What, pray tell, is the parent gap? I know marriage correlates to fecundity somewhat, but it's a weak proxy, and I could see the bastardy set being more intensely pro-government. But I could also see even those poor souls understanding on some level that voting to rob your children of their national patrimony is evil. Without kids, what skin is in the game? Okay, the eternal soul, but belief in that correlates massively with having children and voting to not impoverish them anyway.

Booker only competes if he comes out of the closet.

…which hurts him even worse in the general.

As someone who read the Two Income Trap, this whole thing seems very tragic. This was a sensible, sane, reasonable woman who was doing something incredibly rare, writing a social economics book that actually unflinchingly showed a real way that civilization is crumbling. And yet, she's come to this. The poz is virulent and nasty, and what it's done to our women is a crime.

Validating stereotypes, I know, but I've even heard members of The Hive jokingly reference how bad Twitter/social media is for the mind. They know. They're just addicted. In 40 years, social media will be treated like smoking.

The real chicken-egg question is which came first, the splintering of our meatspace social fabric or the rise of social media. Living in a status pressure-cooker like the social media world is downright lethal as it is but no wonder the poor women who lack Kinder, Küche, or especially Kirche crumple like aluminum cans. I'll exhort you again, get your wife and children into a conservative church where status is awarded based on actual sane and decent living (with a possible bonus of actually buying in to save your soul).

It's all to the good, makes everything more clear. My wife was never pozzed (we homeschool for goodness' sake), but this has been a red-pill week for her. I've been gently showing her Handle's Haus and other calm members of the dissident. She's infuriated by her friends' blind acceptance of Ford's accusations. The sides become ever clearer.

Of course, we have a son. That makes all the difference in the world.

Nobody disputes the GMVH. What people dispute are the implications, particularly at the far right tail of the curve.

No, that doesn't make a lick of sense, but there you go.

Saw in Imgur:
"In the next sequel to The Exorcist a Catholic woman hires a devil to get the priest out of her boy."

The damning thing to me is how Pope Poz is aggressively supporting the pedos. A proper church ought to extradite the bishops back to the Vatican for swift executions. The Vatican III Church is going to make that policy, inked on the flayed hides of these monsters.

Meanest reaction was my wife's innocent "wait, so it wasn't facial cancer that he had?"

I think we should finish the danged fence as the man said. John McCain Border Wall sounds wonderful to me.

AE- Does blogger allow putting certain commentators on ignore, along with those replies? It gets exhausting seeing the arguments against Crow's bad-faith statements. There's no there, there.

The concept of the POC shield makes a lot of sense, but the long-term effects are going to be horrifying. Except for the 2-3% where dad stays around during the entire childhood, the mixed generation of neurotic Obama-esque wrecks will be coming a-cropper right when the electorate goes majority-minority. Who will help them, the members of r/happa?

I'm normally more forgiving than you lot regarding physiognomy, but come on. Look at his face. Just spread pictures of his face. How does someone who looks like that get elected to dogcatcher, even?

That chart is showing legal guns, surely. I'd expect gun ownership rates among the more murderous segments to be a good deal higher than reported.

I am taken aback by the white ownership rates, actually. I feel like some sort of freak in my area for only owning a single gun, which I maintain for home defense; I'm not much of a gun-for-fun type. I can't think of anyone in my neighborhood who doesn't own a gun, and we're not exactly rural.

Feel free to shuffle the question elsewhere, but riffing on the "Color of Love" facts, do we have anything more up to date on the ratios than Sailer's article of twenty years ago? It's useless for educating Corvinia there but it'd still be interesting.

I also am vaguely curious about the difference in atypical mixed-race couples. Our church has four mixed-race couples, two Asian Male/White Female, two White Male/Black Female, which is odd enough to be notable. They're all pretty based people, for what it's worth.

I'd argue this would be more "how much status do you get for claiming to suffer from mental health issues" than "mental health issues". So yet another Pozometer. Most people suffer from depression ever now and then, but it seems like real genuine medical there's-something-wrong-with-my-dopamine disorders bump around in 1-2% marks for both bipolar and depression, and those are going to be unmovable. The switch from "I'm depressed" to "I have Depression" tells us a lot about the signaling pressures.

My normie-sense on this all is that nobody cares. The CNN hyperventilation and Trump's (legitimate) points are all being eye-rolled away in a single "meh". Gone are the days when a nation is filled with outrage at the corruption of its civil servants. We live in an empire now and empires only have factions, not traitors.

Depart from the fever swamps into the airs of normalcy and you see a lot of people pretty content with Trump, mildly disgusted with the elites, but utterly unwilling to shift their daily routine to fight over the corpse of a once-good nation. The empire will abide.

Until it doesn't.

On the subject of Californian succession; have there been any polls of the other 49 on the question? I'd imagine support might be higher outside the state than inside it.

Not seeing how it's ever going to happen but any memetic support for Czechoslovakia rather than Yugoslavia is welcome. Here's to a peaceful separation.

Tempest in a teakettle, right? The 115 number always seemed way high, while neither 107 nor 110 would shock me. I enjoy the sound and fury but it signifies nothing. Blair is just as genocidal against me and mine as Soros.

Am I the only person alarmed that almost 1 in 5 Americans don't think the Earth revolves around the sun?

E's comment is well taken, of course; autism and other mental issues seem to run along in the same pack as atheism. It might well be atheism is a marker of other deeper problems. Exhibit A: Less Wrong.

That being said, the heavy trend of secularization that is also pretty consistent means you're obviously losing Charlotte Simmonses by the bucket at college. The poz is strong; boiling off the non-immune every generation takes a long time before you'd reach a "plainness intensifies" situation like with the Amish. Evolution isn't accelerating *that* much. So maybe the next empire or the one after will solve it but I suspect, as you elude, this one isn't going to fix itself in time.

This discussion is frankly weird and, putting on my normie-glasses, offputting. Religions without truth claims (BRING BACK ODIN) aren't going to go anywhere, and going towards individualist experiences is a quick ticket to die-off. My money is still going to rest on Christianity after however many generations it takes to evolve past the Pill (and decent rubbers). If you'd like to autisticly dismiss that bet, though, you can say I'm biased because I actually believe the truth claims of Christianity.

Is there any data on the average ages of the parents? Clearly, if elf couples are having three children each and orcs are having three children each the math says you're still knee-deep in a WAAGH before long.

That sneering face equals sales galore for Glock, Sturm Ruger, Colt, Federal…