RSS“Their initiation into the Covidian Cult began in January, when the medical authorities and corporate media turned on The Fear with projections of hundreds of millions of deaths and fake photos of people dropping dead in the streets. ”
There is literally no proof provided that this or other cases photos and footage of people dropping over in China were “fake”. All you did was link to a Guardian article on it where they openly acknowledge in the beginning they couldn’t determine for sure if the person died from covid. There is also plenty of testimony from people in the article that many people have died from the virus in Wuhan.
Early on, many speculated that covid was very much an ethnic virus and it disproportionately effected east asians/the chinese and it wouldn’t do the level of damage it did outside of that country, or China was just afflicted with a more lethal strain (or both). That probably was the case all along, but we don’t know for sure and probably will never know because the Chinese will never stop lying about it, and that set the course for many of the extreme measures we’ve seen all year.
I’m surprised Hopkins didn’t elaborate on this aspect anymore though, that all we saw in China was a hoax or something. It seems like he just says “FAKE PHOTOS!” and leaves it at that. I don’t know why it’s so hard to believe that a virus arose in a city/country home to filthy wet markets where animals from all over the world are kept in close contact or that the ground zero city was home to a biolab that held and experimented on viruses and there was an outbreak here, from a country that’s been the origin of scores of plagues and pandemics throughout history. And so on.
But early on- when this virus really did seem broadly lethal- I remember the reaction among certain right-wingers (libertarians and MAGAtards), who fought tooth and nail against the possibility there was something to really worry about. It seemed beyond them that there could be a virus in modern times that could potentially kill millions and that lockdowns and restrictions were necessary (to a certain extent) to prevent a breakout. Because their belief system amounted roughly to the following: “government always bad, free market always good” and “I can’t admit Trump was a failure.” They were largely right about the lockdowns in the end, but for the wrong reasons. And all of this could have been prevented if Trump took a “better safe than sorry” approach and issued major travel shutdowns and travel restrictions, and targeted areas where there were outbreaks, and nipped this in the bud early on. Instead he listened to his nationwrecking son-in-law and his cabal of Jewish billionaires and hedge fund managers as not to upset his one marginal accomplishment (“muh economy”) and let the virus get worse and provide legitimacy for the insane, never-ending lockdown policies.
And all of this after going on about the nature of cults and indoctrination. Yeah, get fuck the out.
(and again, I don’t believe covid is a “doomsday virus” and I stopped trusting the death tolls and many other things from “health authorities” awhile ago.)
I watched this film on Bitchute and these were the sequences that filled me with a despondent speechless rage.
Two sequences deal with the mass slaughter of wildlife after whites pulled out and could no longer protect them. It is totally sickening. There are two kinds of hunters: whites and blacks. The white hunters are seen mowing down fleeing zebras by towing a rope between two jeeps. Another has a helicopter drive an elephant toward him before shooting it down. I have no patience for people who kill big game, even on sustainable game reserves, even if they are white. No, especially if they are white.
“I watched this film on Bitchute and these were the sequences that filled me with a despondent speechless rage.”
So they made you angrier than this?
“In the Belgian Congo, we see European troops and mercenaries repelling rebels who seized Stanleyville. The aftermath is sickening. The rebels had raped, killed, and tortured white nuns, nurses, and schoolchildren.”
I went and tracked this scene down and they did even worse than described (and I won’t repeat it here.) Suffice to say, it was far more disturbing alone than any of the animal footage. They couldn’t even show one of the murdered white children fully uncovered, they cut away right before they pulled back the sheet to reveal their face.
I don’t know but when I read stuff like your comment (and those who agreed with you or who echoed similar sentiments) I just get the sense the extent to which people can show greater outrage over animal abuse reflects some kind of pathology. Yeah they didn’t actually show those white women and children being raped and tortured to death but zebras getting tripped and a gratuitous slaughter of hippos and elephants (which, putting aside how indiscriminate they were, is pretty standard for how those animals are killed for food- it’s nothing like what you’ll see in slaughterhouses or asian liveleak footage, both far, far worse) is what gets you really mad? Fuck out of here. Maybe if the torture of those whites was filmed or those mass graves of “arabs” were actually whites, you’d think differently, but who knows. I’ve seen too many comments over time how they can watch the most extreme violence against human beings but the slightest bit of cruelty towards animals is what makes them really, truly angry (and don’t see anything weird about this.)
And just to make it clear, I absolutely abhor maltreatment of animals and I’d be fully on board with proposals that have been made to put animal abusers on registries like we do with sex offenders. Just think how in a documentary that features the massacre of white children, they choose to get murderously angry over heckin’ zebrarinos getting chased down and tripped with rope, is kind of warped.