Oh yeah, in case it isn’t obvious: my point is, steroids are merely one path to achieving physical superiority. In as far as any tests can only detect doping, then it logically follows that their results will be negative for any individuals enhanced by other means.

And while I am not actually suggesting that this is likely to be the case here, it is indisputable that, if and when genetic experimentation ever produces such an individual, it will be because of the new standard of contempt for human individualism, forced on the world by the CPC and the grotesque evil it represents.

But I digress.

Anyway, as I’m sure this isn’t even being posted (or even still read, for that matter), and I’m only even just writing this to pass time while completing my fifteen mile walk for today, I’ll just summarize the rest, before I distractedly go off on yet another tangent.

First of all:
-quantum computing is panem circenses.
-AI is panem circenses.

These are all delusional fantasies that power-mad nerds corrupted by their own hubris and delusion of grandeur need in order to become sufficiently aroused, so they can carry on with their ritualistic circle-jerk fetishes, anymore. Wanna know what’s not a nerd’s jerk off fantasy? Genetic, human experimentation—as in, Will the Real Kwisatz Haderach Please Stand Up. Because that shyt is deadly real—and, moreover, merely a question of time, will, and resources.

No matter how the vile and despicable CPC arrogated the requisite resources to arrive at the point where it can now conduct human experimentation with complete impudence. And who can tell it to stop, when even the CIA has proved its boorish incompetence by having its personnel roster leaked and its field operatives systematically eliminated?

Imagine if Hitler had won—except, don’t imagine. That is to say, history doesn’t repeat, it rhymes, or some nonsense like that. What’s different is that he ain’t German, and his name ain’t Hitler. Nevertheless, this one is every bit as ideologically devout, but far less feverish—which is probably because, unlike Hitler, he isn’t on a cocktail of uppers and downers, hence far more patient and methodical.

Whups, that was my fifteenth mile. I guess I’m out of time. In summary: the CPC, in its contempt for the individual, is only affirmed by a bunch of panicked Western Elites who, having deliberately abandoned or relativized that which formerly made their civilization uniquely great, have thereby also relinquished all principles that could presently guide their actions. Instead, they are succumbing to hysteria, as the realization sets in that their hubris has brought them to the point where continuing forward means automatic loss of prestige, status, and relevance, while moving backward would be nothing more than admitting their own nefarious and selfish meddling in human affairs, which have resulted in the downfall of Western civilization. So the only option left is to escalate—and hope, increasingly against all hope, that their opponent will fold.

There is not a shred of doubt that, for a time, Western civ was objectively vastly superior to every other prior or concurrent civilization. Whether systematically or by accident, it was the only one that managed to work out a way of systematically working toward the discovery of universal truth, in an artificial environment that was desperately kept uncontaminated by the corruptive factor of human shortcomings—at least, until the last ember of excellence flickered out from the deluge of primitivism that washed over it.

In a way, this cartoonishly exaggerated evil behavior exhibited by Western Elites is, more than anything, a sign of panic: having realized that they have deliberately undermined and sabotaged their own cultures beyond any hope of repair while betting their existence on a delusion of permanent superiority, they are acting like a headless chicken—lashing out aimlessly, even as this only brings about more chaos and further erodes any residual competitiveness.

This ridiculous farce in the Ukraine shows only one thing: in their desperation to cling to power, these evil narcissists will throw everything under the bus—including the very world they seek to retain their permanent power over. This alone is demonstrated by their cultist demeanor, which in Germany literally led to the recent assertion that, should their political opposition somehow gain any form of power in one of the German states during the upcoming state elections in September, they have already agreed on cutting the information flow of the security apparatus of any such state off from the one at the federal level. Essentially, it would be analogous to the DHS refusing to provide intelligence or aid to any state because it was run by Republicans.

What nobody (to my knowledge) who has even acknowledged this in the blogosphere has at least openly realized: this is by definition how extremists behave—how anyone’s cognitive process necessarily functions, after it is distorted and corrupted by maximalist tendencies and black-and-white thinking. Per their own admission, they are prepared to throw their own nation into violent chaos, before they are prepared to relinquish so much as a modicum of power. That, in spite of the fact that it is the comprehensive loss of faith by the voting populace that has brought them to this point—and even as they screech about “protecting democracy” in ever-growing delusional fervor, as if trying to convince themselves more than anyone else at this point that professing their devotion to cultist doublethink nonsense in a crescendo of insufferable hysteria would magically render the delusional factic.

…which is this:

The West is now well and proper fvcked. It went where it never should have gone: full-retard. As every half-baked retard has drilled into them from the start: you do not go full-retard. There is no “coming back” from full-retard—no more than you can “unforget” the accrued knowledge, morals, and etiquette of high civilization: once gone, it is only reacquired through original acquisition, just like the first time. Oh, and a minor detail: humanity may only have one shot at this, if the peak oil theory has even the slightest bit of merit (which it thankfully mostly doesn’t, and which could easily be made a non factor, if some humans somewhere decide to act sensibly already and weather the growing pains, rather than medicate themselves out of pain and life with puberty blockers, for fvck’s sake!).

Having gone full-retard means no going back—because “back” now simply means “away from the normal.” I suspect the schism occurred when conservatives, mesmerized by RINO “W”, implicitly agreed to abandon much of the core academic and rational intellect that once loosely associated with conservatism—mostly because it was fundamentally incompatible with leftists, while holding in common with conservatives the shared belief that centralization of power is strictly a method of concentrating Evil. Except,unfortunately, conservatives merely “believed” in this, without ever understanding why it was so.

Since I may fail to make my point even this time, let me say up front: never argue with an idiot—first, they drag you down to their level; next, they clobber you with experience. It is for this reason that the West is bound to lose: because “forwards” simply means being the dumbass left holding the bag filled with pig vomit, while “backward” means a different “forward,” which in addition is an explicitly declared “Zone of Estrangement.” Logically, the remaining paths to Western Elites are:
1. Subordination.
2. Nuclear Winter Wonderland.

My main point was this:

It occurred to me that there is a plausible explanation for why Western Elites might be so shaken and critical of their own historic values—so much so, that they would willingly copy something as archaic, corrupt, and ultimately misanthropic as the Chinese culture’s utter contempt for and refusal to recognize the individual as the fundament of human civilization, rather than it’s product: civilization is advanced by individuals at a time, while the mob only regresses to instinctive violence. “The wisdom of the masses” is in reality the aggregate wisdom of many individuals—because when people submit themselves to the whims of the mob, their behavior enters a monotonic trajectory, into Lord of the Flies territory.

Let me say up front, I do not equate Chinese people (some of the most hardworking, common sense fvckers on the planet; two people not blood related to me…excuse me, that’s actually hree…who most selflessly helped me most in life, other than the rents, were: Mainland-Chinese, Mainland-Chinese (all FOB), Fomosa-Chinese; and yeah, at least the last two guys fvcked) to the wellspring of Evil known as the CPC. Did I say three, I actually meant four—a generational Chinese-American, although he is the same age as my father—and when it comes to him, I do not think in terms of “fvcking.”

That said, the only reasons why China has become as competitive as it has are:
-Because Western culture had already largely shedded the system of values that made it successful in the first place. How can it be, that in Cold War times, the West intuitively understood that you cannot, and in fact mustn’t attempt to do business with the pinkos. On a common sense level, how can a private organization possibly hope to compete on level ground with a government that functions on an incompatible set of values. Logically, the government can do a wide range of things that would get a CEO fired or incarcerated. In addition, when a certain Bernie campaigned hard for universal minimum corporate tax, who benefits from that the most, given that Chinese corps aren’t merely steered by the CPC but strategically subsidized by it as well. The demented fool may as well have declared a mandatory 15% loss in competitiveness, in favor of Chinese enterprise, which remained de facto unburdened by such a tragically idiotic (or deliberately malevolent) decision.
-Which leads to the next point: Statism (Big Brother government) was, is, and always will be a complete nonstarter, when it comes to human progress. At its best, it merely stands in the way of progress—while, at its worst, it proactively forces regression toward the mean, while the mean itself is continually lowered in all characteristics wherein humans excel.
-Because in the last 2-3 decades and respective to the rest of the world, China has behaved like an opportunistic, amoral parasitoid—an organism that parasitizes, and in the process kills its host organism. Which is to say, it has explicitly and deliberately broken every rule that it agreed to, when it ratified the WTO treaty that gave it access to world trade. The West merely acted in “bad faith,” in that it agreed to this on the grounds that the ensuing improvement in living standards would necessarily lead to an emancipation of the people—whereas Chinese leadership acted expressly in bad faith and with nefarious intent, in that its purpose was to misuse and abuse both the WTO and its own status within it, in order to consolidate wealth and arrogate global influence by continuously violating the treaty. The CPC is, and will under Xi Jinping (and, necessarily, beyond) always remain an evil oppressor of human dignity, notwithstanding changes in Western culture. That is to say, the CPC isn’t suddenly the “good guy,” just because Western Elites have suddenly turned into evil @ssholes. If anything, the hard swing to authoritarianism only comes as welcome news to the ones that have been practicing it the longest—because it justifies their own behavior, which will likely change for the worse, as a result. But make no mistake: their abusive, narcissistic sociopathy didn’t magically change into altruistic humanitarianism—neither in comparison, nor on its own.
-Because they have only misappropriated and outright stolen finished ideas and methods developed by others, without ever contributing anything at all of their own, for the common good they often lament, without themselves believing in it—no more than a self-professed “victim” can possibly ever be a fair, let alone a virtuous person. Why is this so? The answer to the correct(ed) question is: because anyone who behaves from the start and throughout with such a massive entitlement delusion is either a narcissistic sociopath, or feels justified on grounds of their presumed victimhood.
-Finally, as a reminder: it remains entirely to be seen how “well” statist governments manage to continue what they misappropriated from free market-oriented individuals. Just because the CPC was “clever” enough to create a sandbox environment in which it allowed free enterprise to thrive on a fictional premise doesn’t mean by a long shot that it has any hope of doing so on its own. Let’s just say, it has zero demonstrated historical basis of ever having done so. Everything it has managed, it it could only accomplish under the aegis of traditional Western standards. Indeed, anything the Soviets “achieved” was on the basis of espionage and theft, as well. Or, to reiterate: do not do business with pinkos human debris—realistically, you will only lose the any excellence you acquired yourself, as a result.

Which, by the way, still wasn’t the crux of my argument…

First of all, the turbo concept was invented by Alfred Büchi over 100 years ago, and is the only actual “invention.” The idea to use it on a diesel engine isn’t merely an immediately obvious and straightforward application of the concept of producing more power by injecting more fuel into the combustion chamber while maintaining a proper stoichiometric ratio (lambda=14)—it is also something that would only count as an “invention” in today’s age of ignorance, where previously patented ideas are awarded patent status, merely because they’re re-implemented in a network environment.

Unfortunately, in terms of justifying your article, that was not even the case here: the turbo concept was always intended for use with diesel engines primarily, and this application finally succeeded about a decade after it’s original invention. Likely, it took this long because in the real world there are always unknown obstacles in the way—which, in the case of both diesel and normal gas, happens to be premature ignition, if the compressed air is already hot (which it is—because PV=nRT) when it’s added to the fuel mist, then additionally compressed on the downstroke by an additional ~9 to 1 ratio (because…PV=nRT).

Which is really to say: neither I, nor any other sane person who observes some dingbat swallow a bunch of DMT and then hallucinate a bunch of ludicrously vague nonsense would ever turn around and proclaim: “lo and behold—an invention!” Furthermore, it is precisely this sort of strategy, whereby Islamists (who stole the majority of whatever knowledge they had accrued from those they subjugated—in fact, starting with Arabs themselves, who were the actual contributors of scientific knowledge that Westerners capitalized upon).

Well, this wasn’t even the main point of my comment.

I haven’t read all comments, so someone may have already mentioned this.

First of all, while there is absolutely a very serious sense in the general public that, even before outright criminalization, people have to watch what they say; one wrong word can be career-ending, at the very least, which already completely contradicts the most fundamental principle of the German Basic Law (Grundgesetz–Germany’s Bill of Rights-equivalent), which stipulates: (Eine) Zensur findet nicht statt–literally: censorship will not occur. Naturally,, as in the U.S., it therefore first occurred through the constant harassment of P.C.–although, it is worth pointing out that Germany did pass the Selbstbestimnungsgesetz, or self-determination law, which is mostly designed to allow people (including adolescents) to assert their gender, while explicitly outlawing guacrdians from interfering.

Also, on a related note, Germany changed possession of child pr0n from a felony to a misdemeanor in April, on the–IShitYouNot–grounds that this is to “prevent undue punishment of innocents such as parents found in possession, who were merely circulating said materials to other concerned parents,” presumably to commiserate in abject horror.

All that said, what I mainly wanted to say is, it is not quite as bad as the author claimed; or, it isn’t quite as bad in the sense the author asserted, at least. There certainly are very vocal and critical opposition voices in Germany. Just to name one prominent individual: Julian Reichelt, who is a very outspoken opponent and who was editor-in-chief at one of the major news publications until a few years ago, both with his news website nius dot de (“nius” is the German phonetic spelling of the English word news), as well as his “Achtung, Reichelt!” and Nius channels on YouTube. In fact, just 2-4 weeks ago, Julian won a major lawsuit against the federal German government, which enjoins the latter from any further attempts to censor him–which was accomplished squarely on the basis of the Basic Law I mentioned earlier. So, at least in that regard, you might even say that Germany edges out the U.S., in terms of recently set precedent that explicitly sides against the would-be censors. And no, that does not change the fact that harassment and CancelCulture (which was imported wholesale, including the hashtag) aren’t still an ongoing problem.

In addition, because all of this is coordinated across Western nations by NGOs, it is of course also true that elections are likely severely compromised, as other methods of voting were introduced following pandemic lockdowns, same as in the U.S.