As a white person, I look down upon the criminals among us. I do not reflexively defend and glorify them. This was a terrible act: immoral, illegal, and politically damaging to white interests.

This shooting was a hoax and so are the other shootings (i.e. New Zealand).

https://153news.net/watch_video.php?v=2GY3W7ANDXXH

When the hell are people going to wake up and realize this level of ongoing, organic violence has NO precedent in US history, thus calling its authenticity into serious question?

How many times do you need to see the AR-15 put on display and flanked by legislation in the Senate / House by Feinstein and (((Cicilline))) to realize this is, largely, an attack on the 2nd Amendment?

How many times do you need to see white people featured prominently who miraculously leave behind “manifestos” to recognize this is a power struggle of Jews against white, Christian America? Brad Schneider, a Jew, has put up legislation to address the threat of terrorism from “white supremacists”. The obvious goal here is to run these hoaxes featuring “white supremacist” terrorists to ratchet up police state power/focus on the white, Christian majority in America.

Beyond that, these hoaxes are used to paint the white, Christian majority as the enemy and promote Jewish victimhood to wage war on the 2nd Amendment and try to sneak in “hate crime” and “hate speech” legislation to protect Jews from criticism.

Correction: “wage war on the 2nd Amendment” -> “wage war on the 1st Amendment”

European ancestry. As for Jews not being white/European-descended see the Genome project.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iSWXL2arSZg
Video Link

This is white supremacy of the most hypocritical type.

I thought they were Judaics, Mikey?

Video Link

Did they give you a Louis Farrakhan teddy bear to snuggle with when you were at the Savior’s Day conference? Enjoy snuggle time with teddy.

How can it be, when the driving force behind Facebook’s censorship is its own deeply concealed white supremacy?

How big of an idiot is this Hoffman guy?

Facebook as a white supremacist organization? What a complete moron. Its run by a Jew in league with other Jews in the media and other Jewish NGO’s, businessmen, etc. who runs cover for Jewish interests and seeks to stop anything that would undermine Jewish, globalist designs.

I don’t subscribe to the legend that Judaics from Europe are not white. Consequently, for this writer the “white power structure” is comprised of the aforesaid Judaics as well as other whites

Regardless of what you do or don’t subscribe to Jews do not self-identify as white. They consistently acknowledge they see themselves in terms ethnically analogous to European / Christian people. You can go debate biology with Texe Marrs, etc.

White supremacists in the “white power structure” working to displace whites demographically, racially, socially, economically, etc.?

Brilliant reasoning.

Great share, Grace. They’re on the verge of trying to overthrow the 1st Amendment while chipping away at the 2nd. They are only bringing themselves more out into the open in the process. It is not going to end well for them. Trust God, stock up on ammo, and buy guns.

That rabbi put on a clinic in sophistry, giving lip service to Jewish revolutionary activity while insisting Jews who discover their inner kabbalist/godliness should rule the world and spread that love to all.

I have to wonder, Mr. Giraldi, if the NYT wasn’t somehow in on the thing in advance, publishing the meme knowing, in advance, that the game was for them to be called anti-Semitic and only to then lament their behavior before the whole world.

As for the synagogue “shooting” they scraped the bottom of the barrel for the crisis actors on that one. One little girl supposedly took “shrapnel” in her shin bone which then went out of the back of her leg. Zero evidence of that in a close-up of her shin and no evidence in the exit area. The rabbi said he block the bullets with his hand, keeping them from hitting his face. Since when does your hand stop AR-15 rounds?

“In 1937, as the rate of Jewish refugees looking to immigrate to Britain increased, the British government created stricter standards for those whom they would admit.”

Let’s not forget that Zionist groups, run by Jews, worked very hard to prevent their fellow Jews prior to WWII per Alison Weir’s “Against Our Better Judgment” and no problem with Jews dying if it supported the Zionist project.

@HoffmanMichaelA

However, there is nothing in the statement in Rev. 2:9 (repeated in Rev. 3:9), that precludes the inclusion of ethnic impostors — those who in engage in deception and masquerade as descendants of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob.

Of course there is. Paul’s own definition of a Jew being “But he is a Jew, which is one inwardly; and circumcision is that of the heart, in the spirit, and not in the letter; whose praise is not of men, but of God.” (Romans 2:29) Jesus himself asserted that the true offspring of Abraham were those who followed Abraham’s example of faith/obedience. See John 8.

How would counterfeit “Israel” include only those who theologically reject the Messiah of true Israel?

Nice strawman. But, since you asked, Jesus made it very plain that Jewish/Israel’s rejection of him was a theological issue in Matthew 21:33-43. Their rejection of their Messiah/king was a theological rejection, resulting in the end of their covenant with God (Hebrews 8:13). Israel is defined by its rejection of Christ.

Romans 10:21
But to Israel he saith, All day long I have stretched forth my hands unto a disobedient and gainsaying people.

Romans 9:31
But Israel, which followed after the law of righteousness, hath not attained to the law of righteousness

Looks pretty theological to me.

After your remarkable display of sophistry/wizardry you then end with this beauty.

There is no justification for circumscribing them with anthropomorphic musings presented as an authoritative interpretation to which all Christians are bound to submit, or otherwise suffer calumny.

A lot of characters wasted on denying the legitimacy of his exegesis while you offer zero scripture in response. Maybe you should write you own Bible, Mr. Hoffman.

@HoffmanMichaelA

However, there is nothing in the statement in Rev. 2:9 (repeated in Rev. 3:9), that precludes the inclusion of ethnic impostors — those who in engage in deception and masquerade as descendants of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob.

Of course there is. Paul’s own definition of a Jew being “But he is a Jew, which is one inwardly; and circumcision is that of the heart, in the spirit, and not in the letter; whose praise is not of men, but of God.” (Romans 2:29) Jesus himself asserted that the true offspring of Abraham were those who followed Abraham’s example of faith/obedience. See John 8.

How would counterfeit “Israel” include only those who theologically reject the Messiah of true Israel?

Nice strawman. But, since you asked, Jesus made it very plain that Jewish/Israel’s rejection of him was a theological issue in Matthew 21:33-43. Their rejection of their Messiah/king was a theological rejection, resulting in the end of their covenant with God (Hebrews 8:13). Israel is defined by its rejection of Christ.

Romans 10:21
But to Israel he saith, All day long I have stretched forth my hands unto a disobedient and gainsaying people.

Romans 9:31
But Israel, which followed after the law of righteousness, hath not attained to the law of righteousness

Looks pretty theological to me.

After your remarkable display of sophistry/wizardry you then end with this beauty.

There is no justification for circumscribing them with anthropomorphic musings presented as an authoritative interpretation to which all Christians are bound to submit, or otherwise suffer calumny.

A lot of characters wasted on denying the legitimacy of his exegesis while you offer zero scripture in response. Maybe you should write your own Bible, Mr. Hoffman.

@HoffmanMichaelA

We challenge the notion that the Bible nowhere warns against hoaxers who would pretend to be descendants of Judah (i.e. Judeans, Jews) when they are in fact of another ethnicity.

The Book of Revelation in 2:9 and 3:9 does not limit the category of impostors comprising the Synagogue of Satan only to ethnic Jews who deny Jesus. You are reading into 2:9 and 3:9 an exclusion clause that isn’t there.

More sophistry.

Revelation 2:9
I know thy works, and tribulation, and poverty, (but thou art rich) and I know *THE BLASPHEMY OF THEM* which say they are Jews, and are not, but are the synagogue of Satan.

Show me scripture where blasphemy is used in reference to “hoaxers who would pretend to be descendants of Judah”. I’ll wait.

There is ZERO basis in Revelation 2:9, 3:9 for your racial imposter theories. In neither context is race anywhere in view, your begging question(s) notwithstanding. An argument that something is not precluded from context is no proof that’s it in view in context.

Produce scripture where racial impostership of Jews who are not truly Judeans in addressed.

Unfortunately, the historical record shows that the limitations you impose on Rev. 2:9 and 3:9 led in many cases to Christendom ignoring or misinterpreting the warning.

Not an argument. If you’re going to appeal to scripture then at least try to have some scriptural support for your theories.

Racial imposters or not, if they embrace the Talmudic mindset they are enemies of the church. I don’t need novel, private revelation of Revelation 2:9, 3:9 to understand. And, if they are true, racial descendants of Judea, they are no less condemned than all men (Romans 3:23) and no less in need of salvation.

Second that recommendation. The Zundel “false news” trials were the only time that the officially endorsed narrative of Jewish civilian casualties during WW2 was subjected to normal courtroom procedure and standards of proof, including cross examination of prosecution witnesses.

Both “fact” witnesses and “expert” witnesses for the prosecution repeatedly blew up under cross examination. For example:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Raul_Hilberg

Raul Hilberg (June 2, 1926 – August 4, 2007) was an Austrian-born Jewish-American political scientist and historian. He was widely considered to be the world’s preeminent[1][2][3] scholar of the Holocaust, and his three-volume, 1,273-page magnum opus, The Destruction of the European Jews, is regarded as a seminal study of the Nazi “Final Solution.”

Shortly after the twin debacles of the Zundel “false news” trials, European countries began to pass holoheresy laws that specifically banned truth as a defense for those charged with failure to adequately support the mandated narrative…

the resulting full military alliance between Hitler and Stalin would surely have reversed the outcome of the war.

Doubtful. Probably would’ve given Hitler even more confidence in attacking Russia.

If it fails to convince its audience, which includes a number of Arab states required to donate tens of billions to the cause, it will be back to square one with Israel continuing its creeping annexation of Palestinian land with the United States looking the other way.

There it is right there. The Arabs/Muslims get to play the bad guy again for not accepting the “goodwill” of the Jews and get framed as terrorists, unreasonable, etc.

You are a special kind of stupid.

E Michael Jones is also a fed. He says there’s no such thing as white despite the Naturalization Act of 1790, the US Census since 1790, etc. He claims that language is the foundation of ethnicity which makes whites & POC part of the same ethnic group. His idiotic book Ethnos needs Logos claimed to be an answer to race as a consideration in discussions of political solutions (a la David Duke) basically arguing that because a Catholic missionary created a dictionary for some forest people in India and taught them how to sell rope that we can all be just one happy political/nationalism family. That’s just backdoor globalism. I could go on.

He also agitates agains the 2nd Amendment, claiming, “Possession of guns allows the government to kill you in a way that they couldn’t do if you didn’t have a gun”. That’s beyond idiocy. Video here: https://streamable.com/pp5zn