RSSAnschluss.
“The 99%” produce labor. Automation is continuously whittling away their production value, making them less necessary. “The 1%” produce goods and services. Automation is continuously increasing their production value, making them more necessary.
If they need to hire fewer people, they can furnish more of their own needs. If they can furnish more of their own needs, they need fewer customers. If they need fewer customers, “the 99%” can go hang.
Which I believe brings us back to the subject of declining life expectancy.
A penny saved is a penny earned.
Who cares what African blacks want.
Being and wanting to be are not quite the same thing.
(((Sackler)))
Every time.
[i]Hoi[/i] means “the”, so “the hoi polloi” is roughly equivalent to saying “the the masses”.
It is about time to stop you from coming to our homes, killing our families, and getting away with it.
Obviously we haven’t done a good enough job.
Ah yes, “racism”, coined by the communist revolutionary, high-ranking leader-philosopher, and founder and first leader of the Red Army, the Jew Leon Trotsky.
American hoodrats
“””American”””
That's just what an "expert on Eastern wolves" would say, isn't it? She don't need no fancy "DNA analysis," she just knows they are different species.
Linda Y. Rutledge, an expert on Eastern wolves, questioned whether the new study was sufficient to reject them as a separate species.
The definition of “species” is fairly arbitrary. Evolution is an unbroken gradient of differentiation, and so if intermediate organisms exist “between” Specie A and Specie B, there is often no clear delineation.
“Subspecies” are often applied to animals and plants the same way that “race” is applied to humans.
Often, full-blown species can intermix. Humans and Neanderthals did, separated by ~400,000ish years at that time. Clearly, wolves and coyotes did; God knows how long the separation was. And then of course you have ring species, which I encourage you to look up on Wikipedia.
People often claim that the “specie” is defined by that organism which can no longer breed with other species, but this is patently untrue. Brown bears and polar bears can interbreed, but don’t due to habitats that very rarely intersect. Most of the time, the primary distinction between two species of deer, for instance, is their native habitat.
And of course the scientists have divied up animals like rabbits or birds into so many different species that sometimes it is almost impossible to tell them apart from sight alone.
Interestingly, none of this seems to apply to humans.
No.
Excellent article. Top-notch troll.
When I read “the United States has a violence problem and a man problem and a gun problem” I threw my head back and roared.
Thanks for the laugh.
Just how did Mormons come to be so intimately associated with the “deep state”?
That quote is in reference to England’s national interest. It is referring to the alliances of a cohesive, homogeneous country, not the machinations of an elite fundamentally opposed to their subjects and their subjects’ way of life. For example, Henry Temple never ethnically cleansed lower-class and middle-class Englishmen from London, as has in fact happened today. Henry Temple would never dream of doing such a thing, not in a million years.
There are immense differences in economic and political arrangements between universal democracy, aristocratic republicanism, National Socialism, Communism, monarchy, and so on. Under different systems, different people win and lose in various facets of life, in different ways. Sometimes, as with Communism, they lose a whole lot more than they win. In other words, some systems are better than others.
There will always be political friction between “mobs and snobs” simply because their interests are different, but tribal loyalties tend to transcend this division. Ruling elites culturally and genetically unrelated to their wards tend to be much more despotic. There’s much more to politics than class struggle.
In the same way, all of Political Correctness is built around what might be called the question of Jews.
Imagine a series of concentric circles. “Transgender-whatever” is the defensive ring around “Islamophobia”, Islamophobia is the defensive ring around “homophobia”, homophobia is the defensive ring around “sexism”, sexism is the defensive ring around “racism”, “racism” is the defensive ring around HBD, and “HBD” is the defensive ring around Jews.
This is why “antisemitism” is the highest moral crime, higher than all the rest, because the purpose of Political Correctness is to control speech, and the purpose of speech control is to limit discourse about Jews.
I’m not actually convinced about the “Jews control the world” bit, but if you look at the origins and development of the ideology that became Political Correctness you will find it that it came overwhelmingly from Jews concerned with eradicating antisemitism.
I hold with respect to alliances, that England is a Power sufficiently strong, sufficiently powerful, to steer her own course, and not to tie herself as an unnecessary appendage to the policy of any other Government. I hold that the real policy of England—apart from questions which involve her own particular interests, political or commercial—is to be the champion of justice and right; pursuing that course with moderation and prudence, not becoming the Quixote of the world, but giving the weight of her moral sanction and support wherever she thinks that justice is, and wherever she thinks that wrong has been done…I say that it is a narrow policy to suppose that this country or that is to be marked out as the eternal ally or the perpetual enemy of England. We have no eternal allies, and we have no perpetual enemies. Our interests are eternal and perpetual, and those interests it is our duty to follow… And if I might be allowed to express in one sentence the principle which I think ought to guide an English Minister, I would adopt the expression of Canning, and say that with every British Minister the interests of England ought to be the shibboleth of his policy.
Henry John Temple, 3rd Viscount Palmerston (20 October 1784 – 18 October 1865) was a British statesman who served twice as Prime Minister in the mid-19th century. Popularly nicknamed “Pam” and “The Mongoose”, he was in government office almost continuously from 1807 until his death in 1865, beginning his parliamentary career as a Tory, switching to the Whigs in 1830, and concluding it as the first Prime Minister of the newly-formed Liberal Party from 1859.
First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.
I think we’ve entered the laughing phase.
“Race” isn’t a scientific classification, but “subspecies” is.
Yes.
What happened to the old civilized sporting traditions?
Where did they go?
Why are sports teams now performing ritual primitive tribal war whatever routines?
Good God.
And that quality is what will bind us together in November.
Ah yes, bound together by the common hatred of your betters.
Population size is an effect of energy utilization. Energy utilization is an effect of political arrangements and technological systems.
Here’s the thing: the technology we have today is so vast that a population many times our current size would be sustainably possible, in universal luxury, provided adequate population quality (read: the magic people).
For instance, a few hundred white farmers in, say, Zimbabwe, can produce enough food to feed the entire country. The African continent is incredibly vast and incredibly rich, the richest on earth. If we were to clear it out and repopulate it with productive residents, it would be entirely possible to feed many billions of people with but a fraction of the land used to its fullest.
Literally the only reason that population is declining in civilized countries is because of their political arrangements. There are EFFECTIVELY NO natural limits upon human population anymore.
Indeed. There never were. You don't even need the otiose "anymore." Nor does this situation apply uniquely to humanity. There are no effective natural limits on the populations of anchovies or geraniums either. And yet for virtually all of human existence the human population scarcely grew at all and often declined. Why was that?
There are EFFECTIVELY NO natural limits upon human population anymore.
Intelligent Dasein gave a very good response.
There are EFFECTIVELY NO natural limits upon human population anymore.
“Some races are better than others.”
You should check out On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, or the Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life.
Oh, don’t you believe in evolution?
You never fail to crack me up.
Please don’t stop posting. I mean that sincerely.
How many B-52s does the New York Times command?
“There is nothing directly that a U.S. President can do about Birthright Citizenship.”
If President Trump can do nothing, Caesar Trump it must be.
The New York Times has as many B-52s as the Pope had divisions.
That is to say, none.
BREAKING NEWS
Has renowned columnist Steve Sailer finally lost it?
More at 11.
No generation has stood too well against the onslaught of modernity. Among other strains, the increased wealth = fertility decline. The Greatest Generation played the immigration gambit to compensate, but they got invaders instead of immigrants.
Let’s be honest, they let America die.
Fertility decline is caused by female emancipation.
One voice speaks a lie, and every other voice echoes the lie, a million megaphones with one microphone.
A million megaphones speaking with one voice, every mouthpiece sounding in unison.
War is peace. Freedom is slavery. Ignorance is strength.
If Wikipedia had existed in 1984-land, Winston Smith wouldn’t have had a job.
With the Internet, the Ministry of Truth need not employ a veritable army of Winston Smiths working laboriously for years in the dusty record closets of the Oceania government.
Nope, now it’s just a keystroke. A perfect, instantaneous keystroke, everywhere in the world.
History, turning on a dime.
Don’t forget the Whigs, British and American, and also don’t forget Lord Howe.
Do you know who invented the wheel?
I bet you can guess.
You’re stupid on Jim’s blog, and you’re even stupider here.
Lol, Corv. Excellent comment.