RSSIs it possible for China or any developing third world country like the Philippines to stay off the poz and have grow rich at the same time, or are they mutually exclusive?
So what is the reason why older elites like the Victorian elites, Confucian scholar gentry, or medieval nobility might espouse socially conservative ideology?
sorry to be such a grouch, but isn’t Spandrell talking about a social loser like himselg, he seems to be of above average intelligence, but clearly isn’t good at using that to make a lot of money, and is stuck as a dissident right writer, so he is in effect talking about himself, sounds like an incel too.
I mean since society is inherently hierarchical in nature, isn’t there a way steer the system towards elite systems that are less harmful in nature compared to Globohomo, as I said, the old Cominterm, feudalism, European style absolute monarchy, and a quasi theocracy run by a Confucian scholar gentry class is preferable to the present neoliberal Globohomo system.
Marxist societies seem to go though brief periods of craziness (the Soviet Union under Lenin, the Cultural Revolution in China) but then they realise that they have to construct functional societies and the craziness gets quietly dropped. Marxist elites learn that reality trumps theory. Our current elites seem to be incapable of understanding this.
isn’t there a way steer the system towards elite systems that are less harmful in nature compared to Globohomo, as I said, the old Cominterm, feudalism, European style absolute monarchy, and a quasi theocracy run by a Confucian scholar gentry class is preferable to the present neoliberal Globohomo system.
Republican Roman elites did also stop doing that and embrace degeneracy.
Is there theory as to why modern elites might want to spread degeneracy among the masses and the bourgeois and the masses? After all Republican Roman elites were very conservative and spread their conservative Roman values called gravitas among the populace
Well if elite concentration is unavoidable, how can it be incentivised in a way which disincentivices deviancy, which was how elites functioned before the 60s? And about giving low status people status, giving some low status people high status might be less bad than giving other types of low status people high status, for example, giving straight women, or rural Southern white men and women, or talented tenth conservative blacks, or socially conservative Asian people like Twinkie a higher status than they did in the 30s may be a good idea, if only in order to expand the size of the conservative demographics, and is a lot better than giving gays and other sexual deviants, or 70 IQ blacks a high status in the power structure, or a butch black lesbian transexual. And about types of Marxism, some types of Marxism are preferable to others, if that is your only choice, for example, the Soviet geriatric Cominterm run by people like Brezhnev and Andropov, for all of its downsides, is at least still livable, and not not utterly disgusting like the present day Hominterm, and even Karlin pointed this out in the Soviet freezer theory.
.
And about types of Marxism, some types of Marxism are preferable to others, if that is your only choice, for example, the Soviet geriatric Cominterm run by people like Brezhnev and Andropov, for all of its downsides, is at least still livable, and not not utterly disgusting like the present day Hominterm, and even Karlin pointed this out in the Soviet freezer theory
Is there theory as to why modern elites might want to spread degeneracy among the masses and the bourgeois and the masses? After all Republican Roman elites were very conservative and spread their conservative Roman values called gravitas among the populace, and likewise medieval nobility were very conservative and spread Christianity by the sword if necessary, like what happened in the Baltics, and Victorian and Edwardian elites were also conservative, which encouraged conservative behavior among the Victorian middle class.
Republican Roman elites did also stop doing that and embrace degeneracy.
Is there theory as to why modern elites might want to spread degeneracy among the masses and the bourgeois and the masses? After all Republican Roman elites were very conservative and spread their conservative Roman values called gravitas among the populace
To demoralise them and make them easier to control? To destroy the family because it's an alternative focus of loyalty? To encourage a culture of consumption and hedonism which is good for the corporate bottom line?
Is there theory as to why modern elites might want to spread degeneracy among the masses and the bourgeois and the masses?
historically elites have often been morally corrupt themselves but yeah they almost always preached socially conservative values to the lower classes to maintain social stability so what's happened post 1960s is strange and unusual.
Is there theory as to why modern elites might want to spread degeneracy among the masses and the bourgeois and the masses?