For some reason, all the women I've met in these circles have a травма with the so-called “Man-O-Sphere”. Ironically, this травма prevents them for making good counter-arguments. You say that it doesn't stand to empirical evidence that high educated women are more likely to end childless (which I'm not against it) and to counterattack it you post that low income women have a higher decline, as if that debunked anything. It's a red herring, just because low income women have a higher decrease in fertility that doesn't mean they have lower fertility. I mean, Jesus Christ dude, with just tipping “fertility and income” the very first result was a 2010 investigation that says, quote:

“Educated women generally have fewer children than uneducated women. ... Thus, women with primary education tend to have 0–30% fewer children than uneducated women (ratio of total fertility rate of 1 to 0.7). The differential, if any, tends to widen as income increases.”
 

If that's your level of counter-arguments, then you're a lot more dishonest, or a lot more fucking stupid than I previously thought.

Replies: @Der

«A closer look at even these lower rates indicate that there are really two separate groups with very different rates: a woman who is over 25, has a college degree, and an independent income has only a 20 percent probability of her marriage ending in divorce» 20% is not a good percentage. Russian Roulette is 1 in 6, or, 16,6%. 20% is 1 in 5. And furthermore, it's curious, to say the least that you put «cheating» in a condescending way. “It's all your fault because you cheated on her” even though the rate of cheating doesn't match it. Moreover, you ignored other factors like: incompatibility and money. Yeah, don't cheat on her, but if you get injured or lose your job then let's see how long it takes her to divorce you. And according to you, it gets worse in the following years. It increases with age. Make no mistake, things can change in an instant: “Yeah, we had a lion in the house and everything was going perfectly fine until one day....” that's how it ends.

Replies: @Der

And the sole misandrist around here
 

Thus, we reach an even more dramatic conclusion: That for college educated women who marry after the age of 25 and have established an independent source of income, the divorce rate is only 20%!
 

Replies: @Colin Wright, @Der

We frequently find that psychological manipulations do not appreciably change an individual's firmly established opinion. A Communist or a Christian with strong beliefs is very little, if at all, shaken by adverse propaganda. Similarly, a prejudice or a stereotype is hardly ever changed by propaganda; for example it is almost impossible to break down racial prejudice by propaganda. What people think of Negroes, Jews, bourgeois, or colonialists will be only slightly altered by propaganda attempts. Similarly, a reflex or myth cannot be created out of nothing, as if the individual were neutral and empty ground on which anything could be built. Furthermore, even when the reflex has been created it cannot be utilized to make an individual act in just any direction; the individual cannot be manipulated as if he were an object, an automaton—the automatic nature of created reflexes does not transform him into a robot.
- Jacques Ellul, Propaganda, p. 33
 

Replies: @Franklin Ryckaert, @Vojkan, @TheTrumanShow, @anon, @anonymous, @Aristotle1, @Jake, @Anonymous, @Robert Konrad, @foolisholdman, @Snarky1, @Der