Trump is still the only option at this point.

The guy is driven to be the best at what he does. He knows when to keep his head down. He's dealing with a lot. Trump can be fully Trump in his second term. Besides that, free speech is our greatest weapon. Trump, and the Judges he appoints, are more likely to protect this. The enemy cannot defeat our arguments on a level playing field, so that left will attempt to implement "hate speech" laws.

I wouldn't underestimate Trump, but If Trump ends up doing nothing in his second term but securing one SC justice, that will be better than what the dems will do.

More efforts need to be made to demand the GOP earn the white vote. If Nick Fuentes really wants to work with the conservative movement or GOP, why not try this:

If the Israel first crowd wants 5 billion a year for Israel, support doubling it. And if Israel wants to remake the middle East to please them, then we say "mazel tov". But now the GOP must address institutional anti-whiteness, work to re-implement freedom of association(although this is more likely to happen through the supreme court), and back Trump on immigration/The Wall with more enthusiasm. If big business wants immigrants fine, but then they must give the people the right to choose who they wish to include and exclude on the local level.

We want to make the GOP work with us, BUT if they don't, we want them to make it as explicit as they can. Make them come out and admit their support for white genocide. Make them go farther than the recent denouncements of White Nationalism; make them declare that "white people will never be allowed their own spaces and institutions in the US and must accept being force blended out of existence" Or something like that; that really spells it out that "whites aren't welcome."

But Nick (and others) will have to be willing to give up this obsession with Israel and Jews. Is he willing to do this for white well being? Can someone present this to Nick?

Replies: @EVROPA, @Art, @War for Blair Mountain, @No guac for me, please, @renfro, @notanon

@lost in nowhere

its all shills is not organic
 

it's obviously a banking mafia shill operation but i think 95% of it is organic but only in the sense of l'autistes despairing about Trump and jumping on an anti-Trump bandwagon.

(you can tell it's a scam by by the guy talking about automation but not immigration or off-shoring)

#

nb i'm not against people promoting whoever they feel is the most accelerationist candidate but UBI isn't accelerationist.

a simple way of characterizing the root economic problem is the elites have been using mass immigration and off-shoring to turn every full-time $40K job into two part-time $16K jobs i.e. a net drop in demand of $8K.

wages = demand and the elites have been driving wages down and then acting surprised when the economy stagnates due to lack of demand.

UBI is a way of artificially injecting demand into the economy in a way that doesn't reduce banking mafia profits i.e. by getting it from tax payers or borrowing, so *if* it works it will be anti accelerationist.

if l'autistes need an accelerationist strategy i'd suggest promoting the most anti-white Dem candidates by for example supporting Biden as the "white man's candidate" - that would be pretty funny.

on the other hand my logic based take may be wrong and l'autistes instincts are right - they usually are.

Replies: @EVROPA

This is an incredibly stupid article and I hope for the author's sake that he is being sarcastic. Macron is a neoliberal managerialist. He is willing to do the minimum required legwork to make the system work. It isn't because he is "ourguy".

He has just bent his knee to Zionist pressure to include criticism of Israel as 'anti-semitism' even as he lectures Europeans on the supposed dangers of nationalism. He has made it his mission to oppose Orban among others.

This kind of cuck take -"he's secretely based" - was also pushed by Richard Spencer and it massively blew up in his face. To still push it today requires a special kind of idiocy.

Replies: @Anonymous, @Icy Blast, @Threestars, @EVROPA

The promotion and or financing of higher education for migrant girls, or girls in Africa or elsewhere in impoverished communities, will not decrease out-of-control birth rates as long as neoliberal politicians keep paying migrants (and many citizens) per kid produced via welfare programs and child tax credits.

The bureaucrats and educators whose lofty educational programs, salaries and lucrative not-for-profits are financed by taxpayer money will be the biggest beneficiaries of this continued, unsuccessful birth-control method.

The best thing about Macron is his pride in the French architecture and art, which is best-in-class in the world, really. That is the one thing the Yellow Vests got wrong; it was wrong to resent the money Macron spent to renovate historical French buildings. That is not frivolous spending, like the $10,000 haircuts of their former “socialist” leader. Macron’s lavish spending on pool construction for globalist elites to frolic in during the vacations that they call work is another matter.

That phenomenon is widespread in the USA, too, mostly practiced by highly paid, above-firing, dual-earner parents and their children who are said to “study hard” when on globetrotting vacations. Even when people snag high-paying, family-friendly crony jobs, lengthy and frequent vacations, in addition to PTO, multiple pregnancy leaves and other excused time off, is not equivalent to hard work. It is the opposite of hard work, no matter how many kids you’ve offered up as an altruistic gesture to strengthen your nation’s economy and no matter how much you are paid due to being “the talent.”

If you are truly “the talent,” you are needed at work, not in a posh pool at some international resort, where you fraternize with your fellow globalists. That is a vacation, just like the frequent family trips to Europe, described as educational by globetrotting American parents. Yes, Europe has wonderful historical sites galore, but school-year vacations are not equivalent to the grind of studying hard, not even if what sprang from your upscale loins has been labeled as “gifted.”

Apples and trees are the way of the New Aristocracy, created by womb-privileged, above-firing feminists and their assortative mating, which concentrates the wealth from the few good-paying jobs under fewer roofs, halving the size of the middle class.

Quality is not multiplying as fast as the dual earners’ Barbie princess mansions.

It is not just the fact that so many single, educated adults in so-called white-privileged nations cannot even afford the dignity of an independent apartment anymore on earned-only income. With all of these highly educated dual earners at the top, concentrating the wealth in fewer households due to their talent, life expectancy is declining along with other signs of Third Worldish blight, like predatory lending businesses on every corner in formerly middle-class areas.

If the highly paid dual-earner parents were really so gifted, advanced Western nations would not be losing their big, thriving middle classes. Western industries would be expansive, not withering into little, specialized enclaves, employing mostly foreign-national temps and very few citizens, but paying a few “gifted,” vacationing parents massive salaries for their majestic, innate, managerial gifts—gifts passed magically, not through connected-up cronyism, from globetrotting elite assortative-mate parents to the royal offspring in their DNA dynasty.

Those globetrotting, absentee kids are above suspension despite all the lengthy vacations, unlike non-elite kids. The parents, likewise, are above firing despite mornings, afternoons, days and weeks of absenteeism, while ordinary, non-womb-productive underlings who meet the quotas every month and never miss a day of work are fired for 5 minutes of absenteeism.

That is, umm, a decadent society with an entrenched aristocracy, not a society full of hardworking, rugged individualists, rewarded for hard work and production. Corporate cronies do constantly churn & burn hard workers who help to keep their bonus numbers high, but hard work does not pay for most outside of the crony circles, which often revolve around personal-life characteristics, like kids, not work.

And no, the importing of lots of cheap, welfare-assisted, servile workers to reduce labor costs for the rich does not strengthen a nation’s economy. Nor are all (or even most) of the welfare-eligible ones hardworking. Unless they work under-the-table, welfare-consuming immigrants cannot work hard in America. They lose their eligibility for welfare if they go over the earned-income limits.

The talented elites just cannot understand this simple arithmetic.

Immigrants consume more welfare, so no, they are not hardworking.

Neoliberal welfare programs are designed to require recipients to stay under the earned-income limits, which is convenient for cheapskate employers who cut labor costs by offering mostly low-wage, part-time jobs that keep single moms and immigrants welfare-eligible. No matter how the gifted elites spin it, that is how the neoliberal welfare system works, and the emphasis on working moms does not advance feminist educational ideals any more than it advances a broad middle class or a sustainable birth rate.

Neoliberal welfare programs and progressive tax code checks that reward womb-productive sex are not an attempt to control birth rates, quite the opposite, as the demographic breakdown of the younger generations in the USA—the biggest generations in US history—aptly demonstrates.

The biggest generations in US history (the Millennials and the Z Generation) were conceived during three decades of neoliberal welfare and progressive tax code policies, which punish the hard work of non-womb-productive individuals, while rewarding single mothers (and legal / illegal immigrants in single-breadwinner households) with government-financed monthly bills and a maximum child tax credit of $6,431 for working part time, while having kid after kid.

The tax code also rewards higher-earning, dual-earner parents with two income streams, for sex and reproduction. Unless they have reproduced, the tax code does not reward the low-wage babysitters, NannyCams, low-wage daycare workers or elderly grandparents who do the work of raising the well-vacationed dual earners’ kids while they occupy two jobs in an economy bereft of decent-paying jobs.

No group has taken advantage of this neoliberal system—designed to promote the feminist concept of working women in single-breadwinner households—more than immigrants in households with traditional, male breadwinners. They qualify, mathematically, for the same welfare. Just like the single-breadwinner moms, they get it by not working hard—by staying under the programs’ earned-income limits.

This has created a labor market full of low-wage part-time jobs, catering to those with unearned income related to womb productivity, while crushing welfare-ineligible individuals who need for earned-only income to cover all household bills: the single, childless citizens; the older, single moms with kids over 18; the womb-less, single men who cannot pump out kids to make up the difference between low wages and living expenses; the non-custodial parents.

Like international resort vacations for highly paid dual-earner parents, part-time work that qualifies you for welfare is not hard work, even if glorified immigrant parents or equally glorified single moms are the ones doing it.

One of the welfare programs, the monthly cash assistance, makes special provisions for student moms, allowing them to count full-time college hours as their work requirement. In processing thousands of cases, I saw one mom availing herself of that provision.

And it would not bolster the middle class if more welfare moms got degrees; one of the most underemployed groups in the USA is bachelor’s degree holders. That is because automation is reducing the need for workers, including the dual high earners. In addition to the backwatching cronyism of working parents, automatiom is why the highly paid parents, too, get away with taking so much time off from work (for kids, for kids........and for mom-pampering).

Corporations do have a “need” for endless streams of young temp workers from foreign countries.

A bunch of nomadic and mostly foreign temp workers in tech fields, plus a few, aristocratic, crony-parent managers gathering in resort hotels for conferences, does not equal a healthy economy, even if you add in the many welfare-eligible, womb-productive, part-time-working immigrants and moms, plus the students, married moms and elderly people able to get by on part-time jobs since their parents, a spouse, a child support check or retirement checks cover their major household bills.

Replies: @Whitewolf, @EVROPA