Thank you Kevin Barrett for being a relentless anchor of reason and sanity, for your vast intelligence, for preserving the possibility of restoring everyday honor and cultivating human greatness, and for all the benefits that brings to most of us. Thank you Mr. Unz for your courage, wisdom, and intelligence in providing us with this platform. You and so many others here are growing the community we want to live in. It’s growing.

“According to … Guyénot’s hypothesis, the CIA’s false flag fake assassination attempt on President John F. Kennedy, designed to be blamed on Cuba, was transformed by Mossad into a real assassination—and the CIA couldn’t expose it due to its own complicity. … The same scenario, Guyénot argues, explains the anomalies of … the 9/11 false flag operation. ”

I haven’t read all the comments above, but would that scenario, for 9/11, be… Mossad’s prior knowledge of a US-Government plan for a false-flag attack on the Pentagon on 9/11 — leading to a separate Mossad plan to hit three rigged buildings in NYC with airplanes scheduled to depart earlier in the day than the flight that hit the Pentagon? (But who knows if they were even actual commercial flights.) So that the three NYC attacks would not be exposed due to the US’s complicity in the WDC attack?? Just wondering.

Also, is it possible Flight 93, which went down in Pennsylvania, was intended to hit WTC 7? When it didn’t make it, perhaps because some thinking people defied orders to not follow routine and often-rehearsed national-security procedure, Silverstein et al. either had to detonate their explosion set-up without the planned fake cause, or leave standing a building they really, really, really wanted to destroy.

I think it’s going to be impossible to restore traditional concepts of God into modern and post-modern thought. Many people just aren’t able to sustain genuine faith in an unseen spiritual authority. But people have struggled with this for thousands of years. In recent history, for one possible example, didn’t the Deists live by a philosophy that was based on a notion of God derived from human reason, hence was pragmatic and acceptable to people who weren’t persuaded by the idea of using divine revelation as a basis for civil foundations?

So that red-and-blue graph can help a lot with understanding quotas and other “fairness” issues…

…if it’s true that the low-IQ Europeans tend to benefit from association with the higher AVERAGE (emphasis on AVERAGE) IQ of their racial group and appearance.

And all those (many) high-IQ Africans tend to not-benefit (be harmed) by association with the lower AVERAGE IQ of their racial group and appearance.

The graph (if true) shows that, while the AVERAGE (emphasis on average) IQ of all Europeans is higher than the AVERAGE of Africans, huge numbers of both groups are above and below that average. Lots of Europeans’ IQs are lower than lots of Africans’ IQs. Lots are higher. Lots of Africans’ IQs are higher than lots of European IQs. Lots are lower.

So why do we keep talking about this.