What the Zionist establishment fears most is the emergence of a sensible, charismatic, intelligent, patriotic, pro-white male candidate who dares to run the ruthless gauntlet of Zionist gatekeepers.

Actually, they do not fear this at all, since the odds of this occurring are nil in the short-term. But Israeli Jews have been fairly explicit about what they do fear:

“The growing Haredi radicalization [fundamentalist, anti-Zionist Jewish movement] poses a bigger risk [to Israel] than Ahmadinejad.” — Efraim Halevy, former Head of Mossad

Intermarriage among US Jews is the demographic equivalent of “a second Holocaust.” — Rafi Peretz, Israeli Minister of Education

Intelligent Jews fear the loss of the high-IQ, Ashkenazi population, who blend in well with the upper echelons of Western society, while still keeping their tribal loyalties. They dread a world in which the only Jews are low-IQ Orthodox Jews, who stick out like sore thumbs. For some perspective, the poorest two towns in all of New York are both Orthodox Jewish communities. The same rule holds in Israel, which has among the highest poverty rates of any OCED country.

People are ascribing too much competence to Kushner, Bolton, et al. Even if they wished to help Israel, they probably wouldn’t know how, much in the same way the Bush and Obama administrations attempted to help the Middle East and ended up destroying much of the region.

I wouldn’t wish Bolton’s “help” on our worst enemies.

Of course, at some point, there will be a greater presence of the ultra orthodox in the military.

But an Israel, run by ultra orthodox, will be incapable of fielding a modern army or supporting an economy to back it up. Ultra orthodox men attend Yeshiva for education, where they spend their day studying Jewish texts, without any exposure to Western subjects, like history, science or math. The education is similar to a Pakistani madras. Once a population spends several decades going down this path — basically, divorcing itself from the modern world — there is no going back.

It would bolster the Israeli center-left’s (Blue and White Party) claim, that there should be immediate, aggressive efforts to secularize ultra-orthodox Jews, including mandatory conscription for the military and non-religious education. This is currently the biggest issue in Israeli politics, and causing a rift in the current government. But the public is fairly divided on how to act.

The quickest way to ensure this happens is for Israel’s center-left to make the legitimate claim that the US is no longer a reliable ally, as evidenced by younger Democrats populist shift away from pro-Jewish stances, and increasing Republican isolationism (at least in the Middle East).

If Israel succeeds in reigning in the ultra orthodox, they can turn it around. If they wait fifteen years, the high birth rates among the ultra orthodox make it implausible. If they wait another birth cycle, it makes it impossible, as the ultra orthodox will hit a political plurality, dictating Israeli politics more than any other group.

Yep, a Mossad bot, that’s me.

The point still stands. The cleanest, most feasible way to handle the Israel problem (as well as the disproportionate Jewish influence in the US) is to attempt to speed up the process that is already occurring. Secular Ashkenazi Jews (i.e., the intelligent, influential ones) are rapidly waning demographically, while Orthodox, disproportionately Shepardic Jews are exploding population-wise.

It is the secular, left-leaning Ashkenazi that have been a consistent problem in US politics, leading to domestic and foreign policy boondoggles. But the idea that Tulsi Gabbard or any single person can buck this trend is naive. Trump is an anomaly in that he is a billionaire, but he still needs their financial support for downstream candidates. Additionally, there is pro-Israel inertia among conservative whites, which won’t change.

But this support can be redirected toward deemphasizing the Ashkenazi and promoting the Orthodox. Your average Republican politician or voter is oblvious to all of this: they think they are supporting Israel either way, so they’re good. Additionally, it deflates any charge of anti-Semitism.

To a certain degree, Trump is doing this. I don’t think he is conscious of it, but the pattern is there: on strategic issues (like judgeships, military intervention, etc) he is quietly keeping Ashkenazi influence contained, but on high-profile, symbolic issues (embassy in Jerusalem!) he tends to side with the Conservative Orthodox. Secular Jews view this ambivalently, to put it mildly.

If US leaders were being truly Machiavellian, they would double down on their support for Netanyahu, while simultaneously arming Israel with conventional weapons.

Netanyahu gets a large portion of his support from backward, ultra orthodox Jews, who have exceptionally high birth rates (around 7 children per woman) and are extremely politically active. They are expected to be around 1/4th of the Israeli population in twenty years. If this continues, it will turn Israel into a 3rd world country by mid-century, since secular Jews only have slightly-above-replacement birth rates and the ultra orthodox do not have the human capital to support a modern economy.

By arming Israel, it allows their leadership to procrastinate on the issue of Orthodox Jews (who do not serve in the military), allowing the problem to metastasize demographically. Israel has around 30 years to solve the issue before it’s too late, and they are reduced to a regional, third world nation.