Alternate hypothesis. The author’s tinfoil hat is too tight and his loose accusations, if believed by anyone in China, will get Americans killed in retribution for something that it is very unlikely our government had anything to do with.

What we call race realism is what was considered common sense until perhaps the 1950s. It is a body of views that was so taken for granted it had no name, but it can be summarized as follows: That race is an important aspect of individual and group identity, that different races build different societies that reflect their natures, and that it is entirely normal for whites (or for people of any other race) to want to be the majority race in their own homeland. If whites permit themselves to become a minority population, they will lose their civilization, their heritage, and even their existence as a distinct people.

All other groups take it for granted that they have a right to speak out in their own interests. Only whites have lost this conviction.

We are the point where someone who is accused of being a NAZI (vehement, semi-antitic or otherwise) is quite likely the person in the room who is interesting and not hollowed-out and termite-inhabited.

Well done.

Somebody must be messing with the Internet and misdirecting and disinforming. The real flag of Birobidzhan is:

Acknowledged. The rainbow flag is listed on Wikipedia as the flag as of a moment ago, but I accept that this is someone playing a prank. Has to be…

And I can’t see 6 million US Jews receiving much of a welcome anywhere else in the world.

Well, some could go to the Jewish Autonomous Oblast in the Russian Far East. I saw it on the map one day and looked it up because it seemed so anomalous. It is one of two official Jewish regions in the world today though only 0.2% of the people there practice Judaism. On the bright side, the flag is literally a rainbow flag and you know when you see those, you are in an area well on the way to corruption and subversion making the Jews feel right at home.

If you make the mission of the military to defend America only, of course you can rationally cut the military budget by 50% and still outspend any rival. However, as Smedley Butler accurately said, “War is a Racket” and we would have to find a way to overcome the racketeers who control everything.

Having been told that the result would be war with Britain and France. He was a gambler and he lost but it was a gamble he made of his own free will. The invasion of the Soviet Union was another gamble that Hitler made of his own free will. The war came about as a direct result of Hitler’s decisions. Which means he, and he alone, was responsible for the war.

Yes Hitler was a gambler. Yes, he lost. But don’t try to continue the outrageous con that Britain and France who had a choice and made a choice to start another war with Germany as a result of Germany’s actions in the east had no agency in this affair–were mindless automatons in this affair. They made a choice and a gamble as well. While they were on the winning side, it is looking more and more like both of these countries lost their gambles as well. Europe lost WW2 much as it did WW1.

Britain and France had come to the conclusion that a stand had to be made. They did not start the war. Hitler could have avoided war by not invading Poland. The British and French had made their position crystal clear. Hitler chose war.

Hitler chose war with Poland. Britain and France chose war with Germany and thus started WW2 and in doing so, did not help Poland at all. As for negotiating in bad faith with Chamberlain, this presumes that what Germany did to resolve the Danzig situation was any of Britain’s business. I’m not dying on any hill in saying this, but just stating simple truth and fact of who started wars with whom. I also put it in a larger context of the history of British perfidy regarding Europe which is more a matter of interpretation and opinion.

Contrary to the claims in this article, WW2 in Europe began when Britain and France made a choice to start a war with Germany to enforce their Polish guarantee as Germany and the Soviet Union invaded and partitioned Poland. Britain and France chose to war against one of these countries and became allies with the other. Absent this action, there would have likely been a war between Germany and the Soviet Union in time, but no World War. Obviously, the Polish guarantee did not help Poland in the slightest, but I am not deluded into believing that helping Poland was ever the goal of the guarantee. Britain in particular has been starting European wars for centuries to stop would be European hegemons going back to Philip of Spain, Louis XIV of France, the War of the Spanish Succession, the Seven Years War, and the Wars against revolutionary France, and the Crimean War. World War 2 was more of the same–Britain (and France) trying to slap down a would be rival.

My notion is that Europe would be best as federal empire. Rather than centralizing the economy and currency, you have an Emperor and centralize military and foreign policy and devolve everything else to the nations of Europe which decide everything else for themselves.

Within this concept, you break up the large countries in Europe such as France, Germany, Italy, and the UK (if it stays), and Spain, into constituent nations where such separatism is popular. Even some smaller countries like Belgium would be broken up where it makes sense.

Europe would become an Empire of small nations each of which would retain enormous control over how it conducts its own internal affairs. There would be a 3% VAT or some such that funds the Empire which given the economic output of Europe, would suffice to protect its external borders in perpetuity.