Fox The Fox was a Dutch band from Groningen. They convincingly represented pure Frisian culture Anno 1984. To this day it is not clear what was meant by diamond, was it the Oera Linda? Irving writes that Himmler’s brain was stolen to prove its abnormality, but where did it disappear to and why has no example “statuated” to this day? https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/ein_Exempel_statuieren

Today, mankind is being fed the illusion that this is a curtailment of the individual’s personal freedom if not everyone can always find out everything everywhere. In reality, a different principle is at work here, namely the overproduction of useless knowledge for the purpose of distracting from useful knowledge. Man has the illusion that he is always youthful, until he realizes more and more that younger people outdo him. Now he has to accept that he was under an illusion.

Let’s take an Aussie as example, who contextually calls himself Luke Million, but also “Synth Lord”. His band was called “The Swiss”. He calls his style “Future-Retro”, which expresses the whole schizophrenia of the present. People want to preserve something supposedly precious, but it turns out that even back then it was just canned garbage. We live in a throwaway and recycling society, where almost everything is only produced for everyday consumption. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Planned_obsolescence

People like Luke don’t realize something fundamental: If I want to listen to musak that sounds like the 80s, I’ll listen to musak from the 80s. Why would you prefer a copy when the original is available? But how do you become original in a time of complete unoriginality? Luke has never asked himself this question, his mind is occupied by reproducing old tunes. This, he believes, is precisely what is particularly original. His only credo “Have fun!” is the easily satisfied motto of consumerism, which does not pursue any higher “ideal”.

P.S. Of course, the “HollyKlaus” is also a reproduction of a recycling of a reproduction (and so on), i.e. a backdrop and façade that must be constantly renewed and its “horror” intensified, otherwise the wear-and-tear effect will be too strong and will be met with disinterest, from which, however, neither moral nor financial profit could be made by the representatives of the gigantic “HollyKlausindustry”.

Our concept of “freedom” is a mistake and a fallacy. The world’s media system is such that our brains develop withdrawal symptoms without a constant supply of new stimulants. But everything we receive contains virtually zero nutritional value, like sugar. We all devour news as if it were a matter of knowing as much as possible in order to carry this knowledge over into the afterlife. Which is nonsense, of course, because our knowledge fades with the decay of the brain.

But another point is much more important: hardly anyone, apart from the really successful, ever asks themselves what usefulness their store of knowledge has for daily, medium-term and long-term survival. Presumably this is where the failures can be distinguished from the winners. Why does a kindergarten child have to “learn” that there are supposedly countless genders? Why does the farmer on his tractor need to know what scandals are rocking the English royal family?