Replies: @d dan, @Parfois1, @Spanky, @ValMonde, @kauchai

Engineered bat virus stirs debate over risky research

An experiment that created a hybrid version of a bat coronavirus — one related to the virus that causes SARS (severe acute respiratory syndrome) — has triggered renewed debate over whether engineering lab variants of viruses with possible pandemic potential is worth the risks.

https://www.nature.com/news/engineered-bat-virus-stirs-debate-over-risky-research-1.18787?WT.mc_id=TWT_NatureNews
 

Replies: @ValMonde, @Bombercommand

No you do not have a "suspect", try using Occam's Razor, it has never let anyone down.

Replies: @FB, @Daemon, @ValMonde

What you're seeing is a group of neurotic people who're emotionally invested in "America did it!" When your "evidence for conviction" pretty much amounts to "I hate America," you shouldn't think intelligent people will take you seriously.

The number of people here and elsewhere who know—they just know—who did what and why they did it and what's going on and what the virus is and is not and what's going to happen is astonishing.

Welcome to the age of the instant expert. One Google search and these losers start running off at the keyboard like they just won the Nobel Prize in epidemiology. And then there are the anonymous "experts" with insider knowledge whose word you'll just have to accept.

What a nuthouse.

Replies: @ValMonde

US has the motive
 

Replies: @Gleimhart Mantooso, @ValMonde, @Herald

Replies: @Hacienda, @ValMonde, @bluedog, @jkb

Giraldi's delicate use of this toxic term indicates that he actually considers 'anti-Semitism' to be some kind of sin. A mental illness, perhaps?

But does 'anti-Semitism' actually identify a unique strain of morally-depravity?--a unique propensity to injure and kill?

No, it does not. That is a politicized fabrication.

This is not to say that one who holds a fanatical grudge against Jews (or any particular individual, nation or group) cannot be unhinged and act way overboard about it--but every case must be based on its unique merits, history and complaints.

Analyze, measure, and judge. Without favoritism. Yet that reasonable formula has been tossed aside.

Indeed, no tribe, race, or nation has a monopoly on vice or virtue. But anti-Semitic theory would have us believe otherwise.

What's been cooked-up (due to the partisan efforts of Jewish theorists from Freud to Adorno to Marcuse) is a pseudo-science that designates outbursts directed towards Jews as a mental disorder, born from mental defects tied to hidden urges, family conflicts, economic insecurity, and sexual neuroses.

'Anti-Semitic theory' is a scientific fraud. Its purpose is to automatically elevate Jews and exonerate the Tribe from facing the actual details of their myriad conflicts. It attempts to:

1) pathologize gentile aversion to Jewish in-group/out-group behavior, and

2) insulate Jews from outside (non-Jewish) criticism since expressions of disdain for Jewish conduct ('anti-Semitism') is supposedly derived not from the actual conflicts, but from prejudicial beliefs and irrational impulses held by gentiles.

The top-down, self-serving, all-kosher theory of 'anti-Semitism' is both a smear as well as a Get Out of Jail card for this privileged clique. It is further designed to silence the accused (non-Jews who dare to speak out) while providing political cover for Jewish-engineered disruptions and political upheavals.

This is why the very term 'anti-Semitism' should be junked. It provides undue protection for worldwide Zio-Jewish malfeasance.

Besides, what does 'anti-Semitism' even describe?--a hater of Semites?--or a hater of Jews?

Curiously, 'anti-Semitism' has contains no opposite. There's no such thing as 'pro-Semitism'. Indeed, 'Semitism' itself is not a unifying or active political force whatsoever (though Zio-Jewishness certainly is.) This leaves us with a deliberately nebulous term but a handy weapon.

A more honest title for the misnamed charade of 'anti-Semitism' might be this:

'How to Use Fake History and Media Indoctrination to Silence the Goyim'.

As for Semitic peoples, the case could be made that haters of non-JewishSemites constitute a high percentage of America's ruling class. Just take a historic look backwards.

Measure the destructiveness of US Mideast policies towards non-Jewish Semites over the past half century. The body count is astronomical. And contrary to what's advertised, many of Zio-America's destructive policies have targeted 'Semitic' Christians as well as Muslims. This fact illustrates the stark--though unrecognized--political divide (and preferential treatment) that exists in America between Semitic groups. One group is entirely and consistently more equal than others. What does this tell you?

Dialogue is a two-way street. Yet organized Jewry (this includes America's MSM) is hyper-miserly in this regard. Jewish leaders bristle at outside criticism. Their watchdog groups (with essential help from America's MSM) circulate the deceptive and defamatory term 'anti-Semitism' to defame, shame and silence their critics. This strategy works.

Meanwhile, they demand for themselves the right to dissect, demean, defame, and demote the reputation of their adversaries--without shame or cost.

Incredibly, government-sanctioned 'anti-Semitism' is actually official policy--just so long as it does not adversely affect Jews. That is key.

The US has, in fact. killed as many as one million (non-Jewish) Semites over the past two decades. Yet no one calls this organized mass murder 'anti-Semitism'. Why?

Anti-Semitism is actually all about one thing and one thing only: Jewish comfort and security. But the guardians of Jewish privilege refuse to acknowledge this fact, so they resort to linguistic tricks. Incredibly, the world's foremost 'victims' are also the world's foremost victimizers.

It should also be stated that 'Anti-Semitism' presents no clear and present danger to public order, human 'goodness' (?), or even Jewish safety--since dialogue, compassion, compromise and goodwill are always potent remedies. Indeed, the conundrum of 'anti-Semitism' has been accurately described as: "[A] trick. We (Jews) always use it". An Israeli lawmaker who appeared on Amy Goodman's 'Democracy NOW' made this admission. It is certainly true.

It is therefore time then to retire the tendentious, 'Holocaust'-linked term 'anti-Semitism' and substitute something more balanced, neutral and accurate.

'Counter-Jewish' is straightforward and clear, as is 'Jew-averse' or 'Jew-wary'.

In any case, 'anti-Semitism' is not only a deliberately misnamed phenomenon, it deliberately ignores a far greater pathogen; namely, America's abject surrender to a foreign power.

Replies: @Franklin Ryckaert, @Derer, @ValMonde

Some of us have wised-up to creatures that hate us, want to kill us, have enslaved us and are PROUD of it.

Scream "anti-Semite" all you want - this is war. We're taking our world back.

Replies: @ValMonde

Replies: @Munga Bulga, @Majority of One, @Featherless, @glib, @ValMonde, @yurivku, @mwee, @rab352, @Seraphim, @L.K, @TheTrumanShow, @Serge Krieger

Replies: @ValMonde, @ValMonde

Look, the indignant poster, demanding perfectism from everyone, and from Solzhenitsyn in particular!

So give us your evidence, that
a) the gulags weren't so bad
b) not 50 million (but only 20-30 million?) died victims of Soviet communism
c) Solzhenitsyn wanted the USSR nuked.

Also, tell us what about the 'warnings about the evils of totalitarianism' is distasteful to you: the warnings are faux, or it's not really totalitarianism, or totalitarianism also has some overlooked good sides?

If I may make a guess, towards both you and Martyanov:
You're both probably just blind religion-haters, that's where your dislike of Solzhenitsyn originates from.

Replies: @TheIdiot, @ValMonde, @Zarathustra, @ValMonde

Replies: @ValMonde, @Tom Verso

Very spurious reasoning on your side.

First of all, "Soviet communism" stretched farther in time than Stalin.
Second, you to limit 'communism deaths' to only the ones where Stalin, respective the then-government, signed an execution order, is a tiny bit unconvincing.

And then that 'rhetorical question'... yeah that was really a 'nuke them from orbit, it's the only way to be safe' statement. Thanks, you just cleared up for me that you have no substance behind your assertions.

Replies: @ValMonde

Look, the indignant poster, demanding perfectism from everyone, and from Solzhenitsyn in particular!

So give us your evidence, that
a) the gulags weren't so bad
b) not 50 million (but only 20-30 million?) died victims of Soviet communism
c) Solzhenitsyn wanted the USSR nuked.

Also, tell us what about the 'warnings about the evils of totalitarianism' is distasteful to you: the warnings are faux, or it's not really totalitarianism, or totalitarianism also has some overlooked good sides?

If I may make a guess, towards both you and Martyanov:
You're both probably just blind religion-haters, that's where your dislike of Solzhenitsyn originates from.

Replies: @TheIdiot, @ValMonde, @Zarathustra, @ValMonde

Perhaps because M. grew up and was brought up in the Soviet Union in the time of the intense anti-Solzhenitsyn character assassination campaign which followed his expulsion from USSR (he did not flee the country as it is too often suggested). It is doubtful that he ever knew anything else about Solzh. (his books were banned in the SU). And in the US he stumbled upon the same campaign of character assassination, perhaps more vicious than the Soviet one. And perhaps because there are still lots of people for whom only the 'bolsheviks' are 'Russian patriots', whose vision of pre-Communist Russia is the 'Leyenda Negra of Russia' (which has the same origins as the Spanish Leyenda Negra).
And for a professed 'bezbozhnik' the most offensive declaration of Solzhenitsyn is: ”But if I were asked today to formulate as concisely as possible the main cause of the ruinous Revolution that swallowed up some 60 million of our people, I could not put it more accurately than to repeat: “Men have forgotten God; that’s why all this has happened''.

Replies: @Mis(ter)Anthrope, @ValMonde

Replies: @ValMonde, @ValMonde

Funny argument 'Bolsheviks built the biggest empire on earth', them the 'anti-imperialists' (of Russian imperialism in particular)! Now, in point of fact they took over the Empire built by the Tsars after they busted them and killed a few boyars, bourgeois, kulaks, popes (the worst lot).
I was wondering when the theme 'Shalamov vs Solzhenitsyn' would pop out of the hat. He is a central piece of the character assassination of Solzhenitsyn (actually he was the first to accuse Sol of ''playing according to the rulebook of Cold War cultural politics''). He was certainly more palatable to the western 'Left', the leftovers of the Comintern, trotskist, 'antifascist' and neo-con alike. ''A man of inexorable anti-authoritarian instincts, an atheist, and a member of the “left” anti-Stalinist opposition'', who never renounced his core revolutionary ideals and refused to equate Soviet rule with Stalinism''“more left than the leftists”, ''continuing the legacy of the 1920s avant-garde'', eager to “participate in the great battle for the real transformation of life”, who ''never disavowed the Soviet project'' (birds of feather flock together).
Whereas Solzhenitsyn remained stuck into a praise of that Russia which all the 'West', left and right, scholars and politicians, capitalists and proletarians, execrated for centuries because "the tsarist dream of world domination caught the soul of the Russian nation'' (Russia as ''the 'Prison of the peoples', the 'gendarme of Europe', 'authoritarian', etc - the tropes of the perennial anti-Russian propaganda), and desired and worked hard for its 'containment' and eventual downfall. He was guilty of being ''so arrogantly biased that he absolves nineteenth-century Russia of any crime of violence, repression or persecution (above all the crime of crimes -pogroms)'' and denying that the Revolution was an exclusive product of the Russian milieu and not a reflection of the international 'battle for the real transformation of life' (LGBTQ+, transhumanism anyone?). And he committed the unpardonable offense to criticizing the American 'way of life' and American gullibility. And the more unpardonable offense to talk about God. And he is praised by Putin, the ''mafia boss, the totalitarian ruler, the godfather'', the poisoner who “destroyed institutions in Russia”, with whom the “Western leaders shouldn't deal with as a leader” (Mikhail Khodorkovsky) !
I recommend reading Solzhenitsyn.

Replies: @ValMonde

ValMonde - I appreciate much of what you write, but the bit about the USSR's 25-year build-out, portrayed as if it was pulling itself up by its boot-straps, is ludicrous. Antony Sutton's trilogy 'Western Technology and Soviet Economic Development' surely eviscerates that mythology. Having access to State Department archives at the Hoover Institution of War, Revolution and Peace, Sutton was able to tell a more complete story. Not that Russians and subject peoples didn't do the physical labor, but it was Western Capital Goods that built the Soviet Union from 1917-1965, all the way through the proverbial 'Cold War', that was pretty hot in the Southern Hemisphere nations. It wasn't just crack-pots like LaRouche who pointed out the special "Condominium of Interests" shared by those living in the Northern Hemisphere.

I didn't think about it until I read some of yours and others insights about Solzhenitsyn (thanks for those) but he really seems like he was a cultural back-channel, a 'shared-agent' if you will, performing various ideological services, as the times required. Whether he just fronted for a writing-project on his '200 Years Together' is above my pay grade, but his peculiar access to information and his previously protected celebrity-status in the West is too curious. The whole thing about our lack of access to a fully-translated copy of his book and it not being in print in the US is really strange. It's as if someone really wants us to read it? (kind of like the vaccine shortages) Or is it as simple as 'Bolshevik'-patriots suppressing history? That's not sarcasm, just an expression how it's a bit of a challenge to decipher exactly what you're communicating at times. I may just be 'tripping-over' irrelevant details but I'm not sure, as my first sentence above reveals.

In a way, I guess I could say a similar thing about Antony Sutton, as I do Solzhenitsyn, only in a reverse sense, as Sutton was quite obscure, ostensibly IRS-hounded out of the US to Australia, and we're faced with the odd fact that one of the few video interviews one can even find of him was done by Elizabeth Claire Prophet, an uber-cultist if there ever was one; a cultism that red-flags her as having worked for some intelligence agency or another. I mean who else gets to have a mountain-cave redoubt full of military hardware and travel the country hypnotizing audiences with St. Germain schtick and selling gemstone-fakes in hotel lobbies.

Sutton's alma-mater Hoover Institution is probably just one of those higher-levels of "right" perception-management, like say the Institute for Social Research is on the "left", but Sutton really did document trade of massive amounts of production-technology of every sort in exchange for Siberian resources. Our friends play every side of the game. So, although I'm fascinated by your meta-analysis of Solzhenitsyn's changes in perspective, and maybe it is as you say, to me he still smacks of a man who was 'managed' (or coerced) in the gray zone of those quietly co-operating international agencies.

Have you ever read The Penkovskiy Papers by Oleg Penkovskiy?

Replies: @ValMonde, @ValMonde, @ValMonde, @Seraphim, @El Gaucho from the Pampas

ValMonde - I appreciate much of what you write, but the bit about the USSR's 25-year build-out, portrayed as if it was pulling itself up by its boot-straps, is ludicrous. Antony Sutton's trilogy 'Western Technology and Soviet Economic Development' surely eviscerates that mythology. Having access to State Department archives at the Hoover Institution of War, Revolution and Peace, Sutton was able to tell a more complete story. Not that Russians and subject peoples didn't do the physical labor, but it was Western Capital Goods that built the Soviet Union from 1917-1965, all the way through the proverbial 'Cold War', that was pretty hot in the Southern Hemisphere nations. It wasn't just crack-pots like LaRouche who pointed out the special "Condominium of Interests" shared by those living in the Northern Hemisphere.

I didn't think about it until I read some of yours and others insights about Solzhenitsyn (thanks for those) but he really seems like he was a cultural back-channel, a 'shared-agent' if you will, performing various ideological services, as the times required. Whether he just fronted for a writing-project on his '200 Years Together' is above my pay grade, but his peculiar access to information and his previously protected celebrity-status in the West is too curious. The whole thing about our lack of access to a fully-translated copy of his book and it not being in print in the US is really strange. It's as if someone really wants us to read it? (kind of like the vaccine shortages) Or is it as simple as 'Bolshevik'-patriots suppressing history? That's not sarcasm, just an expression how it's a bit of a challenge to decipher exactly what you're communicating at times. I may just be 'tripping-over' irrelevant details but I'm not sure, as my first sentence above reveals.

In a way, I guess I could say a similar thing about Antony Sutton, as I do Solzhenitsyn, only in a reverse sense, as Sutton was quite obscure, ostensibly IRS-hounded out of the US to Australia, and we're faced with the odd fact that one of the few video interviews one can even find of him was done by Elizabeth Claire Prophet, an uber-cultist if there ever was one; a cultism that red-flags her as having worked for some intelligence agency or another. I mean who else gets to have a mountain-cave redoubt full of military hardware and travel the country hypnotizing audiences with St. Germain schtick and selling gemstone-fakes in hotel lobbies.

Sutton's alma-mater Hoover Institution is probably just one of those higher-levels of "right" perception-management, like say the Institute for Social Research is on the "left", but Sutton really did document trade of massive amounts of production-technology of every sort in exchange for Siberian resources. Our friends play every side of the game. So, although I'm fascinated by your meta-analysis of Solzhenitsyn's changes in perspective, and maybe it is as you say, to me he still smacks of a man who was 'managed' (or coerced) in the gray zone of those quietly co-operating international agencies.

Have you ever read The Penkovskiy Papers by Oleg Penkovskiy?

Replies: @ValMonde, @ValMonde, @ValMonde, @Seraphim, @El Gaucho from the Pampas

ValMonde - I appreciate much of what you write, but the bit about the USSR's 25-year build-out, portrayed as if it was pulling itself up by its boot-straps, is ludicrous. Antony Sutton's trilogy 'Western Technology and Soviet Economic Development' surely eviscerates that mythology. Having access to State Department archives at the Hoover Institution of War, Revolution and Peace, Sutton was able to tell a more complete story. Not that Russians and subject peoples didn't do the physical labor, but it was Western Capital Goods that built the Soviet Union from 1917-1965, all the way through the proverbial 'Cold War', that was pretty hot in the Southern Hemisphere nations. It wasn't just crack-pots like LaRouche who pointed out the special "Condominium of Interests" shared by those living in the Northern Hemisphere.

I didn't think about it until I read some of yours and others insights about Solzhenitsyn (thanks for those) but he really seems like he was a cultural back-channel, a 'shared-agent' if you will, performing various ideological services, as the times required. Whether he just fronted for a writing-project on his '200 Years Together' is above my pay grade, but his peculiar access to information and his previously protected celebrity-status in the West is too curious. The whole thing about our lack of access to a fully-translated copy of his book and it not being in print in the US is really strange. It's as if someone really wants us to read it? (kind of like the vaccine shortages) Or is it as simple as 'Bolshevik'-patriots suppressing history? That's not sarcasm, just an expression how it's a bit of a challenge to decipher exactly what you're communicating at times. I may just be 'tripping-over' irrelevant details but I'm not sure, as my first sentence above reveals.

In a way, I guess I could say a similar thing about Antony Sutton, as I do Solzhenitsyn, only in a reverse sense, as Sutton was quite obscure, ostensibly IRS-hounded out of the US to Australia, and we're faced with the odd fact that one of the few video interviews one can even find of him was done by Elizabeth Claire Prophet, an uber-cultist if there ever was one; a cultism that red-flags her as having worked for some intelligence agency or another. I mean who else gets to have a mountain-cave redoubt full of military hardware and travel the country hypnotizing audiences with St. Germain schtick and selling gemstone-fakes in hotel lobbies.

Sutton's alma-mater Hoover Institution is probably just one of those higher-levels of "right" perception-management, like say the Institute for Social Research is on the "left", but Sutton really did document trade of massive amounts of production-technology of every sort in exchange for Siberian resources. Our friends play every side of the game. So, although I'm fascinated by your meta-analysis of Solzhenitsyn's changes in perspective, and maybe it is as you say, to me he still smacks of a man who was 'managed' (or coerced) in the gray zone of those quietly co-operating international agencies.

Have you ever read The Penkovskiy Papers by Oleg Penkovskiy?

Replies: @ValMonde, @ValMonde, @ValMonde, @Seraphim, @El Gaucho from the Pampas

US never invaded Russia. Only they brought some weapons for whites. But reds confiscated the weapons, and used them against whites.

Replies: @Andrei Martyanov, @ValMonde

The problem is not that the 'Bolsheviks brought the empire to the next level', but that they denied all the achievements of the Tsars on which they built on, giving themselves the credit for them. Russia would have achieved an even greater status and quicker without the 'creative destruction' of the bezbozhniks (not only Bolsheviks, that is).
Indeed Russia is an 'organic empire' from its very beginnings and not a 'messianic' one. Messianism, the strive (even fight) for establishing the 'Kingdom of God' on Earth, is a Judaic creation. Orthodoxy, which moulded the Russian character and informed the state institutions, laws, culture, strives for Kingdom of Heaven. The so-called 'Russian messianism' has no roots in Orthodoxy or in the Russian character. The apocalyptic crazes that gripped Russia at times were hypostases of the messianic millenarist crazes which gripped the West. The Church and the Tsars were stumbling blocks on the road to the 'golden future' of the Kingdom of God on Earth, therefore they had to be removed, hence the revolution, civil war, red terror, creation of the 'new culture' of the 'new man' liberated from the shackles of belief in Christ. Stalin, who despite his bolshevik commitment was more attuned to the real 'Russian soul' (he was a seminarian after all), put a kibosh on this nefarious developments and he had to be removed. The fact that this revolution succeeded on the streets of NY is not a proof that sermons about 'forgetting God' are 'not enough'. So, ''What is to be done?'' comrade? Read Shalamov?

Replies: @ValMonde

Replies: @dindunuffins, @ValMonde, @Malla

Replies: @ValMonde

Replies: @israel shamir, @Ray Caruso, @Schuetze, @Malla, @Patric, @ValMonde, @Volksdeutsche, @Boomthorkell, @lavoisier, @Seraphim, @Dum Spiro Spero

re Florida: Agree. Having spent over 6 months shopping to relocate to FL, what I've seen = cultural wasteland built Fort Bragg-style on abundant reclaimed swampland.

Friends stashed me in their golf cart to tour The Villages, about which they were ecstatic, having just spent $700k for a tricked-out $200k cement block house on the edge of a drainage pond ("They have promised to clear the algae and overgrowth once the development is built out, and we pay only $453/month to keep the insects down, the lawn watered." )
We visited two or three of the several Community Centers -- massive buildings/complexes with large and small meeting rooms decorated around themes -- Military, Hunting er something like that; -- complexes include swimming pools, tennis courts & the like. There are several Town Centers that have a central gazebo or band shell, a street or two of retail shops.
It struck me that the Communities replace the parishes of my growing-up years, when the Parish Church was the center of social activity.

But most of the rest of newly developed FL that I have seen (on Gulf Coast) consists of a Publix next to an Advance Auto next to a chain restaurant -- one runs into the other, indistinguishable. Neighborhoods are advertised as Desirable based on their proximity to Costco. I guess you have to be a local or have lived there for X years to know if you're in Bradenton or Sarasota.

Tampa & St Petersburg have a bit more personality, but also more crime & higher taxes.

About Florida not having income tax: well, ya, but the newer developments, of which there are a gazillion, were developed with a financing system called the CDD or Bond (The Villages have Bond; further South, i.e. Manatee Co., CDD -- Community Development ___ ) that tacks anywhere from $1500 to $3500 onto the annual real property tax. DeSantis was - is heavily supported by the Neal family developers who have built out many of these developments on that CDD basis.

In Manatee, Sun City Center (Hillsborough Co) and The Villages, which are heavily 55+ communities, public schools are not numerous and those that exist have very low scores. What will become of these communities when Boomers die off? What will become of Florida's economy when building-developing-real estate sales no longer dominates the economy? It happened before in Florida, that the bottom fell out of the Real Estate market. Will it happen again? Is the RE frenzy in FL Tulipmania, or is the scamdemic motivating people to vote with their feet?

PLUS -- Florida's SouthEast is heavily populated by Jewish interests, + Trump.

Add to that the recent inclusion of Israeli military as elements in US Central Command based in Tampa.
Make of that what you will.

_______
#58 @ValMonde:

“History teaches us that Hitlers Stalins & other Dictators come and go, but the German people, and the German state remain ” - from Obituary: Marshal Joseph Stalin, Dictator of Russia for 29 years

Interesting comparisons:
NSDAP & Hitler were elected at least once. Not sure if Stalin was ever elected by the people of Russia.

Hitler was not German and Stalin was not Russian. (& Napoleon was not French). What should we learn from that?

At least Hitler functioned under his own name. Not so Stalin. (Not so Benjamin Netanyahu)

One more thing: Of these three, Jesus, Hitler and Stalin, the first two are reviled by Jews, while Stalin is admired.

Replies: @Exosome, @Skeptikal, @ValMonde

Replies: @ValMonde, @Schuetze

Replies: @Dr. Charles Fhandrich, @anon, @ValMonde, @profnasty, @The Alarmist, @WardieSouthernSympathiser

So what do you think comes next?

Replies: @ValMonde

What is a Transhumanist homocracy?

Replies: @ValMonde

Assange was a tool of the Kremlin

He came to some sort of agreement not to publish the dirt on Russia

Question,WHY?

did he think Putin would take him out?

Maybe

Or did he see Putin as a means to help amplify wikileaks via RT international and Sputnik news,more likely

Assange operates the following tactics,' the enemy of my enemy is my friend '

Therefore Assange is a traitor,i think if he was Russian lets say collaborating with Navalny he'd be either in a Russian prison or the cemetery by now

Please grow up and stop your little fantasy about Assange he's not a hero and has a very selective idea about who he supports

Personally I'm glad he's in prison, i hope he stays there forever

Replies: @restless94110, @ValMonde

Andreas, Putin,or rather Putler,is a total f@#king nutter,who wants everyone to believe in the myth of 'Russian civilisation ' which basically doesn't exist,as they're a bunch of barbaric savages,who learned all their civilisation and culture from the west

Replies: @Boomthorkell, @hillaire, @ValMonde

Who are these Ukronazis? Did Hitler come back from the dead? Or is the Jewish president of the Ukraine is a Nazi?

Your article leaves the reader with a lot more questions than answers.

Replies: @Kramer, @Fiendly Neighbourhood Terrorist, @ValMonde, @Mulga Mumblebrain

Who are these Ukronazis? Did Hitler come back from the dead? Or is the Jewish president of the Ukraine is a Nazi?

Your article leaves the reader with a lot more questions than answers.

Replies: @Kramer, @Fiendly Neighbourhood Terrorist, @ValMonde, @Mulga Mumblebrain

The saker isn't a sound unbiased source of information on Russia,thats the first thing

Secondly for someone who hates the West as much as he does, he really should go and live in Russia,he'd be much happier,and no i don't care for his blathering about why he won't move to Russia,I'm sure Putin would give him citizenship for all his sterling propaganda work 😉

As for Martyanov,well same thing applies, his so called analyses about disabling a NATO warship wouldn't go down well with NATO or the crew of said ship,as they'd have no option but to shoot back

Maybe thats what NATO want,then they could really hammer Putin's regime,the loss of one warship wouldn't be a high price if it meant the end of Putin's regime,and don't forget once Putin goes Russia goes with him

Anyway nobody is gonna sink anything,NATO sailed straight past Putin's army and they couldn't do jack shit about it,although all of this was spun in a particularly Soviet way by Putin's propaganda machine and hyped up by his fanboy club,you know people like you've mentioned

What they never mention is how poor the Russian economy is and how Putin has had absolutely no ability to stop demographic decline,his regime stinks Russia is now basically run by the FSB so anybody with brains leaves,another massive problem for Putin,but basically he doesn't care

My advice stop reading biased BS about Russia,otherwise you'll be in for a big fat shock when it becomes apparent that Russia is collapsing,which I've predicted to be within the next 15 years,thats when the perfect storm will engulf Russia

Replies: @bayviking, @ValMonde, @Tdstype2, @Zarathustra

Replies: @ValMonde

Replies: @ValMonde

Replies: @ValMonde, @Catilina, @Silicon Silence, @Anonymous, @Naughtius Maximus, @GomezAdddams

Replies: @ValMonde, @Humbert Humbert, @Daniel Rich

@Tvic @ValMonde
Wikipedia: "For the first time in history of science, Zubarev obtained a living cell from dead matter:
Bernadotte, A.; Semenova, V.; Musial, V. A. M.; Kasprzykowska, A.; Zubarev, R. A. Self-assembly of Deinococcus radiodurans supports nanocell scenario of life origin, Discoveries, 2017, 5, E72, doi: 10.15190/d.2017.2.

Replies: @ValMonde

Note that I didn’t cite it, and in fact expressly identified it as “fake news” back in… 2016:
 

Replies: @ValMonde

Also, I doubt the Bulgarians have much in common with the Poles for instance.
 

Replies: @ValMonde, @Aedib

Balkan fantasies aside, genetics shows that Bulgarians, Serbs, and Macedonians are about 20% Slavic by descent; they are mostly Illyrians or Thracians who were linguistically Slavicized.

Replies: @ValMonde

Contrary to what someone repeatedly says at this thread, there has been no extensive enough DNA survey taken to substantiate the belittling of the ethnic Slav component among southeastern European Slav language speakers.

To start with, it's not like there's anything such as a pure Slav. One can find numerous photos of Serbs and Bulgarians who've a general appearance typically associated with Slavs. Across the board, Slavs have mixed with others.

Moreover, the different DNA testing results out there aren't often uniform in their results.

Replies: @ValMonde

Replies: @Anonymous, @Here Be Dragon, @ValMonde

Fun fact: no group on earth considers jews to be white, and no physical evidence exists which shows this. There’s no such thing as a “jewish white supremacist.” Try again with a more coherent argument.

Replies: @Ukraine Tiger, @Boulder, @Commentator Mike, @Realist, @ValMonde

The East Palestine Terror Attack! The Plot Most Definitely Thickens
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dAz_XWaKs2Q
From the people who brought you The Nordstream Terror Attack

Palestine, Ohio. Wow! How In Your Face can you get?
They really are showing their psychopathic fangs for all to see.
Then again, they can't help themselves. It's who they always were and always will be.

Barring a miracle, and it would take one at this point, if they're ever defeated they should never be permitted to hold power anywhere in the world ever again.

Perhaps sensing this is why they're currently, and desperately, pulling all the stops.

Replies: @ValMonde

The concepts of 'Chosen People' and the 'Herrenvolk' are quite similar, as is 'American Exceptionalism'. I've become convinced that Nazism was an effort to apply the modus operandi of Judaism to the 'Aryans'. And now, completing the circle, Israel imitates Nazi Germany in so many ways. Mind you, Germany never controlled the Western world as the Zionazis do today-just see how that prime Sabbat Goy, Starmer, is still hounding Corbyn out of UK Labour, to his 'friend' Bibi's delight.

Replies: @Commentator Mike, @ValMonde

If that stupid white supremacist label could possibly be defined it might be this: siding with the white person in an act of interracial aggression just because he's "one of us," which is bullshit.

Let me just give a heartful good riddance to that thug, by the way. Because we all know what the verdict will be. Not sure about you lunatics but I don't want a society in which I can be murdered by someone simply because he feels "threatened."

Replies: @Commentator Mike, @Bill, @Wokechoke, @peterAUS, @ValMonde, @Adolf Smith, @Lurker

Replies: @Fidelios Automata, @Fumanchu, @Anon, @Amalek, @ValMonde, @Al Liguori, @silviosilver, @CBJonesFan

Alternately, what does "anti-semitism" even mean? Does it mean I don't totally love all Jews and everything Jewish and support Israel without reservations? So what? I have the God-given right to my feelings. I don't advocate violence, so my opinions of Jewish financial dealings and Israeli war crimes are just that, my opinions.

Replies: @Richard B, @Rurik, @ValMonde

Replies: @Anonymous, @ld, @N30rebel, @fish, @ValMonde

Just as Putin's Admin is infested with Jews, so is Zelensky's. Just as the 'Russian Oligarchs' are Jews, so are the 'Ukrainian Oligarchs' too. Ukraine is a ZOG State like Russia or the US/UK.

Replies: @ValMonde, @Anonymous

Replies: @John Johnson, @alexan_der, @Tallest Skil, @Munga Bulga, @rushed boob job, @Joe Paluka, @ValMonde, @Anon001, @Antiwar7, @antibeast, @2stateshmoostate, @bike-anarkist, @Colin Wright, @faith

Please know, "White" denotes European descent AND Christian heritage.
It's not all about skin. Race is bone deep. Capital 'W'.

Replies: @ValMonde