RSSHere, the Guardian refers to illegal African immigrants to China as “fortune seekers,” an accurate term that AFAIK is never used to refer to those seeking their fortune in the USA. I think it’s safe to say that most “undocumented immigrants” to the US are in fact better described as “fortune seekers.”
As with the South Africa story, the press uses more accurate terminology when reporting on non-Western issues than when reporting on the same issue effecting Western countries.
As far as the universal draft, there is less cohesion that you might think. The children of Haredi or Orthodox Jews usually refuse to serve in the military or cooperate in any way with the conscription system including registering.
Sure, but the reason Haredim are so violently opposed to conscription is because it’s so good at promoting social cohesion with the broader society, and they want to remain an island to themselves. (Also, haredim are more accurately called “ultra-Orthodox,” because the more modern-leaning setter-type Orthodox tend to be strongly nationalistic and serve enthusiastically.)
In pointing out Israel’s success at ethnic nationalism, nobody is saying that they’re perfect at it or that they all agree about everything or that they don’t have their own Fifth Columnists. We’re just saying that they’re better at it than Whites, and more importantly that they get to try really hard at making ethnic nationalism work without getting pilloried for it the way Whites do.
Don't they get pilloried for it on this very website, by Philip Weiss, Phil Girardi, The Saker, etc.?Replies: @Almost Missouri
In pointing out Israel’s success at ethnic nationalism, nobody is saying that they’re perfect at it or that they all agree about everything or that they don’t have their own Fifth Columnists. We’re just saying that they’re better at it than Whites, and more importantly that they get to try really hard at making ethnic nationalism work without getting pilloried for it the way Whites do.
“Shutting down rhetoric that undermines the existence and rights of others is not a violation of free speech; it is hate speech.”
I don’t think that sentence means what the author thinks it means. I thought Wellesley was an elite institution.
OT, but a white racist deplorable redneck conservative has been arrested for making all those bomb threats at Jewish Community Centers
http://www.timesofisrael.com/arrest-made-in-bomb-threats-against-us-jewish-centers/
Yup. I go to shul at a Chabad House (Hasidic Orthodox sect known for outreach to less observant Jews), where over the half the congregants are recent Russian-Jewish Immigrants. Aside from a lone Johnson supporter, every single guy there voted Trump, and on Saturday we are having Kiddush for Trump.
And believe me, they are well aware of the gap Steve describes. The denunciations of Soros and his ilk that I’ve been hearing at evening prayers are strong enough to make weev blush.
Yup. Jews who care about actual Judaism are solidly pro-Trump. At the Orthodox shul I go to most Saturday mornings, opinions range from passionately pro-Trump to “I would have preferred Cruz, but Trump is what we got.” Nobody wants Hillary.
Of course, Reform “Judaism,” led by the irrascible traitor Rick “Jihad” Jacobs is a whole other story.
Relevant to Steve’s reporting on the Gulenist cult: https://twitter.com/CNNTURK_ENG/status/754065399193493504
In fact, being 2016, what you're more likely to get is a megaslut taken care of by some beta orbiters, inseminated by the Alpha boyfriend who only shows up occasionally while an omega stays around to cuck out and do slave labor the betas can't even be bothered with. The woman will call it the many flavors of love.
Because in practice polyamory means lots of women flocking to a few jerkboy Alpha males
I think there will be some of that, and I think beta orbiters will play a role in these arrangements. But most women prefer to share an alpha than have a beta to themselves, which is why the arrangement I describe will be the more common one.
Everyone’s laughing, but honestly I predict that so-called “polyamory” will be the next culture war waged by the elites, and it’s going to be ugly.
If the Cathedral is successful in promoting the practice, it will affect housing prices when polyamorous groups with multiple adults price out traditional families. Because in practice polyamory means lots of women flocking to a few jerkboy Alpha males, it will create a population of surplus males with no marriage or sexual prospects.
And it will affect average guys when cultural authority figures tell them that instead of getting violently angry, they should feel ” compersion ” when their wives and girlfriends talk about opening up the marriage.
The elites will find the limits of how far they can push folks, and I tell you it’s going to get bad.
I agree with that. When a guy like Leo DiCaprio can load up his yacht with a few dozen women he has all to himself, that condemns a few dozen men to some lonely nights.Replies: @carol, @Alec Leamas, @Anonymous, @Buffalo Joe
Because in practice polyamory means lots of women flocking to a few jerkboy Alpha males, it will create a population of surplus males with no marriage or sexual prospects.
I have a deep suspicion that polygyny* is simply incompatible with democracy. Of course, we live in a profoundly anti-democratic age (cf the enthusiasm for Alexander Hamilton), so that's no obstacle.
If the Cathedral is successful in promoting the practice, it will affect housing prices when polyamorous groups with multiple adults price out traditional families. Because in practice polyamory means lots of women flocking to a few jerkboy Alpha males, it will create a population of surplus males with no marriage or sexual prospects.
In fact, being 2016, what you're more likely to get is a megaslut taken care of by some beta orbiters, inseminated by the Alpha boyfriend who only shows up occasionally while an omega stays around to cuck out and do slave labor the betas can't even be bothered with. The woman will call it the many flavors of love.
Because in practice polyamory means lots of women flocking to a few jerkboy Alpha males
.
The elites will find the limits of how far they can push folks, and I tell you it’s going to get bad
Is this for real? The earliest appearance of this quote I can find is here – https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/evolutionary-psychology/conversations/topics/2725
which seems questionable. Except that apparently Razib re-posted it here – http://www.gnxp.com/MT2/archives/000770.html
As a proud (((Eskimo))) and avid reader of Sailer, it would be great to claim him as a landsman , but I’m skeptical. Since when is Steve a huge fan of Milton Friedman or of neo-cons? Views change over time, but the quote never addresses that. Seems fishy to me.
(I am not posting I.P.'s full name. You can see it if you click the link.)
I. P. is an evolutionary psychologist who was was one of the very earliest members on the Human Biodiversity Institute mailing list by Steve Sailer.
In 2003, I.P. wrote in an e-mail:
From: "I. P."
Another strange piece from Steve Sailer containing all the usual fallacies...
please note that I am not connected with Steve Salier or his "Human Biodiversity Institute" and that I have not written about or expressed any public opinion at all about transsexualism. I did belong to Sailer's list for a while, but left after he continually blocked my postings, presumably because he didn't approve of the content.
Fortunately he’s a Democrat and he gets the Kennedy get out of feminism free card.
Being a Democrat might be a necessary condition for a get out of feminism free card, but not sufficient. I think JFK and Willie got a pass from feminists because they’re alpha males.
Feminists have never been concered with punishing cads. Indeed, the entire project of feminism has been a war of liberation against the perceived oppression of the beta-providers (“Nice Guys”) that women were generally expected to marry.
The whole point of modern feminist cultural rhetoric and policy positions is to free themselves to pursue the JFK/Clinton type of seducer without consequences, and without having to be dependent on a dull 9-5 working stiff type of guy.
See, for example, how they piled on against the guy from Elevator-gate, but remained pretty silent about Clinton.
What do feminists think of women who can't control their cad men? Can they respect such a person highly or feel secure under one? Who else might such a person be unable to control?
Feminists have never been concered with punishing cads.
Half of 'em, anyway. The rest aren't pursuing men.
The whole point of modern feminist cultural rhetoric and policy positions is to free themselves to pursue the JFK/Clinton type of seducer…
Wait a minute –
9/11 was carried out by Al Qaeda, which was harbored in Afghanistan by the Taliban, who came to power (at least in part) because they were the only guys who could stand up to the Gay Warlords (Gaylords?) who were raping kids.
So the gays did cause 9/11!!!
Rev. Falwell, please accept our apologies.
I’m being facetious, but only a little bit. I think a lot of the world sees USG coming in and destroying the social structures they have put in place to restrain the worst among them. What they see of American culture only confirms their impression that USG is defender of degenerates.
Nope, as shown in the link provided by Kuff 2625 Castle is described by CAIR as the ” Home of Ahmed Mohamed.”
Yes, businesses use mail drops all the time. BUt if you had taken 5 seconds to plug the address into Google you would have found a residence. A couple more seconds with the website of Dallas County Appraisal and you would have seen that it is a house owned by “Faroug Elhassan,” which I mentioned in my original comment.
Please do some research before raising pointless objections.
Although, for the record, I do agree with other commenters that it seems the name of the company was a reference to the Twin Towers of Dallas, not Manhattan.
The AlSufi Center, Mohamed Mohamed’s now-defunct charity, was also registered to 2625 Castle. So I think it’s safe to conclude that the same family was associated with Twin Towers.
ALSUFI CENTER INC.
Texas Taxpayer Number 32003145326
Mailing Address 1418 N STORY RD
IRVING, TX 75061-4300
Help Right to Transact Business in Texas FRANCHISE TAX ENDED
State of Formation TX
Effective SOS Registration Date 02/01/2001
Texas SOS File Number 0161465701
Registered Agent Name ALI MOHAMED
Registered Office Street Address 2625 CASTLE ST
IRVING, TX 75038
Well done.
I think the 2626 house # is a typo, since Dallas County has no record of that address, but does have a record of 2625 Castle.
So, Mohamed Mohamed, Pretender to the Sudanese Presidency, has a business registered to the same address as this Twin Towers Transportation.
The house is owned by Faroug Elhassan. Not clear if that’s a family member or just a landlord.
According to TX Comptroller’s website:
TWIN TOWERS TRANSPORTATION CORPORATION
Texas Taxpayer Number32055028065
Mailing Address2625 CASTLE ST
IRVING, TX 75038-5807
Right to Transact Business in TexasACTIVE
State of FormationTX
Effective SOS Registration Date08/29/2014
Texas SOS File Number0802054544
Registered Agent NameEAZ MOHAMED
Registered Office Street Address2625 CASTLE STREET
IRVINE, TX 75038
According to Dallas County Appraisal District, the house at 2625
Castle owned by,
Owner (Current 2016)ELHASSAN FAROUG
2625 CASTLE ST
IRVING, TEXAS 750385807
I would look into this address and see if it is connected to the clock
family. I have access to Lexis through work, but am reluctant to use
it, since searches on people in the news sometimes get flagged.