGA, correctly, as (at least originally) a soft White-ethnonationalist movement. The core of MAGA is basically the same as the ethnonationalistic movements seen all across Europe today, probably never stronger than in the mid-2020s.
(The AfD in Germany: It’s set to take power in two state governments in 2026, several more to come, and potentially entering the national government by 2029, at the least as a junior-partner, at which point mass-deportations would begin (we can hope). Even today, in a snap election they could take up to one-third of the national Bundestag seats, an amazing change-over since the long dreary years of the cordon-sanitaire, firmly in place from 1945-2015. The AfD, and others like it, are really the same ‘basic’ movement as the Trump-MAGA thing, motivated by the same desires of the White population for survival and self-determination against hostile Wokeness, the Diversity-Leviathan, and Western managed-decline/dispossession. Except the AfD is more morally-serious, smarter, and without a clownish narcissist running things as a reality-show.)
When I think back to it, Elon kind of “trolled” his way into public prominence in the political sphere (or the pro-wrestling-like, hyper social-media version of the political). It’s not clear he ever understood what he was doing or what was happening.
If we hadn’t got W in 2000, we would have gotten Gore, with the same trajectory for the nation. I recall watching those two shrill frat boys debate and knew our republic was in peril. 2008 was a bad time, but we stumbled on to 2015, when gay marriage was discovered in the Constitution. 2020 gave us Covid, a stolen election and the Black! Cultural Revolution, along with swamping the country with the dregs of the world.
It’s like watching a gut-shot squirrel thrashing around until it bleeds out.
With each passing month and year, I'm reminded of this old saying, and I try to tell myself that in many ways, it does beat the alternative, but man...
May You Live in Interesting Times
Literally everything is just a non-stop stream of crazy, mayhem, anarchy, madness, lunacy… and it still seems to be accelerating everyday.
That is only what comes into the computer / phone. Hit the off switch and the real world isn’t crazy, isn’t mayhem, isn’t anarchy, isn’t madness, isn’t lunacy. The programming can be ignored. Almost none of it is needed after you take care of the few basic necessities like bills, shopping, &c.
Go for a walk man. The rabbits and squirrels and the birds and whatnot have not changed at all. The butterflies and the bees are still going strong around my zip code in spite of the internet insisting very loudly that they are in a state of catastrophic decline collapse. It is my deeply held prejudice the people writing that stuff basically never go outside except to take a few steps to where their car is parked.
Have you ran into these bad boys? I deal with yellow jackets, wasps and bumble bees on regular basis, usually being stung a couple times a year. I usually leave the nests alone unless they are located next to the house. But these invasive european hornets are nasty. Not only are they huge and aggressive, they are active at night, making it difficult safely eradicate a nest (always hidden in a tree hole).
The butterflies and the bees are still going strong around my zip code
As far as the dogs go the little buggers are still manipulating us like crazy for their own ends.Replies: @Currdog73
Go for a walk man. The rabbits and squirrels and the birds and whatnot have not changed at all.
Sorry you won’t read an article by a respected journalist for what I consider a poor reason.
I did read it. That’s why I spent a couple of paragraphs responding to what would not make sense outside of the context of her article. I’m sorry you didn’t catch that.
As I tried to explain, even if her writing is from firsthand observation, she is clearly (and perhaps willfully) oblivious to larger logistical and strategic matters. She sees Ukrainians assembling drones, but doesn’t understand that all of the advanced components come from elsewhere. She knows Ukrainians are fighting, but doesn’t understand that their their ammunition, food, their fuel, even their salaries, is paid for by someone else. She cheers for strikes deep into Russia’s civilian interior, but forgets that her side has an open civilian interior too. She is clever, but she’s also a fool, and given her position and the blind belief she engenders, she’s a dangerous fool.
Only recently have I become aware of the massive Russian campaign to influence the West.
“Massive”?!? Where is the mass of this campaign? Every major news, media and propaganda outlet across the West is foursquare behind the pro-Ukraine narrative, no matter how it twists and turns. Anyone who dissents risks censure, deplatforming, and disemployment. I see plenty of mass alright, all of it deployed against Russia.
Unz is one of the few sites on the internet that enjoys relatively free debate on the subject. By an unfortunate coincidence, it is backlisted at Google and therefore basically invisible to anyone who doesn’t already know of its existence.
“I am too racist for one side and not racist enough for the other.”
Are the Chinese racists for preferring their own kind and building a culture that prioritizing Chinese interests over all others? You’re using words made up by people that would brainwash you into not prioritizing the interests of your own kind. They succeeded to some extent.
The Ukrainian government was installed and funded by the EU and the US (neocons). They kept jabbing at the bear, and the bear finally got fed up.
It was an avoidable war, but folks without skin in the game didn’t care.
My understanding is the Ukrainian people would prefer peace, but the EU and Zelinsky aren’t interested, because it’s not their blood on the ground.
A peculiar thing is that neither the US nor even the EU had "skin in the game" until they put it in.
folks without skin in the game didn’t care.
“I think it is fair to call it a NATO proxy war.”
Which deprives Ukraine of its agency and suggests it is merely a pawn in a larger geopolitical game. The Ukrainian government and its people made the sovereign decision to resist Russian aggression. It called for military assistance from outside places to defend their nation. Remember, Russia is the aggressor.
I was going to pass over this in silence, as approvingly quoting neocon warmonger Anne Applebaum might be considered embarrassing. Out of concern for you, I didn’t want to call attention to it. OTOH, given your position in the beating heart of mainstream Canada, maybe intra-NATO comity obliges a reply after all.
Yes, drones are now a crucial weapon on both sides. And I suppose many drones undergo final assembly in Ukraine and there may even be some injection-molding plants in Ukraine that can make plastic propellers or whatnot, but the important drone components, such as the sine qua non of drones—their digital brains, are 100% imported, and anyway both the domestic production and the imports are funded with NATO money, or as you call it “EU funds”. Even as the US may decline to fund its own government next month, the US and NATO are paying Ukrainian government and military salaries and even buying Ukrainian farmers their seeds and fertilizer (Ukraine used to be a huge fertilizer exporter).
Without NATO, this war, whether drone, infantry, or armor, would already be long over. When the war only exists because of NATO, and at this point the government, military, farms and fertilizers only exist because of NATO, I think it is fair to call it a NATO proxy war.
Additionally, Ukrainian-NATO drone attacks blowing up petroleum plants and airports within Russia’s interior may seem like a clever technical achievement, but consider that there are now unidentified drone probes of petroleum plants and airports within NATO’s interior. Then consider what happens if Russia decides to go full sauce-for-the-gander. Will flaming oil platforms in the North Sea and flaming airports in Jutland lead to Ukrainian victory? Or will it force a stark choice on NATO: settle now or launch WWIII?
You and I are far from the front lines so far. My idea of progress doesn’t involve bringing the front lines to us.
I guess I should have read more of the thread before posting my previous comment. LITFLOM likes being slapped around.
You are too easy going, so you keep getting pestered by Corvina and LITFLOM. If you were more obstreperous like Buzz Mo, they would stay clear away.