Oh Please that stupid salute, you think that is the reason he is being silenced? Listen to this skit.
https://youtu.be/BSkUq-3JF3M

Jews have a special concern with Jew hatred as the Catholic church accused the Jews and Judaism of deicide during the middle ages. Jews were considered Satanic, and Jewish rituals were considered a mortal sin. This cat and mouse game between Judaism and Catholicism played out from the middle ages until the Holocaust, which was really the culmination of Christian (Roman) Jew hatred. Germany and Hitelr had very little to do with the Holocaust other then the execution. It was Christian Jew hatred that the Jews killed Jesus and did not accept him as the savior. The Jews considered Jesus a charlatan, who practiced sorcery. A false idol. This did not go over well with the church. The ruling aristocracy decided where Jews could live and work, and ultimately their fate.

In 2020 Islam is reviving this ancient Jew hatred. Jewish behavior does not cause Jew hatred, it is religiously oriented as Jews do not accept Jesus or Mohammed. This hatred must be stopped. It is dangerous. The Catholic church and Christians have come a long way in facing the truth about Jew hatred's causes and have removed the deicide charge and formed a brotherhood with Jews. Unfortunately the Jews still have Islam to deal with.

Replies: @Anon, @anarchyst, @Iris, @Ilya G Poimandres, @Al Liguori, @Colin Wright

Ten years ago, on December 1, 2003, as guest on a TV show appropriately called “You Can’t Please Everybody”, dedicated to current events, Dieudonné came on stage roughly disguised as “a convert to Zionist extremism” advising others to get ahead by “joining the American-Israeli Axis of Good”. This was in the first year of the US assault on Iraq,
The sketch ended with a brief salute, “Isra-heil”. This was far from being vintage Dieudonné, but nevertheless, the popular humorist was at the time enthusiastically embraced by other performers while the studio audience gave him a standing ovation.

Then the protests started coming in, especially concerning the final gesture seen as likening Israel to Nazi Germany.

“Anti-Semitism!” was the cry, although the target was Israel (and the United States as allies in the Middle East). Calls multiplied to ban his shows, to sue him, to destroy his career.----

To invent a pretext for destroying Dieudonné, the leading Jewish organizations CRIF (Conseil Représentatif des Institutions Juives de France, the French AIPAC) and LICRA (Ligue internationale contre le racisme et l’antisémitisme, which enjoys special privileges under French law) have come up with a fantasy to brand Dieudonné and his followers as “Nazis”. The quenelle is all too obviously a vulgar gesture roughly meaning “up yours”, with one hand placed at the top of the other arm pointing down to signify “how far up” this is to be.

But for the CRIF and LICRA, the quenelle is “a Nazi salute in reverse”. (You can never be too “vigilant” when looking for the hidden Hitler.)

https://www.counterpunch.org/2014/01/01/the-bete-noire-of-the-french-establishment/

At at time when Jewish were using anti Muslim rhetorics and anti Islam slogans to prod us wage war against Iraq Syria Saudi Arab even Egypt and showing the military how to think and market the attack . some French anti national was ganging up against an antiwar person ,antiwar nation ( French ddi not sign up for Iraq war ) and asking ban on the popular anti-war show .

Replies: @Fran Taubman

Satan is 'activated' by the disobedience of Adam, when he presumed that he can judge God, accusing him of lying to him. He empowers Satan who was nothing more than a brute on the earth, albeit crafty.

Replies: @Bleuazur, @Ano4, @Radicalcenter

Pas mal ! Et une preuve historique importante en plus :)

Sinon, c'est tiré de quel Astérix svp ?

Replies: @First Millennium Revisionist

But if Roman Empire did not conquer Gaul there should be no Asterix comics.

Did I miss something?

Replies: @Bleuazur

I thought Romans only wrote on stone ! (just kidding)
https://i.postimg.cc/XqLpG2L0/Asterix.jpg

Replies: @Ano4, @Bleuazur

Your evidence and your confidence that the lists of consuls available here and there are relatively consistent and therefore basically authentic is an argument that I cannot reject. I read here and there, however (and no further than Wikipedia), that your confidence is not shared by all scholars, one reason being that Livy says that the fasti had been destroyed durint the sack of 390 BC. But let's assume that those fasti consulares do provide evidence of the Roman Republic ; does that refute the theory of my two articles ? No. Remember, I do not dispute the existence of the Roman Republic, I only dispute its date: it was founded in 1144. Just like the SPQR sign, the Fasti Capitolini engraved in marble could very well be medieval. Now the question is: do we have any independent evidence that medieval Rome have consuls? It seems that there are plenty of affirmations that medieval Rome was a Republic with consuls. However, for some reason, their lists are lost, and just a few names are known (correct me if I'm wrong). So here again we bump into the very puzzling fact that we know so much about the ancient Roman Republic, but so little about the medieval one, which is undoubtedly real but which, strangely, left no archeological strata. I am reminded that Fomenko and Nosovsky actually made that hypothesis that “the ‘mysteriously missing’ mediaeval lists of the Roman consuls from the Middle Ages, which have been arbitrarily displaced into ‘deep antiquity’ by learned historians” (vol. 2, chap. 2, p. 111).
You are certainly going to comment that my theory is unfalsifiable in the Popperian sense! But that is not the case: it could be falsified by archeology, and that is why I hold on to Heinsohn’s approach. The notion that the Roman Republic n°1 is a phantom retro-projection of Roman Republic n°2 could be proven false if, stratigraphically, those papyrus fragments that you mentioned could be scientifically dated from Antiquity. In the case of Rome, with only one strata out of the three that Heinsohn requires, it is impossible. The only way would be to Carbon 14, assuming it is of any worth, and to prove that papyrus was out of use in the MA. Was it really? (not a rethorical question)

Replies: @First Millennium Revisionist, @eknibbs

This guy actually sounds kinda obsessed, but let’s deal with this one by one.

I told you that I don’t know Fomenko’s book so I cannot judge the book is right or wrong, don’t change topic, Mr. Smith, I don’t say anything like ‘I understand Fomenko’s book better than you’, I am pointing out your unstable behavior here.
 

My crazy and stupid typo, yes, I mean you compare Ukro-Nazi and Russia to Vietnam and China, my bad for making you confused. Yes, you are delusional and idiot when compare Ukro-Nazi to Vietnam. I truly don’t see how Ukro-Nazi is same to Vietnam. You don’t live in Ukraine so you don’t know how Ukrainian think about Russia and their own government. You will remind you again the Ukraine History:
 

Slurs are slurs, that right but you are overused them so like a person who love to say ‘fuck you’ so uncontrollable in every argument.
 

Tell me more about your experiences in many countries because if you truly visit many countries like you claim, then you will realize that there are good and bad people around the world.
 

However, many people here does not understand your rude behavior so they will automatically think you are racism.
 

If I just misunderstand, so my bad, ok? But I truly don’t think I misunderstand what you say. I, in fact, think that you believe Russia culture is truly inferior from the European text book, European always denied the Eastern Culture, especially Russia, so why Fomenko cannot make counter-argument?
 

I also like European culture too but that does not equal to ‘overprotective on European (possible fake) history’ like you are doing right now.
 

I mean did those Han trader have so much free time to take research the Rome is actually empire or not? Or those Han Trader just had only time at the Roman Port City? ‘Roman Empire’ might be just a self-proclaim name same to the name Dai Viet (Great Viet) meanwhile not great in fact especially we Vietnamese must pay ‘the independent fee’ to China every year, right?
 

How can I believe you just truly don’t understand the word ‘Sinophilia’ and ‘Sinophobia’ with mocking behavior like that? I call you mental illness because I conclude this from your own behaviors and opinions since beginning, especially compare Ukraine and Vietnam, and supporting those traitor Hong Kong. By the way, you think Hong Kong can survive with itself? Hong Kong is belong to China historically.
 

Ok, if you truly don’t understand the word, so I will explain:
Sinophilia – Same to the word ‘Zoophilia’
Sinophobia – Fear of China symptom.
 

Zoophilia is a paraphilia involving a sexual fixation on non-human animals.
 

You are right that most of Fomenko citation is Russian ones, Anatoly Formenko should take Chinese ones as the counter-argument, but can you prove that the Russian citation are false? You are being cherry picky, sir!
 

How about ask Mr. Unz come here to confirm that your fake email is unique coincidence same to the email of ‘2010 Smith’? If it is right, so I am a fool, and I will admit that I am a fool.
 

Replies: @Seraphim, @Unorthodox Black Sheep VN

That's interesting, thanks. It seems he gave the same lecture (with the same title, at least) in 2017. But the important question is: What did he say in his lecture? I couldn't find the answer, apart from that brief sentence in some report:

Gunnar Heinsohn constructs his demographic theory on the premise that the youth bulge is a socially destabilizing factor, which can be regarded as the other side of the coin of “geriatric peace.”
 

Replies: @Robjil, @Iris, @Bleuazur

The thing is this feud and the viciousness it still raises were news to me. So far I’ve only ever seen the Orthodox side apologists, but I expect the other side to be no less vicious.
 

I've sent this guy's articles to a Latin scholar, and he laughed out loud at the volume of his errors.

Replies: @First Millennium Revisionist, @A Portuguese Man

"I can find no evidence that the European designs, prior to the Wrights turned and maneuvered."

Given the location you keep your head at:

https://www.decalguy.com/prod_images_large/1084.jpg

It's unlikely you'll ever find anything beyond your own fecal matter, sclomo. Which I'm sure suits you fine.

:-D

As for others flying in circles without the sacred name:

Henri Farman
French pioneer aviator and airplane manufacturer

https://www.britannica.com/biography/Henri-Farman

"French aviation pioneer and aircraft builder who popularized the use of ailerons, moveable surfaces on the trailing edge of a wing that provide a means of lateral control.

With his brother, Maurice Farman, he modified a Voisin pusher biplane, now known as the Voisin-Farman I, and in January 1908 won an important prize for the first circular flight of 1 km (0.6 mile). In 1909 he set a world record for endurance with a flight of 234.3 km (145.59 miles) in the Farman III."

They were doing turns, shlomo. Just not as tight. And that was where the Wrights made their impression. It was not that the europeans had not thought of rolling/banking, it was they thought it was too dangerous a manuever after the deaths of Lillianthal and Percey. They didn't understand stalls and worked towards making aircraft stable. The surprise the Wrights generated in their 1908 euro tour was that it was possible to bank an aircraft without seeing it slide to the ground due to loss of lift. (I realise this might be a little too technical for you, shlomo...). The euros were playing it conservative and trying to keep their experimental aircraft level as much as possible, going for stability, due to this. Claiming they did not create maneuverable aircraft is dishonest, or that of an adolescent bugger wannabe.

The Wright's obsession with greed and their desire to make everyone pay them to build an aeroplane actually set back aviation in some ways. But it also advanced it in others, as inventers worked on other avenues to avoid the Wright frivolous legal actions.

The Wright's wing warping was at the time a great breakthrough, but it was a dead end. Within a year, by 1909, it was an obvious wrong direction. A warped wing is a very weak wing, mechanically, can't handle G forces. It is also not a very accurate method of controlling lift. Ailerons work much better. At least then and now. Likely future construction materials will alter this fact.

The Wrights compounded this by attempting to stifle aviation by trying to force inventers to pay them. This screwed up aviation advancement in the usa big time and both hampered aviation elsewhere with anearlier version of the familiar american sanctions thrown about now in tantrums.

Replies: @ivan, @Bombercommand, @Bleuazur, @FB

The truth is that the Gnostics were the first falsifiers of history, producing numerous 'alternative' Gospels and Apostolic writings to attack the Church from the inside. But yes, they were not Christians.
Of course the 'cult of Mary' is not derived from the 'cult of Isis'. There is no need to repeat what you wrote already.

Replies: @gay troll

The searcher John Lash Lamb in Not in his image wrote that contrary to the official interpretations, Nag Hammadi codexes were not written by christians, but by highly educated pagans.
 

Replies: @Bleuazur, @Seraphim

It was about the first alphabet, not the first script.

And it is most likely this Vinca stuff wasn't an alphabet at all, maybe not even a script.

https://www.quora.com/What-is-currently-known-about-the-T%C4%83rt%C4%83ria-tablets-and-the-Vin%C4%8Da-symbols
https://www.quora.com/If-Vinca-script-isnt-writing-what-are-the-symbols-thought-to-represent

As for the Philistine alphabet (also named Phoenician alphabet), its roots go back to the old rune script of the Northern Europeans.

Replies: @FB

Replies: @Ron Unz, @The Z Blog, @Bleuazur

I don’t agree at all with you about “Germanic barbarians without their own history write “Fake History”.

This version of the cultures North from Rome being “barbarians” have long ago been debunked. Roman (fake?) writings spread this myth. Celts for instance created what is today wrongly attributed to Romans, like for instance the so-named “Roman roads” in Europe. Their civilization was highly advanced.

And this is also relevant to even more ancient times : Jürgen Spanuth, a german searcher proved the old Germans were highly evolved. More than 3000 years ago, they were for instance the best seafarers and are at the origins of iron working. They also created the first alphabet, which later evolved to the Greek one. One of their main gods was Apollo…

They were set up on islands of the North Sea (near Helgoland), which make up the actual Atlantis described by Platon (who was right, he just misdated the Atlantis story). In the 13th century BC, there was a (maybe) worldwide cataclysm, and those Germans lost their isles, and so went through almost whole Europe, in a South-Eastern direction. After having been beaten by the Athenians, they settled in the Middle-East where they were called the Philistines. Those brought their highly evolved civilization to the primitive tribes living there, especially the Israelites (which owe much to them – for instance, Solomon’s temple architect was a Philistine – thus a German!). The Philistines tried also to conquer Egypt, but failed. This is proven by ancient paintings in Egyptian temples which clearly show Northern warriors captured by the Egyptians (as well as their ships, that much resemble Viking ones).
Part of the Philistines became the Phoenicians. Later on most of them went back to Greece and this time conquered it (they were called the “Heraklids”). They brought their culture to Greece, and are at the origins of the Hellenistic Greece.

The author shows overwhelming evidence to support his thesis, especially archeological one. And seventy years ago, the remains of the principal isle of Atlantis were still visible in the North Sea, and completely matched Plato’s description (it is very precise and detailed). By the way, Helgoland is the only remaining part of Atlantis.

My personal opinion after reading Spanuth’s books (Das enträtselte Atlantis, Die Philister, Die Rückkehr der Herakliden ; in English there’s also Atlantis – the mistery unraveled), is that old Germans are for sure at the origins of our Western culture.
I know this won’t please everyone, so I can only encourage the reading of his books, available here (afaik the paper version isn’t available anymore) : https://b-ok.cc/s/spanuth

And please, stop applying ideology to history. Even if a (in my opinion proven) theory doesn’t seem “politically correct” and/or doesnt fit your ideas,the truth is still the truth.

Replies: @Commentator Mike, @antibeast

I don't know if the Dead sea scrolls kept in Israel are forgeries. Could very well be. But allready a long time ago, I read Norman Golb's Who wrote the Dead Sea Scrolls and became convinced that, at least, the Essenian hypothesis which was from the very start imposed by the Catholic and Israeli scholars was completly unsubstantiated.

Replies: @Bleuazur

They also created the first alphabet, which later evolved to the Greek one.
 

The Danube Script: Neo-Eneolithic Writing in Southeastern Europe
MUSEUM OF HISTORY, CASA ALTEMBERGER, BRUKENTHAL NATIONAL MUSEUM, SIBU, ROMANIA, May 18-20, 2008.

https://www.archaeomythology.org/archaeomythological-events/romania-2008/

https://qph.fs.quoracdn.net/main-qimg-f1094fb9c8145c3369b9650da665749d

Replies: @Bleuazur

In the 19th century for instance, the (eugenic) Anglo-Saxon ruling class claimed the ancient Greeks and the Romans were Germans. The historical Eastern migration was replaced with an invented one from the North. The Near Eastern people (Canaanites (Phoenicians), Egyptians, et al.) who were instrumental in the development of the Western world were erased.

 

Bottom line: Ruling classes write History. The rest is history.

 

This is the race that gave the world the great civilizations of Egypt, of Crete, of Phoenicia including Carthage, of Etruria and of Mycenean Greece. It gave us, when mixed and invigorated with Nordic elements, the most splendid of all civilizations, that of ancient Hellas, and the most enduring of political organizations, the Roman State. To what extent the Mediterranean race entered into the blood and civilization of Rome, it is now difficult to say, but the traditions of the Eternal City, its love of organization, of law and military efficiency, as well as the Roman ideals of family life, loyalty, and truth, point clearly to a Nordic rather than to a Mediterranean origin.

 

Bottom line: Germanic barbarians without their own history write "Fake History". The rest is history.

Replies: @Seraphim, @Hiram of Tyre, @Bleuazur

I read somewhere that the Dead Sea Scrolls held by the Israel Museum in Jerusalem never leave Israel, so no outsider has verified their authenticity.

Probably if they do leave the museum the Mossad goons keep a close watch to prevent anyone from obtaining a sample for analysis.

Replies: @Bleuazur

Revisionism of Scaligerian chronology is where I'm heading.
I’ll mention Fomenko at length in my third article, as well as Gunnar Heinsohn, whose hard evidence I find more convincing. If you don't know his work, check his video on https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c876lPZ-UZU and his articles on http://www.q-mag.org/gunnar-heinsohns-latest.html

Replies: @Bleuazur

You wouldn't have asked this question had you read the report in its entirety. Never rush to conclusions.

"The report does not cast doubt upon the authenticity of the Dead Sea Scrolls held by the Israel Museum in Jerusalem. These artifacts are among the most precious relics of the ancient world, first discovered in 1947 in a cave at Qumran, near the shores of the Dead Sea. Dated to around 2,000 years ago, most of the scrolls were written in Hebrew, though some were penned in Aramaic and Greek".

Replies: @Bleuazur

Let's hope all the cadavers from the Justinian plague remain in the ground. We don't need a new pandemic.

Even if the manuscripts of Tacitus are proved to be forgeries it casts no doubt on the original New Testament documents. Those documents were meticulously hand copied in the very monasteries that allowed the pagan documents to decay.

The accuracy of the Old Testament manuscripts was conclusively established by the discovery of the Dead Sea Scrolls. Almost no differences were found between the manuscripts that sat in clay jars in the Qumran Caves for over 2,000 years and modern versions of the same scriptures.

Replies: @Bleuazur

"What we believe about the salience of race and racial differences, we know, since we have the data and statistics, the evidence of history, everything, to back us up."

Whites are only 10% of the world's population and the only race in population decline (creating only 7% of the world's babies), yet are the most industrious and innovative race the world has known. Whites unlocked the secrets of DNA and relativity, launched satellites, created automation, discovered electricity and nuclear energy, invented automobiles, aircraft, submarines, radio, television, computers, medicine, telephones, light bulbs, photography, and countless other technological miracles. Whites were the first to circumnavigate the planet by ship, orbit it by spacecraft, walk on the moon, probe beyond the solar system, climb the highest peaks, reach both poles, exceed the sound barrier, descend to the oceans depths... Blacks cannot even feed themselves.

Whites created every country for Blacks, but now have to provide food, medical, financial, and engineering aid to every one. Blacks cannot survive without White charity.

No pre-contact Black society ever created a written language, or weaved cloth, or forged steel, or invented the wheel, or plow, or devised a calendar, or code of laws, or system of measurement, or math, or built a multi-story structure, or sewer, or drilled a well, or irrigated, or created any agriculture, or built a road, or sea-worthy vessel. They never domesticated animals, or exploited underground natural resources, or produced anything that could be considered a mechanical device.

Blacks were still living in the Stone Age when Whites discovered them just 400 years ago.

Blacks are the oldest race, so they should be the most advanced — but they never advanced at all. Sub-Saharan Africans never made any contribution to the world. Everything they have was given to them by Whites. Blacks lived alone in Africa, a vast continent with temperate climates and abundant resources for 60,000 years so they cannot blame slavery, racism, colonialism, culture, environment, or anything else for their failures.

Replies: @mark tapley, @bruce county, @Hartnell, @Bleuazur