The Unz Review • An Alternative Media Selection$
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • B
Show CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
AgreeDisagreeThanksLOLTroll
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Thanks, LOL, or Troll with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used three times during any eight hour period.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Current Commenter
says:

Leave a Reply -


 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
$
Submitted comments have been licensed to The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Commenting Disabled While in Translation Mode
Commenters to FollowHide Excerpts
By Authors Filter?
Alastair Crooke Anatoly Karlin Andrew Anglin Andrew Joyce Audacious Epigone Boyd D. Cathey C.J. Hopkins E. Michael Jones Eric Margolis Eric Striker Fred Reed Gilad Atzmon Godfree Roberts Gregory Hood Guillaume Durocher Ilana Mercer Israel Shamir James Kirkpatrick James Thompson Jared Taylor John Derbyshire Jonathan Cook Jung-Freud Karlin Community Kevin Barrett Kevin MacDonald Lance Welton Larry Romanoff Laurent Guyénot Linh Dinh Michael Hudson Mike Whitney Pat Buchanan Patrick Cockburn Paul Craig Roberts Paul Kersey Pepe Escobar Peter Frost Philip Giraldi Razib Khan Ron Unz Steve Sailer The Saker Tobias Langdon Trevor Lynch A. Graham A. J. Smuskiewicz A Southerner Academic Research Group UK Staff Adam Hochschild Aedon Cassiel Agha Hussain Ahmad Al Khaled Ahmet Öncü Alain De Benoist Alan Macleod Albemarle Man Alex Graham Alexander Cockburn Alexander Hart Alexander Jacob Alexander Wolfheze Alfred McCoy Alison Weir Allan Wall Allegra Harpootlian Amalric De Droevig Ambrose Kane Amr Abozeid Anand Gopal Anastasia Katz Andre Damon Andre Vltchek Andreas Canetti Andrei Martyanov Andrew Cockburn Andrew Fraser Andrew Hamilton Andrew J. Bacevich Andrew Napolitano Andrew S. Fischer Andy Kroll Angie Saxon Ann Jones Anna Tolstoyevskaya Anne Wilson Smith Anonymous Anonymous American Anonymous Attorney Anonymous Occidental Anthony Boehm Anthony Bryan Anthony DiMaggio Tony Hall Antiwar Staff Antonius Aquinas Antony C. Black Ariel Dorfman Arlie Russell Hochschild Arno Develay Arnold Isaacs Artem Zagorodnov Astra Taylor AudaciousEpigone Augustin Goland Austen Layard Ava Muhammad Aviva Chomsky Ayman Fadel Barbara Ehrenreich Barbara Garson Barbara Myers Barry Kissin Barry Lando Barton Cockey Beau Albrecht Belle Chesler Ben Fountain Ben Freeman Ben Sullivan Benjamin Villaroel Bernard M. Smith Beverly Gologorsky Bill Black Bill Moyers Blake Archer Williams Bob Dreyfuss Bonnie Faulkner Book Brad Griffin Bradley Moore Brenton Sanderson Brett Redmayne-Titley Brett Wilkins Brian Dew Brian McGlinchey Brian R. Wright Brittany Smith C.D. Corax Cara Marianna Carl Boggs Carl Horowitz Carolyn Yeager Cat McGuire Catherine Crump César Keller Chalmers Johnson Chanda Chisala Charles Bausman Charles Goodhart Charles Wood Charlie O'Neill Charlottesville Survivor Chase Madar Chauke Stephan Filho Chris Hedges Chris Roberts Chris Woltermann Christian Appy Christophe Dolbeau Christopher DeGroot Christopher Donovan Christopher Ketcham Chuck Spinney Civus Non Nequissimus CODOH Editors Coleen Rowley Colin Liddell Cooper Sterling Craig Murray Cynthia Chung D.F. Mulder Dahr Jamail Dakota Witness Dan E. Phillips Dan Sanchez Daniel Barge Daniel McAdams Daniel Vinyard Danny Sjursen Dave Chambers Dave Kranzler Dave Lindorff David Barsamian David Boyajian David Bromwich David Chibo David Chu David Gordon David Haggith David Irving David L. McNaron David Lorimer David Martin David North David Stockman David Vine David Walsh David William Pear David Yorkshire Dean Baker Declan Hayes Dennis Dale Dennis Saffran Diana Johnstone Diego Ramos Dilip Hiro Dirk Bezemer Dmitriy Kalyagin Donald Thoresen Alan Sabrosky Dr. Ejaz Akram Dr. Ridgely Abdul Mu’min Muhammad Dries Van Langenhove Eamonn Fingleton Ed Warner Edmund Connelly Eduardo Galeano Edward Curtin Edward Dutton Egbert Dijkstra Egor Kholmogorov Ekaterina Blinova Ellen Brown Ellen Packer Ellison Lodge Emil Kirkegaard Emilio García Gómez Emma Goldman Enzo Porter Eric Draitser Eric Paulson Eric Peters Eric Rasmusen Eric Zuesse Erik Edstrom Erika Eichelberger Erin L. Thompson Eugene Gant Eugene Girin Eugene Kusmiak Eve Mykytyn F. Roger Devlin Fadi Abu Shammalah Fantine Gardinier Federale Fenster Finian Cunningham The First Millennium Revisionist Fordham T. Smith Former Agent Forum Francis Goumain Frank Tipler Franklin Lamb Franklin Stahl Frida Berrigan Friedrich Zauner Gabriel Black Gary Corseri Gary Heavin Gary North Gary Younge Gene Tuttle George Albert George Bogdanich George Galloway George Koo George Mackenzie George Szamuely Georgianne Nienaber Gilbert Cavanaugh Gilbert Doctorow Giles Corey Glen K. Allen Glenn Greenwald A. Beaujean Agnostic Alex B. Amnestic Arcane Asher Bb Bbartlog Ben G Birch Barlow Canton ChairmanK Chrisg Coffee Mug Darth Quixote David David B David Boxenhorn DavidB Diana Dkane DMI Dobeln Duende Dylan Ericlien Fly Gcochran Godless Grady Herrick Jake & Kara Jason Collins Jason Malloy Jason s Jeet Jemima Joel John Emerson John Quiggin JP Kele Kjmtchl Mark Martin Matoko Kusanagi Matt Matt McIntosh Michael Vassar Miko Ml Ole P-ter Piccolino Rosko Schizmatic Scorpius Suman TangoMan The Theresa Thorfinn Thrasymachus Wintz Gonzalo Lira Graham Seibert Grant M. Dahl Greg Grandin Greg Johnson Greg Klein Gregg Stanley Gregoire Chamayou Gregory Conte Gregory Wilpert Guest Admin Gunnar Alfredsson Gustavo Arellano Hank Johnson Hannah Appel Hans-Hermann Hoppe Hans Vogel Harri Honkanen Heiner Rindermann Henry Cockburn Hewitt E. Moore Hina Shamsi Howard Zinn Howe Abbot-Hiss Hubert Collins Hugh Kennedy Hugh McInnish Hugh Moriarty Hugo Dionísio Hunter DeRensis Hunter Wallace Huntley Haverstock Ian Fantom Igor Shafarevich Ira Chernus Ivan Kesić J. Alfred Powell J.B. Clark J.D. Gore J. Ricardo Martins Jacek Szela Jack Antonio Jack Dalton Jack Kerwick Jack Krak Jack Rasmus Jack Ravenwood Jack Sen Jake Bowyer James Bovard James Carroll James Carson Harrington James Chang James Dunphy James Durso James Edwards James Fulford James Gillespie James Hanna James J. O'Meara James K. Galbraith James Karlsson James Lawrence James Petras Jane Lazarre Jane Weir Janice Kortkamp Jared S. Baumeister Jason C. Ditz Jason Cannon Jason Kessler Jay Stanley JayMan Jean Bricmont Jean Marois Jean Ranc Jef Costello Jeff J. Brown Jeffrey Blankfort Jeffrey D. Sachs Jeffrey St. Clair Jen Marlowe Jeremiah Goulka Jeremy Cooper Jesse Mossman JHR Writers Jim Daniel Jim Fetzer Jim Goad Jim Kavanagh Jim Smith JoAnn Wypijewski Joe Dackman Joe Lauria Joel S. Hirschhorn Johannes Wahlstrom John W. Dower John Feffer John Fund John Harrison Sims John Helmer John Hill John Huss John J. Mearsheimer John Jackson John Kiriakou John Macdonald John Morgan John Patterson John Leonard John Pilger John Q. Publius John Rand John Reid John Ryan John Scales Avery John Siman John Stauber John T. Kelly John Taylor John Titus John Tremain John V. Walsh John Wear John Williams Jon Else Jon Entine Jonathan Alan King Jonathan Anomaly Jonathan Revusky Jonathan Rooper Jonathan Sawyer Jonathan Schell Jordan Henderson Jordan Steiner Joseph Kay Joseph Kishore Joseph Sobran Josephus Tiberius Josh Neal Jeshurun Tsarfat Juan Cole Judith Coburn Julian Bradford Julian Macfarlane K.J. Noh Kacey Gunther Karel Van Wolferen Karen Greenberg Karl Haemers Karl Nemmersdorf Karl Thorburn Kees Van Der Pijl Keith Woods Kelley Vlahos Kenn Gividen Kenneth Vinther Kerry Bolton Kersasp D. Shekhdar Kevin Michael Grace Kevin Rothrock Kevin Sullivan Kevin Zeese Kshama Sawant Larry C. Johnson Laura Gottesdiener Laura Poitras Lawrence Erickson Lawrence G. Proulx Leo Hohmann Leonard C. Goodman Leonard R. Jaffee Liam Cosgrove Lidia Misnik Lilith Powell Linda Preston Lipton Matthews Liv Heide Logical Meme Lorraine Barlett Louis Farrakhan Lydia Brimelow M.G. Miles Mac Deford Maciej Pieczyński Maidhc O Cathail Malcolm Unwell Marco De Wit Marcus Alethia Marcus Apostate Marcus Cicero Marcus Devonshire Margaret Flowers Margot Metroland Marian Evans Mark Allen Mark Bratchikov-Pogrebisskiy Mark Crispin Miller Mark Danner Mark Engler Mark Gullick Mark H. Gaffney Mark Lu Mark Perry Mark Weber Marshall Yeats Martin Jay Martin K. O'Toole Martin Webster Martin Witkerk Mary Phagan-Kean Matt Cockerill Matt Parrott Mattea Kramer Matthew Caldwell Matthew Ehret Matthew Harwood Matthew Richer Matthew Stevenson Max Blumenthal Max Denken Max Jones Max North Max Parry Max West Maya Schenwar Merlin Miller Metallicman Michael A. Roberts Michael Averko Michael Gould-Wartofsky Michael Hoffman Michael Masterson Michael Quinn Michael Schwartz Michael T. Klare Michelle Malkin Miko Peled Mnar Muhawesh Moon Landing Skeptic Morgan Jones Morris V. De Camp Mr. Anti-Humbug Muhammed Abu Murray Polner N. Joseph Potts Nan Levinson Naomi Oreskes Nate Terani Nathan Cofnas Nathan Doyle Ned Stark Neil Kumar Nelson Rosit Nicholas R. Jeelvy Nicholas Stix Nick Griffin Nick Kollerstrom Nick Turse Nicolás Palacios Navarro Nils Van Der Vegte Noam Chomsky NOI Research Group Nomi Prins Norman Finkelstein Norman Solomon OldMicrobiologist Oliver Boyd-Barrett Oliver Williams Oscar Grau P.J. Collins Pádraic O'Bannon Patrice Greanville Patrick Armstrong Patrick Cleburne Patrick Cloutier Patrick Lawrence Patrick Martin Patrick McDermott Patrick Whittle Paul Bennett Paul Cochrane Paul De Rooij Paul Edwards Paul Engler Paul Gottfried Paul Larudee Paul Mitchell Paul Nachman Paul Nehlen Paul Souvestre Paul Tripp Pedro De Alvarado Peter Baggins Ph.D. Peter Bradley Peter Brimelow Peter Gemma Peter Lee Peter Van Buren Philip Kraske Philip Weiss Pierre M. Sprey Pierre Simon Povl H. Riis-Knudsen Pratap Chatterjee Publius Decius Mus Qasem Soleimani Rachel Marsden Raches Radhika Desai Rajan Menon Ralph Nader Ralph Raico Ramin Mazaheri Ramziya Zaripova Ramzy Baroud Randy Shields Raul Diego Ray McGovern Rebecca Gordon Rebecca Solnit Reginald De Chantillon Rémi Tremblay Rev. Matthew Littlefield Ricardo Duchesne Richard Cook Richard Falk Richard Foley Richard Galustian Richard Houck Richard Hugus Richard Knight Richard Krushnic Richard McCulloch Richard Silverstein Richard Solomon Rick Shenkman Rick Sterling Rita Rozhkova Robert Baxter Robert Bonomo Robert Debrus Robert F. Kennedy Jr. Robert Fisk Robert Hampton Robert Henderson Robert Inlakesh Robert LaFlamme Robert Lindsay Robert Lipsyte Robert Parry Robert Roth Robert S. Griffin Robert Scheer Robert Stark Robert Stevens Robert Trivers Robert Wallace Robert Weissberg Robin Eastman Abaya Roger Dooghy Rolo Slavskiy Romana Rubeo Romanized Visigoth Ron Paul Ronald N. Neff Rory Fanning RT Staff Ruuben Kaalep Ryan Andrews Ryan Dawson Sabri Öncü Salim Mansur Sam Dickson Sam Francis Sam Husseini Sayed Hasan Scot Olmstead Scott Howard Scott Ritter Servando Gonzalez Sharmine Narwani Sharmini Peries Sheldon Richman Sietze Bosman Sigurd Kristensen Sinclair Jenkins Southfront Editor Spencer Davenport Spencer J. Quinn Stefan Karganovic Steffen A. Woll Stephanie Savell Stephen F. Cohen Stephen J. Rossi Stephen J. Sniegoski Stephen Paul Foster Sterling Anderson Steve Fraser Steve Keen Steve Penfield Steven Farron Steven Yates Subhankar Banerjee Susan Southard Sydney Schanberg Talia Mullin Tanya Golash-Boza Taxi Taylor McClain Taylor Young Ted O'Keefe Ted Rall The Crew The Zman Theodore A. Postol Thierry Meyssan Thomas A. Fudge Thomas Anderson Thomas Hales Thomas Dalton Thomas Ertl Thomas Frank Thomas Hales Thomas Jackson Thomas O. Meehan Thomas Steuben Thomas Zaja Thorsten J. Pattberg Tim Shorrock Tim Weiner Timothy Vorgenss Timur Fomenko Tingba Muhammad Todd E. Pierce Todd Gitlin Todd Miller Tom Engelhardt Tom Mysiewicz Tom Piatak Tom Suarez Tom Sunic Torin Murphy Tracy Rosenberg Travis LeBlanc Vernon Thorpe Virginia Dare Vito Klein Vladimir Brovkin Vladimir Putin Vladislav Krasnov Vox Day W. Patrick Lang Walt King Walter E. Block Warren Balogh Washington Watcher Washington Watcher II Wayne Allensworth Wei Ling Chua Wesley Muhammad White Man Faculty Whitney Webb Wilhelm Kriessmann Wilhem Ivorsson Will Jones Will Offensicht William Binney William DeBuys William Hartung William J. Astore Winslow T. Wheeler Wyatt Peterson Ximena Ortiz Yan Shen Yaroslav Podvolotskiy Yvonne Lorenzo Zhores Medvedev
Nothing found
By Topics/Categories Filter?
2020 Election Academia American Media American Military American Pravda Anti-Semitism Benjamin Netanyahu Black Crime Black Lives Matter Blacks Britain Censorship China China/America Conspiracy Theories Covid Culture/Society Donald Trump Economics Foreign Policy Gaza Hamas History Holocaust Ideology Immigration IQ Iran Israel Israel Lobby Israel/Palestine Jews Joe Biden NATO Nazi Germany Neocons Open Thread Political Correctness Race/Ethnicity Russia Science Syria Ukraine Vladimir Putin World War II 汪精衛 100% Jussie-free Content 1984 2008 Election 2012 Election 2016 Election 2018 Election 2022 Election 2024 Election 23andMe 9/11 9/11 Commission Report Abortion Abraham Lincoln Abu Mehdi Muhandas Achievement Gap ACLU Acting White Adam Schiff Addiction ADL Admin Administration Admixture Adolf Hitler Advertising AfD Affective Empathy Affirmative Action Affordable Family Formation Afghanistan Africa African Americans African Genetics Africans Afrikaner Age Age Of Malthusian Industrialism Agriculture AI AIPAC Air Force Aircraft Carriers Airlines Airports Al Jazeera Al Qaeda Al-Shifa Alain Soral Alan Clemmons Alan Dershowitz Albania Albert Einstein Albion's Seed Alcoholism Alejandro Mayorkas Alex Jones Alexander Dugin Alexander Vindman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez Alexei Navalny Algeria Ali Dawabsheh Alien And Sedition Acts Alison Nathan Alt Right Altruism Amazon Amazon.com America America First American Civil War American Dream American History American Indians American Israel Public Affairs Committee American Jews American Left American Nations American Nations American Presidents American Prisons American Renaissance Amerindians Amish Amnesty Amnesty International Amos Hochstein Amy Klobuchar Amygdala Anarchism Ancient DNA Ancient Genetics Ancient Greece Ancient Rome Andrei Nekrasov Andrew Bacevich Andrew Sullivan Andrew Yang Anglo-America Anglo-imperialism Anglo-Saxons Anglosphere Angola Animal IQ Animal Rights Wackos Animals Ann Coulter Anne Frank Anthony Blinken Anthony Fauci Anthrax Anthropology Anti-Defamation League Anti-Gentilism Anti-Semites Anti-Vaccination Anti-Vaxx Anti-white Animus Antifa Antifeminism Antiracism Antisemitism Antisemitism Awareness Act Antisocial Behavior Antizionism Antony Blinken Apartheid Apartheid Israel Apollo's Ascent Appalachia Apple Arab Christianity Arab Spring Arabs Archaeogenetics Archaeology Archaic DNA Architecture Arctic Arctic Sea Ice Melting Argentina Ariel Sharon Armageddon War Armenia Armenian Genocide Army Arnold Schwarzenegger Arnon Milchan Art Arthur Jensen Arthur Lichte Artificial Intelligence Arts/Letters Aryans Aryeh Lightstone Ash Carter Ashkenazi Intelligence Asia Asian Americans Asian Quotas Asians Assassination Assassinations Assimilation Atheism Atlanta AUMF Auschwitz Australia Australian Aboriginals Autism Automation Avril Haines Ayn Rand Azerbaijan Azov Brigade Babes And Hunks Baby Gap Balfour Declaration Balkans Balochistan Baltics Baltimore Riots Banjamin Netanyahu Banking Industry Banking System Banks #BanTheADL Barack Obama Baseball Statistics Bashar Al-Assad Basketball #BasketOfDeplorables BBC BDS BDS Movement Beauty Beethoven Behavior Genetics Behavioral Genetics Bela Belarus Belgium Belgrade Embassy Bombing Ben Cardin Ben Hodges Ben Rhodes Ben Shapiro Ben Stiller Benny Gantz Bernard Henri-Levy Bernie Sanders Betsy DeVos Betty McCollum Bezalel Smotrich Bezalel Yoel Smotrich Biden BigPost Bilateral Relations Bilingual Education Bill Clinton Bill De Blasio Bill Gates Bill Kristol Bill Maher Bill Of Rights Billionaires Billy Graham Bioethics Biology Bioweapons Birmingham Birth Rate Bitcoin Black Community Black History Month Black Muslims Black Panthers Black People Black Slavery BlackLivesMatter BlackRock Blake Masters Blank Slatism BLM Blog Blogging Blogosphere Blond Hair Blood Libel Blue Eyes Boasian Anthropology Boeing Boers Bolshevik Revolution Bolshevik Russia Books Boomers Border Wall Boris Johnson Bosnia Boycott Divest And Sanction Brain Drain Brain Scans Brain Size Brain Structure Brazil Bret Stephens Brett McGurk Bretton Woods Brexit Brezhnev Bri Brian Mast BRICs Brighter Brains British Empire British Labour Party British Politics Buddhism Build The Wall Bulldog Bush Business Byzantine Caitlin Johnstone California Californication Camp Of The Saints Canada #Cancel2022WorldCupinQatar Cancer Candace Owens Capitalism Carl Von Clausewitz Carlos Slim Caroline Glick Carroll Quigley Cars Carthaginians Catalonia Catholic Church Catholicism Catholics Cats Caucasus CDC Ceasefire Cecil Rhodes Census Central Asia Central Intelligence Agency Chanda Chisala Chaos And Order Charles De Gaulle Charles Manson Charles Murray Charles Schumer Charlie Hebdo Charlottesville Checheniest Chechen Of Them All Chechens Chechnya Chernobyl Chetty Chicago Chicagoization Chicken Hut Child Abuse Children Chile China Vietnam Chinese Chinese Communist Party Chinese Evolution Chinese IQ Chinese Language Christian Zionists Christianity Christmas Christopher Steele Christopher Wray Chuck Schumer CIA Civil Liberties Civil Rights Civil Rights Movement Civil War Civilization Clannishness Clash Of Civilizations Class Classical Antiquity Classical History Classical Music Clayton County Climate Climate Change Clint Eastwood Clintons Coal Coalition Of The Fringes Coen Brothers Cognitive Elitism Cognitive Science Cold Cold War Colin Kaepernick Colin Powell Colin Woodard College Admission College Football Colonialism Color Revolution Columbia University Columbus Comic Books Communism Computers Condoleezza Rice Confederacy Confederate Flag Congress Conquistador-American Conservatism Conservative Movement Conservatives Conspiracy Theory Constantinople Constitution Constitutional Theory Consumerism Controversial Book Convergence Core Article Cornel West Corona Corporatism Corruption COTW Counterpunch Country Music Cousin Marriage Cover Story COVID-19 Craig Murray Creationism Crime Crimea Crispr Critical Race Theory Cruise Missiles Crusades Crying Among The Farmland Cryptocurrency Ctrl-Left Cuba Cuban Missile Crisis Cuckery Cuckservatism Cuckservative CUFI Cuisine Cultural Marxism Cultural Revolution Culture Culture War Curfew Czars Czech Republic DACA Daily Data Dump Dallas Shooting Damnatio Memoriae Dan Bilzarian Danny Danon Daren Acemoglu Darwinism Darya Dugina Data Data Analysis Dave Chappelle David Bazelon David Brog David Friedman David Frum David Irving David Lynch David Petraeus Davide Piffer Davos Death Of The West Debbie Wasserman-Schultz Deborah Lipstadt Debt Debt Jubilee Decadence Deep State Deficits Degeneracy Democracy Democratic Party Demograhics Demographic Transition Demographics Demography Denmark Dennis Ross Department Of Homeland Security Deplatforming Derek Chauvin Detroit Development Dick Cheney Diet Digital Yuan Dinesh D'Souza Discrimination Disease Disinformation Disney Disparate Impact Dissent Dissidence Diversity Diversity Before Diversity Diversity Pokemon Points Divorce DNA Dogs Dollar Domestic Surveillance Domestic Terrorism Doomsday Clock Dostoevsky Doug Emhoff Doug Feith Dresden Drone War Drones Drug Laws Drugs Duterte Dynasty Dysgenic Dystopia E. Michael Jones E. O. Wilson East Asia East Asian Exception East Asians Eastern Europe Ebrahim Raisi Economic Development Economic History Economic Sanctions Economy Ecuador Edmund Burke Edmund Burke Foundation Education Edward Snowden Effective Altruism Effortpost Efraim Zurofff Egor Kholmogorov Egypt Election 2016 Election 2018 Election 2020 Election Fraud Elections Electric Cars Eli Rosenbaum Elie Wiesel Eliot Cohen Eliot Engel Elise Stefanik Elites Elizabeth Holmes Elizabeth Warren Elliot Abrams Elliott Abrams Elon Musk Emigration Emil Kirkegaard Emmanuel Macron Emmett Till Employment Energy England Entertainment Environment Environmentalism Epidemiology Equality Erdogan Eretz Israel Eric Zemmour Ernest Hemingway Espionage Espionage Act Estonia Ethics Ethics And Morals Ethiopia Ethnic Nepotism Ethnicity Ethnocentricty EU Eugene Debs Eugenics Eurabia Eurasia Euro Europe European Genetics European Right European Union Europeans Eurozone Evolution Evolutionary Biology Evolutionary Genetics Evolutionary Psychology Existential Risks Eye Color Face Shape Facebook Faces Fake News False Flag Attack Family Family Systems Fantasy FARA Farmers Fascism Fast Food FBI FDA FDD Federal Reserve Feminism Ferguson Ferguson Shooting Fermi Paradox Fertility Fertility Fertility Rates FIFA Film Finance Financial Bailout Financial Bubbles Financial Debt Finland Finn Baiting Finns First Amendment FISA Fitness Flash Mobs Flight From White Floyd Riots 2020 Fluctuarius Argenteus Flynn Effect Food Football For Fun Forecasts Foreign Agents Registration Act Foreign Policy Fourth Amendment Fox News France Francesca Albanese Frank Salter Frankfurt School Franklin D. Roosevelt Franz Boas Fraud Freakonomics Fred Kagan Free Market Free Speech Free Trade Freedom Of Speech Freedom French Revolution Friedrich Karl Berger Friends Of The Israel Defense Forces Frivolty Frontlash Furkan Dogan Future Futurism G20 Gambling Game Game Of Thrones Gavin McInnes Gavin Newsom Gay Germ Gay Marriage Gays/Lesbians GDP Gen Z Gender Gender And Sexuality Gender Equality Gender Reassignment Gene-Culture Coevolution Genealogy General Intelligence General Motors Generation Z Generational Gap Genes Genetic Diversity Genetic Engineering Genetic Load Genetic Pacification Genetics Genghis Khan Genocide Genocide Convention Genomics Gentrification Geography Geopolitics George Floyd George Galloway George Patton George Soros George Tenet George W. Bush Georgia Germans Germany Ghislaine Maxwell Gilad Atzmon Gina Peddy Giorgia Meloni Gladwell Glenn Greenwald Global Warming Globalism Globalization Globo-Homo God Gold Golf Gonzalo Lira Google Government Government Debt Government Overreach Government Secrecy Government Spending Government Surveillance Government Waste Goyim Grant Smith Graphs Great Bifurcation Great Depression Great Leap Forward Great Powers Great Replacement #GreatWhiteDefendantPrivilege Greece Greeks Greg Cochran Gregory Clark Gregory Cochran Greta Thunberg Group Intelligence Group Selection GSS Guardian Guest Guilt Culture Gun Control Guns Guy Swan GWAS Gypsies H.R. McMaster H1-B Visas Haim Saban Hair Color Haiti Hajnal Line Halloween HammerHate Hannibal Procedure Happening Happiness Harvard Harvard University Harvey Weinstein Hassan Nasrallah Hate Crimes Fraud Hoax Hate Hoaxes Hate Speech Hbd Hbd Chick Health Health And Medicine Health Care Healthcare Hegira Height Henry Harpending Henry Kissinger Hereditary Heredity Heritability Hezbollah High Speed Rail Hillary Clinton Hindu Caste System Hindus Hiroshima Hispanic Crime Hispanics Historical Genetics History Of Science Hitler HIV/AIDS Hoax Holland Hollywood Holocaust Denial Holocaust Deniers Holy Roman Empire Homelessness Homicide Homicide Rate Homomania Homosexuality Hong Kong Houellebecq Housing Houthis Howard Kohr Huawei Hubbert's Peak Huddled Masses Huey Newton Hug Thug Human Achievement Human Biodiversity Human Evolution Human Evolutionary Genetics Human Evolutionary Genomics Human Genetics Human Genomics Human Rights Human Rights Watch Humor Hungary Hunt For The Great White Defendant Hunter Biden Hunter-Gatherers I.F. Stone I.Q. I.Q. Genomics #IBelieveInHavenMonahan ICC Icj Ideas Identity Ideology And Worldview IDF Idiocracy Igbo Igor Shafarevich Ilan Pappe Ilhan Omar Illegal Immigration Ilyushin IMF Impeachment Imperialism Imran Awan Inbreeding Income India Indian IQ Indians Individualism Indo-Europeans Indonesia Inequality Inflation Intelligence Intelligence Agencies Intelligent Design International International Affairs International Comparisons International Court Of Justice International Criminal Court International Relations Internet Interracial Marriage Interracism Intersectionality Intifada Intra-Racism Intraracism Invade Invite In Hock Invade The World Invite The World Iosef Stalin Iosif Stalin Iq And Wealth Iran Nuclear Agreement Iran Nuclear Program Iranian Nuclear Program Iraq Iraq War Ireland Irish Is Love Colorblind Isaac Herzog ISIS Islam Islamic Jihad Islamic State Islamism Islamophobia Isolationism Israel Bonds Israel Defense Force Israel Defense Forces Israel Separation Wall Israeli Occupation IT Italy Itamar Ben-Gvir It's Okay To Be White Ivanka Ivy League J Street Jackie Rosen Jacky Rosen Jair Bolsonaro Jake Sullivan Jake Tapper Jamal Khashoggi James Angleton James B. Watson James Clapper James Comey James Forrestal James Jeffrey James Mattis James Watson Janet Yellen Janice Yellen Japan Jared Diamond Jared Kushner Jared Taylor Jason Greenblatt JASTA JCPOA JD Vance Jeb Bush Jeffrey Epstein Jeffrey Goldberg Jeffrey Sachs Jen Psaki Jennifer Rubin Jens Stoltenberg Jeremy Corbyn Jerry Seinfeld Jerusalem Jerusalem Post Jesuits Jesus Jesus Christ Jewish Genetics Jewish History Jewish Intellectuals Jewish Power Jewish Power Party Jewish Supremacism JFK Assassination JFK Jr. Jill Stein Jingoism JINSA Joe Lieberman Joe Rogan John Bolton John Brennan John Derbyshire John F. Kennedy John Hagee John Hawks John Kirby John Kiriakou John McCain John McLaughlin John Mearsheimer Joker Jonathan Freedland Jonathan Greenblatt Jonathan Pollard Jordan Peterson Joseph Kennedy Joseph McCarthy Josh Gottheimer Josh Paul Journalism Judaism Judge George Daniels Judicial System Julian Assange Jussie Smollett Justice Justin Trudeau Kaboom Kahanists Kaiser Wilhelm Kamala Harris Kamala On Her Knees Kanye West Karabakh War 2020 Karen Kwiatkowski Karine Jean-Pierre Kashmir Kata'ib Hezbollah Kay Bailey Hutchison Kazakhstan Keir Starmer Kenneth Marcus Kevin MacDonald Kevin McCarthy Kevin Williamson Khazars Khrushchev Kids Kim Jong Un Kinship Kkk KKKrazy Glue Of The Coalition Of The Fringes Knesset Kolomoisky Kompromat Korea Korean War Kosovo Kris Kobach Kristi Noem Ku Klux Klan Kubrick Kurds Kushner Foundation Kyle Rittenhouse Kyrie Irving Language Laos Larry C. Johnson Late Obama Age Collapse Latin America Latinos Law Lawfare LDNR Lead Poisoning Leahy Amendments Leahy Law Lebanon Lee Kuan Yew Leftism Lenin Leo Frank Leo Strauss Let's Talk About My Hair LGBT LGBTI Liberal Opposition Liberal Whites Liberalism Liberals Libertarianism Libya Light Skin Preference Lindsey Graham Linguistics Literacy Literature Lithuania Litvinenko Living Standards Liz Cheney Liz Truss Lloyd Austin Localism long-range-missile-defense Longevity Looting Lord Of The Rings Lorde Loudoun County Louis Farrakhan Love And Marriage Low-fat Lukashenko Lula Lyndon B Johnson Lyndon Johnson Madeleine Albright Mafia MAGA Magnitsky Act Malaysia Malaysian Airlines MH17 Manosphere Manufacturing Mao Zedong Maoism Map Marco Rubio Maria Butina Marijuana Marine Le Pen Marjorie Taylor Greene Mark Milley Mark Steyn Mark Warner Marriage Martin Luther King Martin Scorsese Marvel Marx Marxism Masculinity Mass Shootings Mate Choice Math Mathematics Mathilde Krim Matt Gaetz Max Boot Max Weber Maxine Waters Mayans McCain McCain/POW McDonald's Meat Media Media Bias Medicine Medieval Christianity Medieval Russia Mediterranean Diet Medvedev Megan McCain Meghan Markle Mein Obama MEK Mel Gibson Men With Gold Chains Meng Wanzhou Mental Health Mental Illness Mental Traits Meritocracy Merkel Merkel Youth Merkel's Boner Merrick Garland Mexico MH 17 MI-6 Michael Bloomberg Michael Collins PIper Michael Flynn Michael Hudson Michael Jackson Michael Lind Michael McFaul Michael Moore Michael Morell Michael Pompeo Michelle Goldberg Michelle Ma Belle Michelle Obama Microaggressions Middle Ages Middle East Migration Mike Huckabee Mike Johnson Mike Pence Mike Pompeo Mike Signer Mike Waltz Mikhael Gorbachev Miles Mathis Militarized Police Military Military Analysis Military Budget Military History Military Spending Military Technology Millennials Milner Group Minimum Wage Minneapolis Minorities Miriam Adelson Miscellaneous Misdreavus Mishima Missile Defense Mitch McConnell Mitt Romney Mixed-Race MK-Ultra Mohammed Bin Salman Monarchy Mondoweiss Money Mongolia Mongols Monkeypox Monogamy Moon Landing Hoax Moon Landings Moore's Law Morality Mormonism Mormons Mortality Mortgage Moscow Mossad Movies Muhammad Multiculturalism Music Muslim Ban Muslims Mussolini NAEP Naftali Bennett Nakba NAMs Nancy Pelos Nancy Pelosi Narendra Modi NASA Nation Of Hate Nation Of Islam National Assessment Of Educational Progress National Debt National Endowment For Democracy National Review National Security Strategy National Socialism National Wealth Nationalism Native Americans Natural Gas Nature Vs. Nurture Navalny Affair Navy Standards Nazis Nazism Neandertals Neanderthals Near Abroad Negrolatry Neo-Nazis Neoconservatism Neoconservatives Neoliberalism Neolibs Neolithic Neoreaction Netherlands Never Again Education Act New Cold War New Dark Age New Horizon Foundation New Orleans New Silk Road New Tes New World Order New York New York City New York Times New Zealand New Zealand Shooting NFL Nicholas II Nicholas Wade Nick Eberstadt Nick Fuentes Nicolas Maduro Niger Nigeria Nike Nikki Haley NIMBY Nina Jankowicz No Fly Zone Noam Chomsky Nobel Prize Nord Stream Nord Stream Pipelines Nordics Norman Braman Norman Finkelstein Norman Lear North Africa North Korea Northern Ireland Northwest Europe Norway Novorossiya NSA Nuclear Power Nuclear Proliferation Nuclear War Nuclear Weapons Nuremberg Nutrition NYPD Obama Obama Presidency Obamacare Obesity Obituary Obscured American Occam's Razor Occupy Wall Street October Surprise Oedipus Complex OFAC Oil Oil Industry Oklahoma City Bombing Olav Scholz Old Testament Oliver Stone Olympics Open Borders OpenThread Opinion Poll Opioids Orban Organized Crime Orlando Shooting Orthodoxy Orwell Osama Bin Laden OTFI Our Soldiers Speak Out Of Africa Model Paganism Pakistan Paleoanthropology Palestine Palestinians Palin Panhandling Papacy Paper Review Parasite Burden Parenting Parenting Paris Attacks Partly Inbred Extended Family Pat Buchanan Pathogens Patriot Act Patriotism Paul Findley Paul Ryan Paul Singer Paul Wolfowitz Pavel Durov Pavel Grudinin Paypal Peace Peak Oil Pearl Harbor Pedophilia Pentagon Personal Genomics Personality Pete Buttgieg Pete Buttigieg Pete Hegseth Peter Frost Peter Thiel Peter Turchin Petro Poroshenko Pew Phil Rushton Philadelphia Philippines Philosophy Phoenicians Phyllis Randall Physiognomy Piers Morgan Pigmentation Pigs Pioneers Piracy PISA Pizzagate POC Ascendancy Podcast Poland Police Police State Polio Political Correctness Makes You Stupid Political Dissolution Political Economy Politicians Politics Polling Pollution Polygamy Polygyny Pope Francis Population Population Genetics Population Growth Population Replacement Populism Porn Pornography Portland Portugal Portuguese Post-Apocalypse Poverty Power Pramila Jayapal PRC Prediction Prescription Drugs President Joe Biden Presidential Race '08 Presidential Race '12 Presidential Race '16 Presidential Race '20 Prince Andrew Prince Harry Priti Patel Privacy Privatization Progressives Propaganda Prostitution protest Protestantism Proud Boys Psychology Psychometrics Psychopathy Public Health Public Schools Puerto Rico Puritans Putin Putin Derangement Syndrome QAnon Qassem Soleimani Qatar Quantitative Genetics Quebec Quiet Skies Quincy Institute R2P Race Race And Crime Race And Genomics Race And Iq Race And Religion Race/Crime Race Denialism Race/IQ Race Riots Rachel Corrie Racial Purism Racial Reality Racialism Racism Rafah Raj Shah Rand Paul Randy Fine Rap Music Rape Rashida Tlaib Rationality Ray McGovern Raymond Chandler Razib Khan Real Estate RealWorld Recep Tayyip Erdogan Red Sea Refugee Crisis #refugeeswelcome Religion Religion And Philosophy Rentier Reparations Reprint Republican Party Republicans Review Revisionism Rex Tillerson RFK Assassination Ricci Richard Dawkins Richard Goldberg Richard Grenell Richard Haas Richard Haass Richard Lewontin Richard Lynn Richard Nixon Rightwing Cinema Riots R/k Theory RMAX Robert A. Heinlein Robert F. Kennedy Jr. Robert Ford Robert Kagan Robert Kraft Robert Maxwell Robert McNamara Robert Mueller Robert O'Brien Robert Reich Robots Rock Music Roe Vs. Wade Roger Waters Rolling Stone Roman Empire Romania Romanticism Rome Ron DeSantis Ron Paul Ron Unz Ronald Reagan Rotherham Rothschilds RT International Rudy Giuliani Rule Of Law Rush Limbaugh Russiagate Russian Demography Russian Elections 2018 Russian History Russian Media Russian Military Russian Nationalism Russian Occupation Government Russian Orthodox Church Russian Reaction Russians Russophobes Russophobia Russotriumph Ruth Bader Ginsburg Rwanda Sabrina Rubin Erdely Sacha Baron Cohen Sacklers Sailer Strategy Sailer's First Law Of Female Journalism Saint Peter Tear Down This Gate! Saint-Petersburg Salman Rushie Salt Sam Bankman-Fried Sam Francis Samantha Power Samson Option San Bernadino Massacre Sandra Beleza Sandy Hook Sapir-Whorf SAT Satanic Age Satanism Saudi Arabia Scandal Science Denialism Science Fiction Scooter Libby Scotland Scott Ritter Scrabble Sean Hannity Seattle Secession Select Post Self Determination Self Indulgence Semites Serbia Sergei Lavrov Sergei Skripal Sergey Glazyev Seth Rich Sex Sex Differences Sex Ratio At Birth Sexual Harassment Sexual Selection Sexuality Seymour Hersh Shai Masot Shakespeare Shame Culture Shanghai Cooperation Organisation Shared Environment Sheldon Adelson Shias And Sunnis Shimon Arad Shimon Peres Shireen Abu Akleh Shmuley Boteach Shoah Shorts And Funnies Shoshana Bryen Shulamit Aloni Shurat HaDin Sigal Mandelker Sigar Pearl Mandelker Sigmund Freud Silicon Valley Singapore Single Men Single Women Sinotriumph Six Day War Sixties SJWs Skin Color Slavery Slavery Reparations Slavoj Zizek Slavs Smart Fraction Social Justice Warriors Social Media Social Science Socialism Society Sociobiology Sociology Sodium Solzhenitsyn Somalia Sotomayor South Africa South Asia South China Sea South Korea Southeast Asia Soviet History Soviet Union Sovok Space Space Exploration Space Program Spain Spanish Spanish River High School SPLC Sport Sports Srebrenica St Petersburg International Economic Forum Stabby Somali Staffan Stage Stalinism Standardized Tests Star Trek Star Wars Starvation Comparisons State Department Statistics Statue Of Liberty Steny Hoyer Stephen Cohen Stephen Colbert Stephen Harper Stephen Jay Gould Stephen Townsend Stereotypes Steroids Steve Bannon Steve Sailer Steven Pinker Strait Of Hormuz Strategic Ambiguity Stuart Levey Stuart Seldowitz Student Debt Stuff White People Like Sub-replacement Fertility Sub-Saharan Africa Sub-Saharan Africans Subhas Chandra Bose Subprime Mortgage Crisis Suburb Suella Braverman Sugar Suicide Superintelligence Supreme Court Susan Glasser Susan Wild Svidomy Sweden Switzerland Symington Amendment Syrian Civil War Ta-Nehisi Coates Taiwan Take Action Taliban Talmud Tatars Taxation Taxes Tea Party Technical Considerations Technology Ted Cruz Telegram Television Terrorism Terry McAuliffe Tesla Testing Testosterone Tests Texas THAAD Thailand The 10/7 Project The AK The American Conservative The Bell Curve The Bible The Black Autumn The Cathedral The Confederacy The Constitution The Eight Banditos The Family The Free World The Great Awokening The Left The Middle East The New York Times The South The States The Zeroth Amendment To The Constitution Theranos Theresa May Third World Thomas Jefferson Thomas Moorer Thought Crimes Tiananmen Massacre Tiger Mom TikTok TIMSS Tom Cotton Tom Massie Tom Wolfe Tony Blair Tony Blinken Tony Kleinfeld Too Many White People Torture Trade Trans Fat Trans Fats Transgender Transgenderism Transhumanism Translation Translations Transportation Travel Trayvon Martin Trolling True Redneck Stereotypes Trump Trump Derangement Syndrome Trust Tsarist Russia Tucker Carlson Tulsa Tulsi Gabbard Turkey Turks TWA 800 Twins Twitter Ucla UFOs UK Ukrainian Crisis UN Security Council Unbearable Whiteness Unemployment UNHRC Unions United Kingdom United Nations United Nations General Assembly United Nations Security Council United States Universal Basic Income UNRWA Urbanization Ursula Von Der Leyen Uruguay US Blacks US Capitol Storming 2021 US Civil War II US Constitution US Elections 2016 US Elections 2020 US Regionalism USA USAID USS Liberty USSR Uyghurs Uzbekistan Vaccination Vaccines Valdimir Putin Valerie Plame Vdare Venezuela Vibrancy Victoria Nuland Victorian England Video Video Games Vietnam Vietnam War Vietnamese Vikings Viktor Orban Viktor Yanukovych Violence Vioxx Virginia Virginia Israel Advisory Board Vitamin D Vivek Ramaswamy Vladimir Zelensky Volodymur Zelenskyy Volodymyr Zelensky Vote Fraud Voter Fraud Voting Rights Voting Rights Act Vulcan Society Wall Street Walmart Wang Ching Wei Wang Jingwei War War Crimes War Guilt War In Donbass War On Christmas War On Terror War Powers War Powers Act Warhammer Washington DC WASPs Watergate Wealth Wealth Inequality Wealthy Web Traffic Weight WEIRDO Welfare Wendy Sherman West Bank Western Decline Western European Marriage Pattern Western Hypocrisy Western Media Western Religion Western Revival Westerns White America White Americans White Death White Flight White Guilt White Helmets White Liberals White Man's Burden White Nakba White Nationalism White Nationalists White People White Privilege White Slavery White Supremacy White Teachers Whiterpeople Whites Who Whom Whoopi Goldberg Wikileaks Wikipedia William Browder William Kristol William Latson William McGonagle William McRaven WINEP Winston Churchill WMD Woke Capital Women Woodrow Wilson Workers Working Class World Bank World Economic Forum World Health Organization World Population World Values Survey World War G World War H World War Hair World War I World War III World War R World War T World War Weed WTF WVS WWII Xi Jinping Yahya Sinwar Yair Lapid Yemen Yevgeny Prigozhin Yoav Gallant Yogi Berra's Restaurant Yoram Hazony YouTube Yugoslavia Yuval Noah Harari Zbigniew Brzezinski Zimbabwe Zionism Zionists Zvika Fogel
Nothing found
Filter?
Jami
Comments
• My
Comments
21 Comments • 9,200 Words •  RSS
(Commenters may request that their archives be hidden by contacting the appropriate blogger)
All Comments
 All Comments
    While the so-called liberal and conservative corporate mainstream media – all stenographers for the intelligence agencies – pour forth the most blatant propaganda about Russia and Ukraine that is so conspicuous that it is comedic if it weren’t so dangerous, the self-depicted cognoscenti also ingest subtler messages, often from the alternative media. A woman I...
  • jami says:
    @Robert Dolan
    The following 28 Jews are in Creepy Joe Biden’s Cabinet

    and most important Administrative positions:

    1) Doug Emhoff, Jewish Husband of Kamala Devil Harris
    2) Janet Yellin, Jewish Secretary Treasury
    3) Anthony Blinken, Jewish Secretary of State
    4) Robert Klain, Jewish Chief of Staff
    5) David Cohen, Jewish Deputy Director CIA
    6) Merrick Garland, Jewish Attorney General
    7) Alejandro Mayorkas, Jewish Secretary Homeland Security
    8) Avril Haines, Jewish Director National Intelligence
    9) Wendy Sherman, Jewish Deputy Secretary of State
    10) Victoria Nuland, Jewish Secretary State Political Affairs
    11) Eric Lander, Jewish Office of Science Technology
    12) Jeffry Zeints, Jewish Covid Czar
    13) Rachel Levine, Jewish Assistant Health Secretary
    14) and 15) Cass Sunstein, Jewish Senior Counselor at the Departmentof Homeland Security, and his wife, Samantha Power, Head of USAID
    16) Dana Stroul, Jewish Pentagon Senior Policy Official on the Middle East
    17) Rochelle P. Walensky, Jewish CDC Director
    18) Anne Neuberger, Jewish Director of Cybersecurity at NSA
    19) Chanan Weissman, Jewish Director of Technology at National Security Council
    20) Avril Haines, Jewish Director of National Intelligence
    21) Polly Trottenberg, Jewish Deputy Secretary of Transportation
    22) Jessica Rosenworce,l Jewish Acting Chairwoman FCC
    23) Jennifer Klein, Jewish Co-Chair of the Gender Policy Council
    24) Jared Bernstein, Jewish Member of Council of Economic Advisers
    25) Jeff Zients, Jewish COVID Czar
    26) David Kessler, Jewish Chief Science Officer of COVID Response
    27) Stephanie Pollack, Jewish Deputy Administrator Federal Highway Administration
    28) Gary Gensler, Jewish Chairman of the Securities and Exchange Commission

    You may ask yourself, what is the likelihood of this happening?

    Replies: @Geowhizz, @jami

    Your list is NOT complete. The latest addition to this list working for zionist Biden regime is ‘New U.S. antisemitism envoy’ Deborah Lipstadt, who said:

    “Speaking in her new office at the State Department, Lipstadt said that recent events — in Ukraine and elsewhere — have altered her views about which forms of denial are the most pervasive and dangerous. Decades ago, what seemed most threatening were outright deniers such as Irving or his French counterpart, Robert Faurisson.”

    She means, of course, Putin denial of ” Russian crimes against in Ukraine”, in the other words, holohoax.

    https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2022/05/11/deborah-lipstadt-antisemitism-envoy-ukraine-putin/

  • This is the concise story of how a suicide bombing may carry the potential to subvert the whole, ongoing, complex process of Eurasia integration. Recently, the Balochistan Liberation Movement (BLA) had released an ISIS-influenced video threatening “Chinese officials and installations” in Pakistan’s vast province. Yet what actually happened in late April was a suicide bombing...
  • jami says:

    The recent article by Benjamin Ivrychohen, on Sassoon family opium trade, where the Mafia treat them as Jewish Kings, published in ‘forward’, is trying to belittle the crimes of Sassoon’s family, by explaining the situation as follows:

    [[The Sassoons had to dismiss some of their Chinese employees because they were addicted to opium. Many of the Jewish families fought tooth and nail against banning opium. Opium was legal and used for medicinal purposes. Like people who sell cigarettes and alcohol, their feeling was that they were filling a need. They also looked upon the Chinese as being different from Westerners. They felt that the Chinese weren’t like us, so selling opium to the Chinese was seen as something that could be done. So there is a moral reckoning for selling this drug, even though the consequences for China were catastrophic.]]
    https://forward.com/culture/442250/when-jews-were-kings-and-opium-lords-in-shanghai/

    Today, we have similar situation with Opioid trade by SACKLER family who deny their role in opioid crisis where many people are dead. People are trying to get justices for their loved one using states to hold these criminals responsible demanding REPARATION.
    Another agent of Sasson in Iran who expanded the cultivation of Opium, instead of crops to cash in, was Mohammad Mehdi Arbab Esfahani, one of the merchant of Bushehr. Sepahsalar and other British agents made Opium as the source of the development of “National economy” to convince people in the position of power.
    Following the “spread of national economic ideas” during the Sepahsalar presidency, not only did opium cultivation progress greatly, but, according to Adamiyat, a pro west historian, addiction became so prevalent for the first time in Iran that described in foreign travelogues.
    Thus the foundation of the “national economy” was laid, but at what cost? This is the point that pro British writers ignore.
    The British Consul in Bushehr explains in his report that in the first years of Arbab Esfahani presidency of the chamber of commerce, the opium poppy was so developed that it led to a famine. Due to the profitability of the opium, the traders were attracted to devote more suitable lands to opium in Yazd, Isfahan and other places to poppy cultivation, and the cultivation of cereals and other crops was neglected. This was combined with drought and other factors, leading to the famine of 1871-1872. According to Ahmad Ashraf, an Iranian socialist, among the foreign companies that operated in Iran during the Qajar period, he mentions Sassoon Company which was engaged in foreign trade and import and export between Britain and Iran, especially opium exports, and had representatives in Bushehr and Isfahan. In the above source, two other Iranian agents of Sassoon Company are identified as follows:
    Haji Mirza Mahmoud Kazeruni, the largest businessman in Shiraz, was the agent of Sassoon Company, and Haji Mohammad Sadr, the merchant of Isfahan, was the richest and most influential businessman.
    Of course, the evil empire never work alone and always have naive and traitor individuals as businessmen or politicians, where some of them are let on the position of power by the empire, to work with a foreign power to rich themselves. This does not deny the crimes of the evil empire such as British where still is going on, of course, as a JUNIOR partner.

  • jami says:
    @Malla
    @jami


    Jewish pro colonists, is trying to push he reason behind the famine under the rug to exonerate the Evil British empire. He writes: “There is, of course, NO one British position on the question of Opium and imperialism”.
     
    Bullshit, he referenced, Okazaki, “The Great Persian Famine, Famines have been taking place in persia much before Opium.

    Famines have been reported throughout Persian history by numerous authors and observers. According to a compilation made by Charles Melville, they occurred in Khorasan in 115/733 AD (Melville, p. 130), in Sīstān in 220/835 AD (Melville, p. 130), in Khorasan and Sīstān in 400/1009-10 AD (Melville, p. 136), in Khorasan in 1099 AD (Melville, p. 136), in Kermān in 576/1180 AD and 662/1264 AD (Melville, p. 130), in Fārs in 683-85/1284-66 AD and 698/1299 AD (Melville, p. 130), in Yazd in 858/1454 AD (Melville, p. 130), and throughout Persia in 1870-72 AD (Melville p. 130), 1929-30 AD (Melville, p. 138), and 1948-49 AD (Melville, pp. 138-39). To these should be added the years 735/1335 AD sqq. (Aubin, pp.131-32), 1226/1811 AD (Morier, I, p. 170), 1232/1817 AD (Johnson, I, pp.195-97), 1277/1861 AD (Brugsch, II, pp. 307, 364-65 and passim), 1296/1879 AD(Wilson) and “the beginning of the 20th century” (Malcolm, pp. 233, 235-36). However, this enumeration probably remains very incomplete as more or less recurrent episodes of famine have plagued various parts of Persia until the middle of the 20th century. “Hardly a year passes in which there is not a famine in some province of Persia,” wrote a European observer in the beginning of the 20th century (Chirol, p. 97). These famines have had spectacular and terrifying aspects: people eating weeds (Morier, I, p. 170, near Persepolis; Bellew, pp. 427, 432) or unearthing roots (between Isfahan and Kāšān; Morier, I, pp. 195, 197); multitudes of beggars and skeletons roaming the city and village streets (Brittlebank, pp. 95-8, 137, 141; Bellew, pp. 333, 339-40, 412, 429, 433, 435, 448); corpses not buried, devoured by dogs, on the roads, in villages and even cities (Brittlebank, pp. 169, 180, 191; Bellew, pp. 396, 432; Bassett, p. 72); skeletons and bones abandoned in villages (Bassett, p. 127); or on the roads (Bellew, pp. 354, 421; to such an extent that this traveler, a British physician with an interest in anthropology, picked up a skeleton completely stripped of flesh and intact), or still scattered in vineyards, where people had died of exhaustion eating vine leaves (Bellew, pp. 434-45); graves hurriedly dug on the side of roads (Bellew, p. 342); fresh cemeteries marked out at the gate of cities (Bellew, p. 437; in Kermānšāh); even reports of cannibalism, mentioned in the 14th century C.E. in Azerbaijan (Aubin, pp. 131-32 with sources; Āmolī, ed. Ḵalīlī, p. 138; ed. Sotūda, p. 204; Ebn Bazzāz, p. 305), and also in Mašhad, in 1871, where parents are reported to have eaten their own children (Smith, p. 361).

    Causes. The territories of Persia and Afghanistan comprise vast, desertic or semi-desertic, regions where the natural variation in precipitation is considerable (see BĀRĀN). Rain water agriculture, which provides an important part of the food resources, is thus especially vulnerable. Drought is obviously the most frequent cause of famine, as was the case in several of the famines mentioned by Melville (p. 130). Unusually rigorous winters on the high Iranian plateau can have the same effects as happened in Khorasan, Sīstān, and the central plateau in 400/1009-10; Khorasan in 492/1099; and Isfahan in 1929-30 (Melville, pp. 136, 138). Both factors can also combine, with the succession of a dry summer by a harsh winter especially to be feared, as in the great famine of 1869-72 or Sīstān in 1949-50 (Melville, pp. 147-48). Other natural, more episodic, causes have been reported, such as the locust invasion of 1890 in Qara Dāḡ (Wilson, p. 168).

    Equally as much can be attributed, however, to human causes (Gilbar, p. 135), which have been aggravating factors to climatic disasters. Changes in the modes of culture, such as the preference given to the opium poppy over cereals, could have had some effect (Wilson, p. 168, for 1879). Neglect in the development and maintenance of the irrigation system during periods of weak administrations has certainly played a role. Above all, the absence of, or great difficulty with, transportation until the middle of the 20th century, has been a determining factor. Speculation by merchants, large land owners, and even government officials and members of the clergy, who did not hesitate to monopolize grain, should also be blamed. Toward the end of the 19th century the governor of Tehran and several high ranking members of the court had thus caused an increase in the price of bread by provoking an artificial shortage. It was only when the supply of the Cossack Brigade was affected that its leader, general Kosogowsky, ordered the barriers that had been raised around the capital to prevent the arrival of grain torn down (Chirol, p. 97).

    Replies: @jami

    Stop sending me COPY and PASTE “comments”, This is NOT your comment. This is copying from the internet and paste it here. It is obvious that you know shit about Iranian history and do not understand these lines that are printed in a Journal or a research paper posted on line, that’s why you come with LONG USELESS lines and paste it as ‘comment’ where no one understands. Do you you understand it?
    I am not going to read these COPIED lines anymore. Use your own initiative and write something that people can understand. It is obvious that you know nothing about the Sassoon family in the development of the Opium Trade, therefore, you resort to COPY and PASTE.
    I Showed that most of your ‘comments’ are NOT yours, but copied from the work of an Israeli researcher from the university of Pennsylvania. Then stop your foolishness at once. I don’t understand why are you so desperate to protect the British empire and its extension here?
    David Sassoon, under British Government protection, had the most lucrative part of British India’s trade with China and other countries. These lucrative goods included opium, textiles, and cotton fibers. The Sassoon family did not work alone but had AGENTS in other countries that facilitated their trade. With David’s death, the Sassoon Foundation passed to his eldest son, Abdullah, who later became “Albert” and was known as Sir Albert Sassoon. He expanded the activities of the Sassoon Foundation in its two main markets, China and Iran . According to Cecil Roth, a Jewish biographer of Sassoon, during the thirty years of Albert’s presidency of the Sassoon Foundation, “the growth of these activities reached its peak and the name of the Sassoon Foundation reached its peak of fame.” So, Albert Sassoon needed AGENTS and TRAITORS to work with him to expand its ‘trade’ elsewhere.The name of Sir Albert Sassoon is DEEPLY connected with the name of Mirza Hossein Khan Sepahsalar, Iran, the great agent of the Sassoon family, and Persian ruler, an Anglophile . The high position of Sassoon family in the structure of the British Empire naturally brought them unparalleled political power, to the point that it made them the stronghold of political figures where had tremendous influence over the British empire and other countries’ political and economic development including Iran. It is known that Sassoon was involved in bringing Mirza Hussein Khan Sepahsalar to the throne in Iran (1871), an AGENT of Sassoon and thus a servant of the British empire. We have the same situation with American empire that have a lot of influence to put their puppets in the position of power to direct a country’s economic and political developments to protect American’s interests and rob the resources of that country. What had happened in British empire is happening with the American empire today with minor differences due to technology advancement.
    If the gullible people think British empire was a benevolent empire, then it is only themselves to blame. According to Iranian history, Mirza Hussain Khan sepahsalar returned to Iran after a three-year mission in Mumbai with a fortune of over 150,000 rupees. He tried to fool people that he had won this large amount of money by “betting on horses”. But there was no doubt that the money was made by giving his services to the British empire . Sepahsalar’s three-year mission in Mumbai, although a turning point in his ties with the British-Indian Jewish oligarchy, was not the end of the road. They were aware of the weakness of Iran and its corrupt rulers, Qajar, compared to the European countries, and they hoped that the Shah and his entourage would open their eyes to the situation in France and feel the need to reform and modernize the old political and economic system of the country. Britain, as an industrial power of the time and one of the main sources of capital in the world, had a special attraction for Mushir al-Dawla (sepahsalar) and some other advisers to the Shah. They believed that the financial and economic participation of the British in Iran would have the benefit of protecting Iran from the threat of the Russians. One of the area of economic participation was opium where benefited Sassoon (British empire) and its agents in Iran and left famine for the local population.Sepahsalar, pro British school, believed that British friendship and support were necessary to maintain Iran’s ‘independence’ from Russian expansionism. We know now that was BULLSHIT, in fact this was the road to dependency, corruption and famine.
    Of coursed, the pro British writers, painted Sepasalar, who was a pro British influence, as ‘patriot’. All these phony writers of the empire do nothing but LIES to keep the gullible people on board. But, those who viewed the situation more critically, disagreed.
    We know that Sepahsalar encouraged Nasser al-Din Shah’s travels to England, and it was during these travels that met Rothschild and his brothers.The Sassons also had a special place as the closest friends of the British Crown Prince. And it was 8 months after the beginning of the Sepahsalar presidency, that the famous concession given to Jewish Reuters, which actually meant the sale of the land of Iran, was concluded. It did not end there, and when the Reuter’s concession failed, the railway of Iran was renewed, this time with the hand of Lord Rothschild and with the mediation of Lord Endolf Churchill, then the Minister of India, and the father of Winston Churchill, Later, the Jewish Oligarch won more concessions from their agents in power in Iran.As far as concession is concerned, a valuable concession was now granted to Reuters for banking operations and mining operations, which led to the establishment of the Imperial Bank of Iran with the participation of Sassoon and its partners, all were thieves.
    To make the story short, the use of Opium was negligible before 1850s in Iran, and it started to rise after this date due to profitability of opium. The opium trade was developed and advanced by the Sassoon family under full protection of British empire for CASH. They did not give a damn about the consequences of this drug on people’s health, let millions die, but the empire prohibited the use of it in Britain. Both British empire and Sassoon Jewish oligarch knew what they were doing. Sassoon fired anyone who was working for its company, as soon as they found out they were addicted to opium.

    • Replies: @Malla
    @jami

    I am not denying the Jewish Sasson family influence in Opium Trade, but you are not giving full picture. Also Opium cannot be blamed alone for those famines, there was speculation and greed of Iranian authorities, merchants, religious clergy etc...

    Also you claimed that Iran had a famine in 1877 and thus could not give grain to starving South Indians which led to the death of millions. But there was no famine in Iran in that year, I checked, it was a lie you said, some cheap excuse.

  • jami says:
    @Malla
    @jami


    This policy let to food shortages and famine which let to many deaths in India, China, Iran and Afghanistan led by British influence in Opium trade.
     
    More bullshit, a theory put by British diplomats. British observers who were present in Iran during the famine in various capacities had made their opinion clear that the expansion of opium cultivation at the expense of cereal cultivation caused the shortage of food during the drought years of 1870-1872. However, already in the late 1970s, Iranian scholars like Nasser Pakdaman and Vahid Nowshiravani expressed their reservations about this too-easy a connection, pointing out that simple common-sense observation of the nature of poppy cultivation does not go hand in hand with an argument that it significantly replaced grain cultivation. Nasser Pakdaman, "Preface - a Special Issue on the Economic and Social History of Iran in the Nineteenth Century," Iranian Studies 16, no. 3/4 (1983); Vahid Nowshirvani, "The Beginning of Commercialized Agriculture in Iran," in The Islamic Middle East 700-1900: Studies in Economic and Social History, ed. A. L. Udovitch (Princeton, NJ: Darwin Press, 1981). Quoted in Mahdavi, For God, Mammon, and Country, 61.

    A more detailed work by Shoko Okazaki (Okazaki, "The Great Persian Famine," 186-89.) has shown that the expansion of opium cultivation did not affect grain production in Iran, which remained the main agricultural product in the country. Okazaki convincingly demonstrates that the acreage necessary for the production of the annual amount of opium reported before and after the 1870s was in fact relatively small and thus the expansion of opium production cannot be blamed for the lack of grain in the market during the famine. The drought of 1869-1871 was the initial cause for the disturbance in the supply of grain, but Okazaki effectively presents direct and indirect evidence which proves that there was no real shortage of grain in Iran at the time and that the famine was caused by the greed of various Iranian merchants, landowners, senior bureaucrats and religious officials who engaged in hoarding and market manipulation, taking advantage of the situation to amass an enormous fortune, even at the price of watching their fellow subjects starve to death. In addition, he points his finger at the Turkish Qajar central government and at least some provincial governors who were particularly ineffective in preventing the situation from developing in the first place and displayed a disturbingly disaffection towards the suffering of the people.
    It is important to remember the direct involvement of some bureaucrats and clerics in the market manipulations that brought about the famine. In a recent article about the rise and fall of the merchant councils (majalis-i wukala-yi tujjar) in 1884-85, Gad Gilbar recounts the vast business interests of Zill al-Sultan, the governor of Isfahan and several other southern provinces,106 the same Zill al-Sultan who ordered in 1880 to sow one jarib of cereal for every four jarib of opium as a preventive measure against future famines. Zill al-Sultan himself was involved in hoarding, profiteering and other manipulations during the famine, and therefore this order was as an attempt to distract public opinion from the real causes of the famine and thus he palmed the blame on the opium industry. For many Iranian peasants, the success of the opium industry brought a stable source of income on which they could count from year to year.

    In India, opium causing famines was impossible as the opium crop was grown after the harvest cycle of foodcrops was over, only then did the British Indian Government issue opium licenses which were greedily lapped up and fought over by Indian peasants. India tends to have two to three crops a year (Rabi, Kharif) per acreage.

    Replies: @jami

    The comment has entirely been copied and pasted here from PAGE 63 of the following link:

    https://repository.upenn.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1845&context=edissertations

    We were talking about Opium war in China and the criminal act of the British imperialism on destruction of china who had CONTROL over the trade using Sassoon family and its agents in many countries including India, Iran, Afghanistan and China.

    British empire’s policy is similar to American empire in other country. Invasion and destruction to gain profits to expand its influence to bring cash to develop itself. Both have caused destruction to many countries in the region.

    British Slavery trade and opium trade caused millions to die. This is the way these people ‘develop’ their countries, on expense of others. Today, India still is a colony.

    • Thanks: showmethereal
  • jami says:

    This is another source for the role of the Jewish mafia in the “opium trade’ in the evil British empire:

    [No, you know, I don’t think so. When you talk to the families now, they’ll say, “We didn’t know it was that bad.” They knew it was bad. The Sassoons had to dismiss some of their Chinese employees because they were addicted to opium. Many of the Jewish families fought tooth and nail against banning opium. Opium was legal and used for medicinal purposes. Like people who sell cigarettes and alcohol, their feeling was that they were filling a need. They also looked upon the Chinese as being different from Westerners. They felt that the Chinese weren’t like us, so selling opium to the Chinese was seen as something that could be done. So there is a moral reckoning for selling this drug, even though the consequences for China were catastrophic. The Kadoories did not deal in opium, and are quite proud of that today; they are sensitive to how the Chinese will, even today, bring up the topic of opium sales.]

    This was posted in ‘forward’.

    https://forward.com/culture/442250/when-jews-were-kings-and-opium-lords-in-shanghai/

    When one reads these bullshits, then remember the zionist SACKLER family who collected billions of dollars selling OPIOD. Many lost their lives.

  • jami says:
    @Malla
    @jami

    In his book Amir Kabir va-Iran, Fereydoun Adamiyat argues that already during Amir Kabir’s reign as the chief Minister of Nasr al-Din Shah (1848-1851), experimental cultivation of opium poppies took place in the outskirts of Tehran. Isfahan-based merchant Aqa Mohammad-Reza Arbab al-Esfahani as being among the first Iranian merchant-landowner who learned the business of opium in India and brought it to Iran. Arbab went to Bombay in the early 1850s, where he learned new methods of opium production and new kinds of financial arrangements for the opium business from Parsis, after returning to Isfahan in 1856-57, he introduced both there and in other provinces. In the beginning of the 1880s, together with other Isfahani merchants, Mohammad-Reza Arbab al-Esfahani established the Kompani-e Teryake Esfahan for opium refining and exporting. This company was then one of the largest business concerns in Isfahan. Mehdi Bamdad writes in his historical biographical collection that in the early 1850s, Mirza Hussein Khan Sepahsalar, who later became Mushir-e Dowleh, another well-known chief Minister of Nasr al-Din Shah, was First Consul of Iran in Bombay. Bamdad claims that it was Mirza Hussein Khan who communicated to Amir Kabir the potential profits to be gained from the export of opium to China and suggested that this industry be developed in Iran.

    During the early 1850s Iranian merchants complained about a ban employed by the British authorities in Bombay not only on the importation of Iranian opium into Bombay, but also on its reexportation through the port. The British did not want Iranian Opium competing with Indian Opium. However the powerful Bagdadi Jewish Sasson family made a deal with Mushir-e Dowleh received a fantastic amount of 150,000 British Indian Rupees by the Bagdadi Jewish Sassoon Company for getting large control on Iranian export of Opium in exchange of "putting pressure" on the British Indian Government for lifting the British ban over the re-exportation of Iranian opium through Bombay. The Sassoons trade empire was established on the enormous profits they made from trading in Malwa opium BTW, which was outside British control and controlled by independent Indian kingdoms.

    The economic success of such notable Indian Parsi merchants like Jamsetjee Jejeebhoy and Jamsetjee Tata stem from their ability to create financial contracts with peasants in the Malwa states and not because they directly controlled fields where poppy was cultivated.Financial arrangements like purchasing entire crops in advance, giving loans for seeds with future crops as a guarantee were indeed a novelty adopted in Iran. In addition, the establishment of local workshops where large amounts of raw opium were processed was another Indian innovation that found its way to Iran. Arbab and other Iranian merchants really learned in Bombay was that even with the high pass duty imposed by the British Government of India on the export of Malwa opium (outside direct British control) from the Bombay port, there was still a handsome margin of profit left for the merchants. In conclusion they must have realized that shipping opium from Iran - where customs on opium were no way near their levels in India - could result with enormous profits in the Chinese market.

    Replies: @nokangaroos, @jami

    The following document, that YOU coppied from and pasted here, is written by a Jewish Israeli researcher by the name of Ram Baruch Regavim from University of Pennsylvania, in 231 pages This is his email in case anyone is interested: [email protected]

    The Most Sovereign of Masters: The History of Masters: The History of Opium in Modern Iran, 1850-1955
    https://repository.upenn.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1845&context=edissertations

    [MORE]

    The following text and other texts in other comments by YOU have been copied and pasted here from the above document, line by line without any interpretation. for example the following comment is taken from CHAPTER 2, page 39 of this document:
    [[In his book Amir Kabir va-Iran, Fereydoun Adamiyat argues that already during Amir Kabir’s reign as the chief Minister of Nasr al-Din Shah (1848-1851), experimental cultivation of opium poppies took place in the outskirts of Tehran. Isfahan-based merchant Aqa Mohammad-Reza Arbab al-Esfahani as being among the first Iranian merchant-landowner who learned the business of opium in India and brought it to Iran…..]]

    This document is written by a Jewish researcher to discredit the work of an independent Iranian historian by the name of Abdullah Shahbazi, who has written many books and articles about the influence of the Jewish oligarch on British empire and their destructive role in Iran. Shahbazi has many books where his 5 volume books tiled :
    ‘Jewish and Parsi Plutocrats: British Imperialism and Iran (1999-2004)’ is known to many.
    By “Parsi” Shahbazi means the wealthy Parsi (Zoroastrian) families of Bombay and western India during the 19th and 20th centuries. The ‘parsi’ claim that they are originally from Persia where left that empire after invasion of Arabs. Parsis are embedded in the British empire and have close ties with the Zionist Jews including Sassoon and Rothschild.
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abdollah_Shahbazi
    I bring Abdullah Shahbazi’s response to Fereydoun Adamiyat, a PRO WEST Iranian historian (1920-2008). Adamiyat never exposed the role of the Jewish Oligarch in Opium trade. I think it was not his concern, although did not view the role of this group in a good light. Besides, not much sources were available in early and mid 20th century.
    Fereydoun Adamiyat wrote:
    “There was very small poppy production during the Savavid era, but nothing close to the era of the Opium production in the second part of the 19th century. in Iran, he believed that the poppy production in Iran was not significant. He wrote that: Poppy cultivation was not common until the middle of the 19th century, and we did not find any mention of opium smoking in the writings of foreign authors who came to Iran at that time. in 1880s opium poppy cultivation around Tehran was tested to measure its results.”
    Shahbazi said: The conclusion we draw is that the introduction to the development of opium began at this time. And this is Shahbazi’s response to Adamiyat:
    Adamiyat thinks opium poppy started in 1880s and calls it only an “introduction to the development of opium poppy” and “experimental”, but a few pages later forgets the previous statement and makes it clear that the dimensions of the issue are wider than this year opium cultivation. Not only “Experimental” but also had an “export” aspect:
    in the previous period, we knew that with the increase of poppy cultivation, Iranian opium became exported in 1881. The Indian government prevented it from entering, arguing that the export of opium to India was prohibited, and that Iranian opium had not been exported to the market before. But the Iranian authorities considered the ban on the import of Iranian products completely unjustified and demanded its removal.
    In short, Shale advocated opening the door to Iranian opium exports to Mumbai and from there to China by corresponding with the government of Palmerston, then Secretary of State in the Liberal Party, pretending that if this ban was not lifted, Amir Kabir would retaliate preventing “British and Indian goods” from entering Iran. So this ban was lifted.
    It became clear from the explanations of Adamiyat that:
    1- Before the year 1850 . Opium did not matter in Iran.
    2. Before this date, opium addiction as a social phenomenon was not significant.
    3- Opium cultivation was established extensively with the aim of exporting it to China in the above year, and ten years later, opium addiction became a social phenomenon in Iran.
    4. The government of the (Liberal) party in England and its subordinate government in India did not initially agree to export Iranian opium to China, but lifted the ban due to pressure. Shale correspondence and positions in favor of Iran’s opium export played an important role in this change of procedure.
    Adamiyat, a pro WEST historian, however, said by Shahbazi, “was ready to mention ONLY the destination of this opium trade (Mumbai and then China) and omits two main points:
    “First, that the cause of the emergence of this phenomenon in the Iranian economy was the Sassoon company based in Mumbai;
    And Second, that Mirza Hussain Khan (Sepahsalar) was the broker of this transaction.
    “Even the above article brings other point of views, that you DID NOT copy: page 66 of this document says:
    [[Several famines took place in India in the 1860s and 1870s: One broke out in
    Orissa in 1866, another one in 1869 in Rajputana and yet another one in Bihar in 1873-
    74. The mortality in those three famines reached 2.5 million people. Worse yet was the
    great famine of 1876-1878 which covered almost all of South India in which between 6-
    10 million people perished.
    The question of famine was debated and the issue at the time was used by the anti-imperialists of the period as a political tool against the British government and its colonialist policy. Blaming opium for the famine in Iran could have been masqueraded criticism of the British administration of India and the enormous profits it made from opium there. Another possibility is that linking the famine to poppy cultivation in Iran was an attempt to divert the attention from the fact that grain continued to be exported out of Iran by British merchants even in the midst of the famine, thus contributing to the severity of the famine, and only local riots forced a release of this grain from storage at a fair price.105 There is of course no one British position on the questions of opium and imperialism, yet blaming opium production for the famine in Iran appears to be serving the interests of more than one side of that debate.]]
    The author of this document, Ram Baruch Regavim, who, like YOU, is pro British empire, is a Jewish pro colonists, is trying to push he reason behind the famine under the rug to exonerate the Evil British empire. He writes: “There is, of course, NO one British position on the question of Opium and imperialism”.
    Of course, as long as the Zionist jews and deniers of the British imperialism are concerned, they are giving us nothing but LIES and DECEPTION to hide the role of British empire and its influential agents, the Jewish Oligarch, then it is difficult to expose the role of Jewish mafia in the empire.
    The author claims, in 2012, that: the influence of the Sassoon family is NOT known yet, and Israel is trying to catalog Sassoon’s file.
    The author, Ram Baruch Regavim, goes on attacking Shahbazi: page 41
    [[More importantly, the prohibitive pass duty policy continued way into the late
    1880s and was certainly not removed by the alleged efforts of Mirza Hussein Khan
    Sepahsalar, as Shahbazi claims. Moreover, Shahbazi’s claims about the role of the
    Sassoon family in this affair make no sense at all. Indeed by the late 1860s the Sassoons
    did develop and expand their investments in Iran, including wholesale purchases of
    opium, but in the early 1850s the Sassoons were still struggling to gain power within the
    context of the Bombay trade community. The Sassoons trade empire was established on
    the enormous profits they made from trading in Malwa opium, thus the protectionist pass
    duty enacted by the Government of Bombay was acting in their favor, and they stood to
    gain nothing from it being cancelled.55 Moreover, although the Sassoon family wrote
    many letters requesting a reduction of the pass duty for Malwa opium in Bombay, letters
    extant in the archives of the British Government of India, not a single reference points to
    their alleged wish for the reduction of the prohibitive pass duty for non-Indian opium
    arriving by sea at Bombay.]]
    And on page 42, the author is telling us that wait until Israel finishes cataloging Sassoon’s business activity in the Opium trade’, then judge. He writes: Page 42
    [[Shahbazi’s conspiracy theories rely to some extent on the regretful lack of reliable sources about the Sassoon family. However, in recent years, the Sassoon papers, deposited in the Jewish National & University Library of Israel, are under a process of cataloging which will hopefully lead to a more serious research of this highly influential family in the future.]]
    And after ‘more serious research’ the Jewish mafia is circulating the following information in the zionist media to feed the public with good will of the “Jewish kings” in the Opium Trade.

    https://www.haaretz.com/middle-east-news/.premium.MAGAZINE-the-rival-iraqi-jewish-clans-who-changed-the-face-of-shanghai-1.8999365

    • Replies: @Malla
    @jami


    Jewish pro colonists, is trying to push he reason behind the famine under the rug to exonerate the Evil British empire. He writes: “There is, of course, NO one British position on the question of Opium and imperialism”.
     
    Bullshit, he referenced, Okazaki, “The Great Persian Famine, Famines have been taking place in persia much before Opium.

    Famines have been reported throughout Persian history by numerous authors and observers. According to a compilation made by Charles Melville, they occurred in Khorasan in 115/733 AD (Melville, p. 130), in Sīstān in 220/835 AD (Melville, p. 130), in Khorasan and Sīstān in 400/1009-10 AD (Melville, p. 136), in Khorasan in 1099 AD (Melville, p. 136), in Kermān in 576/1180 AD and 662/1264 AD (Melville, p. 130), in Fārs in 683-85/1284-66 AD and 698/1299 AD (Melville, p. 130), in Yazd in 858/1454 AD (Melville, p. 130), and throughout Persia in 1870-72 AD (Melville p. 130), 1929-30 AD (Melville, p. 138), and 1948-49 AD (Melville, pp. 138-39). To these should be added the years 735/1335 AD sqq. (Aubin, pp.131-32), 1226/1811 AD (Morier, I, p. 170), 1232/1817 AD (Johnson, I, pp.195-97), 1277/1861 AD (Brugsch, II, pp. 307, 364-65 and passim), 1296/1879 AD(Wilson) and “the beginning of the 20th century” (Malcolm, pp. 233, 235-36). However, this enumeration probably remains very incomplete as more or less recurrent episodes of famine have plagued various parts of Persia until the middle of the 20th century. “Hardly a year passes in which there is not a famine in some province of Persia,” wrote a European observer in the beginning of the 20th century (Chirol, p. 97). These famines have had spectacular and terrifying aspects: people eating weeds (Morier, I, p. 170, near Persepolis; Bellew, pp. 427, 432) or unearthing roots (between Isfahan and Kāšān; Morier, I, pp. 195, 197); multitudes of beggars and skeletons roaming the city and village streets (Brittlebank, pp. 95-8, 137, 141; Bellew, pp. 333, 339-40, 412, 429, 433, 435, 448); corpses not buried, devoured by dogs, on the roads, in villages and even cities (Brittlebank, pp. 169, 180, 191; Bellew, pp. 396, 432; Bassett, p. 72); skeletons and bones abandoned in villages (Bassett, p. 127); or on the roads (Bellew, pp. 354, 421; to such an extent that this traveler, a British physician with an interest in anthropology, picked up a skeleton completely stripped of flesh and intact), or still scattered in vineyards, where people had died of exhaustion eating vine leaves (Bellew, pp. 434-45); graves hurriedly dug on the side of roads (Bellew, p. 342); fresh cemeteries marked out at the gate of cities (Bellew, p. 437; in Kermānšāh); even reports of cannibalism, mentioned in the 14th century C.E. in Azerbaijan (Aubin, pp. 131-32 with sources; Āmolī, ed. Ḵalīlī, p. 138; ed. Sotūda, p. 204; Ebn Bazzāz, p. 305), and also in Mašhad, in 1871, where parents are reported to have eaten their own children (Smith, p. 361).

    Causes. The territories of Persia and Afghanistan comprise vast, desertic or semi-desertic, regions where the natural variation in precipitation is considerable (see BĀRĀN). Rain water agriculture, which provides an important part of the food resources, is thus especially vulnerable. Drought is obviously the most frequent cause of famine, as was the case in several of the famines mentioned by Melville (p. 130). Unusually rigorous winters on the high Iranian plateau can have the same effects as happened in Khorasan, Sīstān, and the central plateau in 400/1009-10; Khorasan in 492/1099; and Isfahan in 1929-30 (Melville, pp. 136, 138). Both factors can also combine, with the succession of a dry summer by a harsh winter especially to be feared, as in the great famine of 1869-72 or Sīstān in 1949-50 (Melville, pp. 147-48). Other natural, more episodic, causes have been reported, such as the locust invasion of 1890 in Qara Dāḡ (Wilson, p. 168).

    Equally as much can be attributed, however, to human causes (Gilbar, p. 135), which have been aggravating factors to climatic disasters. Changes in the modes of culture, such as the preference given to the opium poppy over cereals, could have had some effect (Wilson, p. 168, for 1879). Neglect in the development and maintenance of the irrigation system during periods of weak administrations has certainly played a role. Above all, the absence of, or great difficulty with, transportation until the middle of the 20th century, has been a determining factor. Speculation by merchants, large land owners, and even government officials and members of the clergy, who did not hesitate to monopolize grain, should also be blamed. Toward the end of the 19th century the governor of Tehran and several high ranking members of the court had thus caused an increase in the price of bread by provoking an artificial shortage. It was only when the supply of the Cossack Brigade was affected that its leader, general Kosogowsky, ordered the barriers that had been raised around the capital to prevent the arrival of grain torn down (Chirol, p. 97).

    Replies: @jami

  • @jami
    @d dan

    [[Opium was declared illegal by several Chinese Emperors’ decrees before Opium Wars. The British ignored them and actively tried to bypass the ban.]]


    You are right. The British government FORCED China to consume more Opium to receive SILVER to maintain its colony in India. China, before the opium trade, where British government and Jewish mafia, Sasson and Rothschild, turned it into a lucrative Business, used LITTLE or no opium until its use was forced upon Chinese people in huge quantities by the British Government and its agents in India and elsewhere. Iran also did not use much opium before the entry of the Opium by the Evil empire and its agent, Sassoon.
    in 1829, The Sassoon family left Iraq for Iran to settle in Bushehr which was an important commercial port to sent goods to other places in the region. The family was in Bushehr almost five years, where Sassoon imported commercial goods from Mumbai to Iran, and finally in 1833 fully settled in Mumbai. This migration took place during the heyday of Iran-India trade and the heyday of the British East India Company and other Western companies in Mumbai. Global opium trade was at its beginning and at its peak of profitability.
    In 1832, with the capital of the Rothschild and other British Jewish royal families and their Anglo-Scottish partners established a Company in the port of Canton and became the "giant" of the world opium trade. It was not only the lords of London and their native traders and partners in India and Chinese ports who, on the basis of this trade, established a new class in India and the Far East, and this class has since dominated the Asian economy and politics to control the southeast, but big business in the US port of Boston has also turned to opium trade with China. Big American companies like Perkins, Forbes and Russell made huge profits. The vast wealth of the world opium trade laid the foundation for the emergence of a powerful class in the United States known as the Boston oligarchy.
    On the other hand, The Baghdadi Jewish family, Sassoon family, quickly joined the wave, establishing the Sassoon financial empire in the 1830s . Until then, Indian opium was monopolized by the British and Turkish opium was monopolized by the Americans. The Sassoon family, in collaboration with the rulers of India, made Iran their sphere of activity.

    The Sassoon, in collaboration with their agent in Persia, Hossein Sepahsalar, began their opium activity in 1870s. With the rise of Hossein Sepahsalar power, the widespread cultivation of opium began in Iran and because British made the opium a lucrative trade, then many countries in the world came into the competition to collect profits from opium. Thus, the people in the position of power kept the best land to cultivate opium instead of crops to raise CASH to pay for the imparted goods. This policy let to food shortages and famine which let to many deaths in India, China, Iran and Afghanistan led by British influence in Opium trade.
    Chinese were self sufficient in many areas, had to accept British dictate since they did not have many WMD that could destroy the enemy. The British empire would not give silver to Chinese, but Opium. Then, forcing TREATIES on Chinese's throat, Britain FORCED China into slavery, demanding millions of pounds for damages, and separating their land from them to be used for British interest to make money, Thailand, all through illegal treaties. There is NO difference between what the Evil US empire is doing today with the evil British empire did in the 19th century to Asians and Africans.
    The growing and sale of Indian opium was a British Government monopoly, which poured a golden stream of profits into the British Treasury. The British agents foresaw even greater profits if the defenseless Chinese were made to absorb more Indian opium. The Chinese Government, fully realizing the degenerative qualities of this drug, bitterly protested. It attempted to bar its importation, sale and use.The British ignored the BAN, whereupon the Chinese Government, in desperation, seized large quantities of British opium stored in Canton warehouses. Promptly Britain's Royal Navy went into action and the Opium War was on.There was no declaration of war by the British Government. There was no official explanation given to the public, other than that the Chinese bad flaunted the British prestige, property and flag "Dictating the Treaty of Nanking, 1842, closing the Opium War, Great Britain compelled the Chinese to pay an indemnity of $21,000,000, of which $6,000,000 was reimbursement for the destroyed opium by the Chinese people when the British insisted on forcing it into China against the latter's will. The Chinese were made to pay for the war, but the illicit imports of the deadly weed continued to flow, to the moral and physical decay of millions of Chinese, and to the great financial profit of the British Government and the Jewish Royal family.
    This war nauseated most historians, including British men of letters. Justin McCarthy declared: 'Reduced to plain words, the principle for which we fought in the China War
    was the right of Great Britain to force a peculiar trade upon a foreign people, in spite of the protestations of the Government, and all such public opinion as there was, of the nation.'

    Many American traders had a profitable role in the opium traffic. A group of American merchants formally petitioned Congress to assist Great Britain, France and Holland with a naval demonstration. This was probably the first time that a formal request
    for military co-operation by the United States with Great Britain and other Western powers was proposed to achieve what was camouflaged as a common Far East project where they view as 'opening of China' meaning opening the Chinese MARKET to the thieves for lucrative profits, but China did not have the same advantages.
    Through these illegal acts, trade in Shanghai and other Chinese ports obtained by the Europeans and Americans. The first Opium War led to more wars. In 1857-58, Great Britain was again one of the belligerents. This time Britain was assisted by France. This war is known as the Second Opium War. And, once again, as in the first Opium War, there grew up a persistent drive in the United States and in Britain to involve America to join Britain and France in military operation. The British empire, before the Opium trade, was heavily involved in lucrative SLAVE trade. As the Guardian wrote:

    "The history of British slavery has been buried. The thousands of British families who grew rich on the slave trade, or from the sale of slave-produced sugar, in the 17th and 18th centuries, brushed those uncomfortable chapters of their dynastic stories under the carpet."

    Replies: @jami, @Malla, @Malla, @Malla, @Malla

    I am sorry for the mistake I made. There should be Hong Kong, not Thailand:

    [..and separating their land from them to be used for British interest to make money, Hong Kong, all through illegal treaties. ]

  • jami says:
    @d dan
    @Malla


    "The Opium war was because the Chinese Emperor threw European/Indian opium in the sea without any warning,"
     
    100% lies. Opium was declared illegal by several Chinese Emperors' decrees before Opium Wars. The British ignored them and actively tried to bypass the ban. And even assume your lies are correct (they aren't) - that Chinese Emperor unilaterally destroyed British opium without warning - did it justify to send war ships halfway around the world, start multiple wars, bomb cities, destroy cultural sites, steal treasures and kill Chinese ?

    I am not interested to reply to the tons of BS from a certified house nigger for the West and now, official Japanese bootlicker.

    Replies: @Malla, @jami

    [[Opium was declared illegal by several Chinese Emperors’ decrees before Opium Wars. The British ignored them and actively tried to bypass the ban.]]

    You are right. The British government FORCED China to consume more Opium to receive SILVER to maintain its colony in India. China, before the opium trade, where British government and Jewish mafia, Sasson and Rothschild, turned it into a lucrative Business, used LITTLE or no opium until its use was forced upon Chinese people in huge quantities by the British Government and its agents in India and elsewhere. Iran also did not use much opium before the entry of the Opium by the Evil empire and its agent, Sassoon.

    [MORE]

    in 1829, The Sassoon family left Iraq for Iran to settle in Bushehr which was an important commercial port to sent goods to other places in the region. The family was in Bushehr almost five years, where Sassoon imported commercial goods from Mumbai to Iran, and finally in 1833 fully settled in Mumbai. This migration took place during the heyday of Iran-India trade and the heyday of the British East India Company and other Western companies in Mumbai. Global opium trade was at its beginning and at its peak of profitability.
    In 1832, with the capital of the Rothschild and other British Jewish royal families and their Anglo-Scottish partners established a Company in the port of Canton and became the “giant” of the world opium trade. It was not only the lords of London and their native traders and partners in India and Chinese ports who, on the basis of this trade, established a new class in India and the Far East, and this class has since dominated the Asian economy and politics to control the southeast, but big business in the US port of Boston has also turned to opium trade with China. Big American companies like Perkins, Forbes and Russell made huge profits. The vast wealth of the world opium trade laid the foundation for the emergence of a powerful class in the United States known as the Boston oligarchy.
    On the other hand, The Baghdadi Jewish family, Sassoon family, quickly joined the wave, establishing the Sassoon financial empire in the 1830s . Until then, Indian opium was monopolized by the British and Turkish opium was monopolized by the Americans. The Sassoon family, in collaboration with the rulers of India, made Iran their sphere of activity.

    The Sassoon, in collaboration with their agent in Persia, Hossein Sepahsalar, began their opium activity in 1870s. With the rise of Hossein Sepahsalar power, the widespread cultivation of opium began in Iran and because British made the opium a lucrative trade, then many countries in the world came into the competition to collect profits from opium. Thus, the people in the position of power kept the best land to cultivate opium instead of crops to raise CASH to pay for the imparted goods. This policy let to food shortages and famine which let to many deaths in India, China, Iran and Afghanistan led by British influence in Opium trade.
    Chinese were self sufficient in many areas, had to accept British dictate since they did not have many WMD that could destroy the enemy. The British empire would not give silver to Chinese, but Opium. Then, forcing TREATIES on Chinese’s throat, Britain FORCED China into slavery, demanding millions of pounds for damages, and separating their land from them to be used for British interest to make money, Thailand, all through illegal treaties. There is NO difference between what the Evil US empire is doing today with the evil British empire did in the 19th century to Asians and Africans.
    The growing and sale of Indian opium was a British Government monopoly, which poured a golden stream of profits into the British Treasury. The British agents foresaw even greater profits if the defenseless Chinese were made to absorb more Indian opium. The Chinese Government, fully realizing the degenerative qualities of this drug, bitterly protested. It attempted to bar its importation, sale and use.The British ignored the BAN, whereupon the Chinese Government, in desperation, seized large quantities of British opium stored in Canton warehouses. Promptly Britain’s Royal Navy went into action and the Opium War was on.There was no declaration of war by the British Government. There was no official explanation given to the public, other than that the Chinese bad flaunted the British prestige, property and flag “Dictating the Treaty of Nanking, 1842, closing the Opium War, Great Britain compelled the Chinese to pay an indemnity of $21,000,000, of which $6,000,000 was reimbursement for the destroyed opium by the Chinese people when the British insisted on forcing it into China against the latter’s will. The Chinese were made to pay for the war, but the illicit imports of the deadly weed continued to flow, to the moral and physical decay of millions of Chinese, and to the great financial profit of the British Government and the Jewish Royal family.
    This war nauseated most historians, including British men of letters. Justin McCarthy declared: ‘Reduced to plain words, the principle for which we fought in the China War
    was the right of Great Britain to force a peculiar trade upon a foreign people, in spite of the protestations of the Government, and all such public opinion as there was, of the nation.’

    Many American traders had a profitable role in the opium traffic. A group of American merchants formally petitioned Congress to assist Great Britain, France and Holland with a naval demonstration. This was probably the first time that a formal request
    for military co-operation by the United States with Great Britain and other Western powers was proposed to achieve what was camouflaged as a common Far East project where they view as ‘opening of China’ meaning opening the Chinese MARKET to the thieves for lucrative profits, but China did not have the same advantages.
    Through these illegal acts, trade in Shanghai and other Chinese ports obtained by the Europeans and Americans. The first Opium War led to more wars. In 1857-58, Great Britain was again one of the belligerents. This time Britain was assisted by France. This war is known as the Second Opium War. And, once again, as in the first Opium War, there grew up a persistent drive in the United States and in Britain to involve America to join Britain and France in military operation. The British empire, before the Opium trade, was heavily involved in lucrative SLAVE trade. As the Guardian wrote:

    “The history of British slavery has been buried. The thousands of British families who grew rich on the slave trade, or from the sale of slave-produced sugar, in the 17th and 18th centuries, brushed those uncomfortable chapters of their dynastic stories under the carpet.”

    • Replies: @jami
    @jami

    I am sorry for the mistake I made. There should be Hong Kong, not Thailand:


    [..and separating their land from them to be used for British interest to make money, Hong Kong, all through illegal treaties. ]

    , @Malla
    @jami

    This jami is a lying filthy worm. he is hiding the fact that the Iranians were some of the biggest suppliers of opium to China and it were started by Iranian merchants. And many Iranian farmers and merchants made more money out of it. The Opium wars benefited Iran the most, not India. Iranian opium quality had overtaken Indian opium and was cheaper in price.

    Given the lack of modern industry or even the conditions to develop one, Iran was encouraged to expand its cultivation of cash crops which resulted in the rapid growth in the cultivation of commodities such as cotton, opium, tobacco and dried fruits during the second half of the 19th century. Parallel to these developments, since 1864, Iran’s existing cash crop, silk, took a major blow, as the silkworm population was decimated by the Pebrine disease that struck the growing areas in Gilan. This decline probably gave an incentive and further provoked a sense of urgency to develop other cash crops that would compensate for the losses of the silk.
    At the same time, Iran in the 1800s suffered from some impairing structural problems. First among them was the growing economic burden of the pensions to the unproductive sectors of the Iranian elite, particularly the courtiers. The government’s role in nurturing the turn to cash crops, and to opium cultivation in particular, was more important than most historians give it credit. However, the growing flow of income during the 1860s and the 1870s increased the government’s appetite for expenses beyond what the inefficient taxation system of Iran was able to provide. Furthermore, the outdated system of land-ownership imposed another burden on Iran’s economy. Different forms of land-ownership existed in Iran, but the uncertainty of ownership became the common denominator among them. Tuyul lands, for example, the most recognizable form of land-tenure in Iran, were to be reverted to the crown in case the grantee died or if the Shah could simply appoint a different person to manage a tuyul plot. In reality, though, many tuyul owners could turn their tuyuls into
    hereditary private property. Great variation in taxation upon lands existed depending upon three factors: location; the specific relation of the grantee to the Shah; or simply the ability to collect taxes in a given area. This erratic system brought about abuse of the system for landowners tended to mistreat lands and the peasants under their control out of fear that their tuyul might be taken from them and passed onto another person. Among the various cash crops of Iran, opium-poppy cultivation was particularly suitable for cultivation given the economic and social conditions that prevailed in the country during the 19th century. Various methods of producing opium from the pods of the poppy-flower existed in Iran since antiquity and well into the early 18th century.

    The climatic conditions in Iran, particularly in the southern regions, are ideal for the cultivation of poppies that thrive in areas where wet periods are followed by long dry periods. Poppies in Iran were usually sown around March, by the end of the wet season, and the opium was collected from the mature pods around May. In fact, some areas in eastern Iran could have up to three opium seasons. Normally british mills used Americna cotton and avoided Indian cototn but due to the US Civil war, as there was a shortage of American cotton, Indian cotton came in high demand and many Indian merchants made a lot of money. A sharp increase in the cultivation of cotton at the expense of poppy cultivation occurred in India during the cotton famine of the early 1860s caused by the US Civil War (1861-1865). This shift supposedly caused a shortage of opium supply in China and created an opportunity for Iranian merchants to set a foothold in the Chinese market.

    , @Malla
    @jami

    In his book Amir Kabir va-Iran, Fereydoun Adamiyat argues that already during Amir Kabir’s reign as the chief Minister of Nasr al-Din Shah (1848-1851), experimental cultivation of opium poppies took place in the outskirts of Tehran. Isfahan-based merchant Aqa Mohammad-Reza Arbab al-Esfahani as being among the first Iranian merchant-landowner who learned the business of opium in India and brought it to Iran. Arbab went to Bombay in the early 1850s, where he learned new methods of opium production and new kinds of financial arrangements for the opium business from Parsis, after returning to Isfahan in 1856-57, he introduced both there and in other provinces. In the beginning of the 1880s, together with other Isfahani merchants, Mohammad-Reza Arbab al-Esfahani established the Kompani-e Teryake Esfahan for opium refining and exporting. This company was then one of the largest business concerns in Isfahan. Mehdi Bamdad writes in his historical biographical collection that in the early 1850s, Mirza Hussein Khan Sepahsalar, who later became Mushir-e Dowleh, another well-known chief Minister of Nasr al-Din Shah, was First Consul of Iran in Bombay. Bamdad claims that it was Mirza Hussein Khan who communicated to Amir Kabir the potential profits to be gained from the export of opium to China and suggested that this industry be developed in Iran.

    During the early 1850s Iranian merchants complained about a ban employed by the British authorities in Bombay not only on the importation of Iranian opium into Bombay, but also on its reexportation through the port. The British did not want Iranian Opium competing with Indian Opium. However the powerful Bagdadi Jewish Sasson family made a deal with Mushir-e Dowleh received a fantastic amount of 150,000 British Indian Rupees by the Bagdadi Jewish Sassoon Company for getting large control on Iranian export of Opium in exchange of "putting pressure" on the British Indian Government for lifting the British ban over the re-exportation of Iranian opium through Bombay. The Sassoons trade empire was established on the enormous profits they made from trading in Malwa opium BTW, which was outside British control and controlled by independent Indian kingdoms.

    The economic success of such notable Indian Parsi merchants like Jamsetjee Jejeebhoy and Jamsetjee Tata stem from their ability to create financial contracts with peasants in the Malwa states and not because they directly controlled fields where poppy was cultivated.Financial arrangements like purchasing entire crops in advance, giving loans for seeds with future crops as a guarantee were indeed a novelty adopted in Iran. In addition, the establishment of local workshops where large amounts of raw opium were processed was another Indian innovation that found its way to Iran. Arbab and other Iranian merchants really learned in Bombay was that even with the high pass duty imposed by the British Government of India on the export of Malwa opium (outside direct British control) from the Bombay port, there was still a handsome margin of profit left for the merchants. In conclusion they must have realized that shipping opium from Iran - where customs on opium were no way near their levels in India - could result with enormous profits in the Chinese market.

    Replies: @nokangaroos, @jami

    , @Malla
    @jami


    This policy let to food shortages and famine which let to many deaths in India, China, Iran and Afghanistan led by British influence in Opium trade.
     
    More bullshit, a theory put by British diplomats. British observers who were present in Iran during the famine in various capacities had made their opinion clear that the expansion of opium cultivation at the expense of cereal cultivation caused the shortage of food during the drought years of 1870-1872. However, already in the late 1970s, Iranian scholars like Nasser Pakdaman and Vahid Nowshiravani expressed their reservations about this too-easy a connection, pointing out that simple common-sense observation of the nature of poppy cultivation does not go hand in hand with an argument that it significantly replaced grain cultivation. Nasser Pakdaman, "Preface - a Special Issue on the Economic and Social History of Iran in the Nineteenth Century," Iranian Studies 16, no. 3/4 (1983); Vahid Nowshirvani, "The Beginning of Commercialized Agriculture in Iran," in The Islamic Middle East 700-1900: Studies in Economic and Social History, ed. A. L. Udovitch (Princeton, NJ: Darwin Press, 1981). Quoted in Mahdavi, For God, Mammon, and Country, 61.

    A more detailed work by Shoko Okazaki (Okazaki, "The Great Persian Famine," 186-89.) has shown that the expansion of opium cultivation did not affect grain production in Iran, which remained the main agricultural product in the country. Okazaki convincingly demonstrates that the acreage necessary for the production of the annual amount of opium reported before and after the 1870s was in fact relatively small and thus the expansion of opium production cannot be blamed for the lack of grain in the market during the famine. The drought of 1869-1871 was the initial cause for the disturbance in the supply of grain, but Okazaki effectively presents direct and indirect evidence which proves that there was no real shortage of grain in Iran at the time and that the famine was caused by the greed of various Iranian merchants, landowners, senior bureaucrats and religious officials who engaged in hoarding and market manipulation, taking advantage of the situation to amass an enormous fortune, even at the price of watching their fellow subjects starve to death. In addition, he points his finger at the Turkish Qajar central government and at least some provincial governors who were particularly ineffective in preventing the situation from developing in the first place and displayed a disturbingly disaffection towards the suffering of the people.
    It is important to remember the direct involvement of some bureaucrats and clerics in the market manipulations that brought about the famine. In a recent article about the rise and fall of the merchant councils (majalis-i wukala-yi tujjar) in 1884-85, Gad Gilbar recounts the vast business interests of Zill al-Sultan, the governor of Isfahan and several other southern provinces,106 the same Zill al-Sultan who ordered in 1880 to sow one jarib of cereal for every four jarib of opium as a preventive measure against future famines. Zill al-Sultan himself was involved in hoarding, profiteering and other manipulations during the famine, and therefore this order was as an attempt to distract public opinion from the real causes of the famine and thus he palmed the blame on the opium industry. For many Iranian peasants, the success of the opium industry brought a stable source of income on which they could count from year to year.

    In India, opium causing famines was impossible as the opium crop was grown after the harvest cycle of foodcrops was over, only then did the British Indian Government issue opium licenses which were greedily lapped up and fought over by Indian peasants. India tends to have two to three crops a year (Rabi, Kharif) per acreage.

    Replies: @jami

    , @Malla
    @jami


    the Opium War was on.
     
    And the country which benefited the most from the Opium war was actually.....Iran!!! How?
    The end of the Second Anglo-Chinese War also known as the Second Opium War (1856-1860) and the signing of the Treaties of Tienjin were an additional factor which helped the successful introduction of Iranian opium into China. Indian Merchants expected that the new treaties would ease significantly the trade of Indian opium in China. However, the forced legalization of the opium trade in China was also good news for Chinese entrepreneurs in China who began producing massive amounts of opium in the southern regions of the country, and of course for merchants who dealt in imported non-Indian opium from Iran and the Ottoman Empire.
    The British intentions behind their initiative to legalize opium in China are a complicated issue. Owen cleverly shows that Lord Elgin, who oversaw the signing of the Treaties of Tienjin which legalized opium in China, was in fact personally opposed to the opium trade and fully aware that legalization was not in the interests of the Indian opium trade. He was convinced, though, that legalization was preferable to the previous situation of a government protecting the right of merchants whose trade is a clear violation of another country’s legal code, as he argued that “Legalization is preferable to the evils attending the farce now played”.
    From, Owen, British Opium Policy in China and India, 228-29.
    The Chinese market post-1860 was flooded with opium which caused a significant price reduction. The new lower-level of opium prices was able to guarantee profit only to opium that cost significantly less to produce and transport to China. This made Iranian opium highly attractive for merchants since its production costs were lower than those of the Indian opium and, on top of that, Iran did not have the elaborate customs system of the the British Raj. The British victory in the Opium Wars destabilized the Chinese opium market and opened it for non-Indian opium who took over the market eventually, significantly reducing the profitability of producing opium in India. The end of the Second Opium War created high expectations in India that the opium trade would significantly expand and that a price increase would soon follow that expansion. However, an unexpected rise in the crop of both Patna and Malwa opium in 1861, and the beginning of local opium cultivation by Chinese entrepreneurs, kept prices in China at bay and sales at a slow pace. This had disastrous results for the Indian opium market. Advanced purchases of opium in above-market prices by local merchants in the Malwa states who borrowed money to fund those purchases, left them with cheap opium, incapable to cover their debts. Speculators in Calcutta, who contributed to the price rise in April and May 1861, found themselves in a similar state of insolvency in June 1861. The attempt of all those to quickly regain some of their losses by getting rid of their opium chests in a hurry, pushed the prices even further down.
    This affair took place at basically the same time in which, according to almost all the available sources, the sales of Iranian opium in China began to rise. Since there was no reduction in the demand for opium in China during the 1860s Iranian opium could easily be sold there, and due to its lower production and taxation cost (compared with both Patna and Malwa varieties of India opium) Iranian opium was still profitable for the merchants who dealt with it. While Indian merchants withheld their stocks of Indian opium, merchants who dealt with Iranian opium were only limited by the amounts of opium Iran could produce and export.
  • Once upon a time United States foreign policy was based on actual national interests, but that was long ago and far away before the country was beguiled into a colonial war with Spain followed by a twentieth century that was chock-a-block full of any type and intensity of warfare that one might imagine, including the...
  • jami says:

    This is to remind the ‘trump lovers’ who think this zionist servant does not want a war. He does anything for money including a war, if he can. He is a traitor and now is receiving $billions from the butcher of Saudi Arabia, MBS ‘promising’ to run again and do what the zionist colonists and Wahhabi killers want against Iran. He knows shit about history where makes it easy for him to do.
    He is a member of the Jewish mafia and thinks everyone can be bought by money. He is milking Saudi Arabian PEOPLE, of $billions of dollars through a butcher, MBS, to get more $$ to buy more REAL ESTATES.
    The neocons are NOT against Trump, as long as, is good for Israel. What has he done for the American’s interests during his dark years in office? Nothing, but serving the interest of the Jewish Mafia. Yet, gullible people think that he is against the war. He is not. If he wants a war against Iran, then he is a WARMONGER. What else can he do besides “Maximum Pressure” which was a war.
    He has already earned the tile of ASSASSIN. What is the difference between the Butcher MBS and this traitor Trump? Both are terrorists and assassins, only they have applied different methods to KILL.
    What is left for a member of Jewish mafia whose ‘maximum pressure’ policy has FAILED? There is no options left but a war. Don’t forget that economic sanction is WAR.
    If he were given a second term, he would not hesitate to do the job for the mafia and send the bill to the gullible Arabs in the ‘kingdom’ extracting $billions of dollars more. He does not loose any opportunity if he can make money even if he has to kill many people. This is a signature of the evil empires anyway, be British or American.

    • Agree: Realist
  • This is the concise story of how a suicide bombing may carry the potential to subvert the whole, ongoing, complex process of Eurasia integration. Recently, the Balochistan Liberation Movement (BLA) had released an ISIS-influenced video threatening “Chinese officials and installations” in Pakistan’s vast province. Yet what actually happened in late April was a suicide bombing...
  • jami says:
    @Malla
    @jami


    People who are interested to know about the British genocide in Iran, can read the following book by Mohammad Majd:
    ‘The Great Famine and Genocide in Persia, 1917-1919’
     
    Oh please, this third rate book written by a leftard Professor in a Western Commie University has been debunked. I have personally debunked one more third rate book by some crack pot named Davis.
    Ervand Abrahamian comments that the book by Majd includes an "exaggerated discussion" of losses during the famine, a view he shares with Mahmood Messkoub, Abbas Milani and Rudi Matthee. Abrahamian describes calling the famine a genocide as "wild accusation" and attributes the vast majority of the 2 million deaths he estimates to cholera and typhus epidemics, as well as mostly worldwide influenza pandemic. While accepting that the total death toll could be several millions, Hormoz Ebrahimnejad says Majd's figure is an overestimation.

    Irish historian Cormac Ó Gráda, discussing the difficulty of verifying the death toll of historical famines, describes the claim of genocide as "not possible to take literally": "Such claims are usually rhetorical, and sure signs of major disasters, but poor guides to actual mortality." A similar view is expressed by Alidad Mafinezam and Aria Mehrabi, who state that Majd's work suffers from serious methodological defects.

    Two major grain producing areas of Iran, namely Kermanshah–Hamadan and Azarbaijan were the battlefield between the Ottomans and the Russians, the British were not even involved.


    We hold them responsible and at the right moment will force them to pay reparation for their crimes against humanity.
     
    We 1.2 billion Indians (1/6th of humanity) hold Persia responsible for the deaths in a famine in 1877 when the Persians arrogantly refused to export food to the starving masses of India.

    https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/752481854182916137/786578346762698792/asianexports1877.PNG
    Iranians arrogantly refused to allow food to be exported to Madras in 1877 during famine which led to the death of millions, when millions of Indians desperately needed food. The Chinese bought the Vietnamese surplus, they had a larger famine themselves.
    At the right moment will force Iranians to pay reparation for their crimes against humanity.
    Thank You.

    And by the way, when will, Iran pay back India for the grand looting and theft of Indian wealth by Iranian thug Nadir Shah? 5% interest may bring up the figure to about $ 2000 trillion. Iranians looted our ancestors, need to pay back one day. And Indian Nationalists, of a 1.2 billion Indian nation will make sure, it is paid.

    Replies: @jami, @Kang

    [Ervand Abrahamian comments that the book by Majd includes an “exaggerated discussion” of losses during the famine, a view he shares with Mahmood Messkoub, Abbas Milani and Rudi Matthee.]

    You are a gullible person who knows shit about Iranian history and the Iranian agents of the western intelligence services. Ervand Abrahamian is a historian but he used to work with the ‘Iran opposition’ groups signing petition after petition against Iran when a religious person in iran FART. Of course, he stopped doing it after his realization of the goal of the west. Abrahamian is a left Trotskyite.

    However, Abbas Milani is a traitor anti Iranian, who is a CIA asset. During the Shah era, he was a Moaist, then turned against people and became part of Iranian elite giving services to the west. Then he excaped to California working with the CIA and Israel Lobby. He, along with the zionist and terrorist agents such as Irwin Cotler, Mark Dubowitz and Payam Akhavan, goes to US and Canadian parliaments begging for more sanctions against Iranian people for ‘regime change’. Only the enemy of Iranian people uses such figures to refute the facts against the evil British empire.

    How many decades did the west deny Armenian genocide for their puppet country Turkey? of course with the help of a member of the Jewish mafia figure such as Bernard Lewis? They denied the genocide for a century and still Turkish authorities do not want to accept, but the truth came out. The Iranian people will hold these British and their supporters who have benefited from the British crimes against humanity, responsible. The truth will come out soon.
    The British occupied Iran during the WWI and diverted the Iranian crops to feed the British Army, denying Iranian people access to food produced in Iran. The British army should have provided food from somewhere else not the Iranian crops, especially when they are the occupiers. When you are starved, then you are not immune to diseases.
    Dr. Majd believes that one third of the Iranian population was perished as the result of this policy, knowing that the evil British empire DENIED Dr. Majd having access to the British Archives.

    [Iranians arrogantly refused to allow food to be exported to Madras in 1877 during famine which led to the death of millions,..]

    Why do Iranian who were in the same situation, should have diverted their food stocks to Madras? The reason behind all these FAMINE, India, Iran, Afghanistan, China was the plantation of Opium, using the most fertile land extensively, because Opium was a very profitable business. The opium trade was in the hand of the Jewish Sassoon family, known as Rothschild of the East, so the British army protecting the Opium Trade with all its force.
    Only the gullible people refuse to hold British and its Opium policy responsible for the famine in these countries of the EAST.

    • Replies: @Malla
    @jami


    The reason behind all these FAMINE, India, Iran, Afghanistan, China was the plantation of Opium,
     
    How were the British behind the famine in Iran in 1870s now? Your idiotic theories make less sense as we go forward. The British did not control Iran. We never had famines in India DUE to Opium. So how did it happen in Persia? Was the Persian King, CIA agent?

    However, Abbas Milani is a traitor anti Iranian, who is a CIA asset. ....Abrahamian is a left Trotskyite.
     
    Majd lives in the West, you stupid punk, in Leftists Universities. Western leftist Universities have a history of writing bullshit about Colonialism and trying to show colonialism is bad. There was this crackpot Davies, who wrote bullshit about famines in India, all of that was debunked by me on this site, by referencing original documents. The amount of shameless lying they do is mind boggling. There are many such cases. If you write honest facts about colonialism, the good things of colonialism, you may lose your job. But if you write anti-colonial bullshit, you get promoted.

    Abrahamian is a left Trotskyite...so how is he an US agent? I thought US agents are all Capitalists.
  • jami says:
    @Malla
    @jami


    You idiot, if partition is good then whey don’t you allow Catalan, that feeds Spain, to be separated?
     
    Why only take the example of Spain as a Western country. Why not the UK, which gave the right to Scotland to seek Independence (under the fishface scumbag Salmond)? When will India give the same chance to Kashmir, Indian North East (especailly Nagaland), Khalistan/Punjab to sucede via people's will? When will Pakistan give the same chance to Balochistan, North West Frontier (Pathans) to sucede via people's will? When will Iran give the same chance to Kurshistan, Balochistan,etc..to sucede via people's will? When will Turkey give the same chance to Kurshistan to sucede via people's will? When will China give the same chance to Tibet, East Turkistan (Xinjiang), Southern Mongolia to sucede via people's will? When will Indonesia give the same chance to Western Papua (Irian Jaya), Aceh etc... to sucede via people's will? When will Myanmar give the same chance to Karens, Kachinas, Mons etc... to sucede via people's will? When will Nigeria give the same chance to Biafrans/Ibos etc... to sucede via people's will? When will Kenya give the same chance to Somalis of the North etc... to sucede via people's will?

    If partition is good, then you terrorists, why don’t you allow Quebec or Scotland to be independent.
     
    Are you nuts, Scotland was given the chance to be indpendent, the Scots rejected it. This is even when Scotland has most of the North Sea oil of the U.K.

    That’s why the bloody West and its dumb population have tried to keep these countries POOR and WEAK through wars and economic sanctions so it is easy to steal their resources.
     
    This dumb theory of West "stealing resources and keeping everybody down" was a myth created by the Warsaw Pact Commies to explain to their own people why the populations of the West, including their Working classes were so much more prosperous than those in the Warsaw Pact World. This has been admitted by KGB agent Jack Barsky. This is a continuation of the "Colonies being exploited and market for European goods" bullshit of the Marxists when hey were surprised that their crackpot prophet Marx's dumb prediction of revolution of the proletariat did not materialize in Industrialized Capitalist societies of Western Europe. The truth is, most non White colonies consumed only a tiny percentage of European goods during colonialism. Most of the trade of Britain for example was with the rest of Europe and the USA. Not only that, but British Indian industrial products was already out-competing British products in the China market. Most of Indian cotton was imported by Japan while Britain used more American cotton. So by that dumb theory, Japan was "colonising-exploiting" India, and Britain was "colonising-exploiting" the USA (in the 1800s after the American War of Independence)!!!What?? Stop with dumb theories.

    do you think Sudan is better now, after bloody partition?
     
    So you support the North Sudanese Muslims exploiting the Southern Sudanese Christian tribes? Of course you would do that. Why don't you prater you bullshit in front a big huge, Dinka dude.

    Why don’t you divide the fucking America or British territories into 50 pieces?
     
    That is what White Nationalists want, to secede from the ZOG Washington regime. Support them.

    the rest of the world is not going to support your parasitic life style in American or Britain.
     
    Parasitic lifestyle??? What? So is Japan, South Korea, Singapore, Hong Kong, Taiwan, Germany, Finland, Australia etc... all parasitic lifestyle??

    Replies: @jami

    [Why not the UK, which gave the right to Scotland to seek Independence …]

    British never give the right to Scotland to separate unless they are forced to. The reason that UK can afford to allow the process go forward is that UK knows very well that Scotland is not ready to separate, doing a lot of political work under the table to postpone the separation. The day UK realizes that has no control over the process, then the ‘Ireland method’ will be applied to Scotland. Only the fools think UK has been the most benevolent empire. They have killed millions of people, majority are Muslims. Britain, US and their dogs, Israel and Saudi Arabia, have been working to partition Iran for the benefit of the west, including the zionist mass murderers, for many decades. The last territory separated from Iran by the British was BAHRAIN in 1971 during the Shah. Since then the criminal West has spend billions of dollars to partition Iran through WAR and illegal SANCTIONS. They have spent BILLIONS of dollars to hire traitors, funded many think tanks to spread propaganda war to fool the public, but they have not been successful. This does not mean that they may not get the favorite result one day. They may or may not. These illegal criminal activities of the terrorist states, like UK, US, Israel, will cause a lot of damages, keeping a lot of resources away from the development projects that benefit the people onto stopping the enemies.
    China was lucky to have Soviet Union around, so the west focused on Russia and left China alone. That’s why China was able to develop itself, but India remained as a colony of the west where cannot come close to China, although the west, especially UK, protected its ‘jewel’ at all times. No sanctions on the colony of zionist and racist India, due to ‘good’ behavior.
    How many years, do you think people can resist against these savages and their terrorist activities?
    Iran has to use many tools to destroy these evil forces and people of Iran will cooperate when they are given the facts about their enemies. UK, US, Israel, Saudi Arabia can go and destroy themselves by pushing others until the people go against them.

    [This dumb theory of West “stealing resources and keeping everybody down” was a myth created by the Warsaw Pact Commies to explain to their own people why the populations of the West, including their Working classes were so much more prosperous than those in the Warsaw Pact World.]

    Only gullible people who have benefited from serving the empire come with such a silly statement. Everyone with shallow knowledge of the British empire knows the reasons behind the ‘ Opium Wars’ and looting of China by British and Jewish Sassoon family. The evil British empire used the fertile lands in India, Afghanistan, Iran, China to plant opium to force it upon the people as ‘currency’ to get their resources out of these countries back to Britain, yet the use of opium was outlawed in the UK. This policy was the reason behind famine and starvation in these countries where let millions of people dead. Today, the US empire does the same in Afghanistan to make millions of dollars to pay for its illegal wars against the indigenous population.
    So much for the goodness of the EVIL empire like UK and US.

    The British empire is responsible for millions of deaths in Iran during the WWI, yet they deny to recognize it. We hold them responsible and at the right moment will force them to pay reparation for their crimes against humanity.
    People who are interested to know about the British genocide in Iran, can read the following book by Mohammad Majd:
    ‘The Great Famine and Genocide in Persia, 1917-1919’

    [Mohammad Gholi Majd argues that Persia was the greatest victim of World War One and also the victim of possibly the worst genocide of the twentieth century. Using U.S. State Department records, as well as Persian and British sources, Majd describes and documents a veritable holocaust about which practically nothing has been written.]

    • Replies: @Malla
    @jami


    British never give the right to Scotland to separate unless they are forced to.
     
    This is the dumbest bullshit I have heard. UK gave all the right to Scotland to leave. Take your diseased head out of your diseased ass.

    Only the fools think UK has been the most benevolent empire.
     
    No Britain as a benevolent Empire is fact.

    They have killed millions of people, majority are Muslims.
     
    Hindus believe British and Muslims ganged up to kill Hindus. Everybody has some idiotic theory.

    That’s why China was able to develop itself, but India remained as a colony of the west
     
    This proves you are a low IQ monkey. India was a staunch ally of the USSR till the very end, Pakistan was pro USA and even China collaborated with the USA after the Sino Soviet split. India in 1945 after independence was far more developed than China thanks to the British Empire. Even today India has opposed the West and supported Russia. There are no sanctions on India because India is too important for everybody than your shitty tiny Iran.

    Everyone with shallow knowledge of the British empire knows the reasons behind the ‘ Opium Wars’ and looting of China by British and Jewish Sassoon family. The evil British empire used the fertile lands in India, Afghanistan, Iran, China to plant opium to force it upon the people as ‘currency’ to get their resources out of these countries back to Britain, yet the use of opium was outlawed in the UK.
     
    Does your low IQ monkeyness have no bounds. Arabs have been selling Opium from the 7th century to China. What does Sassoon, a Bagdadi Jew has to do with the British? Persia and Ottoman Empire were some of the largest opium producers in the World along with the British India. Opium was a state monopoly of the earlier Mughal Government of India even before the British. Even before the British, India was exporting opium as Indian opium was of superior quality. The Opium war was because the Chinese Emperor threw European/Indian opium in the sea without any warning, the Chinese Emperor looked upon the Europeans as barbarians anyways. China itself was producing 10 times the opium than it was importing but Bengal opium was superior in quality than anything produced in China at that time (later the smart Chinese improvised and grew superior Opium too). All the revenues generated out of Opium came to India not Britain. Half of Bombay was built on opium money. And no, farmers were not forced to grow opium in Bengal and it did not cause famines. Indeed Indian contractors were exploiting Indian farmers and to prevent that, the British Indian Government nationalized the enterprise to stop abuse. Opium was grown after other crops were grown. There were far more famines in India before the British, indeed if there is one power who has done to stop famines in India, it is the British Empire. the British Empire increased irrigation enormously, built railways to transport food, famine codes, irrigation codes. It is during late British period, famines nearly disappeared from India, which never happened in millennia earlier. And even when the British in Bengal were exporting opium, Indian kingdoms free of the British were exporting opium to China via the Central Asian route.

    Today, the US empire does the same in Afghanistan to make millions of dollars to pay for its illegal wars against the indigenous population.
     
    The US Empire is not the same as the prre-WW2 European Empires. Indeed the USA (Wall Street) funded anti-Colonial "revolutionaries" in Africa. Nobody has done more to destroy European Colonial Empires than the USA (Wall Street bankers)

    Replies: @d dan, @Anonymous, @denk

    , @Malla
    @jami


    People who are interested to know about the British genocide in Iran, can read the following book by Mohammad Majd:
    ‘The Great Famine and Genocide in Persia, 1917-1919’
     
    Oh please, this third rate book written by a leftard Professor in a Western Commie University has been debunked. I have personally debunked one more third rate book by some crack pot named Davis.
    Ervand Abrahamian comments that the book by Majd includes an "exaggerated discussion" of losses during the famine, a view he shares with Mahmood Messkoub, Abbas Milani and Rudi Matthee. Abrahamian describes calling the famine a genocide as "wild accusation" and attributes the vast majority of the 2 million deaths he estimates to cholera and typhus epidemics, as well as mostly worldwide influenza pandemic. While accepting that the total death toll could be several millions, Hormoz Ebrahimnejad says Majd's figure is an overestimation.

    Irish historian Cormac Ó Gráda, discussing the difficulty of verifying the death toll of historical famines, describes the claim of genocide as "not possible to take literally": "Such claims are usually rhetorical, and sure signs of major disasters, but poor guides to actual mortality." A similar view is expressed by Alidad Mafinezam and Aria Mehrabi, who state that Majd's work suffers from serious methodological defects.

    Two major grain producing areas of Iran, namely Kermanshah–Hamadan and Azarbaijan were the battlefield between the Ottomans and the Russians, the British were not even involved.


    We hold them responsible and at the right moment will force them to pay reparation for their crimes against humanity.
     
    We 1.2 billion Indians (1/6th of humanity) hold Persia responsible for the deaths in a famine in 1877 when the Persians arrogantly refused to export food to the starving masses of India.

    https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/752481854182916137/786578346762698792/asianexports1877.PNG
    Iranians arrogantly refused to allow food to be exported to Madras in 1877 during famine which led to the death of millions, when millions of Indians desperately needed food. The Chinese bought the Vietnamese surplus, they had a larger famine themselves.
    At the right moment will force Iranians to pay reparation for their crimes against humanity.
    Thank You.

    And by the way, when will, Iran pay back India for the grand looting and theft of Indian wealth by Iranian thug Nadir Shah? 5% interest may bring up the figure to about $ 2000 trillion. Iranians looted our ancestors, need to pay back one day. And Indian Nationalists, of a 1.2 billion Indian nation will make sure, it is paid.

    Replies: @jami, @Kang

  • jami says:
    @Malla
    @jami


    Only a ‘Hindi’ spreads these LIES around. Baloch people are an Iranian people who live mainly in the Balochistan region, located at the southeastern most edge of the Iranian plateau, encompassing the countries of Pakistan, Iran and Afghanistan.
     
    Stop lying and stop trying to subterfuge the historical facts, you lowly worm.
    From a Muslim researcher himself.
    https://www.files.ethz.ch/isn/180927/31c68a20991b5a98b0dece4fd929c9c8.pdf
    The Baluch insurgency: linking Iran to Pakistan by Zia Ur Rehman
    Zia Ur Rahman (Superior Muslim, not inferior subhuman Hindoo) writes

    "Baluch historians point to the fact that historically an independent Baluchistan existed for several centuries. Afghans, Persians and Sikhs all made repeated but unsuccessful attempts to establish complete control of Baluchistan (AI, 2007). However, during the 19th century the British and Persian empires divided Baluchistan into spheres of influence. In 1928 independent West Baluchistan (today the Sistan and Baluchistan Province of Iran) was forcibly annexed to Iran by Reza Shah Pahlavi, who overthrew the Qajar dynasty in a military coup soon after the “Persian constitutional revolution” took place between 1905 and 1907 and founded the Pahlavi dynasty. Baluch activists say that this dynasty created a centralised, predominantly Persian state in Iran that enshrined ethnic suppression, forcing the Baluch community to fight to protect their rights under Iranian rule (UNPO, 2010).
    In 1979 Iran became an Islamic republic and Shah Muhammad Reza Pahlavi was forced into exile. However, Iran’s new theocratic rulers continued and strengthened Pahlavi’s policies towards the Baluch, perceiving the Sunni Baluch as a threat to their Shia revolution (Tatchell, 2008).
    In 1839 the British gained control over a part of the Baluch region situated in modern-day Pakistan by defeating the forces of Mehrab Khan Baluch, the then-ruler of the Baluch state. The greater part of Baluchistan was – formally or informally – under the British Empire until Indian independence in 1947; the prime British interest in the area was that of securing and protecting the North-Western Frontier Province of British India from both Afghanistan and Iran (Khan, 2011).
    2 Noref Report – May 2014
    Many Baluch believe their province was forcibly incorporated into the new state of Pakistan when the Indian subcontinent was divided into India and Pakistan at the end of British rule in 1947, and since then the province has been in turmoil (IRIN, 2006). Prior to Indian independence there was a serious possibility that the Baluch would be accorded self-rule under the leadership of Ahmed Yar Khan, the ruler of the Baluch state of Kalat, who claimed that Kalat was never a part of the British Indian Empire (Bangash, 2011).
    In the late 1940s Kalat state was declared an independent nation by the British government, while other adjoining areas such as those inhabited by the Bugti and Marri tribes were also included in the new state. When India and Pakistan became independent in August 1947, Baluchistan also declared its independence (Tatchell, 2011). Pakistan, the British and Baluchistan accepted the independent status of Baluchistan through a tripartite agreement signed on August 4th 1947.
    To ascertain the will of the people concerning the future of the state, Ahmed Yar Khan established two houses of parliament in October 1947 (Bangash, 2011). Rejecting the Baluch’s legitimate claim to self-rule, the Pakistani government tried to force Baluchistan to join Pakistan, but both houses of the Baluch parliament rejected this (Tatchell, 2011). Khan was willing to compromise with the Pakistani government on defence, foreign affairs and communication matters, but was not prepared to abandon the sovereign status of the state. However, the Pakistani government moved forces into Kalat territory and pressurised Khan to sign the instrument of accession merging Baluchistan with Pakistan. Baluch separatist groups argue that this accord was mandated by neither the Baluch parliament nor the Baluch people (Tatchell, 2007).
    Khan rose up in revolt, triggering the first of a series of insurgencies in the province. New uprisings, essentially seeking greater autonomy, led to confrontations between Baluch nationalists and separatists and the Pakistan military in 1958, 1962 and 1973-77 (IRIN, 2006). The current armed conflict between Baluch separatists and the Pakistani army has been ongoing since 2004. Members of the powerful Bugti and Marri tribes and parts of the Baluch middle class support the separatists with influence and money, making the current insurgency stronger than previous ones (The Economist, 2012)."

    Replies: @jami

    When I wrote:

    [Only a ‘Hindi’ spreads these LIES around. Baloch people are an Iranian people who live mainly in the Balochistan region..]

    I referred to the following lies that you pasted here.

    [What is interesting is that, Baloch tribes were raiding and carrying off Persian women & children and selling them as slaves. Remember this is the early 1900s!! About how those Persian slaves are given the bare minimum to survive and given maximum work by their arrogant Baloch masters.]

    But, your provided paragraphs does not have the lines related to ‘Baloch tribes were raiding and carrying off Persian women & children and selling them as slaves.’

    The reason is that these lines are lies, because Baloch are an Iranian people.

    • Replies: @Malla
    @jami


    I referred to the following lies that you pasted here
     
    Read the book, moron.
    Link posted in Post 61 of this page which writes about this.
    Baloch might be an Iranian people but are not Persians proper. Tajicks are an Iranian people too. Hell even Pathans/Pastuns are an Iranian people.
  • jami says:
    @Malla
    @jami

    https://iranprimer.usip.org/blog/2020/aug/06/irans-troubled-provinces-baluchistan
    In the 19th century, the greater Baluchistan region, spanning Iran, Afghanistan and Pakistan, was divided by the British colonial power in south Asia between 1870 and 1872. British telegraph workers surveyed the area and defined Iran’s border with Afghanistan and British-ruled India (later Pakistan) to settle territorial disputes with the Qajar dynasty, which ruled Iran from 1789 to 1925.

    In 1897, Sardar Hossein Khan, a Baluch tribal chief, led an insurgency against the Qajar dynasty. The uprising ended three years later when the shah appointed Khan to be the local governor. The Baluch maintained a high degree of autonomy for three decades. In 1925, Reza Shah Pahlavi finally deposed the Qajars, already weakened by the 1906 Constitutional Revolution, and began to solidify his rule across the country. In 1928, he sent an army to wrest control from Baluch tribal chiefs. Several Baluch tribes launched two rebellions, which both failed, in 1931 and 1938. The Pahlavis redrew provincial boundaries to divide the Baluch among multiple provinces, such as Kerman and Hormozgan, and forcibly resettled Baluch elsewhere in Iran.

    The Qajars, the Pahlavis and, since 1979, the Islamic Republic of Iran, have primarily viewed Sistan and Baluchistan as a security liability. Tehran has long worried that the Baluch could rally, perhaps with their brethren in Pakistan, to seek greater autonomy or even independence. After the 1979 revolution, Baluch separatists reportedly began to receive support from outside Iran. Tehran has accused the United States, Britain, Israel, Pakistan and Saudi Arabia of supporting Baluch separatists.

    The central government has done little to integrate the Baluch into Iranian society. Poor socioeconomic conditions have exacerbated ethnic tensions. “Areas with large Baluchi populations were severely underdeveloped and had limited access to education, employment, health care, and housing,” according to the State Department’s 2019 report on human rights. In 2018, life expectancy in Sistan and Baluchistan was the lowest of any Iranian province. In the last census, the province also had a literacy rate of only 76 percent, compared to 93 percent in Tehran province.

    The central government has repeatedly tried to suppress Baluch identity. The government has reportedly sent hundreds of Shiite missionaries to convert the predominantly Sunni Baluch. The government has closed, and, in some cases demolished Sunni mosques and religious seminaries. It has also used public education to promote an Iranian national identity, with Shiism as its foundation. Most elementary and high school teachers in Sunni Baluch areas are also reportedly Shiite. Persian is also the sole language of instruction, which disadvantages the Baluch.

    Some separatist groups have cited discrimination and socioeconomic conditions as the key grievances for their opposition to Tehran. Since 2003, the militant Islamist group Jundallah, or “Soldiers of God,” has fought for Sunni rights. “The only thing we ask of the Iranian government is to be citizens. We want to have the same rights as the Iranian Shiite people. That's it. We do not want discrimination between Sunnis and Shiites in this country,” founder Abdolmalek Rigi said in an interview with Al-Arabiya in 2008.

    Jundallah has attacked both civilian and government targets. Tehran describes the organization as a radical terrorist and separatist organization backed by its enemies. U.S. officials “secretly encouraged and advised” Jundallah starting in 2005, according to an ABC News report in 2007. But the United States, which designated Jundallah a terrorist organization in 2010, has denied providing support. The group has been less active since Jundallah splintered after Rigi was captured and executed by Iran in 2010. But the movement has spawned several other militant groups, including Jaish ul Adl (JUA), Ansar al Furqan, and Harakat Ansar Iran.

    FarooquiJUA (Army of Justice) was founded in 2012 and began attacking Iranian security forces the following year. It has been the most active Baluch insurgent group in Iran. It has launched suicide bombings, carried out assassinations, taken hostages and laid mines. JUA’s founder and leader is Salahuddin Farooqui (also known as Abdul Rahim Mulazadeh), who comes from the Baluchistan province in Pakistan; he has ties to communities on both sides of the border. JUA uses Pakistan as a base of operations.

    Replies: @jami, @Anonymous

    Only fools and illiterate people trust a think tank funded by the US government to spread their propaganda as ‘facts’.

    This think tank, The UNITED STATES INSTITUTE of PEACE, has been established and FUNDED by the congress and Reagan signed into law to spread PROPAGANDA against its victims using gullible and sell out people for the production of its LIES. Don’t copy and paste these lies here.

    https://iranprimer.usip.org/blog/2020/aug/06/irans-troubled-provinces-baluchistan

    [The United States Institute of Peace (USIP) is an American federal institution tasked with promoting conflict resolution and prevention worldwide. It provides research, analysis, and training to individuals in diplomacy, mediation, and other peace-building measures.
    Following years of proposals for a national “peace academy”, the USIP was established in 1984 by Congressional legislation signed into law by President Ronald Reagan. ]

    ‘Iranprime’ that link this, is funded by the western intelligence services to spread propaganda. Everyone with shallow knowledge of Iran policy knows this.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Institute_of_Peace

  • jami says:

    Developments that took place in continental Europe led to the competition among European countries to gain colonies in the Asia.
    One of the most important territories for European governments was India. During the European rivalry for control of India, the adjacent lands became important as access points to that land. One of these areas was Balochestan.
    The British, having been able to cut off their rivals from India, decided to establish a buffer zone along its northwestern border to secure its colony, India. thus the British policy focused on Balochestan extended to Iranian Balochestan on its eastern border.
    With the establishment of Qajar government in Iran, the kings sought to expand their control over the eastern borders of the country. The British government’s attention to Baluchistan as the defense belt of southwestern India and the Qajar kings’ policy focused on Baluchistan, led to a confrontation between the two. At this time, strong British activities let to separation of Baluchistan from Iran as India’s defensive shield.

    Vasco da Gama’s visit from Portugal to India in 1497 paved the way for the establishment of colonies in this land and other parts of Asia. After the Portuguese conquest of India in 1662, the Portuguese government granted the island of Mumbai to King Charles II of England, who transferred the island to the East India Company. The British Empire from the mid-seventeenth century gradually, by force and deception, brought India under its own rule. In this way, the British removed the Portuguese from the competition and took control of the situation.
    In the late 1600s the East India Company was established by order of Queen Elizabeth. The company was gradually able to expand its influence in India and outperform its other competitors. Following the advent of the Industrial Revolution in Europe, the production of goods far exceeded the needs of European markets. In addition, raw materials did not exist in many factories in Europe, therefore, the European countries paid more attention to other lands to meet their demands. One of these lands, was India. India was the land where many European countries sought after.
    Britain, which had dominated India for years and tried to defend it against rivals, suddenly faced with Napoleon who wanted to take India from British.

    Napoleon was aware that Britain’s vital artery was India. He was looking for a way to conquer India, and since Britain was the ruler of the seas, he had no choice but to invade India by land, and this way inevitably passed through Iran. The conquest of India via Iran, Afghanistan, Sindh and Punjab had been recorded repeatedly in history, and the British knew that if they left the door open, the French would easily conquer India.
    The threat of Napoleon’s attack drew the attention of the British government and the East India Company to neighboring India, the routes through which Napoleon’s attack was likely. One of the neighboring lands of India was Baluchistan and as a result of these rivalries between states, this area was important by the colonizers and their competitors in such a way that let to the separation of part of Baluchistan from Iran to protect INDIA from other rivals.
    To conquer India, The Napoleon made the Treaty of Finkenstein with Persia (Iran) in 1807 which formalized the Franco-Persian alliance. One of the provisions of this treaty was the severance of Iran’s relations with the British government and the declaration of war with that country.
    The British government in London panicked and sent representatives to the Iranian court, including Sergeant Malcolm, who was not accepted by the Iranians because of the friendly relationship between Iran and France.
    The danger of Napoleon’s invasion of India through Iran and the rejection of British Ambassador Malcolm by the Iranian court let the East India Company and the British government to identify and explore India’s neighboring territories. where was Baluchistan, as a buffer zone.
    India was so important to the British Empire that some politicians believed that it was impossible for Britain to live without India.
    After 1815 and the alliance of Iran with France, the British government realized that, contrary to previous perceptions, Iran as India’s defensive line was not very reliable. Therefore, London and the British government in India decided to focus their attention on Central Asia and change the defensive wall of India from Iran to Central Asia. Following that in the decade of 1830. There was a growing consensus in Britain that Russia was expanding its territory to the detriment of Iran, the Ottomans, and Central Asia, thus, the idea of ​​the “Great Game” was born. In this plan, Iran as a buffer state against the progress and development of Russia to India was of special strategic importance. They found their defensive barrier in the eastern border areas of Iran, where the central government of Iran did not have a firm policy due to weakness, and this was what the British wanted because they could easily separate strategic areas from Iran according to their plan to achieve a protective belt. Thus, from then, the British was helping Russia to weaken Iran in order to kill two birds with one stone, to preoccupy Russia, weaken Iran and prevent Russia coming towards India.
    Yes, the policy of the evil empire has many victims, the Baloch, the Iranians, Indians, Afghani, Muslims in general to mention few.

    • Replies: @FrodoWasAFremen
    @jami

    Napoleon trying to invade India through Iran...damn, what a concept!!! And that guy honestly had the ambition to try it too! I don’t think the French economized their ability to make use of local auxiliaries under French officers like the British did (or even the Ottomans). The Brits were masters at it. Napoleon made it all the way to Syria relying basically on all French troops, but had to turn back because the British got involved.

    , @Malla
    @jami

    You are right, it was inter-European competition which drove European overseas Empires as well as the Russian land Empire (though Russia had other factors, seeking ports and fear of the Steppe invaders in the east). Later, similar insecurities/competitions led to the USA (pre-Ww2) and japan joining in the race.


    Therefore, London and the British government in India decided to focus their attention on Central Asia and change the defensive wall of India from Iran to Central Asia.
     
    False, both the Russian Empire and the British Empire feared each other moving into their Empires. The Russians feared the British moving into the Central Asian region of the Russian Empire and the British were afraid that because the Russians seeked good ports, the Russians would move into its Indian Empire and take Karachi port. Fun fact: During the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan, the Pakistanis were afraid of the same, of Soviets taking Karachi. Tzarist Russia became USSR and British India became partially Pakistan, geopolitics remains the same. A lot of the issues of Tibet and Afghanistan was because of this Great Game. Nothing abnormal about it.

    Yes, the policy of the evil empire has many victims, the Baloch, the Iranians, Indians, Afghani, Muslims in general to mention few.
     
    How is Britain an evil Empire, why would it not try to protect it's empire like any other Empire in history? Indeed the British Empire was the most benevolent Empire in human history for the people who became part of it. There were a few bad chapters but the good done far far far outweighed the bad. It was the British Empire which stamped out slavery in Africa, gave rights to lower caste Hindus and liberated them from Brahman rule, liberated Hindus from brutal Islamic rule, liberated Muslims of Pakistan from Sikh rule etc...
    Why don't you talk about Persian Emperor Nadir Shah and his invasion and looting of Indian Emperor Mohammed Shah. This was one of the greatest looting of a country in human history. Nader Shah looted out the Peacock Throne of India, thereafter, served as a symbol of Iranian imperial might. It is estimated that Nader took away with him treasures worth as much as seven hundred million rupees. Among a trove of other fabulous jewels, Nader also looted the Koh-i-Noor (meaning "Mountain of Light" in Persian) and Darya-ye Noor (meaning "Sea of Light") diamonds. The Iranian troops left Delhi at the beginning of May 1739, the booty they had collected was loaded on 700 elephants, 4,000 camels, and 12,000 horses. On Nader's return to Iran, Sikh warriors fell upon the foreign invader Iranian army and seized some of the loot and freed the slaves in captivity.
    So is Iran still living on the parasitism of ancient looted Indian wealth? Should Iran be asked to pay compensation, wealth gained by taxing of millions of poor Indian farmers toiling in the sun? What if Indian nationalists put a 5% interest and make calculations and come up with figures like $2000 trillion that Iran would have to pay to India as compensation???
  • jami says:
    @Malla
    @anon


    Balochis are an ultra inbred violent tribe.
     
    They are quite similar to Pastuns/Pathans but still very distinct.

    I was reading this book about General Reginald Dyer when he was posted at the British Empire’s wild frontier of Baloch tribes (British Indian Empire/Balochistan-Persia border areas) during WW1. German (supported by Austrians) and Ottoman secret agents were infiltrating India to rile up the masses against the British Empire and many Baloch tribes on the frontier (Yarmahommedzais, Gamshadzais, Ismailzais etc...) had already gone pro-German, swore loyalty to the German Kaiser and started attacking the British Empire frontier posts (and their supplies). Indian Hindu merchants (contractors of the British Indian Army) refused to send supplies to the frontier British Imperial military posts out of fear of the pro-German Baloch cavalry raiders. That is why Dyer was sent on the frontier, Dyer had single-handedly (with his tough Cockney English working class Driver) turned the situation around but he got a lot of valuable help from loyal warrior Baloch tribes like the Chagai, tribes who still swore 1000% loyalty to the King Emperor and the British Empire. Shows how smart, tough, brave, resourceful, and capable Colonial Victorian Gentlemen officers were compared to today's Western leftard pussyboy naive eloi “rebels without a cause” nonsense. A valuable lesson in people management.
    You learn how tribal Balochistan was. Everything is to be exploited for your family and tribes. But they are also very hospitable and some principles of hospitability are followed to the letter. Also how backstabbing is a part of life, how some tough bully tribe leader would immediately cow down and kiss feet when in a weak position and then immediately attack when in a strong position. Survival of the fittest. How strength and power is respected but weakness ruthlessly attacked. How cunningness and shrewdness is way of life. People promise only to break it, nobody keeps his word. Backstabbing and greed, a way of life. Mixed in with bravery, but smart shrewd bravery not sacrifice yourself for some ideology stupid bravery (Whitey, Jap tendencies). Bravery for some gain.
    This is how most of the Third World was and at the end of the day, always will be as the West weakens up. Life for humans was always meant to be harsh and brutish at the end of the day.
    https://www.gutenberg.org/files/51070/51070-h/51070-h.htm
    Raiders of the Sarhad: Being an Account of the Campaign of Arms and Bluff Against the Brigands of the Persian-Baluchi Border during the Great War by Reginald Edward Harry Dyer.

    What is interesting is that, Baloch tribes were raiding and carrying off Persian women & children and selling them as slaves. Remember this is the early 1900s!! About how those Persian slaves are given the bare minimum to survive and given maximum work by their arrogant Baloch masters. Like life in some Communist Gulag, basically - give minimum, extract maximum. British Imperial Officer Colonel Dyer, played his part in liberating the Persian slaves from the Baloch. How he does that, is written in the book. People do not know this but the last Shah of Iran, had to take many severe military actions in Iranian Balochistan to pacify the fierce Baloch tribes in Iran.

    Replies: @jami

    [What is interesting is that, Baloch tribes were raiding and carrying off Persian women & children and selling them as slaves. Remember this is the early 1900s!! About how those Persian slaves are given the bare minimum to survive and given maximum work by their arrogant Baloch masters.]

    Only a ‘Hindi’ spreads these LIES around. Baloch people are an Iranian people who live mainly in the Balochistan region, located at the southeastern most edge of the Iranian plateau, encompassing the countries of Pakistan, Iran and Afghanistan.

    Balochi language, also is one of the oldest living languages of the Indo-Iranian group of the Indo-European languages. Balochi language, like Persian, has no gender. Balochi language is a member of the Iranian family language. Baluch people were part of Persian empire for cengturies and stil are part of Iran, but the British imperialism, divided the region and re arrange the border in order to keep its colony, India, where still in place, that’s why the Evil empire and its junior partner want to continue the policy to keep their colony India in place.

    Do you think Balochi who are Iranians and have been part of the Persian empire, living together for centuries and have shared history are going to take their own brothers and sisters to sell it as ‘slaves’? This tradition is not among Iranian family rather, I guess, is with the ‘indians’ who take their owns and sell them as slaves.
    Prior to 1947, Balochistan’s official languages was Persian and English was added after the British colonial was established where outlawed Persian, because Persian language was a major obstacle to their criminal plan in India.
    In 1948, with the incorporation of Balochistan into the newly created Pakistan, Balochi was replaced by Urdu as the national language. Urdu is NOT Persian, it is Indian based language with a lot of Persian vocabulary and has gender.

    The invasions of Genghis Khan caused the bulk of Baloch migrations and the Balochs were given refuge in the greater Sindh region.
    Iranian Balochistan had some of the earliest human civilizations in history. The Burnt city near Zahidan dates to 2000 BC. All of what is now Baluchistan was part of the Achaemenid, Seleucid, Parthian, and Sassanid Iranian Empires.

    • Replies: @Malla
    @jami


    Only a ‘Hindi’ spreads these LIES around. Baloch people are an Iranian people who live mainly in the Balochistan region, located at the southeastern most edge of the Iranian plateau, encompassing the countries of Pakistan, Iran and Afghanistan.
     
    Stop lying and stop trying to subterfuge the historical facts, you lowly worm.
    From a Muslim researcher himself.
    https://www.files.ethz.ch/isn/180927/31c68a20991b5a98b0dece4fd929c9c8.pdf
    The Baluch insurgency: linking Iran to Pakistan by Zia Ur Rehman
    Zia Ur Rahman (Superior Muslim, not inferior subhuman Hindoo) writes

    "Baluch historians point to the fact that historically an independent Baluchistan existed for several centuries. Afghans, Persians and Sikhs all made repeated but unsuccessful attempts to establish complete control of Baluchistan (AI, 2007). However, during the 19th century the British and Persian empires divided Baluchistan into spheres of influence. In 1928 independent West Baluchistan (today the Sistan and Baluchistan Province of Iran) was forcibly annexed to Iran by Reza Shah Pahlavi, who overthrew the Qajar dynasty in a military coup soon after the “Persian constitutional revolution” took place between 1905 and 1907 and founded the Pahlavi dynasty. Baluch activists say that this dynasty created a centralised, predominantly Persian state in Iran that enshrined ethnic suppression, forcing the Baluch community to fight to protect their rights under Iranian rule (UNPO, 2010).
    In 1979 Iran became an Islamic republic and Shah Muhammad Reza Pahlavi was forced into exile. However, Iran’s new theocratic rulers continued and strengthened Pahlavi’s policies towards the Baluch, perceiving the Sunni Baluch as a threat to their Shia revolution (Tatchell, 2008).
    In 1839 the British gained control over a part of the Baluch region situated in modern-day Pakistan by defeating the forces of Mehrab Khan Baluch, the then-ruler of the Baluch state. The greater part of Baluchistan was – formally or informally – under the British Empire until Indian independence in 1947; the prime British interest in the area was that of securing and protecting the North-Western Frontier Province of British India from both Afghanistan and Iran (Khan, 2011).
    2 Noref Report – May 2014
    Many Baluch believe their province was forcibly incorporated into the new state of Pakistan when the Indian subcontinent was divided into India and Pakistan at the end of British rule in 1947, and since then the province has been in turmoil (IRIN, 2006). Prior to Indian independence there was a serious possibility that the Baluch would be accorded self-rule under the leadership of Ahmed Yar Khan, the ruler of the Baluch state of Kalat, who claimed that Kalat was never a part of the British Indian Empire (Bangash, 2011).
    In the late 1940s Kalat state was declared an independent nation by the British government, while other adjoining areas such as those inhabited by the Bugti and Marri tribes were also included in the new state. When India and Pakistan became independent in August 1947, Baluchistan also declared its independence (Tatchell, 2011). Pakistan, the British and Baluchistan accepted the independent status of Baluchistan through a tripartite agreement signed on August 4th 1947.
    To ascertain the will of the people concerning the future of the state, Ahmed Yar Khan established two houses of parliament in October 1947 (Bangash, 2011). Rejecting the Baluch’s legitimate claim to self-rule, the Pakistani government tried to force Baluchistan to join Pakistan, but both houses of the Baluch parliament rejected this (Tatchell, 2011). Khan was willing to compromise with the Pakistani government on defence, foreign affairs and communication matters, but was not prepared to abandon the sovereign status of the state. However, the Pakistani government moved forces into Kalat territory and pressurised Khan to sign the instrument of accession merging Baluchistan with Pakistan. Baluch separatist groups argue that this accord was mandated by neither the Baluch parliament nor the Baluch people (Tatchell, 2007).
    Khan rose up in revolt, triggering the first of a series of insurgencies in the province. New uprisings, essentially seeking greater autonomy, led to confrontations between Baluch nationalists and separatists and the Pakistan military in 1958, 1962 and 1973-77 (IRIN, 2006). The current armed conflict between Baluch separatists and the Pakistani army has been ongoing since 2004. Members of the powerful Bugti and Marri tribes and parts of the Baluch middle class support the separatists with influence and money, making the current insurgency stronger than previous ones (The Economist, 2012)."

    Replies: @jami

    , @Malla
    @jami

    https://iranprimer.usip.org/blog/2020/aug/06/irans-troubled-provinces-baluchistan
    In the 19th century, the greater Baluchistan region, spanning Iran, Afghanistan and Pakistan, was divided by the British colonial power in south Asia between 1870 and 1872. British telegraph workers surveyed the area and defined Iran’s border with Afghanistan and British-ruled India (later Pakistan) to settle territorial disputes with the Qajar dynasty, which ruled Iran from 1789 to 1925.

    In 1897, Sardar Hossein Khan, a Baluch tribal chief, led an insurgency against the Qajar dynasty. The uprising ended three years later when the shah appointed Khan to be the local governor. The Baluch maintained a high degree of autonomy for three decades. In 1925, Reza Shah Pahlavi finally deposed the Qajars, already weakened by the 1906 Constitutional Revolution, and began to solidify his rule across the country. In 1928, he sent an army to wrest control from Baluch tribal chiefs. Several Baluch tribes launched two rebellions, which both failed, in 1931 and 1938. The Pahlavis redrew provincial boundaries to divide the Baluch among multiple provinces, such as Kerman and Hormozgan, and forcibly resettled Baluch elsewhere in Iran.

    The Qajars, the Pahlavis and, since 1979, the Islamic Republic of Iran, have primarily viewed Sistan and Baluchistan as a security liability. Tehran has long worried that the Baluch could rally, perhaps with their brethren in Pakistan, to seek greater autonomy or even independence. After the 1979 revolution, Baluch separatists reportedly began to receive support from outside Iran. Tehran has accused the United States, Britain, Israel, Pakistan and Saudi Arabia of supporting Baluch separatists.

    The central government has done little to integrate the Baluch into Iranian society. Poor socioeconomic conditions have exacerbated ethnic tensions. “Areas with large Baluchi populations were severely underdeveloped and had limited access to education, employment, health care, and housing,” according to the State Department’s 2019 report on human rights. In 2018, life expectancy in Sistan and Baluchistan was the lowest of any Iranian province. In the last census, the province also had a literacy rate of only 76 percent, compared to 93 percent in Tehran province.

    The central government has repeatedly tried to suppress Baluch identity. The government has reportedly sent hundreds of Shiite missionaries to convert the predominantly Sunni Baluch. The government has closed, and, in some cases demolished Sunni mosques and religious seminaries. It has also used public education to promote an Iranian national identity, with Shiism as its foundation. Most elementary and high school teachers in Sunni Baluch areas are also reportedly Shiite. Persian is also the sole language of instruction, which disadvantages the Baluch.

    Some separatist groups have cited discrimination and socioeconomic conditions as the key grievances for their opposition to Tehran. Since 2003, the militant Islamist group Jundallah, or “Soldiers of God,” has fought for Sunni rights. “The only thing we ask of the Iranian government is to be citizens. We want to have the same rights as the Iranian Shiite people. That's it. We do not want discrimination between Sunnis and Shiites in this country,” founder Abdolmalek Rigi said in an interview with Al-Arabiya in 2008.

    Jundallah has attacked both civilian and government targets. Tehran describes the organization as a radical terrorist and separatist organization backed by its enemies. U.S. officials “secretly encouraged and advised” Jundallah starting in 2005, according to an ABC News report in 2007. But the United States, which designated Jundallah a terrorist organization in 2010, has denied providing support. The group has been less active since Jundallah splintered after Rigi was captured and executed by Iran in 2010. But the movement has spawned several other militant groups, including Jaish ul Adl (JUA), Ansar al Furqan, and Harakat Ansar Iran.

    FarooquiJUA (Army of Justice) was founded in 2012 and began attacking Iranian security forces the following year. It has been the most active Baluch insurgent group in Iran. It has launched suicide bombings, carried out assassinations, taken hostages and laid mines. JUA’s founder and leader is Salahuddin Farooqui (also known as Abdul Rahim Mulazadeh), who comes from the Baluchistan province in Pakistan; he has ties to communities on both sides of the border. JUA uses Pakistan as a base of operations.

    Replies: @jami, @Anonymous

  • jami says:
    @nokangaroos
    @Malla

    Dontcha think a reorganization into Pashtunistan and Baluchistan might in the long run be preferrable to the current state of affairs?
    (of course independent Kashmir too ... hell, the most spectacular scenery and
    the most beautiful women on the subcontinent, and what are they doing with it?)

    Replies: @American Bulwark, @jami

    You idiot, if partition is good then whey don’t you allow Catalan, that feeds Spain, to be separated? Why no western country who are trying to partition Iraq, Syria, Iran, Turkey and others, did not support Catalan’s struggle for independence, although Catalan is self sufficient dummy? Why all these western thieves were silent against the arrest and abuse of the Catalan leaders? Don’t you think
    the Catalan people have a right to be separated? idiot. Why do you always want to sell your criminal plan as ‘human rights’ to Muslims liars? We know you are nothing but a thief and terrorist planning to steal our lands and resources.

    You, the illiterate, do you think Sudan is better now, after bloody partition? If your answer is Yes, then You are stupid to the core.
    Do you think Yugoslavia is in a better position today, after the bloody invasion by the criminal West, where it was divided by the Evil empire, and its colonies, Britain, Canada and other thieves and terrorists in NATO.

    If partition is good, then you terrorists, why don’t you allow Quebec or Scotland to be independent. Why the zionist Joe does not allow Ukraine to be partitioned into few pieces, but the same zionist thug has done everything to divide the regional countries in the Middle East for the benefits of the zionist’s dicks where should be chopped off. These scum have divided Muslims’ land for centuries. Enough is enough. If they want to be separated, then they can do it themselves. They don’t need thieves and terrorists like YOU.
    All these partitions, especially the lands of Muslims, have geopolitical/economic reasons, gullible.
    That’s why the bloody West and its dumb population have tried to keep these countries POOR and WEAK through wars and economic sanctions so it is easy to steal their resources.
    Always there are few traitors who fall into the western and zionist’s traps to play their music. Otherwise the people of Baluch have fought against British imperialism and zionism. Death to the evil empire and its colonies like racist Zionists in India.

    You idiot, comment without slightest knowledge of the colonial West in the region. Why don’t you divide the fucking America or British territories into 50 pieces? Why the evil empire is trying to increase its population by outlawing ABORTION against China idiots? Do you believe, the bigger in terms of land and population is the better to project your criminal influence? then why do you want to divide the Muslim lands further? Russia is the biggest country in the world. Why don’t you divide Russia, thief?

    The problems in these region is not that these groups cannot live together, rather is the intervention and criminal activities of your fucking governments for centuries in these region for DIVIDE and RULE that create chaos to create opportunity for the criminal west and its gullible population.

    When the people in the region kick out these thieves out of their countries and have control over
    their destiny, then the situation will be reversed and you gullible will be looted and your lands will be divided into many pieces for centuries. It is the time to REVERSE the situation. We are not going to allow you to continue living off other people. When the $$ goes down as an int. currency, then you have to lick each other’s ass to feed yourself, because the rest of the world is not going to support your parasitic life style in American or Britain. Down with both and their partition plan. Shame on you all.

    • Replies: @nokangaroos
    @jami

    :D :D :D
    - Us Natzees (tm) regard "borders" not backed by peoples* as lines on
    a paper; in case you didn´t notice I called the "borders" left behind by the colonizers
    the problem (and I asked Malla - whose area expertise and judgment
    I have come to value - for an opinion).
    - There was no justification for going full Abe Lincoln on the Catalans, true;
    however it should stay within reason: Scotland, no; never divide an island, if at
    all possible. Quebec, why not? Tibet ... nothing between China and India can be truly
    independent, and India has been shown not to respect neutrality; both the Indus
    and the Brahmaputra spring from the Kailash but there´s precious little China could
    do about it. Besides it has been part of China since the 16th century, and there can be
    no doubt they are better off now.
    - But of course it is Kashmir that gets under your skin.
    Confucius say, vegetarian jungle bunny no good in mountain :P
    Come time, you will have to source your actresses and high-end whores elsewhere.

    *This concept is probably not applicable to India.

  • jami says:

    You idiot, if partition is good then whey don’t you allow Catalan, that feeds Spain, to be separated? Why no western country who are trying to partition Iraq, Syria, Iran, Turkey and others, did not support Catalan’s struggle for independence, although Catalan is self sufficient dummy? Why all these western thieves were silent against the arrest and abuse of the Catalan leaders? Don’t you think
    the Catalan people have a right to be separated? idiot. Why do you always want to sell your criminal plan as ‘human rights’ to Muslims liars? We know you are nothing but a thief and terrorist planning to steal our lands and resources.

    You, the illiterate, do you think Sudan is better now, after bloody partition? If your answer is Yes, then You are stupid to the core.
    Do you think Yugoslavia is in a better position today, after the bloody invasion by the criminal West, where it was divided by the Evil empire, and its colonies, Britain, Canada and other thieves and terrorists in NATO.

    If partition is good, then you terrorists, why don’t you allow Quebec or Scotland to be independent. Why the zionist Joe does not allow Ukraine to be partitioned into few pieces, but the same zionist thug has done everything to divide the regional countries in the Middle East for the benefits of the zionist’s dicks where should be chopped off. These scum have divided Muslims’ land for centuries. Enough is enough. If they want to be separated, then they can do it themselves. They don’t need thieves and terrorists like YOU.
    All these partitions, especially the lands of Muslims, have geopolitical/economic reasons, gullible.
    That’s why the bloody West and its dumb population have tried to keep these countries POOR and WEAK through wars and economic sanctions so it is easy to steal their resources.
    Always there are few traitors who fall into the western and zionist’s traps to play their music. Otherwise the people of Baluch have fought against British imperialism and zionism. Death to the evil empire and its colonies like racist Zionists in India.

    You idiot, comment without slightest knowledge of the colonial West in the region. Why don’t you divide the fucking America or British territories into 50 pieces? Why the evil empire is trying to increase its population by outlawing ABORTION against China idiots? Do you believe, the bigger in terms of land and population is the better to project your criminal influence? then why do you want to divide the Muslim lands further? Russia is the biggest country in the world. Why don’t you divide Russia, thief?

    The problems in these region is not that these groups cannot live together, rather is the intervention and criminal activities of your fucking governments for centuries in these region for DIVIDE and RULE that create chaos to create opportunity for the criminal west and its gullible population.

    When the people in the region kick out these thieves out of their countries and have control over
    their destiny, then the situation will be reversed and you gullible will be looted and your lands will be divided into many pieces for centuries. It is the time to REVERSE the situation. We are not going to allow you to continue living off other people. When the $$ goes down as an int. currency, then you have to lick each other’s ass to feed yourself, because the rest of the world is not going to support your parasitic life style in American or Britain. Down with both and their partition plan. Shame on you all.

    • Replies: @Malla
    @jami


    You idiot, if partition is good then whey don’t you allow Catalan, that feeds Spain, to be separated?
     
    Why only take the example of Spain as a Western country. Why not the UK, which gave the right to Scotland to seek Independence (under the fishface scumbag Salmond)? When will India give the same chance to Kashmir, Indian North East (especailly Nagaland), Khalistan/Punjab to sucede via people's will? When will Pakistan give the same chance to Balochistan, North West Frontier (Pathans) to sucede via people's will? When will Iran give the same chance to Kurshistan, Balochistan,etc..to sucede via people's will? When will Turkey give the same chance to Kurshistan to sucede via people's will? When will China give the same chance to Tibet, East Turkistan (Xinjiang), Southern Mongolia to sucede via people's will? When will Indonesia give the same chance to Western Papua (Irian Jaya), Aceh etc... to sucede via people's will? When will Myanmar give the same chance to Karens, Kachinas, Mons etc... to sucede via people's will? When will Nigeria give the same chance to Biafrans/Ibos etc... to sucede via people's will? When will Kenya give the same chance to Somalis of the North etc... to sucede via people's will?

    If partition is good, then you terrorists, why don’t you allow Quebec or Scotland to be independent.
     
    Are you nuts, Scotland was given the chance to be indpendent, the Scots rejected it. This is even when Scotland has most of the North Sea oil of the U.K.

    That’s why the bloody West and its dumb population have tried to keep these countries POOR and WEAK through wars and economic sanctions so it is easy to steal their resources.
     
    This dumb theory of West "stealing resources and keeping everybody down" was a myth created by the Warsaw Pact Commies to explain to their own people why the populations of the West, including their Working classes were so much more prosperous than those in the Warsaw Pact World. This has been admitted by KGB agent Jack Barsky. This is a continuation of the "Colonies being exploited and market for European goods" bullshit of the Marxists when hey were surprised that their crackpot prophet Marx's dumb prediction of revolution of the proletariat did not materialize in Industrialized Capitalist societies of Western Europe. The truth is, most non White colonies consumed only a tiny percentage of European goods during colonialism. Most of the trade of Britain for example was with the rest of Europe and the USA. Not only that, but British Indian industrial products was already out-competing British products in the China market. Most of Indian cotton was imported by Japan while Britain used more American cotton. So by that dumb theory, Japan was "colonising-exploiting" India, and Britain was "colonising-exploiting" the USA (in the 1800s after the American War of Independence)!!!What?? Stop with dumb theories.

    do you think Sudan is better now, after bloody partition?
     
    So you support the North Sudanese Muslims exploiting the Southern Sudanese Christian tribes? Of course you would do that. Why don't you prater you bullshit in front a big huge, Dinka dude.

    Why don’t you divide the fucking America or British territories into 50 pieces?
     
    That is what White Nationalists want, to secede from the ZOG Washington regime. Support them.

    the rest of the world is not going to support your parasitic life style in American or Britain.
     
    Parasitic lifestyle??? What? So is Japan, South Korea, Singapore, Hong Kong, Taiwan, Germany, Finland, Australia etc... all parasitic lifestyle??

    Replies: @jami

  • What happens when a 100 percent non-white high school plays a 99 percent non-white high school in a football game in the state of Alabama? It should be noted for those unfamiliar with the two high schools, almost every student is black. Why does this matter? Because the following event can't be blamed on white...
  • @From Detroit suburbs to rural Philippines
    @Jami

    Jami nice try, Those ghetto, future inmates certainly don't look like my children. Trying to shame us over not being concerned over those who hate us is not going to make me feel bad in the slightest.

    Replies: @Jami

    I’m not trying to make you feel bad but your comment puts all black kids in one lump they aren’t all ghetto and waiting for their time in prison. No more than all white kids are povershed or rich. They make up 13oercent of our society and cause the most problems. I’m not making excuses I’m simply saying your comment is wrong in so many ways. I grew up being told we’re to stick to our race all that. I still believe that way for all races. As I said. I’m just saying some of those kids are just like ours. Wanna good life. Not the ones in this particular incident…. I’m speaking on black children as a whole as you did

    • Replies: @Jim in Jersey
    @Jami

    Then we, like you, are tired of constantly planting/watering/cultivating miles and miles of negros in order to find one that bears fruit so all the leftists can gather around and scream ‘See? It works!’

    The amount we have given up on in this backward, foolish social experiment will probably be recoverable in time but the most time that passes, the less likely it is to happen at all.

    I’m not saying all black children are bad. I will go on record as saying most are a problem and should be dealt with as such.

    You’re stuck in this baby/bath water dilemma. Just stop.

    , @jack daniels
    @Jami

    Young blacks are encouraged by the wealthy white left (aka "the Jews") to be aggressive sociopaths who blame whitey for everything and put all their hopes of success into supporting politicians. What's in it for the whites is that the politicians carry out their radical cultural agenda -- Tranny Storybook Hour and the like. Many blacks refuse to go down this road but so many go along that black culture begins to presuppose social dysfunction as the norm. I don't condemn blacks except they really need to focus more on this aspect of the problem. Farrakhan is one who does, whatever faults he may have.

  • @Love Street
    Oh well.. boys will be boys.
    Don’t pay attention to this story,now go watch Netflix.
    No loss here.

    Replies: @Ward Dorrity, @Jami, @Chris Mallory

    You’re sick. No loss here! Children were shot. Idc what color they are. You disgust me. You make all whites look bad. Keep this fucked up thinking to yourself fuck free speech when you’re talking about kids you asshole

    • Troll: Richard B
    • Replies: @Jim in Jersey
    @Jami

    You said ‘children’ and ‘kids’.

    Neither is true or accurate. Your over- the-top hand wringing over Love Street’s dismissal of a typical black gathering that ended in gunfire shows either your denial of the problem or your agreement with hisbits currently being addressed.

    Blacks are the problem. Wherever they go, this occurs. It’s expected and encouraged. They’re weaponized against us. We’re forced to fight them according to a set of rules that they are not held to.

    So piss off.

    , @From Detroit suburbs to rural Philippines
    @Jami

    Jami nice try, Those ghetto, future inmates certainly don't look like my children. Trying to shame us over not being concerned over those who hate us is not going to make me feel bad in the slightest.

    Replies: @Jami

  • Between the years of 2013 and 2017, 592 people were murdered in Washington D.C. Six of those murdered were white females, or one percent. Why mention this? Because a black male just murdered a white female in Washington D.C. [Man arrested in fatal stabbing of dog walker in Washington, D.C.: Police say a motive is...
  • @bruce county
    @eah

    "IT"will be out on parole in less than 7 years, then hired by a federal agency through affirmative action and "IT" will kill again. Black privilege wins the day. .

    Replies: @Jami

    Although I do agree with the black privilege comment. You’re right on that one. It’s the opposite of what they declare they get every way in the world handed to them to be good people. Out of pity from the ridiculous white folks that believe we owe them something for years past. I just don’t think the comment you made prior was necessary.

  • @HT
    She was a liberal activist, very naive and had no idea of the danger that surrounded her on the streets DC. Probably grew up being told that black people are harmless.

    Replies: @Racoon, @Realist, @Augustus, @Jami, @Margery's friend

    Did you really just say that? Harmless? You don’t have to be a certain color to be harmful or harmless. This is the most ridiculous comment I’ve read in a very long time.

    • Replies: @Jim in Jersey
    @Jami

    You’re adding your own inflection to someone else’s statement.

    Nowhere did I see any mention of other races not being dangerous. Only a mention of how we’re taught from birth that it’s not nice to presume people are dangerous they are black.

    Perhaps you landed on the wrong thread with your second comment. Blacks are notoriously more dangerous than other races and your impression that it’s not true is kind of childish.