Depends on where you grew up and how street smart you are.

I would suggest not going anywhere without a relative or someone that does have the necessary street skills.

If you didn't grow up around US blacks, as you clearly didn't, you have no idea how savage they are.

Live in the woods as well. The views you expressed align closely with mine.

Musical genius, great music from all of them.
 

The Who can do that. The Stones are excellent lyricists with Ruby Tuesday, Gimme Shelter, She Comes in Colors, etc. Never much into the Beatles, but I can see their appeal to both sexes. Abbey Road is a gift.

Pink Floyd is very good with what they do. Soothing songs for the sad young. The barking dogs in Dogs is comic gold.

I really like Stevie Nicks' voice. Pure. transportive.

"vote" = LOL

In many ways it wasn't. True.

you are spreading lies, my friend. read Viktor Suvorov's 'The Chief Culprit: Stalin's Grand Design to Start World War II'.

Did Stalin intend to invade the Nazi Germany? Yes, he obviously saw war as inevitable.
Was he preparing for it? Yes.
Was he ready? No, and for that reason any conclusion that Hitler beat him to the punch fails.

Conversely Hitler was well aware that the Soviet state was gearing for war and knew that he would have to act first.

The major factor missed on all these arguments is what was really forcing German haste. It was food, Europe was not feeding itself. It was raw materials, Europe could not provide enough for Germanys war economy. The problem as in 1914-8 was the Royal Navy command of the Atlantic which effectively isolated Europe from resources.

The solution was invade the Ukraine and Caucasus. Stalin lost the battle for readiness, the Purges put paid to that. Yes he deployed forces to the west, that concurs with military defensive thinking of the time. If they didn’t have plans for a first strike that would be negligent. But did Stalin want to pull the trigger? I think yes, in 1942 or 1943.

 

I agree in totality with your assessment. Stalin was very disappointed - to put it mildly - that the French collapsed in about a month. The thinking behind the Nazi-Soviet pact was that the Germans would get bogged down in France just as in WWI - in the war of the 'imperalists' - with the Soviets marching in later to pick up the pieces. In the event, that did not happen. Stalin then spent all that time upto Barbarrossa, excepting occasions such as the May 5 speech, trying not to provoke Hitler. That accounted for his criminal orders right up to June 22, 1941 to the frontline forces not to respond to German movements. I really don't understand how so-called historians cannot grasp these elementary motivations for Stalin's conduct.

The authour should have included Stalin's War by Sean McMeekin among his references. It tells the story in great detail.

Notwithstanding Putin's hysterical attempts to whitewash Soviet history, for the peoples of Central Europe there was little to choose between Hitler and Stalin, unless one happened to be a Jew.

Communists are such great liars. Appropos of this I once read from an old Catholic priest in Glasgow, who recalled that right from the time of the Nazi-Soviet pact, the commie agitators in the shipyards were sabotaging work on warships, for they did not want to fight for 'British Imperialism', but right after June 22 1941, the tune changed to one of fighting the Nazi fascists to the bitter end.

Replies: @Bugey libre

If he saw war as inevitable he may have suspected France and England might start a war with Germany, as they did when they declared war on Germany in September 1939 commencing the naval war between Germany and England, and with the Jewish Bolshevik USSR and National Socialist Germany being arch-enemies, he would not keep the USSR out of that war, similar to the fact he eventually attacked Japan in 1945.

More generally speaking, England and world Jewry (as numerous people said at the time) were the groups that "started" or pushed the world into WW II. Historian David Irving provides the evidence of this in his widely acclaimed book (and widely despised by Churchill fans) "Churchill's War". Germany's dispute with Poland over German lands and Germans under Polish occupation was no reason to destroy Europe (and the British Empire itself), except that the corrupt Churchill was being paid huge sums of money by Jews (including Britain's own Jewish Board of Deputies) to do just that. Britain had as much business interfering in a German-Polish dispute as Germany would have had if it announced it would join forces with Indian nationalists to expel the British from India.

I don't think President John F Kennedy, who said 'The Germans really are too good - therefore people have ganged up on them to protect themselves' prior to becoming president as a young man in the 1930's was the only one to have those feelings. He also, was not the only admirer of Germany and Adolf Hitler. There were many others, but when a war is over and the victor is looking for blood, the vanquished and their sympathizers or supporters do their best to disappear.

It is also worth noting; no, it should be repeated often enough until the false narrative changes. Prior to the beginning of WW II, Germany did not have mass incarcerations or mass death. There was political violence between Communists, National Socialists and others, but even this did not involve such large numbers (as in the case of the USSR). And Germany's Jews were not subjected to physical attacks. They did have their rights stripped from them and were encouraged to emigrate. By contrast, in the 1930's, England, France and the USA's most important ally, the USSR was murdering millions of people across the USSR and sending many to Siberia where many never returned from. And during and after WW II, the USSR sent huge numbers of Latvians, Estonians and other ethnic groups to far off places never to be seen again also.

It is estimated 8 million Ukrainians were deliberately starved to death in the 1930's, with Jews playing a/the major role in this atrocity. How many people know the name Lazar Kaganovich, the Jewish Bolshevik that played such a big role in the death of those Ukrainians? No war crime trial for him. He was a top Bolshevik, very close to Stalin (Wikipedia is careful not to call him a friend, not wanting to tarnish the Jew too much) who died peacefully in Moscow in 1991.

Replies: @Wizard of Oz, @Carolyn Yeager, @Patrick McNally

What would Churchill say ---Adolf was an honroable man----Chamberlain a peace dove--Hitler needed room to expand ---East was it --get Sudetenland back --then Poland ---then Russia ---Nordic Supreme People must expand ---

Hitler could have obtained resources by means of a Mediterranean/middle-eastern offensive. That's where the oil was and oil was the biggest issue for the Germans. Food was rationed but the situation was still much better than in the immediate post war period 1945-48 when there was a genuine famine in occupied Germany. I therefore reject your assertion that Hitler was motivated by economic reasons - the USSR was supplying Germany right up until the outbreak of war on 22 June 1941. The main reason was clearly to do with knowledge of Stalin's desire for a pre-emptive strike. The meeting with Molotov in November 1940 made up Hitler's mind as he knew that no accommodation would be possible with Stalin that would not entail sacrificing fundamental German interests. Also, how do you know that Stalin was not ready for war in 1941? The Red Army had weaknesses but so did every other army on the planet, including the Wehrmacht! And despite these weaknesses the Red Army was by far the biggest in the world, and backed up by huge numbers of tanks and planes. On paper, the Red Army was perfectly capable of executing an attack on Germany in July/August of 1941. Would it have happened? I think not, because Stalin was naturally cautious and was aware that his forces were not at their optimum potential, but an attack in May/June 1942 was a certainty in my view. Indeed, Stalin expected the Germans to focus on the Mediterranean in 1941 and that would buy time to build up Soviet forces further.

Nah.

First of all, 55 MILLION non-jews died in the war and there is no dispute regarding this.

The six million figure is bullshit. The Red Cross was there, said that approx. 250,000 jews died in the war.

There were no gas chambers.

Jews died as the result of typhus and starvation.....brought about by the Allies bombing railroad lines, not as the result of a "final solution." There are no records of Hitler calling for a "final solution."
It's all made up.

If the Germans wanted to kill the jews...they simply could have shot them. Instead, the jews were sent to work camps where there were gyms, hospitals, theaters, swimming pools, etc.

Why were the jews sent to work camps? Because the jewish elite was implementing a communist takeover in Germany....same as they did in Russia....where the Bolsheviks mass murdered MILLIONS of innocent Russian Christians....burned churches....raped nuns....killed priests.....and Germany was NEXT.

The major political figures of the time did not mention "The Holocaust" in any of their autobiographies.

As mentioned in the above piece...."The Holocaust" was invented long after the war to manufacture support for Israel's fight against the Arabs.

Of course it is sad that any human being dies in war, but the idea that jews win the victim competition is just a weapon they use against white Christian people....and it's particularly offensive to me because my father and both of my uncles fought in WWII, saw action, killed people....risked their lives to fight our brothers in Germany......to have the disloyal jewish elite mount a campaign of destruction against all of Christendom.

Replies: @anarchyst, @Dr. Charles Fhandrich, @A little boy in the crowd, @JM, @sally, @Ed Case, @LeoB, @Anonymous

'Myself I would expand all Holocaust museums to commemorate all the other victims of mass murder....'

Or close all of them. Things are tough all over -- and as a rule, if you're alive today, you weren't a victim.

"Myself I would expand all Holocaust museums to commemorate all the other victims of mass murder."

It looks like you missed the word 'competitive' in the title....

Hollywood mogul to Pol Pot. "You suck at genocide".

https://xyz.net.au/wp-content/uploads/2021/04/Animation-shot-324x160.jpg

https://xyz.net.au/2021/04/food-for-thought-pol-pot-less-evil-than-organised-jewry/

The Zionazis are dead set against your sensible suggestion. According to the Holocaust cult, Jewish suffering is unique, unlike any other. It's pure narcissism.

Myself I would expand all Holocaust museums to commemorate all the other victims of mass murder
 

The whole Holocau$t™ is just that - a myth. If the Germans had wanted to wipe out the Jews they could have done what the largely Jewish Checkists troikas did to the goyim in the USSR: A quick bullet to the head followed by dumping in a mass grave. Most UR readers have heard of the old Russian proverb which says that Jews will always tell you what happened to them but will never tell you why.

Full disclosure: I bought into the complete Holocau$t™ package for most of my life.

Replies: @Rufus Clyde

Holocaust denial or revisionism is very offensive to the victims of the event.

"The Jew cries out in pain as he beats his neighbor with a stick" captures the reality beneath Jewish victimology, and especially the disgusting lie about the so-called Holocaust when it was undeniably Jews who were the vanguard of the communists in Russia who massacred tens of millions of Russians for being white and Christian--in other words, for being like most white Americans.

When white Christian Americans were still coming home in boxes in the aftermath of WW II, having died in the mistaken belief the European Jews needed rescuing, the Jews in America were not only the least likely of all to have worn the uniform, but emblematic Jewish authors like Arthur Miller were already casting Jews as the pure, innocent victims of whites in America and nazifying all white America as even worse than the German Nazis under the skin, including our unborn.

Philip Roth, another undeniably emblematic Jewish author, won this nation's highest literary award for his autobiographical Portnoy's Complaint in which he fantasizes about "shtupping" little Catholic school girls in uniform not, as he writes, because the sex would be any good, but to screw America's Catholic fathers--you know, the ones who disproportionately died to "save the Jews" in WW II.

The real horrors of that era, however, were at the hands of the Jews and are documented in the Black Book of C0mmunism in which the diabolical hatred Jews have for white Christians is beyond comprehension, such as skinning children alive while their parents were forced to watch. How freakin' dare you Jews lecture a dog on aggression.

In Nick Kollerstrom's demolition of the Holocaust fairytale, Breaking the Spell, he footnotes a quip that goes, "In all of German-occupied Europe there were 2.4 million Jews. After the war 3.8 million Jews applied for reparations. Sadly, the other 6 million were lost." Incredibly, no group escaped the horrors of WW II like the Jews. When the Red Cross records are finally made public, the number of Jews who died from disease in the camps will prove the Holocaust is a demonic fairytale that was written to conceal the truth of Jewish Bolshevism and, as always, blame the victims of the Jews one-sided ethnic warfare against whites.

Replies: @saggy

At the taxpayer's expense of course.

Even if the Holocaust victim numbers are true, they are only 10% of the global mortality arising from WWII. I once made a sign:

In World War II 60 million died.
The Jews were just a tithe...
 

Once I was meditating and imagined the suffering of the concentration camp guards who themselves were part of a reign of terror that probably forced them to commit atrocities they didn't really want to do. The same probably can be said for IDF atrocities against Palestinian civilians. A lot of this is the result of coercive group behaviors. But again the Jews just cannot humanize their oppressors and insist on portraying themselves as unique. This is a sign of immaturity and perhaps pathological narcissism.

I also once asked the woman running a Holocaust event at a local college why the fire-bombings of Dresden and Tokyo and the nuclear incinerations of Hiroshima and Nagasaki are not considered a holocaust. She turned white with rage and started shaking in anger and snarled at me:

"Only Jews have a right to use that term." And she had me evicted from the event.

Competitive victimhood is built into the liturgical fabric of Judaism through observances like the fast day of Tisha B’Av (the tenth day of the Hebrew month of Av, usually in the middle of August) when Jews reflect on the history of Jewish trauma from the destruction of the First and Second Temples to the medieval expulsions, the Spanish Inquisition, through to “the Holocaust.” One Jewish source notes how “references to the Holocaust, Nazis, Hitler, WWII, Germany etc. seep into the conversation amongst Jews, regardless of age, religious observance, or political affiliation.” Ashkenazi Jews in particular “continue to internalize and carry the trauma of the Holocaust in a way that shapes how we think and behave as Jews in America (and maybe throughout the rest of the world).” Carrying such feelings while comprising an ethnic ruling elite means Jews often feel “both entitlement and victimhood at the same time” which “can become unsettling and paradoxical.”
 

Replies: @Francis Miville

Holocaust denial or revisionism is very offensive to the victims of the event.

 

German president claims ICC has no jurisdiction over Israel
Frank-Walter Steinmeier said the International Criminal Court couldn't investigate alleged Israeli crimes 'due to the absence of Palestinian statehood’


He said that the position of the German government was that the ICC - which notably investigates allegations of war crimes - had no jurisdiction over Palestinian complaints against Israel "due to the absence of Palestinian statehood”.” https://www.middleeasteye.net/news/germany-israel-palestine-icc-crimes-jurisdiction-statehood

This bastard thinks that a homeless man can be battered raped and murdered by the man with a postal address .
To join the club of victimhood now requires possession of materials including F 16 and cluster bombs free goodies and booties , and possibly yearly economic homage paid by the German and the USA .

Replies: @Druid

Somewhat tangential to your point, but I thought I would address the so-called Rwandan genocide since you mentioned it. Some years ago I was coming to the conclusion that most of the history that we take for granted is largely falsified, and as part of that awakening, I decided to look at Rwanda. The official narrative of that event is, in my view, strongly at odds with even the officially accepted facts.

A couple years before the “genocide” the Hutus and Tutsis had fought a civil war, in which the previous Tutsi rulers were overthrown and a short-lived Hutu government was established. The Tutsi army, the Rwandan Patriotic Front (RPF) retreated to safety in neighboring Uganda.

How does the 1994 “genocide” begin? The “100 days” begins with the shooting down, via surface to air missile, of the Hutu president’s plane as it is landing at the Kigali airport. Shortly after, the Tutsi RPF invades Rwanda from Uganda and the “genocide” begins. Keep in mind, the official story is that Hutus massacred Tutsis. It is always presented in this one-sided fashion. However, after 100 days of Tutsis being “genocided” who is sitting on the thrown in Kigali? None other than Tutsi leader Paul Kagame. Imagine a “genocide” narrative in which over half of those dead are the ones committing the “genocide” (Hutus) and those being “genocided” take political power right after the dust settles.

Of course, Tutsi Paul Kagame remains president to this day and has made what I have just written illegal “Rwandan genocide” denial. Geez, I wonder why. It is almost like "woe is me" genocide narratives are constructed by those who win horrible wars as a way of justifying their victory and preventing anybody from questioning them once they are in power.

https://www.globalresearch.ca/rwanda-the-enduring-lies-a-project-censored-interview-with-professor-ed-herman/5502707

Replies: @Rufus Clyde

Your sentiments are admirable but then where does the saying, "Let him who is without sin, cast the first stone." fit in? Your project would have to entail thousands of memorials to victims of war, in practically every nation on earth!! Notice the fault with this. Who decides who goes monuments, goes to prison, etc. Right now, innocent Americans are locked up by the democratic party leaders..

Revising history is not offensive, it is a search for the truth. Germany stands accused of the murder of six million Jews, mainly by gas chamber. Children are told this on your holocaust museum tours. But is it true? Let's find out.
https://nij.ojp.gov/topics/articles/wrongful-convictions-and-dna-exonerations-understanding-role-forensic-science

I don't mind racism. I hate liars.

Replies: @profnasty

I hate racism. This lady is clearly a racist.
 

Replies: @Fiendly Neighbourhood Terrorist

You're right. This is clearly racist, violent, hate speech. And I'm not white either (I'm Indian just like her genes are).

Replies: @Jeff Stryker

I am a racist and I'm proud to admit it.
I'm proud to be part of a nation who, throughout history has had to fight to survive.
I'm proud of the clan I'm from, who fought against other clans, to keep their lands and their freedom.
I'm proud of my people who have overcome all odds set against them.
I'm proud of the white civilization, as a whole for the many advancements, essentially building the world as we see it today.
I'm proud of the brilliance within my forefathers, in all fields - Science, Engineering, Technology, Mathematics, Literature, Philosophy, Law and Order, Art, Architecture, Sculpture, Masonry, Tradesmanship, Music....the list goes on and on.

When I go to a foreign land, I show respect to the people within, their culture and their traditions and do my utmost to respect their way of life and see that it continues.

However, when I see people like Aruna Khilanani (and the many like her) speweing her hatred towards my people, my culture, my traditions and my civilization, I have nothing but hatred for them, a loathing at people who have no respect, aliens in my land, a land they benefit from, from the brilliance of whites, living in a society they haven't contributed to, whatsoever.

You see, you'd better start being a racist and having hatred towards those who wish to do you wrong. And people like Aruna Khilanani, clearly DO want to do us wrong. You'll need to get off the fence and decide where you stand - with your nation, or as a world citizen, wasting your time differentiating between the good and the bad aliens, living in your lands. You may believe that being kind, compassionate, caring and humanitarian to all peoples on this earth is a good thing, but when it results in the genocide of your people, by the immigrants you've let in and murder you, history won't paint you as what you wish to be painted as, but as the fools you clearly all were.

There's only one solution and that's to put them on a plane, send them back to their ancestral lands and stamp the passport with the words NO RE-ENTRY.

they don't recognize it as such though; oh, the irony. And they are trying to get Whites to agree they have some undiagnosed racism, while projecting their own hatred and racism onto them. It boggles the mind.

I hate racism. This lady is clearly a racist.

 

Sulu

Oh Nick you deluded FOOL - "racism" - the innate preference for one's own kind - is healthy, normal, natural and sane. Humans are innately Tribal. It's hard wired into our DNA.

Most mammalian young are up and running - able to care for themselves - anywhere from 6 months to 2 years. The Human child is not in control of it's motor skills until approximately age 5. Human children require years to raise to successful adulthood. Good parents must expend a lost of time, energy and resources to raise their children. Generally, throughout Human history, only genetic kinfolk will invest the time and energy required to raise a child from birth. So tribalism makes perfect sense, from a survival standpoint. The whole of Life itself is a struggle for turf. So racism is natural, normal, HEALTHY and SANE

Urine-a Khillawhitey's hatred of White stems from the FACT that she doesn't BELONG in a White society. Writing as a woman - I also know seething racial JEALOUSY when a see it and hear it. Woman compete with each other for RESOURCES. I usually don't comment on people's persona looks - but Urine-a is SHOVEL FACE UGLY. Hideous. Good Lord! If she every takes up farming she can use that ENORMOUS nose as a plough. Considering her location she's probably dealing with mostly Jewish women, but most Jewish women are far better looking than that beast. She's gruesome, and I'm certain that's a significant source of her resentment and hatred of Whites.

Nike = sweatshops
China = increasing wages

Nike + China = incompatibility.

__________________

China = Industrial Capital channeling into factories, making factories state of the art, even robotic.

Nike takes its finance capital and looks for sweat shop labor in Vietnam, or anywhere in the world.

Increasing capability of robots and robot vision eventually means that even highly human intensive operations are no longer competitive.

China figures out a way to distribute the economic surplus from automated factories, to thus maintain a market for industrial production.

Humans are no longer making enough wages to buy the output from the factories.

The Western finance capital system collapses, as even low wage countries can no longer race to the bottom.

Replies: @Chinaman

How's Fonterra holding up after that tainted baby formula episode due to Chinese lax standards?

Replies: @Ron Unz, @denk, @Nick J

Australia is doing exactly that. China is it's biggest trade partner and yet it shits on China constantly. The Chinese are now seeking out other raw material sources. This is gonna be fun.

Replies: @Whitewolf, @Nick J

Yet they demand our political loyalty against China
 

Wrong, and indeed, wildly wrong, on every level.

1. Milton Friedman once said "short of bombing, rent control is the surest way of destroying a city's housing stock" or word to that effect. Well theMann's corollary "short of thermonuclear obliteration, Free Trade is the surest way to destroy a country's Economy." It is, as H Ross Perot quite rightly pointed out, the "giant sucking sound" of first Labor, and then Capital, leaving your country forever. The only means known to work for building a Nation's wealth is internal freedom, and external tariffs. High Tariffs.Feel free to argue that fact, along with all the other morons, deliberate destroyers, and servants of international finance, who want to enrich the financial class and impoverish everyone else.

2. Pointless to "Learn" Chinese, or any other Asian language, if you don't learn it as a child. As a rule (and aside from the Chinese being extreme Racist bigots of the worst sort) Asians never hear their language(s) spoken badly, or by a non-native, and have zero ability to cope with understanding their language spoken less than fluently. English and Spanish speakers, on the other hand, spend their entire lives dealing with their language spoken badly, neither group even blinks, and always copes. If you are a native English speaker, learn French and Spanish, which is at least doable, and speaking that trio of languages will serve you well in any business environment.

3. China's past is China's future. Somehow, some day, some where, there will be another EXTREME irruption of Xenophobia in China, slaughtering foreigners, and destroying Capital. You don't want to be caught in it. BTW, Taipang, Boxer, Great Leap Forward....they are overdue, and it will be ugly when it happens. Not to mention, China's neighbors don't just dislike the Children of the Han, they LOATHE them. Virulently.

4. Shove it with "international Trade". Working there is just being a tool for the Financial Class. Maybe a well paid tool, but a tool. The fact remains that most, maybe a huge most, like 90%, of wealthy people got there by creating a business that really met a need, blossoming into more businesses, and so on.....

Replies: @Astuteobservor II, @anon, @Cho Seung-Hui

A Zionist-occupied state.

NZed apparently has its own issues with Woke Jacinda & her cronies but your rot hasn't reached California levels. Stay strong down there.

In South Africa before we were tossed into the maw of the ravening black beast by the jewnited states and other anglophone countries, New Zealand included, sexual assault on a minor was punishable by hanging. How things have changed!

Its absolutely mind-boggling. If I understand correctly, it appears that a State license has been given to engage in acts of pedophilia ? Is this possible ?
My brain is becoming increasingly numb, trying to comprehend the ever increasing grotesqueries of the World....

Replies: @Alden

A state run by the tribe. Like Mexifornia. Or New York!!!! The tribe love their LGBTQPRs. And their baby butchers!!!!!

Replies: @SaneClownPosse

Great video-"We are Democrats":

https://www.youtube.com/watch?app=desktop&feature=youtu.be&v=-J77H56jMRA

Nice sentiment, but Biff's right.

The population has been conditioned to believe that all the rules don't apply to the shining beacon on the hill. They have to be convinced they are wrong with something they can't ignore. That would be the death of the Dollar or a war that produces prodigious holes in the ground near them.

Short of a 2x4 over the head, the US population won't notice what the Fed Gov is up to as that's been the reality for decades.

How does the complete destruction of Western Civ help a globalist? Aren’t things like disposable income and a thriving economy beneficial to an international merchant?
 

Ironically, it's a figurative & aggressively manned wall they've put in place at every legal point of entry that lefty, fantasy narrative addicted eejits are mostly fine and dandy with, while they display paroxysms of agonised pseudo drama if the same is proposed at illegal points of entry. As a Kiwi that's just recently experienced this poorly directed, aggressive border policing towards those partaking in the legal process of border crossing twice while visiting my American in-laws, it is at least a lesson on what dangers lie ahead when allowing far-quits the reigns of power in any institution.

I lived in New Zealand for some time. I was always ashamed coming back to the US at how rude the TSA workers were to the travelers. Really, really embarrassing.

They were the shameful face of the evil empire that is now called America.

Race is more important than culture. At some point, you're defined by your enemies, whether you like it or not. Playing these little games isn't going to work.

Replies: @bookish1, @Corvinus, @Nick J

Ive come to realize that “white” is of no real significance. Culture is everything.
 

I’d challenge anybody to look me in the eye and tell me that either Stalin or Hitler and their whole state apparatus were not totally evil.
 

"I’d challenge anybody to look me in the eye and tell me that either Stalin or Hitler and their whole state apparatus were not totally evil. Explain the body count."

First of all, you have to re-educate yourself about recent history. Then, with an open and critical mind, re-evaluate your worldview and rid yourself of all brainwashing done to you since you were a baby. If you survive all that hard work and sacrifice, someone here will help you to understand why Hitler was/is vilified while the warmonger Churchill was/is glorified (the greatest Englishman ever!). Ditto Stalin, who inherited Hitler's mantle as the most hated man by the enlightened Western victors of WWII. Meanwhile, here is a gentle hint: governments lie, the oligarchical media lie, the plutocracy in power lie and connive, and so on and so forth...