I can only speak from personal experience. I see numbers and stats and only glaze over. I have been in a state of despair pretty much since Ferguson happened, as it was THE eye opening event for me, and everything that has happened since has just been a catalyst from that time. For many decades I pushed my gut feelings about our problems with black behavior down and gave away confidence in them that I cannot retrieve. I suffered them through school, I listened intently in college about their plight. I recently got separated maritally because my spouse decided I had become a devout racist. My own mother and father refuse to call out what is going on, and most, if not all, my friends on social media continue to parade their IKAGO stamps of approval daily and weekly. When people at work ask me about the Superbowl, I barely make a response. I just . Think. This. Is. Irretrievable. I have read this blog for 6 years , and I always got a feeling that I was meeting a secret friend. I only decided to write on it a month ago. I just have had it with it all. The never-ending grudge and proverbial axe to grind,coupled with the innate aggression these people have , in wedlock with the media at large, does not add up to a good end when it comes to ANY other race reconciling or coexisting with them. They are simply a lost effort when it comes to anything besides their absolute reign over what's left of this world. What's more troubling to me are the complicit. They bare the burden, and refuse to claim the truth. Strange times indeed.

Replies: @Gunga Din, @Sick of Orcs, @L (no longer in) Atl hell, @Kim

Some whites are truly irredeemable; this delusional mother, in early stage Amy Biehl syndrome, is one of them. It's sick. She truly disgusts me. That she is a minister gives one a small, but enlightening window on much of contemporary American Christianity (mainstream churches, anyway).

Thankfully, most white Americans are not like her. Most aren't race realists either, unfortunately. But they don't relish their own demise, nor are they eager to sacrifice their children in the altar if diversity. For the most part, they still think (and act) like they can avoid race matters.l, as absurd as that seems. But their denial, their blissful ignorance, their self imposed little bubble...cannot hold much longer.

Within ten years, white America, en masse, will have to frankly and clearly make a choice: Diversity (and death) or Identity/Tribalism and freedom. All of our futures are tied to what choice they make.

Good help us

Replies: @L (no longer in) Atl hell, @Ewok groupie

@Achilles Wannabe

"Honestly, I am at a loss Harbinger. My problem may be that I am stuck or have stuck myself, with this term “feminism” – a movement of which which I may be as opposed to and as critical of as you are though for somewhat different reasons. Much of feminism went wr0ng because it was manipulated by Plutocrats and Jewry, I just don’t necessarily fault women’s nature for feminism as Plutocrats and Jews divested the racialized white males who at one time controlled our Euro Nation States and yet we haven’t lost confidence in white men’s ability to rule"
 

With all due respect Achilles, feminism was never manipulated by plutocrats and Jewry. Feminism IS and always WAS the Plutocrats and Jewry. As stated in my previous reply look to whom it was who created feminism and you will see it was the Fabian Socialists. If you don't know who they are then I suggest that you read up on them, but suffice to say, they did not have women's best interests at heart, quite the contrary.

"But ok, maybe I should say that, instead of “feminists”, I want to see a lot more Red Pilled women in the movement. Otherwise I don’t see how we will ever really BE a movement. Philosophical societies like Unz are great. I enjoy it. But we need NUMBERS desperately if we are ever going to change anything. We need the other half."
 

I'm confused as to what movement you're speaking of? I presume from what you've written that you mean the anti NWO movement, correct? If so, there are. There's one on this forum and she goes under the pseudonym of 'Kali'. She is clearly a red pilled women. In fact, she's more than red pilled, she's black pilled. Do not ever look to feminism for red pilled women. Feminists are blue pilled. They haven't a clue about anything, for if they did, they wouldn't be feminists.
I agree, we do need the other half, but sadly, the overwhelming majority of them are lost and absolutely no use to us. And the same goes for the many men as well. Civil war is the ultimate inevitability of blue pilled idiots.

"Now you and others are going to say women are not constitutionally capable of the right kind of politicization. Actually I confess to not knowing what women are constitutionally capable of. I do know women are not like us in many ways and I would not posit any union based on the assumption that they are."
 

They're not. They never have been, nor ever will be.

"On the other hand they are human so not THAT different and can make contributions in line with their natures. Patriarchy made evolutionary sense but the thing about evolution is that it evolves. Much has changed since the good mother and wife thing. Women have always been as smart as we are and now they don’t have to live chained to their reproductive capacities In a world of contraception and safe abortion, I don’t think they or we are ever going back to Patriarchy."
 

The contribution to society, of women, is and always should be childbirth and child rearing. That is their job. Now the feminists will instantly shout out sexist, misogynist, bigot etc, as they're programmed to, but these morons fail to understand one thing and it's incredibly simple - they are hear because of the sacrifice of men, not women, throughout history. Their continuing choosing to chase a career, sleep around and either birth bastards, or worse abort them is greatly damaging society. This is feminism. This is what feminism has always been about and why it was created. Do you really not think that the Fabians knew exactly where giving women the vote and careers would lead?
Onto contraception and abortion - why?
Why would a man need to wear a condom, or a woman take the pill? Why is there any need to have sex other than to procreate? This is the ultimate question here Achilles. There is no need for coitus, other than to create life. The sad reality, today, is that heterosexuals are now practising homosexual sex. Yes, other than the fact that men now sodomise women (straight from porn and we know who's behind that) the very fact that men and women are now rutting like rabbits, with an obsession for sexual intercourse, proves how lost western man is today.
Masturbation, as described is self pleasuring oneself to orgasm. Sadly, this is now what sex has essentially become. Sexual intercourse, between men and women, men and men, women and women is now masturbation - seeking sexual pleasure. "But there's the concept of people making love" again a convenient lie. Not such a thing, again, it's sexual pleasure. That's why people have sex. They seek the orgasm. And worse, women have lost so much connection to themselves that they don't even comprehend that when they go down to the clinic to have an abortion, they're murdering the future generations. I do not speak to my eldest sister - a feminist, socialist, msm journalist. She's had quite a few abortions.

If people are not rutting like rabbits, they're out in bars chasing the opposite/same sex to rut with. If they're not doing that they're at home watching TV. They're doing everything but be concerned with the world around them. Their life is one of simply consumerism and debt. That's it - get up, go to work, come back, have dinner, go to the pub, come home, watch TV, bed, rinse and repeat. And throw following some sport into the mix for good measure.

Everything that's going wrong in the west is ALL connected to feminism, abortion, careers for women, the LGBTQ+ etc. Everything is working in tandem with one another to divide and conquer.
You state:

"I don’t think they or we are ever going back to Patriarchy."
 

And if we don't then I can safely state that the western civilisation is truly finished.
While feminists rant and rave against the patriarchy, men, shouting rape, promoting #MeToo and every other insanity within them, the west is being flooded with immigrants. Even if we stopped it today and closed the gates, simply through procreation of those who came into the west pre millennium, they will become the majority by 2070. Feminists have failed to cotton onto this simply reality. Islam (of who the largest population of immigrant peoples living in the west) will become the religion of the west. When that comes, then it will be following the teachings of Muhammad by the book. Feminists do not quite seem to understand the implications of this. Unlike the west, which has murdered itself through liberalism, Islam does not adhere to foolishness. It sees things, correctly as black and white -

1. No feminism
2. Women's job is to birth children and raise them
3. No usury
4. No homosexuality
5. Pray to Allah 5 times a day
and so on....

The comforts and the freedoms that women have in the west will instantly disappear. Lesbians will be given an ultimatum - marry a man and have his children or swing from a rope. Homosexual men will simply swing from a rope. Feminists will of course be married off to some mullah to pump out his progeny and raise them. No careers for them.
They also fail to see that there will be no United Nations, no international courts on human rights. That'll be gone.
"But what about the men? Will they not fight for their women and their nation?" - would you want to protect these women? I sure as hell wouldn't. I wouldn't go to the aid of any feminist regardless how dire her situation. When I read of Swedish women being raped and murdered I don't bat an eyelid. They created the environment that they now suffer under. 50 no go areas alone in Malmo and the msm remains silent. Sweden is has now taken over from South Africa as the rape capital of the world, all courtesy of the matriarchal governments. Sweden is the canary in the coalmine of Europe. This is what's coming to the rest of the west, that is western Europe. Eastern Europe has the common sense to repel it. Feminism has been solely responsible for the mess in Sweden. And the med are too feminised, too cuckolded, or simply won't fight back, for obvious reasons and are probably migrating to Poland, Hungary or Romania.

"And right now I am dominated by a regime of Plutocrats and Judocrats who create and/or exploit every difference among and between we Euro goyim."
 

And you have feminism to thank precisely for that.
Why?
Had women never voted, nor had career there would have been no division within the family politically, or would there have been division in the workplace. Women who stayed at home and raised children, raised the next generation of men to protect their lands. Women who stayed at home, never got into politics and psychology to write papers on allowing homosexuality, transgenderism and now paedophilia. And because of that women were responsible for bringing in immigrants and allowing them to live by their way of life.
"What utter nonsense" Really?
The natural psyche of the female is to nurture and care for, hence why throughout history the nurses were always the women, to lend a friendly ear and to comfort. In the past governments were full of men, there to do what was best for the PROTECTION of the nation. Hence why there was war and no immigration. They had the common sense to see where that would inevitably lead. How do you therefore change government and their concerns of the defense of the nation above all else? You bring women into it. You give women political power and influence.
Take a hypothetical example of some village. Disease has ravaged neighbouring villages and this one remains. A group of people arrive outside the village, stopped from entering by bowmen at the outskirts. The villagers beg to come in for food and shelter. The chief, a male, sees them to be diseased and knowing so, will not allow them entrance. He has some food prepared and sends it to them, telling them to be on their way or his archers will open fire. Now take the same scenario but with a woman chief. She would have let them in, the minute she saw young children crying and starving. In doing so, she would have infected the village and more people would have died. This has nothing to do with stupidity (although it was) but everything to do with the natural desire of women to help those in need. 'Motherly instincts' so to speak and the Jews realised that if they can get women into power, they can bring about the destruction of the western civilisation, through immigrant colonisation, under the mask of 'helping' those less fortunate, especially with the refugee status added on.

The downfall of the western civilisation has been solely the work of the feminists. They have destroyed, in 60 years, what took men thousands to build. This is why, throughout history women have been in the place they were and never allowed authority. When they get it, they destroy everything around them. Again, it's about 'motherly instinct' within the very genetic makeup of women, to raise and care for their young. Had women never been in positions of power and influence, there would never have been 100 people coming into the UK yearly, let alone 500,000+ today.

Replies: @Harbinger, @Achilles Wannabe, @L (no longer in) Atl hell

Serious question: would blacks in Philadelphia be meeting together to confront the problem of rising black-on-white crime?
 

Of course not. So what?

You have my gratitude Mr. Kersey for your reporting on black on white crime. But I'm having trouble finding anything wrong with black people in a black city meeting to discuss black on black crime. I don't like their chances but I wish them well. Anything that reduces b on b crime will reduce crime period. Including black on white crime. I think it would be a good thing if there were fewer black murderers.

Replies: @Mr. Rational, @Justvisiting, @AnalogMan, @Sick of Orcs, @L (no longer in) Atl hell