Needed is a restoration of pre-1965 thinking to back before Ted Kennedy lied America into multicultural immolation by immigration.

Because of Ted, one in five people residing in the U.S. is a foreigner, with next to no English. Because of Ted, Americans are aliens in their own homeland.

When I lay aside my civilized and over-educated self and let my native imagination flow, I imagine myself as Consul For Life of the post-American Commonwealth, that section of the continent not enamored of and brought to ruin by the Third World.

At the new Nationalist Mall in our capital city I preside over a magical ceremony. Our all-male Black Ops commandos have raided the Old Republic and stolen the bones of Ted Kennedy, Emmanuel Celler and Philip Hart, the unholy trinity of the 1965 Immigration Act. They are being buried in a septic tank beneath the rest rooms that serve the mall, so that our people, when visiting the new nation’s heart, can have a chance to show them the reverence they so richly deserve.

It is a moment of fantasy that pleases me.

But I worry. Doe this make me a bad person?

Bwahahahahahaha.

John Lennon cool?

Are you serious?

The pussy-whipped author of “Imagine”?

The war against the Confederate flag is a proxy war against all White Southerners. White Southerners are a stand-in for all Whites. It’s not complicated. One more nail in the coffin they are building for all of us and that half of us, at least, are helping them build.

All Whites are Caucasian, but not all Caucasians are White.

Whites are those Caucasians descended from the peoples of European Christendom.

Other Caucasians in North Africa (Berber and Copts) or western Asia (Arabs, Jews, the Turkic and the Iranic peoples, the north Indians) are not White.

Why? One simple reason (of several): a member of the Afro/Asian Caucasians can accuse a Euro Caucasian of “racism” and be taken seriously in our culture. (Jews call it “anti-Semitism”, but it’s the same game.)

If you can’t credibly accuse someone of White Racism against you, you’re White.

Two items seem to get lost when the issue of Israel comes up. Regardless of what you think of Israel, or Jews, consider:

As far as the Arab world goes, no matter what we do, now or in future, the US is considered to be Israel’s ally. It is a First World/Western(ish) Fort Apache in Indian country. If it goes down to the Muslims, that will be –like it or not– a disastrous defeat for us, our position and our perceived power in the world, emboldening the Mohammedan barbarians both abroad and the far too many within our gates.

Second, if Israel does go down, where do you think all those millions of enraged Saba refugees are going to go? They will be all over Europe and especially the US. Consider the unfolding of that scenario. No, really. Think about it.

We don’t have to let the tail wag the dog, but it seems to me we are dug in there, like it or not. Perhaps the mess we have now is preferable to other messes down the road if we wash our hands and walk off. This mess, alas, will follow us no matter where we go.

I have long read Liberalism as a toxic degradation of Christianity, with all its moralism and universalist scope, but lacking the thick theology and “mythology” which restrained this for so long: original sin’s brake on human hubris, the requirement of orthodox faith and church membership for salvation, hierarchical religious authority, etc. And God, who was finally in charge of history and individual life.

This discussion reminds me that, unless my memory is off, the Enlightenment (France excepted) was initially driven very much by thinkers in Protestant countries. What distinguishes Protestantism from Catholicism is that it is a religion clearly and consciously constructed upon the rejection of ancient and settled authority and tradition by means of individual assertions of higher morality and higher access to “pure” truth. In the Reformation case, through sola Scriptura. The endless splits in Protestantism are the natural result of its origin in revolt against tradition and authority of the most sacred kind.

With this background, the Enlightenment (and the consequent degeneration into the cosmic foolishness of Liberalism) is a very –though not completely–Protestant movement. If you know that ancient authority A was rejected, then why not ancient or contemporary authority B?

The enantiodromia of modern Liberalism is that, far from dealing with fact and reason, it is utterly grounded in emotion and wishful thinking.

Further irony is that contemporary Christianity (Orthodoxy somewhat excepted) has been infected by the movements which derived from it by way of opposition and hostility. The Western churches’ enthusiastic embrace of the Third World hordes who will destroy the peoples that created Western Christianity is one of the great betrayals of history.