"The corporate form of ownership is a creation of govt. “Limited liability” is not a natural constraint, but something imposed by the state."

Exactly, but try explaining that to any boiler-plate "the Fed is a private inc." lint head, or yer average "Facebook, Google, Twitter are all private incs" type dimwit.

They [the Fed,Facebook, Google, Twitter and many others] are all merely just poorly veiled extensions of the state itself.

Regards, onebornfree

That is true. During some of the dictatorships in South America people in some shanty towns used to feed themselves with leftovers from open food markets and restaurants, mainly potatoes, in common kitchens for the entire community. And many among them looked fat.

Duh. It happened. Whatever "it" was. In most or all cases, the circumstances were different than the BS stories they are trying to pass off as "troof", I'll wager.

WTF are we supposed to do? Bring it up every farking week? Every day?

Pearl Harbor seems a lot more clear cut against the Japs than these incidents are against Whites. Do the Japs apologize and beat their breasts over it.

Nigrow riots "happened"., too. I never hear any guilt coming from the black and brown L.A. Riot participants.

"The state cannot violate the Constitution of the United States."


That is correct, on my view. However, in this case, the state is preventing her speech. They are simply regulating where such speech can take place. I think the case for the woman n question is more a case of violating a contractual agreement.

I am just as convinced on the grounds as related in this article

Replies: @Greta Handel

The anti-BDS laws everywhere serve as a teaching moment. I use them as examples of how brazen the Israel Lobby is in its control of the system. Even the young and dim-witted can be made to see what a pushover the state and local legislatures have become in granting special favors for this one foreign country but nothing like it for others. We all take for granted that we can diss our own government's evil ways, and certainly the evil ways of anyone else. So why is Israel so special? Is it that God's chosen people can't displease God at times? What business is it of state and local governments to take up for any foreign government? How can state and local legislators who've each taken oaths to unhold the U.S. Constitution vote with a straight face to deny public benefits to U.S. citizens who engage in constitutionally protected speech by boycott? Boycotts to express political displeasure is free speech. How can the First Amendment be read to exempt Israeli misconduct from censured? The anti-BDS laws make it very easy to prove that the old "canard" about Jews controlling everything just might be true. So in this light, what Judge Cohen did in ruling for Ms Martin was indeed good for the Jews. If the Lobby goes too far outside of the country's bedrock principles, and too much unfiltered light will shine on the de facto power structure of the country. There's far more harm in that than in the BDS movement.

1. showed Cohens can be magnanimous to their enemies and make very fine judges.
 

“Defendants fail to explain how Martin’s advocacy of a boycott of Israel has any bearing on Georgia’s ability to advance foreign policy goals with Israel.”

 

2. serves Zion by associating its critics with RT/Putin and telesur and Venezuelan communism.
 

3. proves that America has a strong First Amendment.
 

Better than a court outright upholding a law against criticizing the Jewish state.

Peeling off the many layers of deception, i came to a similar conclusion.

serves Zion by associating its critics with RT/Putin and telesur and Venezuelan communism.
 

I went ahead to the National Geographic link and left my own six words:
"Race: Corporate America's most lucrative product." Followed up with a diatribe about National Geographic's role as a pied piper of conscience for a corporate, government, financial and media reality which is the antithesis of conscience.
Basically, legions of perpetually aggrieved yet resoundingly self centered, self satisfied forever children bleating like angry sheep.
What's truly scary is how easily these sheep can be turned to wolves when given the green light. It's happened before. There's enough blood and misery on Earth for any sane person who hasn't been consumed by this sickness. These people want more blood and misery to fill the void within them. I'm hoping that the violence lands at these people's feet where it belongs. One can only hope that they cannibalize each other before they murder us.

Replies: @mike99588

"Funny thing Gomez---but when I took art in grade 1 and mixed water paints blue and red---the new combined color was black".............and Uncle Fester knows his colors.....

Given that we all originated in Africa, you should be mindful that, today, we are all standing on their shoulders and still evolving into a homogenized people. Were you to go back to your homeland, it might be a long journey via some European nation on the way to your motherland, but nevertheless back to the tree in Africa that you were swinging from to start. Be calm, have a banana and shut up!

Replies: @bike-anarkist, @Malla

How about "Blackness begets ghetto, not the reverse."

I can offer my six words:
 

The Africans didn't come to America voluntarily. They were brought in the most brutal way imaginable. Most African Americans have white ancestry because the planters and overseers loved to fuck.

I don't have a problem with viewing the less than noble aspects of America's past.

Replies: @Trinity, @usNthem, @Colin Wright, @Robert Dolan, @Chris Moore, @Ace, @HallParvey, @mike99588, @ThreeCranes

Then you shouldn't have a problem with

The Jewish takeover of America and the attempted genocide of Whites in Europe, North American and South Africa

The Jewish and Arab role in the African Slave Trade. Not to mention that Africans were enslaved then sold by other Africans.

The Barbary Slave Trade

The treatment of poor Whites in the North and South who worked like slaves in the cotton fields in the South and the factories in the North. Oh and poor Whites slaved away in those factories in the South as well, many nothing but children. EXAMPLE MARY PHAGAN. Phagan was raped and murdered by Jew Leo Frank.

Black on White rapes by the tens of thousands every year in America

Children FORCED to watch their White mothers being raped by marauding Blacks in South Africa before they slaughter the entire family.

The Holodomor and slaughter of Palestinians in Israel/Palestine.

I could go on but you get the point.

Yeah, and the biggest mistake this (former) country ever made...

'The Africans didn’t come to America voluntarily. They were brought in the most brutal way imaginable...'

Given that as a rule, they were captives otherwise destined to be sacrificed alive in unspeakable rituals of human sacrifice, however self-interested their motives, the slavers and plantation owners were often doing them a favor.

...and while the ones headed for Haiti et al were screwed, the ones who came here wound up participating in a kind of medieval revival fantasy of genteel lords and their loyal serfs (see Twain's apostrophizing of the South as suffering from 'Sir Walter Scott Disease.')

...and now their descendants live in America instead of Upper Volta. Which would you pick?

But they don't need to thank us. Think nothing of it.

Replies: @Richard B

You can't lie to me because I've read the ACTUAL SLAVE NARRATIVES.

First of all, there were strict LAWS against race mixing.

If an overseer was caught messing with a slave woman, he was not only fired but blackballed from ALL plantations.

Here, you'll love this asshole.....black women were so undesirable that there were zero black women in whorehouses. Zero as in NONE. Even the black men wanted WHITE whores.

Plantations were run as a business, so...for the most part.....every effort was made to keep the slaves happy. And the ratio of blacks to whites on a plantation ran from 50 to 100 to one.
Planation owners did not want revolts and problems.

I could go on and on. You are full of shit, pushing the jew narrative, which is LIES.

In addition it was jewish merchant ships that brought the slaves to America. White people were not interested in slavery, historically speaking.

Jews and muslims ran the slave trade for thousands of years before WHITE MEN ENDED SLAVERY.

Only a TINY fraction of whites owned slaves....maybe 2%, some of which were jews.
Most white people did not own slaves.....most white people didn't even know anybody that owned slaves.

A small percentage of slaves were brought to America....approx. 10% of the african slave trade. Most of the slaves were taken to Brazil, the West Indies, etc.

America only had about 400,000 slaves from africa....but because they were treated so well....their numbers exploded. Slaves had the very same quality of life as poor whites....the same food, the same shelter, the same clothing.

Whites despised slavery because slaves competed with whites in the labor market.

Slaves were taught skills; farming, animal husbandry, blacksmithing, carpentry, etc.etc.etc.

TBH, slavery in America was the best thing that ever happened to africans, and african americans have a far better life than their brothers in africa.

muslims took approx. 120 MILLION africans as slaves over the centuries, and CASTRATED THEM.
muslims also took whites as slaves, snatched whites right off the coast of Europe.

The true history of slavery is nothing like the bullshit narrative the jews have propagated.

https://christiansfortruth.com/jewish-dominance-of-the-african-slave-trade/

The Africans didn’t come to America voluntarily. They were brought in the most brutal way imaginable.
 

I'm impressed. A man set apart from mere mortals.

I don’t have a problem with viewing the less than noble aspects of America’s past.
 

um, that is just an ill educated assumption.

Any one that does much genealogy finds a lot of deseparate or horny Irish women, with black kids. I had read it before. Then was looking at a 19th century family census record, and the irish maid had a black kid.

Replies: @Robert Dolan

"Boma is no longer "the emporium of the Congo Empire.".....Even at the time of my visit, some 400 to 500 negroes were under guard in a deserted factory, and whilst we were visiting Nessalla, they were marched down to bathe. When I returned from the cataracts, the barracoon contained only fifty or sixty, the rest having been shunted off to some unguarded point. At a day's notice a thousand and within a week 3,000 head could be procured from the adjoining settlements, where the chattels are kept at work. As in Tuckey's day, "those exported are either captives in war or condemned criminals."

From Richard Francis Burton's Two Trips to Gorilla Land and the Cataracts of the Congo 1876

You see? They were slaves--"chattels"--even in Africa. And, as "captives in war or condemned criminals", they weren't sending their best. It's obvious that the reason American blacks are so unruly is because they were the dregs of Africa, the least desirable denizens of the Dark Continent.

There's no substitute for first-hand accounts. Primary sources, they're called. What a real college education should have demanded that you consult.

No kidding...

In other words … follow the 'Rules for Radicals' that b h o and h r c found so worthwhile … use their own rules against them.

I fear the only result of this "reverse psychology" strategy would be your guaranteed prime spot on their lists. Reporting "Jewish Hollywood" tips your hand like a KKK robe to these guys.

I see my speculation was correct.

This comment is ridiculous. The current Amerikan collapse is the result of generations of leftist brainwashing. The whole world wants to emigrate to capitalist America, haven't you noticed?

Replies: @Fiendly Neighbourhood Terrorist, @Anon

There's enough oil in the Earth's crust to last at least half-a-millennium at current consumption rates, and hundreds of times more natural gas. I know, I've been looking for and retrieving it most of my life. The last several years of my career was spent sucking the remaining oil out of reservoirs drilled in the 50's and 60's. In some cases there was three times the original amount drilled in those decades in the periphery of the field, only accessible since the advent of horizontal drilling able to target formations only two meters thick.

The U.S. is collapsing because of the Leftist revolution of feminism, civil rights for savages, and the uncloseting of the butt pirates and other sexual freaks.

Replies: @HbutnotG

Alas, I would have to agree.

Most of my fellow Americans are in a state of utter denial about what is happening to their country. Walk into ANY shopping mall in America & you can see the hordes of spirituality dead, brain dead, obese, slovenly, & profoundly unhealthy looking plebes. Most, utterly unaware of what is going on around the world & don’t care. Utterly unaware of what is happening to their country or just don’t care. They’ll still boast “we’re number #1” while everything around them is collapsing or decaying. Our cities have become filthy, dystopian hellholes. Most White , ahem, “men” are so cucked that many care FAR more about “their team” winning the ballgame than their children’s own future. Hell, some would gladly hand their daughters over to their Homo Erectus “heroes”. Maybe all of this was inevitable?. We’re not really a nation in the traditional sense. We have no common race/ethnicity/language/culture that traditionally holds a people together. Thus, we have nothing that binds us together as a people save the striving for that all mighty dollar. Hardly a basis for long term survival of a people?. We’re destroying our past with nary a whimper & destroying our children’s future with the same nonchalance.

History has never been kind to such a people.. 🤔

Infinite growth "capitalism" isn't possible without a fractional reserve banking system that requires ever greater loans to pay back previous loan's+ interest.

The federal reserve and the loaning of all money into existence is modern slavery.

You obviously don't know anything about The War to Prevent Southern Independence.

Abraham Lincoln repeatedly assured the South that he had no intention of interfering with the institution of Slavery, but that he was determined to collect the tariffs. He wrote to Horace Greeley, editor of the New York Tribune, that he would free all, some, or none of the Slaves, whatever it took to "preserve" the Union.

As Southern States began to secede, Abraham Lincoln was prepared to sign the Corwin Amendment; which would have protected Slavery in perpetuity. When issuing a conditional Emancipation Proclamation in September of 1862, following the Battle of Sharpsburg, Lincoln gave the Confederate States three months to simply rejoin the Union, and he would rescind the Proclamation. The South refused, and on January 1, 1863, the Proclamation went into effect, with numerous exemptions. Just as he had written to Greeley at the beginning of the conflict, Lincoln freed some of the slaves and left others in bondage. The eastern portion of Tennessee, large swaths of Louisiana, all of West Virginia, the border States of Missouri, Kentucky and Maryland, as well as the Northern States of Delaware and New Jersey were not subject to the edict. In other words, Lincoln's Proclamation freed slaves where he had no control and left slavery intact where he did have the authority to emancipate them. The Legislature of the State of Illinois, for which Lincoln had served as a Representative, condemned the Proclamation, calling it "a diabolical attempt to incite a servile insurrection."

The North had repeatedly threatened to secede, but the U. S. Government was dependent upon the revenue from the tariff; a tax burden that was disproportionately borne by the South. This issue had flared up before, most notably during the late 1820's - early 1830's, when the Tariffs of Abomination caused the Nullification Crisis. A future Confederate General was born in South Carolina during this time, he was named State's Rights Gist, and his name had nothing whatsoever to do with a defense of Slavery. He was killed at the Battle of Franklin.

Only 6% of the Negroes transported across the Atlantic were taken to the British Colonies or the fledgling United States. The overwhelming majority, 94%, were unloaded in the Caribbean and South America. The Confederate Constitution had banned the importation of Africans for the purposes of enslavement. But, ships operating out of Northern ports continued to supply African Slaves to Cuba and Brazil, which were the last regions in the Western Hemisphere to outlaw Slavery, in 1888; 23 years after the War to Prevent Southern Independence had ended.

My ancestors struggled to free themselves from the strangulating embrace of the Federal Leviathan. Although, their fears were genuine and well founded, the events of the past few years have clearly demonstrated that their motives were far more than being merely justified.

Albeit, you are woefully unaware, we've got so much to be proud of, that it would literally take volumes to enumerate it all. Simple deductions, calculated from limited information, equate to erroneous summations arrived at from a dearth of knowledge. I strongly recommend that you obtain a library card and use it.

Replies: @Weaver

The fear of poor whites was in part that the North would free them, leading to lower wages and crime. As Jefferson had earlier described it, whites had the wolf by the ears, didn't want to hold him, couldn't let him go.

It was too costly for Lincoln to resettle slaves, then he was shot. Lincoln promised West Virginia perpetual slavery to fight for the North. But again, Lincoln was shot. And etc., no time to write all this out again. There's no reason to believe any would have even been freed had he not been shot.

The North also used tariff money to help the North, not the South. The South, however, was developing, becoming less agrarian.

There had been past secession attempts in the North, and secession was very clearly murky in the Constitution. Regardless, it was the North that invaded. The war wasn't a Civil War. The North invaded.

Slavery preexisted the South in the Americas. The only reason it didn't spread to the North is it wasn't profitable there. It spread everywhere in the US that it was profitable. It's like how today the US imports millions of illegal workers, millions of legal immigrants. Employers thirst for cheap, exploitable labour in the US, and illegals are very much exploited in the US, as are guest workers.

Is it better, today, when cartels run illegals in the US, and rape, even of children, is normal and expected in exchange for running females across the border? You don't care, because you believe you'll profit from their exploitation.

The Confederacy was created to defend the institution of property in Negro slaves.
 

Thats it? That is your tactic? You have no argument, or many that have been discredited so you surrender with a blanket statement predicated upon what evidence? Indeed, explain exactly how if the South had not seceded that in any way or manner Lincoln and his criminal cohorts could have in any way affected or "abolished" any institution or the labor laws of ANY state in the Union?

Because if not, your statement speaks for itself, to wit; empty and incoherent ramblings.

Also, tell us what "pride" can be taken in the dissolution of the Constitution, establishing an elective dictatorship, eternal debt and martial law. Because I see nothing to pride in that.

totally agree - to be a real hero he'd have to have killed a lot more Zionists than that.

Replies: @ariadna

From the Palestinian point of view, this was an Inglourious Basterds' attack on Gestapo headquarters.

Replies: @mulga mumblebrain

"...Why do you feel no compassion for the defenseless civilians murdered by assassins under Zakaria Zubeidi’s direct orders..?"

Have you not read the article?

"...When will non-indegnous Muslims stop killing native Palestinian Jews? Every murder makes things worse for the Muslim occupiers...

The Muslim colonies in Judea & Samaria have failed. Trying to keep land stolen from Infidels has failed..."

Oh yes, the Muslims are "invaders" but the Jews are "natives". If you think that much back in history, why not go back to the time of Joshua, when the invading Israelites genocided the native Canaanites and stole their land?

Replies: @the grand wazoo

"Palestinian Jews"? Sounds like code for "settlers" which is code for invaders. I'm perfectly okay with this list of dead Jew invaders.

No, they were not defenceless. They were occupiers and part of a brutal occupation at that. Nobody in the illegal settlements has any protection under law either.

I wish that list were 10,000 longer.

Well, I feel for you, poor Israelis, slaughtered mercilessly by that no good Palestinians! I'll bet you the score has reached a thousand to one in your favor!

"Why not consider real solutions that might work?"
Like massive relocation to Birobidzhan?

Man I was gone for only a few weeks (overseas travel) and you sneaked in feeling free and then started vomiting all over. Well as a favor to others.

So how have you been? Any new land grab from helpless and caged Palestinians?

How is family and little Talmudist or future Holocaust survivors.

Compare treatment of Palestinians by democratic country Israel with the occupation of France by Nazis. Just watch the bad German army's treatment of French:

http://www.renegadetribune.com/france-under-german-occupation-vs-jewish-occupation/

BTW. You failed to answer one of my questions about your hero Eli Weizel appearing in the West while imprisoned in famous killing center Auschwitz which was liberated by the Soviets and not by the Allies.

The Soviet archives show volumes of listing of dead in Auschwitz. Anti Semite Russians......

While Auschwitz entrance placard has lowered the dead to 1.1 million but the magic 6 million still remain. I suppose Talmudist forgot their math skills or waiting OK from Rabbi.

One Rabbi argued with God. The Rabbi won the argument and God lost. I am making it up. Check Talmud. I will furnish the reference if you are interested.

In future I am going to teach a few things from Talmud which you are shy to learn.

Take the word peace from your emoji.

If you believe that 6 dead jews is license to kill and maim thousands of Palestinians your twisted. As for peace negotiations between Palestinians and Israelis, they are worth the time. The word of Israel is worthless.

Replies: @mulga mumblebrain

Btw Sept 17 & October 2, 1981, over 300 people were killed in a series of car bombs in Lebanon

Palestinians were the victims, not the perpetrators
Israelis were the perpetrators, not the victims
This "terrorist" campaign has been fully forgotten
It has been erased
 

Are there not reasons that Palestinians fight back?

It’s doubtful, because it could be career suicide.
 

Perhpas the 3.5 trillion for Mainstreet should be handed over now to the Military-----it has only been entitled to a Trillion per year over the past 5 years?

Michael Wolff!!!??? You cannot be serious!!!!!!!!!

You should spend some time with your Eggplant inside an X-Ray machine to determine whether or not your alleged brain is bigger than a mouse turd, Mooky.

Probably this guy was a first-hand witness to the death of Osama bin Laden in the caves of Afghanistan, or to some such incident that will blow the cover off the "War" on Terror.

Yeah, and his, what was he doing in Pakistan, when there are so many better places to be!

Replies: @cohen

ISIS- K if had a state,it would be Pakistan, Bulgaria, Thailand,Nigeria offerring services and even anticipating whats needed and how to stay ready like a Pavlovian dog. Dogs are getting old. USA badly needs new charecters. ISIS is ready to serve UK- USA's needs.


By the way,did CIA invent or did it learn from Israel?

The UK/US empire kicks 'allies' to the curb with dizzying regularity. Saddam Hussein was useful one way. Then became useful another. Tony Blair brougth Quaddafi in from the cold. Then Hillary had him murdered and wrecked the country. I think that 'Panamanian Strongman" is still incommunicado for life. He was useful to help CIA smuggle cocaine until they needed a dummy to kick around and test out exotic weapons on civilians. Blinken flies off to Tajikistan to look for air bases to run ISIS K missions from and wisely they said no. This series of puppets in Ukraine will be stabbed in the back. They're set up for it from go. They're Nazis who relish in playing Waffen SS volunteers from WW2. Easiest people in the world to target. "Oh hey! it's come to our attention that there are anti-semites in the Ukrainian government." And then it's all over for Azov Battalion. They should enjoy their very brief time acting as guarentors of Anglo-American domination until such time as they are needed as a foil in a pysch-op.
Dance with the devil and you will come to regret it.

Replies: @Dingo bay rum

Pakistan’s fault... Anon121

Bullshit. It's our fault.

And it falls to this generation to set it right.

Before it consumes us...

Shut it, Shlomo

The Jews don't erect statues to honor their ancestors, so they apparently don't understand the concept.

You’ll believe what you like, but those specific statues were in no way about supremacy.

Lee was against the war, fought to defend Virginia, tried to heal the divides after the war. You probably don’t know much about Lee.

Stonewall broke Georgia law to teach blacks Sunday school. Neither man was seen in the way you’ve been told.

It’s like with Iraq, Americans were told a bunch of bs, went in killed a million Iraqis, and it was all unnecessary. No one bothered to learn anything about Iraq; no one bothered to learn anything about the history of those specific statues nor of those specific men.

Lee was widely honored by both the North and the South after the war. Only in recent years has that changed due to immigration and a bad education system.

Why would whites spend HUGE money erecting elaborate statues to intimidate blacks? Do you even know a black person? Blacks are easily intimidated and frightened, which explains many stereotypes of their behaviors. Vaudeville used to caricature blacks as easily spooked, they are highly superstitious, they use group style attacks because of fear, etc.

No statues were not erected by the UDC to "intimidate blacks"

Oh and the UDC is mainly who erected a lot of them. How many women do you know going around trying to intimidate blacks? Its not their character. Women try to have peace at all costs.

The civil war was not about slavery dumbass.

And now blax are whining about Jefferson, Lincoln and Washington.

Trying to please the most spoiled and pampered blax on earth is a lost cause.

Whites can never be rid of their two main parasites: Jlax and Bews.

The Reconstruction was a campaign of intimidation,putting up Confederate statues was a way of people honoring their local heroes.

White Southerners never wanted blacks to live among them to be intimidated in the first place,dumbass. That's why they had separate drinking fountains and bathrooms,separate courtrooms,separate schools.

In order to see statues of Confederate soldiers in the first place,they'd have to be in a White neighborhood they didn't belong in where the statues were put up before blacks took those areas over and started whining that evidence that White people once lived in the areas that blacks VIOLENTLY INVADED was standing there in the form of statues.


You know,people talk about "white fragility",if what you are saying is true and blacks are "intimidated" by pieces of stone or brass, then they are,indisputably, the biggest pussies on the planet.

Also,I would like for you to even ATTEMPT to make the moral,legal, or ethical argument for why White people shouldn't be supreme in THE COUNTRY THAT WHITE PEOPLE FOUNDED. Please make that retarded,convoluted,baseless and indefensible argument to me. I need a good laugh.

NO ONE IS CLAIMING WHITE PEOPLE HAVE AN EQUAL CONNECTION TO OR AN EQUAL SHARE OF OR EQUAL RIGHT TO EXERCISE AUTHORITY OVER ANY ASIAN,AFRICAN,ARAB,OR LATINO COUNTRY. Not even the people (you) who claim all of these people have a right to come to and control OUR COUNTRIES. At best you're a hypocrite. AT BEST. Any argument that you make that White people shouldn't have supremacy in America STARTS from the position that you advocate for a hypocritical scenario where non-Whites have their own countries but all White countries are for everyone.

The Iranians live in a dangerous neighborhood.
They have the right of self defense, by any means necessary.

A powerful nation such as Russia or China, or both together, should step in and give the Iranians all they can to defend themselves. The sadistic Israeli bullying of Iran is grotesque and would not be tolerated if done by any other country. Israel is powerful and dangerous, but not so powerful and dangerous as to overcome both China and Russia along with Iran. If the Iranians were smart, they would be asking for the best weapons systems those countries can offer, and definitely the best offensive missiles systems. A few well-placed missile strikes on Israel can go far. The fear is America jumping in, but the irony of the Jew attack on America is that they are weakening the nation that could best secure Israel's future. I do think the Israelis will lead the world into war at some point.

Replies: @mulga mumblebrain

With any luck, this is your future.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10271767/Columbia-University-engineering-graduate-student-30-stabbed-death.html

You are reading Consortiumnews and I want my 2 New Brandon Dollars.

Arbery’s Killers & the Logic of Slave Patrols