Methinks all these Alt-Right Conspiracy Theories about the ‘Jewish’ financial control of the West is a cover for the wealthy aristocratic families of Old Europe who prefer the luxury of anonymity and would rather have their ancient wealth managed by the ‘Jews’. I say ‘Jews’ in quotes because most of the richest Ashkenazi Jews have intermixed with these wealthy aristocratic families of Old Europe especially in Western countries like England. Take the Rothschilds, for example, who have intermixed with these wealthy aristocratic families not only in England but also in France, Germany, Italy, etc. The wealth of the Rothschilds most likely came from the Sephardic Jews who transferred their financial wealth from Spain to the Netherlands and England since their expulsion from Catholic Spain. The Ashkenazi Jews have been expelled so many times from so many countries that they behave more like Stateless Capitalists. And that’s why they prefer to accumulate their private wealth in the form of financial capital which is very liquid and thus easy to move around in contrast to the landed estates owned by the wealthy aristocratic families of Old Europe who exercised political power before the rise of European Nation-States. The Ashkenazi Jews are nothing more than glorified middlemen whose function is to act as the court financier to the wealthy aristocratic families of Old Europe.

I don’t think the Jews in question are mere “glorified middlemen” as you put it. The reason is that issuers/controllers of money have always been the real, albeit silent, power. The Old Europe aristocratic families were never issuers/controllers of money. As you stated, they owned lands. The Jews in question have always been issuers/controllers of money. Max Weber wrote of the court accountants of the Persian Shah and how they made a secret doctrine of their budgetary art. They even used a secret script to consolidate power and ensure the Shah’s dependence upon them. The Jews in question have always been court accountants.

Thanks. This article by the Global Research website may explain it better: https://www.globalresearch.ca/unipolar-world-ended-multipolar-world-arrived/5843534

Uni or multipolar world. Does it matter when the same bankers run both?

The Globalist Jews have already established themselves all over HK and Singapore, as they want to hedge their bets that the global balance of wealth and power will continue to shift towards the East and away from the West. Both Putin and Xi have courted the Globalist Jews in the City of London, attempting to lure their International Capital to Russia and China, respectively, just before the outbreak of hostilities in Ukraine while the Zionist Jews OTOH want to exploit the USA to achieve their geopolitical aims in the Middle East. Both Globalist and Zionist Jews know very well that the dying Beast of the U$A Empire is nearing its final end. And that’s why they’re hedging their bets accordingly by moving closer to Russia and China.

Are you suggesting the Jews in question are mere observers and move their bets around (according to world events happening organically) when you write that they “want to hedge their bets” and “moving closer to Russia and China”? If so, and assuming I am misunderstanding you, nothing can be further from the truth. They don’t place or hedge bets. They are The House. When one wins too much and/or doesn’t play by the rules, one is discarded. They have orchestrated world events for centuries – virtually all revolutions, world wars, conflicts, Israel, etc. You name it. The rise and fall of the West/East and war between Russia/Ukraine brought up here are some of them. Each bringing them closer to their (ancient Persian) spiritual fathers’ World State agenda. Judaism being nothing but an ancient Persian Imperial creation. They sucked the US dry and they’re now moving on to the next host.

Methinks the Israeli Jews are treated like Rodney Dangerfields by the Globalist Jews, sort of like how rich people treat their poor relatives. The Ashkenazim vs Mizrahim divide is as real today as it was during the founding of the State of Israel in 1948. To the Mizrahim from the Middle East who consider Israel as their only home, fighting the Arabs is matter of life and death. But to the Ashkenazim from the Western World who treat Israel as their summer camp, living with Arabs is a matter of exotic experiences, sort of like a Middle Eastern version of ‘Alice in Wonderland’. Once the going gets tough, Ashkenazim can always pack their bags and move back to their Country Club lifestyles of the ‘Rich and Famous’ in London, Paris, New York, Los Angeles, San Francisco, etc. These two groups of Jews exist in totally different Worlds: one is the Western World while the other is the Middle Eastern World.

Is the highest peak of the ruling class echelon even Jewish to begin with? I ask because the whole “Jew” thing may be a layer to keep the silent power even more secret. This is not to whitewash anything/anyone but to understand. A quick search online returns the Rothschilds as the big bad wolf. Too easy.

From the Spanish Empire of the 17th century. The English philosopher Francis Bacon used the description in Certaine Miscellany Works, circa 1626: “As one saith in a brave kinde of Expression; The Sunne never sets in the Spanish Dominions, but ever shines, upon one part, or other of them.”

And where did the Spanish get it from?

My point is that it was first attributed to Xerxes I and that ancient Persia was no different than any empire before and after it to date.

Persia, the glorious ancient civilisation will have the last laugh.

Literally.

Persia created what is known today as Judaism (originally known as Pharisaism, then Talmudism then Rabbinism) – a rehash of Zoroastrianism and other/older myths and legends from the region. It was designed by the Persian priesthood (as an Imperial tool) to convert polytheists from Canaan to monotheism so that they obey the Divine and Civil laws and pay a tax to the newly created Temple State . The cult was brought in Canaan under Ezra and Nehemiah – both Persian ministers. Adherents of that cult (known as “Jews” today) have had the last laugh since.

The young brash upstart Brit empire, and its latest incarnation, the Yanks are about to slide further into decline.

Young?

The British Empire lasted for about 500 years before it morphed to the US empire. The British Empire’s sibling, the Dutch Empire, had a lifespan of about 300 years as well. You rightfully stated that the US Empire is the incarnation of the British Empire but ask yourself what were the British and Dutch Empires the incarnation of. The answer is Venice, which itself lasted for 500 years (circa 1000-1500 CE) before its ruling class moved north. It’s not a coincidence that British Israelim came to be at the same time the Venetian/Genoese ruling class moved north.

Persia will have plenty of time to settle accounts with them. What is waiting another 50 years for a civilisation that has been around for 5000 years?

Naive.

What makes you think ancient Persia was any different than any empire after it? Where do you think the British Empire got their “The Empire on which the Sun never sets” from? From Xerxes I before he invaded Greece. “We shall extend the Persian territory as far as God’s heaven reaches. The sun will then shine on no land beyond our borders.””

British Empire is one of the most brutal empire in the history of mankind, is responsible for the “ISRAEL PROJECT” to create a FOOT STEP in the West Asia to steal the resources. British is responsible for many genocide, like Zionists, including Persian genocide in Iran.

When you know what the British Empire is the continuation of then the “Israel Project” makes sense.

‘Britain and the ‘Yemeni Threat’

https://www.counterpunch.org/2017/02/01/britain-and-the-yemeni-threat/

Strange as it may seem, the answer is that Britain is scared of Yemen.

So the current British-Saudi war against Yemen is in fact the third in a century. But why is Britain so seemingly determined to see the country dismembered and its development sabotaged? Strange as it may seem, the answer is that Britain is scared of Yemen. For Yemen is the sole country on the Arab peninsula with the potential power to challenge the colonial stitch-up reached between Britain and the Gulf monarchies it placed in power in the nineteenth century, and who continue to rule to this day. As Palestinian author Said Aburish has noted, the very “nature of the Yemen was a challenge to the Saudis: it was a populous country with more than half the population of the whole Arabian peninsula, had a solid urban history and was more advanced than its new neighbour. It also represented a thorn in the side of British colonialism, a possible springboard for action against their control of Saudi Arabia and all the makeshift tributary sheikhdoms and emirates of the Gulf. In particular, the Yemen represented a threat to the British colonisation of Aden, a territory which considered itself part of a greater Yemen which had been dismembered by colonialism”. The potential power of a united, peaceful, Yemen was also highlighted by Aden’s High Commissioner Kennedy Trevaskis, who noted that, if the Yemenis took Aden, “it would for the first time provide the Yemen with a large modern town and a port of international consequence” and “economically, it would offer the greatest advantages to so poor and ill developed a country”. A peaceful, united Yemen – with over half the peninsula’s population – would threaten Saudi-British-US hegemony of the entire region. That is why Britain has, for over 80 years, sought to keep it divided and warring.

‘Britain and the ‘Yemeni Threat’
https://www.counterpunch.org/2017/02/01/britain-and-the-yemeni-threat/

HEXO WANKO, You seem positively OBSESSED with this topic. Is this a fantasy of yours? Do you want a thick, veiny circumcised Jewish dick rammed down your throat? Or maybe slammed into your REAR END?

Oy Vey Izmir!

Do you speak of thick, veiny circumcised Jewish dicks from experience or did you make an assumption? I ask because you strike me as a radical lesbian.

From my experience, Jewish dicks are small, thin and not veiny — but that’s besides the point. The point is that Haxo laid out some facts and that — obviously — irked you. Why? Could it be that you’re both a libertarian and a Zionist.