RSSTo a degree, I grew up on Steve's comment board. Fifteen years ago or so, I was your typical libertarian-ish conservative. I already knew that genetics played a much larger role in racial differences than what society believed, but Steve and many commentators here helped me understand the depth of how genetics and race (family, really) influenced so much in individual lives, culture and societal outcomes.
When did you grow up and do you remember the details of how it happened?
It is. But with investing, you have to put your money where your mouth is, and that deters a lot of silliness. Also, sooner or later, the numbers prove who was right. Objective results are more important than subjective opinion.Replies: @The preferred nomenclature is..., @ATBOTL, @3g4me, @mongrel
Why wouldn’t investment opinion be infected with who/whom?
Spot on, sadly enough. If more people had had your realisation a few decades ago, we might have avoided this nightmare.
London has better weather than most of the USA which is cruelly hot, humid, or (usually) both.
IMO, a massive US attack to gain air superiority in Syria is completely unrealistic for the following reasons among others:
1. If an aircraft carrier takes part in the attack, if could be sunk by the Russians with moral justification. Sinking an aircraft carrier would cause the dollar to plummet by revealing the phony nature of American military might.
2. The Russians could lose their entire Syrian forces and the larger military balance would not be affected in the short run, nor would the Russian regime be threatened by internal revolution. If the US lost significant numbers of aircraft, especially F-35’s and/or F-22’s, it would be a US disaster. There would be no hiding from the US public that we are at war for no discernable purpose. The sleepwalking goyim could very well take their eyes off Kim Kardashian’s ass and the Trump circus and wake up. The political effects are utterly unpredictable.
3. Russia and China could announce an international gold standard, effectively removing a major source of US income via dollar creation. With US inflation raging, military cutbacks would ensue, kicking off a downward spiral for the ZUSA empire.
4. War in Syria would precipitate a US financial crisis, because US markets are held aloft with smoke and mirrors. We have runaway federal debt, states about to default, a pension crisis, and a consumer debt crisis. When this thing blows, the 2000 crash will look like a picnic. Unemployment will skyrocket from an already high level, and the deep state will be fighting off multiple Occupy Wall Street-like movements. Sure hope those new surveillance tools work well, ‘cause the deep state is gonna need ‘em.
Of course, empires often show the brains of a dinosaur. Did the Ottoman, Austro-Hungarian, Russian and German empires plan to disappear when they entered WWI?
That's exactly what worries me.
Of course, empires often show the brains of a dinosaur. Did the Ottoman, Austro-Hungarian, Russian and German empires plan to disappear when they entered WWI?