RSSBobby PGH wrote: How about "The United Negro Carnage Fund." We can pool our money together and buy .45 Caliber autos and .357 Magnums for disadvantaged "youths" who can only afford .25s and 9mm.
Ok, that was funny.
Anon wrote: And yet, those "stupid blacks" can reproduce faster than "intelligent white" just because they don't believe in bidding up the cost of a crucial life commodity, real estate. Expensive housing is a slow motion national suicide.
Blacks have discovered how to possess highly valuable real estate at literally below replacement cost. Anon is correct. Whites CAN build segregated areas of only upper-middle-class whites and Asians, but doing so requires husband and wife to work to make 6-figure salaries. That means no more than 2 children, and a shrinking next generation and areas to choose from.
There are plenty of unemployed and underemployed young white men without a mission. Were they organized into gangs walking the streets of low-cost white neighborhoods, providing safety just by being present, then whites could retake places like Highland Park, fully surrounded by Detroit, eventually taking control of city hall. Then lower-class whites could live a life focused on family, community, and maybe even cross-race class solidarity, instead of the fractured, frightened, opioid-addled existence through which they stumble at the moment.
The bankers knew well that they were not going to get much mortgage interest out of an impoverished black class. Better to push whites out of low-cost inner city neighborhoods (see Th Slaughter of Cities, urban renewal as ethnic cleansing) where they had low heating costs in row houses, no need for a car as public transit was available, and the ability to have many children with a wife home taking care of them. In the suburbs, they needed a mortgage, two cars, could not organize to defend their interests, and had to pay a lot more for maintenance and heat. The blacks were the tool forcing whites, through crime, off their turf, but don't think they came up with the idea.
How many negroes have to be shot by those racist statues before we finally take them all down!?
We're almost all out of negroes!
Now that was funny.
It's all the blacks getting priced out of NYC and D.C. Cash outta Brooklyn and you can live quite well moving into formerly white housing in Atlanta, just as your ancestors did moving up from the South to Brooklyn.
What a disaster for Atl.
These are presumably law-abiding blacks shopping at legal gun stores, albeit for the wrong reason. Arming law-abiding blacks is likely to lead to a few more deaths, but overall unlikely to harm me and likely to HELP me by killing off criminal blacks who are attacking law-abiding blacks.
Move along.
Chandis Kee? Blessyed? My spellcheck goes wyld. The naming pattern of the AA lower class has bled over into the white lower class. Sheesh.
Class, as defined in Banfield's Heavenly City, is related entirely to future orientation. Distend your body for nine months, mom, then squeeze a head through a hole that normally accommodates much less girthful items, and do so with great struggle and pain. That shows a willingness to invest. That is good. Then take that precious child and let the state fill its head with all manners of garbage. That shows lack of future orientation.
Keep your kids out of public school, and turn off the TV. Cut the cable cord. You can use the saved money and the time not wasted to either teach your child, or send her to a private school.
CENTURION said…
56 years old with 3 Grandchillin's (that she knows of), one being 14?
Maybe, Dear, that is part of the problem?
She only has THREE grandchildren at 56? I think you miss the significance. For a pair of humans to replace themselves, they need to have 2 children; for population to remain stable, 10 women need to have 21 children among them. So, this woman to keep up the population from which she comes should have had 2.1 children, who in turn should have had 2.1 children, meaning you need 4 or 5 grandchildren to hold population steady.
At 3, population is dropping.
Oprah ALMOST gives the game away: Are there still places where people are terrorized because of the color of their skin…
Yes, plenty. Talk about any white left behind in a neighborhood that has flipped.
It started in December 2014, when two police officers (who weren't both white), were executed point blank in New York City. THe police turning their back on Mayor Dingbat had an effect.
Perhaps police in other locations can do the same to praise-obsessed President Obama if he comes to any funerals? I cannot imagine how else to influence him.
The most important task was applying for Social Security Disability Insurance for Mariam. She clearly can’t work.
Oh, goody.
We are indeed irredeemable.
All spending bills originate in the House of Representatitves, which controls the budget. Since January, 2011, this has been under the control of the Republican Party, which has continued to fund HUD. Why do we need Trump?
Why do any of these people matter?
Houston, Jackson, and Prince matter because they are proof that black people could once sing. Contrast with what followed. That Babe Ruth was a drug addict (a drunk) doesn't diminish his accomplishments as both a pitcher and a hitter; the sad end of Jackson, Houston, and Prince to drugs does go to show how culture, not wealth, is the best surety against self-destruction with drugs.
It's hard to think of a white rock star whose death would overshadow Jackson. Bruce Springsteen, maybe? Mick Jagger? Otoh, it's easy too aging plenty of white stars of greater impact than Prince. It would be interesting to contrast coverage of David Bowie with Prince. Who got more column inches?
If you would understand The logic of BRA, you need to re-read Gwoobus Harmon's late comment the other day:
Every single one of those white people in Spanish Lake who were displaced were sold a home elsewhere, by the very same realtors who filled their neighborhoods with blacks. It creates a constant demand for new home construction (and new loans) to move blacks around once homeowners are in the back stretch of their mortgages. Which is why areas of town are targeted for evacuation every 15-20 years and coincides with new shopping centers and homes being made available near enough by. This is the model and pattern used across the country, particularly aging areas of town.
BRA isn't done for the benefit of blacks. They are the tool used by DWLs and Banksters to break up white solidarity and denude lower class white capital. Gwoobus gets it.
Remind me again which party controls the House of Representatives? Since 2010? Is there any reason at all to continue funding HUD?
Pay attention to the role of DWL Republicans in this. The story notes that there was an organized, concentrated black community before urban renewal (driven by WASP Republicans like Mitch Daniels) built Indiana University on top of what was their neighborhood. The fact is, those close-in urban districts are valuable land, and will get more valuable as the gas needed to commute miles each day gets more expensive. Destroy the black community for the purpose of connected developers who want their land, and you get black dispersal into formerly white neighborhoods. Since the blacks cannot afford to move there at white prices, crime serves as the spur to get whites to abandon their lands and houses at prices blacks CAN afford.
The WASP Republican mayors in Detroit did the exact same thing in the 1950s, with the goal of uprooting the close-in black neighborhoods centered on "Black Bottom." Their "urban renewal" destroyed the neighborhood while replacing it with some Mies van der Rohe townhouses that are still highly valued today. This sent the blacks into Catholic ethnic neighborhoods of whites, controlling the Democratic political power and making sure that Cavanaugh in the 60s would be the only white Catholic Democrat mayor. The WASP Republicans won their battle with the Catholic White Democrats, and the city of Detroit was destroyed in the ensuing war.
Frankly, Black Bottom might have been a black slum, but it birthed the singers and performers of Motown. say what you will about that era, it FAR exceeded the cRAP that followed.
@Non-DWL from NE:
The whole purpose of AFFH and the alphabet soup of U.S. Government agencies created since about 1960 and U.S. Supreme Court decisions since about 1945 have been all about the destruction of YT, his family life, income, property and personal security.
It's not about destruction of YT. It's simply an effort to keep YT paying off a mortgage. If you need to pay for a house with a 30yr mortgage and at the end of that time yo have little to show for it, then you don't create or maintain an independent middle class that can stand up to financialist predation. Ideally, you get working whites to buy and move and refinance constantly ahead of the black wave so that the people who control the finance system can profit.
Blacks do not benefit by this system, either, but they do get lower-priced housing from leveraged whites who know a 20% drop in housing prices wipes out their equity. The situation will not change until you can no longer buy houses with less than 50% down.
Texas, too.
Cruz isn't bad. That was Rubio or Jeb. He's no Trump, of course.
@GrimmTale,
That video is shocking. If BlackLivesMattered, all of Chicago would be a Stop, Question, and Frisk zone. Wow.
“In court systems receiving federal funds, these practices may also violate Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, when they unnecessarily impose disparate harm on the basis of race,”
Take the Federal man's dollar, do the Federal man's bidding. Tell me, again, why the Republican congress continues to fund HUD?
If there HAD been a bunch of burly Irish there, then the "teens" would have stayed away. Scandinavians doing St Paddy's day… Not so much.
In 2015 America, you can't go a day in Detroit, Chicago, Newark, Camden, Gary, Rochester, New York City, Philadelphia, Baltimore, Milwaukee, Minneapolis, St. Louis, Birmingham, Memphis, Atlanta, and Indianapolis when a black person isn't shooting another black person (or robbing/shooting a white person).
I'm not so sure about that with respect to NYC. 339 murders in 2014, 350 in 2015. Even if they were all black, they would have missed a few days. Chicago, with about 850,000 blacks versus NYC's 2,000,000, outmurdered us by over 100 murders. So you CAN control black murder rates, but you cannot do it by pretending. Assuming the 488 Chicago murders were all done by blacks, that means that one in every 2000 blacks in Chicago was murdered (an obvious overstatement, but not by much.) translate the same rate to NYC, and that would have been 1000 dead blacks, 650 more than were overall killed in the city.
Why the use of stop, question, and frisk was ever challenged is beyond me, at least from the black perspective.
Savannah Walker deserved to grow up in a world where she could pursue her dreams and live in a peaceful community; unfortunately, Martin Luther King's dream is the map for where ever America is headed.
I'd take MLK's dream at this point. Imagine not judging by the color of skin, but by the content of character? I agree with PK: ANYone who harms a child ought to be brought to swift anD immediate justice. If only we WERE allowed to judge people on the content of their character, instead of first having to check on the color of their skin, to see if we can tell the truth or not.
In a sane world, "Rabbit" would hang from the highest point in New Orleans for days.
I have to disagree. I know our host's distaste for heroin and heroin dealers, perhaps even stronger than murderers. If this killer HAD been strung up, then the Feds would not have gotten, per the story "the indictment against 13 alleged members of the city’s “39ers” gang listed 13 slayings, numerous shootings, drug trafficking and gun crimes in a 45-count roadmap of urban mayhem. Three of the 13 defendants already have pleaded guilty. "
That's 3 people already in jail as a result, and I'd bet a lot of heroin dealers going away. We complain about the ghetto cult of "snitches get stitches," but here is a snitch (who will likely get knifed for it.) if the host truly hates heroin dealers, he has to back this.
Of course, there is NO way to get out of student loan debt, except by paying it off. This kid ought to learn that and not take it on in the first place. That would also cut out most of the educational industrial complex. Good. Couldn't happen to nicer folks.
We need to encourage the HP to keep using the term racist, sexist, etc. this will drain them of any power when people ignore them. The best part about the Trumpening.
How can teenagees have pictures like these on Facebook without getting in trouble? Don't other family members wonder where the kids are at all hours of the night? Didnt the school send home a letter once thier attendance fell off?
This is negligent parenting.
This brings up a thought. These idiots post these pictures ALL THE TIME on Facebook. I expect that they are too young to legally possess firearms and are committing a felony. Or perhaps, given the 1/3rd of black males who are in prison, probation, etc, they live in a house with a man who commits a felony by having a firearm.
How hard would it be to report EVERY picture of an armed young black man like this to local police, and have them investigate? Given the level of white working class unemployment, this would be a VERY socially useful way to pass the time.
The remaining three defendants — Veshawn Smith, 15, and Trequan Sutton and Quindarius Slade, both 16, each pleaded guilty Thursday afternoon and were sentenced to 18 years in prison.
I'd have expected those 3 names to have done worse than Brandon Jerome Smith, who will serve 45 years. Guess that's my white privilege showing.
@PaintJob Theory,
Oh, and the obligatory "good boy" who took care of his mother and was an organ donor. Don't dislocate your arm patting yourself on the back so hard over things that the majority of white people do without even thinking about it.
I think you subscribe to Progressive equalist philosophy, perhaps without knowing it. Blacks donate organs at MUCH lower rates than whites, which is one reason why they have such a hard time when they need an organ. You're upset with applauding them because they did something whites do all the time; in other words, you accept that they are whites with darker skin and should act the same way.
They're not, and there is no value judgment in that. If you want to build a better African, encourage and praise the talented 10th. Shame the pathology of the bottom 20% of them so that illegitimate children and crime are policed by them. The other thing you have to do is continually, gradually raise (not lower, as this society has done) the level of behavior that gets cited as "good behavior."
It strikes me that this guy, like the janitor a few days back, was not an acid dissolving the bonds of society. He won't get your society to the moon or the stars, but as Mr. Rational wrote a few days ago, "if they were all like that, would this blog even exist?" To ask it is to answer it.
Anon 3:15 wrote:
Bottom line, they want cops to give out civil summons instead of arresting people.
You cannot really have a problem with this? One citation for public urination and you are now a sex offender. If the law was changed because blacks cried racism, good for them. Just like I supported black lives matter in taking down Woodrow Wilson, whose anti-Catholic and anti-German bigotry extended World War 1, led to an unjust peace, incentivized the Germans to unleash Lenin on Russia, and basically got 100 Million people killed. If the only reason he gets defamed is because he was also an asshole to blacks, I'll take it.
Blacks without the all-powerful Federal state created by Thomas Woodrow Wilson would be an annoyance, but you would likely never have seen the Federal interference with local matters that has occurred. The police state was created to deal with blacks, but it is a threat to all of us. Don't let anything blind you to that. This rollback is a good thing.
2 Minutes alpha wrote:
Ehh, sounds like he was a decent sort, not the kind to cause trouble … I'm assuming the furniture he was helping to move actually came from his friends apartment, probably an Earl Butz sort of black. Reads like the man was more dedicated to excellence at his job than All the 6 figure professionals I deal with daily are. This country would do well to start treating the janitors, the groundskeepers, the fast food workers, the house painters and all the rest with a little bit more respect which equates to any.
This is the most dangerous and inflammatory comment ever posted on this blog. Rising star is grade inflation, of course, but this man went about an ordinary task with extraordinary grace and a pursuit of excellence. Those commenters who recognized this are correct, especially Mr. rational "If they were all like that, would this blog even exist?"
It's clear the role played by blacks: afflict and destroy the communities of lower-income whites, so the whites can have no buildup of capital across generations, so they have to move every 20 years to a new, safe community, taking out yet another mortgage to feed into the coffers of the moneyed class, safely protected by high economic fences in communities as white as the one Tim Wise lives in. Part and parcel of this is disparaging the work of the working class, white as well as black, and setting whites and blacks in that class against each other so That the DWL class can continue to sneer and profit.
If you want to understand the Trump phenomenon, and why this game is coming to an end, you must check out the posting on this blog from Wednesday, a must read for all here.
“We have to stop killing one another,” said community activist Michael Muhammad, who organized the march. “Don’t shoot your brother and sister.”
If he had stopped at five words, no one here would think a bad thought about Michael. I guess killing non-blacks isn't a problem for him, though.
Anon wrote: It is a tragedy even though he most likely a color blind dwl. The fact is, this is the type of white person who is most likely going to be murdered by blacks. This is of course due to his refusal to see the truth all around him.
Sad but true.
29 and biking around Baltimore on a Saturday night.
Here we have to give credit to the African-American people. They know very well that there is safety in numbers. In other words they have adapted to the current conditions. Walking around by yourself with all the knowledge that people have to have of conditions in the world today indicates that you just simply cannot read reality. This man paid for it.
As Ayn Rand said, "you can avoid reality. But you cannot avoid the consequences of avoiding reality."
Never saw PK comment on the book The Slaughter of Cities but if you want to understand the kleptocracy that is the USA, you need to read the book. In a nutshell, it outlines the strategy that is BRA:extract wealth from unconnected Whites to put into the housing industrial complex. Breakup low-cost white neighborhoods by moving in blacks, andyou also control the breeding of lower-caste whites. You can google the following text; I recommend reading the article from which it originates.
It isHIGHLY relevant to the destruction of white neighborhoods and fertility, especially in rowhouse cities like Baltimore andPhilly.
In addition to the Catholic Church’s ban on contraception, a ban which had added force because of the religious cohesion of the ethnic neighborhood, one of the main things which fueled this demographic increase in Philadelphia was the rowhouse. It was cheap enough for a worker to own. It was more spacious than an apartment, and instead of paying rent and being at the mercy of landlords, a man couId own his home free and clear in the time it took him to payoff his mortgage. Since it was located in the city near public transportation, the rowhouse did not require the expense of owning a car. Since it was surrounded on both sides by other houses, it was cheap to heat. As a result, it allowed the working-class Catholic family to have a large family, and over a period of time, it allowed him to benefit from the political power which followed demographic increase, which is precisely what was causing Blanshard and the Phillips crowd concern.
This is a 1940s version of what Steve Sailer called “Affordable Family Formation,” which explains the red/blue split in America. Jones continues:
The attack on the rowhouse which the BPE orchestrated meant an attack on all of the cultural attributes that went with the rowhouse, a building which symbolized the cultural independence of the ethnic neighborhood based on religious cohesion and the economic independence of immigrant workers who could own their own homes. The attack on the rowhouse in Philadelphia was a covert attack on the Catholics who lived in them, orchestrated by a ruling class that knew, as good Darwinians, that demography was destiny and that they, because of their all but universal adoption of contraception, were on the losing end of the demographic equation. Urban renewal, like the sexual revolution which followed it eighteen years later, was the WASP ruling class’s attempt to keep “the United States from becoming a Catholic country by default.”
Never saw PK comment on the book The Slaughter of Cities but if you want to understand the kleptocracy that is the USA, you need to read the book. In a nutshell, it outlines the strategy that is BRA:extract wealth from unconnected Whites to put into the housing industrial complex. Breakup low-cost white neighborhoods by moving in blacks, andyou also control the breeding of lower-caste whites. You can google the following text; I recommend reading the article from which it originates.
In addition to the Catholic Church’s ban on contraception, a ban which had added force because of the religious cohesion of the ethnic neighborhood, one of the main things which fueled this demographic increase in Philadelphia was the rowhouse. It was cheap enough for a worker to own. It was more spacious than an apartment, and instead of paying rent and being at the mercy of landlords, a man couId own his home free and clear in the time it took him to payoff his mortgage. Since it was located in the city near public transportation, the rowhouse did not require the expense of owning a car. Since it was surrounded on both sides by other houses, it was cheap to heat. As a result, it allowed the working-class Catholic family to have a large family, and over a period of time, it allowed him to benefit from the political power which followed demographic increase, which is precisely what was causing Blanshard and the Phillips crowd concern.
This is a 1940s version of what Steve Sailer called “Affordable Family Formation,” which explains the red/blue split in America. Jones continues:
The attack on the rowhouse which the BPE orchestrated meant an attack on all of the cultural attributes that went with the rowhouse, a building which symbolized the cultural independence of the ethnic neighborhood based on religious cohesion and the economic independence of immigrant workers who could own their own homes. The attack on the rowhouse in Philadelphia was a covert attack on the Catholics who lived in them, orchestrated by a ruling class that knew, as good Darwinians, that demography was destiny and that they, because of their all but universal adoption of contraception, were on the losing end of the demographic equation. Urban renewal, like the sexual revolution which followed it eighteen years later, was the WASP ruling class’s attempt to keep “the United States from becoming a Catholic country by default.”
Adolf, who witnesses said married Eva just hours before the fall of Berlin, was returning from the store where he had just purchased Skittles and schnapps-flavored iced tea when he made the decision to end his life.
Thanks for the great laugh, Anon.
Anon735 wrote: By my estimation 99.9% of coalburnery could be avoided by an intact family and proper parenting…. I'm betting that the social engineers who are constantly trying to undermine the nuclear family know this. Absolutely true.
I could say the same about black families. A father in the home is critical to properly formed young people. White illegitimacy rates now exceed the black rates that Moynihan called a disaster. 70% black illegitimacy goes beyond disaster to Ragnarok.
Find out who profits from destroying first black families and then white families, and target that group. Nothing else will save us.
Rex Hymens wrote Just look at what has happened to EVERY city that has a large negroe population. Then remember that it ONLY happened because of White guilt.
It HAS to stop, before EVERY city and town is a ghetto. ALL we have to do is shrug off White guilt, laugh at political correctness and refuse to continue to allow feral criminals with 80 IQs set the rules and the agenda. Just imagine how the police of the 1930's or 40's would have handled these BLM protests, and let's start demanding we return to some fucking SANITY in our society.
NYC had a large Negro population. Still does; about 25% of the city, over 2 million people. Neighborhoods like West Harlem, Clinton Hill, Fort Greene, and even Bed-Stuy are either majority white again, or trending that way. The difference is that nYC was run for 24 years (even Dinkins was harsh towards blacks, harsher than the current Sandinista mayor) by mayors who used policies that did not pretend that blacks aren't more violent and more likely to commit gun crime.
The chief beneficiaries of this have been the blacks, who are less likely to be killed here than their fellow blacks in places like Chicago. Strict enforcement of laws against criminal behavior gradually changed the population, and I don't think it will return to the 2200 murders of 1990.
The Jim Crow laws had largely the same effect. Black children in 1960 were more likely to be raised in 2-parent families than white children are today. I suppose that the laws would eventually have been repealed as unneeded, after several generations of pressure against the most violent and irresponsible members of the black population. I have to believe that if black dysfunction in the 1960s reflected that seen in th 1990s that there would have been no civil rights movement.
An urban environment is a relatively new evolutionary development. Europeans, Middle Easterners, and East Asians have had thousands of years of selective pressure to remove from the breeding population those who could not get with the program. Looks like we will need to start over with blacks, but the behavior of them in the 1950s suggests it's not hopeless with the right conditions. Those conditions definitely do NOT include bad criminology creating bad law, and subsidizing the behavior of the worst-behaved blacks (and inviting in hordes of immigrants to undercut the economic underpinnings of black men who DO want to work to support their families).
It's the war on people out, walking, enjoying themselves that kills me. It creates a society of people hiding inside, riding in cars for protection. This kind of crime is much worse than a single, deluded person out for a walk getting killed. Here's hoping she is locked away for a long time.
Take two items from the Progressive book of mantras. conflate. What you get is pure comic genius, courtesy Anon:5:15am. Read it again and enjoy:
The problem is that racists have buried boxes of ammunition under the streets in economically disadvantaged neighborhoods.
Now, because of Climate Change, those secret stores are spontaneously erupting and harming the most vulnerable members of society.
Bogolyubski is worth keeping around for coining "Crystal Methodism" alone. He is probably too extreme for most people. That's ok. Most people go the "moderate" route. So triangulating get with bogo moves more people toward where they ought to be.
Sadly, there is no way to Upvote and make a comment the top on a thread. I think one of the following three is the pithiest in the bunch. Enjoy:
All I can do is applaud. Like Paul said, congratulations Baltimore! Great job! And remember, we've still got six weeks to go. There is still plenty of time to break four hundred. I have faith they can do this. Go negroes! The Baltimore police department finally has my respect.
Former Miss Greenbaum
Maybe you can rebrand Life ceral for blacks. Call it Black Life. It would look like Skittles, with a massive dose of high fructose corn sweetener, and the goodness of whole grain g.m.o.'s. Pour on lactose free milk, and it makes it's own purple drank. Just think of the great commercials. Ima not gone eat it. You eat it. I know, lets give it to Jamal, he hates every thing. He likes it! Hey Jamal! Because, black lives matter.
Anon 11:04
Maybe you can rebrand Life ceral for blacks. Call it Black Life.
Perhaps we can add in Post 'Hood Toasties(tm): just the thing to eat after you torched your local grocery during the riot and suddenly find yourself living in a food desert.
Anon 10:16
Wow. they are out-killing New York. There are over 2 Million blacks in NYC, about the size of the city of Chicago. Yet NYC doesn't have the murder count of either other city — yet. Give Mayor Sandinista time.
I have seen some excellent comments at SBPDL. Whoever the Anonymous is who wrote this ought to "sign" future comments with a handle. It's brilliant, and I'd like to be able to read more.
This ought to be an article on its own.
I think you've all missed the significance. I applaud these athletes: no kidding.
University Adminstrations are riddled through and through with DWLs and SJWs who are accountable to no one. Well, I thought no one. But the fact is, they were held accountable by these students. You might not like their race or tactics, but they did something I would not have thought possible. Good for them: one rotten college admin down, the rest of the rotten structure to follow.
Learn from the Negro: stand alone, like a mythical Marlboro man, and you'll get cut down, just like all those Euro-Americans who refused to adapt to reality and went jogging, or bike riding, or walking, by themselves. Individual fingers will snap, but closed into a fist they can do damage. Take all our unemployed white men and have them walk the streets of urban ghettos in gangs of four or five, reclaiming low-priced turf for themselves and their posterity. No other future will work.
Anon 9:49 said Some will say that a return to sanity is impossible while our current government stands, but I don't believe that is necessarily true. The current framework of our government will tolerate sanity because it is the same framework that was in place prior to our foray into insanity.
Fundamentally, it's not the same framework. What we live under now is administrative law. That is VERY different from Anglo-Saxon common law. Think about, for example, getting a ticket for not wearing a seat belt. It is almost inconceivable that someone not wearing a seatbelt could directly harm others, and yet we enforce that "law" in 49 out of 50 states. Under administrative law, means, motive, and opportunity are not needed to prove existence of a crime. Your job as a subject, not a citizen, is to obey.
We built this unjust structure of law, thinking it would apply only to blacks. Now it's hitting everyone, except those in power who are immune. For reference, see the book Three Felonies a Day, about the fact that, according to Federal "law," we each do 3 things every day that make us felons. There is no restoration of America until there is a restoration of Anglo-Saxon law; anything else just means people fighting like post-colonial Africans to gain control of the machinery of power.
Take the Federal man's dollar, do the Federal man's bidding. Don't want to be prosecuted for using Federal dolLars to create disparate impact neighborhoods? DO NOT take the Federal dollar. Do you run a private business and want to avoid being sued?
Let's see what the EEOC has to say about the matter:
Coverage of Business/Private Employers
General Coverage
If a complaint against a business (or some other private employer) involves race, color, religion, sex (including pregnancy), national origin, disability or genetic information, the business is covered by the laws we enforce if it has 15 or more employees who worked for the employer for at least twenty calendar weeks (in this year or last).
Age Discrimination and Coverage
If a complaint involves age discrimination, the business is covered by the laws we enforce if it has 20 or more employees who worked for the company for at least twenty calendar weeks (in this year or last).
Keep your business under 15 employees, and you're judgment proof.
These were black assed bastards attacking good white people.
Anon, I don't know this guy they attacked. But according to the police report, he was 5'8" and 200lbs. That's either overweight or obese. In other words, he was unable to run due to self-created problems, and was probably not in full fighting form. He showed himself to be a soft target. They "seen their opportunities, and they took them."
If I had one wish for white Americans, it would be: grow the f@ck up. Accept reality. Do NOT go out walking alone where crowds of young blacks are walking. Accept that you, like they, must travel in packs (no less than 4, please) if you want to be unchallenged. If you're male, get to the gym and work out. If female, be worthy of investment. Being "fluffy" is an open Invitation to health and crime disaster. That's the world. deal with it.
If Detroit will shrink and leave outlying areas fallow, then you can move in and claim the territory. there is a reason the French founded a city there in 1701. As soon as the hostile natives are no longer around, there will STILL be a need for a city there.
Highland Park, surrounded by Detroit and even blacker, could be bought cheaply by enough whites and flipped. The whites would need to function as a bloc, however, and take over city hall. Hasidic Jews could do it, and Amish if they had protection.
Orwell: Whoever controls the present controls the past. Whoever controls the past controls the future.
Taleb quotes a similar idea in Antifragile: a "man without a past has no future," an idea he credits to the Mediterranean. An Israeli friend told me "a tree without roots cannot grow."
Make no mistake: they know exactly what they are doing.
You have to feel for Mrs. Fitzpatrick. She limited her breeding to two children, and actually has a husband.
You won't defeat AFFH, but there IS a way to not suffer too badly from it. rent to older negroes without children. Next time someone accuses you of racism for avoiding young black men, let them know you do not fear 70yo black men, even a group of 20 of them. Sure, that's discrimination on the basis of age, but they ALL do it. stereotypes work; all you need to do is show them the ones they rely upon.
Roland Park in NW Baltimore is one of the most pleasant places in the USA, I went there two years ago, and was impressed with the architecture and comprehensive feel of the place, La Wik says:
Roland Park is the first planned "suburban" community in North America, located in Baltimore, Maryland, USA. It was developed between 1890 and 1920 as an upper-class streetcar suburb. The early phases of the neighborhood were designed by Edward Bouton and Frederick Law Olmsted, Jr.
Roland Park Elementary/Middle School, a K-8 school,[2] earned the Blue Ribbon for Academic Excellence from the state department of education. The two yearly musicals at the school are said to be the best school musicals in the city.
It's probably populated with the sort of sincere white liberals who do not know any better. I suggest you see it soon. In checking a recent demographic map of Baltimore, the percentage of Caucasians dropped a bit. Turn that into a flood and there will be no more whites living in Charm City.
I don't think you recognize, PK, the implications of your statement about equality. If equality is untrue between races, or rather, if some people are just genetically stupid (and there are plenty of genetically stupid people of all races, just a higher pctg of Africans are that way), then there will be a large percentage of people who will NEVER be able to do jobs requiring high IQ.
If you hold that everyone is equal, then the only thing holding back blacks is either lack of effort ("conservatives") or racism ("progressive"). If you abandon the idea that IQ or ability is environmentally determined, then you need to start to answer this question: how do we design a society so that there ARE jobs or worthwhile work for the people who are NOT ever going to be rocket scientists?
The blacks are correct: there are no jobs for them. There never will be for a lot of them, not the way we are set up now. There will not be jobs for a lot of white people, soon, and the cancer that started in the black lower class is now eating the white lower and middle classes.
The question is: once we recognize that stupid isn't most people's fault, and it cannot be fixed, how do we make for a meaningful life for the stupid people?
@Pat Boyle,
I generally use Starbucks beans. There's nothing wrong with Starbucks in terms of coffee. But be realistic. …
Down the hill there is a Starbucks but there are two other espresso shops directly across the street. If Starbucks hires surly black people I can go to Peets. A lot of people think their coffee is better anyway.
A few years back, I made a trip to a coffee-growing region, where I toured a few coffee farms. At one farm, the manager told us that she sold "to all the major chains. Peets buys our highest grade of coffee; Starbucks buys our lowest grade of coffee."
The next place was an organic coffee farm where they explained the deal on grades of coffee. You can do a Vienna or City roast on high-grade beans as the volatile oils that give coffee its flavor boil out of the bean at low temperatures. Low-grade beans need an Italian or espresso roast to get the oils out, but this can cause the coffee to be bitter. Making the coffee with an espresso maker can avoid some of the bitterness.
This explains why Starbucks makes lousy coffee in a drip pot. It also explains their business model: buy cheap crap coffee and market the hell out of it, while insulting customers about race. You're MUCH better off at Peet's.
@Anon6:31,
Why in God's name are your kids in a public school? You turn your precious children over to the state, you get what you deserve. Sell the car, disconnect cable, live on one salary, and either homeschool or find a Catholic or other religious school.
Divorce yourself from BRA. vote against school taxes. starve the beast. Save your innocent children. Stop wasting time here: go get a second job to buy their freedom from the public school system.
Off topic, but it's been annoying me.
DWL means Disingenuous White Liberal. These are the people who mouth all the platitudes about blacks, who get upset about "black lives matter," but consider integration to be "for thee, but surely not for me." Tim Wise is an example of the species: constantly berating whites for "racism," but living in a +95% white area. The DWL KNOWS the truth, but pretends otherwise in public for personal gain.
There are also SWLs, sincere white liberals. These people believe the propaganda they've ingested. They live integrated lives, not using blacks as a weapon against their enemies. They have the potential to "wake up" and see things realistically, without becoming a DWL.
The DWL will always be your enemy. The SWL Is always one incident away from becoming your ally. don't confuse the two.
World_War_Me said…
Ex-Brooklynite, you are a very talented songwriter. Nog Lobster=hilarious!
Thanks, WWM. I got kinda sickened doing that. The thought of inflicting pain on children by scalding them now horrifies me in a way I did not understand before.
Blacks already start life in the hole, IQ-wise. But to take a dumb child and torture it instead of shower love on it is to take any possibility of its having a dull but pleasant life away. Violent upbringing loads and cocks the gun that is lower IQ and impulse control.
Anonymous said…
Can someone post some updated lyrics to the B-52's song "Rock Lobster"?
From the lyrics given here, I give you Nog Lobster
Ski-doo-be-dop
Eww
Ski-doo-be-dop
Eww
(Ski-doo-be-dop) Negro had a party (Eww)
(Ski-doo-be-dop) Her keed could not go to sleep (Eww)
(Ski-doo-be-dop) Someone walked in to scald it (Eww)
(Ski-doo-be-dop) made a nog lobster (Eww)
Aaaah
Nog lobster
Aaaah
Nog lobster
Eww
Eww
Negro at the beach (Eww)
Everywhere scorching pebbles (Eww)
Some chile went under a dock (Eww)
For that, she earned a rock (Eww)
hot enough to shock (Eww)
Made a nog lobster (Eww)
Aaaah
Nog lobster
Aaaah
Nog lobster
Nog lo-o-obster
Nog lo-o-obster
Dwellin' with a felon (Ooh ah)
Her nose was broke (Hoo ah)
Lots of trouble (Ooh ah)
For kids, double (Hoo ah)
It was in a pan! (Ooh ah)
Scalded head and hand! (Hoo ah)
Nog, nog
Nog lobster! (Aaaaaaaaah)
Down, down! (Aaaaaaah)
Lobster
Nog
Lobster
Nog
Let's rock!
Boys cooked like blinis
Girls like sweetbreads
Everybody's roastin'
Everybody's fryin'
Twistin' round the fire
Havin' fun
(Like) Bakin' potatoes
Bakin' in the sun
Put on your noseguard
Sho' you kno' that life hard
Pass the tanning butter
Here comes a steam spray (ooh wok ooh wok)
There goes a water spray (ah ah ah)
Stung like a jellyfish (huah)
Givin' them a death wish (rea-owr)
Tased by a fat bitch (geh geh geh geh geh geh geh geh geh geh)
An EBT robbin' (Laaaaa)
City-wreckin' baby momma (eh rek eh rek ah hoo)
She's got four mo' (eeeeh)
Pots o' water on the sto' (Aaaaah!)
(Lobster nog lobster-ster) Nog lobster
(Lobster) Nog lobster (Ah-ah-ah-ah-ah)
(Lobster nog lobster-ster) Nog lobster
(Lobster) Nog lobster (Ah-ah-ah-ah-ah)
(Ah-ah-ah-ah-ah)
(Ah-ah-ah-ah-ah)
Anonymous said…
Can someone post some updated lyrics to the B-52's song "Rock Lobster"?
From the lyrics given here, I give you Nog Lobster
Ski-doo-be-dop
Eww
Ski-doo-be-dop
Eww
(Ski-doo-be-dop) Negro had a party (Eww)
(Ski-doo-be-dop) Her keed could not go to sleep (Eww)
(Ski-doo-be-dop) Someone walked in to scald it (Eww)
(Ski-doo-be-dop) made a nog lobster (Eww)
Aaaah
Nog lobster
Aaaah
Nog lobster
Eww
Eww
Negro at the beach (Eww)
Everywhere scorching pebbles (Eww)
Some chile went under a dock (Eww)
For that, she earned a rock (Eww)
hot enough to shock (Eww)
Made a nog lobster (Eww)
Aaaah
Nog lobster
Aaaah
Nog lobster
Nog lo-o-obster
Nog lo-o-obster
Dwellin' with a felon (Ooh ah)
Her nose was broke (Hoo ah)
Lots of trouble (Ooh ah)
For kids, double (Hoo ah)
It was in a pan! (Ooh ah)
Scalded head and hand! (Hoo ah)
Nog, nog
Nog lobster! (Aaaaaaaaah)
Down, down! (Aaaaaaah)
Lobster
Nog
Lobster
Nog
Let's rock!
Boys cooked like blinis
Girls like sweetbreads
Everybody's roastin'
Everybody's fryin'
Twistin' round the fire
Havin' fun
(Like) Bakin' potatoes
Bakin' in the sun
Put on your noseguard
Sho' you kno' that life hard
Pass the tanning butter
Here comes a steam spray (ooh wok ooh wok)
There goes a water spray (ah ah ah)
Stung like a jellyfish (huah)
Givin' them a death wish (rea-owr)
Tased by a fat bitch (geh geh geh geh geh geh geh geh geh geh)
An EBT robbin' (Laaaaa)
City-wreckin' baby momma (eh rek eh rek ah hoo)
She's got four mo' (eeeeh)
Pots o' water on the sto' (Aaaaah!)
(Lobster nog lobster-ster) Nog lobster
(Lobster) Nog lobster (Ah-ah-ah-ah-ah)
(Lobster nog lobster-ster) Nog lobster
(Lobster) Nog lobster (Ah-ah-ah-ah-ah)
(Ah-ah-ah-ah-ah)
(Ah-ah-ah-ah-ah)
With thanks to Anon 5:16, I offer the following version of "If I only had a heart"
Well a thug's an empty kettle
With pistols made of metal
And yet I'm torn apart
Just because you're presumin'
That I could be a human
And I should get a heart
If a giant, I'd be gentle
as a thinker, hyper-mental
Regarding love and art
I'd be aimin' at the sparrows
As a boy who shoots the arrows
If I could get a heart
Picture me a balcony
Above a voice sings low
(Snow White)
Wherefore art thou, Romeo?
(Tin Man)
Give her a beatin'. Sweet!
Just to register emotion,
muh dik I'll put in motion
And spread some legs apart
I could stay young and chipper
And I'd pork a sow-like hippo
If I could get a heart
The obvious question is, did the heart he received come from another negro, or a white person or non-negro? If the heart came from a white person, the chances are pretty good that is what drove this latest round of criminal mayhem. The white heart was filled with hate and made the young boy steal and attempt to kill. White people are known for their criminal behavior and the white heart had a terrible effect on the child's behavior.
Oh, man, was that funny.
You have to wonder if they were able to rip the heart out and give it to someone who could actually use it. You know, to give back to and thank the doctor and society that made it possible?
If you had a list of top posts, this would be in the top 5.
Texas wrote:
I will focus on this: how the DOJ report found that so many residents of Ferguson had outstanding warrants. (PK will know, but it was something like 16,000 out of 21,000.)
Must be racism, right? That's what the report states. I disagree. I think it is a reflection of a truly dysfunctional subculture.
You do make the point about exploitative local govern,nets taxing what they can. The reason I have a problem with police being used for fundraising, as they clearly were in Ferguson:
according to the book, the Federal regulations we are all required to live under have us committing "three felonies a day." It's a horror show to read. I bet a lot of the blacks in Ferguson can't even read to know what malum prohibitum laws they are breaking.
Whites CAN read, except that the Code of Federal Regulations is now hundreds of thousands of pages long. You violated it yesterday; so did I. You just didn't have time to read it, and were lucky that no one decided to prosecute or give you a ticket.
Let them perfect the use of police as shakedown artists against the blacks with poor impulse control. They're just prototyping the weapon they will soon turn against YOU.
@A taxpayer,
I sympathize. He government stuck a gun in my belly and ordered me to pay SS taxes to people I did not know. They've stolen hundreds of thousands, not counting lost interest. It's gone.
Now, the prospect is asking the government to stick a gun in the belly of other people to someday pay me. Two wrongs will not make right the original theft. If they did, then blacks could make an argument for reparations, forever. If I rejct that argument, and I do, I cannot support the same argument when it applies to white people.
The irony is, racial imbalance might end SS as we know it. The population 67 years ago was 90% white, while the one paying to support those people will soon be 50% nonwhite. Don't expect poorer, younger, blacker people to accept paying in to support richer, older, whiter people. Walk away mentally now, so you are prepared.
I repeat my comment from the other article:
Look, the Wilson shoot was a clean shoot. No doubt about it. The department he works for, and the city that runs it, is thoroughly corrupted, however. Here's the problem, white people: you let them build a police force to extract money from blacks, then don't complain when it's turned on whites. You think you have a problem with blacks? What about when they run Ferguson, serve as all the police officers, and fine every white car going through $500 for some made-up infraction?
I refer to this article, on the report by DoJ on policing in Ferguson. Just because the injustice happens to blacks, don't think it won't be turned against you. Here is a quote, to show that we have allowed the fact that it's blacks being oppressed to blind us to a scheme to rob us under color of "law."
"Even if Ferguson were to get it right: Could Florissant? Where a part-time judge making two appearances per month earns $50,000 per year? Where the prosecuting attorney 'works roughly 4% of a fulltime job, but earns 145% of a full-time public defender’s salary'"
Face it: there is very little white folks would lose from the utter collapse of the Federal government. If they could get past the idea of using Social Security to mulct their own and other white people's children, they'd be better off. There is NOTHING I want from the Feds, or the local governments in St. Louis County.
Look, the Wilson shoot was a clean shoot. No doubt about it. The department he works for, and the city that runs it, is thoroughly corrupted, however. Here's the problem, white people: you let them build a police force to extract money from blacks, then don't complain when it's turned on whites. You think you have a problem with blacks? What about when they run Ferguson, serve as all the police officers, and fine every white car going through $500 for some made-up infraction?
I refer to this article, on the report by DoJ on policing in Ferguson. Just because the injustice happens to blacks, don't think it won't be turned against you. Here is a quote, to show that we have allowed the fact that it's blacks being oppressed to blind us to a scheme to rob us under color of "law."
"Even if Ferguson were to get it right: Could Florissant? Where a part-time judge making two appearances per month earns $50,000 per year? Where the prosecuting attorney 'works roughly 4% of a fulltime job, but earns 145% of a full-time public defender’s salary'"
A couple of posters made mention of "the
Founding Fathers." Just a short tale from the trip to the bank yesterday. I was informed that my local bank branch would be open tomorrow, despite the Fed's being closed, so that any transactions would post on Tuesday. Far be it for me to complain about more service, but I had to ask which of the "Monday holidays" the bank stayed closed. Well, kiss Columbus and the Presidents goodbye, but they are still closed Memorial Day, Labor Day, and… Drumroll… Martin Luther King day.
What is wrong with white people? what, they can conquer a whole continent from people who learned to ride horses in 300 years and shoot arrows while riding, but they cannot conquer territory from lower-IQ blacks who don't even know how to hold a gun?
One commenter linked to the derelict Carnegie Library in Camden NJ. Do you know how cheap Camden is, and how depopulated? Why don't white people move in there, force out the native population, and take it over? You don't need to kill anyone, you just need all those unemployed young men to walk the streets protecting your women and children. In other words, what was once the most valuable territory in America (Detroit is an obvious place for a city, for example) is there for the taking, but it requires whites to work together to do it.
Harlem is more white than black in the western part, so it can be done. Have whites become so shallow that only fast-buck house-flipping scams are the sort of communities they will build?
I cannot remember the last movie I went to. There are perhaps a few film makers not propagandizing for TPTB. Just as people say IKAGO. I'm not going to bother taking the time to sort them out, and I'd rather not pay to be insulted. I get films on DVD from my local library, and read. There's no rap or hip/hop in books.
Further to my last comment, <a title=”"http://www.trulia.com/property/3174373415-39-Tuxedo-St-Highland-Park-MI-48203>here” href="http://www.trulia.com/property/3174373415-39-Tuxedo-St-Highland-Park-MI-48203>here is a fine, brick 3br</a> house built in 1909, when the city was 100% white. 2000 square feet, $19,000. Trulia says that highland park sells for $10 a square foot.
You want a white homeland? You could easily buy up enough land in Highland Park to displace enough of the local populace to vote in your own white mayor and city council. For each white family, an investment of maybe 40K and you could create a meaningful role for your young men, a safe community for your women and children, and cut out the squids and their mortgages. You'd have to focus on having NO public sector jobs, no police, no firemen, no schools, and supply those things by the community.
If you think it isn't possible, this is EXACTLY how ultra-Orthodox Jews have reclaimed turf from blacks and Puerto Ricans in Brooklyn. The low land prices allows them to pop out 8 children per woman. Rinse, repeat with the next black neighborhood.
We face a number of problems, and this sign and article point out a solution to them.
First, there are MANY young white men who are unemployed, and perhaps unemployable in the mythically recovered economy. Second, the costs of property are too damn high in safe, white areas. Third, single whites, like Begic in St. Louis, are easy prey for gangs of black youth.
Imagine, however, that an allied group of young white men trained in martial arts, paid for by the community, with that being their sole requirement in return for support. Oh, that, and this: they must be constantly available to escort groups of whites around dangerous neighborhoods that are largely black, and thus cheap. No guns needed, but they don't hurt. Simply a muscular presence to reclaim turf from people who grabbed it with explicit, not implicit, violence.
Take a community like Highland Park, MI, surrounded by Detroit, with average house prices of under 40k. You should be able to buy a house of 2.5 times your income, so an income of 16K should do it, $7.50 an hour at 40 hours a week. Any pay over that level and you can set aside money as a community to buy up more cheap property to convert over to lower class white territory.
Now, the displaced blacks will need a place to live. I would suggest benevolence. Pool resources, and find the DWL-est suburb you can. Buy a house or two there for the people you expel, and in 40 years your children can displace the neighborhood destroyers from that area. Oh, and you WILL be able to afford children when you don't have to pay expensive housing prices to take out big mortgages to pay off the squids.
No violence, no covenants, no control of government needed, just the ability to hang together and plan for the future. whites used to be good at that.
Oh, some sterling comments. I post below in italics, and comment thereafter.
I totally missed the episode where Fred Flintstone beat a man to death for a dinosaur bone, muh diked his woman and set both of them on fire. My parents must have made me do some chores that night.
Thread winner. Btw, dinosaur bones were likely hollow, just like modern bird bones, so the analogy is there for the taking, to chicken bones.
Which demographic is more likely to name their kid "Yabba Dabba Doo"?
There must already be someone with this name. Too funny.
Bedrock was a safe place to live because there were no Africans!
Also, it is very hard to burn down a city made of stone!
Except when it's Dresden, and it's white people trying to burn it down.
While looking for Xmas gifts I wondered how long it will be before there are 22 black crayons in a box to spread "dieversity" to a child's playtime! Of course, then, the box of crayons will stop working. Just my mind wandering.
I am old enough to recall a Crayola crayon in my youth that was peachy-pink in color, with a special name: flesh. I haven't seen that crayon in years. I'd love to see someone make politically incorrect crayons for white children, with different shades of yellow named after, um, you get the idea.
You know what is LEAST changed about the future described by the Jetsons? The family structure. Those cartoons are a time capsule of what the society that 60s radicals were protesting looked like in family structure. Imagine that BLACKS had a higher legitimate birthrate then than whites do now.
yabba dabba doooo!
@RexHymens,
this comment, sir, made me laugh. thank you:
I mean, c'mon BLACK ANNIE!?
Who in their right mind will take their kids to see Lil Orangutan Annie?
@Bogoyulbski,
When you're hot, you're hot. Wow.
Like Gollum in LOTR, the "precious" (their pensions) are far too important to them to let go. At least the mercenaries of old used to demand payment in real money, not just a puffed-up promise blown from a bankster's ass.
@BerniceGreenbaum
despite the negroes' lament about him "yearning to be free", what he really wants is a free poke chop, a blunt, and a Colt 45 every few minutes.
I think you have the solution to Negro crime. I wouldn't give the Colt 45 for the number of people killed by drunks either with cars or guns, but imagine if we gave free pot to every young male negro with the "Warrior Gene?" It would be cheaper than prison, and safer than letting them wander the streets until they earn the right to go to prison. Free pot to age 35.
No money for children birthed on welfare, however.
@Playing Roots Backwards,
Yeah, look at the black victim scams over the years, like Tawana Brawley, Crystal magnum, and others. As you say, not a lot to work with.
But the Cleveland kid is a CLEAR step up over Brown. Clear. If you want to make a winning argument.
It becomes clear that they DON'T want to make a winning argument. Makes me wonder, in agreement with Don M., if the whole thing isn't staged to make charges of police brutality look ridiculous. Also, as Don Points out, cops 'n' negroes have a symbiotic relationship, with negroes justifying ever more money spent on cops.
Check out the real story of the guy who started the Arab Spring in Tunisia some time. There they never fully debunked the myth of the "gentle giant" who also assaulted a cop. Fortunately, we did.
@Anon 4:52
Sorry pal,some dumb ass kid points a pistol at me,I'm drawing and shooting.The officer did what any one with sense would do.Gun turns out to be a replica?I guess momma shoulda smartened that boy up some.
Brownie (heckuva job!) attacked a cop. Wilson didn't throw the first punch, and Wilson didn't draw on him until he was attacked. The situation there means no threat to me, other European Americans, or even most black people, who know HITTING COPS IS NOT ALLOWED AND BRINGS BAD CONSEQUENCES.
Your approach, however, IS a threat to me. "I felt threatened" so I fired first could happen to a 12yo black kid at the hands of a white cop, or a white guy at the hands of a rogue black cop who has been steeped in anti-white hatred. Really, if blacks want to kill whites, in some horrible inversion of the old Alabama trooper's song, all they need to do in your book is become cops, and then fire away because they "thought" they saw a gun.
Perhaps the police, who are paid WELL above what the people earn, should not be prosecuted for firing. But any first use of lethal violence by police ought to come with immediate dismissal from the force. It would slow some of the jumpy ones down, since we seem unwilling otherwise to stop militarized police.
One thing I am certain about the police officer in Cleveland: he is suffering mentally for his quick action. The cops who shot Amadou Diallo were sickened afterward. I don't know how you can bring peace to those men. I hope no more get created.
Amazing to me is how the black leaders are fixated on this guy, Brown, as a cause to rally around. He was a thief, and he attacked a cop. He got shot. Argue if you want about whether lethal force was needed, but they were a LOT smarter back In 1955 to find Rosa Paris, who was much more respectable than the single mother who was originally supposed to stand up to the segregated buses.
Meanwhile there is this 12yo black kid in Cleveland who really DOES look like an innocent victim of overly jumpy police. I would bet most SBPDLers do not support the cop in that case, who I believe was white. No threat, dead kid, yet they still want to focus on Brownie. I don't get it.
Someone, a while back, pointed out that corn syrup and cheap foods were "sterility in food form." Maybe the problem with EBT isn't it's existence, but that it can be used to buy good food that nourishes.
Perhaps we should limit EBT purchases to foods that have a high estrogen level. A lot of feminizing soy, for instance. EBT keeps them from stealing, and it costs a LOT more to lock people up. We need to use it to lower the fertility of the population that receives it. Lower the testosterone of the males, and raise the obesity and thus infertility level of the females.
Oh, good. So a white government agent can shoot a black man, with minimal facial damage to himself, and get off without having to pay for a lawyer at a trial. Meanwhile, Zimmermann can have a broken nose, a bloody scalp, serious injuries, but still has to pay to defend himself at trial. Ask yourself: if Wilson were a homeowner, would he be indicted today?
If you think those government agents will hesitate to shoot white people who stand up to its force, as Randy Weaver how his wife is.
You have a duty: NEVER try to get out of jury duty. Especially not grand jury duty. Do not vote to indict people (even black people) who appear to be defending their lives and property. Do not vote to convict people who acted reasonably in self-defense. This is the one unrestricted power remaining to you in the USA. Use it.
The grand jury made the correct call. 3 blacks also voted not to indict. Good for them.
@Anon3:48
Sounds good in theory, not workable in the real world. There's a reason the usual suspects can get away with excluding "non-compatible" residents and why YT will find himself in court again when it is shown that his residents aren't diverse enough…
Actually, it already works in the real world. There is a cooperative community of Irish, called Breezy Point. It completely burned in Hurricane sandy. To buy there, you pretty much have to know someone in there. Given that most of the residents are Irish, this keeps out blacks.
That would seem to be the major feature of the place to people around here, but it's not. The community is lower and middle class white, and prices are NOT out of control, this for oceanfront property in New York City. In other words, these whites have found a way to beat the Banksters, who use fiat credit to make people but houses with high mortgages, money that the house purchasers can easily lose if a neighborhood flips.
That's the real threat.
Weisse Frau,
Do NOT change your name. this is an ORDEr, and we all know how good Germans are at following orders.
I kinda wish you'd call yourself Deutsche Frau. I think they can get on people who go for white, but who has the balls to tell you you cannot be proud of your heritage? I have German ancestry as well, and unabashedly celebrate it, especially during September, the month of Oktoberfest.
now go drink a beer, keep a clean house, raise tall beautiful children, and listen to a little Wagner. that's an Order.
alles ist in Ordnung, ja?
@Anon 9:02
In the previous blog Ex-Brooklynite posted: "If you have to buy using a mortgage, you do not own."
Even if you don't have a mortgage you still don't own. Just watch how fast your house will be taken once you stop paying the property taxes.
If you take a look at your Federal Income taxes, property taxes are not always deductible from income, while mortgage interest IS. This gives an indication of what TPTB want to make sure you gamble on. Make no mistake, buying a house with a mortgage is a gamble where you get all of the downside, and limited upside. The people who make out on the deal are the ones writing mortgages, like banks paying .25% on money to the Fed, and lending at 3.5% (a "low" rate!) to us, making a gross 14x markup on money.
Why not buy property in places like Detroit where you can spend less than a new car costs? Oh, black people live there? they're cowards, and back down to massed force. If no single whites are on the street to attack, they'll eventually get frustrated and move on.
What the elite NEVER wants to see is ordinary white people abandoning the myths they've pushed of heroic single actors on the frontier. Atomized, by ourselves, we are susceptible: we use their fiat money that they skim profits off of; we are subject to their Anarcho-tyranny laws that cite us for non-crimes like speeding, seat belt use, .08 BAC, with the bigger penalty collected in mandatory "insurance." Together we can cease being their slaves.
As to property taxes, Anon, two thoughts. First, most property tax in my town goes to pay for the skoos. Stop sending your children into the maw of the monster. Cut that expense out, and my property taxes are not much; so long as property taxes pay for LOCAL government, they are manageable. Second, allow me to introduce you to an old Brooklyn tactic: the house church/synagogue. You declare yourself a minister of a church and your house is where you worship. The house cannot be taxed. Jews in Brooklyn used to do this; I think the IRS has clamped down on obvious fraud, but cannot do away with it completely without repealing the first amendment.
Question: what if your church owned a series of buildings and used them to house "the poor" of the community? And what if the poor were members of the church? And what if everyone were poor because he gave all his money to the church?
Now you're thinking. Marlboro man must die; he is a myth to keep non-elite white people from organizing better. You wanna live alone, u gonna die alone.
@Gwinnett Gladiator:
The schools are on a slide, and the white people are contracting into a smaller and smaller area of fortification in N. Fulton. It's great there and all, but I can't quite swing a $450K house. Nor would I even want to, because Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing will inevitably just deposit LaShantay and her brood next door to me. Thus, I don't own anything, and don't want to own anything.
This makes a great impact on the wealth generation of white people, as I've said before, and I am aware of no economic modeling or statistics that attempt to quantify this phenomenon. It must be billions. Except in very rare circumstances, it is no longer possible for a white family to buy a home that they can pay off and then safely reside in until retirement or death. It doesn't exist. Everything turns to shit long before the term of a mortgage could ever be reached.
If you have to buy using a mortgage, you do not own. You've made a leveraged bet on the increase in house prices, or the depreciation of the currency. This was a GREAT bet to make every year until 2005, but since peak oil hit that year, not so much.
How to explain this? Anyone who worries about schools deserves what he gets. You want to be able to afford to live somewhere? Get a bunch of white people to move into a majority black area. You need to observe certain rules: no white is permitted out on the street by himself. No white woman is permitted to walk by herself. EVERY white male is on call to defend the community, armed if permitted, in large, peaceful gangs if arms are forbidden. You need to go somewhere, you do it in packs for safety.
Most of all, you do NOT send your children to public schools. They take BRA's dime, they play its tune. Your children are educated at home by the women (and unemployable men) who no longer need to work to pay for housing whose prices are meant to exclude blacks.
This is all doable, NOW, but requires coordination and cooperation. Whites used to be good at that. You wanna live like some mythical lone wolf, move to the mountains. You want to survive a collapsed economy, you build untaxable social capital, and find a use for all those lower-IQ whites who are shut out in a hyper-technical economy. Large gangs of white men, walking the streets peaceably, can do this, and it will give a mission to our young who lack one.
@Weisse Frau
My children have to function in a brainwashed society full of "invasion of the body snatcher" friends trying to determine if they aren"t also properly brainwashed.
The other day i slipped up. Some moms told me they were against religious extremists. But they also did not want to be an extreme liberal. I let slip that we do not promote gays in our family, that the subject never comes up. They laughed. But since then they have shunned me. No loss, but irritating to make a mistake.
I guess "we do not like religious extremism" is code for "i hope my children grow up wonderfully gay so i push the lifestyle on them".
About the gays: I suspect that there are a number of them that are just born that way. Like being born black, I cannot hate on them for that simple fact. How they choose to ACT with that genetic endowment is another thing. If Michelangelo had been born 500 years later, he'd be a worthless bathhouse banger.
But there are others for whom it is a choice, sort of. They might have a tendency one way, but societal and parental pressure pushes them the other way. I know young people who, picking up the vibe from media and nonstop drumbeat, have chosen the homosexual lifestyle. In the 50s, they'd be straight, and a little odd.
Perhaps you might cite evidence on the life-shortening effects of the gay lifestyle, and talk about concern "for the children." But you clearly have your eye on the prize: grandchildren. The cultural warriors are trying to take that away from you, turn your children into fruitless droids whose excess production can go to BRA instead of their own progeny. Don't let them.
@Weisse Frau
My children have to function in a brainwashed society full of "invasion of the body snatcher" friends trying to determine if they aren"t also properly brainwashed.
The other day i slipped up. Some moms told me they were against religious extremists. But they also did not want to be an extreme liberal. I let slip that we do not promote gays in our family, that the subject never comes up. They laughed. But since then they have shunned me. No loss, but irritating to make a mistake.
I guess "we do not like religious extremism" is code for "i hope my children grow up wonderfully gay so i push the lifestyle on them".
About the gays: I suspect that there are a number of them that are just born that way. Like being born black, I cannot hate on them for that simple fact. How they choose to ACT with that genetic endowment is another thing. If Michelangelo had been born 500 years later, he'd be a worthless bathhouse banger.
But there are others for whom it is a choice, sort of. They might have a tendency one way, but societal and parental pressure pushes them the other way. I know young people who, picking up the vibe from media and nonstop drumbeat, have chosen the homosexual lifestyle. In the 50s, they'd be straight, and a little odd.
Perhaps you might cite evidence on the life-shortening effects of the gay lifestyle, and talk about concern "for the children." But you clearly have your eye on the prize: grandchildren. The cultural warriors are trying to take that away from you, turn your children into fruitless droids whose excess production can go to BRA instead of their own progeny. Don't let them.
it's quite the powerful demonstration of a black lynch mob demanding they be absolved from being required to live under Anglo-Saxon Law (the U.S. Constitution).
I don't think the US Constitution is Anglo-Saxon law. Perhaps at the start, with its negative portrayal of government powers (the govt can ONLY do what is in Article 1 Section 8 [there's some irony, eh? section 8 could save us!]), and anything not in there is not permitted.
But more and more the Constitution has become a positive prescription of government responsibilities. That is in line with Dutch-Roman law, and the Code Napoleon, the former introduced to US Law by the Dutch colony on Manhattan, the latter from Louisiana after Napoleon sold it to us.
Anglo-Saxon law is a wondrous thing. Like the 10 Commandments, it tells you in a concise fashion what you may not do, and everything else is permitted. When you look at the Code of Federal Regulations at over 80,000 pages, all of which you must comply with, you recognize that we do NOT live under Anglo-Saxon law.
Now, even if the original Constitution WERe Anglo-Saxon, it has not prevented us from becoming an administrative law hell. As Joe Sobran once wrote: "I don't believe in living under the Constitution, but I agree that it would be a good start."
PK wrote:
"Suburbs exist for one reason: the opportunity for white people to keep alive some flame of the civilization their white ancestors built over centuries on a landmass previously occupied by illiterate, nomadic tribes."
Well, no. Civilization means living in cities, not living in suburbs. The nice thing is, with the increase in the price of gas that valuable, close-in, well-built-in-the-19th-century neighborhoods like those of North Brooklyn, Over-the-Rhine in Cincinnati, and even Oakland are being reclaimed from the cretins who they were surrendered to in the post-war era when oil was cheap.
Per-capita miles driven have dropped every year since 2005 because there's just no cheap oil left. This means whites are done fleeing, because they cannot afford the oil to flee anymore. What they will do instead is muscle the blacks out of close-in areas, and let them go turn the exurban McMansions into the next slum. As to me, I'll walk down a gentrified street with a cop trained in stop and frisk and not worry about Negroes miles away who cannot afford the gas to come and rob me.
One other note from the article:
"Two of the area’s school districts — Normandy and Riverview Gardens — lost their accreditation, making families with children look elsewhere."
The public skoos are the key. If white parents are SO adamant about not teaching their own children at home that they HAVE to buy a more expensive house in a more expensive area, REQUIRING the wife to work, then the white race in the USA will deserve its extinction. STOP TRYING to scam other people to pay or your kids: that's Negro morality. Live simply, cheaply, and on one income.
There are plenty of young white men who cannot find jobs: make them the menacing gangs who walk the streets of the cheap districts, perhaps with arms, perhaps only with martial arts training, with the idea that the community will support them but only if they defend the community by walking the streets at all hours, threatening the young negroes. Once you have that street presence, you can buy back the areas your ancestors fled from, cheaply, and live without contributing blood and money to BRA. NO OTHER course of action will succeed; the more you work and struggle to try to buy your way out of BRA, the more the system feeds off your efforts through tax dollars and children you couldn't afford to have. Stop feeding it, and walk away.
@Anon 10:47
I think you are the anon who didn't care for my comment on the Maggie Daniels story. It gives me no pleasure to see that I was right, but then I wasn't addressing the comment to Maggie, who is dead and beyond my help.
The comment rather was directed at the living, on the uses of stereotyping. You strike me as a person who rejects BRA. Do you reject all of it? Do you reject Negro sexual mores of multiple partners, premarital sex, fatherless bastard children? You cannot simply oppose the effects of BRA: you must attack it at its root.
Fatherless children with no male investment are FAR more likely to be criminals, even amongst whites. Did you know that "It is only women who have more than one intimate premarital relationship who have an elevated risk of marital disruption", spawning more fatherless children to wreak havoc on society?
You do not have the strength, if a woman, to defeat BRA by force. Do you have the moral fiber to do so? If you did NOT adhere to white morality in your personal life, do you have the strength to speak the truth to others who have not yet made those errors? We cannot alter the past, but we can fight BRA in the future.
It starts, for whites, with making sure our women are worth investing in. A woman who has had even 1 sexual partner who is not her husband has only a 50% chance of remaining married after 5 years, while women who have slept only with their husbands have an 80% chance. Now you know the facts: what will you do to make a white future worth investing in?
@anon12:14
Anonymous said…
To James Wilson:
This is the wrong time and place to speculate. You don't know any of that for a fact. It has been repeatedly stated by the cops that she did NOT personally know the person who may end up convicted in her death.
We don't know how she voted. There are also teachers who vote GOP. NC is a fairly red state.
She was the victim in this case and the fact that it appears that she fought back as best she could means that she at least understood, she wanted to live and not receive whatever BRA as represented by this POSgroid was going to give her.
It's called stereotyping. It is not always 100% accurate. For example, when it comes to black people, I know MORE than a few good ones. I would be horrified to see those people treated like Alabama porch monkeys as they would have to have been under segregation. But I also know it is utter foolishness to assign white values and ethics to a random negro (or, more particularly, negroes, since they go mad in packs very easily), so I avoid being in situations where packs of young negroes can accost me individually. They might be the Harlem Boys Choir, but they're also statistically eight times more likely to kill.
Here's a quick stereotype: do you fear 60-year-old black men? I don't. If they're out and about, it means that they've survived the violent phase of life without getting life without parole and without pissing off some other black enough to get popped. Any negro male under 40, however, is suspect until known undangerous.
James Wilson is correct, the surest sign that a woman will have children is that she has done so by 30. Female fertility is at a peak from 18-24, declines slightly to 27, and then takes on a much more severe decline to age 35, when it is essentially gone; a pregnancy past age 35 used to be called a geriatric pregnancy.
The victim was clearly attractive. She could have had any number of offers of marriage at 21 when she was even MORE attractive by being three things: sweet, a virgin, and receptive. If she adopted negro morality of pre-marital sex (one thing Catholics on the south side of Chicago objected to about Mississippi negroes moving into their neighborhoods), to go with the career-grrl lifestyle, then ignoring sensible stereotypes about negroes would have been part and parcel.
Did you know that 70% of single white women voted for Obama? How about employees of public schools, especially teachers' unions, who also vote heavily for him?
No, we don't know her, just as we don't individually know all the other single white gals. What we do know about those single white gals is this: they aren't married, and if they've got children and aren't widowed, they've adopted Negro sexual mores. In other words, they haven't done the one irreplaceable thing women can do on this planet: give birth to quality children who will be under the authority of a man whose wife is submissive to his gentle but firm rule.
Your comment reveals your sex, Anon. Life has hard rules. She chose a sterile path in life: we won't judge that about her, as there are plenty of women who have contributed greatly to society without bearing children (a lot of them were nuns). You might think the rules for women are unfair: they are. The rules for men are also unfair, and you would not (and cannot) want to live by them. But to pretend that the rules do not exist leads to an even-more tragic life than to recognize them and live by them.
Now YOU have been told a few of the rules. I hope you are 22 and still attractive and a virgin if not married. You know where the wages of sin, and Negro morality, lead. You have the decency to feel empathy for fellow white people, even ones who have done nothing to fight the demographic onslaught from non-whites. What will you do with that white woman's heart you hold?
Latinos are Republican. They just don't know it yet.
Ronald Reagan.
Btw, when not agglomerated together in one area in a majority, like LA with Mexicans, they're nowhere NEAR as crime-prone and dangerous as, um, other groups. Give me a Mestizo area over a Puerto Rican one anyday. NYC area is too large for Mexicans to overwhelm it, and that makes all the difference.
My sister lives in an area that is now 55% Hispanic. It was an all-white area 40 years ago. It is not like it was, and it is a lot more chain-store than mom-and-pop. But compare it to the neighboring white area that went black? Ugh.
I expect that the Hispanics will not be Republican, contra Reagan. But they, being from Mexico and regions south on the continent, have already learned to hate and avoid blacks. It doesn't take immigrants long.
D Sterling-Trump wrote:
On one hand we should be celebrating the fact that blacks are both the perpetrators AND victims. Think of all the future generations of violent, crack-addled, gov't-dependent negros that are being wiped out daily by their own doing.
I can tell you the number: about 0. Kill off 50 out of 100 black males, and the 50 that are left will be sufficient to breed the next generation. You just won't have to pay for them in prison.
It is actually WORSE than that. Because of the relative shortage of black men, black women have to compete for them, with the one thing they have to offer: sex. This leads to MORE bastardy than otherwise.
If it were black females killing each other, then it would be a self-limiting process, especially as the larger number of men competing for women would make men's behavior better.
If you want to reduce future black generations, then you will need to influence the behavior of black females. Would you pay $400 monthly to every black female from 15 to 25 who WASN'T pregnant at the end of the month? That might have some effect. Black men killing black men and boys will not.
“We say no to whites owning our land and they should go.
“They can own companies and apartments in our towns and cities but not the soil.
“It is ours…
Is there anyone here who disagrees with Mugabe on his fundamental premise? I do, and support him. Whites lost Rhodesia, and should get the heck out. I know of another race of losers.
those white Americans would have thought the threat to their civilization either came from the Soviets or some undiscovered alien civilization
The destruction would not have been a surprise to anyone who had been in Detroit, in 1943, during the race riots.
Why so few asians and Indians when they excel in STEM?
Hard as it is to believe, there really WERENT any in 1973. It takes a while for a flood to start, and immigration was only opened up in 1965.
@AnalogMan,
PS ex-Brooklynite re: Save us the agony of link copying, and you might get people to click on your stuff.
You don't have to copy those links. Just select the link text, right-click, click on "Open in new tab".
Doesn't work with my iPad. I was having trouble selecting ONLY the link text to paste into a new tab. Kept getting the text above. Hate that. Prefer a real browser and keyboard and what God intended man to use, a mouse.
Thus the HTML lesson. Had to look up how to put the angle brackets in text; was kind of fun.
I am in a crappy mood. sorry, Anon 6:15.
Here is a simple lesson in inserting links into comments. here's what anon wrote: Negroes…. no matter if in Detroit, New York, or Atlanta… the song's the same:
oh, wait, he didn't use italics. How did I do that? Note below the comment box it says you can use some HTML tags. Using the one with an I in it, and then closing that tag with something that looks like this ‹I› makes for italics.
The a tag is a little harder. It opens with ‹a and then you need to put in the link as follows: title=”"http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2668460/Man-walks-McDonalds-kitchen-knife-sticking-street-corner-argument.html"” href="http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2668460/Man-walks-McDonalds-kitchen-knife-sticking-street-corner-argument.html" note: you need href, ", the link, and then ". Finally, close with › and the tag is started. Put some nice text in the middle like this and you now have a clickable link. You close the link with ‹/a› and you're done.
Try it a few times. Save us the agony of link copying, and you might get people to click on your stuff.
The problem with civil rights and other laws is how complicated it makes things. It is much simpler, easier, to just pass a law allowing race-restrictive covenants. You might not like it (if black), but it is clear what areas you are being kept out of. It is simpler, easier, to have signs like "no Irish need apply" so as to screen out undesireables.
All the simple, direct methods requiring a minimum of thought and effort have now been taken away. What remains, of course, are mechanisms that rely not on overt discrimination, but methods requiring skill, cunning, and intelligence. Are there white people on this board complaining about a game that THEY can play, and most blacks cannot?
The first, simple method to keep blacks out is to keep property prices high, using things like exclusionary zoning. Banning noise helps, too. The few who CAN afford million-dollar homes probably want nothing to do with the lower-caste blacks, in any case, and there are not a lot of them. The problem with this method is that it forces whites into having both partners work; you can be sure that much of the post-war suburbanization trend was initiated to turn cheap gas plus cheap land into mortgages for banksters.
But exclusion by money, the DWL-preferred method, is not the only route; in fact, when middle- and lower-class whites try to play this game, they lose as there will always be profit in blockbusting and destroying white neighborhoods and capital. Of course, no one in an area NEEDS to sell to a black family if active blockbusting is going on. The question becomes: do whites have the cohesive social capital to bond together, to ignore the simple profit motive, and build a community where the value lies not in individual houses selling for as much as they will, but the fact that the housing is within a group of like-minded people? For the last 70 years, the answer has been largely NO, except for Italians and Poles; every other group listened to the materialist siren song and fled their ancestral neighborhoods.
The point is, the game CAN be played by poor, smart whites, or even dumb poor whites with good leadership. Highland Park, completely surrounded by Detroit, is small enough that white homesteaders could buy houses there for under 30K; get 6000 united people together, and you can take over the community. You then need to be RUTHLESS as prosecuting petty crimes, like the DWLs in NYC were, gradually harassing away the criminals. Cut off welfare within the city when you have control. Make EVERY man be required to own a gun, and to respond to a call to arms, using a smartphone app.
And keep the city CHEAP enough so that other whites can move in, and not require both parents to work. This is possible, NOW, with enough organization and intelligence. And there's a small, majority-black, cheap city near EVERY major metro where this is possible. NYC lost 100,000 blacks from 2000 to 2010, and the same can happen in other cities. Camden is cheap, and close to Philly. Could whites buy it slowly and take over? Why not?
And so we disagree.
The Civil Rights Act of 1964 outlawed discrimination in such areas as voting, public restaurants, employment, and education on the basis of such characteristics as race, color, religion, national origin, and sex.
I do wish the South had not had segregation laws to overturn, inviting the Feds to intrude on an area where they really have no authority (repeal the Commerce Clause to the Constitution, and SO much trouble goes away in the USA). But even so, this law, as stated, would not be a problem, even in a multiracial society.
The probelm is ading in two other Johnson laws, the Great Society, and Immigratin "reform." The Great Society paid for the breeding Negro bastards, with the requirement that fathers not be in the home. Recall that the Negro illegitimacy rate in 1965 was about 25%.
Worse yet was immigration reform, which cut the economic legs out from under those black men who DID want to work and support their children. (I know, I know, but there were quite a few.) I prove this point with another quote from the article:
NASA in 1973 did have a place for blacks: 69 percent of the janitors at NASA were minority (black) males, compared to a government-wide average of 56 percent!
When was the last time you saw a black, not Hispanic, janitor?
I'll continue with thoughts in another reply, but Civil Rights, even done Federally, would not have led to the society we have without the other two Johnson-era changes. Civil Rights would not have led to a white minority in the USA; blacks at present ar 16-17% of the population of whites-only in the USA. Could we afford that group, without supporting every other poor person who has immigrated? Sure.
The political leaders who sent Columbus toward a new world made no claim to be concerned about the agony of poverty and deprivation. It didn’t cost Queen Isabella billions of dollars to send her explorers. She didn’t have to take food out of any child’s mouth in order to put Columbus on those leaky old boats.
The black man is correct. Isabella spent her OWN money, one of the benefits of a Monarchy over a democratic republic like the USA, rather than laud the spending of billions of dollars on a moon landing, the solution was MUCH simpler: de-fund the Federal Government. Then it couldn't spend ANY money on moon landings, Section 8, FHA, or any of the other nonsense.
Blacks have not been better off since civil rights, and lower class whites certainly haven't been. The masters of money and power in DC have. Agree with the black man: spending all that dough into outer space was a bad idea, because there were some who were not represented, and did not desire it, Then use that principle against ANY Fed bucks.
If the Feds disappeared tomorrow, with the exception of the the welfare/SS/Medicare check, would you miss them? Would you give up SS/Medicare for your grandchildren to live in freedom?
Create a giant, unaccountable honeypot of money in DC, and everyone will want to get his hands on it. The problem isn't spending more on EBT than NASA, it's spending ANYTHING in DC. realistically, what do those people DO that you would freely pay for?
Anything financialized will be stolen. If you want wealth, build social capital with family, friends, and neighbors. They cannot tax the love of a faithful, non-bitchy wife, which is one reason that they encouraged the sexual revolution so much. Feed your love for family and tribe, and starve the financial economy.