Replies: @Pandos, @dahoit

Replies: @Pandos

They fear secular Arabs who can build cities and use technology. They fear modern Muslims like Iranians who can do engineering and build nuclear plants.
 

Replies: @Qasim, @Pandos, @Art, @SolontoCroesus, @Jacques Sheete

Can you show me the deed?
 

Replies: @Wizard of Oz, @Pandos

I have taken statins for many years and the latest ensures (with exercise I suppose) that my high cheese and ice cream intake doesn't stop me having excellent LDL and HDL levels. But I had never heard of the cataract problem and would be pleased to be given good links to follow up though my own cataract in one eye was neatly fixed.

Replies: @Pandos, @Willem

Replies: @Pandos, @RaceRealist88, @Talha, @Art, @Renfro

Yes, Mr. Derbyshire does give voice to those of us who wish to protect our civilization from debasement-via-immigration, but his omissions do damage, too.

Surely Derb must understand that the wave of 'murderous Muslims' into Europe (and N. America) is a by-product of Zio-Washington's murderous onslaught. Does he not?

So why then does he consistently fail to examine this crucial fact in any depth?

Years of aggressive, Zionist-friendly interventions in the Muslim world have dislocated millions of hapless souls. They're here because we're there. And it's we who started dropping bombs first. That fact is vital to remember. It identifies the cause as well as the initial wrongdoer. What's worse, this process is still underway.

Thus, the story about unwanted Muslim refugees into the West in no way parallels the conundrum involving waves of (economic) refugees pouring into America from the Mexico.

Please devote some time to making this distinction in a future article, Derb.

And why, Mr. Derbyshire, are we waging serial warfare in the Middle East in the first place?

Please don't dish up that 'war for oil' canard. That yarn has been a myth from the start. Even today, pro-Israel policies being imposed by Washington to keep Iranian oil off the global market. But why? This hurts consumers. The goal is to cause injury to Iran and to weaken Iran. This is an Israeli objective. And it keeps happening.

Zionized Washington did the the same to Saddam Hussein (preventing him from selling oil) before we finally bombed Iraq into oblivion. It never ends. And few speak out. Indeed, Zionist concerns generally trump domestic interests in Official Washington. Amazing, but true. These 'values' have cost countless US jobs, not to mention lives. Right now, Boeing is about to lose a huge export deal with Iran due to crypto-Israeli meddling. This is not unusual. Israel's preeminence over mere domestic interests is a permanent part of Washington. It's been this way for decades.

When Nixon/Kissinger, for instance, saved Israel's ass during the Yom Kippur war, it precipitated the infamous 1973 Arab oil embargo. Economic fallout was vast, deep, and long-lasting. Incredibly, most Americans remain completely unaware of these facts.

Pro-Zionist, US-conducted wars have pushed millions Iraqis, Syrians, Libyans and Palestinians out of their homelands and into the 'de-racialized' West. Unnecessary Anglo-Zionist aggression has given life and legitimacy to rising Muslim outrage. This is a real and worsening security issue. All Americans are affected. And it can be tied to Israel's hold on Washington. Yet Derb consistently fails address this matter or connect any dots. Why?

Does Mr. Derbyshire suffer from avoidance anxiety? It sure looks that way.

John Derbyshire--while contributing mightily to the otherwise empty 'national discussion on race'--is clearly too timid to forthrightly examine the harmful impact that decades of Zionist activism has had on immigration and other urgent matters, including the decline of white living standards.

This should interest any honest immigration restrictionist. But not Derb.

And who/what's behind the ongoing taboos that target white racial cohesion and identity?
Any idea, Derb? It's not just the Leftwing 'social justice warriors'.

As for Muslim immigration, Zio-Washington's needless annihilation of Iraq, Libya, Syria and Palestine has produced this wave of these refugees. Why not explore this phenomena closely and honestly?

Derb's oversights are not a minor detail. They fit a pattern. Incredibly, Derb cites Israel as a shining example of what America should do about uninvited immigrants--yet never examines the key role that Zionist militarism and Zio-liberal 'anti-racist' activism has had on the white Western world.

Derb's omissions are no aberration. I recall his negative review of MacDonald's seminal 'Culture of Critique' in American Conservative Magazine nearly 15 years ago.

Derb therefore has a pretty good inkling about who's in mostly-in-charge and who's overwhelmingly responsible for America's preemptive wars, the lax immigration policies into the West (as opposed to Israel), and the subversive, demographic transformation of the Western world.

But he dares not speak its name.

Why not say it out loud, Derb?

Why?

Derb is scared.

He's rolled-over on this subject previously and he's still looking the other way. It's an embarrassing pattern. And now Derb is pretending--yet again--that Israel's artificial centrality in American life is not particularly important and ultimately unrelated to the West's destructive trajectory.

Derb's blithe attitude is foolish, disingenuous and craven.

Like the tenured members of that long and boring list of safe and acceptable pundits who we see on TV and read in America's few surviving newspapers, Derb is terrified of being labeled an 'anti-Semite'. So he's taken a middle course.

It could be worse, sure. But it certainly could be better.

We've got plenty of Muslim-bashers already, Derb. And most anyone who has lived among blacks understands their numerous inadequacies.

When will Derb step up to the plate, take a risk, and make a bold contribution?

Until he and others take that step, countless Americans will believe that all it takes is another Mideast war to solve our security problems. But that avenue is a dead end. We've done enough needless damage there already. Let's set our course right by solving our problems here and respecting other nation's borders, just as we insist they do the same.

Replies: @Anonymous, @geokat62, @Joe Franklin, @lavoisier, @Pandos, @survey-of-disinfo, @utu, @Beefcake the Mighty

Replies: @Pandos, @Chet Roman, @jacques sheete

One very important contradiction is between the advanced nature of Socialist state represented by USSR as frontier of human social evolution, and the traditional nature of Third Rome of Russia - the eternal structure responsible for all humankind, with function not to develop, but to preserve humanity. We Russians could not struggle and work for the rest of humanity any more and longer. When we tried to develop and evolve Polish and Chezh peasants (presumably developed enough almost to the level of ourselves), they revolted, striving to be consumerist slaves and bordellos of Germans and Americans instead of free and just national states. When we entered Afghanistan to build powerplants, schools and hospitals, we found a bunch of barbarians, enjoying their archaism, and shooting us for a couple of bucks. So Russians switched back to the Keeper scenario.

The 'Pax Americana' concept and insistence of US historical academism on Athenian democracy - Roman Republic - then U.S. republican legacy is fundamentally wrong and is an element of propaganda. USA is no Rome and never was close, it is pure Carthage - the maritime trade oligarchy, with public positions sought and bought by the rich, with hired war professionals, and makeshift military coalitions. The origins of USA are just the same as Carthaginian - religious dissidens of another trade maritime oligarchy (Phoenicia). The European states represent only the barbarian kingdoms of the past, and will dissolve with dissolution of their genetic basis. And only Russia is legitimate Third Rome, the only Empire that should stand until the end of times.

Replies: @Pandos, @SimplePseudonymicHandle

. . . Now that I've blurted all this out, I realize it's not something to be all that ashamed of, is it?

Anecdote: I "had" Miss Black in one of those years as my home teacher. She was an elderly fanatic who had the students read from the New Testament (she supplied the books). When in a pet, as often, she would send off a Jewish boy at the end of the school day, by reminding him that he would burn in hell by reason of being who he was. Parents complained to the principal, a Jew, about Miss Black. He put them off because Miss Black was a year or 2 from retirement and he didn't want to jeopardise her retirement pay.

Replies: @Pandos

Working night shift – on a decent paying Union Job – is not too bad when you are young, but, in the long haul, it separates you from your wife and children, and is not a good idea.
 

Replies: @Pandos

Replies: @Pandos, @TWS, @another fred, @Sheeple Believe NGO-Islamic Axis Lies

Replies: @Pandos, @Eagle Eye, @jacques sheete, @james charles

Replies: @Pandos

Replies: @Pandos, @Jake, @Boris N

Correct.

There are many reasons as to why Jews hate Russia, but it all goes back to one thing: Russia is the land from which The Protocols of the Elders of Zion originated. Jews see that as the ultimate affront against them and perhaps the worst single instance of "anti-semitism" (outside the Holocaust).

Replies: @Pandos

Replies: @Pandos

Assad was just dropping barrel bombs on innocent people for no reason whatsoever? Or was it because the "Day of Rage" "protesters" (wink wink wink) murdered dozens of Syrian police officers in coordinated attacks across the country that day?

Shame on the author and shame on Takis. There are already so many al Qaeda propaganda outlets in the West, do we really need another one?

Also, how could a US military strategist fail to take note of the fact that the (((US))) ZOG machine intentionally created al Qaeda and ISIS and continues to foster them through supplying weapons, training, money, logistics and political support? How many videos do we need to see of US coalition planes dropping ammo and food to ISIS until we demand that whoever is in charge be lawfully executed for treason?

Replies: @Pandos

Replies: @Johann, @annamaria, @Pandos, @Anonymous White Male, @Anonymous, @Eric the Red

Replies: @SolontoCroesus, @Pandos

Replies: @Pandos

You could find equivalent passages in Greek (Aristotle and his treatment of barbarians), Sanskrit (look at the laws of Manu and how they deal with people outside the caste system), Chinese (middle kingdom - enough said), Arabic, or Christian theology.

People like to think they're special, and that their group and nation is special. This isn't really news.

Replies: @Pandos, @anon, @Jim, @CanSpeccy, @pensword

Replies: @Pandos

Replies: @Sharrukin, @Ned, @utu, @Randal, @Pandos, @Joe Wong

Replies: @Pandos

Obviously Mr. Giraldi is touching a nerve here. The Israeli influence over the U.S. foreign policy is the single most important issue facing us right now. The more people become aware of this infringement in our national business the sooner we can correct our coarse and begin the process of actually acting in Americas self interest. Our goals and Israeli goals are diabolically different. Keep up the good work Phil. You are providing a valuable service.

Replies: @Pandos, @Anonymous

Replies: @Pandos, @Ace

"Weissberg never fails to ignore the elephant in the conservative living room: Israel."

Does every thread here have to be about Israel & the jews?

Does every poster have to be Philip Giraldi?

Replies: @Art Deco, @Anonymous, @Pandos, @Bill Jones, @Wally

Replies: @The Alarmist, @Pandos

Replies: @Zumbuddi, @helena, @Pandos, @Old Jew, @snag, @jacques sheete, @snag, @Alden, @Cloak And Dagger

Thanks for the Tass article link...

Yes...there is no question that the US would have targeted Syrian airfields...apparently a few did get through at one airfield...but the others were fully rejected...

Laymen who know nothing about aircraft or missiles do not understand the complexities and detail involved...they simply accept the brochure 'information' presented on wikipedia and such about the capabilities of such flight vehicles...

This does not shed any light on a fascinating and important subject...important because now we have had some air combat between US and Nato airpower [Ship, sub and air launched cruise missiles vs. Russian air defenses]...

Clearly the Russians won...there was not a single death on the Syrian side...the US did destroy a few buildings...most notably the Barzeh research center in the Damascus area...

We can tell the Russians won this round because the US is claiming completely ridiculous stuff...that they launched 76 T-hawks with a combined TNT tonnage of nearly 40 tons...yet little pine shrubs standing 20 feet away are completely intact...

I mean how stupid...?

Clearly the US is claiming such a high number of attacks on the three buildings that they did hit because they failed to hit those airfields...and we know that they failed to hit those airfields because if they did we would have satellite imagery being boastfully released...

You can tell as much by the information that is withheld as you can by the information they give out...

Now for some basic technical facts...cruise missiles are not hard to shoot down once they are spotted...but the hard part is spotting them because they are small and thus do not bounce back strong radar reflections...

They can fly close to terrain...although this is not always the case as I have explained previously and depends on the ingress route and the type of terrain along that flight path...ie if it is required to fly over mountainous terrain it must fly quite high...

In 1999 the Serbs shot down a number T-hawks with their 1950s era Soviet equipment...here is the remains of one T-hawk airframe in the Belgrade Aviation Museum...


https://s20.postimg.cc/y3a1od5u5/Downed_Tomahawk_cruise_missile_in_Belgrade_Serbia.jpg

Once spotted on radar...the T-hawks and similar subsonic cruise missiles are sitting ducks...they have no means of evading missile shots...either from an air to air missile launched from a fighter jet...or a surface to air missile launched from an air defense battery...

A fighter jet relies on a radar warning receiver to alert the crew that it has been targeted by a missile shot and the crew can instantly commence evasive maneuver...which is basically going into a steep banked turn so as to break radar lock and evade the missile shot...

Cruise missiles have no such RWR...and it would be pointless to equipment with such since they have very poor turning performance...

This is due to their very high wing loading...which is the ratio of wing area to aircraft weight...a T-hawk weighs about 3,000 lb but has a wing area of only about 10 square feet for a wing loading of 300 lb/ft^2...

That is about three times as high as a passenger jet's wing loading and as much as five times higher than a fighter jet...

Think of wing loading and how it relates to maneuverability by considering a person carrying a backpack...if that person is running and they need to change course having that extra weight on their back will not let them zigzag like a runner carrying no weight...

The same is true for climb performance...think of carrying 100 lb in your backpack and climbing up a set of stairs...

The physical laws of flight performance are based on Newtonian Mechanics and cannot be argued with...

The thrust to weight ratio of a cruise missile is about comparable to that of a passenger jet...the thrust of the T-hawks Williams turbofan engine is about 700 lb against a weight of 3,000 lb that is less than 0.25 thrust to weight...

A powerful fighter like an F15 will have a thrust to weight ratio of close to unity or even above...ie it's engine thrust is actually equal to or greater than its weight and the airplane can thus climb straight up like a rocket...

So the key in defending against subsonic cruise missiles...which fly at about the same speed as passenger jet, about 500 mph [800 km/hr]...is to pick them up on radar...

The Russians have clearly prepared for such an attack ever since the Shayrat strike...the very powerful Russian radars in Syria are capable of tracking any flying object...and the Syrian SAM batteries are networked into that system and are fed that radar data in real time...

We also saw in some of those missile intercept videos near the Damascus airport that Syrian jets were taking off and landing...this is because the jets would use their onboard radar to find the cruise missiles and data link that info back to the SAM batteries...

A fighter is easily capable of taking down a cruise missile with an AA shot also...but this all comes down to pilot skill and training...something which the SyAAF may not be dealing with on a regular basis...considering their focus on the fight against ground targets in Jihadist areas...

As for the Pantsir...yes this point defense system is the perfect tool to shoot down cruise missiles...it is the successor of the Tor SAM system that was designed specifically to shoot down T-hawks...

The older SAMs did not perform badly according to the Russian MoD assessment...the S125 is a 1950s era system that the Serbs used to down two F117s and an F16...much more difficult targets than a T-hawk...

The S200 is a huge missile with a 350 km range...exceeded only by the latest S400 long range missile introduced into service only a couple of years ago...

It flies extremely fast 2,500 m/s which is about Mach 8...it is even faster than the new S400 missiles which fly at 2,000 m/s...by comparison the USN Raytheon SM6 air defense missile used on Aegis missile ships flies only at M3.5...about 1,000 m/s...

The high speed of the S200 is actually its disadvantage against a slow moving target like a cruise missile...the laws of physics tell us that the faster the vehicle is flying, the larger its turn radius will be...thus the big S200 is not going to do well against cruise missiles...this is not surprising...

Overall...the Russian MoD version of events is certainly way more credible than the US version which is full of holes...

Replies: @Vojkan, @Pandos

Replies: @Pandos, @Dagon Shield

Replies: @j2, @Pandos, @KenH

Annexing Austria, then Czechoslovakia, which was a part of Austria before the WWI. And then the war with Poland.
 

Austria was not annexed, they rejoined the Reich after 98% referendum. Austrians are German people, for a very long time, the Reich had two capitals, Berlin and Vienna. What belongs together goes together, hence German troops paraded in Vienna, and Austrian mountain troopers paraded in Berlin.

You refer to the Sudetenland? I would refer to the Munich agreement the signatory allies broke. Soviet forward airfields also played a role.

GERMANY, the United Kingdom, France and Italy, taking into consideration the agreement, which has been already reached in principle for the cession to Germany of the Sudeten German territory, have agreed on the following terms and conditions governing the said cession and the measures consequent thereon, and by this agreement they each hold themselves responsible for the steps necessary to secure its fulfilment:

(1) The evacuation will begin on 1st October.

(2) The United Kingdom, France and Italy agree that the evacuation of the territory shall be completed by the 10th October, without any existing installations having been destroyed, and that the Czechoslovak Government will be held responsible for carrying out the evacuation without damage to the said installations.

(3) The conditions governing the evacuation will be laid down in detail by an international commission composed of representatives of Germany, the United Kingdom, France, Italy and Czechoslovakia.

(4) The occupation by stages of the predominantly German territory by German troops will begin on 1st October. The four territories marked on the attached map will be occupied by German troops in the following order:

The territory marked No. I on the 1st and 2nd of October; the territory marked No. II on the 2nd and 3rd of October; the territory marked No. III on the 3rd, 4th and 5th of October; the territory marked No. IV on the 6th and 7th of October. The remaining territory of preponderantly German character will be ascertained by the aforesaid international commission forthwith and be occupied by German troops by the 10th of October.

(5) The international commission referred to in paragraph 3 will determine the territories in which a plebiscite is to be held. These territories will be occupied by international bodies until the plebiscite has been completed. The same commission will fix the conditions in which the plebiscite is to be held, taking as a basis the conditions of the Saar plebiscite. The commission will also fix a date, not later than the end of November, on which the plebiscite will be held.

(6) The final determination of the frontiers will be carried out by the international commission. The commission will also be entitled to recommend to the four Powers, Germany, the United Kingdom, France and Italy, in certain exceptional cases, minor modifications in the strictly ethnographical determination of the zones which are to be transferred without plebiscite.

(7) There will be a right of option into and out of the transferred territories, the option to be exercised within six months from the date of this agreement. A German-Czechoslovak commission shall determine the details of the option, consider ways of facilitating the transfer of population and settle questions of principle arising out of the said transfer.

(8) The Czechoslovak Government will within a period of four weeks from the date of this agreement release from their military and police forces any Sudeten Germans who may wish to be released, and the Czechoslovak Government will within the same period release Sudeten German prisoners who are serving terms of imprisonment for political offences.
 

The Czechs have to this day the anti-German, kind of raycist Benes decrees in place, even the EUSSR complained.

Massacres on German population, discrimination, prohibition of German language in stolen German territory after Versailles is nothing any German true chancellor can ignore due to his oath he swears to protect the German peoples.

The situation is comparable with Ukraine, Donbass and Crimea. Yes, Putin studied closely these things, he speaks a good German, knows the truth, but keeps repeating the nonsensical Soviet narrative in public.

You people are hopelessly trapped in your on web of lies, deceit, and you have no clue how to get out of it.

Replies: @Pandos

Replies: @Pandos, @Jett Rucker

Replies: @Desert Fox, @anonymous, @Pandos

Replies: @Pandos, @Pandos

Replies: @Pandos, @Pandos

It goes further than that. The Kaiser did all he could to prevent the war. He asked cousin Nicky to stop mobilization, because it meant Germany was obliged to mobilize. The German Ambassador went to Foreign Minister Grey, and asked bluntly whether Britain would join the war if Germany went through Belgium to attack France. He got a non-answer. A few years back, King Eddy's secret meeting with Grey urging him to "find an excuse for war" was uncovered. Eddy hated the Kaiser, because Wilhelm was Grandma's (Victoria) favorite grandchild.

Chamberlain had started increasing arms production in 1934. By 1937, long range Lancaster bombers were being built. Chamberlain was only seeking to extend "peace" in order to provide Britain with an insurmountable military advantage. The generals and Halifax were all on board for a war. They had no intention of intervening on behalf of Poland, which had occupied the Danzig Free State, and had ordered mobilization of its army toward Germany. They wanted an excuse for war to "smash" Germany, which was, once again, becoming a threat to British trade, and the international banking cartel.

Replies: @Pandos, @anonymous1963

Do you have anything to contribute to the conversation? If you disagree with the article, you could try explaining why. Not having an actual argument is pretty gross, anon.

Replies: @Pandos, @Jim Christian