RSSI would hope that even today they have plans for first strikes for G6 countries. You never know what could happen at a moment’s notice and with 350M lives at stake you don’t want to be looking at each other and wondering why you never even planned for something you need to do.
I’m sure Darwin was not thinking of Germans and Ukranians.
His comments on Australian aborigines have become notorious but they are more relevant.
This is very much a live issue. The equalizers have mandated ‘closing the gap’, following an expose of brutal treatment of uncontrollable teenage brutes in the Northern Territory correctional system.
The indigene ‘leaders’ themselves are not too sure if they really want all the dirty laundry exposed by a Royal Commission. The white do-gooders are stunned at the rebuff. They thought they were doing the right thing. Anyhow, it’s all been resolved by putting a part aborigine judge onto the Commission.
Still, 65 IQ humanoids will run around with knives, clubs and matches; making areas unsafe for human habitation as we know it.
There are eruptions of Muslim violence off and on in the US, but Muslims will never be much of a threat. They will always be a small minority.
You could be an Englishman, or Frenchman, twenty years ago.
I can think of a few reasons why Republicans support muslim immigration. First, the US is seen worldwide as being extremely one-sided in our dealings with Israel and the palis. So being able to throw bones to any muslim group serves to show that we have nothing against them. In fact I thought bombing Serbia and supporting the Kosovar muslims was definitely related to this. More than likely allowing muslim immigration into the US is too.
Democrats want mass Islamic immigration for the votes, but what the hell do RINO elites want mass Islamic immigration for?
The agree button didn’t work unless I signed up. And not being a joiner, let me share my assent thusly: people lack a political imagination. They cannot envisage something that hasn’t been seen for the decades they’ve been around. And they believe, like Francis Fukuyama, that things are different these days, because the Internet, because coffee, because Seinfeld.
Nothing has really changed. The barbarians are at the gates…
It would seem that one fifth of Trump supporters feel social pressure to keep their mouths shut when they have to confess their support to a real human, even if just over the phone. The effect may be even stronger than that, as some may not admit to being pro-Trump even in more-anonymous-seeming polls.(Barone's alternative theory: Non-live-interview polls are rigged by Trumpbots.)Replies: @Gp
Trump has consistently run better in polls conducted by automated phone calls and over the Internet (29 percent) than in live-interview polls (23 percent).
Easily solved. No more secret ballot. Every voter must declere before angry black census lady.
Very simple. Malaysia found bush, Blair, and 7 members of the bush administration guilty of war crimes.
How man iSteve readers relating to this guy? We've got Whiskey, but he's the fool of this blog.
Watch out for the guys who say he frequented PuaHate and, ergo hates, HATES! pua's. He was downright feminist, ya know! Except PuaHate is nothing of the kind: a place for failed PUAs angry about being swindled out of their money, not angry about the manipulations and objectification of women. So, pickup artists are also BSAs, imagine that.
I find it curious the extent to which real science is perceived to be taught in a classroom. Almost always (even at Caltech) the concepts being discussed have already been worked out in meticulous detail. Typically even the symbology has been carefully refined and optimized prior to presentation. While interesting and even challenging when seen for the first time this is not really science at all. If anything, it is a kind of presentation art. Science, as I understand it, happens after a large number of empty mountain dew cans and deadend trails in rare flashes of insight that reorganize some part of the world in a way that makes a kind of esoteric sense. Symbology, communicability, and formal proof come later. And, for better or worse, I doubt that the no holds barred curiosity and mental focus at the heart of this enterprise can really be taught or learned easily. At best I think it is encouraged and channeled by something we might reasonably call benevolent peer pressure.