RSSThat probably includes all "homes" in SA. I've lived in Johannesburg for a few years and didn't meet a single white person who didn't live behind a high wall. Most of us lived in "complexes" - which is a walled, gated cluster of residential units with patrolling guards, electrical (non-lethal) fence on top of the wall and private, armed response units on call.
The nation’s citizens employ more private security than its police and army combined. Highs walls, razor wire, and dogs are affordable alternatives. According to some estimates, more than half of homes have such security measures.
Not applicable in Johannesburg. No white person walks around their neighbourhood day or night. You walk inside your "complex" to your car and then drive to another secure area. Public transport is mostly informal and completely unsafe for whites.
most South Africans feel unsafe walking around their own neighborhoods after dark.
He's a moron. Small arms infantry are no match for tanks, planes and artillery - "dysfunctional" or not.
Such a crisis, however, could open the door to white independence. In a 2016 interview, Dan Roodt dismissed the possibility that a breakaway effort would be suppressed, arguing that the South African military has become dysfunctional and inept under ANC leadership. “We have always been outnumbered. I don’t think that’s the problem,” he said. “Only other whites could endanger us.”
Worse. If we allow it, the white race will be genocided much more overtly at some point.Replies: @dvorak, @Rogue, @Matthias Eckert
The same global forces that once broke South Africa are working to do the same thing to every Western country. If they succeed, South Africa’s protection racket could await us all.
Light infantry can defeat mechanized forces with artillery and air support. Look at the Lebanon War of 2006. And the Israeli military, despite not being nearly as strong as itself and the anglo jew worshipers like to portray it, is much better than the South African.
Then there is Chechnya were the Russians needed massive numerical superiority and bribes to take control of the country.
Also possibly it wont be a conflict of Whites versus everyone else but of Blacks vs everyone else as most Asians and Coloureds seem to be discontent with ANC rule too. Furthermore it isn’t unlikely that there will be a lot of infighting along tribal, party, gang lines on the black side. Meaning the numbers won’t be as uneven after all.
Given the great breakdown in South Africa will actually happen. According to many of it’s prophets it has been 3 to 5 years away since at least 15 years.
Yes, they were trained and equipped to resist in a nation that supports them.I've bolded the important differences.For starters: "small arms infantry" is not "light infantry".
Light infantry can defeat mechanized forces with artillery and air support. Look at the Lebanon War of 2006.
She is wearing 2 fragile wristbands. Maybe you just have bad eyes but imagine what a psychologist could interpret into your statement.
Because US companies control all the patents on refining Venezuela's heavy sour crude, and the US has refused to license any of this? (I don't know if this is what actually happened, but it's a possibility. Not everything is Chavez's fault.)Replies: @Matthias Eckert
How that in 20 years the Chavistas have not build a single refinery ?
Maybe Chavez and Maduro are really Alien zoologists on a research trip to earth making an experiment on human (they actually classified us as naked apes) social behavior. (I don’t know if this is what actually happened, but it’s a possibility).
Because US companies control all the patents on refining Venezuela’s heavy sour crude, and the US has refused to license any of this?
Venezuelan oil has been extracted for over 100 years. Patents last 20 – 30 years in most countries (in the USA it is 21 years).
That says nothing about whether the critical patents were still active in Chavez's time. If they were, it would have been easy for the US to prevent him from building the desulfurizing oil refineries.
Venezuelan oil has been extracted for over 100 years. Patents last 20 – 30 years in most countries (in the USA it is 21 years).
Certainly, but clearer thinkers know that some hypotheses are more probable than others.
Maybe Chavez and Maduro are really Alien zoologists on a research trip to earth making an experiment on human (they actually classified us as naked apes) social behavior. (I don’t know if this is what actually happened, but it’s a possibility).
What if the "looted" wealth was stolen in the first place? Is it morally wrong to steal from a thief?
How does it improve the living of the Venezuelan people when Chavistas use the looted money to buy foreign luxury goods or use looted real estate for their enjoyment?
For me, the conclusion is that Chavez didn't have time to overcome the entrenched oligarchs. It takes many years and generations to educate people and build infrastructure, and it takes longer, far far longer, when the country's oligarchs are fighting your reforms. Even China needed generations, in spite of having defeated its corrupt elites in a civil war. Fortunately, a unified China was too strong for the West to break. Unfortunately, a divided Venezuela was and is too weak.Replies: @Vidi, @tac, @Matthias Eckert
For me the conclusion is that the Chavistas have failed the Venezuelan people.
What if the “looted” wealth was stolen in the first place? Is it morally wrong to steal from a thief?
If you take looted or stolen wealth you should give it back to the rightful owner.
And Chavez was certainly not enjoying the loot: he used it to greatly benefit poor Venezuelans. He was not a wealthy man when he died.
Many relatives of Hugo Chavez held or hold political positions. For example one of his brothers was or still is Assistant-Secretary, a son in law was or still is Secretary, his father was governor of Barinas another brother of him later had and may still have the same position. The governor brother is known for his modest yet tasteful lifestyle like wearing several expensive watches at the same time and driving a gold colored Hummer SUV. Higher position in the state of Barinas are said to be almost all held by members of the wider Chavez clan.
But as long as they wave a red banner and oppose the Yanks that seems to be perfectly fine for many here.
What if the wealth was stolen in the first place? Then Chavez did indeed return the wealth to the rightful owner: the Venezuelan 99%.
If you take looted or stolen wealth you should give it back to the rightful owner.
The nepotism is nothing compared to what the oligarchs routinely do for their relatives and friends. (Or compared to what Trump does.) Can you name a billionaire among the relatives that Chavez appointed to government positions?
Many relatives of Hugo Chavez held or hold political positions.
How does it improve the living of the Venezuelan people when Chavistas use the looted money to buy foreign luxury goods or use looted real estate for their enjoyment? And what makes you believe Chavistas don’t have bank accounts in Switzerland, Cyprus, Panama or even Britain? Britain had no problem hosting Russian oligarchs (and their money) with close connections to Putin while standing on opposing side to Russia regarding Ukraine, Syria and getting hysterical about a Russian aircraft carrier steaming through the channel.
Do you think a Russian supremacist and imperialist and judging by his articles The Saker and probably several of his followers here are exactly this, have any problem with Venezuela being looted as long as Mother Russia and not their hated Anglo competitors profit.
How come that the Bolivian economy, living standard and infrastructure improved substantially under Morales despite also being targeted by the US in a very similar manner than Venezuela. For me the conclusion is that the Chavistas have failed the Venezuelan people.
Of course much of what the US and its media spreads is exaggerated, if Venezuelan soldiers and their families would be starving and 90% of them opposed to Maduro he would have been overthrown by now. But I know people in Venezuela, some critical of Chavez from the start some followers. All agree that the live has been getting harder for many years. The electrical grid and the whole infrastructure has been neglected for at least a decade.
What if the "looted" wealth was stolen in the first place? Is it morally wrong to steal from a thief?
How does it improve the living of the Venezuelan people when Chavistas use the looted money to buy foreign luxury goods or use looted real estate for their enjoyment?
For me, the conclusion is that Chavez didn't have time to overcome the entrenched oligarchs. It takes many years and generations to educate people and build infrastructure, and it takes longer, far far longer, when the country's oligarchs are fighting your reforms. Even China needed generations, in spite of having defeated its corrupt elites in a civil war. Fortunately, a unified China was too strong for the West to break. Unfortunately, a divided Venezuela was and is too weak.Replies: @Vidi, @tac, @Matthias Eckert
For me the conclusion is that the Chavistas have failed the Venezuelan people.
The best thing that could happen to Ven. is that we invade it bloodlessly, mess it up more and inject $3Trillion into it the way we did in Afghanistan. Sheesh!
You didn’t inject 3 Trillion into Afghanistan. You injected 3 Trillion into your military-industrial complex.
I agree but think Putin would prefer a US attack on Iran. That would likely be costlier for the US than an attack on Venezuela. Will weaken Iran which really is competing for influence in Syria with Russia and will send oil and natural gas prices up a lot more than an attack on Venezuela will. With Russia as a net exporter profiting from higher prices.
Like I mentioned before, the Venezuelan parliamentary elections in 2015 were won by the opposition, with Guaido winning a seat in that election. Strangely I never came across those CIA trained traitors in Venezuela, neither did any of the Venezuelans I know. Except you consider everyone opposed to the Chavistas a traitor. BTW isn’t it the task of a government to protect its nation from foreign trained and infiltrated traitors? Isn’t a government that in 20 years wasn’t able to clear the countries financial institutions from foreign agents, incompetent and not worth leading a nation. So thanks for making my point.
But I don’t expect you to really care about this. Given that after I criticize an article as biased and one sided you link, to support that articles views, to the page of the of the very same author. Who seems to be a Russian nationalist pretending he knows and cares what is best for people from Syria to Ukraine to Latin America. And luckily there is Mother Russia ready to defend these people and their interests. Basically The Saker seems no different than the myriad neocon propagandists, just working for another side.
Just one more question. With all these Russian superweapons The Saker likes to write about. How come Israel and the USA can attack targets in Syria with impunity? When will the superior Russian missiles go into action sweeping the imperialist planes from the sky?
I don’t advocate and American (supposed you are American or British) intervention in Venezuela. I merely wanted to point out that this article/interview one sided and and therefore not better that the bullshit the Murdoch media and their likes are probably spreading lately.
I try to separate the effects of US aggression from that effects of the Venezuelan governments own failures.
I agree with what another commentator pointed out. US influence in Latin America is often overestimated. In my opinion by both the “left” who see it as cause of most problems and the “right” who tend to see it positive.
Certain groups in Latin America tend to ally with the US. But they do this so they can easier to pursue their own interests. For example imho Pinochet would have successfully overthrown Allende in Chile even without US support. Latin Americans aren’t mindless puppets that are controlled and played from Washington. Moscow or Beijing.
Despite not being a child I don’t know whats wrong with being a child, as long as the child is well mannered and doesn’t resort to name calling when addressing people with different views.
Nowhere did I blame the Chavistas for not building a first world infrastructure within 20 years. I blamed them for worsening the situation in Venezuela which they, I have visited Venezuela and have contacts there, did. And they did that despite having the blessing of high oil prices and the USA being busy in the “war on terror” for much of the start of this century.
Taking down such a topic to a graph seems pretty superficially to me. But even if you believe the Venezuelan elections of 2018 weren’t rigged, even by the official numbers the opposition won the parliament elections in 2015 but Maduro simply chose to ignore the parliament.
Furthermore I never advocated an american intervention in Venezuela. I also oppose foreign interventions in Iraq, Libya or Ukraine, be them American or Russian.
More:
the NED (National Endowment for Democracy), the extended arm of the CIA, has for the last two decades trained funded and infiltrated ‘traitor’ agents into Venezuela, with the goal to assist the opposition to foment unrest, to carry out assassinations and other ‘false flags’, and to simply create chaos and unrest. However, some of these agents are also lodged in Venezuela’s financial institutions, as the Fifth Column, where they sabotage – often with threats – any economic policies that could rescue Venezuela from its economic predicament.
Both Chavez and Maduro had very little leeway of doing differently what they have already done. Sanctions, boycotts, outside money manipulations, driving inflation to astronomical levels and constant smear propaganda, these predicaments are biting hard. The US has a firm grip on Venezuela’s dollar dependency.Last week, Washington confiscated about US$ 23 billion Venezuela’s reserve money in US banks, blocked them from use by the legitimate Maduro government, and, instead, handed them to their US-appointed, puppet, never elected, “president”, Juan Guaidó. – He is now able to use Venezuela’s money in his US-EU-and Lima-Group supported “shadow” government. Will he dare?
46 billion barrels of oil sounds a lot but isn’t so much when considered that the US is currently extracting about 13 million and burning about 20 million barrels a day.
Besides this I second Vidi. It is an assessment. Even when made in good faith it can be far off the mark for bad or worse. If made to reinforce the fracking hype/bubble it is likely higher than the real reserves.
Same goes for almost anything else. Why does Venezuela still have gold deposited in the US and Britain? it’s not like these never seized (not to say stole) foreign assets before.
Just because the Chavistas are enemies of the American oligarchy doesn’t mean the aren’t oligarchs themselves.
ps. That Anglo habit to start nationalities with a capital letter even when used as adjective is an insult to logic
This interview is a whitewash for the Venezuelan government. While I don’t doubt that the described sabotage and subversion orchestrated by the US the Chavistas are clearly incompetent and corrupt.
They had 20 years to diversify the Venezuelan economy and failed completely. Instead of decreasing the reliance on oil exports the increased it.
Most of what was left off the venezuelan agricultural sector got destroyed by handing it to Chavez followers. Similar with almost all other economic sectors. Even the oil production is much lower than it was in 1998 and this is not because of sanctions. They simply didn’t invest enough into replacing equipment that got worn out. They had 20 years to build refineries for venezuelan oil in Venezuela, China or somewhere else out of US influence, they didn’t.
Despite huge increases in domestic oil production in the last years the USA is still the second largest net oil importer in the word (behind China).
Also the USA is extracting its proven reserves at a much faster rate than any other large producer (a pattern it also had in the past, leading to high fluctuation in its production) so unless new reserves are discovered US production will likely start to decline again within a few years.